Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Marple,
Published by ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, USA, 2003
Barbezat G.
Sulzer Metco AG, Wohlen, Switzerland
1249
spray gun. To ensure that the best possible quality is
maintained, as many of these parameters as possible have to
be measured and controlled.
1250
optical filters placed on the CCD detector using an exposure rotate together with the gun, the measurement had to be
time of a few milliseconds. The average particle temperature synchronised to the rotation of the gun.
is measured by two color pyrometry using the two spray
intensity signals. The measurement principle is illustrated in Normally, when measuring non-rotating guns and external
Figure 3 and described in detail by Vuoristo et al [7]. spraying, SprayWatch measures the spray from the side. In
this case, however, the only practical optical access to the
spray was from the top. So the SprayWatch was set to about
250 mm from the spray axis in the way shown in Figure 4.
Imaged area
34 mm
28 mm
Section A Section B
Visual image
Particle detection and count
Particle distribution Spray temperature measurement
Particle velocity measurement Spray intensity profile
Particle temperature measurement
1251
measurement of particle parameters was carried out without
problems.
Figure 5: Spray image taken by the SprayWatch system from The test showed that the SprayWatch system is able to
the rotating plasma gun. measure the temperature, the velocity and the relative number
of particles in a rotating spray without any problems when the
The measured particle temperature and velocity together with gun is outside the cylinder bore.
the spraying parameters used are presented in table 1.
When the gun was driven inside the cylinder bore the situation
was more difficult. The main problem was the fact that the
Table 1: Spraying parameters used in the measurement and
spraying distance was only 50 mm and the bright plasma
measured average values of particle velocity and temperature.
plume extended to about 40-45 mm from the gun nozzle.
Parameter Figure 7. shows the spray image in this case, with measured
Argon (l/min) 50.0 particle marked with numbers and lines. The usable
Hydrogen (l/min) 4.0 measurement area is now only about 5-10 mm because the
Current (A) 320 clouds of plasma gases and vapors saturate the image and
Argon powder gas (l/min) 4.0 decrease the contrast of the image. The SprayWatch software
was not directly able to measure the particle parameters in this
Powder type Low alloyed
case. Improvement and optimization of the particle detection
carbon steel algorithm was needed to enable the particle detection in these
Powder size (nominal, µm) +5 -45 conditions. The algorithm was developed to better take into
Feed rate (g/min) 60 account the low contrast of the particle images and the noise
Gun rotation speed (rpm) 200 generated by the vapor clouds and the particles bouncing back
Spraying distance 50 mm from the cylinder wall. The developed algorithm was able to
Bore diameter 80 mm reliably measure the velocity and intensity of up to about 30
Average particle temperature 2080 particles per image frame.
(°C)
Average particle velocity (m/s) 95 Simultaneous particle temperature measurement was not
possible with SprayWatch inside of the cylinder bore for two
Figure 6. shows a screenshot from the distribution display of reasons; the usable measurement area between the plasma
the SprayWatch software showing the measured distributions plume and the cylinder wall is too small for the double stripe
of particles and particle velocity across the spray. It is seen filter of the SprayWatch, and the emission from the plasma jet
that the distributions of particle velocity and temperature are would cause error on the temperature measurement. Instead of
relatively flat. This indicates good spray gun design, but also the particle temperature, the intensity of the particles (which is
the fact that the measurement was done from the top of the also measured by SprayWatch) can be monitored inside the
spray, from the same direction as the particle injection. cylinder bore. Changes in the intensity would then indicate
Because the particle injection was symmetrical in this changes in the particle temperature.
direction, the distributions of the particle parameters are also
relatively symmetrical.
1252
relationships of particle properties to the spraying parameters
and conditions are relatively well known. Furthermore, it
would be possible to establish a closed loop control strategy
(dashed line between the SprayWatch computer and the spray
controller in Figure 4) based on the measured parameters. This
would allow the spray controller to automatically adjust the
spraying parameters to optimise the coating quality. In some
Cylinder wall cases it would be possible to detect problems, like a small drift
in the particle parameters, before they start affecting the
quality and then solve the problem immeaditely.
Acknowledgements
References
1253