Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
KEYWORDS Abstract A rapid and efficient method for static aeroelastic analysis of a flexible slender wing when
Aeroelasticity; considering the structural geometric nonlinearity has been developed in this paper. A non-planar
Geometric nonlinearity; vortex lattice method herein is used to compute the non-planar aerodynamics of flexible wings with
Non-planar aerodynamics; large deformation. The finite element method is introduced for structural nonlinear statics analysis.
Static aeroelasticity; The surface spline method is used for structure/aerodynamics coupling. The static aeroelastic char-
Vortex lattice method acteristics of the wind tunnel model of a flexible wing are studied by the nonlinear method pre-
sented, and the nonlinear method is also evaluated by comparing the results with those obtained
from two other methods and the wind tunnel test. The results indicate that the traditional linear
method of static aeroelastic analysis is not applicable for cases with large deformation because it
produces results that are not realistic. However, the nonlinear methodology, which involves com-
bining the structure finite element method with the non-planar vortex lattice method, could be used
to solve the aeroelastic deformation with considerable accuracy, which is in fair agreement with the
test results. Moreover, the nonlinear finite element method could consider complex structures. The
non-planar vortex lattice method has advantages in both the computational accuracy and efficiency.
Consequently, the nonlinear method presented is suitable for the rapid and efficient analysis
requirements of engineering practice. It could be used in the preliminary stage and also in the
detailed stage of aircraft design.
ª 2013 Production and hosting by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of CSAA & BUAA.
Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
1. Introduction tural weight and high lift-drag ratio. However, the slender
wings also have noticeable structural flexibility. A geometric
High-aspect-ratio wings are commonly used for high-altitude nonlinear problem may occur when the wings undergo large
long-endurance (HALE) aircraft because of their low struc- deformation. Traditional linear aeroelastic theories that based
on the infinitesimal deformation assumption fail to accurately
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 10 82338723. analyze such deformation and the aeroelastic characteristics of
E-mail address: xiechangc@163.com (C. Xie). flexible aircraft undergoing such a structural deformation.
Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA. In the past several years, Patil et al.1–3 and Zhang4 have
studied the effect of structural geometric nonlinearities on
the static and dynamic aeroelastic characteristics of large-
aspect-ratio wings. A geometrically-exact beam theory is used
Production and hosting by Elsevier
for the structural analysis, and the Office National Etudes
1000-9361 ª 2013 Production and hosting by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of CSAA & BUAA. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2013.04.048
Static aeroelastic analysis of very flexible wings based on non-planar vortex lattice method 515
Expanding Eq. (2) yields: where tui,j indicates the partial derivative of displacement com-
Vixi Viyi Vizi ponent ui for the coordinate xj at time t. The conjugate Kirch-
nxi þ nyi þ nzi ¼ nxi þ nyi b nzi a ð3Þ hoff stress tensor Sji at time t satisfies:
V1 V1 V1
t
Sji t nj ds ¼ t xi;j dTj ð9Þ
where V1 is the velocity magnitude of the free stream.
t
Let C0 = C/V1, and express the boundary condition equa- where nj is the direction cosine of the small area element ds at
tions of all the collocation points by matrix: time t, and dTj the corresponding surface force in which the
AAIC C0 ¼ Ad0 þ Ab b þ Aa a ð4Þ follower force effect is considered. The linear elastic constitu-
tive relation is presented as follows:
where AAIC is the influence coefficient matrix of the normal in- t
Sij ¼ Dijkl t ekl ð10Þ
duced velocity, Ad0 the coefficients vector that represents the
local angle of attack initialization of each panel element; Aa where Dijkl is the elastic tensor, which has a different form for
and Ab are the coefficient vectors related to the angle of attack isotropic or anisotropic materials.
and the angle of sideslip. The finite element method based on energy principles is
The aerodynamic force fAi that acts on the ith vortex ring an effective approach to solve structural problems. For the
element could be computed by the Kutta–Jukovski theory:13 geometric nonlinear problems with follower forces, the
f ¼ qV1 CFi ð5Þ incremental finite element method (FEM) is used. The
Ai
strain eij can be decomposed into a linear part eij and a
where q is the air density, CFi the total vortex strength at the nonlinear part gi:
ith panel element’s quarter chord line; CFi ¼ li C0Fi V1 has differ- t
eij ¼ t eij þ t gij ð11Þ
ent values depending on whether the panel is the leading edge
panel or not, li is the vector describes the magnitude and direc- t
The stress is decomposed by increments, where Sij repre-
tion of the ith panel element’s quarter chord line. C0Fi ¼ C0i sents the equilibrium stress at time t, and tsij the incremental
when the panel is located at the leading edge of the wing, stress to be calculated at each time step:
and C0Fi ¼ C0i C0i1 when it does not. tþDt
Expanding Eq. (5) yields: Sij ¼ t sij þ t Sij ð12Þ
2 3 The integral equation is established by linearization in each
lyi a lzi b
6 7 incremental step:
f Ai ¼ qV21 4 lzi þ lxi a 5CFi ð6Þ R t R t t
t t t t
t V Dijkl ekl d eij d V þ t V sij d gij d V ¼
blxi þ lyi R t t t ð13Þ
tþDt
Q t V sij d eij d V
Then, the aerodynamic forces of all the panels along the
three axes of the aerodynamic coordinates are: where tV is the volume of the element, t+DtQ the incremental
outer force including the aerodynamic force, engine thrust
FAx ¼ 2QD Cx TC A1
AIC ðAd0 þ Ab b þ Aa aÞ and gravity at the new time step. Considering a number of
shape functions, the relationship between strain and deforma-
FAy ¼ 2QD Cy TC A1
AIC ðAd0 þ Ab b þ Aa aÞ ð7Þ
tion is presented as:
FAz ¼ 2QD Cz TC A1
AIC ðAd0 þ Ab b þ Aa aÞ t
e ¼ t BL u
t
ð14Þ
where QD is the flight dynamic pressure; Cx, Cy, and Cz are the g ¼ t BNL u
coefficient matrices for each aerodynamic force component; TC
where tBL and tBNL are the linear and nonlinear shape func-
is the transfer matrix for the vortex strength.
tions of the element at time step t, respectively, and the u is
the corresponding generalized coordinate.
2.2. Geometric nonlinear elasticity
Substituting these shape functions into Eq. (13) leads to the
element governing equation:15
A long slender flexible wing experiencing large aerodynamic
tF
ðt KL þ t KNL Þu ¼ tþDt Q ð15Þ
forces has finite bending and torsion deflection, so the infinites-
imal deformation condition is disobeyed, while the material is where tKL and tKNL are the linear and nonlinear stiffness ma-
thought to not be taken beyond the elastic limitation for the trixes of the element, respectively; t F is the inner force.
small strain. This results in the nonlinear geometric equation,
including the quadric term of the displacement differential 2.3. Surface splines for aerodynamic/structure coupling
and the nonlinear force equilibrium equation established based
on the deformed state of the structure. The incremental finite
The surface spline is used for the coupling of aerodynamics
element method is commonly used to solve structural geomet-
and the structure. The configuration of the structure is usually
ric nonlinear problems. The method has two formulas called
considered to be embedded in a 3-D space. The undeformed
the total Lagrange formulation (TLF) and the updated
configuration could be 1-D, 2-D, or 3-D and the deformed
Lagrange formulation (ULF).14 The ULF is presented and is
configuration is usually 3-D.
used in the current work.
Considering n given structural grids with the coordinate XS
The relationship between the nonlinear Lagrange/Green
and the corresponding deformation vector US, the relationship
strain and displacement is:
between the coordinates and the deformation of grids could be
t 1 represented by a surface spline fitting function, which could be
eij ¼ ðt ui;j þ t uj;i þ t uk;i t uk;j Þ ð8Þ
2 written in matrix form:16
Static aeroelastic analysis of very flexible wings based on non-planar vortex lattice method 517
AS C ¼ WS ð16Þ
where AS and WS are the constant matrices according to the
coordinates and the deformation of the given grids,
T
WS ¼ ½034 UTS ; C is the coefficient matrix of the surface spline
fitting function. When AS is nonsingular, C could be solved as:
C ¼ A1
S WS ð17Þ
Then the deformation vector UA of m aerodynamic grids
with the coordinates of XA could be interpolated
UA ¼ AA A1
S WS ð18Þ
where AA is the constant matrix according to the given coordi-
nates of aerodynamic grids. WS gets its first four rows zeroed,
so Eq. (17) is transferred to:
UA ¼ GUS ð19Þ
where G is the spline matrix for displacement interpolation be-
tween the aerodynamic grids and structural grids, and it is just
the matrix that AA A1
S removes its first four columns.
In aeroelastic analysis, the transformation between the
aerodynamic and the structural force systems requires struc-
ture equivalence rather than static equivalence. Structure
equivalence means that the two force systems deflect the struc-
ture equally. When the aerodynamic force FA and its equiva-
lent structure force FS do the same respective virtual work
on their virtual deflections, the structure equivalence of the
two force systems is guaranteed:17
dUTA FA ¼ dUTS FS ð20Þ
where dUA and dUS are the arbitrary virtual deflections, Fig. 3 Flowchart for geometric nonlinear static aeroelastic
respectively, satisfying Eq. (19). The non-planar aerodynamic analysis.
force computed is FA = [FAx FAy FAz]. Therefore,
FS ¼ GT FA ð21Þ
3. Numerical example
3.1. Model
The Aeroelasticity Research Branch of Beihang University has Fig. 5 Wind tunnel test model of large-aspect-ratio flexible wing.
conducted a wind tunnel model test of a large-aspect-ratio
wing for investigating its aeroelastic characteristics under large wind tunnel of BUAA. The rectangular wing is 487 mm long
deformation. As shown in Figs. 4 and 5, a semispan wing mod- and 60 mm wide, and the airfoil is NACA0015. A single spar
el has been designed, manufactured and then tested in the D4 with a uniform rectangular cross section has been chosen for
518 C. Xie et al.
Fig. 7 Aerodynamic model. Fig. 9 Initial and final aerodynamic models of the flexible wing.
Static aeroelastic analysis of very flexible wings based on non-planar vortex lattice method 519
been analyzed below. The capabilities of the traditional linear illustrated in Fig. 11. Meanwhile, Fig. 12 shows the torsional
method and the nonlinear method developed in this paper for angle h of the deformed wing spar, which represents the angle
geometric nonlinear aeroelastic analysis are also discussed. between the chord line of the wing profile and the airflow.
The initial and final aerodynamic model of the flexible wing Fig. 13 shows the distribution of drag, lateral force and lift
solved by the nonlinear method is shown in Fig. 9. Fig. 10 along the spanwise.
shows the convergence progress of the displacement at the The results indicate that the displacement of the wing spar
wing tip. The displacements along three different axes are rep- along the x axis and y axis calculated by the linear method
resented by Tx, Ty and Tz, respectively. It takes the nonlinear equals zero, as do the aerodynamic components of drag and
method approximately 10 interaction steps before the compu- lateral force. In contrast, the vertical displacement of the spar
tation converges to a steady result. and the lift component spanwise calculated by the linear meth-
The displacements of the wing spar along the three axis od are much greater than the nonlinear results. It has been
directions that were computed by these two methods are pointed out that the infinitesimal deformation assumption of
Fig. 10 Convergence progress of displacements at wing tip. Fig. 11 Displacements of wing spar along the span.
520 C. Xie et al.
When using the nonlinear method, the location of the vor- Acknowledgements
tex lattices is updated according to the deformed configuration
of the wing (shown in Fig. 9). The follower force effect is also This study was co-supported by National Natural Science
considered in the structural nonlinear statics computation. Foundation of China (Nos. 11172025, 91116005), and Re-
Therefore, the nonlinear method produces much more accu- search Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education
rate results when the deformation is large. This can be seen of China (No. 20091102110015).
from the trends shown in Fig. 8.
Moreover, aerodynamic loads along the span, including the References
vertical shear force Fz, bending moment Mx, torsion moment
My, and their aeroelastic increments DFz, DMx, and DMy, 1. Patil MJ, Hodges DH. On the importance of aerodynamic and
are shown in Fig. 14. Similar to the result of deformation, structural nonlinearities in aeroelastic behavior of high-aspect-
the aerodynamic loads calculated by the linear method have ratio wings. AIAA-2000-1448; 2000.
similar trends with the nonlinear results, but they are twice 2. Patil MJ, Hodges DH, Cesnik CES. Limit cycle oscillations in
the magnitude of the rear ones. high-aspect-ratio wings. AIAA-1999-1464; 1999.
3. Patil MJ, Hodges DH, Cesnik CES. Characterizing the effects of
geometrical nonlinearities on aeroelastic behavior of high-aspect-
4. Conclusions ratio wings. Williamsburg: International Forum on Aeroelasticity
and Structural Dynamics; 1999.
4. Zhang J. Modeling and simulation of coupled nonlinear aeroelas-
A rapid and efficient method for static aeroelastic analysis of a ticity and flight dynamics for flexible aircraft dissertation. Beijing:
flexible slender wing that considers the structural geometric Beihang University, 2010 [Chinese].
nonlinearity has been developed in this paper. A non-planar 5. Tang DM, Dowell EH. Comments on the ONERA stall aerody-
vortex lattice method is used herein to compute the non-planar namic model and its impact on aeroelastic stability. Journal of
aerodynamics of a flexible wing undergoing a large deforma- Fluid and Structure 1996; 10(4): 353-66.
tion. The finite element method is introduced for structural 6. Xie CC. Static/dynamic coupling theory and test study of aircraft
nonlinear static analysis. The surface spline method is used aeroelastic stability dissertation. Beijing: Beihang University; 2009
[Chinese].
for structure/aerodynamics coupling. The static aeroelastic
7. Xie CC, Leng JZ, Yang C. Geometrical nonlinear aeroelastic
characteristics of the wind tunnel model of a flexible wing stability analysis of a composite high-aspect-ratio wing. Shock Vib
are studied by the nonlinear method presented, and the nonlin- 2008;15(3–4):325–33.
ear method is evaluated by comparing the results with ones 8. Liu Y, Xie CC. The geometric nonlinear static aeroelastic analysis
from the traditional linear method, the method of Ref. 8 and method for flexible wings with large-aspect-ratio. In: The 12th
the wind tunnel test. The conclusions are summarized as domestic conference in aeroelasticity; 2011. p. 227–33 [Chinese].
follows: 9. Pan D, Wu ZG, Yang C. Flight loads analysis of flexible aircraft
under large deformations. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut
(1) The results of the numerical study indicate that the tra- 2010;36(10):1158–61 [Chinese].
ditional linear method of static aeroelastic analysis is not 10. Palacios R, Cesnik CES. Static nonlinear aeroelasticity of flexible
slender wings in compressible flow. AIAA-2005-1945; 2005.
applicable when large deformation exists because it
11. Joseph K, Allen P. Low-speed aerodynamics. 2nd ed. Cam-
yields unrealistic results. However, the nonlinear bridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
method using the finite element method and the non-pla- 12. He HL, Zhou X. Implementation of an improved unsteady vortex
nar vortex method could provide acceptable analysis lattice method for flexible flap-ping wing aerodynamic computa-
accuracy, and the nonlinear results are in agreement tion. Acta Aeron Astronaut Sin 2010;31(6):1121–6 [Chinese].
with the test results. 13. Qian YJ. Aerodynamics. Beijing: Beihang University Press; 2004.
(2) Different from the nonlinear method of Ref.8, the non- p. 153–69 [Chinese].
planar aerodynamics is herein computed by the non-pla- 14. Wang XC, Shao M. Foundation and numerical method of finite
nar vortex lattice method, which is efficient and does not element method. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press; 1997
require additional parameter adjustments. Moreover, [Chinese].
15. Xie CC, Yang C. Linearization method of nonlinear aeroelastic
the nonlinear finite element method could be used to
stability for complete aircraft with high-aspect-ratio wings. Sci
consider complex structures. Consequently, the nonlin- China Ser E-Tech Sci 2011;54(2):403–11.
ear method presented is suitable for the rapid and effi- 16. Xie CC, Yang C. Surface splines generalization and large
cient analysis requirements of engineering practice. deflection interpolation. J Aircraft 2007;44(3):1024–6.
This method could be used in the preliminary design 17. Leonard M. Fundamentals of vibrations. New York: McGraw-
stage and also in the detailed design stage of aircraft Hill; 2001.
design.
(3) The non-planar vortex lattice method considers the air- Xie Changchuan is an instructor in the School of Aeronautic Science
foil camber and the wing’s spanwise bending effect. and Engineering, Beihang University. His major research interests are
Therefore, it could be further used in the aerodynamic the aeroelasticity and flight dynamics of flexible aircraft, aerodynamics
analysis of wings that have a complex curvature shape. and structure dynamics.