Você está na página 1de 9

Chemosphere 59 (2005) 871–879

www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphere

Effect of alkalinity on the performance of a simulated


landfill bioreactor digesting organic solid wastes
Osman Nuri Ağdağ, Delia Teresa Sponza *

Department of Environmental Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Dokuz Eylül University, Buca Kaynaklar Campus,
Tınaztepe-Izmir 35160, Turkey

Received 1 March 2004; received in revised form 27 October 2004; accepted 17 November 2004

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of alkalinity on the anaerobic treatment of the organic solid wastes collected from
_
the kitchen of Engineering Faculty in Dokuz Eylül University, Izmir, Turkey and the leachate characteristics treated in
three simulated landfill anaerobic bioreactors. All of the reactors were operated with leachate recirculation. One reactor
was operated without alkalinity addition. The second reactor was operated by the addition of 3 g l 1 d 1 of NaHCO3
alkalinity to the leachate and the third reactor was operated by the addition of 6 g l 1 d 1 NaHCO3 alkalinity to the
leachate. After 65 d of anaerobic incubation, it was observed that the chemical oxygen demand (COD), volatile fatty
acids (VFA) concentrations, and biochemical oxygen demand to chemical oxygen demand (BOD5/COD) ratios in the
leachate samples produced from the alkalinity added reactors were lower than the control reactor while the pH values
were higher than the control reactor. The COD values were measured as 18 900, 3800 and 2900 mg l 1 while the VFA
concentrations were 6900, 1400 and 1290 mg l 1, respectively, in the leachate samples of the control, and reactors con-
taining 3 g l 1 NaHCO3 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3 after 65 d of anaerobic incubation. The total nitrogen (TN), total phos-
phorus (TP) and ammonium nitrogen (NH4-N) concentrations in organic solid waste (OSW) significantly reduced in the
reactor containing 6 g l 1 NaHCO3 by d 65. The values of pH were 6.54, 7.19 and 7.31, after 65 d of anaerobic incu-
bation, respectively, in the aforementioned reactors results in neutral environmental conditions in alkalinity added reac-
tors. Methane percentage of the control, reactors containing 3 g l 1 NaHCO3 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3 were 37%, 64% and
65%, respectively, after 65 d of incubation. BOD5/COD ratios of 0.27 and 0.25 were achieved in the 3 and 6 g l 1
NaHCO3 containing reactors, indicating a better OSW stabilization. Alkalinity addition reduced the waste quantity,
the organic content of the solid waste and the biodegradation time.
Ó 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Organic solid waste; Bioreactor; Anaerobic treatment; Leachate recirculation; Alkalinity addition

1. Introduction

*
Corresponding author. Tel.: +90 232 453 1008; fax: +90 The bioreactor landfill provides a similar approach
232 453 1153. and treatment to that utilized in organic solid waste
E-mail addresses: o.agdag@deu.edu.tr (O.N. Ağdağ), digestion. Factors affecting the treatment efficiency of
delya.sponza@deu.edu.tr (D.T. Sponza). municipal solid waste (MSW) in bioreactors are leachate

0045-6535/$ - see front matter Ó 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.11.017
872 O.N. Ağdağ, D.T. Sponza / Chemosphere 59 (2005) 871–879

recirculation, recirculation volume, waste shredding, in a two phase anaerobic reactor. The higher degrada-
waste compaction, pH adjustment, aeration, and nutri- tion of total suspended solid (TSS) and volatile sus-
ent and alkalinity additions (Reinhart et al., 2002). pended solid (VSS) were obtained in the reactors
The alkalinity of water is a measure of its capacity to operated at pH 7 and 8.
neutralize acids and is due primarily to the salts of weak The effect of alkalinity addition has not been well re-
acids (Quasim and Chiang, 1994). If the acid concentra- ported for simulated landfill anaerobic reactors treating
tions (H2CO3 and VFA) exceed the available alkalinity, OSW in literature. This paper reports the results of an
the landfilling bioreactor will ‘‘sour’’. This will be se- examination of a landfill simulated anaerobic reactor
verely inhibiting the microbial activity, especially the treating OSW at varying NaHCO3 alkalinity. The influ-
methanogens. When methane production becomes ence of bicarbonate alkalinity on leachate characteristics
ceases the VFA may continue to accumulate. Methano- and on the degradation of OSW was investigated.
gens prefer nearly neutral pH conditions with a gener-
ally accepted optimum range of approximately 6.5–8.2
(Anderson and Yang, 1992; Speece, 1996).
2. Materials and methods
The continuous hydrolysis of solid waste, followed
by the microbial conversion of biodegradable organic
2.1. Lab-scale simulated landfill bioreactor
content resulting in the production of intermediate
VFAs at high concentrations. In the methane fermenta-
To treat the municipal solid wastes and to collect the
tion phase, the pH value is elevated, being controlled by
biogas, stainless-steel cylindrical bioreactors with a
the bicarbonate buffering system (Reinhart and Al-You-
10 cm diameter and 30 cm in height were constructed.
sfi, 1996). A balance between acid production and acid
These bioreactors were operated in batch mode at a tem-
consumption is essential for a stable anaerobic process
perature of 35–40 °C under anaerobic conditions. The
running at the highest possible rate. Plaza et al. (1996)
leachate was collected at the bottom section of the solid
showed that, pH was controlled by the addition of so-
waste reactor and the effluent was recycled to the top of
dium bicarbonate as a buffer at a minimum buffer/sub-
the reactor with a peristaltic pump. There were three
strate ratio of 0.06 kg kg 1 TS. Adequate alkalinity, or
separate ports on the top of the reactor for the addition
buffer capacity, is necessary to maintain a stable pH in
of simulated rain water, measurement of the methane,
the digester for optimal biological activity (Cobb and
total gas productions, percentage of methane and for
Hill, 1990). An alkalinity level ranging from 1000 to
recirculation of the leachate.
5000 mg CaCO3 l 1 was recommended by Tchobanog-
lous and Burton (1979). Alkaline pretreatment in the
anaerobic digestion of co-mingled municipal solid waste 2.2. Operating conditions for simulated anaerobic
significantly increases the biodegradability of the waste landfill reactors
mixture (Hamzawi et al., 1998).
Limited studies have been performed investigating All the reactors were loaded with solid waste but with
the effect of alkalinity on the anaerobic treatment of different operational modes. The first reactor was oper-
the organic solid waste (OSW) in bioreactors. In the ated with leachate recirculation (control-no alkalinity
study realized by Warith (2002) it was shown that the addition), the second reactor was operated with recircu-
highest pH was observed in the sludge added reactor lation 3 g l 1 NaHCO3 alkalinity was added and the
and a highly reduced COD was observed in the pH buf- third was operated with leachate recirculation and
fered and nutrient added reactor. The study carried out 6 g l 1 NaHCO3 alkalinity was added. Fifty milliliters
by San and Onay (2001) showed that a four times per of anaerobic sludge was added to all the reactors and
week recirculation strategy with a pH control provided mixed in order to provide methanogenic conditions.
the highest degree of stabilization. Dinamarca et al. Approximately 20 ml of NaHCO3 was added on the
(2003) studied the influence of pH on the anaerobic top of the reactors daily. Table 1 shows the operating
digestion of the organic fraction of the urban solid waste protocol for the all reactors. The organic solid wastes

Table 1
Operating protocol for simulated landfill bioreactors in alkalinity study
1 1
Control reactor 3gl alkalinity added reactor 6gl alkalinity added reactor
Quantity of waste (g) 1000 1000 1000
Recirculation vol. (ml d 1) 300 300 300
Alk. addition (NaHCO3) No 3 6
Operation time (d) 65 65 65
O.N. Ağdağ, D.T. Sponza / Chemosphere 59 (2005) 871–879 873

collected were from the kitchen of the Engineering Fac- 50000


ulty in Dokuz Eylül University Campus. (a)
40000

COD conc. (mg.l-1)


2.3. Analytical procedure 30000

20000
Organic matters, water content in OSWs were mea-
10000
sured by the method proposed by Kocasoy (1994). Car-
bon (C) in OSWs was measured following the method 0
developed by Sorgun (1987). The COD concentrations
25000
in leachate samples were detected by using closed reflux
(b)
colorimetric method following standard methods 20000

VFA conc. (mg.l -1)


(APHA, 1992). BOD5 in leachate samples was measured
15000
using the WTW Oxi Top IS 12 system. TN, TP in OSWs
were measured using spectroquant kits numbered 14 537, 10000

14 543 in a photometer Merck SQ 300 after OSW was 5000


dried at 100 °C and crashed. In this process 20 g of
0
OSW was mixed with 200 ml distilled water and was
kept through 48 h in distilled water (USEPA, 1986). 8
Ammonia-nitrogen in leachate samples was measured 7
using spectroquant kit numbered 14 752 in a photometer 6
Merck SQ 300. The pH in leachate samples was deter- 5
mined immediately after sampling to avoid any change
pH

4
due to CO2 stripping, using a pH meter, type NEL pH 3

890. Total volatile fatty acid (TVFA) concentrations in 2


1 (c)
the leachate samples were measured using Anderson
0
and Yang (1992) method. Gas productions were mea-
sured by liquid displacement method. Total gas was 1000
Ammonium conc. (mg.l -1)

measured by passing it through a liquid containing 2%


800
(v/v) H2SO4 and 10% (w/v) NaCl (Beydilli et al.,
1998). Methane gas was detected using a liquid solution 600

containing 3% NaOH (w/v) (Razo-Flores et al., 1997). 400


Methane percentage was monitored with a digital meth- 200
ane meter (Drager Pac Ex). (d)
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Operation time (d)
3. Results and discussion
Fig. 1. Trends in COD, VFA, pH and NH4-N concentrations
3.1. COD variations in leachate samples produced from (a–d) in leachate from the control (—d—), 3 g l 1 (—m—) and
the control and alkalinity supplemented simulated 6 g l 1 (——) NaHCO3 containing reactors.
landfill bioreactors

The initial COD concentration in leachate samples 3 g l 1 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3 were approximately 19 000,
collected from the control, and reactors containing 3900 and 3000 mg l 1 respectively, on d 65 (Appendix
3 g l 1 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3 were approximately A). This indicates that the addition of alkalinity to the
16 000 mg l 1, respectively (Fig. 1a). The COD value of solid waste bioreactors has a positive effect on the anaer-
the leachate in the control reactor increased to 40 700 obic degradation of organic solid wastes. The organic
mg l 1 until d 21, and then started to decrease. The matter easily converts to methane through the methano-
COD values of the leachate taken from the 3 g l 1 and genesis. However, the degradation process occurred
6 g l 1 NaHCO3 containing reactors increased to slowly in the control reactor, because of unsuitable alka-
30 000 and 23 000 mg l 1 until d 7. After d 7, the COD linity for methanogen bacteria. The time required for
concentrations in these reactors started to decrease. stabilization of COD was shortened by the addition of
The reason for this decrease in COD level may possibly alkalinity.
have been the quick degradation of solid wastes in the Inadequate alkalinity/leachate COD ratio in the
lab-scale anaerobic OSW reactor and the positive effect anaerobic reactors may cause minimum pH in the anaer-
of alkalinity on anaerobic degradation. The COD values obic reactor to fall below 6.2 which can lead to failure
of the leachate from the control, and reactors containing of the system. Speece (1996) and Anderson and Yang
874 O.N. Ağdağ, D.T. Sponza / Chemosphere 59 (2005) 871–879

(1992) reported that if the acid concentrations exceed the Behling et al. (1997) reported that, if an UASB reac-
available alkalinity, a drop in pH could occurs, When tor is stable, the TVFA/B.Alk. ratio should be between
methane production becomes ceases the VFA may con- 0.4 and 0.8. In our study, TVFA/B.Alk. ratios were
tinue to accumulate. Methanogens prefer nearly neutral 3.00, 1.20, 1.00, 0.70 and 0.50 on d 5, 28, 31, 65 and
pH conditions with a generally accepted optimum 100 in control reactor. TVFA/B.Alk. ratios were 2.00,
range of approximately 6.5–8.2. Alkalinity addition 0.70, 0.30, 0.40, 0.40 and 0.50 on d 5, 28, 31, 52, 65
was used in numerous studies to neutralize the pH the and 100 in reactor containing 3 g l 1 NaHCO3 while
anaerobic treatment of MSW (San and Onay, 2001; the same ratios were 1.50, 1.10, 0.30, 0.40, 0.60 and
Warith, 2002). 0.50 in reactor containing 6 g l 1 NaHCO3 on the afore-
Souza et al. (1992) and Moosbruger et al. (1993) mentioned d. The low TVFA/B.Alk. ratios could be
found that an alkalinity/COD ratio 0.5 in the influent attributed to the deficient of B. alkalinity on d 31 and
decreased the pH to 6.6, which is considered as the lower 52 in reactors containing 3 g l 1 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3.
limit value recommended for anaerobic digestion pro- The B. Alk. neutralize the CO2/H2CO3 with only the ex-
cesses. In our study, these ratios were 0.22, 0.98 and cess available for neutralizing an increase in VFA.
1.3 in the control, 3 g l 1 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3 supple-
mented reactors, respectively. Since 6 g l 1 of NaHCO3 3.3. pH variations in leachate samples produced from
concentration provided an optimum buffering capacity the control, 3 g l 1 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3 alkalinity
to convert effectively the leachate COD to methane supplemented reactors
and VFA, it could be suggested as an optimum bicar-
bonate alkalinity concentration in influent to maintain During the first two weeks, the pH of the leachates
the pH above 6.6. This value corresponds to an Alk./ from the control, and reactors containing 3 g l 1 and
COD ratio of 1.3 for optimum operation which is higher 6 g l 1 NaHCO3 were approximately 5.30, respectively,
than the ratio proposed by Gonzales et al. (1998) (0.4), on the acidic side of the pH scale (Fig. 1c). In the control
Souza et al. (1992) and Moosbruger et al. (1993) (0.5) reactor, the pH values decreased to 5 within 7 d. This
and Speece (1996) (1.2). caused an the extension of the time required for the sta-
bilization of organic fraction of the waste to stabilize
3.2. VFA variations in leachate samples produced from since methane forming anaerobes are known to be very
the control, 3 g l 1 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3 alkalinity sensitive to low pH (Bolzonella et al., 2003). The meth-
supplemented reactors ane gas productions were 3900, 5900 and 6900 ml d 1 on
d 5 (see Fig. 2a–c). The methane gas productions at a pH
The initial VFA concentrations in leachate samples as low as 5 could be attributed to hydrogenotrrophic
were approximately 10 000 mg l 1 in all reactors (Fig. methanogens present in OSWs (Paulo et al., 2003).
1b). A strong linear correlation between COD and The so-called ‘‘acid habituation’’ or the ‘‘adaptive acid
VFA concentrations was obtained in all reactors (r = tolerance response’’ phenomenon, described by Hall
0.96, 086, and 0.85 in control and reactors containing et al. (1995) might explain the resistance of anaerobic
3 g l 1 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3). The VFA values of the microorganisms in OSWs. Lens et al. (2003) found that
reactors containing 3 g l 1 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3 in- the lack of bicarbonate delayed the conversion of OSWs
creased to 30 000 and 23 000 mg l 1 on d 7. However, to methane resulting in low methane productions and
they were down to about 1400 and 1300 mg l 1 by d percentages in control reactor. The other reason for
65 (Appendix A). The VFA measurements showed that methane production at pH 5 in control reactor could
organic solid wastes in control reactor (no alkalinity be attributed to ammonium bicarbonate alkalinity
addition) degraded slowly. which in turn maintained a pH close to neutral inside
Adequate alkalinity, or buffer capacity, is necessary cells (Speece, 1996). This called ‘‘metabolism generated
to maintain a stable pH in the digester for optimal bio- alkalinity’’ inside cells. The degradation of cation releas-
logical activity (Cobb and Hill, 1990). An alkalinity ing nitrogenous organics (proteins) would double the
varying between 1000 and 5000 mg CaCO3 l 1, was rec- alkalinity concentration generated during biodegrada-
ommended for anaerobic treatment depending on COD tion of proteins in OSWs (Speece, 1996). On the other
and VFA produced (Tchobanoglous and Burton, 1979). hand, VFA alkalinity contributes to the buffering of
Traditionally, the total alkalinity in an anaerobic diges- H2CO3, but is transient since the VFA varies and there-
ter includes all the bicarbonate alkalinity and approxi- fore cannot be consistently relied upon. The pH level of
mately 80% of the VFA (Anderson and Yang, 1992). the control reactor was 6.54 on d 65 (Appendix A). The
When the system is in balance, the methanogens could conversion of fatty acids caused an increase in the pH
be inactivated by unfavorable environmental conditions, levels within the alkalinity supplemented reactors. In
e.g., pH drop, accumulation of VFA, intermetabolites this study the measured pH levels was found to be higher
and toxicity of aromatic amines due to their toxic prop- than the data obtained by Plaza et al. (1996) which used
erties (Kuai et al., 1998). CaCO3 for alkalinity.
O.N. Ağdağ, D.T. Sponza / Chemosphere 59 (2005) 871–879 875

18000 70 nitrogenous organic substances could be attributed to


16000 ammonium bicarbonate alkalinity, which in turn main-
Cumulative methane (ml)

60

Methane percent (%)


14000 tained a pH close to neutral in the anaerobic solid waste
50
12000
bioreactor (Speece, 1996; Jokela et al., 2002b). NH4-N
10000 40
loss through stripping was considered to be negligible
8000 30
because the pH in the reactors containing 3 and 6 g l 1
6000
4000
20 NaHCO3 was below 8 (Diamadopoulos, 1996; Yılmaz
2000 (a)
10 and Öztürk, 2001).
0 0 Since the NH4-N concentration in the leachate sam-
ples is high, the generated ammonium bicarbonate alka-
25000 70
linity contributes to total alkalinity in effluent samples as
Cumulative methane (ml)

20000
60 reported by Dinamarca et al. (2003). On the other hand,

Methane percent (%)


50 since the reserve alkalinity is the bicarbonate alkalinity
15000 40 maintaining pH above 6.2–6.6 in the anaerobic simu-
30
lated reactor; it can be assumed that this alkalinity was
10000
provided in reactors containing 3 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3
20
5000 since the lower pH was recorded as 6.4 apart from the
10
(b) initial pHs.
0 0

30000 70 3.5. Methane gas productions and methane percentages


Cumulative methane (ml)

60 in simulated anaerobic solid waste bioreactors


Methane percent (%)

25000
50
20000
40
The maximum cumulative methane gas production
15000 was recorded as 12 l, 19 l and 23 l in control, and reac-
30
10000 tors containing 3 g l 1 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3, respectively
20
at the end of 65 d, while the maximum cumulative meth-
5000 10
(c) ane gas productions were measured at 16 l, 20 l and 24 l
0 0 after 100 d of operation period (Fig. 2a–c). In order to
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Operation time (d) compare the stability of the control reactor the methane
gas productions and methane percentages were given for
Fig. 2. Cumulative methane gas productions (—d—) and 100 d. The reason for the high cumulative methane in
methane percentage (—h—) of control reactor (a), 3 g l 1 (b)
6 g l 1 reactor is the fast degradation of municipal or-
and 6 g l 1 (c) NaHCO3 containing reactors.
ganic solid wastes in this reactor through rapid metha-
nogenesis on d 65. The methane gas percentages were
58%, 60% and 61% on d 65 while the methane percent-
3.4. NH4-N variations in leachate produced from the ages were measured to be 30% after 100 d of anaerobic
control and alkalinity supplemented simulated landfill incubation in control, and reactors containing 3 g l 1
reactors and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3. It was observed that the anaerobic
degradation terminated since the methane gas produc-
The highest NH4-N concentrations were measured to tions decreased significantly by d 65 in the reactors con-
be 770, 760 and 660 mg l 1 in control, and reactors con- taining 3 g l 1 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3. The biodegradation
taining 3 g l 1 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3 on d 20, 30 and 25 rate was higher in reactors containing 3 and 6 g l 1
through the mineralization of organic nitrogenous com- NaHCO3. It is important to note that the increases per-
pounds (Fig. 1d). The NH4-N concentrations were 750, centages of cumulative methane gas productions was
720 and 650 mg l 1 in the aforementioned reactors after lower in reactors containing 3 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3
65 d of operation period (Appendix A). In this study, it (E = 5.00% and 6.20%, respectively) while the increase
was observed that there were no significant differences in in the percentages of cumulative methane gas produc-
NH4-N concentrations among the control, and reactors tions were higher in control reactor (E = 36%) between
containing 3 g l 1 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3. The low NH4-N d 65 and 100. This shows that the ultimate mineraliza-
removals between d 20–30 and 65 could be attributed to tion of OSW in the control reactor was carried out be-
the utilization of NH4-N through assimilation of anaer- tween d 65 and 100. In this study, the methane
obic bacteria (Yılmaz and Öztürk, 2001). As reported by percentages measured in alkalinity added reactors were
Jokela et al. (2002a) a small amount of ammonium higher than the study realized by San and Onay (2001).
nitrogen released through degradation of proteinic and Methane gas productions and methane percentages
nitrogenous compounds may be incorporated into cell in simulated anaerobic solid waste bioreactors show
biomass. The decreases of NH4-N released from the that the alkalinity addition has a positive effect on
876 O.N. Ağdağ, D.T. Sponza / Chemosphere 59 (2005) 871–879

Table 2
Comparison of characteristics of the simulated landfilling bioreactors
Initial Final
1 1
Control 3 g l NaHCO3 6 g l NaHCO3 Control 3 g l 1 NaHCO3 6 g l 1 NaHCO3
added R. added R. added R. added R.
Water content (%) 90 90 90 91 92 92
Organic matter (%) (in DS) 97 97 97 65 58 51
% C (in DS) 54 54 54 36 32 28
TN (mg g 1) (in waste) 4350 4350 4350 610 220 213
TP (mg g 1) (in waste) 1050 1050 1050 53 46 43
NH4-N (mg g 1) (in waste) 155 155 155 38 36 35
Waste quantity (g) 1000 1000 1000 213 140 120

biodegradation of municipal solid waste in simulated containing 3 g l 1 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3, respectively, at


bioreactors due to high methane gas productions and the end of anaerobic incubation (Table 2). The reduc-
high methane percentages. tions in the organic matter were 33%, 40% and 47%, in
control, reactors containing 3 g l 1 and 6 g l 1 NaH-
3.6. BOD5 concentrations and BOD5/COD ratios in the CO3, respectively, through 65 d of operation period.
leachate samples from the simulated anaerobic solid The results showed that more organic material is trans-
waste bioreactors ferred into the gaseous phase in the reactor containing
6 g l 1 NaHCO3 under methanogenic conditions. The
In order to study in greater detail the proportion of lack of NaHCO3 dropped the methane produced and
biodegradable organic carbon in the leachate it was the conversion of organic matter in OSWs. If the acid
decided to determine the BOD5/COD ratios. The concentration (H2CO3 and VFA) exceeds the available
BOD5 values decreased substantially by 69%, 95% and alkalinity, this severely inhibits the microbial activity,
96% in the aforementioned reactors, respectively (data especially the methanogens in OSWs.
not shown). The experimental results indicate that a The reduction in C content of OSW in the reactor
higher MSW stabilization rate was achieved in the reac- containing 6 g l 1 NaHCO3 was higher than the other
tor containing 6 g l 1 NaHCO3 than that of control and reactors. The alkaline conditions considerably increased
3 g l 1 NaHCO3 containing reactors. Initially, all the the carbon conversion rates in OSWs. On d 65, the grad-
reactors had high BOD5/COD ratios such as 0.9, indi- ual decline of the carbon content of OSWs in the reactor
cating the high degradability of leachate (Quasim and containing 6 g l 1 NaHCO3 can most probably be
Chiang, 1994) (data not shown). On d 52, BOD5/COD attributed to the absence of un-ionized acids since the
ratio decreased to approximately 0.25 from 0.78 in the buffer capacity of the reactor is high. In the absence of
reactor containing 6 g l 1 NaHCO3. This ratio implies NaHCO3 the total carbon content in OSWs was not suc-
a low biodegradable leachate. As the biodegradation cessfully used by the methanogens through the low con-
of organic content of OSW occurred, the BOD5/COD version rate of organic substances compared to
ratio decreased. Low BOD5/COD ratio in 6 g l 1 alka- alkalinity containing anaerobic simulated reactors. It
linity added reactor shows that MSW converted rapidly was observed that the reduction of waste quantity was
to methane via methanogenesis. high in the reactor containing 6 g l 1 NaHCO3. Seventy
If the BOD5/COD ratio was between 0.02 and 0.13, eight percent, 99% and 99.9% reductions in OSWs quan-
this implies that the leachate has a low biodegradability tity were observed in control, and reactors containing
through anaerobic phase. When this ratio is between 0.4 3 g l 1 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3. This parameter is very
and 0.8, this implies the high biodegradability of the important since it would optimize the land utilization.
leachate (Otieno, 1994). The BOD5/COD ratio measured A depletion of high volume in OSWs would reduce the
in the study shows similar data to the findings of Led- landfilling sites and could be used for the management
akowicz and Kaczarek (2002). of anaerobic degradation of OSWs in simulated bioreac-
tors. TN removal efficiencies of OSWs were 86%, 95%
3.7. Comparison of characteristics of the simulated and 96% in control, and reactors 3 g l 1 and 6 g l 1
anaerobic landfilling reactors NaHCO3 while TP removal efficiencies were 95%, 96%
and 96% in the same reactors, respectively. The proteins
The initial organic matter content of OSWs were 97% and organic substances in OSW degraded to NH4-N and
in all reactors while the organic matter ratios of OSWs were released to the leachate. The organic phosphorus
were 65%, 58%, 51% organic in control, and reactors and phosphate in OSW were used by the acetogenic
O.N. Ağdağ, D.T. Sponza / Chemosphere 59 (2005) 871–879 877

and methanogenic bacteria as nutrient and energy in the aforementioned reactors on d 65. Maximum
source through anaerobic metabolism. methane production rates were reached on d 75 and 35
in control and the other two reactors. On d 100 the
3.8. COD mass balance and degree of stabilization of methane gas production rates decreased to 0.199 l d 1
solid wastes and 0.238 l d 1 in the reactors with added 3 and
6 g l 1 NaHCO3, respectively.
As the waste stabilization is directly related to the
amount of methane produced and methane percentage
of the total gas, the amount of methane generated per 4. Conclusions
kg of organic matter stabilized is taken to be an indica-
tor of waste stabilization degree. About 12, 19 and 23 l The alkalinity addition to OSWs has a positive effect
of methane was regenerated from the control, and reac- on the rate of biological degradation in anaerobic simu-
tors with added 3 g l 1 NaHCO3 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3, lated recycled reactors through the degradation of
respectively, on d 65. These results are comparable high organic fraction of solid wastes collected from the
with the study performed by San and Onay (2001) and kitchen of the Engineering Faculty in Dokuz Eylül
Ledakowicz and Kaczarek (2002). _
University Campus, Izmir, Turkey.
In order to determine the stabilization degree, the The findings of this study showed that the anaerobic
maximum mass of COD released was determined by digestion of OSW in a simulated landfill reactor corre-
taking into consideration the maximum released COD late with bicarbonate alkalinity. The alkalinity is lost
and the available moisture in all the reactors for d 57. through NH4-N conversion of organic nitrogen, the buf-
It was found that the maximum mass of COD released fering of H2CO3 acidity by CO2 and VFA generation by
from the OMS to the leachate was equal to 40, 30 and the acidogen microorganisms. VFA build up with VFA
23 g in the control, and in the reactors added 3 g l 1 generated, increased the acidity and reduced the alkalin-
NaHCO3 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3, respectively. Twenty ity. The VFA converted into methane by methanogens
eight percent of COD removed in OSW from the control particularly in the lower and upper zone of simulated
reactor was converted into methane while 44% and 65% anaerobic OSW reactor and in the whole reactor since
of COD removed in OSW was converted to methane in the leachate was recirculated from the bottom to the
the reactors added 3 g l 1 NaHCO3 and 6 g l 1 NaH- top of the reactor. In other words, the leachate was par-
CO3, respectively, on d 57. In our study the COD tially accumulated in the lower part and the upper parts
amount converted to into methane was comparably of OSW reactor, resulting in VFA conversion to meth-
higher in the reactor with added 6 g l 1 NaHCO3 com- ane which the medium part of the reactor mostly exhib-
pared to the study performed by San and Onay (2001). its only under methanogenic conditions.
As the alkalinity supplemented reactors have a higher The alkalinity requirement is 1.4 g NaHCO3 alkalin-
capacity for extracting the COD from the OSW ity/g influent COD providing 87% COD, 87% VFA rem-
compared to control reactor, addition of alkalinity ovals with a methane gas production of about
increased the specific methane yield to about 0.19 and 100 ml d 1 and methane percentage of 59 at a pH 7.31
0.23 m3 kg 1 TSadded waste in 3 g l 1 NaHCO3 and on d 65 through degradation of OSW in a simulated
6 g l 1 NaHCO3 added reactors, respectively, whereas landfill anaerobic reactor.
the methane yield in the control reactor was The observed COD removal efficiencies in reactors
0.13 m3 kg 1 TS on d 65. The specific methane yield in containing 3 and 6 g l 1 of NaHCO3 could be due to
the control reactor was low since the biodegradation no-VFA accumulation resulting in activation of metha-
of OSWs and therefore the methane gas production were nogenic bacteria at pH around 7.0. The acidogenic
not completed by d 65. The specific methane yield in- phase would generate acids, but this was buffered by suf-
creased to 0.19 m3 kg 1 TS in the control reactor on d ficient alkalinity in reactors containing alkalinity.
100 indicating the anaerobic degradation of remaining When 3 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3 was added to the feed
organic substances through methanogenesis. The spe- this alkalinity was not completely consumed. Utilization
cific methane yields were 0.36 and 0.50 m3 kg 1 TS in of anaerobic simulated bioreactor with an alkalinity en-
reactors containing 3 g l 1 NaHCO3 and 6 g l 1 NaH- hances the feasibility of degradation of OSWs through
CO3 depending to CH4-COD remaining and TS in sim- methanogenesis. As a result, more organic material is
ulated anaerobic reactors after 100 d. These results are transferred into the gaseous phase. Anaerobic simulated
significantly higher than the studies performed by bioreactors reduce the landfilling sites since a reduction
Chugh et al. (1998) and Mata-Alvarez et al. (2000). in the volume of the leachate as well as solid volume was
The methane production rates were 0.033 l d 1, obtained in OSWs.
0.102 l d 1 and 0.155 l d 1 in control, and the reactors Because degradation of OSWs and leachate produced
with added 3 and 6 g l 1 NaHCO3 on d 5 while the same through the degradation of organic substances is a most
parameter were 0.118 l d 1, 0.290 l d 1 and 0.349 l d 1 important subject in terms of pollution emissions,
878 O.N. Ağdağ, D.T. Sponza / Chemosphere 59 (2005) 871–879

besides the cost-effective anaerobic treatment process, Appendix A (continued)


the additional alkalinity requirement should be kept in Days Control 3gl 1
NaHCO3 6gl 1
NaHCO3
mind in terms of financial costs.
21 5.16 6.98 7.02
24 5.13 7.07 7.13
Acknowledgments 28 5.26 7.07 7.08
31 5.34 7.07 7.08
This study was executed as a part of the research 42 5.85 6.94 6.99
activities of the Environmental Microbiology Labora- 52 6.04 7.04 7.19
tory of Environmental Engineering Department and 65 6.54 7.19 7.31
the project was partially funded by the Dokuz Eylül Uni- Ammonium
versity Research Foundation. The authors would like to 1 388 370 406
thank this body for the financial support to projects with 3 416 376 464
grant numbers Fen 021, 051 and 03.KB.Fen.017. 7 584 524 528
10 604 612 593
14 736 652 608
Appendix A 17 750 664 603
21 764 672 600
1 1 24 704 732 636
Days Control 3gl NaHCO3 6 g l NaHCO3
28 713 750 604
COD
31 740 760 548
1 16 004 16 121 16 200
42 752 762 602
3 18 936 17 009 16 768
52 763 750 650
7 36 618 30 353 22 850
65 750 713 650
10 35 712 27 549 20 459
14 38 102 26 065 16 749
17 39 304 22 405 13 269
21 40 658 20 624 10 648 References
24 38 432 14 276 6984
28 35 200 7680 5250 American Public Association, 1992. American Water Works
31 32 744 4211 3845 Association, and Water Environment Federation. Standard
Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,
42 26 725 3960 3152
17th ed., Washington, DC.
52 20 214 3920 3057
Anderson, G., Yang, G., 1992. Determination of bicarbonate
65 18 964 3865 2908 and total volatile acid concentration in anaerobic digestion
VFA using a simple titration. Wat. Environ. Res. 64, 53–59.
Behling, E., Diaz, A., Colina, G., Herrera, M., Gutierrez, E.,
1 10 052 10 169 10 103
Chacin, E., Fernandez, E., Forster, C.F., 1997. Domestic
3 9296 8064 7344
wastewater using a simple titration. Wat. Environ. Res. 64,
7 17 152 12 100 10 000 53–59.
10 19 432 11 500 8345 Beydilli, M.I., Pavlosathis, S.G., Tinvher, W.C., 1998. Decol-
14 20 320 11 376 5994 orization and toxicity screening of selected reactive azo dyes
17 21 080 7465 5050 under methanogenic conditions. Wat. Sci. Tech. 38, 225–
21 19 304 4947 4046 232.
24 18 432 3623 2271 Bolzonella, D., Battistoni, P., Mata-Alvarez, J., Cecchi, F.,
28 17 936 2305 1693 2003. Anaerobic digestion of solid wastes: process behavior
31 14 208 1385 1374 in transient conditions. Wat. Sci. Tech. 48, 1–8.
Chugh, S., Clarke, W., Pulammanappallil, P., Rudolph, V.,
42 11 147 1559 1335
1998. Effect of recirculated leachate volume on MSW
52 9967 1500 1300
degradation. Waste Manage. Res. 16, 564–573.
65 6913 1413 1285 Cobb, S.A., Hill, D.T., 1990. Volatile fatty acid interference
pH with alkalinity measurements in anaerobic fermenters.
International Summer Meeting, sponsored by the ASAE.
1 5.32 5.16 5.3
Diamadopoulos, E., 1996. Characterization and treatment of
3 5.33 5.2 5.35
recirculation-stabilized leachate. Wat. Res. 28, 2439–2445.
7 4.98 5 5.11 Dinamarca, S., Aroca, G., Chamy, R., Guerrero, L., 2003. The
10 5 5.12 5.35 influence of pH in the hydrolytic stage of anaerobic
14 5.13 5.41 6.74 digestion of the organic fraction of urban solid waste.
17 5.14 6.34 6.9 Wat. Sci. Tech. 48, 249–254.
O.N. Ağdağ, D.T. Sponza / Chemosphere 59 (2005) 871–879 879

Gonzales, J.S., Rivera, A., Borja, R., Sanchez, E., 1998. Paulo, P.L., Villa, G., van Lier, B., Lettinga, G., 2003. The
Influence of organic volumetric loading rate, nutrient anaerobic conversion of methanol under thermophilic
balance and alkalinity/COD ratio on the anaerobic sludge conditions: pH and bicarbonate dependence. J. Biosci.
granulation of an UASB reactor treating sugar cane Bioeng. 96, 213–218.
molasses. Int. Biodet. Biodeg. 41, 127–131. Plaza, G., Robredo, P., Pacheco, O., Toledo, A.S., 1996.
Hall, H.K., Karem, K.L., Foster, J.W., 1995. Molecular Anaerobic treatment of municipal solid waste. Wat. Sci.
responses of microbes to environmental pH stress. Adv. Tech. 33, 169–175.
Microb. Physiol. 37, 229–272. Quasim, S.R., Chiang, W., 1994. Sanitary Landfill Leachate
Hamzawi, N., Kennedy, K.J., McLean, D.D., 1998. Anaerobic Generation, Control and Treatment. Technomic Publishing
digestion of co-mingled municipal solid waste and sewage Company, USA.
sludge. Wat. Sci. Tech. 38, 127–132. Razo-Flores, E., Luijton, M., Donlon, B.A., Lettinga, G.,
Jokela, J.P.Y., Kettunen, R.H., Rintale, J.A., 2002a. Methane Field, J.A., 1997. Biodegradation of selected azo dye under
and leachate pollutant emission potential from various methanogenic conditions. Wat. Sci. Tech. 36, 65–72.
fraction of municipal solid wastes. Effects of source separa- Reinhart, D.R., Al-Yousfi, A.B., 1996. The impact of leachate
tion and aerobic treatment. Waste Manage. Res. 20, 424–433. recirculation on municipal solid waste landfill operating
Jokela, J.P.Y., Kettunen, R.H., Sormunen, K.M., 2002b. characteristics. Waste Manage. Res. 20, 337–346.
Biological nitrogen removal from municipal landfill leach- Reinhart, D.R., McCreanor, P.T., Townsend, T., 2002. The
ate: low cost nitrification in biofilters and laboratory scale in bioreactor landfill: its status and future. Waste Manage.
situ denitrification. Wat. Res. 36, 4079–4087. Res. 20, 172–186.
Kocasoy, G., 1994. Analyses methods in solid waste, compost San, I., Onay, T.T., 2001. Impact of various recirculation
_
and industrial sludge samples, Bebek, Istanbul, Turkey. regimes on municipal solid waste degradation. J. Hazard.
Kuai, L., De Vreese, L., Vandevivere, P., 1998. GAC-amended Mater. B 87, 259–271.
UASB reactor for the stable treatment of toxic textile Speece, R.E., 1996. Anaerobic Biotechnology for Industrial
wastewater. Environ. Technol. 19, 1111–1117. Wastewaters. Archae Press, Nashville Tennessee, USA.
Ledakowicz, S., Kaczarek, K., 2002. Laboratory simulation of Sorgun, K., 1987. Solid waste management. Turkish General
anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste. Appropriate Directorate of Education and Production Centre, Ministry
Environmental and Solid Waste Management and Tech- of Industry and Commerce, Mersin, Turkey.
nologies for Developing Countries, Turkey, pp. 1139–1146. Souza, M.E., Fuzaro, G., Polegato, A.R., 1992. Thermophilic
Lens, P.N.L., Klijn, R., van Lier, J.B., Lettinga, G., 2003. Effect anaerobic digestion of vinasse in pilot plant UASB reactor.
of specific gas loading rate on thermophilic acidifying and Wat. Sci. Tech. 25, 213–222.
sulfate reducing granular sludge reactors. Wat. Res. 37, Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, F.L., 1979. Wastewater Engineer-
1033–1047. ing. McGraw-Hill International Editions.
Mata-Alvarez, J., Mace, S., Llabres, P., 2000. Anaerobic USEPA, 1986. Extraction procedure, toxicity test method and
digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research structural integrity tests. Method 1310 B, Environmental
achievements and perspectives. Biores. Technol. 74, 3–16. Protection Agency, Washington, USA.
Moosbruger, R.E., Wentzel, M.C., Ekama, G.A., Marais, G., Warith, M., 2002. Bioreactor landfill: experimental and field
1993. Lauterntun waste in UASB systems, feasibility, results. Waste Manage. 22, 7–17.
alkalinity requirements and pH control. Wat. SA 19, 41–52. _ 2001. Biological ammonia removal from
Yılmaz, G., Öztürk, I,
Otieno, F.A.O., 1994. Stabilization of solid waste through anaerobically pre-treated landfill leachate in sequencing
leachate recycling. Waste Manage. Res. 12, 93–100. batch reactors. Wat. Sci. Tech. 43, 307–314.

Você também pode gostar