Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Economic Dynamics
Study Edition
Fourth Edition
S Springer
Chapter 11
11.1 Definitions
An ordinary differential equation is a functional equation involving one or
more of the derivatives y', y", y'", etc. of an unknown function of time y =
f(t): which obviously is differentiable.
Before going on, it is as well to point out that we have adopted the
prime notation (y' etc.) rather than the dot notation (y etc.) to denote time
derivatives because the dot notation becoines awkward when one has to deal
with higher-order derivatives.
We have called the equation an ordinary differential equation since the
unknown function is a function of one argument; if the independent variables
were more than one, partial derivatives would appear in differential equation,
which would be partial differential equation (we shall not treat this type of
functional equation).
The order of a differential equation is given by the highest derivative
appearing in the equation.
After what we said in the Introduction, it will be clear that to solve (or to
'integrate 1 ) a differential equation means to find the unknown function that
satisfies the relationship expressed in the equation.
Let us begin, as usual, by a simple example. Consider the differential
equation y' = a, where a is a constant. From elementary integral calculus it
follows that y = at + 6; let us remember, incidentally, that integration—the
'inverse' operation of differentiation—represents the solution of a differential
equation. We note that in the solution an arbitrary constant b appears (the
other constant a is known, since it appear in the differential equation). This
is not surprising, since we know that differentiation eliminates such constant,
so that from y' — a. Let us now consider the second order differential equation
y" --- a. Performing two successive integrations we obtain y = ^at2 + bt + r;
n )
W + (llí/n ^ + •••• + Q-n-iy' + anlJ — 0. (11.2)
The reason for dealing with these two forms separately is that the solution of
Eq. (11.1) can be obtained in a relatively simple manner when the solution
of Eq. (11.2) is known.
'We have implieitly assumed that this function exists and is unique (apart from the
arbitrary eonstants). Actuallv this assuniption conld he ¡)roved by ineans of an existence
and nniqueness tln^orein, but we shall not treat such theorems. A11 types of equations
considered this l>ook are well behaved, in the sense that their solution ('xists and is unique.
In general, it may be observed that the properties that the 'well behaved' functions used
in economic theory are assumed to have, are usually more than enough to satisfy the
refiuirements oí an.v existence and nniqueness theorem.
11.2. Linear differential eqnations with constant coefficients 165
therefore
A[aoy[ ^ + o>iy[ ^ + an-iy[ 4- anyi\ = 0. (H-3)
If Ayi(t) has to be a solution, Eq. (11.3) must be satisfied. Since y\(t)
is a solution of (11.2), the expression in square brackets vanishes, and so Eq.
(11.3) is indeed identically satisfied. This proves the theorem.
Before going on to the next theorem, it is as well to recall the notion of
linearly independent functions.
Given n functions yi(t), y2(t), yn{t), they are said to be linearly depen-
dent if n constants Ai, A2,..., An exist, which do not all vanish, and such
that the equation
is identically satisfied for all admissible valúes of t. If, on the contrary, this
equation can be identically satisfied only with Ai = A2 = ... = An = 0, the
functions are linearly independent.
where yi(t), y2(t),..., yn(t) are n linearly independent solutions of Eq. (11.2).
and Ai, A2 ..., An are arbitrary constants.
166 Chapter 11. Differential Equations: General Principies
t / r í ] ( t ) ,vr"(í) y ( r a - 1 ) (t)
is different from zero for all admissible valúes of t.
To prove this theorem, consider Eq. (11.4): since this relation is satisfied
identically, it may be differentiated any number of times up to n — 1. Henee
we can write the following linear system
then by letting t = 0 and substituting the given valúes y(0), ¿/'(O),..., y(n ^(0)
we obtain, after rearranging terms,
i/í n l,
(o) ¡Án~l){0) ... ¡¿'->(0)
It is easy to see that IV (0) coincides with the Wronskian W(t)—as defined
in Eq. (11.6)—for t = 0. Since the functions y2(t),..., yn(t) form a
fundamental set, W(t) is different from zero for any t, and so also for t = 0.
It follows that 17(0) 7^ 0. Thus system (11.9) can always be solved.
We now have enough general principies to pass on to a detailed treatment
of the differential equations of the various orders, but before doing that we
would like to point out the great similarity that exists between differential
and difference equations, so much so that the general theorems are the same.
However, some dissimilarities also exist, which give rise to differences in the
economic interpretation. The principal formal dissimilarity is that in dif-
ferential equations t varies continuously and also the function y = f(t) is
continuous (that it must be continuous is obvious, since it is differentiable),
whereas in difference equations t varies discontinuously over a set of equi-
spaced valúes, and so the solution y = f ( t ) is a function which is defined
only corresponding to these valúes of t.
This implies that it is not immaterial whether we use differential 01* dif-
ference equations in the formalization of an economic problem. If we think
that certain dynamic economic phenomenon t.akes place in a continuous way
and without discontinuous lags, then the appropriate mathematical tool to
use is differential equations, while if we think that it takes place in a discon-
tinuous way, then the appropriate tool is difference equations. Unfortunately
this sliarp distinction is not so often possible. And when it is not possible
(or if we do not want to make it), we must use more complex mathematical
tools, e.g. mixed difference-differential equations (see Ghap. 26, where the
reader will also find a general discussion of continuous vs discrete time in
economics). Thus, if we want to avoid these more complicated mathematical
tools, we must give a judgement, from the economic point of view, as to
which aspects are ijrevalent. If we think that the economic problem under
170 Chapter 11. Differential Equations: General Principies
11.4 References
Alien, R.G.D., 1959, Mathematical Economics, Chap. 5, Sects. 5.1, 5.2.
Baumol, W.J., 1970, Economic Dynamics, Chap. 14, Sect. 1.
Ince, E.L., 1956 (1926), Ordinary Differential Equations, Chap. I, Sects. 1.1,
1.2; Chap. V, Sects. 5.1-5.3.
Ince, E.L., 1959, Integration of Ordinary Differential Equations, Chap. I,
Sects. 1, 2; Chap. II, Sect. 37.