Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
AT
NIMR, THE RIDGEWAY, MILL HILL,
LONDON, NW7 1AA
FOR
BARRATT LONDON LIMITED
ASHBURNHAM HOUSE 1 MAITLAND ROAD LION BARN ESTATE NEEDHAM MARKET SUFFOLK IP6 8NZ
TELEPHONE (01449) 723723 FAX (01449) 723907
Desk Study Report for a Proposed Residential Development at
NIMR The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA
CONTENTS
Page No.
CONTENTS 1
1. INTRODUCTION 4
1.1 Background 4
1.2 Legislative Background 5
2. SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS REPORTS 8
2.1 Aurora Report AHP/RPA/NIMR/REP/14/01 (September 2014) 9
2.1.1 Aurora Summary 10
2.1.1.1 Site Walkover - Aurora 10
2.1.1.2 Document Review - Aurora 11
2.1.2 Zetica Summary - NIMR 12
2.1.2.1 Potential Contamination Hazards - Buildings 12
2.1.2.2 Potential Contamination Hazards - Other Sources 13
2.1.3 Zetica Summary - MRCT 14
2.1.3.1 Potential Contamination Hazards - Buildings 14
2.1.3.2 Potential Contamination Hazards - Other sources 14
2.1.4 BRD Summary 15
2.1.4.1 Anecdotal Information 16
2.1.4.2 Description of Envirocheck Report 16
2.1.4.3 Description of Previous Reports 17
2.1.4.4 Preliminary Conceptual Site Model 18
2.2 BRD Report Reference BRD2058-OR2-B - Preliminary Phase 2
Geo-Environmental Site Investigation (August 2014) 18
2.3 Zetica Report Ref. P4522-14-R4-A - Drainage Investigation
(14 May 2015) 21
2.4 BRD Letter Reference BRD2058-let3 - A Summary Update of Further
Investigation at the MRC Site, Mill Hill (27th May 2015) 22
2.5 Aurora Report Reference AHP/CRI/REP/15/1 - Independent
Summary Report of the Radiological Investigation Activities at
MRC Mill Hill, (8 June 2015) 24
2.6 TCM Reference DF8522 - Japanese Knotweed Management
and Eradication (20 September 2016) 26
CONTENTS CONTINUED
CONTENTS CONTINUED
Drawing No.
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
This report describes a Phase 1 desk study report carried out by RSA Geotechnics
Limited to the directions of Barratt London Limited.
The purposes of the desk study and site reconnaissance were to identify any
potential historic or contemporary contaminative sources on site or within close
proximity to the site that may have impacted the soils and groundwater, and to
provide recommendations for the Phase II intrusive investigation.
The scope for the investigation was broadly based on the Barratt London Limited
Ground Investigation Scope of Services Brief – Rev 1, dated 25 October 2016. The
items relating to the desk study are as follows:-
The site has been used for work with pathogens as well as radiological work. The
assessment of risk associated with these aspects is outside the remit of
RSA Geotechnics Limited. These aspects are being considered separately by
Aurora Health Physics Services Limited (Aurora) and BRD Environmental Limited
(BRD), who specialise in these fields. However, the review of previous third party
information detailed later in this report includes a brief discussion of the findings of
those reports.
The investigation was authorised verbally by Scott Teuma, Barratt London Limited,
on 9 January 2017, followed by an appointment document received from
Barratt London Limited dated 10 February 2017.
This report has been prepared for the sole internal use and reliance of Barratt
London Limited. This report shall not be relied upon by other parties without the
express written authority of RSA Geotechnics Ltd. If an unauthorised third party
comes into possession of this report they rely on it at their own risk and the authors
owe them no duty of care and skill.
Advice and recommendations in this report have been based on the findings of the
site reconnaissance and desk study information. It must be appreciated that not
finding indicators does not mean that hazardous substances do not exist at the site.
RSA Geotechnics Limited have based this report on the sources detailed within this
report, which are believed to be reliable. However, RSA Geotechnics Limited
cannot and does not guarantee the authenticity or reliability of the third party
information it has relied upon.
The legislative document regarding land contamination is the 1995 Environment Act.
Forming Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act of 1990, this act created the
framework for the identification and remediation of contaminated land. It established
the Environment Agency as the overall National Enforcement Agency, with regional
control provided by the Local Authorities.
This Act defines “contaminated land” as any land which appears by the Local
Authority to be “in such a condition, by reason of substances, in, on or under the
land that:
In accordance with this and other current guidance, where a ‘land quality’ risk
assessment is required each ‘Relevant Pollutant Linkage’ (formerly referred to as
‘source-pathway-receptor’ framework), is separately identified and a level of risk
attached. The risk assessment takes account of the local environment, end user
behaviour patterns and the nature of the development in relation to proven
‘unacceptable’ risk. This is the approach supported by current guidance and
therefore has been adopted in the assessment of this site.
The outcome of the intrusive investigation and subsequent ‘land quality’ risk
assessment is the establishment of plausible relevant pollutant linkages shown in
the form of a ‘Refined Conceptual Model’. This is then used to determine the need
for further investigation, or remediation to appropriately mitigate any determined
unacceptable risks.
Several reports by third parties were made available for review to help inform the
preparation of this Phase 1 Desk Study Report. Some of the information provided in
these reports could have relevance to future planned site investigation works and
considerations for the proposed development. As a result these reports have been
reviewed as part of this desk study report and pertinent information has been
summarised in the sections below.
- Provide a clear way forward with respect to the strategy and scope of surveys
required to quantify and qualify potential contaminants, and
The desk study was untaken by Aurora, Zetica and BRD with each organisation
leading on their specialist area and expertise, namely:
- Zetica – Investigation into past operations and activities and the location of
potential buried waste, sources of other contaminants or other buried hazards;
and
The Aurora desk study comprised the compiled reports from the three organisations,
and included summaries of the reports undertaken by Zetica and BRD.
A site walkover was carried out by Aurora to record details of potential sources of
radiological contamination. The following locations were identified as potential
sources:
- Mellanby Building
- Irradiator facility
- Kyper/Maintenance Building.
MRCT Buildings
Aurora inspected Environment Agency records relating to the site to look for any
reported radiological incidences and to check the history of the types and use of
radiological materials held on the Public Register, in March 2014. The review gave
an overview of the radionuclides used on site since 1974 and proved confidence
that there had been no significant radiological incidents reported during the issuing
of the Permit to date.
Aurora inspected the MRC archives in April 2014. The records indicated that
radioactive material was used across the site from 1956. The common types used
were listed. The records showed:
- Work with radioactive material wide ranging across the site including in
laboratories and animal pens
- A macerator for radioactive waste was located within the air raid shelter.
The purpose of the Zetica report was to identify sources of radiological, biological
and chemical contaminants which may be present. The Zetica report described the
history of the site from the late 19th Century, when the site was occupied by Rhodes
Farm and its associated fields. The MRC purchased the land in 1922 and
development of the site commenced. The report included detailed plans and
descriptions of the site use, which have been summarised in subsection 3.4 of this
report.
Zetica did not find any records indicating that any bombs fell on the site in WWII.
The nearest bomb reported by Zetica fell on St Vincent’s Orphanage, located
approximately 50 m to the west of the site.
The historical usage of each building has been tabulated in the Zetica report, and
this has been replicated (with amendments by RSA Geotechnics) in
subsection 4.2.1 of this report. The report considered that whilst the majority of the
buildings had been involved in the use of the contaminants for research purposes,
they were considered likely to be free of any significant contamination in their
infrastructure. The table includes further information for the buildings and other
locations where potentially significant contamination has been identified. The report
also noted that while strict controls have been in place, the potential for accidental
spillage or unauthorised disposal of contaminants could not be discounted in any
building.
A plan from 1974 identified four chemical disposal pits along the eastern boundary
of the site. No records were found that confirmed the nature of the chemicals that
were disposed into them, or that indicated when the pits became disused, although
they were recorded as having been used for approximately twenty years. Anecdotal
evidence suggested they were 2 to 3 m deep and that chemicals were disposed
directly into them. As discussed in the Aurora report, an earlier investigation did not
positively identify them, but this investigation was described as limited.
A chemical burner was also identified on the 1974 plan, on the eastern part of the
site. This was used for the disposal of flammable substances, particularly solvents.
A plan included in the report gave a radioactivity value to the burner, indicating
some materials containing tracer isotopes were burned.
It was anticipated in the report, that although waste disposal protocol seemed to
have been well managed and enforced, it was inevitable that some unauthorised
disposal would have taken place which could lead to contamination hotspots
occurring in low points or dead ends associated with the drainage.
The locations of fuel and flammable liquid stores identified by Zetica were shown on
a plan in the report.
The report gave a list of isotopes that were reported to have been used on the site.
This is included in Appendix 3.
The Zetica Report described the history of the site from the middle of the
19th Century, when the site was occupied by a house, a field and a strip of
woodland. The report describes the redevelopment of the site, firstly with a large
house, followed by the ICRF and subsequently with the MRC buildings. Detailed
plans and descriptions of the site use are given in the report.
Zetica did not find any records indicating that any bombs fell on the site in WWII.
The nearest bomb reported by Zetica fell approximately 200 m southwest of the
MRCT site, in the grounds of Wentworth Hall.
The historical usage of each building was tabulated in the Zetica report. The report
considered that whilst the majority of the buildings had been involved in the use of
the contaminants for research purposes, they were considered likely to be free of
any significant contamination in their infrastructure. The tabulated data is replicated
(with amendments by RSA Geotechnics) in subsection 4.2.1 of this report, and has
been modified to include further information for the buildings and other locations
where potentially significant contamination has been identified during recent works.
The report also noted that while strict controls had been in place, the potential for
accidental spillage or unauthorised disposal of contaminants could not be
discounted in any building.
It was reported that the main sewerage system appeared not to have been
substantially modified since the buildings on the site were constructed. Specialist
disposal of hazardous material had been a feature of the site since it was
established and the protocol seemed to have been well managed and enforced, it
was considered inevitable that some unauthorised disposal would have taken place
which could lead to contamination hotspots occurring in low points or dead ends.
There were also records of leaks in the drainage system creating the potential for
soil and groundwater contamination in the immediate vicinity.
There was evidence of historical waste tipping, including fume cabinets in the
wooded northern area of the site. There was no evidence that this included the
disposal of contaminated waste, although this could not be totally discounted.
The location of one fuel store was identified by Zetica and shown on a plan in the
report.
The report gave a list of isotopes that were reported to have been used on the site.
This is included in Appendix 3.
The BRD report described the current use of the site in detail and made
observations of contamination sources. It described the site history as shown on
Ordnance Survey sheets and historical site plans.
The walkover described the current use of the site, its boundaries, surfacing, and its
topography. The buildings, below ground features, chemical and fuel stores, and
underground water tanks were described. Vegetation on site was recorded and the
presence of Japanese Knotweed and Giant Hogweed was observed on the site. A
number of dead trees were also observed along the line of the ditches in the eastern
part of the site.
BRD was supplied with historical site plans, which were presented in their report and
described in the text.
A record of correspondence with Regulators was described. The site had not been
designated as Contaminated Land by the Environmental Health Department; the
Council held no fuel licence for the site, and had no recorded pollution incidents.
London Fire Brigade reported that the site had a licence for a ‘Single Skin Steel’
petrol tank installed in 1968, with a capacity of 2273 litres, which was recorded as
being solid filled (presumably with concrete) in 1993. No plans showing the location
were provided.
The BRD report provided the same information regarding the chemical waste pits as
presented above in subsection 2.1.2.2.
A pollution incident occurred in the ditch adjacent to the north boundary of the main
NIMR site. The incident was as a result of the migration of heating oil from a fuel
leak at the off-site stables to the northwest. The fuel is understood to have migrated
via a sewer crossing this area of the site.
The BRD report incorporated a description of an Envirocheck report that had been
commissioned in March 2014. This corresponded to the findings of the desk study
undertaken most recently by RSA Geotechnics and described in section 3. The only
additional data gleaned from the BRD report was anecdotal information regarding a
heating oil spillage, into a ditch adjacent to the northern extent of the NIMR site,
from the stables adjacent to the western boundary.
The BRD report identified and tabulated the potential on and off site sources for both
the NIMR and MRCT sites. It listed receptors and linkages and produced a
preliminary assessment of contamination risks for both sites as well as the field to
the north.
Ground conditions comprised made ground and superficial reworked London Clay
overlying the bedrock London Clay. No evidence of the Stanmore Gravels or
Claygate Member was encountered towards the southern end of the site at the top
of the ridge nor were there any significant quantities of groundwater recorded.
However, very wet surface soils were encountered to the south of the former stables
in the northwestern corner of the NIMR site. The Made Ground soils were variable
across the site ranging from near surface reworked topsoil to deep reworked natural
soils present to 4.5 m bgl.
The BRD report summarised the findings as follows. It should be noted that the
investigation is considered to be very limited as access to pertinent areas was not
available.
2.3 Zetica Report Ref. P4522-14-R4-A - Drainage Investigation (14 May 2015)
A drainage survey was undertaken by Zetica to validate the location and integrity of
the external drainage system. The integrity CCTV survey of the external drainage
system identified 52 locations recommended for further intrusive investigation.
Windowless sampling was recommended at each location, with exploratory points
positioned either side of each identified drain location.
A further investigation was carried out by BRD and reported in May 2017. This
investigation focussed on the potential high risk contamination areas identified within
the previous BRD Phase 1 and Phase 2 reports that could not be investigated at the
time due to the potential for radiological contamination to be present.
The findings of the exploratory holes and the results of the chemical testing were
provided in the letter. The findings are summarised below:
The Aurora screening of the soils and drilling equipment from this area did not
identify any evidence of any radiological contamination being present.
gravel were recorded with occasional elevated concentrations of lead; and elevated
concentrations of hydrocarbons were recorded in the perched groundwater.
The Aurora screening of the soils and drilling equipment from this area did not
identify any evidence of any radiological contamination being present.
The Aurora screening of the soils and drilling equipment from this area did not
identify any evidence of any radiological contamination being present.
The Aurora screening of the soils and drilling equipment from this area did not
identify any evidence of any radiological contamination being present.
Small Potential Chemical Pit: The boreholes were drilled in close proximity to a
former chemical disposal pit towards the southern end of Building No.4. Due to
operational cooling equipment and live services, the full extent of the inferred pit
location could not be investigated at this time. It was stated that once the adjacent
building had been decommissioned then further investigation could be completed to
determine if there is any contamination that requires remediation.
contract negotiations between MRC and the purchaser, the remediation of these
areas was to comprise the removal of all waste deposits and ashy material
considered to pose a potential risk to human health. The most appropriate
remediation method to deal with these areas was considered to be for them to be
excavated and disposed of off-site as part of MRC’s decommissioning works at the
site. The letter included a plan (ref. BRD2058-OD9-A) which showed the proposed
areas to be remediated in addition to those areas requiring further investigation.
The letter added that it must be noted that the proposed remediation areas assume
that no radiological contamination is identified by Aurora’s outstanding laboratory
testing. Should any unacceptable radiological contamination be recorded by this
testing then the remediation proposals would need to be re-assessed.
This report summarised the key independent radiological investigation activities that
had taken place at MRC Mill Hill by Aurora Health Physics Services Ltd (Aurora),
BRD Ltd (BRD) and Zetica Ltd (Zetica). The report also summarised the activities
which would need to be undertaken to allow the Medical Research Council (MRC) to
surrender its Permits held under the Environmental Permit (England and Wales)
Regulations 2010 for the Site.
Aurora, in collaboration with BRD and Zetica, conducted a desk study and site
walkover of the MRC Mill Hill site. The desk study highlighted a number of areas
requiring further radiological investigation.
It was stated that a radiological survey and sampling of key buildings, including their
associated drainage and ventilation extract systems, located on the MRC Mill Hill
site should be undertaken to ascertain their radiological status. Particular attention
should be focused on areas suspected of historically being used for work with
radioactive material.
The extent and nature of the former chemical disposal pits on the MRC NIMR site
and buried waste on the MRCT site should be investigated as radioactive disposals
could have occurred.
The report makes reference to the external drainage surveys, which recommended
further investigation and remediation in the vicinity of the 52 identified drainage
locations understood to be potentially compromised. The report stated that the
exact nature and scope of the work was still to be agreed with MRC.
A survey for invasive species was undertaken and reported in September 2016.
The survey recorded areas on site where Japanese Knotweed, Giant Hogweed and
Marestail were growing on the site. The report included a plan identifying the
locations of the invasive species and proposed strategies for dealing with the
infestations. The plan showing the infestation locations is included in Appendix 3.
- Excavation and removal of ashy soils around WS142 and TP110 at depths
ranging from ground level to 0.4 m bgl.
Remedial works were undertaken on 3 November 2016 by Vinci Facilities under the
supervision of BRD. The extent of ashy soils were visually assessed during the
excavation and removed where encountered. Material was loaded directly into a
site dumper using the mechanical excavator and deposited on the hardstanding of
the main MRCT car park for off-site removal.
- Excavation and removal of ashy soils around WS142 and TP110 over an area
of 9.4 m by 6.3 m to a depth of up to 0.7 m bgl.
- Excavation and removal of ashy soils around WS160 to WS162 over an area
of 12.2 m by 3.6 m to a depth of 1.1 m depth.
- Excavation and removal of clinker soils around WS173 over an area of 11.7 m
by 7.0 m to a depth of up to 0.7 m bgl.
The report concluded that all identified soils containing incinerated waste had been
excavated and removed from the MRCT site and indicated that the developer
remained responsible for ensuring that the additional investigation of the MRCT area
addressed ‘conventional contamination’.
Nine trial pits were installed in the location of the chemical store and waste pits, and
a combination of four trial pits and three window sample boreholes were selected in
the area of the East Annexe. The works were supervised by a Health Physics
Surveyor from Aurora Health Physics Limited as a risk of radiological contamination
sources was considered to be present.
No further investigation was undertaken in Car Park 1 and the area of laboratory
waste previously identified in the northern part of the wooded area north of the
Chemical Store.
- Ashy soils and laboratory waste beneath and surrounding the former Chemical
Store (including stockpiled material).
- Ethylbenzene contamination 2.0 to 3.2 m bgl in the road area to the southeast
of the former Chemical Store.
The BRD report recommended further site wide investigation, to include beneath
building footprints and a requirement to address ‘conventional contamination’ of
lead, asbestos, hydrocarbon and solvent hotspots. Further site-wide gas and
groundwater monitoring was also recommended to confirm the findings to date.
Following the site-wide investigation, a site-wide Remediation Strategy would be
required.
- Excavation and removal of the ashy soils from Car Park 1, to 1.6 to 2.0 m
depth.
- Excavation and removal of the laboratory waste from below the existing
concrete slab in the vicinity of the East Annexe, to a depth of 1.3 m.
- Excavation and removal of soils across the former Chemical Store area to a
depth of 0.8 m below ground level (0.6 m below existing levels, reduced as
part of the demolition) and to 1.1 m in the area to the north of the Chemical
Store area.
Brief commentary on waste classification was provided, which classified all of the
contaminated soils expected to be excavated as ‘non-hazardous’, however no
reference was made to the visible asbestos fragments discussed earlier in the
report, which would be considered as ‘hazardous’, unless properly segregated.
3. DESK STUDY
This site was located within the Mill Hill area of London, NW7 to the north of the
junction between The Ridgeway (the B552) and Burtonhole Lane. The site can be
located approximately by National Grid Reference TQ 234 925 and is illustrated on
drawing number 14684DS/1.
The site approximates a ‘b’ shape with the northern limb comprising of two
vegetated areas referred to as the ‘Northern Fields’ and the southern section
dominated by the NIMR site in the western two-thirds, with the MRCT site located
adjacent to the east, representing approximately one-third of the area. For the
purposes of this report, these areas can be further sub-divided as indicated below
(and illustrated on drawing reference 14684DS/3):
Northern Fields
- South Field – overgrown grass and vegetation with small trees and footpaths.
NIMR
MRCT
- North – overgrown partially wooded area to the north of the main MRCT site.
Site reconnaissance was conducted over a number of days and found the site in the
condition as outlined in the following subsections. Figures referred to have been
appended to this report.
The southernmost field comprised mainly long grass and small trees, accessed from
a public footpath located near the southwest corner of the field. Water flowed
northwards within a drainage ditch located between the footpath and the site
boundary. In the southwest corner of the area a small brick structure, overgrown
with vegetation (Figure 1) was present, connected by hardstanding to the concrete
base between the two stable blocks in the northwest corner of the NIMR site. It
appeared that the water from the drainage ditch was visible in this location, possibly
culverted below the hardstanding and following the fence line, although this was
unclear due to vegetation. A historical drainage plan from approximately 1962
indicates there may have been a drainage stream running through this location
towards the Ejector House located east of this position. Several footpaths traversed
the land and an unsealed vehicle access track with a row of trees on either side
(Figure 2), was present on the eastern edge, connecting the northernmost field with
the NIMR site via an electronic security gate. Beside the track, a drainage ditch with
water flowing northwards was visible along the eastern boundary of the field
(Figure 3).
The two fields were divided by a generally 20 to 30 m wide strip of trees, within
which the remains of a burnt-out sports pavilion (Figure 4) was present adjacent to
the northern end of the vehicle access track. Rusted pipework, which may be
remnant utility services, was present next to the ruins. To the west of the former
pavilion, a series of ceramic artefacts (Figure 5) were located near the centre of the
wooded area, which may have been a former toilet area.
The northernmost of the two fields was generally grassed sports fields surrounded
by various trees, with drainage ditches occupying the eastern and possibly the
western boundaries (the latter was unclear due to vegetation). The meandering
Folly Brook flowed towards the east on the northern boundary of the site (Figure 6).
An area of rubble and general waste was present near the northwestern corner of
this area (Figure 7), understood to be largely derived from the burnt-down pavilion to
the south. Waste included brick, concrete, metal, plastic, ceramic and possible
asbestos cement pipe (Figure 8).
3.2.2 NIMR
To the south of the Northern Fields was the NIMR site, which was surrounded by an
approximately 3 m high security boundary fence. An access road traversed the site
from near the entrance at the southern boundary to the security gate on the northern
boundary. This area has been subdivided as indicated at the start of subsection 4.2.
The lower elevation in the north of the NIMR site was occupied by farm buildings
and residential properties on the western side of the access road. Near the
northwest corner of this area and on an approximately northwest-southeast
orientation, was a pair of former stable blocks (Figure 9) that were being used for
general storage, which included bricks and small-scale paint and timber treatment
products. Both blocks possessed possible asbestos cement corrugated roofs and
refrigeration units, removed from the main laboratory buildings upslope, were being
temporarily stored on the concrete slab between the two blocks. The southeastern
part of this slab was connected to the central access road by means of a variety of
hardstanding (various phases of flexible surfacing and concrete) and was in a
generally poor condition. On the northern side of this road was a partially open-
sided barn (Figure 10) with a suspected asbestos cement corrugated roof that was
being used for agricultural vehicle storage and maintenance, as well as storage of
tools, road salt and paint products. Evidence of waste oils, herbicides and
pesticides storage was also present, including some areas of hydrocarbon spillage.
Opposite the western part of this maintenance shed was an overgrown area with a
structure that was not accessible (Figure 11). The remaining structures in this
quadrant were derelict residential properties, which were considered likely to contain
asbestos containing materials within their fabric, due to their age. On the northern
side of the road, near the junction with the main access road, a concrete structure,
which may represent a generator or fuel tank base, was observed (Figure 12). The
rear gardens of the southern residential properties opened out onto a moderately
overgrown area (Figure 13), which formed the slope up to Car Parks 1 and 2, which
for the purposes of this report are considered as part of the Southwestern Quadrant.
The lower elevation in the north of the NIMR site and the eastern side of the main
access road was primarily occupied by the Mellanby Building, surrounded by
laboratories and former garages/storage buildings. A small brick structure
immediately east of this road and approximately 30 m south of the northern NIMR
boundary fence, and identified as the ‘Ejector House’, was present (Figure 14). This
structure was understood to intercept waste water from the farm buildings and eject
it uphill to the foul sewer main in The Ridgeway road to the south of the site. The
interior of the structure was mainly used for casual storage, but also had a 1940’s
composite fuse board (based on an internally displayed dated circuit diagram) and a
large manhole in the floor, presumably provided maintenance access to the sewer.
To the north of this maintenance building was a small garden shed used to house
various gardening paraphernalia associated with the allotments immediately north.
Two greenhouses (Figure 20) in relatively poor condition were present in this area
and several examples of Giant Hogweed up to approximately 2 m in height were
visible nearby, as identified in the TCM report referred to in previous sections.
Approximately 40 m west of the greenhouses was another shed with a possible
asbestos cement roof (Figure 21), which was in an area of dense vegetation; with
ventilation pipes located several metres southeast, associated with a surface water
interceptor. A small drainage ditch flowed northwards in line with the eastern wall,
connecting to the ditch that was orientated east-west along the northern NIMR site
boundary (Figure 22). The shed contained only clay roofing tiles and no evidence of
chemical spillage was evident.
The area to the southeast of the greenhouse area was occupied by a number of
allotment pits (Figure 23), up to the tennis courts (Figure 24), which were located
approximately 30 m east of the greenhouse, near the northeast corner of the NIMR
site. This area of ground appeared to have been levelled and built up in some
areas. Giant Hogweed was also recognised around the western and northern
periphery.
To the south of the tennis courts and the east of the Mellanby Building, resided
‘Q Block’, which was a laboratory building also referred to as the ‘Monkey House’
and ‘Quarantine Block’ (Figure 25). Near the northwest corner of this building, a
liquid nitrogen tank was present. On the southeastern side of Q Block, a concrete
slab for a generator and/or fuel tank was evident (Figure 26), however such items
were absent. An area of unkempt grass with several trees (Figure 27) extended
from the east of this building to the site boundary with the overgrown wooded area
north of the MRCT site.
To the south of the Mellanby Building was the ‘Cat House’ or ‘C Block’ (Figure 28),
which recently housed a Category 4 containment facility. Both buildings were
undergoing decommissioning at the time of the site reconnaissance. To the
southwest of this building, air-conditioning plant was noted, supplying C Block. Due
to the double fencing in place around C Block, which extended up to Car Park 3, it
was not possible to inspect this area; however an area of Japanese Knotweed was
recognised through the fencing on the retained earth immediately south of the
building (Figure 29). Immediately west of C Block were the bases of two former
buildings (Figure 30), which extended to within approximately 10 m of the main
access road.
Generators were noted to the west of both the Mellanby building (Figure 31) and
C Block (Figure 32) and three mobile diesel bowsers were stored beside the road
near the southwest corner of the Mellanby Building (Figure 33).
The southern area west of the access road was primarily occupied by the Specific
Pathogen Free (SPF) Building and other laboratories, with the Kyper Building
immediately south, adjacent to The Ridgeway road. The land between the northern
and southern building areas was generally occupied by car parks. Car Park 1 and 2
were located to the west of the main access road and Car Parks 3 and 4 were
located to the east of the main access road.
Due to the gradient of the site, the difference in elevation between Car Park 1 and
Car Park 2 was up to approximately 3 to 4 m. The greatest difference was in the
location of a store built into the bank and fronting onto the lower Car Park 2
(Figure 34). This structure is understood to have been a cobalt store/caesium
irradiator and was consequently used to store radioactive materials. Outside the
door of the facility, a red metal trunk was being used to store grease, but may have
previously housed fire extinguishers or possibly been a small fuel can store.
Anecdotal evidence and dark staining on the wall and floor outside the store
suggested that the area was used for fire training purposes in the past. A car
appeared to have been abandoned in a parking space near the centre of the
northern side of the car park.
Bounding both car parks, on the northern and southern embankments, a number of
mature trees were present.
The ramp connecting Car Park 1 to Car Park 2 was located on the western end.
The eastern end of Car Park 1 was formerly the location of an air raid bunker, which
had been used as a radiation store and chemical store in the past. At the time of the
site reconnaissance, this area had been excavated for remediation purposes,
backfilled and was currently hoarded off (Figure 35).
A waste compactor (Figure 36) was present on the southern side of Car Park 1 and
several skips were located in the car park. Various waste items generated through
the course of vacating the site were present including electrical items, cables,
batteries and laboratory equipment. Segregation of waste into various specific bins
and skips was evident. A small number of containers of oils and lubricants were
present on the concrete hardstanding.
On the eastern side of the Waste Compactor area, a ramp led southwards, up-slope
to the rear of the SPF Building and a plant area. Near the summit of the ramp, two
generators were present to the west (Figure 37) and a container housing a
boiler/steam room was present to the east (Figure 38). Adjacent on the eastern side
of this structure, were two adjoining buildings; the northernmost ‘New Polio Building’
and the southern ‘Old Polio Building’, which were understood to be vacated
laboratories at the time of the site reconnaissance. Bags of salt for water softening
on a pallet (Figure 39) and numerous bottles of ESG 106 ‘liquid multipurpose
treatment for steam raising plant’ in a metal container (Figure 40) were stored
around the southern side of the hardstanding at the summit of the ramp.
Between the southern Old Polio building and the SPF Building, a plant area was
present, which included various chimneys, pipework, ventilation and air-conditioning
units (Figure 41). The plant area was accessed by a path and steps between
various boiler rooms from the summit of the ramp. Two chimneys were present in
the vicinity and a large amount of plant relating to ventilation and air conditioning,
with associated pipework was present on multiple levels of hardstanding in this area,
with some small patches of permeable areas of lightly vegetated shingle. The
pipework (including drainage) was of indeterminate age and it is possible that
asbestos containing materials may be present as gaskets or lagging in some of
these locations.
The road connecting the Waste Compactor with the main access road to the east
was flexibly surfaced and adjacent to the northern side of the New Polio building.
On the southern side of this building, accessed from the main road was a generator
located on a grassed area (Figure 42) beside a subsurface duct housing gas pipes,
which were routed across the site. A large brick chimney was present on the other
side, possibly associated with the Polio Calorifier. The southern side of this area
was where the Old Polio Building was located and upslope of this, to the south,
another generator was located (Figure 43). The plant area could be accessed from
this location through the building door located beside this generator.
On the southern side of the SPF Building and the adjoining Biological Science
building, a flexibly surfaced road servicing the Kyper Building was present
(Figure 44). A ramp was present between this road and the southern side of the
SPF building, allowing vehicular access to the base of the building (Figure 45). A
retaining wall measuring approximately 3 m in height existed between the road and
the base of the ramp near the western site boundary.
At the end of this road, the surface became of concrete construction and a skip and
various cabinets for general chemical storage were present (Figure 46). Examples
of chemicals being stored included small fuel/oil cans, grease, acidic toilet cleaner,
Ethylene Glycol (anti-freeze), as well as a ‘Lamp Bank’ for waste lamps. The
southern side of this vehicle turning area was occupied by a former spray room
(Figure 47). Access to the front of the site, between the building and the perimeter
fencing was possible along the western side of the spray room. The southern side
of the Kyper Building was primarily grassy, with several large trees spaced along
this strip of land. This area was also the location of some above ground tanks,
understood to be for water, elevated on concrete beams (Figure 48), with some
associated pipework presenting inlets/outlets through the security fencing on the
south and east of this area, near the main entrance gate.
Approximately 10 m south of the southeastern corner of the Kyper Building was the
main site entrance gate, leading to the visitor’s car park that occupied the area
between the Kyper Building and the Gatehouse (Figure 49) and represented the
southern end of the main site access road connecting the north and south sides of
the NIMR site. It is understood that there are some underground water tanks below
this car park.
The southern area east of the access road was dominated by the nine-storey
Cruciform Building (Figure 50), which was connected to the North Building to the
north. An underpass was present between the two buildings, which appeared to be
used as a loading area for the laboratories (Figure 51). The underpass formed part
of a one-way system on the site, leading clockwise around the Cruciform Building to
the exit beside the Gatehouse near the centre of the southern site boundary. To the
north of the North Building, a soft landscaped area with picnic tables was present,
overlooking Car Parks 3 and 4 to the north (Figure 52). Several 8 to 9 m high
Cypress trees were present at the southwestern corner of the car parks (Figure 53).
To the east of the car park, was an overgrown wooded area (Figure 54), which was
immediately south of the unkempt grassed area to the north. Small amounts of
general waste and some building rubble was scattered about amongst the trees,
including drainage pipes, possible asbestos cement, polystyrene packaging and an
enamel washbowl (Figure 55).
A vehicle loading area was located within the underpass and a gas cylinder storage
area (accessible from northern and southern sides) was present on the southern
side of the road emerging from the eastern end of the underpass (Figure 62).
Adjoining the northern side of the main core of the Cruciform Building and the
northeast wing, a lift shaft (a potential source of asbestos containing material) was
present from ground level to the top floor (Figure 63). A generator was located near
the door (Figure 64) and a number of refrigeration units were being temporarily
stored on the hardstanding near this location.
On the southern edge of Block D, a pedestrian path led into the adjacent MRCT site
via an electronic security pedestrian gate and the area south of the path was
restricted by the presence of hoarding around an area of remedial excavation
associated with the demolished former Insectarium building. Opposite the hoarding
and immediately east of the Cruciform Building, a sign indicated an exclusion zone
due to the presence of strong magnetic fields emanating from the interior of the
Cruciform Building.
At the southeastern corner of the NIMR site, an ‘L’-shaped building was present
(Figure 69), which was associated with a large number of services and ducts. This
building was understood to have recently housed the Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
equipment.
3.2.3 MRCT
The MRCT site could be accessed via the electronic pedestrian gate through the
security fencing near Block D (Figure 70). The footpath opened out onto a parking
area adjoining the road that provided access to the northern laboratories of the site
and the vehicular access gate to the NIMR site. The northernmost part of the road
terminated at a car park near the two larger laboratory buildings that occupied the
centre of the site (Figure 71). A plant room (Figure 72) was housed in a small
building immediately south of the car park and a concrete plinth of a former fuel
tank, overgrown with Cypress trees, was present on the southwestern side of this
structure (Figure 73). Behind the plant room, on the southeastern side, the locations
of a former generator and possible fuel tank were recognised on the concrete slab in
this area.
Near the southern corner of the MRCT site, a tennis court overgrown with moss
(Figure 74), was present, immediately north of which, was located an electricity
substation (Figure 75). To the west of the tennis court was a large oak tree
(Figure 76). East of the substation was the inverted ‘T’-shaped Main MRCT
Building, which housed a below-ground boiler room on the northwestern side
(Figure 77). On the southeastern (front) side of the building was another car park,
which was part of the main vehicular access route onto site through an electronic
security gate on the southern boundary. This access road increased in elevation
around the eastern side of the building and joined the road that serviced the west
and north of the site. The road also headed northeast to service a larger car park
downslope on the eastern part of the site.
On the eastern side of the Main Building, on the opposite side of the road, was an
almost triangular concrete slab which it is understood was formerly used as a
solvent storage area (Figure 78).
Located between the central laboratory buildings and the lower car park in the east,
was a residential block (Figure 79), with a triangular-shaped garden area to the rear
on the northwest side. At the northeastern end of the eastern car park, two double
garages were present (Figure 80). Access was only possible to one of the buildings,
which appeared to be empty. A soft-landscaped area was present north of the
garden area to the rear of the residential property (Figure 81). The presence of
paving and a low wall crossing part of the centre suggested a building may have
been located in this area in the past. A former incinerator was understood to have
been located in this region, although the exact layout was not determined. Some
remedial excavations had been undertaken on the southern side of the wall
(Figure 82), an area near the northeastern corner of the grassed area (Figure 83),
and an area on the eastern part of the grassed area, adjacent to a wooded zone that
occupied the northeastern corner of the MRCT site (Figure 84). The latter
excavation revealed some drainage pipe fragments and sections of a brick wall,
indicting the presence of a former structure. A possible asbestos cement fragment
was noted in the vicinity of this excavation. A brick barbeque and wooden picnic
bench were present between the eastern remedial excavations and a small
overgrown shed was present in the northeastern corner. Clinker was visible in
numerous places on the surface of the grassed area (Figure 85).
On the western side of the grassed area and to the north of the central laboratory
buildings was the base of a former structure understood to have once housed small
animals (Figure 86). Adjacent and to the north of this structure was an air raid
shelter (Figure 87), which could be accessed only from the western side as the
eastern means of egress appeared to have collapsed. The air raid shelter was in an
overgrown, wooded area (Figure 88), which appeared to be strewn with occasional
building fragments and possible base of a structure. The base of the air raid shelter
was approximately 2 m below the base of the former structure immediately adjacent
to the south due to the reduction in ground level elevation. A smaller laboratory
building was present on the northwestern side of the central laboratory buildings,
which included a platform elevated 1 to 2 m over the slope (Figure 89). The area
underneath this platform had been used for casual storage including building
materials.
A site reconnaissance of the wooded area north of the MRCT site was conducted by
RSA Geotechnics on 14 February 2017 and found this area to be in the following
condition.
Access was gained through a locked gate in the boundary fence located in the
wooded northeast corner of the MRCT area (Figure 90). An area of discarded or
temporarily stored items such as wooden drawers, a pushchair, ducting, metal
frames, wooden fencing posts, etc. was present (Figure 91). A sheep-netting fence
was present approximately 30 m west of the edge of Burtonhole Lane, at the
southern end of the site. At the time of the walkover, the boundary of the proposed
development site was taken to be the boundary with Burtonhole Lane; however the
wire fence may have represented a property boundary. The western side of this
fence was generally overgrown with 1 to 2 m high brambles in the north (Figure 92).
A break in the fence near the southern portion of the site allowed reasonable access
into the western overgrown area. Near the centre of this western field, the brambles
reduced and were replaced by sporadic trees of moderate maturity. No man-made
materials, apart from windblown litter, were visible throughout much of this site area;
however sparse vegetation and a slight change in slope in an area near the centre
of the site suggested some structure or minor re-profiling had occurred the past
(Figure 93). Based on one oblique aerial photograph dated from 1953 (described in
Table 3.4), this may have been a former allotment area. Several trails that could
have been made by either humans or animals traversed the site.
Approximately halfway along the wire netting fence and on the western side, a tent
was found in fairly good condition (Figure 94). A full bird feeder indicated recent
habitation. On returning to the area with site staff, the resident had returned and
following polite conversation, it was agreed that the resident would vacate the area
within the week, having apparently lived there unnoticed for thirteen years.
present amongst some conifers at the northern part of the site near the junction of
the roads for Mill Hill Country Club and Finchley Nurseries.
Historical Ordnance Survey maps and data from a search of Public Registers were
obtained from the Landmark Information Group Limited using their Envirocheck
product (reference number 110527388_1_1). This included information from
organisations such as the Environment Agency, Local Authority, British Geological
Survey, Natural England and others. The maps included a range of historic and
modern Ordnance Survey maps mostly at 1:1,250, 1:2,500, 1:10,000, 1:10,560 and
1:25,000 scales.
Aerial photographs showing the site were obtained from Historic England and
Bluesky at selected intervals, including those dated 1953, 1981, 1992, 2003, 2006
and 2010. The photographs have been appended to this report.
It should be noted that the following text does not generally consider features
beyond a search radius of 250 m, since based on their distance from the site, a risk
from these features was not identified. However, for further details outside this
250 m radius a full list is given in Appendix 1.
The Zetica Desk Study report indicated the Medical Research Council (MRC)
purchased the land at Rhodes Farm in 1922, which then became Farm
Laboratories, as indicated on the historic maps dated from 1935. Farm Laboratories
was understood to have bred various animals, initially for research into vaccines.
The eastern part of the NIMR site became Stroud Laboratories (under the Imperial
Cancer Research Fund, ICRF) prior to 1935, whereas the western side remained
Farm Laboratories. Stroud Laboratories was removed prior to 1938 and relocated to
Burton Bank, adjacent to eastern boundary (MRCT), to make room for the
Cruciform Building. To accommodate this structure, significant excavation would
have been undertaken resulting in highly disturbed soils in the vicinity of the
building.
The Cruciform Building was occupied by the Royal Navy during WWII and used as a
draft centre, training school and accommodation for the Women’s Royal Naval
Service (WRNS). Other buildings on the site were understood to have been used
throughout WWII for medical research, including war-related conditions.
Once the war ended and the Royal Navy left the site in 1947, three years of
refurbishment were undertaken before the new NIMR facilities were officially
re-opened in May 1950. Various redevelopments subsequently occurred to meet
the required research demands.
Research at the site over the years of occupation included chemistry, virology,
pharmacology, parasitology and neuroscience, which would have involved the use
of isotopic tracers and hazardous chemicals during the study of high-risk pathogens.
Outlines of historic buildings were provided as part of the Zetica reports and have
been included on the existing site layout drawing, appended as 14684DS/2.
Historical Ordnance Survey maps of the area dating from 1868 recorded the
following history of the site as summarised in Table 3.4.
Northern Fields
- Car parks and abandoned car as a potential source of hydrocarbon leaks and
spills. Due to the potential age of the flexible surfacing, it is possible that this
may be a source of coal tar (and will be a source of other hydrocarbon
compounds including PAH and TPH).
- Car parks and abandoned car as a potential source of hydrocarbon leaks and
spills. Due to the potential age of the flexible surfacing, it is possible that this
may be a source of coal tar (PAH).
Public Register data was received as part of the Envirocheck Report. This included
information from the Environment Agency, Local Authority, British Geological
Survey, Natural England and several other sources. A full list of the Public Register
entries within a 1 km radius of the site can be found in Appendix 1 of this report. It
should be noted that the positions of symbols on the environment map supplied are
not always very accurate and that judgement should be used in locating each item.
One Discharge Consent was recorded on the site. This was registered to a fish
farm that was registered to Watch Tower House on The Ridgeway, but the plans
showed it located in the southwest quadrant of the site. The consent was for
discharge of an Irrigation area into gravel strata. The consent was issued in 1973
and revoked in 1996.
Two Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters were recorded on the site. The first
was located in the southwest quadrant of the site in 1997, and the second was
located within the southeast quadrant of the site in 1990. These were both
described as Category 3 – Minor Incidents. The pollutant in both cases was
described as Oils – Unknown, and the receiving water and cause of incident was not
recorded.
Sixteen records of Registered Radioactive Substances were included for the site.
Seven of these records were for an address at 1-3 Burtonhole Lane, with company
names Medical Research Council Technology, Gendaq Ltd and most recently
Heptares Therapeutic Ltd. The remaining records were registered to the National
Institute for Medical Research which was located on the Ridgeway. All of the
records were for the keeping and use of Radioactive Materials, or for the disposal of
Radioactive waste. Only four of the entries were recorded as still being authorised.
3.5.2 Waste
One Licensed Waste Management Facility was recorded on the site. This was
registered to the National Institute for Medical Research on The Ridgeway, and was
categorised for In-house Storage Facilities. The licence was issued in 1993 and
surrendered in 1999.
There were no entries relating to Hazardous substances within a 250 m radius of the
site.
3.5.4 Geology
Reference to British Geological Survey (BGS) 1:50,000 Series Sheet 256, ‘North
London’, 2006 and the BGS online Geology of Britain Viewer indicated the site to be
underlain by the London Clay Formation. Claygate Beds and Head Deposits were
recorded in the southern part of the site. A small outcrop of Stanmore Gravel
Formation was present overlying the Claygate Beds in the southern extremity of the
site. No other drift deposits were recorded on the site.
An area of Landslip some 250 m by 200 m was recorded within the London Clay
deposit approximately 220 m to the west of the site.
A review of the BGS Borehole archive website indicated that two boreholes had
been drilled to a depth of about 3 m on the site for the National Institute for Medical
Research in 1938. These exposed clay immediately beneath the topsoil. The clay
was not described and was designated as ‘Claygate Beds?’ A deeper borehole was
drilled 50 m to the south of the site at Watch Tower House, which exposed Claygate
Beds to a depth of 6.50 m, over London Clay to a depth of 94.0 m overlying the
Chalk.
Potential geological hazards associated with the site as given in the Envirocheck
data search are presented in Table 3.5.4A.
The site was listed ‘in an area which might not be affected by coal mining’. No
Hazard was attributed for Non Coal Mining Areas of Great Britain.
Less than 1% of homes were above the Health Protection Agency Action Level for
Radon and the British Geological Survey, National Geoscience Information Service
advised that no radon protection measures are necessary in the construction of new
dwellings or extensions.
Measured Soil Chemistry data was provided by the BGS for one sample of topsoil at
one location on the site (NGR 523238, 192772) for arsenic, cadmium, chromium,
lead and nickel, as summarised in Table 3.5.4B.
BGS Urban Soil Chemistry Averages for the site area were as presented in
Table 3.5.4C.
The nearest surface water feature was recorded as being on site and indicated to be
the drainage ditch approximately 60 m north of the Mellanby Building. Indicated on
the Envirocheck plans, but not recorded on the datasheets, was a pond present in
the northeast part of the site and another drainage ditch was identified between the
two northern fields. Both were also identified during the site reconnaissance. Folly
Brook, a secondary river ran along the northern boundary of the site in an
approximate west-east orientation. Tertiary Rivers ran alongside the eastern and
western boundaries in the northern part of the site.
No water abstractions were recorded on the site. Two entries for water abstractions
were identified within 250 m of the site. These were both for the same borehole,
located 243 m to the southeast of the site for Watch Tower House, on
The Ridgeway. The source was described as Groundwater, with the use described
as ‘Drinking; cooking; sanitary; washing (small garden)’; and ‘Spray Irrigation’.
The southern part of the site was located within part of an Outer Protection Zone
(Source Protection Zone 2). The Inner Protection Zone (SPZ 1) was located 109 m
to the south of the site, and the Groundwater Source was located at Watch Tower
House, 243 m to the southeast of the site.
The site was not in a zone, or within 250 m of a zone, at risk from flooding or
extreme flooding from Rivers and Seas without defences. The site does not benefit
from flood defences or flood water storage areas.
Parts of the site were identified as being a Low to Medium Risk of Surface Water
Flooding (1000 to 100 year return). The area around Folly Brook in the north of the
site was identified as being a Low to High Risk of Surface Water Flooding (1000 to
30 year return).
There were two Industrial Land Use entries located on the site (one Active, one
Inactive) and a further three (one Active, two Inactive) located within a 250 m radius
of the site.
The two entries for the site referred to MRCT, the medical laboratories located at
1-3 Burtonhole Lane in the southeast of the site.
There were no recorded fuel station entries within 250 m of the site.
Review of publicly available data suggests three High Explosive bombs impacted
the site (along the main north-south trending road through the site) and four more
strikes were located approximately 200 m west of the site during the Blitz, between
October 1940 and June 1941.
The initial assessment stated a risk of Low to Medium and that a detailed
assessment was not considered necessary. Recommendations included a full site
non-intrusive multi sensor electromagnetic survey is undertaken to locate any
ferrous or non-ferrous munitions that could present an explosive hazard to personal
and plant conducting intrusive ground engineering works.
4.1 Introduction
A conceptual model represents the characteristics of the site that show the possible
relationship between sources (contaminants), pathways and receptors (or targets).
The following outline conceptual model has been based on the results of the desk
study, and an environmental reconnaissance of the site.
It should be noted that the assessment of risk relating to radiological and biological
contamination is outside the remit of RSA Geotechnics Limited, and consequently is
not considered in detail in this report. It is understood that these aspects are being
considered separately by specialists in these fields, and that the site will be suitably
remediated by specialists prior to the current occupiers vacating the site.
The potential sources of contamination identified for the site and their anticipated
level of risk have been summarised below:-
- Previous uses of the site as research facilities which may have resulted in
radioactive, biological or chemical contaminants leaking into the ground or
being disposed of through drainage systems (Moderate)
- Contents of the outbuildings such as paint, thinners and fuel leaking into the
ground (Low)
- Electrical substation could result in PCBs leaking onto the site (Low)
- Sulphate and acidic soil conditions in the made ground and underlying London
Clay (Low).
The previous uses of the site with respect to individual buildings, together with
potential contaminative sources, have been discussed in detail in the reports
produced by others, précised earlier in this report. The findings of these earlier
reports have been summarised in Table 4.2.1 produced below, with additional
comments provided by RSA Geotechnics Limited. Note that asbestos containing
materials are expected within most of the buildings due to their age.
Approximate outlines of historic buildings were provided as part of the Zetica reports
and have been included on the existing site layout drawing with proposed pre-
demolition exploratory locations, appended as 14684DS/2.
The identified potential pathways for the site were considered to be:-
- direct contact
- inhalation
- ingestion
- leaching and migration via groundwater
- migration via permeable soils
- plant uptake.
- end users
- groundworkers
- Controlled Waters
- off-site receptors
- building materials
- vegetation.
The possible pollutant linkages identified from the desk study and site walkover are
shown in Table 4.2.4.
4.3 Recommendations
The site reconnaissance and desk study have identified significant potential on-site
and off-site sources of contamination. Therefore, it is recommended that an
intrusive ground investigation is undertaken to assess the level of risk posed by
these identified potential pollutant linkage pathways.
A UXO survey was conducted however certain areas were considered inaccessible
to the operatives, such as the wooded areas. These areas should be made
accessible and be surveyed by a suitably qualified specialist prior to intrusive site
works.
Based on the presence of asbestos warning labels on the buildings across the site,
it appears an initial Asbestos Survey has been conducted, however a Pre-demolition
Survey would be required prior to demolition taking place.
It was understood that buildings had been fully assessed for pathogens and
radiation at the time of the site reconnaissance and that decommissioning was being
undertaken.
A post-demolition investigation in the vicinity of the former Chemical Store and the
former Insectarium relating to the historical waste pits had been undertaken. It is
understood that remediation to remove the ‘unconventional’ ashy contamination
from the areas remains outstanding. Remediation of the ‘unconventional’
contamination within the MRCT lawn area was understood to have been completed.
Both areas will require investigation for ‘conventional’ brownfield contamination.
Japanese Knotweed, Giant Hogweed and Marestail were identified on the site.
These will require suitable specialist consideration (management/remediation) prior
to works being carried out in the impacted areas. This could involve specialist
supervision during intrusive investigation in the areas of any identified invasive
vegetation.
The aim of the intrusive investigation should be to target those areas where potential
sources of contamination have been identified and to provide general coverage of
the site. Due to access restrictions caused by the presence of services, buildings
and ongoing investigations, a phased investigation will be required; pre-demolition
and post-demolition.
analysis. The inclusion of ground gas and groundwater monitoring wells should be
included to assess the gassing regime for the site from any on-site made ground or
off-site sources. A minimum of six gas monitoring visits is recommended. This
number may need to be increased depending on the gassing conditions
encountered.
Selected soil and groundwater samples collected from the investigation should be
submitted for chemical analyses, the nature of which should be determined by the
location the samples were collected from, associated anticipated contaminants, and
from visual inspection and initial screening of the soil samples. The analytical
results should be assessed using screening values derived using current guidance
to determine if the historical and current uses of the site and nearby surrounding
area have impacted the underlying soils, and if the impacted soils pose an
unacceptable risk to end users of the development, Controlled Waters and other
identified receptors.
The remit for the investigation be extended to consider the geotechnical aspects of
the proposed development, including in-situ and laboratory testing.
The existing constructions and re-profiling on site are expected to have resulted in
significant areas of reworked ground. Further re-profiling is anticipated for the
proposed development and careful consideration will need to be given for the reuse
of site soils, with respect to creating a stable platform that will adequately support
the construction.
Suitable earthworks testing and assessment will be required at the site investigation
stage. High plasticity clays can be challenging to work successfully, therefore piled
Deeper boreholes should be drilled using cable percussion methods to identify the
ground conditions at depth beneath the site. Piled foundations may be necessary
due to the proximity of mature trees and the presence of potentially highly shrinkable
London Clay. The geotechnical testing and sampling from the boreholes should be
designed to inform the design of foundations, floors and retaining structures for the
proposed development. The works should include initial assessment of slope
stability, given the variation in level across the site, and should take account of
existing and proposed levels and loadings.
Discussion of the geotechnical aspects would then be included within the pre-
demolition investigation interpretative report, to provide information for use in the
design of the scheme.
The limitations inherent in site investigation mean that a detailed Watching Brief will
be required to be maintained throughout the development, with specialists available
as necessary to advise on any unexpected discoveries. Particular attention should
be given to significant sources, such as fuel tanks, chemical stores, electricity
substations, incinerators, waste areas, Ejector House, etc. The chemical waste pits
are indicated to represent local ‘hotspots’ of contamination, therefore present an
ongoing risk of encountering such pits and associated impact.
Any fuel or chemical storage facilities and associated infrastructure will require
careful emptying and decommissioning prior to any works on site.
Flexible surfacing, ash waste and other such materials will need to be segregated
for disposal purposes, and special requirements for waste disposal may apply.
Any identified watercourses, including the Folly Brook will need to be adequately
protected from surface runoff during any works.
5. CONCLUSIONS
The desk study has revealed that the site in its current condition could pose a
potential risk to identified site receptors, as a significant number of potential
contaminative sources have been identified across the site. Therefore
recommendations have been made for a phased intrusive geoenvironmental and
geotechnical ground investigation (pre-demolition and post-demolition) to assess the
risks posed by the site in terms of the proposed development, as detailed in
subsection 4.3. The investigation would inform the assessment of contaminated
land, and geotechnical aspects of the scheme. Radiological and pathogen risks will
be assessed independently by specialists in these fields.
At the time of the production of this report a pre-demolition site investigation was
being undertaken by RSA Geotechnics, the findings of which will be reported in due
course.
Advice and recommendations given in this report have been based on the site
reconnaissance, the findings of the Landmark Envirocheck report and the review of
publicly available records and maps, and third party data provided by the Client for
review. It must be appreciated that no intrusive investigation was undertaken as
part of this report.
A M PHILLIPS, FGS
Technical Director
Site Details:
The National Institute for Medical Research
The Ridgeway, Mill Hill
LONDON
NW7 1AA
Client Details:
Mr L Stockdale
RSA Geotechnics Ltd
Ashburnham House
1 Maitland Road
Lion Barn Estate
Needham Market
Suffolk
IP6 8NZ
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Contents
Summary -
Waste 16
Hazardous Substances -
Geological 17
Data Currency 31
Data Suppliers 36
Useful Contacts 37
Introduction
The Environment Act 1995 has made site sensitivity a key issue, as the legislation pays as much attention to the pathways by which
contamination could spread, and to the vulnerable targets of contamination, as it does the potential sources of contamination.
For this reason, Landmark's Site Sensitivity maps and Datasheet(s) place great emphasis on statutory data provided by the Environment
Agency/Natural Resources Wales and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency; it also incorporates data from Natural England (and the
Scottish and Welsh equivalents) and Local Authorities; and highlights hydrogeological features required by environmental and geotechnical
consultants. It does not include any information concerning past uses of land. The datasheet is produced by querying the Landmark database
to a distance defined by the client from a site boundary provided by the client.
In the attached datasheet the National Grid References (NGRs) are rounded to the nearest 10m in accordance with Landmark's agreements
with a number of Data Suppliers.
Copyright Notice
© Landmark Information Group Limited 2017. The Copyright on the information and data and its format as contained in this Envirocheck®
Report ("Report") is the property of Landmark Information Group Limited ("Landmark") and several other Data Providers, including (but not
limited to) Ordnance Survey, British Geological Survey, the Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales and Natural England, and must not
be reproduced in whole or in part by photocopying or any other method. The Report is supplied under Landmark's Terms and Conditions
accepted by the Customer.
A copy of Landmark's Terms and Conditions can be found with the Index Map for this report. Additional copies of the Report may be obtained
from Landmark, subject to Landmark's charges in force from time to time. The Copyright, design rights and any other intellectual rights shall
remain the exclusive property of Landmark and /or other Data providers, whose Copyright material has been included in this Report.
Site of Special Scientific Interest, National Nature Reserve, Ramsar, Special Protection Area, Special Conservation Area, Marine Nature
Reserve data (derived from Ordnance Survey 1:10000 raster) is provided by, and used with the permission of, Natural England who retain the
copyright and Intellectual Property Rights for the data.
The Data provided in this report was obtained on Licence from Ove Arup & Partners Limited (for further information, contact
mining.review@arup.com). No reproduction or further use of such Data is to be made without the prior written consent of Ove Arup & Partners
Limited. The information and data supplied in the product are derived from publicly available records and other third party sources and neither
Ove Arup & Partners nor Landmark warrant the accuracy or completeness of such information or data.
The cavity data presented has been extracted from the PBA enhanced version of the original DEFRA national cavity databases. PBA/DEFRA
retain the copyright & intellectual property rights in the data. Whilst all reasonable efforts are made to check that the information contained in
the cavity databases is accurate we do not warrant that the data is complete or error free. The information is based upon our own researches
and those collated from a number of external sources and is continually being augmented and updated by PBA. In no event shall PBA/DEFRA
or Landmark be liable for any loss or damage including, without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage arising from the use of this
data.
Information supplied from a joint dataset compiled by The British Geological Survey and Public Health England.
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Summary
Page 501 to 1000m
Data Type Number
On Site 0 to 250m 251 to 500m
(*up to 2000m)
Discharge Consents pg 1 1 1 3
River Quality
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Summary
Page 501 to 1000m
Data Type Number
On Site 0 to 250m 251 to 500m
(*up to 2000m)
Waste
BGS Recorded Landfill Sites
Hazardous Substances
Control of Major Accident Hazards Sites (COMAH)
Explosive Sites
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Summary
Page 501 to 1000m
Data Type Number
On Site 0 to 250m 251 to 500m
(*up to 2000m)
Geological
BGS 1:625,000 Solid Geology pg 17 Yes n/a n/a n/a
Natural Cavities
Potential for Landslide Ground Stability Hazards pg 21 Yes Yes n/a n/a
Potential for Running Sand Ground Stability Hazards pg 21 Yes n/a n/a
Potential for Shrinking or Swelling Clay Ground Stability Hazards pg 21 Yes n/a n/a
Gas Pipelines
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Summary
Page 501 to 1000m
Data Type Number
On Site 0 to 250m 251 to 500m
(*up to 2000m)
Forest Parks
National Parks
Ramsar Sites
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Agency & Hydrological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 1 of 37
Agency & Hydrological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Discharge Consents
4 Operator: Seafield Corporation C/O Sllb Architects A12SW 649 3 524166
Property Type: DOMESTIC PROPERTY (SINGLE) (INCL FARM HOUSE) (E) 192322
Location: Seafield House Partingdale Lane Mill Hill London Nw7 1ns
Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region
Catchment Area: Brent
Reference: Canm.1071
Permit Version: 2
Effective Date: 21st December 2012
Issued Date: 21st December 2012
Revocation Date: Not Supplied
Discharge Type: Sewage Discharges - Final/Treated Effluent - Not Water Company
Discharge Into Land
Environment:
Receiving Water: Groundwater Via A Soakaway
Status: Varied under EPR 2010
Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m
Discharge Consents
4 Operator: Seafield Corporation C/O Sllb Architects A12SW 649 3 524166
Property Type: DOMESTIC PROPERTY (SINGLE) (INCL FARM HOUSE) (E) 192322
Location: Seafield House Partingdale Lane Mill Hill London Nw7 1ns
Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region
Catchment Area: Brent
Reference: Canm.1071
Permit Version: 1
Effective Date: 10th August 2007
Issued Date: 10th August 2007
Revocation Date: 20th December 2012
Discharge Type: Sewage Discharges - Final/Treated Effluent - Not Water Company
Discharge Into Land
Environment:
Receiving Water: Groundwater Via A Soakaway
Status: New Consent (Water Resources Act 1991, Section 88 & Schedule 10 as
amended by Environment Act 1995)
Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m
Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Controls
5 Name: Watch Tower A11SE 457 4 523815
Location: IBSA House, Ridgeway, LONDON, NW7 1RN (SE) 192129
Authority: London Borough of Barnet, Environmental Health Department
Permit Reference: PPC18
Dated: 8th January 1999
Process Type: Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Control
Description: PG6/16 Printworks
Status: Permitted
Positional Accuracy: Manually positioned to the address or location
Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Controls
6 Name: Foreva Dry Cleaners A6SE 916 4 523162
Location: 5 Salcombe Gardens, Mill Hill, London, NW7 2NU (S) 191532
Authority: London Borough of Barnet, Environmental Health Department
Permit Reference: PPCDC018
Dated: 20th April 2006
Process Type: Local Authority Pollution Prevention and Control
Description: PG6/46 Dry cleaning
Status: Permitted
Positional Accuracy: Manually positioned to the address or location
Nearest Surface Water Feature
A10NE 0 - 523347
(N) 192743
Pollution Incidents to Controlled Waters
7 Property Type: Not Given A10NE 0 3 523170
Location: The Ridgeway, MILL HILL (NW) 192650
Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region
Pollutant: Oils - Unknown
Note: Not Supplied
Incident Date: 3rd February 1997
Incident Reference: THN11997030980
Catchment Area: Not Given
Receiving Water: Not Given
Cause of Incident: Not Given
Incident Severity: Category 3 - Minor Incident
Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 2 of 37
Agency & Hydrological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 3 of 37
Agency & Hydrological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 4 of 37
Agency & Hydrological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 5 of 37
Agency & Hydrological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 6 of 37
Agency & Hydrological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Water Abstractions
16 Operator: International Bible Students Association A11SW 243 3 523500
Licence Number: 28/39/38/0034 (SE) 192200
Permit Version: 100
Location: Borehole At Watch Tower House, The Ridgeway, London. Nw7
Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region
Abstraction: Schools And Colleges: Drinking; Cooking; Sanitary; Washing; (Small Garden)
Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point
Source: Groundwater
Daily Rate (m3): 436
Yearly Rate (m3): 50006
Details: Watch Tower House, The Ridgeway, London. Nw7
Authorised Start: 01 January
Authorised End: 31 December
Permit Start Date: 21st December 1990
Permit End Date: Not Supplied
Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m
Water Abstractions
16 Operator: International Bible Students Association A11SW 243 3 523500
Licence Number: 28/39/38/0034 (SE) 192200
Permit Version: 100
Location: Borehole At Watch Tower House, The Ridgeway, London. Nw7
Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region
Abstraction: Schools and Colleges: Spray Irrigation - Direct
Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point
Source: Groundwater
Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied
Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied
Details: Watch Tower House, The Ridgeway, London. Nw7
Authorised Start: 01 May
Authorised End: 30 September
Permit Start Date: 21st December 1990
Permit End Date: Not Supplied
Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m
Water Abstractions
16 Operator: International Bible Students Association A11SW 279 3 523480
Licence Number: 28/39/38/0034 (S) 192160
Permit Version: 101
Location: Watch Tower House, The Ridgeway- Borehole A
Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region
Abstraction: Schools and Colleges: Spray Irrigation - Direct
Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point
Source: Groundwater
Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied
Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied
Details: Watch Tower House, The Ridgeway, London. Nw7
Authorised Start: 01 May
Authorised End: 30 September
Permit Start Date: 13th February 2003
Permit End Date: Not Supplied
Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m
Water Abstractions
16 Operator: International Bible Students Association A11SW 279 3 523480
Licence Number: 28/39/38/0034 (S) 192160
Permit Version: 101
Location: Watch Tower House, The Ridgeway- Borehole A
Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region
Abstraction: Schools And Colleges: Drinking; Cooking; Sanitary; Washing; (Small Garden)
Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point
Source: Groundwater
Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied
Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied
Details: Watch Tower House, The Ridgeway, London. Nw7
Authorised Start: 01 January
Authorised End: 31 December
Permit Start Date: 13th February 2003
Permit End Date: Not Supplied
Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 7 of 37
Agency & Hydrological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Water Abstractions
Operator: Anglian Water Services Limited A3NE 1148 3 523870
Licence Number: 28/39/38/0041 (SE) 191370
Permit Version: 1
Location: Borehole 'A' At Bittacy Hill, Mill Hill
Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region
Abstraction: Public Water Supply: Potable Water Supply - Direct
Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point
Source: Groundwater
Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied
Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied
Details: Bittacy Hill, Mill Hill
Authorised Start: 01 January
Authorised End: 31 December
Permit Start Date: 27th September 2001
Permit End Date: Not Supplied
Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m
Water Abstractions
Operator: The Trustees Of Hendon Golf Club A2NE 1164 3 523361
Licence Number: Th/039/0038/016 (S) 191269
Permit Version: 1
Location: Borehole At Hendon Golf Club
Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region
Abstraction: Golf Courses: Spray Irrigation - Direct
Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point
Source: Groundwater
Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied
Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied
Details: Hendon Golf Club, Ashley Walk, Mill Hill, London.
Authorised Start: 01 April
Authorised End: 31 October
Permit Start Date: 3rd April 2013
Permit End Date: Not Supplied
Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m
Water Abstractions
Operator: Trustees Of Hendon Golf Club A2NE 1173 3 523360
Licence Number: 28/39/38/0046 (S) 191260
Permit Version: 1
Location: Hendon Golf Club- Borehole
Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region
Abstraction: Golf Courses: Spray Irrigation - Direct
Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point
Source: Groundwater
Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied
Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied
Details: Hendon Golf Club, Saunders Lane, Mill Hill, London.
Authorised Start: 01 April
Authorised End: 31 October
Permit Start Date: 8th September 2005
Permit End Date: Not Supplied
Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m
Water Abstractions
Operator: Trustees Of Hendon Golf Club A2NE 1173 3 523360
Licence Number: 28/39/38/0036 (S) 191260
Permit Version: 100
Location: Borehole At Hendon Golf Club, Sanders Lane, Mill Hill
Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region
Abstraction: Golf Courses: Spray Irrigation - Direct
Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point
Source: Groundwater
Daily Rate (m3): 100
Yearly Rate (m3): 10000
Details: Hendon Goldf Club, Sanders Lane, Mill Hill
Authorised Start: 01 April
Authorised End: 31 October
Permit Start Date: 7th July 1997
Permit End Date: Not Supplied
Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 8 of 37
Agency & Hydrological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Water Abstractions
Operator: Finchley Golf Club Limited A8SE 1357 3 524600
Licence Number: Th/039/0038/017 (SE) 191650
Permit Version: 1
Location: Borehole At Finchley Golf Club, Nether Court, Mill Hill
Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region
Abstraction: Golf Courses: Spray Irrigation - Direct
Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point
Source: Groundwater
Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied
Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied
Details: Finchley Golf Club, Nether Court, Frith Lane, Mill Hill, London.
Authorised Start: 01 April
Authorised End: 31 March
Permit Start Date: 9th May 2013
Permit End Date: Not Supplied
Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m
Water Abstractions
Operator: Finchley Golf Club Limited A8SE 1357 3 524600
Licence Number: 28/39/38/0045 (SE) 191650
Permit Version: 1
Location: Borehole At Finchley Golf Club, Nether Court, Mill Hill
Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region
Abstraction: Golf Courses: Spray Irrigation - Direct
Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point
Source: Groundwater
Daily Rate (m3): Not Supplied
Yearly Rate (m3): Not Supplied
Details: Finchley Golf Club, Nether Court, Frith Lane, Mill Hill, London.
Authorised Start: 01 April
Authorised End: 31 October
Permit Start Date: 1st April 2008
Permit End Date: Not Supplied
Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m
Water Abstractions
Operator: Finchley Golf Club Limited A8SE 1357 3 524600
Licence Number: 28/39/38/0038 (SE) 191650
Permit Version: 100
Location: Borehole At Finchley Golf Club, Nether Court, Mill Hill
Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region
Abstraction: Golf Courses: Spray Irrigation - Direct
Abstraction Type: Water may be abstracted from a single point
Source: Groundwater
Daily Rate (m3): 180
Yearly Rate (m3): 15000
Details: Finchley Golf Club, Nether Court, Mill Hill
Authorised Start: 01 April
Authorised End: 31 October
Permit Start Date: 25th November 1998
Permit End Date: Not Supplied
Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m
Groundwater Vulnerability
Soil Classification: Soils of High Leaching Potential (U) - Soil information for restored mineral A10NE 0 3 523356
workings and urban areas is based on fewer observations than elsewhere. A (SW) 192537
worst case vulnerability classification (H) assumed, until proved otherwise
Map Sheet: Sheet 39 West London
Scale: 1:100,000
Groundwater Vulnerability
Soil Classification: Not classified A10NE 0 3 523368
Map Sheet: Sheet 39 West London (N) 192572
Scale: 1:100,000
Drift Deposits
None
Bedrock Aquifer Designations
Aquifer Designation: Secondary Aquifer - A A10NE 0 2 523356
(SW) 192537
Bedrock Aquifer Designations
Aquifer Designation: Unproductive Strata A10NE 0 2 523376
(NE) 192578
Superficial Aquifer Designations
Aquifer Designation: Secondary Aquifer - A A10NE 0 2 523325
(SW) 192507
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 9 of 37
Agency & Hydrological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 10 of 37
Agency & Hydrological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 11 of 37
Agency & Hydrological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 12 of 37
Agency & Hydrological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 13 of 37
Agency & Hydrological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 14 of 37
Agency & Hydrological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 15 of 37
Waste
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 16 of 37
Geological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 17 of 37
Geological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 18 of 37
Geological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 19 of 37
Geological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 20 of 37
Geological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 21 of 37
Industrial Land Use
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 22 of 37
Industrial Land Use
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 23 of 37
Industrial Land Use
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 24 of 37
Industrial Land Use
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 25 of 37
Industrial Land Use
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 26 of 37
Industrial Land Use
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 27 of 37
Industrial Land Use
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 28 of 37
Industrial Land Use
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 29 of 37
Sensitive Land Use
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 30 of 37
Data Currency
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 31 of 37
Data Currency
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 32 of 37
Data Currency
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 33 of 37
Data Currency
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 34 of 37
Data Currency
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 35 of 37
Data Suppliers
A selection of organisations who provide data within this report
Ordnance Survey
Environment Agency
Natural England
Ove Arup
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 36 of 37
Useful Contacts
Contact Name and Address Contact Details
- Public Health England - Radon Survey, Centre for Telephone: 01235 822622
Fax: 01235 833891
Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Email: radon@phe.gov.uk
Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0RQ Website: www.ukradon.org
Please note that the Environment Agency / Natural Resources Wales / SEPA have a charging policy in place for enquiries.
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 37 of 37
Envirocheck ® Report:
Datasheet
Order Details:
Order Number:
110527388_1_1
Customer Reference:
14684DS
National Grid Reference:
523300, 193770
Slice:
B
Site Area (Ha):
18.62
Search Buffer (m):
1000
Site Details:
The National Institute for Medical Research
The Ridgeway, Mill Hill
LONDON
NW7 1AA
Client Details:
Mr L Stockdale
RSA Geotechnics Ltd
Ashburnham House
1 Maitland Road
Lion Barn Estate
Needham Market
Suffolk
IP6 8NZ
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Contents
Summary -
Waste 4
Hazardous Substances -
Geological 5
Data Currency 10
Data Suppliers 16
Useful Contacts 17
Introduction
The Environment Act 1995 has made site sensitivity a key issue, as the legislation pays as much attention to the pathways by which
contamination could spread, and to the vulnerable targets of contamination, as it does the potential sources of contamination.
For this reason, Landmark's Site Sensitivity maps and Datasheet(s) place great emphasis on statutory data provided by the Environment
Agency/Natural Resources Wales and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency; it also incorporates data from Natural England (and the
Scottish and Welsh equivalents) and Local Authorities; and highlights hydrogeological features required by environmental and geotechnical
consultants. It does not include any information concerning past uses of land. The datasheet is produced by querying the Landmark database
to a distance defined by the client from a site boundary provided by the client.
In the attached datasheet the National Grid References (NGRs) are rounded to the nearest 10m in accordance with Landmark's agreements
with a number of Data Suppliers.
Copyright Notice
© Landmark Information Group Limited 2017. The Copyright on the information and data and its format as contained in this Envirocheck®
Report ("Report") is the property of Landmark Information Group Limited ("Landmark") and several other Data Providers, including (but not
limited to) Ordnance Survey, British Geological Survey, the Environment Agency/Natural Resources Wales and Natural England, and must not
be reproduced in whole or in part by photocopying or any other method. The Report is supplied under Landmark's Terms and Conditions
accepted by the Customer.
A copy of Landmark's Terms and Conditions can be found with the Index Map for this report. Additional copies of the Report may be obtained
from Landmark, subject to Landmark's charges in force from time to time. The Copyright, design rights and any other intellectual rights shall
remain the exclusive property of Landmark and /or other Data providers, whose Copyright material has been included in this Report.
Site of Special Scientific Interest, National Nature Reserve, Ramsar, Special Protection Area, Special Conservation Area, Marine Nature
Reserve data (derived from Ordnance Survey 1:10000 raster) is provided by, and used with the permission of, Natural England who retain the
copyright and Intellectual Property Rights for the data.
The Data provided in this report was obtained on Licence from Ove Arup & Partners Limited (for further information, contact
mining.review@arup.com). No reproduction or further use of such Data is to be made without the prior written consent of Ove Arup & Partners
Limited. The information and data supplied in the product are derived from publicly available records and other third party sources and neither
Ove Arup & Partners nor Landmark warrant the accuracy or completeness of such information or data.
The cavity data presented has been extracted from the PBA enhanced version of the original DEFRA national cavity databases. PBA/DEFRA
retain the copyright & intellectual property rights in the data. Whilst all reasonable efforts are made to check that the information contained in
the cavity databases is accurate we do not warrant that the data is complete or error free. The information is based upon our own researches
and those collated from a number of external sources and is continually being augmented and updated by PBA. In no event shall PBA/DEFRA
or Landmark be liable for any loss or damage including, without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage arising from the use of this
data.
Information supplied from a joint dataset compiled by The British Geological Survey and Public Health England.
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Summary
Page 501 to 1000m
Data Type Number
On Site 0 to 250m 251 to 500m
(*up to 2000m)
Discharge Consents pg 1 6
River Quality
Water Abstractions
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Summary
Page 501 to 1000m
Data Type Number
On Site 0 to 250m 251 to 500m
(*up to 2000m)
Waste
BGS Recorded Landfill Sites
Hazardous Substances
Control of Major Accident Hazards Sites (COMAH)
Explosive Sites
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Summary
Page 501 to 1000m
Data Type Number
On Site 0 to 250m 251 to 500m
(*up to 2000m)
Geological
BGS 1:625,000 Solid Geology pg 5 Yes n/a n/a n/a
Natural Cavities
Potential for Shrinking or Swelling Clay Ground Stability Hazards pg 6 Yes n/a n/a
Gas Pipelines
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Summary
Page 501 to 1000m
Data Type Number
On Site 0 to 250m 251 to 500m
(*up to 2000m)
Forest Parks
National Parks
Ramsar Sites
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service
Agency & Hydrological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 1 of 17
Agency & Hydrological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Discharge Consents
3 Operator: Oliver And Saunders (Developments0 Ltd. B2NW 947 3 522940
Property Type: DOMESTIC PROPERTY (SINGLE) (INCL FARM HOUSE) (NW) 194050
Location: 40 Totteridge Common Totteridge London London London N20 8nd
Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region
Catchment Area: Brent
Reference: Canm.0116
Permit Version: 1
Effective Date: 8th March 2000
Issued Date: 13th March 2000
Revocation Date: Not Supplied
Discharge Type: Sewage Discharges - Final/Treated Effluent - Not Water Company
Discharge Freshwater Stream/River
Environment:
Receiving Water: Dollis Brook
Status: New Consent (Water Resources Act 1991, Section 88 & Schedule 10 as
amended by Environment Act 1995)
Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m
Discharge Consents
3 Operator: Mr And Mrs M Levy B2NW 985 3 522940
Property Type: DOMESTIC PROPERTY (SINGLE) (INCL FARM HOUSE) (NW) 194090
Location: No. 42 Totteridge Common Totteridge London N20 8nd
Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region
Catchment Area: Brent
Reference: Canm.0110
Permit Version: 1
Effective Date: 28th March 2000
Issued Date: 30th March 2000
Revocation Date: Not Supplied
Discharge Type: Sewage Discharges - Final/Treated Effluent - Not Water Company
Discharge Freshwater Stream/River
Environment:
Receiving Water: Dollis Brook
Status: New Consent (Water Resources Act 1991, Section 88 & Schedule 10 as
amended by Environment Act 1995)
Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 10m
Discharge Consents
4 Operator: Mr And Mrs M. Most B3NW 999 3 523700
Property Type: DOMESTIC PROPERTY (SINGLE) (INCL FARM HOUSE) (NE) 194100
Location: Montebello, 19 Totteridge Common, London
Authority: Environment Agency, Thames Region
Catchment Area: Not Given
Reference: Ctwc.1682
Permit Version: 1
Effective Date: 9th June 1987
Issued Date: 9th June 1987
Revocation Date: 18th September 1996
Discharge Type: Discharge Of Other Matter-Surface Water
Discharge Freshwater Stream/River
Environment:
Receiving Water: Tributary Offolly Brook
Status: Authorisation revokedRevoked
Positional Accuracy: Located by supplier to within 100m
Nearest Surface Water Feature
B2SE 281 - 523171
(SW) 193543
Groundwater Vulnerability
Soil Classification: Soils of High Leaching Potential (U) - Soil information for restored mineral (SW) 0 3 522467
workings and urban areas is based on fewer observations than elsewhere. A 193056
worst case vulnerability classification (H) assumed, until proved otherwise
Map Sheet: Sheet 39 West London
Scale: 1:100,000
Groundwater Vulnerability
Soil Classification: Not classified B2SE 0 3 523290
Map Sheet: Sheet 39 West London (S) 193727
Scale: 1:100,000
Drift Deposits
None
Bedrock Aquifer Designations
Aquifer Designation: Secondary Aquifer - A (SW) 0 2 522637
192912
Bedrock Aquifer Designations
Aquifer Designation: Unproductive Strata B2SE 0 2 523289
(W) 193766
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 2 of 17
Agency & Hydrological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 3 of 17
Waste
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 4 of 17
Geological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 5 of 17
Geological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 6 of 17
Geological
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 7 of 17
Industrial Land Use
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 8 of 17
Sensitive Land Use
Quadrant
Reference Estimated
Map
Details (Compass Distance Contact NGR
ID
Direction) From Site
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 9 of 17
Data Currency
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 10 of 17
Data Currency
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 11 of 17
Data Currency
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 12 of 17
Data Currency
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 13 of 17
Data Currency
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 14 of 17
Data Currency
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 15 of 17
Data Suppliers
A selection of organisations who provide data within this report
Ordnance Survey
Environment Agency
Natural England
Ove Arup
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 16 of 17
Useful Contacts
Contact Name and Address Contact Details
9 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Telephone: 0113 2613333
Fax: 0113 230 0879
(DEFRA - formerly FRCA)
Government Buildings, Otley Road, Lawnswood, Leeds, West Yorkshire,
LS16 5QT
- Public Health England - Radon Survey, Centre for Telephone: 01235 822622
Fax: 01235 833891
Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Email: radon@phe.gov.uk
Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0RQ Website: www.ukradon.org
Please note that the Environment Agency / Natural Resources Wales / SEPA have a charging policy in place for enquiries.
Order Number: 110527388_1_1 Date: 16-Jan-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v50.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 17 of 17
Geology 1:50,000 Maps Legends
Artificial Ground and Landslip
Geology 1:50,000 Maps
Map Lex Code Rock Name Rock Type Min and Max Age
This report contains geological map extracts taken from the BGS Digital
Colour Geological map of Great Britain at 1:50,000 scale and is designed for users
carrying out preliminary site assessments who require geological maps for
WGR Worked Ground Void Holocene - the area around the site. This mapping may be more up to date than
(Undivided) Holocene previously published paper maps.
The various geological layers - artificial and landslip deposits, superficial
MGR Made Ground (Undivided) Artificial Deposit Holocene -
geology and solid (bedrock) geology are displayed in separate maps, but
Holocene superimposed on the final 'Combined Surface Geology' map. All map
SLIP Landslide Deposit Unknown/Unclassif Quaternary - legends feature on this page. Not all layers have complete nationwide
ied Entry Quaternary coverage, so availability of data for relevant map sheets is indicated below.
Geology 1:50,000 Maps Coverage
Superficial Geology
Map ID: 1
Map Sheet No: 256
Map Name: North London
Map Date: 2006
Map Lex Code Rock Name Rock Type Min and Max Age Bedrock Geology: Available
Colour Superficial Geology: Available
Artificial Geology: Available
Faults: Not Supplied
ALV Alluvium Clay, Silt, Sand Flandrian - Landslip: Available
and Gravel Flandrian Rock Segments: Not Supplied
DHGR Dollis Hill Gravel Member Sand and Gravel Anglian - Cromerian
Order Details:
Order Number: 110527388_1_1
Customer Reference: 14684DS
National Grid Reference: 523360, 192540
Slice: A
Site Area (Ha): 18.62
Search Buffer (m): 1000
Site Details:
The National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill,
LONDON, NW7 1AA
Order Details:
Order Number: 110527388_1_1
Customer Reference: 14684DS
National Grid Reference: 523360, 192540
Slice: A
Site Area (Ha): 18.62
Search Buffer (m): 1000
Site Details:
The National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill,
LONDON, NW7 1AA
Order Details:
Order Number: 110527388_1_1
Customer Reference: 14684DS
National Grid Reference: 523360, 192540
Slice: A
Site Area (Ha): 18.62
Search Buffer (m): 1000
Site Details:
The National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill,
LONDON, NW7 1AA
The bedrock has formed over vast lengths of geological time ranging from
ancient and highly altered rocks of the Proterozoic, some 2500 million years
ago, or older, up to the relatively young Pliocene, 1.8 million years ago.
The bedrock geology includes many lithologies, often classified into three
types based on origin: igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary.
The BGS Faults and Rock Segments dataset includes geological faults
(e.g. normal, thrust), and thin beds mapped as lines (e.g. coal seam,
gypsum bed). Some of these are linked to other particular 1:50,000
Geology datasets, for example, coal seams are part of the bedrock
sequence, most faults and mineral veins primarily affect the bedrock but cut
across the strata and post date its deposition.
Order Details:
Order Number: 110527388_1_1
Customer Reference: 14684DS
National Grid Reference: 523360, 192540
Slice: A
Site Area (Ha): 18.62
Search Buffer (m): 1000
Site Details:
The National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill,
LONDON, NW7 1AA