Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
One of the most striking features of industrial age is the growth of city
life. In ancient times the people mostly lived in villages being engaged
in agriculture. Cities arose here and there as centres of trade or seats
of government. Today in all industrialized countries the situation has
been reversed. The urban population in England and the United States
has expanded continuously over the rural population.
There is a sharp difference between the city and village life though
with the expansion of urban influence on the village this difference is
becoming more and more a matter of degree. However, in spite of the
recent trends of urbanisation the villages still retain many of their
traditional features and present a sharp contrast with the urban life.
The life of all men and women is merged in family life. In short, family
dominates individual’s life in village community. Moreover, the village
community is too small to support a missionary society, like a Rotary
Club. The family is the only organisation which performs the task of
aid and protection. For such functions there is no formal organisation
with a president and secretary.
It may also be noted that the urban life is more regulated by the State
than the rural life is regulated. Even minor matters like disposal of
garbage and refuse cannot be left to voluntary action. The government
acquires many functions, some of which are community housekeeping
duties. Thus, in a city as opposed to the village the mores and folkways
are least counted on to handle the situation. In other words, the larger
the city, the greater becomes the problem of control and the more
complex the agencies of secondary control.
Their relations are personal. Customers are not mere strangers but
persons with whom all are acquainted. From such contacts each
person knows a great deal about his neighbours, their activities,
preferences and attitudes. Status of each one in the village community
is well known.
They are more prodigal than the village people. Country life suggests
‘save’, City life suggests ‘spend’. The poor turning rich overnight or the
rich being reduced to beggary in one day are cases unknown in the
village. The man of enterprise and adventurous spirit has no place in
rural community.
(iv) Specialization:
Another contrast between village and urban community is concerning
the modes of production. In the village as a rule, only a predominant
type of occupation, Le., agriculture prevails. Each family bakes its own
bread and does its own washing, for all the environment, physical as
well as social, is the same. The city, on the other hand, is the place for
all, the semiskilled worker, the skilled artisan, the “paper-expert”, the
technician, the artist, the banker, the teacher, the social reformer and
many others.
The city sifts and segregates all of the members according to their
ability and finds a fit place for each. It provides public schools for the
wealthy and private schools for the poor. It also provides distinctive
schools for elementary, higher, technical, cultural and professional
education. It even provides separate schools for defective persons, e.g.
Deaf and Dumb school.
The structure varies from city to city in accordance with the size, site
and needs, of the city, but generally everywhere in the western world
there is a clear division of space into zones of business activity, of low
rentals and residential congestion, of transitory abode, of “middle-
class” residence, of industrial concentration, and so forth.
The above are then the features that distinguish rural from urban life.
In the city “opposite conditions are found”, aggregation ;instead of
physical isolation; associations of many kind’s supplementing or
supplanting the functions of family or categorical relationships;
contacts with human beings and civilization diversity superseding
contacts with nature; differentiation of economic classes and
specialization of economic tasks, ranking and grading men in ways
often unknown in the country; limited and intensified work, with its
endless varieties and disparities of opportunity and of fortune creating
an intricate design of competitive living traditionally alien to the rural
sense.” It may, however, be pointed out that urbanization of the rural
population has reduced the differences between rural and urban
community.
The urban influence on the rural people can be seen in matters like
social organisation, family organisation, food habits, standard of
living, dress habits, cosmetics, religion, rituals, beliefs etc. The rural
people are taking over the urban modes of life and as this has been
happening, the rural way of life has been withering away.
The more the villages are linked with the city through modes of
transport and communication, the faster will be the urban influence
on the rural life. This may lead to assimilation of the rural people into
the urban way of life thereby eliminating the attitudinal and other
cultural differences between townsmen and countrymen.