Você está na página 1de 2

THE POLICY

DEPARTMENT
STUDY
DETAILS
STUDY
in a nutshell
We provide Committees of the AUTHORS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES

European Parliament in the area of European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde, POLICY DEPARTMENT
Glasgow: John BACHTLER, Laura POLVERARI STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES
Structural & Cohesion Policies with a
dedicated research service.
As a Policy Department we do our own
research but also contract external
experts to deliver studies and briefings Building Blocks for a
for the Committees.
Future Cohesion Policy
– First Reflections
The full study is available here:
http://bit.ly/601-974

You can find our blog here:


https://research4committees.blog/

Follow @PolicyREGI

L009141
IP/B/REGI/IC/2017-11
Current and future challenges of
PE 601.974 April 2017
the post-2020 Cohesion Policy

A study commissioned by the


Committee on Regional Development
MAIN
ABSTRACT FOCUS ON
CONCLUSIONS

• The reform of the EU budget and policy A fundamental enabling issue is the need This study discusses the essential
priorities in the post-2020 Multiannual for harmonization and simplification of themes expected to be part of the
Financial Framework comes at a difficult rules attached to different policies (ESIF debate on the post-2020 Cohesion
time for the EU with major internal and and other EU investment programmes) Policy. It covers the rationale and overall
external challenges. and the applicable EU regulatory policies, framework of the policy, current and
• Cohesion Policy is under pressure to especially concerning State aids and future challenges, and the post-2020
justify its added value in relation to EU public procurement. In addition, there is a delivery system. The context in which
political objectives; the latest data show need for better coordination and debates on the future are taking place is
that the challenges for economic, social communication between relevant more challenging than in the past but
and territorial cohesion remain Commission services – and, equally, advocacy of a continued strong role of
profound. within national and sub-national Cohesion Policy has begun to emerge
• There is increasing evidence of administrations - to bridge the ‘culture from EU, national and regional
Cohesion Policy effectiveness, but there gap’ between regional development and institutions.
are also competing pressures on the EU sectorial policies, to fostering collective
budget. action between ESIF and other EU
• One of the difficult debates for policies. Comments on this study are welcome at:
post-2020 is to clarify the priorities for
poldep-cohesion@europarl.europa.eu
Cohesion Policy and its relationship
with other EU policies.
If you wish to subscribe or unsubscribe
• Discussions will focus on delivery,
namely on how to achieve to our mailing list, please contact us at
simplification, facilitate synergies and the above address mentioning which
provide for increased flexibility in the committee area is of interest:
• Cohesion policy’s management. AGRI
CULT
PECH
REGI

Source: Shutterstock.com
TRAN

The full study is available here:


http://bit.ly/601-974

Você também pode gostar