Você está na página 1de 4

The veil of philanthropy: Kant on the political benefits of

dissimulation and simulation


Jeffrey Church

First Published January 8, 2018 Research Article

Download PDF Article information

Abstract

Kant has traditionally been read as an excessively moralistic critic of lying in


his ethics and politics. In response, recent scholars have noted that for Kant
we have an ethical duty not to be completely candid, but rather we should
practice reticence and simulate virtues even when we do not have them. This
article argues that Kant extends the value of dissimulation and simulation
beyond the interpersonal to society and politics. By examining three
examples—politeness and decorum in society, and the veiled relationships
between the rich and the poor and between government and the people in
politics—this article further challenges the received reading of Kant as a
defender of truth at all costs and reveals him to be much more attentive to
the need for pretense, reserve, and appearance than is commonly
understood.

Keywords Immanuel Kant, lying, manners, transparency

References
Allais L (2014) What properly belongs to me: Kant on giving to beggars. Journal of Moral
Philosophy: 11(4): 1–18. Google Scholar

Anderson P (2017) A Kantian rhetoric of sincerity: Politics, truth, and truthfulness. In: Baiasu
S and Loriaux S (eds) Sincerity in Politics and International Relations. New York: Routledge,
pp. 92–108. Google Scholar
Anderson-Gold S (2001) Unnecessary Evil: History and Moral Progress in the Philosophy of
Immanuel Kant. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar

Anderson-Gold, S (2010) Privacy, respect and the virtues of reticence in Kant. Kantian Review
15(2): 28–42. Google Scholar, Crossref

Baiasu, S (2017) Political dissimulation a la Kant: Two limits on the sincerity requirement. In:
Baiasu, S, Loriaux, S (eds) Sincerity in Politics and International Relations, New
York: Routledge, pp. 139–155. Google Scholar

Bayefsky, R (2013) Dignity, honor, and human rights: Kant’s perspective. Political Theory
41(6): 809–837. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals

Bok, S (1978) Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life, New York: Vintage
Books. Google Scholar

Cholbi, M (2009) The murderer at the door: What Kant should have said. Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research 79(1): 17–46. Google Scholar, Crossref

Clewis RR (2015) Reading Kant’s Lectures. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar

Cohen, T (1982) Why beauty is the symbol of morality. Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics, Chicago,
IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar

Ellis E (2005) Kant’s Politics: Provisional Theory for an Uncertain World. New Haven: Yale
University Press. Google Scholar

Formosa, P (2008) “All politics must bend its knee before right”: Kant on the relation of morals
to politics. Social Theory and Practice 34(2): 157–181. Google Scholar, Crossref

Frierson, P (2005) The moral importance of politeness in Kant’s anthropology. Kantian Review
9: 105–127. Google Scholar, Crossref

Kant I (1996a) Practical Philosophy. Trans. MJ Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University


Press. Google Scholar

Kant I (1996b) Religion and Rational Theology. Trans. AW Wood and G Di Giovanni.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

Kant I (1997) Lectures on Ethics. Trans. P Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University


Press. Google Scholar

Kant I (2000) Critique of the Power of Judgment. Trans. P Guyer and E Matthews. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

Kant I (2007) Anthropology, History, and Education. Ed. G Zöller and RB Louden.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Kant I (2012) Lectures on Anthropology. Ed. AW Wood and RB Louden. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

Kant I (2016) Lectures and Drafts on Political Philosophy. Ed. F Rauscher. Cambridge
University Press. Google Scholar

Korsgaard, C (1986) The right to lie: Kant on dealing with evil. Philosophy and Public Affairs
15(4): 325–349. Google Scholar, ISI

LaVaque-Manty, M (2006) Dueling for equality: Masculine honor and the modern politics of
dignity. Political Theory 34(6): 715–740. Google Scholar, SAGE Journals, ISI

MacIntyre A (1994) Truthfulness, lies, and moral philosophers: What can we learn from Mill
and Kant? The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, delivered at Princeton University, USA.
Available at: http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/m/macintyre_1994.pdf (accessed
11 September 2016). Google Scholar

Mahon, JE (2003) Kant on lies, candor and reticence. Kantian Review 7: 102–133. Google
Scholar, Crossref

Mahon, JE (2006) Kant and Maria von Herbert: Reticence vs. deception. Philosophy 81: 417–
444. Google Scholar, Crossref

Mahon, JE (2009) The truth about Kant on lies. In: Martin, CW (ed.) The Philosophy of
Deception, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 201–224. Google Scholar, Crossref

Melzer, A (2014) Philosophy Between the Lines: the Lost History of Esoteric
Writing, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar, Crossref

Munzel, GF (1995) “The beautiful is the symbol of the morally-good”: Kant’s philosophical
basis of proof for the idea of the morally-good. Journal of the History of Philosophy
33(2): 301–330. Google Scholar, Crossref

Newey, G (1997) Political lying: A defense. Public Affairs Quarterly 11(2): 93–116. Google
Scholar

Ripstein, A (2009) Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political


Philosophy, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar, Crossref

Sedgwick, S (1991) On lying and the role of content in Kant’s ethics. Kant Studien 81(1): 42–
62. Google Scholar

Shell S (2002) Kant on democratic honor. In: Foley and Kries (eds) Gladly to Learn and
Gladly to Teach: Essays on Religion and Political Philosophy in Honor of Ernest L. Fortin.
Lanham, MD: Lexington Press, pp. 239–256. Google Scholar
Stohr, K (2014) Keeping the shutters closed: The moral value of reserve. Philosophers’ Imprint
14(23): 1–25. Google Scholar

Strauss L (1988) Persecution and the Art of Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press. Google Scholar

Sussman, D (2008) Shame and punishment in Kant’s Doctrine of Right. The Philosophical
Quarterly 58(231): 299–317. Google Scholar, Crossref

Sweet KE (2013) Kant on Practical Life: From Duty to History. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. Google Scholar

Você também pode gostar