Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, I fear being indefinitely to life illegally incarcerated,
Qualifiedly Murdered and incidentally Tortured, Bodily Harmed as I’ve objectivized it’s the mafia’s
intent to an effect in section I.A.II.1.3.1.5 at any time and therefore be unable to lodge this penal
complaint completed to ICC, I’m submitting the sufficiently proven short version, adding more about the
criminal activity of the Romanian “state” mafia in time. Sections enclosed in “<>” while pointing to
sufficient relevant information are work in progress meaning I will expand upon
Mr. Prosecutor,
I, the undersigned with first name Tudor-Andrei, last name Raneti, mother’s name Mariana,
father’s name Viorel, legally domiciled in Bucharest, sector 3, Theodor Pallady boulevard, no 2, M2A
apartment block, entrance B, 6th floor, 61th apartment, where I don’t live since 2009 – so don’t use it as
address of correspondence, identified with Identity Card series RT no 654712 emitted by SPCEP S3
bureau no 4 on 4th September 2009 and having personal numeric code 1801010394508, with the
chosen address of electronic correspondence: tudor.raneti@gmail.com,
0.1. article 15 paragraph 1 from the Rome Statute “The Prosecutor may initiate investigations
proprio motu on the basis of information on crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court.”, following that I
simultaneously notify all other competent international institutions and organizations,
0.1.1 because I, refugee, human rights defender and the victim of Crimes against humanity,
have thoroughly investigated and demonstrated in this ICC penal dossier that 2 instances of Crimes
Page 1 of 501
against humanity have been committed and 6 instances of Crimes against humanity have been
attempted against me as I objectivize in section I.A.II.1.3.1,
0.1.2 and that Crimes against humanity are committed against institutionalized children,
homeless, members of Rroma minority, ignorant youngsters and elders, and any person in general
unable to defend itself and not defended by anyone else, as well as persons “put outside the protection
of the law” by the murderous Romanian “state “mafia regime such as dissidents and human rights
defenders such as myself, as I discovered during my investigations and as I objectivize in parallel to my
case throughout section I.A that the Crimes against humanity are “part either of a government policy”
and not just “or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de
facto authority”
0.1.3 by the Romanian “authorities” which I dubbed the Romanian “state” mafia because as I
proven by my case and investigations controls at least the entire judiciary system meaning the
courthouses, tribunals, appeal courts and supreme court, the Constitutional Court, the Superior
Magistrate Council, the Judiciary Inspection, the entire prosecutor’s offices hierarchy near these courts
or Public Ministry, the Ministry of Justice, meaning in short the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes, the
Ministry of Interior Affairs meaning the mafia “masked police”, “police”, “secret police”, “special agents”
and “gendarme” soldiers , the county lawyer bars and the national lawyer bars union, the Health
Ministry and subsidiary institutions meaning the entire legal medicine hierarchy, the health directions
containing the malpraxis committees, the medic’s colleges, meaning the mafia associates, and more as
objectivized in paragraph 0.2 and chapter V.3 of annex 23 from my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for
interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, public demonstration of the mafia’s
criminal activity which motivated it to commit Crimes against humanity against me between the years
2014 - 2017 which ultimately forced me to become a permanent refugee fleeing in fear of indefinite to
life illlegal incarceration, Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualified Murder as I objectivized in paragraph
2.4^45 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to
this ICC penal dossier, Crimes against humanity which are in the jurisdiction of ICC because Romania
signed the Roma statute in July 1999, ratifying it on 11th April 2002, and which has entered into force on
1st July 2002
0.1.4 The refusal to prosecute will result in the accomplice and intrinsically instigating or
determining of Crimes against humanity “prosecutor” to be inculpated, respectively I will demonstrate
the refusal is new evidence to reinsert this ICC penal dossier in consequence in which the inculpated
“prosecutor” cannot participate according to the principle nemo esse iudex in sua causa potest, just like
I’ve proceeded against the Romanian “state” mafia “prosecutor” caporegimes who attempted to cover-
up the penal dossiers declaratively instead of syllogistically motivating their falsified ordnances
0.2. article 17 paragraph 1 letters a and b of the Roma Statute “The case is being investigated or
prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to
carry out the investigation or prosecution”, and
0.2^1 according to article 17 paragraph 2 “In order to determine unwillingness in a particular
case, the Court shall consider,having regard to the principles of due process recognized by international
law,whether one or more of the following exist, as applicable:
Page 2 of 501
0.2^2 (a) The proceedings were or are being undertaken or the national decision was made for
the purpose of shielding the person concerned from criminal responsibility for crimes within the
jurisdiction of the Court referred to in article 5;
0.2^3 (b) There has been an unjustified delay in the proceedings which in the circumstances is
inconsistent with an intent to bring the person concerned to justice;
0.2^4 (c) The proceedings were not or are not being conducted independently or impartially, and
they were or are being conducted in a manner which, in the circumstances, is inconsistent with an intent
to bring the person concerned to justice.”, and
0.2^5 according to article 17 paragraph 3 “In order to determine inability in a particular case, the
Court shall consider whether, due to a total or substantial collapse or unavailability of its national judicial
system, the State is unable to obtain the accused or the necessary evidence and testimony or otherwise
unable to carry out its proceedings.”
0.2.1. because the Romanian Public Ministry by which I mean the entire competent
prosecutor hierarchy refuses to prosecute itself for Crimes against humanity or any other crime no
matter the gravity as proof of total system collapse, by either ignoring my penal complaints or falsifying
ordinances of rejection against them, which got the mafia “prosecutor” caporegimes proven felons in
the same penal dossiers they attempted to cover-up, and in this ICC penal dossier as proof,
0.2.2. respectively the Judiciary Inspection refuses to investigate and condemn the mafia
“prosecutor” caporegimes because is populated by more mafia “prosecutor” caporegimes proven felons
in the same penal dossiers they attempted to cover-up, and in this ICC penal dossier as proof, and
0.2.3. the Romanian “state” mafia controls the Supreme Council of Magistrates leadership who
has attributions in regard to the activity of the chief of the Judiciary Inspection, and who controls
whether a mafia “magistrate” caporegime is to be prosecuted or not as proof of lack of judicial
independence, leadership positions in which of course more mafia “prosecutor” caporegimes were
installed such as “prosecutors” Luminita Palade and Ban Cristian Mihai responsible for the cover-up of
all the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes and all the mafia associated “lawyers” crimes in the capital city
of Bucharest, the latter against who I opened many penal dossiers in which he was never acquitted
before Crimes against humanity were committed against me, cases in which he intervened to cover-up
with falsified ordnances and made himself accomplice and instigator to the Crimes against humanity
against me, and
0.2.4. the minister of justice, the general prosecutor of Romania and the supreme court
president who being members of the Supreme Magistrate Council and being entitled to initiate
disciplinary action are all mafia underbosses or bosses who according to article 44 from the Romanian
Law 317/2004, refused, reason for which I’ve also inculpated them in the same penal dossiers they tried
to cover-up, and in this ICC penal dossier as proof, and
0.2.5 the prime-minister actively and his cabinet of control refused to initiate any action against
the minister of justice and minister of interior affairs accomplice and instigators to the Crimes against
humanity committed and attempted against me, respectively the president of Romania refused to
initiate penal action against the prime-minister, and so on and so forth, meaning the entire Romanian
government is controlled by the mafia for which rightfully I dubbed it the Romanian “state” mafia, and
this mafia’s bosses and underbosses are also the so called mafia “secret information services” who took
power or inherited oligarchically it more accurately in the 1989 coup d’état from their ancestor the
Page 3 of 501
mafia “communist security secret police”, and never let it go - who would as short proof, history about
which I spoke often in this ICC penal dossier and can be found by searching for keywords “coup d’état”,
0.2.6 respectively everyone in Romania is afraid of carrying out any public investigation except
me which is why I say I am the only anti-mafia fighter from Romania as I can prove I’ve notified by email
for years all the Romanian media of any kind, multiple committees for human rights near the Romanian
Parliament, near the European Parliament and from CoE, committees which did not do anything except
the Romanian ones who forwarded my petitions to the other mafia controlled institutions to attempt to
absolve themselves of any personal responsibility, respectively I’ve notified a plethora of useless
Romanian human rights NGOs who also did nothing, and my forum from “militia.freeforums.net” where
I published over a hundred of the mafia’s “magistrate” caporegimes penal dossiers and other antimafia
specialized articles I wrote was entirely censored illicitly on 8th April 2017, and my facebook.com partly
censored illicitly on 10th April 2017, exactly during the almost daily acts of state terrorism through illegal
home breakings and illegal arrests committed against my family and me before Orthodox Easter 2017 on
6th, 10th, 13th and 14th April 2017, which made my mother fall ill with Zoster Area from stress and trauma,
when the mafia was falsifying its pretexts and cover-up stories preparing to commit Crimes against
humanity on Orthodox Easter 2017 in typical “communist” mafia fashion to stop me from denouncing
its criminal activity concomitantly meaning by erecting another forum, Crimes against humanity which
the mafia eventually committed against me as proof by illegally arresting me from my law faculty exams
on 27th May 2017, illegally incarcerating me in the Focsani “psychiatric” gulag, illegally tying me up to an
operating table and illegally putting me into anaphylactic shock for at least three days through daily
deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxic injections without treatment meaning expecting me to die, then
after I survived the mafia “psychiatrist” torturers forcefully chemically lobotomized me with other
deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins until 8th June 2017 as I objectivized in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^7,
I.B.6 and I.A.I.1-2. The mafia overreacted again partly censoring illicitly my facebook.com account in
February 2018 when I opened a group named “Romanian revolution for human rights”, situation which I
demonstrated at large multiple times through this ICC penal dossier as can be found by searching the
keywords “Romanian revolution for human rights”. In conclusion not even a full public investigation is
run by anyone but me against the Romanian “state” mafia Crimes against humanity despite I’ve picked
from the press the fact it even has been chemically lobotomizing institutionalized children as it
performs national wide illegal experimentation for illicit profit from the pharmaceutical mafia in which
“justice” participates by obligating innocents to chemical lobotomy according to a mafia “secret
information services” bosses superficial report to “throw the dead cat in the courtyard” of the Romanian
general prosecutor mafia underboss who of course did nothing afterwards as I should’ve been notified
because I attached this case to theirs, as I’ve objectivized in an email towards Citizen’s Commission on
Human Rights that I linked to INTERPOL in my request to recognize I’m politically persecuted, not even
falsely indicted and convicted, that the Romanian “state” mafia engages in state terrorism and Crimes
against humanity, as I’ve objectivized in https://1drv.ms/b/s!Av_pxCea0UPwkWoBrEVB_efSpXDy,
respectivelly in paragraphs 2.4^14 and 2.4^28, and 1.1^6, 2.4^13.5 and 2.4^20.1 from annex 21 of my
Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier,
respectively requesting that INTERPOL acknowledges the acts of state terrorism and Crimes against
humanity perpetrated by the Romanian “state” mafia. In fact the corruption is so widespread in
Romania that even the corrupt chief of the Romanian National Direction for Anticorruption Kovesi Laura
Page 4 of 501
Codruta declared publicly over 50% of the oncologists subjected healthy persons to chemotherapy for
illicit profit <as prooven by - seek press article link when I have internet>, of course only the situation
got dire as I was making propaganda against the “justice” chemically lobotomizing innocents in
response to the Romanian “state” mafia Crimes against humanity attempts to chemically lobotomize
me that directed my attention and found proof in the public evidence of dossiers ECRIS that it’s a
widespread practice of course, and of course the Romanian “state” mafia issued immediately a conjoint
Ministry of Justice and Supreme Magistrate Council order to hide the evidence except my falsified
dossiers who were kept public for the purpose of discrediting me and my work of denouncing the
mafia’s criminal activity as I’ve objectivized in the document linked above, , respectivelly in paragraphs
1.1^6, 2.4^13.5 and 2.4^20.1 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier
0.2.7 I can demonstrate this chapter on demand as translating the penal dossiers and obtaining
transcripts of the emails I’ve notified the Romanian “state” mafia controlled institutions with is time
consuming. I will as I complete this ICC penal dossier demonstrate the involvement in Crimes against
humanity of the most important Romanian “state” mafia “prosecutor” caporegimes and others I’ve
indicated by name and public office abused
0.3. article 7 paragraph 1 of the Rome Statute regarding Crimes against humanity meaning
0.3.1 “(a) Murder;” - attempted 8 times in qualified form as objectivized in section I.A.II.1.3.1
0.3.2 “(e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of
fundamental rules of international law” - committed 6 times on 17th September 2015, 11th December
2014, 18th May 2016, 6th and 10th April 2017 and between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, and
attempted 5 times on 2nd October 2015, 13th, 14th and 27th April 2017, then indefinitely through the
mafia’s final solution - the falsified sentences from 12718/231/2017, as objectivized in section
I.A.II.1.3.1^8
0.3.3 “(d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population” - I’ve been forced to become a
permanent refugee fleeing in fear of indefinite to life illegal incarceration, Torture, Bodily Harm and
Qualified Murder as objectivized in annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier. See also paragraph 0.3.7 below regarding the factual
objectivization of article 7 paragraph 1 letter i of the Rome statute
0.3.4 “( f) Torture” - committed 2 times in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014 and
between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 as objectivized in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^2 and I.B.22,
respectively I.A.II.1.3.1^7 and I.B.6, and I.A.I.1-2, and attempted 6 times as objectivized in the rest of
section I.A.II.1.3.1 and corresponding I.B sections. Repeated acts of state terrorism through illegal home
breakings and arrests is a form of psychosomatic torture as proven by the fact the almost daily home
breakings and arrests before Orthodox Easter 2017 made my mother ill with Zoster Area from stress and
trauma
0.3.5 “(g) enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity” -
committed 2 times in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014 and between 27th May 2017 and 8th
June 2017 as objectivized in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^2 and I.B.22, respectively I.A.II.1.3.1^7 and I.B.6, and
I.A.I.1-2, and attempted 6 times as objectivized in the rest of section I.A.II.1.3.1 and corresponding I.B
sections, through proven deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxic poisoning as objectivized in chapter 1
Page 5 of 501
from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC
penal dossier, and section <create a section quoting the myriad of health problems caused by the deadly
fluorine based poisons employed by the “psychiatry” charlatanry, sexual dysfunction included>
0.3.6 “(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political... cultural,
religious, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in
connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;” - I
have been persecuted on political, cultural and religious grounds, because I’m a human rights defender
and a Christian, meaning an upholder of the rule of law, state of right and an absolutely honest way of
life which are my politics, culture and religion reason for which I’ve denounced the criminal activity of
the Romanian “state” mafia regime who destroyed family, social, professional and familiar personal life
as objectivized in chapter IV from annex 23 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier regarding damage claims, reason for which the Romanian
“state” mafia engaged in acts of totalitarianism committing Crimes against humanity to stop me from
denouncing its criminal activity in an attempt to raise public awareness and create outrage to oust from
public office the Romanian “state” mafia, which the mafia feared as objectivized by the fact it declared
in the falsified motivation from 11224/231/2015 in 1st instance that I must be “psychiatrically”
incarcerated in the Focsani gulag so that others don’t take example although unspecified example of
what since I’ve only displayed civilized behavior, falsified motivation totally unrelated to the penal
matter object of an “psychiatric” charlatanry impossible incarceration for “examination” which cannot
take place without my consent and cooperation, and the fact according to article 49 paragraph 1 from
Romanian Law 487/2002 regarding mental health no “psychiatric” charlatanry matter can be disposed
as a sanction, which proves the Romanian “state” mafia fears a real revolution and it identified me as a
potential leader as objectivized in section I.B.20, which is further reason to commit Crimes against
humanity against me
0.3.7 “(i) Enforced disappearance of persons - attempted as objectivized in chapter 2.4 from
annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier regarding the fact the Romanian “state” mafia placed me “outside the protection of the law”
and attempted to indefinitely to life illegally incarcerate me, Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualifiedly
Murder me as objectivized in annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier. The Romanian “state” mafia refused to acknowledge the
Crimes against humanity committed against me as proven by the falsified decision from 1779/91/2017
as objectivized in section I.B.15 and annex 15 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, or even use the proofs it falsified under Torture against
me openly of course as objectivized in annex 16 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim
measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, because it’s typical criminal behavior to distance
themselves from the Crimes against humanity committed between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017
proven in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^7, I.B.6, and I.A.I.1-2, as objectivized in paragraph 2.4^46 from annex 21 of
my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier
regarding the fact they aren’t mentioned at all in the falsified sentences from 12718/231/2017 nor the
falsified “prosecutor’s” proposal they are based on, respectively distance themselves from the Crimes
against humanity committed against me in the night between 5th to 6th December 2014 proven in
sections I.A.II.1.3.1^2, I.B.22 and I.A.I.1-2, as objectivized in chapter 2.7 from annex 2 of my Rule 39
Page 6 of 501
ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier regarding the
fact one mafia “prosecutor” caporegime attempts to use one of my declarations against me and is
caught admitting but downplaying the Crimes against humanity committed against me in the night
between 5th to 6th December 2014, naming it an “aggression”. The fact I was forced to become a
permanent refugee also qualifies as enforced disappearance as it comes with plenty of risks being
outside the protection of one’s country, meaning is an indirect way of enforcing the disappearance of a
person, as I’ve been between 1st September 2017 and the present human trafficked and exploited,
thieved and put in a dangerous situation more than once, and unable to obtain justice because of the
Romanian “state” mafia who placed me “outside the protection of the law” as its “communist” mafia
ancestor did not before 1989 against dissidents and human rights defenders before me, objectivizing
using the notorious extreme proofs of indirect enforced disappearance of persons in Romania, the case
of priest Illarion Argatu who took refuge in a walled section of a house’s attic for approximately 40
years, the case of monk Ilie Cleopa who fled in the mountains living in the wilderness for 9 years, and
the case of the man nicknamed “Tarzan of the Carpathians”, an anti-communist fighter who survived a
very long time in the mountains owing his nickname for avoiding the communist patrols by jumping
from tree to tree in winter to not leave tracks in the snow <come back with press article links when I
have internet. The only reason I’ve not “disappeared” although the other parts of the definition
according to article 7 paragraph 2 letter i from the Rome statute hold meaning being intentionally
removed from the protection of the law for a prolonged period of time, through the threat of arrest and
detention, and even more Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualified Murder, accompanied by the refusal of
acknowledgement of Crimes against humanity attempts and committals by the Romanian “state” mafia,
is that I’ve been able to stay in contact with various organizations for protection
0.3.8 “(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or
serious injury to body or to mental or physical health” - although already qualifying according to
Romanian Penal Code law text as Torture and Bodily Harm as translated in chapter 3 from annex 21 of
my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier,
about which I’ve indicated the demonstration in paragraph 0.3.4 above according to article 7 paragraph
2 letter e from the Rome statute, this Rome statute article regards the effects of Torture and especially
Bodily Harm therefore I objectivize indicating chapter IV from annex 23 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent
request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, especially paragraph 5^1
regarding the fact I was chemically lobotomized through the 2 Crimes against humanity committals
proven in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^2 and I.B.22, respectively I.A.II.1.3.1^7 and I.B.6, and I.A.I.1-2, as I was
covertly injected with a deadly fluorine neurotoxin in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014,
respectively between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 I was put in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days
without treatment through deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxic injections, then after I survived
forcefully chemically lobotomized with other deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins, in all instances to
make the Qualified Murder appear as a death of natural causes like an cardiac arrest, about which of
course the mafia associated “legal medics” would falsify the death certificate omitting that the cardiac
arrest was caused by deadly fluorine neurotoxic poisoning, deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxic
poisonings which instead caused permanent anhedonia meaning I’ ve been amputated of the ability to
enjoy life and induced suicidal ideation and other brain damage effects such as overall intelligence loss,
Page 7 of 501
learning, memory, sexual dysfunctions, endocrine and sight disorders, metabolism and parasympathetic
system damage, panic attacks, terror, anxiety and other physical and psychological problems
0.4 regarding grave fundamental rights infringements meaning as relevant the European
convention on human rights articles 2 (right to life – physical and psychical integrity), 3 (right to not be
tortured and not be subjected to degrading treatment), 8 (right to not be arbitrarily deprived of
liberty) in principal, as well as ECHR articles 1, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14 and 17, or the Universal declaration
of human rights articles 3 (right to life, liberty and security), 5 (no one be subjected to torture or cruel,
inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment), 9 (right to not be arbitrarily arrested, detained), as
well as UDHR articles 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 17, 18, 19, 21 (2), 22, 23, 25, 27, 29, or the Rome statute article 7
<seek Rome statute or relevant fundamental rights regarding correlation with ECHR or UDHR
the present
0.5 against the perpetrators, accomplices and instigators to the felonies and for the reasons
constituting Crimes against humanity, enumerated below in relative reverse chronological order of
Crimes against humanity committal or attempted dates or periods,
0.5.1 as proven by objectivizing that the grave felonies committed for wrongful political
repression against me constitute Crimes against humanity in section I.A meaning murder,
dehumanization, unethical human experimentation, extrajudicial punishments, state terrorism,
kidnapping, unjust imprisonment, enslavement, torture, political repression, religious persecution and
other human rights abuses, and
0.5.2 as proven by demonstrating the Crimes against humanity were perpetrated by the
persons enumerated in the below preliminary section and the corresponding I.B sections,
0.5.3 referencing mainly my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures and its annexes
attached as annex 1 to the present ICC penal dossier, and other proofs as necessary
-1 ICC complicity and instrinsic instigation to Crimes against humanity preliminary section
-1.1 “Mark .P. Dillon”
-1.2 a so-called prosecutor who refused to give his name knowing he is accomplice and
instigator to the Romanian Crimes against humanity demonstrated in over 900 pages of this dossier and
referenced documents, as proven below anyway in this preliminary section,
-1^1 mafia agents posing as “Head of the Information & Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor” and prosecutor of ICC, who are illegally destroying ICC penal dossiers to cover-
up the Romanian Crimes against humanity and those of the international mafia they are thus proven
members of, international mafia in cahoots with the Romanian “state” mafia as also proven by this ICC
Page 8 of 501
penal dossier, comprised thus of ICC itself as also ECHR (the so-called registrars and judges), CoE (the so
called anti-corruption committee, president and other parliamentary members of the various national
organized crime groups) and EU (the so-called members of parliament, especially those in LIBE), all
notified and who refuse to take a stance against the Romanian Crimes against humanity even if just a
political stance, but actually because they’ve actively abused office to cover for the Romanian Crimes
against humanity are thus proven in bussiness with the pharmaceutical mafia who is the primary
beneficiary of the
-1^1.1 chemical lobotomization and illegal human experiments conducted on orphans as again
revealed in the Romanian press not a month ago - google: “cum se face lobotomizarea chimica a
copiilor” which means in English mot-a-mot: “how is chemical lobotomization of children done”,
-1^1.2 members of the Rroma minority as exemplificatively proven by the Ivascu case which the
Romanian “state” mafia in cahoots with ECHR tried to cover-up until I picked it up and denounced the
case of Mr Ivascu, a Rroma minority member who was incarcerated in a “psychiatric” charlatanry gulag
for hundreds of days and chemically lobotomized for demanding justice before being absolved by
courthouse “Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei” in dossier 907/307/200 who declared nobody can be
subjected in penal matters to the security measure of “psychiatric treatment” until it has been
established that the accused has committed a felony and that there is a danger of committing further
felonies according to article 109 from the Romanian Penal Code and article 23 paragraph 11 from the
Romanian Contitution,
-1^1.3 and other defenseless persons incarcerated and chemically lobotomized nation-wide as
proven by a Romanian “state” mafia “secret service” report to the Public Ministry or general prosecutor
of Romania Augustin Lazar, a notorious communis torturer who of course covered-up the penal dossier,
-1^1.4 or persons made defenseless by being put outside the protection of the law by the
Romanian “state” mafia such as dissidents and human rights defenders as I, Tudor-Andrei Raneti
political refugee after being perpetrated against 8 Crimes against humanity by the Romanian “state”
mafia who committed against me incidentally Torture, Bodily Harm to the principal motive to an effect
of Qualifiedly Murdering me to stop me from denouncing its criminal activity,
-1^2 as proven thoroughtly in this ICC penal dossier and summarily in the referenced Rule 39
ECHR urgent request for interim measures, and as short proof made evident by the notorious fact the
so-called general prosecutor of Romania Augustin Lazar is a communist torturer for over 30 years, being
let to abuse office by none other than the EU (who accepted this anticorruption so-called prosecutor
sacked for corruption in Romania no less, as EU prosecutor candidate), CIA (as unconspired by the
Romanian “state” mafia defector Sebastian Ghita) and George Soros protejee Kovesi Laura Codruta
who also notoriously knew both of Augustin Lazar’s real occupation being another “communist”
nomenclature oligarch as well, as well as of the Romanian “state” mafia who let her to abuse the
general prosecutor office as well before abusing the office of the national anticorruption direction for
political police such as againt journalist Dan Diaconescu who is also denouncing the mafia and was
interdicted to practice journalism for it being falsely accused of blackmail against a person who admitted
on tape he couldn’t have been ever possibly blackmailed by Dan Diaconescu, or such as the assasination
of Dan Adamescu who after a conviction of 4 years for corruption wasn’t allowed medical treatment
and died making his case nothing more than an assasination, or the assasination of the mafia’s
“magistrate” capo regime Mustata who took the wrong inner mafia faction side and paid the ultimate
Page 9 of 501
price. Kovesi Laura Codruta also new notoriously according to the evidence in the press that Augustin
Lazar had a penal dossier open at the moment he was let into the office of general prosecutor of
Romania, all of these arguments proving the existence of the Romanian “state” mafia with which ICC is
in cahoots with, mafia comprised of the old “communist” criminal nomenclature, who was installed as a
puppet government through the 1989 coup d’etat by CIA and its allies. All this is notorious, proven in the
Romanian press
-1^3 Demonstration of the “Mark .P. Dillon” and the other mafia “prosecutor” capo regime who
falsified the ICC address from 4th April 2019 after delaying this ICC penal dossier for half a year, illegal
acts through which these mafia agents attempted to cover-up the ICC penal dossier OTP-CR-424/18 and
failed. I attach the falsified communique from 4th April 2019 as annex 5 to this ICC penal dossier. These
ICC clerks impersonating mafia agents lied and I quote: “...your communication appears to relate to
matters (Crimes against humanity) outside the jurisdiction of the Court (!?). The Prosecutor has
therefore confirmed (how!?) that there is not a basis at this time to proceed with further analysis (after
not analyzing anything as proven for half a year), which proves the falsification of the ICC address from
4th April 2019 and therefore the appartenence of the inculpated mafia agents anumerated above to the
international mafia targeted by this ICC penal dossier for Crimes against humanity, because the above
quoted text is a multiple falacy because:
-1^3.1 no functionary in the world under the rule of the law or system rule by the legality
principle has the right to infer syllogistically any juridical act without a factual particular premise
correlated with an universal law premise - see legal syllogism
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_syllogism). Because these mafia agents
-1^3.1.1 lied that this ICC penal dossier does not regard classic Crimes against humanity as I’ve
punctually demonstrated as summarized in section II.1^1 that “Crimes against humanity (1.1) can be
committed during peace or war.[1] They are not isolated or sporadic events, but are part either of a
government policy (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy) or of a wide
practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority.(1.2) War
crimes, murder (1.3), massacres, dehumanization (1.4), genocide, ethnic cleansing (1.11), deportations
(1.12), unethical human experimentation (1.5), extrajudicial punishments (1.6) including summary
executions, use of WMDs, state terrorism or state sponsoring of terrorism(1.7), death
squads, kidnappings and forced disappearances(<), military use of children, unjust imprisonment (<? see
section I.A.II.1.3.1^7 until I make an inline summarized reference>), enslavement
(1.13), cannibalism, torture (1.8), rape, political repression (1.9), racial discrimination, religious
persecution (1.14), and other human rights abuses (1.10) may reach the threshold of Crimes against
humanity if they are part of a widespread or systematic practice“ pointing out the index within this ICC
penal dossier to the demonstration of each type of Crimes against humanity
-1^3.1.2 and even worse subjectively declared “it appears” instead of demonstrating it does not,
not even attempting to contradict a single argument of mine because these mafia agents know its
impossible to undo logic and justify the Romanian Crimes against humanity and inherently of the
international mafia they are part of, even lying this ICC penal dossier was analyzed as proven by the
Page 10 of 501
quote “further analysis” where not a shred of analysis is presented such as a single attempt to contradict
a single demonstration of Romanian Crimes against humanity
-1^3.1.3 it is proven beyond all reasonable doubt the mafia agents premeditatedly lied to cover-
up the Romanian Crimes against humanity.
-1^4. Further explication of paragraph 0^4. A prosecutor is obligated by the universal logic of the
law to respect the legal syllogism in formulating any juridical or judiciary act more precisely, meaning
both in decisions about a penal dossier, and the communications of those decisions. The legal syllogism
means the prosecutor is obligated to formulate a factual particular premise, constituted as the name
suggest of the facts of the case meaning the prosecutor is obligated to inventory and administrate or
objectivize all evidence of the case, factual ensemble which then the prosecutor must correlate with an
universal law premise, constituted as the name suggest of the law, regulations, norms, even customs
correlated with juridical logic, in this case the Rome Statute at least, premises out of which according to
the 6 laws of the syllogism an inferrence can be made meaning without ommitting any of the necessary
and sufficient arguments of the case correlated with all relevant aspects of the law. This is the only way
a judiciary decision can be valid, but the ICC mafia agents falsified decision is not only syllogistically and
thus judicially invalid, it is intrinsically false because I have defined the truth by demonstrating it, and
the ICC mafia agents have not even attempted to contradict me logically knowing its impossible to
contradict logic and justify Crimes against humanity, which proves it, the enumerated ICC clerks
inculpated are mafia agents for premeditatingly attempting to cover-up Crimes against humanity, as
proven by the fact nobody falsified documents and lies by accident which retrospectivelly means the
delaying in emitting a decision about this ICC penal dossier was also premeditated because once a
criminal has an intent to an effect he carries it out as proven by the falsified ICC address from 4th April
2019, as I’ve otherwise objectivized a criminal does in section I.A.II.1.3.1.1. Simply said the prosecutor
did not demonstrated in the least that any of the facts correlated with the law amount to Crimes against
humanity, which I’ve proven pervasively without being contradicted, meaning in corroboration
according to the law of the excluded middle - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_excluded_middle
or law of the excluded third juridical logic principle, I can only be right and the mafia agents can only be
wrong, also corroborated with the fact this entire over 900 pages long investigation which could easily
be risen to tens of thousands as I’ve only caught the tip of the iceberg of Romanian Crimes against
humanity which escaped in the press or I demonstrated myself through my human rights defending
activity, has been presented not only at ICC, but at ECHR, at the various UN bodies, INTERPOL, before
the Romanian “state” mafia of course, neither of which ever even accused me of False declarations for
lying, Inducing the judiciary bodies into error for falsifying evidence and Disseminating false
informations for publishing these dossiers on the internet, which proves all these institutions and
organizations legally obligated to accuse me of these felonies from the Romanian Penal Code, although
institutions controlled by the mafia who even worse has the proven intent to falsify penal dossiers
against me as proven in this ICC penal dossier it already falsified 4, did not even accuse me of these
felonies tacitly admitting I am right in all aspects of my investigation meaning again according to the law
of the excluded middle this entire ICC penal dossier is correct, and the ICC mafia agents lied it doesn’t
demonstrate to Crimes against humanity, the ICC mafia agents making an even worse logical error by
declaring it doesn’t appear to refer to Crimes against humanity which it clearly does and beyond,
demonstrates the Romanian Crimes against humanity beyond any reasonable doubt, and the
Page 11 of 501
involvement in cover-up of Crimes against humanity of ICC, EU, CoE, ECHR and other so called
institutions of right in actuality controlled by an international mafia cartel comprised of members of the
various national organized crime groups, such as the Romanian and French “state” mafias who are
heavily involved in perpetrating and attemting to cover-up these Crimes against humanity, both nations
who arepro-US evil imperialism and state terrorism puppets
-1^5. Because the ICC mafia agents have not used a single premise in inferring aberrantly that “it
appears” this ICC penal dossier doesn’t refer or demonstrate Crimes against humanity, the ICC mafia
agents demonstrated they’ve lost touch with reality and hallucinate, as well as manifesting logical
incoherence and intrinsic occupational dysfunction by not knowing the law, the legal syllogism, the
principle of the excluded middle or not having any juridical training whatsoever evidently for that matter
and not anticipating they represent a danger not only to others but also to their own persona by
incriminating themselves for complicity and intrinsic instigation to Crimes against humanity by
encouraging the international mafia they are part of to continue to perpetrate Crimes against humanity.
Losing touch with reality, logical incoherence and occupational dysfunction are the 3 main symptoms of
schizophrenia according to DSM-V “psychiatry” charlatanry manual of diagnosis and statistics, which
means as correlated with the deeds of the ICC mafia agents that in conclusion they are schizophrenic all
the more the Romanian Crimes against humanity are notoriously presented in the Romanian press,
meaning the mentally alienated ICC mafia agents declared against public evidence that the proven
communist torturer Augustin Lazar, the so-called prosecuotr of Romania, is not accomplice and
instigator to Crimes against humanity by
-1^5.1 covering up the chemical lobotomy of institutionalized children, meaning orphans, as the
press revealed again - google: “cum se face lobotomizarea chimica a copiilor” which means in English
mot-a-mot: “how is chemical lobotomization of children done”
-1^5.2 covering up the chemical lobotomy of the Rroma minority and other defenseless social
categories, or put outside of the protection of the law by the Romanian “state” mafia in order to be
illegally incarcerated in the Romanian “psychiatry” charlatanry gulags to be chemically lobotomized and
be made human experiments, fact proven by the Romanian mafia “secret information service” report
I’ve printed from the general prosecutor’s office press announcement and republished at address:
https://www.scribd.com/document/331592730/comunicat-de-presa-SRI-PICCJ-din-31-05-2016-privind-
faptul-ca-psihiatrii-fac-din-pacienti-cobai, situation of which I’ve spoken in paragraphs 1.1^6, 2.4^13.5
and 2.4^20 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1
to this ICC penal dossier, respectively after I’ve researched the Romanian situation in general notified
Citizen’s Commission on Human Rights and INTERPOL with it in this email I’ve printed and uploaded to
this address: https://1drv.ms/b/s!Av_pxCea0UPwkWoBrEVB_efSpXDy
-1^5.3 covering up meaning being accomplice, and being instigator to the 8 Crimes against
humanity perpetrated against me, as proven by the fact this notorious communist torturer Augustin
Lazar, so-called general prosecutor of Romania, supervized the falsification of the 4 penal dossiers
against me as he did before against political dissidents, dossiers in which I remind I was never indicted
and convicted, and personally falsified the rejection of my request that the 4 falsified penal dossiers be
moved in another jurisdiction than the one they were falsified in for proven partiality through pervasive
law breaking which is the single most evident demonstration of partiality, because Augustin Lazar
arranged to use these 4 falsified penal dossiers as a cover-up and pretext for the 8 Crimes against
Page 12 of 501
humanity against me, in cahoots with other members of the Romanian “state” mafia as demonstrated
by the falsification of the Romanian Constitutional Court Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017 by the
Romanian judiciary, the communist torturer Augustin Lazar included, the Romanian Government, the
Romanian Parliament and the Romanian Ombudsman, all who lied in this falsified decision that it isn’t
necessary that a deed is proven to exist, that it constitutes a felony, that the accused committed it, that
the accused is convicted by an impartial tribunal through a fair or legal trial, that the decision remains
definitive through which the presumption of innocence can legally lifted, and that only then an impartial
tribunal can prove or not whether a penal security measure is necessary, according to the law, meaning
in Romania according to the mafia policy made evident by this falsified Romanian Constitutional Court
Decision no 25 from 19 January 2017, since the law it contradicts is still in vigor as I’ve demonstrated in
section I.B.11 of this ICC penal dossier, law which the mafia never obeys of course, anyone can be
arrested from the street or his home and be incarcerated and chemically lobotomized or subjected to
other forms of Crimes against humanity under the cover-up and pretext of penal security measures.
This truth I’ve also published at http://truthjustice.x10host.com/index.html and other sites
-1.6 Beyond the demonstration above all reasonable doubt above, as made evident by the ICC
messages on Twitter, ICC is just another American propaganda mill covering up US Crimes against
humanity and US War crimes, not condemning them, reminding the Romanian Crimes against
humanity are committed for illicit profit from the pharmaceutical mafia which originates from and is a
protejee of US and its allies, as proven by the criminal acts of George Soros on behalf of this
international mafia he is part of, reason for which he was expunged from the Russian Federation as
personna non grata, as I’ve demonstrated in section I.A.II.1.2.4. The way in which the US evil empire
operates, is frame a casus belli with a minor nation then wage an economic war in desguise devastating
that country and installing a puppet government to allow the US companies to enter under the guise of
foreign investors, and illicitly syphon the resources of the victim country and enslave the people. This is
what happened in Romanian through the 1989 coup d’etat spearheaded by CIA and its allies with the
help of Romanian traitors, and this is why a communist torturer, Augustin Lazar, is abusing the office of
prosecutor general of Romania 30 years after the 1989 coup d’etat and the so-called fall of communist
and installment of democracy which is another lie and utopia. US’s war on communism is thus proven
fake; it was always an economic war as all wars. The best tactic the ICC mafia agents could’ve used is
continue to delay the ICC trial without justification as ICC has been doing so far, which is just another
proof of ICC’s complicity and intrinsic instigation to Crimes against humanity through propaganda and
dissinformation encouraging the committal of Crimes against humanity, and War crimes, but of course
the ICC mafia’s hubris couldn’t resist defiantly producing a falsified document of cover-up of the
Romanian Crimes agianst humanity after I’ve baited them on ICC already demonstrating ICC is covering
Crimes against humanity by delaying trials, and now I got definitive proof. Pride really is the most useful
sin
1 - I.B.1 ECHR complicity and instrinsic instigation to Crimes against humanity preliminary
section
1.1. "D.Lupu",
Page 13 of 501
1.2. "I.Banu",
1^1. Romanian “state” mafia agents posing as ECHR registrars and illegally destroying Romanian
petitions to ECHR before reaching the judges to cover-up the Crimes against humanity perpetrated by
the Romanian “state” mafia they are members of, as proven by the fact my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request
for interim measures published at https://www.scribd.com/document/352597506/Raneti-vs-Romania-
at-ECHR and attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, is so grave that "D.Lupu" and "I.Banu"
destroyed it 4 times to stop it from reaching the judges in various ways although being the same petition
which provess it right away logically, for which I opened a penal dossier against them which I lodged
with the French “authorities” indicated in the penal files’s header, and published at address:
https://www.scribd.com/document/365438323/penal-complaint-against-D-Lupu-and-I-Banu-at-
European-Court-of-Human-Rights, respectivelly attached as annex 2 to this ICC penal dossier, in which I
demonstrated the facts which I also transposed in this ICC penal dossier regarding the felonies of
"D.Lupu" and "I.Banu" that constitute complicity and inherent instigation or determination of the Crimes
against humanity objectivized in this ICC penal dossier. <complete the penal complaint> My Rule 39
ECHR urgent request for interim measures has been destroyed 2 more times afterwards by “C.Vezan”
and “I.Banu” again, about which I had not the time to update the penal complaint, nor consider it a
priority since “D.Lupu” and “I.Banu” are already caught proving ECHR and CoE are accomplice and
inherently instigators or determinant in the Crimes against humanity objectivized in this ICC penal
dossier by participating in the cover-up and encouraging or permitting the Crimes aganist humanity to
occur instead of issuing the urgent interim measures I’ve proposed in chapter III from annex 23 of my
Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier
1^2 Background. The fact these patsy's are preventing the Romanian Crimes against
humanity denunciations from reaching the ECHR judges doesn't mean these ECHR judges can be
assessed as honest, because it is absolutely plausible they are just as corrupt and criminal, as proven by
the following demonstration - because I've notified ECHR's <anticorruption and torture prevention
committees> as proven by annex <print email and proof update inventory> and because I’ve got no
answer from the <anticorruption committee>, and I've got a generic response meant to "handle" me
from the <torture prevention committee> meaning to cover up the refusal to solve the petition by
answering that ~"they're interested but doing nothing to solve my petition" in short, as also proven by
the fact ECHR never did anything about it so far neither positively or negatively - positively meaning
ousting "D.Lupu" and "I.Banu" from office disciplinarily and denouncing them to the penal authorities as
I did through the penal complaint attached as annex 2 to this ICC penal dossier, which in turn it means
ECHR backs up "D.Lupu" and "I.Banu" felonies and their cover-up of the Crimes against humanity
committed by the Romanian mafia meaning its really within ECHR’s hidden agenda that is obviously not
justice, or negatively meaning ECHR would admit publicly that it backs up "D.Lupu" and "I.Banu" felonies
and their cover-up of the Crimes against humanity committed by the Romanian “state” mafia, which
because ECHR didn’t then explains the generic answer of ECHR’s <anticorruption bodies> by the fact first
of all ECHR as proven doesn't wish to solve the situation because ECHR as proven covers up the mafia
crimes, corroborated secondly by the fact that ECHR won't admit it even if it obviously refuses to solve
this case and even if I've already proven "D.Lupu" and "I.Banu"'s felonies in the penal complaint
attached as annex 2 to this ICC penal dossier, from which I'm transcribing the content into section I.B.1.,
and thirdly ECHR ignoring the petition would've been just as bad as admitting it is covering up for the
Page 14 of 501
Romanian Crimes against humanity, so ECHR's only solution they thought was to attempt to fool me
with a generic response which would've probably work on someone else, not me who I've investigated
the Romanian mafia aproximatively 9 years to this date and seen a lot of its modus operandi. In
conclusion ECHR beyond any reasonable doubt conducts the cover-up of at least Romanian state
terrorism and Crimes against humanity for wrongful political repression, proven by the analysis of
ECHR’s <anticorruption bodies and torture prevention committees> generic answer or none at all as
proven by annex <print email and proof update inventory>, cover-up motivated by illicit political reasons
infringing on the law and regulations and preventing that justice be done once and for all about the
Romanian criminal activity which ECHR as proven by this argument are clearly upholding, as well as
covering up for this illicit activity of cover-up within itself which I've also proven implicitly. ECHR's illicit
motivation then remains to be objectivized after its illicit activity has been proven, for which I retain that
ECHR actually condemned the Romanian "magistrate" mafia many times superficially for denial of
justice and abuse by annulling the falsified Romanian "decisions" proving intrinsically the "magistrate"
mafia exists as corroborated by the notorious fact no Romanian mafia "magistrate" caporegime was
ever condemned and made to pay for his falsified with malice aforethought anulled decision because
the mafia doesn’t condemn itself as opposed to what a real body of magistrates is suppose to do
according of the law - lustrate itself of any corruption, which corroborates to the argument mentioned
before that ECHR with aforethought won't solve this dramatic situation although it has the power to
impose drastic measures, leading again to the conclusion that ECHR's annulment of Romanian falsified
decisions and lack of legal repercussions against the falsifiers is part of an occult conspiracy and not the
agenda of justice because ECHR’s decisions are obviously not intended to fulfill justice although they’re
intrinsically proving the head of Romanian judiciary system meaning the disciplinary and penal justice
against the corrupt and criminal Romanian "magistrates" is putrid corrupt and criminal itself obviously
because the mafia doesn't condemn itself contrasting to what a real body of magistrates would do as
legally obligated, which just proves the whole "magistrate" Romanian body of functionaries is at least
part of the Romanian mafia, meaning as obvious the “magistrate” mafia is in cahoots with other factions
of a bigger mafia cartel because the Romanians "magistrate" mafia can’t be also the executioner of their
falsified decisions because they are attempting to maintain an image of lawfulness, meaning in cahoots
with the mafia soldier "police", "secret police", "masked police", “special agents” and "gendarmes", in
short the Romanian Ministry of Interior Affairs apparatus, in cahoots with legal medicine for the cover-
up of their violent crimes or Crimes against humanity committed through use of the “psychiatry”
charlatanry for chemical lobotomy and cover-up of the Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualified Murder is
part of this organized crime cartel who is as proven in this ICC penal dossier participating in acts of state
terrorism and wrongful political repression as demonstrated, and at this point an investigator’s intuition
would raise the natural question about how and who if anyone is concertizing this mafia cartel’s criminal
activity, question which I will address next
1^3 Because ECHR is thus proven fake justice and is not an end in its means then it is a mask for
something else, another motive, an instrument for a wider materialistic motivated charlatanry to cover
up the reality of Romanian economy being dilapidated by the EU's illicit western classical ex-imperialist
national, corporate interests as well as other foreign interests, meaning while EU is providing fake
justice for Romania's partnership, is imposing in turn its economic interests above the Romanian
interests as it even escaped such unfortunate syntagms in at least one Romanian government ordnance,
Page 15 of 501
meaning in reality as already proven the Romanian “state” mafia which is notoriously recognized by the
ex-president Traian Basescu although truth be told not officially obviously because ex-president Traian
Basescu is not anti-mafia but he is part of the old “communist” mafia nomenclature, a proven
collaborator with the “communist” secret services, but in an unconspired private phone conversation
made public by Antena 3 television, is backed up and controlled under the table by EU's illicit western
classical ex-imperialist national, corporate and other associated foreign illicit interests that actually as
notoriously known ordered the Romanias's economy be destroyed through a tandem of imposed
economically plateaus or illogical restrictions on production, open foreign investor legislation allowing
Romania to be sold out as a colony since evidently an ex communist country doesn't have the capital to
buy itself because nobody had enough capital in a “communist” country where the state mafia
totalitarianism kept everyone poor, stupid and thus easily governable, then destroyed the Romanian
industry and old way of life through its political commissars or so called economic hitmen which if not
obviously foreigners could only be the traitorous ex “communist” secret services members who sold
Romania out to foreign interests or robbed it patrimony and split it amongst themselves which is a
specialized sector called the liquidator mafia as the infamous Hassan Awdi who had his hundreds of
millions of dollars bussiness expropriated through a mafia takeover during the last decade at least, ex
“communist” secret services and other nomenclature of the “communist” ruling class (using quotes
meanins false communism because true communism or any egalitarian state of right has only one class
as the mandated functionaries are remunerated servitors of the people nor rulers) who took power in
the 1989 coup d'etat from “communist” dictator Nicolae Ceausescu, and never let it go obviously (who
would as proof) ever since, and who are controlling the mafia "magistrate" caporegimes or the
monopoly on cover-up fake legitimacy for public consent, mafia soldiers meaning the Ministry of Interior
Affairs monopoly on state terrorism and the mafia associates meaning legal medicine, lawyers, registrars
and others, mafia or organized crime group which was always controlled historically as of fact in
Romania, as exemplifiedly proven by the Hohenzollern's genocidal family usage of this criminal
apparatus to destroy the Legionary Movement - a christian nationalistic movement, and Torture, Bodily
Harm and Qualifiedly Murder its members, mafia "magistrate" caporegimes who as of notorious fact in
1989 coup d'etat assassinated Nicolae Ceausescu and Romanian justice publicly along with him, without
use of the law and implicitly against the law, with no proofs, no appeal, no anything remotely judicial
but a pure televised extrajudicial assassination and no less on the 25th December, the Christmas day to
mock and defy the Christian Romanian people, which I remember it shocked me then as I was 9 years
old, and it still shocks me now that they had the audacity to televize atrocities, except shocked not into
submission as meant to by the mafia, but into indignation and outrage as humanely proper, as these
“shock and awe” tactics to me translate as normal into shock, fear, hate then will to destroy the source
of this evil as I have become a human rights defender for this purpose. The mafia "magistrate"
caporegimes in Romania is controlled or concertized as the mafia soldiers and associates through
blackmail and is ordered around by the ex-“communist security” and “secret information services” and
other high office ex-“communist” nomenclature, either by dossiers of blackmail maintained in archives
like SIPA which is a notorious proof being an archive of magistrate's personal data and more irrelevant
to the state of right data which has no democratic use whatsoever proving in turn its real use as well as
the fact its very existence is pointing at the entity maintaining and using it, a secret information agency.
Another instrument for the “magistrate” mafia and its soldiers and associates is the control of
Page 16 of 501
institutions through which the mafia "magistrate" caporegimes if not controlled through blackmail
dossiers are threatened anyway with fake penal and disciplinary dossiers from the Supreme Magistrate
Council and Judiciary Inspection mafia controlled institutions, respectively the general prosecutor’s
offices with Supreme Magistrate Council and Judiciary Inspection approval and direction, mafia
controlled institutions where only the most corrupt and criminally obedient mafia "magistrate"
caporegimes accede into function to be used as slave masters against the rest of Romanian
"magistrature", a bunch of so-called magistrates from the Supreme Magistrate Council and Judiciary
Inspection which I've caught and opened penal dossiers against that I've also published along with the
denunciation of all other disciplinary action titularies meaning the supreme court president, minister of
justice and general prosecutor according to article 44 from the Romanian Law 317/2004, which beyond
any reasonable doubt triggered the Romania “state“ mafia to commit against me between the years
2014-2017 6 Crimes against humanity attempts and 2 Crimes against humanity commitals in the night
between 5th and 6th December 2014 and the between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, by abusing
against me the judiciary system ( mafia caporegimes), the order forces (mafia soldiers) and legal
medicine and lawyers (mafia associates) as weapons of state terrorism and wrongful political repression,
as proven bluntly in my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures, and in detail in this ICC penal
dossier.
1^4 I conclude according to the evidence that ECHR's cover-up of Crimes against humanity
amongst other crimes cannot be self motivated because there is no interest plus ECHR’s clerks are also
protected from prosecution obviously therefore the French judicial system is in cahoots for the cover-up
of Romanian Crimes aganist humanity at least, thus the cover-up of Crimes against humanity must be
motivated at the instigation of the group of illicit interests ECHR and CoE belongs to or is under control
of, group of illicit interest which itself operates from a larger area than the geographical confines of
Europe as illicit financial interests pervade all boundaries, being immediately evident that I’m thinking
first and modeling this group of illicit interests after the financiers of the mass Crimes against humanity
in Romania through illegal experimentation, that is non other than the pharmaceutical mafia and other
demented personalities such as George Soros’s national sovereignty underminind network of NGOs
which was banned in the Russian Federation and George Soros declared persona non grata for pushing
fluoridating bills to brain poison the russian people as I objectivized in section I.A.II.1.2.6. The other
entities of this group of illicit interests evidently according to the outcome manipulated the
circumstances on all levels since and before 1989 coup d’etat so that Romania became a cheap labor
force colony infested by french and german hypermarchet chains, myself being a victim of the Delhaize
Group run by convicts who bribed through the corrupt Kinstellar SPARL “lawyers” the mafia
“magistrate” caporegimes who sold out my worker rights as objectivized in chapte IV from annex 23 of
my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, a
cheap or gratuitous raw material source as notoriously proven by the mountains of minerals carried out
for free or almost nothing out of Romania, an open market for European closeouts, second-hand and
other junk, or for second hand outdated and useless military equipment and army surplus refrigerated
food, in exchange for example for exported Romanian rich and clean agricultural products as Romanian
has been dubbed for a while now “the granary of Europe”. The Romanian work force was enslaved in its
own country by anthropic created vicissitudes through imposed systemic government corruption and
inherent economic nation wide dilapidation, and to avoid malcontent and an inevitable real revolution
Page 17 of 501
over 3 million Romanian economic refugees as after a civil war were maneuvered into unqualified
subserviance to the so-called European developed countries which clearly owe their welfare to praying
on others, as proven by the destruction of the Romanian academia and political maneuvering towards
low grade technical schools by, amongst others, the minister of education Ecaterina Andronescu
nicknamed “the destroyer of Romanian education”, economic refugees lured by the promise of a better
life which in actually doesn’t mean a civilized way of life but wage slavery as demonstrated by the
inequities between the native and foreign work forces throughout Europe which just proves the gross
inequity policy of EU conglomerate of economic interests despite its fanfare of human rights directives,
and the rest of Europe for that matter because this chapter is about ECHR's jurisdiction or CoE’s not just
EU’s, socioeconomic situation which has nothing to do with a progressist and developed society but the
abject achieval of illicit economic interests as always by all purposes and means, in short wild capitalism
at its worst, EU’s and CoE’s juridics being obviously tools used by the expanded economic interests
conglomerate which is actually EU's origin, and other illicit interests from around the world such as the
corrupt military industrial sectors of the superpowers which long outlived their usefulness and as all
who gained power refuse to let it go and dismantle, and have turned to become an established
corporations that at least influence the states their operate in and others for their own illicit interests, or
the pharmaceutical mafia which acts all around the world through the “psychiatric” charlatanry to do
the totalitarian dirty work of the ruling class in exchange for which it receives state accreditation to prey
on the weak for illicit profit in the trillions, affording to callously pay fines of a few billions once in a
while as I objectivized in chapted 1.9 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim
measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, while destroying millions of lives. One human
rights court and a few judges for 80 million Europeans is obvious an injustice in itself, as trials take even
10 years to complete making the justice in a reasonable amount of time principle a mockery as people
die before seeing justice inclusively from cancer as from Romania where exemplificatively but relevant
to the present ICC penal dossier, a huge amount of money instead of being allocated to cancer patients
dying in agony, is poured into the "psychiatry" charlatanry gulags where illegal experiments are
perpetrated on institutionalized children, homeless, youngsters, elders, the Rroma minority or any
category of people who can't defend itself or is put outside the protection of the law by the mafia
"magistrate" caporegimes such as dissidents and human rights defenders against the Romanian “state”
mafia as myself, fact which I thoroughly prove in the section I.A regarding the objectivization of the
Crimes against humanity perpetrated against me and others, or, if people don’t die waiting on justice
they get to see their lives destroyed from all possible directions in the meantime as in my case appealing
to ECHR just to get my petitions destroyed over and over again illegally by Romanian “state” mafia
agents posing as ECHR registrars to cover-up the Romanian Crimes against humanity that were
committed exactly because of ECHR’s failure to act at all not just promptly, as in August 2018 I’m
lodging my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier for the 7th time, number obtained by counting the number of times the previous have been
illegally destroyed in various ways despite being the same as first logical proof, by mafia agents posing
as ECHR registrars, mentioning the 1st I lodged on 18th April 2017 was destroyed on 26th April 2017
meaning it could've prevented the Crimes against humanity committed against me between 27th May
2017 and 8th June 2017 as well as me becoming a permanent refugee from 1st September 2017, status
quo which constitutes a reason to place ICC's reputation in question also right from the start for "sharing
Page 18 of 501
the neighborhood" with ECHR, CoE and their puppeteers but being totally silent about this, remaining to
be proven whether ICC is real justice or fake like I demonstrated ECHR is, using ICC's response to the
Crimes against humanity committed against me and other Romanians. I warn thus in good faith that a
“prosecution” and / or “judgment” against the law meaning an injustice will result in a public display of
ICC fake justice and will just bring this Crimes against humanity penal complaint again in ICC with the
felons from within ICC in the case, and to the attention of the competent UN committees. I've already
done this in Romania as of fact, reason for which the Romanian “state” mafia realized there is no way to
cover-up its felonies against me just by falsifying decisions for rejecting my claims which just helped me
demonstrate statistically the Romanian “magistrature” body of public functionaries is just one big mafia
cartel in itself subdivided into local crime groups organized by their real jurisdiction and territoriality in
which they manifest power by abusing public function, demonstration that I made public which led to
the Crimes against humanity the Romanian “state” mafia committed against me to stop me from
denouncing its criminal activity as demonstrated in this penal complaint, and I can't be blamed for
wanting to live a lawful inherently peaceful and loving life which is the guaranteed promise of the rule of
the law under which I’ve been raised, even more so as a Christian Orthodox, nor the atrocities
perpetrated by the Romanian “state” mafia have any excuse at all as it cannot even invoke “mafia
bussiness” against me since I obviously was no threat to the mafia before it committed Crimes against
humanity against me and shown its real face, that of being Stalinist - paranoid and openly totalitarian,
reason for which it must be destroyed as the derailed “communist” anti-social relic of the past it is
1^5 Regardless of who supports the proven complicity and instrinsic instigation of "D.Lupu" and
"I.Banu" to Crimes against humanity, "D.Lupu" and "I.Banu" must be ousted from public office, put
under life interdiction to occupy another public office and penally convicted for being accomplice and
instigators to Crimes against humanity as proven, amongst other accompanying felonies
1^6 “D.Lupu” and “I.Banu” are to be subpoenaed at their place of work, European Court of
Human Rights, Council of Europe, F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex, fax +33 (0)3 88 41 39 00,
1^6.1 or if not found through the Romanian authorities and ultimately if still not found, through
Europol, Interpol and similar organizations
Page 19 of 501
Torture and Bodily Harm, I've been arrested by the mafia's secret police from my law faculty exams on
27th May 2017, tied up at the Focsani “psychiatric” gulag to an operating table and put in anaphylactic
shock for 3 days through fluorine and chlorine injected poisoning, then after I survived they forcefully
chemically lobotomized me until 8th June 2017 under threat of violence with other deadly fluorine and
chlorine poisons, all of which I've demonstrated based on the same proofs in dossier 12718/231/2017
“judge” Badiu Mandica had but never administer any, dossier in which furthermore I thoroughly
objectivized in my written plead also attached as annex 20 to my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for
interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, how all the penal dossiers and
psychiatric actions against me were falsified by the Romanian "state" mafia breaking every relevant law,
regulation and juridical logic without any grounded factual motivation or juridical logical justification,
and without administering any proofs because all demonstrate by themselves my innocence which is the
same reason my demonstration of my innocence was refused to be brought in discussion at an attempt
to contradict and rejected it exactly because it's impossible to contradict it veridically and logically
<assimilate what I've said in the other paragraph>, proofs which "judge" Badiu Mandica was legally
obligated to administer but refused in favor of executing the mafia's orders to which "judge" Badiu
Mandica thus proven belongs to, not even administering the mafia's falsified documents because it’s
impossible to objectivize their veridicity being obviously false and demonstrating by themselves
according to the principle of non-contradiction my innocence and mental sanity given the mafia’s
interest to successfully falsify penal dossiers against me and psychiatric actions and the fact the mafia
failed as proven by annex 17 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex
1 to this ICC penal dossier regarding my empty judicial history meaning I was never indicted or convicted
since 2014 in the thus proven 4 falsified penal dossiers against me, also proven falsified in many other
ways which I will demonstrate in this ICC penal dossier, as the fact the mafia failed when I annulled their
“psychiatric” charlatanry actions in their own courthouses meaning in 15730/231/2014,
11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance and 14277/231/2015 in 1st and 2nd instance as proven in my Rule 39
ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, while the last
two falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry actions are in ne bis in idem relation with the two before them,
meaning they are also intrinsicly proven falsified, meaning 4909/231/2017 in ne bis in idem relation with
11224/231/2015 and 12718/231/2017 in ne bis in idem relation with 14277/231/2015 regarding the
same obvious false accusations that I’m irresponsible, lacking discernment, violent and a public danger
groundlessly. “Judge” Badiu Mandica refused to administer the mafia’s falsified documents because it
also meant administering in contradiction my demonstration the mafia's documents are falsified, as well
because the main obvious reason is that it’s impossible to legally justify a falsified judicial decision for
the committal of the felonies Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualified Murder constituting Crimes against
humanity against me. I mention I objectivized in my plead attached as annex 20 of my Rule 39 ECHR
urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier how any penal or
psychiatric action against me was and can only be falsified regardless when it is falsified because as I
proven in 12718/231/2017 with documents, witnesses and logic regarding my entire biography, that I
can not even reasonably be suspected of being a sociopath criminal like the Romanian "magistrates"
who can't abstain from pervasively breaking the law and infringing on people's right daily which I've
proven extensively both to the Romanian "penal authorities" who to my dismay I found out from their
lack of response or falsified answers, and thus proven statistically that all “magistrates” are also part of
Page 20 of 501
the Romania "state" mafia. The penal dossiers I opened against the Romanian “magistrate” mafia I
published on the illicitly mafia censored forum "militia.freeforums.net" between the years 2014 - 2017
hoping for public outrage and lustration of the corrupt and criminal “magistrates” from office which
failed because of the Romanian people’s idiocy meaning lack of skill and interest in public affairs, not to
mention cowardice and lack of integrity, penal dossiers in which never was a criminal "magistrate" I
caught acquitted because it’s impossible given I built all dossiers based on proven accusations ready to
be sent in court, and as proof of verity of my declarations in all the penal dossiers I opened against the
Romanian "magistrate" mafia, I was never accused of the felony of giving False declarations even if it's
the Romanian "magistrate" mafia intention proven by the 4 penal dossiers it falsified against me, I was
never accused of the felony of Inducing the judiciary bodies into error by falsifying proofs, and I was
never accused of the felony of Disseminating false information by publishing on the internet most of the
penal dossiers against the Romanian "magistrate" mafia caporegimes, their "police" and "gendarmes"
soldiers, and their "legal medics", "lawyers" and other interloper associates. To this I continue to declare
responsibly knowing of the consequences of False declarations, Inducing the judiciary bodies into error
and Disseminating false information (because I'll publish and disseminate this plead to raise public
awareness) according to Romanian Penal Code, judicial declarations that I've also given to a number of
international organizations such as INTERPOL where the same no fault was found in my demonstration
of the Romanian "state" mafia criminal activity
2.2. "prosecutor" Peicu Daniela instigated that the sentence in 12718/231/2017 be falsified
2.3 . my mafia appointed “state lawyer" Miron Adrian pleaded against my plead, against the
law, against my fundamental rights, against juridical logic, against facts and invoked proofs and facts
that don't exist but never presented them obviously because they don't exist, as he was instigated by
the Romanian “state” mafia to do
2.4. accomplice “registrar” Luminita Mioara Haiduc, who wrote the meeting closing document
based on which quotes I punctually demonstrated the instigation and complicity to Crimes against
humanity, and who refused to denounce the criminal activity she witnessed as a public functionary
according to articles 61, 291 paragraph 2 and 293 from the Romanian Penal Code, committing the felony
of Omission to denounce flagrantly
2.5 subpoena addresses
2.5^1 “judge” Badiu Mandica from Vrancea Tribunal is to be subpoenaed at his place of work,
Tribunalul Vrancea, Focşani, Str.Cuza Vodă nr.43, judeţul Vrancea, email: tr-vrancea@just.ro
2.5^2 “prosecutor” Peicu Daniela is to be subpoenaed at his place of work, Parchetul de pe
langa Tribunalul Vrancea, Focşani, Str.Cuza Vodă nr.43, judeţul Vrancea, email: pt_vrancea@just.ro
2.5^3 “lawyer” Miron Adrian is to be subpoenaed at his place of work, Baroul Vrancea, Focşani,
Strada Cuza Vodă nr. 6, cod 620034, email: baroulvrancea@yahoo.com
2.5^4 “registrar” Luminita Mioara Haiduc is to be subpoenaed at his place of work, Tribunalul
Vrancea, Focşani, Str.Cuza Vodă nr.43, judeţul Vrancea, email: tr-vrancea@just.ro
3 - I.B.3
3.1."judge" Miron Doina from "Judecatoria Focsani" courthouse falsified the sentence in
12718/231/2017 in 1st instance as thoroughly demonstrated in this section and section I.B.3., claiming
against all law, regulations, juridical logic that groundlessly, being proven innocent meaning never
Page 21 of 501
indicted and convicted of anything thus benefiting of the presumption of innocence, I must be Illegally
deprived of liberty indefinitely to life then Tortured, Bodily Harmed and Qualifiedly Murdered by being
incarcerated in the Focsani “psychiatric” gulag although being proven mentally sane as in army
incorporable, apt for work and superior studies, having work experience with superior studies, as proven
logically, having witnesses etc., then put in anaphylactic shock and chemically lobotomized with deadly
fluorine based neurotoxins for the purpose of state terrorism and wrongful political repression in the
Romanian “state” mafia’s interest to stop me from denouncing its criminal activity, "judge" Miron Doina
knowing as proof of her murderous aforethought exactly how by breaking every relevant law, regulation
and juridical logic, and absolutely unjustified as I've demonstrated punctually in section A. II. 1.3.1^7.(1-
10) regarding the 7th Qualified Murder attempt, Torture and Bodily Harm, I've been arrested by the
mafia's secret police from my law faculty exams on 27th May 2017, tied up at the Focsani “psychiatric”
gulag to an operating table and put in anaphylactic shock for 3 days through fluorine and chlorine
injected poisoning without treatment, then after I survived they forcefully chemically lobotomized me
until 8th June 2017 under threat of violence with other deadly fluorine and chlorine poisons, all of which
I've demonstrated based on the same proofs in dossier 12718/231/2017 “judge” Miron Doina had but
never administered any, dossier in which furthermore I thoroughly objectivized in my written plead also
attached as annex 20 to my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to
this ICC penal dossier, how all the penal dossiers and psychiatric actions against me were falsified by the
Romanian "state" mafia breaking every relevant law, regulation and juridical logic without any grounded
factual motivation or juridical logical justification, and without administering any proofs because all
demonstrate by themselves my innocence which is the same reason my demonstration of my innocence
was refused to be brought in discussion, meaning no attempt was made to contradict and reject my
demonstration of my innocence and mental sanity exactly because it's impossible to contradict my plead
veridically and logically <assimilate what I've said in the other paragraph>, proofs which "judge" Miron
Doina was legally obligated to administer but refused in favor of executing the mafia's orders to which
"judge" Miron Doina thus proven belongs to, not even administering the mafia's falsified documents
because it’s impossible to objectivize their veridicity being obviously false and demonstrating by
themselves according to the principle of non-contradiction my innocence and mental sanity given the
mafia’s interest to successfully falsify penal dossiers and psychiatric actions against me and the fact the
mafia failed as proven by annex 17 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as
annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier regarding my empty judicial history meaning I was never indicted or
convicted since 2014 in the thus proven 4 falsified penal dossiers against me, also proven falsified in
many other ways which I will demonstrate in this ICC penal dossier, and as the fact the mafia failed
when I annulled 4 out of 6 of their “psychiatric” charlatanry actions in their own courthouses meaning in
15730/231/2014, 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance and 14277/231/2015 in 1st and 2nd instance as
proven in my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier, while the last two falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry actions are in ne bis in idem relation with
the two before them, meaning they are also intrinsically proven falsified, meaning 4909/231/2017 is in
ne bis in idem relation with 11224/231/2015 and 12718/231/2017 in ne bis in idem relation with
14277/231/2015 regarding the same obvious false accusations that I’m irresponsible, lacking
discernment, violent and a public danger groundlessly, only posing a danger to the Romanian "state"
mafia itself according to its Stalinist paranoia. “Judge” Miron Doina refused to administer the mafia’s
Page 22 of 501
falsified documents because it also meant administering in contradiction my demonstration the mafia's
documents are falsified, as well because the main obvious reason is that it’s impossible to legally justify
a falsified judicial decision for the committal of the felonies Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualified Murder
constituting Crimes against humanity against me. I mention I objectivized in my plead attached as annex
20 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier how any penal or psychiatric action against me was and can only be falsified regardless when it is
falsified because as I proven in 12718/231/2017 with documents, witnesses and logic regarding my
entire biography, that I can not even reasonably be suspected of being a sociopath criminal like the
Romanian "magistrates" who can't abstain from pervasively breaking the law and infringing on people's
right daily which I've proven extensively to the Romanian "penal authorities" who to my dismay I found
out from their lack of response or falsified answers, and thus proven statistically, that all “magistrates”
are also part of the Romania "state" mafia, other national and international institutions and
organizations, and publicly on the illicitly mafia censored forum "militia.freeforums.net", my illicitly
mafia partly censored facebook.com account which occurred simultaneously with the censorship of
"militia.freeforums.net" in April 2017 during the daily home breakings before Orthodox Easter by tens of
mafia soldier “masked policemen”, “policemen”, “secret policemen” and “gendarmes” as if I were a
MMA fighter or terrorist not an intellectual human rights defender, then again immediately after I
opened a facebook.com group called "Romanian revolution for human rights" in February 2018, while
some of the documents presented through these internet media remain on my public scribd.com
account. The penal dossiers I opened against the Romanian “magistrate” mafia I published on the illicitly
mafia censored forum "militia.freeforums.net" between the years 2014 - 2017 hoping for public outrage
and lustration of the corrupt and criminal “magistrates” from office which failed because of the
Romanian people’s idiocy meaning lack of skill and interest in public affairs, not to mention cowardice
and lack of integrity, penal dossiers in which never was a criminal "magistrate" I caught acquitted
because it’s impossible given I built all dossiers based on proven accusations ready to be sent in court,
and as proof of verity of my declarations in all the penal dossiers I opened against the Romanian
"magistrate" mafia, I was never accused of the felony of giving False declarations even if it's the
Romanian "magistrate" mafia intention proven by the 4 penal dossiers it falsified against me, I was
never accused of the felony of Inducing the judiciary bodies into error by falsifying proofs, and I was
never accused of the felony of Disseminating false information by publishing on the internet most of the
penal dossiers against the Romanian "magistrate" mafia caporegimes, their "masked policemen",
"secret policemen", "policemen" and "gendarmes" soldiers, and their "legal medics", "lawyers" and
other interloper associates. To this I continue to declare responsibly knowing of the consequences of
False declarations, Inducing the judiciary bodies into error and Disseminating false information (because
I'll publish and disseminate this plead to raise public awareness) according to Romanian Penal Code,
judicial declarations that I've also given to a number of international organizations such as INTERPOL
where the same no fault was found in my demonstration of the Romanian "state" mafia criminal activity
3.2. "prosecutor" Anca Rasca instigated that the sentence in 12718/231/2017 be falsified
3.3 . my mafia appointed “state lawyer" Arginteanu Dan pleaded against my plead, against the
law, against my fundamental rights, against juridical logic, against facts and invoked proofs and facts
that don't exist but never presented them obviously because they don't exist, as he was instigated by
the Romanian “state” mafia to do
Page 23 of 501
3.4. accomplice “registrar” Judele Claudia, who wrote the meeting closing document based on
which quotes I punctually demonstrated the instigation and complicity to Crimes against humanity, and
who refused to denounce the criminal activity she witnessed as a public functionary according to articles
61, 291 paragraph 2 and 293 from the Romanian Penal Code, committing the felony of Omission to
denounce flagrantly
3.5 subpoena addresses
“judge” Miron Doina from “Judecatoria Focsani” courthouse is to be subpoenaed at his place of
work, Judecatoria Focsani, Focşani, Str.Cuza Vodă nr.43, judeţul Vrancea, email: jud-focsani@just.ro
3.5^1 “prosecutor” Anca Rasca is to be subpoenaed at his place of work, Parchetul de pe lângă
Judecatoria Focsani, Str. Cuza Vodă nr. 43, Focşani, jud. Vrancea, email: pj_focsani@just.ro
3.5^2 “lawyer” Arginteanu Dan is to be subpoenaed at his place of work, Baroul Vrancea,
Focşani, Strada Cuza Vodă nr. 6, cod 620034, email: baroulvrancea@yahoo.com
3.5^3 “registrar” Judele Claudia is to be subpoenaed at his place of work, Judecatoria Focsani,
Focşani, Str.Cuza Vodă nr.43, judeţul Vrancea, email: jud-focsani@just.ro
4 - I.B.4
4.1. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior
4.2. "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras Ionut,
instead of proving my innocence as legally obligated according to article 5 from the Romanian
Penal Procedure Code regarding the principle of finding out the truth, and the principle of the
impartiality of the prosecutors, my innocence being evident according to all the proofs, even the
accusers penally self-incriminating depositions, all which "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his
superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras Ionut refused to administer for both the accusation and the
defense, as they refused to build an indictment with which to notify the courthouse, or close the cause
right away denouncing to the superior prosecutor office the felonies of False declarations and Inducing
into error the judicial bodies committed by the lying accusers, they claimed against all relevant law,
regulations, juridical logic that groundlessly and being proven innocent meaning never indicted and
convicted of anything thus benefiting of the presumption of innocence as they admit in their falsified
ordnance anyway, that I must be Illegally deprived of liberty indefinitely to life then Tortured, Bodily
Harmed and Qualifiedly Murdered by being incarcerated in the Focsani “psychiatric” gulag although
being proven mentally sane as in army incorporable, apt for work and superior studies, licensed in
informatics, having work experience in informatics, being a student in law, having other documents
proving my mental sanity as this plead in itself proves my mental sanity logically, having witnesses etc.,
then put in anaphylactic shock and chemically lobotomized with deadly fluorine based neurotoxins for
the purpose of state terrorism and wrongful political repression in the Romanian “state” mafia’s interest
to stop me from denouncing its criminal activity, "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first
prosecutor" Petrescu Auras Ionut knowing as proof of their murderous aforethought exactly how by
breaking every relevant law, regulation and juridical logic, and absolutely unjustified as I've
demonstrated punctually in section A. II. 1.3.1^7.(1-10) regarding the 7th Qualified Murder attempt,
Torture and Bodily Harm constituting Crimes against humanity, I've been arrested by the mafia's
"secret police" soldiers from my law faculty exams on 27th May 2017, tied up at the Focsani “psychiatric”
Page 24 of 501
gulag to an operating table and put in anaphylactic shock for 3 days through fluorine and chlorine
injected poisoning without treatment, then after I survived the “psychiatrist” torturers forcefully
chemically lobotomized me until 8th June 2017 under threat of violence with other deadly fluorine and
chlorine poisons, all of which I've demonstrated based on the same proofs in dossier 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor"
Petrescu Auras Ionut never administered because the proofs demonstrate my innocence and mental
sanity by themselves, falsified dossiers in which furthermore I thoroughly objectivized in my penal
complaint I lodged with the title of judicial declaration against these "judiciary bodies" proving how and
why they falsified these dossiers, and lodged with the penal authorities, as in short I’ve also declared
and demonstrated in the 3 declarations they judicially harassed me to give, judicial declarations through
which I made these accused "judiciary bodies" incompatible to address these dossiers according to the
principle nemo esse iudex in sua causa potest, or as according to jurisprudence how notoriously the
anticorruption Romanian commissar Traian Berbeceanu accused and got convicted his lying accusers
from the same anticorruption institution, in the same penal dossier they falsified against him.
Furthermore I demonstrated in my written plead also attached as annex 20 to my Rule 39 ECHR urgent
request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, how all the penal dossiers
and “psychiatric” charlatanry actions against me were falsified by the Romanian "state" mafia breaking
every relevant law, regulation and juridical logic without any grounded factual motivation, juridical
logical justification or scientific objectivization, and without administering any proofs because all proofs
demonstrate by themselves my innocence and mental sanity which is the same reason my
demonstration of my innocence and mental sanity was refused to be brought in discussion on all
mandatory occasions, meaning no attempt was made to contradict and rejected my demonstration of
my innocence and mental sanity exactly because it's impossible to contradict my plead veridically and
logically, proofs which "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu
Auras Ionut were legally obligated to administer but refused in favor of executing the mafia's orders to
which these "prosecutors" thus proven belong to, not even administering the mafia's falsified
documents because it’s impossible to objectivize their veridicity being obviously false and
demonstrating by themselves according to the principle of non-contradiction and principle of excluded
third my innocence and mental sanity given the mafia’s interest to successfully falsify penal dossiers and
psychiatric actions against me and the fact the mafia failed as proven by annex 17, annex 18 and annex
19 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier regarding my empty judicial history and continuous mentions of lacking a judicial history
meaning I was never indicted or convicted since 2014 meaning in all the proven 4 falsified penal dossiers
against me, also proven falsified in many other ways which I will demonstrate in this ICC penal dossier,
and also given the fact the mafia failed when I annulled 4 out of 6 of their “psychiatric” charlatanry
actions in their own courthouses meaning in 15730/231/2014, 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance and
14277/231/2015 in 1st and 2nd instance as proven in my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim
measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, while the last two falsified “psychiatric”
charlatanry actions are in ne bis in idem relation with the two before them, meaning they are also
intrinsically proven falsified, meaning 4909/231/2017 is in ne bis in idem relation with 11224/231/2015
and 12718/231/2017 in ne bis in idem relation with 14277/231/2015 regarding the same obvious false
accusations that I’m irresponsible, lacking discernment, violent and a public danger groundlessly, as
Page 25 of 501
even the courthouse proven falsified documents from 14277/231/2017 where invoked in
12718/231/2017 in 2nd instance no less by the same “judge” Badiu Mandica who rejected them in
14277/231/2017 in 1st instance being aware they were also rejected in 2nd instance as inadmissible and
unfounded, even by reduction ad absurdum only posing a danger to the Romanian "state" mafia itself
according to its Stalinist paranoia, which is no legitimate reasoning in any regard. "prosecutor" Lupu
Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras Ionut refused to administer the mafia’s
falsified documents because it also meant administering in contradiction my demonstration the mafia's
documents are falsified, as well as because the main obvious reason is that it’s impossible to justify a
falsified judicial decision for the committal of the felonies Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualified Murder
constituting Crimes against humanity against me. I mention I objectivized in my plead attached as annex
20 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier how any penal or psychiatric action against me was and can only be falsified regardless when it is
falsified because as I proven in 12718/231/2017 with documents, witnesses and logic regarding my
entire biography, that I can not even reasonably be suspected of being a sociopath criminal like the
Romanian "magistrates" who can't abstain from pervasively breaking the law and infringing on people's
rights daily which I've proven extensively to the Romanian "penal authorities" who to my dismay I found
out from their lack of response or falsified answers, and thus proven statistically, that all “magistrates”
are also part of the Romania "state" mafia, as I’ve proven to other national and international institutions
and organizations, and published on the illicitly mafia censored forum "militia.freeforums.net" on 8th
April 201, my almost simultaneously illicitly mafia partly censored facebook.com account on 10th April
2017 during the daily home breakings before Orthodox Easter by tens of Romanian “state” mafia soldier
“masked policemen”, “policemen”, “secret policemen” and “gendarmes” as if I were a MMA fighter or
terrorist not an peaceful intellectual human rights defender, facebook.com account then again illicitly
censored in part immediately after I opened a group called "Romanian revolution for human rights" in
February 2018 which startled the Stalinist-paranoid Romanian “state” mafia hanging on my
facebook.com account all day judging by their prompt selective reaction. The reason for the illicit
censorships is the penal dossiers I opened against the Romanian “magistrate” mafia that I published
without being accused of the felony of Disseminating false informations as proof of verity, on the illicitly
mafia censored forum "militia.freeforums.net" between the years 2014 - 2017, hoping for public
outrage and consequent lustration of the corrupt and criminal “magistrates” from office even if just
coming from the Romanian “state” mafia to protect it’s fake public image, which failed because of the
Romanian people’s idiocy meaning lack of skill and interest in public affairs, not to mention cowardice
and lack of integrity, public penal dossiers in which never was a criminal "magistrate" I caught acquitted
because it’s impossible given I built all dossiers based on proven accusations ready to be sent in court,
and as proof of verity of my declarations in all the penal dossiers I opened against the Romanian
"magistrate" mafia, I was never accused of the felony of giving False declarations even if it's the
Romanian "magistrate" mafia illicit intention proven by the 4 penal dossiers it falsified against me in
which I was never indicted and convicted as proof, I was never accused of the felony of Inducing the
judiciary bodies into error by falsifying proofs, and I was never accused of the felony of Disseminating
false information by publishing on the internet most of the penal dossiers against the Romanian
"magistrate" mafia caporegimes, their "masked policemen", "secret policemen", "policemen" and
"gendarmes" soldiers, and their "legal medics", "lawyers", convicts and other interloper associates,
Page 26 of 501
although I even filed self denunciations based on the "prosecutor's" lies that the "magistrate" felonies
I've filed penal complaints for don't exist, and the self denunciations were of course covered up by other
"prosecutors" who delayed solving them indefinitely as they thought they only had this option which
also proves my case anyway, or 5 non-viable alternatives of, first, going against the mafia and indict the
"magistrate" criminal I caught and send him to be convicted which of course wouldn't happen because
the mafia doesn't convict its own members as proof of the difference to a real body of magistrates,
corroborated factually with the notorious evidence for all the ECHR convictions of Romania, no mafia
"magistrate" who falsified those annulled decisions with aforethought ever paid to my knowledge and
according to the press, second, if this "other" prosecutor refused to indict me and closed the file
concluding I didn't commit False declarations and Inducing the judiciary bodies into error, according to
the principle of non-contradiction and principle of excluded third he would contradict the "prosecutor"
who lied the felonies I've denounced don't exist and who should've in fact accused me of the felonies of
False declarations and Inducing the judiciary bodies into error ex officio but also tacitly admitted I am
right by this, third, if this other "prosecutor" indicted me, the case most probably would've failed in
court automatically proving this "other" prosecutor falsified the indiction, just like I've annulled the 4
“psychiatric” charlatanry actions against me proving they are falsified in the mafia's courthouses;
15730/231/2014, 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance and 14277/231/2017 in 1st and 2nd instance, while
the last 2 of the total 6 are in ne bis in idem relation with the last 2 before them being proven false
implicitly, fourth, if this other "prosecutor" abused the judicial system and psychiatry as state terrorism
and wrongful political repression he would get involved in Crimes against humanity directly like the
"judicial bodies" who instigated and committed the Crimes against humanity against me as proven in
this ICC penal dossier, through which they achieved the opposite of their goal; they abilitated me and
supported my goal to further demonstrate the existence and criminal activity of the Romanian "state"
mafia, and finally fifth, resign, in conclusion this other "prosecutor" having no options at all because any
path taken serves my purpose of proving the criminal activity of the Romanian "state" mafia. To this I
continue to declare responsibly knowing of the consequences of False declarations, Inducing the
judiciary bodies into error and Disseminating false information (because I'll publish and disseminate this
plead to raise public awareness even if internationally about the Romanian “state” mafia) according to
Romanian Penal Code, judicial declarations that I've also given to a number of international
organizations such as INTERPOL where the same no fault was found in my demonstration of the
Romanian "state" mafia criminal activity. As proof the Romanian "state" mafia tacitly admits the
decisions in 12718/231/2017 are falsified, the prosecutor's office should also have accused me of the
felony of Disrespecting the court order by not allowing the mafia to indefinitely to life "psychiatrically"
incarcerate me, Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualifiedly Murder me, against which of course not only can I
prove as I did in this ICC penal dossier that the decisions in 12718/231/2017 are falsified which is
relevant because this felony refers to disrespecting judicial decisions not falsified documents with no
force of right whatsoever, but I can also invoke the Romanian Penal Code physical and moral constraint
clause which removes the penal character of this particular felony in this particular cause, making a
further accusation against me useless even if it was falsified for the purpose of covering up the falsified
decision from 12718/231/2017
Page 27 of 501
4.3 "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras Ionut
to be subpoenaed at their place of work, Parchetul de pe lângă Judecatoria Focsani, Str. Cuza Vodă nr.
43, Focşani, jud. Vrancea, email: pj_focsani@just.ro
5 - I.B.5
5.1. "judge" Neagu Rodica from Vrancea Tribunal delayed the trial in 1779/91/2017 to allow the
Romanian “state” mafia to capture me and commit Crimes against humanity against me, as it
attempted in 4909/231/2017 in 2nd instance where it motivated “I must prove I’m not the devil”. For
participating in the attacked falsified decision in 4909/231/2017 in 2nd instance, “judge” Neagu Rodica
was incompatible to address dossier 1779/91/2017 according to article 64 paragraphs 3 and 4 from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code, althemore I have many penal dossiers against “judge” Neagu Rodica
lodges with the prosecutor’s office, in which he was never aquitted as I declare knowing the
consequences of the felonies of False declarations of which I was never accussed, penal dossiers
inclusively for being accomplice to the cover-up of the Crimes against humanity committed against me
in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014, in cahoots with the same “judge” Croitoru Sandina
Mariana who falsified the decision in 4909/231/2017 in 2nd instance after obtaining the dossier from
“judge” Neagu Rodica with no apparent legal forms. "judge" Neagu Rodica from Vrancea Tribunal after
allowing Crimes against humanity to be committed against me between 27th May 2017 and 8th June
2017 as I objectivized in section A.II.1.3.1^7, attempted to cover them up through the falsification of the
decision in 1779/91/2017, all of which I thoroughly demonstrated in section I.B.5.
5.2. "prosecutor" Barsan Victoria instigated that the decision in 1779/91/2017 be falsified
5.3 . my mafia appointed “state lawyer" Lupu Cosmin pleaded against my plead, against the law,
against my fundamental rights, against juridical logic, against facts and invoked proofs and facts that
don't exist but never presented them obviously because they don't exist, as he was instigated by the
Romanian “state” mafia to do
5.4. accomplice “registrar” Varlan Carmen, who wrote the meeting closing document based on
which quotes I punctually demonstrated the instigation and complicity to Crimes against humanity, and
who refused to denounce the criminal activity he witnessed as a public functionary according to articles
61, 291 paragraph 2 and 293 from the Romanian Penal Code, committing the felony of Omission to
denounce flagrantly
5.5 subpoena addresses
5.5^1 “judge” Neagu Rodica from Vrancea Tribunal is to be subpoenaed at his place of work,
Tribunalul Vrancea, Focşani, Str.Cuza Vodă nr.43, judeţul Vrancea, email: tr-vrancea@just.ro
5.5^2 “prosecutor” Barsan Victoria is to be subpoenaed at his place of work, Parchetul de pe
lângă Judecatoria Focsani, Str. Cuza Vodă nr. 43, Focşani, jud. Vrancea, email: pj_focsani@just.ro
5.5^3 “lawyer” Lupu Cosmin is to be subpoenaed at his place of work, Baroul Vrancea, Focşani,
Strada Cuza Vodă nr. 6, cod 620034, email: baroulvrancea@yahoo.com
5.5^4 “registrar” Varlan Carmen is to be subpoenaed at his place of work, Tribunalul Vrancea,
Focşani, Str.Cuza Vodă nr.43, judeţul Vrancea, email: tr-vrancea@just.ro
<remained here with work, enumerate the perpetrators in inverse chronological order according
to plead.txt and I.B.? sections
Page 28 of 501
<perhaps make link references in the <x - I.B.x to aid in navigation of the document, although
they can also be easily reached by find the appropriate paragraph who is also bold to differentiate from
the references to it
<6 - I.B.6
6.1. <adapt from plead.txt> “psychiatrist” torturer Florea Gabriela is the Focsani “psychiatric”
gulag chief who “authorised” me being tied to an operating table and put in anaphylactic shock for at
least 3 days through daily deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxic poisoning without treatment
expecting me to die, then after I survived being chemically lobotomized me with other deadly fluorine
and chlorine neurotoxins, constituting the 7th Crimes against humanity committal against me as
objectivized in section I.A.II.1.3.1^7, I.B.6, and I.A.I.1-2. See annex 16 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request
for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier
6.2. <“psychiatrist” torturer Barbarosie Carmen is the mafia associate who named or was
named curator and breaking every relevant law, regulation, norm, deontology and logic chemically
lobotomized me with deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins again to Qualifiedly Murder me while
incidentally Torturing and gravely Bodily Harm me as I’ve objectivized especially in chapter 1 from
annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier. In short not only are both fluorine and chlorine neurotoxic poisons deadly, it’s proven they
cause “mental illness” not cure it as obvious by destroying the brain as proven, and in combination they
increase the chance of dying which is why I was always administered these deadly poisons in
combination as overdose to be Qualifiedly Murdered, which is why I was put in anaphylactic shock for
at least 3 days without treatment being expected to die
6.3. <“psychiatrist” torturer Dutescu Mircea is both one of the “psychiatrists” torturers on guard
in the first 3 days of “psychiatric” torture when I was put in anaphylactic shock without treatment and
expected to die, and participated on the 3rd day in the face committee convening for covering-up the
fact my “psychiatric” incarceration was illegal, irregular, against norms, deontology and logic as I’ve
succintly indicated all the laws, regulations, norms, deontology and logic broken by the “pscychiatrist”
charlatans in chapter I.3 from annex 23 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, 3rd day when “psychiatrist” torturer Dutescu Mircea was
yelling that “I’m a public danger and must be incarcerated and chemically lobotomized” although
obviously innocent and obviously a human right defender being wrongfully politically repressed, being
no doubt about the fact “psychiatrist” torturer Dutescu Mircea is one of the principal perpetrators of
Crimes against humanity against me between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, both disposing that I be
injected at night in the 2nd day and in the morning in the 3rd day with deadly fluorine and chlorine
neurotoxic poisons even if I reported repeatedly the symptom that was visible of severely shacking from
all my body and that I was feeling very ill
6.4. <”psychiatrist” torturer Puiu <?other name?> is the the other “psychiatrist” torturers on
guard from the 1st day in which I was expected to be incarcerated in the Focsani “psychiatric” gulag by 5
“psychiatrist” charlatans ( - I refer to “psychiatrist” “assistants” and “medics” as “psychiatrist”
charlatans because there is no differece, they are charlatans and their medical and scientific knowledge
is relatively equal meaning virtually non-existant, while historically in fact the “psychiatrist” charlatans
wrose exactly from “medical assistants” who wrote charlatanry literature to elevate their status in
Page 29 of 501
society for illicit profit.) who tied me up violently to an operating table and injected me with an
overdose of deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxic poisons putting me in anaphylactic shock since the
first day
6.5. <of the other “psychiatrist” torturer accomplices who were present during most of the time
th
of the 7 Crimes against humanity commital I name the “psychiatrist” charlatan Mihai Oana who was
repeatedly and sadistically asking me if “I was afraid”, and I mention this one because Mihai Oana also
participated in the falsified convening of the committee for the cover-up of the illegality of my
“psychiatric” incarceration on the 3rd day, a monday as I remember, and witnessed when the
“pscyhiatrist” torturer Barbarosie Carmen callously “prescribed” after I survived the first 3 days in
anaphylactic shock other deadly fluorine and chlroine neurotoxins, calling me probably “schizo” - short
for schizophrenic showing objectivization of dehumanization towards her victims as a typical psychopath
/ sociopath, which corresponds with the deadly risperidone or paliperidone fluorine based neurotoxin
which claims to cure schizophrenia by causing schizophrenia proving the producers, commercializers,
state agencies who approve it and “pscyhiatrist” charlatans who prescribe it are all schizophrenic or
logically incoherent. On the annex 16 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached
as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier of course there’s not even a falsified diagnosis of schizphrenia,
proving again the mafia’s intent to Qualifiedly Murder me with the most brain damaging poisons they
“legitimally” had at disposal to cover-up the Qualified Murder at the same time reminding no Qualified
Murder and no Bodily Harm or Torture is ever investigated and condemned in the Romainan
“psychaitric” gulags because the Romanian “state “mafia pervasively used still as it did before during the
“communist” era, the “psychiatry” charlatanary as a weapon of wrongful political repression. Because
Mihai Oana seems to fetch the “psychiatric” ccharlatanry poisons at the orders of the others, I suspect
Mihai Oana is the same who stole the deadly fluorine based neurotoxin risperidone or paliperidone from
the inventory, with which I was covertly injected during the night between 5th and 6th December 2014
constituting the 2nd Crimes against humanity I’ve objectivized in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^2, I.B.22, and
I.A.I.1-2
6.6. <the third member of the committee who attempted to cover-up the illegality on the 3rd
day while still in anaphylactic shock, meaning all three were aware I was in anaphylactic shock and
refused to treat me for it, is an elderly grey hair and having a moustache person, member of the
leadership of the local health direction where I saw him while interesting myself of my 3 petitions
ignored by the malpraxis committee, not knowing his name
6.7. <from the “pscyhiatrist” charlatans “assistants I remember there was one tall blond typical
“communist” torturer who during the first three days of being put in anaphylactic shock through deadly
fluorine and chlorine neurotoxic poisoning was sadistically mocking me by saying things like “you want
more poison?” while grinning, while I was reporting I was shacking from my whole body and feeling very
ill, meaning this one is a clear sadistic psychopath who painfully twisted my arm while I was tied
violently to the operating table, meaning who authored the actual 7th Crimes against humanity. I also
remember 2 of the other “pscyhiatrist” charlatans “assistants” were members of the Rroma minority,
both thin and middleaged, and one of them less thin is the one who injected me first with the deadly
overdose of fluorine and chlorine neurotoxic poisons then stood “on guard” expecting me to die while I
was entering anaphylactic shock. I don’t remember who the 4th and 5th ones were as they were present
just for violently tying me up to the operating table making a big circus about it as typical from sadistic
Page 30 of 501
psychopaths to witness the suffering and destruction of another man’s life, but I’m sure they can be
identified by the others. I do remember to this circus one of the mafia “secret police” soldiers who was
clearly a member of the Rroma minority although having no more “official” bussiness came to watch me
being Tortured, Bodily Harmed and beint attempted Qualified Murder against, making the Rroma
minority mention because in fact the Nazi scientist report that the members of the Rroma minority
predisposed genetically and culturally to be sociopaths, ~”will never socially integrate in civilized society”
was never invalidated and proven time and time again, their occupation ranging throughout all Europe
from thiefs and bribe-takers to murderers. Of course if there is even one honest Rroma minority
member and there are a few, the Rroma minority as a whole can’t be discriminated against, but here I’m
not discriminating but scientifically proving why half of the “pscyhiatrist” torturers were in fact members
of the Rroma minority, and so is “prosecutors” Mihaila Paul, Tarlea Florin Cristinel, Barsan Victoria,
“policewoman” Popescu Lacramioara and pretty much half of the ones who falsified acts of procedure
instigating Crimes against humanity againt me. Europe has no ideea what it unleashed upon itself twice,
as ironically the Romanian Rroma minority is nothing else than old Syrian refugees who never integrated
socially over the course of hundreds of years, fact which I’ve discovered by the identical traditional
clothing between Romanian Rroma minority and some of the over 20 Syrian minority ethnic groups,
which makes perfect sense since Syria or the Levant was a theatre of war and genocide for millenia.
Finally I remember one fat young Romanian and one middle aged Rroma minority “pscyhiatrist”
assistants who attempted to inject me with what they claim to be antibiotics, marking me like cattle
with a ball point pen which is a form of dehumanization as I’ve objectivized in section I.A.II.1.4.
preparing to put a permanent needle in my arm which would’ve contributed to intrahospital infection
many Romanians died from, and this by force while I didn’t consent, time at which I implored the
“psychiatrist” torturer Florea Gabriela who was sadistically witnessing to stop poisoning and sticking
needles in me as I did every day in fact, who played “good cop” telling the two other “psychiatrst”
torturers to stop torturing me. The fat young Romanian “psychiatrist” torturer from these two was on
another time assuring me in cahoots with Gabriela Florea, grinnng sadistically the deadly fluorine and
chlorine based neurotoxins weren’t brain damaging me while I was daily imploring them to stop
chemically lobotomizing me, as I both knew from before and feeling losing my mind faculties from
neurotoxic poisoning, and as I’ve objectivized now in annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for
interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier in fact the chemical lobotomization I was
subjected to being much more severe than I believed because the mafia’s intent to an effect was as
proven to Qualifiedly Murder me while making it appear “of natural causes” as surely they would’ve
faked the legal medicine report regarding an cardiac arrest, and only incidentally Tortured and gravely
Bodily Harmed me, just as when I was covertly injected with the same deadly fluorine based neurotoxic
risperidone or paliperidone in the night between 5th adn 6th December 2014 which constitutes the 2nd
Crimes against humanity committal against me. There was another “psychiatrist” assistant guard
present both during the days I was in anaphylactic shock, and who forcefully took me to the last
“psychologist” charlatan, and to the “psychiatric” charlatanry “examination” from 8th June 2017 where
nothing happened as usual as nothing could happen without my consent and cooperation but the
“psychiatrist” charlanta Lucasievici Silviu also involved in the falsification of the “psychaitrist” charlatan
documents against me since 2015 kept repeating “is clear” being obviously mentally alienated since if he
was aware of falsifying the procedure every time there was no need to convince anyone he wasn’t, me
Page 31 of 501
or himself or the other “psychaitrist “charlatans, because we were all aware of “pscyhiatric” charlatnary
falsification of documents and Crimes against humanity. This last guard is thin, blond and young, having
an eye problem and being clearly mentally retarded, as I’ve indicated often the Romanian mountain red-
necks and the Romanian Rroma minority being the recruiting grounds of torturers since the
“communist” era at least, meaning from the ranks of immoral, functionally analphabet at least persons
from the violent Romanian peasantry
6.8 <the other accomplices are the “psychologist” charlatans <name and <name, who
interviewed me even during anaphylactic shock on <, and respectivelly on <, and also refused to dispose
that I be treated for meaing are clear accomplices and intrinsic instigators to the Crimes against
humanity by refusing to denounce the mafia as legally obligated, but neither did they resign as at least
humane if they feared the mafia’s reprisal, but simply sacrificed my life for their petty financial interests
demontrating they are sociopaths. See annex 16 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim
measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier for the objectivization of their falsified document
contribution to the cover-up of the 7th Crimes against humanity, in reality contributing to the
demonstration of the breaking of every relevant law, regulation, norm, deontology and logic as
objectivized in chapter I.3 from annex 23 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, and even as the last declared I had full cognitive functions
after 12 days of chemical lobotomization, anaphylactic shock, meaning Torture and Bodily Harm both
physical and psychosomatical, about which he should’ve noted post traumatic shock disorder
6.9. <as aforementioned the last accomplices and intrinsic instigators of the 7th Crimes against
humanity are the members of the “pscyhiatric” charlatanry committee from 8th June 2017 where I was
taken by force as usual without my consent where no “expertise” took place, and where I recognized
Lucasievici Silviu, one of the “psychiatrist” charlatans who falsified the “psychiatric” charlatnary
documents ever since 17th September 2015, another woman “psychiatrist” charlatan at least if not two, I
don’t remember clearly and they were suppose to be 5 as on 17th September 2015, and Florea Gabriela
again who was mocking me using an “unbelieving” tone whether “I would take my medicine” meanign
the chemically lobotomizing and schizophrenia causing risperidone or paliperidone, for which I was
never even falsely diagnosed and with which I was covertly injected as I can prove now during the night
between 5th and 6th December 2014, constituting the 2nd Crimes against humanity committal against me
6.10 <there are other accomplices to the Crimes against humanity committed in general in the
Focsani “psychiatric” gulag, meaning the workers in the kitchen who are aware of what happens in the
Focsani “psychiatric” gulag and refuse to denounce, and other personel involved in the illegal
experimentation making fake statistics as objectivzied by the very mafia “secret service” report I spoke
of in paragraphs 1.1^6, 2.4^13.5 and 2.4^20 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for
interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, reminding that especially in the Focsani
“psychiatric” gulag the torturers declared that the Ministry of Health gave them authorization to break
the law as if that is even possible, proving they are also schizophrenic - logically incoherent,
occupationally dysfunctional and failing to recognize what’s real. I also mention an assistant secretary it
seems from the local “legal medicine” who was aware in cahoots with another who faked the
“psychaitric” paperwork on 6th April 2017 at the instigation of “pscyhiatrist” torturer Berzvehnnii Igor
primarely and two other woman “pscyhiatrist” or “psychologist” charlatans, meaning instigators through
the falsified decision in 4909/231/2017 that refered to these falsified documents to instigate the 7th
Page 32 of 501
Crimes against humanity committal, proving the wide concertizing at the hand of the mafia’s leadership
as I’ve objectivized in section I.A.II.1.3.1.7^7
<6.11. As I’ve objectivized in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^7, I.B.6, and I.A.I.1-2,no ethics committee was
ever convened, committee in which surely the chief “psychaitrist” torturer Florea Gabriela would’ve
been part of, again proving the central “psychiatrist” torturer who “authorised” the 7th Crimes against
humanity against me is Florea Gabriela. Clearly the whole nomenclature from the mafia associated
“legal medicine”, “lawyers”, “registrars”, the hospital management, the local health direction and
malpraxis committee and medic’s college are in cahoots for the commital of Crimes against humanity
aganist me and others as I’ve witnessed personally, because all are legally obligated to denounce the
crimes to the penal authorities which is true that in Romanian don’t exist, while the “penal authorities”
were also obligated to make sure the evidecne of the crimes don’t exist and prosecute and sent the
perpetrators of Crimes against humanity to be convicted, but of course they wouldn’t send themselves
to be convicted, the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes who actually instigated that the Crimes against
humainty be committed as proven in section I.A.II.1.3.1 in particular, nor would they convict the mafia
“secret police” soldiers who illegally arrested and incarcerated me making the 7th Crimes against
humanity possible as objectivized in section I.A.1.3.1^7, about which I demonstrate punctually in the
I.B.x sections in reverse chronological order because the latest Crimes against humanity are the most
relevant to my permanent refugee status which is why I demontrated them first
<This is the committal of the 7th Crimes against humanity, see section I.A.II.1.3.1^7
<7 - I.B.7 “judge” Neagu Rodica, under the watch of a Romanian “state” mafia appointed
unknown (isn’t even named anywhere) “lawyer” to “represent me” by usurping my rights in favor of the
mafia of course, emitted a ruse address to “prove I’m not the devil” as mediaval witch trials went, by
proving I’m not mentally insanwhich I actually did according to annex 22 from ECHR demonstrating as
certified by my family doctor who would’ve been notified otherwise though the informatized system of
any diagnostics, that I’m army incorporable and apt for superior studies, about which I have 4 work legal
medicine certificates, the ceertification of my 4 year college graduated from which I’m licensed in
informatics, and ever since army incorporable, as well as I’ve proven logicall, having witnesses etc.
although I didn’t have to prove anything according to the presumptino of innocence and blatant proof
all acts of procedure against me are falsified because they are simultaneously illegal and groundless.
“jugdge” Neagu Rodica attempted to fool me to go to a “psychaitrist” charlatan who would’ve called the
mafia soldiers to illegally arrest me, and “judge” Neagu Rodica delayed the trial in 4909/231/2017 for
this purpose, just as she illegally took over the contestation of it in 1779/91/2017, delayed it permitting
the 7th Crimes against humanity to be committed against me between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017,
and only then falsified the decision of rejection on 21st June 2017 as proven in detail in section I.B.5
<“judge” Croitoru Mariana Sandina took dossier 4909/231/2017 in 2nd instance without
apparent legal forms from “jduge” Neagu Rodica, and falsified teh decision copy-pasting the falsified
decision from 4909/231/2017 in 1st instance, and stole a administrative request about removing my
public evidence according to the law and Ministry of justice and Supreme magistrate council order to
Page 33 of 501
falsify a judiciary rejection which is inadmissible to start with, not just illegal and unfounded, acording to
the princple of separation of powers in theh democratic state, then falsified teh rejection of my
notification of the Romanian Constitutional Court, all in cahoots with “lawyer” <?which isn’t even
named in the falsified decision nor did he plead at all in my defence> and “prosecutor” Mihaila
Gheorghe who actually instigated the 4th Crimes aganist humanity in 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance
and lost. See annex 13 and annex 14 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached
as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier
<This is instigation to the 7th Crimes against humanity committal using the falsified decisions
from 4909/231/2017, see section I.A.II.1.3.1^7
<8 - I.B.8 on 13th, 14th and 27th April 2017, mafia 1 “police” and 1 “gendarme” then 2 or 3 “secret
police” soldiers broke into my mother’s apparment with falsified mandates they refused to hand my
mother as legally required, as well as refused to tell who they were, as proof of being fully aware they
were accomplice and instigators to Crimes aganist humanity, thus fully aware they are instigated mafia
soldiers to Crimes aganist humanity, the falsfieid mandates they had being proof with which they were
obligated to denounce the mafia instigator “magistrate” caporegimes who sent them, meaning Lupu
Mihai Cristian and Petrescu Auras Ionut, and their mafia “secret police / police / gendarmes” chiefs. First
the chiefs can be indentified, then these mafia soliders . The Romanian mafia controlled institutions
typically refuse to communicate the reports as legally required, especially in my case regarding a
“covert” concertizing of Crimes against humanity by the Romaniain “state” mafia leadership as proven
by the fact I was denied the right to make copies from falsfieid penal dossiers 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016, and to consult dossiers 4909/231/2017, 1779/91/2017 and
12718/231/2017 in which I sent my mother with a mandate to look and I know there weren’t even any
falsified “psychiatric” charltanary docuemtns in them meaning as I’ve heard they are circulated by the
mafia leadership meaning the mafia “secret services”, the oligarchic descendants of the “communist
secret police” who controls the actual Romanian “state” mafia cartel including the judiciary system most
importantly, and these documents are and will be kept secret as if a “state secret” which is no more
given my research and this document, pointing out that there have been discovered numerous illicit
understanding between the maifia “secret services” and the national anticorruption direction where the
mafia “secret services” were practically writing the penal dossiers of political police, as proof agani and
again which factino “is running the show” of the Romanian “state” mafai ever since 1945 in actuality,
maening my case is nothing different than the old “communist” mafia persecutions of intellectuals,
while the mafia oligarchic descendants after ~27 years of “democracy” are still protecting the
“communist” torturers and still believe the “communist” wrongful political repression would work,
which I have to admit would’ve if not for the help of God who kept me alive in 4 distinct instances I
could’ve died in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014 consituting the 2nd Crimes aganist
humanity committal, and in the daily Qualified Murder attempts from between 27th May 2017 and 8th
June 2017 constituting the 7th Crimes against humanity, reminding that because of the long presence of
the deadly fluorine based neurotoxin risperidone and paliperidone in the body meaning up to 300 days
depenidng on metabolism, proved in my blood stream for 6 month, meaning for 12 month or a whole
years i was in elevated risk of dying from poisoning while no mafia member denounced this or even
Page 34 of 501
attracted my attention in any way, nor was I treated for anaphylactic shock during the first worse 3 days,
clearly being expected to die, also meaning the chemical lobotomization or neurotoxicity persisted for at
least 12 months in my body and is responsible for the severe anhedonia, autoimmune sindrome I
developed in my hands if not from gadolinium poisoning at the medlife clinique where I took the 2nd MRI
scan, endocrine sytem problems related with sexual dysfunction problems, sight problems, learning,
memory and other cognition problems as I’ve objectivized through the objective testimonies in
paragraph 1.8 from annex 21 and chapter IV.5 from annex 23 from my ECHR request
<“registrar” Valentina Miauta is accomplice and improper instigator by the refusal to denounce
the mafia
<This is instigation to the 7th Crimes against humanity committal using the falsified decisions
from 4909/231/2017, see section I.A.II.1.3.1^7
<9 - I.B.9 <”judge” Dinu murgulet ana falsified a mandate constituting an act incidental act of
state terrorism through illegal home breaking and illegal arrest with 9 mafia “gendarme” soldiers as if I
were a dangerous terrorist or MMA fighter not a peaceful intellectual human rights defender, for the
sole purpose of impeding my right to defend myself by bringing me in court at the last possible moment
and not be able to consult the falsified dossier dossier 4909/231/2017 in which “judge” Dinu Murgulet
Ana falsified the decision in the same day of 10th April 2017 although he was incompatible for 11 reasons
as I’ve objectivized in section I.B.4.22.1^11. For the summary falsification demonstration of decision in
4909/231/2017 in 1st instance see annex 12 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier
<mafia appointed “lawyer” Micu Mihai as all others pleaded against my plead and rights even
aberrating that ne bis in idem expires (between 11224/231/2015 and 4909/231/2017), and of course
didn’t denounce the mafia he works for
<mafia “prosecutor” Batranu Iuliana is the same one who instigated the 5th Crimes aganist
humanity attempt in 14277/231/2015 in 1st and 2nd instance, while “judge” Dinu Murgulet Ana the same
one who instigated 4th Crimes aganist humanity attempt through the identical falsification of
10547/231/2015 as he falsifid 4791/231/2017 to lead to 4909/231/2017 just as 10547/231/2015 lead to
11224/231/2015 being evident that the same mafia actors or members are instigating Crimes against
humanity against me
<“registrar” Crina Stancu is accomplice and improper instigator by the refusal to denounce the
mafia
<This is instigation to the 7th Crimes against humanity committal using the falsified decisions
from 4909/231/2017, see section I.A.II.1.3.1^7
<10 - I.B.10 “judge’ Dinu Murgulet Ana falsified the mandate from 4791/231/2017 on 5th April
2017 just as he falsified the mandate from 10547/231/2015, illegal mandate executed by 2 mafia
“masked police” and 2 “police ‘soldiers on 6th April 2017, who illegally broke into my mother’s home,
illegally arrested and detained me for two hours then forcefully brought me to the “legal medicine”
institution where the “pschiatrist” charlatan Berzvehnii Igor and two other “psychiatrist” or
“psychologist” charlatans pretended a “psychiatric” charlatanry “expertise” took place. There are other
Page 35 of 501
witnesses to this such as two “legal medicine” isntitution workers, one of which who was falsifiying the
acutal “psychiatric” charlatanry documentation and another who had a horror look on her face from
what was happening but didn’t have the humanity to at least resign but collaborated with the mafai,
and my mother who accompanied me. The falsified “pscyhiatric” charlatanry documents were hidden
until now, just like the documents frmo the falsidifed dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/p/2016 and
4329/P/2016 because they are proof they are falsfiied, just as the refusal of the mafia “judciiary bodies”
is proof, just as I’ve proven in annex 8 and annex 9 these dossiers ar falsified, then made about the same
declarations 3 more tiems to the police who falsfied acts of procedure in them, wihtout ever being
accused of the felony of giving False declarations which proves all my declarations are true as even the
mafia admits it tacitly
<11- I.B.11 Constitutional Court falsified decision 25/19th January 2017 abolishing the
presumption of innocence and intrinsically implying that Crimes against humanity can be committed
against me by being illegally incarcerated indefinitely, Tortured, Bodily Harmed and Qualifiedly
Murdered, without an indictment and conviction according to article 109 from Romanian penal Code
which refers to convicts, and article 23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitutions refering to the
presumption of innocence which is only removed by being convicted definitively after an indictment
which in my case doesn’t even exist because the deeds I’m accused of don’t even physically exist and
cannot physically exist.
<the falsifiers and instigators to Crimes against humanity are Victor Ciorbea, the so-called
“peple’s lawyer”, a physically and mentally handicapped person just like Zegrean Augustin who falsified
a Constitutional Court decision in the past aganist me of lesser relative importance, meaning the mafia
consistently as I theorized hires and maintains as “magistrates” schizophrenics and mentally
handicapped, because they are mentally labile or lacking integrity and easily manipulated into
committing crimes for the mafia,
<and the other one I don’t remember clearly except that he is the president of the
Constitutional Court... <? - research when having internet?>, not having to remember because for a
falsifiedd decision of this magnitute all Constitutional Court members are aware, as well as the prime-
minister, the presiddent of Romania etc., meaning Constitutional Court falsified decision 25/19th
January 2017 is pivotal in the demonstartion that the Romanian “state” mafia controls CSAT - the
supreme council of the country’s defence, for which STS works, a maifa “secret telecommunications
service” who has been monitoring me as I’ve been discretely notified. Needles to mention I had a penal
dossier on Victor Ciorbea and Klaus Iohannis and whatever the prime-minister name was since they are
exchanged less than yearly in Romania as the mafia wind blows, none of which were ever acquitted
being impossible
<of course all this I can prove as soon as i have time although it’s obvious by itself the decision
being public and published by the state and the felons notoriously known or easily identifiable by
following the law and the responsibles who didnt’ do their job, or accomplices who are intrinsic
instigators etc.
<again needless to say this proves the mafia control of the Romanian press who never said
anything about this as if it never happened, of which ironically in parallel I investigated Hassan Awdi’s
case of illegal expropriation by the mafia in what looks like a mafia takeover although it concomittanlty
Page 36 of 501
looks like a behind the scene understanding, and whatever the case is it led to the destruction of the
Romanian free press putting under mafia control the rest who is subventioned by the mafia as proof
and refuses to tell its financing source, while Hassan Awdi was used as a scape goat for the whole affair.
hassan awdi’s case is notorious as one can google him cross-referencing with ICSID where he won once
already and is suing again for the rest
<12 - I.B.12 a falsified “pscyhiatric” charlatanry “expertise” in secret and in my absence on 8th or
9th December 2016. As usual teh falsified documents were illegally hidden but referenced without ever
appearing in the dossiers meaingn manipulated by the mafia’s “secret services” who clearly
demosntrates how it contorls and manipulates the Romanian “judiciary system” in a puerile manner I
might add because they haven’t realized anything but prove their existance by this when the right
course of action was to ignore me, but being paranoid criminal sociopaths they are obsessed to make a
show of their fictive power which wouldn’t even exist without the psychotic consent of the other
schizophrenic and sociopathic mafia “magistrate” caporegimes who could’ve simply opposed the mafia
at no cost as proven by “judge” Harabor Dorel who annulled the falsfieid decision in 11224/231/2015 in
1st instance, in 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance as proven by annex 3 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request
for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, or “judge” Badiu Mandica who
annuled in 14277/231/2015 in 1st instance the falsified “prosecutor” proposal for chemical
lobotomization demontrating openly the instigation to Crimes against humanity, although “judge Badiu
Mandica was clearly coerced by the mafia leadership somehow to falsify the decision in
12718/231/2017 in 2nd instance as objectivized in paragraph I.A.II.1.3.1.7^7 because he invoked the
falsified “pscyhaitric” charlatanry documents he annulled before, or even the mafai “magistrate”
caporegime Popa Mariana who annulled the “prosecutor” falsified appeal in 14277/231/2015 in 2nd
instance because he didn’t want to get involved in Crimes against humanity, although he fasified the
penal dossiers 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 and instigated the 7th and 8th Crimes against humanity
knowing what was the mafia’s intent to an effect - to Qualifiedly Murder me to stop mem from
denouncing its criminal activity, the felonies of Torture and Bodily Harm being incidental as were all teh
acts of state terrorism meang fot the purpose of infringing my right to defend myself or aid in the
falsificatino of acts of procedure against me
<13 - I.B.13 “policewoman” Popescu Lacramioara falsified the ordnances in rem, in personam
and putting into motion the penal action, and the proposal that I be subjected to an impossible
“pscyhaitric” charlatanry “examinatino” without my consent and cooperation, clearly demonstrating the
instigating of the 7th and 8th Crimes against humanity which wouldn’t exist because the mafia is
obsessed with pretexts and cover-up stories such as the falsfidied penal dossiers 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 althorugh so poorly executed that it helped me demontrated the
concertizing of the mafia leadership instead meanign it backfired again on the paranoid Romanian
“state” mafia who I repeat if it ignored my human rights defending it would’ve not gotten so far but
remained at the corruption level denouncements I was making agains thte Bucharest Tribunal “judges”,
Supreme Magistrate Council, prosecutors, ministry of justice, national anticorruption direction and anti
organized crime directions, crimes of corruption with which I coudln’t have notified ICC or the UN
Human Right Committees and many other international institutions and organizations, nor would I have
Page 37 of 501
discovered that the Romanian “state” mafia commits Crimes against humanity agianst institutionalized
children, homeless, Rroma minority, yougnsters, elders, dissidents, human rights defenders etc. thorugh
illegal exeperimentation for illicit profit from the pharmaceutical mafia, even using the judiciary system
to convict innocents to be chemically lobotomized for it as I’ve objectivized in para paragraphs 1.1^6,
2.4^13.5 and 2.4^20.1 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached
as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier
<accomplices and intrinsic instigators are, another “policewoman” named Manta <?> who took
the place of Popescu Lacramioara one time, and the chief of police <?> of the degenerated “European”
Vrancea county, and the chief of burreau of criminal investigation <?>, and a mafia appointed “lawyer”
<?>, all against which I opened penal dossiers in which they were never acquitted
<14 - I.B.14 “judge” Popa Mariana falsified on 7th July 2016 the decision in 14277/231/2015 in
2nd instance rejecting my appeal in which I was denouncing the mafia’s crimnal activity thorugh the
falsfication of dossier 2417/P/2014, meaning “judge” Popa Mariana falsified the decision to cover-up
the 4th , 5th and 6th Crimes against humanity attempts, and also rejected the falsified appeal of
“prosecutor” Dogaru Luminita Georgeta because it was blatantly flawed not having active quality
formulating an appeal in an closed obviously falsified dossier and contradicting with the law while doing
it. See annex 7 and annex 10 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex
1 to this ICC penal dossier. This constituted the 6th Crimes against humanity attempt , see section
I.A.II.1.3.1^6
<15 - I.B.15 “judge” Popa Mariana however harassed me for hours, falsfiied 2 judicial tickets and
falsified penal dossiers 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 clearly instigating the 7th and 8th Crimes against
humanity because “judge” Popa Mariana knew the mafia’s intention to an effect to commit Crimes
against humanity against me for stopping me from denouncing its criminal activity
<“prosecutor” Victoria Barsan is accomplice and instrinsic instigator to the falsfiication of the
penal dossiers 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 clearly also instigating the 7th and 8th Crimes against
humanity
<“registrar” Ciuperca Radu is accomplice and improper instigator by the refusal to denounce the
mafia
<“lawyers” Dragovici Cristian (relative of Dragovici Anca Cristian instigator to Crimes against
humanity?), and Teodorescu Monica were also mafia appointed and instigated to not aid me, and did
not plead in my benefit (and if they attempted to plead against me in my face which Teodorescu Monica
did which is why I asked to be removed, I would’ve filed penal dossiers against them, whcih I did as I
remember and they were never acquitted but most interestingly the mafia ignored entirely the penal
dossiers) but I had to defend myself. Lawyers do no have an obligation to denounce any crime to the
penal authorities, but they do have an obligation to represent their client, and they do have as
everybody the oblgiation to denounce death-threat felonies such as Crimes against humanity which
were instigated against me exactly through 14277/231/2015 in 2nd instance cosntituting the 6th Crimes
agianst humanity attempt. See annex 9 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier
Page 38 of 501
<16 - I.B. 16 “prosecutor” Dogaru Luminita Georgeta and “judge” Paun Ionel Iulian stole my
complaints against the falsfiied prosecutor’s acts from 2417/P/2014 2220/91/2015 (and
1560/231/2016) with the intentino of falsifying the decisions of rejection, and concomitantly attempted
to frame me up for the felony of disturbing the courthouse solemnity, falsifying penal dossier
2845/P/2016 for it which constitutes also the instigation to the 7th and 8th Crimes against humanity
attempts because these mafia “magistrate” carepogimes knew the mafia’s intent to an effect of
committing Qualified Murder agianst me to stop me from denouncing its criminal activity, from the
previous 5 Crimes against humanity attemtps against me, and the Crimes against humanity committal
from the night between 5th and 6th December 2014
<“registrar” Bulancea Mihaela is accomplice and improper instigator by the refusal to denounce
the mafia
<mafia “gendarme” soldiers Butuc Emanuel and Toni Lepadatu participated in the falsfiication
of dossier 2845/P/2016 by refusing to testify the truth although not contributing to the false
acccusations against me it does not absolve them of collaborating with the mafia, else if they denounced
the mafia the penal dossier 2845/P/2016 wouldn’t exist
<mafia “special agent” Crintea Valerica from the Ministry of Interior Affairs who also
participated as a false witness nto contributing to the false accusations but neither telling the truth
about 18th May 2016. I’ve demontrated that the mafia “secret services” of the mafia control and relay
orders from the mafia leadership to the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes. This idiot is another clear
proof of the mafia’s leadership instigation and concertizing of Crimes against humanity against me,
especially the committal s from the night between 5th and 6th December 2014 and frm between 27th May
2017 and 8th June 2017, and through the falsification of the sentences in 12718/231/2017, also judging
by the awkward frame-up that backfired on the mafia as usual frm 18th may 2016
<17 - I.B.17 “judge” Badiu Mandica rejected in 14277/231/2015 in 1st instance the falsified
“prosecutor’s” proposal that I be obligated to chemical lobotomizatino which constitutes Crimes agains
thumanity,as if sucha thing could legally exist in a state of right, but didn’t denounce the mafia
therefore is accomplice and intrinsic instigator to futher Crimes against humanity which he could’ve
stopped by denouncing the mafia. , see section I.A.II.1.3.1^5
<“prosecutor” instigating that Crimes against humanity be committed against me is Batranu
Iuliana
<“prosecutor” that proposed that I be obligated to chemical lobotomizatino which constitutes
Crimes agains thumanity, is Mihaila Paul who falsified penal dossier 2417/P/2014 and committed
numerous crimes for the cover-up of the 1st and 2nd Crimes against humanity in person namely in penal
dossiers 2222/P/2014, 1863/P/2015 (829/P/2015) and others
<“registrar” Gabara Alina is accomplice and improper instigator by the refusal to denounce the
mafia
<accomplices and intrinsic instigators to Crimes against humanity as the two mafia “gendarme”
soldiers who illegally detained me 3 hours not giving me the mandate to not even learn of the object of
the falsified dossier 14277/231/2015 in which “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul hid the fact he lsot in
11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance
Page 39 of 501
<18 - I.B.18 “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul falsified teh ordance of penal pursuit renounciation in the
falfisied penal dossier 2417/P/2014 which is unconstitutional reason for which the law for penal pursuit
renunciation was repealed the following year, lying that I threatened to kill his instigator and the
principal instigato of all Crimes gainst humanity “judge” Dita Mirela which if were true I were in jail, and
instigated that I be chemically lobotomized constituting the 5th Crimes aganist humanity attempt
through 14277/231/2015 in 1st instance, using the falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry documents from
23rd November 2015 which I found hidden in another dossier of the courthouse archive not in
14277/231/2015. I remind I was never indicted and convicted as legally required, as proven in annex 17
of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier.
See annex 6 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC
penal dossier
<19 - I.B.19 on 23rd November 2015 the “psychiatrist” torturers Lucasievici Silviu, Berzvehnii
Igor, Florea Gabriela, Mihai Oana Georgiana, (“pscyhologist” charlatan) Luminita Grajdeanu, falsified
“pscyhiatric” charlatanry document attached and demonstrated falsfiied as annex 4 of my Rule 39 ECHR
urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, constituting the
instigation to all the following Crimes against humanity 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th where in 12718/231/2017 in
2nd instnace this falsified document was invoked again even if annulled by the same schizophrenic
“judge” Badiu Mandica in 14277/231/2015 in 1st instance, even if irrelevant for the future according to
article < from Romanian Law 487/2002 and logic. These “pscyhiatrist” charltans also instigate the 4th
Crimes against humanity from 11224/231/2015 where they lost in 2nd instance, and one of them stole
the deadly fluorine neurotoxic poison risperidone or paliperidone I was coveertly injected with in the
night between 5th and 6th December 2014. See annex 4 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim
measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier
<20 - I.B.20 “judge” craciun constantin catalin falsified the decision from 11224/231/2015
constituting the 4th Crimes against humanity attempt, see section I.A.II.1.3.1^4. See annex 2 and annex
3 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier.
The instigator is “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul who also instigated the 5th Crimes against humanity through
14277/231/2015, in cahoots with the “psychiatrist” charlatans enumerated in preliminary section 19
above, all instigated by the principal instigator “judge” Dita Mirela instigated by Delhaize Group through
its Kinstellar SPARL lawyers as proven by the fact they in cahoots with “judge” Dita Mirela instigated the
3rd Crimes ganist humanity attempt through 15730/231/2014 claimingn that I must be put under”
psychiatric” charlatanry interdiction for exercising my right to justice, when in reality “judge” Dita Mirela
was helping them usurp my worker rights in dossiers 1118/91/2013 and 861/91/2015 regarding my
trials aganist Delhaize Group for falsifying 3 disciplinary sanctions through the Kinstellar SPARL and
disrespecting the judge order from 43961/3/2009 where I annuled its first falsified disciplinary sanction,
and breaking other worker rights
<”prosecutor” Mihaila paul on 22nd September 2015 Harassed, Threatened and Blackmailed my
mother through the telephone instigating her to either convince me to incarcerate myself in the Focsani
“psychaitric” gulag, or perhaps convince her to ask the”pscyhiatrist” charlatans to incarcerate me, as the
Page 40 of 501
psychopathic / sociopathic Mihaila Paul psychosis makes him believe that if he instigates Crimes against
humanity against his fellow people everyone is a mentally ill criminal like him, even family members and
Christians, of which I spoke more in section I.A.II.1.3.1^4.3 that there are indeed more pscyhopaths and
sociopaths in the degenerated “European” Vrancea county who sell their parents home leaving them
homeless and leave abroad, but most importantly the mafia “magistarte” caporegimes are obligating
innocents to chemical lobotomization for illicit profit for the pharmaceutical mafia as I’ve proven in
paragraph paragraphs 1.1^6, 2.4^13.5 and 2.4^20.1 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request
for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, illicit affair in which the entire
judicial hierarchy, ministry of health, public ministry, ministry of justice, secret services, prime minister
and president of romania is involved
<”prosecutor” Mihaila paul instigated the incidental act of state terrorism through illegal home
breaking and illegal arrest from 17th September 2015 of which I’ve spoke more in section I.A.II.1.3.1^4.3,
through a falsified mandate he instigated “judge” Dinu Murgulet Ana to falsfify on 10th September 2015
in 10547/231/2015, for the purpose of falsifying acts of procedure to instigate the 4th Crimes against
humanity attempt through 11224/231/2015 in 1st instance as he did
<”prosecutor” Mihaila paul falsified mandates of arrest and detainment towards the Bucharest
sector 3 police, after faking a pretext that I elude justice, which he never actually used in writing, by
sending me a falsified subpoena on 5th May 2015 to my mother after the hour he established for the
summoning on 5th May 2015, falsified subpoena in which he was calling me a felon already and
ommitting every other information to threaten me implicitly that he will falsify the penal dossier in this
regard. I sent “prosecutor” Mihaila Paul a memo on 9th May 2015 to send a legal subpoena and he
refused not only for 4 months until he proved again he knew where to send me a subpoena by, but
“prosecutor” mihaila paul never legally subpoenaed me nor the mafia “Magistrate” caporegimes he
instigated against me in 11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015
<all these falsfied acts of procedure are instigated by “judge” Dita Mirela as I’ve objectivzied in
section I.A.II.1.3.1^4.3
<21 - I.B.21 <remained here with work
<22 - I.B.22
<23 - I.B.23
<24 - I.B.24 of course to all these criminals are accomplice the mafia leadershi pmembers such
aas the minister of justice, general prosecutor of romania, prime minister, minister of interior affairs,
president of romania, cheif of judiciary inspection, leadership of the supreme magistrate council,
supreme court president, cheifs of anticorruptin and antiorganized crime directions, the people’s
lawyer, members of the constitutional court if not all, as objectivized in paragraph 0.2 from this ICC
penal dossier and chapter V.3 from annex 23 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier
I. In fact,
Page 41 of 501
<summary with links
<point out more often the logic by which all these are responsible for the Crimes against
humanity against me
<Note: the latest Crimes against humanity are the most relevant to my permanent refugee
status which is why I demontrated them first
1. Page 44 - A. Objectivization of the Crimes against humanity committed against me and
against other Romanians
2. Page 276 - I.B.1. Plead against “D.Lupu” and “I.Banu” from ECHR, accomplices and
instigators to Crimes against humanity
3. Page 277 - I.B.2. Plead against “judge” Badiu Mandica and accomplices for the falsification
of the decision in 12718/231/2017 in 2nd instance, and instigation to Crimes against
humanity
4. Page 326 - I.B.3. Plead against “judge” Miron Doina and accomplices for the falsification of
the decision in 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance, and instigation to Crimes against humanity
5. Page 361 - I.B.4. Plead against “prosecutors” Lupu Mihai Cristian and Petrescu Auras Ionut
for the falsification of the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from 2845/P/2016 (united with
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016), and the falsification of the ordnances in rem, in personam
and putting into motion the penal action, and instigation to Crimes against humanity
6. Page 451 - I.B.5. Plead against “judge” Neagu Rodica and accomplices for the falsification of
the decision in 1779/91/2017, and instigation to Crimes against humanity
7. <Page 469 - I.B.6. 27th May 2017 - 8th June 2017? the psychiatrists, assistants, secret police
instigated by proseecutors with the falsified decision in 2nd instance of 4909/231/2017 <I’ve
demonstrated it all in section A.II.1.3.1^7 which I will keep expanding in time, and annex 16
from echr, and preliminary section
8. <Page 471 I.B.7 4909/231/2017? in 2nd instance from 18? May 2017, fake lawyer? fake
address from 14th of neagu rodica, see annex 13 and 14 from ECHR
9. <Page 471 b.8 27th April 2017 secret police instigated by prosecutors, 13th 14th April 2017
secret police, police and gendarmes instigated by prosecutors, with the falsified decision in
1st instance of 4909/231/2017
10. <Page 471 b9 4909/231/2017? in 1st instance from 10th April 2017, 9 gendarmes arrest, ,
fake lawyer, see annex 12
11. <Page 471 b10 4791/231/2017 falsified mandate from 5th April 2017, 6th April 2017 masked
police and police arrest, 6th April 2017 SML Vrancea falsified acts by committee in secret,
never communicated - copy plead from sectionI. B.4. also
12. <Page 472 b11 Constitutional Court falsified decision 25/19th January 2017 abolishing the
presumption of innocence and intrinsically implying that Crimes against humanity can be
committed against me by being illegally incarcerated indefinitely, Tortured, Bodily Harmed
and Qualifiedly Murdered, without an indictment and conviction according to article 109
from Romanian penal Code which refers to convicts, and article 23 paragraph 11 from the
Romanian Constitutions refering to the presumption of innocence which is only removed by
being convicted definitively after an indictment which in my case doesn’t even exist because
the deeds I’m accused of don’t even physically exist and cannot physically exist.
Page 42 of 501
13. <Page 493 b12 8th or 9th Decemb er 2016 SML Vrancea falsified acts by committee in secret,
never communicated - copy plead from section B.4.
14. <Page 493 b13 Plead against “policewoman” Popescu Lacramioara for the falsification of the
ordnances in rem, in personam, for being accomplice to the falsified ordnance of putting
into motion the penal action, and for the proposal to undergo an impossible “psychiatric”
charlatanry “examination without my consent as foreseen by the procedure against the
suspects or accused of homicide, and instigation to Crimes against humanity
15. <Page 494 b14 7 July 2016, falsificatino of decision from 14277/231/2015 of rejection of my
appeal, and even the falsification of the rejection of the “prosecutor” Dogaru Luminita
Georgeta’s appeal - meaning without any logical juridical motivation whatsoever. <Page 494
b15 24th June 2016, falsificatino of closing from 14277/231/2015 constituting judicial
harassment and instigation or determination of Crimes against humanity through the penal
complaint from 24th June 2016 that was registered under numbers 3992/P/2016 and
4329/P/2016 prove copying from B.4. how it was falsified <although proving sufficiently the
instigation to Crimes against humanity against me, at this point I could translate the penal
complaint I made in Romanian against “judge” Popa Mariana from
_drept\_vrancea\_tribunal\penal\Mariana Popa\pentru 24.06.2016 din 14277 231 2015 si
3992 P 2016 si 4329 P 2016>
17. <Page 494 b16 18th May 2016, falsificatino of closing from 2220/91/2015 (and
1560/231/2016) constituting judicial harassment and instigation or determination of Crimes
against humanity through the penal complaint from 18th May 2016 that was registered
under number 2845/P/2016 - prove copying from B.4. how it was falsified <translate paun
ionel iulian penal complaint from D:\_drept\_vrancea\_judecatoria\penal\_Paun Ionel
Iulian\ppp paun ionel iulian pentru 18.05.2016
18. <Page 494 b17 2nd or 5th feb ruary 2016, falsification of rejection of action 14277/231/2015
against me, because it’s unmotivated juridically properly nor are all my requests addressed,
and falsification of “prosecutor’s” appeal against it too. Falsified appeal of Dogaru
19. <Page 494 b18 10th December 2015, falsificatino of ordnance of penal pursuit renounciation
in 2417/P/2014, and proposal of 14277/231/2015 constituting instigation to Crimes against
humanity - refer to section A. the illegal home breaking and illegal arrest from 11th
December 2015, and my illegal detainment in the Focsani courthouse for 3 hours by “judge”
Badiu Mandica who ordered the “gendarmes” illegally
20. <Page 494 b19 23rd November 2015, falsification of annex 4 of my ECHR request,
constituting instigatino to Crimes against humanity through 14277/231/2015 - refer to
section A
21. <Page 494 b20 11224/231/2015 constituting instigation to 4th Crimes against humanity -
refer to section A. mention the blackmail from 22nd september 2015, homebreaking from
17th, falsified mandate from 10547 from 10th, falsified acts from the summer of 2015 and 5th
may 2015
22. <Page 494 b21 15730/231/2014 which could’ve resulted in Crimes against humanity - refer
to section A. Kinstellar SPARL who bribe the mafia for the Delhaize group, in cahoots with
Page 43 of 501
dita mirela instigated that Crimes against humanity be committed against me to be
eliminated physicallly so I don’t pursue them penally for their crimes against me
23. <Page 494 b22 Crimes against humanity perpetrated against me on the night between 5th
and 6th december 2014 by both being hit on the head by interloper herghelegiu danut, and
being poisoned with risperidone or paliperidone as proven by the blood test I took later, and
parhon case and all the other happenings that indicated this, other bucharest
endocrinologist, monza hospital money back, dutescu, dulcan money back, psychiatrist
scharlatan woman from 17th september, refusal of legal medicine to send me to medical
specialties and falsification of report for which I opened penal dossiers 1863/P/2015
(829/P/2015) etc. (hired lawyers about medcare and medlife who both “dissapeared”) -
refer to section A
24. <Page 495 b23 mentino the 1st qualified murder attempt from 27th october 2014, and link
the summary of Dita Mirela’s criminal activity from Proofs or my grounds of fearing
indefinite detainment, torture and loss of life_2.doc and from the sesizarea comisiilor
25. <Page 495 b24 mentioning in the cover-up of the falsified acts of procedure in the falsified
penal dossiers against me 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016
through which Crimes against humanity were perpetrated against me, a cohort of “judiciary
bodies” participated, which I will name and prove in time because it’s less important, but of
which I clearly remember the same “judiciary bodies” that directly instigated the Crimes
against humanity also are implicated in the cover-up falsified decisions although almost
always incompatible. Furthermore, I’ve notified all the superior institutions regarding penal
and disciplinary action against these “judciiary bodies”, all who refused to take action
proving themselves accomplice to the Crimes against humanity<mention here the
accomplice superiors frmo Buccuresti and magistrates from Galati, and others such as from
DSPV, ministers, generals etc. denounce them all here
26. Annex C - the quoted and underlined law used in this ICC penal dossier plead
<the general plan is to prove what (Crimes against humanity), how (this whole section), by who
(the other plead regarding the perpetrators) and again how technically regarding their felonies in the I.B
sections>
<when having acces to internet and a proper computer complete section C quoting all the law
referenced and google translating it fast>
A. Objectivization of the Crimes against humanity committed against me by the Romanian
“state” mafia to stop me from denouncing its criminal activity and other eligibility corroborations
Page 44 of 501
Page 52 II.1.2 The proof that the Crimes against humanity committed against me and others by
the Romanian “state” mafia are “part either of a government policy”
Page 53 II.1.2^1.2 Innocents sentenced to chemical lobotomization by the mafia “justice”. The
Romanian “state” mafia attempted to cover-up my denouncement through illicit censorship and the
Crimes against humanity between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 against me
Page 54 II.1.2^1.2.3 the Romanian “state” mafia abolished the presumption of innocence
through Romanian Constitutional Court Decision no 25 from 19th January 2017 - see section I.B.11
Page 76 II.1.2.1 Demonstration that “psychiatry” is charlatanry, neither medicine nor science
Page 119 II.1.3 Murder (Qualified, attempted) ... with malice aforethought
Page 124 II.1.3.1.3 The logical proof scientifically objectivized that the mafia’s intent to an effect
not being fulfilled, caused themafia to continue to instigate the committal of Crimes against humanity
against me
Page 132 II.1.3.1.5 the proofs that the mafia’s intent to an effect or committing Crimes against
humanity against me to stop me from denouncing its criminal activity against me and in general
Page 137 II.1.3.1.6 the concertizing of the Crimes against humanity from the night between 5th
th
and 6 December 2014 by the Romanian “state” mafia
Page 143 II.1.3.1.6^4.1-5 the objectivization of the Bodily Harm, attempted Qualified Murder
and intigation or determinatino of Crimes against humanity from the night between 5th and 6th
December 2014 by the interloper Herghelegiu Danut
Page 152 II.1.3.1.7 objectivization regarding the main instigator Dita Mirela. Also see
I.A.II.1.3.1.4^2 and I.A.II.1.3.1.6^1
Page
Page 185 II.1.3.1^1-8 the chronological enumeration of the Crimes againts humanity pleads
Page 188 II.1.3.1^2 2nd Crimes against humanity committal from the night between 5th and 6th
December 2014 objectivization
Page 196 II.1.3.1^2.1^2-3 demonstration I was covertly injected with the deadly fluorine based
neurotoxin risperidone or paliperidone - risperidone’s metabolite meaning basically the same thing,
during the 2nd Crimes against humanity between 5th and 6th December 2014
Page 221 II.1.3.1^7 7th Crimes against humanity committal from between 27th May 2017 and 8th
June 2017 objectivization
Page 240 II.1.3.1^7.11^3.1 unfolding of 7th Crimes against humanity between 27th May 2017
th
until 8 June 2017
Page 247 II.1.4 Dehumanization
Page 257 II.1.5 Unethical human experimentation
Page 259 II.1.6 Extrajudicial punishment
Page 261 II.1.7 State terrorism
Page 263 II.1.8 Torture
Page 263 II.1.8^1.4 Proof of being put in anaphylactic shock during the 7th Crimes against
humanity between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, meaning the most evident proof of all the
Qualified Murder attempts through deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxic poisons overdose
Page 269 II.1.9 Political repression
Page 273 II.1.10 Human rights violations
Page 45 of 501
<TODO: wherever I mention proofs, also attempt to quote in short from the proofs, and at the
end of each paragraph reference all the law, conventions (from OHCHR), regulations etc., or better yet
in section C
<II.2-n should be commenting based on other sources of analysis of Crimes agiants humanity to
help me objectivize... if this is not enough which it is
<remained here with work, needs heavy reworking to represent the content>I. Chapter
introduction
<Legend, where I mention an annex from ECHR, I’m certainly refering to an annex from the Rule
39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures, and where I’m refering to just an annex I’m referring to
an annex to this ICC penal dossier, and although my intent is to be specific where I say paragraph I
sometimes intended to say chapter meaning more relevant paragraphs and subparagraphs grouped
together as numbered, so where I say paragraph and there’s subparagraphs according to the numbering
those certainly are relevant, as the paragraph I’m indicating may be a subparagraph of a whole relevant
chapter, and where I indicate an paragraph or chapter withouth mentioning an annex I’m certainly
refering to this ICC penal dossier paragraphs and chapters, respectively where I use the word
“aforementioned” I refer to the last mentioned occurence of the indicated plead element
<mention all the “features”, the constitutional court falsifying a decision of cover-up for the 7th crimes
against humanty, EU, CoE and ECHR being accomplice etc., but in short referencing the body of the ICC penal
dossier
I am presenting below the bjectivization of the Crimes against humanity committed against me
and others by the Romanian “state” mafia to stop me from denouncing its criminal activity and other
eligibility corroborations, by quoting the encyclopedia which is referencing the most relevant scientific
truth in the world, other scientific literature quotes and their references I am using for objectivization,
that I am correlating with the facts and proofs of my case to conclude the enumerated types of Crimes
against humanity were committed and are continuously attempted against me but also committed
against the general populace as proof this is the Romanian mafia state policy of committing crimes in
the name of profit. For objectivization I will also reference Romanian Penal Code regarding the felony of
Crimes against humanity and its types such as the felonies of Torture, Bodily harm, Qualified murder
and other crimes which I remind I already objectivized in the email regarding “proofs or my grounds of
fearing indefinite detainment, torture and loss of life” at the end of the document attached to it, as well
as reference the relevant ICC laws and regulations such as the Rome statute and any other international
laws and regulations in this matter
As short proof of verity, I’m made these declarations to all competent international institutions
for my case, that didn’t accuse me of the felonies of False declarations, Inducing the judiciary bodies into
error and Disseminating false informaetions according to the Romanian Penal Code, because I’m telling
the truth as proven anyway,
respectively I’ve never been accused by the Romanian “state” mafia for the same felonies when
lodging over a hundred perhaps penal dossiers against its members in 9 years of investigating its
branches, even if the mafia has the proven interest to falsify penal dossiers against me it wants to avoid
bringing attention to its criminal activity as much as possible
I.1. I also remind in short that the Crimes against humanity were committed against me since
5th December 2014 when I was attacked by an interloper at the instigation of the Romanian
“magistrate” mafia for the purpose of silencing me from denouncing their criminal activity as I did for
years before, interloper who hit on the head with extreme violence and threw me on a flight of stairs
unconsciously to make the Qualified murder attempt look like an accident as proven by the fact I caught
Page 46 of 501
him lying about it using my audio-video recording proof, no doubt as he was taught by his instigators,
fact proven by the lies told by the “authorities” themselves who protected the interloper from
prosecution in penal dossier 246/P/2015 and even civil trials by pervasively breaking the law intently for
favoring the perpetrator, hiding the facts and stealing dossiers from the random distribution system and
proofs from the dossiers, delaying the prosecution unjustified then lying and falsifying all the acts of
procedure while committing at the same time Crimes against humanity attempts against me in
11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015 as proven by annex 3 and annex 5 from my Rule 39 ECHR urgent
request for interim measures, to deter me from denouncing them again to the penal authorities and
publicly. Immediately after the interloper committed the felonies of attempted Qualified murder and
Bodily Harming against me, in the same night between 5th and 6th December 2014 I was also poisoned at
the emergency hospital ward of “Sf. Pantelimon” hospital from Focsani municipal city of Vrancea
county, without my consent with an unknown substance by an unknown person who injected it in my
right elbow believing I wouldn’t feel the needle, while I refused to be interned in the hospital thus any
treatment for the very reason of fearing being poisoned after acknowledging the attack in aforethought
of the interloper in the same night and the illegal behavior of the gendarmes, that there was a
concerted attack against me involving the “authorities”, fear which was confirmed by the fact I went to
the police station the same night who also refused to take my declarations and notify the prosecutor’s
office at my verbal complaint as required by the law, as well as refusing to notify the prosecutor’s office
at the notification of the hospital, then again after I went to the forensic medics or legal medicine
service “SML Vrancea” to obtain a certificate of my injuries, the forensic medics refused to send me to
the proper medical specialties for head trauma proving they falsified the expertize I requested which I
proven beyond any reasonable doubt afterwards by the fact they declared the diagnostics I obtained
afterwards anyway falsified and falsified the expertize again for which I opened penal dossier
1863/P/2015 (829/P/2015) which of course was covered-up with falsified acts of procedure at about the
same time with 246/P/2015 during Crimes against humanity attempts were committed against me
through 11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015 as proven by annex 3 and annex 5 from my Rule 39 ECHR
urgent request for interim measures, for the purpose of deterring me from denouncing them to the
penal “authorities” and publicly, and proving that I wasn’t going to receive any examination and
treatment if interned because this was their intent, but by interning myself in the hospital I was putting
myself at risk. Furthermore, I found out later investigating that the gendarmes were circulating a fake
story lying up to the gendarmes general Mircea Olaru that I aggressed the interloper and he called the
gendarmes not my mother, which of course I proved with the phone company evidence of the phone
call being made by my mother, and the gendarmes general Mircea Olaru refused to start and
investigation of course by delegating the gendarmerie direction of internal control, because they were
all in cahoots with the “magistrate” mafia with orders to support the murder attempt. The hospital
responded to my information request that the illegal injection from the night between 5th and 6th
December 2014 was Tetravax antitetanos which is also neurotoxic, however by the symptoms of severe
anhedonia and many other correlated symptoms which I experienced myself and correlated experience
with the many internet testimonies of the victims of this poisoning type, most notably proven high
prolactin or hyperprolactinemia by blood test which notoriously is a symptom of fluorine based
poisoning or as the “psychiatric” charlatanry calls it “neuroleptic”, as proven by the scientific article at
address: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3010960 from which I quote “The mechanism
by which conventional neuroleptics cause increased prolactin is a dopamine blockade in the tubero-
infundibular tract of the hypothalamus, which in turn reverses the dopaminergic inhibition of prolactin in
Page 47 of 501
the anterior pituitary”, it means I was also injected with a high dose of “neuroleptic” not Tetravax
antitetanos, corroborated with the fact I took the blood tests months after I was poisoned and the effect
endured because of the long life of paliperidone / risperidone poison in the bloodstream, that can only
mean I was poisoned with the same deadly neurotoxic poison Invega in the night between 5th and 6th
December 2014 for the same purpose of being murdered by it as it’s notoriously known in the press that
it caused the death of at least tens of other people around the world as I’ve proven in annex 21 of my
Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures, and I corroborate it was Invega poisoning using the
proof of the fact I was illegally and unjustified poisoned at the instigation of the same “magistrate”
mafia members from “European” Vrancea county with Invega between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017
as proven by the last row of first page of the document attached as annex 16 to my updated Rule 39
ECHR urgent request for interim measures published at address:
https://www.scribd.com/document/352597506/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-ECHR, which is why without any
diagnostic I was poisoned with Invega (risperidone or paliperidone deadly fluorine neurotoxic poison)
between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, because it’s the mafia’s obsession and I recognize their
mentality pattern after so many years of investigating them. I objectivize the high prolactin with the
blood test proof from 10 April 2015 attached as annex <. Furthermore, seeking help to alleviate my
suffering after the murder attempt from 5th December 2014, I talked soon after 5th December 2014 to
one of the torturer “psychiatrists” from 27th May 2017 – 8th June 2017 called Mircea Dutescu, and I
noticed he started giving unasked advice as if he knew I was drugged and he was describing the
psychological symptoms I would experience, unrelated with the murder attempt, and avoided
deliberately to theorize about the physiological symptoms related to the reproductive system problems
which are caused by Invega poisoning, and I wouldn’t mention this evidence if I was in doubt – he heard
and knew from back then of the murder attempt from 5th December 2014 which is why he participated
as a torturer between 27th May 2017 – 8th June 2017 because he was all along a mafia collaborator, fact
which I remind is perfectly correlated with the falsified uncalled for psychiatric action 15730/231/2014
started on 27th November 2014 supposedly but in secret, which demonstrates the aforethought for
“psychiatric” abuse which corroborates in support to the proofs I was poisoned with Invega in the night
between 5th and 6th December 2014, as well as demonstrate who was the instigator, the same “judge”
Dita Mirela from Vrancea Tribunal who in fact also stole the dossiers against the interloper Herghelegiu
Danut and falsified the decisions to cover-up his crimes, then the same “judge” Dita Mirela instigated as
I’ve proven in section <, the falsification of 4 penal dossiers in which I was never indicted and convicted
as proven by annex 17 from the Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures regarding my empty
judicial history meaning I wasn’t even official prosecuted, and the falsification of 5 more psychiatric
actions against me, 4 out of the total which I annulled proving they are falsified, and the last 2 being
identical to the last 2 are obviously falsified as well as I’ve proven in annex 20 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent
request for interim measures. I mention annex 16 to my updated Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for
interim measures does not represent a diagnostic but an invalid juridical act lacking any factual backup,
or in juridical terms it’s a conclusion without a premise. I’ve objectivized in detail how annex 16 from my
Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures constitutes a falsified document, in annex 20 from
my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures, 2nd document regarding the demonstration of
the falsification of the discharge from “psychiatric” imprisonment. In this document it is also inscribed
that (1) I was poisoned with overdose of Haloperidol, a fluorine based poison or “neuroleptic” as the
“psychiatric” charlatans call them – see first page, or another injectable fluorine based poison such as
Invega to induce anaphylactic shock as proven by quoting the article at address
Page 48 of 501
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11048906 “a 6-week acute trial ... haloperidol 5 to 20 mg/d ...
analysis ... suggests that ... PRL is elevated ... intermediately by haloperidol (mean change,
approximately 17 ng/mL), and strongly by risperidone (mean change, 45-80 ng/mL)” and (2) I had
prolactin level 608.3 mIU/L which is 28.59 ng/mL using this calculator: http://unitslab.com/node/28
which reported to the scientific article https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3010960 is
abnormally high, as I quote from it the norm: “Hyperprolactinemia is clinically defined as a plasma
prolactin level of >20ng/mL for men and >25ng/mL for women.2 Elevated prolactin in men may cause
erectile dysfunction, ejaculatory dysfunction, gynecomastia, and decreased libido.” After the murder
attempt from 5th December 2014 I met another member of this mafia in the person of an “university
endocrinology professor” at Parhon hospital in Bucharest named Badiu Corin which is supposed to be
specialized in endocrinology, “professor” to whom I presented the evidence and lied to me attempting
to throw me off the course of my investigation to both relieve my suffering and condemn the
perpetrators of the crimes against me, mentioning that this knowledge he should’ve known is amongst
the most basic in endocrinology, being a direct correlation between symptom and the hormones
responsible for it, as well between the endocrine dysfunction and the cause, fluorine poisoning, but this
Parhon hospital university professor did say to me that the causes are not what I think meaning from the
hit on the head with the proper intonation of knowing what was the real cause, which he refused to
utter, but which I objectivized anyway above. At the same time I met with a neurologist named Dulcan
Constantin who as soon as I made the right inference in front of him asking him to help me complete my
investigation, he became nervous and wrote a reference sending me to see a psychiatrist, for which
being at a particular clinic I demanded and obtained my money back from the quack examination of this
so called “famous” neurologist, also dealing in esotery as proven by his book named “Intelligence of
matter” which must be mentioned because one cannot ignore all the evidences leading to the particular
criminal organization named masonry, which is just a vanity title and occupation for the mafia. I also
went in the same day or period to another endocrinologist named < who instead of deducing my
morning hand stiffness autoimmune syndrome was because of fluorine poisoning as I’ve proven in
section < regarding scientific facts on the biological effects of fluorides, made me a lecture saying I
should watch the grass grow. Needless to say against Parhon hospital “service” I hired a lawyer named <
who I heard nothing ever since, proving again as I already did in Romania the whole judiciary system and
health system is owned by the mafia, meaning judges, prosecutors, lawyers, medics, “psychiatric”
charlatans as well as the government meaning the “order”-of-the-mafia maintaining forces of “police”
and “gendarmes”, and I could go on with the proofs in this direction which I address in the other chapter
where I demonstrate who committed the Crimes against humanity and how in detail, being the proper
place for the virtue of brevity of this summary
I.2. Taking the time to analyze my proofs more attently I discovered the uncontrolled shivering
I've experienced after the first 3 days of sleep deprivation and fluorine and chlorine daily poisoning
between 27th May 2017 and 8 June 2017 was actually anaphylactic shock, and the evidence was all
along in annex 16 to my latest Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures, which I’ll prove here
summarily and objectivize at length in the section regarding Crimes against humanity through murder
attempts. For objectivizing my declaration I quote the specialty literature from address:
https://www.rxlist.com/haldol-side-effects-drug-center.htm "Call your doctor at once if you have a
serious side effect such as, only quoted as relevant: "dizziness, fainting, fast or pounding heartbeat,
tremor (uncontrolled shaking)...”. In this blood test the high number of basophiles (0.2*10^3/uL%, 2.6%)
indicate an allergic reaction according to medical specialty literature which I quote as proof from
Page 49 of 501
address: https://www.pcfarm.ro/analize_medicale/269/Numarul-de-bazofile- in romanian: “Crestterea
numarului de bazofile peste 200/µLse numeste bazofilie si este caracteristica in:
Boli alergice: rinita alergica, polipoza nazala, sinuzita cronica, astm, dermatita atopica, alergii
medicamentoase” objectively translated to English by Google translate: “
Increasing the number of basophils over 200 / μL is called basophilia and is characteristic in:
Allergic diseases: allergic rhinitis, nasal polyps, chronic sinusitis, asthma, atopic dermatitis, drug
allergies” meaning I’m at higher risk of death from the “psychiatric” poisons that caused the allergic
reaction, never having an allergic reaction before to anything else except to penicillin, and I kept
imploring them daily between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 to stop poisoning me because I’m extra
allergic to foreign bodies and toxins which I believe is a psychosomatic response to my sane personality
profile of instinctively rejecting everything malignant by acknowledging it at a subconscious level,
exemplificatively but relevant mentioning I always use toothpaste with no fluorine, and I only drink
bottled water with low chlorine to perform well intellectually. As proof I am not allergic normally, I
indicate the normal number of basophiles in the blood test I took on 10 April 2015, 4 months after I was
provably poisoned with fluorine during the continuous murder attempt perpetrated against me in the
night between 5th and 6th December 2014 which left plenty of time for the allergic reaction to subside,
but not the hyperprolactinemia induced through the specific fluorine poison paliperidone / risperidone
I.3. Both Qualified murder attempts in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014, by being
violently hit on the head, thrown on a flight of stairs unconscious then poisoned at the emergency ward
as proven above, mentioning I could’ve also been poisoned while I was unconscious, were preceded by a
similar attempt on 27th October 2014 by the same interloper who hit my mother’s door with his feet
attempting to provoke me, accompanied by a policeman and gendarme who hid in the interloper
apartment when the attempt failed because neighbors from 3 floors of the apartment building came out
the door who would’ve witnessed the Qualified murder attempt and also my mother got to the door
before me and the interloper backed down, the “policeman” and “gendarme” he brought with him
refusing to come out from the interloper’s apartment and do their job taking the declarations of the
witnesses, myself and my mother into a report according to the articles 61, 291 paragraph 2 and 293
from the Romanian Penal procedure code with which they were supposed to notify the prosecutor’s
office but that obviously wasn’t the reason of their presence but to be themselves false witnesses as
proven by the fact they lied I disturbed the peace even if I proved what happened with a video-audio
recording which of course meant nothing to the mafia who occupies the police and prosecutor’s office.
In fact I remember now that they’ve used as a false excuse that they didn’t want to do their job the
syntagm that “I was agitated” which is the usual “psychiatric” lie that someone was evangelizing in the
local mafia collective, meaning they were thought, badly as is, how to lie. The same phenomena I
witnessed many times, of an idiotic syntagm or behavior being copied and executed identically between
the members of this criminal organized group, such as in the spring and summer of 2017 when before
the Orthodox Easter my mother’s apartment was broken into and I was arrested almost every day with
tens of “masked policemen”, “policemen” and “gendarmes” attempting to falsify the procedure and
appearance of legitimate “psychiatric” imprisonment exactly during Orthodox Easter like the specialty
literature indicates is the mafia’s stereotype to do so exactly on holydays, causing my mother to fall ill
with Zoster Area from the stress and trauma, then they hunted me with the secret “police” which
accosted my mother on 27th April 2017 too by two members of the secret police, then on 27th May 2017
I was arrested from my law faculty exams by 3 members of the secret police, tied at the psychiatric ward
and poisoned with fluorine and chlorine, without even falsified papers, illegally, unfounded, being
Page 50 of 501
innocent, being sane, without diagnosis, without consulting the committee for evaluating the legality of
my “psychiatric” imprisonment, without consulting the committee for evaluating the legality of my
poisoning without my consent, without a contract with my legal or conventional representative, all of
which I’ve demonstrated in section <, when they were all muttering the same common theme that
~“they want only my good” as no doubt they’ve been taught, which again is ridiculous and foolish
because it shown me the extent of the mafia again, including a priest named Costica <?other name?>
who I was suspecting and thus frequenting to draw information from, and who was afterwards
rewarded to serve of all the tens of churches in Focsani exactly at the church of the priest husband of
the “judge” Croitoru Sandina Mariana who falsified the decision in 4909/231/2017 in 2nd instance
resulting in my illegal and unfounded “psychiatric” incarceration and torture with poison between 27th
May 2017 and 8th June 2017, “judge” who visibly intervened to cover-up the complaints against the
prosecutor’s acts of cover-up of the interloper that attempted murder against me on 27th October 2014
and 5th December 2014, and who committed a long list of other felonies against me, being in cahoots
with the prime instigator “judge” Dita Mirela from the start. In the period since 27th October 2014 and
for years after especially same “magistrate” members of this mafia eluded the random distribution of
dossiers which they thus illegally obtained for the purpose of covering the truth up with falsified
ordinances and decisions against all the civil and penal files I made against the interloper they’ve
instigated to murder me, for which I as before, investigated, proven and filed penal complaints against
the “magistrate” mafia itself who was in cahoots for the cover-up with a number of accomplices from
the local “legal medicine service”, “police” and “gendarmes”, reason for which the same “magistrate”
mafia members as proof, to silence me after I proven the murder attempt and their crimes of covering
up for the interloper and accomplices, falsified 4 penal dossiers against me between the years 2014-
2016 in which I was never indicted and convicted as proven by my empty judicial history attached as
annex 17 from my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures where not even the illegal and
unfounded prosecution was noted as required by the law because the criminal abuse was covert, only
used as a pretext for falsifying 6 psychiatric actions against me, 4 of which I’ve annulled meaning
15730/231/2014, 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance after I’ve been illegally convicted and
14277/231/2015 in 1st and 2nd instance, proving thus all the proposals that I be psychiatrically
committed are falsified as the last 2 which are identical to the last 2 before them meaning ne bis in
idem. In dossiers 4909/231/2017 (identical to 11224/231/2015) and 12718/231/2017 (identical to
14277/231/2015) meaning made the same with fictive accusations and same vitiated procedure by law
breaking, actually the “magistrate” mafia went beyond just breaking the law and falsifying documents in
cahoots with their accomplices, this time they’ve condemned me to be poisoned forcefully with the
deadly neurotoxin Invega for another person named Vasilache Daniel’s felonies and diagnosis because I
wasn’t indicted and convicted and I wasn’t diagnosed as I’ve already declared judicially without being
accused of false declarations, as proof of verity. I’ve proven all this and the fact the penal files and
psychiatric actions against me are falsified meaning I’m proven innocent and sane, in the documents I’ve
given <?entity> with which I’ve also updated my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures also
given to <?entity>, especially annex 20 regarding my plead in 12718/231/2017 and annex 17 regarding
my empty judiciary history of this document which I’ve published updated at address:
https://www.scribd.com/document/352597506/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-ECHR, which I’m going to
reference throughout this document, attempting to point out at the old documents I’ve given <?entity>
at the same time, remaining to build another translated plead on the existing penal dossiers against the
interloper and his accomplices for which I had neither room in the existing Rule 39 ECHR urgent request
Page 51 of 501
for interim measures, nor the time because the “magistrate” mafia desperately perpetrated in cascade
Crimes against humanity against me through Torture, Bodily Harm and attempted Qualified murder to
attempt to silence me about the very fact they’ve instigated the interloper to kill me to start with,
through which they’ve continuously demonstrated the same murderous intent and criminal versatility
thus proving my case way beyond any reasonable doubt
<TODO: make paragraphs shorter and number them all. Achieve this through separation of ideeas
<TODO: make more references to the ECHR request and shorten the document. Remember this is
objectivizing the Crimes against humanity against me and others, and not demonstrating my innocence,
so stick to the exact point, point to proofs and draw conclusions to the point. Avoid commenting too
much on the background, although make perfect proofs. Make a skeleton document and add more later
if needed, and always prove what I say by referencing proofs of any kind, testimonies, notorious facts,
press articles, declarations, logic, science etc.
<walk all over the plead I’ve made already and insert these principles
II.1.1. This encyclopedic article describes Crimes against humanity in terms of international law
as proven by the fact it’s scientifically cross-referencing 51 relevant sources, of which I exemplify by
indicating the first by Margaret M. DeGuzman in "Crimes against humanity" RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW, Bartram S. Brown, ed., Edgar Elgar Publishing, 2011
II.1.2. The proof that the Crimes against humanity committed against me and others by the
Romanian “state” mafia are “part either of a government policy (through unconstitutional laws, illegal
norms and law breaking) (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy (such
as the mafia “policemen” soldiers who in Romania are notoriously just “professional” false witnesses,
pedofiles, torturers, killers and other types of criminal sociopaths recruited by the mafia regime for
Page 52 of 501
being mentally labile, meaning lacking integrity or schizophrenic and therefore easily coopted for
committing crimes on command)) or of a wide practice (totalitarian doctrine) of atrocities tolerated or
condoned by a government or a de facto authority (to say at least since a totalitarian regime doesn’t
“tolerate and condone” its regime, it imposes its regime or totalitarian policy)”, is
II.1.2^1 that the Crimes against humanity are “part either of a government policy” meaning
through unconstitutional laws, illegal norms and law breaking, is proven by the following facts
II.1.2^1.1 that according to Romanian Penal code articles 107 - 110 regarding security measures,
a potentially recidivist felon can be chemically lobotomized - see sections <I.A from this ICC penal
dossier and chapter 1 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached
as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier regarding the fact “psychiatric” charlatanry “treatment” always
employed deadly brain damaging poisons such as mercury, opium, heroin, fluorine and chlorine
meaning has always been chemical lobotomy which is capital punishment - the eradication of
individuality or a persona’s identity, which is unconstitutional according to article 22 from the
Romanian Constitution regarding the guaranteed right to life, body and psychic integrity <quote and
translate?, and according to articles 11 and 20 from the Romanian Constitution regarding that the
international ratified treaties by Romanian are internal right unless the Romanian Constitution is more
favorable, respectively and articles 2 and 3 from ECHR and articles 3 and 5 from UDHR regarding the
right to life and prohibition of Torture and Bodily Harm. This proves right from the start that Crimes
against humanity through chemical lobotomy are “part either of a government policy” in Romania
meaning through unconstitutional laws and illegal norms, indicating the logical notorious proof of the
fact that not only there is no such thing as medical treatment for felonies with the exception of drug
addiction which doesn’t stop a felon from becoming drug addicted again, but the “psychiatry”
charlatanry chemical lobotomy obviously falsely advertised as medicine because medicine cannot
engage in chemical lobotomization being sworn by the oath of Hippocrates to “at least do no harm”,
induces suicidal or worse homicidal ideation and behavior as proven in section I.A.II.1.2.10^1, thus
represent a death threat to the general population, ironically since it’s wrongfully called a “security
measure” since it creates deadly insecurity, and even more ironically a “medical treatment” since it
causes a life threatening state of mind and body for oneself or others as I objectivize in the rest of
section I.A of my ICC penal dossier and chapter 1 of annex 21, therefore the “psychiatry” charlatanry in
cahoots with the pharmaceutical mafia is not just an “industry of death” as notoriously nicknamed
internationally <link to article, but it is an industry of Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualified Murder which
constitutes Crimes against humanity. This is the Romanian “state” mafia’s policy meaning it can’t be
spoken of a totalitarian regime tolerating and condoning its own regime it imposes
II.1.2^1.2 The Romanian reality is far worse however as the Romanian “state” mafia breaks the
law abusing the judiciary system and the “psychiatry” charlatanry to chemically lobotomize innocents
for illegal experimentation and illicit profit from the pharmaceutical mafia as I’ve proven and denounced
in this illicitly censored mafia article republished at:
https://www.scribd.com/document/344526386/justitia-din-Vrancea-drogheaza-oameni-nevinovati, as
further proven by this press article <link in which the “psychiatrist” torturers admit they are conducting
illegal experiments by lying the Ministry of Health gave them permission to break the law which is
preposterous and proves concomitantly the “psychiatrist” charlatans are schizophrenic or logically
incoherent, occupationally dysfunctional and inherently failing to recognize what’s real according to the
DSM-V “psychiatric” charlatanry manual of diagnosis and statistics. This is the Romanian “state” mafia’s
policy meaning it can’t be spoken of a totalitarian regime tolerating and condoning its own regime it
imposes
II.1.2^1.2.1 The denouncement aforementioned triggered the Romanian “state” mafia to issue
the joint Ministry of Justice and Superior Magistrate Council order <identify and link> to hide the public
Page 53 of 501
dossiers from the informatic system “ECRIS” except my dossiers <print email transcript to ANSPDCP and
CNCD and proofs, annex or publish and link> which were kept public to discredit me and my work of
denouncing the criminal activity of the Romanian “state” mafia, to which the Romanian data protection
agency “ANSPDCP” and the Romanian national council for combating discrimination “CNCD” are in
cahoots as I proven by petitioning them followed by their refusal to do their job and falsifying the
answer to my petition as proven by this penal dossier I opened against CNCD and published at address:
https://www.scribd.com/document/331775977/dosar-penal-Dragus-Daniel-Asztalos-Csaba-Ferenc-
Pentru-Falsificarea-Raspunsului-in-Scopul-de-a-Solutiona-Petitia-Si-Probe <publish ANSPDCP email
transcript and link proving in short how it broke the data protection law or my right to demand and
obtain the removal of my personal data from public space>,
II.1.2^1.2.2 then the Romanian mafia “secret information service” bosses issued a superficial
report “to throw the dead cat in the courtyard” of the general prosecutor of Romania who of course
didn’t solve anything as I should’ve been notified since I attached my own case to it which directly
proves the complicity and instigation of the general prosecutor of Romanian Augustin Lazar to the
Crimes against humanity committed against me the next year, and against others in general,
corroborated with the fact Augustin Lazar falsified personally a rejection of my legal request that the
falsified penal dossiers against me be moved to another prosecutor’s office in another county based on
proven lack of impartiality flagrantly proven by the falsification of the penal dossiers 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 as I’ve demonstrated in annex 8 and annex 9 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent
request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, in which furthermore I
inculpated the mafia “judicial bodies” who falsified them by attaching to them with the title of judicial
declaration, the penal dossiers I’ve investigated and lodged otherwise with the Romanian “state” mafia
“penal authorities” and which I’ve also published on the mafia illicitly censored forum
“militia.freeforums.net”, as proven jurisprudentially I can by the notorious case of anti-terrorism and
organized crime commissar Traian Berbeceanu who inculpated his mafia “prosecutor” caporegimes false
accusers in the same falsified penal dossier against him and got them convicted too in what looked like a
mafia internal struggle for power <seek article and link>, meaning the “judicial bodies” I inculpated
could not legally touch the penal dossiers they falsified without breaking the principle nemo esse iudex
in sua causa potest, and concretely article 11 from the Government Ordnance 27/2002. The Romanian
mafia “secret information service” report I’ve printed from the general prosecutor’s office press
announcement and republished at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/331592730/comunicat-
de-presa-SRI-PICCJ-din-31-05-2016-privind-faptul-ca-psihiatrii-fac-din-pacienti-cobai, situation of which
I’ve spoken in paragraphs 1.1^6, 2.4^13.5 and 2.4^20 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request
for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, respectively after I’ve researched the
Romanian situation in general notified Citizen’s Commission on Human Rights and INTERPOL with it in
this email I’ve printed and uploaded to this address:
https://1drv.ms/b/s!Av_pxCea0UPwkWoBrEVB_efSpXDy,
II.1.2^1.2.3 then the Romanian “state” mafia issued the falsified Constitutional Court Decision
no 25 from 19th January 2017 as I objectivized in section I.B.11, where a sum of notoriously criminal
mafia “judge” caporegimes denounced even by the corrupt ECHR such as mafia “judge” caporegime
Livia Stanciu who is accomplice, declared that I do not benefit of the presumption of innocence if it’s not
proven a deed exist and if it’s not proven it constitutes a felony and if I’m not convicted for that felony
according to the law that removes the presumption of innocence, meaning any innocent in Romania can
be chemically lobotomized without being proven a deed even physically exists, that it constitutes a
felony and premise for a diagnosis, and that a court of law decided definitively the innocent commited
the felony, and that respectively the innocent committed it without discernment, reminding relevantly
there is no such thing as medical treatment for lack of discernment but only education in conditions of
safety for the general population meaning in prison and even then with the convict’s consent and
Page 54 of 501
cooperation else it’s not possible except perhaps through brainwashing by Torture, such as in the a
certain notorious movie after the notorious novel <“1983” - research on internet name and author> as it
was always the modus operandi of totalitarian regimes, meaning it’s not even necessary that a deed to
exist and constitute a felony for any “security measure” to be taken against an innocent in Romania
according to the Constitutional Court Decision no 25 from 19th January 2017 as I objectivized in section
I.B.11, falsified decision which can logically but illegally be abused to justify any penal measure which
proves again that the Crimes against humanity are “part either of a government policy (through
unconstitutional laws, illegal norms and law breaking) (although the perpetrators need not identify
themselves with this policy (such as the mafia associated data protection agency and national council for
combating discrimination public functionaries and other types of criminal sociopaths recruited by the
mafia regime who by themselves do not form the Romanian “state” mafia but are mafia collaborators))
or of a wide practice (totalitarian doctrine) of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de
facto authority (to say at least since a totalitarian regime doesn’t tolerate its regime, it imposes its
regime as proven by the Constitutional Court Decision no 25 from 19th January 2017 as I objectivized in
section I.B.11, and the involvement of most of the other Romanian “state” mafia controlled institutions
enumerated in paragraph 0.2, meaning the tolerating or condoning of Crimes against humanity is
perpetrated improperly usually by the mafia collaborators who are accomplices and marginally
instigators by assuring the Romanian “state” mafia that they would meet no opposition when engaging
in Crimes against humanity, and that they will be committed by these patsy mafia associates that makes
it harder to trace them back to the mafia leading instigators, which makes however even the mafia
collaborators no less important determining factors or instigators)”
II.1.2^1.1^1 For a potentially recidivist convict to become a mental patient, according to the text
of article 184 paragraph 1 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code the potentially recidivist convict
can be proposed by a judiciary body to undergo a “psychiatric” charlatanry “examination” meaning not
be coerced according to article 184 paragraph 3 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code and article 11
from the Romanian Law 487/2002 regarding the inquiry for consent, as coercion attracts the vice of
consent or lack of consent and invalidation of any proof obtained illegally or under Torture according to
articles 102 (paragraphs 1 and 2) and 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, proofs which
are required for “legal” (ad absurdum) obligation to “psychiatric” incarceration and chemical
lobotomization according to article 184 paragraph 7, 245-248 and 566-572 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code, proposal that can only be made to minors between 14 and 16 years old or women
who harmed or killed their baby whenever the prosecutor hallucinates - any inference without
evidence is a symptom of schizophrenia or failure to recognize what’s real, that there’s a doubt
regarding the discernment of the suspect or accused in the moment of the felony committal - expression
which proves the “prosecutor” who wrote this article (in Romania mafia “prosecutor” caporegimes write
this law for themselves to abuse which is then passed by the mafia controlled parliament, reason for
which the Romanian notoriously nicknamed this “democratic” system “the prosecutor republic” - <insert
link here to press article) is schizophrenic also since suspects and accused by definition committed no
felony, they are legally and logically innocent - article 184 paragraph 1 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code is unconstitutional and illegal at the same time because according to article 4 paragraph
2 from the Romanian Penal Procedure, any prosecutor’s doubt, in my particular case a proven
“prosecutor’s” schizophrenic hallucination, can only be interpreted in favor of the suspect or the
accused who dispose of what’s in their favor according to the principle of disposition, respectively it
cannot be proposed to the suspect or the accused according to the presumption of innocence but only if
the suspect or accused admit they committed the felony case in which they still must be prosecuted,
indicted and convicted as required by the law because it’s been known persons with mental problems
admitted that they committed felonies which they didn’t respectively there’s a small chance of a person
being drugged (e.g. with scopolamine or “the devil’s breath” according to <insert link to article here) or
Page 55 of 501
otherwise coerced to admit to have committed a felony, presumption of innocence which according to
article 23 paragraph 11 form the Romanian Constitution can only be removed through a definitive
conviction by an impartial tribunal which respected all the rights of the accused as the suspect cannot be
indicted and convicted, and proved the accused guilt beyond all reasonable doubt, as corroborated with
articles 11 and 20 from the Romanian Constitution, article 6 paragraph 2 from ECHR and article 11 from
UDHR. Because in my case the Crimes against humanity have been instigated by breaking every possible
and relevant law as enumerated in chapter 3 from annex 23 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for
interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, and as summarily objectivized in the rest
of the annex summaries of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to
this ICC penal dossier backed up by the full demonstrations from the I.B sections in principal from this
ICC penal dossier, it is proven that the Crimes against humanity are “part either of a government policy”
because it involves all the Romanian “state” mafia controlled institutions enumerated in paragraph 0.2
II.1.2^1.1^2 Because is unheard of that a “psychiatrist” charlatan informs his victim he will
falsify “psychiatry” charlatanry documents which lead to illegal “psychiatric” charlatanry incarceration
and chemical lobotomization, it’s proven that any potentially recidivist convict and mental patient
doesn’t give his consent in legal conditions except if receiving real medical attention regarding drug
addiction withdrawal, as any other “psychiatric” charlatanry “treatment” is nothing else than chemical
lobotomy through poisoning with deadly fluorine or chlorine neurotoxins. Because is unheard of that a
“psychiatrist” charlatan informs and asks his victim if it wishes to be chemically lobotomized and
induced a myriad other health problems in the process, potential death included as objectivized in
chapter 1 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1
to this ICC penal dossier, it’s not only proven that any potentially recidivist convict and mental patient
doesn’t give his consent in legal conditions, but cannot consent to assisted suicide given chemical
lobotomy is capital punishment through the eradication of individuality or a person’s identity, and
cannot even consent to be bodily damaged because in Romania, CoE and the world as of fact is illegal
according to article 22 from the Romanian Constitution, articles 2 and 3 from ECHR and articles 3 and 5
from UDHR. Taking deadly neurotoxic poisons cure nothing and produce by brain damage the “mental
illness” they claim to cure as objectivized in chapter 1 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request
for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier. This proves again that the Crimes
against humanity are “part either of a government policy (through unconstitutional laws, illegal norms
and law breaking) ... of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority (to say
at least since a totalitarian regime doesn’t tolerate its regime, it imposes its regime as proven by thefact
the Romanian “state” mafia gives accreditation to the “psychiatry” charlatanry to raise its power
because it abuses it together with the Romanian “judicial system” as weapons of state terrorism and
wrongful political repression - of course the mafia won’t destroy but enhance its tools, meaning in other
words when the mafia doesn’t abuse the “psychiatry” charlatanry as a weapon of state terrorism and
wrongful political repression, it “tolerates and condones” the “psychiatric” charlatanry atrocities or
Crimes against humanity committed for illicit profit through illegal experimentation for the
pharmaceutical mafia, or for personal illicit profit of the “psychiatrist” charlatans which I’ve observed in
Romania occupy both public functions and have a prive “psyhiatry” charlatanry bussinees which
obviously creates a conflict of interest
II.1.2^1.1^3 According to article 184 paragraph 3 from the Romanian Penal Code respectively
articles 10 and 11 from the Romanian Law 487/2002 that state a “psychiatric” charlatanry
“examination” can only take place directly, with the person’s freely given consent in front of the
judiciary body in writing in the presence of his legal representant, then again in front of the
“psychiatrist” committee of charlatans after the person has been informed of its rights and
repercussions of giving its consent to the “psychiatrist” charlatans as objectivized in paragraph
II.1.2.1.1^2, with the exception of the person lacking discernment which because it cannot be
Page 56 of 501
established by the judiciary bodies, can only be established through a legal medicine expertise according
to article 10, 11 and 13 paragraph 4 from the Romanian Law 487/2002 case in which the procedure is
impossible to realize because again it requires the person’s freely given consent after being informed in
front of a committee of “psychiatrist” charlatans as objectivized in paragraph II.1.2.1.1^2 or, or not be
given case in which the “psychiatric” charlatanry “examination” is physically and logically impossible to
achieve except if there are proofs that the person lacks discernment such as manifesting logical
incoherence, occupational dysfunction and failure to recognize what’s real case which are impossible to
achieve if a person refuses to cooperate and according to articles 10 and 14 from the Romanian Law
487/2002 a “psychiatric” charlatanry “examination can only take place directly, and proofs can only be
obtained directly and are only relevant in the prezent, nor in the past or the future meaning the
“psychiatry” charlatanry cannot evaluate the mental health of a felon regarding the committal of a
felony in the past, nor can ever the subjective “psychiatrist” charlatans hallucinations constitute an
objective proof in a criminal investigation which prove again the mafia illicit accreditation of the
“pscyhiatry” charlatanry for illicit abuse of its own, mentioning while I was a temporary refugee
between 11th April 2017 and 27th May 2017 I wrote an essay for the law faculty regarding judicial use of
psychology in which I demonstrated judicial psychology cannot offer proofs in any judicial act of
procedure and was graded 70% because I didn’t have acces to enough reading material to reference but
just logic, my own case and my own research, while the essay is suppose to reference every other
perspective or research in the world for 100% coverage of the subject. In the case that a foolish person
cooperates with the “psychiatrist” charlatans who thus rightfully declare that person lacking
discernment if only for failing to recognize that “psychiatry” is charlatanry, that person’s legal or
conventional representant must be inquired for consent for the “psychiatric” charlatanry “examination”
which if given makes that representant a direct instigator and accomplice to Crimes against humanity if
the “psychiatric” charlatanry “examination” leads to “psychiatric” charlatanry incarceration and
chemical lobotomization, as further proven by the fact lack of discernment can’t be cured as logically
notorious through deadly neurotoxic poisoning which causes lack of discernment through brain
destruction as objectivized in chapter 1 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim
measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, else everybody would take this fictious
treatment and exemplificatively there would be no more car crashes, logical fact which stands as proof
in general that “psychiatry” is charlatanry, neither medicine nor science. As I objectivized in paragraph
2.4^18 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to
this ICC penal dossier, as a pretext and cover-up story for the Crimes against humanity the Romanian
“state” mafia committed against me between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 as objectivized in section
I.A.II.1.3.1^7, I.B.6, and I.A.I.1-2, the “psychiatrist” torturer Barbarosie Carmen was groundlessly
appointed without legal forms my curator and refused to close the legally required conventional
representancy contract with my mother which of course wouldn’t have consented to my “psychiatric”
charlatanry incarceration and chemical lobotomization. Although the existence of a curator would make
it appear I was falsely declared lacking discernment, in actuality I wasn’t declared or implied such in the
falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry discharge papers from 8th June 2017 as proven by the fact it’s retained
in it I have full cognitive functions as proven by annex 16 summary of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request
for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, which instead proves the
“psychiatrist” charlatans are logically incoherent, occupationally dysfunctional and failing to recognize
what’s real, meaning schizophrenic according to these symptoms and DSM-V “psychiatry” charlatanry
manual of diagnosis and statistics, even as criminal charlatans and torturers which immediately classifies
them as sociopaths - persons who pervasively break the law and other person’s rights sacrificing their
lives for achieving their petty illicit interests. This proves that the Crimes against humanity against me
are “part either of a government policy (pervasive law breaking) ... or of a wide practice (totalitarian
doctrine) of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority (to say at least
Page 57 of 501
since a totalitarian regime doesn’t tolerate its regime, it imposes its regime as proven by the
involvement of most of the other Romanian “state” mafia controlled institutions enumerated in
paragraph 0.2, controlled institutions including the “psychiatry” charlatanry to which the mafia gives
accreditation “tolerating and condoning” it just to abuse it as a weapon of state terrorism and wrongful
political repression when needed - similar state of illicit affairs which exist between the foreign illicit
interests who installed the puppet or puppetable Romanian “state” mafia regime in the 1989 coup
d’etat, in other words the Romanian “state” mafia being allowed to do what it wants in Romania as long
as it “privatizes” the national interest or cooperates with the foreign illicit interests that improperly at
best “tolerates and condones” it for illicit profit which are the foregin interest’s policy)”
II.1.2^1.1^4 According to article 29 paragraph 2 from Romanian Law 487/2002 the “psychiatrist”
charlatan can circumvent the patient’s consent regarding “psychiatric” charlatanry “treatment” by
chemical lobotomization, if he can prove the patient’s behavior is a risk of imminent damage to himself
or others. I was falsely accused of deeds that cannot physically exist which therefore cannot possibly
constitute felonies or premises for diagnosis as I objectivized in annex 8 and annex 9 of my Rule 39 ECHR
urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, and if that isn’t
enough, the felony of Disturbing the meeting I’ve been falsely accused of cannot be possibly objectivized
to constitute a public danger to myself or others, all arguments which prove the penal dossiers
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 and all “psychiatric” charlatanry documents are falsified
poor pretexts and cover-up stories for Crimes against humanity as objectivized anyway in annex 16, 18-
20 and 22 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier, respectively section I.B.2, I.B.3, I.B.4 and I.B.6. Furthermore, because I was falsely suspected of
an aggravation circumstance and not a felony in 2417/P/2014 because the “prosecutor” is schizophrenic
as proven by his symptoms of logical incoherence, occupational dysfunction and failure to recognize
what’s real according to DSM-V “psychiatry” charlatanry manual of diagnosis and statistics, and clearly I
haven’t been accused in any of these falsified penal dossiers of killing my baby not being a woman to
give birth of a baby to start with, nor am I a minor evidently, therefore the “psychiatric” charlatanry
“examination” procedure according to article 184 paragraph 1 from the Romanian Penal Procedure is
not applicable to me, nor am I a felon for security measures to be applied to me according to articles
107-110 from the Romanian Penal Code as proven by annex 17 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for
interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier regarding my empty judicial history.
Because the falsified penal dossiers 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 used as
pretexts and cover-up stories for the Crimes against humanity committed against me involve all the
Romanian “state” mafia controlled institutions enumerated in paragraph 0.2, it’s proven that the Crimes
against humanity against me are “part either of a government policy”
II.1.2^1.1^5 As proof that Crimes against humanity are “part either of a government policy
(through unconstitutional laws, illegal norms and law breaking) ... or of a wide practice (totalitarian
doctrine) of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority (to say at least
since a totalitarian regime doesn’t tolerate its regime, it imposes its regime as proven by the following
case, and the involvement of most of the other Romanian “state” mafia controlled institutions
enumerated in paragraph 0.2), I recount the fact that the Romanian “state” mafia to protect some of its
members incarcerated for hundreds of days and chemically lobotomized a member of the Rroma
minority for filing a penal complaint against one of the members of the mafia as reported in this article:
http://www.juridice.ro/346691/romania-la-cedo-cauza-pendinte-ivascu-internarea-medicala-
nevoluntara-la-ordinul-procurorului-dreptul-la-viata-privata-si-raspunderea-statului.html, case in which
the superior legal medicine institutions “IML Cluj” and “’Mina Minovici’ Bucharest” sustained the
“psychiatrist” charlatans falsified documents against the Rroma minority member named Ivascu that he
is mentally alienated for exercising his legal rights, then the courthouse “Judecatoria Sighetu Marmatiei”
in dossier 907/307/2010 declared nobody can be subjected in penal matters to the security measure of
Page 58 of 501
“psychiatric treatment”, proving this judge made a difference between medical treatment and
“psychiatric” charlatanry chemical lobotomization, until it has been established that the accused has
committed a felony and that there is a danger of committing further felonies according to article 109
from the Romanian Penal Code and article 23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Contitution, which
proves that the entire legal medicine hierarchy is controlled by the mafia who used the “psychiatry”
charlatanry as a weapon of political repression against the Rroma minority member named Ivascu. I
remind in my case the legal medicine hierarchy meaning “IML Iasi” and “’Mina Minovici’ Bucharest”
ignored my petitions because it’s impossible to contradicts my pleads, which I retain as proof of tacit
acknowledgement of the Crimes against humanity committed against me, which is why the mafia
committed 8 Crimes against humanity against me attempting to stop me altogether from investigating
and denouncing its criminal activity
<remained here with work><In conclusion the “psychiatry” charlatanry procedure in penal matters is
applicable only if interpreted in bad faith by liars disregarding the real meaning of juridical terms, the
fundamental rights and the fact the law is only interpretable mandatorily as a whole. The Romanian
“state” mafia corrupted and void of right law text that potentially recidivist convicts can be chemically
lobotomized through a “medical” measure of security is not only a contradiction in terms because
medicine is sworn to “at least do no harm” according to the oath of Hippocrates, but is also ironically
against public safety because the “psychiatric” charlatanry chemical lobotomy induces suicidal and
homicidal ideation as I’ve objectivized in section I.A.II.1.2.10^1 which proves any reasoning that anyone
can be obligated or consent to lose his physical and psychical integrity results in a legal aberration,
because the right to physical and psychical integrity is a fundamental inalienable right in Romanian
Constitution article 22 as well as in Romanian internal right, articles 2 and 3 from ECHR and articles 3
and 5 from UDHR. I wasn’t even falsely accused of murder to be chemically lobotomized, and even so
the charlatanry which is “psychiatric treatment” or in reality chemical lobotomy, abstracting the
illegalities and human rights infringements which lead to this point in the procedure, can only be
executed with a convict’s consent according to the Romanian mental health Law 487/2002 articles 10,
11, 43 and others as well as Romanian Penal procedure code article 184 paragraph 3 according to which
a “psychiatric” charlatanry interview is impossible without the examinee’s consent therefore the
charlatanry which is “psychiatric treatment” is impossible without diagnosis which is impossible without
examination, as direct observation means nothing because evidently refusal to consent means refusal to
cooperate to be examined thus any observations can only be invalid or false, corroborated with the
proven fact “psychiatry” charlatanry is neither medicine nor science – it’s charlatanry as I proven beyond
any reasonable doubt in section <freud took bribe and other such sections>. I was never convicted of
anything in my life, nor did I ever even display immoral behavior to be “psychiatrically” examined under
the penal procedure – the only reason behind the Crimes against humanity committed against me being
that I am denouncing the Romanian “magistrate” mafia both publicly and to the penal authorities which
to my dismay I discovered are the mafia also, as easily attested by the fact all my penal complaints were
rejected illegally with lies such as they aren’t signed or contain facts, and the 3 years old forum from
2014 containing many published “magistrate” mafia penal dossiers militia.freeforums.net on 8th April
2017 was censored right in the middle of daily arrests by tens of “masked policemen”, “policemen” and
“gendarmes” on 6th and 10th followed by the attempts from 13th, 14th then 27th April 2017 by the secret
“police” with no other reason but to harass me and my family and falsify the appearance of legality
about the forged acts of procedure regarding my “psychiatric” imprisonment “for examination” with no
justification as I’ve demonstrated in my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures, annex 20
regarding my plead in 12718/231/2017 and annex 23 regarding explanatory notes plead, and attempt to
murder me by putting me in anaphylactic shock like I’ve demonstrated in section <regarding murder> .
In conclusion because the Romanian mafia government meaning masked “policemen”, “policemen”,
Page 59 of 501
undercover “policemen”, “gendarmes”, “forensic medics”, “psychiatrists” and others executed in bad
will meaning with premeditation falsified juridical acts against me, it is proven this is the “government
policy”, also proven notoriously by the fact I am not the only one persecuted – against many street
protesters the “psychiatry” charlatanry has been used as a weapon of wrongful repression with the false
claim that exercising the right to assemble according to article 39 from the Romanian Constitution and
Law 60/1991, constitutes mental alienation, ergo Romanians are supposed to be idiots by the Romanian
“psychiatric” charlatan’s agenda at least – which is exactly what I’ve been accused of in dossier
15730/231/2014 that I must be put under legal interdiction because I exercise my legal rights, and I’ve
even been told repeatedly by psychiatrists in short that I have no rights except what they decide,
proven in annex 15 from my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures where at 5th page the
prosecutor made the blunder of declaring "the complainant is free from now on as long as hospitals and
other courthouses permit" because I was never indicted, convicted or diagnosed as proven by annex 17
and annex 22 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC
penal dossier regarding my empty judicial history and my certification that I’m army incorporable and
apt for superior studies, which reveals the real Romanian “state” mafia policy of ruling by state
terrorism and political repression through Crimes against humanity, that I must quit working with
superior studies and be an unqualified worker putting wares on shelves at foreign hypermarkets, that I
must retreat within myself and other such imbecilities which would’ve been funny if the “psychiatric”
torturers didn’t have the power to chemically lobotomize forcefully at the order of any high standing
state mafia member, meaning any criminal occupying a high influence public function in Romania, this
status quo representing the real Romanian “government policy”. In fact I’ve also denounced the
“psychiatric” quackery in Romania for making illegal experiments on people while the judiciary system
condemns innocent to “psychiatric treatment” on 19th April 2016, as proven by this saved post from the
mafia censored forum militia.freeforums.net which I reposted on scribd:
https://www.scribd.com/document/344526386/justitia-din-Vrancea-drogheaza-oameni-nevinovati\
which may have triggered this secret services report published on the general’s prosecutor’s site on 31st
May 2016 which I saved and published at address:
https://www.scribd.com/document/331592730/comunicat-de-presa-SRI-PICCJ-din-31-05-2016-privind-
faptul-ca-psihiatrii-fac-din-pacienti-cobai, communiqué not in an effort of the secret services to do their
job but to “throw the dead cat” in another courtyard or make it appear in the 25th hour that they are
doing their job when in fact they have been covering this all along for many years, and they’ve
attempted to murder me by instigating the “magistrate” mafia to sentence me to be indefinitely
imprisoned, tortured and killed by Invega poisoning, as clearly proven for another’s man’s named
Vasilache Daniel’s felonies and diagnosis, while the sentence against me itself is illegal and unjustified
because it’s unmotivated, as proven by annex 19 from my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim
measures regarding the falsified motivation from 12718/231/2017, and annex 20 from my Rule 39 ECHR
urgent request for interim measures regarding my plead in 12718/231/2017 demonstrating any decision
against me as all the ones before can only be illegal and unfounded thus falsified. This again proves
statistically any “institution” I’ve encountered in the Romanian state mafia menagerie provably
adheres to the “government policy” of committing atrocities against the general population,
instigating or being accomplice, being no coincidence that Romanian has over 3 million “economic”
refugees as if there is a civil war ongoing, which in fact it is, between the aggressor state mafia and the
victimized Romanian people. Furthermore to also corroborate about the “other” institutions, after I
denounced the “magistrate” mafia for drugging innocent people in public, and because I started making
psychiatric profiled dossiers against these “magistrates” myself, they issued a conjoint Ministry of justice
and Superior magistrate council orders to hide all the psychiatrically profiled dossiers from the public
Page 60 of 501
evidence ECRIS except they didn’t hide the ones they’ve made against me on purpose even when I
demanded it as proven in annex 14 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures regarding
the illegal rejection of the request when it wasn’t the competence of “judge” Croitoru Sandina Mariana
who stole the administrative petition to falsify the rejection of it judicially, nor was the petition
addressed to any particular dossier not having anything to do judicial matters but the execution of the
Ministry of justice and Supreme council of magistrate’s order non-discriminatorily, fact which I’ve
proven to the antidiscrimination council (ro. CNCD), and to the data protection agency (ro. ANSPDCP)
also corroborating with the supreme’s court (ro. ICCJ) decision no 37 from 7th December 2015
recognizing a person’s name is also personal data meaning not public, “institutions” which again refused
to do their job by falsifying responses to cover up their refusal to solve the petitions, fact which I can
prove on demand by copies of the emails and in CNCD’s case a penal complaint meaning complete with
proofs and investigation, which I’ve published at address:
https://www.scribd.com/document/331775977/dosar-penal-Dragus-Daniel-Asztalos-Csaba-Ferenc-
Pentru-Falsificarea-Raspunsului-in-Scopul-de-a-Solutiona-Petitia-Si-Probe
II.1.2^2 regarding “perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy”, it is evident as I
proven anyway in chapter I.3 from annex 23 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, that none of the Romanian “state” mafia “magistrate”
caporegimes identify themselves with the Romanian theoretically governing state of right, which is their
only work attribute and obligation - to obey the law according to article 124 paragraph 3 from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code, which proves complementarily of course that at least some of them
must identify themselves with the Romanian “state” mafia policy for the mafia to exist, maintain
cohesiveness and ethos and not dissolve due to infighting or external pressures, and the ones who
identify themselves with the mafia’s policy are most probably the ones who benefit the most from this
social order or have the most to lose if the order changes, meaning the mafia “magistrate” underbosses
or the ones occupying the most important functions and having most influence within the Romanian
“state” mafia and over the mafia controlled Romanian “judiciary system” meaning the ability to call
upon the most public function abuse, which are exemplificatively the supreme court presidents such as
the notorious criminal Livia Stanciu currently destroying justice at the Romanian Constitutional Court as
proven in paragraph I.A.II.1.2^1.2.3 and as I objectivized in section I.B.11, the general prosecutors of
Romania out of which I name Tiberiu Nitu for the fact he was a soldier in term who shot people from
the roof of the national television building during the 1989 coup d’etat meaning he was a mafia
collaborator and a traitor which is why he acceded such an important function so fast, besides being
stupid as hell just like Augustin Lazar the current general prosecutor of Romania which is always an
indicator for a public functionary that he’s merely a tool and has been installed in function and is
controlled illicitly, the notorious criminal Kovesi Laura Codruta chief of the national anti-corruption
direction prosecutor’s office who only engaged in political police inclusively at the instigation of the
Balkans regional CIA chief according to mafia “secret information services” defector Sebastian Ghita, the
notorious criminal Horodniceanu Daniel chief of anti-terrorism and anti-organized crime direction who
cannot not know of the Romanian “state” mafia he works for and who for instance is keeping the
infamous human trafficker Hassan Awid’s penal dossier open doing nothing in it as it has been for the
past 10 years because it describes the mafia takeover of Hassan Awdi’s Lebanese clan illicit business
through an illegal expropriation which is why Hassan Awdi won at ICSID, and even worse it describes the
mafia’s takeover of the Romanian press behind which are clearly foreign interests as the Romanians are
not by far smart enough to concertize politics at this level as proven by the fact the lot of them put
together could not stop me from denouncing their criminal activity - thank God, although have
committed Crimes against humanity 8 times against me, Ban Cristian Mihai who as a general
prosecutor of the prosecutor’s office near the Bucharest Appeal Court covered-up all crimes of the mafia
Page 61 of 501
“magistrate” caporegimes and mafia “lawyer” associates in Romania’s capital Bucharest with some of
the most stupid ordnances I ever saw again indicative this Romanian mafia “state lawyer” is nothing but
a tool just as Netejoru Lucian chief of Judiciary Inspection is for covering-up the disciplinary
infringements of the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes from all over Romania, or jus as the ministers of
justice are because being responsible constitutionally for the activity of the mafia “prosecutor”
caporegimes they are suppose to do nothing, ministers of justice out of which the most dangerous or
who did the most damage being Pruna Raluca who through Government Ordnance 18/2016 gave back
“the prosecutor republic” their renunciation to penal pursuit instrument of abuse, restricted access to
justice attempting to eliminate the ways of attack against the mafia “prosecutor” caopregimes always
falsified acts of procedure, gave the troglodyte peasant pedofile and murderous Romanian mafia
“policemen” soldiers the ability to write ordnances just like prosecutors and gave more tools to the
Romanian “state” mafia to infringe on the presumption of innocence as typical, Pruna Raluca being a
close friend of the mafia oligarchic inheritor of power Monica Macovei who has falsified reports about
the “justice progress” in Romania for EU for years which is clearly just for show as I’ve proven by
notifying LIBE with my case, the civil rights and liberties subcommittee near the European Parliament,
and inclusively Monica Macovei by her LIBE email address, and all so called European Parliament
members and of LIBE committee I notified did absolutely nothing proving it’s known perfectly well in EU
the dire situation Romania is in which is partly EU’s doing as I keep reminding as background throughout
my case, and so on and so forth. All who abuse these public functions in Romania are “set for life”, and if
the Romanian “state” mafia regime falls in favor of a legitimate government they will get prison for life
just for the complicity and instigation in Crimes against humanity cases alone even according to mafia
destroyed and permissive Romanian legislation, as for the real volume of their crimes it would take for
each one of them an untold number of prosecutors and judges as these criminals are only preoccupied
to commit crimes all day for the entire length of their career, being thus necessary at least one good
prosecutor for the same amount of time to write their indictments, respectively a judge to convict them
for each one, being in conclusion obvious these degenerated animals do identify themselves with the
mafia’s policy because organized crime is their life.
II.1.2^2.1 It is unknown in which quantity the rest of the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes
identify themselves with the mafia policy or just collaborate for various reasons which are known, such
as sacrificing other people’s lives by committing crimes for the mafia for the petty fear of persecution by
the mafia and losing their luxury illegal wages and privileges and intrinsically their social position and
easy life which is a form of sociopathy, or do not really fear of losing anything but collaborate with the
mafia anyway out of the callousness and apathy of real psychopaths and justifying to themselves that
whatever is good for them is ultimate good and whatever is bad for them is ultimately bad which is the
sociopathic perspective, or collaborate out of ambition for power and animal sadistic gratification by
abuse of power which is yet another characteristic of sociopaths to seek excitement by abusing others
since they have no life of their own being fundamentally psychopaths, this latter antisocial personality
being more appropriate to the mafia “policemen” soldiers made judges such as Craciun Constantin
Catalin who falsified the decision in 11224/231/2015 as proven by annex 3 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent
request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, and Paun Ionel Iulian who
falsified the penal dossier 2845/P/2016 through the frame-up from 18th May 2016 as objectivized in
annex 8 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier, respectively the “psychiatrist” torturers for which committing Crimes against humanity is a way
of life. The mafia “masked policemen”, “policemen”, “secret policemen”, “special agents” and
“gendarmes” soldiers are just dumb animals for which they are recruited as these animals otherwise in
life would just make it as unqualified workers and pack animals so working for the mafia is heaven for
them getting to fulfill their animal desires and getting paid for it they’re nothing more than prostitutes,
reason for which there’s no wonder these immoral troglodyte peasants which was also the field of
Page 62 of 501
recruitment for “communist” torturers, turn out to be pedophiles and murderers as notoriously known
in Romania, therefore clearly the mafia bovine soldiers from the Minister of Interior Affairs identify with
their sadistic animal instincts not the mafia’s policy which should be to conduct illicit business although I
wonder about that since the Romanian “state” mafia gained absolutely nothing apparently for
committing Crimes against humanity against me and would’ve lost nothing so far by leaving me alone,
being clear I’m facing Stalinist paranoid criminals. The other mafia associates such as the “lawyers”,
“registrars”, “archivists” etc., tell themselves they have no choice but to cooperate with the mafia to
earn their measly dishonest wage for their mediocre work at best and thus do not identify with the
mafia’s policy but collaborate with the mafia nevertheless because they are schizophrenic or mentally
labile and unable to fare on their own as real humans. The only mafia members who identify the most
with the mafia’s policy are the Crimes against humanity accomplices and instigators from the mafia’s
various “secret information services” and especially its leaders of course, mafia “secret services”
numbering 7 and having on payroll 85.000 employees, rivaling even U.S.A. as proof that unopposed the
mafia core meaning the “secret services” bosses and underbosses, and “magistrates” underbosses and
caporegimes arrogated themselves huge illegal salaries and privileges, dilapidated the state budget, and
as from the beginning when the analphabet or illiterate immoral peasants did when they were put into
public functions by the stupid soviets wrongfully applying the communist principle of equal opportunity,
hired their whole interloper family “along with their pig and their bitch” as we say in Romania which is
why there’s so many parasites especially in the mafia’s “secret services” which are modeled after
Stalin’s ideea gone awfully wrong, that everyone should rat on everyone to maintain the order,
respectivelly that every apartment block should have a squealer at least, direction towards which the
entirety of the mafia “proximity or sector police” works for and never for maintaining public quietness
and peace which is their only work attribute as I’ve demonstrated as always by petitioning and not only
getting falsified answers in return to cover-up the refusal of the “proximity police” to do their work, but
threats with fines if I petition the “proximity police” and an actual falsified fine against my mother
Raneti Mariana which was annulled in court as proof, and that I should quit being an intellectual and
work as a shelf arranger in French hypermarkets, aberration which I’ve also heard from the
“psychiatrist” charlatans by which is how I know it’s not simply an insult but the mafia’s audacity to
believe I have no right to make demands from the public offices they occupy and behave about as a red-
neck on his turf, and even more the mafia’s audacity to not even pretend they are public functionaries
but arrogantly display their abuse of power which I explicate is all about social status within the criminal
society which dominates Romanian culture today, in which the victims are despised and criminals
praised which is why Romanian “state” mafia members honor crimes are also for achieving this praise
from their sociopathic entourage, this being the Romanian “state” mafia member’s way to display their
savagery and callousness towards human life by which they inspire fear in others, being also notoriously
known that it is the young Romanian “state” mafia members who are the most savage correlating to
their desire to establish themselves in the Romainan “state” mafia criminal society, just like the
“psychiatrist” torturers Puiu <?other name?>, Mircea Dutescu and Barbarosie Carmen who committed
Crimes against humanity against me between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, or the interloper
Herghelegiu Danut who committed Bodily Harm and attempted Qualified Murder against me as part of
the Crimes against humanity committed against me in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014
through a covert deadly fluorine neurotoxic injection after being transported at the emergency ward of
“Saint Pantelimon” hospital in Focsani, as objectivized in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^2 and I.B.22, respectively
I.A.II.1.3.1^7 and I.B.6, and I.A.I.1-2.
II.1.2^2.2 According to my observation conducted mainly on mafia “judges”, the statistics
reveals all mafia “magistrate” caporegimes are corrupt and about 86% are disposed to commit Crimes
against humanity when demanded by the mafia which means the remaining 14% are either not
Page 63 of 501
sociopaths or intelligent enough to weigh their options better. <find scribd link regarding the general
removal request of the criminal “magistrates” from my files, and final conclusion on Vrancea judicial
system, posted just before “militia.freeforums.net” forum was illicitly censored most probably because
of this “last straw”> The fact all Romanian mafia “magistrate” caporegimes are corrupt, and because the
space within which the scientific observation was conducted is anthropic meaning man-made not
natural or random, it means that all Romanian mafia “magistrate” caporegimes are corrupt is the intent
not an event, which means there is no error margin and 100% of the Romanian “magistrates” are
corrupt as proven by the fact this social phenomena seeks to eliminate any potentially honest
magistrates which is why the Romanian “state” mafia in the 2nd session of the 1st year of my law faculty
exams committed against me and my family state terrorism through illegal home breakings and illegally
arresting me almost daily before Orthodox Easter 2017 on 6th, 10th attempting on 13th, 14th and later on
27th April 2017 with tens of mafia “masked policemen”, “policemen”, “secret policemen” and
“gendarme” soldiers as if I was a dangerous terrorist or MMA fighter not a peaceful intellectual human
rights defender, forcing me to become a temporary refugee from 11th April 2017 until 27th May 2017
when I was arrested from my law faculty exams by 3 mafia “secret policemen” soldiers, incarcerated in
the Focsani “psychiatric” gulag where 5 “psychiatric” torturers were waiting for me as instructed by the
mafia, tied to an operating table and injected with deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins daily and
put in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days without treatment being expected to die, then after I
survived I was forcefully chemically lobotomized with other deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins
until 8th June 2017, which constitute the second committal of Crimes against humanity against me, the
latter deadly fluorine based neurotoxic poison being the same I was covertly injected with in the night
between 5th and 6th December 2014 which constitutes the first committal of Crimes against humanity
against me, as I objectivized in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^2 and I.B.22, respectively I.A.II.1.3.1^7 and I.B.6, and
I.A.I.1-2 from my ICC penal dossier, respectively chapter 1 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim
measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier. Afterwards the Romanian “state” mafia
returned with the falsified “prosecutor” proposal from 1st August 2017 that Crimes against humanity be
committed against me through indefinite to life illegal incarceration, Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualified
Murder through deadly fluorine based neurotoxic poisoning as between 27th May 2017 and 8th June
2017 proven by the falsified sentence in 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance where the schizophrenic
“judge” Miron Doina used the Romanian term “medicamentos” meaning drugged, while falsifying the
sentence for the crimes and diagnosis of another person named Vasilache Daniel because I was never
indicted, convicted or diagnosed as proven by annex 17, annex 18, annex 19 and annex 22 of my Rule 39
ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, regarding my
empty judicial history, the admittal by the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes I have no judicial history and
respectively the family doctor certified evidence that I’m army incorporable and apt for superior studies
meaning mentally healthy, corroborated with the fact I also have according to annex 20 of my Rule 39
ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, 4 legal work
medicine certificates declaring I’m mentally sane and apt for work as correspondent to the 4 legal work
years as an IT programmer which stopped when the Romanian “state” mafia destroyed this career
definitively too in Romania as I objectivized in chapter IV of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim
measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, being before this licensed in mathematics -
informatics, informatics specialization after my 4 years in college meaning apt for superior studies, and
Page 64 of 501
army incorporable all along, corroborated with the fact no falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry documents
were made official as proven by the fact my family doctor would’ve been notified through the Ministry
of Health informatic system, respectively I was never communicated as legally required according to
articles 32, 33 paragraph 5, 58 and 61 paragraph 5 from the Romanian Law 487/2002, article 28
paragraph 2 from the norms of application of the Romanian Law 487/2002, any of these falsified
“psychiatric” charlatanry documents with the exception of the falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry
incarceration discharge papers from 8th June 2017 attached as annex 16 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent
request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, respectively I wasn’t even
officially under penal pursuit as proven by the “psychiatrist” torturers who lied I am paranoid and
psychotic for the last 3 years 2015-2017 for knowing I was under penal pursuit in the 4 falsified penal
dossiers 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 as proven by annex 16 and annex
17 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier, meaning as retained in the falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry incarceration discharge papers
form 8th June 2017, and respectively the fact in my empty judicial history there should’ve been inscribed
according to the law the fact I was under penal pursuit at the time I requested it, meaning
simultaneously the Romanian “state” mafia attempted to covertly politically repress me through 6
Crimes against humanity attempts, and 2 Crimes against humanity committals, to stop me from
denouncing its criminal activity. In conclusion the Romanian “state” mafia also feared me becoming a
law practitioner in Romania which is why it actively destroyed my second career in law, corroborated
with the fact my mother recounted that while going to the courthouse in my stead in the Spring of 2017
heard someone speaking loudly over the phone behind a door saying ~”...did you catch him yet? He
thinks he can do this forever...”, as becoming meaning earning my living as a law practitioner meant
assuring my life long activity as a human rights defender in Romania, always be able to denounce the
Romanian “state” mafia criminal activity no matter the case I would have been involved in as a lawyer,
prosecutor or judge. This also concludes the argument that the fact all the Romanian mafia “magistrate”
caporegimes are corrupt is the intent not an event, proven by the fact I’ve notified every possible
competent institution responsible for the penal or disciplinary action against these mafia “magistrate”
caporegimes, mafia soldiers and mafia associates, as objectivized in paragraph 0.2 and chapter V.3 from
annex 23 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier, and all refused to do their job proving the leadership of the Romanian “state” mafia is
accomplice and instigator or major determinant factor by assuring their subordinates they won’t be
prosecuted or expelled from public function - the Romanian “state” mafia members only source of
power apparently.
II.1.2^2.3 It cannot be ascertained in which proportion however the cohesiveness of the
Romanian “state” mafia members is owed to a particular psychology or another, being obvious however
that all the Romanian “state” mafia members fear losing their luxury wages, privileges and easy
mediocre life else they would resign for humane reasons which reveals instead they are all at least to
some degree sociopaths, and because they are sociopaths lacking integrity or honor, it means
malcontent members of the mafia can be leveraged to create dissension within the mafia actively and
respectively to obtain testimony from some of the mafia members against the others in exchange for
deals of punishment reduction or oversight of their crimes, as sociopaths are always malcontent or
hungry for power respectively all are egotistical meaning none will have the mafia’s interest at heart but
Page 65 of 501
his own, nor have I ever found any clue that the Romanian “state” mafia is anything else but a criminal
society of troglodyte peasants acting on their degenerated animal instincts, meaning there is no esotery
that would coerce these sociopaths to put the mafia’s interests or safety of another mafia member over
his own, although the Romanian “state” mafia attempts to insert esotery in their ranks in the form of
masonry of which an unknown number of mafia “magistrate” caporegimes are members of as proven by
the fact the Romanian Superior Magistrate Council declared the public functions of judge or prosecutor
are not incompatible with the membership to a masonry group which is illegal because masonry is
sworn to help other members in need while the judge and prosecutors are sworn to obey the law
exclusively, the conflict of interest being evident, and even more masonry is illegal in Romania according
to article < of the Romanian Constitution which forbids secret associations, which instead proves that
indeed members of the mafia “magistrate “caporegimes are members of secret associations also
although there is no such thing as masonry, only another form of mafia organization as real masonry has
moral rules and does not allow criminals in its ranks, which instead is another way of proving some of
the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes have organized in mafia subgroup equivalents of mutual defense
pacts, which proves the mafia members only think of themselves which is hopeful for the destruction of
the Romanian “state” mafia. Sociopaths can be made malcontent by anything they wrongfully perceive
as iniquity - towards them alone of course since they do not understand the meaning of the term seeing
themselves the source of all right in existence, or any action infringing on what they perceive as their
territory or what they disserve because sociopaths are just degenerated animals acting on primitive
instinct exacerbated by the use of the neocortex which is not in control as in real human beings,
sociopaths thus thinking they disserve everything it’s within their attention span and that everything
they do is good therefore they cannot stand justice or real equity, therefore friction can be aroused by
using their greed and envy actively, or, the circumstances can be actively manipulated so that the
sociopathic nature of the mafia members sensing weakness or victims within the mafia will despise the
other sociopath and perhaps even attack them which will create further friction and dissension between
mafia members, or, putting pressure of enough intensity and duration that the differences between the
mafia members in terms of commitment to a goal such as my political persecution will start to appear,
creating further friction between the differently interested mafia members, or, by destroying even one
mafia “magistrate” caporegime, make it notorious and thus make him an example, a domino effect will
be triggered so that the fear that worked towards mafia cohesiveness will overnight turn in mistrust and
fear of the mafia’s cohesiveness and ability to protect it’s members, and a fear of “falling off the cliff
along with the herd”, and so on and so forth, being thus easily observable the biggest factor for the
mafia’s cohesiveness is the lack of opposition or Romanian cowardice and treacherous spirit instilled by
the various totalitarian regimes that ruled Romania, meaning since 1989 the foreign interest puppetable
Romanian “state” mafia “governed” notoriously by CIA, EU, CoE and the World Bank, between 1945-
1989 the soviets which eradicated the intellectuals, real Christians and any true honest citizen meaning
the true socialists which prove there was no such thing as real communism in Romania or the USSR,
before 1945 since the middle of 18th century or so by the genocidal Hohenzollern family which also
actively destroyed any shred of justice, the Christian Orthodox “Legionary movement”, and persecuted
the “communists” even, and before that Romania or its three major regions were feudal subjects of the
Ottoman Empire for approximately 400 years and the corrupt aristocracy which more often than not
was controlling the monarch, meaning there was never and there is nobody with the authority in
Page 66 of 501
Romania to prosecute and convict any mafia “magistrate” caporegime which is one of the major
Romanian “state” mafia powers in Romania, as proven by the fact despite the colossal sum paid by
Romania at ECHR for trials lost for the fake trials conducted by the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes, no
mafia “magistrate” caporegime was ever prosecuted, convicted or at least made to pay the money back
to my knowledge which just proves the mafia’s arrogance as it faced no repercussions for its Crimes
against humanity yet, which is why it commits Crimes against humanity whenever opportune for the
psychological reasons aforementioned relative to the dynamics of a criminal society of sociopaths. In
conclusion the mafia’s policy is any political doctrine in particular but the natural squirming of egotistical
illicit interests of social parasites and other totalitarian animals, each with its own psychosis as proven
by the fact the mafia’s policy should be profit by any means yet through the Crimes against humanity
committed against me they profited nothing apparently, and would’ve surely lost nothing material by
leaving me in peace, but instead lost their public reputation which was my first target so I call that a
success since nobody believes anymore there is such a thing as a single honest magistrate in Romania,
except the mentally alienated which simply are unable to discern what’s real and what’s not, meaning
it’s not that the mafia members identify or not with a policy but rather are pretty much like a pack of
animals subservient to the authority manifested through the power conferred by public function abuse
of other mafia members with which they can inflict violence upon others, meaning that indeed inducing
fear or state terrorism is the Romanian “state” mafia’s doctrine but since it assassinated its dictator
Nicolae Ceausescu, it gave birth to about as many dictators instead as many mafia members there are
and the mafia’s doctrine got polluted with personal interests and corrupted meaning it doesn’t work
anymore as proven by the fact I am still alive and fighting by the grace of God pretty much alone against
a mafia with millions of members meaning all the Romanians in public service offices and their
interloper families which I do not openly declare but it’s the inconvenient truth of subsistence in
Romanian as a honest citizen without social status or influence of any kind which automatically means
being a “perfect victim” or prey for the illicit interests of any criminal in Romania aware of this “state of
affairs” which is why I’ve been even swindled by apartment administrators and hosts totally unafraid of
the judicial repercussions because none could exist, meaning a decent life is impossible except if being
one of at least the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes as I wouldn’t call anything less a decent life, while
the mafia soldiers and associates settle for less being mediocre, and this is the major factor why 3
million Romanians became economic refugees, not that they were displeased with the remuneration in
Romania but that they couldn’t get a job at all as proven by the fact I struggled immensely to hold on for
4 years to my IT programmer career, been forced to learn the law and appeal to the “authorities”
constantly about the felonies committed against me to no avail, I couldn’t afford even a small one room
apartment through a bank loan and the bank along with the state agency were favoring the Romanian
“state ‘mafia’s clientele for bribe and nepotism, over half my salary went on rent and utilities and so on
and so forth, meaning not only is life misery in Romania as one cannot even sleep in peace and have to
even buy the drinking water, but a honest decent life is impossible and I don’t consider slavery living
meaning life in Romania is unacceptable and the reason I became a human rights defender and fought
against this regime. In Romania on everyone there’s a constant pressure to become a criminal because
it’s as proven quite impossible to have a decent life in this criminal society, and becoming a criminal I
find unacceptable not just because I would lose my identity meaning not only committing spiritual
suicide but becoming mad since I’ve explicated that the only logical way of living for a human being is
Page 67 of 501
making the world better for all humankind because a human observes he is 99.9% genetically identical
to the others which is easily observable by naked eye or as God put it “love your neighbor as yourself”
because all the others are virtually (as good as) yourself, and also observing that being born in the
humankind continuum is proof one will be born again for being 99.9% identical to the others meaning
the superficial difference is not even a guarantee, a human being can only deduce that to make the
world better for oneself he must make the world better for everyone, and this is how I prove real
egotism is no different than real altruism to my amusement of demonstrating even a perfect antonimic
opposition is an illusion. Furthermore by becoming a criminal one does not simply lose just its identity
and sanity, but because becoming a criminal in Romania it means becoming part of the pyramidal
criminal scheme in which one is constantly blackmailed by bigger criminals into obeying as nothing is
given for free and blackmail is a machination of control in Romania, it means one also loses freedom,
argumentation by which I just proven that being a criminal is madness, and the mafia members are
really subservient to their own inhuman abject mediocrity, love of vice, vanity, illicit profit instead of
honest work, living in fear even of being hated and envied for rising above the immoral slum which is
the Romanian culture and hating culture and intellectuality as proven by the notorious event from the
degenerated “European” Vrancea county where in 1989 coup d’état a bunch of demented illiterate
peasants started burning books of course, amongst which one exited the mayor’s office with an
encyclopedia raised high in his hands, yelled “Death to intellectuals! This is their ideology!”, and threw
the encyclopedia in the fire; an event symbolic to the type of degenerated animal that populates the
Romanian public sector offices which were acceded through “politics” meaning the Romanian parties
also, which in Romania are just identical criminal cliques and sandboxes or training grounds for
ascending petty criminals, with different masks meaning name and emblem, reason for which enough of
these economic felons mostly are often changing parties in search for a better position which means
these groups have nothing to do with politics and have everything to do with organized crime as proven
by the fact they only act for their illicit profit and not to benefit society, and as proven by the staggering
amount of convicted for corruption parliament members still in office which should’ve been put under
interdiction to occupy any public function instead according to the law <seek an article regarding the list
of Romanian convicted parliament members in function and link>, meaning the Romanian “state” mafia
policy is the collection of unspoken rules of the Romanian criminal society risen out of the sociopathic
ambition for power and animal sadistic gratification of the illiterate and immoral peasants found by the
soviet invasion in 1945, who tortured and killed the Romanian intellectuals, and left the torturers and
criminals in power after the retreat of the soviet occupation forces, including former Nazi collaborators
introduced in the “communist” party by the infamous Ana Pauker <link to wikipedia articles where I’ve
picked this information from>, “communist” party which is the origin of the current oligarchy of state-
level organized crime which perpetuated itself through the 1989 coup d’état. It is therefore proven the
malevolent pervasive intent or mafia policy of achieving any criminal goal for personal mafia members
illicit profit and favoritism or the mutual illicit benefit or more mafia members, and the perpetuation of
the mafia lifestyle, and not that any mafia crime is “tolerated or condoned” but praised in Romanian
criminal society and sought to be committed to show one’s worth in the mafia’s ranks and inspire fear in
one’s enemies, respectively the cohesiveness of the mafia and its pervasive criminal policy when
engaging in criminal activity can’t be dismissed as temporary or local in any way as proven by the
cooperation of the entire hierarchy of public offices occupied by the mafia to cover-up any crime no
Page 68 of 501
matter how down in the mafia social status is the mafia member abuser, which is the red-string
characteristic of the Romanian “state” mafia that pervades the simple practice of criminal favoritism and
proves the mafia by controlling the state engaged in totalitarianism which is why it has the motive and
opportunity to commit state terrorism and wrongful political repression by abusing the judicial system
and “psychiatry” charlantary as weapons against its adversaries or victims. It is easily observed as well
that no Romanian “state” mafia member ever speak against the mafia even when its crimes are obvious
or notorious, and the mafia leaders when confronted try to downplay the crime and appear neutral
when they should at least be outspoken anticrime fighters according to the office they occupy which
proves they aren’t very smart nor involved in any way with the attributes of their work for which they
have no experience but are mounted in public office themselves to be used as mafia tools, and this
practice of silence is called omerta or the ironically notorious but unspoken of law of silence within a
criminal society, speaking of which I’ve noticed a death-inspired-like fear and fanaticism to praise the
other mafia members in most if not all of the mafia members from the degenerated “European”
Vrancea county, attitude worthy no less than North Koreea like culture and blind appraisal of the
dictator, a culture which seems to have survived for decades after the Romanian “state” mafia through a
mock trial foreboding of today’s Romanian “justice” assassinated its leader Nicolae Ceausescu (and
incidentally Elena Ceausescu why not... and judicially harassed their children) who was praised just like
the dictator in North Koreea in his late years in power, after visiting North Koreea no less from where he
picked the personality cult it’s rumored, and because to every rule there are exceptions I also indicate
that the only circumstance when a mafia member speaks strategically and not pervasively against the
mafia, is when the mafia infighting spits one of them out just like the mafia “secret information services”
defector Sebastian Ghita who didn’t “spill the whole beans” but rather selectively revealing certain
subjects against his enemies from the mafia
II.1.2^3 regarding “or a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or
a de facto authority”, I recount the objectivized fact in paragraphs above regarding this criterion in
antithesis with “part either of a government policy” , that the practice of atrocities is improperly spoken
of as “tolerated or condoned” by the “de facto” authority or the Romanian “state” mafia, because ethics
it’s not by far within a criminal society’s policy or concerns which therefore do not regard atrocities in
terms of tolerance or even forgive them because atrocities can bruise no ethical rules within a criminal
society as there are none, but in a criminal society crime is praised accordingly to their gravity meaning
atrocities are all the more praised by other criminals as opposed to petty crimes, as atrocities are usually
committed to instill fear and by it respect, as proven by the old roman saying vae victis. As I’ve also
objectivized before the Romanian “state” mafia is a criminal society enacted by centuries of turmoil
which counter-intuitively did not solidify some sort of evolutionary select elite class but rather drowned
every moral revolution in blood and destroyed intellectuality which is why at the soviet invasion in 1945
60% percent of the immoral peasants were also illiterate, and these are the roots of the contemporary
Romanian “state” mafia, illiterate and immoral peasants raised into public functions by the wrongful
application of the communist principle of equal opportunity by the soviet occupation, which also
persecuted and killed the intellectuals and the Christians leaving no opposition to the new illiterate and
immoral peasant “ruling class” which did what it only knew as the animals they are, they treated public
function as their own turf, and multiplied hiring into public function all their relatives making veritable
clans that eventually united for the common goal or criminal policy and lifestyle forming the Romanian
Page 69 of 501
“state” mafia, which is why after the 1989 coup d’état there was no lustration of the old “communist
state” mafia from public functions, but the political power oligarchy perpetuated, and this is why the
current mafia “secret services” numbering 7 and having 85.000 employees on state payroll rivaling even
U.S.A., is comprised of the members of the old “communist” regime security, their progeny,
collaborators and other “friends” from before the 1989 coup d’etat when the “communist” regime
security profiting from the fall of the communist block took absolute power under the malevolent
protection of the foreign interests spearheaded by CIA which does the dirty corporatist work for a
number of illicit economical interest, caused by use of its network of traitors the collapse of the
communist block, then the old “communist” regime security never let the power go - who would as
proof, and also as proof there was no revolution since nothing really changed for the better meaning,
then as proof of the new savage mafia “secret services” installing itself in absolute power, it abuses
public office at will currently for foreign illicit interests and its own, where before power was mostly
abused only by dictator Nicolae Ceausescu who was kept in check by the USSR, which proves the old
empirical observation right again, that a multitude of rulers is not a good thing, which I mention because
this is what happened in 1989 coup d’état, the mafia assassinated its dictator leader and gave birth to as
many dictators as there are mafia members, at least not counting the wannabes. In the present this
George Soros and CIA backed murderous totalitarian Romanian “state” mafia regime holds nothing back
in the name of illicit profit, devastating both the country’s resources as well as the people themselves as
proven by the 3 million Romanian economic refugees out of a population of total 19 million, with
approximation. Proof of this is notoriously public – there was a mafia “secret service” defector recently
named Sebastian Ghita who testified publicly that the so called anticorruption prosecutor Kovesi Laura
Codruta met with Balkans regional CIA chief at mafia “secret services” “protocol” villas, as proven by
one of many such articles: https://www.cotidianul.ro/casele-sri-unde-se-intilneau-codruta-kovesi-
sebastian-ghita-si-seful-cia-din-romania/, “protocol” villas which are nothing less of dictator Nicolae
Ceausescu’s old palaces, being obvious a prosecutor having no business to meet with secret services
agents in person ever as public function especially that of a prosecutor is not someone’s personal
business but the institutions must communicate institutionally only be it transparently or not, the only
functionaries that should partake in protocol meetings being diplomats or secret service agents
masquerading as diplomats, then the same prosecutor Kovesi Laura Codruta, the corrupt chief of the
Romanian national anti-corruption direction appears defended by George Soros’s financed “#rezist”
movement as proven by many such articles: https://psnews.ro/ce-nu-ne-spune-miscarea-rezist-soros-
condamnat-definitiv-asemanarea-cu-vintu-197282/, which is diverting from the country’s real problems
by protesting non-stop in favor of a non-existing justice system, covering all the legitimate protests by
sheer numerical superiority and driving away other legitimate protesters through violence even, in short
a “fight fire with fire” tactic. Same Kovesi Laura Codruta appeared on allegedly George Soros’s
sponsored television ARTE to make propaganda for her agency of political police, which is ridiculous in
itself because a prosecutor who does its job does not need propaganda that he’s doing his job when he
clearly does not else his accomplished job would make its own propaganda, all proof that Romania is the
most corrupt country in Europe rivaling even most of the 3rd world countries, or as the infamous human
trafficker and exploiter Hassan Awdi who was notoriously illegally expropriated by the Romanian “state”
mafia in a mafia takeover, and won at ICSID because of it, puts it: ~“Romania is a banana republic (with
no justice) where only the mafia businesses work”. Kovesi Laura Codruta I remind was general
Page 70 of 501
prosecutor of Romania since 2006, having in 2018 over 10 years of mandate to eradicate any corruption
at all which she didn’t because Kovesi Laura Codruta notoriously protects corruption and all she does is
political police abusing the prosecutor’s powers. There is much more proof about this background which
is not directly the subject of this penal complaint, such as the fact the old “communist” regime torturers
are hidden by this totalitarian murderous Romanian “state” mafia regime because it’s in fact the same
organized crime actors or their descendants in disguise so the old policy is also the new policy carried
out by the mafia oligarchy, as proven by the fact it took a lot of effort to even convict very late one such
old “communist” torturer - the notorious Visinescu, only seldom being convictions in Romania for
Crimes against humanity after decades of the Romanian “state” mafia regime hiding the torturers and
awarding them fat retiring funds, and even then only to save the appearance of a legitimate Romanian
state in the eyes of the world, convictions which only happen anyway under huge public pressure by the
mass-media as proof, except none of the crimes committed during the 1989 coup d’état and afterwards
by the old and new Romanian “communist” “state” mafia led then by Ion Iliescu we condemned, being
notorious that it was Ion Iliescu who called on the radio in actuality as he convened secretly before with
the other members of the mafia, the miners from Jiu Valley infiltrated by the old “communist” mafia
regime security forces in cahoots with the old “communist” mafia “secret services” ever since some
unrest in the area against dictator Nicolae Ceausescu’s mafia regime, as proven by the notorious fact
one mafia member, who now became “general Oprea” as stereotypical for mafia run banana republics,
was the miners leader’s bodyguard officially, but unofficially the one who was dropping the mafia’s
orders in the miner leader’s ears who because was a mafia “patsy” or scapegoat went to jail instead of
his obvious instigators for the crimes committed by the miners he also instigated as they were called in
1990 by Ion Iliescu and the mafia to maintain Ion Iliescu’s mafia regime installment by beating and killing
the protesters against the neo-“communist” mafia regime instated by Ion Iliescu, who was also a leader
in the old “communist” public function nomenclature and should’ve been the first lustrated if there was
such as thing as a revolution in 1989, nomenclature which constitutes a veritable terrorist criminal
organization who owns the Romanian state ever since – reminding again as proof the rhetorical
question of who would in fact let go of such power once it has obtained, and even more why if it has no
morals at all(?), all of this being notoriously proven and easily observable with minimum research on the
internet, situation from which arise three more rhetorical questions, first, does anyone think that the
two mandates as president of Romanian were won by Ion Iliescu and the “social democratic party”
through fair elections (?) and second, are the facts presented in the artistic documentary movie about
the Italian mafia “Il capo dei capi” that the mainstream mafia party in Italy after World War II was also
the called the “socialist democratic party” then the “change” in regime the “liberal democrats” as it
happened in 2004 in Romania through the corrupt regime of old “communist” mafia notorious
collaborator Traian Basescu who was made president and created the office of “prosecutor” Kovesi
Laura Codruta for political police, a coincidence or history repeating itself because of the hubris and lack
of imagination of the mafia troglodyte peasants (?), and third, where’s the democracy in all of this? As
proof there’s no such thing as democracy in Romania but only the totalitarian murderous Romanian
“state” mafia, I can provide on demand the petitions accompanied by proofs I’ve notified with every
competent authority in Romania about the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes meaning all the
responsibles for initiating disciplinary action against the magistrates according to article 44 from
Romanian Law 317/2004, meaning the minister of justice, the general prosecutor of Romania, the
Page 71 of 501
president of the supreme court and the judiciary inspection chief, as I’ve objectivized also in paragraph
0.2 and chapter V.3 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this
ICC penal dossier. In fact I am accusing the Romanian “state” mafia leaders in this ICC penal dossier in
section I.B.23, for complicity and instigation to Crimes against humanity based on the fact I’ve notified
them and they refused to fulfill their duty proving themselves accomplices and instigators and assuring
by this the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes they wouldn’t be prosecuted and convicted for committing
Crimes against humanity or any felony for that matter, determining in consequence the perpetration of
the Crimes against humanity according to the text regarding instigation to a felony from the Romanian
Penal Code, and as further proof the mafia leaders continue to protect their mafia subordinates as
concrete or unassailable proof of “part either of a government policy” rather than “a wide practice of
atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority” because as I’ve objectivized
before the mafia doesn’t “tolerate or condone” its own crimes, nor a totalitarian regime regarding the
regime it imposes through state terrorism and wrongful political repression. I’ve also filed penal dossiers
against the mafia “magistrates” caporegimes in which they were never acquitted as proof, and I’ve
lodged complaints against the “prosecutor’s” falsified acts of procedure and for refusing to send the
denounced mafia “magistrate” caporegimes in trial to be convicted, or acquitted if I lied which is the
proof the mafia avoided any public trials to minimize their exposure to public opinion, and my
complaints were rejected with more falsified acts of procedure by mafia “judge” caporegimes. I’ve even
lodged self-denouncements based on the argument that if I lodged falsified penal complaints proven by
the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes that their mafia counterparts felonies do not exist, according to the
universal principle of non-contradiction I must be sent in trial and convicted for the felonies of False
declarations, Inducing the judiciary bodies into error, and Disseminating false information by publishing
the penal dossiers I opened against the mafia “magistrate“ caporegimes, mafia “policemen” and
“gendarmes” soldiers, mafia “lawyers” and “legal medics” associates and so on and so forth, self-
denouncements of which I heard nothing back since because the mafia doesn’t know what to do with
them - if they say the deed doesn’t exist, they contradict themselves, if they say the deed exist they
must prove which they can’t because it’s impossible to justify breaking the law with malice
aforethought. By repeating this algorithm against the Romanian “state” mafia controlled judiciary
system hierarchy all the way to the top I proven all the “magistrates” in Romania from the lowest
courthouse to the highest institutions of justice, are corrupt, out of which 86% are outright criminals
disposed to be accomplices and instigators to Crimes against humanity, and the fact 100% of the
Romanian magistrates are corrupt means it’s the mafia’s intent to only have corrupt or puppetable
magistrates in office, meaning if corruption is not a random chance event but the intent, there’s no
margin of error and my statistic demonstrated that indeed all of the Romanian magistrates are corrupt,
leading to the obvious conclusion every magistrate in Romania is part of the same organized crime
group, as I’ve continuously proven by continuing to investigate and denounce the Romanian “state”
mafia never once being wrong, nor was I ever been even accused of the felonies of False declarations,
Inducing the judiciary bodies into error or Disseminating false information on the internet by publishing
the penal dossiers against the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes, which I remind were illicitly censored by
the deletion of the forum “militia.freeforums.net” on 8th April 2017 where I posted them, respectively
my facebook.com was partly illicitly censored on 10th April 2017, right when the Romanian “state” mafia
committed state terrorism through illegal home breaking and illegal arrests almost daily against me and
Page 72 of 501
my mother using tens of mafia “masked policemen”, “policemen”, “secret policemen” and “gendarmes”
soldiers on 6th, 10th, 13th, 14th and 27th April 2017 as if I was a dangerous terrorist or MMA fighter not a
peaceful intellectual human rights defender, with the obvious intention to falsify the pretext and cover-
up story to commit against me Torture, Bodily harm, and attempted Qualified murder during Orthodox
Easter 2017 in typical “communist” mafia fashion like they’ve assassinated their leader Nicolae
Ceausescu (and his wife Elena Ceausescu because why not - actually to not tell the truth if kept alive) on
Christmas as a mockery of the at least 80% Romanian Orthodox Christians and, as proven by the fact
they committed these felonies against me constituting Crimes against humanity by illegally arresting me
during my faculty exams on 27th May 2017, incarcerating me in the Focsani “psychiatric” gulag, tying me
up to an operating table and injecting me with deadly fluorine and chlorine based neurotoxins daily
putting me in anaphylactic shock for 3 days without treatment and expecting me to die, then after I
survived forcefully poisoning me with other deadly fluorine and chlorine based neurotoxins until 8th June
2017. Furthermore being forced to acquaint myself with the “psychiatry” charlatanry literature to build
my defense plead, I’ve discovered and proven another aspect of the mafia’s policy, the fact that only
schizophrenic mafia “magistrate” caporegimes are admitted and kept in the judicial system because
they are psychologically labile, that is they lack integrity, thus they are easily manipulated into
committing felonies when ordered to, which corroborates to my other demonstration that 100% of the
mafia “magistrate” caporegimes are corrupt. This is another of the grave facts I’ve proven publicly and
one of the reasons or motives the Romanian “state” mafia perpetrated 2 Crimes against humanity
committals and 6 Crimes against humanity attempts against me, by which the mafia just strengthened
my credibility by proving I am important enough to be Tortured, Bodily Harmed and Qualifiedly
Murdered to be stopped from denouncing the mafia’s criminal activity, and that in reality I’m not a
“public danger” but that the mafia perceives me as a danger to itself by which it proves itself Stalinist
paranoid since I am clearly no danger else I would’ve managed to destroy some mafia member’s power
meaning oust them from public office, not just destroy the Romanian’s “state” mafia fake reputation,
and by abusing the judiciary system and “psychiatry” charlatanry against me as state terrorism and
weapons of wrongful political repression, falsifying 4 penal dossiers against me without indicting and
convicting me of anything proving they are pretexts and cover-up stories for Crimes against humanity
committed through deadly fluorine and chlorine poisoning, the mafia also has proven its existence by
demonstrating it has the opportunity or that it controls the judiciary system, the Public Ministry, the
Ministry of Interior Affairs, the Ministry of Health, the lawyer bars in principal, and other institutions as
enumerated in paragraph 0.2 and chapter V.3 from annex 23 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for
interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier. The mafia also proven that it wasn’t just
my activity of investigating and denouncing their criminal activity it wanted stopped, but also to
discredit my findings which is why it employed the “psychiatry” charlatanry to commit Crimes against
humanity against me, and make a public display illegally of the multitude of “psychiatry” charlatanry
actions against me although the mafia lost officially 4 out of 6 while the last 2 are identical to the 2
before them meaning ne bis in idem, and I’ve proven them all falsified summarily in chapter I from
annex 23 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier, and fully demonstrated in section I.B.2, I.B.3, I.B.4, I.B.7 and I.B.9 regarding the falsified
proposals and sentences from dossiers 4909/231/2017 and 12718/231/2017 which I’ve also summarily
proven falsified in annex 12, annex 14, annex 18 and annex 19. This truth that I’ve sought to investigate,
Page 73 of 501
demonstrate and uncover to public opinion to initiate a revolution starting from public outrage, is the
reason why Romania is the most corrupt and miserable country in Europe and rivaling even most of the
3rd world countries as I’ve suspected to start with, but truth which was so great it was even unbelievable
to me until I obtained the proofs which I also published on the forum “militia.freeforums.net” hoping for
help from other dissidents, but because of its intellectual nature and amount of effort involved in this
endeavor, and because of the cowardly, treacherous and illiterate nature of the Romanian people just as
the mafia wants it entertaining a disastrous education system towards this purpose as even admitted
publicly by the ex-president of Romania Traian Basescu that ~“the education system makes idiots” <seek
article and link>, the public failed to react in an outrage as feared by the Romanian “state” mafia which
in turn proved itself Stalinist paranoid and illicitly censored this forum and partly my facebook.com
account, and simultaneously attempted to silence me by committing Crimes against humanity against
me as described above. The Romanian “magistrate” mafia has proven itself Stalinist paranoid by the
social experiment of perpetrating 2 Crimes against humanity committals and 6 Crimes against
humanity attempts between the years 2014 and 2017, although I clearly represented no danger
whatsoever to the Romanian “state” mafia which existence I couldn’t even suspect until the Crimes
against humanity it committed against me in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014 when I saw
with my own eyes the concert effort of a multitude of institutions cooperating to commit Crimes against
humanity against me and cover-up the evidence as I demonstrate fully in section I.B.22, meaning it was
the Stalinist paranoia of the Romanian “state” mafia that helped me uncover and prove the truth, as at
that time I was just calling it the “magistrate” mafia. This truth is corroborated with facts I obtained from
analyzing the infamous human trafficker and exploiter Hassan Awdi’s problems with the apparent
“magistrate” mafia who illegally expropriated him in what appeared to be a classic mafia takeover, as
proven already by the notorious fact Hassan Awdi won at ICSID against Romania, and against the
falsified penal dossiers the Romanian “magistrate” mafia put on Hassan Awdi attempting to liquidate
him like they notoriously did to Dan Adamescu, Hassan Awdi won also in court in Lebanon which
consequently refused to extradite Hassan Awdi, but this truth is also wider and that is the Romanian
“state” mafia used the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes as aforementioned to destroy the Romanian
free press and control the rest, and use Hassan Awdi as a scapegoat in the process, level of illicit politics
which is above the troglodyte peasants that make up the Romanian “state” mafia, meaning indicative of
the illicit foreign interests intelligence agencies who control the Romanian “state” mafia. Through the
analysis of Hassan Awdi’s files I’ve concluded that besides the outrageous unconstitutional privileges the
mafia “magistrate” caporegimes arrogated themselves including 10 times over the minimal economy
wage which is also indicative of what mainly comprised the Romanian “state” mafia, these and the mafia
“secret service” leaders who also have outrageous salaries and privileges, the mafia “magistrate”
caporegimes and mafia “secret services” also finance themselves by dilapidating the Romanian economy
most noticeably by bringing into insolvency the Romanian industry which it sold for scrap as instigated
by foreign interests, and the various Romanian private sector businesses which aren’t already under
mafia control. The notorious dilapidation of Oltchim involving the falsification of a penal dossier against
Romanian journalist Dan Diaconescu through which he was illegally imprisoned for 1001 days by his
account and forbidden to practice reporting the truth for 10 years, is another proof of the criminal
activity of the what’s publicly known as “the binomial of the ‘magistrate’ mafia’s in cahoots with the
Romanian neo-“communist” secret services” , “the parallel state”, “the mafia state”, “the prosecutor
Page 74 of 501
republic” and so on and so forth. Last but not least I indicate the Romanian Constitutional Court Decision
no 25 from 19th January 2017 as I objectivized in section I.B.11, where a sum of notoriously criminal
judges declared that I do not benefit of the presumption of innocence even if it’s not proven a deed
exist, and even it’s not proven that the non-existing deed constitutes a felony, and even if it’s not proven
that the non-existing deed that cannot possibly constitute a felony or premise of a diagnosis for that
matter was committed by me, respetively even if I’m not convicted for that felony, all of which
happened in the 4 penal files falsified against me by the Romanian “state” mafia, which is against the
fundamental principle of justice that any penal action can only be taken against the perpetrator of a
crime, also according to the text of the articles 107-110 of the Romanian Penal Code, where the
Romanian term “faptuitor” in penal matters context means as translated to English mot-a-mot “penal-
deed-doer” or according to article 23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution an accused
convicted through a definitive decision by an impartial court of law with the respect of all the accused’s
rights and the demonstration beyond all reasonable doubt of the accused’s guilt as also according to
articles 11 and 20 from the Romanian Constitution according to which international Romanian ratified
treaties are internal right, such as article 6 paragraph 2 from ECHR and article 11 from UDHR, the simple
logic proof of the falsification of the Romanian Constitutional Court Decision no 25 from 19th January
2017 as I objectivized in section I.B.11, and the abolishment of the presumption with it which is
outrageous, being that if the deed is not proven to exist which can only be established legally in a court
of law by a judge or contingent of judges not by a lying or hallucinating “prosecutor”, the “penal-deed-
doer” or convict cannot exist since there is no deed there is no felony, and if there is no felony there is
no felon, which is the exact situation in my mafia falsified 4 penal dossiers as proven by the fact they
were never sent in a court of law to be proven correct meaning I was never indicted and convicted as
proven in short by annex 17 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex
1 to this ICC penal dossier, and in fact not even a falsified administration of proofs was attempted. The
Romanian Constitutional Court Decision no 25 from 19th January 2017 as I objectivized in section I.B.11,
led in consequence to the perpetration of Crimes against humanity against me between 27th May and
8th June 2017, as instigated by these heads of the mafia assuring the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes
that any absurdity can be declared in judicial acts and any atrocity can be committed without the
perpetrators being prosecuted and convicted, just like the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes from the
Romanian Constitutional Court. In closing the argument I eliminate any shred of doubt that there is such
a thing as a Romanian government by the evidence of the fact that for wanting to live as a true Christian
and believer in the rule of law I was nearly killed, if I manage to escape the Romanian “state” mafia hunt
forever that is, therefore the Romanian “state” mafia’s policy is not the state of right and rule of law
evidently and the Romanian “state” mafia is not the Romanian state of right government since no state
of right government commits Crimes against humanity against the people or even against the political
opposition, only totalitarian regimes and the mafia physically eliminates its opposition and is also
extremely paranoid about the opposition, all the more evident since Crimes against humanity were
committed against me for being a human rights defender against which no state of right government is
ever against, by the abuse of the “psychiatry” charlatanry which is only accredited by the Romanian
“state” mafia to be used as a weapon of state terrorism and wrongful political repression as no real
state of right government legalizes the “psychiatry” charlatanry, statement which I make knowing full
well as I declared before that the “psychiatry” charlatanry is in fact accredited by all the totalitarian
Page 75 of 501
regimes and elite or ruling classes of the world to do their dirty political work against dissidents and
human rights defenders, which is also the only reason the “psychiatry” charlatanry was allowed to exist
so far being not medicine nor science, only politically useful for wrongful repression as I’ve objectivized
in chapter 1 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex
1 to this ICC penal dossier and section I.A.II.1.2.1^1 of this ICC penal dossier, all of which proving there is
no such thing as a state of right Romanian government, only the Romanian “state” mafia, as
corroborated by the fact in the Crimes against humanity committed against me there are involved the
mafia controlled Romanian “judiciary system”, mafia soldier “masked policemen”, “policemen”, “secret
policemen”, “special agents” and “gendarme” soldiers and mafia associated “lawyers” and “legal
medics”, all of which illegally collaborated and abused public function. Furthermore the Romanian
“state” mafia I proven to abuse the “psychiatry” charlatanry not only against the dissidents and human
rights defenders but its victims too who seek justice, for the purpose of “tying any loose knots” that is
preventing the victims from becoming dissidents or human rights defenders and fight against the
totalitarian mafia regime, category in which I also fall naturally because as my life was systematically
destroyed in every manner all I wanted was justice, and a normal, decent life, a job, a home, a family, all
of which were ripped from me along with all of the fundamental rights the mafia could and I was under
the illusion I could avail myself of. In conclusion I’ve proven the existence of the Romanian “state” mafia
by proving the cooperation of all possible and relevant mafia controlled institutions towards the
committal of Crimes against humanity against me and others meaning there is no government to be
spoken of, nor can it be argued that there is such a thing as a state of right government that commits
Crimes against humanity against the people, and thus I’ve proven that the Crimes against humanity
committed against me and others are “part either of a government (“state” mafia) policy” not really “or
a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority”, because in
a criminal society crime is praised not tolerated or condoned, and in a totalitarian state its regime is
imposed not tolerated or condoned
II.1.2.1. The 2 Crimes against humanity committed against me in the night between 5th and 6th
December 2014 and between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 meaning Torture, Bodily Harm and
attempted Qualified Murder, I’ve objectivized in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^2 and I.B.22, respectively
I.A.II.1.3.1^7 and I.B.6, and I.A.I.1-2 from my ICC penal dossier. The first Crimes against humanity
attempt from 27th October 2015 was meant to be consumed as the Crimes against humanity committed
against me in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014 meaning Bodily Harmed and attempt to be
Qualifiedly Murdered by the interloper Herghelegiu Danut then covertly poisoned at the emergency
ward of the “Saint Pantelimon” Focsani hospital with the deadly fluorine based neurotoxin risperidone
or paliperidone, and the other 5 Crimes against humanity attempts were meant to be consumed as the
Crimes against humanity committed between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, except the last attempt
through the falsification of the sentences in 12718/231/2017 for indefinite to life incarceration, Torture,
Bodily Harm and Qualified Murder meaning the mafia’s final solution, as I’ve objectivized in annex 18,
annex 19, annex 20 and annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as
annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier. Both Crimes against humanity committals were far worse than
anything I’ve experienced in my life including the Bodily Harm and Qualified Murder attempt
committed by the interloper Herghelegiu Danut at the mafia’s instigation the night between 5th and 6th
December 2014, as I’ve objectivized in chapter I from annex 21 and chapter IV.5 from annex 23 of my
Page 76 of 501
Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier.
Chemical lobotomization is far worse than rape and even physical Torture because they only leave
superficial Bodily Harm and psychic trauma which can be healed respectively overcome, but chemical
lobotomy amputates the brain eradicating individuality or a persona’s identity which is capital
punishment and and creates a myriad other health problem throughout the body, and the brain can’t be
healed nor can the destruction of the mind through brain damage be reversed. The “psychiatry”
charlatanry as I will prove next is the most horrific and insidious weapon of state terrorism and wrongful
political repression on Earth, literally committing Crimes against humanity by eradicating the humanity
in people and even worse inducing psychosis, suicidal and homicidal ideation and behavior
II.1.2.1^1. The Romanian “state” mafia committed the Crimes against humanity against me
abusing the charlatanry called “psychiatric medicine” it gives accreditation to for use as state terrorism
and wrongful political repression, charlatanry which as proven by my case and the other cases I present
in parallel chemically lobotomizes innocent people forcefully or without their consent and by inducing
them into error that the “psychiatry” charlatanry is medicine or science and benefits them in any way, in
reality destroying their physical and psychical integrity which is clearly the opposite of what medicine
does according to the oath of Hippocrates to “at least do no harm”, and even opposite of what the
“psychiatric” charlatanry claims to do of course since charlatans do not admit they are charlatans or
what they are really doing else they couldn’t swindle anyone into being chemically lobotomized,
“psychiatric” charlatanry lying claim as quoted: “Psychiatry is the medical specialty devoted to the
diagnosis, prevention, study, and treatment of mental disorders” according to:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychiatry, definition which I will punctually prove is false in all its aspects,
individual or put together, and respectively as required I will concomitantly demonstrate the
“psychiatry” charlatanry never cured anyone of anything logically and scientifically as immediately
obvious the “psychiatric” charlatanry poisons meaning mercury, opium, heroine, fluorine and chlorine
can’t cure anything being notorious deadly neurotoxic poisons
II.1.2.1^1.1 The only “evidence” that the “psychiatry” charlatanry ever cured anyone of anything
are the subjective declarations of
II.1.2.1^1.1^1 either the “psychiatrist” charlatans who being interested in succeeding to swindle
people for illicit profit, and taking advantage of the opportunity given by totalitarian states
accreditation, never by states of right accreditation because no real state of right poisons the people
from which the state of right flows meaning the people evidently wouldn’t poison themselves, has the
motive to lie and lies as proven by the fact the “psychiatrist” charlatans subjective declarations are
always illogical (pleonasm intended as declarations are always illogical or logically invalid meaning
lacking at least a premise from which an inference can be made) and unobjectivized scientifically or
experimentally being impossible to prove poison cures anything just as it’s impossible to justify breaking
the law with malice aforethought,
II.1.2.1^1.1^2 or the subjective declarations of mentally alienated or ignorant victims of the
“psychiatrist” charlatans especially picked because they don’t have the mental ability to fight back or
even recognize the danger, nor is there usually anyone to defend them which is another circumstance
actively sought by the “psychiatrist” charlatans as proven by the fact although I had and have the mental
capacity to fight back juridically and more than recognize the danger but actively condemn the
“psychiatry” charlatanry, the “psychiatrist” torturers while committing Crimes against humanity
between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 against me amongst breaking all relevant law, regulations,
Page 77 of 501
norms, deontology and logic, avoided actively to close a contract with the conventional representant
which is my mother as legally required in regard to consent to be “psychiatrically” incarcerated and
chemically lobotomized to which nobody mentally sane would give his consent for himself or another,
even after the “psychiatrist” torturer Barbarosie Carmen was confronted by my mother with the
contract as I sent her and the “psychiatrist” torturer Barbarosie Carmen still refused, being named
curator with no apparent or possible legal forms because at the same time there were no falsified
“psychiatric” charlatans documents lying I had no discernment as proven by annex 16 regarding the
“psychiatric” charlatanry incarceration discharge papers where it’s retained I had full cognitive
functions. The subjective declarations of the mentally alienated meaning people who can’t recognize
what’s real, are also always illogical and unobjectivizable scientifically as proven by the fact they are
contradicted by science and by logic such as the fact the “psychiatric” charlatanry poisons are
scientifically proven to cause the problems they claim to solve as objectivized in chapter 1 from annex
21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier, but these subjective declarations are objectively contradicted by other victims of the
“psychiatry” charlatanry as proven by the public testimonies I quoted in chapter 1.8 from annex 21 of
my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, and
as further proof I do not declare I was cured of anything nor was Ill of anything as proven by annex 17
and annex 22 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC
penal dossier regarding the fact being innocent there is no premise for diagnosis against me, nor was I
ever diagnosed with anything as certified by my family doctor I am army incorporable and apt for
superior studies, meaning there were no possible pretext and cover-up story for the mafia to poison me
with deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins but I prove I was the victim of 2 Crimes against humanity
committals through chemical lobomotization as I objectivize in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^2 and I.B.22,
respectively I.A.II.1.3.1^7 and I.B.6, and I.A.I.1-2 from my ICC penal dossier, meaning
II.1.2.1^1.1^3 in conclusion not only are the subjective declarations of the “psychiatrist”
charlatans and some of their mentally alienated victims illogical and scientifically unobjectivizable as
proven by the fact they are contradicted by science and logic, but these declarations are in contradiction
with the declaration of other victims of “psychiatric” charlatanry who objectively meaning not knowing
of each other cases declare not only they have been cured of nothing but they suffered brain damage
proven objectively through MRI scan, and a myriad other health problems as I demonstrated
scientifically in chapter 1.8 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier regarding the objectivized effects of the deadly fluorine
based neurotoxin risperidone of paliperidone because these declarations correlate with the scientific
evidence from the poison’s “prospect” as evident since fluorine has no biological function, it’s a toxin or
poison, and which correlate logically, being thus proven beyond any reasonable doubt that the
“psychiatrist” charlatans and their mentally alienated victims who declare they have been cured, lie and
hallucinate - making inferences with no premises or no scientific or logical evidence, which instead
proves “psychiatry” is charlatanry because it’s the pervasive practice of the “psychiatrist” charlatans
who never cured anyone as proven here, which contradicts the definition of the “psychiatry” charlatanry
in the underlined terms from this quote: “Psychiatry is the medical specialty devoted to the diagnosis,
prevention, study, and treatment of mental disorders”, because medicine is a scientific practice sworn to
“at least do no harm” according to the oath of Hippocrates, while “psychiatry” charlatanry only using
Page 78 of 501
poisons such as mercury, opium, heroin, fluorine and chlorine obviously only does harm therefore can’t
be called medicine nor science as proven above there is no evidence it cures anyone of anything
meaning there’s no disease nor a cure, and furthermore the “psychiatrist” charlatans lie and hallucinate
as proven objectively in general by the fact they speak of inexistent cures for inexistent illnesses, and in
particular by my case in annex 4 and annex 16, or as notorious by the fact in Romania recently as in
Canada not long ago the “psychiatrist” charlatans poisoned institutionalized children - like orphans, for
illegal experimentation and illicit profit, as I’ve objectivized in paragraphs 1.1^6, 2.4^13.5 and 2.4^20.1
respectivelly 2.4^14 and 2.4^28 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier where I’ve linked the email I’ve notified CCHR and
INTERPOL with. Consequently if there’s no treatment for mental disorders there’s no prevention either,
respectively as I prove in section I.A.II.1.2.1^1 there’s no such thing as “mental disorders”, or “mental
illness”, or “mental disease”, they are all bad metaphors as also objectivized in annex 20 of my Rule 39
ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier where even
some of the “psychiatrist” charlatans admit in the press there are no such things. Logically because the
inference or the result of the “psychiatry” charlatanry is charlatanry or the false diagnosis and chemical
lobotomization not treatment since there is no such thing as “mental disorders” nor treatment for
something that does not exist nor can deadly neurotoxic poisoning can cure anything which is why it’s
called chemical lobotomy or chemically induced brain damage, the premise of the “psychiatric”
charlatanry or “psychiatric” charlatanry study can only be false or part of the charlatanry, as
exemplificatively proven by the fact the definition of schizophrenia is basically synonymous with the
definition of stupidity or really undistinguishable, enabling the “psychiatrist” charlatans to falsely
diagnose exactly their targets which are the ignorant thus perfect victims, being obvious that brain
poisoning stupid people does not make them smart as the only cure for stupidity is education when
possible meaning when no neurological problems exist, being again obvious neurological problems
cannot be fixed by destroying the brain with poisoning, or with electroshocks, unless assuming
education or brainwashing through Torture is legal which is not and which still doesn’t make the
“psychiatry” charlatanry medicine, it makes it a weapon of terrorism and repression as is not the
Torture or even Bodily Harm that prevents a behavior by fear of Torture and Bodily Harm, and even this
doesn’t work as proven by me as being chemically lobotomized meaning being Tortured and Bodily
Harmed not only did not stop me from continuing to investigate and denounce the Romanian “state”
mafia, reminding there have been 2 Crimes against humanity committals against me not one therefore
the mafia’s intent through poisoning clearly was not just chemical lobotomization as it observed once it
doesn’t work against me, but the mafia’s real intent was Qualified Murder in both instances, but being
amputated of the ability to enjoy life I have been left with no other purpose in life than to destroy this
evil that destroyed my life, and that much more time to do it not wasting it by enjoying life. I’ve also
proven that not only Torture and Bodily Harm through chemical lobotomization doesn’t achieve the
sought after result, but even worse it induces suicidal or homicidal behavior, as I demonstrated by a very
recent and relevant Romanian case that suspiciously occurred soon after the last Crimes against
humanity attempt against me, in which a person with real mental problems was Illegally deprived of
liberty through illegal “psychiatric” incarceration in Spain, which is worse than isolation imprisonment,
Tortured and Bodily Harmed by the “psychiatrist” charlatans in Spain, and induced homicidal ideation
through poisoning reason for which it pushed another person into the subway trench later in Romania,
Page 79 of 501
latter person who was killed as I objectivized in section I.A.II.1.2.10^1, while the person with mental
problems never displayed homicidal ideation before, and this outcome of chemical lobotomization
through “psychiatry” charlatanry poisoning is scientifically documented thus predictable but the
“psychiatrist” charlatan still proceeded to Torture and Bodily Harm this person being thus responsible
for the death of the other person and Crimes against humanity in general. About suicidal ideation proof
there can be found in the Romanian press the case of an Italian who was illegally “psychiatrically”
incarcerated in Romania, illegally poisoned and later committed suicide because of it, and is not the only
case as I’ve noticed reports of persons gone missing after interacting with the “psychiatrist” charlatans,
and later found dead, while other persons were killed by the “psychiatrist” charlatans through poisoning
and the Romanian “state” mafia “legal medicine” falsified the report declaring cardiac arrest and not
that the cardiac arrest was caused by poisoning which of course is missing entirely from the report
which is thus not objectivized, as no cardiac arrest simply just happens according to the law of causality.
Furthermore I’ve often demonstrated the members of the Romanian “state” mafia are schizophrenic
according to the DSM-V “psychiatry” charlatanry manual of diagnosis and statistics, for displaying all
major symptoms of logical and behavioral incoherence and occupational dysfunction both as
functionaries and mafia members, and inherent failure to recognize what’s real, not that the proven fact
they are criminals doesn’t automatically classify them as sociopaths also, meaning persons who
pervasively are breaking the law and other people’s rights, and who are sacrificing the lives of others to
achieve their illicit petty goals, but I never heard in Romania or the world for that matter of the
“psychiatry” charlatanry ever going against especially the factions of the totalitarian states that gives
them accreditation and calling them schizophrenic and sociopaths, meaning against any criminal
magistrate or governing politician which I retain as further notorious proof the “psychiatry” charlatanry
is indeed accredited by totalitarian states for use against the population not the members of the regime
II.1.2.1^1.1^4 Lastly, there can be found ludicrously obvious fake declarations on the internet
paid for by the pharmaceutical mafia, obvious because they either do not report the adverse effects
which I’ve proven are the only effects therefore there can be no benefits of being poisoned as evident,
but these declarations like those of the “psychiatrist” charlatans and their ignorant mental alienated
victims, are not objectivized as they cannot be since they are contradicted by science and logic, and
futhermore encourage the use of the poison which clearly it cannot be simultaneously praised and
claimed as scientifically proven anyway it’s chemical lobotomization. These declarations have the same
worth as the falsified FDA approvals which I’ve objectivized by the notorious acknowledgment of its
corruption in section I.A.II.1.2.7. regarding the truth about “The Worthlessness of FDA Approval” and
any other such accreditations, that they’re bought not true, as was Sigmund Freud by two
pharmaceutical “companies” for declaring heroin and opium as “psychiatric” charlatanry treatments
which notoriously are not
II.1.2.1^1. the key word of the entire “psychiatry” charlatanry is as typical to liars the generic
term “disorder” which is a carte blanche term under which the “psychiatrist” charlatans falsifies the
diagnostics also generically lying declaratively or illogically, meaning with no logical objectivization based
on a factual premise syllogistically verified out of which results this “disorder” as correlated with the
law, regulation, norm, deontology or at least doctrine and correlated with the scientific objectivization
of this “disorder’s” anatomy and immorality mechanics reported to reality meaning the scientific
objectivization must also include an ethical objectivization, none of which exist because the purpose of
Page 80 of 501
the “psychiatry” charlatanry is charlatanry for which reason of achieving its purpose the “psychiatry”
charlatanry employs these carte blanche “disorders” which can pervade the short scrutiny of ignorant
victims who trust in the totalitarian state accreditation of the “psychiatry” charlatanry and its quackeries
such as faking the credibility of a real medical discipline by recommending brain destroying poisons to
cure the fictive “disorders” which just disables the ignorant victim further from reacting to the horror
that is chemical lobotomization or the destruction of the rest of the life of the “psychiatric” charlatanry
victim, and reason for which the “psychiatrist” charlatans even masquerade as medics wearing white
robes which is just ludicrous but makes sense since evidently impersonating a profession requires to
wear that profession’s insignia. Furthermore the “psychiatrist” charlatans to defend their charlatanry
declare aberrations such as people exercising their right to justice are paranoid, and that borderline
geniuses are schizophrenic because are highly intelligent which is preposterous as I’ve never even heard
of a highly intelligent person who is simultaneously logically incoherent, occupationally dysfunctional
and failing to recognize what’s real, the real reason for these wild aberrations I’ve found in the
“psychiatric” charlatanry literature being that the “psychiatrist” charlatans fear people who are
intelligent enough to discover that they are charlatans, and that simultaneously have the self respect to
claim their rights, which is why the “psychiatrist” charlatans in cahoots with the totalitarian state that
gives them accreditation attempt to discredit them or even worse commit Crimes against humanity
against them, again modeling after my own case which is relevant to other Romanian citizens who have
been abused, but also according to the testimonies quoted I prove it’s the reality all over the world as
there can’t be a single notorious crime committed by a “psychiatric” charlatan who goes unpunished,
about which it doesn’t’ t mean that at least the judicial system of that country is not instigator and
accomplice by its passivity. After falsifying the diagnosis as aforementioned and the victim refuses to be
chemically lobotomized voluntarily for which one has to be truly mentally alienated or unable to
recognize what’s real, although even mentally alienated people have the right to life, physical and
psychical integrity therefore must be actively protected from chemical lobotomization and the
“psychiatry” charlatanry, then the “psychiatrist” charlatans falsifies the obligation to “psychiatric”
incarceration for forceful chemical lobotomization, again generically with no scientific objectivization
based on a veridical factual premise which should have been the diagnosis if “psychiatry” charlatanry
was either medicine or science which is not, and based on the ethical objectivization that chemical
lobotomization is in a person’s interest which cannot ever be objectivized, reminding that there is such a
formal requirement according to article 43 from the Romanian Law 487/2002 which in my case it was
disregarded of course by which the Romanian “state” mafia tacitly admitted it’s murderous intent to
chemically lobotomize me until Qualifiedly Murdering me as I’ve objectivized in annex 21 of my Rule 39
ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier. In other words
because the chemical lobotomization inference as a cure for fictive illnesses can only be correlated with
the scientific and ethical objectivization that the treatment benefits the subject, the procedure cannot
ever be legal meaning nobody can be forced or swindled into chemical lobotomization according to the
law and human rights. Because chemical lobotomization is all that the “psychiatry charlatanry” does,
even in the case of prescribing so called anti-depressant drugs which come with plenty adverse health
effects including brain damage meaning chemical lobotomization, and also don’t cure anything as
evident that no chemical is a substitute for a mind, will power and the right psychology and philosophy
as proven by myself, being able to function although I’ve been chemically lobotomized and I should be in
Page 81 of 501
clinical depression according to science, or by the notorious fact marijuana, which can be considered a
natural anti-depressant although it’s much worse creating a sort of cult-like addiction which as the
“psychiatrist” charlatans the addicts think it should be of global use, never produced a single genius to
my knowledge but on the contrary it has been notoriously proven to produce brain damage being thus
as well chemical lobotomization as all “psychiatric” charlatanry poisons ever were - mercury, opium,
heroin, fluorine and chlorine, and if there’s a chemical imbalance in the brain then that is a
neuroendocrinological problem, not that “psychiatry” charlatanry can solve any problem which only
causes. Furthermore it is also notorious that anti-depressant prescription is also quackery unless a hole
is drilled in the head of the patient and a sample of the cerebrospinal fluid is analyzed and thus
scientifically observed there is a chemical imbalance in the brain which then the neuroendocrinologist
can advise the patient to fix, and the choice lying entirely with the patient about the procedure,
meaning in short that because nobody in his right mind would agree to be chemically lobotomized, or
even have a hole drilled in his head for scientific observation of potential causes of his clinical
depression, the “psychiatry” charlatans falsifies the documentation and forces chemical lobotomization
on patients to justify its existence without any possible scientific and ethical objectivization, under the
protection of totalitarian governments around the word as proven by the totalitarian Romanian “state”
mafia under which no Qualified Murder or Bodily Harm in “psychiatric” charlatanry incarceration
through chemical lobotomization is ever criminally investigated, nor have I ever heard of a malpraxis
case against a “psychiatrist” charlatan about which I’m convinced it cannot exist in Romania because of
the mafia’s policy to cover-up all the crimes of its tool the “psychiatry” charlatanry, as I’ve proven by
denouncing myself all the “psychiatrist” charlatans who attempted and committed Crimes against
humanity against me to the local malpraxis committee who ignored my first petition, rejected the
second through a falsified answer refusing to name a random expert or committee of experts from the
Romanian national register of experts to analyze and conclude whether there was a malpraxis or not,
answer falsified of course by one of the “psychiatrist” charlatans in person named Berzvehnii Igor, the
same one involved in all the “psychiatric” charlatanry documents ever falsified against me and all the
intrinsic instigations to Crimes against humanity, then the third ignored again.<research the books
regarding the death industry that the “psychiatry” charlatanry is, and other cases of “psychiatric”
charlatanry abuse such as against members of the yogi MISA group> As demonstrated before, the
reason why the murderous totalitarian Romanian “state” mafia under which no death or bodily harm in
“psychiatric” charlatanry incarceration and chemical lobotomization is ever criminally investigated, is
that this mafia gives accreditation to the “psychiatry” charlatanry in exchange for using it as a weapon of
state terrorism and wrongful political repression against the dissidents of the regime and the human
rights defenders such as me and as it was used to commit Crimes against humanity against me,
meaning the generic carte blanche term “disorder” is also designating metaphorically a conflict between
a totalitarian regime’s ideology or “order” and the ideology of the target of “psychiatric” charlatanry
which calls it “disorder” and attempts to repress the person through chemical lobotomization at the
totalitarian regime’s instigation, being obvious I’m modeling a generalization after my own case which is
valid according to the encyclopedic conclusions I’ve quoted in sections <quotes from wikipedia regarding
the use of the “psychiatry” charlatanry as a weapon of wrongful political repression> including regarding
this totalitarian practice of Crimes against humanity in Romania, and according to recent cases from
Romania objectivized in my notification to CCHR and INTERPOL published at address:
Page 82 of 501
https://1drv.ms/b/s!Av_pxCea0UPwkWoBrEVB_efSpXDy), meaning the repression of the ideology of an
undesirable person to the totalitarian regime, or the repression of the undesirable altogether
accompanied with the undesirable’s discreditation for avoidance of public opinion outrage, undesirable
which is either a dissident such as a person refusing to adhere to the doctrine of the regime and
passively or actively protests, or a human rights defender such as myself who actively denounces the
totalitarian regime judicially and politically, or simply a religion or philosophy member of which I am also
as a Christian Orthodox, persecuted me for my belief in an absolute honest life by being denied the
conform of my religion during the Crimes against humanity committed against me between 27th May
2017 and 8th June 2017 by the “psychiatrist” charlatans who called that Christian Orthodox people,
honest people and believers in the rule of law suffer from the “mystical delirium” psychosis, as all three
qualities are basically the same thing, respectively persecuted me exactly on and right before Orthodox
Easter 2017 by the mafia attempting to commit Crimes against humanity during Orthodox Easter 2017
against me, respectively persecuted me by the Crimes against humanity attempt through the
falsification of the Crimes against humanity attempts during Christmas 2015 and Orthodox Easter 2016,
respectively persecuted me by the Crimes against humanity committal in the night between 5th and 6th
December 2016 on Saint Nicholas which another popular Christian holiday, respectively the falsified
decisions in 11224/231/2015 in 1st instance and 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance were taken within a
week of my birthday, reminding targeting meaningful days and holydays is the “psychological wars”
stereotype of the “communist” mafia who even assassinated it’s leader Nicolae Ceausescu on Christmas
1989 to mock the over 80% Romanian Christian Orthodox people. I remind between 27th May 2017 and
8th June 2017 I was “psychiatrically” incarcerated with no justification and other reason than to be put in
anaphylactic shock through deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxic daily injections for the first 3 days at
least without treatment and expected to die, then for the rest of the days forcefully chemically
lobotomized in the morning and evening with other deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxic poisons as
objectivized in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^7, I.B.6 and I.A.I.1-2. All of these proofs mean “disorders” is a carte
blanche term justifying whoever holds “authority” to stigmatize anyone with a fictive “mental illness”
meaning social ostracization for that person for the purpose of placing that person outside the
protection of the law, discrediting that person to deter public outrage followed by the elimination of
that person through chemical lobotomization which I’ve often objectivized is capital punishment
through the eradication of a person’s individuality or identity, “authority” meaning the control of the
society usually through a monopoly on fear which constitutes the legitimate or not “state” relative to
whether it’s a people mandated state of right or not as it’s not the law or law enforcers that control
society within a state of right for example but the fear of the repercussions of breaking the law which
means no such thing as the “psychiatry” charlatanry can exist in a true state of right, which evidentiates
that in totalitarian regimes the “state” quite often clandestine as the so called democracies of the world
today prove, having thus the opportunity unopposed to legitimize such a thing as the “psychiatric”
charlatanry, effectively controls that society’s reality where that totalitarian “state” operates by
manipulation of what is accepted behavior and what not, being rumor of the existence of such a thing as
“opinion formers” which is not far from the contemporary expression of “manufacturing consent” which
is clearly a totalitarian political expression as in a true state of right consent and conscience is free of
even manipulation, use of the “psychiatry” charlatanry as a weapon of wrongful political repression
which is exactly what the Romanian “state” mafia attempted against me, to discredit me and my work
Page 83 of 501
or public denouncements of the criminal activity of the Romanian “state” mafia polluting it with
references to the “psychiatry” charlatanry which to the Romanian troglodyte peasantry means
immediately that any person that had friction with the “psychiatry” charlatanry is crazy, therefore the
credibility of my work was attacked although not only was this a futile effort by the mafia because the
Romanians I also proved are cowardly and treacherous and wouldn’t have helped regardless of my
credibility and what the mafia did, reality to which the mafia is advised now and is more dangerous than
ever believing quite correctly it can engage in any type of Crimes against humanity reason for which it
even attempted a mass obligatory vaccination law which was banished in Germany as a result of a
sinister conspiracy <seek article and link>, evidently of the pharmaceutical mafia and the Romanian
“state” mafia, but perplexingly also the offshoot of the Helsinki Committee’s NGO APADOR-CH who
militated against human rights in this instance <seek article and link>. Instead, the mafia’s failed Crimes
against humanity committals and attempts made me able to fully demonstrate it’s existence and as well
be eligible to address ICC through this penal complaint and any other international committee,
organization or association regarding human rights, as well as be the first that proved EU, CoE and ECHR
are corrupt beyond any reasonable doubt thanks to the complicity of EU’s LIBE committee and of those
in CoE, and the Romanian “state” mafia agents who illegally destroyed my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request
for interim measures 6 times until August 2018 in various ways although being the same petition which
is proof in itself of the illegalities committed, mostly the disregard of the fact that my ECHR urgent
request juridical regime is according to Rule 39 is exempt of the formalities of Rule 47 and Rule 35
according to Rule 47 paragraph 5.1 letter b. I remind however that the attempt to discredit my work
only came after the Crimes against humanity attempt from 27th October 2014 which was suppose to
play out as the Crimes against humanity committal from the night between 5th and 6th December 2014
when the same interloper Herghelegiu Danut as instigated by the mafia hit me violently on the head,
while I was unconscious hit my head against the wall then violently pushed me down a flight of stairs to
make it look like an accident, and after I was transported at the emergency ward of the “Saint
Pantelimon” hospital in Focsani I was injected without my consent with the deadly fluorine based
neurotoxin risperidone or paliperidone - risperidone’s metabolite or basically the same thing, in my right
elbow by an unknown person believing I wouldn’t feel it, as I’ve objectivized in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^2,
I.B.22 and I.A.I.1-2, attack of a violence, callousness and hubris which makes absolutely no sense other
than its the result of the Romanian “state” mafia versatility in exactly the same type of Crimes against
humanity also committed before against others, respectively attack which not only shamed the mafia by
not working against me for which I can only thank God for it as there’s a concrete spiritual parallel story
to this, but motivated the mafia to desperately attempt 5 Crimes against humanity and also commit the
Crimes against humanity from between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 because of which I’ve been
able to identify the risperidone or paliperidone poison I was covertly injected with in the night between
5th and 6th December 2014 because of its long presence in the blood stream for which it was chosen by
the mafia who knew it could only covertly inject me once or for a short period covertly, but which had
effects for at least 4 months after when I took a blood test of which I still have the result, that showed
symptoms which proved the presence of the poison in my blood stream, respectively I recognized the
physical and psychological symptoms and I have half a dozen other clues that all corroborate thanks to
the stupidity of the troglodyte peasant Romanian “state” mafia members of which I spoke in the
aforementioned sections. The final Crimes against humanity attempt as I’ve objectivized in chapter 1
Page 84 of 501
from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC
penal dossier, was meant to play out as between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 to make me
“disappear” by indefinite to life illegal incarceration, Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualified Murder,
discrediting me publicly concomitantly as proven blatantly by the fact the Romanian “state “mafia has
hidden all the psychiatrically profiled dossiers from the public evidence of dossiers ECRIS but mine about
which I’ve also notified the Romanian data protection agency “ANSPDCP” about that has attributions
regarding my personal data in public space, and the Romanian national council for combating
discrimination “CNCD” to which I also proven I’ve been discriminated, institutions who of course being
controlled by the Romanian “state” mafia refused to do their job and falsified answers in return for
which at least I opened a penal dossier against “CNCD” which I published at address:
https://www.scribd.com/document/331775977/dosar-penal-Dragus-Daniel-Asztalos-Csaba-Ferenc-
Pentru-Falsificarea-Raspunsului-in-Scopul-de-a-Solutiona-Petitia-Si-Probe <publish ANSPDCP email
transcript and link proving in short how it broke the data protection law or my right to demand and
obtain the removal of my personal data from public space, or the penal dossier if I included it in one
already>, and putting me in a vulnerable situation through indefinite to life illegal incarceration in the
Focsani “psychiatric” gulag which means the impossibility to raise public awareness by communicating
with the press which is mafia controlled or afraid anyway as are the vast majority of the Romanians, the
impossibility to denounce penally and publicly the mafia criminal activity against me not that is possible
to obtain justice in Romania as proven by my entire case, as the “psychiatrist” torturers even refused to
provide copies of the relevant law and the Focsani “psychiatric” gulag regulations as required by the law
after the “psychiatric” charlatanry illegal incarceration between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, the
impossibility to defend myself or receive the defense of a legal or conventional representant with which
the “psychiatrist” torturer Barbarosie Carmen actively refused to close the contract therefore would
again, and “psychiatrically” incarcerated means not only disallowed to complain but also physically and
psychically abused because of it as I’ve observed between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 the other
inmates were, respectively chemically lobotomized through deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins
and be unable to dissent against the murderous injustice or even report it eventually because of the
extent of the brain damage as I’ve witnessed it was done to the other inmates between 27th May 2017
and 8th June 2017 who were “psychiatrically” incarcerated for a longer period, especially a member of
the Rroma minority I befriended, indefinite to life illegal “psychiatric” incarceration which meant I
would’ve been poisoned continuously with the deadly fluorine based neurotoxins I’ve objectivized upon
in chapter 1 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex
1 to this ICC penal dossier, until dying from one of the fatal health issues it causes, or be so severely
brain damaged that I wouldn’t have been able to function anymore as the Romanian “state “mafia
already falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry documents for that I’m irresponsible, lacking discernment,
being violent and a public danger as proven by annex 4 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim
measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, reminding the fact no Torture, Bodily Harm or
Qualified Murder in “psychiatric” regime incarceration in Romania is ever criminally investigated and
condemned although it’s public knowledge it exists thanks to some brave journalists - unless trickling
horror stories is another state terrorism strategy of the Romanian “state” mafia as the pervasive terror
story I’ve been often threatened or “warned” with by the various mafia “lawyer” associates, even priests
out of which I already can prove some are mafia collaborators, that the mafia will lock me up in the
Page 85 of 501
Focsani “psychiatric” gulag and “make me a vegetable” for being a dissenter and human rights defender
against the mafia, nor is there ever a malpraxis condemnation of “psychiatrist” charlatans to my
knowledge, as every “psychiatric” charlatanry case in reality is a malpraxis and therefore all
“psychiatrist” charlatans should be out of “business” by they are covered up by the Romanian “state”
mafia which constitutes another proof of “a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a
government or a de facto authority”, again I remind as the mafia only gives accreditation to the
“psychiatry” charlatanry to use it as state terrorism and wrongful political repression which is the
Romanian “state” mafia’s policy, being improper to speak of a government in Romania, or that the mafia
“tolerated or condoned” Crimes against humanity which also are within the Romanian “state” mafia’s
policy against not just dissenters and human rights defenders, but for illicit profit against
institutionalized children, homeless, members of Rroma minority, youngsters, elders, and in short and in
general anyone unable to fight back judicially and undefended by anyone else, meaning perfect victims
for the “psychiatry” charlatanry in cahoots with the Romanian “state” mafia who falsified even the
obligation to chemical lobotomy judicial decisions as I’ve discovered and denounced, followed by a
series of cover-ups by the Romanian “state” mafia as I’ve objectivized in paragraphs 1.1^6, 2.4^13.5 and
2.4^20.1 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to
this ICC penal dossier. No complaint I could’ve made however would’ve been of any use anyway as the
Crimes against humanity committed against me between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 were totally
covered up by the Romanian “state” mafia who as proof even avoided mentioning it happened in the
last Crimes against humanity attempt through the falsification of the sentences in dossier
12718/231/2017 where it’s not referenced, as I’ve summarily proven in annex 18 and annex 19 of my
Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier,
respectively sections I.B.2, I.B.3 and I.B.4, and especially in the paragraphs 2.4^8 and 2.4^46 from annex
21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier. In conclusion by its Crimes against humanity against me the mafia practically declared that my
human rights defender activity, legitimized not just by my fundamental rights but also by the obligation
of any Romanian citizen to defend its country according to article 55 from the Romanian Constitution, is
a “disorder”, respectively the “psychiatrist” charlatans contrary to the “psychiatric” charlatanry
literature indicated in annex 20 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as
annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, regarding the “psychiatry” charlatanry stated fact that assimilating the
law as one’s social command is proof of utmost discernment and civility, and declared that civility and
respecting the law is psychosis meaning false ideation resulting in socially unaccepted behavior, in other
words the “psychiatrist” charlatans declared the state of right a “disorder”, which makes perfect sense
since these are associated with the Romanian “state” mafia “order”, which of course didn’t declare
openly and in writing in the falsified “psychiatric” charlatanry documents attached as annex 4 and annex
16 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier, but is the only logical conclusion since is the only behavior I’ve displayed, corroborated with the
fact I’ve been illegally arrested during the 2nd session of my law faculty exams also before Orthodox
Easter 2017 with the obvious intent of committing Crimes against humanity against me during
Orthodox Easter 2017, then I’ve been illegally arrested from my law faculty exams on 27th May 2017 and
Crimes against humanity have been committed against me until 8th June 2017, then the mafia falsified a
“prosecutor’s” proposal for Crimes against humanity to be committed against me with which I was
Page 86 of 501
tipped off and became a permanent refugee from 1st September 2017 which is the start of the law
faculty exam recovery session, respectively the “psychiatrist” charlatans lied that I’m paranoid and that I
imagined being under penal pursuit in the falsified penal dossiers against me 2417/P/2014,
2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016, as proven by annex 16 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent
request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, which means as I thoroughly
prove below beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no such things as “mental disorders”, but just
pretexts and poor cover-up stories for Crimes against humanity just as in my case, as no “disorder” can
be scientifically objectivized being invented by the “psychiatry” charlatanry to fool fools only, first of all
as admitted by some of the very same “psychiatrists” charlatans themselves as proven in annex 20 of my
Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier,
secondly as proven by the obvious fact the psychic cannot be “ill” then “cured” through poisoning
evidently because it chemically destroys the support of the psychic meaning the physical brain primarily
and the rest of the central nervous system as well as other vital organs, thirdly because “mental illness”
is a bad metaphor since there is no comparison between physical diseases and psychological complex
thought patterns, nor is there a cure for metaphors or a cure by comparison and analogy evidently - it’s
the absurd sounding exposure of the “psychiatric” charlatanry illogical quackery, fourthly because killing
and any other animal behavior is perfectly normal and natural for animals which humans basically are
except for the mind meaning education and culture, animal behavior is only abnormal in civilized human
society which is a man-made mental construct, social convention or culture which proves the so called
“disorders” are also invented to prey on social convention namely social conformity which is mostly
puppetable by fear of ostracization which of course the totalitarian “state” and the elite class has
monopoly of, totalitarian “state” which of course gives accreditation to the “psychiatry” charlatanry to
control the masses and eliminate dissenters and human rights defenders, and although the “psychiatry”
charlatanry paradigms appear moral to have the aspect of a legitimate discipline that benefits human
society, and fool the bovine simpleton member of the working class who is the most often found victim
of the “psychiatry” charlatanry, being sacrificed as cattle for illegal experimentation for being cattle, in
reality the “mental illnesses” are generalized premises used by the “psychiatrist” charlatans to
stigmatize anyone with their quackery diagnostics which would be easily discovered every time and
there would be no more “psychiatry” charlatanry if everyone would be trained in law and logic, and also
not be cowardly and fight injustice for their own sake at least, and fifthly the “psychiatrist” charlatans
and the old “medical” assistants of mentally impaired people are one and the same thing as the
“psychiatrists” are a self-glorified clique of charlatans who raised their social status based on the wide
spread illiteracy and thus ignorance on which all charlatans prey actually, for illicit profit, when in reality
even today the “psychiatrist” charlatans are a category of medicine college flunkies or drop-outs as
proven by the fact they do not even know to copy-paste from their own quackery and at least formally
attempt to objectivize their falsified documents not that it would’ve worked against me, flunkies who
only graduate college as allowed by the Romanian “state” mafia through lessening the rigors of
academia to the lowest level of mediocrity in Romania which is rock bottom, “medical” assistants who
only became “psychiatrist” charlatans in an effort to glorify themselves as medics to access the
privileges that come from being mafia associated and the respect a medic received just by title as the
peasants of the 18th century notion of medicine was the village priest or the local witch, mentioning that
the “psychiatry” charlatanry in Romania originated from the Hebrew charlatans of 18th century who
Page 87 of 501
notoriously poisoned the Romanian national poet Mihai Eminescu with mercury because he was
denouncing their criminal activity, then it was ironically (because it was used on Hebrews) adopted by
the totalitarian Nazi and Soviet regimes and other criminal organizations such as even more ironically
(because of the false claim of being a democratic federation which is anything but - it’s an empire
proven by the approximatevely 200 wars it started in the last 200 years) U.S.A’s “intelligence agencies”
which found the “psychiatric” charlatanry useful against the dissenters or the undesirables to U.S.A’s
politics, “psychiatry” charlatanry who was engaged in Crimes against humanity and War crimes during
World War II reason for which to make it look scientific and not be convicted as criminals of war, the
“psychiatrist” charlatans picked up by the allies through operation “Paperclip” wrote quackery lying they
medically treated prisoners in the Nazi concentration camps with fluorine which was really used to quell
dissenters, and of course wrote this to continue masquerading as medics, perpetuate the charlatanry
and have cover to poison people for illicit profit, since whoever heard of a medic with no medicine.
These “psychiatrist” charlatans invented scientific sounding but ludicrous terms for even normal human
behavior which they declared “mental illness” <watch the marketing of madness to provide an example
or two>, behavior of the “psychiatrist” charlatans which ironically by their own “psychiatric” definition
represents the antisocial personality disorder or sociopathy that is the behavior of sacrificing other
people’s lives to achieve their own illicit petty interests, or the behavior of pervasively breaking the law
and other people’s rights, behavior determined by callousness characteristic to psychopaths who lacking
humanity of course would call humans “mentally ill” not just out of antisocial behavior which is
characterized by the belief of the sociopath aggressor that whatever he does is right and whatever the
victim does is wrong and furthermore disserves to be aggressed for it, but for the very reason of
justifying their crimes and getting away without being punished, and this is the red thread of
“psychiatry” in short. I have witnessed by reading various “psychiatry” charlatanry literature also
attempts of actually declaring the adherence to the rule of law paranoia, and the life style of continuous
learning or being an intellectual schizophrenia, because the “psychiatrist” charlatans fear persons
trained in law and logic and intellectuals because they can discover and prove they are charlatans.
Because the “psychiatrists” charlatans are psychopaths who have no scruples, allied themselves with the
pharmaceutical mafia to capitalize on “psychiatric medicine” which is notoriously as appropriately
nicknamed “the industry of death”, which is why the judicial system of “European” Vrancea county in
Romania is convicting innocents to be obligated to chemical lobotomy, because it performs illegal
experiments on them, fact which the Focsani “psychiatric” gulag torturers admitted to the press
claiming as the schizophrenics they are that the Ministry of Health gave them permission to break the
law, and the Romanian “state” mafia is clearly in cahoots with them, as proven by the fact I’ve
denounced this publicly after which immediately the Romanian “state” mafia issued a joint order of the
Superior Council of Magistrates and Ministry of Justice that this information be hidden from the public
by selective censorship of the public dossiers evidence system ECRIS, to stop me from gathering more
proof, except the mafia namely through the Ministry of Justice who operates ECRIS deliberately and
defiantly left public the “psychiatric” charlatanry profiled dossiers they’ve falsified against me, although
at that time in all 4 of them 15730/231/2014, 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance and 14277/231/20135 in
1st and 2nd instance I won in court annulling them and proving them falsified, which just proves the
Romanian mafia is obsessed to discredit me even in the least for the purpose of making my
denouncements of the mafia criminal activity unbelievable by associating my name with “psychiatric”
Page 88 of 501
charlatanry actions as for the stupefied Romanian proletariat is enough to believe there must be some
truth in “psychiatric” charlatanry actions against me even if they are proven falsified by being annulled
which isn’t deduced by the Romanian simpleton who rather being a coward actually sees the threat
represented by the mafia that falsified these actions to also make an example out of me and instill terror
in the population therefore the Romanian simpleton instead of being outraged by injustice cowardly
backs down as it actually happened. Although the manipulation of the ECRIS system doen’t actually
constitute Crimes against humanity but are acts of state terrorism and a direct proof that the Romanian
“state” mafia controls the Minister of Justice, the Superior Magistrate Council and the Romanian data
protection agency and Romanian national council for combating discrimination which I’ve notified and
refused to do their job as indicated above where I’ve also linked to a penal dossier published about the
latter institution, chemically lobotomizing people for illegal experimentation constitutes Crimes against
humanity. In conclusion and as modeled by the Crimes against humanity committed against me
between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, the charlatanry named “psychiatry”, after depriving the
undesirable of his freedom illegally and vitiating his consent not even required through harassment and
violence perpetrated by the “psychiatrist” torturers in cahoots with the totalitarian “state” so-called
order forces, in Romania meaning the mafia “masked policemen”, “policemen”, “secret policemen” and
“gendarme” soldiers, concocts one “disorder” or another cover-up story for the purpose of falsely
justifying but hiding from public scrutiny the repression of the undesirable’s individuality through the
eradication of the undesirable’s moral but unwanted behavior by the totalitarian regime through
chemical lobotomization, cover-up for the purpose of being clandestine political repression which will
follow as defined by the “psychiatrist” charlatanry a masquerade of identifying and preventing that
unwanted behavior and fictious “disorder” by “diagnosis, prevention, study, and treatment of mental
disorders”, meaning the eradication of individuality or a person’s identity which is no different from
capital punishment because the destruction of the individuality through chemical lobotomy or a
person’s identity is no different from killing a person or making it to cease to exist – any human being
identity or individuality resides in its brain not its body as proven by the fact that when a person is brain
damaged it loses partly or entirely its individuality or identity, meaning the person’s integrity of
identity or individuality if destroyed means capital punishment, because it’s the equivalent of killing
that person, and I corroborate this with the already proven fact that the “psychiatric” charlatanry only
abused deadly neurotoxic poisons such as mercury, heroin, opium, fluorine and chlorine to chemically
lobotomize people and conveniently make their victims unable to fight back and unable to fully realize
what happened to them as chemical lobotomy not only destroys the person’s integrity of identity
psychologically and physically through the destruction of the physical brain, it also destroys any of the
cognitive functions, and as proof the “psychiatry” charlatanry is murderous the deadly poisons it uses
also kills people and create a myriad other health problems which again as I’ve proven to begin with is
the opposite of medicine does, all of which proves “psychiatry” is charlatanry and a criminal not medical
occupation
<remained here with work, spoke of fake proofs of psychiatry curing anyone meaning
contradictory declarations while the ones against psychiatry are backed up by science and logic, spoke
of the fake psychiatry esotery regarding “disorders”, will speak concentrately on comparison between
psychiatry and medicine, then science, giving examples, then finally make a plan, a skeleton of
everything>
Page 89 of 501
II.1.2.1^2. “psychiatry” charlatanry logically and scientifically proven is not medicine as I’ve
objectivized in the paragraphs above, that is demonstrated by referencing Hippocrates’s oath of ~“at
least do no harm” which is required to be taken by all medics, and which is juridically a verbal or written
contract that if broken constitutes the penal category of felonies of service, e.g. abuse, negligence,
usurping, dilapidation etc. The psychiatric quackery is notoriously only doing harm as proven by the host
of testimonies and scientific research I’ve indicated in chapter 1 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR
urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, as corroborated with
the fact the “psychiatry” charlatanry historically only ever abused brain damaging poisons meaning
mercury, heroin, opium, fluorine and chlorine. Reciprocally if “psychiatry” isn’t science it can’t be
medicine. Furthermore “psychiatry” charlatanry is proven not medicine logically as to be expected when
scrutinizing a lie’s consistency with reality and the lie itself - given the fact that after the “psychiatric”
charlatanry chemical lobotomization the mind is partly or totally destroyed which is capital
punishment through the eradication of that person’s identity and individuality, the equivalent of killing
a person, lets assume that what remains of the brain compensates by creating another mind with what
it has left meaning usually no functioning mammalian brain meaning no emotions. That new mind will
be then the mind of a psychopath, an inhuman being or an animal, which is why the “psychiatry”
charlatanry chemical lobotomy induces suicidal or homicidal behavior as objectivized in section
I.A.II.1.2.10^1. Even ad absurdum if a mind could be destroyed leaving the brain intact for the
installation of another mind which is capital punishment through the eradication of that person’s
identity and individuality, the process is not random meaning in the same conditions a similar mind will
develop except with another identity, lacking the memories of childhood and love for instance, and
being incarcerated in a “psychiatric” charlatanry gulag creates a deeply traumatized mind which will
either ideatize at suicide, homicide, or both, the homicidal ideation being natural, logical and justified
against the aggressors meaning the “psychiatrist” torturers because of the fundamental subconscious
evolutionary survival mechanisms within the brain perceiving an aggression and threat to the very life of
the person which then it seeks to eliminate, therefore there is no real or ad absurdum scenario that can
unfold and prove “psychiatry” is medicine and not charlatanry. This proves the “psychiatry” charlatanry
is false even from its logical premises not just in practice, and that therefore it’s neither medicine nor
science because it only does harm and is both logically invalid and alienated from reality
II.1.2^3 “Psychiatry” charlatanry logically and objectively proven is not science as I’ve
objectivized in the paragraphs above, because logically proven “psychiatry” is not medicine and because
medicine is science “psychiatry” therefore is not science, and because the “psychiatry” charlatanry
declares it’s medicine and science while it’s obviously not it lies therefore is charlatanry. Because
“psychiatry” charlatanry doesn’t falsify its reports based on scientific observation because it’s impossible
as the scientific method guarantees the extraction of the truth, and scientific method would reveal
there’s no such thing as “mental illness”, therefore there’s no such thing as “mental illness” cure, and
science already revealed the “psychiatric” charlatanry “cures and treatments” are brain damaging
methods meaning either chemical lobotomy through deadly neurotoxic poisons such as mercury, opium,
heroin, fluorine and chlorine, or electroshocks, “psychiatry” charlatanry is again proven not science
therefore not medicine, as the “psychiatric” charlatanry reports are based on the “psychiatrist”
charlatan’s hallucinations as generally proven by the fact there’s no such thing as “mental illnesses” as
even admitted by some of the “psychiatrist” charlatans in the press as I’ve objectivized in annex 20 of
Page 90 of 501
my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier
therefore there’s no such thing as “mental illness” cures and treatments as proven by the fact nobody
was ever cured or treated for “mental illness” as proven by the fact the only proofs for that are
subjective false declarations contradicted by other testimonies who in turn correlate with science and
logic, as evidently the “psychiatry” charlatanry cannot cure anything with deadly neurotoxic poisons
such as mercury, opium, heroin, fluorine and chlorine which only destroy the mind, brain and body of
the “psychiatry” charlatanry victims not coincidentally or randomly but intently, to prevent the victims
from fighting back or even realize the damage done, and the “psychiatrist” charlatans are protected by
all totalitarian states around the world to use as a weapon of state terrorism and wrongful political
repression just as it was abused against me by the Romanian “state” mafia to commit 2 Crimes against
humanity and attempt 6 Crimes against humanity to cover-up my previous denouncements by
discrediting me publicly and to stop me from further denouncing its criminal activity, therefore because
the “psychiatrist” charlatan doesn’t observe and declare the observed reality but invents or falsifies
factual premises or doesn’t mention them altogether and breaks all the relevant laws, regulations,
norms, deontology or logic for that matter for faking the syllogistical inference or the diagnostic, the
“psychiatrist” charlatan is perpetrating a charlatanry, as immediately proven by the fact the
“psychiatrist” charlatan doesn’t immediately declare the logically obvious and scientific notorious fact
poisoning a person doesn’t cure that person of anything, but the “psychiatrist” charlatan just
hallucinates or lies it does “recommending” it by force meaning appealing to the totalitarian state illicit
order forces to carry out the “psychiatric” charlatanry incarceration which serves the only purpose of
putting a person in a situation of vulnerability at the discretion of the “psychiatrist” torturers who
physically abuse regularly the incarcerated persons in their gulags, and chemically lobotomize them with
fluorine and chlorine, just as I objectivized it by my case objectivized in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^2 and I.B.22,
respectively I.A.II.1.3.1^7 and I.B.6, and I.A.I.1-2, and testimony regarding the chemical lobotomization
of others I’ve personally witnessed according to paragraph 1.24 from annex 16 of my Rule 39 ECHR
urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, and as objectivized by
the press who disclosed many cases of people being brain damaged to the point of committing either
suicide, or committing homicide as I’ve proven in section I.A.II.1.2.10^1. Because logically “psychiatry”
charlatanry falsely claims to be a medical specialty it’s sufficient that I proven it’s not medicine to also
prove it’s not science as I proven vice-versa anyway, in other words the because “psychiatric”
charlatanry doesn’t adhere to the scientific method which means the “psychiatric” charlatans are always
lying about the truth not observing and reporting it according to the physical reality but falsifying the
premises or omitting them and breaking the law, regulations, norms, deontology and logic in order to
conduct the charlatanry, and they achieve this thanks to public ignorance instilled by totalitarian states
around the world who keep the general population ignorant so that the “psychiatrist” charlatans can
either induce their victims into error because of its their own stupidity, or forcefully incarcerating and
chemically lobotomizing the victim without its consent when the victim is unable to defend itself
because of lack of money, social position and influence thus also undefended by others, such as the case
of institutionalized children being chemically lobotomized in Romania and not long ago in Canada where
it has already been proven it has destroyed the rest of their lives, or the case of the Rroma minority in
Romania, or homeless people, Rroma minority members, or ignorant youngsters and elders, or in the
case of dissidents and human rights defenders fighting against the totalitarian state which in turn abuses
Page 91 of 501
the judiciary system and the “psychiatry” charlatanry as weapons of state terrorism and wrongful
repression, the totalitarian state places the dissidents and human rights defenders outside the
protection of the law then forcefully chemically lobotomizes them as proven by my case, the notorious
case of the Rroma minority member Ivascu locked up and chemically lobotomized in Romania for
hundreds of days just for demanding his rights, and other cases of uneducated people picked as targets
for being uneducated reason for which they are unheard of because they don’t know how to defend
themselves, but I’ve witnessed they exist in far greater numbers than the known cases, reason for which
a thorough investigation must be undertaken against the Romanian “state” mafia to have all its
ramifications and all its Crimes against humanity unveiled to stop it once and for all from preying on the
unaware public, as victim’s ignorance is the common ground of all forms of charlatanry. Another proof
that “psychiatry” is charlatanry is the fact that the “company” that commercializes poisons as medicine
was many times convicted billions of dollars as I’ve objectivized in paragraph 1.9 of annex 21 of my Rule
39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier regarding my
proven and thus legitimate reasons to fear and indefinite to life arbitrary incarceration, Torture, Bodily
Harm and Qualified Murder, annex in which I’ve also proven that the prospect of the risperidone or
paliperidone deadly fluorine based neurotoxin I’ve been poisoned with lies that there are no proofs it’s
deadly or that fatalities are not reported because the pharmaceutical mafia refuses to make an
experiment that would demonstrate it’s deadly, and it lies that it cures schizophrenia by causing
schizophrenia, which proves the prospect was not written by scientists but by schizophrenic charlatans
as proven by their logical and behavioral incoherence, occupational dysfunction, and failure to recognize
what’s real according to DSM-V “psychiatric” charlatanry manual of diagnosis and statistic, while being
the kind of charlatans that costs people their lives automatically classifies them as sociopaths - persons
who sacrifice other people’s lives for achieving their petty illicit goals, or who are breaking the law and
other person’s rights pervasively. I remind I was never diagnosed even falsely with schizophrenia or
anything else to be chemically lobotomized with the risperidone or paliperidone deadly fluorine
neurotoxin, meaning as obvious I was just chemically lobotomized with the most destructive and deadly
poison the mafia had to Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualifiedly Murder me, reminding between 27th May
2017 and 8th June 2017 I was put in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days without treatment with daily
deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxic injections, and expected to die, as I’ve objectivized in sections
I.A.II.1.3.1^7, I.B.6 and I.A.I.1-2 from my ICC penal dossier, poisons which I’ve proven in chapter 1 from
annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier that cannot constitute a cure for anything meaning the “psychiatry” charlatanry do not cure
anything but chemically lobotomize people which is neither medicine, or science, or legal for that
matter, it’s charlatanry when it’s not used as state terrorism and wrongful political repression. As
further proof psychiatry hasn’t cured nobody ever of anything, not just obviously because poisons cure
nothing, but because the “mental illnesses” fictive “psychiatric” charlatanry premises for faking
diagnosis with no relation to reality are invalid metaphors not designating real, observable and
measurable phenomena, which therefore can’t be cured because they don’t exist being bad metaphors
meaning even as metaphor being invalid as there is no comparison between physical illnesses and
mental processes, then the notion that metaphors can be cured as if being illnesses is simply ludicrous,
nor can anything be cured obviously by comparison or analogy then poisoning which is simply crazy that
is the “psychiatrist” charlatans are, argument which must be stated in this dissected form to
Page 92 of 501
demonstrate beyond any reasonable doubt the charlatanry named “psychiatry”. Even worse, the
“psychiatric” charlatanry claims that it “cures” the “symptoms” of the fictive “psychiatry” charlatanry
“mental illnesses”, “symptoms” which are normal human behaviors such as being intelligent, having self
esteem, having libido, laughing, socializing, reading, enjoying music, games, movies, creativity, vividity,
sex, engaging in philosophy and art and more as proven by the fact the “psychiatrist” charlatans
eradicate all these through chemical lobotomization as I’ve proven objectively by my own testimony
from chapter IV.5 from annex 23 correlated with paragraph 1.8 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR
urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, which is why the
“psychiatric” charlatanry as I’ve as described before was found useful by Nazi, Soviet and other
totalitarian regimes, or other criminal organizations, which then gave “state” accreditation to the
“psychiatry” charlatanry even if obviously is against the fundamental human rights which the world so
called democracies hypocritically declare bur infringe upon at the same time by accrediting the
“psychiatry” charlatanry, to abuse it against the people as a weapon of wrongful political repression,
targeting dissidents and human rights defenders worldwide for Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualified
Murder through chemical lobotomization, charlatanry which was been historically acknowledged as
widely used by the Nazi or Soviet regimes against prisoners of wars in concentration camps or gulags,
which is exactly why it was used against me as a dissenter against the mafia controlled “state” of
Romania and as a defender of human rights, with the clear intent to silence me by gravely bodily
harming me and Qualifiedly Murder me to stop me from denouncing the criminal Romanian “state”
mafia regime as proven summarily by my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as
annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, and in full in this ICC penal dossier
<mention somewhere the logic that there is no such thing as a medical cure for lack of
discernment else everyone would take it as proof, and there would be no more accidents, or reference
the ECHR annex 4 or 16
II.1.2.2. As proof in support of II.1.2^3, that the “psychiatric medicine” charlatanry was abused
historically against dissidents against an totalitarian regime, which is “part either of a government
policy” and not “or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de
facto authority” because obviously a totalitarian regime does not tolerate or condone its own regime it
imposes, I reference the fact the Romanian national poet and dissident against institutionalized
corruption Mihai Eminescu was evidently stigmatized with the false diagnosis of schizophrenia and
syphilis against the clear evidence to the contrary and of course in lack of evidence for the false
diagnosis, and was poisoned with mercury claimed to be “psychiatric” charlatanry treatment although it
was empirically knows even at the time it was a deadly poison, and because Mihai Eminescu had a
strong mind which wasn’t damaged sufficiently by the poisoning even after years of torture, they
cracked his skull with a brick and killed him because he was as of fact the biggest political dissident
against corruption of his time and he had a newspaper meaning a means for propaganda against
corruption, assassination by abuse of the “psychiatric “charlatanry proven by the bias in this article
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mihai_Eminescu#Later_life_and_death where again as typical of liars
generic terms are used as accusations, not facts, because the accusations are false, as concretely proven
by the evident false “deviant behaviors” accusation which are not specified because they don’t exist
II.1.2.3. As proof in support of II.1.2^3 that “psychiatry” is charlatanry is not medicine and not
science, I also reference the scientific documentary “The marketing of madness” of which I couldn’t
stand watching but the first 5 minutes which clearly proves Sigmund Freud or better said “fraud” took
Page 93 of 501
bribe from 2 pharmaceutical companies to promote opium and heroine as psychiatric medicine – this
documentary is easy to find by name using google.com search engine, and more material can be
consulted from CCHR. This practice correlates with the truth about FDA members who take bribe to
accreditate the “psychiatry” charlatanry, and the fact the “psychiatric” charlatan “medics” are the most
“financed” meaning bribed in actuality, by the pharmaceutical mafia because “psychiatry” is the most
lucrative charlatanry where a wide range of chemically lobotomizing poisons can be marketed illegally
under the cover of “psychiatric medicine” state legitimized charlatanry, while the same pharmaceutical
mafia was repeatedly convicted for commercializing poisons as “psychiatric medicine”, meaning the
pharmaceutical mafia calculates it’s profitable even to get severely fined commercializing poisons as
“psychiatric medicine, as I’ve objectivized in paragraph 1.9 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent
request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier. I also reference at this the
incoming section II.1.2.8. where I quote the truth about “The Worthlessness of FDA Approval” and any
other such accreditations
II.1.2.4 (old I.A.II.1.2.6 referenced in the ECHR request following that I fix the references) As
proof “psychiatry” charlatanry is a criminal occupation, neither medicine nor science, I also reference
the fact “psychiatrist” criminals of war were imported by the Allies after World War 2 through Operation
“Paperclip”, criminals of war which to avoid prosecution and capital punishment wrote quackery books
about how poisoning dissidents in Nazi concentration camps with fluorine was medicine and not a crime
of war – president Vladimir Putin of the Russian Federation being one of the most recent personalities
who invoked this truth of which he should know best as a former member of the soviet intelligence who
also used fluorine in its gulags, and used against the criminal NGO network of George Soros who was
banished from Russia as persona non grata along with his NGOs because he was petitioning the Russian
government to put fluorine in the water as I prove by referencing this article amongst many similar:
http://yournewswire.com/putin-bans-fluoride-russia/ from where I quote: “Vladimir Putin has banned
fluoride from Russia, stating that the “toxic poison” that was “force fed to prisoners of war during Soviet
times” should not “under any circumstances, now or in the future, be considered for use on the people of
the Russian Federation.”... Putin responded to questions about the fluoridation campaign by pointing out
who was behind the plot: George Soros’s OSF and the subsidiary offshoots it employs to find ways of
disregarding the laws of sovereign nations” which I quote as proof because I’ve also been poisoned with
the deadly fluorine based neurotoxin risperidone or paliperidone for being a dissident against the
George Soros’s backed Romanian “state” mafia, especially by inculpating George Soros’s favorite
Romanian “state” mafia prostitutes Kovesi Laura Codruta, the corrupt chief of the national anti-
corruption direction who only engages in political police, and Pruna Raluca, the ex-minister of justice
who is the tool of the mafia oligarch Monica Macovei, the EU parliament members who has been
falsifying reports that Romania has a judicial system for years, and who was perfectly aware of all 8
Crimes against humanity committals and attempts against me as I’ve notified her as a LIBE member. I
mention I was against the Romanian “state” mafia of which I was only aware as generalized and
institutionalized corruption not that’s it’s actively state-level if not perhaps world-level organized crime
because it does illicit business internationally, before I discovered I’m genetically virtually identical to
everyone else and being egotistical is idiocy therefore because there really isn’t escaping life while
humans are born so everything one builds for humanity builds for himself really, but I only become an
active human rights defender after the Romanian “state” mafia made it personal actively cutting off all
my possibilities to get a job, a home, implicitly a family. The Romanian “state” mafia has been in fact
Page 94 of 501
doing this since 1989 not wishing to debunk conspiracy theories that it may have been even longer than
that, because the Romanian “state” mafia put the Romanian industry and economy in general in
insolvency since the 1989 coup d’état, privatized the national interest and protected the criminals who
are destroying the Romanian state of right in every conceivable way, its education system in which I’ve
suffered in my youth as fodder for every troglodyte with relations who posed as a “professor”, its health
system from which I escaped thank God for my skepticism and poverty not having money to bribe else I
would’ve been operated tens of times by the Romanian charlatan butchers who open anyone up to get
some illicit profit as proven by the fact even the judicial prostitute Kovesi Laura Codruta admitted over
50% of oncologists put healthy persons on chemotherapy, destroyed the worker rights and syndicalism,
even protected the “communist” mafia regime torturers such as Visinescu who was eventually caught by
huge effort and media coverage, because the actual mafia has oligarchically inherited the power and
even the methods as proven of the old totalitarian regime. I am convinced the Romanian “state” mafia
destroyed my life through the 1989 coup d’état and following “politics” of dilapidation of the
“communist” economic corpse, because even under Nicolae Ceausescu’s “communist” regime, I
would’ve had a home, a job, a wife and family, there would have been order and justice and I would’ve
been happy, a great personality contributing to the welfare of humanity, not having to fight for life with
these animated feces that are the members of the Romanian “state” mafia and its collaborators
II.1.2.4^1 (old I.A.II.1.2.6^1 referenced in the ECHR request following that I fix the references)
In support of previous proofs that fluorine is not a “psychiatric” charlatanry cure, it’s a chemical used for
totalitarian mass control, I reference the following quote: “In a 1954 letter to the Lee Foundation for
Nutritional Research, Perkins stated:
"The German chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass control that was
submitted to and adopted by the German General Staff. This plan was to control the population of
any given area through mass medication of drinking water supplies... In this scheme of mass control,
‘sodium fluoride’ occupied a prominent place...
However, and I want to make this very definite and very positive, the real reason behind water
fluoridation is not to benefit children’s teeth... The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to
reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty... Repeated doses of
infinitesimal amounts of fluorine [sic] will in time gradually reduce the individual’s power to resist
domination by slowly poisoning and narcotizing this area of brain tissue, and make him submissive to
the will of those who wish to govern him...
I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official of the great Farben chemical
industries and was prominent in the Nazi movement at the time... I say this with all the earnestness
and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years research [sic] into the chemistry,
biochemistry, physiology, and pathology of ‘fluorine [sic].’ ...
Any person who drinks artificially fluoridated water for a period of one year or more will never again
be the same person, mentally or physically.”
“ from the article at address
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_mindcon52.htm, which is a vast article
– ergo, destruction of a person’s identity or physical integrity aimed even at the destruction of
psychical integrity, is as I’ve proven capital punishment, and beyond, a means of control through the
Page 95 of 501
eradication of a person’s identity, individuality, self-esteem and thus its liberty, autonomy or self-
determination, and I testify that after being poisoned I’ve been put in what I call “the living death”
forever, a existence devoid of most sentimentality in which state I’m able to function by my power of
will, having foreseen this circumstance if that helped my power of will at all but most important being
trained involuntarily by the miserable life I had in Romania which forced me to carry on by power of will
since ever regardless of how I felt, which didn’t train me at all for having my emotional intelligence
amputated which led me to suicide ideation for months that I had to overcome by brute force but really
just forgetting I had a life which made me unaware of the loss that was the cause of the suffering and
half of the problem, and ultimately aided for the other half by the grace of God or scientifically called
the practice of philosophy of Christianity which helps in wide regard of areas, purpose, atonement,
enlightenment, to which I also adhered because I recognized in it my old ethos and which I knew it
would further my agenda and keep me in line if I would be damaged by the Romanian “state” mafia and
operate if only at a level of belief in what once I understood – Christianity or faith is a means to achieve
a higher plane of moral knowledge, logic and intrinsic moral behavior which is normally
incomprehensible in its entirety by the limited human brain, but of which I understood as much as it was
revealed to me when I still had my full emotional intelligence, that is before being chemically
lobotomized and amputation of the ability to appreciate and enjoy life as I’ve objectivized in chapter
IV.5 from annex 23 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this
ICC penal dossier, through Torture and Bodily Harm by deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxic
poisoning which constitute the 2 Crime against humanity committals against me as I’ve objectivized in
sections I.A.II.1.3.1^2 and I.B.22, respectively I.A.II.1.3.1^7 and I.B.6, and I.A.I.1-2, which have almost
eradicated my natural humanity, that I compensate for by virtue of my humane will with which I’ve
consciously build up an inertial artificial replica of my old self. In short I’ve been dehumanized as
described in the encyclopedic article regarding Crimes against humanity, and this is simple truth about
how the “psychiatry” charlatanry by chemical lobotomization push people into suicide ideation and even
worse homicidal ideation, because “pscyhiatry” charlatanry chemical lobotomization destroys the brain
unraveling the primitive side of people making them dysfunctional even by eliminating their natural
evolutionary inhibition against suicide and homicide, and because the forceful “psychiatric” charlatanry
chemical lobotomization is perceived as an aggression the victims are naturally provoked into homicidal
ideation which unfortuntely doesn’t occur as diserving against the “psychiatrist” charlatans who are
aware of this, but against the general ignorant population, as I’ve objectivized in section II.1.2.10^1
<find more quotes from articles on keywords psychiatry, paperclip, allies, world war 2 etc.
II.1.2.5 (old I.A.II.1.2.7 referenced in the ECHR request following that I fix the references) I
also reference the fact that the deadly neurotoxic “psychiatric” chartalanry poisons are FDA approved
means nothing, because the FDA clerks that approved it are obviously corrupt and in consequence of
their felonies, criminals:
“
The Worthlessness of FDA Approval
You are probably wondering how psychiatric drugs get approval from government agencies such as the
U.S.A.'s Food & Drug Administration (FDA) if they are as harmful as indicated here. There are several
reasons.
Page 96 of 501
One reason is former drug company executives who seem to have more loyalty to their former
employers than to the public hold high positions within the FDA.
Another reason is FDA officials who have never worked for a drug company acquiesce to drug
company proposals in hopes of gaining favor and being hired at eye-popping salaries by the companies
they (theoretically) regulate during their stint at the FDA. In the words of Princeton University
economics professor Paul Krugman in a book published in 2012—
“
Consider, for example, the revolving door, in which politicians and officials end up going to work for the
industry they were supposed to oversee. That door has existed for a long time, but the salary you can
get if the industry likes you is vastly higher than it used to be, which has to make the urge to
accommodate the people on the other side of that door, to adopt positions that will make you an
attractive hire in your postpolicy career, much stronger than it was thirty years ago. [End this Depression
Now!, W.W.Norton & Co., p. 87]
“
In his book Pharmocracy (Praktikos Books 2011, p. 153), Life Extension Foundation Co-Founder William
Faloon cites an Associated Press report saying "a record number of FDA employees are leaving the
agency to go to work for pharmaceutical companies." He says "the FDA functions primarily to protect
the financial interests of the pharmaceutical industry, not the public's health" (p. 152). In an article
published in 2007, Marcia Angell, M.D., a senior lecturer at Harvard Medical School and former editor of
the New England Journal of Medicine, says "The FDA now behaves as though the pharmaceutical
industry is its user, not the public" ("Taking back the FDA", Boston Globe, February 26, 2007). Experts
on FDA advisory panels are often simultaneously paid consultants for drug companies. According to Dr.
Vernon Coleman, a British physician, "Governments say they can't find any doctors without conflict of
interest to sit on committees assessing drugs" (Do Doctors And Nurses Kill More People Than Cancer?,
European Medical Journal 2011, p. 34). Until this incestuous relationship between drug companies and
the FDA is stopped by laws preventing anyone who has been employed by a drug company in recent
years from serving at the FDA, and prohibiting FDA officials from accepting employment at drug
companies for many years after leaving the FDA, and prohibiting experts on FDA advisory panels from
accepting money from drug companies for many years before and after serving as consultants for the
FDA, the FDA will probably continue to foster and protect the best interests of drug companies more
than the best interests of the public.
...
In her book Side Effects—A Prosecutor, a Whistleblower, and a Bestselling Antidepressant on Trial
(Algonquin Books 2008) Alison Bass shows how drug studies are deliberately falsified for the purpose of
getting useless or harmful drugs approved and sold. She provides facts proving "that doctors who
receive consulting or other personal income from drugmakers are more likely to report positive findings
about a particular drug than researchers who don't receive money from the industry" and "psychiatry
was the specialty with the highest number of doctors receiving payments from drug companies" (p.
224).
In his book Saving Normal—An Insider's Revolt Against Out-of-Control Psychiatric Diagnosis, DSM-5, Big
Pharma, and the Medicalization of Ordinary Life (HarperCollins 2013, p. 212), psychiatrist Allen Frances
says "The legal psychiatric drug industry has thrived through the aggressive spread of misinformation."
“ quote from address http://www.wayneramsay.com/drugs.htm. This proof pertains to any kind of
research corrupted when the interest is any other than the objective public health
Page 97 of 501
II.1.2.6 (old I.A.II.1.2.8 referenced in the ECHR request following that I fix the references)
Because I’ve been also poisoned with benzodiazepines (Diazepam and Prazolex), meaning chlorine
based neurotoxins, I also reference the truth about this category of drugs:
“
"The benzodiazepines have caused infinitely more sorrow and despair than all illegal drugs put together"
(benzo.org.uk, accessed January 15, 2015). Like all psychiatric drugs, the so-called minor tranquilizers
don't cure anything but are merely brain-disabling drugs. In one clinical trial, 70 percent of persons
taking Halcion "developed memory loss, depression and paranoia"
“, quote from address http://www.wayneramsay.com/drugs.htm
In his book Toxic Psychiatry, psychiatrist Peter Breggin, speaking of the minor tranquilizers, says
"As with most psychiatric drugs, the use of the medication eventually causes an increase of the very
symptoms that the drug is supposed to ameliorate" (p. 246).
David Knott, a physician at the University of Tennessee, in 1976 warned: "I am very convinced that
Valium (Diazepam), Librium and other drugs of that class cause damage to the brain. I have seen
damage to the cerebral cortex that I believe is due to the use of these drugs, and I am beginning to
wonder if the damage is permanent" (quoted in Robert Whitaker, Anatomy of an Epidemic, Crown
Publishers 2010, p. 137).
“ quote from address http://www.wayneramsay.com/drugs.htm, corroborated with the research I’ve
shown in chapter 1 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as
annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier regarding the objectivization of my thus legitimately proven fear of
indefinite imprisonment to life, torture and loss of life, showing that also Diazepam and Prazolex, the
chlorine based neurotoxins I’ve been poisoned with forcefully do cause permanent brain damage, as
well as the other fluorine based deadly neurotoxins Haloperidol and Invega, proving it was an attempt at
Qualified murder as objectivized by the fact i was put in anaphylactic shock for 3 days without
treatment and expected to die, then after I survived I was forcefully chemically lobotomized with other
deadly fluorine and chlorine based neurotoxins with which and I was also thus Bodily harmed and
Tortured, felonies which constitute Crimes against humanity. Also, I mention there is no brain damage
that isn’t permanent, because the brain doesn’t heal as of notorious fact – neurogenesis is severely
limited both in extent and to two regions of the brain meaning the subventricular zone (SVZ) of the
lateral ventricles and the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the dentate gyrus within the hippocampus, and
these are interneurons – see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adult_neurogenesis, and clearly synapses or
the mind doesn’t heal meaning lost memory and cognitive function. Once a brain cell is dead it remains
dead, the remaining brain cells only compensating – see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_healing
meaning all the billions of cells that have been killed in my brain through chlorine and fluorine poisoning
will never recover, I am condemned to this state I call “the living death” for life by the “psychiatrist”
torturers in cahoots with the Romanian “state” mafia. Also, the word “medication” can’t be used in the
same sentence that describes it worsens symptoms, because by definition “medication” is “A drug or
other form of medicine that is used to treat or prevent disease” not to chemically lobotomize, as quoted
from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/medication – it’s a pleonastic besides a contradiction
in terms, the proposition thus orthographically resolved shows there is no such thing as “psychiatric
medication”, only “psychiatric” charlatanry chemical lobotomy
Page 98 of 501
II.1.2.7 (old I.A.II.1.2.9 referenced in the ECHR request following that I fix the references)
Because I’ve been also poisoned with neuroleptics (Haloperidol and Invega) meaning fluorine based
neurotoxins, I also reference the truth about this category of drugs:
“
NEUROLEPTICS: Even as harmful as psychiatry's (so-called) antidepressants and lithium and (so-called)
antianxiety agents (or minor tranquilizers) and ADHD drugs are, they are nowhere near as damaging as
the neuroleptics, now most often (although incorrectly) called "antipsychotic" drugs. "Neuroleptic"
means nerve-seizing. At one time these drugs were called "major tranquilizers", but over time the myth
that they are anti-psychosis developed. Included in this category are "older" or "typical" neuroleptics
such as Thorazine (chlorpromazine), Mellaril, Prolixin (fluphenazine), Compazine, Stelazine, and Haldol
(haloperidol) and "newer" or "atypical" or "second generation" neuroleptics such as Abilify, Clozaril,
Geodon, Invega, Latuda, Risperdal, Seroquel, and Zyprexa. Contrary to the often-repeated claim the
newer or so-called atypical or second-generation neuroleptics are less likely than "older" or "typical"
neuroleptics to cause neurological damage manifested by movement disorders, sometimes called
"extrapyramidal side effects", such as tardive dyskinesia, dystonia, and akathisia, the National Institute
of Mental Health (NIMH) Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study in 2005
found that "Contrary to expectations, movement side effects (rigidity, stiff movements, tremor, and
muscle restlessness [dyskinesia, dystonia, and akathisia]) primarily associated with the older
medications were not seen more frequently with perphenazine than with the newer drugs"
“ quote from address http://www.wayneramsay.com/drugs.htm, mentioning I’ve also proven in annex
21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier that it causes a myriad other permanent health problems such as learning disability, memory
dysfunction, prefrontal cortex damage causing a decision making disability, and death, all of which can
be observed in the Invega deadly poison “prospect” which claims it treats schizophrenia by causing
schizophrenia or killing the “patient”, meaning clearly the criminals who approve (e.g. FDA),
commercialize (the pharmaceutical mafia) and prescribe (the ‘psychiatrist” charlatans) this deadly
poison are schizophrenic by the DSM-V definition itself, exhibiting logical incoherence, occupational
dysfunction and failure to recognize what’s real - that they are part of humanity which they callously as
the psychopaths they are destroy. Lastly I mention again I wasn’t even falsely diagnosed with
schizophrenia or anything else - I was covertly injected with the deadly fluorine neurotoxin risperidone
or paliperidone - risperidone’s metabolite meaning basically the same thing, in the night between 5th
and 6th December 2014 which is the first Crimes against humanity committal against me, and I was
forcefully chemically lobotomized with risperidone or paliperidone - risperidone’s metabolite between
27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 which is the second Crimes against humanity committal against me, as
I’ve objectivized in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^2 and I.B.22, respectively I.A.II.1.3.1^7 and I.B.6, and I.A.I.1-2
from my ICC penal dossier
II.1.2.8 (old I.A.II.1.2.10 referenced in the ECHR request following that I fix the references)
Because I’ve been poisoned by the “psychiatric” charlatan torturers with the deadly fluorine based
neurotoxin risperidone or paliperidone - risperidone’s metabolite meaning basically the same thing, I’m
quoting and underlining as necessary what I’ve already noticed in my own biology or is directly relevant
in corroboration to my plead in annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
Page 99 of 501
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, and where I do not underline it may be that I find the
whole sentence or paragraph relevant:
II.1.2.8^1 (old I.A.II.1.2.10^1 referenced in the ECHR request following that I fix the
references). I mentioned “Even worse”, because a person with mental problems named Magdalena
Serban on 12th December 2017 pushed another person on the subway tracks which killed the other
person – see: https://www.digi24.ro/stiri/actualitate/social/crima-de-la-metrou-magdalena-serban-a-
spus-de-ce-a-impins-o-pe-tanara-de-la-dristor-in-fata-metroului-848669 , which occurred suspiciously
soon after the Crimes against humanity committed against me raising the conspiracy theory that it was
a directed event to raise erroneous public awareness about the importance of the “psychiatry”
charlatanry or the danger posed by the mentally deranged persons in liberty, both scenarios being
detrimental to my situation and typical of the kind of scenarios put into motion by the schizophrenic
mafia “secret services” of which I can recount a few and prove them also, but both scenarios being
II.1.2.8^2 (old II.1.2.10^2 referenced in the ECHR request following that I fix the references).
Lastly being as proven through my plead humanely intelligent as opposed to these psychopathic animals
calling themselves “psychiatrists” as even some charlatans may be found humane, and as I’ve trained
my brain for decades to even instinctively obtain the truth of a situation, I’ve had the distinct impression
these “psychiatrist” animals victimize innocent people as proven in fact, but closing on the point I’m
making, treating them worse than cattle in reality as is one thing to swindle someone and another to
objectivize and inhumanely disrespect everything a person is, which correlates to what I’ve declared
before that I’ve been told to renounce my intellectual life and be an idiotic docile slave with no rights in
short a perfect victim for the “psychiatrist” charlatans and the “state” mafia, meaning as I’ve witnessed
on other and myself, the psychopath “psychiatrist” charlatans and their associated torturer mafia
“muscle” of the illicit operation treat “patients” in “psychiatric” incarceration like some meaningless
pieces of meat and a means to an end - just an illicit justification of the psychopath “psychiatric”
charlatan’s occupation. I objectivize this not just by the experience I’ve had in the Focsani “psychiatric”
gulag where the inmates (calling them such because I couldn’t identify mental problems of any sort with
a good number of them and for good reason because there were plenty of victims who just were
peasants who drank too much at one time, homeless people, members of the Rroma minority,
youngsters, meaning not random victims, but victims with no understanding of the law or means to
defend themselves meaning either having someone else who could not that it would matter much as
only social position and influence with the Romanian “state” mafia is a real deterrence against mafia
abuses against oneself, or money to hire a legal representant not that it would matter much could
because all “lawyers” in Romania are either mafia associated and would not represent a victim of the
mafia, or are at least afraid of the mafia to not represent a victim of the mafia without which they
couldn’t swindle their way into some illicit profit by not informing their clients what they’re up against
and their real chances of success before they pay the fee, meaning in short the “lawyers” are otherwise
basically useless in Romania because the judiciary system is mafia controlled, unless the “lawyers” is a
relative of the “judiciary bodies” meaning having influence, case in which the only outcome is being
temporarily saved from being a mafia victim for which there is no justice to be achieved in Romania),
II.1.3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder
II.1.3^1 “Murder is the unlawful killing of another human without justification or
valid excuse, especially the unlawful killing of another human being with malice aforethought.”
II.1.3^2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malice_aforethought
II.1.3^3 “Malice aforethought was the "premeditation" or "predetermination" (with malice)
that was required as an element of some crimes in some jurisdictions[1] and a unique element for
first-degree or aggravated murder in a few.”
II.1.3.1. The Romanian “state” mafia perpetrated against me 2 Crimes against humanity
committals in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014 and between 27th May 2017 and 8th June
2017 meaning Torture, Bodily Harm and attempted Qualified Murder as I’ve objectivized in sections
II.1.4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dehumanization
II.1.4^1 “Dehumanization or an act thereof can describe a behavior or process that
undermines individuality of and in others. “
II.1.4.1 The “magistrate” mafia not only sought to undermine my individuality by extreme
psychological pressure exerted by using the judiciary system, the order forces and psychiatry as
weapons of terrorism against me and my family as it could’ve arrested me off the street but insisted of
breaking into my mother’s home repeatedly, but intended to gravely Bodily Harm me like it did on 5th
December 2014 instigating an interloper to hit me on the head and through me on a flight of stairs to
murder me and make it look like an accident, and committed Torture, Bodily Harm and attempted
Qualified murder through poisoning me with fluorine and chlorine simultaneously and putting me in
anaphylactic shock in the period between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, the fluorine poisons
especially being of nature to destroy individuality as they’ve been identified to do and accordingly
administered to prisoners of nazi concentration camps and soviet gulags to eradicate dissent and
murder, fluorine not having any biological function whatsoever being plainly a deadly neurotoxin used
by the modern “psychiatry” charlatanry to promote its profit agenda at the expense of people’s lives,
and perpetuate its existence institutionally by collaborating with totalitarian regimes for which the
“psychiatrist” charlatans act as torturers using “psychiatry” as a weapon of political repression <describe
copying from above that destruction of a person’s identity or individuality is capital punishment, as I've
experienced Torture by poisoning with Invega deadly neurotoxin, which is what I call the living death
because it destroys any pleasure in living leading to suicide ideation even from me who I have strong
logical, scientific and philosophical convictions against suicide, I immediately recognized the process of
"dehumanization" by chemically lobotomizing my emotional intelligence through poisoning, which also
in this instance being fluorine poisoning acts as an agent of destroying individuality and the capacity to
fight back aggression, as it is once used against prisoners of war in nazi camps and gulags, which stands
behind the decision of president Vladimir Putin to ban fluorine from the water supply as he made it
public notoriously, that Russia doesn't need a mentally deficient population by fluorine poisoning.
Furthermore this heinous act of chemically lobotomization is far worse than physical rape or torture,
because one may recover from such with psychological scars or none, while from chemical
lobotomisation your brain is damaged thus your actual persona and being, the act being worse than an
execution because it forces the victim to live this white hell or living death, which I'm surviving by power
of will and the fact some primitive feelings survived, not being subject long enough to the poison, such
as anger and fear related to the primitive part of the brain which if too heavily damages results in death,
and compassion related to the highest functions of the brain. Nothing in between survived meaning my
physical emotional intelligence, which I compensated with regular intelligence, projecting by power of
II.1.5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation
"
Unethical human experimentation is human experimentation that violates the principles of medical
ethics, such as the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki. It has been performed by countries
including Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, North Korea, People's Republic of China, Baathist Iraq, United
States, and the Soviet Union. Examples include Project MKUltra, Unit 731, and the experiments of Josef
Mengele.
"
II.1.5.1 <mention first the evidence the “psychiatrist” charlatans are drugging institutionalized
children in Romania, besides homeless, the Rroma minority, youngsters, elders etc. >the "magistrate"
mafia in cahoots with the "psychiatrists" charlatans are making experiments by drugging innocent
people, proven by both admitting in the press but lying it isn't illegal to experiments on fake patients
meaning either fictive patients or sane people obviously with faked “psychiatric” charlatanry
documentation diagnosis, consent etc. – me being one of these latter cases, and by a secret service
report to the general prosecutor's office, made public to the press by the general prosecutor's office and
removed afterwards, but of which I retained a copy which I published at the address: <. The fact the
“psychiatrist” charlatans admit they are making experiments is the article at address: < and the fact the
experiments are illegal is the report to the other proofs that their “ministry of health approval” excuse
means nothing because it’s not a mandate to break the law and cannot be for poisoning people
forcefully against their consent, or misinforming people as all charlatans do. The fact they are doing
experiments I know personally overhearing they are doing statistics at the psychiatry, for which there is
only one explanation: experimentation, fact obviously correlated with the fact that the international
manual for diagnostics DSM-V is in fact based on statistics and probability, not fact but insinuation,
subjectivity and invalid inference. Furthermore the “psychiatrist” charlatans in cahoots with the local
direction of health and child care under the protection of the “magistrate” mafia is drugging
institutionalized children, as it is drugging elders, youngsters, peasants, gypsies or anyone deemed
unable to defend himself judicially meaning with no education, and no social statute, or, placed outside
the protection of the law by the “magistrate” mafia meaning the dissidents such as me, about which I
indicate a number of other usages of “psychiatry” charlatanry as a weapon of repression: <get the links
and plead from the email>. This has happened before because psychiatry wasn’t abolished as
charlatanry and criminal occupation: "The Duplessis Orphans ... were children victimized in a mid-20th
century scheme in which approximately 20,000 orphaned children ... were falsely certified as mentally ill
... and confined to psychiatric institutions ... About 78% reported difficulty functioning socially or
emotionally in their adult life ... many of these children were subjected to ... a variety of drug testing and
used in other medical experiments" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duplessis_Orphans
II.1.5.2 Furthermore, the German supreme court notoriously rejected the law for obligatory
vaccination for a non-existing measles virus, claiming it was a sinister conspiracy. The same law is being
passed in Romania: http://www.cdep.ro/pls/proiecte/upl_pck2015.proiect?idp=16586, pushed by the
II.1.6 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extrajudicial_punishment
II.1.6^1 "
Extrajudicial punishment is punishment for an alleged crime or offense carried out without legal process
or supervision from a court or tribunal through a legal proceeding
...`
Politically motivated
Extrajudicial punishment is often a feature of politically repressive regimes
...
individuals or groups deemed threatening—or even simply "undesirable"—to a government may
nevertheless be targeted for punishment by a regime or its representatives. Such actions typically happen
quickly, with security forces acting on a covert basis, performed in such a way as to avoid a massive
public outcry and/or international criticism that would reflect badly on the state. Sometimes, the killers
are agents outside the government. Criminal organizations, such as La Cosa Nostra, have reportedly
been employed for such a purpose
"
<mention the summary of broken laws frmo anne 23 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for
interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier>
II.1.6.1 This is exactly what happened to me, through use of an interloper to kill me, then
repeated use of “psychiatry” charlatanry as a weapon of wrongful repression and murder <mention the
sections demonstrating the 1st and 2nd Crimes against humanity in link>
II.1.6.2 I was convicted without trial for a crime I proven it doesn't exist physically, not even
penally, meaning they physical deeds I've been accused of don't exist physically or are even impossible
physically, such as disturbing the quietness of the courthouse meeting by listening to audiobooks on
earphones which I did many times without being accused of such an aberration - meaning it's a pretext
invoked by criminal psychopaths or schizophrenics who aren't logical that this may turn against them, or
accusing me that the plea in my defense also constitutes the disturbing the solemnity of the courthouse,
which I did many times in the same way without being accused of such an aberration. Before I’ve been
accused of judiciary outrage which is an aggravating circumstance of a crime committed against a
magistrate, and I’ve not been accused of an actual crime which is the equivalent of being accused of
premeditation which isn’t a crime – the crime perpetrated with premeditation is a crime with an
aggravated circumstance
II.1.6.3 My presumption of innocence has been gravely infringed upon meaning totally, meaning
by my fundamental right being totally disregarded, my defense right severely and aggressively attacked
II.1.6^5 History
"
Other Soviet Bloc secret police organizations like the East German Stasi, Romanian Securitate have also
used it from time to time.
" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extrajudicial_punishment
II.1.7 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_terrorism
II.1.7^1 "
State terrorism refers to acts of terrorism conducted by a state against foreign targets or against its own
people.
Torture has been carried out or sanctioned by individuals, groups, and states throughout history from
ancient times to modern day, and forms of torture can vary greatly in duration from only a few minutes
to several days or longer. Reasons for torture can include punishment, revenge, political re-education,
deterrence, coercion of the victim or a third party, interrogation to extract information or a confession
irrespective of whether it is false, or simply the sadistic gratification of those carrying out or observing
the torture.
"
<demonstarte the torture form the night between 5th and 6th December 2014 through the
covert injection with risperidone or paliperidone mostly, and reference dehumanization type torture
II.1.8^1.1 I've been tortured 12 days between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 by being
arrested from my law faculty exams, tied up and poisoned at a psychiatric ward illegally, unjustified,
without diagnosis, without meeting the committee for evaluating the legality of interment, without
meeting the committee for evaluating the legality of me being poisoned, without my consent, without
closing a contract with a legal or conventional representative even when asked as legally was required
II.1.8^1.2 See section < regarding the objectivation of the torture as an “knowing and
intentional act”, as proven pervasively illegal, unfounded and immoral. <Tying me to an operating table
and putting me in anaphylactic shock for at least 3 days through daily deadly fluorine and chlorine based
neurotoxic injections without treatment as objectivized below, then after I survived poisoning me with
other deadly fluorine and chlorine based neurotoxins, cannot be anything but a ”knowing and
intentional act”, as even the fluorine and chlorine combination was intentional to increase the odds of
fatality as objectivized in paragraph 1.5 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim
measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier
II.1.8^1.3 See paragraph 1.8 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim
measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier regarding the objectivation of the suffering and
damaged caused by poisoning torture through testimonies to which I relate, without being able to
influence the testimonies which constitutes the objectivation proof, corroborated with scientific in this
plead and annexes which objectivize my declarations constituting my proof of verity
II.1.8^1.4 I corroborate my reasons to fear Torture, grave Bodily Harm through chemical
lobotomization / “chemotheraphy” and Qualified Murder by the totalitarian Romanian “state” mafia
regime I fled from becoming a permanent refugee from 1st September 2017 as objectivized in annex 1 in
general and paragraph 2.4^45 from annex 1 respectivelly of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim
measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, with the facts that I learned by studying annex
16 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier representing the falsified discharge papers from "psychiatric" imprisonment and Torture, that
the uncontrolled shivering I've experienced after the first 3 days of sleep deprivation and fluorine and
chlorine daily poisoning was actually anaphylactic shock, which the torturer "psychiatrist" charlatans
II.1.9 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_repression
II.1.9^1 "
Political repression is the persecution of an individual or group within society for political reasons,
particularly for the purpose of restricting or preventing their ability to take part in the political life of a
society thereby reducing their standing among their fellow citizens
"
II.1.9^2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry
“
II.1.9^3.1 I mention Romanian “magistrate” mafia can’t even claim political disobedience
because the judicial system is democratically separate from the legislative, and the politics of the mafia
is outright crime therefore it can’t be justified in any moral sense. I find it is wrong as I proven, that
“psychiatry” is mentioned without “charlatanry”, and juxtaposed to the word “hospital” as if
“psychiatry” charlatanry is medicine or science, in fact doing only harm as proven by its entire history, of
which one can find out about visiting CCHR’s site amongst others
II.1.9^4 “
Psychiatry possesses a built-in capacity for abuse that is greater than in other areas
of medicine.[8]:65 The diagnosis of mental disease allows the state to hold persons against their will
and insist upon therapy in their interest and in the broader interests of society.[8]:65 Psychiatry can be
used to bypass standard legal procedures for establishing guilt or innocence and allow political
incarceration without the ordinary odium attaching to such political trials.[8]:65 The use of hospitals
instead of jails also prevents the victims from receiving legal aid before the courts in some countries,
makes indefinite incarceration possible, and discredits the individuals and their ideas.[9]:29 In that
manner, whenever open trials are undesirable, they are avoided.[9]:29
“
II.1.9^4.1 I’ve deduced all of this by my exact experience being politically victimized through
usage of psychiatry as a weapon of wrongful repression. There is no such thing as a diagnose of mental
disease because there is no such thing as a mental disease, it’s a metaphor and charlatanry esotery,
nothing to do with science and medicine. There can’t be claimed “broader interest of society” because
in all totalitarian regimes by definition a minority infringes on the rights of the majority, therefore usage
of the authority of the totalitarian minority can’t be justified as the interest of society because
dictatorships don’t represent the society but themselves, or as notoriously and artistically put, dictators
free themselves by enslaving the people. Psychiatry can’t bypass the law as proven in my case the
“psychiatrist” charlatans broke the law. The article author is right but not less documented than me
II.1.9^5 “
The political abuse of the power entrusted to physicians, and particularly psychiatrists, has a long
and abundant history, for example during the Nazi era and the Soviet rule when political dissenters
were labeled as "mentally ill" and subjected to inhumane "treatments".[10] In the period from the
1960s up to 1986, abuse of psychiatry for political purposes was reported to be systematic in
the Soviet Union, and occasional in other Eastern European countries such as Romania...
...
Romania[edit]
In Romania, there have been allegations of some particular cases of psychiatric abuse during over a
decade.[8]:73 In addition to particular cases, there is evidence that mental hospitals were utilized as
II.1.9^5.2.5^3 Neglect includes the failure to properly attend to the needs and care of a
patient, or the unintentional causing of injury to a patient, whether by act or omission.[2]
“
II.1.9^5.2.5^3.1 Mentioning I was never an interned patient in any circumstance, ever. I was
politically repressed through usage of judicial system and psychiatric "legal-medicine" as weapons of
wrongful repression against me, and furthermore “reducing my standing” not only by public
discrediting, but by pervasive infringement of any human right they could, as exemplificatively I point
II.1.10 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights#Violations
II.1.10^1 "
Human rights violations occur when actions by state (or non-state) actors abuse, ignore, or deny basic
human rights (including civil, political, cultural, social, and economic rights). Furthermore, violations of
human rights can occur when any state or non-state actor breaches any part of the UDHR treaty or other
international human rights or humanitarian law.
"
II.1.10^1.1. I’ve already objectivized this aspect in my documents submitted to <?entity>
<refer to the sketch regarding UDHR infringement I’ve given <?entity <actually refer to chapter
I.3 from annex 23 and link with the ECHR proofs>
II.1^11-14 Following I’m enumerating a number of improper Crimes against humanity criteria
concomitantly relevant to Romanian mafia state policy
II.1.11 ethnic cleansing – improperly by cultural eradication of the active citizens living in the
spirit of honest life, rule of law and civic duty, through deprivation of all possible human rights as they
did to me, stealing my money for my home, selling my work litigation for bribe and leaving me jobless,
arresting me from my law faculty exams to impede me acceding a law practitioner profession and
attempting to murder me repeatedly for denouncing them. See that by definition ethnic means an
disjunctive enumeration of grouping of people by a number of criteria, cultural being one of them.
“living together or enjoying life in communities or organized groups / denoting or deriving from or
distinctive of the ways of living built up by a group of people” -
<II.2... cross reference other sources refering to Crimes against humanity as necessary, mayb
Rome statute
I.B.1. See penal dossier against “D.Lupu” and “I.Banu” from ECHR <massively updated in August
2018> which I published at address: https://www.scribd.com/document/365438323/penal-complaint-
against-D-Lupu-and-I-Banu-at-European-Court-of-Human-Rights and attached as annex 2 to this ICC
penal dossier, and preliminary section of this ICC penal dossier
<”I.Banu” and another ECHR “registrar” named “C.Vezan” destroyed my Rule 39 ECHR urgent
request for interim measures 6th and 5th time respectively meanwhile, about which I’m yet to add the
plead against them.
I.B.2.1 To conclude the argument of "communist" modus operandi of the Romanian “state”
mafia, after it lost in 15730/231/2014, 2417/P/2014, 11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015, it started
repeating itself falsifying 3 more penal dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 as if
numbers of falsified acts of procedure would make them legal, clearly the mafia believing numbers of
falsified acts through which it also reassured or instigated itself, is a substitute for legal juridical acts, as
credibility means absolutely nothing to the rule of law judicial system which is not intuitive but scientific,
logical and ethical, and can't be spoken of as existing when it's not as proven by the notoriously known
fact in Romania that "there's no justice" evidently because although the law is in order, the body of
functionaries who are suppose to apply the law is not - not even one functionary is honest because
I.B.2.1.1 10547/231/2015 in ne bis in idem with 4791/231/2017 state terrorism home breaking
mandates from 10th September 2015 and 5th April 2017 respectively falsified by same "judge" Dinu
Murgulet Ana who also the stole the dossier
I.B.2.2 In 14277/231/2015 where I "won", "judge" Badiu Mandica pampered the "magistrate"
mafia attempting to cover up as much as she hallucinated possible of the entire falsified procedure
which "judge" Badiu Mandica should've declared falsified and denounce it to the penal authorities as
legally required before the 1st dossier term. As proof of malice aforethought stands the fact "judge"
I.B.2.3 "judge" Badiu Mandica falsified the sentence in 12718/231/2017 in 2nd instance without
motivating the falsified decision in fact and by the law because it's impossible to justify breaking the law,
convicting me for another man's called Vasilache Daniel felonies and diagnosis as proven by the falsified
decision in 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance - see annex 19 from my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for
interim measures, because I committed no felonies nor was I diagnosed by a "psychiatric" charlatan ever
which I declare knowing the consequences of the felony of False declarations of which I was never even
accused in 9 years of making demonstrations of the Romanian “state “mafia criminal activity, nor does a
penal or psychiatric document exists in this regard, proven by the falsified sentence in 12718/231/2017
in 1st instance attached as annex 19 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures where no
such document was even invoked but instead the schizophrenic “judge” Miron Doina invoked the crimes
and diagnosis of another person named Vasilache Daniel which is illegal, and proven by the falsified
sentence in 12718/231/2017 in 2nd instance where "judge" Badiu Mandica invoked a falsified
"psychiatric" document which I annulled as falsified in 14277/231/2015 where the same "judge" Badiu
Mandica annulled the action as inadmissible contradicting herself with the sentence she falsified in
12718/231/2017 based on same proven falsified “psychiatric” document which in 14277/231/2015 was
annulled as unfounded also in 2nd instance, “psychiatric” document which is obviously illegal,
I.B.2.4 Because "judge" Badiu Mandica used against me the false argument or aberrant
accusation of "determination and irrational perseverence" from 14277/231/2015 according to the
falsified sentence from 12718/2331/2017 in 2nd instance attached as annex 19 of my Rule 39 ECHR
urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1, it is also worthy to mention that the
"psychiatrist" charlatans that accused me of "determination and irrational perseverence" according to
the falsified document attached as annex 4 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, failed to ground in facts the meaningless "accusation"
what am I determined and perseverant about, that is the reality I'm perseverant in investigating and
denouncing the Romanian “state” mafia to which the charlatan "psychiatrists" are mafia associates or
collaborationists, and to which the "magistrates" are mafia caporegimes as proven by the fact they are
able to instigate the mafia "soldiers" meaning the "masked police", "secret police", "police" and
"gendarmes" to participate in their crimes unquestionably as proven and as corroborated by the fact all
these also as public functionaries are obligated to denounce the crimes they were instigated to commit
by the Romanian "state" mafia, or had the option to resign. Both "psychiatrist" charlatans and criminal
"magistrates" failed to objectivize this lie because it's impossible to justify breaking all juridical logic,
laws and regulations, and of course they wouldn't openly admit that I'm investigating and denouncing
I.B.2.5 The "psychiatrist" charlatans in the same falsified document from 14277/231/2015
aberrated that I have no discernment because I have superior studies, fast thinking and general culture
as proven by annex 4 from my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to
this ICC penal dossier, evidently because notoriously nobody without discernment also has superior
studies, fast thinking and general culture, lack of discernment being synonymous with logical
incoherence which is the main symptom of schizophrenia which didn't occur to the "psychiatrist"
charlatans to lie about diagnosing me with because they are in fact schizophrenic as corroborated by
their occupation dysfunction, even as charlatans and mafia associates, not that they could’ve gotten
away with it which they didn’t as long as I’m alive, which is why they attempted to murder me
desperately but covertly in 2017 between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017 when they put me in
anaphylactic shock for 3 days then poisoned me forcefully with another deadly fluorine based
neurotoxin, as proven by section A and annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim
measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier. The "psychiatrist" charlatans also lied I have
a judicial history in the last page, which is untrue as proven by annex 17 from my Rule 39 ECHR urgent
request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier representing my empty
judicial history, despite the Romanian "magistrate" mafia who falsified 4 penal dossiers against me;
2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 in which I was never indicted and convicted
as proven. Annex 4 from my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to
this ICC penal dossier is proof that the 5 "psychiatrist"/"psychologist" charlatans are schizophrenic
according to their own diagnostic manual DSM-V, proven by the symptoms of perfect logical
incoherence and inherent occupational dysfunction which I objectivize by the factual contradictions that
they first lied I agreed to cooperate after refused to give my consent, which is an obvious lie, then they
contradicted themselves declaring I'm not cooperant, then contradicted themselves again declaring I'm
I.B.2.6 As a side fact related however to the falsified "psychiatric" charlatanry used as state
terrorism and wrongful political repression against me, the mafia "motivated" in 11224/231/2015
regarding an impossible "psychiatric" charlatanry examination during "psychiatric" incarceration without
my consent, totally in parallel to any legal and factual justification or doctrinary proceedings, that is the
"judge" Craciun Constantin Catalin, an corrupt ex-policeman from Vaslui county Romania, hallucinated
in the 11224/231/2015 decision he falsified that I must be "psychiatrically" incarcerated in the Focsani
gulag so as others don't take my example but didn't specify what to take example of as in reality and as
proven I only give example of civility and non-cooperation with the Romanian “state” mafia "judge"
Craciun Constantin Catalin works for as I've proven annulling his falsified decision from 11224/231/2015
in 1st instance, in 11224/231/2015 in 2nd instance as unfounded, as proven by annex 2 and annex 3 of
my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, and
denounced him penally and publicly. I remind "judge" Craciun Constantin Catalin is the biggest falsifier
of dossiers in the penal section of the "Judecatoria Focsani" courthouse, with aproximatively 10 dossiers
falsified, more than twice than any other "judge" of this courthouse which I've also investigated, caught
and denounced establishing a full frame of reference on which I based my scientific facts about the
statistical truth that 100% of the Romanian judicial system public functionaries form the "magistrate"
I.B.2.7 Finally when everything else failed meaning the Romanian "state" mafia committing
Torture, Bodily harm and attempted Qualified Murder against me both through physical violence and
poisoning me with fluorine in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014, then attempting at the
same time to silence me abusing public function for the purpose of state terrorism and wrongful
political repression through 15730/231/2014 falsified "psychiatric" charlatanry interdiction annulled as
proven by annex <given to ?entity> as also public knowledge according to Romanian public evidence of
dossiers named ECRIS searchable on courthouse’s sites, 2417/P/2014 falsified penal dossier in which I
was never indicted and convicted to the present as proven by annex 17 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent
request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, 10547/231/2015 regarding a
falsified mandate of home breaking and arrest state terrorism executed on 17th September 2015 with 4
"masked policemen" and 2 "policemen", 11224/231/2015 falsified obligatory "psychiatric" charlatanry
incarceration for an impossible examination without my consent but abberantly motivated as obviously
contrary to the mafia's interest to keep their motives covert, that the real reason is wrongful political
repression and state terrorism as enunciated by the ex-corrupt "policeman" made "judge" by the mafia
Craciun Constantin Catalin ~"so that others don't take example of civility", annulled in 11224/231/2015
in 2nd instance as unfounded meaning falsified as proven by annex 3 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request
for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, 14277/231/2015 falsified obligation
to be forcefully chemically lobotomized with deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins as between 27th
May 2017 and 8th June 2017, annulled as inadmissible and unfounded meaning falsified as proven by
annex 5 and annex 10 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to
this ICC penal dossier, the Romanian "state" mafia falsified 3 more penal dossiers 2845/P/2016,
I.B.2.8 I deduced and denounced publicly and penally the murderous Romanian "state" mafia
intent over two years in a row between 2015-2017, relying on public opinion which proved non-existent,
and on the penal authorities which to my dismay proven to be part of the Romanian "magistrate" mafia
which effectively controls the entire judiciary system, after I demonstrated the Qualified murder
attempt committed by the interloper Herghelegiu Danut in the night between 5th and 6th December
2014 when I was also poisoned with the same deadly fluorine based neurotoxin I’ve been forcefully
chemically lobotomized between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, which establishes as proven the
murderous intent of the Romanian “state” mafia as well as its motive of silencing me from denouncing
its criminal activity, for which I opened penal dossier 246/P/2015 against the interloper Herghelegiu
Danut and accused "judge" Dita Mirela of instigating him as I also proven it according to section A. II.
1.3.1 which then motivated the Romanian "state" mafia to commit state terrorism against me using the
penal dossier 2417/P/2014 falsified by "judge" Dita Mirela, by falsifying a mandate in 10547/231/2015
by "judge" Dinu Murgulet Ana as instigated by "prosecutor" Mihaila Paul which falsified the acts of
procedure in dossier 2417/P/2014, falsified mandate with which 4 "masked policemen" and 2
“policemen” mafia soldiers broke into my mother's home illegally on 17th September 2015 detaining
and harassing me 7 hours without effectuating a single act of procedure as legally required, as proven
by annex 1 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC
penal dossier, then after that failed to stop me denouncing the mafia as if I could be coerced by state
terrorism after being hit on the head, thrown unconsciously on a flight of stairs and injected with a
deadly fluorine neurotoxin in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014, which chemically
lobotomized my ability to appreciate life and put into a state which I call the living death which drove
I.B.2.9 The punctual demonstration of the falsification of the decision in 12718/231/2017 in 2nd
instance using the lies retained in it, is as follows, walking the falsehoods in the "judge's" motivation
from 12718/231/2017 in 2nd instance attached as annex 19 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for
interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier:
I.B.2.9.1 The appeal in 12718/231/2017 was registered on 23rd November 2017. I filed it on 13th
October 2017 which I can prove with an email print on demand because is not important enough to
bother beyond declaring this, and the courthouse was obligated to register it within 24 hours, with a 24
hours motivated delay only, corroborated with the fact the object of the dossier is to be judged in a
urgency regime, all the more the Romanian "magistrate" mafia claimed an unmotivated emergency in
4909/231/2017 that I be "psychiatrically" incarcerated during Orthodox Easter while tens of mafia
soldiers "masked police", "police", "secret police" and "gendarmes" broke into my mother's home
almost every day causing her to fall ill with Zoster Area from the stress and trauma, and that I be
Tortured, Bodily Harmed and Qualifiedly Murdered like it happened after I've been illegally arrested
from my law faculty exams on 27th May 2017, tied to an operation table by 5 psychiatric assistants who
were waiting meaning they were instigated and had no other motive, and who poisoned me with
chlorine and a deadly fluorine neurotoxin putting me in anaphylactic shock for 3 days as proven in
section A. II. 1.3.1^7 and A.I.1-2, then after surviving they continued to poison me with other deadly
fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins until 8th June 2017. The delay as I know the crooked logic of the
"magistrate" mafia psychopaths, is that they hoped to liquidate me without even having to falsify the
decision in 12718/231/2017 which is why it took so long when the trial should've ended altogether in
October 2017 according to law and regulations
<add from the separate first plead against 12718/231/2017 in 2nd instance, as necessary
I.B.2.9.3 As proof "judge" Badiu Mandica proferated the lies that the ordinances exist and are
legal and founded without proving it as legally required meaning without any administration of proofs
and objectivization, I quote from the falsified decision in 12718/231/2017 in 2nd instance attached as
annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier, first in Romanian: "Prin Ordonanta din 21.07.2016 s-a dispus inceperea urmaririi penale pentru
incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei infractiunea prevazuta de art. 278 Cod penal, constand in acea ca in
sedinta Camerei de Consiliu din 24.06.2016 contestatorul a folosit in mod repetat in fata completului de
judecata cuvinte jignitoare si acuze, incalcand astfel solemnitatea sedintei de judecata" and translated to
English: "Through the Ordnance from 21st July 2016 the in rem penal pursuit began for the violation of
meeting solemnity felony foreseen by article 278 from the Penal Code, consisting in that during the
meeting of the Council Chamber from 24th June 2016 the contester used repeatedly in front of the
judgement contingent insulting words and accuses, disturbing therefore the solemnity of the judgement
meeting". The first proof this is a lie is that the deed was never proved to exist through my indiction and
conviction as proven by annex 17 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as
annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier representing my empty judicial history which should've contained the
mention I am under penal pursuit in dossiers 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 and doesn't
contain it because these falsified dossiers and falsified acts of procedure are covert state terrorism and
wrongful political repression of course off the official records being blatanly falsified. Until proven guilty
definitively, by a legally constituted judgement contingent, with full benefit of my trial rights, I benefit
from the presumption of innocence according to article 4 of the Romanian Penal procedure code, article
23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution, articles 11 and 20 from Romanian Constitution that
makes Romanian ratified international treaties internal right meaning article 11 from the Universal
declaration of human rights and article 6 paragraph 2 from the European convention of human rights. In
fact as proven I was never indicted and convicted, I never met or heard of even of a legal judgement
contingent in Romania as I proven statistically and logically the entire magistrature is comprised of
about 100% corrupt functionaries, out of which 86% are downright criminals <refer to the scribd link
where I published the general request for removal of incompatible judges from the dossier>, no
objectivization of felonies was ever effectuated against me because it's impossible to build one on
proofs that demonstrate my innocence so one has not even been attempted which why no proofs were
administered, and last but not least I have not even benefited of my rights such as that to defense
during the falsified covert prosecution against me. As proof the whole mafia apparatus of wrongful
repression is against me, The Romanian Constitutional Court ("CCR" in Romanian) declared in decision
25 from 19 January 2017 as I objectivized in section I.B.11, that my presumption of innocence has no
legal basis because a penal measure of security doesn't require that the deed is proven to exist and
proven that I committed it, through a legal public trial, contradicting themselves with the immediately
above mentioned law articles especially in the context of this being a penal matter because I was penally
I.B.2.9.4 I quote another proof from the falsified decision in 12718/231/2017 in 2nd instance
attached as annex 19 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to
this ICC penal dossier, first in Romanian: "Prin Ordonanta din 05.08.2016 ..." and translated to English:
"Through the Ordnance from 5th August 2016 ...". This proof declaration is a lie in the same manner as
the other one I objectivized above.
I.B.2.9.5 I quote another proof from the falsified decision in 12718/231/2017 in 2nd instance
attached as annex 19 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to
this ICC penal dossier, first in Romanian: "Prin Ordonanta din 07.09.2016 s-a dispus efectuarea in
continuarea urmaririi penale fata de contestator, Ordonanta confirmata de Parchetul de pe langa
Judecatoria Focsani la data de 08.09.2016" and translated in English: "Through the Ordonance from 7th
September 2016 it was issued the continuation of penal pursuit against the contester, Ordnance
confirmed by the Prosecutor's office near the Focsani courthouse on 8th September 2016". The Ordnance
supposedly from 7th September 2016 was falsified by police woman Popescu Lacramioara, and the
legally required confirmation meaning coauthorate of the falsification of the ordnance was perpetrated
by "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian. Continuation of penal pursuit means they've attributed me the title
of suspect which is judicially abberant since the falsifiers of the penal dossiers claimed from the start I've
perpetrated the felonies in flagrant therefore the penal pursuit should've been put directly into action
and me being attributed the title of accused, be indicted and convicted which I wasn't as proven by
annex 17 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier, where even the fact I was under penal pursuit was hidden because the penal dossiers were
obviously falsified and against my falsifided accusation there is no penal pursuit to be had, it's either
indiction and conviction or aquittal case in which the "magistrates" who made the false accusation must
be indicted and convicted for the felonies of False declarations and Inducing into error the judicial
bodies. The purpose of the falsification of this particular kind of ordnance was judicial harassment as I've
been called to give the same declaration 3 times in total although 1 time was too much given the
accusations are self-contradictory and thus proven false, implicitly the accusers are proven
schizophrenic or logically incoherent and occupationally dysfunctional. I've demonstrated summarily
how these ordnances were falsified above using the proof the deed does not exist because it cannot
exist, therefore is not a penal offence, and I demonstrated at length in the penal dossier I opened
against all the felons involved in the Crimes against humanity instigated through the falsification of
penal dossiers against me 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016, which I can attach to this ICC
penal dossier on ICC's demand in the original Romanian form because I have not the time to translate it
nor is it necessary since I am proving as necessary and sufficient the incrimination regarding the Crimes
I.B.2.9.6 I point out at the schizophrenia symptom of incoherence of the judgement contingent
members, who notes 3 times that, I quote in Romanian: "Prin Ordonanta din 07.09.2016 s-a dispus
efectuarea in continuare a urmariri penale" and as translated into English: "Through the Ordonance from
7th September 2016 it was issued the continuation of penal pursuit", for the same fictive accusations
about the inexistant deeds not committed physically and not constituting penal offences even reducing
the argument to the absurd idea the generic and groundless accusations referred to real deeds, on the
date of 24th June 2016. Furthermore the ordnance of in rem penal pursuit or beginning of penal pursuit
is mentioned after the in personam ordnance or continuation of penal pursuit which is not in the
juridical and chronological order in which they should've been objectivized and weren’t, mentioning that
as the ordinances themselves were falsified though breaking the syllogistical form of juridical acts of
grounding the accusation on facts by administering proofs and correlating not breaking every relevant
law in the process, also the decision in 12718/231/2017 is devoid of any juridical logic and legal act of
procedure to support thus the obvious falsified sentence
<ataseaza toate plangerile impotriva actelor procurorului in care am demonstrat detaliat cum au
fost falsificate ordonantele, cu mentiunea ca au fost deturnate la parchet ilegal pentru a se impiedica
judecata acestora, sau asimileaza continutul in aceasta pledoarie
I.B.2.9.7 "judge" Badiu Mandica lied outright that, I quote in Romanian: "Prin Ordonanta din
08.09.2016, s-au reunit dosarele nr. 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 la dosarul nr. 2845/P/2016", as
translated to English: "Through the Ordnance from 8th September 2016, there were reunited the dossiers
no 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 with dossier no 2845/P/2016", omitting the fact the ordnance
through which the dossiers were "reunited" must be motivated according to article 286 from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code, that the deeds exists by proof administration correlated in at least a
legal in rem ordnance, because if they don't as is obvious they weren’t, they cannot fulfill the conditions
according to articles 43 and 301 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code regarding the procedure of
“reuniting” dossiers, motivation which doesn't exist physically because it was never formulated by the
"prosecutor", being impossible because the deeds don't exist physically and were never proven to exist
not just because it's impossible to prove given the false accusations of the schizophrenic "magistrates"
can't even constitute penal offences if the deeds by reduction to the absurd existed physically, but
because the proofs demonstrate by themselves the deeds don't physically exist as admitted by the
accusers themselves, meaning the schizophrenic accusers contradicted themselves declaring they never
saw or heard the obscene gesture or words they accused me of, nor described any in consequence, then
were contradicted by the witnesses who also contradicted themselves and amongst themselves, then
they all contradicted of course with the objective proof of the audio recording of the courthouse which
demonstrates by itself the deeds don't exist physically, as "judge" Badiu Mandica knows by studying the
dossiers, and as proof of criminal aforethought, issued the falsified decision in 12718/231/2017 in 2nd
instance without a shred of proof administration and contradicting judicial logic and law alike, perfectly
I.B.2.9.8 "judge" Badiu Mandica lied that, I quote in Romanian: "Prin Ordonanta din 02.11.2016
s-a pus in miscare actiunea penala fata de contestator pentru cele 3 infractiuni prev. la art. 278 Cod
penal", as translated in English: "Through the Ordnance from 2nd November 2016 it was put into action
the penal pursuit regarding the contestator for the 3 felonies foreseent by article 278 from the Penal
Code", ommitting that the ordnance is evidently falsified as the in rem and in personam ordnances,
because they contain no proof administration because the proofs demonstrate by themselves my
innocence which I also did although not required to according to the presumption of innocence, but
demonstration of my innocence through which I accused the same "judiciary bodies" of falsifying the
penal dossier, in the same dossier, like the notorious anticorruption commissar Traian Berbeceanu who
accussed his lying acusators in the same penal dossier they framed him with, meaning not only is legally
possible but from that point on the accused "judiciary bodies" are forbidden from addressing that
dossier according to the princiiple nemo esse iudex in sua causa potest, or article 11 from Romanian
Government Ordinance regarding petition solving regime no 27 from 2002 who forbids any functionary
to solve the complaints about his own abuse or negligence. "judge" Badiu Mandica also lied by omission
regarding the fact none of these ordinance present a juridical or syllogistical motivation meaning a
particular factual premise correlated with an universal law premise from which there is a logical
inference representing the ordinance's thus founded and legal disposition, which otherwise is invalid
and void of right <perhaps make a short summary of each way the ordinances were falsified, from the
complaint against the falsified prosecutor's acts><insert the general plead regarding the fact that there
was no motivation according to the law, and mention again I can't attach documents from these falsified
dossiers because the mafia "judiciary bodies" refused to communicate copies when I requested it
according to the law <cite law here >
I.B.2.9.9 "judge" Badiu Mandica lied that, I quote in Romanian: "In timpul urmaririi penale
contestatorului i sa cerut consimtamantul pentru expertizarea medico legala psihiatrica, acesta nefiind
de acord. La data de 08.12.1016 s-a dispus efectuarea unei expertize medico legale psihiatrice fata de
contestator, prin Incheierae din 05.04.2017 a Judecatorului de Drepturi si Libertati de la judceatoria
Focsani, s-a dispus emiterea mandatului de aducere in scopul prezentarii contestatorului la comisia
medico - legala psihiatrica, mandat executat la data de 06.04.2017", as translated in English: "During the
penal pursuit the contestator was requested to give his consent for the psychiatric legal medicine
expertise, the contetator not giving his consent. On 8th December 2016 it was disposed the effectuation
of an psychiatric legal medicine expertise on the contestator, through the decision from 5th April 2017 of
the Judge of Rights and Liberties from the Focsani courthouse, it was disposed the emission of the
mandate of detainment for the presentation of the contestator to the psychiatric legal medicine
committee, mandate executed on 6th April 2017”, omitting to retain that the proposal for a psychiatric
examination is absolutely unfounded and illegal as all the other falsified acts of procedure in all the 4
penal dossiers the "magistrate" mafia falsified against me as shortly proven by the fact I was never
indicted and convicted by annex 17 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as
annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, and all the psychiatric actions out of which I annulled as proof the first
I.B.2.9.10 "judge" Badiu Mandica lied as I reproduce in Romanian: "In urma examinarii medico-
legale comisia de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica din cadrul SJML Vrancea a recomandat internarea
inculpatului intr-o instituie medico legala de specialitate in vederea examinarii psihiatrice", and as
translated to English: "Following the legal medicine examination by the psychiatric legal medicine
committe from within SJML Vrancea it recommended the internment of the accused in a specialized legal
medicine institution for the psychiatric examination", proven by the fact there was no "psychiatric"
charlatanry examination ever performed on me, meaning on 17th September 2015, 8th December 2016,
6th April 2017 or 8th May 2017 as the Romanian “state” mafia claims, which I've demonstrated by the
lack of the documents existing or invoked even in the falsified decision in 12718/231/2017 in 1st and 2nd
instance, and mentioning again the procedure was falsified because according to article 184 paragraph 1
form the Romanian Penal Procedure Code I must be a suspect or accused of homicide, article which is an
abberation since the suspect and accused are legally innocent according ot the principle of the
presumption of innocence and article 4 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code and article 23
paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution as well as articles 11 and 20 from the Romanian
Constitution regarding the international treaties ratified by Romania constituting internal right such as
article 6 paragraph 2 from the European Convention of Human Rights and article 11 from the Universal
I.B.2.9.11 "judge" Badiu Mandica lied that, I quote in Romanian: "Prin Incherea din 10.04.2017,
Judecatorul de Drepturi si Libertati de la Judecatoria Focsani a dispus internarea medicala nevoluntara a
contestatorului pentru efectuarea expertizei psihiatrice", as translated in English: "Through the decision
form 10th April 2017, the Judge of Rights and Liberties from the Focsani courthouse disposed the
involuntary medical internment of the contester for effectuating the psychiatric examination", as proven
by the fact the "psychiatrist" charlatans and "judge" Dinu Murgulet Ana in the falsified decision from
10th April 2017 from 4909/231/2017 when she also falsified a mandate to be arrested with 9 (nine)
gendarmes who physically abused me while filming me inclusively on private property to provoke me
and who stole from me even two pencils accusing me that I would hurt myself with them writing my
defence, but didn't steal them from me until I asked for a piece of paper too to write my defence on as
they searched me before, and who of course brought me in the last possible moment in the courthouse
to impede me building a defence or consult the dossier 4909/231/2017 which because it was in ne bis in
idem with 11224/231/2015 I've easily pleaded in my defense anyway. I've demonstrated summarily how
the "psychiatrist" charlatans and "judge" Dinu Murgulet Ana broke the law, regulations and juridical
logic falsifying their respective decisions without even using a factual premise meaning groundless, and
I've demonstrated at length in my plead in 12718/231/2017 attached as annex 20 of my Rule 39 ECHR
urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, how all the penal
dossiers and psychiatric actions against me were falsified by the Romanian "state" mafia, also
demonstrating using my biography, documents and witnesses that it's ridiculous even to suspect me I
would contitute a public danger or a felon, making it painfully obvious the only danger I pose is that
I.B.2.9.12 "judge" Badiu Mandica lied outright that, I quote in Romanian: "Potrivit concluziile
raportului intocmit contestatorul prezinta tulburare psihotica acuta predominant deliranta, tulburare de
personalitate de tip paranoid. Comisia a apreciat discernamantul contestatorului absent la momentul si
in raport de faptele pentru care a fost cercetat si a recomandat instituirea masurii de siguranta la
tratament medical", as translated in English: "According to the conclusions of the raport made the
contester presents acute psychotic disorder predominantly delirant, personality disorder of paranoid
type. The committee appreciated the discernment of the contester absent in the moment and reported to
the deeds for which he was under examined and recommended the security measure of medical
treatment", because first of all, a conclusion is an inference out of a premise in case of logical
proposition, and in case of a juridical act, a logical inference out of a particular factual premise
correlated with an universal law or regulations premise, but the falsified "psychiatric" incarceration
discharge documents from 8th June 2017 which are not the "psychiatric" charlatanry examination which
was also faked on 8th June 2017 formally but no documents appeared or were invoked, contains no
premises, inherently no correlation between them, and no logical inference meaning it's an obvious
falsified document demonstrating only the "psychiatrist" charlatans and "judge" Badiu Mandica are
schizophrenic by their symptoms of logical incoherence and occupational dysfunction, according to
DSM-V "psychiatry" charlatanry diagnosis manual. The "psychiatric" charlatanry "raport" is thus proven
falsified, being illegal, unfounded, self contradictory and syllogistically invalid lacking any premises, the
correlation between them and the logical inference, as I've mostly proven already in annex 20 of my
Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier
regarding my plead in 12718/231/2017 and demonstration that all the penal dossiers and psychiatric
actions against me were falsified and can only be ever falsified according to my biography objectivized
with documents and witnesses. Furthermore, I remind I've been convicted in 12718/231/2017 1st
instance for Vasilache Daniel's crimes and diagnosis, because I have none given I was never indicted and
convicted as demonstrated by annex 17 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, or examined psychiatrically or psychologically because I
haven't consented or cooperated, thus never diagnosed as I've demonstrated in the above paragraphs,
which is why the proven falsified documents from 14277/231/2015 and obviously as proven falsified
“psychiatric” incarceration papers not constituting an expertise were also invoked but only in
12718/231/2017 in 2nd instance, because "judges" Miron Doina and Badiu Mandica respectively are
I.B.2.9.13 "judge" Badiu Mandica lied that, I quote in Romanian: "Fata de aceste conditii s-a
dispus clasarea cauzei in temeiul art. 16. alin 1 lit d Cod procedura penala si sesizarea Judecatorului de
Camera preliminara pentru a dispune masura de siguranta a obligarii la tratament medical", as
translated in English: "Facing these conditions it was disposed the classation of the cause according to
article 16 alignment 1 letter d from the Penal Procedure Code and the notification of the Preliminary
Room Judge to dispose the security measure of obligation to medical treatment", omitting to administer
my demonstration the "prosecutor's" falsified ordnance is illegal and unfounded as proven in annex 20
of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier,
I.B.2.9.14 "judge" Badiu Mandica lied that, I quote in Romanian: "Prin Incheierea Judecatorului
de Camera preliminara din 11.10.2017 a fost respinsa ca inadmisibila cererea contestatoturului
formulata in timpul judecarii cauzei de sesizarea a Curtii Constitutionale cu exceptia de
neconstittuionalitate a disp. art. 315 Cod Penal, a fost admisa sesizarea Parchetului si a fost obligat
contestatorul la tratament medicamentos pana la insanatosire sau pana la ameliorarea starii de
sanatate care sa inlature starea de pericol a acestora", as translated in English: "Through the decision of
the Preliminary Room Judge from 11th October 2017 it was rejected as inadmissible the request of the
contester formulated during the judgment of the cause of notification of the Constitutional Court with
the exception of unconstitutionality of dispositions of article 315 Penal Code, it was admitted the
proposalt of the prosecutor's office and the contester was obligated to treatment by poisoning
("medicamentos" means drugging, drugging means poisoning) until made healthy or until the
amelioration of the health situation which would alleviate the danger situation of these", because there
is no motivation for the declaration of my request as inadmissible, not even for the rejection of my
demonstration that my request is admissible because it's impossible to contradict the law, and the
falsified decision in 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance is absolutely unmotivated as well in all regards as
anticipated and proven in my plead in annex 20 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, which "judge" Badiu Mandica ignored knowing I proven all
the penal dossiers and psychiatric actions against me falsified. Proof is also the fact the lack of
discernment cannot be physically or logically be treated by poisoning or drugging like the term used by
the schizophrenic "judge" Miron Doina in the sentence against me, “judge” Miron Doina who above
being incoherent and occupationally dysfunctional as proven by the plain fact "judge" Miron Doina
sentenced me for the crimes and diagnosis of Vasilache Daniel because I'm not indicted, convicted and
diagnosed, "judge" Miron Doina also has been hearing voices in her head for at least 10 years according
to the press and my own witness declaration, which "judge" Miron Doina constantly tries to quiet by
appealing to the “gendarmes”. Reciprocically because everybody suffers to a degree from lack of
discernment as there is no such thing as perfect discernment, everyone would undergo a treatment for
lack of discernment and for example there would be no more car crashes, but the fact lack of
discernment can be treated with poisons or neurotoxic drugs is absurd, and proves in itself the decision
in 12718/231/2017 is absurd,although I proven it falsified in every way it could've been possibly falsified,
also proving the mafia is sociopathic and defies the rule of law like this, showing contempt for it. I
remind, no public danger was ever even grounded on real ennounced even facts, nor objectivized, and
I.B.2.9.15 "judge" Badiu Mandica lied that, I quote in Romanian: "In motivarea Incheierii s-a
retinut ca, in cauza sunt indeplinite conditiile prev. la art. 109 alin 1 Cod Penal pentru dispunerea masurii
de siguranta, avand in vedere concluziile expertizei medico legale, masura fiind neesar pentru inlaturarea
starii de pericol", as translated into English: "In the motivation of the decision it was retained that, in the
cause there are fulfilled the conditions of article 109 alignment 1 Penal Code for the disposition of the
security measure, with regards to the conclusions of the legal medicine expertize, the measure being
necessary for the alleviation of the state of peril", because as I've demonstrated before and even in
I.B.2.9.16 judge" Badiu Mandica lied that, I quote in Romanian: "Solutia este legala si
temeinica", as translated in English: "The solution is legal and founded", because this declaration is
neither a syllogistical conclusion or inference, nor a logical proposition meaning is a groundless
declaration and given all the proofs to the contrary I've given that the decision in 12718/231/2017 in 1st
instance is illegal and unfounded, the declaration is really a deliration or hallucination that it can
constitute a cover up because this declaration in itself is proof 12718/231/2017 is falsified, and "judge"
Badiu Mandica is schizophrenic. I remind I thoroughly demonstrated in annex 20 of my Rule 39 ECHR
urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier all the acts of
procedure against me are criminal abuses, not just the falsified as anticipatedly demonstrated decision
in 12718/231/2017, therefore absolutely no act of procedure falsified by the "magistrate" mafia is legal
and founded
I.B.2.9.17 "judge" Badiu Mandica lied that, I quote in Romanian: "In ce priveste cererea de
sesizare a Curtii Constitutionale, cu exceptia privind neconstitutionalitatea art. 315 Cod procedura
penala, in mod temeinic Judecatorul de Camera Preliminara de la fond a respins-o ca inadmisibila
intrucat nu are legatura cu aceasta cauza, esenta cauzei fiind concret conditiile in care se dispune o
I.B.2.9.18 "judge" Badiu Mandica lied that, I quote in Romanian: "Referitor la solutia dispusa, si
anume, luarea masurii de siguranta a tratamentului medical aceasta este de asemena legala si
temeinica", as translated in English: "Referring to the disposed solution, and namely, the undertaking of
the security measure of medical treatment it's also legal and founded", because a falsified decision is not
a judicial solution, is just a falsified document, nor the issuer is a judge from the moment it falsified that
document, or even caught attempting as it was obvious the "judge" didn't notify the penal authorities
right away the "prosecutor's" proposal is falsified since as a professional it should've spotted that it's
illegal and unfounded immediately, all the more "judge" Miron Doina knew that the mafia has been
using the judicial system against me and not only me as state terrorism and wrongful political repression
for years, just like I've proven in annex 20 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier regarding my plead in 12718/231/2017. The declaration
that the falsified decision in 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance is legal and founded is a lie because this
declaration is neither a syllogistical conclusion or inference, nor a logical proposition meaning is a
groundless declaration and given all the proofs to the contrary I've given that the decision in
12718/231/2017 in 1st instance is illegal and unfounded, as I thoroughly demonstrated in annex 20 of my
Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier all the
acts of procedure against me are criminal abuses
I.B.2.9.20 judge" Badiu Mandica lied that, I quote in Romanian: "Expertiza medico legala
efectuata in cauza a relevat o afectiune psihica a contestatorului care necesita tratament medical sub
supraveghere, pentru inlaturarea starii de pericol in care insusi contestatorul s-ar putea plasa sau iar
putea pune pe cei din jur, fiind indeplinite astfel, conditiile prevazute la art. 109 Cod Penal", as translated
in English: "The legal medicine expertise in this cause has shown a psychic affection of the contester that
necessitates medical treatment under surveillance, for the alleviation of the danger situation the
contester himself could place himself under or put the ones near him, being fullfilled thus, the conditions
foreseen by article 109 Penal Code", because as I've demonstrated, there is no legal medicine expertise
in dossier 12718/231/2017, as none was invoked with the exception of the falsified "psychiatric"
documents from 14277/231/2015 where they've been declared inadmissible and unfounded no less by
the same "judge" Badiu Mandica who proved itself schizophrenic by perfect logical incoherence and
occupational dysfunction, and the falsified "psychiatric" incarceration discharge papers who aren't just
illegal, groundless, self-contradictory and syllogistically invalid, they don't constitute a legal medicine
expertise which should've been the falsified documents from the formally faked expertise from the
same day of 8th June 2017, documents which they refused to communicate as legally required, if they
exist at all as proven in 12718/231/2017 where they don't exist as my mother who I mandated to look in
the dossiers didn't see, and in the falsified decision they aren't indicated by number or quoted, meaning
they don't exist, making the falsified decisions in 12718/231/2017 unfounded not just because of the
groundless accusations against me, but because the required "psychiatric" charlatanry documents are
missing, documents which also can only be falsified since no expertize ever took place and the
procedure has been vitiated through the breaking of all relevant laws and regulations, and no
“psychiatric” charlatanry inference can be made against me because the deeds that would constitute
the particular factual premise do not exist physically therefore any “psychiatric” charlatanry document
about me is invalid even before proven illegal and unfounded, because I commit no felonies, as I proven
I.B.2.9.21 "judge" Badiu Mandica lied that, I quote in Romanian: "Din expertiza medico legala
psihiatrica rezulta ca, in urma examinarii repetat a contestatorului s-a constatat ca acesta este
imprevizibl in relatiile sociale, prezinta determinare si perseverenta irationala, percum si un risc de
escaladare rapida de la violenta virtuala si de limbaj la violenta fizica", as translated in English: "From
the psychiatric legal medicine expertise it results that, following the repeated examination of the
contester it was found that he is impredictible in social relations, presents determination and irational
perseverence, and also a risc of rapid escalation from virtual violence and of language to physical
violence", because "judge" Badiu Mandica again refers to non existant logic from the falsified
"psychiatric" documents annulled as inadmissible and unfounded in 14277/231/2015 proven by annex
4, annex 5 and annex 10 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to
this ICC penal dossier, reminding the same "judge" Badiu Mandica is proving herself schizophrenic by
invoking documents herself annulled. The lie that I'm "imprevisible in social relations" is proven a lie by
the fact I am a law abiding citizen therefore I'm predictable to respect the law in society. The lie that I'm
"irationally determined and perseverent" I already proven false in the paragraphs above, wheren I've
shown there is no such thing as irrational since there is a cause for everything, and determination and
perseverence are virtues according to all motivational psychology of success videos on youtube.com
being thus a nonsense to be accused of such a thing form all points of view, being obvious the
"psychiatrist" mafia associates have a doleance with me denouncing their crimes, denouncements which
they consider irrational since the Romanian "state" mafia members think of themselves the masters of
the world thus infalable, like my lawyer Mariana Militaru told me once in 2009. The lie that I'm "virtually
I.B.2.9.22 "judge" Badiu Mandica lied that, I quote in Romanian: "Aceste imprejurari
indreptatesc concluzia ca pentru inlaturarea starii de pericol, apreciata in functie de constatarile de mai
sus se impune obligarea contestatorului la tratament medical de specialitate, masura benefica in primul
rand contestatorului din prezenta cauza, care poate oricand sa conteste tratamentul recomandat de
medicii specialisti, in mod intemeiat, sa ceara tratament alternativ, etc.", as translated to English: "This
circumstances make right the conclusion that for alleviating the state of danger, appreciated according
to the aforementioned retainings, it's imposed that the contested be obligated to specialized medical
treatment, measure beneficial to the contester in the present cause, who can anytime to contest the
treatment recommended by the specialist medics, in a founded way, to ask for alternative treatment,
etc.", because "judge" Badiu Mandica attempts to falsify a syllogistical inference using false factual
premises, meaning the proven inexistant public danger, invoking that she administered proofs when she
didn't administer any, as I proven although needlesly that "judge" Badiu Mandica declared the action
founded and legal without proving anything and objectivizing by correlating with the law, which proves
in itself the decision in 12718/231/2017 is falsified, all the more I proven it falsified before I even saw it
because it's in ne bis in idem relation with 14277/231/2015 from where the schizophrenic "judge" Badiu
Mandica is invoking documents declared inadmissible and unfounded including by herself in 1st instance
of 14277/231/2015 as proven by annex 5 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier. "judge" Badiu Mandica abberates as directed by the mafia
for all its members to constitute a chorus that it's "beneficial for me" to be Tortured, Bodily Harmed and
Qualifiedly Murdered, the mafia delirating that this lie somehow helps at covering up the Crimes
against humanity committed by their reckoning against me for my benefit, chorus which helped me
identify the mafia members all the more easily, including a priest who participated in the crimes from
I.B.2.9.23 "judge" Badiu Mandica lied outright that, I quote in Romanian: "In prezenta
contestatie, nu a fost expus nici un argument care sa inlature argumentele si considerentele pe care
Judecatorul de Camera preliminara de la instanta de fond si-a intemeiat solutia", as translated in English:
"In the present contestation, no argument was exposed to eliminate the arguments and considerents on
which the Preliminary Room Judge from the 1st instance has founded the solution". The first proof that
"judge" Badiu Mandica lied as quoted, is of course annex 19 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for
interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier containing the quote in the falsified
decision from 2nd February 2018 from 12718/231/2017 in 2nd instance, then the proof I did "expose an
argument", in fact 78 pages of many arguments against the falsified decision from 11th October 2017
from 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance, is the plead attached as annex 20 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent
request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier through which I anticipated
the decision in 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance would be falsified deducing from the fact that as in the
past the "judge" will copy without judging all the abberations in the falsified "prosecutor's" proposal
which is in fact to my knowledge the "state" organized crime system in Romania at least since the ex-
"communist" era, and from the fact there was no possible argument to justify breaking the law against
me obviously, nor any grounds, therefore in the contestation of the falsified decision in 12718/231/2017
in 1st instance I just made a summary of the plead against the falsified "prosecutor's" proposal and
inherently falsified the decision in 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance because there was no need to plead
different since I foreseen every contingency and intrinsicly demonstrated even before seeing the
falsified "motivation" of the falsified decision in 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance, that it could only be
falsified as the "prosecutor's" proposal was, and at the same time syllogistically invalid or lacking any
juridical logic thus inadmissible, and illegal by pervasively breaking the law, and unfounded or
groundless as no real facts were objectivized through any administration of proofs, and indeed "judge"
Miron Doina did not only not motivate the decision in 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance in any way exactly
because its impossible to justify breaking the law and fundamental rights and issue a sentence without
any grounds, or even juridical logic, in corroboration and to objectivize that it's exactly the case, "judge"
Miron Doina condemned me for this person Vasilache Daniel's crimes and diagnosis, person with which I
I.B.2.9.24 "judge" Badiu Mandica was obligated to correct ex officio the 1st instance falsified
decision about the fact there is no "psychiatric" diagnosis or indiction and conviction against me, reason
for which the sentence in 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance is issued on another person named Vasilache
Daniel's crimes and diagnosis, fact which is also subsummed to my argument that there was no
argument against me to support the falsified condemnation in 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance that was
obviously unfounded as expected since there were no grounds to found such a sentence which is also
illegal about every relevant law that could've been broken, even the "judge" Miron Doina being
incompatible for being accused in a penal dossier I opened, in which "judge" Miron Doina was never
aquitted because it's impossible as I've demonstrated the case thoroughly enough to put it in jail as is
the case of any of the penal dossiers I opened against the "magistrate" mafia members primarely but
also their mafia soldiers from the "police" and "gendarmes" and mafia associates from the "lawyer's
bar" and "legal medicine", which then makes consequently the condemnation in 12718/231/2017 2nd
instance unfounded and illegal or falsified as well for upholding the falsehoods within 12718/231/2017
in 1st instance, proven by the fact "judge" Badiu Mandica deliberately ommitted to objectivize on the
fact I can't be condemned for another man's felonies and diagnosis while I am not indicted, convicted or
diagnosed, nor did "judge" Badiu Mandica objectivize on the fact there is no diagnosis against me, or
that there is when invoking the falsified "psychiatric" charlatanry documents from 14277/231/2015
where same "judge" Badiu Mandica declared the action inadmissible in 1st instance because it was
unfounded as it was declared in 14277/231/2015 in 2nd instance, meaning "judge" Badiu Mandica
contradicted herself perfectly proving is schizophrenic by perfect logical incoherence and occupational
I.B.2.9.25 "judge" Badiu Mandica according to declarations of a person from Vrancea county is
the wife of a policeman who witheld the evidence regarding the murder of that person's son in a bar,
meaning an audio-video recording. "judge" Badiu Mandica or her accomplices from within the
courthouse in fact witheld audio evidence from me regarding her harassing me verbally in a courthouse
meeting in 2016 <seek the proof request for the audio evidence and illegal response, and the exact date
of the audio evidence>, and I caught her provoking an old convict into protesting her courtroom
injustice and verbal agression, only to convict him wrongfully for "audience felonies" of which "judge"
Badiu Mandica is actually guilty, doing so from animalic or psychopathic sadism, taking pleasure in the
power to harm others obviously by abusing the magistrate function. The Badiu family is then evidently
another of the interloper crime families operating within the Vrancea "state" mafia, obviously directly in
cahoots with its soldiers through family relations making the mafia denomination even more
appropriate. Last but not least, Badiu Mandica I accused in a penal dossier I opened against her for
harassing me by commiting against me the felony of Illegal deprivation of liberty by detaining me for
hours illegally and unfounded with the "gendarmes" within the Focsani courthouse, who also knew they
had no mandate as prooof of the cooperation between the "magistrate" mafia caporegimes and their
soldiers from the "gendarmerie", and for falsifying the acts of procedure of dossier 14277/231/2015 for
two months when it was clearly inadmissible from the first day, clearly to harass me to prove her mafia
honor. Because "judge" Badiu Mandica was never aquitted, her only compatibility is with predictable
indiction, conviction and prison according to the principle of non-contradiction, not with falsifying acts
of procedure and decisions in my cases and in 12718/231/2017 instigating that Crimes against humanity
be committed against me clearly out of Revenge for the help I given justice by denouncing her felonies
in 14277/231/2015 which is in ne bis idem with 12718/231/2017 meaning "judge" Badiu Mandica also
contradicted herself about the same provedly falsified “psychiatric” documents from 14277/231/2017
and 12718/231/2017, annulled as inadmisibile and unfounded in 14277/231/2017, which is an
aggravation circumstance felony raising the punishment for Crimes against humanity according to
Romanian Penal Code. The principle of non-contradiction proof I invoked is based on the fact I wasn't
ever accused of False declarations, Inducing the judiciary bodies into error (giving false proofs) or
Disseminating false information (publishing the penal dossier against "judge" Badiu Mandica) which
means the Romanian "magistrate" mafia tacitly recognizes the veridicity of my demonstration of "judge"
Badiu Mandica's felonies, because my demonstration is impossible to contradict which means
predictably "judge" Badiu Mandica's dossier only possible solution is a prison sentence and the
interdiction to ever occupy a public function. Proof is the quote from the falsified decision in
<to be assimilated>
I.B.2.9.26 Furthermore "judge" Badiu Mandica sentenced me to be Tortured, Bodily Harmed
and Qualifiedly Murdered because according to the falsified decision in 1st instance in 12718/231/2017
another person named Vasilache Daniel with no connection to me whatsoever, commited other felonies
than the ones I'm falsely accused of as proven, and because Vasilache Daniel is diagnosed with
"undiferentiated schizophrenia" unlike me who I am not diagnosed with anything as I judicially declare
under penalty of committing the felonies of giving False declarations and Inducing the judiciary bodies
into error of which I was never even falsely accused of as proof of verity of my declarations and proven
demonstrations, that I was never psychiatrically examined and diagnosed according to article 184
paragraph 1 and 3 from Romanian penal procedure code and articles 10 and 11 from Romanian Law
487/2002 regarding the fact a psychiatric examination can only be initiated against murder suspects or
accused, and can only occur directly through interview with a "psychiatrist" charlatan with my informed
consent given in the presence of a legal or conventional representant, consent which was never given as
proven by “judge” Badiu Mandica’s retainings and various other proofs of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent
request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, nor there is a legal or
conventional representant who can testify otherwise as proof, because as I proven no “psychiatric”
charlatanry examination ever took place so that “psychiatric” documents regarding me can legally exist
before they were falsified as I've proven in 14277/231/2015 anulled action as inadmissible and
unfounded for being falsified, because the "magistrates" Badiu Mandica and Popa Mariana from
Vrancea Tribunal had scruples being involved directly in committing Crimes against humanity which
now they are instigating. Furthermore, no "psychiatric" charlatanry inference about me can be
<to be assimilated>
I.B.2.9.27 As proof I'm sentenced explicitly in writing for the penal deeds and diagnosis of this
person named Vasilache Daniel with whom I have no connection, with aforethought by the "magistrate"
mafia as obvious because I denounced its criminal activity and for the purpose of discrediting me and
silencing me from denouncing it further by committing against me Illegal deprivation of liberty, Torture,
Bodily Harm and ultimately Qualified murder through putting me in anaphylactic shock and chemically
lobotomizing me which is constituting Crimes against humanity, I attach to this ICC penal dossier the
falsified motivation of the "judge" Miron Doina's decision in 12718/231/2017 1st instance as annex 19 of
my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, the
demonstration of the falsification of "judge" Miron Doina decision in 12718/231/2017 as annex 20 of my
Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, falsified
decision in 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance which "judge" Badiu Mandica upholds through the falsified
sentence in 12718/231/2017 in 2nd instance which is thus inherently proven falsified by my plead
attached as annex 20 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to
this ICC penal dossier regarding the falsified “prosecutor's” proposal on which dossier 12718/231/2017
was founded, through which I demonstrated that any of the penal dossiers or psychiatric actions against
me can only be falsified as I've proved otherwise by not ever being indicted and convicted as proven by
annex 17 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier, and anulling even in instance the first 4 falsified psychiatric actions against me as proven by
annex 1, annex 3 and annex 5 of my Rule39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as
annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, and because the last 2 are identical to the 2 before them I've also
proven them falsified intrinsicly but also explicitly as in annex 20 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for
interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier. The inventory which I've made in my
general removal request of all "judges" who falsified any decision against me, which in time grew against
all of the "judges" of the penal section of "Judecatoria Focsani" courthouse, demonstrates that all
falsified sentences against me if correlated with the "judges" brings up the fact "judges" steal dossiers
consecutively which is the statistical proof, from the random distribution system to falsify acts of
procedure in them, and refuse to abstain from falsifying acts of procedure in my dossiers although
against all I opened penal dossiers before without them ever being aquitted nor me accused of the
felonies of False declarations, Inducing into error the judiciary bodies (for false proofs) or Disseminating
false informations (for publishing the penal dossiers against the "magistrates") which according to the
principle of non-contradicton constitutes the proof of verity of my penal dossiers against these
"magistrates" which should've been indicted and convicted if the entire Romanian "magistrature" wasn't
actually part of the Romanian "state" mafia, as proven by the fact "judge" Dinu Murgulet Ana falsified
mandates of arrest in 4791/231/2017 which is in ne bis in idem with 10547/231/2015 regarding the
identical false accusations that I'm a public danger, totally irresponsible, lacking discernment and
<to be assimilated>
I.B.2.9.28 In fact I demonstrated in my plead attached as annex 20 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent
request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, the first decision in
12718/231/2017 is falsified as I anticipated before I even saw the motivation in first instance, meaning
that "judge" Miron Doina wouldn't and didn't motivate the sentence in any logical way as all Romanian
"magistrates" I've ever encountered during my investigations, because it's impossible to justify the
flagrant breaking of the law which I also proven knowing it would be broken because the "prosecutor's"
proposal is instigating the law be broken as before in 14277/231/2015, and I know the "judges" "obbey"
the proposals of the "prosecutors" exactly as they did in the "communist" era under the direction of the
"secret services" mafia which in fact took power in 1989 coup d'etat and never let it go since, and who
control the "magistrates" through dossiers of blackmail as notoriously proven by the SIPA archive who
has no democratic use whatsoever, through blackmail by control of the penal and disciplinary
institutions threatening with falsified dossiers which isn't even necessary as all the Romanian
"magistrates" as I've proven are corrupt and criminals, that is the mafia is blackmailing the "magistrates"
with their own mafia commanded crimes, and beyond terrorism control, the mafia system promotes
sociopaths who commit crimes to further their social position within the mafia, perhaps so called honor
crimes. Furthermore it is impossible to invoke the verity of documents that don't even exist as proposed
by the "prosecutor", use contradictory logic within the same falsified documents against themselves as
proven by the "psychiatrist" charlatans who lied obviously I am irresponsible, lacking discernemnt,
violent and a public danger not only without proof, but claiming it's because I have superior studies, fast
thinking and general culture, and lied I have judicial history meaning penal history as proven by annex 4
from my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier, which is a falsified document they refused to communicate to me as legally required because it
is obviously falsified in every possible way meaning syllogistically invalid, groundless and illegal, and
I.B.2.10 "prosecutor" Peicu Daniela instigated that the sentence in 12718/231/2017 be falsified
without motivating in fact and by the law its falsified plead, nor invoking any kind of proof. I already
have a penal dossier opened against Peicu Daniela who was never acquitted therefore her only
compatibility is with prison time for her felonies and collaboration with the mafia as I've demonstrated,
not falsifying acts of procedure in falsified dossiers against me, which just proves the Romanian "state"
mafia carelessness brought by self assuredness nobody can convict them for this
I.B.2.11 "prosecutor" Peicu Daniela lied that my designated defender meaning my mother
renounced to come to the terms in the dossier. In reality "judge" Badiu Mandica lied to my mother that
my judicial powers mandate that I gave her at the notary who knows better, is not valid, and refused to
hear my mother in my defense, which is a direct infringement of the my right to my defense. Because of
this I told my mother to stop going to the tribunal so the psychopathic "judge" Badiu Mandica make a
mockery of her time and justice as always, because "judge" Badiu Mandica proved she wasn't going to
allow my mother to talk in my defense. Proof of the lie is in the annex 19 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent
request for interim measures attached as annex 1, as I quote in Romanian: "Reprezentantul Ministerului
Public ... la cererea aparatorului care a renuntat sa vina sa il mai reprezinte" and as translated into
English: "The Representant of the Public Ministry (the prosecutor) ... at the demand of the defender who
renounced to come and represent him". Regardless, no defender is needed as I formulated my plead in
1st instance in 12718/231/2018, and invoked it in the contestation along with a summarized version of
it, all of which was with malice aforethought ignored because it demonstrates how the Romanian
"state" mafia falsified 4 penal dossiers against me, 6 psychiatric actions out of which I even annulled 4 in
the mafia's own courthouses because the "judges" had scruples in face of my overwhelming evidence
which would've led to the "judges" being directly involved in Crimes against humanity against me, while
the last two are identical to the two before them being inherently proven falsified as well as I
demonstrate anyway in this ICC penal dossier
I.B.3. "judge" Miron Doina lied outright that, I quote in Romanian from the document from 11th
October 2017 from 12718/231/2017 attached as annex 19 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for
interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier: "Dezbaterile au avut loc in sedinta
publica din data de 02.10.2017 si au fost consemnate in incheierea de sedinta de la termenul respectiv
care face parte integranta din prezenta hotarare, cand, instanta, avand nevoie de timp pentru a delibera,
a amanat pronuntarea la data de 11.10.2017, cand a hotarat urmatoarele:", as translated to English:
"The debates have taken place in the public meeting from 2nd October 2017 and were consigned in the
closing document of the meeting from the respective term which is integral part of this present decision,
when, the instance, needing time to deliberate, has delayed the pronunciation to the date of 11th
October 2017, when it decided the following:", because the debates have not taken place as proven by
the fact not a single argument was invoked and debated according to articles 349 and 351 from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code, from my plead attached as annex 20 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent
request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, nor such a debate was
consigned in the closing document of the meeting from 2nd or 11th October 2017, except the retention
that I did lodge a plead in my defense and a request for the notification of the Romanian Constitutional
Court which was also unjustifiedly rejected because it's impossible to debate against the law, because
the law is not debatable in a trial, it is only applicable unless unconstitutional when it has no force of
right. In conclusion "judge" Miron Doina refused to administer the proofs and objectivize their
relevance, for the accusation as well as for the defense, breaking the law according to article 403
paragraph 1 letters c and d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, by refusing to administer proofs
and motivate factually and lawfully the falsified decision from 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance according
to the juridical syllogism laws because it's impossible to justify the instigation to Crimes against
humanity using the law, or justify the obvious falsification of the 3 penal dossiers where the deeds
obviously do not even physically exist because they cannot physically exist to be appreciated to
constitute felonies, and the accusers and witnesses admit they haven't even witnessed they deeds they
generically speak of, evidently because they don't exist like objectivized by the material proofs of the
audio recordings of the courthouse
I.B.3.1 "judge" Miron Doina lied outright in cahoots with the schizophrenic "prosecutor" Lupu
Mihai Cristian and his superior "prosecutor" Petrescu Ionut Auras brought especially from the capital
Bucharest to supervise the Romanian "state" mafia criminal activity, that, I quote in Romanian from the
I.B.3.2 "judge" Miron Doina lied outright that, I quote in Romanian from the document from
11th October 2017 from 12718/231/2017: "domiciliat ... fara forme legale in Focsani, B-dul Unirii, nr. 28,
bl. 28, ap.5, jud,Vrancea" meaning in English: "domiciled ... without legal forms in Focsani, B-dul Unirii,
nr. 28, bl. 28, ap.5, jud,Vrancea", which is a lie proven by the fact I do not live at that address as
objectivized by the falsified decision in 4791/231/2017 regarding state terrorism through illegal home
breaking, where the "judge" Dinu Murgulet Ana declared that ~"I couldn't be found for the expertise on
8th December 2016", and although I'm unaware if I was searched for by the mafia "secret police"
soldiers at my mother's address which I’m certain my mother would’ve told me, it can certainly mean
my mother's apartment is under surveillance, as is her phone, as is the phone of one of my friend’s
I.B.3.3 "judge" Miron Doina lied by ommission that, I quote in Romanian from the document
from 11th October 2017 from 12718/231/2017: "In motivarea sesizarii, se arata ca, impotriva
suspectului Raneti Tudor Andrei s-au inregistrat la Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani, trei
plangeri penale pentru savarsirea in datele de 18.05.2016, 14.07.2016 si 28.07.2016 a trei infractiuni de
incalcare a solemnitatii sedintelor de judecata prezidate de judecatorul Paun Ionel Iulian din cadrul
Judecatoriei Focsani si Popa Mariana, din cadrul Tribunalului Vrancea", as translated into English: "In the
motivation of the notification, it is shown that, against the suspect Raneti Tudor Andrei there was
registered at the prosecutor's office near the "Judecatoria Focsani" courthouse, three penal complaints
for the committal on the dats of 18th May 2016, 14th July 2016 and 28th July 2016 of three felonies of
Disturbing the solemnity of the courthouse meetings presided by the judge Paun Ionel Iulian from
"Judecatoria Focsani" courthouse and judge Popa Mariana from Vrancea Tribunal", because "it's not
shown" nor proved anywhere that I committed any felony, or that even a physical deed exists that could
be appreciated to constitute a felony on the dates of 18th May 2016 and 24th June 2016 (the quoted
dates are wrong), as proven by this very falsified decision where "judge" Miron Doina lies generically as
typical to liars or according to the Romanian proverb "lies have short legs" meaning they don't
withstand scrutiny as these lies don't even try to hide the truth, but "judge" Miron Doina never
administers any proofs or objectivizes the meaning of proofs according to articles 349 and 351 from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code because they demonstrate my innocence by themselves, and does not
correlate the meaning of the proofs with the law to prove or disprove my guilt, procedure of tying a
felony to the felon which cannot even be undertaken before proving a deed even physically exist, and
inherently the "judge" Miron Doina never infers a legal and founded judicial decision, but falsifies one as
proven by my positive demonstration I already made in my plead attached as annex 20 of my Rule 39
ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier that the
decision in 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance can only be falsified if it's against me and upholds the
falsified "prosecutor's proposal" and is against even any of my arguments when it is in fact against all as
it’s falsified in all possible manners as I objectivize in this ICC penal dossier, corroborated with the
demonstration I already made regarding the falsification of the decision in 12718/231/2017 in 2nd
instance, as well as the demonstration I will make regarding the falsification of the "prosecutor's
proposal", as I summarily remind no deed physically existed as the accusers themselves and witnesses
admitted no obscene words were uttered and no obscene gestures were committed on 18th May 2016,
I.B.3.4 "judge" Miron Doina lied by omission that, I quote in Romanian from the document from
11th October 2017 from 12718/231/2017: "Deoarece au existat indoieli cu privire la discernamantul
suspectului, prin expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica efectuata sub nr.1447/A1/P/333/09.12.2016 de SML
Vrancea s-a concluzionat ca acesta prezinta "tulburare psihotica, acuta predominant deliranta, tulburare
de personalitate de tip paranoid", apreciindu-se ca la momentul comiterii faptei discernamantul a fost
absent", as translated to English: "Because there were doubts regardnig the discernemnt of the suspect,
through the legal medicine expertise effectuated under no 1447/A1/P/333/09.12.2016 by SML Vrancea it
was concluded that the suspect presents "psychotic disorder, acute predominantly delirant, paranoid
personality disorder", being appreciated that at the moment of the deed committal the discernment was
absent",
I.B.3.4.1 because no "doubts" were enounced and according to article 286 from the Romanian
Penal Procedure Code all acts of procedure must be motivated in fact and by the law, so no "doubts"
could be even objectivized, even less inferred from that a "psychiatric" charlatanry "examination" must
be performed, which also according to the law is illegal in my case because I'm not suspect accused of
homicide, according to article 184 paragraph 1 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, I haven't
given my consent for the mafia to use as a legal cover-up thus an "expertise" is impossible according to
article 184 paragraph 3 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code and article 11 from the Romanian Law
487/2002 regarding mental health, and last but not least, all doubts are to be interpreted in favor of the
suspect or accused according to the principle presumption of innocence as enounced by article 4 and
article 99 of the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, and
I.B.3.4.2 because the mentioned "psychiatry" charlatanry legal medicine expertise was falsified
in my absence meaning illegally because according to article 10 from Romanian Law 487/2002 regarding
mental health any "psychiatric" charlatanry examination can only occur directly meaning in my presence
and if I cooperate. Evidently the delirium of a "psychiatrist" charlatan can never constitute an objective
proof in any criminal investigation, all the more because I've proven in section A "psychiatry" is
charlatanry, neither medicine or science, the hallucinations of the "psychiatrist" charlatans being
evidently subjective, not to mention always false and illicit as proven by the simple fact they don't
diagnose themselves as schizophrenics when they emit these self-contradictory falsified documents,
which correlates with the notorious facts it's always the crazy people who are not aware of their mental
illness, as these "psychiatrist" charlatans or the "magistrates" who use their obviously falsified
documents and incriminate themselves by it. Furthermore this falsified expertise was never
communicated to me as legally required according to articles 32, 33 paragraph 5, 58 and 61 paragraph 5
I.B.3.7 the schizophrenic "judge" Miron Doina abberated that, I quote in Romanian from the
document from 11th October 2017 from 12718/231/2017: "Prin ordonanta data in dosarul penal
nr.377/P/2017 al Parchetului de pe langa Tribunalul Vrancea s-a dispus clasarea cauzei fata de suspectul
Vasilache Daniel, pentru savarsirea infractiunii de ultraj, prev. d art.257 alin.1 si 4 C.p. pe motiv de
iresponsabilitate, conform art.28 C.p.", as translated in English: "Through the ordnance given in penal
dossier nr.377/P/2017 of the prosecutor's office near Vrancea Tribunal it was disposed the classation of
the cause regarding suspect Vasilache Daniel, for the committal of the felony of outrage, foreseen by
article 257 alignment 1 and 4 Penal Code for the reason of iresponsability, according to article 28 Penal
Code", because obviously no person can be sentenced to chemical lobotomisation which is capital
punishment like I've proven in section A, for the crimes and diagnosis of another person, declaring
responsibly knowing the consequences of the felonies of False declarations and Inducing the judiciary
bodies into error, that I do not know this person Vasilache Daniel, meaning I am not even his accomplice
or instigator, nor as proof is there such a connection made in any of the penal and "psychiatric"
charlatanry documents falsified against me
I.B.3.8 the schizophrenic "judge" Miron Doina abberated that, I quote in Romanian from the
document from 11th October 2017 from 12718/231/2017: "In expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica
nr.565/A1-P/131/12.06.2017 s-a concluzionat ca suspectul prezinta "schizofrenie nediferentiata"
apreciindu-se ca la momentul comiterii faptei avea discernamantul absent", as translated to English: "In
the legal medicine psychiatric expertise no 565/A1-P/131/12.06.2017 it was concluded that the suspect
presents "undifferentiated schizophrenia" being appreciated that at the moment of the deed committal
it had no discernment", because the named "psychiatric" charlatanry "expertise" does not refer to me
but this Vasilache Daniel person, being obvious that nobody can be subjected to these abberating
I.B.3.9 the schizophrenic "judge" Miron Doina abberated that, I quote in Romanian from the
document from 11th October 2017 from 12718/231/2017: "Pentru suspect s-au depus inscrisuri, acesta
neputand fi audiat", as translated to English: "For the suspect there were lodged documents, the suspect
couldn't be audiated", because first of all this doesn't refer to me who I am falsely accused not
suspected in the falsified 3 penal dossiers against me, then there's no administration and objectivization
that the "lodged documents" are and represent my plead, nor is there an objectivization why the
suspect can't be audiated, which regardless if it's not about me it proves "judge" Miron Doina
incoherence and occupational dysfunction by not motivating any of its generic arguments typical to liars
and proven false even in this form when compared with the law, and incompatible with any juridical act
which must adhere to a syllogistical form according to juridical logic, of consisting of particular factual
premises, correlated universal law or regulations premises, and logical inferences, which constitute the
mandatory motivation of a judicial decision according to article 403 paragraph 1 letters c and d from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code
I.B.3.11 Furthermore, the only two "psychiatric" charlatanry documents I managed to obtain
despite the legal obligation of the "psychiatrist" charlatans to communicate them to me according to
articles 32, 33 paragraph 5, 58 and 61 paragraph 5 from Romanian Law 487/2002, article 28 paragraph 2
from the norms of application of the Romanian Law 487/2002 and article 566 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code, as well as the according to the principle of contradictoriality according to articles 349
and 351 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, are the falsified in my absence "psychiatric"
charlatanry "expertise" from 2015 mentioned in 14277/231/2015 where it was annulled as inadmissible
and unfounded in 1st and 2nd instance, as proven by annex 4, annex 5 and annex 10 of my Rule 39 ECHR
urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, and which even
contains not a diagnosis but a presumption that "I'm probably paranoid" that the Romanian "state"
mafia falsified dossiers 15730/231/2014, 2417/P/2014, 11224/231/2015 and 14277/231/2015 against
me as i’ve proven in the penal dossiers against the falsifiers, dossiers in all of which I "won" annulling
and proving them falsified, but the fact the "magistrate" mafia protected its members, soldiers and
associates unlike a real body of magistrates, proving the existence of the Romanian "state" mafia, then
the falsified in my absence "psychiatric" charlatanry incarceration discharge papers from 8th June 2017
that do not constitute an "expertise" and thus cannot support a decision of obligation to medical
treatment all the more is obviously illegal, groundless, self-contradictory and syllogistically invalid, even
if they mention an "expertise" from 8th June 2017 meaning the same day which didn't take place as all
and any of the others mentioned or not yet mentioned by the falsifying mob of "psychiatrist" charlatans
and "magistrate" criminals, because as I declared they are impossible without my informed given
consent and cooperation, because they are interviews, according to articles 11 from Romanian Law
287/2002 and article 184 paragraph 3 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, and this last
"expertise" was also falsified in my absence in conclusion given the fact it did not take place and if the
document exists at all it can only contain the "psychiatrist's" charlatan hallucinations, mentioning at this
point an "expertise" can only take place directly with the "psychiatrist" charlatan, according to article 10
of the Romanian Law 487/2002. I also mention the obvious fact the falsified "diagnosis" from 8th June
I.B.3.12 the schizophrenic "judge" Miron Doina lied that, I quote in Romanian from the
document from 11th October 2017 from 12718/231/2017: "Fata de dispozitiile legale mentionate, de
motivele clasarii cauzei penale in care suspectul a fost cercetat cat si de concluziile expertizei medico-
legale psihiatrice mentionate mai sus, se constata ca prezenta sesizare este intemeiata, urmand a fi
admisa astfel si pe cale de consecinta va obliga pe suspectul Raneti Tudor Andrei la tratament
medicamentos, pana la insanatosire sau pana la ameliorarea starii de sanatate care sa inlature starea de
pericol a acestuia", as translated to English: "According to the legal dispositions mentioned, the motives
of classation of the penal cause in which the suspect was prosecuted and the conclusions of the legal
medicine psychiatric expertise mentioned above, it is concluded that the present proposal is founded,
following to be admitted and in consequence obligate the suspect Raneti Tudor Andrei to poisoning (or
drugging according to the Romanian term "medicamentos"), until made healthy or until the amelioration
of health status that would alleviate the state of danger he poses",
I.B.3.12.1 because the legal dispositions mentioned meaning article 109 from the Romanian
Penal Code refers to convicts, not suspects, and not the falsely accused as I am and as I've proven in the
above paragraphs <, meaning as obvious an innocent does not pose a “state of danger”, logical
incoherence which again proves “judge” Miron Doina is schizophrenic, and
I.B.3.12.2 because the closing ordinance of the falsified 3 penal dossier against me is also
falsified like I've demonstrated in the above paragraphs <, and as I will punctually demonstrate, as I've
punctually proven regarding this falsified 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance falsified decision which in
general picks up the lies of the "prosecutor's proposal" which I already proven false as anticipated in
annex 20 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier, and
I.B.3.12.3 because I was never "expertized" by a "psychiatrist" charlatan like I've demonstrated
in the above paragraphs <, all the more evident because the schizophrenic "judge" Miron Doina
attempted because I was never indicted, convicted and diagnosed, to sentence me for the crimes and
diagnosis of Vasilache Daniel breaking one of the fundamental principles of justice that nobody can be
convicted for another man's crimes, and
I.B.3.12.4 because like I proven in the above paragraphs < nobody can be treated for
irresponsibility through chemical lobotomisation of his humanity constituting capital punishment by the
eradication of his humanity as I've demonstrated in section A, meaning as I've also proven in section A
and also annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this
ICC penal dossier, that this falsified 12718/231/2017 dossier is the Romanian "state" mafia's final
solution for stopping me from denouncing its criminal activity, through indefinite to life "psychiatric"
incarceration, Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualified Murder
I.B.3.14 Regarding the previous document from 2nd October 2017 from 12718/231/2017, I prove
the following falsehoods were perpetrated, meaning that
I.B.3.14.1 the schizophrenic "judge" Miron Doina lied that, I quote in Romanian from the
document from 2nd October 2017 from 12718/231/2017: "Nefiind cereri de formulat sau probe de
administrat, instanta constata terminata cercetarea judecatoreasca si acorda cuvantul in cadrul
dezbaterilor asupra fondului cauzei", as translated into English: "Because there are no more request sand
proofs to administer, the instance concludes finished the judge's dossier research and starts the debates
on the cause", because the schizophrenic "judge" Miron Doina ignored entirely my plead attached as
annex 20 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier, comprised of 78 pages of proofs regarding the breaking of 12 articles from ECHR, demonstration
of my innocence and mental sanity and more such as the fact "psychiatry" is charlatanry and the
existence of the Romanian "state" mafia and its criminal activity, and most relevant not only I proven all
4 penal dossiers and all 6 psychiatric actions against me falsified, as evidently I am not ever been
indicted, convicted or diagnosed and I've annulled 4 of the 6 psychiatric actions in the mafia's own
courthouses proving them falsified, while the last 2 12718/231/2017 included are identical or in ne bis in
idem relation with the 2 before them regarding the same fictional accusations that I'm irresponsible,
without discernment, violent and a public danger, but I've proven positively using my entire biography,
that I'm army incorporable, apt for work, apt for superior studies, licensed in superior studies and having
work experience, and through other documents, logic and witnesses, that there can't be even a shadow
of a doubt I'm anything else than a law abiding citizen and human rights defender, and not a sociopath
criminal like I've proven in contrast according to the principle of non-contradiction and principle of
excluded third, that the members of the Romanian "magistrate" mafia are, specifically 100% of the
Romanian “magistrates” being corrupt, and about 86% percent of them are criminals and can be
instigated into committing Crimes against humanity, or don't need to, committing Crimes against
humanity out of sociopathic motivation of advancing in rank in the Romanian "state" mafia by
committing mafia honor crimes and thus showing their worth to the mafia. Even more, the
schizophrenic "judge" Miron Doina did not even administer the mafia's proofs objectivizing their legality,
veridity and relevance because it's impossible like I've demonstrated in the paragraphs above, because
I'm not indicted, convicted and diagnosed, the schizophrenic "judge" Miron Doina sentenced me for the
crimes and diagnosis of a person named Vasilache Daniel with which I have no connection, and falsifies
the judicial syllogism by declaring a suspect is a convict to match the universal law premise of article 109
I.B.3.15 the schizophrenic "judge" Miron Doina is under penal pursuit and was never acquitted,
at least for the falsification of the decision in dossier 1560/231/2016 regarding my complaint against the
falsification of the "prosecutor's" acts in the falsified dossier 2417/P/2014, meaning the schizophrenic
"judge" Miron Doina was no stranger in the cover-up of state terrorism and wrongful political repression
perpetrated against me by the Romanian "state" mafia, and most relevantly meaning "judge" Miron
Doina is incompatible to address any of my dossiers according to article 64 paragraph 1 letter f from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code, her only compatibility being with jail time. In dossier 1560/231/2016 I
demonstrated the falsification of dossier 2417/P/2014 against me, which is why it was at first stolen
from the random distribution system along with dossier 2220/91/2015, and on 18th May 2016 "judge"
Paun Ionel Iulian and "prosecutor" Dogaru Luminita Georgeta instead of proceeding to judge these
dossiers, framed me with the false accusations that made up the falsified dossier 2845/P/2016 through
which the Romanian "state" mafia committed the Crimes against humanity between 27th May 2017 and
8th June 2017 to cover up the Crimes against humanity it committed against me in the night between
5th to 6th December 2014 through which the mafia attempted to stop me from denouncing its criminal
activity from before, because exactly before that I linked the criminal activity in Vrancea county, with
the criminal activity in the hierarchical superior county Galati, and the head of justice in the capital city
of Bucharest, meaning the disciplinary action titularies for the magistrate body of functionaries, the
minister of justice directly responsible for the activity of the “prosecutor republic”, the supreme court
president and the general prosecutor, which triggered the Romanian "state" mafia to commit 8
I.B.3.16 In continuation I translate the demonstration of the different proofs of the falsification
of the decision in 12718/231/2017 according to the sketch I lodged at various institutions before, which
I'm expanding to explicitate the logic
I.B.3.16.1 "1." the object of 12718/231/2017 regarding obligation to medical treatment
according to article 566 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code is not the same thing as the object of
provisory obligation to medical treatment according to article 315 paragraph 2 letter e and article 246
paragraph 13 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, corroborated with article 572 from Romanian
Penal Procedure Code which proves the object of provisory obligatory medical treatment is not the
same as the object of obligatory medical treatment in the law. The term "correspondently" within the
text of the article 315 paragraph 2 letter e indicates is to be applied to the corresponding procedure,
meaning article 315 paragraph 2 letter e is the article to start any article 109 from Romanian Penal Code
security measure, and article 246 paragraph 13 is to be used only in the case of provisory obligatory
medical treatment object. The falsified "prosecutor's proposal" is for obligatory medical treatment not
provisory obligatory medical treatment, according to article 315 paragraph 2 letter e from the Romanian
Penal Procedure Code, and article 109 from the Romanian Penal Code, and the naming of the object in
writing both in the falsified proposal in 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 and the falsified
decision from 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance, proven by annex 18 and annex 19 of my Rule 39 ECHR
urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, therefore the falsified
decision in 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance aberrantly legally motivated based on article 246 paragraph
13 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code and article 109 from the Romanian Penal Code, is self-
contradictory within the same falsified decision where elsewhere it declares is based on article 566 from
the Romanian Penal Procedure Code and has thus exceeded the limits of judicial power which is to judge
what was demanded according to the syllogistical laws of juridical logic, fact corroborated with the
evidence the word "provisory" is missing from the entire falsified 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance
decision exactly because it's legally based on article 566 not article 246 paragraph 13 from the Romanian
Penal Procedure Code. The falsified decision in 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance by not objectivizing its
motivation within the law, is void of right according to articles 280 - 282 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code. Regardless, I've already proven that the schizophrenic "judge" Miron Doina attempted
to falsify the law premise by declaring that the suspect or accused who benefit from the presumption of
innocence, are the same as a convict according to article 109 from the Romanian Penal Code, which is
the central article regarding all the so called penal security measures which are only applicable on
convicts who obviously do not benefit from the presumption of innocence, and because I was never
indicted and convicted as proven by annex 17 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier obviously article 109 from Romanian Penal Code cannot be
invoked against me, corroborated with the fact according to article 318 paragraph 12 the presecutor's
ordinance must be confirmed by a judge, since it is not constitutionally a prosecutor's work attribution
to condemn or acquit. Furthermore, the unconstitutional provisory security measures which break the
presumption of innocence making the law void of right and inapplicable I mention, are supposed to be
I.B.3.18 According to article 566 paragraph 1 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, and
articles 32, 33 paragraph 5, 58 and 61 paragraph 5 from the Romanian Law 487/2002, article 28
paragraph 2 from the norms of application of the Romanian Law 487/2002, I should've been
communicated the falsified "psychiatric" charlatanry "expertise report" which I declare knowing the
consequences of committing the felonies of False declarations and Inducing the judicial bodies into
error, that I haven't been communicated it meaning neither the one from 9th or 8th December 2016
falsified in my absence, nor the one from 8th June 2017 falsified without an actual “expertise” because I
didn't give my consent and cooperate as I've not given my consent and cooperate before or after which
proves again the "psychiatry" charlatanry "expertise" through an interview is indeed impossible without
my consent, which I haven't given especially not to give the mafia the legal cover-up it needed but force
it to break the law in this regard too to commit Crimes against humanity afterwards, reminding that
regardless of the "psychiatrist" charlatans falsified documents, I've proven my mental sanity through
documents regarding the fact I'm army incorporable, apt for work, apt for superior studies, licensed with
superior studies and having work experience with superior studies, having other documents in this
regard, proven my sanity logically, have witnesses etc. The mafia is withholding evidence so I don't use it
against it further proving its existence and criminal activity, which I already did as proven in my Rule 39
ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier. Also regardless,
I've proven the mafia used the falsified "psychiatric" charlatanry "expertise report" in 12718/231/2017
in 2nd instance, which was annulled as inadmissible and unfounded in 14277/231/2015, and proven the
falsified "psychiatric" incarceration discharge papers from 8th June 2017 do not constitute a "psychiatric"
charlatanry "expertise report", and I've also proven these falsified incarceration discharge papers illegal,
groundless, self-contradictory and syllogistically invalid in annex 20 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request
for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, just like I've proven the ones
mentioned in 14277/231/2015 attached as annex 4 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim
measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, who were also falsified in my absence and never
communicated to me but I found them hidden in another dossier at the courthouse archive, and the
proven falsified "psychiatric" incarceration discharge papers did not even reference the falsified
"psychiatric" charlatanry "expertise report" from 9th December 2016 on which is supposedly based on
but do not justify the Crimes against humanity I've been subjected during 27th May 2017 to 8th June
2017 based on the falsified decision in 4909/231/2017 regarding an impossible "psychiatric" charlatanry
"examination" not "treatment" by putting me on anaphylactic shock for 3 days expecting me to die then
chemically lobotomizing me with the same deadly fluorine based neurotoxin I was injected covertly in
I.B.3.19 Because the Romanian "state" mafia learned that I went into permanent hiding out of
fear of indefinite to life "psychiatric" charlatanry incarceration, Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualified
Murder, which is another proof my mother’s apartment is under surveillance as was the place where I
took exams for my law faculty where I was illegally arrested from on 27th May 2017, although legally
required, it didn't falsify as obligated by the law until the present another decision that I be
I.B.3.20 Both the "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian falsified proposal and "judge" Miron Doina
falsified decision in 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance are falsified in the same manner because they are
based on article 109 from the Romanian Penal Code regarding so called penal security measures, who in
reality don't work as notoriously known and proven but that's not the subject of this plead, but the fact
this article refers to convicts not the suspect or accused, reminding that during the trial in
12718/231/2017 in 1st instance I was not in penal pursuit because of the schizophrenic abberations
within the Romanian Penal Procedure Code written by the schizophrenic Romanian “prosecutors”,
losing even the falsified quality of accused because of the falsified closing ordnance from 1st August
2017, meaning I had no passive quality. In 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance I was an innocent person not
a procedural subject meaning not under penal pursuit, with no penal history, benefiting from the
presumption of innocence and proven innocent and mentally sane through annex 20 of my Rule 39
ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier regarding my
plead in 12718/231/2017. The presumption of innocence I remind is instated through article 4 from the
Romanian Penal procedure code, article 23 (11) from the Romanian Constitution and articles 11 and 20
from Romanian Constitution who makes Romania's ratified treaties internal right meaning article 11
from the Universal declaration of human rights and article 6 paragraph 2 from the European convention
of human rights. Because the falsified decision in 12718/231/2017 in 1st instance does not retain that
the falsified "prosecutor" ordnance is not confirmed by a court of law regarding the existence of the
felonies who I proven do not physically exist because they can't physically exist, or ad absurdm those
false accusations or fictive deeds cannot even constitute felonies, as the false accusations are simply
contradicted no less by the accusers themselves, then the witnesses, then the material proof of the
I.B.3.21 The prosecutor as obvious is not legally allowed to declare the felonies were committed
or not, which proves the lack of impartiality of "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian, not just by breaking the
law which in itself proves the lack of impartiality, but by instigating that Crimes against humanity be
committed against me, through which "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian proves malice aforethought
therefore lack of impartiality. The prosecutor is just a state lawyer with the obligation to be impartial,
while the judge has the exclusive judiciary capacity to condemn or acquit according to Decision no 23 of
the Romanian Constitutional Court regarding the unconstitutionality of article 318 before it was
reinstated unconstitutionally by the "prosecutor republic" mafia spearheaded by George Soros's puppet
and close friend of ex-"communist" mafia so called European parliamentary Monica Macovei, ex-
"minister of justice" Pruna Raluca, also responsible for the Crimes against humanity perpetrated in
Romania, for introducing facilities for the pharmaceutical mafia in cahoots with the "magistrate" mafia
who committed against me and others the felonies of Torture, Bodily Harm, attempted Qualified
Murder, Illegal deprivation of liberty and other felonies. I'm speaking of the same pharmaceutical mafia
who bribed the Romanian "state" mafia for the introduction of obligatory vaccination in Romania, where
it is involved even the so-called NGO "for human rights" APADOR-CH, a branch of the Helsinki
Committee, who for the first time to my knowledge and surprise since I even subvented them one time,
in actuality militated against human rights declaring they are not guaranteed and can be restricted,
whilst the same law was rejected in Germany where the judge demonstrated that the obligatory
vaccination law is pushed by sinister motives and there is no virus in actuality
I.B.3.22 "2.1." I remind in accordance to annex 20 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for
interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier regarding my plead in 12718/231/2017,
that the entire "psychiatric" charlatanry action meaning the proposal in 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and
4329/P/2016 followed by falsified dossiers 4791/231/2017, 4909/231/2017, the daily arrests before
Orthodox Easter with tens of mafia soldiers as if I were a MMA fighter or terrorist not an intellectual
human rights defender, the Crimes against humanity between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017
obviously, 1791/91/2017 and 12718/231/2017 are legally vitiated because is illegal from the start point
which is article 184 paragraph 1 from the Romanian Penal Code who states only if I was suspected or
accused of homicide could the proposal that I be "examined" by a "psychiatric" charlatan be made, and
therefore whatever else that followed be legal. In support I'm mentioning the legal text makes a
conjunction not a disjunction condition referring to the prosecutor's doubt, which means is a
conjuncture of conditions, corroborated with the fact the prosecutor's doubt is always to be interpreted
in favor of the suspect or accused according to article 4 paragraph 2 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code regarding the presumption of innocence
I.B.3.23 "2.2" I remind in accordance to annex 20 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim
measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier regarding my plead in 12718/231/2017 and
according to other evidence invoked in it, that there is no medical treatment for "mental illnesses" in
conformity with the public testimony of the "psychiatrist" charlatans themselves who declared there is
I.B.3.24 "3." The Romanian quote from the document from 2nd October 2017 from
12718/231/2017 that: "Procedura de citare nu este legal indeplinita", meaning as traslated to English:
"The procedure of citation is not legally fulfilled", proves yet another instance of incoherence of the
judgment contingent members, since in the above paragraph they claimed the legal representant is
present, meaning the Romanian "state" mafia appointed "lawyer" who committed the felony of Unloyal
assistance and representacy against me, and they claimed by conventional representant is present,
meaning my mother Mariana Raneti, which in actuality is not my conventional representant as I've
demonstrated before by the fact there is no evidence or reason in this regard, my mother I gave full
judicial powers through the notary. That my mother pleaded for me is my mother's idea about which I
told her to not waster her time because she would be mocked by the “magistrate” criminals who do not
care about the truth, I just wanted her to look in the falsified dossier to have an idea of the Romanian's
"state" mafia other mistakes, since in debate my plead which I had already lodged in 12718/231/2017,
and attached as annex 20 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1
to this ICC penal dossier, is already unbeatable in any regard, as proven by the fact the "magistrate"
criminals avoided administering it and bringing into discussion even one proof from it, admitting tacitly I
am right in every regard, and according to the principle of non-contradiction and principle of excluded
I.B.3.25 "4." The schizophrenic "judge" Miron Doina as proof of her incoherence confuses
throughout the falsified decision the quality of suspect, accused, and in my case that of lacking passive
quality or not being under penal pursuit because the 3 falsified penal dossiers were closed without me
being indicted and convicted, and not even the "prosecutor's" falsified ordinance confirmed by a judge,
reason for which I also benefit as any law abiding citizen from the presumption of innocence. According
to article 314 paragraph 2 and article 318 paragraph 12 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, the
prosecutor's ordnance of proposal of not sending the suspect or accused to be judged, must be
confirmed by a judge because justice is the judge's exclusive function according to article 1 from
Romanian Law 303/2004 regarding the statute of judges and prosecutors, not the prosecutor's who is
just a state lawyer, or in my case a criminal as I've accused him in the same penal dossiers he falsified, to
which he didn't have the right to address them from that point on according to the principle nemo esse
iudex in sua causa potest, which is another reason for his falsified ordnance to be declared inadmissible.
Legally, the falsified proposal in 12718/231/2017 should've thus been rejected as inadmissible from the
start, motivated by my lack of passive quality or not being a prosecution subject, corroborated with the
fact the closing ordnance from 1st August 2017 from 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 is not
confirmed in 12718/231/2017 or other dossier, being not even a single falsified mention of the
confirmation of the falsified ordinance of closing the penal dossiers in regard meaning to the committal
of the felonies, which is necessary because the schizophrenic "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian lied that I
committed penal felonies out of which he falsely inferred I am a public danger, which he has no quality
to declare because he is no judge obviously, abstracting he obviously lies as proven, all the more he
never administered any proofs for the accusation or defense in these dossiers, let alone objectivize the
relevance of the proofs, because the proofs demonstrate by themselves my innocence and mental
sanity as opposed to the schizophrenia of the "magistrates" and "psychiatrist" charlatans who displayed
symptoms of logical incoherence and occupational dysfunction pervasively, symptoms which prove they
are schizophrenic according to DSM-V "psychiatric" charlatanry diagnosis and statistics manual
I.B.3.26 "6." I do make this separated mention regarding the fact my judiciary declarations,
meaning declarations that are lodged either at the prosecutor's office or in the courthouse in the
dossiers, are proofs according to article 97 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, given I was never
accused of committing the felonies of False declarations, Inducing the judiciary bodies into error (by
falsifying proofs) or Disseminating false informations (by publishing over a hundred perhaps penal
dossiers I've made against the "magistrate" mafia members), which constitutes the proof of verity of my
declarations and proofs, all the more it wasn't even insinuated that I made false declarations, or been
ever contradicted at least, all which proves the Romanian "state" mafia admits the verity of my
declarations and according to the principle of non-contradiction and principle of excluded third it admits
if falsified all 4 penal dossiers against me, all 6 psychiatric actions against me and perpetrated 6 Crimes
against humanity attempts, and 2 Crimes against humanity committals against me
I.B.3.28 "prosecutor" Anca Dorina Rasca instigated that the sentence in 12718/231/2017 be
falsified without motivating in fact and by the law according to article 286 of the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code, nor invoking any kind of proof, let alone administering or objectivizing any's relevance.
I.B.3.29 "9." In the same manner "prosecutor" Anca Dorina Rasca instigates without any
syllogistical demonstration according to juridical logic, lying intrinsically as she should've objectivized
I.B.3.30 "5." Furthermore "prosecutor" Anca Dorina Rasca lied that my Constitutional Court
request is inadmissible without any factual or lawful motivation, contradicting my obvious
demonstration that article 315 from Romanian Penal Procedure Code is linked with the cause and
unconstitutional therefore my request is admissible. I’ve attached as proof my request regarding the
unconstitutionality of article 315 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code annex 20 of my Rule 39
ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, not that it
matters because I already filed penal dossiers against some of the members of the Romanian
Constitutional Court, following that I open this most important penal dossier at ICC against the members
of the Romanian Constitutional Court for breaking the presumption of innocence by declaring in
Decision no 25 from 19th January 2017 that anyone can be committed Crimes against humanity against
by being incarcerated by the "psychiatric" charlatans and be chemically lobotomised without
committing any deed penal or immoral as I objectivized in section I.B.11, automatically implied as
I.B.3.31 "my" Romanian "state" mafia assigned "lawyer" Arginteanu Dan pleaded against my
plead by lying the falsified "psychiatric" charlatanry "expertise" just "contains inadvertencies" meaning
is self-contradictory like I've demonstrated in annex 20 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim
measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, mentioning it was already annulled in
14277/231/2015 as inadmissible and unfounded meaning falsified, and he didn't plead that it's also
illegal, groundless and syllogistically invalid like a lawyer should know all the more I wrote the plead in
my defense which he just needed to follow, the one attached as annex 20 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent
request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, meaning "my" Romanian
"state" mafia assigned "lawyer" Arginteanu Dan committed the felony of Unloyal assistance and
representacy, corroborated with the fact he didn't uphold any of my fundamental rights given he didn't
plead for them as I've pleaded, and he pleaded against juridical logic given he didn't use any juridical
logic at all making his defense worthless in favor of the Romanian "state" mafia who put him up to it,
and pleaded against facts which prove my innocence and mental sanity as this "lawyer" omitted on
purpose to prove my innocence and mental sanity like I've pleaded, and invoked proofs and facts that
don't exist meaning the obviously falsified "psychiatric" charlatanry "expertise" who is just a falsified
document like I often demonstrated being illegal, groundless, self-contradictory, syllogistically invalid
and even more falsified in my absence, without my consent and breaking the law that states the
procedure is applied on homicide cases only. "my" Romanian "state" mafia assigned "lawyer"
Arginteanu Dan refused to plead that the deeds I'm falsely accused of can't physically exist let alone be
constituted into felonies, and never presented these facts as I've pleaded, but pleaded worthlessly as he
was instigated or intimidated by the Romanian "magistrate" mafia to do. The "psychiatric expertise
report" this "lawyer" mafia associate invoked is obviously not a an "expertise report" but a falsified
document like I've demonstrated it being illegal, groundless, self-contradictory and syllogistically invalid
in this ICC penal dossier, even to the untrained eye because it's groundless and self-contradictory, and
obviously falsified to a professional because all juridical acts in any state of law in the world must be
motivated syllogistically using a factual particular premise, a correlated legal universal premise, and a
logical meaning consistent with the syllogism laws inference. Not only the "expertise report" does not
exist in the dossier 12718/231/2017 as proven by the fact my mother who I mandated to look in my
stead in the dossier to not be arrested by the mafia “secret police” or just by the courthouse
“gendarmes”, did not find any, but the falsified "psychiatric" charlatans "expertise report" I already
annulled in 14277/231/2015 both in 1st and 2nd instance as inadmissible and unfounded, meaning who
was also falsified in secret and who I managed to find hidden in another dossier, and which was invoked
although falsified in 12718/231/2017 in 2nd instance by one of the very schizophrenic "judge" who
annulled it in 14277/231/2015 meaning Badiu Mandica. According to the law and principle of
contradictoriality if a proof is not opposed to all the parties it is not admissible, and if it's not in the
dossier it cannot exist as a premise in the judicial syllogism, all the more I declared and proved all the
penal dossiers and "psychiatric" charlantary actions falsified without ever being accused of the felonies
I.B.4. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras Ionut
from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" falsified the closing ordnance and
I.B.4.1 "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras Ionut
from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian from
the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with 3992/P/2016
and 4329/P/2016): "Examinand actele de urmarire penala efectuate in dosarul cu numarul de mai sus...",
as translated in English: "Examining the acts of penal pursuit effectuated in the dossier with the number
from above...", because all the procedure acts were falsified by "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian in
cahoots with "policewoman" Popescu Lacramioara", evidently both instigated to do so by the Romanian
“state” mafia since we didn’t know each other therefore there was no personal reason, falsified acts of
procedure proven thus by the fact I’ve been judicially harassed with no proof whatsoever inventoried,
I.B.4.3. “prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras Ionut
from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian from
the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with 3992/P/2016
and 4329/P/2016): "La data de 18.05.2016 a fost inregistrata la Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria
Focsani incheierea de sedinta din data de 18.05.2016 a Judecatoriei Focsani spre a fi efectuate cercetari
fata de Raneti Tudor Andrei pentru infractiunea de incalcare a solemnitatii sedintei, prev. si ped. de art.
278 Cp., cauza fiind inregistrata sub nr. 2845/P/2016", as translated in English: "On the date of 18th May
2016 it was registered at the prosecutor's office near the "Judecatoria Focsani" courthouse the
"Judecatoria Focsani" courthouse meeting closing document from the date of 18th May 2016 to be
effectuated investigations against Raneti Tudor Andrei for the felony of disturbing the solemnity of the
courthouse meeting, foreseen by article 278 from the Romanian Penal Code, the cause being registered
under number 2845/P/2016",
I.B.4.2.1. because the meeting closing document from 18th May 2016 from dossier
2220/91/2015 attached as annex 8 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as
annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, is a falsified document comprised obvious not just by the generic
groundless accusations against me as typical to liars, but by the fact the lying accusers contradict
themselves from the start accusing me of visually witnessing deeds they claim at the same time they
didn't see, proven by not describing them, and audibly witnessing deeds they claim they didn't hear,
proven by not describing them, deeds who are physically impossible such as disturbing the quietness of
the courthouse meeting by listening to audio books on earphones as objectivized I was doing the same
thing for an hour and a half without being accused, as I've did in courthouse before without being
accused if the accusation is not ridiculous enough in itself as proof the accusers are liars, deeds to which
the other named witnesses of the accusation do not corroborate, deeds who do not exist as objectivized
by the audio recording of the courthouse which I've also published at address < and used to plead
against the accusation in the penal complaint I filed to the “penal authorities” and as a judicial
declaration in my defense against the "judiciary bodies" in the very falsified dossiers 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 these "judiciary bodies" falsified, making the accused "judiciary bodies"
incompatible according to the principle nemo esse iudex in sua causa potest, meaning all the falsified
acts of procedure in these falsified dossiers are not just void of right and null according to articles 280-
282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code for being illegal and groundless, but they were also made
by incompatible functionaries who as of fact falsified as proven in this ICC penal dossier all the
procedure acts, which also means inherently that the procedure acts are syllogistically invalid having no
particular factual premises or correlated universal law premises for inferences or judicial decisions to be
drawn from, as the deeds do not physically exist and cannot constitute felonies. In conclusion the
meeting closing document from 18th May 2016 from dossier 2220/91/2015 is a document proof against
the lying accusers, of which the "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor"
Petrescu Auras Ionut knew, meaning they lied by omission refusing to prove my innocence from the
start, and refusing to denounce the lying "magistrate" accusers to the “competent penal authorities",
and refusing to retain accordingly in this thus falsified ordnance;
I.B.4.4.Article 309 paragraph 1 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code regarding the putting
into motion the penal action which was illegally disposed against me, also demonstrates the falsification
of the ordnance of closing from 1st August 2017 from 2845/P/2016 (united with 3992/P/2016 and
4329/P/2016), because as I quote the law text in Romanian: "Actiunea penala se pune in miscare de
procuror, prin ordonanta, in cursul urmaririi penale, cand acesta constata ca exista probe din care
rezulta ca o persoana a savarsit o infractiune si nu exista vreunul dintre cazurile de impiedicare
prevazute la art. 16 (1)", as translated in English: "The penal action is put into motion by the prosecutor,
through an ordnance, during the penal pursuit, when he finds that proofs exist that a person has
committed a felony and any of the cases of impediment foreseen by article 16 paragraph 1 from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code do not exist", because no security measure based on article 16
paragraph 1 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code can be issued against the accused who gained
the penal quality according to article 309 paragraph 1 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, or the
suspect who was attributed the penal quality according to article 305 paragraphs 1 and 3 from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code, according to the text of the law which states these penal qualities can
only be attributed if there’s no article 16 paragraph 1 case from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code.
Against me there were falsified both the in personam ordnance and the putting into motion the penal
action ordnance as judiciary harassment to be called at the police station repeatedly to give the same
declaration for nothing three times even, ordnances which are according to articles 305 paragraphs 1
and 3 and 309 paragraph 1 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code therefore meaning article 16
paragraph 1 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code can’t be invoked in conjuncture with
article 38 from the Romanian Penal Code regarding the non-punishment clause of irresponsibility,
corroborated with the fact article 38 from the Romanian Penal Code refers to convicts not the suspect
or accused therefore it can only be impartially proposed after the definitive decision of conviction
according to the presumption of innocence. As proof the ordnance from 1st August 2017 is falsified in
this regard, meaning the "prosecutor" refers to me as the accused and invokes illegally article 16
paragraph 1 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code instigating to Crimes against humanity
I.B.4.7. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras Ionut
from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian from
the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with 3992/P/2016
and 4329/P/2016): "Prin ordonanta din data de 07.09.2016 emisa de organele de cercetare penala din
cadrul Politiei Municipiului Focsani s-a dispus efectuarea in continuare a urmaririi penale fata de Raneti
Tudor Andrei sub aspectul savarsirii infractiunii de incalcare a solemnitatii sedintei prev. de art. 278 Cp.,
iar prin ordonanta din data de 08.09.2016 a Parchetului de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani s-a dispus
confirmarea ordonantei de efectuare in continuare a urmaririi penale", as translated into English:
"Through the ordnance from the date of 7th September 2016 emitted by the penal investigation bodies
from within the Focsani City Police it was disposed the effectuation in continuation of the penal pursuit
regarding Raneti Tudor Andrei under the aspect of the committal of the felony of meeting solemnity
breaking foreseen by article 278 from the Penal Code, and through the ordnance from the date of 8th
September 2016 of the prosecutor's office near the "Judecatoria Focsani" courthouse it was disposed
the confirmation of the ordnance of continuation of penal pursuit",
I.B.4.7.1. because there are no such thing as "penal investigation bodies" within the city of
Focsani "police" institution, only mafia soldiers, felons, which I prove by the fact they've investigated
Crimes against humanity against me by participating in the falsification of the "psychiatric" charlatanry
procedure in a futile attempt to cover-up the illegality and groundlessness of their accusations that I'm
irresponsible, without discernment, violent and a public danger, then these mafia "police" and "secret
police" soldiers also arrested me illegally using falsified mandates from the mafia "magistrate"
caporegimes on 6th April 2017 and 27th May 2017 especially from my law faculty exams, and handed me
to the "psychiatrist" torturers and their accomplices who tied me up to an operating table in Focsani
"psychiatric" gulag and injected me with deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins putting me in
anaphylactic shock for 3 days without treatment, then after I survived they poisoned me forcefully with
other deadly fluorine and chlorine neurotoxins until 8th June 2017, in fact with the same deadly fluorine
neurotoxin risperidone or paliperidone - risperidone's metabolite, with which the Romanian "state"
mafia covertly injected me with in my right elbow in the emergency ward of the "Saint Pantelimon"
I.B.4.8. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras Ionut
from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian from
the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with 3992/P/2016
and 4329/P/2016): "2) La data de 14.07.2016 a fost inregistrata la Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria
Focsani incheierea din data de 24.06.2016 pronuntata in dosarul 14277/231/2015 a Tribunalului
Vrancea, spre a fi efectuate cercetari fata de Raneti Tudor Andrei pentru infractiunea de incalcarea
solemnitatii sedintei, prev. si ped. de art. 278 Cp., cauza fiind inregistrata sub nr. 3992/P/2016", as
translated to English: "2) On the date of 14th July 2016 it was registered at the prosecutor's office near
the "Judecatoria Focsani" courthouse the meeting closing document from the date of 24th June 2016
pronounced in the dossier 14277/231/2015 by Vrancea Tribunal, for effectuating investigations
regarding Raneti Tudor Andrei for the felony of the disturbing the solemnity of the courthouse, foreseen
by article 278 from the Romanian Penal Code, the cause being registered under number 3992/P/2016",
I.B.4.8.1. because the courthouse meeting closing document form 24th June 2016, attached as
annex 9 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier, is obviously falsified by accusing me that pleading constitutes the felony of Disturbing the
solemnity of the courthouse according to article 278 from Romanian Penal Code, therefore the
"prosecutors" should've ex-officio denounce "judge" Popa Mariana who falsified the meeting closing
document form 24th June 2016, to the superior prosecutor's office competent to prosecute magistrates,
just like I opened a penal dossier against "judge" Popa Mariana who was never acquitted as proof, and
as corroboration I was never accused of the felonies of False declarations (for false judicial declarations
such as in a false penal complaint), Inducing into error the judicial bodies (for false proofs) or
Disseminating false information (for publishing the penal dossier against "judge" Popa Mariana, and
legally advertising she is a criminal on the internet, as I did against perhaps with over a hundred penal
dossiers on the illicitly mafia censored forum “militia.freeforums.net”), through which I make the proof
of verity of my declarations and proofs, certified by the very Romanian "state" mafia who has
demonstrated every interest in its 8 attempts to Qualifiedly Murdering me, Torturing and gravely
Bodily Harming me in two instances as I've objectivized in section A.II.1.3.1. As analytic proof the
accusation is false, according to the text of the felony of Disturbing the solemnity of the courthosue
meeting, the words used must be insults or obscene, not that the plead in my defense of my rights in
which I demonstrated "judge" Popa Mariana is incompatible for breaking the law by being thus proven
partial, and by implicitly revealing Popa Mariana is not a judge but a felon, fact which "judge" Popa
Mariana admits by falsely accusing me of using insulting words not that my plead is insulting which is
not, as proven by "judge" Popa Mariana failing to specify the insulting or obscene words and accusing
me generically typical to liars that the phrases of my plead in defense of my rights are insulting or
obscene, again with no objectivization as none can be formulated, as proven by annex 9 of my Rule 39
I.B.4.9. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras Ionut
from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian from
the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with 3992/P/2016
and 4329/P/2016): "Prin ordonanta din data de 21.07.2016 s-a dispus inceperea urmaririi penale pentru
infractiunea de incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei prevazuta de art. 278 Cp., constand in aceea ca in sedinta
camerei de consiliu din data de 24.06.2016, in care s-au judecat contestatiile promovate de Parchetul de
pe langa Judecatoria Focsani si de contestatorul Raneti Tudor Andrei impotriva incheierii din data de
05.02.2016, pronuntata de Judecatoria Focsani in dosar nr. 14277/231/2015, Raneti Tudor Andrei fiind
prezent in fata completului de judecata prezidat de judecator de drepturi si libertati Popa Mariana , a
folosit in mod repetat cuvinte jignitoare si acuze contribuind astfel la incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei de
judecata.", as translated to English: "Through the ordnance from the date of 21st July 2016 it was
disposed the beginning of the penal pursuit for the felony of disturbing the solemnity of the meeting
foreseen by article 278 from the Romanian Penal Code, consisting in that in the council meeting room
from the date of 24th June 2016, in which there were judged the contestations promoted by the
prosecutor's office from near the "Judecatoria Focsani" courthouse and by the contester Raneti Tudor
Andrei against the closing decision from the date of 5th February 2016, pronounced by the "Judecatoria
Focsani" courthouse in dossier no 14277/231/2015, Raneti Tudor Andrei being present in front of the
judgment contingent presided by rights and liberties judge Popa Mariana , used repeatedly insulting
words and accusations contributing like this to the disturbing the meeting solemnity",
I.B.4.9.1. because on 24th June 2016 there was no council meeting but an illegal public meeting
meaning as legally required there was supposed to be a council meeting with only with me and the
judge present, and my mafia appointed useless and barely worth mentioning "state lawyer", but "judge"
Popa Mariana on purpose broke article 352 paragraph 6 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code,
allowing other parties and their lawyers in the room, the false witness "gendarme" Lepadatu from 18th
May 2016 who was posted in the courthouse room at the mafia's orders abnormally since 8:30 a.m. and
kept there for hours until I left, and the convicts for murder who were also on trial that day, and
I.B.4.9.2. because the felony of Disturbing the meeting solemnity refers as I quote from the text
of the law from the Romanian Penal Code as translated in English directly: "Using words or gestures that
are offensive or obscene, of nature to disturb the activity of the instance, committed by a person who
participates or assists to a procedure that takes places before the instance, is punishable with jail from a
month to three months or a fine", and since I have not uttered insulting or obscene words, and pleading
in my defense of my rights doesn't constitute the felony of Disturbing the solemnity of the meeting as
falsely accused on 24th June 2016, as proven by annex 9 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim
measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, given no such insulting or obscene words are
specified but generic typical to liars accusations are made against me, not to mention falsified fines
based on these false accusations, it is proven beyond any reasonable doubt I am innocent also in
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 thus proven falsified dossiers, therefore "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai
Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras Ionut falsified the in rem ordnance in cahoots
I.B.4.10. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras
Ionut from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian
from the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016): "Prin ordonanta din data de 07.09.2016 emisa de organele de cercetare
penala din cadrul Politiei Municipiului Focsani s-a dispus efectuarea in continuare a urmaririi penale fata
I.B.4.11. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras
Ionut from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian
from the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016): "La data de 28.07.2016 a fost inregistrata la Parchetul de pe langa
Judecatoria Focsani decizia penala nr. 113/91/2016 din data de 24.06.2016 a Tribunalului Vrancea
pronuntata in dosarul nr. 1053/91/2015, spre a fi efectuate cercetari fata de Raneti Tudor Andrei pentru
infractiunea de incalcare a solemnitatii sedintei, prev. si ped. de art. 278 Cp., cauza fiind inregistrata sub
nr. 4329/P/2016", as translated into English: "On the date of 28th July 2016 it was registered at the
prosecutor’s office near the courthouse "Judecatoria Focsani the penal decision from dossier number
1053/91/2015, for effectuating investigations regarding Raneti Tudor Andrei for the felony of the
disturbing the solemnity of the courthouse, foreseen by article 278 from the Romanian Penal Code, the
cause being registered under number 4329/P/2016",
I.B.4.11.1. as proven by the same reasoning I pleaded with before in this ICC penal dossier
paragraph < regarding the falsification of the penal complaint in 3992/P/2016, given this paragraph from
the falsified ordnance from 1st August 2017 is identical to the last one, and the falsification of the penal
complaint is identical meaning containing the same lies since in corroboration I mention my plead in 24th
June 2016 was identical about "judge's" Popa Mariana incompatibility to address any dossier regarding
me, as also proven by her severe psychotic episode from 24th June 2016 of gathering false witnesses and
incriminating herself for the felony of Influencing my declarations through judicial harassment meaning
abusing the function of a judge and breaking the law, then committing the felonies of False declarations
and Inducing into error the judicial bodies, and determining thus instigating in cahoots with the other
"magistrates" the Crimes against humanity committed against me between 27th May 2017 and 8th June
2017
I.B.4.13. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras
Ionut from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian
from the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016): "Prin ordonanta din data de 07.09.2016 emisa de organele de cercetare
penala din cadrul Politiei Municipiului Focsani s-a dispus efectuarea in continuare a urmaririi penale fata
de Raneti Tudor Andrei sub aspectul savarsirii infractiunii de incalcare a solemnitatii sedintei prev. de art.
278 Cp., iar prin ordonanta din data de 08.09.2016 a Parchetului de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani s-a
dispus confirmarea ordonantei de efectuare in continuare a urmaririi penale", as translated into English:
"Through the ordnance from the date of 7th September 2016 emitted by the penal investigation bodies
from within the Focsani City Police it was disposed the effectuation in continuation of the penal pursuit
regarding Raneti Tudor Andrei under the aspect of the committal of the felony of meeting solemnity
breaking foreseen by article 278 from the Penal Code, and through the ordnance from the date of 8th
September 2016 of the prosecutor's office near the "Judecatoria Focsani" courthouse it was disposed
the confirmation of the ordnance of continuation of penal pursuit",
I.B.4.13.1. as proven by the same reasoning I pleaded with before in this ICC penal dossier
paragraph < regarding the falsification of the penal pursuit continuation or in personam ordnance in
2845/P/2016, given this paragraph from the falsified ordnance from 1st August 2017 is identical to the
last one, and the falsification of the penal pursuit continuation ordnance in 4329/P/2016 is identical,
meaning the ordnance is illegal - with no proof administration being therefore groundless and
intrinsically syllogistically invalid, and void of right according to articles 280-282 from the Romanian
Penal Procedure Code
I.B.4.14. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras
Ionut from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian
from the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016): "La data de 08.09.2016 prin ordonanta emisa de Parchetul de pe langa
Judecatoria Focsani s-a dispus reunirea dosarelor 3992/P/2016 si 4329/P/2016 la dosarul penal nr.
2845/P/2016", as translated into English: "On the date of 8th September 2016 through the ordnance
emitted by the prosecutor's office near the courthouse "Judecatoria Focsani" it was disposed the
reunification of the dossiers 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 to penal dossier no 2845/P/2016",
I.B.4.15. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras
Ionut from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian
from the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016): "In fapt, la data de 18.06.2016 respectiv 24.06.2016, aflandu-se in fata
completelor de judecata prezidate de judecatorii Paun Ionel Iulian din cadrul Judecatoriei Focsani si Popa
Mariana din cadrul Tribunalului Vrancea, inculpatul Raneti Tudor Andrei a proferat in mod repetat
cuvinte jignitoare si acuze care au determinat trecerea in derizoriua a sedintelor de judecata, contribuind
astfel la incalcarea solemnitatii sedintelor", as translated into English: "In fact, on the date of 18th June
2016 respectively 24th June 2016, being found in front of the judgment contingents presided by judges
Paun Ionel Iulian from "Judecatoria Focsani" courthouse and Popa Mariana from Vrancea Tribunal, the
accused Raneti Tudor Andrei uttered repeatedly insulting words and accusations that determined the
I.B.4.16. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras
Ionut from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian
from the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016): "La data de 02.11.2016 prin ordonanta nr. 2845/P/2016 emisa de
Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani s-a pus in miscare actiunea penala impotriva inculpatului
Raneti Tudor Andrei pentru infractiunile de incalcarea solemnitatii sedintei prev. de art.278 Cp., art.278
Cp. si art.278 Cp. cu aplicarea artr. 38 alin.1 Cp.", as translated into English: "On the date of 2nd
November 2016 through ordnance number 2845/P/2016 emitted by the prosecutor's office near the
"Judecatoria Focsani" courthouse it was put into motion the penal action against the acussed Raneti
Tudor Andrei for the felonies of disturbing the solemnity of the courthouse meeting foreseen by article
278 from the Romanian Penal Code, article 278 from the Romanian Penal Code and article 278 from the
Romanian Penal Code, with the application of article 38 alignment 1 from the Romanian Penal Code",
I.B.4.16.1. because the falsified ordnance of putting into motion the penal action is proven
falsified by the previous falsification of in rem and in personam ordnances that demonstrate no deed
even exist physically to be appreciated to constitute a felony even ad absurdum and therefore I can't be
suspected or accused of committing a felony that doesn't exist, mentioning that through the ordinance
of penal pursuit continuation or in personam ordinance a person gains the penal quality of suspect,
I.B.4.17. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras
Ionut from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian
from the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016): "Numitul Raneti Tudor Andrei a fost audiat in calitate de suspect si
ulterior in calitate de inculpat (in prezenta unui aparator din oficiu), ocazie cu care i s-a cerut
consimtamantul scris pentru expertizarea medico-legala psihiatrica, insa aceasta a declarat ca nu este
de acord", as translated into English: "The named Raneti Tudor Andrei was audiated as a suspect and
later in quality of acussed (in the presence of an ex officio defender), ocassioni in which he was
I.B.4.18. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras
Ionut from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian
from the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016): "La data de 08.12.2016, prin ordonanta nr. 2845/P/2016 emisa de
Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani s-a dispus efectuarea unei expertize medico-legale psihiatrice
fata de inculpatul Raneti Tudor Andrei", as translated to English: "On the date of 8th December 2016,
through ordnance number 2845/P/2016 emitted by the prosecutor's office near the "Judecatoria
Focsani" courthouse, it was disposed the effectuation of a legal medicine psychiatric expertise against
the accused Raneti Tudor Andrei",
I.B.4.18.1. because the ordnance from 8th December 2016 from 2845/P/2016 is illegal by
breaking article 184 paragraphs 1 and 3 regarding the psychiatric examination procedure, and breaking
article 4 paragraph 2 regarding the presumption of innocence, and along with that article 23 paragraph
11 from the Romanian Contitution, and articles 20 and 11 from the Romanian Constitutions declaring
Romanian ratified international treaties internal right meaning article 6 paragraph 2 from ECHR and
article 11 from UDHR. This ordnance although uncomunicated as all the others can only be unmotivated
because there are no grounds in any of the penal dossiers ever falsified against me by the Romanian
"state" mafia, as shortly proven by the fact I was never indicted and convicted by annex 17 of my Rule
39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, therefore
breaking article 286 paragraph 2 letter d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code regarding the
obligation of the "judicial bodies" to motivate any procedure act through a particular factual premise
and a correlated universal law premise, only valid and legal method from which a logical juridical
decision can be inferred. Because this ordnance breaks every relevant law and regulation, it is void of
right according to article 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, and all subsequent acts of
procedure logically derived from it, and
I.B.4.19. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras
Ionut from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian
from the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016): "Prin incheierea din data de 05.04.2017 judecatorul de drepturi si
libertati de la Judecatoria Focsani a admis propunerea formulata de Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria
Focsani si a dispus emiterea mandatului de aducere in scopul prezentarii inculpatului Raneti Tudor Andrei
la comisia medico-legala psihiatrica", as translated into English: "Through the courthouse meeting
closing decision from 5th April 2017 the judge of rights and liberties from the "Judecatoria Focsani"
courthouse admitted the proposal formulated by the prosecutor's office near the "Judecatoria Focsani"
courthouse and disposed the release of the mandate of bringing for the purpose of presenting the
accused Raneti Tudor Andrei to the psychiatric legal medicine committee",
I.B.4.19.1. because the "prosecutors" deconspire their illicit intent by declaring the mandate
was emitted so I be "presented" to the "psychiatric" charlatanry committee not that I be "examined" by
the "psychiatric" charlatanry committee, through which it is admitted that a "psychiatric" charlatanry
"expertise" is impossible without my consent and cooperation, meaning my illegal arrest and
detainment in front of the "psychiatric" charlatanry committee is obviously illegal according to common
logic as proven by the law itself, article 184 paragraph 4 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
which states that only after the suspect of accused of homicide according to article 184 paragraph 1
from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, has given his consent according to article 184 paragraph 3
from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, but didn't present itself to the "psychiatric" charlatanry
committee, can a mandate of arrest and detainment be issued according to article 184 paragraph 4 from
I.B.4.20. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras
Ionut from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian
from the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016): "La data de 06.04.2017, ora 9, in baza mandatului de aducere emis de
judecatorul de drepturi si libertati, inculpatul Raneti Tudor Andrei a fost prezentat la S.J.M.L. Vrancea",
as translated to English: "On the date of 6th April 2017, 9 o'clock, on the base of the bringing mandate
emittted by the rights and liberties judge, the acussed Raneti Tudor Andrei was presented to S.J.M.L.
Vrancea",
I.B.4.20.1. because the "prosecutors" lie by omission about the fact I was arrested from my
mother's home at about 7 a.m. on 6th April 2017 with 2 mafia "masked policemen" and 2 "policemen"
soldiers for the purpose of conducting state terrorism by breaking into my home while I was sleeping, as
usual and as they did for decades during the ex-"communist" Romanian era at least, and detained me
without a reason as proof of this at the Focsani city police station for nothing, before being brought by
force to the "psychiatric" charlatanry "committee" at "S.J.M.L. Vrancea" where I found the "psychiatrist"
charlatan Berzvehnii Igor presiding over a "committee" consisting of just himself at about 8:45 a.m.
perhaps and refused to tell the "policemen" mafia soldiers to release me until 9 a.m. when he called two
more woman "psychiatrist" charlatans, still not up to the usual 5 member "psychiatric" charlatans
committee, and only after I was released, mentioning Berzvehnii Igor is the "psychiatrist" charlatan who
is also member of the local malpraxis committee within the local sanity direction from where he falsified
I.B.4.21. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras
Ionut from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian
from the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016): "In urma examinarii medico-legale psihiatrice, avand in vedere si
complexitatea cazului, comisia de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica din cadrul S.J.M.L. Vrancea a
recomandat internarea inculpatului intr-o institutie medico-legala de specialitate respectiv sectia de
Psihiatrie a Spitalului Judetean de Urgenta "Sf. Pantelimon" Focsani in vederea efectuarii psihiatrice si a
emis biletul de trimitere nr. 1447/A1-P/333/06.04.2017", as translated into English: "Following the
examination of the psychiatric legal medicine, and having in regard the complexity of the case, the
committee of psychiatric legal medicine examination from S.J.M.L. Vrancea has recommended the
internment of the accused in a specialty legal medicine institution respectively the Psychiatry section
from Emergency Hospital "Saint Pantelimon" from Focsani regarding the effectuation of the psychiatric
examination and it has emitted the ticked for sending number 1447/A1-P/333/6th April 2017",
I.B.4.21.1. because as I've proven before twice, even the lying "prosecutors" admit I wasn't
"examined" by the "psychiatric" charlatanry committee but just "presented, as obvious by the fact i
haven't given my consent making a "psychiatric" charlatanry "examination" impossible, and
I.B.4.21.2. because there is no such thing as "preliminary legal medicine psychiatric
examination" given no "psychiatric" charlatanry "examination" at all could take place without my
I.B.4.22. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras
Ionut from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian
from the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016): "Prin incheierea din data de 10.04.2017 judecatorul de drepturi si
libertati de la Judecatoria Focsani a admis propunerea formulata de Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria
Focsani si a dispus internarea medicala nevoluntara in vederea efectuarii expertizei psihiatrice a
inculpatului Raneti Tudor Andrei", as translated to English: "Through the closing meeting document from
10th April 2017 the judge of rights and liberties from the "Judecatoria Focsani" courthouse admitted the
proposal formulated by the prosecutor's office near the "Judecatoria Focsani" courthouse and disposed
the involuntary medical internment regarding the effectuation of the psychiatric expertise of acussed
Raneti Tudor Andrei",
I.B.4.23. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras
Ionut from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian
from the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016): "Potrivit concluziilor raportului de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica
nr.1447/A1-P/333/09.12.2016 inculpatul Raneti Tudor Andrei prezinta tulburare psihotica acuta
predominant deliranta, tulburare de personalitate de tip paranoid", as translated to English: "According
I.B.4.24. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras
Ionut from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian
from the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016): "Comisia de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica a apreciat
discernamantul absent la momentul si in raport de faptele comise si a recomandat instituirea masurii de
siguranta cu caracter medical prev. de art.109 C.p. respectiv obligarea la tratament medical", as
translated in English: "The psychiatric legal medicine expertise committee has appreciated the
discernment absent at the moment and in raport with the deeds committed and has recommended the
establishment of the security measure with medical character foreseen by article 109 from the
Romanian Penal Code respectively the obligation to medical treatment",
I.B.4.24.1. because the "psychiatric" charlatanry "expertise report" nr.1447/A1-
P/333/09.12.2016 was falsified half a year after in my absence and without my consent which makes it
impossible regardless, breaking articles 10 and 11 from the Romanian Law 487/2002 regarding the fact
all "psychiatric" charlatanry "examination" can only occur directly with a "psychiatrist" charlatan
meaning through a direct interview and only if the examinee gives his consent and cooperates since
obviously an interview cannot take place without the examinees consent and cooperation, and the
I.B.4.25. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras
Ionut from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian
from the ordnance from 1s August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016): "Intrucat inculpatul Raneti Tudor Andrei, potrivit raportului de expertiza
I.B.4.26. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras
Ionut from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian
from the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016): "Avand in vedere ca urmeaza a se dispune clasarea cauzei, pentru
luarea masurii de siguranta a obligarii inculpatului Raneti Tudor Andrei la tratament medical, se impune
sesizarea judecatorului de camera preliminara, intrucat inculpatul in contextul afectiunilor medicale
constatate in cuprinsul raportului de expertiza medico-legala psihiatrica si al savarsirii, in mod repetat,
de fapte penale, prezinta pericol pentru societate", as translated in English: "Having in regard that it
follows to be disposed the closing of the cause, for the taking of the security measure of obligation of
the acussed Raneti Tudor Andrei to medical treatment, it is imposed the notification of the preliminary
room judge, as the acussed in the context of the medical aflications observed in the content of the
psychiatric legal medicine expertize report and of committal, in a repeated mode, of penal deeds,
presents a danger to society"
I.B.4.26.1. because as I demonstrated in paragraph <2nd?the one with 103, 331 and
907/307/2010>, the "prosecutors" never notified the courthouse even with a falsified indictment for a
definitive conviction to be falsified against me and my presumption of innocence to be at least falsely
invalidated, which is the only situation in which the “judicial bodies” could declare I committed felonies,
and the only legal way to dispose a security measure and invoke the irresponsibility clause of non-
punishment according to the law text of articles 38 and 109 from the Romanian Penal Code who refer to
convicts not to the suspects or accused. No penal deeds are ever objectivized in an indictment or
anywhere else, nor an indictment exists because the deeds that I'm falsely accused of do not even exist
physically because they cannot physically exist let alone constitute felonies even ad absurdum as
demonstrated in this ICC penal dossier. Missing an indictment, no public danger is ever objectivized to
exist being impossible to be inferred out of felonies that do not exist because they are illogically
declared to be constituted out of deeds that physically cannot exist, as I explicitate a couple of
paragraphs down, and demonstrated before in this ICC penal dossier. In even invoke the Romanian
jurisprudence from dossier 907/307/2010 where the instance declared that a security measure can’t be
disposed except against a convict against which also there’s objectivized the danger that he will commit
felonies in the future;
I.B.4.26.2. because article 109 from the Romanian Penal Code regarding security measures
refers to convicts not the suspect or accused like I've been falsely attributed the quality of in the last 3
falsified penal dossiers against me, reminding that after the falsified ordnance of closing the penal
pursuit on 1st August 2017, I had no penal quality at all and benefitted of the presumption of innocence
as any law abiding citizen, therefore no security measure can be executed against me. Article 38 from
the Romanian Penal Code refers to convicts too I remind, and suspects and the accused benefit from the
presumption of innocence as well according to article 4 of the Romanian Penal procedure code, article
23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution, articles 11 and 20 from Romanian Constitution that
makes Romanian ratified international treaties internal right meaning article 11 from the Universal
declaration of human rights and article 6 paragraph 2 from the European convention of human rights
I.B.4.27. "prosecutor" Lupu Mihai Cristian and his superior "first prosecutor" Petrescu Auras
Ionut from prosecutor's office "Parchetul de pe langa Judecatoria Focsani" lied that, I quote in Romanian
from the ordnance from 1st August 2017 from falsified penal dossiers 2845/P/2016 (united with
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016): "Fata de cele constatate, in temeiul art. 314 alin. 1 lit.a C.p.p. si art.315
alin.1 lit.b C.p.p. rap. la art.16 alin.1 lit.d C.p.p. in ref. la art.28 C.p.", as translated into English: "In regard
to the findings, according to article 314 alignment 1 letter a from the Penal Procedure Code and article
315 alignment 1 letter b from the Penal Procedure Code reported to article 16 alignment 1 letter d from
the Penal Procedure Code referencing article 28 Penal Code",
I.B.4.27.1. because as I demonstrated in paragraphs <, article 16 paragraph 1 from the
Romanian Penal Procedure Code cannot be invoked in the falsified closing ordnance from 1st august
2017 after the falsification of the ordnances in personam or continuation of penal pursuit according to
article 305 paragraph 1 and 3 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, and of putting into motion the
penal action according to article 309 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code who explicitly exclude all
subsequent article 16 paragraph 1 invocations, meaning the falsified ordnance from 1st August 2017
from 2845/P/2016 (united with 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016) is illegal thus void of right according to
articles 280-282 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
I.B.4.27.2. because as I demonstrated in paragraph <, article 38 from the Romanian Penal Code
regarding the non-punishment clause of irresponsibility cannot be invoked according to this article's text
except against the convicted that is following an indictment according to article 331 from the Romanian
I.B.5. "judge" Neagu Rodica from Vrancea Tribunal falsified the sentence in 1779/91/2017
instead of stopping the Crimes against humanity committed by the Romania “state” mafia against me
between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, by annulling the falsified decisions in 4909/231/2017 through
1779/91/2017, falsified decisions which aren’t even covering up for the Crimes against humanity, but
the Romanian “state” mafia used them for putting me into a situation of vulnerability by issuing a
falsified mandate and arresting me using its “secret police” from my law faculty exams on 27th May
2017, then tying me up at the Focsani “psychiatric” gulag to an operating table and puting me in
anaphylactic shock for 3 days through fluorine and chlorine injected poisoning without treatment
expecting me do die then falsify the paperwork making it appear it happened out of natural causes, then
after I survived they forcefully chemically lobotomized me until 8th June 2017 under threat of violence
with other deadly fluorine and chlorine poisons of the same kind they covertly injected me in the night
between 5th and 6th December 2014 as I’ve demonstrated in sections A.II.1.3.1^7 and A.I.1-2. If through
the decision 1779/91/2017 the falsified decisions in 4909/231/2017 would’ve been annulled as legally
I.B.5.1. “judge” Neagu Rodica also knew that if he falsified the decision in 1779/91/2017
immediately after receiving the dossier I would’ve filed another appeal in annulment against it as I did
before tens of times against the falsified decisions of the mafia becoming especially predictable in this
regard, procedure of appeal in annulment motivated exclusively on the fact each and every decision
attacked was falsified therefore the mafia “judge” was proven lacking impartiality to say the least,
through which I proved the extend of the magistrate mafia hierarchically and laterally reaching a
statistic truth that 100% of the Romanian magistrates are corrupt and about 86% criminals, especially
true for the upper tiers of the Romanian judicial bodies where this scientific truth is based on the fact all
of the heads of the Romanian inexistent judiciary system are corrupt and criminals, which is not a
statistic with a presumable small margin of error. “judge” Neagu Rodica however didn’t know as before
in 4909/231/2017 in 2nd instance when and whether I would’ve been silenced by the Romanian “state”
mafia he belongs to, therefore it also delayed the judgment in 1779/91/2017 as it did in 4909/231/2017
in 2nd instance making sure that me attacking his falsified decision would’ve been purposeless in regard
of stopping the Crimes against humanity from being committed which although I predicted it was the
murderous intent of the Romanian “state” mafia since 2014, I didn’t also think the mafia was committed
to perpetrate based on the fact not being paranoid as the Romanian “state” mafia I knew it had no real
reason to commit Crimes against humanity against me, and this being the supposed motivation of some
of the mafia members and based on the fact before I profited from these scruples of these various mafia
members who didn’t want to get directly involved in committing Torture, Bodily Harm and Qualified
Murder against me, I proved the 4 falsified penal dossiers and 4 psychiatric actions against me are
falsified achieving this within no less than the Romanian “state” mafia’s own courthouses, and there
were plenty of laws and procedures I could’ve invoked before the Crimes against humanity could’ve
I.B.5.2. Finally, I am proving the exact, necessarily and sufficient manner in which the decision in
1779/91/2017 was falsified meaning declared inadmissible illegally, that proves the complicity of
I.B.5.3.For the purpose of proving the decision in 1779/91/2017 is falsified I’m quoting in
Romanian the fact the schizophrenic “judge” Neagu Rodica lied making a falsehood the reasoning
standing behind the falsified decision that my appeal in annulment is inadmissible: “...potrivit
dispozitiilor art.426 C.p.p. se poate face “contestatie in anulare” numai impotriva hotararilor penale si
care au ramas definitive, adica la finalizarea unui parcurs judiciar reglementat prin dispozitiile art. 3 pct.
1 lit.a-d C.p.p.” meaning as translated into English: “...according to the dispositions of article 426 from
the Romanian Penal Procedure Code it can be made an “appeal in annullment” only against penal
decisions which remained definitive, meaning at the finalization of a judiciary process reglemented by
dispositions of article 3 point 1 letters a-d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code”, the lies consisting
in that firstly, the falsified attacked decision in 4909/231/2017 in 2nd instance is a penal decision
according to article 370 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code as I’ve indicated in my appeal in
annulment 1779/91/2017 so that any schizophrenic judge could have not even the judicial inadmissible
excuse he didn’t know the law, then secondly the penal decisions that remain definitive have nothing to
do with article 3 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code but with article 551 from the Romanian
Penal Procedure Code. The irrelevant invocation of article 3 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code is
another proof by the Romanian “state” mafia member “judge” Neagu Rodica that I was never indicted
or convicted; therefore articles 38 and 109 from the Romanian Penal Code regarding the non-
punishment clause of irresponsibility and so called security measure of medical treatment which is
ridiculous since there is no such thing as medical treatment for irresponsibility as I’ve explicitly
demonstrated in section I.B.4, can’t be invoked against me because they refer to convicts. Furthermore
I’ve presented no less than 10 jurisprudential proofs in my appeal in annulment that any definitive penal
decision is attackable through contestation in annulment, which I demonstrate by attaching my appeal
in annulment against the falsified decision in 4909/231/2017 in 2nd instance as annex <.
I.B.5.4. For the purpose of proving the decision in 1779/91/2017 is falsified I’m quoting in
Romanian the fact the schizophrenic “judge” Neagu Rodica lied making a falsehood the reasoning
standing behind the falsified decision that my appeal in annulment is inadmissible: “Textul insusi al
articolului 426 alin.1 lit. a-i C.p.p. conditioneaza promovarea “Contestatiei in anulare” de stadiul cauzei -
dupa judecarea in apel si nicidecum intr-o faza pentru care Judecatorul de drepturi si libertati se
pronunta prin “Incheiere””, meaning as translated into English: “The text itself of article 426 alignment 1
I.B.5.6. In conclusion as shown in the last 3 paragraphs the schizophrenic “judge” Neagu Rodica
falsified the decision in 1779/91/2017, then goes on attempting again to cover-up the fact he delayed
the trial in 1779/91/2017 on purpose to allow the Romanian “state” mafia to capture me and commit
Crimes against humanity against me, as it tried in 4909/231/2017 in 2nd instance before, reason for
which he was incompatible according to article 64 paragraph 3 and 4 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code to address dossier 1779/91/2017 anyway, being evident from the public history of
dossier 1779/91/2017 that it was stolen from the random distribution system of dossier, assigned to the
schizophrenic “judge” Croitoru Mariana Sandina who was obviously incompatible for falsifying the
attacked decision from 4909/231/2017 in 2nd instance, then by abusing and breaking regulations
hallucinating that any number of illegal convolutions can hide their crimes, the Romanian “state” mafia
assigned the dossier to the schizophrenic “judge” Neagu Rodica. The concrete proof that the
schizophrenic “judge” Neagu Rodica goes on attempting again to cover-up the fact he delayed the trial
in 1779/91/2017 on purpose to allow the Romanian “state” mafia to capture me and commit Crimes
against humanity against me, is as I quote in Romanian his own words: “Mai observa tribunalul ca pana
la solutionarea “Contestatiei” s-a realizat expertizarea medico-legala a contestatorului ori tocmai
aceasta a facut obiectul nemultumirii contestatorului care a solicitat infirmarea masurii”, meaning as
translated in English: “Furthermore the tribunal observes that until the solving of the “Contestation” it
was realized the legal medicine expertise of the contester or this is the reason of the object of the
malcontent of the contester that solicited the annulment of the measure”, which is a lie because first of
all no legal medicine expertise was performed on me since the Crimes against humanity committed
against me in the night between 5th and 6th December 2014, legal medicine expertise which I demanded
and was refused on 8th December 2014 being offered a superficial falsified expertise instead of being
sent to the proper medical specialties to which eventually I went guided by my suffering and after I
obtained a number of diagnostics, as proof the “legal medics” Dicu Serban Dan and Ionescu Natalia
refused to make a real expertise report declaring the MRI reports and all the diagnostics from
I.B.5.7. "prosecutor" Barsan Victoria instigated that the sentence in 1779/91/2017 be falsified
without motivating in fact and by the law its falsified plead, nor invoking any kind of proof. I already
have many penal dossiers opened against Barsan Victoria who was never acquitted in any of them
therefore her only compatibility is with prison time for her felonies and collaboration with the mafia as
I've demonstrated, not falsifying acts of procedure in falsified dossiers against me, which just proves the
Romanian "state" mafia carelessness brought by self assuredness nobody can convict them for this
I.B.5.7.1. Because the aberrations “prosecutor” Barsan Victoria are the same as those retained
by the schizophrenic “judge” Neagu Rodica, I also indicate the same plead above demonstrating thus
that prosecutor” Barsan Victoria is also schizophrenic as using the same symptoms of incoherence and
intrinsically occupational dysfunction. Furthermore “prosecutor” Barsan Victoria is clearly at enmity with
me since the year 2008 or so when instigated by a corrupt policeman's relatives because I was
repeatedly denouncing them for making scandal in the apartment building for years, “prosecutor”
I.B.5.8. My mafia appointed state "lawyer" Lupu Cosmin pleaded against my plead, against the
law, against my fundamental rights, against juridical logic, against facts and invoked proofs and facts
that don't exist but never presented them obviously because they don't exist, as he was instigated by
the "magistrate" mafia to do. I mention I already have a penal dossier against half a dozen of these
crooked lawyers which proves statistically the whole lawyer bar association is corrupt because it has a
disciplinary committee which I've notified and refused to do its job, instigated by the very president of
the bar association. The union of Romanian bar association is also corrupt, proven in exactly the same
way, as I've proven every branch of the Romanian state is the Romanian mafia
I.B.5.8.1. My mafia appointed state "lawyer" Lupu Cosmin lied that ~“the motives (of the appeal
in annulment) cannot be identified easily” and that ~”he cannot solicit the admissal of the appeal in
annulment because the judge wasn’t clarified regarding the reasons of the appeal in annulment, nor was
he”, unless he is severely retarded case in which he has no business representing other people nor
himself and he shouldn’t have been able to graduate 4th grade which is implausible he made it in front of
the instance pleading against me as my mafia appointed “state” lawyer, therefore Lupu Cosmin lies. As
proof “the motives” of the appeal in annulment can be easily identified I indicate my appeal in
annulment itself attached as annex <, from which I indicate that “the motives” are on the first page,
namely the law, quoted even - nothing is easier to identify for a professional law practitioner than the
law itself, therefore my mafia appointed state "lawyer" Lupu Cosmin lied and committed the felony of
Unloyal assistance or representancy. Besides I’ve filed perhaps over a hundred of these appeals in
annulment always based on the same reason, the fact all Romanian “judges” break the law pervasively
and falsify all decisions, and I don’t remember anyone else lying that he doesn’t understand “the
motives”
I.B.5.8.2. My mafia appointed state "lawyer" Lupu Cosmin lied that ~”because the claimant is
missing and the claim is not really sustained and the claimant refuses to sustain the claim and motivate
the claim, will leave to the instance the appreciation of its legality”. This lawyer is clearly an idiot
declaring he refuses to represent his client because the client is missing, because that’s the whole point
of a contract of representancy, that the client doesn’t go to court but the lawyers go instead, through
which he admits he commits the felony of Unloyal assistance and representancy. Of course working for
<I.B.6 see annex 16 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex
1 to this ICC penal dossier
<see paragraph I.3 from annex 23 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier about the borken laws by the “psychiatrist” torturers
<see paragraph IV.5 from annex 23 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier about my suffering as a result of “psychiatric” torture
Barbarosie Carmen, uttered to my mother the same abberations instigated by Dita Mirela,
tried to convince me there is nothing on my MRI contradicting herself with 2 neurologists and 2
neurosurgeons as well as with the 2 MRIs themselves
committed Crimes against humanity against me through deadly fluorine and chlorine poisoning using
exactly risperidone or paliperidone as I was covertly injected with in the night betwen 5th and 6th
December 2014
deliberately refused to also prescribe an antidepressant which the “psychaitry” charlatnary recommends
as the chemical lobotomy through deadly fluorine poisoning causes, as well as the chlorine poisoning
exacerbates the symptoms of chemical lobotomy
named herself curator and refused to close the conventional representant contract with my mother
etc.
<see plead from plead.txt, adapt
<lies with which “judge” Dita Mirela instigated two years later the torturer “psychiatrist”
Barbarosie Carmen who committed Crimes against humanity against me between 27th May 2017 and 8th
June 2017 as objectivized in sections I.A.II.1.3.1^7, I.B.6, and I.A.I.1-2, and who uttered the exact lies
of”judge” Dita Mirela to my mother not me, as my mother told me that the “psychiatrist” torturer
Barbarosie Carmen told her that ~”I blocked the activity of the courthouse” meaning in 2014, which is
impossible to achieve by suing even every “judge” of the courthouse, case in which the courthosue is
<The fact I stopped the abuse is not owed as much by my protest but to the torturer
“psychiatrist” charlatan Florea Gabriela’s typical criminal avoidance of the crime scene to which he was
<I.B.7 see annex 12 annex 13 and annex 14 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim
measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier
<I.B.8 refused to give mandate, names, report the falsified mandate, threatened my mother
who fell ill of Zoster Area
<I.B.9 see annex 12 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex
1 to this ICC penal dossier
<see sections I.B.4.22.1^1-11 which I should repeat here and summarize in annex 12 of my Rule
39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier if I didn’t
cover them all already
<I.B.10 see annex 11 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex
1 to this ICC penal dossier
< (Beyond illegallity and groundlessness of the falsified decision demonstrated, I’m also proving
the syllogistical invalidity) in other words the universal syllogism laws that state the inferrence space
must coincide with the premise space meaning if a term in the inferrence doesn’t exist in the premises,
the syllogism in invalid. In other words the universal syllogism laws protects the logical consistency as
where there is no inferrence which by its definition meaning a conclusion drawn from one or two
premises, there is no logic, and where there’s no logic, there’s no science because all science is verified
by the fundamental principle of logic or consistency, meaning the continuous observation that an event
in identical circumstances remains the same even which is the logical universal principle of identity and
the basis of the scientific method - where an experiment always yields the same result, that is called an
objective fact and the scientific truth. In juridical logic, a person cannot be declared guilty, or mentally
ill, because that’s not a logical or scientific inferrence, is a proposition without proof which is why in
divine right there’s the rule that the absolute monarch can say no wrong which exists exactly because
the monarch is often wrong and that constitutes an acknowledgement of the fact therefore in real
ethical justice, the universal syllogism structure of the juridical act is the fundamental law above the
principles of legality and of finding out the truth which simply state every juridical act is an infference
from a particular factual premise correlated with an universal law premise
<I remind that the judicial logic I’m aware of that nobody can be obligated to a security measure
if it has not been proven to have committed a felony, and that it has not been proven to be a recidivist,
has been exactly used already in decision 907/307/2010 of which I spoke in annex 20 of my Rule 39
ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier representing my
plead in 12718/231/2017, 907/307/2010 being about the notorious Ivascu case wheren a member of
the Rroma minority has been incarcerated and chemically lobotomized for hundreds of days with
falsified documents based on an obviously false charge that lodging a penal complaint is threatening to
the felons, just as in my case the principal instigator “judge” Dita Mirela declared in 15730/231/2014
<In short the mafia declared it can incarcerate and chemically lobotomize anyone it wants
<Furthermore this falsified constitutional court decision contradicts with article 14 paragraph 2
from the Romanian Mental Health Law 487/2002 that no past diagnosis can be grounds for a future or
past diagnosis, because the law doesn’t include this condition requiring the law practitioner to know of
its existance when the law must be explicit and not require the people to have formal juridical studies
which the mafia “state” doesn’t conduct ex officio to keep the population ignorant of their rights and
concomittantly hide the fact it controls the judicial system which becomes clear when anyone as I did
petitions it and is made a mockery of all his rights and furthermore committed Crimes against humanity
against for denouncing the mafia. Finally I’ve proven that “psychaitric” charlatanry documents have
been falsified in my absence on 23rd November 2015 as proven in annex 4 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent
request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, and on 8th or 9th December
2014, and on 6th April 2017, and on 8th June 2017, which don’t appear in any dossier because they are
hidden the mafia believing it can thwart my investigation when in actuality it helped it just like the
Crimes agianst humanity it committed twice and attempted six times against me alone abilitated me to
demand their conviction at ICC. As proof the criminals are distancing themselves instinctivelly as typical
from the 7th Crimes against humanity they committed between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017, in
12718/231/2017 in 1st and 2nd instance it’s not referenced the inexistand “psychiatric” charlatanry
documents from 8th June 2017 which was the whole point of the falsified dossier 4909/231/2017 which
the mafia believed it served as a cover-up story but more as an actual pretext in which also the falsified
“psychaitric” documents from 6th April 2017 don’t appear, and for which this constitutional court
decision has been falsified at the instigation of Livia Stanciu because I’ve sued her and lodged penal
complainst against her since the Crimes against humanity began in 2014, at first just for refusing to
initiate disciplinary action against the criminal mafia “magistrate” caporegimes, then for being
accomplice and instigator to Crimes against humanity
<search for 19th January 2017 throughout this ICC penal dossier about short demonstrations
<the authors of the falsified Romanian Constitutional Court decision no 25 from 19th January
2017 are
Valer Dorneanu
Marian Enache
Petre Lazaroiu
Mona-Maria Pivniceru
Simona-Maya Teodoroiu
Varga Attila
in cahoots with
Victor Ciorbea - “people’s lawyer” who pleaded against the presumption of innocence
and others
<paths to sources:
D:\me\_propaganda\propaganda.txt
<art. 394 tradarea savarsita de kovesi facand politie politica pentru CIA, intalnindu-se sa ia
ordine la vilele de protocol desi un procuror n-are nici o legatura cu astfel de intalniri
savarsita sub forma de inalta tradare de handicapatul ciorbea si altii prin instigarea la eliminarea
prezumtiei de nevinovatie
402, atacul impotriva unei colectivitati prin obligarea la vaccinare obligatorie care infecteaza de
fapt cu virusul
The Romanian “state” mafia bosses and underbosses who personally perpetrated against me
and others by complicity and instigation or determination of the felonies of Crimes against humanity
through Qualified Murder attempts and incidentally Tortura, grave Bodily Harm through chemical
First I link to the original Romanian Constitutional Court Decision no 25 from 19th January 2017:
http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/188564
<update the above link to point to the Romanian Official Monitor newspaper which legally publishes it,
from which I’m actually quoting althought they’re the same the original source elliminates any
credibility issues
Then I link to the summary demonstration of the criminal activity of the Romanian “state” mafia in the
form of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier Link descrierea activitatii criminale a statului mafiot roman:
https://www.scribd.com/document/352597506/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-ECHR
Then I link to the full demontration which this ICC penal dossier represents, published at address:
https://www.scribd.com/document/383381894/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-ICC-for-Crimes-Against-Humanity
Then I link to the European Union Directive, representing internal right according to article 11 and 20
from the Romanian Constitution (<presumably regarding the presumption of innocence or other related
right since I can’t check being w/o internet http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-
content/RO/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32016L0343&from=EN
1. the mafia “people’s lawyer” Victor Ciorbea lied in the Romanian Constitutional Court Decizion
no 25 from 19th January 2017 lied that, I quote in Romanian: "12...critica autorului excepţiei potrivit
căreia una din premisele obligării la tratament medical rezidă în existenţa unei condamnări, nu are
suport legal, Codul de procedură penală nereglementând o asemenea condiţie", and I translate to
English: “12 ... the critique of the author of the exception according to which one of the premises of the
1.1 the mafia “people’s lawyer” Victor Ciorbea speaks of the universal law premise of the judicial
syllogism, and lies that the penal security measure of obligation to medical treatment doesn’t legally
require that
1.1.1. a deed needs to be proven to exist, which is untrue, because the prosecutor is obligated
to prove the deed exist legally and facutlayy first through the ordnance in rem according to articles 305-
306 and 286 paragraphs 2 letters c and d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, then he is obligated
to transpose the demontration in an indictment according to article 331 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code with which the prosecutor is obligated to notify the courthouse in the case of the penal
security measure of obligation to medical treatment which doesn’t exist except for drug addicts and
even that doesn’t guarantee anything, every other “medical treatment” being illegal chemical
lobotomization constituting Crimes aganist humanity against me and others as my entire ICC case
proves, which causes suicidal and homicidal behavior therefore is the opposite of a penal security
measure and a national security issue as I demonstrated in section I.A.II.1.2.8^1, and
1.1.1^1. that the existing deeds constitutes a felony as evidently if a deed does not exist
because it can’t even physically exist as in my mafia falsifeid penal dossiers 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016,
3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 as objectivized in annex 6, annex 8 and annex 9 of my Rule 39 ECHR
urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, it’s impossible to
demonstrate it constitutes a felony and a factual particular premise for “psychiatric” charlatanry
diagnosis, which again is the prosecutor’s obligation to demonstrate as described in the previous
paragraph, therefore according to the principles of non-contradiction and excluded third, and
1.1.2. that the existing deeds constituting felonies were committed by a person, which is
untrue because the prosecutor is obligated to demonstrate according to articles 309, 306 and 286
paragraph 2 letters c and d from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code
1.1.2^1 mentioning that if the person is irresponsible cannot be established during the
prosecution phase if a person does not consent to be “examined” by “psychiatrist” charlatans because
one has to be truly mentally alienated to not understand the “psychiatrists” are charlatans which is
obvious to anyone with a shred of reasoning, which is the exception as obvious that only a person
without discernment can legally end up chemically lobotomized in a “psychiatric” charlatanry gulag
which is illegal anyway but another logical matter as I aforementioned. The presumption of innocence
cannot be legally eliminated or disregarded meaning the legal obligation of a person to be indicted and
convicted then declared irresponsible or not and subjected to security measures or not because it’s
been known that mentally alienated persons confessed to crimes they didn’t commit, or sane persons
coerced confessed to crimes they didn’ t commit, or drugged persons such as with scopolamine
nichnamed “the devil’s breath” have been coerced into confessing crimes they didn’t commit, according
to articles 4, 99 and 184 paragraphs 3 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, therefore there’s no
possible ethical logic to support the disrespect for the law and presumption of innocence meaning
according to the principles of non-contradiction and excluded third a “judiciary body” who disregards
the presumption of innocence does so from malice aforethought as can be proven in many other ways
1.1.4 and that all the conditions from the indictment document in which all the prosecution is
gathered, needs to be judged meaning the prosecution is validated or invalidated by a judge depending
on whether the judge finds the prosecution legal or not, time at which the judge is obligated to
denounce the prosecutor if he refused to administer all proofs as in my case which proves the existance
of the organized crimes that exists between any “judge” and “prosecutor” in Romania as I’ve
demonstrated and publicly denounced which is why the Romanian “state” mafia perpetrated 2 Crimes
against humanity committals and 6 Crimes against humanity attempts for the intent to an effect of
stopping me from denouncing its criminal activity as objectivized in section I.A.II.1.3.1.4^2, and
1.1.4^1 any other proofs the courthouse judge or the other courthouse meeting prosecutor
discovers are to be obligatorily judged, mentioning in Romanian the mafia “prosecutor” caporegime
who falsified the penal dossier and the courthouse mafia “prosecutor” caporegime is not one and the
same meaning the courthouse mafia “prosecutor” caporegime never understands the mafia falsified
penal dossier but mindlessly supports it even adding further lies to the accusation without an indictment
as my case proves, although the courthouse prosecutor as everyone in Romanian is obligated to respect
the law especially by having the statute of a public serband and prosecutor. The judge and the
courthouse proseutor have the obligation of observing that the mafia “prosecutor” caporegime falsified
the penal dossier as for instance in my case never administering a single proof regardless whether I’m
the claimang or the falsely suspect or accused in the mafia falsified penal dossiers against me, not even
the mafia’s falsified proofs because it’s impossible to justify breaking the law, which proves the criminal
organization constituted by this actos, criminal organization which I’ve proved to exist throughout the
entirey judicial hierarchy and other competent ministers as objectivized in paragraph 0.2 and section V.3
from annex 23 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC
penal dossier, which is why the Romanian “state” mafia perpetrated 2 Crimes against humanity
committals and 6 Crimes against humanity attempts for the intent to an effect of stopping me from
denouncing its criminal activity as objectivized in section I.A.II.1.3.1.4^2, and
1.1.4^2 and by legally eliminating any proofs proposed by the person prosecuted, accused and
indicted leading to that person’s conviction, only after which the clause of irresponsability and non-
punishment can be invoked based on “psychiatric” chalratanry documents or other evidence such as
1.2. in short the mafia’s “people’s lawyer” Victor Ciorbea lies that there are no legal conditions
in the “Penal procedure code” by which he means the Romanian one, that I be convicted before I can be
obligated meaning coerced with the state order bodies to penal security measures.
1.2^1 The logical fallacy through which the schizophrenic "people's lawyer" Victor Ciorbea lied,
is that he to contradict my proven syllogistical conclusion, declared my syllogism universal premise as I
quote in romanian"nu are suport legal" meaning in English "has no legal support", by which the mafia
“people’s lawyer” Victor Ciorbea declare that I lie, which is false and the mafia “people’s lawyer” Victor
Ciorbea lies as I’ve proven above. Then, the mafia “people’s lawyer” Victor Ciorbea knowing his
2. Following I quote the summarized logical argument I’ve made invoking the unconstitutionality
of basically all articles regarding security measures against the suspect and the accused because the
Romanian Constitutional Court emmits generally obligatory decisions which pertain to the entire judicial
logic and interpretation of the law, although the law doesn’t require interpretation because it’s
obligatorily formulated clear not in parables like the Bible which is clear to me also although one has to
read it to know that, meaning the Romanian Constitutional Court itself is another mafia instrument used
2^1 as I quote from the law a different summarized logical demonstration based on the
law, of the unconstitutionality request I’ve lodged as proof acording to annex 20 summary of
my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier
“
14 pages, my original notification in Romanian to the Romanian Constitutional Court against articles
315 paragraph 2 in rapport with article 16 paragraph 1 letter d in rapport with articles 566 - 572 from
the Romanian Penal Procedure Code and other similar ones regarding the obligation to medical
treatment such as articles 245-246, based on the presumption of innocence, right to life, physiological
and psychological integrity, the supremacy of the Romanian Constitution to the law which is
unconstitutional, or, the principle of legality, infringement of the right to fair (legal) trial, infringement
of the right to freedom of conscience and religion, infringement of the right of free expression (of
conscience), infringement of the right to an effective national (justice) remedy, discrimination and
interpretation of the law contrary to human rights with murderous aforethought
2.1. article 245 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code sais in Romanian "dispune obligarea
provizorie la tratament medical a suspectului sau inculpatului, daca se afla in situatia prevazuta de art.
109 alin. (1) din Codul penal" meaning in English “disposes the provisory obligation to medical treatment
of the suspect or the accused, if he is in the situation foreseen by article 109 paragraph 1 from the
Romanian Penal Code”, mentioning that “medical treatment” is not “psychiatric” treatment as I
demontrated in section I.A.II.1.2.1 that the “psychiatry” charlatanry is not medicine nor science , neither
are mercury, opium, heroine, fluorine and chlorine medicaments but deadly poisons, meaning
“psychiatry” charlatanry only does harm while medicine is sword according to the Hippocratic oath to
2.2. article 109 from the Romanian Penal Code foresees in Romanian "daca faptuitorul ...
prezinta pericol pentru societate" meaning in English: “if the felon ... presente a danger to society”,
making note that the mot-a-mot translation of “faptuitorul” means “deed-doer” which in penal matters
means felon because
2.2.1 a “deed-doer” is a felon because “it presents a danger to society” by being a felon,
otherwise it would make no legal and logical sense to institute a penal security measure as it is stated
from the beginning in the penal code, article 2 paragraph 1 from the Romanian Penal Code that ~”the
security measures that can be taken against the persons who committed deeds foreseen by penal law”,
meaning of course a “deed-doer” means a felon as by a “deed” the Penal Code refers to “deeds
foreseen by penal law” therefore “deed-doer” means “felony-doer” or felon for short, and that a person
is a felon can only be established through a definitive sentence following an indictment, in a trial in
which it is proven that a deed exist, that it constitutes a felony and that the person indicted or accused is
guilty of committing that felony, and only after according to the law, judicial logic and presumption of
innocence principle can a security measure be taken against that person according to the
aforementioned quote and article 23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution
2.2.2 a “deed-doer” is refered as such and not a suspect or accused because a suspect or
accused is not a “deed-doer” else article 109 would refer to the suspect or accused which is not because
the meaning of suspect or accused is a person about which there’s insuficient respectively suficient
proof to be believed by the prosecutor to have had committed a felony according to the law, while a
“deed-doer” which is meaningless in penal terms unless it refers to a felon meaning a felony-committer
according to article 2 from the Romanian Penal Code, is a person proven to have committed a felony
which can only be achieved according to article 23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution
2.3. according to article 107 from the Romanian Penal Code the “deed-doer” is in Romanian
"persoana care a comis o fapta prevazuta de legea penala, nejustificata" meaning in English: “the person
who committed a deed foreseen by the penal law, unjustified”, which I’ve already proven in the above
paragraph 2.2. In conclusion again: the “deed-doer” refered to by the law is the convict or the felon
meaning the perpetrator of felonies, not the suspect or accused which are subjects of the penal process
about which there is insufficient respectivelly sufficient proof for thejudicial bodies to believe they
committed a felony, which can be only established scientifically by the scientific method through
gathering and administering proofs meaning objectivizing scientifically the legality and relevance of
proof to the case, with which the courthouse is notified through a document named the indictment who
validates or not its logic and performs futher judicial research according to the judge’s obligations and
the accused sent in trial’s rights. The Romanian Penal Procedure Code has been intentionally destroyed
by what we Romanians call “the prosecutor republic” meaning a notorious pervasive acknowledgement
of the existance of the mafia as the “state” in Romania, as the Romanian Penal Procedure Code has
been actually written by the mafia “prosecutor” caporegimes, a sector of the mafia that even destroyed
the law to reflect its occupation in cahoots with the mafia’s “political” puppets from the Romanian
Parliament who passed these abominations who as proven here are protected by the Romanian
Constitutional Court also controlled by the Romanian “state” mafia
2.4. according to article 4 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code regarding the presumption
of innocence according to the Romanian text of the law "Orice persoană este considerată nevinovată
până la stabilirea vinovăţiei sale printr-o hotărâre penală definitivă" meaning in English: “Any person is
2.5. according to article 11 from the Universal declaration of human rights and according to
articles 11 and 22 from the Romanian Constitution, the international treaties ratified by Romania are
internal Romanian law, meaning the international or universal convention on the presumption of
innocence according to the Romanian text: "Orice persoana acuzata de comiterea unui act cu caracter
penal are dreptul sa fie presupusa nevinovata pina cind vinovatia sa va fi stabilita in mod legal in cursul
unui proces public in care i-au fost asigurate toate garantiile necesare apararii sale" meaning in English:
“Any person accused of committing an act of penal character has the right to be presumed innocent until
its guilt has been established legally through the course of a public trial in which all the guarantees
necessary to its defense have been assured”, reminding in my case I was never indicted, convicted, and
not even the right to defense was respected during the illegal prosecution as even today the content of
the fasely penal dossiers 2417/P/2014, 2845/P/2016, 3992/P/2016 and 4329/P/2016 are hidden from
me and the public by the Romanian “state” mafia who even hid the illegal prosecution from the last 3
falsfied penal dossiers in my judiciary history in which it should’ve been inscribed at the time I requested
it, as proven by annex 17 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1
to this ICC penal dossier
2.6. according to article 6 paragraph 2 from the European convention on human rights and
according to articles 11 and 22 from the Romanian Constitution, the international treaties ratified by
Romania are internal Romanian law, meaning the international or universal convention on the
presumption of innocence according to the Romanian text: "Orice persoană acuzată de o infracţiune
este prezumată nevinovată pînă ce vinovăţia sa va fi legal stabilită" meaning in English: “Any person
accused by a felony is presumed innocent until its guilt will be legally established”
2.7. according to article 23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution, according to the
Romanian text "Până la rămânerea definitivă a hotărârii judecătoreşti de condamnare, persoana este
considerată nevinovată", as translated in English: “Until the judicial decision of conviction becomes
definitive, a person is considered innocent”
2.8. according to article 331 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, the courthouse is
notified by the prosecutor with the proposal of taking the security measure of medical treatment only
through the indictment document in which all the prosecution is gathered meaning the proofs and the
objectivization of their legality and relevance to the cause along with the judicial syllogism through
which the accused guilt or innocence is proven, and while the guilt is proven the innocence must be
proven impossible concomittantly to eliminate any reasonable doubt else the conviction cannot take
place according to article 103 paragraph 2 from the Romanian Penal Procedure Code, in other words
there mustn’t be any circumstance in which a person could be innocent when pronounced guilty as
proven else a person is not scientifically proven guilty unless considered probably guilty which is not
contrary to the presumption of innocence, which is why the gathering and administering of proofs is so
important in a real judicial system, and this is why the mafia didn’t administer a single proof because
2.9. Furthermor ethere is no such thing as “medical treatment” for felons with the exception of
drug addicts who can recieve treatment for the forced withdrawal symptoms, withdrawal which if
untreated can be deadly and is bodily harming, and
2.9.1. there is no such thing as “pscyhiatric” charlatanry “treatment” as I’ve proven in section
I.A.II.1.2.1 “psychiatry” is neither medicine nor science, it’s charlatanry, it never cured anyone of
anything anytime but only employed deadly brain damaging poisons to disable its victims to swindle
them out of their body and psychic health for illicit profit, meaning the “psychiatry” charlatanry actually
causes what it claims to cure as proven by the deadly fluorine based neurotoxin risperidone or
paliperidone “prospect” which claims to treat schizophrenia by causing schizophrenia, or control
schizophrenia symptoms by causing schizophrenia and therefore schizophrenia symptoms, as I’ve
objectivized in chapter 1 from annex 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier
2.9.2. In short medicine is sworn accoding to the Hippocratic oath “to at least do no harm”,
while the “psychiatry” charlatanry only does harm and is accredited by totalitarian “states” accross the
world, meaning where a minority infringes on the right of the majority meaning there is no accepted but
imposed “state”, for use as state terrorism and wrongful politicla repression. Furthermore the
“psychiatrist” charlatans do not base their “diagnostics” on the scientific method observing that they
only do harm, but only lie declaring not proving they’ve ever cured anyone anytime, being obvious they
can’t cure anyone with mercury, opium, heroin, fluorine and chlorine, deadly neurotoxic chemicals
employed by the “pscyhiatrist” charlatans to damage their victims
I.B.11.3. In conclusion there is no perspective from which the Romanian Constitutional Court
Decision no 25 from 19th January 2017 can be considered legal and logical, as it contradicts itself
between paragraphs 22 and 23 as proven by annex 4 to this ICC penal dossier where I’ve attached a
copy of the officially publicated Romanian Constitutional Court Decision no 25 from 19th January 2017,
as I demonstrate even a third time by quoting each paragraph from it to demontrate punctually both its
falsification and the guilt or complicity and instigation to Crimes against humanity of the mafia “prime-
minister” Sorin Grindeanu, the mafia “people’s lawyer” Victor Ciorbea and the rest of the Romanian
“state” mafia “magistrate” caporegimes enumerated above and inculpated in this ICC penal dossier:>
I.B.11.3.1. The schizophrenic mafia member Marinela Minca, representant on behalf of the
mafia controlled Public Ministry meaning the ministry of the mafia “prosecutor” caporegimes
demonstrated his schizophrenia through its logically and legally incoherent declarations, intrinsically
demonstrating his occupational dysfunction and failure to recognize what’s real as I demonstrate
quoting in Romanian from annex 4 to this ICC penal dossier: “Cauza fiind in stare de judecata,
I.B.11.3.1^1 meaning as translated to English: “The cause being in a state of being judged, the
president of the Court awards the representative of the Public ministry the possibility to plead, who
shows that the texts reglement the conditions of application of the obligatory provisory measure to
medical treatment, and, respectivelly, the procedure of application and dismissal of this measure, / sense
in which there are imposed obligations for the bodies justified to propose and dispose such a measure, /
and, respectively rights and guarantees for teh suspect or accused against which it is proceeded to be
undertaken the measure of provisory obligation to medical treatment. / The provisory obligation to
treatment is a security measure of medical character, which can only be taken during the penal process,
/ the suspect or the accused benefiting from a series of warranties, such as the effectuation of an
expertise, the obligativity to be assisted by a chosen lawyer or ex officio, the possibility of being assisted
by a curant medic or by a specialized medic. / Therefore the criticised texts do not affect the right to an
equitable proces or the presumption of innocence, reason for which he appreciates that the exception of
unconstitutionality is unfounded”
I.B.11.3.1.1 because “shows that the texts reglement the conditions of application of the
obligatory provisory measure to medical treatment, the content of this measure, and, respectivelly, the
procedure of application and dismissal of this measure” is logically incoherent with the debates in
contradictory because I haven’t proven unconstitutional that the law has conditions, content and
conditions of applications or dismissal, but that the law conditions are unconstitutional namely that the
suspect or the accused cannot be opposed with any security measures as if being convicted according to
article 23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution regarding the presumption of innocence,
because the suspect and the accused are obvious not proven guilty and are not convicts or felons,
therefore the factual particular premise for a diagnosis cannot even exist meaning the “prosecutor’s”
proposal to obligation to chemical lobotomization which is unconstitutional anyway being contrary to
the right to life, body and psychic integrity according to article 22 from the Romanian Constitution, and
the “psychiatric” charlatanry documents which accompany it can only be falsified meaning illegal,
groundless and intrinsically syllogistically invalid, as in particular I proven in my case to be not just that
but also self-contradictory demontrating the falsifiers are schizophrenic and sociopathic, as I’ve
objectively proven in annex 4 and annex 16 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier, meaning logically incoherent persons who are
I.B.11.3.1.2 because “sense in which there are imposed obligations for the bodies justified to
propose and dispose such a measure” is logically incoherent with the debates in contradictory because I
haven’t contested that is unconstitutional that the bodies have obligations but that the bodies aren’t
justified to propose and dispose such a measure which the schizophrenic “prosecutor“Marinela Minca
didn’t demontrate they are but just declared they are while in judicial procedures a declaration of a
judicial body is equivalent to a hallucination because the judicial bodies are obligated to express
themselves logically, formulate syllogistical inferences, meaning the schizophrenic “prosecutor“Marinela
Minca is logically incoherent with the law he is suppose to uphold, because according to article 23
paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution the judiciary bodies are not “justified” to propose
security measures against the suspect and the accused because if they “propose and dispose such a
measure” the judicial bodies are not judicial bodies anymore for breaking the supreme law, according to
articles 1 paragrahp 5 and 23 paragraph 11 from the Romanian Constitution regarding the principle of
legality, the constitutional supremacy over the law and the presumption of innocence, and the law
meaning the articles 2, 38, 107 and 109 from the Romanian Penal Code regarding the fact security
measures and the clause of irresponsability for non-punishment can only be opposed to convicts not the
suspect or the accused, and articles 4, 286 paragraph 2 letters c and d and 306 from the Romanian Penal
Procedure Code regarding the presumption of innocence and the obligation to motivate all acts of
procedure factually and legally which is impossible because breaking the law is impossible to justify, as
it’s impossible to demonstrate someone’s guilt based on falsified evidence, as one can fool most for
most off the time but not all for all time, being no perfect crime in existance because beyond the will of
humanity that its enemies are caught and punished, the law of causality cannot be broken and
repercussions are guaranteed by God, and I exemplify through the fact that in Romania because of the
system collapse caused by the Romanian “state” mafia or the immoral and illiterate criminal Romanian
peasantry, the quality of life is worse than medieval as everything that created and supposed to provide
confort is turned into a weapon or some sort of suffering for deprivation of, such as medicine where all
medics are how we say in Romania “axe’s handles”, perhaps the equivalent of the English metaphoric
terms “saps”, as the real medics if any migrated for economic and desire for a civilized life reasons,
meaning most of the mafia members themselves cannot access proper medicine, nor education, nor be
in peace amongst the chaotic criminal society in which one is constantly undermined by the other
criminals around, and the mafia’s “good life” is just a peasant’s illusion of being priviledged which is why
some of the sadistic psychopaths that comprise the Romanian “state” mafia are gratifying themselves by
victimizing others to justify their illusion of power, illusion broken by me through the grace of God as I’m
still very much alive and fighting this mafia wich with all its resources could not silence me as this ICC
penal dossier proves;
I.B.11.3.1.5 because “the suspect or the accused benefiting from a series of warranties, such as
the effectuation of an expertise, the obligativity to be assisted by a chosen lawyer or ex officio, the
possibility of being assisted by a curant medic or by a specialized medic” is logically incoherent because
“psychiatrist” charlatans are not even experts in the “psychiatry” charltanry which I turned against them
demonstrating they are schizophrenic according to the DSM-V “psychiatric” charlatanary manual of
I.B.11.3.1.6 because “Therefore the criticised texts does not affect the right to an equitable
proces or the presumption of innocence, reason for which he appreciates that the exception of
unconstitutionality is unfounded” is logically incoherent because without contradicting my plead the
schizophrenic “prosecutor” Marinela Mincu infers he contradicts my plead, or in other words the
schizophrenic “prosecutor” Marinela Mincu did not demonstrate its declaration that security measures
are legally undertaken against suspects or accused and thus not infringing on the presumption of
innocence, demontration which if it were possible would’ve naturally been in contradiction with my
plead and demonstration that security measures can’t be legally undertaken against suspects or accused
and not infringing on the presumption of innocence. Furthermore an equitable proces means a legal
proces, or in accordance with the principle of legality, which because I’ve proven that security measures
can’t be legally and most importantly constitutionally undertaken against suspects or accused because
are infringing on the presumption of innocence, the principle of legality is also broken intrinsically
therefore the schizophrenic “prosecutor” Marinela Mincu lies that my “the criticised texts does not
I.B.11.3.2 Regarding paragraph 5 from the falsified Romanian Constitutional Court Decision no
25 from 19th January 2017, I infer that if Romania was a real state of right under the rule of law there
would be no such article as “obligation to medical treatment” because felons can’t be cured of criminal
ideation through chemical lobotomization which induces suicidal and even worse homicidal behavior as
I’ve objectivized in section I.A.II.1.2.8^1 constituting a national security threat not a security measure
because it creates public insecurity by creating deadly threats, nor can felons be tortured if that were
legal as proven by the existance of recidivists. The only exception is drug consumption in which medicine
I also remark the fact that if the Romanian Constitutional Court public functionaries involved
were real magistrates, they would’ve denounced penally and disciplinarily the other mafia “magistrate”
caporegimes involved in the falsification of penal dossier 2417/P/2014 and penal “psychiatric”
charlatanry action 14277/231/2015
I.B.11.3.3 <remained here with work, continue punctually to demonstrate the falsification of the
decision and the schizophrenia and sociopathy of the falsifiers
wrote my<... lied that, I quote in Romanian: “<...”, meaning in English: “<...”
<I.B.12 8th or 9th Decemb er 2016 SML Vrancea falsified acts by committee in secret, never
communicated - copy plead from section B.4.
<I.B.21 <refer to plead in section A about dita mirela kinstellar sparl and delhaize group
< I.A.II.1.3.1.7^6.1 - proof that Delhaize Group bribed the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes through the
Kinstellar SPARL lawyers
I.A.II.1.3.1.7^1 the mafia “judge” caporegimes refusal to judge demonstration
<I.B.22 <
< 1.1^2. "The death toll among people who have taken the schizophrenia drug Xeplion has climbed
to 21...Xeplion, which is injected, uses paliperidone palmitate to control symptoms of schizophrenia in
adult patients. The chemical remains in the body for at least four months, it said"
1.1^3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paliperidone
1.1^4. "Paliperidone, sold under the trade name Invega among others... In April 2014, it was
reported that 21 Japanese people who had received shots of the long-acting injectable paliperidone to
date had died"
>
<loof for “proof in itself or attently re-read the passages containing references because I left plenty
proofs I should reference here to not escape any, even if referencing those sections back
<look for all references to sectino I.B.22 and prove in full and reference proofs as necessary, such as the
involvement of mafia “magistrate” caporegimes Comanescu Carmen, Croitoru Sandina Mariana, Neagu
Rodic and <Popa Mariana who lied lied not one of over 20 proofs exist and consequently refused to
administer any of them to cover-up the Crimes against humanity from the night between 5th and 6th
December 2014
<I.B.22 after the order of paragraphs referenced in II.1.3.1^2.1, order and expand the plead here
II. Of right,
<copy paste from the preliminary section actually>formulate according to article 15 of the Rome
Statute “<quote
B. I declare under private signature knowing the dispositions of judiciary false declarations
felony, that the declarations contained within this document represent the truth, as well as those
contained in my Rules 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures, reminding I made the same
declarations to all competent Romanian institutions, and a number of international institutions and
III.1 See chapter IV from annex 23 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures
attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal dossier. I also objectivize the fact that I also invoke the damages
not directly linked to the Crimes against humanity meaning the deliberate destruction of my two
careers in IT and law by the Romanian “state” mafia, because the Crimes against humanity were
perpetrated to deliberately destroy my two careers, more precisely to stop me from denouncing the
mafia’s criminal activity such as taking bribe from the Delhaize Group to refuze to judge as I’ve
objectivized in paragraph <, respectivelly to stop me from denouncing the mafia’s criminal activity while
simultaneously getting licensed and professing as a law practitioner, as I’ve demonstrated the
involvement of the bribing Delhaize Group and it’s Kinstellar SPARL “lawyers” in paragraph <, who even
personally instigated the 3rd Crimes against humanity attempt against me declaring in civil dossier
15730/231/2014 that I must be chemically lobotomized for exercising my right to justice just as the
principal instigator “judge” Dita Mirela who invented civil dossier 15730/231/2014 regarding my
placement under “psychiatric” charlatanry interdiction for exercising my right to justice which would’ve
unfolded as the Crimes against humanity between 27th May 2017 and 8th June 2017. In other words if
the 6 Crimes against humanity attempts and especially the 2 Crimes against humanity committals
weren’t perpetrated against me I would’ve continued at least one of the two careers if not both,
meaning its the Crimes against humanity that also caused those damages
III.2 I constitute myself into a civil party under which quality I demand compensation for the
pecuniary and inherent non-pecuniary damages I've incurred from the 6 Crimes against humanity
attempts and especially the 2 Crimes against humanity and its effects, including my 2 careers in IT and
law destroyed as well as the opportunity to build a family which is another reason I’ll suffer solitude for
the rest of my days unless I can repair this situation with the damages compensation, not just from the
Romanian “authorities” inculpated in the preliminary section in reverse chronological order of the
Crimes against humanity committed or attempted, but also from the international accomplices and
intrinsic instigators, the EU LIBE members and other European Parliament members who I inculpate in
preliminary section -1 for being notified for years and taking no action, and the CoE and ECHR members
starting with the Romanian “state” mafia agents posing as ECHR registrars and covering-up Romanian
Crimes against humanity by destroying the petitions against them, who I inculpate in section 1,
<remained here with work> to undermine the act of justice, awards which naturally ECHR should regress
for recovering from the Romanian mafia "state" and its agents which being against the rule of law have
notoriously called upon the derogatory designations about the Romanian state from the people such as
in Romanian “statul paralel” meaning as translated in English "the parallel state", the Romanian
“binomul” meaning as translated in English together with the "the binomial of the “magistrate” mafia
and neo-“communist” security “secret services”", the Romanian "republica procurorilor" meaning as
translated in English “the prosecutor republic”, “the mafia state” and so on and so forth as it can be
objectivized by searching google.com being notorious, which depict clearly the fact the so-called
Romanian magistrates and secret servicemen have instituted totalitarianism back again – where a
minority infringes on the rights of the majority, because no lustration of the state was applied after the
1989 “revolution” which was in fact Ceausescu’s security forces “revolution” meaning coup d’état
carried by the wave of western pressure for fall of the communist block, for which they massacred the
population to make it look like a revolution and when the populace took to the streets they called upon
the security infiltrated body of miners to beat up and kill the protesters in 1990 as notorious proof, time
in which of course the army under the control of the neo-“communist security” mafia didn’t intervene,
after which the same mafia in control of the judiciary system covered up no less than 23 times the
“revolution” dossier, even dementedly claiming recently that the people were tired and shot and killed
themselves
I evaluate the total of the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages as described in chapter IV from
annex 23 the Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier, objectivizing that as long as ECHR illegally refuses to judge the Rule 39 ECHR request for interim
measures it tacitly admits my rights were gravely infringed upon therefore it justifies the damages
claimed against ECHR in full by refusing to award them, damages which ECHR must pay in solidarity with
the murderous totalitarian Romanian “state” mafia regime and its agents it covers for. Even if ECHR will
judge the Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures fairly, it must still be held to pay in
solidarity with the Romanian criminal regime and its agents because if it would’ve judged before 27th
May 2017 it would’ve prevented my illegal arrest from my law faculty exams by 3 mafia “secret police”
<annex 1, Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1 to this ICC penal
dossier - because it’s cumbersome and error prone to handle emailing this document along with very
large annex through multiple consecutive emails, I’m just indicating where I published them on the
internet where I also keep the document updated as I investigate further and report the results:
https://www.scribd.com/document/352597506/Raneti-vs-Romania-at-ECHR
<annex 2, the penal dossier against d.lupu and i.banu, reference the internet
https://www.scribd.com/document/365438323/penal-complaint-against-D-Lupu-and-I-Banu-at-
European-Court-of-Human-Rights
<annex 3, the blood proof from 2015. The counterproof that I do not normally have hyperprolactinomia
I cannot attach at the moment becaue it would lead the mafia to my location and the situation I’ve
objectivized in section 21 of my Rule 39 ECHR urgent request for interim measures attached as annex 1
to this ICC penal dossier. Perhaps after getting legal protection somewhere else than Romania or if ICC
explicitly requests it and I’m positive it leads to the conviction of the mafia members and not my
Qualified Murder
I however declare knowing the consecuquences of False declarations that my normal prolactine
on 23 February 2018 is 8.4 as opposed to 17.2 on 10th April 2015, on a reference of 4.04 - 15.2,
rd
meaning I was covertly injected with the deadly fluorine based neurotoxin risperidone or paliperidone in
the night between 5th and 6th December 2014, which caused the symptom of hyperprolactinomia
<annex 4, a copy of the constitutional court decision, or link to its publicatino on the internet, updating
all the references to it that it’s annexed as proof: http://www.monitoruljuridic.ro/act/decizia-nr-25-din-
<annex 5, the falsified communique from 4th April 2019, as proven in preliminary section -1^3 of this ICC
penal dossier
<annex ? the false testimony of the interloper Herghelegiu Danut referenced in I.A.II.1.3.1.6^1. I will
annex these in the order displayed here but after the numbered annexes, until I establish a number for
these too
I.A.II.1.3.1.7^6.1 - proof that Delhaize Group bribed the mafia “magistrate” caporegimes through the
Kinstellar SPARL lawyers
I.A.II.1.3.1.7^1 the mafia “judge” caporegimes refusal to judge demonstration
<TODO: spread this reference wherever the word “incidental” appears> I.A.II.1.3.1.7 the mafia felonies
of Torture and Bodily Harm are incidental to the principal felony and intent to an effect of Qualifiedly
Murdering me to stop me from denouncing the mafia’s criminal activity
I.A.II.1.3.1.6, I.A.II.1.3.1.7^7 the mafia leadership concertized the perpetration of the 7th Crimes against
humanity committal and the 8th Crimes against humanity ongoing attempt as proven
1989 coup d’état of which I spoke more in paragraphs I.A.II.1.2^3, I.A.II.1.3.1.6^3 and others from my
ICC penal dossier linked above
I.A.II.1.3.1.6^1 regarding the two mafia soldiers who accompanied interloper Herghelegiu Danut to
cover-up the Crimes against humanity attempt from 27th October 2014
BIOCHIMIE
AB005 Calciu seric ionic* (R1,L2,A3) 4.29 3.80 - 5.60 mg/dL
AB004 Calciu seric total* (R1,L2,A3) 9.75 8.60 - 10.20 mg/dL
AB003 Creatinina serica* (R1,L2,A3) 0.70 0.70 - 1.20 mg/dL
AB008 Glicemie * (R1,L2,A3,D1) 87.33 65.00 - 115.00 mg/dL
AB018 TGP* (R1,L2,A3,D2) 31.67 10.00 - 41.00 UI/L
AB001 Uree serica* (R1,L2,A3) 20.47 10.00 - 50.00 mg/dL
BIOCHIMIE URINI
AU001 Sumar urina + sediment* (R1,L2,A1)
HEMATOLOGIE
AH001 Hemoleucograma completa* (R1,L2,A2)
IMUNOLOGIE
(R2,L1,A5) RECOLTARE AM = 6.2 - 19.4
AE014 Cortisol seric 19.60 RECOLTARE PM = 2.3 - 11.9
ug/dL
LEGENDA:
Responsabili de analiza: R1 - DOBRIN Diana; R2 - GROSU Liliana
Laboratoare de executie: L1 - Laboratorul Gral Colentina; L2 - Clinica OncoFort Focsani
Analizoare: A1 - Pocket Chem; A2 - Sysmex XS1000i; A3 - Cobas Integra 400; A4 - SEDI TAINER; A5 - Cobas 6000 (E601-1)
Denumiri alternative ale analizelor: D1 - glucoza serica; D2 - ALT, GPT, glutamic-piruvat transferaza, alanil aminotransferaza; D3 - viteza de sedimentare a hematiilor; D4 - tiroxina libera; D5 -
tirotropina, hormon stimulator al tiroidei; D6 - PRL; D7 - hormonul luteinizant
Atentie,
2018 Juristi!
2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009
Conflictele de munca pot fi
solutionate!
Cititi intreaga legislatie cu
privire la neintelegerile si Comunica experienta
conflictele de munca! MonitorulJuridic.ro
Descarcati GRATUIT
Raportul Special "Litigiileadresa
de£600 de e-mail
£35 £150 £495 £900 £400
munca: legislatie comentata
si exemple practice"
DECIZIA nr. 25 din 19 ianuarie 2017 referitoare la excepţia de neconstituţionalitate
Cautare document
a dispoziţiilor art. 245 şi art. 246 din Codul de procedură penală
adresa de email
vreau informatii despre produsele Rentrop&Straton. Sunt de acord ca datele personale sa fie prelucrate Termen:
EMITENT: Curtea Constituţională
RegulamentuluiTrimite-mi
UE 679/2016acum Raportul Gratuit
PUBLICAT: Monitorul Oficial nr. 294 din 26 aprilie 2017
cuvant cheie
Da, vreau sa primesc newsletterul zilnic cu stiri,
noutati, articole, dezbateri pe teme juridice
Comenteaza legea Tipul actului:
Tipul actului
┌───────────────────────┬────────────────────┐
│Valer Dorneanu │- preşedinte │
├───────────────────────┼────────────────────┤ Anul publicarii actului:
│Marian Enache │- judecător │
├───────────────────────┼────────────────────┤ Anul Cauta
│Petre Lăzăroiu │- judecător │
├───────────────────────┼────────────────────┤
│Mircea Ştefan Minea │- judecător │
├───────────────────────┼────────────────────┤
│Daniel Marius Morar │- judecător │
├───────────────────────┼────────────────────┤
│Mona-Maria Pivniceru │- judecător │
├───────────────────────┼────────────────────┤
│Livia Doina Stanciu │- judecător │
├───────────────────────┼────────────────────┤
│Simona-Maya Teodoroiu │- judecător │
├───────────────────────┼────────────────────┤
│Varga Attila │- judecător │
├───────────────────────┼────────────────────┤
│Afrodita Laura Tutunaru│- magistrat-asistent│
├───────────────────────┴────────────────────┤
│ │
└────────────────────────────────────────────┘
file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Admin/My%20Documents/Downloads/_%20DECIZIA%20nr.%2025%20din%2019%20ianuarie%202017%20referitoare… 1/8
9/17/2018 DECIZIA nr. 25 din 19 ianuarie 2017 referitoare la excepţia de neconstituţionalitate a dispoziţiilor art. 245 şi art. 246 din Codul de procedură penală
măsurii obligării provizorii la tratament medical, conţinutul
acestei măsuri şi, respectiv, procedura de aplicare şi de Click aici pentru lista completa
ridicare a măsurii, sens în care impun anumite obligaţii pentru
organele îndreptăţite să propună şi să dispună o astfel de
măsură şi, respectiv, drepturi şi garanţii pentru suspectul sau
inculpatul faţă de care se procedează la luarea măsurii Categorie Act
obligării provizorii la tratament medical. Obligarea provizorie
la tratament este o măsură de siguranţă cu caracter medical,
Acord Act Aditional
care nu poate fi luată decât pe parcursul procesului penal,
suspectul sau inculpatul beneficiind de o serie de garanţii, cum Addendum Altele
ar fi efectuarea unei expertize, obligativitatea de a fi asistat Amendament Anexa
de către un avocat ales sau din oficiu, posibilitatea să fie Apel Aranjament Comercial
asistat de un medic curant sau de un medic specialist. Aşadar, Calculator Cerinte
textele criticate nu afectează dreptul la un proces echitabil Circulara Cod Aerian
sau prezumţia de nevinovăţie, motiv pentru care apreciază că
Cod Comercial Cod Procedura Penala
excepţia de neconstituţionalitate este neîntemeiată.
CURTEA, Cod Vamal Codul Fiscal
având în vedere actele şi lucrările dosarului, constată Codul Muncii Completare
următoarele: Comunicat Conditii
5. Prin Încheierea din 11 ianuarie 2016, pronunţată în Constitutie Contract
Dosarul nr. 14.277/231/2015, Judecătoria Focşani a sesizat
Contract de Finantare Contract de Munca
Curtea Constituţională cu excepţia de neconstituţionalitate a
Conventie Criterii
dispoziţiilor art. 245 şi art. 246 din Codul de procedură
penală, excepţie ridicată de Andrei Tudor Raneti într-o cauză Criterii si Proceduri Cuantum Total
având ca obiect soluţionarea propunerii formulate de către Decizie Declaratie
Parchetul de pe lângă Tribunalul Vrancea de obligare provizorie Declaratie solemna Decret
la tratament medical. Decret Lege Dispozitie
6. În motivarea excepţiei de neconstituţionalitate se
Document Ghid Operational
susţine că prevederile legale menţionate afectează prezumţia de
nevinovăţie, întrucât numai condamnaţii pot fi obligaţi la Hotarare Incheiere
tratament medical ambulatoriu. Mai arată că, în preambulul Indrumar Instructiuni
ordonanţei de renunţare la urmărirea penală, procurorul desemnat Intelegere Lege
în cauză a inventat o infracţiune de ultraj şi l-a instigat pe Lista Masuri
medicul legist să redacteze în fals un raport de expertiză Memorandum Metodologie
medico-legală psihiatrică.
Motiune Normativ
7. Judecătoria Focşani opinează că excepţia de
neconstituţionalitate este neîntemeiată, deoarece măsura de Norme Norme Metodologice
siguranţă a obligării la tratament medical reglementată de art. Ordin Ordonanta
245 şi art. 246 din Codul de procedură penală, cu referire la Ordonanta de Urgenta Plan
art. 109 alin. (1) din Codul penal, nu reprezintă o veritabilă Pozitie Comuna Precizare
sancţiune de drept penal, care are legătură directă cu vinovăţia
Precizari Prescriptii
sau nevinovăţia suspectului/inculpatului cercetat într-o cauză
Procedura Proces Verbal
penală.
8. Măsura de siguranţă are drept scop protejarea Program Propunere de metodologie
suspectului/inculpatului, precum şi a celorlalte persoane în Protocol Protocol Aditional
situaţiile în care se constată că suspectul sau inculpatul are Raport Rectificare
nevoie de tratament medical pentru o afecţiune constatată Reglementari Regulament
medico-legal. Această măsură nu impietează în niciun fel asupra
Reguli Reguli Uniforme
răspunderii penale a persoanei faţă de care se solicită a se lua
măsura şi în situaţia în care se dispune o soluţie de clasare, Rezolutie Schema
renunţare la urmărirea penală ori achitare urmează a fi sesizată Sentinta Sinteza
instanţa civilă care va dispune asupra internării nevoluntare a Sistem Situatie
persoanei în cauză. Aşadar, măsura de siguranţă a obligării la Standard Statut
tratament medical, privită din perspectiva scopului său, nu Strategie Transe Venit Impozabil
apare ca fiind o măsură esenţialmente cu caracter penal, iar ea
Tratat
este reglementată în Codul de procedură penală graţie situaţiei
procesuale la care se află la un moment dat persoana faţă de
care se solicită a se dispune măsura.
9. Potrivit prevederilor art. 30 alin. (1) din Legea nr.
47/1992, încheierea de sesizare a fost comunicată preşedinţilor
celor două Camere ale Parlamentului, Guvernului şi Avocatului
Poporului, pentru a-şi exprima punctele de vedere asupra Skoda fabia se tsi auto 1.2
excepţiei de neconstituţionalitate ridicate. 2012 12 moths mot 5 doors
hpi clear
Skoda fabia Se Tsi S A
10. Guvernul apreciază că excepţia de neconstituţionalitate Aut…
este neîntemeiată. Astfel, dispoziţiile legale criticate
reglementează aspecte ce ţin de aplicarea provizorie a măsurilor
£2,550
de siguranţă cu caracter medical, respectiv a unor aspecte
legate de obligarea provizorie la tratament medical a
Reg 61 volkswagen polo 1.2 s
suspectului/inculpatului. Din coroborarea acestor prevederi cu petrol, f/s/h,long mot, 2 keys,
ex…CAT, HPI Clear, full
cele ale art. 107 din Codul penal rezultă că acestea nu conţin No
serv…
norme care ar permite stabilirea vinovăţiei unei persoane
acuzate de comiterea unei infracţiuni ori considerarea acesteia £2,800
ca fiind vinovată la un moment anterior pronunţării unei
hotărâri definitive de condamnare, fiind deci conforme cu
dispoziţiile art. 23 alin. (11) din Legea fundamentală.
file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Admin/My%20Documents/Downloads/_%20DECIZIA%20nr.%2025%20din%2019%20ianuarie%202017%20referitoare… 2/8
9/17/2018 DECIZIA nr. 25 din 19 ianuarie 2017 referitoare la excepţia de neconstituţionalitate a dispoziţiilor art. 245 şi art. 246 din Codul de procedură penală
11. Avocatul Poporului apreciază că dispoziţiile legale
criticate sunt constituţionale. Astfel, măsura de siguranţă a Monitoare Oficiale
obligării la tratament medical are ca scop înlăturarea unei
stări de pericol şi preîntâmpinarea săvârşirii faptelor
prevăzute de legea penală, motiv pentru care se prevede expres Monitorul Oficial 775 din 10 Septembrie 2018
că măsura va putea fi dispusă până la însănătoşire sau până la Monitorul Oficial 772 din 07 Septembrie 2018
obţinerea unei ameliorări care să înlăture starea de pericol. Monitorul Oficial 773 din 07 Septembrie 2018
12. În acest context, critica autorului excepţiei potrivit Monitorul Oficial 774 din 07 Septembrie 2018
căreia una din premisele obligării la tratament medical rezidă
Monitorul Oficial 768 din 06 Septembrie 2018
în existenţa unei condamnări, nu are suport legal, Codul de
procedură penală nereglementând o asemenea condiţie. În Monitorul Oficial 769 din 06 Septembrie 2018
literatura de specialitate se arată expres că o primă condiţie Monitorul Oficial 770 din 06 Septembrie 2018
pentru luarea măsurii este ca făptuitorul să fi săvârşit o faptă Monitorul Oficial 771 din 06 Septembrie 2018
prevăzută de legea penală, indiferent dacă fapta este sau nu Monitorul Oficial 764 din 05 Septembrie 2018
infracţiune. Monitorul Oficial 765 din 05 Septembrie 2018
13. Prin urmare, nu se poate reţine încălcarea prezumţiei de
nevinovăţie, întrucât art. 23 alin. (11) din Legea
Click aici pentru lista completa
fundamentală consacră această prezumţie exclusiv pentru ipoteza
răspunderii penale. Această concluzie rezultă nu numai din
termenii reglementării constituţionale, făcându-se referire
explicită la „hotărârea judecătorească de condamnare“, dar şi
din economia reglementărilor, prevederile fiind înscrise în MonitorulJuridic.ro este un proiect:
cuprinsul dispoziţiilor cu privire la „libertatea individuală“.
În acest sens se invocă Decizia Curţii Constituţionale nr. 16
din 20 ianuarie 2005.
14. Referitor la încălcarea art. 6 paragraful 2 din
Convenţia pentru apărarea drepturilor omului şi a libertăţilor
fundamentale, Avocatul Poporului arată că textele criticate
stabilesc detaliat procedura de aplicare şi de ridicare a
măsurii, precum şi controlul legalităţii luării acesteia,
instituind suficiente garanţii ale asigurării dreptului la un
proces echitabil şi ale respectării prezumţiei de nevinovăţie.
15. Preşedinţii celor două Camere ale Parlamentului nu au
comunicat punctele lor de vedere asupra excepţiei de
neconstituţionalitate.
CURTEA,
examinând încheierea de sesizare, punctele de vedere ale
Guvernului şi Avocatului Poporului, raportul întocmit de
judecătorul-raportor, notele depuse de autor, concluziile
procurorului, dispoziţiile legale criticate, raportate la
prevederile Constituţiei, precum şi Legea nr. 47/1992, reţine
următoarele:
16. Curtea Constituţională a fost legal sesizată şi este
competentă, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 146 lit. d) din
Constituţie, precum şi ale art. 1 alin. (2), ale art. 2, 3,
10 şi 29 din Legea nr. 47/1992, să soluţioneze excepţia de
neconstituţionalitate.
17. Obiectul excepţiei de neconstituţionalitate îl
constituie dispoziţiile art. 245 cu denumirea marginală
Condiţiile de aplicare şi conţinutul măsurii şi art. 246 cu
denumirea marginală Procedura de aplicare şi de ridicare a
măsurii, ambele din Codul de procedură penală. Ulterior
sesizării Curţii, dispoziţiile art. 246 din Codul de procedură
penală au fost completate prin art. II pct. 60 din Ordonanţa de
urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 18/2016 pentru modificarea şi
completarea Legii nr. 286/2009 privind Codul penal, Legii nr.
135/2010 privind Codul de procedură penală, precum şi pentru
completarea art. 31 alin. (1) din Legea nr. 304/2004 privind
organizarea judiciară, publicată în Monitorul Oficial al
României, Partea I, nr. 389 din 23 mai 2016, în sensul că, după
alin. (12), se introduce un nou alineat, alin. (13). Având în
vedere că, în cauză, a produs efecte norma de procedură
prevăzută de art. 246 din Codul de procedură penală în forma în
vigoare la data sesizării, Curtea se va pronunţa asupra
dispoziţiilor art. 246 din Codul de procedură penală în
redactarea anterioară modificării lor prin Ordonanţa de urgenţă
a Guvernului nr. 18/2016. Prin urmare, prevederile de lege
criticate au următorul conţinut:
- Art. 245:
"(1) Judecătorul de drepturi şi libertăţi, pe durata
urmăririi penale, judecătorul de cameră preliminară, în cursul
procedurii de cameră preliminară, sau instanţa, în cursul
judecăţii, poate dispune obligarea provizorie la tratament
medical a suspectului sau inculpatului, dacă se află în situaţia
prevăzută de art. 109 alin. (1) din Codul penal.
file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Admin/My%20Documents/Downloads/_%20DECIZIA%20nr.%2025%20din%2019%20ianuarie%202017%20referitoare… 3/8
9/17/2018 DECIZIA nr. 25 din 19 ianuarie 2017 referitoare la excepţia de neconstituţionalitate a dispoziţiilor art. 245 şi art. 246 din Codul de procedură penală
(2) Măsura prevăzută la alin. (1) constă în obligarea
suspectului sau inculpatului să urmeze în mod regulat
tratamentul medical prescris de un medic de specialitate, până
la însănătoşire sau până la obţinerea unei ameliorări care să
înlăture starea de pericol.
(3) Judecătorul de drepturi şi libertăţi şi judecătorul de
cameră preliminară se pronunţă asupra măsurii prevăzute la alin.
(1) în camera de consiliu, prin încheiere motivată. Instanţa se
pronunţă asupra măsurii prin încheiere motivată.“; "
– Art. 246:
"(1) În cursul urmăririi penale sau al procedurii de cameră
preliminară, dacă apreciază că sunt întrunite condiţiile
prevăzute de lege, procurorul înaintează judecătorului de
drepturi şi libertăţi sau judecătorului de cameră preliminară de
la instanţa căreia i-ar reveni competenţa să judece cauza în
primă instanţă o propunere motivată de luare faţă de inculpat a
măsurii obligării provizorii la tratament medical.
(2) Propunerea prevăzută la alin. (1) va fi însoţită de
expertiza medico-legală din care să rezulte necesitatea
aplicării măsurii obligării la tratament medical.
(3) Judecătorul sesizat conform alin. (1) fixează termen de
soluţionare a propunerii în cel mult 5 zile de la data
înregistrării acesteia şi dispune citarea suspectului sau
inculpatului.
(4) Când suspectul sau inculpatul este prezent, soluţionarea
propunerii se face numai după audierea acestuia, în prezenţa
unui avocat, ales sau numit din oficiu. Propunerea se
soluţionează şi în lipsa suspectului sau inculpatului, atunci
când acesta nu se prezintă, deşi a fost legal citat, dar numai
în prezenţa avocatului, ales sau numit din oficiu, căruia i se
dă cuvântul pentru a pune concluzii.
(5) Participarea procurorului este obligatorie.
(6) Suspectul sau inculpatul are dreptul ca la soluţionarea
propunerii de luare a măsurii obligării provizorii la tratament
medical să fie asistat şi de către un medic desemnat de acesta,
care poate prezenta concluzii judecătorului de drepturi şi
libertăţi. Suspectul sau inculpatul are dreptul să fie asistat
de medicul specialist desemnat de acesta şi la alcătuirea
planului terapeutic.
(7) Judecătorul se pronunţă asupra propunerii printr-o
încheiere, care poate fi contestată în 5 zile de la pronunţare.
Contestarea nu suspendă punerea în aplicare a măsurii de
siguranţă.
(8) Dacă admite propunerea, judecătorul dispune obligarea
provizorie la tratament medical a suspectului sau inculpatului
şi efectuarea unei expertize medico-legale, în cazul în care
aceasta nu a fost depusă potrivit alin. (2).
(9) În cazul când după dispunerea măsurii s-a produs
însănătoşirea suspectului sau inculpatului ori a intervenit o
ameliorare a stării sale de sănătate care înlătură starea de
pericol pentru siguranţa publică, judecătorul de drepturi şi
libertăţi sau judecătorul de cameră preliminară care a luat
măsura dispune, la sesizarea procurorului ori a medicului de
specialitate sau la cererea suspectului ori inculpatului sau a
unui membru de familie al acestuia, ridicarea măsurii luate.
Dispoziţiile alin. (2)-(7) se aplică în mod corespunzător.
(10) Dacă după dispunerea măsurii a fost sesizată instanţa prin
rechizitoriu, ridicarea acesteia, potrivit alin. (9), se dispune
de către judecătorul de cameră preliminară sau, după caz, de
către instanţa de judecată în faţa căreia se află cauza.
(11) În cursul judecăţii în primă instanţă şi în apel, la
propunerea procurorului ori din oficiu, inculpatul poate fi
obligat provizoriu la tratament medical de către instanţa de
judecată în faţa căreia se află cauza, care solicită acte
medicale concludente sau efectuarea unei expertize medico-
legale. Dispoziţiile alin. (4)-(9) se aplică în mod
corespunzător.
(12) Dacă suspectul sau inculpatul încalcă cu rea-credinţă
măsura obligării provizorii la tratament medical, judecătorul de
drepturi şi libertăţi, judecătorul de cameră preliminară sau
instanţa care a luat măsura ori în faţa căreia se află cauza
dispune, la sesizarea procurorului sau a medicului de
specialitate ori din oficiu, internarea medicală provizorie a
suspectului sau inculpatului, în condiţiile prevăzute la art.
file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Admin/My%20Documents/Downloads/_%20DECIZIA%20nr.%2025%20din%2019%20ianuarie%202017%20referitoare… 4/8
9/17/2018 DECIZIA nr. 25 din 19 ianuarie 2017 referitoare la excepţia de neconstituţionalitate a dispoziţiilor art. 245 şi art. 246 din Codul de procedură penală
247.“ "
file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Admin/My%20Documents/Downloads/_%20DECIZIA%20nr.%2025%20din%2019%20ianuarie%202017%20referitoare… 5/8
9/17/2018 DECIZIA nr. 25 din 19 ianuarie 2017 referitoare la excepţia de neconstituţionalitate a dispoziţiilor art. 245 şi art. 246 din Codul de procedură penală
de nevinovăţie tinde a proteja o persoană învinuită de
săvârşirea unei fapte penale împotriva unui verdict de
culpabilitate ce nu a fost stabilit în mod legal şi priveşte
ansamblul procedurii penale litigioase, fiind inclus şi modul de
administrare a probelor (a se vedea Hotărârea Curţii Europene a
Drepturilor Omului din 25 august 1987, pronunţată în Cauza
Nolkenbockhoff împotriva Germaniei, paragraful 33).
21. Analizând condiţiile de aplicare şi conţinutul măsurii
provizorii la tratament medical, precum şi procedura de aplicare
şi ridicare a unei astfel de măsuri, Curtea constată că aceasta
poate fi dispusă pe toată durata procesului de către judecătorul
de drepturi şi libertăţi, judecătorul de cameră preliminară ori
instanţa de judecată şi constă în obligarea provizorie a
suspectului/inculpatului să urmeze în mod regulat tratamentul
medical prescris de către un medic de specialitate. Caracterul
provizoriu al unei astfel de măsuri se deduce din faptul că
aceasta este dispusă pe parcursul procedurilor judiciare (în
cursul urmăririi penale, al procedurii de cameră preliminară
şi/sau în cursul judecăţii) prin convertirea măsurii de
siguranţă reglementată de art. 108 lit. a) din Codul penal într-
o măsură procesuală a cărei subzistenţă sub o astfel de
identitate se încheie odată cu pronunţarea unei hotărâri
judecătoreşti - potrivit art. 404 alin. (4) lit. d) din Codul de
procedură penală dispozitivul hotărârii trebuie să cuprindă şi
cele hotărâte cu privire la măsurile de siguranţă. Aceasta nu
înseamnă că, în mod automat, dispunerea obligării la tratament
medical se întinde până la finalizarea procesului, întrucât
menţinerea ei este indisolubil legată de însănătoşire ori de
obţinerea unei ameliorări care să înlăture starea de pericol.
Totodată, măsura obligării provizorii la tratament medical va fi
dispusă după ce, în prealabil, a fost efectuată o expertiză
medico-legală, cu citarea suspectului/inculpatului şi numai în
prezenţa avocatului ales sau numit din oficiu. Persoana supusă
măsurii are dreptul ca, la soluţionarea unei astfel de
propuneri, să fie asistată şi de către un medic desemnat de
aceasta care poate prezenta concluzii şi care poate participa la
alcătuirea planului terapeutic. În cazul în care a intervenit
însănătoşirea ori o ameliorare a stării de sănătate care
înlătură starea de pericol, măsura provizorie a obligării la
tratament medical poate fi ridicată la sesizarea procurorului
ori a medicului de specialitate sau la cererea
suspectului/inculpatului ori a unui membru de familie al
acestuia.
22. Aşa fiind, Curtea constată că măsura obligării la
tratament medical este o măsură procesuală provizorie, iar nu o
sancţiune penală, care poate fi dispusă împotriva persoanelor
care au săvârşit fapte prevăzute de legea penală, dar nu ca o
consecinţă a răspunderii penale, neavând aşadar caracter
punitiv, ci eminamente preventiv. Aşadar, legiuitorul, prin
edictarea normelor legale criticate, şi-a exercitat tocmai
competenţa constituţională consacrată de art. 61 din Legea
fundamentală, ţinând cont de specificul măsurilor cu caracter
medical instituite în procesul penal - măsuri procesuale cu
caracter provizoriu - şi de scopul pentru care acestea sunt
dispuse, respectiv de a înlătura pericolul pentru societate.
23. În concluzie, persoana supusă măsurii provizorii
beneficiază de garanţii specifice dreptului la un proces
echitabil şi în concordanţă cu prezumţia de nevinovăţie, câtă
vreme necesitatea dispunerii măsurii obligării la tratament
medical este evaluată de către o instanţă în cadrul unei
proceduri judiciare, ce include o audiere publică în care
apărarea are acces la dosarul cauzei şi în care prezumţiile pe
care acuzarea se bazează nu sunt absolute, astfel încât ele pot
fi răsturnate de persoana interesată. Mai mult, din
interpretarea dispoziţiilor art. 245 şi art. 246 din Codul de
procedură penală nu rezultă că suspectului/inculpatului i se
impută săvârşirea unei infracţiuni, fapt care nu poate fi
stabilit decât prin hotărâre judecătorească de condamnare rămasă
definitivă, ci că, din cauza unei boli preexistente, prezintă
pericol pentru societate. De altfel, pe baza prevederilor legale
contestate, suspectul/inculpatul supus măsurii provizorii a
obligării la tratament medical nu este considerat vinovat de
săvârşirea unei fapte penale, întrucât această măsură se poate
dispune faţă de o persoană care a comis o faptă prevăzută de
legea penală, chiar şi în situaţia în care acesteia nu i se
file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Admin/My%20Documents/Downloads/_%20DECIZIA%20nr.%2025%20din%2019%20ianuarie%202017%20referitoare… 6/8
9/17/2018 DECIZIA nr. 25 din 19 ianuarie 2017 referitoare la excepţia de neconstituţionalitate a dispoziţiilor art. 245 şi art. 246 din Codul de procedură penală
aplică o pedeapsă. De aceea, nu se poate susţine că dispoziţiile
legale examinate ar fi contrare prevederilor art. 23 alin. (11)
din Constituţie privitoare la prezumţia de nevinovăţie.
24. Pentru considerentele expuse, Curtea constată că
dispoziţiile art. 245 şi art. 246 din Codul de procedură
penală nu afectează principiul prezumţiei de nevinovăţie
consacrat de art. 23 alin. (11) din Constituţie, art. 6
paragraful 2 din Convenţia pentru apărarea drepturilor omului şi
a libertăţilor fundamentale şi art. 11 din Declaraţia Universală
a Drepturilor Omului.
25. Pentru considerentele expuse mai sus, în temeiul art.
146 lit. d) şi al art. 147 alin. (4) din Constituţie, al art. 1-
3, al art. 11 alin. (1) lit. A.d) şi al art. 29 din Legea nr.
47/1992, cu unanimitate de voturi,
CURTEA CONSTITUŢIONALĂ
În numele legii
DECIDE:
Respinge, ca neîntemeiată, excepţia de neconstituţionalitate
ridicată de Andrei Tudor Raneti în Dosarul nr. 14.277/231/2015
al Judecătoriei Focşani şi constată că dispoziţiile art. 245 şi
art. 246 din Codul de procedură penală sunt constituţionale în
raport cu criticile formulate.
Definitivă şi general obligatorie.
Decizia se comunică Judecătoriei Focşani şi se publică în
Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I.
Pronunţată în şedinţa din data de 19 ianuarie 2017.
Tags: Monitorul Oficial, Acte Monitorul Oficial, Decizie, Alte Institutii, DECIZIA nr. 25 din 19 ianuarie 2017
Comentarii
Nume
Comentariu
Da, doresc sa primesc informatii despre produsele, serviciile etc. oferite de Rentrop & Straton.
Cod securitate:
Salveaza
file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Admin/My%20Documents/Downloads/_%20DECIZIA%20nr.%2025%20din%2019%20ianuarie%202017%20referitoare… 7/8
9/17/2018 DECIZIA nr. 25 din 19 ianuarie 2017 referitoare la excepţia de neconstituţionalitate a dispoziţiilor art. 245 şi art. 246 din Codul de procedură penală
Fii primul care comenteaza.
file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Admin/My%20Documents/Downloads/_%20DECIZIA%20nr.%2025%20din%2019%20ianuarie%202017%20referitoare… 8/8
Our Reference: OTP-CR-424/18
On behalf of the Prosecutor, I thank you for your communication received 21/09/2018, as well as any
subsequent related information.
As you may know, the International Criminal Court (“the ICC” or “the Court”) is governed by the Rome
Statute, which entrusts the Court with a very specific and carefully defined jurisdiction and mandate. A
fundamental feature of the Rome Statute is that the Court may only exercise jurisdiction over persons for the
most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole, namely genocide, crimes against
humanity and war crimes, as defined in the Rome Statute (Articles 6 to 8). The Court may only exercise
jurisdiction over crimes committed on or after 1 July 2002 (Article 11). In addition, the Court may only exercise
jurisdiction over crimes committed on the territory of a State that has accepted the jurisdiction of the Court or
by a national of such a State (Article 12), or where the Security Council refers the situation to the Court (Article
13).
Accordingly, I regret to advise you that your communication appears to relate to matters outside the
jurisdiction of the Court. The Prosecutor has therefore confirmed that there is not a basis at this time to proceed
with further analysis. The information you have submitted will be maintained in our archives, and the decision
not to proceed may be reconsidered if new facts or evidence provide a reasonable basis to believe that a crime
within the jurisdiction of the Court has been committed.
I hope you will appreciate that with the defined jurisdiction of the Court, many serious allegations will be
beyond the reach of this institution to address. I note in this regard that the ICC is designed to complement, not
replace national jurisdictions. Thus, if you wish to pursue this matter further, you may consider raising it with
other appropriate national or international authorities.
I am grateful for your interest in the ICC. If you would like to learn more about the work of the ICC, I
invite you to visit our website at www.icc-cpi.int.
Yours sincerely,
Madame, Monsieur,
Au nom du Procureur, je vous remercie de votre communication, reçue le 21/09/2018, ainsi que de tout
autre renseignement connexe envoyé subséquemment.
Comme vous le savez peut-être, la Cour pénale internationale (ci-après nommée la ”CPI” ou la ”Cour”)
est régie par le Statut de Rome, lequel confère à la Cour une compétence et un mandat particuliers et bien
définis. L’un des aspects fondamentaux du Statut de Rome (article 11) est la stipulation que la Cour peut
seulement avoir compétence sur les personnes accusées des crimes les plus graves qui touchent l’ensemble de la
communauté internationale, notamment le génocide, les crimes contre l’humanité et les crimes de guerre, tels
qu’ils sont définis dans le Statut de Rome (articles 6 à 8). La Cour a uniquement compétence à l’égard des
crimes commis à partir du 1er juillet 2002 (article 11). De plus, la Cour peut seulement exercer sa compétence à
l’égard de crimes commis sur le territoire d’un État qui a accepté la compétence de la Cour ou de crimes commis
par un ressortissant d’un État qui a accepté la compétence de la Cour (article 12), ou lorsque le Conseil de
sécurité défère la situation à la Cour (article 13).
Par conséquent, je regrette de vous informer que votre communication semble porter sur une affaire sur
laquelle la Cour n’a aucune compétence. Le Procureur a donc confirmé qu’il n’existe actuellement aucune base
justifiant une analyse plus poussée. Les renseignements que vous avez soumis seront versés dans nos archives,
et la décision de ne pas poursuivre l’analyse pourra être revue si de nouveaux faits ou éléments de preuve
fournissent une base raisonnable de croire qu’un crime relevant de la compétence de la Cour a été commis.
J’espère que vous comprenez que compte tenu de sa compétence, telle qu’elle est définie, la Cour ne
pourra instruire bon nombre d’allégations graves. À ce sujet, je vous fais remarquer que la CPI a été conçue
pour être le complément des juridictions nationales, et non pour les remplacer. Ainsi, si vous souhaitez
poursuivre cette affaire, vous pourrez peut-être songer à la soumettre aux autorités nationales ou
internationales compétentes.
Si vous désirez en apprendre davantage sur le travail de la CPI, vous pouvez consulter notre site Web, au
www.icc-cpi.int. Je vous remercie de l’intérêt porté à la CPI et vous prie, Madame, Monsieur, de recevoir mes
salutations cordiales.