Department of Education

Region X
Division of Bukidnon
Bukidnon National School of Home Industries
Maramag, Bukidnon

Name of Ratee EUFROCINO T. MANGINSAY 66 CHARLYN N. SABARES

Position TEACHER I Position: HEAD TEACHER III
Review Period JUNE 2017-MARCH 2018 Date of APRIL, 2018
Division DIVISION OF BUKIDNON - DEPED REVIEW

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUAT

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
1.Prepared well-constructed plans( LP)/ Daily Lesson 5-OUTSTANDING.Has met the five(5)
Log( DLL) reflecting the following characteristics of a LP/DLL
characteristics: 4-Very Satisfactory.Has met the
a. five parts 15% four(4)characteristics of a LP/DLL
b.Objective is SMART,based on the desired learning JUNE 2017-MARCH 3- Satisfactory.Has met the three(3)
competencies 2018 characteristics of a LP/DLL
c. With desired learning competencies 2- UnSatisfactory.Has met the two(2)
d. Based on budget work characteristics of a LP/DLL
e. Use appropriate and updated IMs 1-Poor.Has met the one(1) characteristics
of a LP/DLL
1. Teaching- 2.Facilitated learning in the school through functional 5-OUTSTANDING.Has met the five(5)
Learning Process daily logs and innovative teaching strategies such as:

a. Group Reporting characteristics of Facilitated Learning

b. Experiential Learning Strategies 4-Very Satisfactory.Has met the four(4)
c.Cooperative Learning Strategies characteristics of a Facilitaed Learning
d.Information and Communication Technology(ICT) JUNE 2017-MARCH 15% 3- Satisfactory.Has met the three(3)
integration (i.e. PPT etc.) 2018 characteristics of Facilitated Learning
 JUNE 2017-MARCH
2018
e.Provision of individualized interaction ( Oral Recitation) 2- Unsatisfactory.Has met the two(2)

f. Making mini- research characteristics of Facilitated Learning

1-Poor.Has met one(1) characteristics of
Facilitated Learning
1. Monitored evaluated and maintained students' 5-OUTSTANDING.Presence of all five(5)
progress evidences
Required Evidences: 4-Very Satisfactory. Presence of four(4)
a.Class Record/E-Class Record evidences
b.Learners Portfolio JUNE 2017-MARCH 10% 3- Satisfactory. Presence of three (3)
c.Table of Specificatios (TOS) of Test Questions(TQ) 2018 evidences
d. Item Analysis Reports 2- UnSatisfactory. Presence of two (2)
e. Pre- test and Post test were administered and analyzed evidences

1-Poor. Presence of one( 1)evidence

2.Monitored attendance of students 5-OUTSTANDING.Presence of all five(5)
Required Evidences: evidences
a. Attendance Sheet 4-Very Satisfactory. Presence of four(4)
evidences
2.Learners Outcomes JUNE 2017-MARCH 3- Satisfactory. Presence of three (3)
2018 10% evidences
2- UnSatisfactory. Presence of two (2)
evidences
1-Poor. Presence of one( 1)evidence

3. Analyzed Learners' Performance 5-OUTSTANDING.Presence of all five(5)

Required Evdences: evidences
a. MPS Result 4-Very Satisfactory. Presence of four(4)
b. Failure Rate evidences
JUNE 2017-MARCH
c. Reports on Students' Performance 10% 3- Satisfactory. Presence of three (3)
2018
e.List of intervention Materials evidences
2- UnSatisfactory. Presence of two (2)
evidences
1-Poor. Presence of one( 1)evidence
1. Conducted regular/periodic PTA meetings and 5-Outstanding*Presence of all five(5)

JUNE 2017-MARCH
 conferences: (1st Semester) evidences
a. Notice/letter to parents/guardians 4-VS*Presence of all four(4) evidences
JUNE 2017-MARCH
b.Agenda/Schedule 10% 3- Satisfactory. Presence of three (3)
2018
c.Minutes of the meeting evidences
d.Attendance Record duly signed by attendees 2-US* Presence of two (2) evidences
e.Documentation 1-P* Presence of one( 1)evidence
3. Community 2.Visited parents of students needing academic 5-OUTSTANDING.Presence of all five(5)
Development monitoring/ follow -up evidences
Required Evidences 4-Very Satisfactory. Presence of four(4)
a. Home Visitation Form evidences
JUNE 2017-MARCH
b. Pictures/official documentation 3- Satisfactory. Presence of three (3)
2018
3. Participated in community activities 10% evidences
a. aAnti- Dengue Drive 2- UnSatisfactory. Presence of two (2)
b. Natuonal Clean up Drive evidences
1-Poor. Presence of one( 1)evidence
1. Conducted Action Research classroom-based focusing on 5-OS* Conducted one ( 1) duly
-negative learning environment approved and adopted action research by
-learning behavior the school
4-VS*Conducted one(1) action research
duly approved by the school principal
JUNE 2017-MARCH
5% 3-S* submitted proposal to the division office
2018
duly recommended by the school principal
2.-US* identified problem focusing negative
learning environment, learning behavior and
increased performance of students
1-P* Never conducted any action
2. Earned relevant professional trainings, earned units 5-OS*Earned at least 30 units in PhD degree
4.Professional 4-VS*Earned at least 27 units in PhD degree
or graduated from a higher relevant degree.
Growth and JUNE 2017-MARCH
Development 5% 3-S*Earned at least 18 units in PhD degree
2018
2-US*Earned at least 9 units in PhD degree
1-P*Earned at least 6 units in PhD degree
3. Attended trainings, seminars,workshops , or 5-Oustanding.Atleast one(1) training /
conferences seminar abroad
Required Evidences: 4-Very Satisfactory. At least one(1) national
a. Certificate of Appearance/Participation and Regional seminar/training/conference
JUNE 2017-MARCH
2018
b. Pictures/official documentation
c. Travel Order (if any)
d. Memorandum (if any)
JUNE 2017-MARCH 3-Satisfactory. Atleast one(1) school
2018 10% seminar/training/conference
2-Unsatisfactory. At least one (1) school
seminar/training/conference
1-Poor. No Seminar/training/conference
attended

OVER-ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT

TOTAL (Excluding Plus Factor) 100%
VERY SATISFACTORY

* MTAP- DEPED MATH

CHALLENGE DIVISION
ORAL CHAMPION (GRADE
9)
* SERVED AS
PLUS FACTOR COOPERATING TEACHER 5%
*SERVED AS
CURRICULUM CHAIRMAN
IN THE SHS (FIRST SEM)
* ASSIST HT IN THE
SCHOOL PROGRAM

OVER-ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT

GRAND TOTAL
OUTSTANDING

EUFROCINO T. MANGINSAY CHARLYN N. SABARES

Ratee Rater
NOTED:
ROLISA T. BENEDICTO, Ph.D.
Secondary School Principal II
RING EVALUATION

ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING SCORE
Q E T

3 3 3 3.00 0.45

4 4 4 4 0.6
5 5 5 5 0.5

4 4 5 4.3333333 0.433333

3 3 3 3.00 0.30
3 3 5 3.6666667 0.366667

3 3 4 3.3333333 0.333333

3 3 5 3.6666667 0.183333

3 4 4 3.6666667 0.183333
 3 4 4 3.67 0.37

34 36 42 37.333333 3.72
Weighted
Average 37.33
Mean

RY
3.72

0.19

ESSMENT
3.90

N. SABARES
ater
 Adjectival Rating Scale
Outstanding
4.500 - 5.000
Very Satisfactory
3.500 - 4.499
Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499
Unsatisfactory
1.500 - 2.499
Poor 1.000 - 1.499