School JACOBO Z.
GONZALES MEMORIAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
GRADES 1 TO 12
DAILY LESSON LOG
I. OBJECTIVES
A. Content Standards
B. Performance Standard
C. Learning Competencies / Objectives
II. CONTENT
III. LEARNING RESOURCES
A. References
1. Teacher’s Guide Pages
2. Learner’s Materials pages
3. Textbook Pages
4. Additional Materials from
Learning Resource (LR) portal
B. Other Learning Resources
IV. PROCEDURES
A. Reviewing previous lesson or
presenting the new lesson
B. Establishing a purpose for the lesson
C. Presenting examples/ instances of the
new lesson
D. Discussing new concepts and
practicing new skills #1
E. Discussing new concepts and
practicing new skills #2
F. Developing mastery
(Leads to formative assessment 3)
G. Finding practical applications of
Grade Level TEN
Teacher MARIBEL L. NAYAD Learning Area RESEARCH IV
Teaching Dates and Time JUNE 4-8, 2018 Quarter FIRST
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
The learner demonstrates understanding of evaluating research paper.
The learner should be able to evaluate research papers.
Engage the students in the Utilizes the standards (criteria Utilizes the standards (criteria or Assess the pre-knowledge of
syllabus content for the 1 st or checklist) in evaluating checklist) in evaluating research Grade 10 students about the
quarter. research paper (peer/ group/ paper (peer/ group/ expert whole coverage of Research
expert evaluation). evaluation). IV.
Subject Orientation/ Evaluation of a Research Paper Evaluation of a Research Paper DIAGNOSTIC TEST
Introduction of the topic
Methods of Research and Thesis Writing
Research Fundamentals from Concept to Output
Recall prior knowledge on What is the purpose of Define research evaluation.
the definition/ importance/ evaluating a research paper?
parts of a research paper.
Establish student-teacher Show the checklist in evaluating Explain the importance of
relationship. a research paper. evaluating a research paper.
Present the content of the How to critically evaluate
syllabus for the 1st quarter/ scientific papers?
grading system.
Have a short interview Discuss the correct process of Let the students continue
regarding the research paper research paper evaluation from answering the previous group
that they conducted last year. the title until the last part. activity.
What is research evaluation? Use the study Lantana Camara
Discuss the checklist for (Kantutay) as Pelletized
evaluating a research report. Mosquito Larvicide as guide in
answering the checklist.
The students will be divided Group Activity: Group Activity:
into groups and decide the Let the students use the Let the students use the checklist
final research topic / checklist in evaluating a in evaluating a research paper
problem. research paper.
Enforce learning that Examine the research paper
Page 1 of 2
 involves making mistakes with a critical eye.
concepts and skills in daily living while pursuing the joy of
discovery.
Consultation time to guide Research evaluation is the process Research evaluation is the process in
students in the research to in which the purpose of research, which the purpose of research, the
be conducted. the methodology used and methodology used and methods, such
methods, such as data collection as data collection and analysis are
H. Making generalizations and
and analysis are rated to ascertain rated to ascertain their relevance,
abstractions about the lesson their relevance, value and their value and their ability to achieve
ability to achieve research research objectives, and to ascertain
objectives, and to ascertain the the significance of a research.
significance of a research.
Ask some students to Collect and analyze the checklist Based on the checklist prepared
present their output in class. provided by each group. by each group the students will
I. Evaluating learning
start revising their research
paper.
GROUP TASK: Prepare the GROUP TASK: Prepare the
J. Additional activities for application or
previous research paper that previous research paper that
remediation
they had last year. they had last year.
The lesson will be continued
V. REMARKS
next meeting.
VI. REFLECTION
A. No. of learners who earned 80% in
the evaluation
B. No. of learners who require
additional activities for remediation
who scored below 80%
C. Did the remedial lessons work? No. of
learners who have caught up with the
lesson
D. No. of learners who continue to
require remediation
E. Which of my teaching strategies
worked well? Why did these work?
F. What difficulties did I encounter
which my principal or supervisor can
help me solve?
G. What innovation or localized
materials did I use/discover which I
wish to share with other teachers?
For improvement, enhancement and/or clarification of any DepEd material used, kindly submit feedback to bld.tld@deped.gov.ph

Prepared by: Checked by:

Mrs. Maribel L. Nayad Mr. Romeo A. Cerdenñ a

Science Teacher Science Dept. Coordinator
Page 2 of 2