Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
ABSTRACT
This Program Evaluation contains a
revised unit of work for Stage 4 English:
Film Study, which incorporates
Understanding by Design, inquiry-based
learning, differentiation for students with
low English literacy and scaffolding for a
high challenge, high support learning
environment.
You’re My Hero
SHREK
Program Evaluation
Table of Contents
Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 3
Introduction and background ................................................................................................................. 3
Part A: Recommendations ..................................................................................................................... 4
The Pitch: ............................................................................................................................................ 4
Table 1: Comparative Table: You’re My Hero ..................................................................................... 6
Understanding by Design .................................................................................................................... 7
Part B: Redesigned Unit of Work ......................................................................................................... 11
English | Stage 4 | Scope and Sequence........................................................................................... 11
Concept Map..................................................................................................................................... 12
Assessment Tasks: Teacher: Formative Assessment (5%) ................................................................ 13
Table 2: Common Marking Rubric for Formative Assessment ..................................................... 13
Table 3: Rubric for Autonomous Performance (Gradual Release of Responsibility) .................... 13
Assessment Tasks 2: Teacher: Multimodal Assessment Task (20%)................................................. 14
Table 4: Common Marking Criteria ............................................................................................... 14
Multimodal Assessment Task: Student ............................................................................................. 15
Assessment Evidence ........................................................................................................................ 15
Table 5: Common Marking Criteria ( - /20) ................................................................................... 15
Storyboard template ......................................................................................................................... 16
UNIT OUTLINE – You’re My Hero (film study)................................................................................... 17
References ............................................................................................................................................ 30
Original teaching unit............................................................................................................................ 33
Abstract
The purpose of this report is to make recommendations for the reconstruction of Stage Four
English unit: ‘Heroes in Film’ using three complementary educational frameworks: inquiry based
learning using Understanding by Design (UbD) (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005, 2012); differentiation
using the principals of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) (CAST, 2011); and scaffolding learning
using the Teaching and Learning Cycle (Gibbons, 2009, 2015). The main objective is to provide a
“high support, high challenge” learning environment for students with low English literacy capability
comprehensive school for Years 7-12. The school profile demonstrates a below average ICSEA (Index
backgrounds, and low student gains in literacy in comparison to similar schools (ACARA, My School
website, 2018). In a longitudinal study of Exemplary Teachers of Students in Poverty, Munns, Sawyer
and Cole (2013) challenge the idea that socio-economic disadvantage of students and schools has a
strong influence on educational outcomes but propose that outcomes are inherently tied to
“equitable access to high quality education” (p. 4). The focus of Munns et al’s (2013) study was to
establish the “how” of exemplary teachers’ praxis in challenging classrooms that engages students in
learning and improves academic outcomes. Hairon and Dimmock (2012) propose that professional
collaborative communities in schools that are reflexive and transform pedagogical praxis “builds
camaraderie and solidarity among teachers” (p. 412). In the interests of being an active member of
the professional learning community, and as a reflexive activity on my own pedagogical praxis, I have
approaches to teaching English including: conceptual learning through English Textual Concepts
(English Teachers Association, 2016); inclusivity through Universal Design for Learning (UDL) (CAST,
2011); culturally responsive pedagogies (Yunkaporta, 2009); collaborative learning (in every unit)
(Rutherford, 2014); inquiry-based learning through Understanding by Design (UbD) (Wiggins &
McTighe, 2005, 2012) and high challenge, high support teaching through the Teaching and Learning
Cycle (Gibbons, 2009, 2015). The recommendations in this report are designed to incorporate these
approaches to teaching and learning into a redesigned Stage 4 English unit on the close study of the
film, Shrek, (or adapted to any animated film). The overall learning goal of the unit to develop visual
literacy and skills is maintained by responding and composing texts, exploring language specific to
context, audience and purpose in the creation of new texts. Although Kelley (2012) recommends
implementing small and progressive changes in the workplace, my expansive approach to the
redesigned unit may at first appear daunting and unachievable however, the teaching and learning
systems all complement each other, often overlap and are easily integrated with a view to
Part A: Recommendations
The Pitch: the original unit is a close study of a film with a “strong emphasis on film techniques,
in film and students’ ability to self-assess their own work” (Original Unit Outline, p. 1). The overall
design of the unit is activity-focussed and is weak in the areas of inquiry-based learning, developing
linked to syllabus outcomes, challenging collaborative learning activities and the absence of
differentiation for students with low English literacy ability. Traditional education approaches which
are “hands-on without being minds-on” can lead to accidental rather than insightful learning
(Wiggins & McTighe, 2005, p. 16), therefore the primary focus in the redesigned unit is to address
learning to engage critical and creative thinking, and connected learning using backward
mapping from the summative assessment task (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005, 2012).
3. Scaffolding of teaching and learning strategies using the four stages of the teaching and
learning cycle: building the field, modelling the genre, joint construction, and
dictogloss, jigsaw task, and café conversation (Johnson & Johnson, 2009; Rutherford,
2014).
These five recommendations are reduced to two key areas for discussion because of the
overlap in their application. That is, collaborative learning is part of high challenge, high
support strategies and is also used in building the field of knowledge and joint construction
based learning which includes differentiation through scaffolded learning and assessment
Understanding by Design
The first step in applying Understanding by Design is to align the unit with the three-stage
process proposed by Wiggins and McTighe (2012) by first identifying the desired learning results;
determining acceptable evidence and finally planning learning experiences (Figure 1: Outline of
Modules, p. 1). Although the redesigned unit is not in the explicit format given by Wiggins and
McTighe (2015) there is concurrence with the key principals demonstrated by first planning the
desired learning results (the assessment task), establishing the acceptable evidence of learning (the
formative assessment tasks) and then designing learning activities for the unit outline that are
scaffolded using the teaching and learning cycle (Gibbons, 2015). The overall unit goals develop and
assess student autonomy (Wiggins & McTighe, 2012) and provides high challenge, high support
The multimodal assessment task (Week 9 and Multimodal Assessment: Teacher / Student) is
redesigned with a focus inquiry question: What are the defining features of this film? To
demonstrate their understanding, students have a choice of presenting a visual product (Storyboard)
or an oral presentation (The Pitch). Both modes require a written explanation and justification for
their choices with common marking criteria and quality criteria specific to the mode of presentation.
The marking criteria is designed to give “concrete and specific” feedback of student performance
(Wiggins & McTighe, 2012, p. 23) and is set according to the overall learning goals of the unit which
explores how Shrek challenges the conventions of fairytales. Shrek makes a metatextual
commentary on fairytale conventions by incorporating and disrupting the idea of the fairytale, the
hero, the princess and the villain. This is the implicit understanding being explored within the unit –
it is both high challenge and highly conceptual (Wilson & Devereux, 2014) – but it is not stated in
these terms. The students are lead to this understanding through the use of inquiry-based strategies.
The formative assessments are designed using inquiry-based projects (Film Review, Week 5
and Movie Poster, Week 7). Inquiry-based learning is not just a presentation of facts, but uses
questions, problems and scenarios to build student autonomy in the learning process. Wiggins and
McTighe (2005) state that students need to “experience how their own inquiries and understandings
‘essentially’ parallel those of experts, and how even key agreed-upon understandings can change
over time as a result of ongoing inquiry” (p. 122). Open-ended focus questions and inquiry questions
are designed to elicit critical thinking about the underlying concepts (see Concept Map), and to
examine how culturally and socially constructed understandings can change over time. The purpose
of the inquiry projects is to assess the level of knowledge and skills for differentiation of learning
support and areas for development in preparation for the summative assessment (Week 9).
Students are guided to achieve the criteria throughout the unit and not just for the end product. A
common marking rubric details the degree of understanding demonstrated in the performance of
the formative tasks graded as: thorough (5), substantial (4), understanding (3), partial (2) and
misunderstanding (1) with underlying criteria in understanding, effectiveness, clarity, accuracy, and
level of dependence - which are the same criteria for the summative assessment (Wiggins &
McTighe, 2012).
Each learning week has set focus questions, syllabus outcomes and conceptual learning
framed within the four stages of the teaching and learning cycle (Gibbons, 2015). Students are asked
inquiry questions that examine characterisation such as, “Are heroes flawless” and “How do cultural
and social stereotypes impact on your understanding of the ‘hero’ and the ‘princess’? This
exploration also stimulates an ethical understanding about how gender is represented in children’s
animated films in the past in Snow White, Cinderella, and Sleeping Beauty, compared to 21st century
Students develop critical and creative thinking through the exploration of challenges to the
conventions of fairytales and characterisation using a comparative analysis of the main characters:
Shrek, Princess Fiona, Lord Farquaad and Donkey, against older representations of the hero (Prince
Charming), princess (Snow White), villain (Evil Queen), and ‘helpful’ friend(s) (dwarfs) in a traditional
fairytale, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs1 (1937). The example of the differences in
representation between the character of Snow White in Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (Walt
Disney Productions, 1937) and Princess Fiona in Shrek (DreamWorks, 2001) challenges the
conventional understanding of the ‘princess’ as the damsel in distress who needs rescuing by a
handsome prince (Snow White) as opposed to the martial arts enabled, self-determined, princess
Students also explore changes in technology by comparing video clips from Snow White
(1937) and complementary scenes from Shrek (2001). This allows for the exploration of codes and
conventions and genre (ETA, & DoE, 2016) specific to a particular context, audience and purpose.
The inquiry question asks: “What is the impact of technological innovations on texts, particularly
media text? (ACELY1765) and “How have these genres been rewritten for different contexts and
media?” (Week 4). As an example of applying the teaching and learning cycle (Gibbons, 2009), the
teacher builds the field of knowledge around common assumptions about genre, before modelling a
scene analysis and jointly constructing with students an analysis of another scene. Students then
work independently towards answering the focus questions. The scaffolding of learning in this way
supports the development of learner autonomy and engagement in critical thinking after
The Café Conversation (Week 6) is a high challenge learning task that develops students’
critical understanding of other peoples’ perspectives while also building personal and social
capability through collaborative learning (Johnson & Johnson, 2009). Students share responsibility
for ‘meaning making’ and task participation (Rutherford, 2014) while also developing interpersonal
communication skills as a progressive task towards academic language proficiency (Cummins, 2014).
Building English language proficiency is embedded throughout the teaching and learning cycle
1
“Dwarfs” was considered the correct plural form until J.R.R. Tolkien published The Hobbit and popularised the
term ‘dwarves’. Retrieved 22 April, 2018 from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0029583/trivia?ref_=tt_ql_2
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI 9
Part A: Recommendations 10
(Gibbons, 2009) through scaffolded strategies such as dictogloss (Week 5), jigsaw (Week 3) and
ongoing group and think, pair, share activities. According to Vass (2018) building knowledge is
“dialogic” (p.102) and therefore dependent upon socially interactive learning environments.
Does the redesigned unit for Stage 4 English: You’re My Hero, do everything intended within
the scope of Wiggins & McTighe’s (2005, 2012) principals of Understanding by Design? Not yet.
There are areas that still need developing in the Scope and Sequence. More details in assessment for
and as learning is needed. This unit is a work in progress. To incorporate the entire UbD approach
would take more practice, a sprinkle of in-class experimentation, a dash of collegial collaboration
and a dollop of reflexive praxis. With this in mind, I am presenting this unit to the English Faculty as
an opening to a conversation about unit design that achieves the desired results with consistent
1
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
0
Part B: Redesigned Unit of Work 11
Term 4 - 10 weeks
Week1 Week2 Week3 Week4 Week5 Week6 Week7 Week8 Week9 Week10
Introduction to Shakespeare Media: Newspapers
Focus: language forms and features Focus: code and convention: spelling, structure, language features, audience, context, purpose
Students examine the history of the Elizabethan era, Shakespeare’s style of writing, his plays and ideas. Students develop understanding of news conventions: hyperbole, emotive language, hard/soft stories.
Assessment of Learning: Leaflet (20%). Assessment as and for learning: peer review Assessment of learning: no formal assessments after reporting period. Peer review, T/S talk and reflect
Focus outcomes: EN4-2A, EN4-5C, EN4-6C, EN4-7D, EN4-8D, EN4-9E Key capabilities: civics & citizenship, ICT.
1
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
1
12
Concept Map
Manawaiti, C. (2018). Redesigned Unit of Work: Stage 4 English: You’re My Hero. 102098 Contemporary
Teacher Leadership, Western Sydney University.
Adapted from: English Faculty, Cambridge Park High School, Sydney (Term 2, 2017). Original Unit Outline:
You’re My Hero: Stage 4 English. Board of Studies, Teaching and Educational Standards NSW
(BOSTES): Program Builder.
Source: English Teachers’ Association NSW and the State of New South Wales Department of Education (2016).
English textual concepts: Related syllabus content Stage 4. NSW Department of Education. Retrieved
from http://englishtextualconcepts.nsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/S4%20Syllabus%20Content.pdf
1
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
2
13
Marking criteria: each task marked out of /5 and then all 3 marks averaged for final score.
1
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
3
14
Syllabus Outcomes:
EN4-2A effectively uses a widening range of processes, skills, strategies and knowledge for
responding to and composing texts in different media and technologies.
EN4-2A reflect on ideas and opinions about characters, settings and events in literary texts,
identifying areas of agreement and difference with others and justifying a point of view
(ACELT1620)
EN4-7D demonstrates understanding of how texts can express aspects of their broadening
world and their relationships within it.
Content:
1. Visual: Storyboard: students produce an 6-panel storyboard of either: a prelude to the film
or an alternate ending to the film. The storyboard is constructed using the template from
Week 9 and attached after marking criteria.
Quality criteria: neatness, composition, effective use of colour and a range of angles.
Written: Justification (200 words) will answer the focus question: What are the defining features of
Shrek? By explaining the process in designing the storyboard, the film techniques and camera angles
used, choice of colour, characters and justify the design.
2. Oral: The Pitch: students write a pitch designed to persuade an Australian producer to make
Shrek and perform the pitch to the teacher/class. The pitch needs to apply the template
from How to pitch a movie (Week 8) which includes genre, title, main character, goal and
obstacle. Be prepared to answer two questions from the producer/teacher.
Quality criteria: pronunciation, pacing, eye contact with audience.
Written: Justification (200 words) Will answer the focus question: What are the defining
features of Shrek? By outlining the steps taken to write the pitch for genre, theme and structural
elements specific to the film and justify the language choices made for the pitch.
1
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
4
15
Content:
3. Visual: Storyboard: students produce an 6-panel storyboard of either: a prelude to the film
or an alternate ending to the film. The storyboard is constructed using the template from
Week 9 and attached after marking criteria.
Quality criteria: neatness, composition, effective use of colour and a range of angles.
Written: Justification (200 words) will answer the focus question: What are the defining features of
Shrek? By explaining the process in designing the storyboard, the film techniques and camera angles
used, choice of colour, characters and justify the design.
4. Oral: The Pitch: students write a pitch designed to persuade an Australian producer to make
Shrek and perform the pitch to the teacher/class. The pitch needs to apply the template
from How to pitch a movie (Week 8) which includes genre, title, main character, goal and
obstacle. Be prepared to answer two questions from the producer/teacher.
Quality criteria: pronunciation, pacing, eye contact with audience.
Written: Justification (200 words) Will answer the focus question: What are the defining
features of Shrek? By outlining the steps taken to write the pitch for genre, theme and structural
elements specific to the film and justify the language choices made for the pitch.
Pitch Guide: “My story is a (genre) called (title) about (hero) who wants (goal) despite (obstacle).”
Step 2: Identify Possible Genres: Boxofficemojo.com – find similar movies
Step 3: Identify Themes
Step 4: Identify Structural Elements
Step 5: Brainstorm Comparisons: This film could be compared to…Or…If you liked… you’ll love…
Assessment Evidence
Table 5: Common Marking Criteria ( - /20)
Mark Understanding Effectiveness Accuracy Clarity
5 Thorough/complete High High Exceptional
4 Substantial Effective Complete Clear
3 Understands General General General
2 Partial/incomplete Somewhat Inaccurate lacking
1 Misunderstands Ineffective Major inaccuracies Unclear
1
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
5
Part B: Redesigned Unit of Work 16
Storyboard template
1
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
6
Part B: Redesigned Unit of Work 17
Manawaiti, C. (2018). Redesigned Unit of Work: Stage 4 English: Heroes in Film. 102098
Contemporary Teacher Leadership, Western Sydney University.
Adapted from: English Faculty, Cambridge Park High School, Sydney (Term 2, 2017).
Original Unit Outline: You’re My Hero: Stage 4 English. Board of Studies, Teaching
and Educational Standards NSW (BOSTES): Program Builder.
1
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
7
Part B: Redesigned Unit of Work 18
Resources
Texts: Shrek (2001). Mike Myers, Eddie Murphy, Cameron Diaz. Directors: Andrew Adamson, Vicky Jenson. Dreamworks Pictures.
Websites: Edmodo or Google classroom (optional).
Cartoon/storyboard: Pixton: https://www.pixton.com/ or Comix https://www.makebeliefscomix.com/
1
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
8
Part B: Redesigned Unit of Work 19
1
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
9
Part B: Redesigned Unit of Work 20
Students provide extended ICT Focus Utilise Universal Design for Learning principles (CAST, 2011)
written responses to source Students make critical use of which include:
texts. information technologies Multiple forms of representation
such as computers, internet Multiple forms of action and expression
Students demonstrate the ability search engines and visual Multiple forms of engagement
to write for specific purposes communication tools as These overall principles meet the requirements to differentiate
such as film review and film essential skills to living and strategies including:
advertising using persuasive working in the twenty-first 1. curriculum compacting
language. century. 2. providing key vocabulary
3. developing individual learning goals
Students develop fluent Students develop 4. including learning centres to facilitate guided or
communication of thoughts independent research and independent learning
and ideas in written, oral and writing skills through the use of 5. providing a variety of stimulus materials in a range of
multimodal media. ICT. mediums.
Differentiated programming is achieved through
Students develop skill in self- Numeracy Focus Student learning profile including learning styles, prior
correcting and peer-correction Students understand knowledge, experience, interest and talents.
of spelling, grammar, chronology and can Students are given a variety of options including:
punctuation, form and structure sequence events accurately. collaborative and individual learning
in writing. project-based work
student choice
Students develop visual literacy teacher/student dialogue around learning activities
and language skills to
understand and apply the Source: NESA https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/k-
10/understanding-the-curriculum/programming/differentiated-
metalanguage of film making to
programming
analyse meaning making in film.
Assessment tasks (formative and summative) are tiered using
Blooms Taxonomy and students have the choice to engage
at the level they feel most comfortable.
Week Teaching and Learning Strategies including assessment for learning. Resources
Syllabus Content
2
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
0
Part B: Redesigned Unit of Work 21
Week 1 Pre-test: knowledge and experience with film study, key film terms Student learning cards: adapt
Establishing prior (trailer, soundtrack, director, genre etc), camera shots/angles. from
knowledge Student learning profile – what are your pop culture interests – http://openingpaths.org/blog/
music, sport, social media, film, TV, streaming? Subjects. Learning 2014/01/learning-profile-cards/
EN4-6C: Engage style. Skills.
personally with texts: Progressive Brainstorm In groups of 4, each group is given a large Butchers paper / white boards
recognise, explain and piece of paper with a centre circle containing the question: and marker pens, blue tack or
analyse the ways literary What makes a good film? cellotape.
texts draw on readers’ Each group has a different colour pen.
knowledge of other texts Students brainstorm what they know, writing down the words or
and enable new concepts. Film Term Definitions Research
understanding and Every few minutes students move to the next group’s table leaving Activity
appreciation of aesthetic their paper behind and using their group colour pen add their
qualities (ACELT1629) ideas to the next group and so on. Spelling: Copy / Cover / Write
Once back at their original sheet the group discusses additions Each week a spelling list is
and briefly reports back to the whole group. given on Friday for re-test the
Group task: What makes a hero? What makes a heroine? following Monday.
Progressive Brainstorm as above.
Create a title page: You’re my hero.
Film term research activity: In pairs student use a dictionary to
research key terms on the activity sheet and write a sentence with
correct usage of the term.
Spelling: Copy / Cover / Write: Teacher read out loud words. Students
have spelling word list to practice each weekend.
Week 2: View 1: During screening students maintain a viewing log of key Viewing log sheets Shrek 1 & 2.
View Film events / scenes / actions / characters.
Teacher: Read out loud: Cloze Passage and short answer questions
on events in first half of film.
2
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
1
Part B: Redesigned Unit of Work 22
2
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
2
Part B: Redesigned Unit of Work 23
EN4-6C recognise, Students join their character expert group and jointly construct a Venn Diagram chart.
explain and analyse the character traits chart: physical description, personality traits,
ways literary texts draw occupation, relationship to others; and the Venn diagram chart.
on readers’ knowledge of In the outer crescents of the Venn diagram place the qualities for the
other texts and enable following: Shrek: villain / hero and any mixed qualities in the centre.
new understanding and Princess Fiona: damsel in distress / heroine / and mixed qualities.
appreciation of aesthetic Donkey: hero / annoying side-kick and mixed qualities.
qualities (ACELT1629) Lord Farquaad: villain / hero and mixed qualities.
Joint construction: Each character expert returns to their original
Characterisation group to jointly prepare a group report on each character answering
Focus questions: the analysis prompts:
Character. Shrek is a hero because….
Are heroes flawless? Are Shrek is not a hero because….
all villains, evil or do they In the beginning Shrek was not a hero but he changed because…
have good intentions?
Adapt for the remaining characters:
Fiona is / is not a damsel in distress… but changed…
EN4-1A: compare the
ways that language and Donkey is / is not an annoying side-kick… but changed…
images are used to Lord Farquaad is / is not a villain… but changed…
create character and to Independent: Answer the focus questions:
influence emotions and Are heroes flawless?
opinions Are all villains, evil or do they have good intentions?
(ACELT1621)
EN4-7D: Explain and
justify personal
empathy, sympathy and
antipathy towards
characters, situations and
concerns depicted in
texts.
Week 4: Build the field: Classic fairytale conventions (use examples from other Powerpoint of classic fairytale
Genre, Code and films such as Snow White, Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty). conventions.
Convention
2
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
3
Part B: Redesigned Unit of Work 24
What are the common assumptions made about heroes (the Film extracts: Snow White and
Focus Question: Genre. handsome prince), villains and princesses (damsel in distress)? View Shrek
How does the film Shrek video clips. Contrast Snow White’s prince and princess with Shrek and Snow White: Smile and a song
challenge genre Princess Fiona. Compare and contrast the villains – the evil https://youtu.be/hQZ6zzLpoNQ
conventions? stepmother and Lord Farquaad and the side-kicks (Donkey and
EN4-6D investigate how dwarfs) Princess Fiona sings:
visual and multimodal Genre: definition and examples from multiple film types e.g. crime, https://youtu.be/fM3VLM_kl_8
texts allude to or draw on romance, science fiction, adventure, comedy, drama.
other texts or images to Evil Queen: mirror mirror
enhance and layer Model: Teacher: Analysis of Scene 1: the opening scene (Shrek https://www.youtube.com/wa
meaning reading a fairytale book) with a focus on structure, language forms tch?v=mqmIMvWnIV8
(ACELA1548) and features, camera angles/shots.
Context/scene/action/ point of view/character/purpose of the Lord Farquaad: mirror mirror
Focus question: Code opening montage to illustrate Shrek’s character. https://www.youtube.com/wa
and Convention tch?v=H28TWyDJJ6I
How have these genres Joint construction: Teacher and students conduct analysis of the
been rewritten for ‘rescue’ scene, where Shrek and Donkey retrieve Princess Fiona from Prince Charming: rescue
different contexts and the dragon’s castle. Focus on action sequences, camera https://youtu.be/XpgXgDYlsFI
media? angles/shots, do these illustrate the traditional idea of the fairytale?
EN4-6D investigate how Shrek: rescue
visual and multimodal Independent: Answer the focus questions. https://www.youtube.com/wa
texts allude to or draw on How does the film Shrek challenge genre conventions? tch?v=OuRTx939VAQ
other texts or images to How have these genres been rewritten for different
enhance and layer contexts and media?
meaning In what ways does Princess Fiona differ from other Disney princesses?
(ACELA1548)
Week 5 Build the Field: Dictogloss
Formative Assessment: Teacher read out loud sample film review e.g. Frozen Example film reviews: Frozen,
Film Review Definitions – clarify new terms, and then read the features of what The Boss Baby, Toy Story, Up!,
is included / not included in a film review. Despicable Me.
Focus question: Code Students listen/teacher read again/ students listen again.
and Convention Film review
On third reading students take notes – key ideas, words.
instructions/structure.
2
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
4
Part B: Redesigned Unit of Work 25
How do cultural and Then ask students in pairs to share and rewrite notes. Then in
social stereotypes impact groups of four to rewrite whole text onto large sheet of paper. Film review template and star
on the understanding of checking for accurate grammar and spelling, subject-verb stickers.
the ‘hero’ and ‘princess’?
agreement, noun and verb endings.
EN4-7D engage Finally, show students the original text and compare their texts
personally with texts and with the original for similarities and differences, and concurrence
the ways in which in meaning.
personal experiences Checklist what to include/not to include in a film review.
and perspectives shape Model: Structure: title, target audience, plot action, theme, and
their responses to text. rating.
Joint construction: Language form and features in The Boss Baby
Focus question: review.
Connotation, imagery, Independent: Half A4 page film review for the film Shrek.
symbol. 1. Include the name of the film,
What is the impact of 2. what the film was about,
dialogue, imagery and
3. what you liked/disliked about the film,
language choices in
creating meaning? 4. the target audience,
5. a score out of 5 stars,
EN4-1A respond to and 6. and why you gave it that score.
composes imaginative,
informative and Do a draft and then put the final review on the template. Formative assessment: Movie
persuasive texts for Reflection: answer focus questions. Poster week 7
different audiences, How do cultural and social stereotypes impact on the understanding
purposes and contexts. of the ‘hero’ and ‘princess’?
What is the impact of dialogue, imagery and language choices in
creating meaning?
Goal: understanding different perspective on animated films by Café Conversation adapted
Week 6 engaging in conversation with people who represent other from
backgrounds and experiences. https://www.facinghistory.org/r
esource-library/teaching-
strategies/cafe-conversations
2
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
5
Part B: Redesigned Unit of Work 26
Group Task: Café Build: Preparation: Create 5 personalities with different cultural
Conversation: Formative backgrounds, political attitudes, education level, occupation, age,
Assessment-collaborative gender and family status. Wraparound activity:
learning Model: Teacher demonstrate a character and their perspective. https://www.facinghistory.org/r
Students: are in groups of at least 5 and allocated a personality and esource-library/teaching-
EN4-9E uses, reflects on background from which they create an identity chart of their strategies/wraparound-
and assesses their character and explore how that character might feel about the whiparound
individual and conversation topics.
collaborative skills for Joint construction: Jigsaw: form groups of the same character so that Teacher: character outlines.
learning. students can brainstorm their character, then reform into original Mixed ability group allocation.
Develop and use mixed groups to discuss their topic. Guide and focus
vocabulary for Independent: Topics: (not limited to these) conversations.
describing, analysing and 1. Technology, such as CGI and animation, will eventually put actors Facilitate post-activity
reflecting on learning out of work. discussion.
experiences. 2. Hero stories are always about male heroes.
Understand and value 3. Representations of girls / women in animation has changed in the
the differences between 21st century.
their own and others’
ways of learning. Reflect and debrief on conversations.
Wraparound activity: each student shares one idea from their
conversation.
2
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
6
Part B: Redesigned Unit of Work 27
2
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
7
Part B: Redesigned Unit of Work 28
EN4-2A use a range of Joint Construction: Using films that students have viewed before, *Make sure computer lab
software, including word compose a pitch for Frozen or The Boss Baby or Toy Story. booked for next weeks
processing programs, to Independent: Focus question: In what ways can you make a pitch Assessment Task.
create, edit and publish compelling?
texts imaginatively.
(ACELY1728, ACELY1738) Build the field: Theme is an underlying message or the big idea of a
story. This message could tell more about human nature or life in
Themes general. Many stories have more than one theme. Study.com: Themes
Focus question: Group brainstorm common themes: courage, perseverance, https://study.com/academy/le
How does the film Shrek endurance, family, friendship, trust, betrayal, acceptance, sson/theme-lesson-for-kids-
support or challenge your belonging, transformation definition-examples.html
understanding of the Model: Example of theme in well-known film.
themes in the film? Joint Construction: Themes in Shrek: friendship, loyalty, love, courage,
identity, family.
Independent: What do the characters learn throughout the story? Do
the characters change at all?
Focus question:
How does the film Shrek support or challenge your understanding of
the themes in the film?
Week 9 Build the Field Snow White and the 7 Dwarfs:
Summative Assessment Storyboards: planning a film. What goes into a storyboard? Queen’s order: storyboard
Task: Storyboard and Examples: Snow White and Toy Story. View. https://www.youtube.com/wa
justification Model: The Storyboard: Pixton.com – demonstrate a scene from an tch?v=fCvXDYmhOIQ
alternate animation film. Toy Story side-by-side
EN4-2A reflect on Joint construction: Think pair share: Similarities and differences storyboard and final scene.
ideas and opinions between storyboards and comic strips. https://www.youtube.com/wa
about characters, Independent: students use Pixton.com to create a comic based on a tch?v=Z5-a9uQkzac
settings and events in scene from Shrek. Computer Lab
literary texts, identifying Summative Assessment: (Task Sheet and at end of unit outline) Students have in-class time to
areas of agreement and Focus question: What are the defining features of the film Shrek? complete assessment task and
difference with others The project, review instructions, marking criteria. Recap the pitch, film to Q & A teacher.
and justifying a point of techniques and terminology. Storyboard template for draft.
view (ACELT1620) Independent
2
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
8
Part B: Redesigned Unit of Work 29
2
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
9
References 30
References
Board of Studies NSW (2012). English K-10 syllabus: Volume 2: English years 7-10. Board of
Studies NSW for and on behalf of the Crown in right of the State of New South
Wales.
CAST (Centre for Applied Special Technology). (2011). Universal design for learning
guidelines version 2.0. Compiled by David H. Rose and Jenna Gravel. Wakefield, MA:
http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlguidelines/downloads
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.01.006
English Teachers’ Association NSW and the State of New South Wales Department of
Education (2016). English textual concepts: Related syllabus content Stage 4. NSW
http://englishtextualconcepts.nsw.edu.au/sites/default/files/S4%20Syllabus%20Con
tent.pdf
Facing History and Ourselves. (2017). Resource library: teaching strategies: Café
library/teaching-strategies/cafe-conversations
Gibbons, P. (2009). English learners, academic literacy, and thinking: learning in the
3
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
0
References 31
Hairon, S. & Dimmock, C. (2012). Singapore schools and professional learning communities:
Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social
365-379. doi:10.3102/0013189X09339057
Kelley, D. (16 May, 2016). How to build your creative confidence. TEDTalks. Retrieved from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16p9YRF0l-g
Munns, G., Sawyer, W., Cole, B. (Eds.) and Fair Go Team. (2013). Exemplary teachers of
https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/k-10/understanding-the-
curriculum/programming/differentiated-programming
New South Wales Education Standards Authority (NESA) (2017). Reflection and evaluation.
Vass, E. (2018). Chapter 10: Building dialogic spaces through inclusive conversations. In W.
Wiggins, G. P. & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (Expanded 2nd ed.). Alexandria,
3
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
1
References 32
Wilson & Devereux (2014). Scaffolding theory: High challenge, high support in Academic
Language and Learning (ALL) contexts. Journal of Academic Language & Learning
8(3), 91-100.
pedagogies at the cultural interface. PhD thesis, James Cook University. Department
3
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
2
Original teaching unit 33
Cambridge Park High School is a government co-educational secondary school of 696 students located in Western Sydney on the traditional
country of the Darug people.2 The school ICSEA (Index of Community Socio-educational Advantage) is 907, below the average ICSEA of 1000,
with 63% of students in the bottom quarter suggesting a low educational advantage (ACARA, 2011).
The following documents are the original Stage 4 Scope and Sequence – Year 7, 2016 retrieved from the English Faculty Handbook. The unit
outline, You’re my Hero / Stage 4 / English was supplied via USB, by my mentor while on practicum in Autumn 2017, but has no known author.
2
All data for Cambridge Park HS current for 2017, Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA), 2018 retrieved from
https://myschool.edu.au/school/41835.
3
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
3
Original teaching unit 34
3
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
4
Original teaching unit 35
Summary Duration
Film study Shrek Weighting: 20% 15% Assessment Term 2
Task 5% Class work
9 weeks (Week 1 – Week 9)
Focus: Visual literacy and language
This unit will focus on visual language and film techniques and how
the use of techniques helps add to the narrative and create mood
and tone.
3
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
5
Original teaching unit 36
3
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
6
Original teaching unit 37
3
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
7
Original teaching unit 38
3
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
8
Original teaching unit 39
3
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
9
Original teaching unit 40
reflect on and assess their own and others' Students complete Venn Diagram Activity
learning against specific criteria, using (Resource 3)
reflection strategies, eg learning logs, blogs
and discussions with teachers and peers Students write a paragraph on their
favourite character from the movie and
why that character is their favourite.
Analysis Task
Scene Analysis 1
4
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
0
Original teaching unit 41
ICT
4
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
1
Original teaching unit 42
Analysis task
Sample Questions:
4
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
2
Original teaching unit 43
4
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
3
Original teaching unit 44
Introduction to storyboards.
ICT
Assessment
4
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
4
Original teaching unit 45
4
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
5
Original teaching unit 46
4
17165378 CHRISTINA MANAWAITI
6