Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
A R T I C L E I N F O: ABSTRACT
Article history: Urban Space is not just a simple, physical configuration. Instead, it is a
Received 2 August 2017 transformation of human experiences with the different synchronic architectural
Accepted 11 December 2017 characteristic that needs a critical examination to segregate discrete layers of
Available online 16 December structural elements. As a result, the traditional urban space is a unique existence
2017 of reality; it is a product of prolonged interaction between society and architecture.
Keywords: The association is so prevailing that each portion has a significant role in creating
Urban Space; a combination of mental prototypes of interpretation between the different factors
Traditional city; that gives the urban space its final form. Neglecting any part in the public space
Prototypes; perception process is leading to crash the binary equation letting the meaning
Context; paralyzed without being able to represent any society or potentially keep the sense.
Synchronic; There are many examples of worn-out urban space some of them was a result of
Diachronic. ignorance and absent of realization of the interaction between Society and
architecture. Al-Kadhimiya, a city north of Baghdad, the capital of Iraq, is a
crucial example of this type. The Iraqi municipality demolished that relationship
by importing different layers that are not compatible with the original one or as a
result of inserting new means of technology in the heart of the historic cities. The other example from Erbil, a city
north of Iraq, where the municipality determinable removed the old fabric to insert a well-defined rectangle space,
somehow to create an urban public space, that procedure juxtaposed by form a barrier to isolate the old Souk from
the other part of the old city. Both cities suffered from a misunderstanding of the urban binary equation between
space and architecture as a tool to understand the context.
CONTEMPORARY URBAN AFFAIRS (2018) 2(2), 71-77. Doi: 10.25034/ijcua.2018.3672
www.ijcua.com
Copyright © 2017 Contemporary Urban Affairs. All rights reserved.
2. Communication through urban fabric relationships between the different spaces and
Harold Proshansky said, «The physical architectural masses to create some pattern or
environment that we construct is as much a order or Deep Structure (HIillier & Hanson, 2009).
social phenomenon» (Lawson, 2001). If any Although the meaning has a structure, that
urban fabric has its internal system, then those meaning is not alone and related to different
«descriptions of space can be related both to layers with a different period. As a result, there
the everyday buildings that make up the system are different layers of structures that stacked
and to the various» (HIillier & Hanson, 2009) kinds above each other, the combination of those
of public building that exist within the urban layers composes the final sign of the urban form
fabric. Space is medium for interaction
understanding as well as understand the 3.3 Phenomenological view
message behind the urban fabric. There are Phenomenology role is to probe for the
different layers of combinations to transfer the deeper structure of human reality and thereby to
meaning or as a way of shifting the meaning. In articulate the «language of metaphors that can
another word, there is continuous changes and be identified with our existence.» (HIillier &
modifications in the fabric from diachronic point Hanson, 2009). Phenomenology further
view. So, there is a need to understand the emphasizes the fact that architecture is first and
underlying structure which regulates the spaces foremost a multi-sensory experience as opposed
within the entire urban fabric. For Space gets its to a purely visual or conceptual exercise. There
meaning through its direct connections with is a focus on the human place «the structure of
human consciousness. place becomes manifest as environmental
totalities which comprise the aspects of
3. Society and Urban Fabrics binary interaction. character and space.» (Schulz, 1991). The theory
3.1 Introduction focused on experiences and its interpretation by
Both Space and Society have a particular a human. It is crucial to get that the skills play a
structure which is modified and molded in almost prominent role in understanding the space, but
complete compatibility with the other with all its then what remains is how to transfer those feeling
intrinsic values. The understanding of the reality or experience accordingly. This method is well
through a binary interaction and understand the determined and identified for a single area
meaning of the context, text, and urban fabric is where spectator could record his own
a vast field, its root goes back to some other experiences, but the question remained about
artistic field. In linguistics, Saussure insisted «that the relationship of that space with the other
our ability to discern phonemic structures related spaces! How could be so sure about the
requires that we recognize units of meaning such interconnection with other spaces? Although
that they are reiterable.» (Winters, 2007). the phenomenological offer a useful tool to
Saussure did not consider it necessary to recognize places and its internal structures, it is
distinguish between a language where that suffering from indications that connect spaces
consists in the mastery of concepts and grasping with each other. It is worth to say that the
content on the one hand and investing insight Structuralists offer a better method for
with connotation on the other. understanding the connection between the
elements.
3.2 Structuralism binary interpretation.
In its simplest form, structuralism is an 3.4 Post-Structuralism and Deconstructionism
analytical approach to consider phenomena as approach.
a complex system of variables operating under The post-structuralism focused on time and
the certain universal rule. The urban space plays Changing of the meaning accordingly there is
a significant role in understanding the essential no fixed connection between the signifiers and
meaning of any urban fabric. The the signified or between the urban fabric or
undistinguishable world comprises of the space as well as the context with interpretation
structures that inspire and establish all of these being created by the subconscious or the
phenomena is the underlying phenomena, spectator so it
which is «consists of the structures that underlie Sought to redress the universalizing tendencies
and organize all of these phenomena so that we of structuralism by introducing a particular
can make sense of them.» (Tyson, 2006). The first specificity into the discourse. Thus against the static
one related to the physical world. Architecture
and universal models of structuralism, post-
and urban design are similar to the internal
structuralism introduced notions of time and 2-The study of the Relations between parts,
difference (Leach, 1997). these could be varied from different and varied
In its most exciting form, deconstruction structures and influences (inside/outside),
saw as a way of undermining «all statements (Down/Up), (Focus/Diffusion),
about the world, leaving us both silent and (Toward/backward),…etc. The effects of this
stricken with the acute condition of undesirability principle will be very evident in the case study of
a fatal malady in most academic and political Erbil City.
circles.» (Mallgrave & Goodman, 2011). The 3- Combine the different structure in such
instability of the meaning is the purpose coherent a way that each structure could be distinguished
in the post and deconstruction it leads to consciously from the whole overlapped structure
«emphasize the aspect of a difference it which is in the urban Form.
differentiation over that which is a deferral.» Just in combining those (Figure 1) three
(Massey, 2008). Here we have the concept of points there will be an acceptable approach to
(Time/Space) as a tool to affect the different understanding the urban form.
structures of the meaning accordingly. The
research believes that the understanding of the
final meaning through various layers is more
reliable and acceptable in the urban space.
Consequently, it is possible to combine the
different structure of meaning.
Structures(Struturalism)
• Direct interaction with the • Combine the different
space with all its features structure
Menaing
4. Traditional Urban fabric as a product of the traveling. They may be primarily junctions, places
interaction between the social, culture and of a break in Transportation, a crossing or
the physical existence. convergence of paths, moments of shift from
Most of the values in cities located in the one structure to another» (Lynch, 1960).
traditional area where the physical form and the However, it is «an outstanding feature of
spatial distribution of activities in the city partly the visual cityscape, a marker that helps anchor
contained in the traditional fabric. the individual’s mental map of the city.»
(Williams, 2010). Without these landmarks or
4.1 Centrality / Exteriority focus point, the observer loses the ability to build
This element is more related to the whole an image or description of the layout that he is
understanding of the urban space from one side trying to decipher. This concept changed
and the urban fabric as a whole phenomenon. according to the modern development and
The human being could understand the city or a transportation requirements “Due to dynamic of
part of the urban fabric when there is the point urban growth the city expanded itself to the
of interactions or social gravity to guide the exterior part of the city” (NIA & SULEIMAN, 2017).
people to those points. This principle reached its
maximum in the traditional cities and historical 4.4 Continuity/Discontinuity
towns and lost that importance on behalf of the The continuity of the space was one of the
Exteriority in the gridded system where space has aesthetic value of the modern space,
a fluent continuous dimension. According to this accordingly “The Aesthetic Values based on
element, all the direction could lead to creating simple, straight Shapes and forms, the
something more important or a place where all whole Compositions stand on square forms”
these points collected together or leading to (Amen, 2017). This structure is related to the
some other place that has more gradient power continues urban language in the traditional
or performance. This type of movement has its area, «In ordinary daily life people need more
own internal rules as centrality has its own continuity and predictability in their
morphological rules. surroundings» (Williams, 2010). People inside any
space need enough mystery and complexity to
4.2 Exposure / Enclosure keep their interest in looking around them.
Raymond Unwin declared that «we should Discontinuity in the language or the structure
secure some orderly line up to which the country lead to misconception and fragility of the
and town may each extend and stop definitely.» meaning, some cities suffered from this kind of
(Samuels, 2004). The principle related to the discontinuity when some elements inserted
enclosure of the space and feeling of the human which is far from the existed structure or which is
that he is in a definite way. A type of interaction in the total discord with it. That why there should
between the people and building around them. be guidelines and structures assuring continuity
Unwin (1909) confirmed the previous point by both regarding physical form and cultural
saying that « the designer of the buildings, much context.
may be done to produce interest and variety in
the street pictures, while at the same time 4.5 Variations/ uniformity
maintaining the general sense of unity which is The principle is related to the dynamic
usually so wanting in modern suburban roads.» change of the space and place simultaneously
(Unwin, 1909). Feeling to be inside is an influential with the movement of the pedestrian. Space
factor to encourage social activities it is thus focus on internal elements inside the traditional
tempting to correlate the particular morphology cities which are similar to the human scale and
of the close with these types of common the limit of the definition of the space, these
practice. variations can drive by personality, status, and
culture. Most of the traditional cities built
4.3 Concentration/ Separation compactly for some or other reason that reason
The mental image of cities depends on ranged from religious, social and environmental
some point as landmarks to create a issues and manifestations. The Variation is a
comprehensive mental image for the city. Lynch reflection of two factors, the scale, and
described it as nodes that according to him movement. The variations of the area depend
«Nodes are points, the strategic spots in a city on the magnitude and power of connectivity
into which an observer can enter, and which are and disconnected perceptual image.
the intensive foci to and from which he is
Figure 3. New Centers near the citadel pushing out Source Developed 6.4. Continuity/Discontinuity.
by the author. The right axis and isolation all together
worked as one combination to increase the
segregation with the other part of the city.
Conclusion
The urban fabric is the final product of the
prolonged process between human activities
and the architectural space; each part contains
a compatible structure with the other part. It is
good to comprehend that many layers of
meaning and transformation live implicitly in any
urban fabric, that why there is a difficulty to
Figure 4. Both side of the new square development with sharp contrast. understand the urban fabric through one layer of
interpretation.
6. Al-Kadhimiya /Baghdad/ Iraq As we have seen through the paper, there
Kadhimiya is one of the suburbs of was a sharp conflict in the internal structure of
Baghdad and its holiest place; it is 5 km to the Erbil old city, and the developed one. The most
north of the center of Baghdad. The urban fabric important part of the city (the Citadel) has lost
of the city organized around the sacred shrine; its power and gravity influence in favor of the
the municipality developed the area in 1980, the newly developed space and the giant mall just
area around the main shrine demolished with in the opposite direction. Also, the using of
roads crossing the area all the way to the main traditional material around the Citadel worked
shrine (Figure 5). The new project has to reduce the impression of the Citadel old walls
characteristics with sharp discord with the and features. All these elements worked in large
structural view of the area. In comparison with part to crash the old structure and create
the five fundamental points, we will find that the conflict with the old one and create a language
language is transformed according to as it based on diffusion, marginality, and exposure
cleared below. which in all combinations are in far contrast with
enclosure, centrality, and variety that the old
fabric had adopted. There is a sharp
6.1. Centrality / Exteriority. atmosphere between the existing fabric and the
Here we could conclude that the creating developed models, some new element (the new
of the giant space all around the shrine made open space) has started to share the centrality
the shrine wall works as a barrier for space (Figure with existed dominant elements (the Citadel).
Acknowledgments
This research did not receive any specific grant
from funding agencies in the public,
commercial, or non-for-profit sectors.
References
Amen, M. A. (2017, August). The inspiration of
Bauhaus principles on the modern housing
in Cyprus. Journal of Contemporary Urban
Affairs, 1(2), p. 21-32.
doi:https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2017.3645
HIillier, B., & Hanson, J. (2009). the Social Logic of
Space. Cambridge University Press.
Lawson, B. (2001). the Language of Space.
Architectural Press.
Leach, N. (1997). Rethinking Architecture.
Rutledge. Routledge.
Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of The City. MIT press.
Mallgrave , H. F., & Goodman, D. (2011). An
Introduction to Architectural Theory 1968 to
the Present. Wiley-Blackwel.
Massey, D. (2008). For Space. Sage Publications
Ltd.
NIA, H. A., & SULEIMAN, Y. H. (2017, August).
Identity in Changing Context: Factors of
losing Identity in new developed part of the
city of Famagusta, North Cyprus. Journal of
Contemporary Urban Affairs., 1(2), 11-20.
doi:doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.3661
Samuels, I. (2004). Urban forms the death and life
of the urban block. . Architectural: Press.
Schulz, C. N. (1991). Genius Loci: Toward a
phenomenological view in Architecture.
Rizzoli.
Tyson, L. (2006). Critical theory today: a user-
friendly guide. Routledge.
Unwin, S. (1909). Town Planning in Practice: An
Introduction to the Art of Designing Cities
and Suburbs. : . New York: Charles Scribner
& Sons.
Williams, J. (2010). Understanding post-
structuralism. Acumen.
Winters, E. (2007). Aesthetics and Architecture.
Continuum International Group.