Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
and
Amorphous Semiconductors
Sadao Adachi
Preface xiii
Acknowledgments xv
Introductory Remarks 1
References, 3
A Group-VI Semiconductors 5
Al Diamond (C), 5
References, 12
A2 Silicon (Si), 18
References, 24
A3 Germanium (Ge), 33
References, 39
A4 Gray Tin (a-Sn), 49
References, 54
AS Cubic Silicon Carbide (3C-SiC), 63
References, 66
A6 Hexagonal Silicon Carbide (2H-, 4H-, and 6H-SiC), 73
References, 81
A7 Rhombohedral Silicon Carbide (15R-SiC), 91
References, 93
A8 Silicon-Germanium Alloy (SixGe,_j, 94
References, 98
A9 Carbon-Incorporated Alloys (Si,_xCx, Si'_x_yGexCy, etc.), 113
References, 116
viii CONTENTS
The purpose of this book is to give tabulated values and graphical information on
the optical constants of the most popular semiconductors over the entire spectral
range.
This book presents data on the optical constants of crystalline and amorphous
semiconductors. A complete set of the optical constants are presented in this book.
They are: the complex dielectric constant (E=e.+ieJ, complex refractive index
(n*=n+ik), absorption coefficient (a.), and normal-incidence reflectivity (R). The
semiconductor materials considered in this book are the group-IV elemental and
binary, llI-V, IT-VI, IV-VI binary semiconductors, and their alloys.
The reader will fmd the companion book "Optical Properties of Crystalline and
Amorphous Semiconductors: Materials and Fundamental Principles" useful since it
emphasizes the basic material properties and fundamental prinCiples.
The extensive bibliography is included for those who wish to fmd additional infor-
mation if required. It is hoped that the book will attract attention of not only device
engineers, but also solid-state physicists and material scientists, and particularly
students specializing in the fields of semiconductor physics and device engineering.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author wishes to thank the editors and authors of the following journals and
books for permission to reproduce previously published figures; Physical Review for
Figs. AI-I, AI-5, A3-1, A3-4, A4-1, A4-2, A6-1, A6-2, A8-1, A8-3, Bl-l, B2-1,
B3-1, B3-2(a), B4-1, B1O-1, Bll-l, B13-1, BI4-1, BI5-1, C2-V-2, C2-VI-l,
C2-IX-l, C2-X-l, C3-IV-2, C3-IV-3, 01-1, 02-1, 03-1, 04-3, 05-1, 05-2, 06-1,
07-1, 07-2, 09-1, 010-1, 011-1, 015-1, 019-3, 021-1, 022-4, 023-1, 023-2,
023-5, 024-1, 024-4, El-l, E2-1, E3-1, E4-1, F2-4, F2-5, and F3-4; Journal of
Applied Physics for Figs. A9-2, C2-I-l, C2-1-2, C2-III-l, C2-VI-2, C2-VII-l,
C2-X-2, C2-XIII-l, C3-II-l, C3-II-2, C3-IV-l, C3-IV-4, C3-V-l, C3-V-2, C3-X-l,
C3-X-2, C3-X-4, C3-X-6, C3-XI-2, C3-XI-3, C3-XIV-l, C3-XIV-2, 08-1, 014-1,
015-2, 015-3, 017-2, 017-3, 022-1, 023-6, 025-2, E6-4, F3-5, and F4-3; Solid
State Communications for Figs. B5-1 and 018-1; Physica Status Solidi for Figs.
B9-1, C2-V-l, 012-1, 019-2, 021-2, and 022-3; Journal de Physique for Fig.
020-2; Applied Physics Letters for Figs. A2-2, A9-3, B5-2, C2-1-3, C2-Xl-1,
014-3, and 024-3; Japanese Journal of Applied Physics for Figs. C2-II-l, C2-X-3,
C2-X-4, 02-2, 04-2, 016-2, 016-3, 017-1, 018-2, and 018-3; Soviet Physics
Semiconductors for Fig. 019-1; Journal of Physics: Condensed Matters for Figs.
C2-IX-2, 023-3, 023-7, and 024-2; Journal of Crystal Growth for Fig. 05-3;
Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids for Figs. A4-3, B6-1, B7-1, B8-1, and
04-1; Chemistry and Physics of Carbon for Figs. AI-2 and AI-3; Journal of the
Optical Society of America for Figs. AI-4, A6-3, and A6-4; Proceedings of the
Physical Society for Figs. A2-1 and A3-2; University of South Carolina Press for
Fig. A5-I; Proceedings of the Royal Society for Figs. A7-1 and A7-2; Optical
Materials for Fig. A8-4; Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology for Fig. A9-1;
Materials Research Society Symposium for Figs. A9-4 and C2-IX-3; RCA Review
for Fig. B3-2(b); Physical Review Letters for Figs. B3-3 and E6-1; Materials
Science & Engineering for Fig. B13-2; Thin Solid Films for Fig. C2-1-4; Crystal
Research and Technology for Fig. C2-XIII-2; Institute of Conference Series for Fig.
C3-XI-l; Physica Scripta for Fig. 01-2; Semiconductor Science and Technology for
Figs. 06-2, 014-2, 023-4, and 025-1; W. A. Benjamin, Inc. for Fig. 011-2;
Progress in Quantum Electronics for Fig. D20-1; Infrared Physics for Figs. D22-2,
E6-2, and E6-3; International Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves for Figs.
ES-1 and ES-2; Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids for Fig. F4-1; and Philosophical
Magazine for Fig. F4-2.
xvi
CONTENTS OF THE COMPANION BOOK
a- - amorphous-
AFM - Atomic Force Microscopy
BZ - Brillouin Zone
c- - crystalline-
c- - cubic-
CP - Critical Point
CPA - Coherent-Potential Approximation
CVD - Chemical-Vapor Deposition
h- - hexagonal-
Iffi - Heavy-Hole
HOA - Harmonic Oscillator Approximation
HREELS - High-Resolution Electron-Energy Loss Spectroscopy
IR - Infrared
KK - Kramers-Kronig
KSM - Koster-Slater Method
LA - Longitudinal Acoustic
LCAO - Linear Combination of Atomic Orbitals
LDA - Local-Density Approximation
xx ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
+sr
81 n2 - (1)
.~[(s:+sr
-·r
(2)
k=[(.~+.~r (3)
(4)
(5)
The optical constants have been discussed starting in the reststrahlen region and
working to higher photon energies. We have used photon energy E in electron volts.
2 ThITRODUCTORYREMARKS
where E is in eV. In Eqs. (6) and (7), h is Planck's constant and e and v are, respec-
tively, the velocity and frequency oflight in the vacuum.
For almost every optical constant given in this book, different sources give
somewhat different values. Often, these differences are larger than the stated accu-
racy. In such cases, we chose and list the values which we believe to be more reli-
able.
The optical spectra in the reststrahlen region of semiconductors have been popu-
larly analyzed by a classical oscillator fit. In most cases, therefore, we have calculat-
ed the optical constants in this spectral region using the reststrahlen parameters re-
ported in the original references. It must be noted that the damping parameter in an
oscillator expression, 'Y in Eq. (2.7), strongly influences the calculated values of £1
and ~ at their maxima.
For frequencies above or below roTQ, the absorption spectrum has considerable
structure and values much higher than those predicted from a simple oscillator
model, Eq. (2.7). Since the same bands are observed in compensated and uncompen-
sated samples, they are attributed to absorption by the lattice, i.e., multiphonon
bands. However, the absorption spectra from different labs are usually in qualitative
but not in quantitative agreement. Thus, we have paid no much attention on these
absorption bands in most semiconductors.
The optical constants in the interband transition region of solids can be deter-
mined by KK analysis of normal-incidence reflectance data [1]. This procedure
evaluates the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric function which describe these
properties. More recently, SE has been shown to be an advantageous techriique to
study the optical response of solids. This technique is unquestionably more powerful
for a number of reasons [2]. For example, the complex dielectric function can be
obtained directly on a wavelength-by-wavelength basis without having to resort to
multiple measurement or to KK analysis. On-line digitization of the data permits fast
and efficient analysis of the structures observed in the £(E) spectra in terms of theo-
reticalline shapes for interband CPs. The experimental SE data have been preferen-
tially chosen in this book.
It is well known that the optical constants of solids are strongly influenced by
their surface quality (see, e.g., Ref. [3]). We, therefore, used a simple criterion for
evaluating the "best-prepared" surfaces and, thus, for choosing the accurate values
INTRODUcrORY REMARKS 3
of the optical constants among the original references, here the "best-prepared" sur-
faces mean those most free of roughness, unintentional overlayers, and physisorbed
contaminants. This criterion is well known as "biggest is best" one [4,5]. When SE
is used, it can be applied as the sample is being prepared, so spectral measurements
can be restricted only to surfaces of the highest quality [3].
In most instances, the optical-constant data have been taken from tables and
graphs in the original references. Graphs that are too small to read have been ex-
panded. These procedures produce all sorts of eyestrain problem. Therefore, some of
these numbers may have an uncertainty larger than the experimental error quoted in
the original work.
REFERENCES
1. See, for instance, H. R. Philipp and H. Ehrenreich, Phys. Rev. 129, 1550
(1963).
2. D. E. Aspnes, in Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, edited by E. D.
Palik (Academic, Orlando, 1985), p. 89.
3. K. Sato and S. Adachi, J. Appl. Phys. 73,926 (1993).
4. D. E. Aspnes, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 17, 1057 (1980).
5. D. E. Aspnes and A. A. Studna, Appl. Phys. Lett. 39, 316 (1981).
A
GRouP~IV SEMICONDUCTORS
A1 DIAMOND
(C)
r, r,
L A r A X U,K r
Wave vector k
Figure At·t Electronic energy-band structure of diamond along several lines of high sym-
metry from the center (r) to the boundary of the first BZ as calculated with a modified
LCAO method. (From Chelikowsky and Louie [4].) The locations of several interband tran-
sitions are included by the vertical arrows.
TABLE At·t Energies o/the indirect band gap (E gID) and CPs in
diamond at 300 K (in eV).
Eo'
5.5 7.1 11.7
Al DIAMOND (C) 7
This expression gives the 300-K value of £.=5.70. The pressure derivative of the di-
electric constant is also given by
The optical properties of diamond are now known, to a large extent, for photon
energies covering four orders of magnitude, from 30 meV to 610 eV
[2,5,7-9,11-20]. About sixty years ago, Robertson, Fox, and Martin [21] reported
striking differences in the optical and phtotoconductive properties of natural dia-
monds. They classifIed diamonds into types I and II according to their different IR
and UV absorption properties.
Figures Al-2 and Al-3 show, respectively, the IR and visible-UV absorption
spectra measured for diamonds [14]. Type-I (type-Ia) diamonds absorb light at three
distinct bands around 0.15, 0.25, and 0.4 eV (Fig. AI-2) with a secondary absorption
edge around 4 eV (Fig. Al-3). Most natural diamonds are of type I, and nitrogen
impurities are known to be mainly responsible for the type-I characteristics [14].
Type-I diamonds can be further subdivided into types la and lb. Type-Ib diamonds
contain nitrogen as an impurity in dispersed form (single substitutional N atoms).
Only about 0.1 % of natural diamond is of this type, but the great majority of nitro-
8 GROUP-IV SEMICONDUCTORS
2 4
Wavenrnber ("(l3an·1)
Figure Al-2 IR absorption spectrum of type-Ia diamond. The absorption at wave numbers
greater than -1400 cm-! is observed in all diamonds with the same strength. The absorption
below -1400 cm'! is specimen dependent. (From Davies [14].)
1.
O.
O. 1.2
Log10 Ioftt OII--_ _ _la_A_ _ _ _ _ ____
Q8
O.1-_ _ -==--__-==::::::J.---
lIa
Ol~------------------
lib
1.5
Figure Al·3 Visible-UV absorption spectra for type-I and II diamonds at room temperature.
Type-Ia (-laB) diamond is shown before and after thinning by a factor of ten. A type-lIb
diamond may show decreasing absorption from the red to the blue spectral range. (From
Davies [14].)
gen bearing synthetic diamond are type lb. The O.15-eV band is much stronger in
type Ib than in type Ia.
In type-II diamond the O.15-eV band is absent [14]. Moreover. the absorption
edge in type II occurs near 5 e V as compared to 4 e V in type I. Type-II diamonds
can also be subdivided into types IIa and lIb. Type-lIb diamond. called semicon-
ducting diamond, shows p-type conductivity and phosphorescence effects in the far
At DIAMOND (C) 9
UV that are not observed in type IIa. Type-lla diamonds are considered to be most
pure and, thus, to best represent the ideal diamond crystal.
The translational symmetry of the perfect diamond lattice forbids single phonon
absorption of radiation because of a lack of a linear electric moment. Consequently,
the lattice absorption band is probably due to the multiple-phonon processes which
allow a higher-order electric moment to be induced, providing the coupling to the
radiation field. Qualitatively [14], we can think of one phonon being required to
break the translational symmetry of the crystal, permitting local fluctuations in the
changes on each atom. Radiation can then couple to these instantaneous dipoles and
so can be adsorbed with the creation of a second phonon. In diamond, this intrinsic
absorption lies predominantly above 0.17 e V (> 1400 cm- I ) and occurs both in types I
and II.
Impurities can change dipole-transition selection rules by destroying the trans-
lational symmetry of the crystal and creating local static dipoles. The 0.15-eV band
seen in Fig. AI-2 arises from this absorption mechanism. This absorption band is
specimen dependent both in strength and shape and observed only in type-I dia-
monds. Furthermore, types I and II diamonds are known to show different behaviors
in photoconductivity and luminescence [14].
The refractive index of type-lla diamond in the visible region has been discussed
by Edwards and Ochoa [15]. In Fig. AI-4 we reproduce the refractive-index values
for the visible region collected from the literature [15]. It should be noted that the
only value obtained by Bartoshinskii (3) at A.=0.5358 J.Ull is not consistent with the
other data; either it is in error or the sample is anomalous.
Edwards and Ochoa [15] measured the refractive index of natural type-lla dia-
mond in the IR region (2.5-25 Ilm) using a channel spectrum technique. They ob-
tained the refractive-index dispersion that can be represented by the Herzberger-type
dispersion formula (A in Ilm)
n =A+BL+CL2 +D1..2 +EA4 (A1.3)
with
L= 1 (AlA)
1..2 -0.028
Z 2.7
o
~
ILl
II: 2.6
15 Figure Al·4 Refractive-index values
for type-lla diamond collected from
~ the literature. The solid line repre-
~
2.5
sents a fit of these data to the Her-
zberger-type dispersion formula of Eq.
(A1.3). (From Edwards and Ochoa
[15].)
refractive index obtained by Edwards and Ochoa [15] is 2.375. This value is about
0.01 smaller than that determined using the audio-frequency capacitance technique
by Fontanella et at. (n=2.387) [10]. The characteristic absorption band in the IR re-
gion of type-lla diamond is too weak to have a noticeable effect on the refractive
index.
In the UV region (S35 eV), Roberts and Walker [9,12] and Philipp and Taft [13]
performed reflectance measurements combined with the KK dispersion analysis to
determine the dielectric response function of type-I diamonds. These data revealed
CP features at -7 eV (Eo') and -12 eV (E;J, together with an indirect absorption
edge at -5 eV (EgID) [13]. The only difference in the dielectric response functions of
these two reports is relatively small difference in the magnitude of such CPs. Rob-
erts and Walker [9] also carried out reflectance measurements on type-lla diamond
and found that the CP strengths are slightly weaker than in type I. In principle, no
large difference can be expected in optical properties of the interband transition re-
gion between type-I and IIa diamonds. The impurities, or more generally, the lattice
defects in semiconductors, will reduce the lifetime of the excited electronic states,
resulting in a change in optical properties. The optical dielectric function may thus
be affected by the lifetime broadening of the electronic states, especially at photon
energies close to the CP structure. Temperature also causes a change in optical prop-
erties of solids. Roberts and Walker [9] obtained reflectance spectra at room tem-
perature and also at low temperature (77 K). Unfortunately, however, they did not
state whether their reported results were for room temperature or 77 K.
Reflectance spectrum of a type-Ia diamond in the soft X-ray (200-610-eV) region
was measured by Nithianandam and Rife [20]. They combined their measured X-ray
reflectance spectrum with an earlier UV optical spectrum (Ref. [13]) and performed
extrapolation to these reflectance spectra using a model dielectric function com-
posed of a set of Lorentz oscillators. The reflectance extrapolation made at high en-
Al DIAMOND (C) 11
ergies with these Lorentz oscillators provided the correct ~ dependence for reflec-
tance. A Fortran program using a fast Fourier transform algorithm was developed to
evaluate the KK integration. The resultant n(E) and k(E) spectra in the 200-800-eV
region are shown in Figs. AI-5 (a) and (b), respectively. It should be noted that the
fine structures near E-300 eV are due to the carbon Kedge.
The room-temperature values of £=£I+i~, n*=n+ik, a, and R for diamond listed in
Table AI-2 were taken from the following works: Edwards and Ochoa [15] (see also
Ref. [17]) for the transparent region (~5 eV), Philipp and Taft [13] for the interband
transition region (5<E~35 eV), and Nithianandam and Rife [20] for the UV-soft X-
ray region (40-800 e V). Since the strength of the IR absorption band is very weak in
diamond, we neglected this contribution in the tabulation work. The nand £1 values
for E~5 eV were obtained from the Herzberger-type formula [Eq. (Al-3)]. The val-
ues of ~ just above the fundamental absorption edge were obtained from the ab-
sorption coefficient a(t..) of Philipp and Taft [13], using the relation [5]
(A 1.5)
The optical constants for 40~E~190 eV were obtained from a set of the Lorentz os-
cillators [20].
The (£1' ~), (n, k), a, and R values in Table AI-2 are plotted in Figs. AI-6-Al-9,
respectively. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of each CP (Eo'
and E2 ) and Eg ID gap.
0.012
0.008 -1 , 0.012
;\
>-
z
'"(3
...i:::
g
C 0,004-
8'" 0.008
75 150
1 Z
0
i=
u
z
i=
x
0.000 '" 0.00<4-
(a) (b)
-0.00<4- 0.000
200 JOO 400 500 600 700 600 200 JOO 400 500 600 700 600
PHOTON ENERGY (eV) PHOTON ENERGY (eV)
Figure Al-5 Variations of (a) l-n and (b) extinction coefficient k for type-Ia diamond
measured at 300 K. The insets show those below the diamond Is core threshold. (From Ni-
thianandam and Rife [20].)
12 GROUP-IV SEMICONDUCTORS
REFERENCES
1. R. Messier and W. Yarbrough, Phys. Today 42, S-65 (1989).
2. D. T. Morelli and C. Uher, Appl. Phys. Lett. 63,165 (1993).
3. M. W. Geis, Proc. IEEE 79,669 (1991).
4. J. R. Chelikowsky and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. B 29, 3470 (1984).
5. A. D. Papadopoulos and E. Anastassakis, Phys. Rev. B 43,5090 (1991).
6. M. S. Hybertsen and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. B 34,5390 (1986).
7. C. D. Clark, P. J. Dean, and P. V. Harris, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 277,312
(1964).
8. F.1. Himpsel, J. F. van der Veen, and D. E. Eastman, Phys. Rev. B 22, 1967
(1980).
9. R. A. Roberts and W. C. Walker, Phys. Rev. 161, 730 (1967).
to. J. Fontanella, R. L. Johnston, J. H. Colwell, and C. Andeen, Appl. Opt. 16,
2949 (1977).
11. F. Peter, Z. Phys. 15,358 (1923).
12. W. C. Walker and J. Osantowski, Phys. Rev. 134, A153 (1964).
13. H. R. Philipp and E. A. Taft, Phys. Rev. 136, A1445 (1964).
14. G. Davies, Chern. Phys. Carbon 13, 1 (1977).
15 D. F. Edwards and E. Ochoa, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71, 607 (1981).
16. H. Armon and J. P. F. Sellschop, Phys. Rev. B 26, 3289 (1982).
17. D. F. Edwards and H. R. Philipp, in Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids,
edited by E. D. Palik (Academic, Orlando, 1985), p. 665.
18. D. L. Windt, W. C. Cash, Jr., M. Scott, P. Arendt, B. Newnam, R. F. Fisher, A.
B. Swartzlander, P. Z. Takacs, and J. M. Pinneo, Appl. Opt. 27, 279(1988).
19. A. T. Collins, S. C. Lawson, G. Davies, and H. Kanda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65,891
(1990).
20. J. Nithianandam and J. C. Rife, Phys. Rev. B 47, 3517 (1993).
21. R. Robertson, J. J. Fox, and A. E. Martin, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A 232,
463 (1934); Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 157, 579 (1936).
At DIAMOND (C) 13
25~~~~--,-~-r~-'
20
Diamond
-10
0~~~1~0~~20~~3~0~~4·0
Photon energy (eV)
Figure AI-6 £1(E) and £2(E) spectra for diamond at 300 K.
4
!E2
3
Diamond
..lI::
2
c:
o 10 20 30
Photon energy (e V)
Figure AI-7 n(E) and k(E) spectra for diamond at 300 K.
14 GROUP-IV SEMICONDUCTORS
107 1E2
Eo'
106 t Kedge
'I
-
u
E 10 5
~
104
E ID
gl
Diamond
103
10 1 102 103
Photon energy (eV)
Figure Al·8 aCE) spectrum for diamond at 300 K.
0.5
0.4
a:
0.3
0.2
Diamond
0.1
o 10 20 30 40
Photon energy (eV)
Figure Al·9 R(E) spectrum for diamond at 300 K.
Al DIAMOND (C) 15
18
A2 SILICON (Si) 19
quently, the lattice absorption bands observed in such crystals are probably due to
the multiple-phonon processes, not due to the one-phonon process. For Si, this type
of lattice absorption occurs predominantly in the spectral region between 500 and
1500 em-I.
Figure A2-1 shows, as an example, the optical absorption coefficient plotted
against wave number for Si measured at four different temperatures (20, 77, 290,
and 365 K) [Ill. The 20- and 77-K curves are almost identical, the only significant
difference being in the height of the two peaks at 560 and 610 cm·l • The most inten-
se peak seen in Fig. A2-1 is identified to as a summation band of TO and LO pho-
nons (610 cm· l ) and the second one to as a combination of LO and TA phonons (566
cm· l ) or that of LO and LA phonons (740 cm·l ) [Ill. More.recently, these multipho-
non bands have been identified to as TO(L)+TA(X) (610 cmol ), TO(X)+TA(L) (566
cmol ), and 2TA(X)+TO(X) (740 cmol ), respectively [14]. The 1040-1240-cmol spec-
tral region is found to be largely obscured by the residual impurity (oxygen) band,
but in the case of the 20-K curve this impurity band is fairly narrow and an estima-
tion of the shape of the absorption curve in the spectral region indicates that there
are probably unresolved absorption bands at 1030, 1080, 1160, and 1230 cmol , re-
12
-
~
c::
·0
0)
9 I 3'5'.
2 290'.
1 77'.
4 ZO'K
.....
:;:::
0)
0
0 6
c::
0
:;::::;
c..
....
0
en
.0
<t 3
~~O~O=C~L-6~O~O~~~-9~OO--~~~12~O~O~~~1~5~O-O~~
Wave number (cm-1)
Figure A2·1 Optical absorption coefficient plotted against wave number for Si measured at
four different temperatures. Note that the 20- and 77-K curves are almost identical, the only
significant difference being in the height of the two peaks at 560 and 610 cmol • (From John-
son [11].)
20 GROUP-IV SEMICONDUCTORS
spectively. Pradhan et al. [14] identified the 1160-cm-1 absorption band as a summa-
tion band of 2TO(r)+TA(L). Jichang et al. [15], on the other hand, suggested from
Fourier-transform IR measurements that the 1160-cm-1 band is due to interstitial
oxygen_
The absorption coefficient just at the 61O-cm-1 peak is -9.5 cm- I (290 K, Fig. A2-
1). From this a value, we obtain the following imaginary optical constants:
k-1.2xlO-3 and ~-8.5xlO-3. These values are too small to have a noticeable effect on
the real optical constants (e l [Eq. (U8a)], n [Eq. (U9a)], and R [Eq. (1.22)]).
The refractive-index dispersion in the transparent region of Si has been deter-
mined by a number of authors [16-18]. Li [19] has discussed the n dispersion and its
temperature dependence for Si in the ranges 1.2 to 14 ~m and 100-750 K. Edwards
[20] tried to fit the experimental n data from 1.12 ~m to 588 ~ to the Herzberger-
type dispersion formula of Eq. (A1.3). The quality of the fit was found to be good
with differences in the third and fourth decimal places. The Herzberger-type disper-
sion parameters determined from this fit were A=3.41906, B=1.23172xlO-1,
C=2.65456x10-2 , D=-2.66511xl0- 8 , andE=5.45852 x10-14 •
Macfarlane et al. [21] observed fine structures in the absorption spectra near the
fundamental absorption edge of Si (-1 e V) measured at various temperatures be-
tween 4.2 and 415 K. These structures were interpreted in terms of indirect transi-
tions involving phonons. The form of the absorption associated with each type of
phonon indicated that, as well as the formation of free electron-hole pairs taking
place, indirect excitons with a: binding energy of -10 meV can be produced in such
optical absorption process. More recently, Keevers and Green [22] have determined
the absorption coefficient near the fundamenta:I absorption edge of Si (T=300 K) to
values as low as 10-7 cm- I by sensitive photocurrent measurements on high efficien-
cy Si solar cells. We reproduce in Fig. A2-2 the aCE) spectrum measured by Keevers
and Green [22]. The fine structures due to three- and four-phonon-assisted absorp-
tion processes are clearly seen in the spectrum. The absorption spectrum in the 1-3-
e V spectral region of Si has also been determined by HultMn [17] by means of opti-
cal transmission and photoconductivity measurements.
SE is an excellent technique to investigate the optical response of semiconductors
over a wide range of photon energies. This technique allows to determine el(E) and
~(E), or alternatively, neE) and k(E) directly without KK analysis. Aspnes and
Studna [23] obtained the optical constants of Si, as well as of other semiconductors,
in the 1.5-6.0-eV region at room temperature through the use of SE. These data
have long been used as the standard source of the optical constants of Si. More re-
cently, Jellison [24] has determined the optical constants of Si using two-channel
polarization modulation spectroscopy. This instrument is particularly well-suited for
the measurement of small values of k, which results in much higher accuracy of the
absorption coefficient of Si for photon energies well below the direct band gap (-3.4
eV). His analysis, however, still required the "mathematical removal" of the effect
of a thin surface layer after surface preparation. The layer was assumed to be a na-
tive oxide film and its thicknesses were d=0.58±O.02, 0.62±O.02, and 0.77±O.02 nm
for Si (111), (110), and (100) surfaces, respectively.
A2 SILICON (Si) 21
10 2
10 1
---- This work
E 10 0 - 0 - Green's Interpolation
g
10-1
'E
10- 2
;g
CD
'i 10- 3
0
0
10- 4
c
E Figure A2·2 Optical ab-
0. 10- 5 sorption at the indirect
.,(; 10- 6
edge of Si at 300 K.
.0
« (From Keevers and
10- 7 Green [22].)
10- 8
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
Wavelength (nm)
Recently, Nayar et al. [25] reported the e(E) spectra of Si (111) and (100) orien-
tations obtained from ex situ SE on clean epitaxial surfaces. Their data represented
the highest directly observed dielectric-constant peak values of £Z(Ez) ~ 47, so far
reported from a (100) [or (111)] Si surface. Notice that the imaginary part of the
pseudodielectric function at the E2 peak maximum, £Z(E2), can provide a sensitive
and unambiguous indication of the sharpness of the dielectric discontinuity between
the substrate and ambient, i.e., its value reflects not only the residual oxides and oth-
er overlayers but also the selvedge region, bulk degradation, and microstructural
effects as well. The £Z(E2) value, thus, yields direct information about the relative
quality of surface regions prepared by different methods [26]. Nayar et al. [25] de-
monstrated that the surface features with lateral scales of -0.5-2 J.l.m do not affect
the dielectric spectra significantly.
More recently, Yasuda and Aspnes [27] have shown that hydrogen-terminated
Si(lll) wafers prepared with NH4F-based treatments can serve as a calibration stan-
dard for ellipsometers and reflectometers. The £Z(Ez) peak value obtained by these
authors was 48.3±O.l, exceeding the highest previously reported value of 47.6 at
E=4.23 eV measured on epitaxial surfaces [25]. Several authors [28,29] have point-
ed out that the hydrogen atoms on the chemically-treated Si surface result in the
modification of the dielectric function, i.e., a reduction in the £Z value. Yasuda and
Aspnes, however, paid no attention on this effect.
Philipp [30] corrected his measured reflectance spectrum for the presence of a
surface oxide layer and analyzed it using the KK relation to yield a set of the optical
constants for oxide-free Si in the 0-25-e V region. The dielectric-function spectrum
obtained by him gives a peak height of £Z=47 at the Ez peak maximum (-4.25 eV).
22 GROUP-IV SEMICONDUCTORS
The native oxide is speculated to be not Si02 , but more likely some intermediate
oxide such as SiO.
For Si, the threshold for excitation of the 2p electrons (4.3 shell) occurs at about
100 eV and that of the Is electrons (K shell) at about 1840 eV, respectively [31].
The optical properties of Si in the UV-soft X-ray region have been studied by a
number of authors [20,32-7]. The atomic scattering factors for Si have been deter-
mined by Henke et ai. [31,38] between 100 and 2000 eV from the photoabsorption
cross-sectional data. From these scattering factors, Edwards [20] obtained the index
of refraction n and extinction coefficient k for photon energies between 99 and 2000
eV using a model of Henke et ai.
Figure A2-3 shows the extinction coefficient k as a function of photon energy for
Si in the 10-4000-eV region taken from various sources [20,34-6]. These data
clearly reveal the absorption thresholds at the 4,3 and K edges. The data for D-100
eV agree with each other. However, there is a clear difference atE<100 eV between
Edwards [20] and Windt et al. [34]. The data of Philipp [30] are found to fit well
with those of Edwards [20], but not with those of Windt et al. [34]. The Si sample
used by Windt et al. was prepared by electron-beam evaporation. The rms roughness
for this sample was typically of the order of 1.87±O.25 nm. Note that this roughness
value is considerably larger than that of the mirror-finished bulk Si surface (-0.12-
0.18 nm, Ref. [39]). In general, the change in the optical constants due to surface
1
&
-g
10-4 e.g
~
A Edwards ~ ~
Windt at al. A ,
0 Yanagihara et al. A: 00
-
A' 0
Woronick et al. 0
.I
10-6 101 102 103 104
Photon energy (eV)
Figure A2·3 Extinction coefficient k as a function of photon energy for Si in the 10-4000-
eV spectral region taken from Edwards [20], Windt et al. [34], Yanagihara et al. [35], and
Woronick et al. [36]. The vertical arrows indicate the absorption thresholds at the L-z,3 and K
edges.
A2 SILICON (Si) 23
roughness is larger for shorter wavelength. This is expected as the effect of surface
roughness that becomes conspicuous as the wavelength of light approaches the scale
of the surface height. Since the effect of surface roughness was taken into consid-
eration in the determination of the optical constants by the inclusion of a Debye-
Waller factor in the Fresnel equations, the data of Windt et al. [34] agreed well with
those of Edwards [20], Yanagihara et al. [35], and Woronick et al. [36] (see Fig.
A2-3). The discrepancy at E<100 eV of Windt et al. [34] is puzzling at present.
The optical constants in the interband transition region of Si have been deter-
mined using SE at temperatures between 30 and 820 K by Lautenschlager et al. [40]
and at elevated temperatures from 298 K to 763 K by Jellison and Modine [41]. The
temperature-dependent optical-constant data of Lautenschlager et al. [40] have been
successfully analyzed using the MDF by Adachi and coworker [42]. Effects of dop-
ing on the optical properties of Si have been studied in the far-IR and mid-IR re-
gions by Spitzer and Fan [43], Zhou et al. [44], and Gaymann et al. [45] and in the
interband transition region by Vifla and Cardona [46] and Jellison et al. [47]. Tem-
perature dependence of the near-IR refractive index has also been discussed by a
number of authors [48-50]. Optical absorption by free carriers due to the intercon-
duction-band transitions has been found at 1.-2.3 11m [43]. Effect of the biaxial
strain on the dielectric-function spectra has been reported by Lee and Jones [51].
This effect is found to be relatively large near the EI CP region. The uniaxial-stress-
induced change in the optical constants of Si in the visible-UV range has also been
studied by Etchegoin et al. [52] using SE.
PL in highly porous Si at room temperature has given rise to enormous interest in
this material for its potential in optoelectronic applications [53]. The optical proper-
ties of porous and nanostructure Si have been studied both theoretically [54-6] and
experimentally [57-9]. The optical response of such materials cannot be described
by the bulk dielectric function of Si. The topology is found to significantly influence
the dielectric function of porous Si.
Table A2-1 lists the room-temperature values of E=EI+iEz, n*=n+ik, n, and R for
Si. The EI and n for E:5:1.4 eV were obtained from the Herzberger-type dispersion
formula of Eq. (A1.3) [20]. The Ez and k values for E:5:1.4 eV were calculated from
the experimental n data of Keevers and Green (E:5:1.2395 eV, Ref. [22]) and Philipp
(E=1.3 and 1.4 eV, Ref. [30]). A set of the optical constants in the interband transi-
tion region (1.5:5:E:5:6 eV) were taken from Aspnes and Studna [23] and Nayar et al.
[25]. The optical constants in the UV-soft X-ray region were obtained from Philipp
(7:5:£:5:20 eV, Ref. [30]), Edwards (20.33:5:£:5:386 eV, Ref. [20]), and Yanagihara
(400:5:£:5:3750 eV, Ref. [35]).
The (E I, Ez), (n, k), n, and R values in Table A2-1 are plotted in Figs. A2-4-A2-7,
respectively. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of each CP and
E gX gap. The MDF analysis [42,60] suggested that the EI structure can be character-
ized by a 3D MI (or 2D Mo) CP, the E2 structure by a mixture of DHO (a broadened
2D MI CP) and 2D M2 CP, and the EI' structure by the DHO.
24 GROUP-IV SEMICONDUCTORS
REFERENCES
1. J. D. Meindl, IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. ED-31, 1555 (1984).
2. S. M. Sze, in High-Speed Semiconductor Devices, edited by S. M. Sze (Wiley-
Interscience, New York, 1990), p. 1.
3. K. Seeger, 1. Appl. Phys. 63,5439 (1988).
4. T. S. Moss, Optical Properties of Semiconductors (Butterworth, London,
1959).
5. C. D. Salzberg and J. J. Villa, 1. Opt. Soc. Am. 47, 244 (1957).
6. G. A. Samara, Phys. Rev. B 27,3494 (1983).
7. J. R. Birch, Infrared Phys. 18,613 (1978).
8. M. N. Afsar and J. B. Hasted, Infrared Phys. 18, 835 (1978).
9. R. J. Collins and H. Y. Fan, Phys. Rev. 93,674 (1954).
10 M. Lax and E. Burstein, Phys. Rev. 97,39 (1955).
11. F. A. Johnson, Proc. Phys. Soc. London 73, 265 (1959).
12. J. R. Aronson, H. G. McLinden, and P. J. Gielisse, Phys. Rev. 135, A785
(1964).
13. B. Bendow, H. G. Lipson, and S. P. Yukon, Appl. Opt. 16, 2909 (1977).
14. M. M. Pradhan, R. K. Garg, and M. Arora, Infrared Phys. 27, 25 (1987).
15. Z. Jichang, W. Jiangen, M. Bilan, Z. Jingbing, and Q. Fenyuan, Infrared Phys.
33,381 (1992).
16. W. Primak, Appl. Opt. 10, 759 (1971).
17. R. Hulthen, Phys. Scripta. 12,342 (1975).
18. D. F. Edwards and E. Ochoa,Appl. Phys.19, 4130 (1980).
19. H. H. Li, 1. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 9, 561 (1980).
20. D. F. Edwards, in Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, edited by E. D.
Palik (Academic, Orlando, 1985), p. 547.
21. G. G. Macfarlane, T. P. McLean, J. E. Quarrington, and V. Roberts, Phys. Rev.
111,1245 (1958).
22. M. J. Keevers and M. A. Green,Appl. Phys. Lett. 66,174 (1995).
23. D. E. Aspnes and A. A. Studna, Phys. Rev. B 27, 985 (1983).
24. G. E. Jellison, Jr., Opt. Mater. 1,41 (1992).
25. V. Nayar, W. Y. Leong, C. Pickering, A. J. Pidduck, R. T. Carline, and D. J.
Robbins, Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 1304 (1992).
26. D. E. Aspnes and A. A. Studna, Appl. Phys. Lett. 39, 316 (1981).
27. T. Yasuda and D. E. Aspnes, Appl. Opt. 33, 7435 (1994).
28. K. Utani, T. Suzuki, and S. Adachi, 1. Appl. Phys. 73, 3467 (1993).
29. H. Yao, J. A. Woollam, and S. A. Alterovitz, Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 3324 (1993).
30. H. R. Philipp, 1. Appl. Phys. 43, 2835 (1972).
31. B. L. Henke, P. Lee, T. J. Tanaka, R. L. Shimabukuro, and B. K. Fujikawa, At.
Data Nucl. Data Tables 27, 1 (1982).
A2 SILICON (Si) 25
32. C. Gahwiller and F. C. Brown, in Proc. 10th Int. Conf Phys. Semicond., Cam-
bridge, Mass., 1970, edited by S. P. Keller, J. C. Hensel, and F. Stern (U. S.
Atomic Energy Commission, Springfield, Va., 1970), p. 213.
33. F. C. Brown, R. Z. Bachrach, and M. Skibowski, Phys. Rev. B 15,4781 (1977).
34. D. L. Windt, W. C. Cash, Jr., M. Scott, P. Arendt, B. Newnam, R. F. Fisher, A.
B. Swartzlander, P. Z. Takacs, and J. M. Pinneo, Appl. Opt. 27, 279 (1988).
35. M. Yanagihara, M. Niwano, T. Yamada, and S. Yamaguchi, Appl. Opt. 27, 563
(1988).
36. S. C. Woronick, W. Ng, A. Kr6l, and Y. H. Kao, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 53,
1265 (1992).
37. R. Soufli and E. M. Gullikson, Appl. Opt. 36, 5499 (1997).
38. B. L. Hanke, P. Lee, T. J. Tanaka, R. L. Shimabukuro, and B. K. Fujikawa, AlP
Conf Proc. 75, 340 (1981).
39. E. Hartmann, P. O. Hahn, and R. J. Behm, J. Appl. Phys. 69,4273 (1991).
40. P. Lautenschlager, M. Garriga, L. Vifia, and M. Cardona, Phys. Rev. B 36, 4821
(1987).
41. G. E. Jellison, Jr. and F. A. Modine, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 3758 (1994).
42. T. Aoki and S. Adachi, J. Appl. Phys. 69, 1574 (1991).
43. W. Spitzer and H. Y. Fan, Phys. Rev. 108,268 (1957).
44. Z.-H. Zhou, B. Choi, M. 1. Flik, S. Fan, and R. Feif, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 2448
(1994).
45. A. Gaymann, H. P. Geserich, and H. v. Lohneysen, Phys. Rev. B 52, 16486
(1995).
46. L. Vifia and M. Cardona, Phys. Rev. B 29, 6739 (1984).
47. G. E. Jellison, Jr., S. P. Withrow, J. W. McCamy, J. D. Budai, D. Lubben, and
M. J. Godbole, Phys. Rev. B 52, 14607 (1995).
48. M. Bertolotti, V. Bogdanov, A. Ferrari, A. Jascow, N. Nazorova, A. Pikhtin,
and L. Schirone, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 7, 918 (1990).
49. J. A. McCaulley, V. M. Donnelly, M. Vernon, and 1. Taha, Phys. Rev. B 49,
7408 (1994).
50. G. Ghosh, J. Appl. Phys. 79, 9388 (1996).
51. H. Lee and E. D. Jones, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68,3153 (1996).
52. P. Etchegoin, J. Kircher, and M. Cardona, Phys. Rev. B 47,10292 (1993).
53. L. T. Canham, Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 1064 (1990).
54. F. Huaxiang, Y. Ling, and X. Xide, Phys. Rev. B 48,10978 (1993).
55. M. S. Hybertsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72,1514 (1994).
56. L.-W. Wang and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73,1039 (1994).
57. H. Mtinder, M. G. Berger, H. Ltith, U. Rossow, U. Frotscher, W. Richter, R.
Herino, and M. Ligeon, Appl. Surf Sci. 63, 57 (1993).
58. U. Rossow, H. Mtinder, M. ThOnissen, and W. TheiB, J. Lumin. 57, 205 (1993).
59. L. H. Qin, Y. D. Zheng, R. Zhang, S. L. Gu, H. T. Shi, and D. Feng, Appl. Phys.
A 58,163 (1994).
60. S. Adachi, Phys. Rev. B 38, 12966(1988); J. Appl. Phys. 66, 3224 (1989).
26 GROUP-N SEMICONDUCTORS
50
40
30
20
01------
-10
-20
0~~~2~~-4~~~6~~~8
5
~ 4
c
3
2
El
!
0 2 4 6 8
Photon energy (eV)
Figure A2-S neE) and k(E) spectra for Si at 300 K.
A2 Sll..ICON (Si) 27
Si
10-3
10-6
0.9 ,.--,---r-.....--.----.-..,.-----.--,
0.8
0.7
0.6
c:
0.5
EgX
0.4 ! Si
0.3
0.20!:---'---::2!:---'---4~-'---::6!:---'--~8
Photon energy (eV)
Figure A2·7 R(E) spectrum for Si at 300 K.
28 GROUP-N SEMICONDUCTORS
-12
r U.K r
33
34 GROUP-IV SEMICONDUCTORS
from that of Si (see Fig. 1.8). In Si the lowest-lying r conduction band is p-like r ls
(r6-, r s-); however in Ge the s-like r 2. (r7-) band is the lowest conduction band. Such
conduction-band ordering in Ge is the same as that in III-V and II-VI, zinc-blende
semiconductors [i.e., these zinc-blende-type semiconductors have the s-like lowest-
lying and p-like second lowest-lying conduction bands].
The fundamental absorption edge of Ge corresponds to indirect transitions from
the highest valence band at the r point to the lowest conduction band at or near L
[i.e., rS+~L6- (or A 6-) ]. As in the zinc-blende semiconductors, the lowest-direct-gap
transitions in Ge occur at the center of the BZ, rS+~r7- (Eo) and r/~r7- (Eo+.1o).
The EI and EI+d l structures result from transitions in the A (L) directions of the BZ.
The next prominent structure, E2 , is attributed to an accidental coincidence of an MI
saddle point at X and an M2 saddle point in the 1: directions [2-4]. The E2 structure
is also believed to originate mainly from a region in the r -X-U-L plane near
k=(21t/a)(3/4,l/4,l/4) [5,6]. More recently, it has been attributed to a small region
centered at k=(21t/a)(0.77,0.29,0.16) [7]. The Eo' and E I' transitions may occur at or
near the rand L points in the BZ, respectively. The .10, .10', and d l splittings in Ge
are considerably larger than those of Si, and thus their related transitions have been
clearly observed experimentally. Table A3-1 summarizes the CP energies and indi-
rect-band-gap energy in Ge [8].
TABLE A3-1 Energies of the indirect band gap (E,L) and CPs in
Geat300K.
E gL , CPs eV
ELg 0.67
Eo 0.80
Eo+L1o 1.09
EI 2.11
EI+L1 1 2.30
Eo' region 2.8-3.47
Ez 4.35
E I' 5.8
effects below <55 cm-! with n decreasing and k increasing [10,11]. The temperature
and pressure dependence of the static dielectric constant for Si has been discussed in
Ref. [12].
The IR lattice absorption bands in Ge have been measured by a number of groups
[13-16]. We show in Fig. A3-2 the results measured by Fray et al. [16]. The observ-
ed lattice absorption bands have been assigned to as summation bands involving
four characteristic phonon energies of hro ro-35 meV. hroLO-30 meV. hroLA-23 meV.
and hro TA-8 meV [16]; for example. the most intense band at E-43 meV has been
assigned to as a combination of TO+T A phonons. Especially intriguing here is the
clearly indicated split in the most intense band [15.16]. Aronson et al. [15] consid
ered that the splitting is analogous to the intriguing doublet in the band at -2000
cm-! in diamond (see Fig. Al-2). They gave a possible explanation of this splitting
as due to an isotope effect that could possibly be justified for Ge on the basis of its
stable isotope abundance [15]. This explanation. however. clearly must fail for dia-
mond because suitable stable isotopes are not present in sufficient abundance for
this element.
The refractive-index dispersion in the transparent region of Ge has been measured
by several authors [17-21]. Li [22] has also discussed the refractive-index disper-
sion and its temperature dependence for Ge in the ranges 1.9 to 16 ~m and 100-550
K. We plot in Fig. A3-3 the n dispersion in Ge measured by Briggs [17]. Salzberg
and Villa (at 300 K. Ref. [18]). Icenogle et al. (at 297 K, Ref. [20]). and Edwin et al.
(at 293 K, Ref. [21]). We can understand from this figure that each data agrees
within 0.2%.
The temperature-dependent n data of Icenogle et al. [20] were used to fit with the
Sellmeier-type dispersion formula [23]:
Bt.: m.}
n2 =A + + --.:,.--- (A 3.1)
(}..} - C) (t.: - E)
Using this equation, Barnes and Piltch [23] determined the following temperature-
dependent Sellmeier coefficients:
A=-6.040x1 0-3T+11.05128
B= 9.295xlO- 3T+4.00536
C=-5.392xlO-4T+0.599034 (A3.2)
D= 4.151xlO-4T+0.09145
E= 1.51408 T+3426.5
The solid line in Fig. A3-3 shows the calculated result of this equation with T=297 K.
We can see in this figure that the Sellmeier-type equation, Eq. (A3-1), is a good ex-
pression for the n dispersion in the wavelength range 2 to 20 ~m.
The intrinsic absorption spectra of high-purity Ge have been measured by several
authors [24-6]. Macfarlane et al. [25] observed fine structures that could be inter-
~
c:I\
Wavtltnqth (I'm)
25 22 20
Wavtlenqth (I'm)
16 15 14 13 12 1\ 10 0-10
I I I I j 1 J.
0-08
-06
293 "K
~ -04
'" 0-6~ J WI'(
E E
.§
0-02 .§
."
;:; ."
u
~ 0-2
8 10-01 ~
c
..g ·008 o~
~ 0-10' ·006 .~
g
~ o-o~- ,0-004 ~
0-06
(b) o
0-04
I 0-002 ~
, ~
iTWO-Phonon cut-off jThrtt-Phonon cut-off
1
0-02 ~
(a) 0-08 0-09 0-10 0-1\ 0-12 0-124 en
Entrqy (tV)
tIl
oj I I I
~
0-04 0-05 0-06 0-07 n
Entrqy (tV)
~
o
Figure A3-2 Lattice absorption bands in Oe for energies (a) below and (b) above the two-phonon
cut off. (From Fray et al. [16].)
en
~
A3 GERMANIUM (Ge) 37
4.16
• Ge
4.12
• Briggs
I>. Salzberg & Vila
Icenogle et a!.
c 4.08 [J
o Edwin eta!.
4.04
4.00
10° 10 1
Wavelength (J.l m)
Figure A3·3 Refractive-index dispersion in Ge measured by Briggs [17], Salzberg and Villa
(at 300 K, Ref. [18]), Icenogle et at. (at 297 K, Ref. [20]), and Edwin et al. (at 293 K, Ref.
[21]). The solid line shows the calculated result of Eq. (A3.1) with T=297 K [23].
6
",
,"
2'3 ...."
-----55 ",
'-" ",
:..:
0--
2'2 ","
:z:
,"
~4
;:;: ","
u. ,,'
w
0
u
:z:
~3
c..
a:
0
V'l
co
""
u.
02 .:"'/
15
~ ..-..
w
a:
""
gl ,../
Figure A3·4 Optical absorption spectrum for high-purity Ge at various temperatures. (From
Macfarlane et al. [25].)
Studna (30.089, Ref. [30)). It should be noted, however, that the value of Jellison
was obtained after mathematically removing the effect of an oxide overlayer, The
thickness of this oxide overlayer was determined to be 1.13 nm using a nulling ellip-
sometry experiment at t..=1152 nm (k-O),
Cardona et at. [32] measured the optical absorption spectrum of Ge from 15 to
170 eV and observed weak structures at -30 eV and 120 eV. These structures corre-
spond to the M 4 •5 (30.1 eV) and M 2•3 (123 eV) absorption edges, respectively [33].
An experimental determination of the optical constants in the 23.6-67-A wavelength
range (185-525.2 eV) was made by Lukirskii et al. [34]. We find from their data
that the o=l-n and k are dependent on wavelength approximately as 00ct..1.2 and
koc t..2 .2 , respectively.
Temperature dependence of the refractive index in the transparent region of Ge
has been discussed by several authors [35,36]. SE has been used by Viiia et at, [37]
to measure optical constants of Ge in the range 1.25 to 5.6 eV at temperatures be-
tween 100 and 850 K. The effects of doping on the optical properties of Ge have
also been studied by Viiia and Cardona [38] using SE in the 1.6-5.6-eV spectral
range. A red shift of the CP energies. together with an increase in the lifetime broad-
A3 GERMANIUM CGe) 39
ening, have been observed (see Figs. 3.28 and 3.29). The uniaxial-stress-induced
change in the optical constants of Ge in the visible-UV range has also been studied
using SE by Etchegoin et at. [39]. Free-carrier absorption in n-Ge has been meas-
ured by Fan et at. [40]. Intervalence-band absorption has also been found in p-Ge by
Briggs and Fletcher [41].
We list in Table A3-2 the room-temperature values of £=£,+i£;Z, n*=n+ik, n, and R
for Ge. The £, and n below the fundamental absorption edge were calculated from
the Sellmeier-type dispersion formula of Eq. (A3.1) [23]. The £;Z and k values for
E:::;1.45 eV were obtained from the experimental n data of Dash and Newman [24].
A set of the optical constants in the interband transition region (1.476:::;E:::;21 eV)
were taken from Jellison [31] and Philipp and Ehrenreich [29]. The n values for
22:::;E:::;155 eV were read from a graph of Cardona et al. [32]. The optical constants
for R185 eV were taken from Lukirskii et at. [34].
The (£" £:z), (n, k), n, and R values in Table A3-2 are graphed in Figs. A3-5-A3-8,
respectively. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of each CP and
EgL gap. It has been shown [8,42] that such optical-constant spectra can be success-
REFERENCES
1. J. R. Chelikowsky and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 14, 556 (1976).
2. F. Bassani and D. Brust, Phys. Rev. 131, 1524 (1963).
3. D. Brust, Phys. Rev. 134, A1337(1964); 139, A489 (1965).
4. L. R. Saravia and D. Brust, Phys. Rev. 171,916(1968); 176,915 (1968); 178,
1240 (1969).
5. C. W. Higginbotham, F. H. Pollak, and M. Cardona, Solid State Commun. 5,
513 (1967).
6. J. R. Chelikowsky and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 1582 (1973); Phys.
Rev. B 10,5095 (1974).
7. W. D. Grobman, D. E. Eastman, and J. L. Freeouf, Phys. Rev. B 12, 4405
(1975).
8. S. Adachi, Phys. Rev. B 38,12966 (1988).
9. F. A. D' Altroy and H. Y. Fan, Phys. Rev. 103, 1671 (1956).
10. C. M. Randall and R. D. Rawcliffe, Appt. Opt. 6,1889 (1967).
11. M. N. Afsar, D. D. Honijk, W. F. Passchier, and J. Goulon, IEEE Trans. Micro.
Theor. Tech. MTT.2S, 505 (1977).
12. O. A. Samara, Phys. Rev. B 27,3494 (1983).
13. R. J. Collins and H. Y. Fan, Phys. Rev. 93, 674 (1954).
14. M. Lax and E. Burstein, Phys. Rev. 97,39 (1955).
15. J. R. Aronson, H. G. McLinden, and P. J. Gielisse, Phys. Rev. 135, A785
(1964).
40 GROUP-IV SEMICONDUCTORS
-200~~2~~4~~6~~8~~10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure A3-S E1(E) and E2(E) spectra for Ge at 300 K.
7r-~'-~-'~~~~~~~
~ 4
c 3
o 246 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure A3-6 n(E) and k(E) spectra for Ge at 300 K.
42 GROUP-IV SEMICONDUCTORS
0.2
Ge
0.1
o 2 4 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure A3-8 R(E) spectrum for Ge at 300 K.
A3 GERMANIUM (Ge) 43
Table A3-2 Optical constants of Ge at 300 K.
eV £\ £2 n k a (cm'\) R
0.Q3 15.86 3.982 0.358
0.04 15.96 3.994 0.359
0.05 15.99 3.998 0.360
0.06 16.00 4.000 0.360
0.07 16.01 4.002 0.360
0.08 16.02 4.003 0.360
0.09 16.03 4.004 0.360
0.1 16.03 4.004 0.360
0.15 16.06 4.008 0.361
0.2 16.10 4.012 0.361
0.25 16.15 4.018 0.362
0.3 16.20 4.025 0.362
0.35 16.27 4.033 0.363
0.4 16.35 4.043 0.364
0.45 16.44 4.054 0.365
0.5 16.54 4.067 0.366
0.55 16.66 4.082 0.368
0.6 16.80 4.099 0.369
0.63 16.89 2.1E-05 4.110 2.51E-06 1.60E-Ol 0.370
0.64 16.92 5.20E-05 4.113 6.32E-06 4.10E-Ol 0.371
0.65 16.95 1.77E-04 4.117 2.15E-05 1.42E+00 0.371
0.66 16.98 3.94E-04 4.121 4.78E-05 3.20E+00 0.371
0.67 17.02 7.41E-04 4.125 8.98E-05 6.lOE+00 0.372
0.68 17.05 1.14E-03 4.130 1.38E-04 9.50E+00 0.372
0.69 17.09 1.65E-03 4.134 2.00E-04 1.40E+01 0.373
0.7 17.12 2.22E-03 4.138 2.68E-04 1.90E+01 0.373
0.71 17.16 2.88E-03 4.143 3.47E-04 2.50E+Ol 0.373
0.72 17.20 3.52E-03 4.147 4.25E-04 3. lOE+O 1 0.374
0.73 17.24 4.38E-03 4.152 5.27E-04 3.90E+01 0.374
0.74 17.28 5.54E-03 4.157 6.66E-04 5.00E+01 0.375
0.75 17.32 6.79E-03 4.162 8. 15E-04 6.20E+01 0.375
0.76 17.36 8.33E-03 4.167 9.99E-04 7.70E+01 0.376
0.77 17.40 0.011 4.172 1.28E-03 1.00E+02 0.376
0.78 17.45 0.014 4.177 1.67E-03 1.32E+02 0.377
0.79 17.49 0.020 4.182 2.37E-03 1.90E+02 0.377
0.8 17.54 0.036 4.188 4.32E-03 3.50E+02 0.378
0.85 17.79 0.578 4.218 0.068 5.90E+03 0.380
0.9 17.82 0.583 4.222 0.069 6.30E+03 0.381
1 18.12 0.739 4.258 0.087 8.80E+03 0.384
1.1 18.69 0.915 4.325 0.106 1.18E+04 0.390
1.2 19.39 1.108 4.405 0.126 l.53E+04 0.397
1.3 20.04 1.380 4.479 0.154 2.03E+04 0.404
1.4 20.74 1.798 4.558 0.197 2.80E+04 0.411
1.45 21.11 1.990 4.600 0.216 3. 18E+04 0.414
1.476 21.34 2.193 4.626 0.237 3.55E+04 0.416
1.484 21.36 2.221 4.628 0.240 3.61E+04 0.417
1.493 21.51 2.201 4.644 0.237 3.59E+04 0.418
1.502 21.56 2.204 4.649 0.237 3.61E+04 0.418
1.512 21.61 2.281 4.655 0.245 3.76E+04 0.419
1.521 21.74 2.363 4.670 0.253 3.90E+04 0.420
44 GROUP-IV SEMICONDUcrORS
49
50 GROUP-IV SEMICONDUCTORS
. . . . . . . . . . . . . ::~:::.::::::::::::;~:>
Q)
.........
>- -2 :
.......... .......
<!J L4,5v
a: -4 .............
~ -6 '. ........
W ........
-8 .. '
·:X;~~~::·· . · · · ·
-10
r+ .... .............................................
-12
L....6v
.:.:·········.
............. ~~ ...... ..
-14 a-Sn
-16
L r x K r
Figure A4-1 Electronic energy-band structure of a-Sn as calculated within the LDA in-
cluding the SO interaction as a perturbation. (From Brudevoll et al. [6].) The locations of
several interband transitions are included by the vertical arrows.
TABLE A4-1 Energies of the CPs and indirect gap (E/) in a-Sn at 300 K.
CPS,EgL eV
Eo 0.0
E La -0.1
g
El 1.28
El+~l 1.74
Eo' 2.38
Eo'+~o' 2.68
Ez 3.45
E 1' 4.6
E3 .5.15 b
ar25' (l8+)~Ll (L/) transitions.
bValue at 200 K.
A4 ORAY TIN (a-Sn) 51
where A=N.(m/mJ+Nh(m/mJ, me and mh are the effective masses of the electrons and
holes, respectively, rna is the free electron mass, and ').. is the wavelength in microns.
Thus, the high-frequency dielectric constant £~ and free-carrier concentration A can
be determined by plotting n2-Jil vs. ')..2. Figure A4-2 shows, as an example, the plotted
result for a sample with N.-Nd=2.3xlO I8 cm-3 [2]. This plot gives a straight line of
slope A=6.7xl019 cm-3 and intercept £~=26 on the vertical axis (')..2~0). Lindquist
and Ewald [2] obtained in this way from a few samples the average £~ value of 24.
Lavine and Ewald [14] obtained the same value (£~=24) from a transport analysis of
n-type (Sb-doped) o.-Sn. Most of the samples used in this study were prepared by
transforming cast, single-crystal ~-Sn wires to the gray phase.
The IR reflectivity spectra taken by Lindquist and Ewald [2] were in the 0.05-
1.24-eV (1-25-J..lm) region. The KK analysis yielded a set of the optical constants, n,
k, and a.. Hanyu [13] also performed reflectivity measurements on o.-Sn grown from
the Hg solution in the spectral region from 1.18 to 4.95 eV at 278 K (5°C). The re-
sultant optical-constant data revealed distinct structures at energies of the EI (1.25
eV), EI+AI (1.65 eV), Eo' (2.25 eV), E2 (3.02 eV), and EI' (4.20 eV) CPs.
More recently, Viiia et al. [11] have measured the real and imaginary parts of the
dielectric function of o.-Sn in the 1.2-5 .6-e V photon-energy region at temperatures
between 100 and 350 K using SE. The o.-Sn sample used was a 950-A-thick film
epitaxially-grown on an InSb(OOI) substrate by MBE. In addition to E I, EI+AI, Eo',
52 GROUP-IV SEMICONDUCTORS
30~--~,----,~--~,--~,~--~,--~
a-Sn
10f-
Of-- -
-100~-1~6-o-2-6~o--3~6o--4~6~o--5~6o--6~OO
A 2 (,U m2)
Figure A4-2 n 2-Ji2 vs. ').} for a-Sn at 300 K. This plot gives a straight line of slope
A=6.7x10 19 cm-3 and intercept £~=26 on the vertical axis [see Eq. (A4.1)]. The average £~
value obtained in this way from a few samples is 24. (From Lindquist and Ewald [2].)
E2 , and E1', they found the E3 structure at 5.15 eV (T=200 K). This CP may corre-
spond to transitions between the upper valence and 3rd conduction bands in the
(110) plane [8].
Viiia et al. [11] have also reported the e(E) spectra for films transformed into
metallic f3-Sn after heating to 90°C. These e(E) spectra showed Drude dispersion
behavior typical of metals. A fact that the epitaxial film has much higher transfor-
mation (a-Sn-7f3-Sn) temperature (-70°C) than the bulk crystal (13.2°C) has been
clearly shown.
Optical reflectivity spectra at the plasma edge of both n- and p-type a-Sn have
been reported by Wagner and Ewald [15] and those in the interband transition region
by Cardona and Greenaway [12] and Higginbotham et al. [16]. Figure A4-3 (a)
shows the reflectivity spectrum of an p-type (p-3.12x10 19 cm-3 ) a-Sn measured by
Wagner and Ewald [15]. The solid line represents a best fit to the data using a clas-
sical free-carrier expression. The temperature dependence of free-carrier-minimum
wavelength /"'0 for a lightly dopedp-type sample is also shown in Fig. A4-3 (b). The-
se authors showed that values of carrier densities and mobilities obtained from elec-
trical measurements are in good agreement with those deduced from optical meas-
urements. ER study on a-Sn has also been performed by Cardona and coworkers
[17,18].
A4 ORAY TIN (a-Sn) 53
08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26
WAVELENGTH (microns)
...>-->--. 57 o
~
t;'~ 55 • -t- • •
1IJ.ci
...I ..
I::i~ •
a: 53 T ·25"1<
REFERENCES
1. A. W. Ewald and O. N. Tufte, l. Appl. Phys. 29, 1007 (1958).
2. R. E. Lindquist and A. W. Ewald, Phys. Rev. 135, A191 (1964).
3. R. F. C. Farrow, D. S. Robertson, G. M. Williams, A. G. Cullis, G. R. Jones, I.
M. Young, and P. N. J. Dennis, l. Cryst. G.rowth 54, 507 (1981).
4. J. Menendez and H. Hochst, Thin Solid Films 111,375 (1984).
5. J. L. Reno and L. L. Stephenson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 2207 (1989).
6. T. Brudevoll, D. S. Citrin, M. Cardona, and N. E. Christensen, Phys. Rev. B 48,
8629 (1993).
7. S. Groves and W. Paul, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 194 (1963).
8. F. H. Pollak, M. Cardona, C. W. Higginbotham, F. Herman, and J. P. Van Dyke,
Phys. Rev. B 2, 352 (1970).
9. J. R. Chelikowsky and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 14, 556 (1976).
10. S. Adachi, l. Appl. Phys. 66,813 (1989).
11. L. Viiia, H. Hochst, and M. Cardona, Phys. Rev. B 31, 958 (1985).
12. M. Cardona and D. L. Greenaway, Phys. Rev. 125, 1291 (1962).
13. T. Hanyu, l. Phys. Soc. lpn. 36,1738 (1971).
14. C. F. Lavine and A. W. Ewald, l. Phys. Chem. Solids 32,1121 (1971).
15. R. J. Wagner and A. W. Ewald, l. Phys. Chem. Solids 32,697 (1971).
16. c. W. Higginbotham, F. H. Pollak, and M. Cardona, Solid State Commun. 5,
513 (1967).
17. M. Cardona, P. McElroy, F. H. Pollak, and K. L. Shaklee, Solid State Commun.
4,319 (1966).
18. M. Cardona, K. L. Shaklee, and F. H. Pollak, Phys. Rev. 154, 696 (1967).
A4 GRAY TIN (<x-Sn) ss
o
a-Sn
-10
o 12345 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure A4·4 E1(E) and E2(E) spectra for <x-Sn at room temperature.
o 1 2 3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure A4-S n(E) and k(E) spectra for <x-Sn at room temperature.
S6 GROUP-IV SEMICONDUCTORS
a-Sn
10-1 100 10 1
Photon energy (e V)
Figure A4·6.o.(E) spectrum for a-Sn at room temperature.
0.7
a::
0.5
0.4
a-Sn
0.3
o 1 2 3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure A4·7 R(E) spectrum for a-Sn at room temperature.
A4 ORAY TIN (a-Sn) 57
63
64 GROUP-IV SEMICONDUCTORS
about 3 eV. Up to now, however, there exist strong ambiguities about the location
and nature of the peaks in the experimental optical spectra, as well as their assign-
ment to specific CPs in the k space [12-18] (see Table AS-I).
Schering type. Their data suggest that E,=10.2±O.2 at 20 K and lOA at 77 K, respec-
tively. Note that the 300-K E, values of C (diamond) and Si are 5.70 and 11.6, re-
spectively.
Because SiC is a heteropolar semiconductor, strong IR absorption band can be
observed. It is thus easily understand that E,;t:€~ for SiC. Applying the Lyddane-
Sachs-Teller relationship to the refractive-index data of Shaffer and Naum [21],
Patrick and Choyke [22] determined the static and high-frequency dielectric
constants of 3C-SiC to be E,=9.72 and E~=6.52, respectively. The similar analysis by
Pikhtin et at. [23] provided the values of E,=9.82 and E~=6.583 (T=297 K).
IR optical properties of 3C-SiC have been studied by Spitzer et at. [24] and more
recently by Moore et at. [25]. Films of 3C-SiC used in these experiments were
grown by the reaction of methane with a high-purity Si surface at 1300°C [24] and
deposited by CVD on Si substrates [25]. The reststrahlen parameters of 3C-SiC were
found to be essentially the same as those for the ordinary ray in the hexagonal SiC
[24]. Moore et at. [25] obtained the following dispersion equation including a real
contribution from the fundamental gap, ~:
where E,=9.52, E~=6.38, v To=796.l cm-I, v LO=973 cm-I, r=1 cm- I, and ~=1.8xlO-9
cm2 at T=300 K. (Note that there are some typos in the original expression of Eq.
(A5.l), see Eq. (7) of Ref. [25].) These authors also reported the 5-K dispersion
parameters that are E,=9.28, E_=6.22, v To=798 cm-I, v LO=975 cm- I, r=1.2 cm- I, and
~=4xlO-9 cm2.
The refractive-index dispersion in 3C-SiC has been determined by Shaffer and
Naum [21] at seven different wavelengths from 691 to 467 nm. The data were sim-
ply described by n(A.)=2.55378+3AI7xl04[A? (A. in nm).
Absorption coefficients at the fundamental absorption edge of cubic SiC have
been determined by Philipp [26] in the 2A-3.6-e V region and more recently by
Choyke et at. [27] in the 2.6-3A-eV region. These data are in reasonable agreement
with each other. The 3C-SiC films used in Ref. [27] were grown on Si(100) sub-
strates by way of CVD with thicknesses from 0.06 to 25 Ilm.
Reflectance spectra in the interband transition region of 3C-SiC have been meas-
ured by a number of authors [14-17] (see, e.g., Fig. A6-2 below). These authors,
however, did not perform KK analysis to obtain a set of the optical constants (n, k)
or (E I, Ez). Using SE, the optical constants of 3C-SiC in the visible-UV spectral re-
gion (1.5-9.5 eV) of 3C-SiC have been determined by Logothetidis and coworkers
[12,28]. The measured SE data showed CP features at energies -6.0, 7.3, and 9.2 eV.
These authors also reported that the n dispersion below the lowest direct gap (-6.0
eV) can be fitted by the Sellmeier equation [28]:
2 A~}
EI(A)=n(A) =1.0+ 2 2 (A5.2)
').;, -1.0
66 GROUP-IV SEMICONDUCTORS
with A=5.721 and 1.0=0.1635 J.lm. We find that the above equation agrees with the
experimental data of Shaffer and Naum [21] within 1%.
We list in Table A5-2 the room-temperature values of e=el+i~, n*=n+ik, (X, and R
for 3C-SiC. A complete set of the optical constants for &;0.4 eV were calculated
from Eq. (A5.1) [25]. The refractive indices in the 0.8-4.7-eV region were obtained
from Eq. (AS.2) [28]. The absorption coefficients below 3.6 eV were taken from
Philipp [26]. The optical constants in the interband transition region (4.8::;E~9.5 eV)
were taken from Logothetidis and Petalas [28]. The absorption coefficients for
3.7~E~4.7 eV were obtained using an interpolation scheme between Philipp [26]
and Logothetidis- Petalas' data [28].
The (el' ~), (n, k), (x, and R values in Table AS-2 are graphed in Figs. AS-2-A5-5,
respectively. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the position of the lowest
indirect gapE/.
REFERENCES
1. A. R. Verma and P. Krishna, Polymorphism and Polytypism in Crystals (Wiley,
New York, 1966).
2. W. E. Nelson, F. A. Halden, and A. Rosengreen, 1. Appl. Phys. 37, 333 (1966).
3. H.-G. Junginger and W. van Haeringen, Phys. Status Solidi 37, 709 (1970).
4. L. A. Hemstreet and C. Y. Fong, in Silicon Carbide-1973, edited by R. C. Mar-
shall, J. W. Faust, and C. E. Ryan (University of South Carolina Press, Colum-
bia, 1974), p. 284.
5. D. N. Talwar and Z. C. Feng, Phys. Rev. B 44,3191 (1991).
6. M. Rohlfing, P. KrUger, and J. Pollmann, Phys. Rev. B 48,17791 (1993).
7. C. H. Park, B.-H. Cheng, K.-H. Lee, and K. J. Chang, Phys. Rev. B 49, 4485
(1994).
8. P. Kiickell, B. Wenzien, and F. Bechstedt, Phys. Rev. B SO, 10761 (1994).
9. W. H. Backes, P. A. Bobbert, and W. van Haeringen, Phys. Rev. B 51, 4950
(1995).
10. V. I. Gavrilenko,Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 16 (1995).
11. B. Wenzien, P. Kiickell, F. Bechstedt, and G. Gappellini, Phys. Rev. B 52,
10897 (1995).
12. S. Logothetidis, H. M. Polatoglou, J. Petalas, D. Fuchs, and R. L. Johnson,
Physica B 185, 389 (1993).
13. V. I. Gavrilenko, S. I. Frolov, and N. I. Klyui, Physica B 185, 394 (1993).
14. W. R. L. Lambrecht, B. Segall, W. Suttrop, M. Yoganathan, R. P. Devaty, W. J.
Choyke, J. A. Edmond, J. A. Powell, and M. Alouani, Appl. Phys. Lett. 63,
2747 (1993).
15. W. R. L. Lambrecht, B. Segall, M. Yoganathan, W. Suttrop, R. P. Devaty, W. J.
Choyke, J. A. Edmond, J. A. Powell, and M. Alouani, Phys. Rev. B SO, 10722
(1994).
AS CUBIC SILICON CARBIDE (3C-SiC) 67
25~~~~~~~~~~~
20 3C-SiC
15
10
o
-5
4 3C-SiC
c
2
X30,
,,
1 ,,
EgX "
1 /:'
o 2 4 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure A5·3 neE) and k(E) spectra for 3C-SiC at 300 K.
WTol 3C-SiC
0.7
0.6
3C-SiC
0.5
0.4
ex: EX
9
0.3 1
0.2
0.1
0 2 4 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure AS-S R(E) spectrum for 3C-SiC at 300 K.
73
74 GROUP-IV SEMICONDUCTORS
2H 4H
6H
Figure A6·1 Electronic energy-band structures of (a) 2H-SiC, (b) 4H-SiC, and (c) 6H-SiC
as obtained within the Off-LOA calculations. (From Klickell et al. [1].)
TABLE A6·1 Lowest-indirect-exciton gap and hexagonality for some SiC polytypes.
PolytyPe Exciton Gap (eV) Hexagonality (%)
3C 2.390 o
24R 2.728 25
8H 2.80 25
21R 2.853 29
6H 3.023 33
15R 2.986 40
4H 3.265 50
2H 3.330 100
Figure A6-2 shows the theoretical reflectivity spectra for 2H-, 4H-, 6H-, and 3C-
SiC polytypes as calculated by Lambrecht et al. [7]. The band structures were cal-
culated by means of the scalar-relativistic LMTO method. The imaginary part of the
dielectric function ~(E) was derived at the random-phase approximation level using
the muffin-tin-orbital basis set. The real part £\(E) was then obtained from ~(E) by
means of the KK transformation. No lifetime broadening effect was taken into con-
sideration in the calculation. The experimental data for 4H, 15R, 6H, and 3C
polytypes measured by these authors are also shown in Fig. A6-2 by the solid lines.
In Fig. A6-2, the overall experimental features are broader than the theoretical
A6 HEXAGONAL Sll..rCON CARBIDE (2H-, 4H-, and 6H-SiC) 75
0.52H RB
f \.....~\ C
0.4 i \ f\
A/ \ t j ....·,
0.3 ............../.... ..
0.2 /-++...,............I-j-HH+!-++++!-++++f++.++1
0.5 4H D
0.4
0.3
0.2 t+<-~H-+-I-j-HH+!-++++!-++++f++.++i
~
:> 0.5 15R
i= B C
~ 0.4
w 0.3
CC
0.2 1++1+f-.........1-j-HH+!-++++!-++++f++.++l
Figure A6-2 Reflectivity spectra for 2H-, 4H-,
15R-, 6H-, and 3C-SiC polytypes: dotted lines
0.5 6H (theory), solid lines (experiment at 300 K).
0.4
C The data for 2H-, 4H-, 15R-, and 6H-SiC cor-
respond to Eloc. Note that no lifetime bro-
0.3 adening effect was taken into consideration in
0.2 t+<-~.........l-j-HH+!-++++I-++++f++.++l
the theory. (From Lambrecht et al. [7].)
0.5 3C
0.4
0.3
......,.
02 ~~~~~~~~~~
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PHOTON ENERGY (eV)
the r -K-X plane near K [7]. Similar flat interband-transition curves also exist in 4H
and 6H along the r -K line. This axis of the hexagonal BZ corresponds to the ~r
K and Q=L-W lines of cubic SiC which are both folded onto the T=r-K line of the
hexagonal BZ.
2.800
2.180
2.160
2.140
>< 2.120
Figure A6-3 Refractive-
Q>
'C
oS
~ 2.100 index dispersion for SiC
~ polytypes. Data included
Ci for 2H and 6H curves only.
'" 2.680 The 3C (P), 4H, and 15R
curves are from Shaffer [9].
2.660 Diamonds, Thibault (see
Ref. [8]); squares, Shaffer
2.640 [9]; circles, Powell [8].
(From Powell [8].)
2.620 IN.
2.600
400
Wavelength. nm
A6 HEXAGONAL SnJCON CARBIDE (2H-, 4H-, and 6H-SiC) 77
.09
/'
/'
/'
.08 /'
/'
/' 0
.07 /' 2H
/'
/'
/'
Q) .06 /'
o 4H /'
C
~ .OS
C
~ .04 ~
~ 21R
39R
/' 24R
iIi /'
.03 /'
/'
/'
.02
.01
r~lcublcl
"",'
.1 .3.4.5.6
Hexagonality
Figure A6-4 Birefringence vs. hexagonality for SiC polytypes at A.=584 nm. (From Powell
[8].)
Figure A6-4 plots the birefringence, dn=n.(E II c)-no(E.Lc), vs. hexagonal fraction
(hexagonality) for some SiC polytypes at 584 nm [8]. There have been attempts to
relate the birefringence of SiC to the crystal structure [8,9,11]. In the structurally
analogous system of ZnS polytypes, the birefringence is a linear function of the
hexagonal fraction h [12]. The situation for SiC is not so simple. As seen in Fig. A6-
4, the birefringence is a linear function of h for values of h between 0.25 and 0.50.
However, the values for 3C-SiC (h=O) and 2H-SiC (h=1.0) are considerably below
this line.
We list in Table A6-2 the ~\, n, and R [=(n-l)2/(n+l)2] values for 2H-SiC. They
were calculated from Eq. (A6.1) [8]. Limiting A-too in Eq. (A6.1), we obtain the
high-frequency dielectric constant £_=6.51 for E..Lc and 6.84 for Ellc.
(b) 4H-SiC-The n dispersion data for 4H-SiC were reported by Shaffer [9] (see
Figs. A6-3 and A6-4). The crystals were grown by the sublimation method. The ex-
perimental n data were fitted to the Cauchy dispersion formula of Eq. (A6.1) with
C=O. The fit-determined dispersion parameters were: A=2.561O and B=3.40xI04 for
E-Lc; A=2.6041 and B=3.75xI04 for Ellc.
Biedermann [10] studied the optical absorption properties of some SiC polytypes,
including 4H-SiC, in the wavelength range 0.35 to 2.5 Ilm with light polarization
perpendicular and parallel to the c axis. He observed in N-doped n-type samples
(n-5xI0 18 cm- 3) the main absorption bands in the 0.6-3-eV region that were strongly
dependent upon the polytype and light polarization. These bands were assumed to be
due to electron excitation from the conduction-band minimum to other sites of in-
creased DOS in the higher, empty band (namely, due to the intracondution-band ab-
sorption). No comparable absorption bands were observed in AI-doped, p-type sam-
ples. The absorption coefficients in the p-type samples increased continually from
the minimum near the band edge towards longer wavelengths, the dependence being
given approximately by k_').,!·5 for the ordinary ray and k_')...O.9 for the extraordinary
ray.
Sridhara et al. [13] have also reported the absorption coefficients of 4H-SiC
measured at 300 K, with light propagating along the c axis, from 3900 to 3350 A.
The sample was n type with an impurity concentration in the high 1014 cm,3. It was
carefully polished to a thickness of 64 Ilm. By using the known shift of the band gap
with temperature, they have also given the absorption values at 2 K.
The fundamental reflectivity spectrum in the interband transition region of 4H-
SiC was reported by Lambrecht et al. [7] (see Fig. A6-2). We note, however, that the
reflectivity peak value at -7 eV for 3C-SiC obtained by these authors is considera-
bly smaller than the recent SE result (cf. Fig. A5-5).
More recently, Zollner and Hilifker [14] have reported the SE e(E) spectra of 4H-
SiC from 0.72 to 6.6 eV. The sample studied was obtained commercially from Cree
Research. It was not intentionally doped and single-side polished (Si-terminated).
The sample was measured as received without surface preparation. The SE data re-
vealed CP near 5.53 eV.
Table A6-3 lists the optical-constant data for 4H-SiC. They were obtained for
E~2.654 eV from Shaffer [9] and for F23 eV from Zollner and Hilifker [14]. These
data yield the high-frequency dielectric constants e_=6.56 for E-Lc and 6.78 for E II
c [A.~oo in Eq. (A6.1)].
Table A6-3 Optical constants of4H-SiC at 300 K.
EJ.c Ellc
eV £1 £2 n k R £1 n R
1.794 6.9353 2.6335 0.202 7.2006 2.6834 0.209
2.012 7.0267 2.6508 0.204 7.3078 2.7033 0.212
2.104 7.0692 2.6588 0.206 7.3544 2.7119 0.213
2.182 7.1049 2.6655 0.206 7.3940 2.7192 0.214
A6 HEXAGONAL SILICON CARBIDE (2H-, 4H-, and 6H-SiC) 79
(c) 6H-SiC-The reported £_ data for 6H-SiC have yielded widely different values
ranging from 6.17 to 6.7 for E.lc and from 6.49 to 6.72 for Ellc [15]. Pikhtin et al.
[16] measured the n data in the 0.4-50-Jlm wavelength region at 297 and 105 K and
estimated from their data the static and high-frequency dielectric constants to be
£,=9.66 (9.64) and £.=6.520 (6.509) for E.lc and £.=10.09 (10.01) and £.=6.742
(6.692) for Ellc at 297 K (l05 K).
IR optical properties of 6H-SiC have been studied by Spitzer et al. [17] and more
80 GROUP-N SEMICONDUCTORS
recently by Engerlbrecht and Helbig [18]. The samples used by Engerlbrecht and
Helbig [18] were cut from boules grown by a modified Lely method (n=0.5-
1.0xt0 17 cm-3). The measured spectra were fitted to the classical Lorentz oscillator
model. The number of the Lorentz oscillators required for this fit was one for E.1.e
and five for Elle: four extra oscillators for Elle correspond to two weak one-phonon
absorption lines in the reststrahlen band and two weak absorption lines at longer
wavelengths. Spitzer et al. [17] reported additional, but only one weak absorption
line in the reststrahlen band for Elle. The reststrahlen data of Engerlbrecht and
Helbig [18] yielded the €~ values of 6.17 and 6.49 for EJ.e and Elle, respectively,
while Spitzer et al. [17] obtained the €~ value of 6.7 both for EJ.e and Elle.
The n dispersion in 6H-SiC has been studied by many authors [8,9,16,19,20].
Like 2H- and 4H-SiC, the ordinary values no (EJ.e) are usually smaller than the ex-
traordinary ones no (Elle) at the same wavelengths (Le., iliI=n.-no>O, see Fig. A6-3).
Optical absorption at the fundamental absorption edge of 6H-SiC has been studied
by a number of authors [21-5]. The data revealed fine structures caused by phonons
involved in the indirect-transition process [23].
Optical absorption in the region well below the fundamental absorption edge has
been studied by Biederman [10] and Ellis and Moss [26]. These authors observed
the relatively strong absorption peaks at E-1.6 eV in the n-type samples for Elle.
Their peak strengths were found to increase with increasing carrier concentration
[26]. They were considered to arise from the interconduction-band absorption [10].
It was also found [26] that the absorption edge for EJ.e occurs at slightly longer
wavelength than that for Elle, in agreement with the data of Choyke and Patrick [23].
The free-carrier absorption, however, showed no evidence of anisotropy in the scat-
tering mechanism [26].
Fundamental reflectivity study in the interband transition region of 6H-SiC was
performed by Lambrecht et al. [7] in the 4-9.5-eV region (see Fig. A6-2), by Philipp
and Taft [27] in the 1-11.5-eV region, and by Wheeler [28] in the 3-13-eV region.
Unfortunately, the Refs. [7] and [28] authors did not performed KK analysis. Philipp
and Taft [27] performed KK analysis, but they did not state whether the data were
measured for EJ.e, or Elle, or a mixture.
The SE data for 6H-SiC have been reported by Adachi and coworker [15] in the
1.2-5.4-eV region for both EJ.e and Elle and more recently by Logothetidis and Pe-
talas [29] in the 1.5-9.5-eV region for EJ.e. The measured SE data showed CP fea-
tures at energies -6.7 and 9.2 eV for EJ.e [29] and at -5.4 eV for Elle [15]. Logo-
thetidis and Petalas [29] also found that the n dispersion for EJ.e below the lowest-
direct-band gap (1.5-5.5 e V) can be fitted by the Sellmeier equation:
with A(=1.481, 1.01 =0.1817 11m, A2=4.142, and 1.02 =0.1597 11m. Adachi and coworker
[15] also reported the fitted results of their measured n data for EJ.e and Elle using
the first-order Sellmeier equation.
A6 HEXAGONAL SILICON CARBIDE (2H-, 4H-, and 6H-SiC) 81
More recently, Zollner and Hilifker [14] have measured the e(E) spectra of 6H-
SiC from 0.72 to 6.6 eV using rotating-analyzer ellipsometer. The sample was ob-
tained commercially from Cree Research. It was not intentionally doped and single-
side polished (Si-terminated). The sample was measured as received without surface
preparation. The accuracy for ~ was reported to be 0.01.
The optical constants in the UV-soft X-ray region (10.2-S25 eV) of SiC were
reported by Windt et al. [30]. The samples used by them were grown by CVD. The
Si L absorption edge was visible in the extinction coefficient near 100 eV. The dip in
the n dispersion near 21 eV was also found.
Tables A6-4 and A6-5 list the room-temperature values of E=el+i~, n*=n+ik, a,
and R for 6H-SiC for EJ.c and Ellc, respectively. A set of the optical constants for
ESO.l2 eV for El.c (Eg).22 eV for Ellc) were calculated using the reststrahlen
parameters in Ref. [18]. [Note that in Table III of Ref. [18], the values of rJoo/ (not
r j) were listed.] The k (a) values in the region 0.14SES2.3 eV (0.24SES2.4 eV) for
El.c (Ellc) were taken from Ellis and Moss [26] (n=1.11xl0 17 cm·'). Some optical
constants for 0.14SES2.3 eV for El.c were taken from Refs. [18] and [29], while
those for 0.24SES2.4 eV for Ellc were taken from Refs. [15] and [18]. A complete
set of the optical constants in the region 2.5SES9.5 eV for El.c were taken from Lo-
gothetidis and Petalas [29], and those above 2.5 eV for Ellc were taken from Ref.
[1S]. The optical constants above 10.2 eV for El.c were taken from Windt et al.
[30].
The (£1' ~, (n, k), a, and R values in Tables A6-4 and A6-5 are graphed in Figs.
A6-S-A6-8, respectively. The solid and dashed lines represent the data for El.c and
Ellc, respectively.
REFERENCES
1. P. K!1ckell, B. Wenzien, and F. Bechstedt, Phys. Rev. B 50, 10761 (1994).
2. C. H. Park, B.-H. Cheng, K.-H. Lee, and K. J. Chang, Phys. Rev. B 49, 4485
(1994).
3. B. Wenzien, P. K!1ckell, F. Bechstedt, and G. Gappellini, Phys. Rev. B 52,
10897 (199S).
4. Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, edit-
ed by K.-H. Hellwege and O. Madelung, Landolt-Bomstein, New Series,
Group III, Vol. 17, Pt. a (Springer, Berlin, 1982).
5. W. J. Choyke, D. R. Hamilton, and L. Patrick, Phys. Rev. 133, A1163 (1964).
6. L. Patrick, D. R. Hamilton, and W. J. Choyke, Phys. Rev. 143,526 (1966).
7. W. R. L. Lambrecht, B. Segall, M. Yoganathan, W. Suttrop, R. P. Devaty, W. J.
Choyke, J. A. Edmond, J. A. Powell, and M. Alouani, Phys. Rev. B SO, 10722
(1994).
8. J. A. Powell, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 62, 341 (1972).
9. P. T. B. Shaffer, Appl. Opt. 10, 1034 (1971).
82 GROUP-IV SEMICONDUcrORS
25r-r-~~~~~~~~~
20 6H-SiC
15
10
5
o Figure A6·5 el(E) and e2(E)
spectra for 6H-SiC at 300 K.
-5 E..Le
Elle
-100
2 4 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
A6 HEXAGONAL SILICON CARBIDE (2H-, 4H-, and 6H-SiC) 83
6H-SiC
4
3
r:::
2 Ele
Elle
1
k
",
o 2 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure A6·6 n(E) and k(E) spectra for 6H-SiC at 300 K.
107 6H-SiC
106
105
-.
'I 104
--
E
U
~
103
102
10 1
Ele
EUe
0.7
0.6 6H-SiC
Ele
0.5 Elle
a: 0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1 0 2 4 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure A6-8 R(E) spectra for 6H-SiC at 300 K.
91
92 GROUP-IV SEMICONDUCTORS
400
200
100
"I
E
~
~ 50
20~-+--~---+----~----~--+-~
roL--0~~--~O'-6---l~--~2-----4~-+6~
A (,.an)
Figure A7-l Absorption in n-type lSR-SiC (n-9xlO 17 em-3) for EJ.c (Kll ) and E " c (K33 ) at
300 K. (From Ellis and Moss [6].)
10001----+---1----+-1-----1-----4-----1----
'I
E
-
roOII-----~-+~+4----+_---__+----~~----+_----~
o
6 12 18
A (/Lm)
Figure A7-2 Long-wavelength absorption in n-type lSR-SiC (n-3_06xlO 17 em-3) for El.c
(Kll ) and E II c (K 33 ) at 300 K. (From Ellis and Moss [6].)
A7 RHOMBOHEDRAL SILICON CARBIDE (15R-SiC) 93
Reflectance measurements have been carried out on 15R-SiC in the 3-13-eV re-
gion by Wheeler [1] and in the 4-9.5-eV region by Lambrecht et al. [2] (see Fig.
A6-2). These authors, however, did not perform KK analysis to obtain a set of the
optical constants (n, k) or (e1 , ~). No SE data has also been reported so far on 15R-
SiC. Thus, no (e1, ~ or (n, k) data are available in the interband transition region of
15R-SiC. Modulation spectroscopies, such as wavelength-modulated absorption [7]
and ER [8], have been carried out to determine the CP energies in some polytypes of
rhombohedral SiC (15R-, 21R-, and 27R-SiC).
Table A7-1 lists the e 1, n, and R [=(n-V/(n+l)2] values for 15R-SiC. They were
obtained from Shaffer [4]. These data yield the high-frequency dielectric constants
e~=6.53 for El.c and 6.70 for E " c, in good agreement with those obtained by Pik-
htin et al. [3].
REFERENCES
1. B. E. Wheeler, Solid State Commun. 4,173 (1966).
2. W. R. L. Lambrecht, B. Segall, M. Yoganathan, W. Suttrop, R. P. Devaty, W. J.
Choyke, J. A. Edmond, J. A. Powell, and M. Alouani, Phys. Rev. B 50, 10722
(1994).
3. A. N. Pikhtin, V. T. Prokopenko, V. S. Rondarev, and A. D. Yas'kov, Opt.
Spectrosc. 43,420 (1977).
4. P. T. B. Shaffer, Appl. Opt. 10, 1034 (1971).
5. E. Biedermann, Solid State Commun. 3, 343 (1965).
6. B. Ellis and T. S. Moss, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 299, 393 (1967).
7. V. 1. Gavrilenko, 1. S. Gorban', V. G. Litovchenko, and A. S. Skirda, Sov. Phys.
Semicond. 16, 109 (1982).
8. R. G. Humphreys, D. Bimberg, and W. J. Choyke, Solid State Commun. 39,
163 (1981).
A8 SILICON-GERMANIUM ALLOY
(Slpe1_X )
The lattice mismatch between Si and Ge is about 4.2%. We have seen significant
development in the growth of high-quality SixGe1.)Si heterostructures [1]. These
heterostructures have inspired new research in Si-based band-engineering physics
and device technology.
10.--;,-------,------,
?o
"--
-4
Q)
t: -6
UJ
-8
-10
-12
-"
-16
Figure AS-! Electronic energy-band structures for Si, SixGe 1_x (x=O.5), and Ge as calculated
within aCPA-VCA. (From Krishnamurthy etal. (2].)
94
A8 SILICON-GERMANIUM ALLOY (SixGel.J 9S
calculated within a CPA-VCA by Krishnamurthy et al. [2]. Figure AS-2 also shows
the composition dependence of some CP energies and lowest-indirect-gap energy in
SixGe1•x alloy determined from ER [3] and optical absorption measurements [4].
The conduction-band ordering at the r point of Ge is quite different from that of
Si. In Si the lowest-lying r conduction band is p-like r 1S (r6', rs'); however in Ge
the s-like r 2 • (r7') band is the lowest conduction band. The corresponding lowest
direct gap is Eo' for Si and Eo for Ge (see Fig. AS-I). From Fig. AS-2, we can expect
the Eo-Eo' (r2 .-r1S) crossing at x-o.75. The lowest indirect gap (EglD) also changes
from EgL to E/
at x-o.l5. No or very weak x dependence has been observed about
the Eo' (Eo'+~') and E2 CP energies [3].
5.0
eV Si xGe 1-x
4.6 0
[, ., ~
4.2
3.8
I
14
fo+t1'o
00'" IA
II ~
""?,: o~ I::?"
3D
...... 2.6
E,+t1, ;- 81 ~
21
~V
~f, -:;;;
W
fo+t1 o 1/ Figure A8·2 Composition dependence of some
V
1.8 CP energies and lowest-indirect-gap energy in
1.4
/ SixGel.x alloy determined from ER [3] and opti-
cal absorption measurements [4] at room tem-
1.0
~ E ID
g~ ---
perature.
11f"
0.6 V I
o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1D
x
Optical absorption in the reststrahlen region of SixGe l _x alloy has been measured
by several authors [5-71_ The measured spectra are rather complex due to a number
of two- and single-phonon bands. The absorption coefficient is weak for the whole
composition range, with the peak value of a-30 cm-I • Figure A8-3 shows, as an ex-
ample, the IR absorption spectra for SixGe l _x alloy (0$x~1.0) as measured by Braun-
stein [51. The samples used in this study were selected for homogeneity of composi-
tion and low free-carrier concentration. Nevertheless, most of the spectra for
0.22$x~0.81 showed a strong background absorption due to free carriers. Bulk sin-
gle crystals were used in the x range 0 to 20% and 90 to 100%; the intermediate
compositions were coarse polycrystals. For several at.% Si in Ge or vice versa, the
general features of the spectra are similar to the lattice absorption spectra of the
dominant constituent, except for slight changes in the positions and shapes of the
bands. Aside from the Ge- and Si-like bands present in the alloy, new bands starting
at 214 and 508 cm- I are formed at the Ge and Si ends of the alloy, respectively. Both
of these bands grow in intensity and shift slightly with position as the Ge and Si
content are increased.
Braunstein [81 reported free-hole absorption in p-type bulk samples of various
~ ~S~II
5°D.,·SI 5 0 b : ] 2 .SI, .
10 10
5 5 0.5
I I 0.1 '-'--'-'-'-'-'--'-'-&....J
0
64".
'l,~~;]
..:- 50 2.5'10 SI 1 SI]
50 0 0 E :
I 100
10
~ 5
10
5 0.5 V,\ n '
f- I I 0.1
':t 'V\
~ ;~~'Sll
zlOO
~50~".SI 50 68'10 SI
100G
II- 10 10
~ 5 5 0.5 1\
u
I I 0.1
~IOO 10,--.....--.---.----.,.--.--...,
t SI 0
505:]1.5'1
50 76"1. sl
100B
: ~SII\
~ 10 10
::l 5 5 0.5
IggE;J2'1o
-' I
10
SI Iggol.,.SI
10
I~~
5 5 0.5~
I I 0.1
200 600 1000 200 600 1000 200 600 1000
WAVE NUMBER (CM-II
Figure AS-3 IR absorption spectra for SixGel.x alloy (O~1.0). (From Braunstein [5].)
A8 SILICON-GERMANIUM ALLOY (Si.Ge 1_.) 97
with
no(x) = 4.01-0.S1x+0.22x2 (AS.4a)
~(x) =0.216- 0.211x + 0.OS9X2 (AS.4b)
Reflectance measurements on bulk and LPE samples of Si.Ge 1_. (0::;X::;1.0) have
been performed by Schmidt [11] in the spectral range 1 to 13 eV at room tempera-
ture and in the range 1 to 6 eV at 90 K. He reported not only the R(E) spectra but
also the e(E) data in graphical form. The thickness of surface oxides was ellip-
so metrically estimated to be in the range 2-4 nm. However, no correction was made
for the oxide overlayers. His data were discussed and tested against recent ellisp-
sometric results by Humlfcek et at. [12].
SE has been used to study optical properties of Si.Ge 1_. alloy by Humlfcek et at.
[13]. The samples studied were: (i) polycrystalline with typical grain diameters of
about 1 mm and (ii) LEP-grown epilayers of several micrometers thick. Accurate
values of the El CP energies were obtained by performing an SCP analysis. Subse-
quent data by Jellison et at. [14], however, indicated that the samples used by
Humlfcek et at. [13] may have had a residual oxide or roughness overlayer. Eight
samples were used by Jellison et at., covering the entire composition range of
Si.Ge 1_. alloy. They were grown using a conventional CVD on Ge substrates (x=0.11,
0.20, O.2S, and O.4S) and on Si substrates (x=0.47, 0.65, 0.S5, and 0.9S). The effects
of surface overlayer were mathematically removed. The optical constants in the
1.476-5.165-eV region were presented both in graphical and tabular forms. These
data will form a good data base for optical studies of Si.Ge 1.JSi(Ge) layered struc-
tures. We reproduce in Fig_ AS-4 the spectral dependence of (e 1, ~) measured by
Jellison et at. [14]- The temperature dependence of the optical constants for Si.Ge 1_.
alloy has also been investigated using SE by HumHcek et at. [12,15].
Si.Ge 1_. alloy in the form of thin, strained, epitaxial layer is under investigation for
applications as high speed heterojunction bipolar transistors and multi-quantum-well
devices_ Pickering and Carline [16] studied the dielectric-function spectra for
strained and unstrained Si.Ge 1_. alloys with x-O_SO and 0_S7 using SE. The effect of
strain was shown to cause a modification of the spectra in the El CP region, result-
98 GROUP-IV SEMICONDUCTORS
Ge
- c-Si
= ~~
30 40 - - 98
30
oS 20 20 - 47
10 10
01 4 5 01 2 4 5
Energy (eV) Energy (eV)
Figure A8-4 £I(E) and £2(E) spectra for Si.Gel-% alloy. The numbers indicate the %Si. (From
Jellison et al. [14].)
ing in a decrease in the refractive index at 1.96 eV, amounting to 0.06 at x=0.78. The
measured data were presented in both graphical and tabular forms.
Ordering in elemental semiconductor alloys has been observed by many workers
[1]. Tsang et al. [17] studied the compositionally-ordered Sio.sGIlo.s alloys grown by
MBE at low temperatures using RS and SE. The description of the SE £(E) results in
terms of the EI CP showed that the ordering does not produce large change in the
dielectric response of such ordered alloys.
Tables A8-1a-A8-lf list the room-temperature values of £=£I+i~, n*=n+ik, a,
and R for SizGel-x alloy with x=O.l1, 0.20, 0.28, 0.48, 0.65, and 0.85, respectively.
The data for 1.476S;ES;5.165 eV were taken from Jellison et al. [14] and those for
ES;1.4 eV (£1' n, and R) were from Humlf~ek et al. [10] [Eq. (A8.3)].
REFERENCES
1. See, for example, V. P. Kesan, and S. S. Iyer, in Molecular Beam Epitaxy-Ap-
plications to Key Materials, edited by R. F. C. Farrow (Noyes, Park Ridge,
1995), p. 453.
2. S. Krishnamurthy, A. Sher, and A.-B. Chen, Phys. Rev. B 33,1026 (1986).
3. J. S. Kline, F. H. Pollak, and M. Cardona, Helv. Phys. Acta 41, 968 (1968).
4. R. Braunstein, A. R. Moore, and F. Herman, Phys. Rev. 109,695 (1958).
5. R. Braunstein, Phys. Rev. 130,879 (1963).
6. A. E. Cosand and W. G. Spitzer, J. Appl. Phys. 42, 5241 (1971).
7. S. C. Shen and M. Cardona, Solid State Commun. 36; 327 (1980).
8. R. Braunstein, Phys. Rev. 130,869 (1963).
9. J. Humlf~ek, F. Luke~, and E. Schmidt, in Handbook of Optical Constants of
Solids ll, edited by E. D. Palik (Academic, Orlando, 1991), p. 607.
A8 SILICON-GERMANIUM ALLOY (SixGel_x) 99
113
114 GROUP-IV SEMICONDUCTORS
pirical interpolation scheme, Soref [2] also obtained a red shift of the band-gap en-
ergy in relaxed Sil.x.yGexCy alloy with yS11 %. We reproduce in Fig. A9-1 his ob-
tained result, together with the constant lattice-constant contours of this alloy system
[2]. In the case of Ge, substitutional C decreased the lattice constant but increased
the band-gap energy ([4], see Fig. A9-3 below). These are known simply to be due
to the bulk alloy effect. We can, thus, conclude that the substitutional C plays a dif-
ferent role between in Si and Ge.
Kissinger et al. [11,12] reported SE and ER results on the Eo', E 1, and E2 CP ener-
gies in strained Sil.xCx layers grown pseudomorphically on Si(100) by MBE. The Eo'
and E2 gaps decreased with increasing C content x (x<O.02), while the EI gap in-
creased in energy, as depicted in Fig. A9-2 [12]. Zollner et al. [13] obtained the es-
sentially same results as those measured by Kissinger et al. [11 ,12]. Note that the CP
energies in heteroepitaxial alloy film are dependent not only on its alloy composi-
tion, but also on the strength of built-in strain present in such heteroepitaxial film.
Therefore, Zollner [14] have performed theoretical calculation using established
deformation-potential theory and found that the experimental shift of the EI gap has
the expected sign and magnitude, but the lack of similar shifts of the Eo' and E2 gaps
is puzzling and needs further study.
Recently, Lee et al. [15] have used SE to study optical properties of heteroepi-
taxial Sil.xCx and Sio.924.xGeo.076C. layers grown on Si(lOO) (see Fig. A9-4 below). The
EI gap in Sil.xCx is found to decrease at x=O.7% and increase at 1.4%, in contrast
with the monotonous increase of the ER data by Kissinger et al. (Fig. A9-2). Thus,
there is some ambiguity about the CP energies in Sil.xCx alloy.
1 3 0 0 . . - - - - - - - - -n
Si (b)
1200
silicon gap
>:
! 1100
Co
I'll
.g
c:
1000
,
1l \
900
Ge 800~~~~~~~~~~
o 2 4 6 8 10 12
carbon content, y (percent)
Figure A9-1 (a) Lattice parameter of Sil.x.yGexCr Altitude is a lattice parameter in nm. (b)
Band gap of unstrained Sil .•.yGe,Cr Altitude is band gap in e V. (From Soref [2].)
A9 CARBON-INCORPORATED ALLOYS (Sil.xC.. Sil ...,GexC" etc.) 115
4.25
__ _ -.-.--0-_._.
- - - . - ----0::"'"
-••• -:w
Ea (SE)
4.2
I
>- E, (ER) •
j 3.45~.--____------.---~----~------~
Figure A9-2 CP energies
-
3.4 E (SE)
1 ........... .. obtained by SE (T=300 K)
........... ••• a_ ••••••••• -
and ER (T=80 K) for strained
3.35 Sil.xCx layer. (From Kissinger
'-__ E' (ER) et al. [12]).
----~--:.-- -.---..J.
3.3~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~
.
of'1000
~
E
.8-
c:
0
100
x=O.01 (
1.::/
(X=O.02 fx=o.03 .
....
0.
0 10
II)
.0
«
«i
()
~
0.
0 0.1
~,,~I Figure A9-3 Optical absorpti-
on coefficient a for Sil ..Cx with
x=0.01,0.02, and 0.03 at 300 K
compared with that of bulk Ge.
(From Kolodzey et al. [4].)
for Gel_xCx as measured by Kolodzey et al. [4]. The a(E) data reported by Orner et al.
[16] for (Si,Ge,Sn,C) and Sil_x_pexCy alloys were in the lO-lOs-cm-1 range.
The pseudodielectric-function spectra of C-incorporated alloys were reported by
Kissinger et al. [11], Lee et al. [15], Krishnamurthy et al. [18], Orner et al. [19],
Junge et al. [20], and Yang et al. [21]. We reproduce in Fig. A9-4 the results ob-
tained by Lee et al. [15]. The corresponding derivative spectra d2e/dE showed that
for Sio.924_xGeo.o76CjSi the EI gap increases and the E2 gap decreases as C compensa-
tion increases. The EI CP amplitude was also found to be the largest for the lattice-
matched x=0.9% sample due to strain compensation.
40
(b) SiO.924-xGeO.076Cx 0.9 %
30
e20
~ 60 0%
V (al Si C
t· • •
1.4%
C 40 0%
.2
....,•
U 30
c 0.7% .g
:s ti
u. 20
0
0
'90
"2
'C £.
10
l! '"•
i
0
E 1f-10
-10 •
GI
en
0.. -20 -20
1.6 2 2.6 3 3.6 4
Energy (eV) 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Figure A9-4 SE (£\> £2) spectra for (a) Sil_xC. and (b) Sio.924-.GeO.076C. alloys measured at 300
K. (From Lee et al. [15].)
REFERENCES
1. R. A. Soref, Proc. IEEE 81,1687 (1993).
2. R. A. Soref, 1. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14, 913 (1996).
3. R. I. Scace and G. A. Slack, 1. Chem.Phys. 30, 1551 (1959).
4. J. Kolodzey, P. A. O'Neil, S. Zhang, B. A. Orner, K. Roe, K. M. Unruh, C. P.
Swann, M. M. Waite, and S. I. Shah, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67,1865 (1995).
5. A. A. Demkov and O. F. Sankey, Phys. Rev. B 48, 2207 (1993).
6. J. Gryko and O. F. Sankey, Phys. Rev. B 51,7295 (1995).
7. J. Xie, K. Zhang, and X. Xie, 1. Appl. Phys. 77, 3868 (1995).
A9 CARBON-INCORPORATED ALLOYS (Sil_.C.. Sil_._yGe.Cy, etc.) 117
18.0 r----""T----:rroo::;;::-.------.
12.0
6.0
~ 0.0
~
c:
~-6.0
w
-12.0 c-BN
-18.0
-24.0 tL:-~A;::-lr~-A~-+.--;-)=---:::---='
X U,K E r
Figure BI·I Electronic energy-band structure of c-BN as calculated within the total-energy
pseudopotential method employing a local-density approximation. (From Wentzcovitch et
at. [4].)
B 1 CUBIC BORON NITRIDE (c-BN) 121
transmittance measurements [9] suggest the presence of CPs at -9.5, 11.5, 13.5, and
17 eV. The fundamental absorption edge was also determined to occur at 6.1±o.2 eV
[9].
REFERENCES
o
Photon energy (eV)
Figure 81·2 £,(E) and ~(E) spectra for c-BN at 300 K.
o 4
Photon energy (eV)
Figure 81·3 neE) and k(E) spectra for c-BN at 300 K.
124 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
c-BN
0.25
c-BN
a:
0.20
0.15
o 4 8 12 16 20
Photon energy (eV)
Figure BI-S R(E) spectrum for c-BN at 300 K.
Bl CUBIC BORON NITRIDE (c-BN) 125
KH Ar ML A
WAVE VECTOR
127
128 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
REFERENCES
1. R. S. Pease. Acta Crystallogr. 5.536 (1952).
2. Y.-N. Xu and W. Y. Ching. Phys. Rev. B 44.7787 (1991).
3. U. BUchner. Phys. Status Solidi B 81. 227 (1977).
4. M. J. Rand and J. F. Roberts. 1. Electrochem. Soc.llS. 423 (1968).
5. W. Baronian. Mater. Res. Bull. 7.119 (1972).
6. M. R. Vilanove. C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. B 271.1101 (1971).
7. C. Tarrio and S. E. Schnatterly. Phys. Rev. B 40. 7852 (1989).
8. A. Catellani. M. Postemak. A. Baldereschi. and A. J. Freeman. Phys. Rev. B 36.
6105 (1987).
9. R. Geick. C. H. Perry. and G. Rupprecht. Phys. Rev. 146. 543 (1966).
10. A. J. Gatesman. R. H. Giles. and J. Waldman. 1. Appl. Phys. 73. 3962 (1993).
11. A. J. Noreika and M. H. Francombe. 1. Vac. Sci. Technol. 6. 722 (1969).
12. A. Zunger and A. Katzir. Phys. Rev. B 13.5560 (1976).
13. E. Franke. H. Neumann. M. Schubert. T. E. Tiwald, J. A. Woollam, and J.
Hahn. Appl. Phys. Lett. 70,1668 (1997).
14. M. Schubert. B. Rheinlander, J. Hahn, M. ROder. and F. Richter. Appl. Phys.
Lett. 70. 1819 (1997).
15. E. Franke. M. Schubert. H. Neumann, T. E. Tiwald. D. W. Thompson. J. A.
Woollam. J. Hahn, and F. Richter. 1. Appl. Phys. 82. 2906 (1997).
16. O. Stenzel. J. Hahn. M. ROder, A. Ehrlich, S. Prause. and F. Richter, Phys.
Status Solidi A 158.281 (1996).
25r-II-.nn.----.--~~
20
15 h-BN
.... 10
'" 5
o
-5~~~~~~~
30r-
25
20 -Elc
-----EI/c
: 15
10
5
%~~5~7~9~--~2~0~~4~0~
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B2-2 £.(E) and Ez(E) spectra for h-BN at 300 K.
130 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
5
4
3
c
2
1
g
-Elc
3 -----Ellc
.::t:.
2
1
°3 5 7 9 20 40
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B2·3 n(E) and k(E) spectra for h-BN at 300 K.
107
h-BN
106
105
I" 104
-
E
()
103 Elc
~ Ellc
102
10 1
10°
10-1
10-2 10-1 100 10 1
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B2·4 OO,E) spectrum for h-BN at 300 K.
B HEXAGONAL BORON NITRIDE (h-BN) 131
h-BN
0.5 -Elc
•.... Ell c
0.4 '.
.",\
,,,'..
a: '." , ,," ,,
0.3 ... . , ,,, ,,,
... ..
,, ,
, , ,, ,
,,,
0.2 ,
,,
,
.'
,,
,,
,
0.1
03 5 7 9 20
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B2-5 R(E) spectrum for h-BN at 300 K
6.0
~ 0.0
>-
(,!)
a:
w
Z-6.0
w
BP
-12.0
r"
-18.0 L
A r Ll X U,K E r
Figure B3-1 Electronic energy-band structure of BP as calculated within the total-energy
pseudopotential method employing a local-density approximation. (From Wentzcovitch et
al. [1].)
137
138 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
indirect- and direct-gap energies for BP. Huang-Ching's result [3] yielded the low-
est conduction state at L; however, the majority of the theoretical calculations re-
sulted at X or L\.iD' Recent calculations [1,5,6] suggest that the lowest r conduction
state is at r ls (p like), not at r 1 (s like).
Experimentally, an indirect absorption edge of 2.0 eV was obtained from a
square-root plot of the absorption coefficients [7,8] (see Fig. B3-3 below). Peaks and
shoulder at 5,6.9, and 8.0 eV in the reflectivity spectrum ofBP were found (see Fig.
B3-2 below) and interpreted as due to transitions at r, X, and L, respectively [7].
16
(a)
~ 14
~
§
...
12
~
10
12
--
orb
units 1\
(b)
Figure B3·2 (a) Room-
1\
10
temperature IR reflectivity of
/" BP. (From Gielisse et al.
8
/" V ........... [10].) (b) Room-temperature
6
1\ ........ / UV reflectivity of BP. (From
Q::
r-- Wang et al. [7].)
4
o
4 6 8 m n U ffi ~~~
flf,,_
grown surface ofBP in the wavelength range of 0.05-0.6 J.UI1 [Fig. B3-2 (b)].
Optical transmittance studies have been performed on BP by several authors
[7,8,11]. The values of the extinction coefficient k obtained by these authors were
6.6xl0-4-6.2xl0-s in the wavelength range 0.422 to 0.710 J.UI1 [12]. Figure B3-3 re-
produces a plot of a.'fJ. vs. E measured by Archer et al. [8]; •
REFERENCES
1. R. M. Wentzcovitch, K. J. Chang. and M. L. Cohen. Phys. Rev. B 34. 1071
(1986).
2. L. A. Hemstreet. Jr. and C. Y. Fong. Phys. Rev. B 6.1464 (1972).
3. M.-Z. Huang and W. Y. Ching. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 46.977 (1985).
4. B. N. Onwuagba. Solid State Commun. 89. 289 (1994).
5. P. Rodriguez-Hernandez. M. Gonzalez-Diaz. and A. Munoz. Phys. Rev. B 51.
14705 (1995).
140 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
I
13
I
12
1
/
10
9 /
8
I
"'01to 6
J
5
/
4 l'
'/
3
I
2
I
o
1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0
hv(eVI-
Figure B3·3 oJ...E)l12 VS. E plots for BP measured at 300 K. (From Archer et al. [8].)
B4 BORON ARSENIDE
(BAs)
5.0 5.0
:;
~
2.0 2.0
r
(!)
a::
w
z
w
-1.0 -1.0
-4.0 -4.0
BAs
X 3V -7.0
W L r x u r
Figure B4-1 Electronic energy-band structure of BAs as calculated with a first-principle
orthogonaJized-plane-wave method. (From Stukel [2].)
141
142 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
corresponding indirect gap, rlS~~in' is 1.6 e V. The next lowest minimum occurs at
L (l.:J) where r1S~l.:J is 2.81 eV. The lowest direct gap, r1S~r1S' is 3.56 eV.
Experimentally, Ku [3) made transmittance measurements at room temperature on
powdered samples and estimated an optical gap of 1.46 eV.
REFERENCES
1. A. J. Perri, S. La Placa, and B. Post,Acta Cryst. 11,310 (1958).
2. D. J. Stukel, Phys. Rev. B 1,3458 (1970).
3. S. M. Ku, J. Electrochem. Soc. 113,813 (1966).
4. T. L. Chu and A. E. Hyslop, 1. Electrochem. Soc. 121,412 (1974).
85 ALUMINUM NITRIDE
(AIN)
143
144 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
__ 6
>Q)
--
W2
4
-6
-B~ ____ ~ __ ~ ____ ~ __ ~ ______ ~ __ ~ ______ ~
A R L U M E r fl A 5 H P K r
Figure B5·1 Electronic energy-band structure of AlN as calculated with a nonrelativistic
nonlocal pseudopotential method. (From Jones and Lettington [5].)
eV with a maximum at 13.8 eV, as well as the shoulder at 17.5 eV. Yamashita et at.
[7] also found peaks in the R(E) spectrum at -6.2 and 7.5-7.8 eV. Loughin and
French [9], however, suggested that the 7.5-7.8-eV peaks are observed for the aque-
ously polished specimen, but not for the nonaqueously polished, single-crystalline
specimen. Because hydrolysis of AIN occurs easily, forming ammonia and bohmite,
they concluded that the best optical results can be obtained on nonaqueously pol-
ished specimens. Loughin et at. [3,9] observed several CP structures in the vacuum-
UV e(E) spectrum of the nonaqueously polished sample and identified them to tran-
sitions as N 2p~A13s (8.7 eV), Al=N~Al3p (14 eV), and N 2p~A13d (33 eV).
Recent theoretical studies [10-12] have shown that in the zinc-blende structure,
AIN will be an indirect gap (['~X, 3.5-5.1 eV) semiconductor while GaN will have
a direct gap of 3.1-3.4 e V at [' as the lowest energy gap. The latter is in good
agreement with recent absorption experiments on cubic GaN (3.2-3.3 eV, see Ref.
[11]). No experimental data has, however, been reported on cubic, zinc-blende AIN.
[13,15,16] and polycrystalline AIN [14]. IR optical properties in the reststrahlen re-
gion of epitaxial AIN film deposited on (OOOl)-oriented 6H-SiC substrate has also
been reported [17].
The static and high-frequency dielectric constants determined from unpolarized
light by Akasaki and Hashinoto [14] were e,=8.50 and e~=4.68, respectively, while
those by Collins et al. [13] were e,=9.14 and e~=4.84, respectively. Polarization
measurements by Collins et al. [13] revealed a sharp minimum in the reststrahlen
band for Ell c at -111.0 meV (-1376 cm-I ); Otherwise the reflectivity curves were
identical for both polarizations. The reflectivity minimum at -111.0 me V was tenta-
tively assigned to be due to an unspecified two-phonon process resulting from inter-
ference between two components of the complex dielectric susceptibility of the
crystal [13].
The refractive indices of AIN in the transparent region for both El.c and E I c
have been measured by Past:nl~ et al. [18,19]. The samples used were prepared by
direct reaction of aluminum vapor with nitrogen at temperatures of 1900 to 2000°C.
The c axis was in the crystal plane and parallel to the longer deltoid edge. The
measured data clearly showed the birefringence of l1n=ne(E II c)-no(El.c)>O. At
visible wavelengths, an n value of 2.1-2.3 is generally accepted [18,19], although
thin AIN films often give lower values (see Ref. [9]). More recently, Tang et al. [20]
have used an optical waveguide technique to determine the n dispersion in
MOCVD-grown AIN on sapphire substrate for El.c in the wavelength range be-
tween 632.8 and 488.0 nm.
Optical absorption in AIN has been measured for El.c by Yim et al. [21] and
Slack and McNelly [22] and both for El.c and E II c by Past:nl~ and Roskovcova
[23]. We can see that the absorption coefficients on the low energy side of the band
edge vary largely from sample to sample [21-3]. The samples studied by Slack and
McNelly [22] show the lowest overall impurity absorption of any of the single or
polycrystalline samples yet studied. The two features of the extrinsic absorption,
which were the broad band extending from 6x103~~.3x104 cm- I and the rather
sharp peak at E-2.3x104cm-1 or 2.85 eV, were found from these samples [22] and
they were attributed to nitrogen vacancies (6x103~~.3x104 cm-I ) and oxygen
(E-2.3x104 cm-I ), respectively [24].
Optical properties in the interband transition region of AIN have been studied by
Loughin et al. [3,9] and Guo et al. [25] from measurements of the fundamental re-
flectivity spectra. We reproduce in Fig. B5-2 the complex dielectric function,
e(E)=el(E)+i~(E), for AIN with El.c obtained from the KK analysis of the reflec-
tance data [3]. An AIN single crystal used was grown by a modified Bridgman tech-
nique [22,24]. We note that their obtained data show strong absorption (-2x10 s cm-I ,
see Ref. [9]) at -5 eV, i.e., in the subband-gap region. The n (e l ) data in the trans-
parent region are also found to be much larger than those obtained by PastrMk and
Roskovcova [18]. Loughin et al., however, mentioned neither reason for these nor
accuracy of their measurement. Guo et al_ [25] reported the ~(E) spectrum in the
energy range from 6 to 120 e V obtained form the KK analysis of the reflectance
146 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
(8)
1 (b)
2
--,-
to)
" ,,",,,
,. \/ '..\rI:..:,.:"-:,,,_ _ _...c::.-:::.:--~-.=:;--~-:::.--::':-:::'-:::--"""-:::':--=-""'--------=
-2
-6
4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36
Energy (eV)
Figure B5-2 (a) f.2(E) and (b) f. 1(E) spectra for AlN with EJ.c obtained from the KK analy-
sis of the reflectance data. The dashed lines correspond to those obtained from the first prin-
ciples. (From Loughin et at. [3].)
data. They found four CPs peaking at 7.6,8.9,13.0, and 14.6 eV.
Tables BS-1 and BS-2 list the 300-K values for the optical constants of AIN with
E.ic and E I c, respectively. A set of the optical constants in the IR region for El.c
(ES;l.O eV) were calculated from the reststrahlen parameters reported by Collins et
at. [13]. Since the reststrahlen reflectivity was practically the same for both polari-
zations [13], only the optical constants for El.c were listed in Table BS-l. The re-
fractive-index values in the transparent region for both El.c and E I c were taken
from Pastrilak et at. [18]. The a(E) values for El.c were taken from Pastrilak and
Roskovcova [23] and Vim et at. [21] and those for E II c from Pastrnak and
Roskovcova [23].
The (1:.1, ~), (n, k), a, and R values in Tables BS-1 and BS-2 are plotted in Figs.
BS-3-BS-6, respectively. The solid and dashed lines represent the data for El.c and
E I c, respectively.
B5 ALUMINUM NITRIDE (AlN) 147
REFERENCES
1. Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, edit-
ed by K.-H. Hellwege and O. Madelung, Landolt-Bomstein, New Series,
Group III, Vol. 17, Pt. a (Springer, Berlin, 1982).
2. S. N. Mohammad, A. A. Salvador, and H. Mork~, Proc. IEEE 83, 1306
(1995).
3. S. Loughin, R. H. French, W. Y. Ching, Y. N. Xu, and G. A. Slack, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 63, 1182 (1993), and references cited therein.
4. A. Rubio, J. L. Corkill, M. L. Cohen, E. L. Shirley, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev.
B 48, 11810 (1993).
5. D. Jones and A. H. Lettington, Solid State Commun. 11,701 (1972).
6. P. B. Perry and R. F. Rutz,Appl. Phys. Lett. 33, 319 (1978).
7. H. Yamashita, K. Fukui, S. Misawa, and S. Yoshida, J. Appl. Phys. 50, 896
(1979).
8. V. V. Michailin, V. E. Oranovskii, S. Pacesova, J. PastrMk, and A. S. Salama-
tOY, Phys. Status Solidi B 55, K51 (1973).
9. S. Loughin and R. H. French, in Properties of Group III Nitrides, EMIS Da-
tareviews Series No. 11, edited by J. H. Edgar (INSPEC (lEE), London, 1994),
p. 175.
10. W. R. L. Lambrecht and B. Segall, Phys. Rev. B 43, 7070 (1991).
11. A. Rubio, J. L. Corkill, M. L. Cohen, E. L. Shirlehy, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev.
B 48, 11810 (1993).
12. W. J. Fan, M. F. Li, T. C. Chong, and J. B. Xia, J. Appl. Phys. 79,188 (1996).
13. A. T. Collins, E. C. Lightowlers, and P. J. Dean, Phys. Rev. 158, 833 (1967).
14. I. Akasaki and M. Hashimoto, Solid State Commun. 5, 851 (1967).
15. J. Pastrnak and B. Hejda, Phys. Status Solidi 35,941 (1969).
16. J. Pastrilak and B. Hejda, Phys. Status Solidi 35, 953 (1969).
17. P. Wisniewski, W. Knap, J. P. Malzac, J. Camassel, M. D. Bremser, R. F.
Davis, and T. Suski, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73,1760 (1998).
18. J. Pastrilak and L. Roskovcova, Phys. Status Solidi 14, K5 (1966).
19. L. Roskovcova, J. Pastrilak, and R. Babu§kova, Phys. Status Solidi 20, K29
(1967).
20. X. Tang, Y. Yuan, K. Wongchotigul, and M. G. Spencer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70,
3206 (1997).
21. W. M. Yim, E. J. Stofko, P. J. Zanzucchi, J.1. Pankove, M. Ettenberg, and S. L.
Gilbert, J. Appl. Phys. 44,292 (1973).
22. G. A. Slack and T. F. McNelly, J. Cryst. Growth 42,560 (1977).
23. J. Pastrilak and L. Roskovcova, Phys. Status Solidi 26,591 (1968).
24. G. A. Slack and T. F. McNelly, J. Cryst. Growth 34,263 (1976).
25. Q. Guo, M. Nishio, H. Ogawa, and A. Yoshida, Phys. Rev. B 55, R15987
(1997).
148 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
100 8 AIN
10 50 6 ~
---------_ .. -_ ..
1//
........ -'
4
£2 Figure B5-3 E1 (E) and
2 _ Elc (Xl00), E2(E) spectra for AIN at
-50 ----- Ell c ,'" 300K.
o~--~--~~--~
234 6
Photon energy (eV)
10 3
8
2
~ n
------------_ .. -..........
"
6
~
AIN
I::
Figure B5·4 n(E) and k
k(E) spectra for AIN at 1 (X200)
300K.
2 - Elc
----- Ellc
0 0
10-1 2 3 4 6
Photon energy (eV)
AIN
lO°'---'--,-,-L.LWl.-.J-.L...L.ULWJ
10-2 10-1 100 4 6 8
Photon energy (eV)
B5 ALUMINUM NITRIDE (AIN) 149
.··
AIN
0.2
,
.
.
a: ,,
-'
0.15
Figure B5·6 R(E) spec-
Elc trum for AIN at 300 K.
Ellc
3 4 6
Photon energy (e V)
152
B6 ALUMINUM PHOSPHIDE (AlP) 153
REFERENCES
12.-~~--~-r~--.-~-.
11
10
9
8
7
'" 6
5
4 £2
(X500)
3
Figure B6·2 El(E) and ~(E) spec-
2 tra for AlP at 300 K.
1
o 1 2 3 4
Photon energy (eV)
3
~
~
2
c AlP
k
(X500)
1 Figure B6·3 n(E) and k(E) spectra
for AlP at 300 K.
0 1 2 3 4
Photon energy (eV)
B6 ALUMINUM PHOSPHIDE (AlP) 155
AlP
101
~-=~-=~-=~~~~~~
2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2
Photon energy (eV)
...
156
B7 ALUMINUM ARSENIDE (AlAs) 157
TABLE B7·1 Energies of the indirect gaps (EglD) and CPs in AlAs at 300 K.
E glD, CPs eV
EX
g 2.16-2.17
EL
g 2.35-2.40
Eo 2.9-3.14
Eo+t1o -3.2
El 3.6-3.9
El+t11 3.8-4.1
Eo' 4.5-4.7
E2 -4.9
2.16 eV [E/, f\s (r8)~XI (~)] at 300 K [3-5]. The second lowest indirect gap is
about 2.4 eV at 300 K [EgL , r lS (r8)~Ll (L6)]. The lowest direct absorption edge in
AlAs corresponds to transitions at the r point, Eo [rIS (r8)~rl (r6)] and Eo+t1a [rIS
(r7)~rl (r6)]' The experimental Eo and Eo+t1a energies at 300 K are -3.0 and 3.2 eV,
respectively. The El and EI+~I transitions in the zinc-blende crystals take place
along the A direction or at the L point. These energies in AlAs at 300 K are -3.8 and
4.0 eV, respectively (~-0.2 eV, Refs. [3-5]). An analysis of the interband-transition
line shapes revealed further CP, E 1', at 6.475-6.810 eV at 90 K [7].
The band structure shown in Fig. B7-1 suggests that the lowest conduction and
the top valence bands are almost parallel along t1. The energy separations r ls
(r8)~rIS (r7) (Eo') and Xs (X7)~XI (~) (E2) are thus almost equal, 4.48 and 4.75
eV, respectively [6]. Experimentally, these gaps are determined to be -4.6 eV (Eo')
and 4.9 e V (E2 ), respectively. The theoretical calculation also predicts the following
interband transition energies: Egx=2.37 eV, E gL=2.81 eV, Eo=2.79 eV, E1=3.69 eV,
and E1'=6.74 eV [6].
fer layer (-111m thick) and then immediately transferred in the HREELS chamber.
The residual pressure in the HREELS chamber during the measurements was SxlO-11
mbar, allowing several hours of measurements without any contamination.
The room-temperature reststrahlen parameters determined from these studies
were: O)To=361.S cm-!, c,=lO.1, c~=S.2, and "(=S.O cm-! [11]; O)To=359 cm-!, c,=lO.16,
c~=8.16, and "(=3.2 cm-! [12]. Perkowitz et al. [11] determined such parameters not
only at room temperature but also at low temperatures (77 and 6 K). IIegems and
Pearson [10] reported the IR reflectivity spectrum of AlAs, but they did not attempt
to fit by an oscillator model due to poor sample quality. The RS spectrum can also
yield most of the parameters needed to calculate the IR spectrum. Onton [13] deter-
mined from RS data O)TQ=361.S cm-!, (cs-c~)=1.90, and "(=0.97 cm-!, and chose
c~=7.S. The only dramatic difference in these sets of parameters is in the values of Yo
the line width S.O cm-! [11] seems too large, while the line width 0.97 cm-! [13]
seems too small for typical semiconductors.
The refractive-index dispersion data in the transparent region of AlAs have been
measured by several authors [14-16]. Figure B7-2 shows the neE) data of AlAs
measured at 300 K by Monemar [14], Fern and Onton [15], and Grahn et al. [16].
Note that the experimental uncertainty of these measurements were ±O.15 [14],
±O.OOS [15], and ±O.21 [16], respectively. We can, thus, recognize that the data of
Fern and Onton [15] fall within those of Monemar [14]; however, the data of Grahn
et at. [16] are considerably smaller than these values. The solid line in Fig. B7-2
shows the theoretical fit of the MDF calculation to Fern-Onton's data [3-5].
4.0
AlAs 300 K
3.5 .
0
A
Monemar
Fern & Onton
Grahn et al.
o
o
-Calc. o
e::
3.0
A
A
REFERENCES
1. See, for instance, High-Speed Semiconductor Devices, edited by S. M. Sze
(Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1990).
2. See, for instance, Ill-V Quantum System Research, edited by K. H. Ploog, lEE
Materials and Devices Series 11 (Peter Peregrinus, UK, 1995).
3. S. Adachi, f. Appt. Phys. 58, Rl (1985).
4. Properties of Aluminium Gallium Arsenide, EMIS Datareviews Series No.7,
edited by S. Adachi (INSPEC (lEE), London, 1993).
5. S. Adachi, GaAs and Related Materials: Bulk Semiconducting and Superlattice
Properties (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).
6. M.-Z. Huang and W. Y. Ching, f. Phys. Chem. Solids 46, 977 (1985).
7. O. Gi.inther, C. Janowitz, G. Jungk, B. Jenichen, R. Hey, L. Daweritz, and K.
Ploog, Phys. Rev. B 52, 2599 (1995).
8. E. D. Palik, O. J. Glembocki, and K. Takarabe, in Handbook of Optical Con-
stants of Solids ll, edited by E. D. Palik (Academic, Orlando, 1991), p. 489.
9. C. M. Herzinger, H. Yao, P. G. Snyder, F. G. Celii, Y.-c. Kao, B. Johs, and J.
A. Woollam, f. Appl. Phys. 77, 4677 (1995).
10. M. Ilegems and G. L. Pearson, Phys. Rev. B 1, 1576 (1970).
11. S. Perkowitz, R. Sudharsanan, S. S. Yom, and T. 1. Drummond, Solid State
Commun. 62,645 (1987).
B7 ALUMINUM ARSENIDE (AlAs) 161
30
AlAs
20
co 10
EX!
9
,,"
,,
o
-10
o 1 2 3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B7·3 £1(E) and £2(E) spectra for AlAs at 300 K.
!!
E1+.6. 1
6 AlAs E1
Eo+.6. o
5
EO! !
~
4
c n
3
2
EgX! ./
1 , k
(X1000) .:
0 2 3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B7·4 nee) and k(E) spectra for AlAs at 300 K.
B7 ALUMINUM ARSENIDE (AlAs) 163
107~~~~~~~~~~~
106 ClJTO
105
~ 104
I
~ 103
"-"
~ 102
101
AlAs
10°
1
10 10- 2 10-1 10°
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B7-5 aJ..E) spectrum for AlAs at 300 K.
0.8
E2
0.7 AlAs
El+Al !
Eo' !
!
0.6 El!
Eo+Ao
a: 0.5
Eo !
0.4 EX
9
!
0.3
!
0.20
1 2 3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B7-6 R(E) spectrum for AlAs at 300 K.
164 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
-15,L..----:-_-=-_-:-_+.----+._-=-_~
l AT A K E r
166
B8 ALUMINUM ANTIMONIDE (AlSb) 167
TABLE B8·1 Energies o/the indirect gaps (E/D) and CPs in A1Sb at 300 K.
EglD, CPs eV
EX 1.61
B
EL 1.63-2.21
B
Eo 2.27
Eo+80 2.99
EI 2.84
E I+81 3.23
Eo' 3.70
E2 4.05
EI' 5.25
There are two indirect band gaps below the lowest r gap, Eo. The lowest one, r ls
(rs)-+xI (X6), occurs at 1.61 eV at 300 K; the next one is from rlS (rs) to LI (LJ
and occurs at around 2 eV [6]. The direct r transitions are observed to occur at ener·
gies -2.3 eV [Eo, r ls (rs)-+rl (rJ] and -3.0 eV [Eo+.1o, r ls (r7)-+rl (rJ], respec-
tively [8]. The E I , EI+AI , and EI' transitions in AlSb may occur along the <111>
directions (A) or at the L point in the BZ and are observed at energies -2.8 eV (E I ),
-3.2 eV (EI+A I), and -5.3 eV (E I '), respectively. The Eo' and E2 gaps are also found
to occur at energies -3.7 and 4.1 eV, respectively [8].
Theoretically [5], the lowest-indirect-gap energy is 1.94 eV (EgL , rls-+L I), while
the second one is 2.08 eV [EgX, r ls (rs)-+X I (XJ]. The direct r-gap energies are
2.79 eV (Eo, r ls -+rl) and 4.48 eV (Eo', r l5 -+rls), while those at the L and X points
are 3.69 eV (E I , ~ -+LI), 6.74 eV (E I ', ~ -+~), and 4.39 eV (Ez, Xs -+XI).
The (£1' ~), (n, k), a, and R values in Table B8-2 are graphed in Figs. B8-2-BS-5,
respectively. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of each CP and
E gX gap. It has been shown [S] that such optical-constant spectra can be successfully
explained by the MDF.
REFERENCES
1. Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, edit-
ed by K.-H. Hellwege and O. Madelung, Landolt-Bomstein, New Series,
Group III, Vol. 17, Pt. a (Springer, Berlin, 1982).
2. G. P. Schwartz, G. J. Gualtieri, W. A. Sunder, and L. A. Farrow, Phys. Rev. B
36,4868 (1987).
3. A. Joullie, B. Girault, A. M. Joullie, and A. Zien-Eddine, Phys. Rev. B 25, 7830
(1982).
4. <;. Alibert, M. Skouri, A. Joullie, M. Benouna, and S. Sadiq, J. Appl. Phys. 69,
3208 (1991).
5. M.-Z. Huang and W. Y. Ching, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 46, 977 (1985).
6. K. Strossner, S. Ves, C. K. Kim, and M. Cardona, Phys. Rev. B 33, 4044
(1986).
7. S. Zollner, C. Lin, E. SchOnherr, A. Bohringer, and M. Cardona, J. Appl. Phys.
66,383 (1989).
8. S. Adachi, J. Appl. Phys. 67,6427 (1990).
9. M. Hass and B. W. Henvis, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 23, 1099 (1962).
10 W. J. Turner and W. E. Reese, Phys. Rev. 127, 126 (1962).
11. R. F. Blunt, H. P. R. Frederikse, J. H. Becker, and W. R. Hosler, Phys. Rev. 96,
578 (1954).
12. W. J. Turner and W. E. Reese, Phys. Rev. 117, 1003 (1960).
13. E. Haga and H; Kimura, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 19, 1596 (1964).
14. R. Braunstein and E. O. Kane, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 23,1423 (1962).
15. N. N. Sirota and A. I. Lukomskii, Sov. Phys.-Semicond. 7, 140 (1973).
16. F. Oswald and R. Schade, Z. Naturf. A 9, 611 (1954).
17. T. E. Fischer, Phys. Rev. 139, A1228 (1965).
IS. D. E. Aspnes, B. Schwartz, A. A. Studna, L. Derick, and L. A. Koszi, J. Appl.
Phys. 48, 3510 (1977).
19. M. Cardona, W. Gudat, B. Sonntag, and P. Y. Yu, in Proc.l0th Int. Conf. Phys.
Semicond., Cambridge, Mass., 1970, edited by S. P. Keller, J. C. Hensel, and F.
Stem (U. S. Atomic Energy Commission, Springfield, Va., 1970), p. 209.
20. C. M. Herzinger, P. G. Snyder, F. G. Celii, Y.-C. Kao, D. Chow, B. Johs, and J.
A. Woollam, J. Appl. Phys. 79,2663 (1996).
170 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
35
30
25
20
15
'" 10
5
0
-5
-10
-150 1 2 3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure BS-2 £1 (E) and e,.(E) spectra for AlSb at 300 K.
B8 ALUMlNUM ANTIMONIDE (AlSb) 171
107
106 WTO
105 EX
9
'I 104 1
E
(..)
-; 103
102
AISb
101
175
176 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
~A~~~~~~~~r~d~A~~--~H~p~K~~~r
k
Figure B9·1 Electronic energy-band structure of a-GaN as calculated with the EPM. (From
Bloom et at. [3].) The locations of several interband transitions are included by the vertical
arrows.
wurtzite BZ, as well as along three other directions perpendicular to c, which can be
pushed by symmetry requirements down the basal (r-L.-M) or top (A-R-L) plane
of the BZ. Therefore, the El gap, which is by definition associated with transitions in
the <111> direction, is split in wurtzite materials into two (e.g., CdS, see Ref. [12])
or more distinct peaks (e.g., CdSe, see Refs. [13,14]) for E.lc polarization. In view
of this, the CP structures at -7 and 8 eV are concluded to be due to the El gap [9]. If
E II c then the El gap will be reduced to a single peak, as observed in CdS [12] and
CdSe [13,14].
(1120) -oriented GaN epitaxial layers contain the hexagonal c axis in the plane of
the films. This crystallographic orientation of the layers enabled to measure the IR
spectra exactly for both El.c and E II c polarizations. The static and high-frequency
dielectric constants obtained from this study are £,=8.9±O.3, £~=5.2±O.1 for El.c and
£,=9.8±O.3, £~=5.2±O.1 for E II c. Using the polarized RS data and Lyddane-Sachs-
Teller relation, Azuhata et al. [20] estimated the static dielectric constant of a-GaN
to be 9.28 and 10.1 for El.c and E II c, respectively.
The n(E) dispersion in the transparent region of a-GaN has been determined by a
number of groups [21-8]. The GaN single crystals used were bulk plane-parallel
platelets [21,22] or epitaxial films grown on (0001) sapphire substrates [23-8]. The
n(E) data obtained correspond to those for El.c. Ejder [21], Zhang et al. [25], and
Yu et al. [28] also measured the data for the extraordinary ray (E I c). We plot in
Fig. B9-2 the n(E) data for El.c measured by Ejder [21], Perlin et al. [22], Lin et al.
[23], and Zhang et al. [25]. One can understand from the figure that the data of Per-
lin et al. [22] are considerably larger than those reported by others. The second-
order nonlinear optical coefficients, d33 , d31 , and diS' in GaN epitaxial film have also
been investigated by the standard Maker fringe of an anisotropic medium [25].
Optical absorption studies at the fundamental absorption edge of a-GaN have
been made by a number of authors [5,24,29-41]. These studies demonstrate the sen-
sitivity afforded optical absorption measurements in determining the band-edge en-
ergy in pure, doped, or alloyed samples. However, the observed positions of the ab-
sorption edge varied for different samples of GaN. The Burstein-Moss shift may be
one of the origins of this difference [37].
2.8 0 Ejder
to. Perlin et a!.
• Lin et a!.
Zhang et a!.
2.6
Elc
c
2.4
a-GaN
2. 2 '---1~--'--2:!:----'-----'3:!:----'------'4'
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B9-2 Refractive-index dispersion for a-GaN with El.c at 300 K. The experimental
data are taken from Ejder [21], Perlin et at. [22], Lin et at. [23], and Zhang et at. [25].
178 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
The UV reflectivity spectra of a-GaN have been measured in the I0-30-eV re-
gion (not E.lc, but a mixture of the reflectivities for E.lc and E II c) by Olson et al.
[7] and 0-30-eV region (E.lc) by Lambrecht et al. [8]. These authors performed the
KK analysis to get the complex dielectric function and its related constants. Note
that the £(E) data of Lambrecht et al. [8] give a peak height of ~-6 at E-7 eV. This
value is much smaller than that obtained from SE study (~-9.6, Ref. [42]).
The SE £(E) spectra for a-GaN (E.lc) have been measured by Yu et al. [27] in the
spectral range up to 5 eV, by Logothetidis et al. [9-11] up to 10 eV, by Kawashima
et al. [42] and Edwards et al. [43] up to 6 eV, Yao et al. [44] up to 5.5 eV, by Weth-
kamp et al. [45] up to 25 eV, and by Yang et al. [46] up to 3.8 eV. The GaN samples
used in these studies were epitaxially grown on (0001) sapphire [9-11,27,42,44-6]
and 6H-SiC(0001)si substrates [43]. Because of the limited experimental photon-
energy range, the measured SE spectra of Yu et al. [27], Edwards et al. [43], Kawa-
shima et al. [42], Yao et al. [44], and Yang et al. [46] showed only one CP structure
arising from the lowest-direct-gap edge (Es-3.4 eV). On the other hand, the SE
spectra of Logothetidis et al. [9-11] and Wethkamp et al. [45] revealed, at least,
four CP structures at energies -3.4 (Es)' 7, 8, and 9 eV. Measurements in the tem-
perature range from 80 to 650 K provided the temperature-dependent CP parameters
of these CPs. Our Bruggeman EMA-LRA analysis [42], however, suggested that the
sample of Logothetidis et al. may have a large number of void networks in the film
medium.
Table B9-1 lists the room-temperature values of f.=£I+i~, n*=n+ik, a, and R for
a-GaN with E.lc. A complete set of the optical constants for ESO.5 eV were calcu-
lated using the reststrahlen parameters of Sobotta et al. [17]. The optical constants
for 1.3SES3.3 eV were taken from Ejder [21] and those for D-3.35 eV were from
Logothetidis and coworkers [9-11]. Note that Logothetidis' data were listed after
mathematically removing the effects of surface roughness (fv=29%, d=178 A, see
Ref. [42]).
Table B9-2 lists the room-temperature values of f.=£I+i~, n*=n+ik, a, and R for
a-GaN with E I c. They were taken from Sobotta et al. (ESO.5 eV) [17] and from
Zhang et al. (1.2SES2.7) [25]. Camphausen and Connell [32] reported optical ab-
sorption coefficients for E I c only in the limited photon-energy range, 3.4SES3.5
eV. Dingle et al. [31] studied the low-temperature (T=2 K) reflectivity near the fun-
damental absorption edge for both E.lc and E I c polarizations. Ejder [21] also
studied the refractive-index dispersion for E.lc and E II c, and found that the differ-
ence in the refractive indices between these polarizations is I.5±O.2% at 1..=0.5 J.lm.
Unfortunately, however, he gave no further information about the n(E) dispersion
for Ell c.
The (£1' ~), (n, k), a, and R values in Tables B9-1 and B9-2 are plotted in Figs.
B9-3-B9-6, respectively. The solid and dashed lines represent the data for E.lc and
E II c, respectively. It has been shown [42,47] that such optical-constant spectra can
be successfully explained by the MDF.
B9 WURTZITE GALLIUM NITRIDE (a-GaN) 179
REFERENCES
1. S. Nakamura, M. Senoh, S. Nagahama, N. Iwasa, T. Yamada, T. Matsushita, H.
Kiyoku, and Y. Sugimoto, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 35, L217 (1996).
2. I. Akasaki, S. Sota, H. Sakai, T. Tanaka, M. Koike, and H. Amano, Electron.
Lett. 32, 1105 (1996).
3. S. Bloom, G. Harbeke, E. Meier, and I. B. Ortenburger, Phys. Status Solidi B
66,161 (1974).
4. Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, edit-
ed by K.-H. Hellwege and O. Madelung, Landolt-Bomstein, New Series,
Group III, Vol. 17, Pt. a (Springer, Berlin, 1982).
5. R. Dingle, D. D. Sell, S. E. Stokowski, and M. Ilegems, Phys. Rev. B 4, 1211
(1971).
6. K. P. Korona, A. Wysmolek, K. Pakula, R. St~pniewski, J. M. Baranowski, I.
Grzegory, B. Lucznik, M. Wr6blewski, and S. Porowski, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69,
788 (1996).
7. C. G. Olson, D. W. Lynch, and A. Zehe, Phys. Rev. B 24, 4629 (1981).
8. W. R. L. Lambrecht, B. Segall, J. Rife, W. R. Hunter, and D. K. Wickenden,
Phys. Rev. B 51, 13516 (1995).
9. S. Logothetidis, J. Petalas, M. Cardona, and T. D. Moustakas, Phys. Rev. B 50,
18017 (1994).
10. S. Logothetidis, J. Petalas, M. Cardona, and T. D. Moustakas, Mat. Sci. Eng. B
29,65 (1995).
11. J. Petalas, S. Logothetidis, S. Boultadakis, M. Alouani, and J. M. Wills, Phys.
Rev. B 52, 8082 (1995).
12. S. Ninomiya and S. Adachi,!. Appl. Phys. 78,1183 (1995).
13. S. Logothetidis, M. Cardona, P. Lautenschlager, and M. Garriga, Phys. Rev. B
34,2458 (1986).
14. S. Ninomiya and S. Adachi, J. Appl. Phys. 78, 4681 (1995).
15. D. D. Manchon, Jr., A. S. Barker, Jr., P. J. Dean, and R. B. Zetterstrom, Solid
State Commun. 8, 1227 (1970).
16. A. S. Barker, Jr. and M. Ilegems, Phys. Rev. B 7, 743 (1973).
17. H. Sobotta, H. Neumann, R. Franzheld, and W. Seifert, Phys. Status Solidi B
174, K57 (1992).
18. G. Mirjalili, T. J. Parker, S. F. Shayesteh, M. M. BUlbUl, S. R. P. Smith, T. S.
Cheng, and C. T. Foxon, Phys. Rev. B 57,4656 (1998).
19. G. Yu, H. Ishikawa, M. Umeno, T. Egawa, J. Watanabe, T. Soga, and T. Jimbo,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 1472 (1998).
20. T. Azuhata, T. Sota, K. Suzuki, and S. Nakamura, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 7,
L129 (1995).
21. E. Ejder, Phys. Status Solidi A 6,445 (1971).
22. P. Perlin, I. Gorczyca, N. E. Christensen, I. Grzegory, H. Teisseyre, and T.
Suski, Phys. Rev. B 45,13307 (1992).
180 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
47. A. B. Djurisi6 and E. H. Li, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 868 (1998).
150~~~~~12~--~~~~~~
-Ele
----- Ell e 10 ex-GaN
100 l
.'""" 8
{~
6
50 .~
E 1"
:' 4
" "
2
o
-50L-~~~~~_2~__~~~~~~~
10-1 10° 2 4 6 10 1
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B9-3 fleE) and f 2(E) spectra for a-GaN at 300 K.
12
Ele
10 Elle
8 2
..x::
~ 6 ex-GaN
c
1
2
O~~~~~~ O~--~~~~~~
10-1 10° 2 4 6 10 1
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B9-4 neE) and k(E) spectra for a-GaN at 300 K.
182 llI-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
Ele
Elle
a-GaN
,,
100~~~~~~ ~~--~~~~~~
10-2 10-1 100 4 6 8 10 1
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B9·5 al..E) spectrum for a-GaN at 300 K.
1.0 0.4
0.9
0.8 0.35
a-GaN
0.7
0.6 0.3
a: 0.5
0.4 0.25
0.3 --
0.2
-Ele
0.1 ----- Ell e
0.0
10-1
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B9·6 R(E) spectrum for a-GaN at 300 K.
188
B10 CUBIC GALLIUM NITRIDE (~-GaN) 189
10
> 0
~
>.
0')
L-
aJ -5
c=
w
-10
-15
r X K r L K W X
(U)
Figure B10-1 Electronic energy-band structure of ~-GaN as calculated with the local-
density-functional theory and norm-conserving pseudopotential method. (From Miwa and
Fukumoto [5].) The locations of several interband transitions are included by the vertical
arrows [6].
TABLE B10-1 Energies of the CPs in /3-GaN for E 1/ c at 300 K (in eV).
• Lin et al.
2.8 o Vidal et al.
2.6
c
Figure BI0·2 Refractive-
2.4 index dispersion for ~-GaN at
300 K. The experimental data
are taken from Lin et al. [13]
and Vidal et al. [14].
2.2 (3-GaN
o 1 2 3 4
Photon energy (e V)
[14].
The SE £(E) spectra for p-GaN have been measured by Logothetidis and cowork-
ers [6,15,16] in the spectral region up to 10 eV. The p-GaN samples were epitaxially
grown on Si(100) substrates by MBE. These SE data revealed, at least, three CP
structures at energies -3.25 (Eg), 7.0, and 7.6 eV. Measurements in the temperature
range from 80 to 650 K provided the temperature-dependent CP parameters of these
CPs.
Table B 10-2 lists the room-temperature values of £=£\+iEz, n*=n+ik, <x, and R for
p-GaN. A set of the optical constants for E~O.5 eV were calculated using the rest-
strahlen parameters of Mirjalili et at. [11]. The optical constants for 1.3~~3 .23 e V
were taken from Lin et at. [13] and those for D-3.25 eV were from Logothetidis and
coworkers [6,15,16].
The (£}, Ez), (n, k), <x, and R values in Table B1O-2 are graphed in Figs. B1O-3-
B 10-6, respectively. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of each
CPo
REFERENCES
1. M. Mizuta, S. Fujieda, Y. Matsumoto, and T. Kawamura, lpn. l. Appt. Phys. 25,
L943 (1986).
2. H. Okumura, S. Yoshida, and T. Okahisa, Appt. Phys. Lett. 64,2997 (1994).
3. D. E. Lacklison, J. W. Orton, I. Harrison, T. S. Cheng, L. C. Jenkins, C. T.
Foxon, and S. E. Hooper,J. Appt. Phys. 78,1838 (1995).
BID CUBIC GALLIUM NITRIDE (~-GaN) 191
10
9 j3-GaN
8
7
6
c.J 5 e1
4
EO
3 !
2
1
0 2 4
Photon energy (eV)
Figure BI0-3 £1(E) and £2(E) spectra for ~-GaN at 300 K.
4
j3-GaN
3
n
~
c: 2
k
1
o 2 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure BI0-4 nee) and k(E) spectra for ~-GaN at 300 K.
B 10 CUBIC GALLIUM NITRIDE (~-GaN) 193
WTO
{3-GaN
0.35
0.30
0.25
c::
0.20
0.15
{3-GaN
0.100
2 4 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure BI0·6 R(E) spectrum for ~-GaN at 300 K.
194 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
198
B 11 GALLIUM PHOSPHIDE (GaP) 199
><IJ
(9
0::
W
Z
W
WAVE VECTOR K
Figure B11·1 Electronic energy-band structure of GaP as calculated by an ENPM. (From
Chelikowsky and Cohen [3].) The locations of several interband transitions are included by
the vertical arrows.
TABLE B11·1 Energies of the indirect gaps (E,lD) and CPs in GaP at 300 K.
EiID , CPs eV
EXg 2.26
ELg 2.63
Eo 2.74
Eo+l'.o 2.84
EI 3.70
Eo' 4.75
Eo'+l'.o' 4.8
E2 5.15-5.30
E2+0 5.75
E1' -6.7
GaP are reported to be in the ranges £,=10.2-11.2 and £_=8.4-9.11 [9-15], respec-
tively. Some data on the temperature dependence of the static dielectric constant at
atmospheric pressure have been reported [13-16]. These data showed that the £, val-
ue decreases with decreasing temperature. The hydrostatic-pressure effects on £, of
GaP, GaAs, Si, and some II-VI compounds have been investigated by Samara [14]
for pressures up to 0.7 GPa. He obtained the values of £, and its logarithmic pressure
derivatives of these materials.
Optical properties in the reststrahlen region of GaP have been studied by many
authors [9-13,17,18]. Optical absorption in the multiphonon absorption band region
has also been studied [9,17,19]. The R values in these regions from various labs
agreed to within the experimental accuracy.
At 1.>4 Ilm in n-GaP there was continuous increase in ex according to the law
exocAm, typical of absorption by free carriers [20-2]. The most unique feature of the
IR absorption spectrum in n-GaP is the sharp peak observed at 1.-3 Ilm (see Fig.
5.38). This peak is caused by electronic transitions between the r- and X-
conduction-band minima, namely, the interconduction-band absorption [20-3].
The refractive-index dispersion in the transparent region of GaP has been meas-
ured by a number of authors [13,24-7]. Figure BII-2 plots the n(E) data of GaP
measured by Bond (open circles, Ref. [24]) and Nelson and Turner (solid circles,
Ref. [25]), together with those measured by Jellison using two-channel polarization
modulation spectroscopy (open triangles, Ref. [28]). The method of minimum de-
3.6
GaP
3.2
3.0
o 1 2
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B11-2 Refractive-index dispersion for GaP at 300 K. The experimental data are ta-
ken from Bond (open circles, Ref. [24]), from Nelson and Turner (solid circles, Ref. [25]),
and from Jellison (open triangles, Ref. [28]). The solid line represents the calculated result
of Eq. (B 1l.1).
B 11 GALLIUM PHOSPHIDE (GaP) 201
viation was used to measure the neE) data at room temperature [24] and 24.5°C [25].
The experimental uncertainty was 10.0012 [25]; in Bond [24] n was measured to the
fourth decimal. The temperature and pressure coefficients of the refractive index in
the transparent region of GaP have been discussed by Bertolotti et al. [29] and
Strossner et al. [30], respectively.
Parsons and Coleman [11] used Barker's classical oscillator model (Ref. [10)) for
the relative dielectric constant to include a frequency-dependent damping term in the
ionic oscillator term as follows:
(BIU)
where Sj, Vj, and Yj are the oscillator strength, oscillator frequency, and damping pa-
rameter, respectively. The second term in Eq. (BI1.1) represents the interband elec-
tronic contribution while the third term represents the lattice contribution to the re-
lative dielectric constant. Parsons and Coleman [11] fit the IR (Ref. [10)) and neE)
data in the O.5-4-llm range (Refs. [24,25)) with this expression. The solid line in Fig.
Bll-2 represents the calculated result of this expression (n-e/!2). The oscillator
parameters used in this calculation are summarized in Table BIl-2 [11]. Note that
Eq. (B 11.1) gives the static dielectric constant of 10,=11.148 (v~O cm,I).
Absorption coefficients at the intrinsic absorption edge of GaP have been meas-
ured by several authors [7,31-4]. These studies demonstrate the sensitivity afforded
optical absorption measurements in determining the lowest-indirect-band-gap en-
ergy (E/) in pure or doped GaP. The lowest-direct-band-gap energy (Eo) and its
temperature coefficient have been determined by Dean et al. [32]. Fine structures
TABLE B11·2 Oscillator parameters used in Eq. (B11.1) jor GaP at 300 K.
Electronic Ionic
S.I=2.570 E~=9.091
vel=2.90x104 cm,l S0=2.056
S.2=4.131 v0=363.4 em,l
ve2=4.27x104 em,l Yo=1.1 em' I
S.3=1.390 SI=7.0xlO,4
v.3=5.80x104 em,l vI=349.4 em,l
11=21.0 em,l
S2=3.5xlO,4
v2=358.4 em,l
12=12.6 cm,l
202 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
that could be explained by indirect transitions involving phonons have also been
successfully identified in a(E) spectra [31-3] (see Fig. 5.8, Ref. [31]). The hydro-
static-pressure dependence of the lowest-direct-absorption edge has also been stud-
ied using a diamond anvil cell up to 23 GPa by Yes et al. [35].
The fundamental reflectivity in the interband transition region of GaP has been
measured by Ehrenreich et al. [36], Philipp and Ehrenreich [37], and Stokowski and
Sell [38]. The e(E) spectrum obtained from the KK analysis by Philipp and Ehren-
reich [37] showed a value of ~-22 at the E2 peak (-5.2 eV). A set of the optical con-
stants in the interband transition region of GaP have also been determined using SE
in the 1.8-4.0-eV region by Jungk [39] and in the 1.5-6.0-eV region by Aspnes and
Studna [40]. An ~ value at the E2 peak for GaP(11O) measured by Aspnes and Stud-
na was 26.58 (E-5.0 eV). This value is much larger than that of Philipp and Ehren-
reich [37]. It should be noted that the dielectric function of tetrahedral semiconduc-
tors at the £2 peak, ~(E2)' provides a sensitive indication of the dielectric disconti-
nuity between the sample and ambient [41,42]. The sample with the cleanest surface,
as well as the dielectric-function spectrum most accurately representing that of the
pure bulk material, can then be identified simply from ~(E2) values by using the
"biggest is best" criterion.
More recently, Jellison [28] has determined the optical constants of GaP(100)
using two-channel polarization modulation spectroscopy. This instrument is par-
ticularly well-suited for the measurement of small values of k. His data show the
~(E2) maximum of 27.87 at E2=5.08 eV that is considerably larger than those ob-
tained by Aspnes and Studna (26.58, Ref. [40]) and Philipp and Ehrenreich (-22,
Ref. [37]). It must be noted, however, that the value of Jellison was obtained after
mathematically removing the effect of an oxide overlayer. The thickness of the ox-
ide overlayer (1.46 nm) was determined using a nulling ellipsometry experiment at
1152 nm (k-O). The temperature dependence of the complex dielectric function e(E)
for GaP from 10 to 640 K in the 1.6-5.6-eV spectral region has also been deter-
mined using SE by Zollner et al. [43].
An experimental determination of the absorption and reflection spectra of GaP in
the 1O-170-e V region has been made by Cardona and coworkers [44-7]. They ob-
served weak structures at -20,106, and 131 eV. These structures correspond to tran-
sitions at the outermost d (Ga), p (Ga), and p (P) core levels, respectively.
Table B 11-3 lists the room-temperature values of e=e\+i~, n*=n+ik, a, and R for
GaP. A complete set of the optical constants for ES;1.4 eV were obtained from Eq.
(B1U). The a (~ and k) values at the fundamental absorption edge (2.137s;E
S;2.724 eV) were taken from Spitzer et al. [7]. A set of the optical constants in the
interband transition region were taken from Jellison (1.476s;ES;5.6 e V) [28], from
Aspnes and Studna (5.3S;ES;6.0 eV) [40], and from Philipp and Ehrenreich
(6.5S;ES;25 eV) [37]. The a and k values for E230 eV were taken from Cardona et al.
[45].
The (e\, ~), (n, k), a, and R values in Table B 11-3 are plotted in Figs. B 11-3-
Bll-6, respectively. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of each
CP and E/ gap. The MDF analysis [4,48,49] suggested that the Eo and Eo+flo
B11 GALLIUM PHOSPHIDE (GaP) 203
and E gX gap. The MDF analysis [4,48,49] suggested that the Eo and Eo+ilo structures
can be characterized by a 3D Mo CP, the EI structure by a 3D MI (or 2D Mo) CP, and
the Eo', E2, and E2+~ structures by a DHO (a broadened 2D MI CP).
REFERENCES
1. Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, edit-
ed by K.-H. Hellwege and O. Madelung, Landolt-Bornstein, New Series,
Group III, Vol. 17, Pt. a (Springer, Berlin, 1982).
2. S. Adachi, Physical Properties of III-V Semiconductor Compounds: InP, InAs,
GaAs, GaP, InGaAs, and InGaAsP (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1992).
3. J. R. Chelikowsky and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 14, 556 (1976).
4. S. Adachi, J. Appl. Phys. 66,6030 (1989).
5. S. Zollner, M. Garriga, J. Kircher, J. Humlicek, M. Cardona, and G. Neuhold,
Phys. Rev. B 48, 7915 (1993).
6. M. L. Cohen and T. K. Bergstresser, Phys. Rev. 141,789 (1966).
7. W. G. Spitzer, M.l Gershenzon, C. J. Frosch, and D. F. Gibbs, J. Phys. Chem.
Solids 11, 339 (1959).
8. M.-Z. Huang and W. Y. Ching, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 46,977 (1985).
9. D. A. Kleinman and W. G. Spitzer, Phys. Rev. 118, 110 (1960).
10. A. S. Barker, Jr., Phys. Rev. 165,917 (1968).
11. D. F. Parsons and P. D. Coleman, Appl. Opt. 10, 1683 (1971).
12. M. Giehler and E. Jahne, Phys. Status Solidi B 73, 503 (1976).
13. A. N. Pikhtin, V. T. Prokopenko, and A. D. Yas'kov, Sov. Phys. Semicond. 10,
1224 (1976).
14. G. A. Samara, Phys. Rev. B 27, 3494 (1983).
15. K. Seeger, Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 1268 (1989).
16. L. Patrick and P. J. Dean, Phys. Rev. 188, 1254 (1969).
17. A. K. Wan Abdullah, G. A. Gledhill, C. Patel, and T. J. Parker, Infrared Phys.
29,719 (1989).
18. K. A. Maslin, C. Patel, and T. J. Parker, Infrared Phys. 32, 303 (1991).
19. E. S. Koteles and W. R. Datars, Solid State Commun. 19,221 (1976).
20. A. D. Remenyuk, L. G. Zabelina, Yu. I. Ukhanov, and Yu. V. Shmartsev, Sov.
Phys.-Semicond. 2,557 (1968); 2, 561 (1968).
21. J. D. Wiley and M. DiDomenico, Jr., Phys. Rev. B 1, 1655 (1970).
22. A. N. Pikhtin and D. A. Yas'kov, Phys. Status Solidi 34,815 (1969).
23. E. Haga and H. Kimura, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 19,658 (1964).
24. W. L. Bond, J. Appl. Phys. 36,1674 (1965).
25. D. F. Nelson and E. H. Turner, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 3337 (1968).
26. S. A. Abagyan, G. A. Ivanov, Yu. E. Shanurin, and V. I. Amosov, Sov. Phys.-
Semicond. 5, 889 (1971).
204 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
30
20
Co,) 10
-10
o
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B11-3 £1(E) and £2(E) spectra for GaP at 300 K.
7.-~.-~.-~.-~.-~
6 E,!
GaP
5
~ 4
c 3
2
EX
9
1
t
o 268 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure 811-4 n(E) and k(E) spectra for GaP at 300 K.
206 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
108~~~~~~~~~~~~
10 7
wro
106
1
105
IE 104
o
'-" 103
~
102 GaP
10 1
10°
1
10 10- 2 10-1 100 10 1 102
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B11-5 a(E) spectrum for GaP at 300 K.
0.6
Eo
a: !
0.4 El!
0.2
GaP
o 2 4 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B11-6 R(E) spectrum for GaP at 300 K.
B 11 GALLIUM PHOSPHIDE (GaP) 207
213
214 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
Z _ 1 A In E: - EZ ~ G;
(B12.1)
n - +- Z 2 + £.J 2 2
1t Eo -E ;=1 E; -E
with the parameters Eo=1.428 eV, EI=3.0 eV, E2=5.1 eV, E3=0.0333 eV, GI=39.194
eva, Gz=136.08 eva, G3=0.OO218 eV2 ,and A=0.5858. This expression fits the ex-
perimental data to a few units in the third decimal place.
Temperature dependence of the refractive index of GaAs has been studied both
theoretically [39-42] and experimentally [37,43-7] (see Fig. 5.25, Ref. [37]). In situ
measurements of GaAs and AlAs n(E) dispersion at MBE epitaxial growth tem-
perature (600°C) have been demonstrated by Bardinal et al. [48] using dynamic op-
tical reflectometry with a tunable laser light source.
Several investigations [49-53] have made in the past which have determined the
B12 GALLIUM ARSENIDE (GaAs) 215
The (e l , ez), (n, k), n, and R values in Table B12-1 are plotted in Figs. B12-1-
BI2-4, respectively. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of each
CP. The MDF analysis [72-4] suggested that the Eo and Eo+~ structures can be
characterized by a 3D Mo CP, the EI and EI+~I structures by a 3D MI (or 2D Mo) CP,
and the Eo' and E2 structures by a DHO (a broadened 2D MI CP).
REFERENCES
1. High-Speed Semiconductor Devices, edited by S. M. Sze (Wiley-Interscience,
New York, 1990).
2. C. Y. Chang and F. Kai, GaAs High-Speed Devices: Physics, Technology, and
Circuit Applications (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1994).
3. Semiconductor Lasers: Past, Present, and Future, edited by G. P. Agrawal
(AlP Press, New York, 1995).
4. J. S. Blakemore, J. Appl. Phys. 53, R123 (1982).
5. S. Adachi, J. Appl. Phys. 58, Rl (1985).
6. Properties of Gallium Arsenide, 2nd Edition, EMIS Datareviews Series No.2
(INSPEC (lEE), London, 1990).
7. V. Swaminathan and A. T. Macrander, Material Aspects of GaAs and InP
Based Structures (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1991).
8. S. Adachi, GaAs and Related Materials: Bulk Semiconducting and Superlattice
Properties (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).
9. G. A. Samara, Phys. Rev. B 27, 3494 (1983).
10. K. S. Champlin and G. H. Glover, Appl. Phys. Lett. 12, 231 (1968).
11. S. Jones and S. Mao,J. Appl. Phys. 39, 4038 (1968).
12. T. Lu, G. H. Glover, and K. S. Champlin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 13,404 (1968).
13. I. Strzalkowski, S. Joshi, and C. R. Crowell, Appl. Phys. Lett. 28, 350 (1976).
14. K. G. Hambleton, C. Hilsum, and B. R. Holeman, Proc. Phys. Soc. 77, 1147
(1961).
15. C. J. Johnson, G. H. Sherman, and R. Weil, Appl. Opt. 8, 1667 (1969).
16. W. J. Moore and R. T. Holm, J. Appl. Phys. 80, 6939 (1996); erratum, ibid. 81,
3732 (1997).
17. A. H. Kachare, W. G. Spitzer, F. K. Euler, and A. Kahan, J. Appl. Phys. 45,
2938 (1974).
18. R. T. Holm, J. W. Gibson, and E. D. Palik, J. Appl. Phys. 48, 212 (1977).
19. J. A. A. Engelbrecht, I. G. Lee, and D. J. L. Venter, Infrared Phys. 27, 57
(1987).
20. M. Hass and B. W. Henvis, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 23,1099 (1962).
21. H. Jamshidi and T. J. Parker, Infrared Phys. 24, 167 (1984).
22. C. G. Olson and D. W. Lynch, Phys. Rev. 177, 1231 (1969).
23. H. R. Chandrasekhar and A. K. Ramdas, Phys. Rev. B 21, 1511 (1980).
B12GALLIUM ARSENIDE (GaAs) 217
55. A. R. Gofii, A. Cantarero, K. Syassen, and M. Cardona, Phys. Rev. B 41, 10111
(1990).
56. G. B. Lush, M. R. Melloch, M. S. Lundstrom, H. F. MacMillan, and S. Asher, 1.
Appl. Phys. 74, 4694 (1993).
57. R. E. Morrison, Phys. Rev. 124, 1314 (1961).
58. H. R. Philipp and H. Ehrenreich, Phys. Rev. 129, 1550 (1963).
59. D. E. Aspnes and A. A. Studna, Phys. Rev. B 27, 985 (1983); D. E. Aspnes, S.
M. Kelso, R. A. Logan, and R. Bhat, 1. Appl. Phys. 60, 754 (1986).
60. G. E. Jellison, Jr., Opt. Mater. 1, 151 (1992).
61. P. Lautenschlager, M. Garriga, S. Logothetidis, and M. Cardona, Phys. Rev. B
35,9174 (1987).
62. H. Yao, P. G. Snyder, and J. A. Woollam, 1. Appl. Phys. 70, 3261 (1991).
63. G. N. Maracas, C. H. Kuo, S. Anand, and R. Droopad, 1. Appl. Phys. 77, 1701
(1995).
64. F. Lukes, S. Gopalan, and M. Cardona, Phys. Rev. B 47, 7071 (1993).
65. M. Alouani and J. M. Wills, Phys. Rev. B 54, 2480 (1996).
66. P. Etchegoin, J. Kircher, M. Cardona, C. Grein, and E. Bustarret, Phys. Rev. B
46,15139 (1992).
67. M. Cardona, W. Gudat, E. E. Koch, M. Skibowski, B. Sonntag, and P. Y. Yu,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 659 (1970).
68. M. Cardona, W. Gudat, B. Sonntag, and P. Y. Yu, in Proc. 10th Int. Con! Phys.
Semicond., Cambridge, Mass., 1970, edited by S. P. Keller, J. C. Hensel, and F.
Stem (U. S. Atomic Energy Commission, Springfield, Va., 1970), p. 209.
69. W. Gudat, E. E. Koch, P. Y. Yu, M. Cardona, and C. M. Penchina, Phys. Status
Solidi B 52, 505 (1972).
70. D. E. Aspnes, M. Cardona, V. Saile, M. Skibowski, and G. SprUssel, Solid State
Commun. 31,99 (1979).
71. O. GUnther, C. Janowitz, G. Jungk, B. Jenichen, R. Hey, L. Diiweritz, and K.
Ploog, Phys. Rev. B 52, 2599 (1995).
72. S. Adachi, Phys. Rev. B 35, 7454 (1987).
73. S. Adachi, 1. Appl. Phys. 66,6030 (1989).
74. S. Ozaki and S. Adachi, 1. Appl. Phys. 78, 3380 (1995).
B 12 GALLIUM ARSENIDE (GaAs) 219
15 6
"'TO
! 5 GaAs
10 4
.::t:.
c~
3
"'TO
GaAs
1.0
i WTO
!E2
0.8 E1+A~
E'
0 1
Eo+Ao E1!
0.6
a: Eo!
0.4 t
~ Figure B12-4 R(£)
227
228 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
6
eV L6
L4.5
3
I 0
...... -3
~2L- __~~~~____~__L-____~~
L A r 1:1 X U.K E r
k
Figure B13-1 Electronic energy-band structure of GaSb as calculated by an ENPM. (From
Chelikowsky and Cohen [5].) The locations of several interband transitions are included by
the vertical arrows.
TABLE B13-1 Energies of the CPs and indirect gaps (EBID) in GaSb at 300 K.
CPs,E/D eV
Eo 0.72
EL
g 0.805
EX
g 1.05
Eo+l:1o 1.46
E, 2.05
E,+I:1, 2.50
Eo' 3.27-3.85
E2 4.08-4.20
E,' -5.4
The fundamental lattice reflection band of GaSb was measured by Hass and Henvis
[11] at liquid helium temperature (4.2 K). The reststrahlen parameters determined by
these authors were: ooTQ=230.5±3 cm-', ooLO=240.3±2 cm-', £,=15.69, £_=14.44, and
'Y= 1.61 cm-'.
More recently, the room-temperature optical constants in the reststrahlen region
of GaSb have been measured using a dispersive Fourier transform spectroscopy by
Maslin et al. [12]. The specimen used in this work was nominally undoped single
crystal with a minimum thickness of about 3 mm. Unfortunately, however, they re-
B13 GALLIUM ANTIMONIDE (GaSb) 229
ported only the phonon frequencies of OlTQ=227.5 cm-I and Olw=237.5 cm- I . Using
the Lyddane-Sachs-Teller relation and assuming E~=14.4, we obtain the static di-
electric constant of GaSb at room temperature to be E,=15.7. Using these reststrahlen
parameters and a classical dispersion model, we fit Maslin's (n, k) data and then de-
termined the damping parameter to be ,,(=2.7 cm- I at room temperature. It should be
noted that the phonon frequencies OlTQ and Olw usually decrease with increasing
temperature. The dielectric constants E, and E~ are functions of temperature and usu-
ally increase with increasing temperature. The damping constant "( may also be
strongly dependent on temperature, i.e., it will have larger value at higher tempera-
ture.
The refractive-index dispersion in the transparent region of GaSb has been deter-
mined by several authors [13-17]. Measurement techniques used in these studies
were reflectivity [13-15], prism method [14,17], and SE [16]. Figure B13-2 summa-
rizes the n(E) dispersion of GaSb obtained by these authors [16]. All the samples
studied had p-type conductivity with p-l0 17 cm-3 [13-15] or _lOIS cm-3 [16]. Munoz
Uribe [16] determined the n(E) dispersion in n-GaSb (n-5x10 17 cm-3) and found that
below the band gap the indices are slightly smaller than those for the p-type material.
The resolution in n for the experimental setup was estimated to be ±O.005. The ex-
perimental data reported by Munoz Uribe [17] can be successfully fit to the so-
called single-oscillator model:
eI (E)=I+ E2EE0 d
_E2 (BI3.1)
o
x
Q)
4.4 •
6
Munoz Uribe at al.
Alibert et al (reflectivity)
"'C o Edwards et al (prism)
c: 4.2 <> Edwards et al (refiectivityT
Q) 6
••••• ..... _ Oswald et al (reflectivity)
•••••••••••
.~ 4.0 • 6
6
•••••••••••••••
13
ro 3.8 o o
•
o
6
•
o o o o o
~
~ 3.6
GaSb have been reported by Cardona and coworkers [30-3]. They measured weak
structures at -21 and 33 eV. These structures correspond to transitions at the outer-
most d (Ga) and d (Sb) core levels, respectively.
We list in Table B13-2 the room-temperature values of E=EI+i~, n*=n+ik, a., and
R for GaSb. A set of the optical constants in the IR region (E:50.3 e V) were calculat-
ed using the room-temperature reststrahlen parameters as follows: wTO=227.5 cm"1,
E,=15.7, E~=14A, and "(=2.7 cm"l. The real optical constants (EI' n) for OAQ":50.835
eV were obtained from Eq. (13.1). The imaginary optical constants (k, a.) for
0.7125:5E :50.8375 eV were taken from Ghezzi et al. [21]. A complete set of the op-
tical constants for 1.5:5E:56.0 e V were taken from Aspnes and Studna [28]. The a.
and k values for 1214 eV were obtained from Cardona et al. [31].
The (EI' ~), (n, k), a., and R values in Table B 13-2 are plotted in Figs. B 13-3-
B13-6, respectively. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of each
CP. The MDF analysis [7,34] suggested that the Eo and Eo+6.0 structures can be
characterized by a 3D Mo CP, the EI and EI+~I structures by a 3D MI (or 2D Mo) CP,
and the Eo' and E2 structures by a DHO (a broadened 2D MI CP).
REFERENCES
1. Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, edit-
ed by K.-H. Hellwege and O. Madelung, Landolt-Bomstein, New Series,
Group III, Vol. 17, Pt. a (Springer, Berlin, 1982).
2. A. G. Milnes and A. Y. Polyakov, Solid-State Electron. 36, 803 (1993).
3. S. K. Haywood, A. B. Henriques, N. 1. Mason, R.I. Nicholas, and P. 1. Walker,
Semicond. Sci. Technol. 3, 315 (1988).
4. A. Baraldi, C. Ghezzi, R. Magnanini, A. Parisini, L. Tarricone, A. Bosacchi, S.
Franchi, V. Avanzini, and P. Allegri, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 28,174 (1994).
5. 1. R. Chelikowsky and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 14, 556 (1976).
6. S. Adachi, 1. Appl. Phys. 61,4869 (1987).
7. S. Adachi, Phys. Rev. B 35,7454 (1987).
8. M. E. Lee, 1. Poole, W. S. Truscott, 1. R. Cleverley, K. E. Singer, and D. M.
Rohlfing, 1. Appl. Phys. 68, 131 (1990).
9. S. Zollner, M. Garriga, 1. Humlfcek, S. Gopalan, and M. Cardona, Phys. Rev. B
43,4349 (1991).
10. A. N. Pikhtin and A. D. Yas'kov, Sov. Phys. Semicond.12, 622 (1978).
11. M. Hass and B. W. Henvis, 1. Phys. Chem. Solids 23, 1099 (1962).
12. K. A. Maslin, C. Patel, and T. 1. Parker, Infrared Phys. 32, 303 (1991).
13. F. Oswald and R. Shade, Z. Naturf. A 9,611 (1954).
14. D. F. Edwards and G. S. Hayne, 1. Opt. Soc. Am. 49, 414 (1959).
15. C. Alibert, M. Skouri, A. loullie, M. Benouna, and S. Sadiq, 1. Appl. Phys. 69,
3208 (1991).
232 Ill-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
o 1 2 345 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B13·3 £1(E) and £iE) spectra for GaSb at 300 K.
5
n
4
~
c 3
1 Eo
GaSb
t
0 1
2 3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B13·4 nee) and k(E) spectra for GaSb at 300 K.
234 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
WTO
GaSb
.1
10-1100 10 1 10 2
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B13·5 aCE) spectrum for GaSb at 300 K.
0.8
E2
0.7 !
Eo'
0.6
E1+A1 !
a: E1 !
0.5 !
Eo
0.4
! GaSb
0.30
1 2 3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B13·6 R(E) spectrum for GaSb at 300 K.
B13 GALLIUM ANTIMONIDE (GaSb) 235
Table B13-2 Optical constants of GaSb at 300 K.
eV £1 £2 n k <X (em· l ) R
0.Q1 15.89 0.0072 3.986 0.00090 9.lOE-01 0.359
0.02 17.02 0.044 4.125 0.0054 1.09E+01 0.372
0.024 19.11 0.173 4.372 0.020 4.80E+01 0.394
0.026 23.03 0.630 4.799 0.066 1.73E+02 0.429
0.027 29.74 2.095 5.457 0.192 5.25E+02 0.477
0.0272 32.59 2.993 5.715 0.262 7.22E+02 0.494
0.0274 36.73 4.611 6.072 0.380 1.05E+03 0.516
0.0276 43.15 7.950 6.596 0.603 1.69E+03 0.546
0.0278 53.85 16.44 7.422 1.108 3. 12E+03 0.589
0.0279 61.48 26.24 8.010 1.638 4.63E+03 0.618
0.028 68.72 45.60 8.695 2.622 7.44E+03 0.655
0.02805 69.09 61.41 8.987 3.417 9.72E+03 0.677
0.0281 62.52 81.51 9.090 4.483 1.28E+04 0.702
0.02815 43.82 101.2 8.777 5.763 1.64E+04 0.727
0.0282 13.50 109.5 7.869 6.959 1.99E+04 0.752
0.02825 -16.25 99.93 6.519 7.665 2.20E+04 0.774
0.0283 -33.93 79.92 5.143 7.770 2.23E+04 0.790
0.02835 -39.79 60.06 4.016 7.478 2.15E+04 0.802
0.0284 -39.10 44.61 3.180 7.015 2.02E+04 0.809
0.0285 -31.72 25.75 2.137 6.024 1.74E+04 0.815
0.0286 -24.15 16.18 1.569 5.158 1.50E+04 0.811
0.0288 -13.55 7.858 1.028 3.822 1.12E+04 0.780
0.029 -7.184 4.570 0.816 2.802 8.24E+03 0.707
0.0292 -3.079 2.972 0.775 1.918 5.68E+03 0.546
0.0294 -0.243 2.082 0.963 1.081 3.22E+03 0.233
0.0296 1.826 1.538 1.451 0.530 1.59E+03 0.077
0.0298 3.397 1.181 1.870 0.316 9.54E+02 0.103
0.03 4.629 0.936 2.162 0.216 6.58E+02 0.139
0.Q305 6.791 0.575 2.608 0.110 3.4IE+02 0.199
0.Q31 8.191 0.388 2.863 0.068 2. 13E+02 0.233
0.032 9.893 0.211 3.145 0.034 1.09E+02 0.268
0.034 11.54 0.090 3.397 0.013 4.58E+Ol 0.297
0.036 12.34 0.050 3.512 0.0071 2.58E+01 0.310
0.04 13.12 0.021 3.622 0.0029 1.20E+01 0.322
0.05 13.79 0.0060 3.714 0.00080 4.06E+00 0.331
0.06 14.03 0.0026 3.746 0.00035 2.14E+00 0.335
om 14.15 0.0014 3.761 0.00019 1.36E+00 0.336
0.08 14.22 0.00088 3.770 0.00012 9.48E-01 0.337
0.09 14.26 0.00058 3.776 0.000077 7.05E-01 0.338
0.1 14.29 0.00041 3.780 0.000054 5.48E-01 0.338
0.2 14.37 0.000045 3.791 0.0000059 1.20E-01 0.339
0.3 14.39 0.000013 3.793 0.0000017 5.23E-02 0.340
0.4 14.49 3.806 0.341
0.5 14.76 3.842 0.344
0.6 15.11 3.887 0.349
0.7 15.54 3.942 0.354
0.7125 15.60 0.026 3.950 0.0033 2.39E+02 0.355
0.725 15.66 0.190 3.958 0.024 1.76E+03 0.356
0.7375 15.73 0.462 3.966 0.058 4.35E+03 0.357
0.75 15.79 0.530 3.974 0.067 5.07E+03 0.358
236 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
238
B 14 INDIUM NITRIDE (inN) 239
18
15
12
"...... 6
:>
Q)
'-" 3
:>-< 0
0
0::: -3
Iil Figure B14-1 Electronic en-
Z
rx:l ergy-band structure of InN as
calculated with the self-
consistent orthogonalized
LCAO method. (From Xu
and Ching [8].)
r K H A r M L A
WAVE VECTOR
The UV reflectivity spectrum measured by Guo et al. [10] in the 2-20-eV region
showed a somewhat different feature from that of polycrystalline sample [21]. In
particular, the absolute reflectivity is considerably larger in the epitaxial film than in
the polycrystalline sample.
240 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
Table B 14-1 lists the room-temperature values of £=£I+i~, n*=n+ik, a, and R for
InN with El.c. They were taken from Guo et al. [10]. The (£1' ~), (n, k), a, and R
values in Table B14-1 are graphed in Figs. BI4-2-BI4-5, respectively.
REFERENCES
1. T. L. Tansley and C. P. Foley, Electron. Lett. 20,1066 (1984).
2. S. N. Mohammad, R. A. Salvador, and H. Morko9, Proc. IEEE 83, 1306
(1995).
3. O. Takai, J. Ebisawa, and Y. Hisamitsu, in Proc. 7th Intern. Confer. Vac. Metal.
(Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, Tokyo, 1982), p. 137.
4. Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, edit-
ed by K.-H. Hellwege and O. Madelung, Landolt-Bornstein, New Series,
Group III, Vol. 17, Pt. a (Springer, Berlin, 1982).
5. C. P. Foley and T. L. Tansley, Phys. Rev. B 33,1430 (1986).
6. D. W. Jenkins, R.-D. Hong, and 1. D. Dow, Superiatt. Microstruct. 3, 365
(1987).
7. M.-H. Tsai, D. W. Jenkins, J. D. Dow, and R. V. Kasowski, Phys. Rev. B 38,
1541 (1988).
8. Y.-N. Xu and W. Y. Ching, Phys. Rev. B 48, 4335 (1993).
9. N. E. Christensen and 1. Gorczyca, Phys. Rev. B 50, 4397 (1994).
10. Q. Guo, O. Kato, M. Fujisawa, and A. Yoshida, Solid State Commun. 83, 721
(1992).
11. H. J. Hovel and J. J. Cuomo,Appl. Phys. Lett. 20, 71 (1972).
12. K. Osamura, K. Nakajima, and Y. Murakami, Solid State Commun. 11, 617
(1972).
13. N. Puychevrier and M. Menoret, Thin Solid Films 36,141 (1976).
14. V. A. Tyagaf, A. M. Evstigneev, A. N. Krasiko, A. F. Andreeva, and V. Va.
Malakhov, Sov. Phys. Semicond. 11, 1257 (1977).
15. T. L. Tansley and C. P. Foley, 1. Appl. Phys. 59, 3241 (1986).
16. K. L. Westra, R. P. W. Lawson, and M. J. Brett, 1. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 6,1730
(1988).
17. T. L. Tansley and R. J. Egan, Thin Solid Films 164,441 (1988).
18. T. L. Tansley and C. P. Foley, 1. Appl. Phys. 60, 2092 (1986).
19. K. L. Westra and M. J. Brett, Thin Solid Films 192,227 (1990).
20. T. L. Tansley and R. J. Egan, Physica B 185, 190 (1993).
21. V. V. Sobolev, S. G. Kroitoru, A. F. Andreeva, and Y. Va. Malakhov, Sov.
Phys. Semicond. 13,485 (1979).
22. V. A. Tyagaf, O. V. Snitko, A. M. Evstigneev, and A. N. Krasiko, Phys. Status
Solidi B 103, 589 (1981).
23. B. T. Sullivan, R. R. Parsons, K. L. Westra, and M. J. Brett, 1. Appl. Phys. 64,
4144 (1988).
B14 INDIUM NITRIDE (inN) 241
7
6
5
4
co 3
2
1
0
-1 0 5 10 15 20
Photon energy (eV)
Figure 814·2 £1(E) and £z(E) spectra for InN at 300 K.
3.0
2.5
2.0
..li::
1.5
r:::
1.0
0.5
o 5 10 15 20
Photon energy (eV)
Figure 814·3 n(E) and k(E) spectra for inN at 300 K.
242 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
I"
E
S
InN
Elc
InN
Elc
0.2
ex:
0.1
o 5 10 15 20
Photon energy (eV)
Figure 814·5 RCE) spectrum for InN at 300 K.
B14 INDIUM NITRIDE (InN) 243
.......
-
~
ffi
z Figure 815·1 Electronic
w energy-band structure of
InP InP as calculated by an
ENPM. (From Che·
likowsky and Cohen [6].)
The locations of several
interband transitions are
included by the vertical ar-
rows.
A r 11 X U,K L r
(111) (100) (110)
245
246 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
TABLE Bls-l Energies a/the CPs and indirect gaps (E/ D ) in InP at 300 K.
CPs, EgID eV
Eo 1.35
Eo+t'l.o 1.45
ELg 2.05
EXg 2.21
El 3.17
El+t'l.l 3.29
Eo' 4.70
Eo'+~' 4.79
E2 5.10
E2+0 5.69
E l' -6.5
The fundamental absorption edge of InP corresponds to direct transitions from the
highest valence band to the lowest conduction band at the r point in the BZ [Eo
(1.35 eV): rs (rI5)~r6 (r l), Eo+!lo (1.45 eV): r7 (rI5)~r6 (rl)]' The lowest-
indirect-band-gap transitions may occur at 2.05 eV [EgL , rs (rI5)~L6 (L I)]. The indi-
rect E/ transitions [rg (rI5)~~ (XI)] may also occur at energies above EgL. How-
ever, the difference in energy between EgL and E gX is considered to be very small
(-0.16 eV).
The EI and EI+lll transitions may occur along the <111> directions (A) or at the L
point in the BZ [EI (3.17 e V): A4 •5 (A 3) ~ A6 (AI) or L4 •5 (~)~ L6 (Ll ), EI +lll (3.29
eV): A6 (A3)~A6 (AI) or L6 (~)~L6 (L I)]. The Eo' and Eo'+!lo' transitions are ex-
pected to occur at the center of the BZ and at -4.70 eV [rs (r15)~r7 (r15)] and 4.79
eV [rs (rls)~rs (rls )], respectively. A further Eo' transition, found in the calcula-
tion [6], is located along [100] (ll) about 20% of the way to X [Eo'(.1): .1s~.1s].
The E2 transitions are expected to take place along the [110] CE) or near X [X7
(X5)~X6 (XI)], and occur in InP for energies close to the Eo' and Eo'+!lo' CPs
(-5.10 eV). The E 2+0 transitions are thought to occur at the X point and at energies
-5.7 eV [X7 (X5)~X7 (X3)]. The E I ' transitions may also occur near the L point [L4•5
(~)~L6 (~), -6.5 eV (Ref. [8])].
Newman [13] determined the values of e,=15 and e~=10.6 for InP from IR reflec-
tance measurements. We note that Newman's values are considerably larger than
those generally accepted (e.g., e~=9.55-9.79, Refs. [14,15]).
Optical properties in the reststrahlen region of InP have been studied by Newman
[13], Hass and Henvis [16], Bairamov et al. [17], and Maslin et al. [18]. The data of
Newman indicated 100% reflectivity at the reststrahlen peak, which is unrealistic.
The data of Hass and Henvis [16] showed too much variation from the simple rest-
strahlen curve. This may be attributable to free-carrier plasma and mechanical pol-
ishing effects [19]. More recently, Bairamov et al. [17] have performed room-
temperature RS and IR reflectivity measurements on semiinsulating InP doped with
Fe and determined the reststrahlen parameters of this material: OlTQ=303.7 cm,t,
OlLO=344.5 cm't, and y=1.9 cm't. From the Lyddane-Sachs-Teller relationship and
using e,=12.50, we obtain e~=9.71, which is in agreement with the generally accept-
ed value (Le., e~=9.55-9,79). Maslin et al. have also determined the IR optical con-
stants of InP by reflection dispersive Fourier transform spectroscopy. They reported
the phonon frequencies OlTQ=304 cm,t and OlLO=346.5 cm't, but not '( value. Optical
absorption at the multiphonon bands has also been investigated by several authors
[13,20,21].
The neE) dispersion data in the transparent region of InP have been reported by
several authors [22-5]. They were obtained by the method of prism minimum de-
viation (Pettit and Turner [22]), by SE (Herzinger et al. [23]), by a grating coupling
technique (Martin et al. [24]), and by means of an integrated optical demultiplexer
in InP (Gini and Melchior [25]). A precision of ±O.003 in the n values is quoted in
Ref. [22]. References [24] and [25] also quote accuracy of 5xlO-4.
The data for n between 0.5 and 1.4 eV by Pettit and Turner [22] were found to fit
to the Sellmeier-type dispersion formula:
n2=A+~ (B15.1)
')}-C
range of 15-40 eV and are found to be much smaller than those in Ref. [8]. At E=20
eV, for example, the data in Ref. [50] gives a value of a=4.6x105 cm,l (k=0.23),
while a value of a=1.0x10 6 cm,l (k=0,49) was reported in Ref. [8]. The accuracy of
the absolute values of the absorption coefficient in Ref. [50] was reported to be bet-
ter than ±20%.
We list in Table B 15-2 the 300-K values of £=£I+iEz, n*=n+ik, a, and R for InP. A
complete set of the optical constants for E::;;0.3 e V were obtained from the rest-
strahlen parameters of Bairamov et al. [17] (w To=303.7 cm,l, £,=12.50, £~=9.71, and
"(=1.9 cm'I). The real optical constants £1 and n for 0.5::;;£::;;1.38 eV were calculated
from Eq. (BI5.1) with the dispersion parameters of Gini and Melchior [25]. The
imaginary constants k and a for 1.28::;;E::;;1.38 eV were taken from Turner et al. [33].
A complete set of the optical constants for 1.5::;;£::;;6.0 e V and those for 6.5::;;£::;;20 e V
were taken from Aspnes and Studna [46] and Cardona [8], respectively.
The (£1' €z), (n, k), a, and R values in Table B 15-2 are plotted in Figs. B 15-2-
BI5-5, respectively. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of each
CPo The MDF analysis [7,52-4] suggested that the Eo and Eo+~ structures can be
characterized by a 3D Mo CP, the EI and EI+~I structures by a 3D MI (or 2D Mo) CP,
and the Eo', Eo'+~', E2 , and E2+0 structures by a DHO (a broadened 2D MI CP).
REFERENCES
1. G. P. Agrawal and N. K. Dutta, Semiconductor Lasers, 2nd Edition (Van
Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1993).
2. B. Jalali and S. J. Pearton, InP HBTs: Growth, Processing, and Applications
(Artech House, Boston, 1995).
3. Properties of Indium Phosphide, EMIS Datareviews Series No.6 (INSPEC
(lEE), London, 1990).
4. V. Swaminathan and A. T. Macrander, Material Aspects of GaAs and InP
Based Structures (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1991).
5. S. Adachi, Physical Properties of IIl-V Semiconductor Compounds: InP, InAs,
GaAs, GaP, InGaAs, and InGaAsP (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1992).
6. J. R. Chelikowsky and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 14, 556 (1976).
7. H. Yoshikawa and S. Adachi, lpn. l. Appl. Phys. 35, 5946 (1996).
8. M. Cardona, l. Appl. Phys. 36, 2181 (1965).
9. R. E. Neidert, S. C. Binari, and T. Weng, Electron. Lett. 18, 987 (1982).
10. L. G. Meiners, J. Appl. Phys. 59, 1611 (1986).
11. K. Seeger,Appl. Phys. Lett. 54,1268 (1989).
12. A. N. Pikhtin and A. D. Yas'kov, Sov. Phys. Semicond. 12,622 (1978).
13. R. Newman, Phys. Rev. 111, 1518 (1958).
14. S. Adachi, I. Appl. Phys. 53,8777 (1982).
15. Y. T. Cherng, D. H. Jaw, M. J. Jou, and G. B. Stringellow, I. Appl. Phys. 65,
3285 (1989).
250 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
16. M. Hass and B. W. Henvis, f. Phys. Chem. Solids 23, 1099 (1962).
17. B. H. Bairamov, 1. P. Ipatova, V. A. Milorava, V. V. Toporov, K. Naukkarinen,
T. Tuomi, G. Irmer, and J. Monecke, Phys. Rev. B 38, 5722 (1988).
18. K. A. Maslin, C. Patel, and T. J. Parker, Infrared Phys. 32, 303 (1991).
19. O. J. Glembocki and H. Piller, in Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids,
edited by E. D. Palik (Academic, Orlando, 1985), p. 503.
20. W. N. Reynolds, M. T. Lilburne, and R. M. Dell, Proc. Phys. Soc. London 71,
416 (1958).
21. E. S. Koteles and W. R. Datars, Solid State Commun. 19,221 (1976).
22. G. D. Pettit and W. J. Turner,f. Appl. Phys. 36, 2081 (1965).
23. C. M. Herzinger, P. G. Snyder, B. Johs, and J. A. Woollam, f. Appl. Phys. 77,
1715 (1995).
24. P. Martin, EI M. Skouri, L. Chusseau, C. Alibert, and H. Bissessur, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 67, 881 (1995).
25. E. Gini and H. Melchior, f. Appl. Phys. 79,4335(1996); erratum, ibid. 80, 7172
(1996).
26. B. Jensen and A. Torabi, f. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2, 1395 (1985).
27. P. J. L. Herve and L. K. J. Vandamme, f. Appl. Phys. 77,5476 (1995).
28. M. Bertolotti, V. Bogdanov, A. Ferrari, A. Jascow, N. Nazorova, A. Pikhtin,
and L. Schirone,J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 7, 918 (1990).
29. J. A. McCaulley, V. M. Donnelly, M. Vernon, and I. Taha, Phys. Rev. B 49,
7408 (1994).
30. M. S. Whalen and J. Stone, f. Appl. Phys. 53,4340 (1982).
31. A. D. Yas'kov, Sov. Phys. Semicond. 17,937 (1983).
32. V. B. Bogdanov, V. T. Prokopenko, and A. D. Yas'kov, Opt. Spectrosc. 62,
551 (1987).
33. W. J. Turner, W. E. Reese, and G. D. Pettit, Phys. Rev. 136, A1467 (1964).
34. M. Bugajski and W. Lewandowski, f. Appl. Phys. 57, 521 (1985).
35. M. A. Abdullaev, S. I. Kokhanovskii, Yu. M. Makushenko, and R. P. Seisyan,
Sov. Phys. Semicond. 23, 724 (1989).
36. G. Augustine, N. M. Jokerst, and A. Rohatgi,Appl. Phys. Lett. 61,1429 (1992).
37. W. P. Dumke, M. R. Lorenz, and G. D. Pettit, Phys. Rev. B 1, 4668 (1970).
38. A. A. Ballman, A. M. Glass, R. E. Nahory, and H. Brown, f. Cryst. Growth 62,
198 (1983).
39. M. R. Lorenz, W. Reuter, W. P. Dumke, R. J. Chicotka, D. G. Pettit, and J. M.
Woodall, Appl. Phys. Lett. 13,421 (1968).
40. C. H. Henry, R. A. Logan, F. R. Merritt, and J. P. Luongo, IEEE f. Quantum
Electron. QE-19, 947 (1983).
41. H. C. Casey, Jr. and P. L. Carter, Appl. Phys. Lett. 44, 82 (1984).
42. M. Cardona, f. Appl. Phys. 32,958 (1961).
43. M. Cardona, f. Appl. Phys. 32,2151 (1961).
44. S. S. Vishnubhatla and J. C. Woolley, Can. f. Phys. 46,1769 (1968).
45. H. Burkhard, H. W. Dinges, and E. Kuphal, f. Appl. Phys. 53, 655 (1982).
B15 INDIUM PHOSPHIDE CInP) 251
25
20 Eo+ Ao
InP
15 l
EOl
'" 10
5
0
"1
-5
-10
0 2 4 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B15·2 E1CE) and E2 CE) spectra for InP at 300 K.
252 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
..::t:. 3
c
2
o 2 468 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B15-3 neE) and k(E) spectra for InP at 300 K.
107~~~~~~~~~~~
106 "'TO
105
1
I"-104
§ 103
---~ 10 2
10 1
InP
10°
10"110-2 10-1 100 101
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B15-4 acE) spectrum for InP at 300 K.
254 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
257
258 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
6
eVI==~
InAs
-9 Xs
-12
L A r X U,K r
TABLE B16·1 Energies o/the CPs and indirect gaps (E/D ) in InAs at 300 K.
CPs, EglD eV
Eo 0.36
Eo+~o 0.76
EL
g 1.07
EX
g 1.37
El 2.50
El+~l 2.78
E2 4.45
E2+0 -5.2
E 1' -6.4
mined to be c,=15,15 and c~=12.25 (T=4.2 K) by Hass and Henvis [10] and
c,=14.55±o.3 and c~=11.8±o.1 (T=300 K) by Lorimor and Spitzer [11]. They were
obtained from IR reflectivity [10] and absorption measurements [11].
The fundamental lattice reflection band of InAs was measured by Hass and Hen-
vis [10] at 4.2 K. A set of the reststrahlen parameters obtained by these authors
were: Ul To=218.9±3 cm· 1 , Ul LO=243.3±2 em-I, c,=15.15, c~=12.25, and )'=1.53 em-I.
B16 INDIUM ARSENIDE (InAs) 259
n2 = A+ B + C +~ (B16.1)
1- (v / 3920)2 1- (v / 219)2 v 2
where the B term is the contribution from the band edge resonance, the C term is the
contribution from the reststrahlen band, and the D term comes from the free-carrier
susceptibility. The best fit to the experimental data gave A=l1.1±O.l, B=0.71±O.01,
260 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
and "(=4.9 cm· l . The real optical constants (£'1' n) for 0.2::;£:50.35 eY were obtained
from Eq. (12.1) (Eo=0.356 eY, EI=2.2 eY, E2=4.9 eY, E3=2.714xlO·2 eY, G I =28.748
ey2, G 2=79.354 ey2, G3=0.0020l ey2, and A=1.1732, Ref. [19]). The imaginary op-
tical constants (k, a) for 0.325:5E :50.85 eY were taken from Dixon and Ellis
(n=2xlO I6 cm·3 , Ref. [23]). A complete set of the optical constants for 1.5::;£:56.0 e Y
were taken from Aspnes and Studna [31 J and those for 6.5::;£:515 e Y were obtained
from Philipp and Ehrenreich [29J. The a and k values for £<::16 eY were obtained
from Cardona et al. [33J.
The (£'1' €.z), (n, k), a, and R values in Table B16-2 are plotted in Figs. BI6-2-
BI6-5, respectively. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of each
CP. It has been shown [7,8,3 7J that the Eo and Eo+1lo structures are chl!Iacterized by
a 3D Mo CP, the E, and E,+A, structures by a 3D M, (or 2D Mo) CP, and the E2
structure by a DHO (a broadened 2D M, CP).
REFERENCES
1. Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, edit-
ed by K.-H. Hellwege and O. Madelung, Landolt-Bomstein, New Series,
Group III, Vol. 17, Pt. a (Springer, Berlin, 1982).
2. A. G. Milnes and A. Y. Polyakov, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 18, 237 (1993).
3. J. R. Chelikowsky and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 14,556 (1976).
4. S. N. Sahu, J. T. Borenstein, Y. A. Singh, and J. W. Corbett, Phys. Status Solidi
B 122,661 (1984).
5. M.-Z. Huang and W. Y. Ching, 1. Phys. Chem. Solids 46,977 (1985).
6. S. Massidda, A. Continenza, A. J. Freeman, T. M. de Pascale, F. Meloni, and M.
Serra, Phys. Rev. B 41,12079 (1990).
7. S. Adachi, Phys. Rev. B 35, 7454 (1987).
8. S. Adachi, 1. Appl. Phys. 66,6030 (1989).
9. D. L. Rode, Phys. Rev. B 3,3287 (1971).
10. M. Hass and B. W. Henvis,l. Phys. Chem. Solids 23,1099 (1962).
11. O. G. Lorimor and W. G. Spitzer, 1. Appl. Phys. 36, 1841 (1965).
12. A. Memon, T. J. Parker, and J. R. Birch, Proc. SPIE 289,20 (1981).
13. K. A. Maslin, C. Patel, and T. J. Parker, Infrared Phys. 32, 303 (1991).
14. E. S. Koteles and W. R. Datars, Can. 1. Phys. 54, 1676 (1976).
15. E. Haga and H. Kimura, 1. Phys. Soc. Ipn 19,471 (1964).
16. F. Matossi and F. Stern, Phys. Rev. 111,472 (1958).
17. M.1. Aliev, Kh. A. Khalilov, and G. B. Ibragimov, Phys. Status Solidi B 140,
K83 (1987).
18. E. D Palik and R. T. Holm, in Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, edited
by E. D. Palik (Academic, Orlando, 1985), p. 479.
19. A. N. Pikhtin and A. D. Yas'kov, Sov. Phys. Semicond. 12,622 (1978).
20. G. Ghosh,]. Appl. Phys. 79, 9388 (1996).
262 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
30
25
Eo+t:.o El
El+t:.l
1 1E2
InAs
20 1 1
15 1Eo
CO
r----·
10
5
0
..- ""
~ 1
-5
-1 0 0~~2:--'---'::4----'-~6--'--8~'--'10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B16-2 £1(E) and £2(E) spectra for InAs at 300 K.
El+t:.l
5 Eo+t:.o Elll
1 InAs
4 IEo
~ r--"-
C 3
1
.... ','"
0 2 4 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B16-3 neE) and k(E) spectra for InAs at 300 K.
264 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
108
107
106 WTO
.;::' 105 !
-{3
I
104
~ 103
InAs
102
10 1
0.8
0.7 E2
1 InAs
0.6
E1+A1 E1'
a: E1 1
0.5 Eo+Ao 1
!
0.4 Eo
1 .. '
0.3
2 4 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B16·5 R(E) spectrum for InAs at 300 K.
B16 INDlllM ARSENIDE (InAs) 265
Table 816-2 Optical constants of InAs at 300 K.
eV £1 £2 n k IX (em-I) R
0.01 14.96 0.030 3.868 0.0039 3.97E+00 0.347
0.02 17.80 0.218 4.219 0.026 5.25E+Ol 0.380
0.024 24.41 1.167 4.942 0.118 2.87E+02 0.440
0.025 29.90 2.533 5.473 0.231 5.87E+02 0.478
0.026 44.19 8.895 6.681 0.666 1.75E+03 0.550
0.0262 49.99 12.92 7.128 0.906 2.41E+03 0.574
0.0264 57.76 20.17 7.712 1.308 3.50E+03 0.603
0.0266 67.43 34.65 8.463 2.047 5.52E+03 0.639
0.0267 71.81 47.24 8.882 2.659 7.20E+03 0.661
0.0268 73.18 65.50 9.257 3.538 9.61E+03 0.685
0.0269 66.08 89.73 9.421 4.762 1.30E+04 0.713
0.027 42.92 113.6 9.065 6.265 I.71E+04 0.742
0.0271 5.043 121.3 7.951 7.627 2.lOE+04 0.770
0.02715 -13.69 115.8 7.174 8.072 2.22E+04 0.783
0.0272 -28.78 105.6 6.352 8.314 2.29E+04 0.794
0.0273 -45.25 80.18 4.838 8.286 2.29E+04 0.812
0.0274 -48.32 57.94 3.683 7.867 2.19E+04 0.824
0.0275 -45.39 41.97 2.866 7.321 2.04E+04 0.833
0.0276 -40.61 31.08 2.294 6.773 1.90E+04 0.838
0.0278 -31.18 18.44 1.588 5.805 1.64E+04 0.843
0.028 -23.81 11.99 1.193 5.023 1.43E+04 0.841
0.029 -6.339 2.972 0.575 2.583 7.59E+03 0.749
0.03 -0.084 1.300 0.781 0.833 2.53E+03 0.192
0.031 3.058 0.723 1.761 0.205 6.46E+02 0.081
0.032 4.938 0.459 2.225 0.103 3.35E+02 0.145
0.034 7.072 0.231 2.660 0.043 1.50E+02 0.206
0.036 8.246 0.138 2.872 0.024 8.78E+01 0.234
0.038 8.985 0.091 2.997 0.Q15 5.88E+01 0.250
0.04 9.491 0.065 3.081 0.011 4.26E+01 0.260
0.05 10.67 0.019 3.266 0.0030 1.51E+01 0.282
0.06 11.10 0.0089 3.332 0.0013 8. 11E+OO 0.290
0.07 11.32 0.0049 3.364 0.00073 5.17E+00 0.293
0.08 11.45 0.0030 3.383 0.00045 3.63E+00 0.296
0.09 11.53 0.0020 3.395 0.00030 2.71E+00 0.297
0.1 11.58 0.0014 3.404 0.00021 2. 11E+OO 0.298
0.2 11.75 3.427 0.301
0.21 11.78 3.432 0.301
0.22 11.81 3.436 0.302
0.23 11.84 3.441 0.302
0.24 11.87 3.445 0.303
0.25 11.91 3.451 0.303
0.26 11.95 3.457 0.304
0.27 11.99 3.463 0.305
0.28 12.04 3.470 0.305
0.29 12.10 3.478 0.306
0.3 12.16 3.488 0.307
0.31 12.24 3.499 0.308
0.32 12.34 3.512 0.310
0.325 12.39 0.0018 3.521 0.00025 8.30E+00 0.311
0.33 12.46 0.0036 3.530 0.00051 1.70E+Ol 0.312
266 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
268
B17 INDIUM ANTIMONIDE (InSb) 269
L4,5
4
2
-
~
--2
0
>-
(!J -4
a:
w -6
Z InSb
W -8
-10
-12
L A r X U,K r
Figure B17·1 Electronic energy·band structure of lnSb as calculated by an ENPM. (From
Chelikowsky and Cohen [3].) The locations of several interband transitions are included by
the vertical arrows.
TABLE B17·1 Energies afthe CPs and indirect gaps (E/D ) in inSb at 300 K.
CPs , EgID eV
Eo 0.18
EL
g 0.93
Eo+l1o 0.99
EX
g 1.63
El 1.80
El+111 2.30
E2 3.90
E1' -5.3
ured reststrahlen data using the simple harmonic oscillator model including the free-
carrier plasma contribution:
(17.1)
CO( CO + il)
The reststrahlen parameters fit-determined at 300 K were: £,=17.72, £_=15.68,
coTO=179.1 cm,l, "(=2.87 cm'l, CO p2=1.028X10 5 cm,2, and r=1O.7 cm,l [11]. The 100-
270 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
and 373-K values were also reported in Ref. [11]. The sample used in this study was
nearly intrinsic material with n=6xl0!5 cm,3 at low temperature (n=2xlO!6 cm,3 at
300 K). The data of Refs. [11] and [9] were very close except near the reststrahlen
peak region.
Gammon and Palik [12] reported the 300-K reststrahlen parameters for a sample
with n=2xlO!6 cm,3 to be E_=16, ro To=180 cm'!, ro w =190.3 cm'!, y=3.2 cm'!,
ro/=5.81x10 5 cm,2, and r=7.0 cm'!. (Using the Lyddane-Sachs-Teller relationship,
one can obtain E, to be 17.9.) Note that peak values in nand k near roTO are very sen-
sitive to y (Le., nand k have larger peak values when yis smaller). Maslin et al. [13]
also reported the 300-K (n, k) values in graphical form. Their obtained k value at
ro-ro TO is -5.6, which is considerably smaller than the value of k-8.6 obtained by
Sanderson [11]. Optical absorption in the multiphonon-band region has also been
studied by Koteles and Datars [14].
Free-carrier absorption in n-type InSb has been studied both theoretically [15] and
experimentally [16-19]. The absorption coefficient increased smoothly as the light
wavelength increased. This absorption mechanism is due to the normal intraband
free-carrier absorption. The intervalence-band absorption in p-InSb has also been
studied experimentally [20] and theoretically [21]. This type of absorption was pro-
duced by hole transitions between the LH and HH bands, and thus depended
strongly on the hole concentration [20].
The refractive-index dispersion at or below the fundamental absorption edge was
measured by Moss et al. [22] and Valyashko and Gerrmann [23] by means of trans-
mittance interference fringe method. Although not specified, sample in Ref. [22]
was intrinsic and measured at room temperature. Uncertainty in n was reported to be
±O.5. The dependence of neE) on the free-carrier density in n- and p-InSb samples
with different impurity concentrations was studied by Valyashko and Gerrmann [23]
at T=117-395 K. The neE) data of lightly doped samples were found to be different
in the intrinsic and impurity conduction regions that the absolute values of n depend
on the density of free carries of both signs and that these quantities increase with
increasing minority carrier density in the impurity conduction region. An error of !In
was estimated to be ±O.015 that arose from the uncertainty in the interference spac-
ing ~A.=±O.05 11m.
Optical absorption at the fundamental absorption edge of InSb has been studied
by a number of groups [16,18,22,24] (see also Ref. [25]). The absorption coefficient
a was found to strongly dependent on the carrier concentration [16,18]. Note that
the Burstein-Moss effect at the band edge was originally discovered in heavily do-
ped InSb [26,27]. The aCE) data at photon energies well above the fundamental ab-
sorption edge have also been reported by several authors [28,29].
The fundamental reflectivity of InSb has been studied by several authors [30-4].
By performing the KK analysis, some authors extracted (n, k) or (EI> ~) values in the
0-6-eV spectral region (T=300 K, Ref. [30]), in the 1O-26-eV region (T=300 K, Ref.
[32]), and in the 0-25-eV region (T=300 K, Ref. [33]). Morrison [30] obtained a
value of k-1.8 at the E2 peak, which is much smaller than Philipp-Ehrenreich's val-
B17 INDIUM ANTIMONIDE (lnSb) 271
ue of k-3,4 (~-17.5) [33]. This may indicate that the quality of Morrison's sample
surface was not as good as that of Philipp and Ehrenreich.
Aspnes and Studna [35] used SE to determine the optical constants of InSb at
room temperature from 1.5 to 6.0 eV. The SE data were taken on a best-prepared
sample in a flow of dry N2 gas and presented in tabular form. The k value at the E2
peak was -3.7, which is considerably larger than Philipp-Ehrenreich's value (k-3,4,
Ref. [33 D. Logothetidis et al. [36] have studied, using SE, the effects of temperature
on £(E) of InSb in the temperature range between 100 and 740 K and determined the
interband CP parameters and their temperature dependence by performing an SCP
line-shape analysis of the measured £(E) data.
An experimental determination of the optical constants in the outermost core re-
gion (10-170 eV) of InSb has been made by Cardona et al. [37-40]. They observed
weak structures at -18 and 33 eV in the absorption and reflectivity spectra. These
structures correspond to transitions at the outermost d (In) and d (Sb) core levels,
respectively.
Table B17-2lists the room-temperature values of£=£I+i~, n*=n+ik, a, and R for
InSb. A complete set of the optical constants for E~0.04 eV were calculated from Eq.
(17.1) using the reststrahlen parameters of Sanderson [11]. The real optical constants,
£1 and n, for 0.0558~E~0.158 eV and imaginary optical constants, ~ and k, for
0.180~E~,496 eV were taken from Moss et al. [22]. A set of the optical constants
for 0.75~E~1.25 eV and 7~E~13 eV were taken from Philipp and Ehrenreich [33],
while those for 1.5~E~6 eV were obtained from Aspnes and Studna [35]. The a and
k values for D-15 eV were taken from Cardona et al. [38].
The (£1' ~), (n, k), a, and R values in Table B17-2 are graphed in Figs. BI7-2-
B17-5, respectively. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of each
CPo It has been shown [7,41-3] that such optical spectra can be successfully
explained by the MDF.
REFERENCES
1. Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, edit-
ed by K.-H. Hellwege and O. Madelung, Landolt-Bornstein, New Series,
Group III, Vol. 17, Pt. a (Springer, Berlin, 1982).
2. J. R. Chelikowsky and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 14, 556 (1976).
3. J. R. Chelikowsky and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 30, 4828 (1984).
4. S. N. Sahu, J. T. Borenstein, V. A. Singh, and J. W. Corbett, Phys. Status Solidi
B 122,661 (1984).
5. M.-Z. Huang and W. Y. Ching, 1. Phys. Chern. Solids 46,977 (1985).
6. S. Massidda, A. Continenza, A. J. Freeman, T. M. de Pascale, F. Meloni, and M.
Serra, Phys. Rev. B 41,12079 (1990).
7. S. Adachi, Phys. Rev. B 35, 7454 (1987).
8. S. Adachi, 1. Appl. Phys. 61,4869 (1987).
272 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
El!
25 Eo+Ao El+Al 1E2
20 1 1 InSb
15
10
5
o
e 1
-5
-100L-~2L-~4L-~6L-~8L-~10
6
El
5 o+A) El+Al
1 1 E2 InSb
4 1 El '
~
C 3 1
2
1
n
0 2 4 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure B 17 -3 n(E) and k(E) spectra for lnSb at 300 K.
274 III-V BINARY SEMICONDUCTORS
WTO Eo+~o
1 1
Eo
1
InSb
0.8 r--"'--r--'--r---r---r---r-~~~
0.7
0.6
0.5
a:
0.4
0.3
0.2
InSb
0.1
o 2 4 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure 817·5 R(E) spectrum for InSb at 300 K.
B17 INDIUM ANTIMONIDE (lnSb) 275
C1 GENERAL REMARKS
There has been considerable interest in the III-V semiconductor alloys for many device
applications. Literature on the fundamental properties of these alloys is growing rapidly
[1,2]. However, some practical device parameters in these materials have been ham-
pered by a lack of definite knowledge of many material parameters. An interpolation
scheme is a powerful tool for estimating some material parameters of semiconductor
alloys. Although the scheme is still open to experimental verification, it provides more
reliable values over the entire range of alloy composition [3].
If one uses linear interpolation, the ternary material parameter (1) can be derived
from binary parameters (B's) by
for alloy of the form given by A)31-xC, where a=BBC and b=BAc-BBC' Some material
parameters, however, deviate largely from the linear relation of Eq. (CI.I), and have an
approximately quadratic dependence on the mole fraction of one compound x. The ter-
nary parameter, in such a case, can be very efficiently approximated by the relation-
ship:
(C1.2)
where a=BBC' b=BAc-BBC> and C=-CA_B • The parameter c (CA-B) is usually called a
"bowing" or "nonlinear" parameter.
The quaternary material A1_)3xC))I_Y is thought to be constructed of four binaries:
AC, AD, BC, and BD. If one uses a linear interpolation scheme, the quaternary pa-
rameter (Q) can be derived from the binary parameters by
Q(x,y) = (1- x)yBAC + (1- x)(I- y)BAD + xyBBC + x(1- y)BBD (C1.3)
If one of the four binary parameters (e.g., BAD) is lacking, the quaternary parameter
can be estimated from
If the material parameter can be given by a specific expression owing to some physi-
cal basis, it is natural to consider that interpolation scheme may also be obeyed to this
expression. The dielectric constant e is one such case that follows the Clausius-Mosotti
relation (see Sec. 2.1). Then, the interpolation expression, e.g., for A1-)3xC))l-y alloy
has a form given by
e(x,y) -1 (1
--'-~'--- = - x ) y e(AC) -1 + (1 - x )(1 - y ) e(AD) -1 e(BC)-1
+ xy ---'--'---
e(x,y) - 2 e(AC) - 2 e(AD) - 2 e(BC) - 2
+ x(l- ) e(BD) -I (C1.6)
y e(BD)-2
If relationships for the ternary parameters (Ts) are available, the quaternary
parameter can be expressed either as (Al_)3xCyDl_y)
with
u = (1- x - y) / 2 (C1.9 a)
v = (2 - x - 2 y) /2 (C1.9b)
w=(2-2x-y)/2 (C1.9c)
The lattice constant "a" is known to obey Vegard's law well, i.e., to vary linearly with
composition [see Eqs. (CLl), (C1.3), and (C1.5)]. On the other hand, the band-gap
energy in a ternary semiconductor usually deviates from a simple linear relation of Eq.
(C1.l), and has an approximately quadratic dependence on the mole fraction x. Table
Cl-l summarizes the lattice constants and band-gap energies for some III-V binary
compounds of interest here. Table Cl-2lists the bowing parameters of Eo, Eo+llo, EgX,
and EgL gaps for some III-V ternary alloys.
Introducing the lattice parameters of Table Cl-l into Eq. (C1.3) [Eq. (C1.5)], we can
obtain the lattice matching condition for A1o..BxCPloy quaternary on various III-V bi-
nary substrates in the following form:
TABLE Ct·t Lattice constants and band-gap energies of some Ill-V binary
compounds at 300 K.
Band-Gap Energy (eV)
Binary Eo A_ EX. ELb
'-'0 g &
AlP 5.4625 3.58 0.10 2.48 3.30
AlAs 5.6611 2.95 0.28 2.16 2.36
AlSb 6.1355 2.30 0.72 1.61 2.21
GaP 5.4512 2.74 0.10 2.26 2.63
GaAs 5.6533 1.42 0.34 1.91 1.73
GaSb 6.0959 0.72 0.74 1.05 0.76
InP 5.8688 1.35 0.10 2.21 2.05
InAs 6.0584 0.36 0.40 1.37 1.07
InSb 6.4794 0.18 0.81 1.63 0.93
• r8~~ transitions.
b r8~L6 transitions.
282 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
(C 1.1 0)
x = Ao+BoY (CUI)
Tables CI-3 and 4 list a set of the Ao, Bo, Co, and Do (Ao and Bo) values for various III-
V quaternary systems of types Al"xBxCyDl.y and AxByC1..x.yD (ABxCyDl..x), respectively.
It should be noted that no lattice matching can be achieved between the AlxGayIn1.x.ySb
quaternary and any commercially available III-V binary substrate (GaP, GaAs, GaSb,
InP, InAs, or InSb).
The quaternary band-gap energies, Eo, Eo+~, EgX, EgL, as a function of composition
can be obtained, using the numeric data given in Tables CI-I and CI-2, from Eq.
(C1.7) [or Eq. (C1.8)]. Such band-gap energies will be presented in graphical form in
Sec. C3 and used to calculate the refractive-index dispersion of the quaternary alloys.
F C'E CI E2
+ o-3D-ex- In 0 + B' (C1.12)
G E 2 E; _E2
with
!(Xo) = X~2[2 - (1 + Xo)1I2 - (1- Xo)1I2] (C1.13a)
! (Xso) =X;[2 - (1 + X.o)1I2 - (1- X.o)1I2] (C1.13b)
Xo =E I Eo (C1.13c)
Xso =E I (Eo + llo) (C1.13d)
where Ao', FoD', and Foc> represent the strength parameters of the EoI(Eo+Ilo)-gap one-
electron (free electron-hole pair), discrete-exciton, and continuum-exciton transitions,
respectively, and B' corresponds to the nondispersive contribution arising from the
higher-lying gaps (EI' EI+lll , Eo, Ez, etc.).
Notice that that the excitonic effects are considerably weaker in III-V semiconduc-
tors than in II-VI semiconductors. We can, therefore, successfully neglect the exciton
contributions and thus
(C1.14)
The parameters Ao' and B' can be determined by fitting Eq. (C1.14) with the experi-
mental data.
We list in Table CI-5 the values of Ao' and B* required to fit the experimental III-V
binary data to Eq. (C1.14). The n(E) curves calculated from these dispersion parame-
ters are shown in Fig. Cl-l. The previous studies [4,5] showed that the values of Ao'
and B* vary almost linearly with composition for such semiconductor alloys as AlzGa l_
zAs and Inl_zGa~s»I_Y' Based on this fact, the alloy values of Ao' and B' can be suc-
cessfully obtained from the numerical solutions of Eq. (C1.1) or Eq. (C1.3) [Eq.
(C1.5)], using the binary values listed in Table CI-5.
C1 GENERAL REMARKS 285
TABLE Cl-5 Dispersion parameters usedfor calculation ofn(E) from Eq. (Cl.14).
Binary Ao· B·
AlP" 18.39 -0.74
AlAs b 25.30 -0.80
AlSb c 59.68 -9.53
GaP d 14.71 4.38
GaAs' 6.30 9.40
GaSb c 4.05 12.66
Inp! 8.40 6.60
InAs c 5.14 10.15
InSb c 7.91 13.07
"B. Monemar, Solid State Commun. 8, 1295 (1970).
bR. E. Fern and A. Onton,]. Appl. Phys. 42, 3499 (1971).
cB. O. Seraphin and H. E. Bennett, Semiconductors and Semimetals, edited by R. K.
Willardson and A. C. Beer (Academic, New York, 1967), Vol. 3, p. 499.
dK. Strtissner et al., Phys. Rev. B 32, 6614 (1985) .
• H. C. Casey, Jr. et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 24, 63 (1974).
I G. D. Pettit and W. J. Turner, J. Appl. Phys. 36, 2081 (1965).
6.0
5.5 AlSb
5.0
4.5
C
AlP
3.5
3.0
2.5
0 2 3 4
fH\) (eV)
Figure Cl-l Refractive-index dispersion of some llI-V binaries calculated from Eq. (Cl-14).
286 ill-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
REFERENCES
1. H. C. Casey, Jr. and M. B. Panish, Heterostructure Lasers (Academic, New York,
1978), Parts A and B.
2. A.-B. Chen and A. Sher, Semiconductor Alloys: Physics and Material Engineer-
ing (Plenum, New York, 1995).
3. S. Adachi, Physical Properties of Ill-V Semiconductor Compounds: InP, lnAs
GaAs, GaP, InGaAs, and InGaAsP (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1992).
4. S. Adachi, J. Appl. Phys. 58, Rl (1985).
5. S. Adachi,]. Appl. Phys. 53, 5863 (1982).
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS
287
288 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
X
2.9 %AIN: 1
GaN
%InN:
~ 10 5 0 5 10
~ 2.8 Figure C2-I-l Refractive indices of
g2 GaN and its AI and In ternary alloys
at room temperature. The curves for
~ 2.7
GaN and 10% AlN correspond to
U
the experimental data of Amano et
~ 2.6 at. [4], while the other curves are
obtained by applying a rigid shift of
~ the GaN curve to match the alloy's
2.5 band gap. (From Bougrov and Zu-
brilov [8].)
2.4 L-J'--'--'.--L--L--'--'--'--'--1-..L-.L-.~L-J
300 350 400 450
WAVELENGTH ( nm )
2.8,.-----------------,
x= 0
2.6
c::
)( 2.4
GI
'C
-=
GI
>
~
f
'lii 2.2
a:
2.0 Al xG8 1. xN
Figure C2-1-2 Refractive
indices of AIxGal.xN films T=300K
grown on (0001) sapphire
substrates. (From Brunner
et at. [9].)
1.8 ..J...--~_+_-~_I--'--+_~-_t_-~_j
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
Photon Energy leV]
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 289
sity deficit of approximately 2%. The effects of the density deficit on the optical prop-
erties of epitaxial GaN films have been discussed in more detail in Ref. [10].
Optical absorption at the fundamental absorption edge of epitaxial AlxGa1.xN films
has been studied by a number of authors [9,11-15]. Figure C2-I-3 shows, as an exam-
ple, the absorption coefficient squared as a function of photon energy as measured by
Wickenden et al. [15]. The (OOOI)-plane AlxGal.~ layers were grown by low-pressure
MOCVD on sapphire substrates. The a(E) spectra did not exhibit large low-energy
tails observed in other studies [11,13], indicating that there were minimal macroscopic
nonuniformities in the alloy samples. The a(E) spectra of AlxGal.~ alloy at high ab-
sorption region (E>-EJ were also found to be nearly the same as that of GaN [9,14].
40
,.... 20
0
x
---
N
C
10
o~--~--~--~-*~~~~--~~~
3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.6
Energy (eV)
Figure C2·I·3 Absorption coefficient squared (cr) as a function of photon energy for AlxGal..N
with x<OA measured at room temperature. (From Wickenden et al. [15].)
Edwards et al. [16] used SE to assess the preparation of smooth and abrupt GaN,
AlN, and AlxGa1.xN surfaces by wet chemical etching in real time. The epilayers stud-
ied were grown on 6H-SiC(0001>Si substrates by MOVPE. The SE £(E) spectra for
Alo.4sGllo.ssN (and GaN) before and after chemical treatment were presented in graphi-
cal form. The oscillations found in the low-energy region originated from multiple in-
ternal reflections in the epilayers where they were effectively transparent. Because of
the limited spectral range (1.5Q:S;5.75 eV), only the lowest-direct-band edge could be
recognized as the CP structure in their measured £(E) spectra.
More recently, Wethkamp et al. [17] have measured the pseudodielectric-function
spectra <£2(E» using SE in the 3-25-eV region of hexagonal AlxGa1.xN (O::;;XS:1.0)
grown on (0001) sapphire substrates. Figure C2-I-4 shows their measured pseudodi-
290 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
x(%)
AI.~ ~100
~; ----- 86
~77
~..l ---63
1\
w'"
~61
v
~O
~33
~17
10
~~
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
energy (eV)
Figure C2-I-4 Pseudodielectric-function spectra <q(E» of hexagonal Al.Gal..N films grown
on (0001) sapphire substrates. Data sets are shifted for clarity and multiplied by 5 above 11 eV.
(From Wethkamp et al. [17].)
REFERENCES
1. C. Wetzel, E. E. Haller, H. Amano, and I. Akasaki, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68,2547
(1996).
2. G. Yu, H. Ishikawa, M. Umeno, T. Egawa, J. Watanabe, T. Soga, and T. Jimbo,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 1472 (1998).
3. P. Wisniewski, W. Knap, J. P. Malzac, J. Camassel, M. D. Bremser, R. F. Davis,
and T. Suski,Appl. Phys. Lett. 73,1760 (1998).
4. H. Amano, N. Watanabe, N. Koide, and I. Akasaki, lpn. l. Appl. Phys. 32, L1000
(1993).
5. S. N. Mohammad, A. A. Salvador, and H. Morkoc;, Proc. IEEE 83,1306 (1995).
6. M. E. Lin, B. N. Sverdlov, S. Strite, H. Morkoc;, and A. E. Drakin, Electron. Lett.
29,1759 (1993).
7. J. Pastrihik and L. Roskovcova, Phys. Status Solidi 14, K5 (1966).
8. V. E. Bougrov and A. S. Zubrilov, l. Appl. Phys. 81, 2952 (1997).
9. D. Brunner, H. Angerer, E. Bustarret, F. Freudenberg, R. HopIer, R. Dimitrov, O.
Ambacher, and M. Stutzmann, l. Appl. Phys. 82, 5090 (1997).
10. T. Kawashima, H. Yoshikawa, S. Adachi, S. Fuke, and K. Ohtsuka, l. Appl. Phys.
82,3528 (1997).
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 291
r--.
('oJ
I
E
u 10
<Xl
0
- X
x=1.0
--
.........
N
C
ClI
.~
'+-
'+-
ClI 5
0
U
C
--
0
0.
I-
0
Vl
.0
«
0
2 3 4
Photon Energy (eV)
Figure C2·II·l Absorption coefficient squared (a2) as a function of photon energy for G~Inl_
xN with x::::O.58 measured at room temperature. (From Nagatomo et at. [4].)
292
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 293
applied a rigid shift to the refractive index vs. energy curve obtained for GaN [6] by
matching the band edge of the Ga)nl_..N alloy. Bougrov and Zubrilov [7] also obtained,
using the essentially same scheme as that of Mohammad et al., the n(E) curves of GaN
and its In and AI ternary alloys and simulated wave guiding properties of Ga)nl_
..N/GaN/AI..Gal_..N double heterostructures. The results obtained by Bougrov and Zu-
brilov [7] are reproduced in Fig. C2-I-1.
REFERENCES
1. T. Yang, S. Nakajima, and S. Sakai, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 34, 5912 (1995).
2. K. Osamura, S. Naka, and Y. Murakami, J. Appl. Phys. 46,3432 (1975).
3. K. Osamura, K. Nakajima, Y. Murakami, P. H. Shingu, and A. Ohtsuki, Solid
State Commun.ll, 617 (1972).
4. T. Nagatomo, T. Kuboyama, H. Minamino, and O. Omoto, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 28,
L1334 (1989).
5. S. N. Mohammad, A. A. Salvador, and H. Mork~, Proc. IEEE 83, 1306 (1995).
6. M. B. Lin, B. N. Sverdlov, S. Strite, H. Mork~, and A. B. Drakin, Electron. Lett.
29,1759 (1993).
7. V. E. Bougrov and A. S. Zubrilov, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 2952 (1997).
The Al..Ga1.)' alloy system is one of the least studied III-V alloy systems. Because AlP
and GaP are indirect-band-gap semiconductors, their alloys are expected to have indi-
rect gaps as the lowest band edge in the whole composition range (0~1.0). The com-
position dependence of the indirect-absorption-edge energy for Al..Ga1.), alloy has
been reported by several authors [1,2]. The x dependence of the direct-band-gap ener-
gies has also been studied using electrolyte ER [3,4] and SE [5].
The refractive-index data at several wavelengths for Al..Ga1.)' (O<x<O.3) have been
measured by Dias et al. [6]. Samples of Al..Ga1.)' were grown on GaP substrates by
LPE. The n data were measured by a phase diffraction grating method. The n values
obtained from this study were presented in Table C2-III-1.
Rodriguez and Armelles [5] have determined e(E) spectra for Al..Ga1.), (x=O, 0.10,
0.30,0.43, 0.49, and 0.53) using SE in the photon-energy range of 1.5-4.5 eV. The
epitaxial layers were grown on GaP(100) substrates by MOCVD. Their thickness was 5
!lm. Figure C2-III-l shows the results of this study [5]. (Note that the e values in Fig.
C2-III-l were plotted with "arbitrary units," not absolute values.) By analyzing the
numerically calculated second-derivative spectra of e(E), they also reported the x de-
pendence of the Eo and E\ gaps [5].
REFERENCES
1. H. Sonomura, T. Nanmori, and T. Miyauchi,Appl. Phys. Lett. 24,77 (1974).
2. V. N. Bessolov, E. S. Dobrynina, V. I. Petrov, and Yu. P. Yakovlev, Sov. Phys.
Semicond. 15,395 (1981).
3. D. P. Bour, J. R. Shealy, A. Ksendzov, and F. H. Pollak, f. Appl. Phys. 64, 6456
(1988).
4. J. M. Rodriguez, G. Armelles, and P. Salvador, f. Appl. Phys. 66,3929 (1989).
5. J. M. Rodriguez and G. Armelles, f. Appl. Phys. 69, 965 (1991).
6. P. Dias, V. A. Mishurnyi, E. L. Portnoi, B. S. Ryvkin, and V. B. Smirnitskii, Sov.
Tech. Phys. Lett. 3,290 (1977).
294
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 295
--
rJ)
'::lc
en
.....
'c::l
--
.ci
....
--'"
.ci
....
CU CU
( \J
'"
Figure C2-ill-l e(E) spectra for Al.Ga1.•P with (a) x=O, (b) x=O.10, (c) x=0.30, (d) x=O.43, (e)
x=0.49, and (1) x=O.53 measured at room temperature. (From Rodrfguez and Armelles [5].)
In early work on Al)nl.J', the direct r gap (Eo) was measured and found to vary line-
arly with composition x [1]. More recently, Bour et al. [2] obtained from electrolyte ER
measurements a concave upward bowing in the Eo gap, similar to the behavior found in
other ternary alloys.
Al)nl.J' alloy can be epitaxially grown on GaAs with x-O.5, only, since the lattice
constant of GaAs is between the values of the two binary parents AlP and InP. Optical
properties of Al,Inl.J' are not well known, except for AIo.5lno.5P (x-0.5). Data on the
optical constants of Alo.slnO.5P will be presented in Sec. C3-X as an end-point material
of the AlxGllyln1.x.),/GaAs quaternary system.
REFERENCES
1. A. Onton and R. J. Chicotka, f. Appl. Phys. 41, 4205 (1970).
2. D. P. Bour, J. R. Shealy, G. W. Wicks, and W. J. Schaff, Appl. Phys. Lett. 50,615
(1987).
296
Ternary alloy Ga)nl_J' can be epitaxially grown on GaAs with x-0.5, only, since the
lattice constant of GaAs is between the values of the two binary parents GaP and InP.
Detailed optical properties of Ga)nl_..p are not well known, except for Gao.sInO.5P
(x-O.5). In Sec. C3-X, we will present the optical-constant data of Gao.5InO.5P as an end-
point material of the AlxG~Inl-x-~/GaAs quaternary system.
The main activity in III-V semiconductor alloys has been determining the composi-
tion variation of the fundamental absorption gaps or, more generally, of three conduc-
tion-band states-r6c, ~c, and L6c-relative to the top of the valence band rsv, and the
crossing of the direct and indirect band gaps (see, e.g., [1]). The most recent study on
Ga)nl_..p alloy at 300 K [2] suggests a direct (r6C)-indirect (L/) crossover occurring at
xc=0.67±O.01 with an energy of Eg,c=2.13±O.OI eV and an indirect (L6 )-indirect (~c) C
DB GaP
126
0.4
121
0. L.u..u.-L.wJ-1.00.L.U...L..U...w...L6:WDDw...ww...w~50.u'O '-'-'-~~~J~OD~-'-W......JL-..."-'-'-~j.lJoo '-'-'-~~JO.LOw...w-'-'-'-~4..J.OOl6-..~~!iI).J.jv
wave nurnb~r (em-') -~
Figure C2-V-l IR reflectivity spectra for Ga.InI_xP with O~l.O measured at room tempera-
ture. (From Jahne et al. [4].)
297
298 ill-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
the fundamental absorption edge [6]. Theoretically. Ting and Chang [7] studied disor-
der effect on the optical absorption of some III-V alloys. including GaxIn,_"p. with the
use of CPA and VCA They found that the CPA and VCA produce similar absorption
spectra for photon energy above the direct band edge. However. for indirect materials.
because of the scattering due to the disorder potential. clear difference was recognized
in these absorption spectra. Figure C2-V-2 reproduces the results for Ga)n,_"p alloy
[7].
GOXlnl-xP
x=O.IO x=0.30 x=0.90
~105
~
·c::l
-€104
2
I- =0.15eV
z 8fo
!:!:!103 8fb =0.53eV
u
u:
lI..
w
810 2 --CPA
Z
Q ---- VCA
I-
&:10
o(/)
CD
4 IL-~~_~li-_L-~~_~~~~~W--~~~
1.4 1.8 2.2 2.6
PHOTON ENERGY -nw (eV)
Figure C2·V·2 Comparison of the absorption coefficient obtained by CPA and VCA at various
alloy compositions for GaJn,_xP alloy. (From Ting and Chang [7].)
Lee et al. [8] studied optical properties of GaxIn,_"p (O.26~O.8) epitaxial layers
grown on GaAs and graded GaInP/GaP substrates using SE and RS. They determined
the E, and E,+.:l, CPs and first-order phonon frequencies as a function of x and found
that the general behavior of the peak energy (frequency) shift and broadening of both
the E, and optical phonons can be explained in terms of the biaxial strain and strain
relaxation caused by lattice-mismatch.
REFERENCES
1. A-B. Chen and A Sher. Semiconductor Alloys: Physics and Materials Engi-
neering (plenum. New York. 1995).
2. Yu. K. Krutogolov. S. V. Dovzhenko. S. A Diordiev. L. I. Krutogolova. Yu. I.
Kunakin. and S. S. Ryzhikh. Sov. Phys. Semicond. 23.557 (1989).
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 299
300
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 301
)
g 2
4 . 5 , - - - - - - - - - - - -__
1.0
4.0
c 3.5
2.5 ~--'-....L...-"'_:_'::_'_-'--..L.--I_:l_--'-....L...-J......j......J..I
o 1.0 2.0 3.0
PHOTON ENERGY (eV)
302 ill-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
conditions and electrical properties of these samples were not described. The accuracy
of the pseudodielectric function at selected wavelengths in the technologically relevant
composition range of x=O-O.5 was less than 2% of its peak value. Their measured n(E)
and k(E) are shown in Figs. C2-VI-3 (a) and (b), respectively.
5 4
4 3
2 345 6 2 3 4 5 6
PHOTON ENERGY (eV) PHOTON ENERGY (eV)
Figure C2-VI-3 n(E) and k(E) spectra for Al.Gal .•As with the nine compositions, from left to
right with increasing x. These are calculated from the SE £(E) data of Aspnes et at. [9].
The data of Aspnes et al. [9] are very worthy for understanding fundamental optical
properties of AlxGal ...As. However, these data seem to have one disadvantage with re-
spect to their usefulness: they are not expressed as continuous analytic functions of
photon energy E and alloy composition x. Various theoretical models have, therefore,
been proposed recently which enable calculation of the optical constants in the inter-
band transition region of semiconductors [10-15].
Tables C2-VI-la-C2- VI-1flist the room-temperature values of E=~\+i~, n*=n+ik, n,
and R for AlxGal_xAs (0.14~:::;0.54). These data were obtained from the reststrahlen
parameters of Kim and Spitzer [4]. Tables C2-VI -2a-C2- VI -2i list the optical constants
in the transparent and interband transition regions of AlXGa1...As (O.099~.900) at
room temperature. They were taken from Adachi [1] for 0.5:::;E:::;1.4 eV and from Asp-
nes et al. [9] for 1.5:::;E:::;6.0 e V.
REFERENCES
1. S. Adachi, I. Appl. Phys. 58, Rl (1985).
2. Properties of Aluminium Gallium Arsenide, EMIS Datareviews Series No.7, edit-
ed by S. Adachi (INSPEC (lEE), London, 1993).
3. S. Adachi, GaAs and Related Materials: Bulk Semiconducting and Superlattice
Properties (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 303
Table C2-VI-la Optical constants in the reststrahlen region oj AI.GaJ .• As with x=O.14
at300K.
eV cm· 1 101 ~ n k a (em-I) R
0.0248 200 15.20 0.203 3.899 0.026 6.44E+Ol 0.350
0.0254 205 15.49 0.228 3.936 0.029 7.53E+Ol 0.354
0.026 210 15.82 0.271 3.978 0.034 8.89E+Ol 0.358
0.0266 215 16.22 0.314 4.028 0.039 1.06E+02 0.363
0.0273 220 16.70 0.384 4.087 0.047 1.29E+02 0.368
0.0279 225 17.29 0.466 4.159 0.056 1.59E+02 0.375
0.0285 230 18.03 0.586 4.247 0.069 2.00E+02 0.383
0.0291 235 19.00 0.767 4.360 0.088 2.59E+02 0.393
0.0297 240 20.30 1.046 4.507 0.116 3.49E+02 0.406
0.0304 245 22.17 1.517 4.711 0.161 4.96E+02 0.423
0.031 250 25.03 2.434 5.009 0.243 7.65E+02 0.446
0.0312 252 26.66 3.062 5.172 0.296 9.39E+02 0.458
0.0315 254 28.71 3.975 5.371 0.370 1.18E+03 0.473
0.0317 256 31.39 5.376 5.623 0.478 1.54E+03 0.490
0.032 258 34.95 7.672 5.947 0.645 2.09E+03 0.511
0.0322 260 39.79 11.77 6.375 0.923 3.02E+03 0.538
0.0325 262 46.16 19.94 6.944 1.436 4.73E+03 0.574
0.0327 264 51.71 37.96 7.611 2.494 8.27E+03 0.621
0.033 266 37.70 71.27 7.692 4.633 1.55E+04 0.683
0.0332 268 -13.10 72.94 5.523 6.603 2.22E+04 0.744
0.0335 270 -29.18 38.57 3.097 6.227 2. 11E+04 0.777
0.0337 272 -23.33 19.51 1.882 5.184 1.77E+04 0.786
0.034 274 -16.50 11.08 1.299 4.265 1.47E+04 0.779
0.0342 276 -11.35 6.968 0.992 3.512 1.22E+04 0.757
0.0345 278 -7.590 4.727 0.822 2.875 1.00E+04 0.716
0.0347 280 -4.788 3.388 0.734 2.308 8. 12E+03 0.648
304 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
Table C2·VI·lb Optical constants in the reststrahlen region of AI.Ga] .• As with x=O.18
at300K.
eV em-! 1O! £.2 n k a (em·!) R
0.0248 200 14.84 0.616 3.853 0.080 2.0 1E+02 0.346
0.0254 205 15.09 0.684 3.886 0.088 2.28E+02 0.349
0.026 210 15.39 0.777 3.924 0.099 2.61E+02 0.353
0.0266 215 15.75 0.881 3.970 0.111 3.01E+02 0.357
0.0273 220 16.17 1.022 4.023 0.127 3.51E+02 0.363
0.0279 225 16.69 1.202 4.088 0.147 4.15E+02 0.369
0.0285 230 17.33 1.442 4.167 0.173 5.00E+02 0.376
0.0291 235 18.16 1.784 4.267 0.209 6. 17E+02 0.386
0.0297 240 19.27 2.295 4.397 0.261 7.87E+02 0.398
0.0304 245 20.81 3.119 4.574 0.341 1.05E+03 00413
0.031 250 23.06 4.623 4.826 00479 1.51E+03 00435
0.0312 252 24.27 5.604 4.959 0.565 1.79E+03 00446
0.0315 254 25.72 6.959 5.117 0.680 2. 17E+03 00460
0.0317 256 27046 8.926 5.307 0.841 2.71E+03 00476
306 llI-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
Table C2·VI·lc Optical constants in the reststrahlen region of Alpal.As with x=030
at 300 K.
eV em'! £! £2 n k a (em'!) R
0.0248 200 14.47 0.479 3.805 0.063 1.57E+02 0.341
0.0254 205 14.71 0.529 3.836 0.069 1.79E+02 0.344
308 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
Table C2-VI-ld Optical constants in the reststrahlen region of AlxGal_xAs with x=O.36
at300K.
eV em- 1 £1 £2 n k ex (em· l) R
0.0248 200 14.27 0.748 3.779 0.099 2.49E+02 0.338
0.0254 205 14.49 0.838 3.808 0.110 2.83E+02 0.341
0.026 210 14.75 0.937 3.842 0.122 3.22E+02 0.345
0.0266 215 15.05 1.064 3.882 0.137 3.71E+02 0.349
0.0273 220 15.41 1.226 3.929 0.156 4.33E+02 0.354
0.0279 225 15.86 1.443 3.986 0.181 5.12E+02 0.360
0.0285 230 16.41 1.728 4.056 0.213 6. 17E+02 0.366
0.0291 235 17.11 2.138 4.144 0.258 7.63E+02 0.375
0.0297 240 18.03 2.768 4.259 0.325 9.80E+02 0.386
0.0304 245 19.30 3.796 4.414 0.430 1.33E+03 0.401
0.031 250 21.07 5.725 4.632 0.618 1.94E+03 0.423
0.0312 252 21.95 7.001 4.743 0.738 2.34E+03 0.434
0.0315 254 22.89 8.793 4.869 0.903 2.88E+03 0.448
0.0317 256 23.76 11.37 5.005 1.136 3.66E+03 0.464
0.032 258 24.15 15.17 5.132 1.478 4.79E+03 0.484
0.0322 260 23.00 20.51 5.187 1.977 6.46E+03 0.508
0.0325 262 18.21 26.64 5.024 2.651 8.73E+03 0.536
0.0327 264 8.58 29.55 4.436 3.331 1.10E+04 0.563
0.033 266 -1.12 25.21 3.473 3.630 1.2IE+04 0.581
0.3332 268 -5.19 17.32 2.539 3.411 l.15E+04 0.580
0.0335 270 -4.89 10.90 1.879 2.901 9.84E+03 0.550
0.0337 272 -3.07 6.819 1.485 2.296 7.85E+03 0.481
0.034 274 -1.08 4.357 1.306 1.668 5.74E+03 0.355
0.0342 276 0.69 2.856 1.346 1.061 3.68E+03 0.188
0.0345 278 2.16 1.918 1.590 0.603 2. 11E+03 0.101
0.0347 280 3.39 1.309 1.875 0.349 1.23E+03 0.106
0.035 282 4.42 0.904 2.113 0.214 7.58E+02 0.132
0.0352 284 5.29 0.631 2.303 0.137 4.89E+02 0.157
0.0354 286 6.03 0.447 2.457 0.091 3.26E+02 0.178
0.0357 288 6.67 0.315 2.584 0.061 2.22E+02 0.196
0.0359 290 7.24 0.231 2.691 0.043 1.56E+02 0.210
0.0362 292 7.74 0.172 2.782 0.031 1.14E+02 0.222
0.0364 294 8.20 0.137 2.863 0.024 8.81E+Ol 0.233
0.0367 296 8.61 0.117 2.934 0.020 7.42E+Ol 0.242
0.0369 298 8.99 0.108 2.998 0.018 6.90E+01 0.250
0.0372 300 9.34 0.116 3.057 0.019 7.06E+Ol 0.257
0.0374 302 9.68 0.124 3.112 0.020 7.74E+Ol 0.264
0.0377 304 10.00 0.145 3.163 0.023 8.88E+Ol 0.270
0.0379 306 10.31 0.173 3.211 0.027 1.04E+02 0.276
0.0382 308 10.61 0.209 3.258 0.032 1.23E+02 0.281
C2TERNARY ALLOYS 311
Table C2-VI-ld Continued (AI.Gal_.As, x=O.36).
eV em-) E) 102 n k a. (em-)) R
0.0384 310 10.91 0.244 3.303 0.037 1.46E+02 0.286
0.0387 312 11.20 0.295 3.347 0.044 1.72E+02 0.292
0.0389 314 11.49 0.346 3.390 0.051 2.02E+02 0.297
0.0392 316 11.79 0.405 3.434 0.059 2.36E+02 0.301
0.0394 318 12.09 0.480 3.478 0.069 2.75E+02 0.306
0.0397 320 12.41 0.557 3.523 0.079 3.19E+02 0.311
0.0399 322 12.73 0.650 3.569 0.091 3.69E+02 0.316
0.0402 324 13.07 0.752 3.617 0.104 4.25E+02 0.322
0.0404 326 13.43 0.880 3.667 0.120 4.9IE+02 0.327
0.0407 328 13.82 1.019 3.720 0.137 5.66E+02 0.333
0.0409 330 14.23 1.193 3.776 0.158 6.53E+02 0.339
0.0412 332 14.69 1.389 3.837 0.181 7.56E+02 0.345
0.0414 334 15.19 1.631 3.903 0.209 8.78E+02 0.352
0.0416 336 15.74 1.932 3.975 0.243 1.02E+03 0.359
0.0419 338 16.36 2.295 4.055 0.283 1.20E+03 0.367
0.0421 340 17.05 2.759 4.143 0.333 1.42E+03 0.376
0.0424 342 17.85 3.352 4.243 0.395 1.70E+03 0.386
0.0426 344 18.74 4.129 4.355 0.474 2.05E+03 0.397
0.0429 346 19.76 5.173 4.483 0.577 2.5IE+03 0.410
0.0431 348 20.90 6.617 4.627 0.715 3. 13E+03 0.425
0.0434 350 22.10 8.655 4.787 0.904 3.98E+03 0.442
0.0436 352 23.18 11.59 4.955 1.170 5.18E+03 0.462
0.0439 354 23.70 15.83 5.109 1.549 6.89E+03 0.485
0.0441 356 22.52 21.57 5.182 2.081 9.3IE+03 0.513
0.0444 358 17.80 27.86 5.043 2.762 1.24E+04 0.543
0.0446 360 8.80 31.30 4.545 3.443 1.56E+04 0.573
0.0449 362 -0.80 28.66 3.733 3.839 1.75E+04 0.598
0.0451 364 -6.36 22.14 2.887 3.834 1.75E+04 0.613
0.0454 366 -7.80 15.77 2.213 3.563 1.64E+04 0.615
0.0456 368 -7.14 11.06 1.736 3.186 1.47E+04 0.606
0.0459 370 -5.79 7.871 1.411 2.789 1.30E+04 0.585
0.0461 372 -4.34 5.717 1.191 2.400 1.12E+04 0.549
0.0464 374 -3.01 4.253 1.049 2.027 9.52E+03 0.495
0.0466 376 -1.84 3.220 0.967 1.665 7.87E+03 0.418
0.0469 378 -0.83 2.482 0.946 1.312 6.23E+03 0.313
0.0471 380 0.04 1.938 0.995 0.974 4.65E+03 0.192
0.0473 382 0.79 1.529 1.121 0.682 3.27E+03 0.097
0.0476 384 1.44 1.213 1.290 0.470 2.27E+03 0.056
0.0478 386 2.01 0.967 1.456 0.332 1.61E+03 0.052
0.0481 388 2.51 0.772 1.602 0.241 1.17E+03 0.062
0.0483 390 2.95 0.615 1.727 0.178 8.73E+02 0.075
0.0486 392 3.35 0.488 1.834 0.133 6.56E+02 0.089
0.0488 394 3.70 0.385 1.925 0.100 4.93E+02 0.101
0.0491 396 4.01 0.297 2.005 0.074 3.69E+02 0.112
0.0493 398 4.30 0.224 2.075 0.054 2.71E+02 0.122
0.0496 400 4.56 0.162 2.136 0.038 1.93E+02 0.131
0.0502 405 5.12 0.050 2.263 0.011 5.50E+Ol 0.150
0.0508 410 5.58 0.028 2.362 0.006 0.164
0.0514 415 5.96 0.083 2.441 0.017 0.175
0.0521 420 6.28 0.125 2.506 0.025 0.185
312 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
Table C2-VI-Ie Optical constants in the reststrahlen region ofAI.Gal_.As with x=O.44
at300K.
eV em-! £! q n k a (em-!) R
0.0248 200 14.23 0.551 3.773 0.073 1.84E+02 0.338
0.0254 205 14.46 0.624 3.803 0.082 2.10E+02 0.341
0.026 210 14.72 0.706 3.838 0.092 2.42E+02 0.344
0.0266 215 15.03 0.807 3.878 0.104 2.82E+02 0.348
0.0273 220 15.41 0.950 3.927 0.121 3.33E+02 0.353
0.0279 225 15.86 1.132 3.985 0.142 4.01E+02 0.359
0.0285 230 16.43 1.379 4.057 0.170 4.93E+02 0.366
0.0291 235 17.17 1.759 4.149 0.212 6.25E+02 0.375
0.0297 240 18.17 2.341 4.271 0.274 8.28E+02 0.387
0.0304 245 19.56 3.374 4.439 0.380 1.17E+03 0.403
0.031 250 21.58 5.431 4.682 0.580 1.82E+03 0.426
0.0312 252 22.60 6.924 4.808 0.720 2.27E+03 0.438
0.0315 254 23.68 9.021 4.951 0.911 2.9IE+03 0.454
0.0317 256 24.57 12.25 5.100 1.201 3.86E+03 0.472
0.032 258 24.46 17.12 5.211 1.643 5.33E+03 0.495
0.0322 260 21.36 23.56 5.156 2.285 7.47E+03 0.522
0.0325 262 12.88 28.42 4.695 3.027 9.97E+03 0.548
0.0327 264 2.21 25.99 3.761 3.455 1.15E+04 0.565
0.033 266 -3.24 18.30 2.770 3.303 1.10E+04 0.559
0.0332 268 -3.51 11.54 2.068 2.790 9.40E+03 0.519
0.0335 270 -1.87 7.235 1.674 2.161 7.33E+03 0.434
0.0337 272 0.03 4.666 1.533 1.522 5.20E+03 0.298
0.034 274 1.73 3.119 1.628 0.958 3.30E+03 0.168
0.0342 276 3.16 2.148 1.868 0.575 1.99E+03 0.127
0.0345 278 4.34 1.518 2.114 0.359 1.25E+03 0.139
0.0347 280 5.33 1.100 2.320 0.237 8.32E+02 0.162
0.035 282 6.15 0.810 2.486 0.163 5.76E+02 0.184
0.0352 284 6.87 0.603 2.623 0.115 4.1IE+02 0.201
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 313
Table C2-VI-2a Optical constants in the interband transition region of Al.GaJ .• As with
x=0.099 at 300 K.
eV £1 £,. n k a (cm· 1) R
0.5 11.290 3.360 0.293
0.6 11.330 3.366 0.294
0.7 11.384 3.374 0.295
0.8 11.445 3.383 0.296
0.9 11.526 3.395 0.297
1 11.628 3.410 0.299
1.1 11.751 3.428 0.301
1.2 11.916 3.452 0.303
1.3 12.138 3.484 0.307
1.4 12.461 3.530 0.312
1.5 12.758 3.572 0.316
1.6 13.401 0.434 3.661 0.059 9.62E+03 0.326
1.7 13.521 0.600 3.678 0.082 1.4IE+04 0.328
1.8 13.798 0.738 3.716 0.099 1.8IE+04 0.332
1.9 14.237 0.962 3.775 0.127 2.45E+04 0.338
2 14.563 1.305 3.820 0.171 3.46E+04 0.343
2.1 14.981 1.540 3.876 0.199 4.23E+04 0.349
2.2 15.471 1.864 3.940 0.237 5.27E+04 0.356
2.3 16.067 2.216 4.018 0.276 6.43E+04 0.364
2.4 16.796 2.627 4.111 0.320 7.77E+04 0.373
2.5 18.732 3.225 4.220 0.382 9.68E+04 0.384
2.6 18.732 4.023 4.353 0.462 1.22E+05 0.397
2.7 20.080 5.196 4.518 0.575 1.57E+05 0.413
2.8 21.744 7.213 4.725 0.763 2.17E+05 0.433
2.9 23.411 11.184 4.968 1.126 3.31E+05 0.461
3 20.038 17.765 4.838 1.836 5.58E+05 0.483
3.1 16.095 17.384 4.460 1.949 6.12E+05 0.469
3.2 13.306 18.598 4.253 2.187 7.09E+05 0.475
3.3 10.072 17.026 3.864 2.203 7.37E+05 0.458
3.4 9.205 15.494 3.690 2.100 7.24E+05 0.441
3.5 8.846 14.619 3.601 2.030 7.20E+05 0.430
3.6 8.699 14.060 3.552 1.979 7.22E+05 0.423
3.7 8.690 13.736 3.532 1.945 7.29E+05 0.419
3.8 8.809 13.609 3.537 1.924 7.4IE+05 0.417
3.9 9.028 13.692 3.566 1.920 7.59E+05 0.419
4 9.342 14.017 3.618 1.937 7.85E+05 0.423
4.1 9.734 14.664 3.697 1.983 8.24E+05 0.431
4.2 10.146 15.766 3.801 2.074 8.83E+05 0.444
4.3 10.364 17.571 3.922 2.240 9.76E+05 0.464
4.4 9.851 20.145 4.017 2.507 1.12E+06 0.489
4.5 7.811 23.065 4.010 2.876 1.31E+06 0.519
4.6 4.236 24.731 3.829 3.229 1.51E+06 0.546
4.7 0.537 25.535 3.611 3.536 1.68E+06 0.572
4.8 -4.119 25.136 3.267 3.846 1.87E+06 0.604
4.9 -8.604 22.369 2.772 4.036 2.ooE+06 0.637
5 -10.991 17.583 2.207 3.983 2.02E+06 0.662
5.1 -10.408 13.478 1.819 3.704 1.91E+06 0.664
5.2 -9.116 11.220 1.634 3.433 1.81E+06 0.651
5.3 -8.043 9.870 1.531 3.223 1.73E+06 0.635
318 ill-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
Table C2·VI·2b Optical constants in the interband transition region ofAI.Gal .• As with
x=0.198 at 300 K.
eV £1 ~ n k <X (em· l ) R
0.5 10.949 3.309 0.287
0.6 10.996 3.316 0.288
0.7 11.049 3.324 0.289
0.8 11.116 3.334 0.290
0.9 11.196 3.346 0.291
1 11.296 3.361 0.293
1.1 11.418 3.379 0.295
1.2 11.567 3.401 0.298
1.3 11.758 3.429 0.301
1.4 12.006 3.465 0.305
1.5 11.950 3.457 0.304
1.6 12.502 0.017 3.536 0.002 3.9OE+02 0.313
1.7 13.213 0.145 3.635 0.020 3.ooE+02 0.323
1.8 13.402 0.601 3.662 0.082 1.50E+04 0.326
1.9 13.682 0.696 3.700 0.094 1.81E+04 0.330
2 14.119 0.887 3.759 0.118 2.39E+04 0.337
2.1 14.529 1.260 3.815 0.165 3.52E+04 0.343
2.2 14.946 1.567 3.871 0.202 4.51E+04 0.349
2.3 15.464 1.909 3.940 0.242 5.65E+04 0.356
2.4 16.096 2.313 4.022 0.288 6.99E+04 0.364
2.5 16.845 2.812 4.118 0.341 8.65E+04 0.374
2.6 17.767 3.460 4.235 0.409 1.08E+05 0.386
2.7 18.893 4.363 4.375 0.499 1.36E+05 0.399
2.8 20.272 5.787 4.547 0.636 1.8IE+05 0.417
2.9 21.877 8.225 4.757 0.865 2.54E+05 0.439
3 22.682 13.063 4.943 1.322 4.02E+05 0.467
3.1 17.781 17.110 4.607 1.857 5.83E+05 0.472
3.2 15.264 17.325 4.379 1.978 6.42E+05 0.467
3.3 11.927 17.808 4.084 2.180 7.29E+05 0.466
3.4 9.908 16.040 3.792 2.115 7.29E+05 0.447
3.5 9.315 14.923 3.668 2.034 7.22E+05 0.434
3.6 9.061 14.254 3.602 1.979 7.22E+05 0.426
3.7 8.987 13.874 3.572 1.942 7.28E+05 0.421
3.8 9.035 13.714 3.568 1.922 7.40E+05 0.419
3.9 9.199 13.758 3.588 1.917 7.58E+05 0.420
4 9.458 14.047 3:633 1.933 7.84E+05 0.423
4.1 9.795 14.630 3.701 1.976 8.21E+05 0.431
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 319
Table C2·VI·2c Optical constants in the interband transition region ofAl.Gal.xAs with
x=0315 at 300 K.
eV 10 1 102 n k a (cm· l ) R
0.5 10.543 3.247 0.280
0.6 10.589 3.254 0.281
0.7 10.647 3.263 0.282
0.8 10.713 3.273 0.283
0.9 10.791 3.285 0.284
1 10.890 3.300 0.286
1.1 11.002 3.317 0.288
1.2 11.142 3.338 0.290
1.3 11.310 3.363 0.293
1.4 11.519 3.394 0.297
1.5 11.585 3.404 0.298
1.6 11.945 3.456 0.304
1.7 12.312 3.509 0.310
1.8 12.901 0.058 3.592 0.008 1.46E+03 0.319
1.9 13.309 0.812 3.650 0.111 2.14E+04 0.325
2 13.597 1.070 3.690 0.145 2.94E+04 0.330
2.1 14.036 1.250 3.750 0.167 3.55E+04 0.336
2.2 14.516 1.543 3.815 0.202 4.51E+04 0.343
2.3 14.937 1.755 3.872 0.227 5.28E+04 0.349
2.4 15.495 2.038 3.945 0.258 6.28E+04 0.356
2.5 16.167 2.460 4.032 0.305 7.73E+04 0.365
2.6 16.963 3.037 4.135 0.367 9.68E+04 0.376
2.7 17.928 3.794 4.258 0.446 1.22E+05 0.388
2.8 19.089 4.900 4.404 0.556 1.58E+05 0.403
2.9 20.478 6.614 4.582 0.722 2. 12E+05 0.421
320 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
Table C2-VI-2d Optical constants in the interband transition region of AI.Gal_.As with
x=0.419 at 300 K.
eV £\ £2 n k a (cm-\) R
0.5 10.176 3.190 0.273
0.6 10.227 3.198 0.274
0.7 10.278 3.206 0.275
0.8 10.343 3.216 0.276
0.9 10.426 3.229 0.278
1 10.517 3.243 0.279
1.1 10.628 3.260 0.281
1.2 10.758 3.280 0.284
1.3 10.916 3.304 0.287
1.4 11.102 3.332 0.290
1.5 11.160 3.341 0.291
1.6 11.412 3.378 0.295
1.7 11.709 3.422 0.300
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 321
Table C2-VI-2e Optical constants in the interband transition region of AI.Ga}_.As with
x=O.49J at 300 K.
eV £1 ~ n k a (cm· l ) R
0.5 9.585 3.096 0.262
0.6 9.629 3.103 0.263
0.7 9.685 3.112 0.264
0.8 9.747 3.122 0.265
0.9 9.816 3.l33 0.266
1 9.904 3.147 0.268
1.1 10.005 3.163 0.270
1.2 10.125 3.182 0.272
1.3 10.259 3.203 0.275
1.4 10.414 3.227 0.278
1.5 10.480 3.237 0.279
1.6 10.721 3.274 0.283
1.7 10.973 3.3l3 0.288
1.8 11.247 3.354 0.292
1.9 11.591 3.405 0.298
2 12.017 3.467 1.00E+Ol 0.305
2.1 12.575 0.034 3.546 0.005 1.03E+03 0.314
2.2 l3.380 0.458 3.658 0.063 1.40E+04 0.326
2.3 13.599 0.931 3.690 0.126 2.94E+04 0.329
2.4 14.097 1.181 3.758 0.157 3.82E+04 0.337
2.5 14.682 1.574 3.837 0.205 5.20E+04 0.345
2.6 15.208 2.047 3.909 0.262 6.9OE+04 0.353
2.7 15.837 2.532 3.992 0.317 8.68E+04 0.362
2.8 16.600 3.140 4.092 0.384 1.09E+05 0.372
2.9 17.493 3.936 4.208 0.468 1.37E+05 0.384
3 18.517 5.Q70 4.343 0.584 1.78E+05 0.399
3.1 19.653 6.784 4.497 0.754 2.37E+05 0.416
3.2 20.560 9.557 4.649 1.028 3.33E+05 0.436
3.3 19.663 l3.530 4.665 1.450 4.85E+05 0.454
3.4 16.542 15.536 4.429 1.754 6.04E+05 0.456
3.5 14.l37 16.255 4.224 1.924 6.83E+05 0.455
3.6 11.804 15.923 3.977 2.002 7.31E+05 0.447
3.7 10.713 15.077 3.822 1.973 7.40E+05 0.437
3.8 10.287 14.581 3.750 1.944 7.49E+05 0.431
3.9 1O.l31 14.417 3.725 1.935 7.65E+05 0.428
4 10.113 14.518 3.729 1.947 7.89E+05 0.430
4.1 10.210 14.870 3.758 1.978 8.22E+05 0.434
4.2 10.403 15.554 3.815 2.038 8.68E+05 0.442
4.3 10.647 16.723 3.903 2.142 9.34E+05 0.455
324 Ill-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
Table C2-VI-2g Optical constants in the interband transition region of AI.Gal .• As with
x=O.700 at 300 K.
eV £1 £2 n k aCem· 1) R
0.5 9.236 3.039 0.255
0.6 9.278 3.046 0.256
0.7 9.327 3.054 0.257
0.8 9.388 3.064 0.258
0.9 9.456 3.075 0.259
1 9.536 3.088 0.261
1.1 9.629 3.103 0.263
1.2 9.734 3.120 0.265
1.3 9.853 3.139 0.267
1.4 9.998 3.162 0.270
1.5 9.940 3.153 0.269
1.6 10.161 3.188 0.273
1.7 10.398 3.225 0.277
1.8 10.636 3.261 0.282
1.9 10.928 3.306 0.287
2 11.294 3.361 0.293
2.1 11.728 0.001 3.425 3.00E+01 0.300
2.2 12.252 0.003 3.500 9.00E+01 0.309
2.3 12.924 0.016 3.595 0.002 5.lOE+02 0.319
2.4 13.653 0.513 3.696 0.069 1.69E+04 0.330
2.5 14.012 0.969 3.746 0.129 3.28E+04 0.335
2.6 14.582 1.408 3.823 0.184 4.85E+04 0.344
2.7 15.200 1.918 3.906 0.245 6.72E+04 0.352
2.8 15.806 2.446 3.987 0.307 8.71E+04 0.361
2.9 16.538 3.058 4.084 0.374 1.10E+05 0.371
3 17.393 3.857 4.196 0.460 1.40E+05 0.383
3.1 18.378 4.965 4.325 0.574 1.80E+05 0.397
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 325
Table C2·VI·2h Optical constants in the interband transition region of AlxGaJ_xAs with
x=0.804 at 300 K.
eV £1 £2 n k a (em-I) R
0.5 8.928 2.988 0.248
0.6 8.970 2.995 0.249
0.7 9.018 3.003 0.250
0.8 9.072 3.012 0.251
0.9 9.132 3.022 0.253
1 9.211 3.035 0.254
1.1 9.296 3.049 0.256
1.2 9.394 3.065 0.258
1.3 9.505 3.083 0.260
1.4 9.629 3.103 0.263
1.5 9.761 3.124 0.265
1.6 9.902 3.147 0.268
1.7 10.068 3.173 0.271
1.8 10.251 3.202 0.275
1.9 10.472 3.236 0.279
326 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
Table C2-VI-2i Optical constants in the interband transition region of AlxGal_xAs with
x=0.900 at 300 K.
eV £1 £2 n k ex (em· 1) R
0.5 8.673 2.945 0.243
0.6 8.708 2.951 0.244
0.7 8.756 2.959 0.245
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 327
TABLE C2-VII-l n and ex of MOCVD-grown AI.Inl.,As layers for wavelengths of 0.6328 and
1530 pm ata growth temperature of535°C. (From Baek etal. [2].)
N=0.6328 J.Ull N= 1.530 J.Ull
x n ex (x 104 em-I) n a (x 104 em-I)
0 4.255 3.675 6.2
0.04 4.125 3.574 6.0
0.14 4.042 3.471 4.6
0.34 3.996 9.3 3.392
0.44 3.820 9.1 3.315
0.64 3.600 2.7 3.177
0.78 3.531 3.108
0.86 3.400 3.048
1.00 3.264 2.924
The e(E) spectra for Al,Inl-xAs in the photon-energy range of 1.5-4.0 eV have been
obtained by Rodriguez and Armelles [3] at 300 K using SE. A set of the epitaxial lay-
ers (x=O-1.0) were grown on GaAs(lOO) substrates by MBE. The thickness of the epi-
taxiallayers was 0.8 11m. Figure C2-VII-l shows the measured results. (Note that the e
values in Fig. C2-VII-l were plotted with "arbitrary units," not absolute values.) By
analyzing the numerically calculated second-derivative spectra of e(E), these authors
also reported the x dependence of the E I - and EI+~I-gap energies [3]. More recently,
Kamlet and Terry [4] have measured the pseudodielectric-function spectra in the
1.5-5.6-eV spectral range of Alxlnl-xAs (0.305:::;;X:::;;0.635) grown on (lOO)InP by MBE.
The data were fit using a CP-based approach, and a numeric dielectric-function model
was generated with the AlAs fraction x as the only free variable.
328
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 329
en
:!::: en
c: .1:
c:
::J
.e
::J
.ci
~
~ ~
C\I
IIJ
IIJ
Figure C2-VII-l e(E) spectra for AlJn1..As with (a) x=O, (b) x=O.07, (c) x=O.14, (d) x=O.S3, (e)
x=O.S9, (f) x=O.63, (g) x=O.87, (f) x=1.0 measured at room temperature. (From Rodrfguez and
Armelles [3].)
REFERENCES
1. Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, edited
by K.-H. Hellwege and O. Madelung, Landolt-Bornstein, New Series, Group III,
Vol. 17, Pt. a (Springer, Berlin, 1982).
2. J.-H. Baek, B. Lee, S. W. Choi, J. H. Lee, and EI-Hang Lee, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68,
2355 (1996).
3. J. M. Rodriguez and G. Armelles, 1. Appl. Phys. 69, 965 (1991).
4. L. I. Kamlet and F. L. Terry, Jr., Thin Solid Films 313-314, 177 (1998).
Ga)n\_xAs is a material with a variety of potential and actual device applications (see,
e.g., Ref. [1]). The most commonly studied alloy composition is .x=OA7, the InP lattice
matching condition. A review of many important physical and semiconducting proper-
ties of lattice-matched and strained Ga)n\.xAs has been given in Refs. [1, 2]. Data on
the optical constants of lattice-matched Gao.47Ino.53As will be presented in Sec. C3-IV as
an end-point material of the Ga)n\.,PyAs\.)InP quaternary system.
The fundamental reflectivity spectra in the reststrahlen region of Ga)n\_xAs have
been measured by several authors [3,4]. Plasma-edge reflectance measurements [5]
have suggested that the e~ value of GaxIn\_xAs can be given by the linear interpolation
between the values of InAs (.x=0) and GaAs (.x=1.0) within the limits of experimental
error. The linearly interpolated values of e~ and e, for this alloy system have already
been given in Fig. 2.3.
The refractive indices in the transparent region of Ga)n\_xAs have been studied by
Takagi [6]. The samples with x>O.5 were grown on GaAs(100)-oriented 3° off by va-
por-phase epitaxy. In order to reduce strain in the epitaxial layer caused by lattice mis-
matching, a compositionally graded layer of about 10 11m thick was inserted between
the substrate and epitaxial layer. The n values in the 0.5-1.4-eV spectral region were
determined from reflectivity measurements. The measured data were analyzed based
on the single-oscillator model. We can recognize from these data a clear systematic
change in n vs. x (i.e., the n value below Eo decreases as x increases). No experimental
data has, however, been reported so far for samples with x::S;O.5.
Optical constants in the interband transition region of Ga)n\_xAs have been measured
by SE [7-9]. Two types of films were measured: thin pseudomorphic and "thick." The
pseudomorphic film was assumed to be fully strained, and the 1-2-l1m thick films on
GaAs were treated as fully relaxed. However, it has been shown that a considerable
amount of strain is maintained even in thick Ga)n\_xAs films on GaAs (see Ref. [7]).
The (n, k) data for Ga)n\_lAs films (.x=OA-O.915) grown on GaAs and InP have also
been obtained up to growth temperature (700°C) [10]. We have already shown in Fig.
3.27 the e(ro) and its derivative spectra for stained and relaxed Ga)n\_xAs (.x=O.76)
measured by SE.
Table C2-VIU-l lists the n values for photon energies below Eo for GaxIn\_xAs
(0.5~::S;1.0). They are calculated from a modified single-oscillator model with the dis-
persion parameters determined by Takagi [6].
REFERENCES
1. T. P. Pearsall, N. K. Dutta, and D. Pavlidis, in Properties of Lattice-Matched and
Strained Indium Gallium Arsenide, EMIS Datareviews Series No.8, edited by P.
Bhattacharya (INSPEC (lEE), London, 1993), pp. 265-305.
2. S. Adachi, Physical Properties of III-V Semiconductor Compounds: InP, lnAs,
GaAs, GaP, InGaAs, and InGaAsP (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1992).
330
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 331
x 0.00
-----------------
=
x = 0.05
w
U x = 0.15
Z
<{
I-
U
W
x = 0.35
--J
u..
w x = 0.50
a:
--J
<{
I-
Z
w
::!:
a:
w
a.
X
w
0.4 f=--------------
0.2
0.0 L-'_ _- ' -_ _- ' -_ _.L..---'-_ _--'-_ _- ' -_ _""'-----'-_ _--'--'
200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380
FREQUENCY (cm- 1 )
Figure C2-IX-l IR reflectivity spectra for AlxGal_xSb with 0~1.0 measured at room tem-
perature. Fiducial marks indicate a reflectance of DAD. (From Lucovsky et al. [2].)
332
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 333
The e~ curve varied quadratically with x, but the correction due to the bowing parame-
ter was very small. We list in Table C2-IX-l the n values obtained by Ance and Van
Mau [6].
The fundamental reflectivity in the interband transition region of Al.Ga 1_.Sb (x=0-
0.73) has been measured by Ance et al. [7]. We reproduce in Fig. C2-IX-2 their
obtained R spectra. We can identify, at least, eight CPs in these spectra (£1' £1+.:\1' Eo',
etc.). The variation of such CP energies with composition x was also reported [7].
SE was used to systematically characterize epitaxial Al.Ga1_.Sb layers for different x
compositions (x~0.5) in the 1.4--6-eV region [8,9]. The samples were grown on GaSb
substrates by MBE. The e(E) spectra obtained in this study are shown in Fig. C2-IX-3
[8]. The interband CP parameters and their composition dependence were determined
by performing an SCP line-shape analysis. Note that the SE e(£) data in Fig. C2-IX-3
were plotted after mathematically removing the effect of an oxide overlayer (G~03
oxide in thickness ranging from 2 to 3.5 nm).
REFERENCES
1. C. Alibert, A. Joullie, and A. M. Joullie, Phys. Rev. B 27,4946 (1983).
2. G. Lucovsky, K. Y. Cheng, and G. L. Pearson, Phys. Rev. B 12,4135 (1975).
3. N. Kitamura and T. Wada, Mater. Lett. 19, 105 (1994).
334 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
,....
~
'"
<II
~ l,
.......
'Cj
:0
l-
CI
...
<II
""
'c
;:)
Q::
Figure C2·IX·2 R(E) spectra for Al.Gal ...Sb with (A) x=O, (B) x=O.17, (C) x=O.22, (D) x=O.34,
(E) x=O.40, and (F) x=O.56 measured at room temperature. The vertical arrows numbered from
1 to 8 indicate the positions of the CP structures assigned to E10 EI+L11o Eo', Eo'+L1', E2 , E2+L12,
E2+/), and EI'. (From Ance et al. [7].)
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 335
30
AI,.GaI •• Sb --x~.O
20 - - - x=<l.1
••••• x=<l.3
10 _._. x~.5
w
.....
--x=1.0
0
-10
30
20
cSI
10
0
2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5
Energy (eV)
Figure C2·IX·3 £(E) spectra for Al.Ga, ....Sb layers (x=O-1.0) grown on GaSb substrates meas-
ured at room temperature. (From Dilernia et al. [8].)
The Gaxln1_xSb alloy is an attractive semiconductor material for optoelectronic devices
in the near-to-far IR spectral region. Although the optical response in GaSb and InSb
has recently been well established, very slight information is available on their alloy.
The IR reflectivity spectra of Ga)n1_xSb have been measured in the spectral ranges of
135-285 cm-1 [I] and 100-350 cm-1 [2]. Figure C2-X-I shows the results obtained by
Brodsky et al. [1]. The reststrahlen parameters obtained in this study were presented in
tabular form [I].
The fundamental reflectivity measurements in the far-IR region of Ga)n1_xSb have
been carried out by Aubin et al. [3]. From these data, the values of £_ were extracted
O.BO
0.60
0.40
x=1.0 - - - - - -
0.40'F-
0.301-
0.4oF-
0.30,b
0.4df-
0.30,b
0.4 Or
0.30,b
~ 0.40'F-
~ 0.301-
G0.40~
~ 0.30
~ ~:!~~
0.30
0.20
0.10 Figure C2-X-l IR reflectivity
spectra for Ga,In,_.Sb with the
O.4~r
0.30
0.20
ten compositions, from bottom
to top with increasing x (x=O,
0.05, 0.15, 0.30, 0.50, 0.60,
0.10
0.70, 0.84, 0.95, and 1.0),
o measured at room temperature.
0.60
(From Brodsky etal. [1].)
0.40 x=O
0.20
0.0 L-Ll-L-L-L-'-L...!--L-L-L-L--L-L....:L...!-L-L-I
100 120 140 160 IBO 200 220 240 260 280
WAVENUMBER Icm-l)
336
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 337
and found to vary linearly with x within the limit of experimental error.
The complete calculation of the refractive index in III-V Sb-based semiconductors
has been reported by Adachi [4]. In his model the refractive-index dispersion is ex-
plained by considering the contributions to the dielectric function by the various inter-
band transitions that play an important part in the optical response. The model, how-
ever, does not include the effects of free carriers, and thus the adequate estimation of
the refractive index of doped or excited materials may be impossible. Paskov [5], there-
fore, considered the free-carrier-related effects on the refractive-index dispersion. We
reproduce in Fig. C2-X-2 his obtained results [5]. For intrinsic materials (a), a well-
pronounced maximum is observed at E=Eo. The values of n below Eo decrease with
composition x. The p-type materials (b) show nearly the same behaviors as those in (a).
For n-type materials (c), the composition dependence of n is found to change consid-
4.20
~ 4.10
~ 4.00
~ 3.90
~ 3.80
(a)
~
3.70
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
4.20
~ 4.10 x .. O x=O.4 x=O.6 x=O.B x=1
~ 4.00
~ 3.90
~
~
3.80
It:
3.70
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
Figure C2·X·2 Calculated n(E)
4.20 r---------------.,
spectra for GaJnl ..Sb (x=O-l.O):
(a) intrinsic materials, (b) p-type
x-O.4 x=O.6 x=O.B x-I materials withp=lxlO 18 cm-3, and
(c) n-type materials with
n=lxlQ18 cm-3• (From Paskov
[5].)
(e)
3.70 l.L.'---'L....-;L..-JL-.JL..-J--I--1--1---L---L---L---L--l
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
PHOTON ENERGY (eV)
338 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
erably. The n value at the maximum increases with x as a result of the reduction of the
band-filling effect.
Imai and Adachi [6] have reported the optical response in GaxInl_xSb in the 1.5-5.4-
e V photon-energy range at 300 K measured by SE. The bulk samples were grown by a
conventional Bridgman method. The measured SE spectra showed distinct structures at
energies of the E 1, E1+Ll1, Eo', Eo'+Ll', E2 , and EI' CPs. Figure C2-X-3 shows, as an
example, the £(E) spectrum of Ga)nl-xSb (x=0.5). Note that this spectrum was correct-
ed for oxide overlayer of 1.8 nm thick. The solid lines represent the theoretical fit of the
MDF calculation.
30
25 Gao.slno.sSb
20
15
10
'" 5
0
-5 Experimental
-10 - MDF
-15
1 2 3 456
Photon Energy (eV)
Figure C2·X·3 SE e(E) spectrum for Ga.In1..Sb with x=05 measured at 300. K. The solid lines
represent the theoretical fit of the MDF calculation. (From Imai and Adachi [6].)
Since the various CP parameters used in Ref. [6] have been specified in terms of the
alloy composition x alone, one can easily calculate the optical response in Ga)nl_xSb of
arbitrary composition x. Figure C2-X-4 shows the calculated results of n(E) and k(E)
for GaxInl-xSb alloy with x-composition increments of 0.25 [6]. We can understand that
these spectra shift toward the high-energy side with increasing x, in accordance with
the shift of the CP energies.
REFERENCES
1. M. H. Brodsky, G. Lucovsky, M. F. Chen, and T. S. Plaskett, Phys. Rev. B 2,
3303 (1970).
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 339
6 5
Gax lnl_xSb
5 4
4 3
c: ..!<:
3 2
-.-.-.••0.25 -.-.-.•..0.25
2 ----. •-0.50 ----. ...0.50
......... x-o.75 •........• -0.75
11 2 3 4 5 6 °1 2 4
3 5 6
Photon Energy (eV) Photon Energy (eV)
Figure C2-X-4 Calculated neE) and k(E) spectra for Ga.In1 .•Sb with x-composition increments
of 0.25 at 300 K. (From Imai and Adachi [6].)
XI GaNxP 1.x AND GaNxAs 1.x
It is interesting to study whether alloys between GaAs (GaP) and GaN can be formed
and what their properties would be. Note that the lattice mismatch of more than 20%
between GaN and GaAs is larger than for all previously investigated semiconductor
alloys. Therefore, this alloy system is ideally suited to study the consequences of lattice
mismatch on various alloy properties [1].
Theoretical works [2-5] have given information about the electronic energy-band
structure of this type of alloy systems. These works predict unexpectedly large bowing
in the band gap that could even result in a "negative" band gap at large x. Recent ex-
perimental results for GaNxAs 1.x (GaNJ\.J [2,6-13], in fact, showed a strong redshift
for small x compositions, indicating an unexpectedly large bowing in the band gap.
This example is shown in Fig. C2-XI-1, together with the square plots of the absorption
coefficient for GaNxAs 1•x (x=0.057 and 0.148) [11].
'" GaNO.14.Aso .• 52
12
oC '""'--(R'O
10 •
KOftdoW.cIl(RT}
l<ondowet_{rnQ
~ 1. <> Wer-ec ... (77tQ 1.2xl09
8 > -Sabl ..... (Rll
~
6
w'" 1.2 • 0 ~
'l'
S- 1.0
o E 8.0xl0 B
~ 4 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 .3-
Cl x(N) C\I
W 2
000
r:l
0 4.0xl0 B (b)
-2
(a)
-4
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 L....,,.-........rI£-L......:.......J-........<.:....................,J
0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2
x(N)
Energy (eV)
Figure C2-XI-l (a) Eg vs. x for GaNxAs 1.x at 300 K. (b) Absorption coefficient squared (ex?) as
a function of photon energy for GaNxAs 1•x with x-=0.057 and 0.148 at 300 K. (From Bi and Tu
[11].)
REFERENCES
1. J. Neugebauer and C. G. Van de Walle, Phys. Rev. B 51, 10568 (1995).
2. J. N. Baillargeon, K. Y. Cheng, G. E. Hofler, P. J. Pearah, and K. C. Hsieh, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 60,2540 (1992).
3. Su-Huai Wei and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 664 (1996).
4. S. Nakajima, H. Ohshiba, T. Yang, and S. Sakai, Jpn. 1. Appl. Phys. 35, 5602
(1996).
340
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 341
TABLE C2·Xll·l Room-temperature refractive indices for GaP,AS}.x as calculated from the
first-order Sellmeier equation (see Ref. [3]). See also Table B12-1 for GaAs (x=O) and Table
B11-3 for GaP (x=1.o).
n
eV x=0.1 x=0.2 x=0.3 x=O.4 x=0.5 x=0.6 x=0.7 x=0.8 x=0.9
0.5 3.280 3.250 3.221 3.193 3.165 3.137 3.108 3.079 3.048
0.6 3.292 3.262 3.232 3.203 3.174 3.146 3.117 3.087 3.056
0.7 3.308 3.275 3.245 3.215 3.186 3.156 3.127 3.097 3.066
0.8 3.326 3.292 3.260 3.229 3.199 3.169 3.139 3.108 3.077
0.9 3.347 3.311 3.277 3.245 3.214 3.183 3.153 3.122 3.090
1 3.372 3.333 3.297 3.264 3.231 3.200 3.169 3.137 3.104
1.1 3.400 3.359 3.320 3.285 3.251 3.219 3.187 3.154 3.121
1.2 3.433 3.388 3.347 3.309 3.274 3.240 3.207 3.173 3.139
1.3 3.470 3.421 3.377 3.337 3.300 3.264 3.229 3.194 3.159
1.4 3.513 3.460 3.412 3.368 3.328 3.291 3.254 3.218 3.181
1.5 3.563 3.504 3.451 3.404 3.361 3.321 3.283 3.245 3.206
1.6 3.554 3.496 3.444 3.398 3.355 3.314 3.274 3.233
1.7 3.547 3.490 3.439 3.392 3.348 3.306 3.263
1.8 3.542 3.486 3.435 3.387 3.341 3.296
1.9 3.539 3.482 3.430 3.381 3.332
2 3.536 3.478 3.424 3.372
2.1 3.532 3.472 3.416
2.2 3.526 3.464
2.3 3.516
342
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 343
Disorder effect on the optical absorption of some III-V alloys, including GaPxAs._x,
has been studied theoretically by Ting and Chang [6] with the use of CPA and VCA.
These authors found that the CPA and VCA produce similar absorption spectra for
photon energy above the direct band edge. However, for indirect materials, because of
the scattering due to the disorder potential, clear difference was recognized in these
absorption spectra.
More recently, Kim et al. [7] have reported the dielectric-function spectra of
GaPxAs._x grown on (100)GaAs (.x=O.2 and 0.4) and (OOl)GaP (.x=O.7) by vapor-phase
epitaxy. The measured spectra revealed distinct structures at energies of the Eo, E.,
E.+6., Eo', and E2 CPs.
REFERENCES
1. Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, edited
by O. Madelung, Landolt-Bomstein, New Series, Group III, Vol. 22, Pt. a
(Springer, Berlin, 1987).
2. C. H. Gooch, Injection Electroluminescent Devices (Wiley, London, 1973).
3. G. D. Clark, Jr. and N. Holonyak, Jr., Phys_ Rev. B 156,913 (1967).
4. H. C. Casey, k, J_ Appl. Phys. 45,2766 (1974).
5. A. N. Pikhtin and A. D. Yas'kov, Sov. Phys. Semicond. 14,389 (1980).
6. D. Z.-Y. Ting and Y.-c. Chang, Phys. Rev. B 30,3309 (1984).
7. K. J. Kim, M. H. Lee, J. Ho Bahng, K. Shim, and B. D. Choe, J. Appl. Phys. 84,
3696 (1998).
The band gap of InAsxSb 1_x exhibits strong nonlinearity with composition x, and a
minimum of the band gap in this alloy system occurs at x-OA (Eo-OJ eV) [1]. The
InAsxSb 1_x alloy system has, thus, potential applications for optical sources and photo-
detectors operating in the 3-12 ~m wavelength range (see Refs. [2,3]).
The IR reflectivity spectra of InAsxSb 1_x alloy (x=0.20, 0.25, and 0.85) have been
measured in the spectral range of 135-285 cm-1 [4]. Plasma-edge reflectance data ob-
tained by Thomas and Woolley [5] suggest that the £~ value for InAsxSb 1_x can be given
by the linear interpolation between the values of InSb (x=O) and InAs (x=1.0) within
the limits of experimental error.
The complete calculation of the refractive index in III-V Sb-based semiconductors
has been reported by Adachi [6]. His model, however, does not include the effects of
free carriers, and thus the adequate estimation of the refractive index of doped or excit-
ed materials may be impossible. Paskov [7], therefore, considered the free-carrier-
related effects on the refractive-index dispersion. We reproduce in Fig. C2-X-l his ob-
tained results [7]. Because of the extremely large bowing in the Eo gap, the calculated
n(E) spectra show very complex behaviors with alloy composition and photon energy.
It is also seen that the influence of the free carriers on the refractive index increases
with a decrease in the band gap.
Optical absorption at the fundamental absorption edge of InAsxSb 1_x has been meas-
ured by several authors [1,8,9]. The bulk samples used in Ref. [8] were grown by di-
rectional freezing and zone recrystallization methods, whereas the epitaxial InAsxSb 1_
jInAs films were grown by MBE and LPE in Refs. [1] and [9], respectively. Such
samples were used for the determination of the optical energy gaps by standard trans-
mission measurements.
Gong et ai. [2] have grown high-quality InAsxSb1_x/lnAs multilayers by LPE for fab-
ricating photodetectors in the 3-12-~m wavelength range. They have evaluated the
InAsxSb1_x epilayers by Fourier-transform IR transmission and PL measurements, as
well as SE. We reproduce in Fig. C2-XIII-2 their measured SE spectra for InAsxSb 1_x
(x=0.85), together with those for homoepitaxial InAs and InSb [2]. The solid and
dashed lines represent the best-fit MDF calculation.
REFERENCES
1. M. Y. Yen, B. F. Levine, C. G. Bethea, K. K. Choi, and A. Y. Cho, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 50,927 (1987).
2. X. Y. Gong, H. Kan, T. Makino, T. Yamaguchi, T. Nakatsukasa, M. Kumagawa,
N. L. Rowell, A. Wang, R. Rinfret, Cryst. Res. Technol. 30, 603 (1995).
3. J. Diaz, H. Yi, A. Rybaltowski, B. Lane, O. Lukas, D. Wu, S. Kim, M. Erdtmann,
E. Kaas, and M. Razeghi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70,40 (1997).
4. O. Lucovsky and M. F. Chen, Solid State Commun. 8, 1397 (1970).
5. M. B. Thomas and J. C. Woolley, Can. f. Phys. 49, 2052 (1971).
344
C2 TERNARY ALLOYS 345
4.20
~ 4.00
!@
1-1
3.80
~
u 3.60
~ 3.40
(0)
~
3.20
0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.45 0.55 0.65
4.20
x=O.35
~ 4.00
~ 3.80
~ 3.60
~
lZl
3.40
(b)
I:t::
3.20
0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.45 0.55 0.65
4.20
~ 4.06 x=O
~ 3.80
~
t> 3.60
x=l
~
!Xl
3.40
(c)
~
3.20
0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.45 0.55 0.65
PHOTON ENERGY (eV)
Figure C2-XIII-l Calculated neE) spectra for InAsxSb 1•x (=0-1.0): (a) intrinsic materials, (b)
p-type materials with p=lxlQl8 cm- 3, and (c) n-type materials with n=lxlOl8 cm-3 • (From
Paskov [7].)
346 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
20
(a)
15
10
w 5
0 Q
0
(, ~.
-5 \.,
-10
1.5 2. 5 3.5 4.5 5.5
20
15
10 .~~~)
w 5 0
0
0 q
0
-5 \r.~
-10
1.5 2. 5 3. 5 4. 5 5. 5
25
20 (e)
15 •
~
10
w
5 '----.
0
-5
-10
1. 5 2. 5 3.5 4.5 5. 5
Photon Energy(eV)
Figure C2·XIII·2 SE e(E) spectra for (a) homoepitaxial InAs, (b) InAs.Sb1.JInAs (x=O.85),
and (c) homoepitaxial InSb measured at 300 K. The solid and dashed lines represent the best-fit
MDF calculation. (From Gong et at. [2].)
C3 QUATERNARY ALLOYS
The AlzGal_»yAs I _y quaternary system can be grown lattice-matched to GaAs (see Ta-
ble CI-3). The quaternary system is a promising material for use as the confming layer
in visible light emitting laser diodes because of its large energy gap and good lattice
matching to GaPyAs l_y substrates with their wide range of alloy compositions (y=0-
1.0).
The IR reflectivity spectra of some AlzGal_»yASI_, alloys have been measured by Sen
and Lucovsky [1] in the spectral range of 200-500 cm-I • The reststrahlen parameters
obtained in this study were presented in tabular form, together with those for the end-
member ternary alloys.
Optical absorption spectra at the fundamental absorption edge of AlzGa l_»,Asi-' have
been measured in Ref. [2]. Single-crystalline samples were grown on GaP substrates by
LPE with several pairs of composition (x, y). The majority of the samples exhibited
both indirect (EgX) transitions, which were probably due to the formation of an indirect
excitons and accompanied by the emission of LA phonons, as well as direct (Eo) tran-
sitions. However, no further studies have been performed on this alloy system.
Figures C3-I-l and C3-1-2 show the composition dependence of the band-gap ener-
gies (Eo, EgX, and EgL ) and refractive-index curves with x-composition increments of 0.1
for AlzGal_»yASI_, lattice-matched to GaAs, as calculated from Eqs. (C1.7) and (C1.l4),
respectively. From Fig. C3-I-l, we can expect a direct (r6c)-indirect (X6C, L6 cross-
C
)
REFERENCES
1. P. N. Sen and G. Lucovsky, Phys. Rev. B 12,2998 (1975).
2. V. V. Kuznetsov, V. N. Razbegaev, and S. EI-Giziri, Sov. Phys. Semicond. 23,
552 (1989).
347
348 III-V AL LOY SEMICONDUCTORS
3.0
AI xGa l-xPyAs1_Y'GaAs
Figure
band-gaC3-I- 1 Composition d
,PyAs .
ly
fC:~srgieS
at 300 K.
an~P;~d)efince
(Eo, Eg X,
g
of the
or AI,Gal_
0.5 1.0
X
5.0
4.5
Figure
AI G C3-I-2 Refractiv .
. ' al_,PyAsl-/GaAs w' e mdices for
mcrements of 0.1 at 3001~. x-composition
-tlw ( eV
The AlxGal_xAsySbl_y quaternary system can be grown lattice-matched to GaSb, InP, and
InAs (see Table CI-3). The alloy system is an important material system covering the
wavelengths between the visible and IR region (0.57-1.72 11m) suitable for device ap-
plications, such as injection lasers, photodiodes, and solar cells. The alloy system is
also interesting for use in cladding (or barrier) layers of the Ga)n'_xAsySb,_y /AlxGa1_
xAsySb,_y lasers [1,2].
The IR reflectivity spectra of some AlxGal_xAsySbl_y alloys lattice-matched to GaSb
have been measured by Mezerreg et al. [3] in the spectral range of 75-400 cm- I . The
reststrahlen parameters obtained in this study were presented in tabular form.
Theoretical predictions of the refractive-index dispersion in the transparent region of
AlxGa,_..AsySb,_y have been reported on the bases of data concerning the binary parents,
AlAs, AISb, GaAs, and GaSb [4,5]. Experimentally, Alibert et al. [6] determined the
refractive-index dispersion in AlxGal_xAsySbl)GaSb alloy (x=0-0.51) grown by LPE.
The neE) data in this study were obtained based on an accurate measurement of the
reflection of p-polarized light as a function of the incident angle and by fitting the re-
flectance data to a calculated one. The accuracy of this measurement was estimated to
be within ±o.005. The measured data were fitted to the single effective-oscillator model.
Note that their obtained neE) data in the limit E-70 eV (i.e., £~ values) show very
strong nonlinearity with respect to alloy composition x [6].
The experimental values of neE) for AlxGal_xAsySbl_/InP (.x=0.l) have been deter-
mined by measuring reflectance of a thin MBE-grown film of known thickness and by
fitting the minima and maxima [7].
Optical absorption coefficients in LPE-grown AlxGal_..AsySbl_y on GaAs substrates
with (x,y)=(O,O.9) and (0.06,0.9) have been determined at different temperatures be-
tween 20 and 300 K [8]. Note that this alloy system is not lattice-matched one.
Figure C3-II-l shows the composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo, EgX,
and E gL) for (a) AlxGal_xAsySbl)GaSb, (b) AlxGal_xAsySbl_/InP, and (c) AlxGal_..ASySbl_
/InAs, as calculated from Eq. (Cl.7). The refractive-index curves with x-composition
increments of 0.1 for (a) AlxGal_xAsySbl-/GaSb, (b) AlxGa'_xAsySb,_y/lnP, and (c)
AlxGal_xAsySbl_jInAs, as calculated from Eq. (C1.14), are also shown in Fig. C3-II-2
[4]. The experimental data taken from Ref. [7] are shown in Fig. C3-U-2 (b) by the
solid circles. We can see in Fig. C3-II-l that these alloy systems show a direct (r6c) -
indirect (~C. L6 crossover occurring at xc-OA-O.5.
C
)
REFERENCES
1. S. J. Eglash and C. K. Choi,Appl. Phys. Lett. 57,1292 (1990).
2. D. Z. Garbuzov, R. U. Martinelli, H. Lee, R. J. Menna, P. K. York, L. A. DiMarco,
M. G. Harvey, R. J. Matarese, S. Y. Narayan, and J. C. Connolly, Appl. Phys. Lett.
70,2931 (1997).
3. A. Mezerreg, C. Llinares, J. L. Lazzari, and A. Montaner, Thin Solid Films 221,
196 (1992).
349
350 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
3D~-------------. 3D~-------------.
>u
""2.0
(a) (b)
o~~~~~~~~ o~~~~~~~~
o 0.5 1.0 o 0.5 1.0
X x
3.0.---------------..,
AIxGal-x Asy Sb l -y ImAs
>u
"" 2.0
(c)
x
Figure C3·n·l Composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo, E/, and EgL ) for (a)
Al.Ga1 ...As,Sb1-/GaSb, (b) Al.Ga1 .•As,Sb1.jlnP, and (c) Al.Ga1 ...As,Sb1.jlnAs at 300 K. [(a),
(c): From Adachi [4].]
C3 QUATERNARY ALLOYS 351
6~~------------------~ 5.5r-----------.
AlxGal_~sySbl_Y'GaSb
5.5 to 5.0
1.0
5.0 4.5
c: 4.0
3.5
5.5
10
5.0
4.5
c: 4.0
3.5
(c)
3.0
2.5
0 3.0
11w
Figure C3-ll-2 Refractive indices for (a) Al.Gal ..AsySbl-/GaSb, (b) Al.Gal..AsySbl.jInP, and
(c) Al.Gal .•AsySb1.jInAs with x-composition increments of 0.1 at 300 K. The experimental data
taken from Ref. [7] (x=0.1) are shown in (b) by the solid circles. [(a), (c): From Adachi [4].]
The AlzGa,.J'ySb,.y quaternary system can be grown lattice-matched to GaAs, GaSb,
InP, and InAs (see Table CI-3). However, a very few studies have been performed on
this alloy system so far.
Shimomura et al. [1] have reported the refractive indices for the end-point ternaries
GaPySb,./InP (.x=0) and AlPySb,./InP (.x=1.0) at 1.55 !-lm measured by ellipsometry
and those for GaPySb,./InP determined using a reflectance spectroscopy technique. The
ellipsometry n values were 3.579 and 3.037 for GaPySb,./InP and AlPySb,./InP, re-
spectively. The n(E) curves obtained from reflectance spectroscopy were found to
agree well with the calculated ones based on the simplified interband-transition model
[2].
Figure C3-III-1 shows the composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo, EgX,
and EgL ) for (a) AlzGa,.J'ySb,.jGaAs, (b) AlzGa,.J'ySb,.jGaSb, (c) AlxGa1.J'ySb,./InP,
and (d) AlxGa,.J'ySb,./InAs, as calculated from Eq. (C1.7). The refractive-index curves
with x-composition increments of 0.1 for (a) AlxGa1.J'ySb1.)GaAs, (b) AlxGa,.J'ySb1.
)GaSb, (c) AlxGa,.J'ySb1./InP, and (d) AlxGa1.J'ySb,./InAs, as calculated from Eq.
(C1.14), are also shown in Fig. C3-III-2. The experimental data taken from Ref. [1] are
shown in Fig. C3-III-2 (c) by the solid circles.
REFERENCES
1. H. Shimomura, T. Anan, and S. Sugou,J. eryst. Growth 162,121 (1996).
2. S. Adachi, J. Appl. Phys. 53,5863 (1982).
352
C3 QUATERNARY ALLOYS 353
3.0 AlxGol_xPySbl_/GoSb
>
Q)
~
c.. c..
~ ~
0
Z
~ to
AlxGol_xPySbl_/GaAs
(b)
0 0
0 0.5 to 0 0.5 to
X X
(c) (d)
O~~L-L-L-L-~~~~ O~~~~~~~~~~
o 0.5 1.0 o 0.5 1.0
X X
5P,---------------------~
6.0.------------.
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
(a)
2.5~.L.U.J...J..LI.L.U.J...U.JLJ..L.!:J..L.1.Ju..u.~u..u..L.U..L.U 3~~UL~~~~LULU~LU
o 234 o 20 3.0
nw (eV) eV )
5.5,---------------------, ~5r-------------------~
1.0
5.0 5.0
0.5
4.5 0.5
c: 4.0
3.5
(d)
3.0 3.0
(c)
2.5L-L-L~.........c...L.L::.........~.........c.L.L-L.J...L'W'-'O'......,.. 2.50.LLL..LJ....I..J..J....L...LLJ..U...L.J..I..J..J....LJ...LJ..U...L.J..I~
o 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
( eV ) -I1w ( eV )
Figure C3-ll1-2 Refractive indices for (a) AlxGal.xPySbl./GaAs, (b) AlxGal.xPySbl./GaSb, (c)
AlxGal.xPySbl.jInP, and (d) AlxGal.xPySbl./inAs with x-composition increments of 0.1 at 300 K.
The experimental data taken from Ref. [1] are shown in (c) by the solid circles.
The Ga)n1_»yAs 1_y quaternary system can be grown lattice-matched to GaAs and InP
(see Table CI-3). The quaternary system is used to produce lasers operating in the
wavelength range between 1.3 and 1.6 Ilm. Lasers emitting at this spectral range are of
great technological interest because of their application in an optical fiber communica-
tion system. The Ga)nl_»yAs1_y laser structures are grown lattice-matched to InP sub-
strates. The GaoA7II1o.s3As(y=O)/lnP heterostructure system has also broader interest
since it is used for various optoelectronic and transport device applications. A review
of many important physical and semiconducting properties of the Ga)nl_»yAsl.y alloy
system has been given in Refs. [1,2].
The static (EJ and high-frequency dielectric constants (E_) for Ga)n1.»yAs 1_y alloy at
300 K can be given by [2]
E,(y)=13.94-1.44y (C3.1)
E_(y)= 11.61-1.95y (C3.2)
Wavenumber (em- 1)
355
356 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
Ga)n1YyASI_Y (y==O, 0.2, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0) and unstrained Ga)n1Y#l-Y grown on InP
substrates by MOCVD. SE has also been used by Amiotti and Landgren [23] to deter-
mine thickness and n values at 1..=1.3, 1.55, and 1.7 Ilm of Ga)n1YyAs1_y films grown
on InP substrates.
The data of Kelso et al. [20] are very worthy for understanding fundamental optical
properties of GaxInl-xPyAsI_Y' However, these data seem to have one disadvantage with
(a)
(b)
.- (1-y)=
-QOO(Inp) 10
----- 0.24 (1-y)=
o ----.-.. -- 0.42
- - - 055 -O.OO(Jnp)
----- 0.B2 --- 0.24
--1.oo(InGOAS) --------042
---0.55
---0.82
--1.00 (InGOAS)
0L-~~-~3~~~4--~-5~~~
E(eV) E(eV)
Figure C3-IV-2 Real (El) and imaginary parts (E0 of the pseudodielectric function for Ga.In_
.PyAsl_/lnP with y==O-1.0 measured at room temperature. (From Kelso et al. [20].)
358 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
(a)
3
c 3 (l-y)=
- 0.00 (Inp)
---- 0.24
·········0.42 ---- 0.24
- ' - 0.55 ·········0.42
2 _._. 0.82
- - 1.00CInGQAS)
- - - 0.55
·_·_·0.82
- - 1.00([nGoAs)
4 5 6 5 6
E (eV) E (eV)
Figure C3-IV-3 Real (n) and imaginary parts (k) of the complex refractive index for GaxIn.
xPyAs1.jInP with y=D-1.0 measured at room temperature. (From Kelso et al. [20].)
respect to their usefulness: they are not expressed as continuous analytic functions of
photon energy E and alloy composition y. Various theoretical models have, therefore,
been proposed recently which enable calculation of the optical constants in the inter-
band transition region of semiconductors [24,25].
The refractive indices of Gao.47In0.53As lattice-matched to InP have been measured by
Asai and Iwamura [26] in the wavelength range between 1.0 and 2.0 /lm using reflec-
tance spectroscopy technique. The n dispersion showed a clear peak at Ag-1.2 /lm (see
Fig. C3-XI-l and Table C3-XI-l, below). Optical absorption spectra near the funda-
mental absorption edge of Gao.47Illo.S3As/InP have also been measured by a number of
authors [27-32]. These spectra showed the n=l discrete-exciton peak at low tempera-
tures, as shown in Fig. C3-IV-4 [29]. The optical constants in the interband transition
region of Gao.47In0.53As/InP have been determined by Dinges et al. [33] using SE at 300
K. The 450°C data of nand k for Gao.4)nO.53 As/InP have been reported by Celii et al.
[34]. The chemical treatment effect of Gao.47Ino.53As/InP has also been studied using SE
by Aspnes and Stocker (35]. The optical constants, n*=n+ik and £=£I+iEz, in the visi-
ble-IR region of Gao.47InO.53As/InP have also been determined from the KK inversion
analysis of the reflectance data by Nee and Green [36]; the data show better resolved
peaks associated with the El and El+~1 transitions than those obtained from SE.
Tables C3-IV-2a-C3-IV-2e list the room-temperature values of £=£I+iEz, n*=n+ik, a,
and R for Gaxln1-xPyAs1.y!InP for 1.5~::;6.0 eV obtained from SE by Kelso et al. [20].
The optical-constant data for E::;1.24 eV (y=0, Gao.47In0.53As/InP) are also listed in Ta-
ble C3-IV-2a. They are taken from Dinges et al. [33].
Figure C3-IV-5 shows the composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo, E/,
and E gL) for (a) Ga)nl.xPyAsl.JGaAs and (b) Gaxlnl'XPyAsl.y!InP, as calculated from Eq.
(C1.7). The refractive-index curves with y-composition increments of 0.1 for Ga)n l.
xPyAs1./GaAs, as calculated from Eq. (C1.14), are shown in Fig. C3-IV-6.
C3 QUATERNARY ALLOYS 359
GalnAsllnP
8000
......
'I
E 6000
.....u
tS 4000
2000
a
Q725 0.750 0.775 Q800 0.825 0.850
energy [eV]
Figure C3-IV-4 AbsOlption spectra of Gllo.47Ino.s3As/lnP (n=8xlQI4 cm-3) at various tempera-
tures. The vertical arrows mark the band-gap energies given by the onset of the absorption. The
scale of the absorption values on the left is valid for all spectra which have been shifted verti-
cally for clarity. (From Zielinski et al. [29].)
>2.0
......CII t---=----:~
(a) (b)
O~L-L-L-L-L-L-L-L-~
0.5 to o 0.5 1.0
Y Y
Figure C3-IV-5 Composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo. EgX, and E gL ) for (a)
Ga.InI-xPyAs1_/GaAs and (b) Ga.Inl-xPyAsl_,llnP at 300 K.
360 ill-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
to
Figure C3·IV-6 Refractive indices
for Ga.Inl..P,As1./GaAs with y-
composition increments of 0.1 at
300K.
REFERENCES
1. S. Adachi,f. Appl. Phys. 53, 8775 (1982).
2. S. Adachi, Physical Properties of III-V Semiconductor Compounds: InP, InAs,
GaAs, GaP, InGaAs, and InGaAsP (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1992).
3. P. M. Amirtharaj, G. D. Holah, and S. Perkowitz, Phys. Rev. B 21,5656(1980).
4. C. Pickering, f. Electron. Mater. 10, 901 (1981).
5. M. Amiotti, G. Guizzetti, M. Patrini, A. Piaggi, A. Borghesi, L. Colombo, and G.
Landgren, f. Appl. Phys. 75, 3085 (1994).
6. G. M. zinger, I. P. Ipatova, and A. I. Ryskin, Sov. Phys. Semicond. 18, 13 (1984).
7. P. Chandra, L. A. Coldren, and K. E. Strege, Electron. Lett. 17,6 (1981).
8. B. Broberg and S. Lindgren, f. Appl. Phys. 55, 3376 (1984).
9. W. Kowalsky, A. Schlachetzki, and F. Fiedler, Phys. Status Solidi A 68, 153
(1981).
10. W. Kowalsky, H.-H. Wehmann, F. Fiedler, and A. Schlachetzki, Phys. Status
Solidi A 77, K75 (1983).
11. C. H. Henry, L. F. Johnson, R. A. Logan, and D. P. Clarke, IEEE J. Quantum
Electron. QE.21, 1887 (1985).
C3 QUATERNARY ALLOYS 361
Table C3·IV·2a Optical constants ojGa.[nl .• PyAs1•y with y=O (GaoA7Ino.53As) at 300 K.
eV £1 Ez n k cx(cm·l ) R
0.652 10.69 3.27 0.283
0.689 12.32 3.51 0.310
0.729 12.81 0.36 3.58 0.05 3.70E+03 0.317
0.775 12.88 0.50 3.59 0.07 5.50E+03 0.319
0.826 12.95 0.58 3.600 0.08 6.70E+03 0.320
0.885 13.04 1.23 3.615 0.17 1.53E+04 0.322
0.953 13.07 1.38 3.620 0.19 1.84E+04 0.323
1.033 13.16 1.60 3.635 0.22 2.30E+04 0.325
1.215 13.25 1.90 3.650 0.26 3.20E+04 0.327
1.24 13.32 2.05 3.660 0.28 3.52E+04 0.328
1.5 13.61 2.70 3.71 0.36 5.54E+04 0.335
1.6 13.93 2.82 3.75 0.38 6.lOE+04 0.339
1.7 14.36 3.07 3.81 0.40 6.94E+04 0.346
1.8 14.79 3.19 3.87 0.41 7.53E+04 0.352
1.9 15.32 3.47 3.94 0.44 8.49E+04 0.359
2 15.89 3.87 4.02 0.48 9.77E+04 0.368
2.1 16.54 4.48 4.10 0.55 1.16E+05 0.377
2.2 17.36 5.18 4.21 0.61 1.37E+05 0.388
2.3 18.25 6.13 4.33 0.71 1.65E+05 0.401
2.4 18.93 7.88 4.44 0.89 2. 16E+o5 0.416
2.5 18.57 10.89 4.48 1.22 3.08E+05 0.431
2.6 15.71 14.33 4.30 1.67 4.39E+05 0.443
2.7 13.21 15.09 4.08 1.85 5.06E+05 0.442
2.8 11.07 15.64 3.89 2.01 5.71E+05 0.443
2.9 9.46 15.58 3.72 2.09 6. 16E+05 0.442
3 8.07 14.42 3.51 2.06 6.25E+05 0.429
3.1 7.43 13.50 3.38 2.00 6.28E+05 0.417
3.2 7.07 12.88 3.30 1.95 6.33E+05 0.408
3.3 6.86 12.42 3.24 1.91 6.40E+05 0.401
3.4 6.89 12.15 3.23 1.88 6.48E+05 0.397
3.5 6.79 11.96 3.20 1.87 6.62E+05 0.394
3.6 6.79 11.96 3.20 1.87 6.81E+05 0.394
3.7 6.79 11.99 3.21 1.87 7.01E+05 0.395
3.8 6.79 12.33 3.23 1.91 7.35E+05 0.400
3.9 7.00 12.79 3.28 1.95 7.70E+05 0.407
4 6.96 13.44 3.32 2.02 8.20E+05 0.416
4.1 6.96 14.69 3.41 2.16 8.96E+05 0.434
4.2 6.43 16.13 3.45 2.34 9.96E+05 0.454
4.3 5.36 17.48 3.44 2.54 1. llE+06 0.474
4.4 3.39 19.08 3.37 2.83 1.26E+06 0.503
4.5 0.71 19.29 3.16 3.05 1.39E+06 0.525
4.6 -2.86 18.56 2.82 3.29 1.53E+06 0.556
4.7 -5.36 16.72 2.47 3.39 1.6IE+06 0.580
4.8 -6.64 13.80 2.08 3.31 1.61E+06 0.593
4.9 -6.79 11.66 1.83 3.18 1.58E+06 0.596
5 -6.43 9.91 1.64 3.02 1.53E+06 0.592
5.1 -6.00 8.59 1.50 2.87 1.48E+<)6 0.586
5.2 -5.46 7.73 1.41 2.73 1.44E+06 0.575
5.3 -5.00 6.93 1.33 2.60 1.40E+06 0.564
C3 QUATERNARY ALLOYS 363
Table C3-IV -2c Optical constants of GaJnl .• P,As1., with y=0.45 at 300 K.
eV £\ £2 n k a (cm'\) R
1.5 12.82 2.09 3.59 0.29 4.42E+04 0.321
1.6 12.89 2.18 3.60 0.30 4.91E+04 0.322
1.7 13.18 2.36 3.64 0.32 5.58E+04 0.327
1.8 13.43 2.45 3.68 0.33 6.08E+04 0.331
1.9 13.75 2.76 3.73 0.37 7. 13E+04 0.337
2 14.29 2.94 3.80 0.39 7.84E+04 0.345
2.1 14.75 3.25 3.86 0.42 8.96E+04 0.351
2.2 15.29 3.68 3.94 0.47 1.04E+05 0.360
2.3 15.96 4.23 4.03 0.52 1.22E+05 0.370
2.4 16.79 5.06 4.14 0.61 1.49E+05 0.382
2.5 17.50 6.23 4.25 0.73 1.86E+05 0.395
2.6 18.07 7.98 4.35 0.92 2.42E+05 0.410
2.7 17.86 11.04 4.41 1.25 3.43E+05 0.428
2.8 16.07 13.80 4.32 1.60 4.54E+05 0.440
2.9 13.57 15.00 4.11 1.82 5.36E+05 0.441
3 10.93 15.00 3.84 1.95 5.94E+05 0.436
3.1 9.11 14.42 3.62 1.99 6.27E+05 0.428
3.2 7.93 13.56 3.44 1.97 6.40E+05 0.417
3.3 7.36 12.82 3.33 1.93 6.45&05 0.407
3.4 7.14 12.33 3.27 1.89 6.50E+05 0.400
3.5 6.96 12.02 3.23 1.86 6.6IE+05 0.395
3.6 6.96 11.96 3.22 1.85 6.77E+05 0.393
3.7 6.96 11.99 3.23 1.86 6.97E+05 0.395
3.8 7.11 12.15 3.25 1.87 7. 19E+05 0.397
3.9 7.14 12.36 3.27 1.89 7.47E+05 0.400
4 7.21 12.85 3.31 1.94 7.87E+05 0.407
4.1 7.21 13.62 3.36 2.02 8.42E+05 0.418
4.2 7.14 14.72 3.43 2.15 9. 14E+05 0.434
4.3 6.61 16.20 3.47 2.33 1.02E+06 0.454
4.4 5.54 17.79 3.48 2.56 1.l4E+06 0.477
4.5 3.57 19.63 3.43 2.86 1.3IE+06 0.507
4.6 0.36 19.42 3.15 3.09 1.44E+06 0.529
4.7 -2.86 18.10 2.78 3.25 1.55E+06 0.553
4.8 -5.00 15.64 2.39 3.27 1.59E+06 0.569
4.9 -6.39 13.19 2.03 3.24 1.61E+06 0.587
5 -6.79 11.20 1.78 3.15 1.60E+06 0.597
5.1 -6.36 9.91 1.65 3.01 1.56E+06 0.590
C3 QUATERNARY ALLOYS 365
REFERENCES
1. C. A. Wang and H. K. Choi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 802 (1997).
2. C. Pickering, J. Electron. Mater. 15,51 (1986).
3. A. Mezerreg, C. Llinares, 1. L. Lazzari, and A. Montaner, Thin Solid Films 221,
196 (1992).
4. W.G. Bi, A. Z. Li, and S. S. Tan, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 216,213 (1991).
5. S. Adachi, J. Appl. Phys. 53, 5863 (1982).
368
C3 QUATERNARY ALLOYS 369
2.0 20
Gaxlnl_xAsySbl_/GaSb Gaxlnl_xAsySb1_/lnp
0.
0.
~ 1.0 ~ 1.0
0
0
z z Eo
;a «
IXl
0.5 0.5
(a) (b)
0
0.5 1.0 0 0.5 to
X X
2.0
~ t5
o
~
IXl 0.5
(c)
O~~~-J~~~-L~~.
o 0.5 1.0
X
Figure C3-V -1 Composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo, EgX, and EgL ) for (a)
Ga.oInl.xAsySbl-/GaSb, (b) Ga.oInl.xAsySbl_JInP, and (c) Ga.oInl_xAsySbl_JInAs at 300 K. [(a), (c):
From Adachi [7].]
370 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
(a)
0.5 1.0
-f,(U ( eV )
4.0
3.8
3.6
InP
C
3.4
3.2
(b)
3.0
0 0.5 1.0 1.5
-1\00 eV )
4.1
3.9
x·a
(c)
0.5 1.0
i\w ( eV )
Figure C3-V-2 Refractive indices for (a) Ga,In\_.AsySb\.!GaSb, (b) Ga,In\ .•AsySb\./illP, and
(c) Ga,In\..AsySb\./illAs with x-composition increments of 0.1 at 300 K. [(a), (c): From Adachi
[7].]
The Gaxlnl_J\Sb l_y quaternary alloy has the room-temperature band gap ranging from
0.18 eV (InSb) to 2.26 eV (GaP). The quaternary alloy can be grown lattice-matched to
GaAs, GaSb, InP, and InAs (see Table Cl-3). However, a large miscibility gap exists
due to the large difference of lattice constants of the end-point binary components. This
has prevented the growth of this alloy system until recently.
Optical properties of the MOCVD-grown Ga)nl_~ySbl_y layers on GaAs, InP, InAs,
GaSb, and InSb substrates were reported by Jaw et al. [1]. Transmission and PL exci-
tation spectroscopy were used to determine the fundamental absorption edges of such
quaternary layers. No further studies have been performed on this alloy system.
Figure C3-VI -1 shows the composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo, Egx,
and E gL) for (a) Ga)nl_~ySbl-JGaAs, (b) Ga)nl_~ySbl-JGaSb, (c) Ga)nl_~ySbl_JInP,
and (d) Ga)nl_~ySbl_JInAs, as calculated from Eq. (C1.7). The refractive-index curves
with x-composition increments of 0.1 for (a) Ga)nl_~ySbl-JGaAs, (b) Ga)nl_~ySbl_
/GaSb, (c) Gaxlnl_~ySbl_JInP, and (d) Ga)nl_~ySbl_JInAs, as calculated from Eq.
(C1.14), are also shown in Fig. C3-VI-2. Like Ga)nl_~sySbl_y, the Ga)nl_~ySbl-JGaSb
system shows a refractive-index anomaly, i.e., the smaller Eo-gap material has a smaller
value of the refractive index [see Fig. C3-VI-2 (b)].
REFERENCES
1. D. H. Jaw, M. J. Jou, Z. M. Fang, and G. B. Stringfellow, J. Appl. Phys. 68,3538
(1990).
371
372 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
-
>2.0 ;-2.0
QI QI
(a)
1.0
X
a.. a..
~ ~
0
~ 1.0
Eo
Gax1n1_xPySb1_/lnP
(C) (d)
0 0
0 0.5 to 0 0.5 1.0
X X
Figure C3-VI-l Composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo, EgX, and E gL ) for (a)
GaJnl..PySbdGaAs, (b) Ga..Inl ..PySbl-/GaSb, (c) Ga..Inl ...PySb1_,llnP, and (d) Ga.In1..PySb1_
,llnAs at 300 K.
C3 QUATERNARY ALLOYS 373
4.0..---------------, 4.1.------------~
3.9
c C 3.7
3.5
3.2
(a) (b)
3.0~-'-'-W-L..u..J1..LJ...LJ..l..LJ...w..J.-'-'-L-L..L..LJ...Ju..J
o 1.0 2.0 3.0 0.5 1.0
-1\00 ( eV ) -1100 ( eV )
4.0·.-------------. 4 . 1 . - - - - - - - - -_ _~
3.9
3.5
c C 3.7
3.0
3.5
(c) (d)
2~~~~0~.5~~1.LO~~1.w5~~20 3.3o!:-",--..I..--'--~....l.os--'---''--I-.-.!..-..l
. 1.0
i\w ( eV )
-1100 (eV)
Figure C3-VI-2 Refractive indices for (a) Ga)n1.xPySb1./GaAs, (b) Ga)n1.xPySb1./GaSb, (c)
GaxInl.xPySbl./InP, and (d) Gaxlnl.xPySbl./lnAs with x-composition increments of 0.1 at 300 K.
The Al)nl ..pyAsl.y quaternary system can be grown lattice-matched to GaAs and InP
(see Table Cl-3). As we will see [Fig. C3-VII-1 (a)], the material system Al)nl.J'yAs I .
/GaAs falls into the indirect-band-gap (E/) region over the entire range of alloy com-
position. The Al)nl ..pyAsl./lnP system, on the other hand, falls into the direct-band-
gap (Eo) region for 0:5y:::;I.0 [see Fig. C3-VII-1 (b)]. However, the quaternary system
AI)n1.'pyAsl.JInP has band gaps not at an interesting emission wavelength. Further,
AI)nl.'pyAsloy is expected to have a miscibility gap. Since then, less attention has been
paid on this quaternary system. No detailed data on the optical properties of this alloy
system is also available at present.
Figure C3-VII -1 shows the composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo,
E/, and E gL ) for (a) Al)n1.)'yAs1./GaAs and (b) Al)n1.)'yAs1oJInP, as calculated from
Eq. (C1.?). The refractive-index curves with y-composition increments of 0.1 for (a)
AI)n1o)'yAs1./GaAs and (b) Al)n1.)'yAs1.JInP, as calculated from Eq. (C1.14), are also
shown in Fig. C3-VII-2.
3.0r.:::::----------, 3.0
Alxln]_xPyAs]_y'lnP
>
Q)
>
Q)
EX
EX 9
2.0 9 ....... 2.0
EL
9
c..
<X:
(!)
c Eo
~ 1.0
a:l
AIx In] -xPAs]
y -y IGaAs
(a) (b)
0
0.5 1.0 0 0.5 1.0
Y Y
Figure C3-VII-l Composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo, EgX, and EgL ) for (a)
Al.!nloxPyAsl-!GaAs and (b) AlxInloxPyAslojInP at 300 K.
374
C3 QUATERNARY ALLOYS 375
4.5 4.0
Alxlnl_xPyAsl_/GaAs Alxlnl_xPyAsl_/lnP
y=o
y=0.1
3.8
4.0 0.5" 0.4"
3.6
C 3.5
~ c
3.4
3.0
3.2
(a)
(b)
2.5 3.0
0 3.0 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
-nw eV ) iiw ( eV )
Figure C3·VII·2 Refractive indices for (a) Al.In1 .•PyAs1./GaAs and (b) Al.In1 .•PyAs1.JInP with
y-composition increments of 0.1 at 300 K.
The Al)nl_xAsySbl_y quaternary system can be grown lattice-matched to GaSb, lnP, and
lnAs (see Table C1-3). Although several quantum-well structures have been demon-
strated based on this alloy system (see Ref. [1]), no experimental data on the optical
constants of this alloy system is available at present.
Figure C3-VIII-1 shows the composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo,
E/, and EgL ) for (a) Al,In1_xAsySb1-!GaSb, (b) Al)n1_xAsySb1-/lnP, and (c) Al,Inl_
xAsySb1-/lnAs, as calculated from Eq. (C1.7). The refractive-index curves with x-
composition increments of 0.1 for (a) Al)n1_xAsySb1-/GaSb, (b) Al)n1_xAsySb1_jInP,
and (c) Al,In1_xAsySb1_jInAs, as calculated from Eq. (C1.14), are also shown in Fig. C3-
VIII-2.
REFERENCES
1. A. D. Andreev and G. G. Zegrya, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70,601 (1997).
376
C3 QUATERNARY ALLOYS 377
~Or-----------------, 3D~-----------------,
-~
....... 2.0
a.
~
a
z
~ 1.0
Alxlnl_xAsySbl_/lnP
(a) (b)
OL-L-~~~-J-J-J-J-J 0
o 0.5 1.0 0 0.5 1.0
X X
3Dr-----------------~
~
--2.0
(c)
OL-~~~~~~~~~
o 0.5 1.0
X
Figure C3-VIII-l Composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo, EgX, and E gL ) for (a)
Alxln1.xAsySb1-/GaSb, (b) AlxInl.xAsySbl.jInP, and (c) AlxInl.xAsySbl.jInAs at 300 K.
378 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
5P.---------------------~
AIx 1n1 -xAsySb l -yIlnP 1.0
5.5 x.tO
4.5 0.8
5.0
4.0
c: c:
3.5
3.0
3.0
(a) (b)
2.5 1,-J-l..LLLLJ..LLLLJ..LLJ..L.JU-L.1-L.L..L..J...LLL.L..U
0
1.0 2.0 3.0
ftw eV
6.0~-----------.,
5.5
1.0
5.0
c:
3.0
(c)
2.5,Lw..LL-U..JU-L.J..J...L..L..J...LLLLJ..LJ...L.J..J...w...u...L.J
o 1.0 2.0 3.0
ftw ( eV )
Figure C3-VIII-2 Refractive indices for (a) Al)nl_xAsySb1./GaSb, (b) Al.Inl_xAsySbl_JInP, and
(c) AlxInl_xAsySbl_JInAs with x-composition increments of 0.1 at 300 K.
The Al)n1_J>ySb 1_yquaternary system can be grown lattice-matched to GaAs, GaSb, InP,
and InAs (see Table Cl-3). However, no detailed data on the optical properties of this
alloy system is available at present.
Figure C3-IX-l shows the composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo, EgX,
and EgL ) for (a) Al)n1_J>ySb1-!GaAs, (b) Al)n1_J>ySb1-!GaSb, (c) Al)n1_J>ySb1-!InP, and
(d) Al)nl_J>ySb1_JInAs, as calculated from Eq. (C1.7). The refractive-index curves with
x-composition increments of 0.1 for (a) Al)n1_J>ySb1-!GaAs, (b) Al)n1_J>ySb1-!GaSb,
(c) Alxln1-.J\Sb1_JInP, and (d) Al)n1_J>ySb1-/lnAs, as calculated from Eq. (C1.14), are
also shown in Fig. C3-IX-2.
3.0
20
(a)
1.0
x
(c)
x X
Figure C3·IX·l Composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo, EgX, and EgL) for (a)
Al.In1_xPySb1-!GaAs, (b) AlxInl_xPySbl-!GaSb, (c) AlxInl_xPySbl_JInP, and (d) AlxInl_xPySbl_JInAs
at 300 K.
379
380 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
5.0 6.0
5.0
0.8
4.0
4.5
C
3.5
GoAs~
3.0
3.0
(a) (b)
2.5 2.5
0 2 3 4 0 1.0 2.0 3.0
1100 eV ) 1100 ( eV )
6.0 5.5
1.0
Alx '''1_x PySb 1_yl1nP
5.5
5.0
1.0
5.0
4.5
c
4.0
3.5
(c) (d)
2.5 2.5
0 1.0 2.0 3.0 0 1.0 2P 3.0
i\w ( eV ) 1\(1) eV
Figure C3-IX-2 Refractive indices for (a) Al.In1 .• PySb1./GaAs, (b) Al.In1 .•PySb1./GaSb, (c)
Al.In1 .•PySb1.jInP, and (d) Al.In1 .• PySb1.jInAs with x-composition increments of 0.1 at 300 K.
The AlxGayln._x_l quaternary system can be grown lattice-matched to GaAs [(AlxGa._
x)osIllosP/GaAs, see Table Cl-4]. The quaternary system offers the widest direct energy
gaps in the III-V alloys apart from the N-based compounds. Therefore, this alloy sys-
tem is an exceptionally promising material system for fabricating solar cells and light-
emitting and laser diodes in the visible wavelength region below 700 nm. Excellent
laser diodes with very low threshold current and high output power have been reported
so far (see, e.g., Refs. [1,2]).
Under certain conditions, the end-member GRo.slfio.sp ternary alloy grown by
MOVPE exhibits spontaneous CuPt-type ordering, with alternating Ga- and In-rich
planes along the {Ill} crystallographic direction [3]. Of interest is the band-gap low-
ering that it causes, and the importance of this alloy for making various optoelectronic
devices [4,5].
The high-frequency dielectric constant, E_, for (AlxGa._JoslnosP lattice-matched to
GaAs has been reported to be given by [6]
This value was obtained, as a byproduct, by fitting the refractive-index dispersion data
with the first-order Sellmeier equation:
B"K
n(/,i=A+-- (C3.4)
"K-C
where A. is the wavelength in the vacuum (in 11m).
The n dispersion in the transparent region of (AlxGa._.)uslnosP/GaAs has been meas-
ured by several authors [6-8]. The samples used in these studies were grown by
MOVPE [6,7] and by gas-source MBE [8]. Measurement techniques were SE [6], opti-
cal transmission [7], and reflectance spectroscopy [8]. Figure C3-X-l shows, as an ex-
ample, the n dispersion for GRosIllosP (x=0) obtained at energies below and a little abo-
ve the Eo edge by SE (solid circles) [6]. The open circles also represent the refractive
indices obtained by Moser et at. [7]. We can recognize in the figure a considerable de-
viation between these two experimental data (&1-0.04 at 1.2 eV). Notice, however,
that this deviation is within the experimental error of the transmission experiments
(-0.2, Ref. [7]).
From the fit with the first-order Sellmeier equation [Eq. (C3.4)], Adachi et at. [6]
determined a set of the dispersion parameters A, B, and C for (AlxGa •.Jo.s1nosP/GaAs
quaternary that can be written as
A(x) = 5.38 + 2.l6x (C3.5a)
B(x) = 4.01- 3.0 Ix (C3.5b)
C(x) = 0.184 - 0.019x +0.024x2 (C35c)
381
382 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
4.0
Gao.5Ino.5P
3.8
3.6
.'
c
3.4
o •
3.2
3.0 0
0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0
Photon Energy (eV)
Figure C3-X-l Refractive indices for Gao.sIno.sp grown on (lOO)GaAs measured by SE at room
temperature (solid circles). The open circles show the experimental data obtained by Moser et
at. [7] from transmission measurements. The solid line represents the calculated result of Eq.
(C3.4). (From Adachi et at. [6]).
As A.~oo in Eq. (C3.4), one obtains that n(A.~oo)2=E_=A+B. The resultant E_ value for
(AlxGat_x)o.sIno.sP/GaAs quaternary is given by Eq. (C3.3).
The optical constants in the interband transition region of (AlxGat_x)o.sIno.sP/GaAs
have been measured using SE by several authors [9-11]. Ozaki et at. [10] have report-
ed the E(E) and its related optical spectra for (AlxGat-.,)o.sIno.sP quaternary of target
compositions x=0-1.0 in steps of 0.25 at energies between 1 and 6 eV at 300 K. The
samples used were epitaxially grown on (lOO)GaAs by MOCVD. Figures C3-X-2 and
C3-X-3 show, respectively, the E(E)=E1(E)+iEiE) and n*(E)=n(E)+ik(E) spectra ob-
tained by Ozaki et at. [10]. The solid lines in Fig. C3-X-2 represent the theoretical fits
of the MDF calculation. The CP parameters obtained in this analysis were listed in
tabular form [10].
As seen in Fig. C3-X-2, the two major features of the spectra are the EI and E2
structures at -3.2-3.7 eV and -4.8 eV, respectively. The EI structure moves to higher
energy with increasing x, while the E2 structure does not perceptibly do so. The E1+/':,.1
structure is not clearly discernible in this alloy system. This is because the EI and E1+/':,.1
structures overlay with each other and the oscillator strength of E 1+/':,.1 is much smaller
than that of E 1• Lee et at. [11] also measured the SE E(E) spectra of (AlxGa l _
x)o.sIno.sP/GaAs quaternary; however, their study was concentrated mainly on the de-
termination of the SCP parameters by an SCP analysis.
The refractive indices and absorption coefficients in the region below and a little
above the Eo edge of Gaa.s1no.sP have been determined from the reflectance interference
C3 QUATERNARY ALLOYS 383
E,
40 40 I (b)
30 x=1.00
(+20) 30
x=0.75
(+15)
20 x=0.50
'"
w
(+10)
x=0.25 20 x=0.50
(+5) (+10)
10 x=o
x=O.25
(+5)
x=o
0
3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV) Photon energy (eV)
(a)
4 4 x=O
x=0.25
x=0.50
x=0.75
3 3 x=1.00
2 x=o 2
x=0.25
x=0.50
x=0.75
x=1.00
(b)
o 2 3 4 5 6 o 2 3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV) Photon energy (eV)
Figure C3-X-3 Complex refractive indices, n'(E)=n(E)+ik(E), for (AlxGa1_x)o.sIno.sP/GaAs at
room temperature. They are calculated from the teE) data in Fig. C3-X-2.
spacing (n) and conventional transmission measurements (ex) by Garbuzov et at. [12].
The n and ex values in the A.=400-800-nm region of Gao.sIno.sp have also been deter-
mined using Brillouin scattering and SE techniques by Hassine et at. [13]. Their ob-
tained results are reproduced in Fig. C3-X-4.
The effects of spontaneous ordering in Gao.slno.sP were studied using SE [10]. They
were investigated by growth on (lOO)GaAs substrates tilted at angles of 2°, 7°, and 15°
with respect to the nearest <110> direction. The tilted-angle dependence of €(E) was
384 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
3.7
562.8
3.6
x 4.2 3.5
w
0 Ag~ 752.
z 4.0 3.4
w 560 620 6BO 740
> 3.B
i=
0
« 3.6
a:
LL
w 3.4 (a)
a: Ag
3.2
400 500 600 700 BOO
WAVELENGTH (nm)
",350
E
u
'b
,.... 300 (b)
2S
z 250
o
~ 200
a:
55 150
co
«
...J
100
«()
1= 50
0....
o 0 \
4~0~0--~45~0~-=50~0~-=55~0~~60~0~~6~50~~700
WAVELENGTH (nm)
Figure C3-X-4 (a) Refractive indices and (b) absorption coefficients for GlIo.sIno.sP grown on
(lOO)GaAs measured by Brillouin scattering (vertical bars) and SE (open triangles) at room
temperature. (From Hassine et at. [13]).
observed not only for GlIo.sIno.sP but also for (AlxGa\.x)o.sIno.sP (x;t(). It is hard to expect
such a spontaneous ordering in the quaternary alloys because it may be somewhat in-
hibited by the presence of Al. We, therefore, consider that the observed tilted-angle
dependence may result mainly from the difference in the degree of surface roughness.
The n data shown in Fig. C3-X-1 are for the 2°-tilted sample. The SE study of
Gao.sIno.sP alloy has also been carried out by a number of groups [14-17].
Tables C3-X-1a-C3-X-1e list the room-temperature values of £=£l+i~, n*=n+ik, Ct.,
and R for (AlxGal_Jo.sIno.sP/GaAs with x between 0 (Gao.sIno.sP) and 1.0 (Alo.sIno.sP) in
steps of 0.25 forO.5~S;5.65 eV determined by SE [6,10].
C3 QUATERNARY ALLOYS 385
Figure C3-X-5 shows the composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo, EgX,
and EgL ) for (AlxGal-x)o.sIno.sP/GaAs, as calculated from Eq. (C1.8). The refractive-
index dispersion with x-composition increments of 0.1 for (AlxGal.x)o.sIno.sP/GaAs, as
calculated from Eq. (C3.4), is also shown in Fig. C3-X-6.
3.0.-------------,
3.6
(AlxGa1-x)O.5Ino.5P
3.5
3.4
3.3
c
3.2 x=O
3.1 x=O.5
3.0
x=1.0
REFERENCES
1. H.-P. Gauggel, J. Kuhn, C. Jerichow, C. Geng, F. Scholz, and H. Schweizer,
Electron. Lett. 33, 1385 (1997).
2. Y. Ueno, K. Endo, H. Fujii, K. Kobayashi, K. Hara, and T. Yuasa, Electron. Lett.
26,1726 (1990).
3. A. Gomyo, T. Suzuki, and S. Iijima, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60,2645 (1988).
4. G. S. Horner, A. Mascarenhas, R. G. Alonso, S. Froyen, K. A. Bertness, and J. M.
Olson, Phys. Rev. B 49, 1727 (1994).
5. M. C. DeLong, D. J. Mowbray, R. A. Hogg, M. S. Skolnick, J. E. Williams, K.
Meehan, S. R. Kurtz, J. M. Olson, R. P. Schneider, M. C. Wu, and M. Hopkinson,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 66,3185 (1995).
6. S. Adachi, H. Kato, A. Moki, and K. Ohtsuka, 1. Appl. Phys. 75,478 (1994).
7. M. Moser, R. Winterhoff, C. Geng, I. Queisser, F. Scholz, and A. Dornen, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 64,235 (1994).
8. Y. Kaneko and K. Kishino, 1. Appl. Phys. 76, 1809 (1994).
9. H. Kato, S. Adachi, H. Nakanishi, and K. Ohtsuka, lpn. 1. Appl. Phys. 33, 186
(1994).
10. S. Ozaki, S. Adachi, M. Sato, and K. Ohtsuka, l. Appl. Phys. 79,439 (1996).
11. H. Lee, M. V. Klein, D. E. Aspnes, C. P. Kuo, M. Peanasky, and M. G. Craford, 1.
Appl. Phys. 73, 400(1993); erratum, ibid. 75, 679 (1994).
12 D. Z. Garbuzov, E. V. Tulashvili, V. P. Evtikhiev, and I. N. Arsent'ev, Sov. Tech.
Phys. Lett. 8, 551 (1982).
13. A. Hassine, J. Sapriel, P. Le Berre, P. Legay, F. Alexandre, and G. Post, 1. Appl.
Phys. 77, 6569 (1995).
14. M. Moser, C. Geng, E. Lach, I. Queisser, F. Scholz, H. Schweizer, and A. Dornen,
1. Cryst. Growth 124, 333 (1992).
15. M. Schubert, V. Gottschalch, C. M. Herzinger, H. Yao, P. G. Snyder, and J. A.
Woollam, 1. Appl. Phys. 77, 3416 (1995).
16. K. Watanabe, K. Kobayashi, C. C. Wong, Yi-M. Xiong, T. Saitoh, and F. Hyuga,
Thin Solid Films 270, 97 (1995).
17. H. Lee, M. V. Klein, J. M. Olson, and K. C. Hsieh, Phys. Rev. B 53,4015 (1996).
300K
-.... Ag
. . . . . . :;-...T--_. /-",
......... I
x ...-....J_- - - . . '"
~ 3.5r-~"
"
'.'. '._X-O.O
:z ~ \ '- (InGaAsl
-w '- '-..
"., "'-. ' - - '-'--.- 0.27
>
i= ""'- " ' .-".
.,........
.......... - ___.---.-.-
• 0 .49
e:w
~
'--...- -__
" - . - - ._ _ - - - 0.54
"---
._._
0.75
1.0
--
0:: " nAIAs)
398
C3 QUATERNARY ALLOYS 399
TABLE C3-XI-l Room-temperature refractive indices in the region below and a little above
the Eo edge of (AI.Gal.Jo.4sln052AsllnP measured by reflectance technique [4J.
n
A (J.Ull) eV x=0 x=0.27 x=O.49 x=0.54 x=O.75 x=1.00
2 0.620 3.485 3.388 3.331 3.270 3.235 3.172
1.9 0.652 3.509 3.390 3.326 3.278 3.236 3.175
1.8 0.689 3.551 3.404 3.343 3.289 3.249 3.181
1.75 0.708 3.576
1.7 0.729 3.598 3.415 3.347 3.294 3.253 3.188
1.65 0.751 3.592
1.6 0.775 3.559 3.434 3.361 3.308 3.264 3.196
1.55 0.800 3.545
1.5 0.826 3.543 3.472 3.375 3.326 3.278 3.208
1.45 0.855 3.499
1.4 0.885 3.549 3.515 3.401 3.348 3.292 3.224
1.35 0.918 3.522
1.3 0.953 3.563 3.526 3.442 3.382 3.317 3.249
1.25 0.992 3.475
1.2 1.033 3.581 3.535 3.505 3.428 3.345 3.278
1.15 1.078 3.515 3.440
1.1 1.127 3.608 3.554 3.516 3.454 3.389 3.301
1.05 1.180 3.460
1 1.240 3.628 3.572 3.530 3.482 3.435 3.331
xl0 8
N
IE
~
N
lj
of strain on the band-gap energy has been properly taken into consideration in the cal-
culation. Their obtained results are reproduced in Fig. C3-Xl-3.
The optical constants in the interband transition region of (AlxGal_x)o.4sIno.5zAs/lnP
have been determined using SE by several authors [1,8-10]. The energies and bro-
adening parameters of the El and El+l11 CPs as a function of Al composition are deter-
mined from an SCP analysis of the SE data [1]. The refractive indices in the wave-
length range 1.0-1.9 !lm of (AlxGal.x)o.4sIno.5ZAs/lnP have also been determined by SE
400 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
2
---E
I
a
(J
c
.Q 1
+-'
0..
L
o Figure C3·XI·3 Optical absorption spec-
<fJ tra for Al.Inl .•As/InP (A: =0.488; B:
..0
« =0.484; C: =0.481; D: =0.461; E:
=0.448) at 14 K. (From Roura et al. [7].)
O+O~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1.45 1.50 1.55 1.60
Photon Energy ( eV)
REFERENCES
1. J.-W. Pan, J.-L. Shieh, J.-H. Gau, J.-1. Chyi, J.-c. Lee, and K.-J. Ling, 1. Appl.
Phys. 78, 442 (1995).
2. C. De Bernardi, M. Meliga, S. Morasca, C. Rigo, B. Sordo, and A. Stano, 1. Appl.
Phys. 68, 6513 (1990).
3. M. J. Mondry, D. 1. Babic, J. E. Bowers, and L. A. Coldren, IEEE Photon. Tech-
nolo Lett. 4, 627 (1992).
4. H. Asai and H. Iwamura, Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 145,985 (1996).
5. K. Masu, T. Mishima, S Hiroi, M. Konagai, and K. Takahashi, 1. Appl. Phys. 53,
7558 (1982).
6. P. Swarup, R. K. Jain, S. N. Verma, S. Charan, and D. M. Tandle, Phys. Status
Solidi A 72, K189 (1982).
7. P. Roura, M. L6pez-de Miguel, A. Cornet, and J. R. Morante, 1. Appl. Phys. 81,
6916 (1997).
C3 QUATERNARY ALLOYS 401
3.0..---------------,
......
~
-2.0
o~~~~~~~~~~~
o 0.5 1.0
X
Figure C3·XI·4 Composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo, E/, and EgL ) for
(Al.Gal .•)0.4sInO.S2As/InP at 300 K.
402 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
4.0c-----------------------,
1.0
InP
AI0.48Ino.5~s/l nP
4
n
1 k
o 1 2 345 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure C3-XI-7 n(E) and k(E) spectra for Alo.4sIno.52As/lnP at 300 K.
Table C3-XI·2b Optical constants of (Al.Gal .• )o.s lno.sAs with x=0.85 at 300 K.
Eo
Eo
~ ~ EL
9
EX
9
A.
e;
~
(a) (b)
A1PxAsyS~_x_y'GaAs
1.0 1.0
AlPxAsySb1_x_llnAs
3.01-
~ Eo
EL
9
2.01-
A.
EX
~ 9
C
Z
~ 1.0 I-
(c)
0 1
0 0.1 0.2
y
Figure C3-XII-! Composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo. E/. and EgL ) for (a)
AlP"ASySbl.x-/GaAS. (b) AlP.AsySb1 .•.jlnP. and (c) AlP"AsySb1.x-jlnAs at 300 K.
405
406 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
~Or-----------------------~ 5.5,---------------,
AlP As Sb IInP
x Y l-x-y
4.5
y.o Y=O
5.0
0.5
4.0 4.5
c c
) GaAs
3.5~ 4.0
3.5
(a)
3.0 ~.w..Ju.J...l_':J':W-LW...LL.w.J...L.Lu.J...w..JLLl
o ~
eV )
~5r----------------------,
5.0
4.5
4.0
InAs
3.5 )
(c)
Figure C3-XII-2 Refractive indices for (a) AlP.AsySb1_•./GaAs, (b) AlP.AsySb1_._JInP, and (c)
AlPxAsySb1_x_jInAs at 300 K.
XIII GaPxASySbl_x_y
The GaPxAsySbl_X_y quaternary system can be grown lattice-matched to GaAs. InP. and
In As (see Table CI-4). Brilliant photo- and cathodoluminescence were observed in
bulk GaPxAsySbl_x_y grown by transport reactions [1]. No further studies have been per-
formed on this alloy system.
Figure C3-XIII-l shows the composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo.
Egx. and EgL ) for (a) GaPxAsySb1_X-JGaAs. (b) GaPxAsySbl_x_JInP. and (c) GaPxAsySb l_x_
/InAs. as calculated from Eq. (C1.8). The refractive-index curves for (a) GaPxAsySb l_x_
/GaAs. (b) GaPxAsySbl_x_JInP. and (c) GaPxAsySbl_x-/lnAs. as calculated from Eq.
(C1.14). are also shown in Fig. C3-XIII-2.
REFERENCES
1. E. Lendvay. Czech. f. Phys. B 34. 479 (1984).
-;2.0
'"
a.. a..
(3 (3 EX
9
Q
~ 1.0 ___~
~1.0IY EL
9
~
Eo
(a) (b)
~~~~~0~p~~~~1~ 0.5 1.0
Y Y
2~r-------------~
a.. EX
<t 9
~1.0
Q EL
Z 9
«
III
Eo
0.5-
(c)
0 I
0 0.05 0.1
y
Figure C3-XIII-l Composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo. E/. and EgL ) for (a)
GaPxAsySb1.x.jGaAs. (b) GaPxAsySb1_x_jInP. and (c) GaPxAsySb1.x.jInAs at 300 K.
407
408 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
4.0r-----------~ 4.0.------------,
3.8 3.8
3.6 3.6
0.5
C InP
C y,O
3.4 3.4
y'O
3.2 3.2
(a)
(b)
3.0 3.0
0 1.0 2.0 0 0.5 1.0 1.5
-I1c.o eV ) -I1w eV )
3.9
3.7
roO
InAs
C
3.5
(c)
GaPxAsySb1_x_/lnAs
3.3
0 0.5 1.0
-1\(1) ( eV )
Figure C3-XIII-2 Refractive indices for (a) GaP.AsySb1 .•.JGaAs, (b) GaP.AsySb1 .•.)InP, and
(c) GaP.AsySb1 .•.)InAs at 300 K.
The InPxAsySbl_x_y quaternary system can be grown lattice-matched to GaSb and In As
(see Table CIA). The quaternary system has promising applications as light sources
and detectors in the midwavelength IR band (2-5 /lm) [1-4].
The IR reflectivity spectra of some InPxAsySbl_x_y alloys grown on (111)InAs have
been measured by Belov et al. [5]. An investigation of optical transmission has been
made on LPE-grown InPxAsySb1_x_jInAs [6].
Figure C3-XIV-l shows the composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo,
E/, and E gL ) for (a) InPxAsySb1_x_/GaSb and (b) InPxAsySb1_x_/InAs, as calculated from
Eq. (C1.8) [7]. The refractive-index curves with y-composition increments of 0.1 for
(a) InPxAsySb1_X-/GaSb and (b) InP,AsySb1_x_jInAs, as calculated from Eq. (C1.14), are
also shown in Fig. C3-XIV-2 [7]. We can see in Fig. C3-XIV-l that the alloy systems
fall into the direct-band-gap region (Eo) over the entire range of alloy compositions.
REFERENCES
1. A. N. Baranov, A. N. Imenkov, V. Sherstnev, and Y. P. Yakovlev, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 64,2480 (1994).
2. J. Diaz, H. Yi, A. Rybaltowski, B. Lane, G. Lukas, D. Wu, S. Kim, M. Erdtmann,
E. Kaas, and M. Razeghi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70,40 (1997).
3. D. Wu, E. Kaas, J. Diaz, B. Lane, A. Rybaltowski, H. J. Yi, and M. Razeghi,
IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 9, 173 (1997).
4. X. Y. Gong, T. Yamaguchi, H. Kan, T. Makino, T. !ida, T. Kato, M. Aoyama, Y.
Hayakawa, and M. Kumagawa, lpn. l. Appl. Phys. 36, 2614 (1997).
5. A. G. Belov, G. M. Zinger, M. A. II'in, Yu. N. Korchagin, E. P. Rashevskaya, and
A. 1. Ryskin, Sov. Phys. Solid State 22, 839 (1980).
6. N. P. Esina, N. V. Zotova, B. A. Matveev, L. D. Neulmina, N. M. Stus', and G. N.
Talalakin, Sov. Phys. Semicond. 15, 1372 (1981).
7. S. Adachi, l. Appl. Phys. 61,4869 (1987).
409
410 III-V ALLOY SEMICONDUCTORS
2D------------------~
~ 1.5
Q. Q.
~1.0 ~ 1.0
o o
i i
0.5 0.5
(a) (b)
01L-L-L-~~~~~~~ OL-L-L-~~~~~~~
o 0.5 1.0 o 015 to
Y y
Figure C3·XIV·l Composition dependence of the band-gap energies (Eo, E/, andEgL ) for (a)
InPxAsySbl-x-/GaSb and (b) InPxAsySbl-x_jInAs at 300 K. (From Adachi [7].)
(a)
InPxAsySbl_x_y'GaSb
0,5 1.0
ilw ( eV )
3.9
InPxAsySb1_x-y/lnAs
y·o
Figui"e C3·XIV·2 Refractive
3.7
indices for (a) InP.AsySb l_x_
jGaSb and (b) InP xAsySbl-x_
C jInAs with y-composition in-
crements of 0.1 at 300 K.
3.5 (From Adachi [7].)
(b)
3.3
0 0.5 1.0
-1\", ( eV )
D
II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
D1 MAGNESIUM OXIDE
(MIO)
position of the minimum of the lowest conduction band that is placing at r l and antici-
pating a direct gap or at X3 indicating an indirect gap (see Ref. [4]). Recent band-
structure calculations based on the LDA provide the direct gap of -5.2 eV at r [3,5].
Figure Dl-l reproduces the electronic energy-band structure as calculated by Ching et
al. [5]. The experimental optical band gap is -7.7-7.8 eV at T=77-85 K [4,6]. The ex-
tremely large gap is as expected since MgO is highly ionic.
16
12
41
s:-
~
o
W
-41
Figure Dl·l Electronic energy-
band structure of MgO as cal-
culated within the LDA method.
-12 (From Ching et al. [5].)
-16
L r X K r
The reflectivity spectra at the fundamental absorption edge of MgO have been
measured up to 1800 K using a newly developed vacuum-UV spectrometer [6]. At this
temperature, the r -exciton peak is found to shift 1.4 eV to lower energies at a rate of -
0.92 meV/K, to broaden and to decrease in amplitude. The results of this experiment
are shown in Fig. DI-2 (T=292-1573 K) [6].
18
292K
327K
16
14
~ 12
~
a:
10
9 8 7 6 5
E (eV)
Figure Dl-2 Fundamental reflectivity spectra at the rW-~r15 exciton region of MgO at tem-
peratures between 292 and 1573 K. (From French [6].)
The optical constants in the near-IR-far-UV region of MgO have been modeled by
Chen et al. [11]. The simple Lorentzian functions are used as the optical-dispersion
expressions in this modeling. The I-sum rules are properly taken into consideration.
The theoretical results are in good agreement with the experimental data compiled by
Roessler and Huffman [7].
The room-temperature values of (£1' £z), (n, k), a, and R listed in Table Dl-1 were
taken from Cunsolo et ai. [8] for E:::;0.0434 eV, from Roessler and Huffman [7] for
0.0459s;E:::;0.5332 eV and 5s;E:::;75 eV, and from Vedam and Kim [9] for 1.38s;E:::;4.96
eV.
The (£1' £Z), (n, k), a, and R values in Table Dl-l are plotted in Figs. D1-3-D1-5,
respectively.
414 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
REFERENCES
1. R. Huang,!. Electron. Mater. 22, 215 (1993).
2. E. J. Tarsa, M. De Graef, D. R. Clarke, A. C. Gossard, and J. S. Speck, J. Appl.
Phys. 73, 3276 (1993).
3. U. Schonberger and F. Aryasetiawan, Phys. Rev. B 52, 8788 (1995).
4. Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, edited
by K.-H. Hellwege and O. Madelung, Landolt-Bornstein, New Series, Group III,
Vol. 17, Pt. b (Springer, Berlin, 1982).
5. W. Y. Ching, F. Gan, and M.-Z. Huang, Phys. Rev. B 52, 1596 (1995).
6. R. H. French, Phys. Scripta. 41, 404 (1990).
7. D. M. Roessler and D. R. Huffman, in Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids I/,
edited by E. D. Palik (Academic, Orlando, 1991), p. 919.
8 S. Cunsolo, P. Dore, S. Lupi, P. Maselli, and C. P. Varsamis, Infrared Phys. 33,
539 (1992).
9. K. Vedam and S. Y. Kim, Appl. Opt. 28, 2691 (1989).
10. R. E. Stephens and I. H. Malitson, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 49, 249 (1952).
11. Y. F. Chen, C. M. Kwei, and C. J. Tung, Phys. Rev. B 48,4373 (1993).
8 MgO
w 4
10 20
Photon energy (eV)
3.5
3.0 MgO
2.5
.x: 2.0
c
1.5
1.0
0.5
0 10 20
Photon energy (eV)
Figure Dl-4 nee) and k(E) spectra for MgO at 300 K.
107
(a)
.:=-- 106
-§
I
105
~
104 MgO
103
0.3
a: 0.2
0.1
0 10 20
Photon energy (eV)
Figure Dl·5 (a) af...E) and (b) R(E) spectra for MgO at 300 K.
416 IT-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
420
D2 ZINC OXIDE (ZnO) 421
ZnO
25~----~--~-----.--.------.---,------,
5C
-10
-15
3'V
-20p---t-+=::::::::::::=i~+----r-1~::::::::::1
IV
-25A R L UM L r 6 ASH P K T r
+
WAVE VECTOR k
Figure D2·1 Electronic energy-band structure of ZnO as calculated with the semiempirical
tight-binding scheme. (From Kobayashi et al. [9].)
ZnO were reported to be £,=8.1 and £~=3.95 for E.le and £,=9.0 and £~=4.05 for Elle
[14]. They were obtained by analyzing the dispersion spectra of IR reflection. The
high-frequency dielectric constant was also determined from an extrapolation of the
published n data (Bond, Ref. [15]) by Heltemes and Swinney [16] to be £~=3.70 (E.le)
and £~=3.75 (Elle).
Optical properties in the reststrahlen region of ZnO have been studied by Heltemes
and Swinney [16] and more recently by Venger et al. [14]. The reststrahlen parameters
obtained by these authors are: ffi TO=406 cm-!, ffiLO=589 cm-!, £,=7.8, £~=3.70, and '(=7.5
cm-! for E.le (ffi TO=377 cm-!, ffiLO=575 cm-!, 10,=8.75, E~=3.75, and '(=12.0 cm-! for EIIc)
[16]; ffiTo=412 cm-!, ffiLO=591 cm-!, £,=8.1, £~=3.95, and '(=11 cm-! for E.lc (ffiTO=380
cm-I, ffiLO=570 cm-!, £,=9.0, E~=4.05, and '(=11 cm-! for Elle) [14]. An additive weak
422 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
vibration band was observed in Ref. [14] at 504 cm- l for both E.le and Elle; although
the nature of this band requires further investigations, the presence of mechanical stress
in the crystal is considered to be one of the reasons. There also exist regions in the R
spectra where it was not possible to model them within the framework of the one-
oscillator model [14,16]. These regions can be seen in the lower energy part of the
main reststrahlen band for E.le and Elic. They are found to be dependent on the quality
of the sample treatment and are connected with the thin distributed layer near the sam-
ple surface [14]. Optical absorption in the multiphonon absorption band region of Li-
doped Zno has also been studied [17].
The n(E) dispersion data in the transparent region of Zno have been reported by
several authors [15,18,19]. The experimental techniques used were the method of prism
minimum deviation [15] and transmittance interference spacing [19]. The data in Ref.
[19] showed the natural birefringence, i.e., ~=n.(Elle)-no(E.le):#O; its sign is positive
for longer wavelength and becomes negative when approaching the exciton absorption.
The isotropic point ~=O occurred at 3966 A at 300 K, at 3930 A at 77 K, and at 3928
A at 4.2 K. Geidur and Yaskov [20] calculated the n(E) dispersion, natural birefrin-
gence, and piezobirefringence of some wurtzite-type semiconductors, including ZnO,
in the region near the fundamental absorption edge. The hydrostatic-pressure depen-
dence of n at A=5893 Ahas also been determined for some hexagonal crystals, includ-
ing Zno, by an interferometric technique for pressures up to 0.7 GPa [21].
The reflection and transmission spectra near the exciton and excitonic polariton
resonance of ZnO have been reported and compared with the valence-band structure of
wurtzite-type crystals [10,22-7]. Two-photon absorption spectroscopy has also been
used recently to determine the exciton parameters as a function of hydrostatic pressure
in nearly the complete stability range of the wurtzite phase [11].
The fundamental reflectivity spectra in the interband transition region of ZnO have
been measured by Freeouf [12], Klucker et al. [13], and Hengehold et al. [28]. By per-
forming the KK analysis, the (~\,~) values were extracted in the 1-2S-eV region [12],
in the 2-25-eV region [13], and in the 3-24-eV region [28]. No polarized incident light
was used in Ref. [28]. It should be noted, however, that there is no quantitative agree-
ment between these results; e.g., the ~ value at the 12.S-eV peak is 4.4 in Ref. [12] but
is 2.8 in Ref. [13].
The optical constants for ZnO have been measured using SE by Matz and Liith [29]
in the l.S-4.0-eV spectral region and by Adachi and coworker [30] in the 1.5-S.0-eV
region at room temperature. The bulk ZnO single crystals used in these studies were
grown by a vapor-phase method, not intentionally doped, and their surfaces were ori-
ented parallel to the e axis. Because of the optical anisotropy of wurtzite-type crystals,
at least two independent measurements at each wavelength are necessary to determine
the two sets of optical constants, (no' kJ and (n., k.), for E.le and Elle, respectively. The
surface orientations, parallel to the e axis, enabled such measurements. More recently,
Washington et al. [31] have determine e(E) for E.le of Zno films grown on (0001)
sapphire substrates using SE in the 1.33-4.96-eV region at room temperature. Below
the band gap, the data were analyzed by the frrst-order SeIlmeier dispersion equation.
D2 ZINC OXIDE (ZnO) 423
. Bond Bond
0 o
Mollwo • Mollwo
~ 2.2 -Caleu. ;:; 2.2 -Caleu.
(a)
Figure D2-2 shows the experimental n(E) dispersion of Zno for (a) El.e and (b) Elle
determined by SE near the Eo-exciton absorption [30]. The open circles and triangles
represent the experimental data taken from Bond [15] and Mollwo [18]. These data
were analyzed using the first-order Sellmeier equation:
2 Bf!
n(A) =A+-- (D2.l)
f!-C
where A, B and C are the fitting parameters and A is in J.lID. The solid lines in Fig. D2-2
indicate the results of Eq. (D2.1) fitted to the experimental data. The numeric values
fit-determined were: A=2.84, B=O.84, and C=O.lDl J.lm2 for El.e; A=2.85, B=O.87, and
C=0.096 J.lm2 for Elle.
We list in Tables D2-1 and D2-2 the room-temperature values of e=el+i~, n*=n+ik,
a., and R for Zno for El.e and Elle, respectively. A set of the optical constants for
E'5.0.2 eV were calculated using the reststrahlen parameters ofVenger et al. [14]. The n
(e) values below the Eo-exciton absorption edge (0.31'5.£'5.2.75 eV) were taken from
Bond [15]. A set of the optical constants in the interband transition region (£>2.75 eV)
were taken from Freeouf [12].
The (£)' ~), (n, k), a., and R values in Tables D2-1 and D2-2 are plotted in Figs. D2-
3-D2-5, respectively.
424 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
REFERENCES
7
6 ZnO (a) Elc
5
4
W 3
2
1
o
-1 :=::=:::=:=::=::=:::=~
5 10 15 20
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D2-3 £)(E) and q(E) spectra for Zno at 300 K.
106 0.4
.-...
'I 105 0.3
E a:
0
......... 104 0.2
e:l
0.1
103
106 0.4
f"'
E
105 0.3
a:
0
......... 104 0.2
e:l
0.1
103
0 5 10 15 20
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D2·5 a(E) and R(E) spectra for ZnO at 300 K.
431
432 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
-10
A R LUM :L rl:lA S
~
HPK T r
WAVE VECTOR k
Figure D3·1 Electronic energy· band structure of a-ZnS as calculated with an ETBT. (From
Kobayashi et al. [4].)
coTO=274 cm-I, coLO=356 cm-1 , "(=4.7 cm-1 , £,=9.6, and £_=5.7 for both Ric and Ellc.
Hattori et al. [12] obtained the static and high-frequency dielectric constants at 2, 80,
and 300 K from the refractive-index data measured in the 1O-100-cm-1 region; however,
the Zns crystals used were of mixed cubic and hexagonal type. The 300-K dielectric
constants obtained by Hattori et al. [12] were £,=8.34 and £_=4.7.
The neE) dispersion in the transparent region of a-ZnS has been determined by sev-
eral authors [13,14J. The measured n values are in reasonable agreement with each
other, and these data showed the positive birefringence, i.e., l:In=ne(Ellc)-noCE.lc»O,
for photon energies below the Eo edge. The natural birefringence in a-ZnS has also
been discussed in more detail by several authors [15-17]. The birefringence,
l1n=ne(Ellc)-n o(E.lc) , and optical band gap vs. hexagonal fraction (hexagonality) for
D3 WURTZITE ZINC SULPHIDE (u-ZnS) 433
some ZnS polytypes were studied by Brafman and Steinberger [15]. The ZnS polytypes
used were vapor-phase grown and were 2H, 3C, 4H, 6H, IOH, etc. This study suggests
that for ZnS polytypes the birefringence and optical band gap are linear functions of the
hexagonality h. The hydrostatic-pressure dependence of the refractive index for several
II-VI hexagonal semiconductors, including a-ZnS, has also been reported by Vedam
and Davis [18] for pressures up to 0.7 OPa.
The Urbach rule in some ZnS polytypes (a-, ~-, and 4H-ZnS) has been studied by
Brada et ai. [19]. Dimmock [20] discussed the optical absorption and reflection spectra
at the Eo-exciton edge of some II-VI semiconductors. In the case of the hexagonal
crystals, the quasi-cubic model was used to deduce the band parameters at the r point
of these semiconductors.
The fundamental reflectivity spectra in the interband transition region of a-ZnS have
been reported by Cardona and Harbeke [8], Freeouf [9], and Baars [10]. The samples
used in these studies were bulk single crystals. By performing the KK analysis, the (n,
k) and (£\, Ez) values were extracted in the 1-11-eV region [8] and in the 1-25-eV re-
gion [9], respectively. We can, however, find no quantitative agreement between these
KK-extracted data. The (n, k) and (10\, Ez) values of evaporated Zns films have also
been reported in the vacuum-UV region from 160 to 2000 A (6.2-77.5 eV) by Hunter
et al. [21]. Note, however, that the films studied were polycrystalline with randomly
oriented crystallites of hexagonal and cubic forms.
Optical properties in the 36-150-eV region of some II-VI compounds, including
ZnS, have been studied by Cardona and Haensel [22]. A sharp doublet associated with
transitions from the 3p core levels of Zn to the conduction bands was observed for ZnS,
ZnSe, and less clearly for ZnTe. Note that the ZnS film used in this study was obtained
by vacuum evaporation on a noncrystalline substrate, and thus it was polycrystalline.
While the polycrystallinity of the samples was not discussed, there should be no essen-
tial difference between zinc-blende and wurtzite spectra.
Tables D3-1 and D3-2 list the 300-K values of £=€\+i~, n+ik, a, and R for ex-ZnS
for El.e and Elle, respectively. A set of the optical constants for E~O.1 eV were calcu-
lated using the reststrahlen parameters of Manabe et al. [11]. They were listed only in
Table D3-1 (El.e). This is because the optical properties in the reststrahlen region of ex-
ZnS showed no strong polarization dependence between El.e and Elle [11]. The n (£\)
values for El.e and Elle below the Eo edge (0.885~~3.443 eV) were taken from Bie-
niewski and Czyzak [14]. A complete set of the optical constants in the interband tran-
sition region (3.5~~26 eV) for El.e and Elle were taken from Freeouf [9]. The imagi-
nary constants, k and ex, for F257 eV were obtained from Cardona and Haensel [22];
since no polarization dependence should exist in this spectral region, we listed these
data only in Table 03-1 (El.e).
The (10\, ~), (n, k), ex, and R values in Tables D3-1 and D3-2 are plotted in Figs. D3-
2-03-4.
434 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
REFERENCES
1. W. L. Roth, in Physics and Chemistry of II-VI Compounds, edited by M. Aven
and J. S. Prener (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1967), p. 117.
2. A. Addamiano and M. Aven, f. Appl. Phys. 31, 36 (1960).
3. I. T. Steinberger and S. Mardi", in II-VI Semiconducting Compounds, edited by D.
G. Thomas (Benjamin, New York, 1967), p. 167.
4. A. Kobayashi, O. F. Sankey, S. M. Volz, and J. D. Dow, Phys. Rev. B 28, 935
(1983).
5. M.-Z. Huang and W. Y. Ching,J. Phys. Chem. Solids 46, 977 (1985).
6. P. Schroer, P. Kriiger, and J. Pollmann, Phys. Rev. B 47, 6971 (1993).
7. Y.-N. Xu and W. Y. Ching, Phys. Rev. B 48, 4335 (1993).
8. M. Cardona and G. Harbeke, Phys. Rev. 137, A1467 (1965).
9. J. L. Freeouf, Phys. Rev. B 7, 3810 (1973).
10. J. W. Baars, in II-VI Semiconducting Compounds, edited by D. G. Thomas (Ben-
jamin, New York, 1967), p. 631.
11. A. Manabe, A. Mitsuishi, and H. Yoshinaga,Jpn. f. Appl. Phys. 6,593 (1967).
12. T. Hattori, Y. Homma, A. Mitsuishi, and M. Tacke, Opt. Commun. 7, 229 (1973).
13. W. W. Piper, D. T. F. Marple, and P. D. Johnson, Phys. Rev. 110,323 (1958).
14. T. M. Bientewski and S. J. Czyzak,J. Opt. Soc. Am. 53,496 (1963).
15. O. Brafman and I. T. Steinberger, Phys. Rev. 143,501 (1966).
16. V. D. Kulakovskii, V. I. Grinev, and M. P. Kulakov, Sov. Phys. Solid State 19,
345 (1977).
17. A. N. Pikhtin and A. D. Yas'kov, Sov. Phys. Semicond. 15,8(1981).
18. K. Vedam and T. A. Davis, Phys. Rev. 181, 1196 (1969).
19. Y. Brada, B. G. Yacobi, and A. Peled, Solid State Commun. 17,193 (1975).
20. J. O. Bimmock, in II-VI Semiconducting Compounds, edited by D. G. Thomas
(Benjamin, New York, 1967), p. 277.
21. W. R. Hunter, D. W. Angel, and G. Hass, f. Opt. Soc. Am. 68, 1319 (1978).
22. M. Cardona and R. Haensel, Phys. Rev. B 1,2605 (1970).
D3 WURTZITE ZINC SULPHIDE (a-ZnS) 435
14.--.---r--.---'-~---'
12
10 a-ZnS
8
~ 6
w 4
2
o
-2
_4L---L-~--~--~---L--~
14
12
10 - Elc
wN 8 ----- Ellc
6
4
2
o 2 6 8 10 12
Photon energy (eV)
Figure 03·2 E)(E) and EiE) spectra for a-ZnS at 300 K.
3
r:: 2
a-ZnS
1 ~ . ........ -
2
- Elc
----- Ellc
~ ,,
1
o 2 4 6 8 10 12
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D3·3 nee) and k(E) spectra for a-ZnS at 300 K.
436 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
r
107 1
- ---
"
106 "
" a-ZnS 0.8
"
""
'I 105 ':,, 0.6
~ 104 ,, a:
,, ",.11 0.4
e3 103 --- (a) Elc
I'
,",' I~ ~'~I
",-,
102 , 0.2
.,
101 0
0.8
106 _a
f"' 105 ----- R
0.6
E 0.4 a:
.2-104 "
\ " 11
,~:~: :>.
e3 103 ,' "'. '.
--_ ....
··, 0.2
(b) E II c '"
102
0
10-2 10-1 10° 10 1 102
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D34 al...E) and R(E) spectra for a-ZnS at 300 K.
445
446 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
:>
Q)
L r XK r
TABLE D4-1 Energies of the CPs and positions of peaks in the
optical spectra of [3-ZnS at 300 K.
CPs eV
Eo 3.75
Eo+Ao 3.82
5.8"
7.0
9.2
13
"2D-exciton energy
O)LQ=352 cm-!, and "(=6.8 cm-! (1::,=8.9 and 1::_=5.7). Optical absorption in the multipho-
non absorption band region of ~-ZnS has also been studied [19,20]. The absorption
spectra in Ref. [20] are dominated by extrinsic effects over much of the region of inter-
est. In Ref. [19], the two-phonon combinations and their locations in the BZ were suc-
cessfully identified; however, the absorption spectra reported were plotted in arbitrary
scale.
The refractive-index dispersion in the transparent region of ~-Zns has been measured
by several authors (see Refs. [11,21]). Figure D4-2 plots the neE) data of ~-ZnS meas-
ured by Cardona and Harbeke (solid squares, Ref. [8]), Czyzak et al. (open circles, Ref.
[22]), Piper et al. (open squares, Ref. [23]), Piper (open triangles, Ref. [24]), Eastman
Kodak Pub. (inverse open triangles, Ref. [25]), and Bond (solid circles, Ref. [26]), to-
gether with those measured by Ozaki and Adachi using SE (solid line) [11]. The dashed
line represents the calculated result of the first-order Sellmeier equation, Eq. (D2.1),
with A=4.17, B=I.06, and C=0.087 11m2. The temperature and pressure coefficients of
the refractive index have also been determined experimentally by Bertolotti et al. [27]
and Griebl et al. [28], respectively. A comprehensive review of the refractive index for
~-ZnS (ZnSe and ZnTe) and its temperature derivatives reported up until 1984 has been
3.0.--------------,----,
(3 -ZnS
• Cardona & Harbeke
2.8 o Czyzak et al.
[] Piper et al.
I>. Piper
v Eastman Kodak Pub.
c: • Bond
2.6 -SE
- - - - Sellmeier Eq.
2.4
•• iii
v ....
T= 10 K
r--..
-;' 1.8
5
~ 1.6
......
~1.4
!:l
8 1.2
ffi
0 1.0
U
Z
0°·8
f::
~0.6
o
CIl
~ 0.4
0.2
3.76 3.78 3.80 3.82 3.84 3.86 3.88 3.90 3.92 3.94
ENERGY (eV)
Figure D4-3 Absorption spectrum at 10 K from a 0.87-IJ.II1-thick ZnS/GaAs heterostructure
(solid circles). The best fit of the data is shown by the thick solid line, together with the individ-
ual Is and 2s HH, LH, and SO absorption resonances and continuum edge including the Som-
merfeld factor (thin solid lines). (From Femlindez et al. [30].)
D4 CUBIC ZINC SULPHIDE (~-ZnS) 449
[32,33]. The crystals measured were sphalerite [32] and MOCVD-grown Zns films on
(100)GaAs and (111)Si substrates [33].
The reflectivity spectra in the interband transition region of bulk ZnS crystals have
been measured by Cardona and Harbeke [8] and Baars [9]. By performing the KK
analysis, the (n, k) values in the 0-20-eV region were extracted [13]. The CPs observed
in these studies were correlated with various electronic transitions in the BZ [7,8]. Lite
et al. [34] also studied the fundamental reflectivity of a Zns film and found in it several
CP peaks and shoulders at energies of 5.7,7.0, 7.5, and >9 e V.
The (£1' €.J values for ~-Zns have been measured using SE by Ozaki and Adachi [11]
in the 1.2-5.6-eV spectral region at room temperature. The ~-Zns single crystals used
in these measurements were grown by a vapor-phase method and not intentionally
doped. The measured SE data revealed distinct structures at energies of the EoI(Eo+l!.o)
CPs. Dielectric-related optical constants of ~-Zns, such as the complex refractive index
(n*=n+ik), absorption coefficient (a.), and normal-incidence reflectivity (R), were also
presented.
Sulfur K- and L-edge X-ray absorption near-edge structures of sphalerite have been
obtained using synchrotron radiation [35]. Optical properties in the vacuum-UV region
of ZnS have also been studied by several authors (36-150-eV region by Cardona and
Haensel [36]; 6-77-eV region by Hunter et al. [37]). However, the films used in these
experiments were obtained by vacuum evaporation on noncrystalline substrates [36,37],
and thus they were polycrystalline with randomly oriented crystallites of hexagonal and
cubic forms [37]. Similarly, Hattori et al. [38] reported the refractive indices and ab-
sorption coefficients in still-smaller frequency range (10-100 cm- I) of Zns crystals
grown by the Bridgman method; however, these crystals were described as a mixture of
cubic and hexagonal ZnS.
Table D4-2 lists the room-temperature values of £=£I+i~, n*=n+ik, a., and R for ~
ZnS. A complete set of the optical constants for E'5.0.07 eV were calculated from the
reststrahlen parameters of Manabe et al. [17]. The real optical constants, £1 and n, were
taken from the Eastman Kodak Pub. [25] for 0.103'5,£::;0.413 eV and from Bond [26]
for 0.516'5,£::;2.754 eV. A set of the optical constants for 2.75'5,£::;5.4 eV were taken
from Ozaki and Adachi [11], while those for 5.7'5,£::;20 eV were obtained from Cardona
and Harbeke [8]. No essential differences between the cubic and wurtzite Zns spectra
should exist in the high-energy spectral region [36]. We have already listed the absorp-
tion constants ofZnS (o.-ZnS) for E257 eV in Table D3-1.
The (£1' ~), (n, k), a., and R values in Table D4-2 are plotted in Figs. D4-4-D4-7,
respectively. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of each CPo It has
been shown [11] that such optical-constant spectra can be successfully explained by the
MDF.
450 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
REFERENCES
1. Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, edited
by O. Madelung, Landolt-Bornstein, New Series, Group III, Vol. 22, Pt. a
(Springer, Berlin, 1987).
2. J. L. Martins, N. Troullier, and S.-H. Wei, Phys. Rev. B 43, 2213 (1991).
3. J. E. Jaffe, R. Pandey, and M. J. Seel, Phys. Rev. B 47,6299 (1993).
4. W. V. M. Machado, J. A. Kintop, M. L. De Siqueira, and L. G. Ferreira, Phys. Rev.
B 47, 13219 (1993).
5. O. Zakharov, A. Rubio, X. Blase, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. B SO,
10780 (1994).
6. D. Vogel, P. KrUger, and J. Pollmann, Phys. Rev. B 54,5495 (1996).
7. M.-Z. Huang and W. Y. Ching, l. Phys. Chem. Solids 46, 977 (1985).
8. M. Cardona and G. Harbeke, Phys. Rev. 137, A1467 (1965).
9. J. W. Baars, in II-VI Semiconducting Compounds, edited by D. G. Thomas (Ben-
jamin, New York, 1967), p. 631.
10. D. L. Greenaway and G. Harbeke, Optical Properties and Band Structure of Semi-
conductors (pergamon, Oxford, 1968).
11. S. Ozaki and S. Adachi,Jpn. l. Appl. Phys. 32, 5008 (1993).
12. D. Theis, Phys. Status Solidi B 79,125 (1977).
13. S. Adachi, Phys. Rev. B 35, 7454 (1987).
14. S. Adachi, Phys. Rev. B 38,12966 (1988).
15. S. Adachi, Phys. Rev. B 41,1003 (1990).
16. T. Aoki and S. Adachi, l. Appl. Phys. 69,1574 (1991).
17. A. Manabe, A. Mitsuishi, and H. Yoshinaga, lpn. l. Appl. Phys. 6, 593 (1967).
18. G. A. Samara, Phys. Rev. B 27,3494 (1983).
19. E. A. Kwasniewski, E. S. Koteles, and W. R. Datars, Can. l. Phys. 54, 1053
(1976).
20. B. Bendow, H. G. Lipson, and S. P. Yukon, Appl. Opt. 16, 2909 (1977).
21. H. H. Li, l. Phys. Chem. Ref Data 13, 103 (1984).
22. S. J. Czyzak, D. C. Reynolds, R. C. Allen, and C. C. Reynolds, l. Opt. Soc. Am. 44,
864 (1954).
23. W. W. Piper, D. F. T. Marple, and P. D. Johnson, Phys. Rev. 110,323 (1958).
24. W. W. Piper, Phys. Rev. 92, 23 (1953).
25. Eastman Kodak Publication No. U-72, Rochester, New York, 1971.
26. W. L. Bond,l. Appl. Phys. 36, 1674 (1965).
27. M. Bertolotti, V. Bogdanov, A. Ferrari, A. Jascow, N. Nazorova, A. Pikhtin, and L.
Schirone, l. Opt. Soc. Am. B 7, 918 (1990).
28. E. Griebl, G. F. Schotz, Ch. Birzer, W. Kerner, T. Reisinger, B. Hahn, and W.
Gebhardt, Acta Phys. Polon. A 88, 995 (1995).
29. S. Ves, U. Schwarz, N. E. Christensen, K. Syassen, and M. Cardona, Phys. Rev. B
42,9113 (1990).
D4 CUBIC ZINC SULPHIDE (~-ZnS) 451
12
:!." EoO(?)
E1(EX)! ~ E2
10
8 '' "
o
.
"
{3 -ZnS
f!
!
00'
I I E11
II 0 ,: :I
I
6 , ,
I
• "
"
I
,
,
w ' ,
o "
I I
", ,,
:"
d
4 ,,
, !
2 ,, .. _........ ,
,, E2
0
,,
0
0
E1
-2
0 4 8 12 16 20
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D4·4 elE) and elE) spectra for P-Zns at 300 K.
452 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
{3 -ZnS
3
n
-':II::
2
c d
,
, !
1 EOl ,,
,,
':k
, "-
,
0 4 8 16 12 20
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D4-S n(E) and k(E) spectra for ~-ZnS at 300 K.
-
..-
I
E104
-(,)
{3 -ZnS
100'L---'----'--'---'-'-'-'-'-'-----l
10-2 10- 1 2 10 30
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D4-6 C1J..E) spectrum for ~-ZnS at 300 K.
D4 CUBIC ZINC SULPHIDE (~-ZnS) 453
0.4
E1(Ex~ ! ! E2 El
0.3
0:
0.2
13 -ZnS
0.1
0 4 8 12 16 20
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D4-7 R(E) spectrum for ~-Zns at 300 K.
459
460 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
8 L4.5
Ls
6
Ls
-
4
>ell 2
0
~
a: -2 Ls
UJ
z
UJ
-6 Xs
ZnSe
-8
-10 Xs
rs
L 1\ r 1\ X U.K t r
WAVE VECTOR k
Figure DS·l Electronic energy-band structure of ZnSe as calculated with an ENPM. (From
Chelikowsky and Cohen [6].) The locations of several interband transitions are included by the
vertical arrows.
TABLE DS·l Energies oj the CPs and positions oj peaks in the optical spectra
oJZnSe at 300 K.
CPs eV
Eo 2.69
Eo+~ 3.10
EI 4.75"
EI+~I 5.05"
E2 6.7
E2+13 7.2
EI' 9.1
EI'+~I' 9.6
d1 10.6
d2 13.8
"2D-exciton energy.
D5 ZINC SELENIDE (ZnSe) 461
3.0
2.9
ZnSe
2.8
c
2.7
2.6
Figure D5·2 n(E) dispersion for
ZnSe measured by SE at 300 K.
Shown by the solid line is the theore-
25 tical result of the MDF calculation.
(From Adachi and Taguchi [5].)
21.
0 3.5
flw ( eV )
8
T =1.7 K
Elc
r- w
:
~---
l~B
2
1 J)k~.'
.. Ul 3.0 3.2
:
: .
~
O~~~·2.·~~~~~~~~~
:
2.78 2.82 2.86
Energy, eV
Figure D5·3 Absorption spectrum at 1.7 K from an epitaxial ZnSe at the exciton resonance
region. The inset shows the part of the spectrum for large values of the photon energies. Also
shown by the dashed line is the PL spectrum. (From Aliev et al. [30].)
D5 ZINC SELENIDE (ZnSe) 463
spectrum of ZnSe in Fig. S.7 (b) of Sec. S.1.4.] The pressure dependence of the Eo ab-
sorption edge of ZnSe has also been studied by several authors [21,31].
The fundamental reflectivity in the interband transition region of ZnSe has been
measured by a number of groups [lO,32-S]. The KK analysis was performed to extract
(£1'~) and/or (n, k) spectra from the measured R data [lO,34,3S]. The (£1'~) spectra in
the interband transition region have also been determined using SE at room tempera-
ture in the l.S-S.3-eV region by Adachi and Taguchi [S], in the l.6--S.4-eV region by
Jans [36], in the l.S-6.0-eV region by Kim et al. [37], in the l.S-S.0-eV region by
Dahmani et al. [38], in the 1.8-S.5-eV region by Rossow et al. [39], in the 1.S-S.3-eV
region by Kato et al. [40], and in the 1.S-6.0-eV region by Kim and Sivananthan [41].
The measured samples were bulk ZnSe crystal [S] or epitaxial ZnSe/GaAs films
[36-41]. The SE data measured have yielded widely different £ values and spectral
features. It has been shown [40] that the £(E) spectra for as-grown ZnSe are quite dif-
ferent from those for air-exposed ZnSe epilayer, suggesting the fast oxidation of ZnSe
surface. We may, thus, consider that the different £(E) spectra from various labs are
caused by the different ZnSe surface qualities (i.e., different oxide thickness, different
degree of surface roughness, etc.).
Optical properties in the vacuum-UV region (36-1S0 eV) of some II-VI compounds,
including ZnSe, have been studied by Cardona and Haensel [42]. The film used by the-
se authors was obtained by vacuum evaporation on a noncrystalline substrate, and thus
it was polycrystalline. A sharp doublet associated with transitions from the 3p core lev-
els of Zn to the conduction bands was observed for ZnSe, ZnS, and less clearly for
ZnTe.
We list in Table D5-2 the room-temperature values of £=£I+i~, n*=n+ik, a, and R
for ZnSe. A complete set of the optical constants for E::;0.0744 eV were calculated
from the reststrahlen parameters of Deneuville et al. [7]. The absorption and imaginary
constants, a, k, and ~, in the multiphonon region (0.0322::;£::;0.0744 eV) were read
from a graph of Deneuville et al. [7]. The real optical constants, £1 and n, for 0.5::;£::;1.9
eV were taken from Marple [16]. A set of the optical constants determined by SE for
1.95::;£::;5.49987 eV were taken from Adachi and Taguchi [5] and Rossow et al. [39].
A set of the optical constants for 6::;£::;23 eV were taken from Freeouf [34], and a and
k for &2:40 eV were taken from Cardona and Haensel [42].
The (£1' ~), (n, k), a, and R values in Table DS-2 are graphed in Figs. DS-4--D5-7,
respectively. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of each CP and
2D-exciton peak (Ex). It has been shown [S] that such optical-constant spectra can be
successfully explained by the MDF.
REFERENCES
1. K. Nakano and A. Ishibashi, in Properties of Wide Bandgap II-VI Semiconduc-
tors, EMIS Datareviews Series No. 17, edited by R. Bhargava (lNSPEC (lEE),
London, 1997), p. 190.
464 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
14r-~.-~.-~-.~-.~-.
12
10
8
IAJ 6
4
2
o
-2~~~~~~-L~~~~
o 2 4 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure DS-4 £1(E) and £2(E) spectra for ZnSe at 300 K.
466 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
4
Eo+.6. o
1 X H 1
E (E) E1+.6. 1
(Ex)
E2
3
EO! !
~ E1'
C
2 I \ !
1 \
ZnSe (\ I ~
1 \ I
1 ,-I
1 k 1
I
I
,.., ",/'
0 2 4 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure DS-S neE) and k(E) spectra for ZnSe at 300 K.
ZnSe
10° .- \ ..,
10-1~~~~~~.~1~~~~=L~
10-2 10-1 10° 101 102
Photon energy (eV)
Figure DS-6 ai..E) spectrum for ZnSe at 300 K.
05 ZINC SELENIDE (ZnSe) 467
468 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
473
474 IT-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
4
>Q.I
60::
W
Z
w
-2 Ls
U,K
N r
Figure D6·1 Electronic energy-band structure of ZnTe as calculated with the EPM. (From
Walter et al. [2].) The locations of several interband transitions are included by the vertical
arrows.
TABLE D6·1 Energies a/the CPs in the optical spectra o/ZnTe at 300 K.
CPs eV
Eo 2.25
Eo+1lo 3.20
El 3.78
El+l'1, 4.34
Eo' 4.92
E2 5.30
E,' -6.8
E,'+L'1, -7.5
theoretically obtained these CPs are 4.93 eV (X5~X,) and 7.81 eV (l-:J~l-:J) [3].
12 I I I I
_10
ZnTe
'";"e
..,.() 8 ..
-....
0
c
o
6
..
j4 +' ~'- fI b' ft."",
« 2
+
.. /
..
...,
o -/. I I I I
2380 2400 2420 2440 2460 2480
Energy (meY)
Figure D6-2 Absorption spectrum at 2 K from an epitaxial ZnTe at the exciton resonance re-
gion. The absorption peaks correspond to the n=l HH (-2.396 eV), n=2 HH (-2.406 eV), and
n=l LH excitons (-2.45 eV). The splitting into an HH-LH exciton structure is due to the biaxi-
al strain caused by the different thennal expansion of glass, glue, and ZnTe. (From Leiderer et
al. [21].)
476 ll-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
different thermal expansion of glass, glue, and ZnTe. The dependence of the Eo ab-
sorption edge of ZnTe on hydrostatic pressure has also been reported by Lindner et aZ.
[16]. The fundamental reflectivity near the Eo-edge exciton resonance of ZnTe has been
reported by a number of authors [19,21,23,24]. The samples used in these studies were
bulk ZnTe crystals [19,23,24] and MOVPE-grown ZnTe film [21].
The fundamental reflectivity spectra in the interband transition region of ZnTe have
been measured by several authors [2,6,25,26]. By performing the KK analysis, the (n,
k) or (£" ~ values were extracted in the 0-20-eV region (T=297 K) [25] and in the 0-
24-eV region (T=300 K) [26]. The CPs observed in these studies were correlated with
various electronic transitions in the BZ [2,6,26].
A set of the optical constants for ZnTe at 300 K have been determined using SE in
the 1.5-5.6-eV spectral region by Sato and Adachi [8] and in the 1.5-5.4-eV region by
Castaing et aZ. [27]. The bulk ZnTe single crystals used were grown by the Bridgman
method, and not intentionally doped. The measured SE data revealed distinct structures
at energies of the Eo, E" E,+Ll" and Ez CPs. Chemical treatment effects on the pseudo-
dielectric function of epitaxial ZnTe films grown on (lOO)GaAs by MBE were also
studied by Kim et at. [28] using SE.
Optical absorption spectra in the vacuum-UV region (36-150 eV) of some II-VI
compounds, including ZnTe, have been reported by Cardona and Raensel [29]. The
film used by these authors was obtained by vacuum evaporation on a noncrystalline
substrate, and thus it was polycrystalline. A sharp doublet associated with transitions
from the 3p core levels of Zn to the conduction bands was observed for ZnSe, ZnS, and
less clearly for ZnTe, at -90 e V.
More recently, Guo et aZ. [30] have measured the reflectance spectra in the 15-155-
eV region of ZnTe. A set of the optical constants have been determined on the basis of
the KK analysis. Fine structures related to the Zn 3d and Te 4d core levels have been
identified at -20 and 40 eV, respectively. KisIel et aZ. [31] also reported the reflectivity
spectra of some II-VI compounds, including ZnTe, in the region of d-core transitions.
The sharp structures above approximately 10 eV were interpreted as transitions origi-
nating in the metal uppermost d levels.
Table D6-2 lists the room-temperature values of £=£,+iEz, n*=n+ik, a, and R for
ZnTe. A complete set of the optical constants for E::;;0.04 eV were obtained from the
reststrahlen parameters of Manabe et aZ. [12]. The real optical constants, £, and n, for
0.5::;;£::;;1.4 eV were taken from Marple [15]. A set of the optical constants for
1.505::;;£::;;5.586 eV were taken from Sato and Adachi [8], while those for 5.75::;;£::;;10
eV were obtained from Freeouf [26]. The optical constants for 15::;;£::;;155 eV were ob-
tained from Guo et at. [30].
The (£" ~, (n, k), a, and R values in Table D6-2 are graphed in Figs. D6-3-D6-6,
respectively. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of each CP and
2D-exciton peak (Ex). The MDF analysis [7-9] suggested that the EJ(Eo+l1o) structures
can be characterized by a 3D Mo CP, the E,/(E,+Ll,) structures by a 3D M, (or 2D Mo)
CP, and the Eo' and Ez structures by a DRO (a broadened 2D M, CP).
D6 ZINC TELLURIDE (ZnTe) 477
REFERENCES
1. H. Ogawa, G. S. Irian H. Nakayama, M. Nishio, and A. Yoshida, lpn. l. Appl.
Phys. 33, L980 (1994).
2. J. P. Walter, M. L. Cohen, Y. Petroff, and M. Balkanski, Phys. Rev. B 1,2661
(1970).
3. M.-Z. Huang and W. Y. Ching, l. Phys. Chern. Solids 46, 977 (1985).
4. O. Zakharov, A. Rubio, X. Blase, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. B 50,
10780 (1994).
5. D. Vogel, P. KrUger, and J. Pollmann, Phys. Rev. B 54,5495 (1996).
6. M. Cardona and D. L. Greenaway, Phys. Rev. 131,98 (1963).
7. S. Adachi and K. Sato, lpn. l. Appl. Phys. 31, 3907 (1992).
8. K. Sato and S. Adachi, l. Appl. Phys. 73,926 (1993).
9. K. Suzuki and S. Adachi, l. Appl. Phys. 82,1320 (1997).
10. S. Adachi, Phys. Rev. B 35, 7454 (1987).
11. S. Adachi, Phys. Rev. B 38,12966 (1988).
12. A. Manabe, A. Mitsuishi, and H. Yoshinaga,lpn. l.Appl. Phys. 6,593 (1967).
13. A. Hadni, J. Claudel, and P. Strimer, Phys. Status Solidi 26, 241 (1968).
14. G. Le Bastard, R. Granger, S. Rolland, Y. Marqueton, and R. Triboulet, l. Phys.
(France) 50, 3223 (1989).
15. D. T. F. Marple, l. Appl. Phys. 35,539 (1964).
16. M. Lindner, G. F. SchOtz, P. Link, H. P. Wagner, W. Kuhn, and W. Gebhardt, l.
Phys.: Condens. Matter 4,6401 (1992).
17. H. H. Li, l. Phys. Chern. Ref Data 13, 103 (1984).
18. G. J. Glanner, H. Sitter, W. Faschinger, and M. A. Herman, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65,
998 (1994).
19. E. Loh and R. Newman, l. Phys. Chern. Solids 21, 324 (1961).
20. G. N. Aliev, N. P. Gavaleshko, O. S. Koshchug, V. I. Pleshko, R. P. Seisyan, and
K. D. Sushkevich, Sov. Phys. Solid State 34, 1286 (1992).
21. H. Leiderer, A. Supritz, M. Silberbauer, M. Lindner, W. Kuhn, H. P. Wagner, and
W. Gebhardt, Sernicond. Sci. Technol. 6, A101 (1991).
22. H. Mayer, U. Rossler, and M. Ruff, Phys. Rev. B 47, 12929 (1993).
23. M. V. Kurikand V. S. Manzhara,Sov. Phys. Solid State 18, 1445 (1976).
24. V. V. Sobolev, V. I. Donetskikh, and E. F. Zagainov, Sov. Phys. Sernicond. 12,
646 (1978).
25. M. Cardona,J. Appl. Phys. 36, 2181 (1965).
26. J. L. Freeouf, Phys. Rev. B 7, 3810 (1973).
27. O. Castaing, J. T. Benhlal, R. Granger, and R. Triboulet, l. Phys. I (France) 6,
907 (1996).
28. Y. D. Kim, S. G. Choi, M. V. Klein, S. D. Yoo, D. E. Aspnes, S. H. Xin, and J. K.
Furdyna, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 610 (1997).
29. M. Cardona and R. Haensel, Phys. Rev. B 1,2605 (1970).
478 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
30. Q. Guo, M. Ikejira, M. Nishio, and H. Ogawa, Solid State Commun. 100, 813
(1996); Q. Guo, private communication (1996).
31. A. KisIel, M. Zimnal-Starnawska, F. Antonangeli, M. Piacentini, and N. Zema,
Nuovo Cimento D 8, 436 (1986).
_8L---J----L--~--~~~
o 2 4 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D6-3 1:.1(E) and 1:.2(E) spectra for ZnTe at 300 K.
5~--~--~----~--~--~
E1 (EX)!
E 1+A 1 (Ex)
4
! !
E2
ZnTe
3 n
E1' E '+A
..::t::.
C
I 1! 1 1
I
2 1\1
,'J
I
k I
1 I
I
I
,,'
o 246 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D6-4 nCE) and k(E) spectra for ZnTe at 300 K.
D6 ZINC TELLURIDE (ZnTe) 479
ZnTe
...,
•• 1
0.7
0.6 ! E2
E1+lI. 1(Ex)
0.5 E1(EX)! !
a: 0.4
1:01
0.3
0.2 ZnTe
0.1 0
2 4 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D6·6 R(E) spectrum for ZnTe at 300 K.
480 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
487
488 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
2
:;-
~
Ei
CIl
0
C
w
-2 Figure D7·1 Electronic energy-band
structure of c-CdS as calculated
within the local-density-functional
-4 fonnalism. (From Zunger and Free-
man [3].) The locations of several
interband transitions are included by
-6 the vertical arrows.
-9 c-CdS
-11
-13
W l A r t.. X K L r
TABLE D7·1 Energies of the CPs and positions of peaks in the optical
spectra of c-CdS at 300 K.
CPs eV
Eo 2.41
El 5.02"
E2 6.4,6.9b
Eo' 7.4b
E 1' 8.3 b
4d (Cd) 13.0-14.Sb
a2D-exciton energy.
bAt 90 K.
~
4 E'1
.......... '\
o
2
. "
',t' .. / \ ................... _..
0.5
.. '",,1
4 E'1
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 IS 16 17 18
Photon Energy (e V) Photon Energy (e V)
Figure D7-2 £(E) spectra for (a) c-CdS and (b), (c) hexagonal w-CdS measured by SE at 90 K.
(From Hofmann et al. [9].)
490 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
REFERENCES
1. W. G. Wilke, R. Seedorf, and K. Hom,]. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 7, 807 (1989).
2. D. J. Stukel, R. N. Euwema, T. C. Collins, F. Herman, and R. L. Kortum, Phys.
Rev. 179,740 (1969).
3. A. Zunger and A. J. Freeman, Phys. Rev. B 17,4850 (1978).
4. S.1. Kurganskii, O. V. Farberovich, and E. P. Domashevskaya, Sov. Phys. Semi-
condo 14,775 (1980).
5. K. J. Chang, S. Froyen, and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 28,4736 (1983).
6. O. Zakharov, A. Rubio, X. Blase, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. B SO,
10780 (1994).
7. M. Rohlfmg, P. KrUger, and J. Pollmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3489 (1995).
8. D. Vogel, P. Krrtiger, and J. Pollmann, Phys. Rev. B 54, 5495 (1996).
9. Ph. Hofmann, K. Hom, A. M. Bradshaw, R. L. Johnson, D. Fuchs, and M. Car-
dona, Phys. Rev. B 47, 1639 (1993).
to. U. Rossow, T. Weminghaus, D. R. T. Zahn, W. Richter, and K. Hom, Thin Solid
Films 233,176 (1993); U. Rossow, private communication (1994).
11. D. W. Niles and H. Hochst, Phys. Rev. B 44,10965 (1991).
12. A. P. J. Stampfl, Ph. Hofmann, O. Schaff, and A. M. Bradshaw, Phys. Rev. B 55,
9679 (1997).
13. M. Cardona, M. Weinstein, and G. A. Wolff, Phys. Rev. 140, A633 (1965).
14. D. R. T. Zahn, G. Kudlek, U. Rossow, A. Hoffmann, I. Broser, and W. Richter,
Adv. Mater. Opt. Electron. 3, 11 (1994).
15. M. Cardona and R. Haensel, Phys. Rev. B 1, 2605 (1970).
16. M. Cardona and G. Harbeke, Phys. Rev. 137, A1467 (1965).
D7 CUBIC CADMIUM SULPHIDE (c-CdS) 491
10.-~--~~--~~--~~
9 !
E 1 (Ex)
8
7
6 I
I
I.U 5 I
4 I
/
/
3
,,,
/ E1
/
r-/
2
1
o c-CdS
-10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D7-3 £1(E) and £2(E) spectra for c-CdS at 300 K.
c-CdS ! E 1 (Ex)
2
c:
o 1234567
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D7·4 n(E) and k(E) spectra for c-CdS at 300 K.
492 ll-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
c-CdS
0.4 ,-----,----,-----,--,-,------,--,
c-CdS
0.3
a:
0.2
0.1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D7-6 R(E) spectrum for c-CdS at 3OOK.
07 CUBIC CADMIUM SULPHIDE (c-CdS) 493
497
498 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
2.8
CdS
2.7 : SE data
x 2 Lisitsa et al.
CD
"'0 :-::-:-: Calcu .
.5 2.6
~
13
~ 2.5
'Q)
0:
2.4
T=300 K
2.3'---7-L-.l...-J.~..l;::-l--L....L.......I1.......!-....L.......IL...L~~
1 1.5 2 2.5
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D8·1 neE) spectra of w-CdS for E.Lc (n.J and Elle (nl~ at room temperature. The solid
circles and triangles represent the SE data. The open circles and triangles also represent the
experimental data taken from Lisitsa et at. [15]. The solid and dashed lines show the calculated
results using Eq. (D2.1). (From Ninomiya and Adachi [16].)
terference fringe [15] and SE [16]. The solid and dashed lines in Fig. 08-1 represent
the calculated results of the fIrst-order Sellmeier equation, Eq. (02.1), with A=4.23,
B=1.00, and C=0.180 Jlm2 for E.le (solid line) and A=4.29, B=1.00, and C=O.I78 Jlm2
for Elle (dashed line). As a byproduct [Le., 1..-+00 Jlm in Eq. (02.1)], the high-frequency
dielectric constants of w-CdS were determined to be £.=5.23 for E.le and 5.29 for Elle
[16]. The hydrostatic-pressure dependence of nat 1..=5893 A has been determined for
some hexagonal crystals, including w-CdS, by an interferometric technique for pres-
sures up to 0.7 GPa [17].
The absorption properties at the fundamental band edge of w-CdS have been re-
ported [18-23]. The samples used were bulk CdS single crystals [18-21,23] and epi-
taxial CdS fIlm [22]. Sharp resonances associated with the A and B excitons have been
clearly found in such optical absorption spectra. Peaks due to the C exciton have also
been identifIed in Refs. [19,22]. The Eo-edge exciton resonance has also been found in
the fundamental reflectivity spectra of w-CdS by a number of groups [19,23-7]. Two-
photon absorption spectroscopy has been used recently to determine the exciton
parameters of w-CdS as a function of hydrostatic pressure in the range of 0-2 GPa
[28].
The fundamental reflectivity spectra in the interband transition region of w-CdS have
been measured by Cardona and Harbeke [29] and Freeouf [30]. By performing the KK
analysis, the (n, k) or (£1' ~ values were extracted in the 1-12-eV region [29] and in
D8 WURTZITE CADMIUM SULPHIDE (w-CdS) 499
REFERENCES
1. L. Ward, in Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids II, edited by E. D. Palik
(Academic, Boston, 1991), p. 579.
2. I. Broser, Ch. Fricke, B. Lummer, R. Heitz, H. Perls, and A. Hoffmann, J. Cryst.
Growth 117,788 (1992).
3. A. Yoshikawa and Y. Sakai, Solid-State Electron. 20,133 (1977).
4. G. A. Samara, Phys. Rev. B 27, 3494 (1983).
5. T. Hattori, Y. Homma, A. Mitsuishi, and M. Tacke, Opt. Commun. 7, 229 (1973).
500 IT-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
10
8 w-CdS
6
1.\1 4
2 El..e
::--
0 Elle
-2
12 E1A(Ex) !E 1B (Ex)
10
C\I 8
L,
/ \
1.\1 \
6 Eo I
4
2
!
0 2 4 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D8-2 E1(E) and ~(E) spectra for w-CdS at 300 K.
3 w-CdS
2
1 Ele
Elle
o 2 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D8-3 n(E) and k(E) spectra for w-CdS at 300 K.
502 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
107 0.4
106
0.3
f'10 5 , ~
Q.104 ,,
1'- ,. 0.2 a:
~ 103 "
"
(a) Elc 0.1
102
101 0
- .., ".,,,
106 0.4
-IX
I 105 ----- R 0.3 a:
''
-
"
5104 '- .....
, ,f"'" ~,
,, "
" ,, 0.2
~ 103 ,
,, (b) Ell c
102 ,. 0.1
10~OO 0
101 102
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D8·4 al...E) and R(E) spectra for w-CdS at 300 K.
-~
3
>. 0
~
Q)
c: -3
W Figure D9-1 Electronic energy-
band structure of c-CdSe as cal-
-6
culated within the ENPM for-
CdSe malism. (From Kim et al. [4].)
-9 The locations of several inter-
band transitions are included by
-12 the vertical arrows.
L A r A X U,K 1: r
Wave Vector (k)
510
D9 CUBIC CADMIUM SELENIDE (c-CdSe) Sl1
TABLE D9-1 Energies o/the CPs in the optical spectra o/c-CdSe at 300 K.
CPs eV
Eo 1.74
Eo+~ 2.15
EI 4.28"
EI+Al 4.48"
E2 -6.1
"2D-exciton energy.
REFERENCES
1. N. Samarth, H. Luo, J. K. Furdyna, S. B. Qadri, Y. R. Lee, A. K. Ramdas, and N.
Otsuka, Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 2680 (1989).
2. H. Jeon, J. Ding, A. V. Nurmikko, H. Luo, N. Samarth, J. K. Furdyna, W. A.
Bonner, and R. E. Nahory, Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 2413 (1990).
3. M. A. Haase, J. Qui, J. M. DePuydt, and H. Chen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 1272
(1991).
4. Y. D. Kim, M. V. Klein, S. F. Ren, Y. C. Chang, H. Luo, N. Samarthj, and J. K.
Furdyna, Phys. Rev. B 49, 7262 (1994).
5. S. Ninomiya and S. Adachi, 1. Appl. Phys. 78,4681 (1995).
6. V. Lunz, J. Kuhn, F. Goschenhofer, V.SchUssler, S. Einfeldt, C. R. Becker, and G.
Landwehr, 1. Appl. Phys. 80,6861 (1996).
7. W. Shan, J. J. Song, H. Luo, and J. K. Furdyna, Phys. Rev. B 50,8012 (1994).
8. S. Adachi,Phys. Rev. B 35, 7454 (1987).
9. S. Adachi, Phys. Rev. B 38,12966 (1988).
10. R. Ludeke and W. Paul, Phys. Status Solidi 23, 413 (1967).
11. C. Janowitz, O. GUnther, G. Jungk, R. L. Johnson, P. V. Santos, M. Cardona, W.
Faschinger, and H. Sitter, Phys. Rev. B 50,2181 (1994).
D9 CUBIC CADMIUM SELENIDE (c-CdSe) 513
12.--.--.--.--~~--~~
11
10
9
8
7
6
W 5
4
3
2
1
o
-1 c-CdSe
-20~-1~~2~~--L--L--L-~
34567
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D9·2 £1(E) and £2(E) spectra for c-CdSe at 300 K.
E,(EX)! E,+.6.,
! (Ex)
3 n
~
2
c:
Eo+.6. o
1 Eo!
!
c-CdSe
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D9·3 neE) and k(E) spectra for c-CdSe at 300 K.
514 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
c-CdSe
1030 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D9·4 a.(E) spectrum for c-CdSe at 300 K.
0.5
c-CdSe E,+.6.,
(Ex)
E,(Ex) ! E2
0.4 ! !
0:
100+.6. 0
0.3
Eo!
!
0.20
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D9·5 R(E) spectrum for c-CdSe at 300 K.
D9 CUBIC CADMIUM SELENIDE (c-CdSe) 515
Table D9·2 Optical constants of c-CdSe at 300 K.
eV £1 £2 n k a (cm· l ) R
1.5 7.43 2.73 0.215
1.6 7.73 0.10 2.78 0.02 3.04E+03 0.222
1.7 8.29 0.58 2.88 0.10 1.75E+04 0.236
1.8 7.93 1.28 2.82 0.23 4. 14E+04 0.230
1.9 7.97 1.57 2.84 0.28 5.34E+04 0.233
2 8.00 1.80 2.85 0.32 6.41E+04 0.236
2.1 8.00 2.00 2.85 0.35 7.47E+04 0.237
2.2 7.85 2.30 2.83 0.41 9.06E+04 0.237
2.3 7.80 2.40 2.83 0.43 9.91E+04 0.237
2.4 7.70 2.60 2.81 0.46 1.12E+05 0.237
2.5 7.70 2.70 2.82 0.48 1.21E+05 0.238
2.6 7.70 2.80 2.82 0.50 1.3IE+05 0.240
2.7 7.70 2.90 2.82 0.51 1.41E+05 0.241
2.8 7.70 3.10 2.83 0.55 1.56E+05 0.244
2.9 7.75 3.25 2.84 0.57 1.68E+05 0.247
3 7.80 3.40 2.86 0.60 1.81E+05 0.250
3.1 7.80 3.60 2.86 0.63 1.98E+05 0.252
3.2 7.85 3.80 2.88 0.66 2.14E+05 0.256
3.3 7.90 4.00 2.89 0.69 2.31E+05 0.260
3.4 7.90 4.30 2.91 0.74 2.55E+05 0.265
3.5 7.95 4.60 2.93 0.79 2.79E+05 0.270
3.6 8.00 4.90 2.95 0.83 3.03E+05 0.276
3.7 8.10 5.30 2.98 0.89 3.33E+05 0.283
3.8 8.10 5.90 3.01 0.98 3.78E+05 0.293
3.9 8.00 6.60 3.03 1.09 4.31E+05 0.305
4 7.90 7.30 3.05 1.20 4.85E+05 0.316
4.1 7.40 8.20 3.04 1.35 5.61E+05 0.330
4.2 6.40 9.20 2.97 1.55 6.60E+05 0.346
4.3 4.70 9.60 2.77 1.73 7.54E+05 0.356
4.4 3.80 8.90 2.60 1.71 7.65E+05 0.346
4.5 3.10 8.70 2.48 1.75 7.99E+05 0.347
4.6 2.30 8.00 2.31 1.74 8.10E+05 0.338
4.7 2.00 6.90 2.14 1.61 7.67E+05 0.313
4.8 2.30 6.50 2.14 1.52 7.38E+05 0.296
4.9 2.50 6.20 2.14 1.45 7.19E+05 0.284
5 2.60 6.10 2.15 1.42 7.20E+05 0.280
5.1 2.70 6.00 2.15 1.39 7.20E+05 0.275
5.2 2.80 6.00 2.17 1.38 7.29E+05 0.274
5.3 2.90 6.10 2.20 1.39 7.46E+05 0.277
5.4 3.00 6.20 2.22 1.39 7.63E+05 0.279
5.5 3.00 6.40 2.24 1.43 7.95E+05 0.285
5.6 3.00 6.70 2.27 1.47 8.36E+05 0.294
5.7 2.90 7.00 2.29 1.53 8.84E+05 0.304
5.8 2.60 7.70 2.32 1.66 9.77E+05 0.327
5.9 1.90 8.20 2.27 1.81 1.08E+06 0.349
6 1.10 8.30 2.18 1.91 1.16E+06 0.366
6.1 0.30 8.00 2.04 1.96 1.21E+06 0.377
6.2 -0.20 7.50 1.91 1.96 1.23E+06 0.380
516 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
517
518 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
IOr------.--~------~~------~--~------~
Figure DIO·l Electronic energy-band structure of w-CdSe as calculated with an ETBT. (From
Kobayashi et at. [6].) The locations of several interband transitions are included by the vertical
arrows.
Optical properties in the reststrahlen region of w-CdSe have been studied by several
authors [11-15]. The reststrahlen parameters obtained by Geick et al. [11] were:
ffiTO=172 cm- 1 , ffiLO=21O cm- 1 , and y==7.0 cm- 1 (£,=9.29, £_=6.20) for El.c; ffiro=166 cm- 1 ,
ffiLO=211 cm- 1, and y==8.0 cm- 1 (£,=10.16, £_=6.30) for Elk. Note that unpolarized radia-
tion was used in the study of Refs. [13,14]. Further, single-crystalline specimens of
containing 1.5% and 0.5% S (sulfur) were used as "pure" CdSe in Refs. [12,15], re-
spectively. Optical absorption in the multiphonon absorption band region of w-CdSe
has also been studied using polarized [11] and unpolarized radiation [16].
OlD WURTZITE CADMIUM SELENIDE (w-CdSe) 519
TABLE 010-1 Energies of the CPs in the optical spectra ofw-CdSe at 300 K.
eV
CPs
El.c Ellc
EOA 1.732
EOB 1.761 1.761
Err. 2.161 2.161
EIA 4.lD
ElB 4.55
E 1C 4.85 4.78
Eo' 5.6 6.0
E2 ' 7.6,8.7 a
E 1' 9.5 a
aFar unpolarized light.
The neE) data in the transparent region of w-CdSe have been reported by Parsons et
al. [17] (T=4.2, 77, 300 K), Bond [18] (T=300 K), Lisitsa et al. [19] (T=I00-600 K),
and Terekhova et al. [20] (T=5 K). These data were taken for both the ordinary and
extraordinary rays, and presented in graphical [17,19,20] and/or tabular fonn [18,19].
The experimental uncertainty reported was 5xW4 [19]; in Bond [18] n was measured
to the fourth decimal. Ninomiya and Adachi [7] also detennined the 300-K neE) disper-
sion for w-CdSe using SE. We can, however, find that such data show no good agree-
ment with each other (e.g., no values at /..=0.8 J.!m and T=300 K are 2.580 [17], 2.6448
[18], and 2.683 [7], respectively). All these data, except in Ref. [17], showed the posi-
tive birefringence, i.e., &l=neCEllc)-no(EJ..c»O, for longer wavelengths. Only Ref. [17]
reports the negative birefringence, &l=ne-no<O, in the long wavelength region.
Optical properties near the Eo-exciton resonance region of w-CdS have been studied
by optical absorption [17,21-3] and fundamental reflectivity measurements [24,25].
Sharp resonances associated with the A and B excitons have been clearly found in such
optical absorption spectra. Absorption peaks due to the C exciton have also been identi-
fied in Ref. [17]. Optical absorption properties in the UV region of epitaxial w-CdSe
films grown on BaF2 substrates and bulk samples have also been reported in Refs.
[26,27].
The fundamental reflectivity in the interband transition region of w-CdSe has been
measured by Cardona [8], Lange and Iliev [27], Cardona and Harbeke [28], and
Freeouf [29]. The t.z values at the El peak for Ellc obtained from the KK analysis were
-7.4 [27] and -9.2 [29]. An t.z value at the El peak for E II c obtained using SE by Ni-
nomiya and Adachi [7] was -10.7. It should be noted that the dielectric function of tet-
rahedral semiconductors at the E2 (or E 1) peak, f-z(E2) [or f-z(E 1)], provides a sensitive
indication of the dielectric discontinuity between the sample and ambient [30,31]. The
sample with the cleanest surface, as well as the dielectric-function spectrum most accu-
rately representing that of the pure bulk material, can then be identified simply from
520 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
£iE2 ) values by using the "biggest is best" criterion. We can also recognize that the SE
R value at the EI peak (-0040 for EIIe, Ref. [7]) is considerably larger than that of Car-
dona and Harbeke (-0.3, Ref. [28]).
The optical-constant data in the interband transition region of w-CdSe have been
determined using SE in the 1.2-5.3-eV region at 300 K by Ninomiya and Adachi [7],
in the 1.5-5.5-eV region at 15-550 K by Logothetidis et al. [9], and in the 2-25-eV
region at 90 K by Janowitz et al. [10]. The samples used in these studies were bulk sin-
gle crystals. It should be noted that the (£1' €.z) data reported by Logothetidis et al. [9] in
graphical form are only at 15, 210, 400, and 500 K.
Optical properties in the vacuum-UVregion (36-150 eV) of some II-VI compounds,
including CdSe, have been studied by Cardona and Haensel [32]. The CdSe film used
was obtained by vacuum evaporation on a noncrystalline substrate, and thus it was
polycrystalline. Only a broad structure peaking at -75 eV was observed in the absorp-
tion spectrum of polycrystalline CdSe [32].
Tables DlO-2 and DlO-3 list the room-temperature values of e=el+i€.z, n*=n+ik, lX,
and R for w-CdSe for E.lc and EIIe, respectively. A set of the optical constants for
E:::;O.1 eV were calculated using the reststrahlen parameters of Geick et al. [11]. The n
(£1) data below the Eo absorption edge (0.310:::;£:::;1.24 eV) were taken from Bond [18].
A complete set of the optical constants in the interband transition region were taken
from Ninomiya and Adachi [7] for 1.3:::;£:::;5.3 eV and from Cardona and Harbeke [28]
for 6:::;£:::;10 eV. The imaginary constants, k and lX, for E?:40 eV were obtained from
Cardona and Haensel [32]. Since no polarization dependence should exist in this spec-
tral region (i.e., E?:40 eV), we listed these data only in Table 010-2.
The (£1' €.z), (n, k), lX, and R values in Tables DlO-2 and DlO-3 are plotted in Figs.
DI0-2-DlO-4. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of each CP and
2D EI exciton peak (Ex). It has been shown [7,33] that such optical-constant spectra
can be successfully explained by the MDF.
REFERENCES
1. R. Tenne, R. Jliger-Waldau, M. Lux-Steiner, E. Bucher, J. Rioux, and C. Levy-
Clement, Phys. Rev. B 42,1763 (1990).
2. Y.-N. Xu and W. Y. Ching, Phys. Rev. B 48, 4335 (1993).
3. P. Schroer, P. Kri.iger, and J. Pollmann, Phys. Rev. B 48,18264 (1993).
4. O. Zakharov, A. Rubio, X. Blase, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. B 50,
10780 (1994).
5. D. Vogel, P. Kri.iger, and J. Pollman, Phys. Rev. B 54,5495 (1996).
6. A. Kobayashi, O. F. Sankey, S. M. Volz, and J. D. Dow, Phys. Rev. B 28, 935
(1983).
7. S. Ninomiya and S. Adachi, 1. Appl. Phys. 78, 4681 (1995).
8. M. Cardona, Phys. Rev. 129, 1068 (1963).
DlO WURTZITE CADMIUM SELENIDE (w-CdSe) 521
...
~~-
4
\ w-CdSe
w 2 -- Elc
- - - Ellc \
01- '.
_2L-~~~-L~~--~L-~~
14 E1B(Ex)U E1dEx)
12
10 E1A(Ex) I 1\
+J ,
wC\l 8 \,
6
4
2
o 4 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure DlO·2 eiE) and £2(E) spectra for w-CdSe at 300 K.
3
~
w-CdSe
2
c
Elc
1 Ellc ~-
0
E1B(EX)!! E1dEx)
2 E1A(Ex)! ( \ E2'
~ ! l
1 "",-/--"'--....
'" '"
0 4 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure DIO·3 nee) and k(E) spectra for w-CdSe at 300 K.
010 WURTZITE CADMIUM SELENIDE Cw-CdSe) 523
107 .-----...--r-~"T·I----r""""T""T""rTTTTlr---t.....,.--,.",...'IIO.4
~ ~~ W-CdSe..),~ ~ 0.3
o . 0.2 a:::
-;; 104 :'.....
103 (a) Elc 0.1
102L-~~~.1~~~~~~~~0
'I
530
D11 CADMIUM TELLURIDE (CdTe) 531
6
eV l6
to u...L
_4•5_ _
l6
.... -2
-4
CdTe
-8
TABLE DU·1 Energies of the CPs in the optical spectra ojCdTe at 300 K.
CPs eV
Eo 1.5
Eo+~ 2.45
EI 3.55
E 1+111 4.13
Eo' 5.00
E2 5.30
E 1' -6.5
E 1'+111 -7.2
• / ._~.-. I I
l(r / K·~
!
/ I (em"']
/ I 8
I I
~'K
/ / I
I I I I
!
, 413 'K I / 293'K Ill) 'K 7
,. : 3S2-K
103 '
,
l
: .+
! ~
,i
,.
;
/ j ! CdTe T,
6 ~
t!
! '/
IJ
+ 5
+ 04Jr measunmenls I'lfJ
l(f polarimetric 1
8 I m~Qsurfments!1
6 .
I ./}+
., : l'
IIL
l I I { sample 4
4 thickn.ss
I ' /
j'! tr=--
lI ;I I ,. QOJ95mm J I
2 11159 mm tranSmittance J J'
1,17 mm measu ...m.nts.~ , 3
101 fofarplls 17 i
measur.me"Y !
.... ! 2
• I
/ x" ! i
./1.(-:/1
I
/
• .. 111
/
/ !
I 160 hv[;VJ--:~
1
/ il-
~.1S ~ h~['11
Figure Dll·2 a(E) spectra for CdTe measured at several temperatures in the absorption edge
~
region. Marple's results [21] are also shown for comparison, (From Koi\.ak et al. [22],) CM
534 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
The £(E) spectra in the interband transition region of CdTe have been determined
using SE at room temperature by a number of groups [11, 37-42] (see Figs. DI4-3,
D22-4, and D24-4 below). Kim et al. [40] reported the SE £(E) spectra measured at
temperatures between 296 and 800 K. The samples used in these studies were bulk
CdTe crystals [11,37-9,42] and epitaxial CdTe films grown on Si [40] and CdTe sub-
strates [41]. These SE data exhibit values of ~-IO-12 at the E2 peak and at T-300 K
[11,37-40]. Aspnes and Arwin [38] found that the "bare" surface of CdTe can be ob-
tained by rinsing with Br in methanol, followed by a rinse with fresh saturated BaBH.t
in methanol, and finally with Br in methanol solution. They reported the maximum ~
value of -12.1. It must be noted that the maximum ~ value of -16.2 obtained by
Freeouf [10] from reflectivity measurement is extremely larger than this SE value
(-12.1). Strain effects in MBE-grown (111)CdTe epitaxial layers on (lOO)GaAs sub-
strates have also been investigated using SE [43].
The vacuum-UV (36-150-eV) optical absorption properties of some II-VI com-
pounds, including CdTe, have been studied by Cardona and Haensel [44]. The CdTe
film used was obtained by vacuum evaporation on a noncrystalline substrate, and thus
it was polycrystalline. A broad structure peaking at -90 eV was observed in the ab-
sorption spectrum of this sample. KisIel et al. [45] also reported the reflectivity spectra
of CdTe, ZnTe, and HgTe in the region of d-core transitions. The sharp structures abo-
ve approximately 10 eV were interpreted as transitions originating in the group-II metal
uppermost d levels.
We list in Table DII-2 the room-temperature values of £=£,+i~, n*=n+ik, a, and R
for CdTe. A set of the optical constants for ESO.4 eV were calculated from the rest-
strahlen parameters of Vodop'yanov et al. [20]. The real optical constants, £, and n, for
0.5SESl.2 eV were taken from Marple [29]. A set of the optical constants were taken
for 1.254SES1.455 eV from Adachi et al. [11], for 1.5SES6.0 eV from Aspnes and
Arwin [38], and for 6.2SES20 eV from Cardona [34]. The imaginary constants, k and a,
for ~40 eV were from Cardona and Haensel [44].
The (£" £0, (n, k), a, and R values in Table Dl1-2 are plotted in Figs. Dl1-3-D11-6,
respectively. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of each CP and
2D E, exciton peak (Ex). It has been shown [11] that such optical-constant spectra can
be successfully explained by the MDF.
REFERENCES
1. K. Zanio, in Semiconductors and Semimetals, edited by R. K. Willardson and A.
C. Beer (Academic, New York, 1973), vol. 13.
2. T. L. Chu, in Current Topics in Photovo[taics, edited by T. J. Coutts and 1. D.
Meakin (Academic, London, 1988), vol. 3, p. 236.
3. R. Sporken, M. D. Lange, C. Masset, and 1. P. Faurie, Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 1449
(1990).
4. A. Continenza and A. 1. Freeman, Phys. Rev. B 43, 8951 (1991).
Dll CADMIUM TELLURIDE (CdTe) 535
37. L. Vifia, C. Umbach, M. Cardona, and L. Vodopyanov, Phys. Rev. B 29, 6752
(1984).
38. D. E. Aspnes and H. Arwin, f. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2,1309 (1984).
39. P. Lautenschlager, S. Logothetidis, L. Vifia, and M. Cardona, Phys. Rev. B 32,
3811 (1985).
40. C. C. Kim, M. Daraselia, J. W. Garland, and S. Sivananthan, Phys. Rev. B 56,
4786 (1997).
41. M. Luttmann, F. Bertin, and A. Chabli, f. Appl. Phys. 78,3387 (1995).
42. S. G. Choi, Y. D. Kim, S. D. Yoo, D. E. Aspnes, I. Miotkowski, and A. K. Ram-
das, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 249 (1997).
43. M. S. Han, T. W. Kang, J. H. Leem, B. K. Song, Y. B. Hou, W. H. Baek, M. H.
Lee, J. H. Bahng, K. J. Kim, J. M. Kim, H. K. Kim, and T. W. Kim, f. Electron.
Mater. 26, 507 (1997).
44. M. Cardona and R. Haensel, Phys. Rev. B 1,2605 (1970).
45. A. Kisiel, M. Zimnal-Starnawska, F. Antonangeli, M. Piacentini, and N. Zema,
Nuovo Cimento D 8,436 (1986).
10
CAl 5
o
CdTe
2 3 4 5 6 7
Photon energy (eV)
Figure Dll-3 tl(E) and t2(E) spectra for CdTe at 300 K.
D11 CADMIUM TELLURIDE (CdTe) 537
E1+t. 1(Ex)
4
! E\! E2
3
.::t:.
\
r:: E1(Ex)!
I
I \
\
2 \
I \. k
~ I '- /
h.l --
Eo+t.o I n
1 Eo !I
I
!.,.
/
/
/ CdTe
_/
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Photon energy (eV)
Figure Dl1-4 n(E) and k(E) spectra for CdTe at 300 K.
108
107
106
105 ! CAITO
IE 104
<.>
-103
~
102
10 1
CdTe
10°
10-1~~=L~~~~~~~~
10-2 10-1 10° 10 1 102
Photon energy (eV)
Figure Dl1-5 aJ..E) spectrum for CdTe at 300 K.
538 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
0.6
!E2
EO!
0.5
E,(EX)l
rex)
E,+ll.,
a: 0.4
Eo+ll.o
Eo
!
0.3 !
CdTe
0.20
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Photon energy (eV)
Figure Dll-6 R(E) speetrum for CdTe at 300 K.
r
k-
Figure D12-1 Electronic energy-band structure of HgSe as calculated with an EPM. (From
Bloom and Bergstresser [4].) The locations of several interband transitions are included by the
vertical arrows.
546
012 MERCURY SELENIDE (HgSe) 547
dielectric constant E_ of HgSe obtained from this study was 7.5±1. This value is com-
patible, within the error, with the literature value of 7.3±o.3 [11], but is considerably
smaller than 11±1 according to Ref. [10]. Kireev and Volkov [13] also reported the
experimental optical absorption spectrum for HgSe measured in the 0.1-0.6-eV region
at 300 K.
The fundamental reflectivity spectra in the interband transition region of HgSe have
been measured by a number of authors [7,12,14-16]. By performing the KK analysis,
the (n, k) or (EI'~) values were extracted in the 2-3.5-eV region (T=300 K) [15] and in
the 2-12-eV region (T=300 K) [16]. The CPs found in such spectra were correlated
with various electronic transitions in the BZ [7,14,16]. Kumazaki et al. [17] have also
reported the SE (EI, ~) values for Hgl_xCdxSe (x=0, 0.03, and 0.1) measured in the re-
gion between 1.7 and 5.6 eV at 300 K. The Hgl_xCdxSe single crystals used were grown
by the Bridgman method. The measured ~(E) spectrum for x=O (HgSe) showed a
broad peak at the EI CP (-2.9 eV) with a peak value of -9.5. This value is compatible
with that of Ref. [15] (-9.0), but is much larger than -5.0 in Ref. [16].
We show in Table D12-2 the room-temperature values of E=EI+i~, n*=n+ik, a, and
R for HgSe. These data were taken for E~1.0 eV from Einfeldt et al. [12] and for
1.7~~5.4 eV from Kumazaki et al. [17].
The (EI'~' (n, k), a, and R values in Table 012-2 are plotted in Figs. D12-2-012-4.
The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of the EI and EI+.11 CPs.
REFERENCES
12
8
w
4
r
"2
0
HgSe
-40
1 2 3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure 012-2 £1(E) and £2(E) spectra for HgSe at 300 K.
550 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
3 n
oX:
c: 2
1
k
HgSe
o 1 2 3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D12-3 n(E) and k(E) spectra for HgSe at 300 K.
0.5
0.4
0.3a:
R
0.2
HgSe 0.1
HgTe
L6
t
>-
Lr,
01
....
dI L ',5 X7
c: L6
W Xc
X7
La
L r X
Figure Dl3·1 Schematic electronic energy-band structure of HgTe. The locations of several
interband transitions are included by the vertical arrows.
553
554 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
TABLE D13-1 Energies of the CPs in the optical spectra ofHg'fe at 293 K.
CPs eV
Eo -0.146
Eo+~ 0.750
2.109
2.741
4.369
6.57
The optical constants in the interband transition region of HgTe have been deter-
mined using SE in the 0.75-5.7-eV region at 293 K by Castaing et al. [7] (see Fig.
D20-2 below), in the 1.5-6.0-eV region at 300 K by Arwin and Aspens [22], and in the
1.8-5.5-eV region at 300 K by Viiia et al. [23] (see Fig. D22-4 below). The bulk. single
crystals used in these studies were grown by a traveling-heater method [7,23] or by
zone-melt refining [22]. The measured f-z(E) spectra showed peaks at the EI (-2.1 eV),
E1+dl (-2.7 eV), and E2 CPs (-4.4 eV). The f-z values at the E2 peak are, respectively,
-9.6 [7,22] and -8.7 [23].
KisIel et al. [8] reported the reflectivity spectra of some II-VI compounds, including
HgTe, in the region of d-core transitions. The sharp structures above approximately 10
e V were interpreted as transitions originating in the metal uppermost d levels.
Table D13-2 lists the room-temperature values'of £=£I+if-z, n*=n+ik, a, and R for
HgSe taken from Arwin and Aspnes [22].
The (£1' £0, (n, k), a, and R values in Table D13-2 are plotted in Figs. D13-2-D13-4.
The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of the E 1, E1+d1, and E2 CPs.
REFERENCES
1. C. T. Elliott, in Properties of Narrow Gap Cadmium-Based Compounds, EMIS
Datareviews Series No. 10, edited by P. Capper (INSPEC (lEE), London, 1994), p.
311.
2. I. M. Baker, in Properties of Narrow Gap Cadmium-Based Compounds, EMIS
Datareviews Series No. 10, edited by P. Capper (INSPEC (lEE), London, 1994), p.
323.
3. T. C. Harman, in l/-VI Semiconducting Compounds, edited by D. G. Thomas
(Benjamin, New York, 1967), p. 982.
4. M. T. Czyzyk and M. Podg6rny, Phys. Status Solidi B 98, 507 (1980).
5. N. A. Cade and P. M. Lee, Solid State Commun. 56,637 (1985).
6. R. Markowski and M.Podg6rny, l. Phys. C: Condens. Matter 4, 2505 (1992).
7. O. Castaing, J. T. Benhlal, R. Granger, and R. Triboulet, l. Phys. I (France) 6,
907 (1996).
8. A. KisIel, M. Zimnal-Starnawska, F. Antonangeli, M. Piacentini, and N. Zema,
Nuovo Cimento D 8, 436 (1986).
9. K.-U. Gawlik. L. Kipp. M. Skibowski, N. Orlowski, and R. Manzke, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 78,3165 (1997).
10. J. Baars and F. Sorger, Solid State Commun. 10, 875 (1972).
11. G. A. Samara, Phys. Rev. B 27, 3494 (1983).
12. M. Grynberg, R. Le Toullec, and M. Baikanski, Phys. Rev. B 9,517 (1974).
13. M. P. Volz, F. R. Szofran, S. L. Lehoczky, and C.-H. Su, Solid State Commun. 75,
943 (1990).
14. C.-C. Wu, D.-Y. Chu, C.-Y. Sun, and T.-R. Yang, lpn. l. Appl. Phys. 34,4687
(1995).
556 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
18r--.--~--~--~--~~
16
14
·.
E 1
12 ,.. ".
10 · .I
,
... ' ,
..·
..
8
6
4
2
o HgTe
-2
o
-4~--~--~--~--~--~--~
1 2 3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D13-2 E[(E) and ez(E) spectra for HgTe at 300 K.
D13 MERCURY TELLURIDE (HgTe) 557
5
E'l
4
n
E2
..::.::
3 !
c:
2
1
k HgTe
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D13-3 n(E) and k(E) spectra for HgTe at 300 K.
0.50
E2 !
E,+.6.,
106 0.45
E,
!.. a;
! ,,
,,',
..-..
'. . 0.40 ,,
.. a:
r-
"
,,
-
I
E
0
i!!
.. ,,,. .. 0.35
R
,,
.. , '
105 0.30
HgTe
0 1 2 3 4 5 60 .25
Photon energy (eV)
Figure D13·4 a(E) and R(E) spectra for HgTe at 300 K.
558 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
a 2K
• 300K
- - quadratic
..... linear fit
o 0.5 1.0
Composition x
559
560 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
in eV at 300 K, with a similar law, lying 0.1 eV higher in energy, at 2 K [2]. In this
study, the Eo gap was detected in the reflectance spectra as an excitonic feature for low
Mg contents and as the onset of Fabry-Perot oscillations within the MgTe/CdTe layer
for high Mg contents.
Optical properties in the far-IR region of MgxCd1.xTe are studied by several authors
[4-6]. Measurement techniques used in these studies were fundamental reflectivity [4]
and optical absorption [5,6]. The reststrahlen parameters obtained at 300 K for MgxCd l .
xTe (x=0.1, 0.35, and 0.5) were given in tabular form in Ref. [4]. The local modes of
Mg-P pairs and Mg2+ in CdTe were discussed in Refs. [5] and [6], respectively.
The n(E) data in the transparent region of MgxCd1-xTe alloy have been measured by
Lugauer et at. [7] at 77 and 300 K, by Luttmann et at. [8] at 300 K, and by Andre and
Dang [9] at T=4 K. The data were obtained from optical reflection [7], SE [8], and in-
terference fringe measurements [9]. The alloys with compositions of x=O.12- 0.69,
0-0.79, and 0-0.70 were studied in Refs. [7]-[9], respectively. They were grown by
MBE on (lOO)CdTe [7], on (l00)Zno.04 Cdo.96Te [7,8], and on (lOO)Zno.osCdo.9sTe sub-
strates [9]. We reproduce in Fig. D14-2 the n(E) date obtained by Lugauer et at. [7].
The Sellmeier-type or similar dispersion relation was applied to describe the index be-
havior as a function of wavelength for optional x compositions [7-9] and different
temperatures [7].
Optical properties in the interband transition region of MgxCd1.xTe have been studied
using SE at 300 K in the 0.7-5.6-eV region by Luttmann et at. [7] and in the 1.5-6.0-
Wavelength (nm)
1000 800 700 600 500
3.0
2.9
c
)( 28
..
QJ
"tJ
.....c 27
-
QJ
.....> ..............
v 26
<IS
.!:
QJ
2.5 .' .'
~ .... " "
"
24 I.··· ....
.. , ...........
'--_'1"1"1"""
I •••
23L-------------------------------~
1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6
Energy (eV)
Figure D14·2 n(E) curves for Mg.Cd1 .•Te (x=0.12, 0.33, 0.40, 0.55, and 0.69) at 77 and 300 K.
(From Lugauer et al. [7].)
D14 MAGNESIUM CADMIUM TELLURIDE (Mg.Cdl .•Te) 561
2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
E (eV) E (eV)
Figure 014·3 (a) £I(E) and (b) Ez(E) spectra for Mg.Cdl .•Te (x=O, 0.25, 0.40, and 0.55) meas-
ured by SE at 300 K. (From Choi et at. [10].)
eV region by Choi et al. [10]. The crystals grown by the modified Bridgman method
(x=0-D.s0) were used in Ref. [10]. Figure D14-3 shows the e(E) spectra obtained by
Choi et al. [10]. As clearly seen in the figure, the SE spectra reveal distinct structures at
energies of the Eo, E 1, EI+~I' and E2 CPs.
REFERENCES
1. A. Kuhn, A. Chevy, and M.-J. Naud, 1. Cryst. Growth 9, 263 (1971).
2. J. M. Hartmann, J. Cibert, F. Kany, H. Mariette, M. Chrleux, P. Alleysson, R.
Langer, G. Feuillet, 1. Appl. Phys. 80, 6257 (1996).
3. A. Waag, H. Heinke, S. Scholl, C. R. Becker, and G. Landwehr, 1. Cryst. Growth
131, 607 (1993).
4. S. Nakashima, T. Fukumoto, A. Mitsuishi, and K. Itoh, 1. Phys. Soc. Ipn 35,1437
(1973).
5. B. V. Dutt and W. G. Spitzer,1. Appt. Phys. 48, 2107 (1977).
6. E. Oh and A. K. Ramdas, 1. Electron. Mater. 23, 30 (1994).
7. H.-J. Lugauer, F. Fischer, T. Litz, A. Waag, D. Hommel, and G. Landwehr, Semi-
condo Sci. Technol. 9, 1567 (1994).
8. M. Luttmann, F. Bertin, and A. Chabli, 1. Appl. Phys. 78, 3387 (1995).
9. R. Andre and Le Si Dang, 1. Appl. Phys. 82, 5086 (1997).
562 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
Similar quadratic relation holds for the Eo+~, Elo and El+LlI CP energies [5]. It should
be noted, however, that the 300-K value of Eo for c-CdSe varies from 1.66 to 1.74 eV
(see Ref. [5]).
The lattice vibronic properties of cubic (c-) ZnxCd1.xSe alloys grown on (100)GaAs
substrates by MBE have been studied using RS [7]. The changes in the LO and TO
phonon energies vs. alloy composition are found to be of an intermediate between the
one- and two-mode behaviors.
The waveguiding properties of MBE-grown ZnSe/ZnxCd1.xSe/ZnSe heterostructures
have been reported by Walecki et at. [8]. These authors reported the refractive-index
dispersion for Zno.S3CdO.17Se, expressed as the optical-confinement index Lln=nZncdSe-
nZnSe' in a graphical form. A temperature shift of the refractive index, Lln/LlT=1.0xlO""
Kl (T=50-300 K), has also been reported by analyzing laser emission wavelength from
a ZnxCd1.xSe-based distributed feedback laser as a function of temperature [9]. A prism
563
564 IT-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
5.5
E,~
5.0
--
>Q)
4.5
4.0 E
1
>-
e> 3.5
Q) E +A
c: Zn Cd Sa 0 0
w x 1-x
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Zn Concentration (x)
Figure DIS-I Composition dependence of the Eo, Eo+Ao, E 1, and El+£\1 CP energies for
ZnxCd1_xSe at 300 K. (From Kim et al. [5].)
coupling technique has also been used to determine the n(E) dispersion (E~2.282 e V)
for a series of c-Zn.Cd1_.Se epilayers (x=O-o.212) grown by MBE on (100)GaAs sub-
strates [10].
SE has been used to study optical properties of c-Zn.Cd1.•Se alloy by several groups
[5,11-13]. The samples used in these studies were epitaxial films grown by MBE on
(lOO)GaAs substrates with x=0-1.0 [5],0.75-1.0 [11],0.66-1.0 [12], and an MBE-
grown epitaxial Zno.53Cdo.47Se film lattice-matched to (lOO)InP [13]. Accurate values of
the Eo, Eo+flo, E 1, and El+Al CP energies as a function of x were determined by per-
forming an SCP analysis (see Fig. DIS-I).
Adachi proposed a model (MDF) for the optical dielectric function of semiconduc-
tors and successfully applied it to fit the c(E) data of some semiconductors (see, e.g.,
Ref. [14]). Suzuki and Adachi [15] used this model to obtain a closed analytic formula
for the optical dielectric function of ZnxCd1-xSe as a function of x.
Figure D15-2 shows the MDF-calculated c(E) spectra for Znx Cd1_x Se alloy with x-
composition increments of 0.2 [15]. The solid and open circles represent the experi-
mental data taken from Refs. [16] (ZnSe) and [5] (c-CdSe), respectively. The composi-
tion dependence of the CP strength and broadening parameters was determined by fit-
ting the binary data (ZnSe, c-CdSe) and ZnxCd1_XSe values (x=0.53, Ref. [13]) with a
quadratic expression.
Knowledge of the refractive indices of semiconductors in the region below or near
the fundamental absorption edge is often of interest in optoelectronic device design and
analysis. Figure DlS-3 shows the MDF-calculated spectral dependence of n(E) below
015 ZINC CADMIUM SELENIDE (Zn.Cdl .•Se) 565
. =0
01
2 3 4 5 6
01
2 3 4 5
Photon energy (eV)
3.2
ZnxCd1_xSe
3.0 300K 0
the EoI(Eo+llo'J region of ZnxCd1.xSe alloy with x-composition increments of 0.2 [15].
The solid and open circles represent the experimental data taken from Refs. [16] (ZnSe)
and [13] (Zno,s3Cdo,47Se), respectively.
REFERENCES
1. A. Ishibashi, in Blue Laser and Light Emitting Diodes, edited by A. Yoshikawa, K.
Kishino, M. Kobayashi, and T. Yasuda (Ohmsha, Tokyo, 1996), p. 113.
2. A. S. Nasibov, Yu. V. Korostelin, P. V. Shapin, L. G. Suslina, D. L. Fedorov, and
L. S. Markov, Solid State Commun. 71, 867 (1989).
3. N. Samarth, H. Luo, J. K. Furdyna, R. G. Alonso, Y. R. Lee, A. K. Ramdas, S. B.
Qadri, and N. Otsuka, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56,1163 (1990).
4. E. Snoeks, S. Herko, L. Zhao, B. Yang, A. Cavus, L. Zeng, and M. C. Tamargo,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 2259 (1997).
5. Y. D. Kim, M. V. Klein, S. F. Ren, Y. C. Chang, H. Luo, N. Samarthj, and J. K.
Furdyna, Phys. Rev. B 49, 7262 (1994).
6. U. Lunz, J. Kuhn, F. Goschenhofer, U. SchUssler, S. Einfeldt, C. R. Becker, and G.
Landwehr, J. Appl. Phys. 80, 6861 (1996).
7. R. G. Alonso, E.-K. Suh, A. K. Ramdas, N. Samarth, H. Luo, and 1. K. Furdyna,
Phys. Rev. B 40, 3720 (1989).
8. W. J. Walecki, A. V. Nurmikko, N. Samarth, H. Luo, and J. K. Furdyna, J. Opt.
Soc. Am. B 8, 1799 (1991).
9. M. llling, G. Bacher, A. Forchel, D. Hommel, B. Jobst, and G. Landwehr, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 67, 1 (1995).
10. F. C. Peiris, S. Lee, U. Bindley, and J. K. Furdyna, J. Appl. Phys. 84, 5194 (1998).
11. J. C. Jans, J. Petruzzello, J. M. Gaines, and D. 1. Olego, Proc. SPIE 1985, 260
(1993).
12. J. Lee, R. W. Collins, and A. R. Heyd, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69,2273 (1996).
13. T. Holden, P. Ram, F. H. Pollak, and J. L. Freeouf, Phys. Rev. B 56,4037 (1997).
14. S. Adachi, Phys. Rev. B 35, 7454 (1987).
15. K. Suzuki and S. Adachi, J. Appl. Phys. 83, 1018 (1998).
16. S. Adachi and T. Taguchi, Phys. Rev. B 43, 9569 (1991).
D16 ZINC CADMIUM TELLURIDE
(Zn.rCd 1_xTe)
:> 2.0
~
o
LU
o 0.5 1.0
x
567
568 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
3.3
3.2
3.1
3.0
c
2.9
Figure D16-2 Refractive index for
2.8 ZnxCd1_xTe with =0 (CdTe), 0.3,
0.5, 0.8, and 1.0 (ZnTe) measured
300 K by SE at 300 K. (From Adachi and
2.7 Kimura [8].)
4.5 3.5
Zn xCd 1_xTe
4.0 3.0
300 K
300 K
2.5
3.5
2.0
c 3.0 ~
1.5
2.5
1.0
----- x=0.8 -.--- x=0.8
2.0 0.5 0.5 0.5
0.3 0.3
1.5 1 01
2 3 4 5 6 2 3 4 56
Photon Energy (eV) Photon Energy (eV)
Figure D16·3 n(E) and k(E) spectra for Zn.Cdl .•Te (x=O, 0.3, 0.5, 0.8, and 1.0) measured by SE
at 300 K. (From Adachi and Kimura [19].)
REFERENCES
shown by the dotted line is the result of Ebina et al. [4] written as (in eV)
Far-IR reflectivity and absorption spectra of ZnSxSe 1.x alloy have been measured by
Brafman et al. [6]. The results suggest that the alloy system shows the two-mode be-
havior of the lattice vibronic properties [7].
Low-temperature (2 K) optical absorption spectra at the Eo edge of MOCVD-grown
ZnSxSe1.x layers have been reported by Gebhard and Schotz [8]. The Is-exciton peak
energy vs. x relation was determined in this study.
Jans et al. [9] carried out the SE study on MBE-grown ZnSxSe1jGaAs samples.
However, only the e(E) spectrum for ZnSO.lSSeO.8S(x=O.15) was reported in this study in
graphical form. Ozaki and Adachi [2] have, therefore, used the MDF to obtain a closed
analytic formula for the optical constants of ZnSxSe 1_x alloy as a function of x. Figure
D17-2 shows the MDF-ca1culated e1(E) and ~(E) spectra for ZnSxSe 1_Xalloy with x-
composition increments of 0.2 [2]. The solid and open circles represent the experi-
mental data taken from Refs. [10] (ZnSe) and [11] (ZnS), respectively.
The room-temperature reflectivity spectra in the interband transition region of
ZnSxSe1_x were measured by Ebina et al. [4]. Several peaks related to the EJ(Eo+flo) and
Ed(E1+/l 1) CPs were identified in these spectra. We note, however, that their obtained
R values ($;0.3) are considerably smaller than those reported in Ref. [2], suggesting
poorer quality of their sample surfaces.
Figure D17-3 shows the MDF-calculated spectral dependence of n(E) below the
EJ(Eo+flo) region of ZnSXSe 1_x alloy with x-composition increments of 0.1 [2]. Thesolid
and open circles represent the experimental data taken from Refs. [10] (ZnSe) and
10rr---,----.---.----.---.
12
(a)
ZnS xSe1_x
8 10
300K
8
..., ...,'" 6
(b)
4
4
2 ZnS xSe1_x
2
300K
o1 2 3 4 5 ~ 4 5
Photon energy (eV) Photon energy (eV)
Figure D17-2 (a) £I(E) and (b) ~(E) spectra for ZnSxSel.x alloy with x-composition increments
of 0.2 as obtained from the MDF calculation. The solid and open circles show the experimental
data taken from Refs. [10] (ZnSe) and [11] (ZnS), respectively. (From Ozaki and Adachi [2].)
017 ZINC SULPHO-SELENIDE (ZnS.Sel_.) 573
2.8
2.6
c:
2.4
2.2~1---'--~2:-----'--~3:-----'----'4
[11] (ZnS), respectively. The SO-splitting energy .10-0.07 eV of Zns is much smaller
than that of ZnSe (~-o.4 eV). It is, thus, difficult to find the ~-related structures in
optical spectra of larger x alloys.
Recently, Ktihnelt et al. [12] have reported optical waveguide properties consisting
of ZnS%Se I_% and Mg.,ZnI_%Se. They reported the n data at wavelengths 500, 600, and
700 nm, plotted as a function of alloy composition x for ZnS.,8el_%. The data suggested
that the refractive index of ZnS%Se1_% can be calculated in good approximation by linear
interpolation between the data of ZnSe [10] and ZnSe [11].
REFERENCES
1. H. Araki, H. Kanie, and M. Sano, Jpn. J_ Appl. Phys. 33,235 (1994).
2_ S. Ozaki and S_ Adachi, J_ Appl. Phys_ 75, 7470 (1994).
3. S. Larach, R. E. Shrader, and C. F. Stocker, Phys_ Rev_ 108,587 (1957).
4. A. Ebina, E. Fukunaga, and T. Takahashi, Phys_ Rev_ B 10,2495 (1974).
5. L. G. Suslina, D. L. Fedorov, S. G. Konnikov, F. F. Kodzhespirov, A. A. Andreev,
and E. G. Sharlai, Sov. Phys. Semicond_ 11, 1132 (1977).
6. O. Brafman, I. F. Chang, G. Lengyel, S. S. Mitra, and E. Camall, Jr., Phys. Rev.
Lett. 19, 1120 (1967).
574 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
575
576 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
2.9
2.7 v Photoluminescence
>CD <> Photoreflection
.50 0 Absorption o
>-
!? 2.5
CD
c:
w
2.3
15
ZnSeXTe1_X
10
., N
(b)
5
Figure D18-3 shows the MDF-calculated n(E) below the Eo/(Eo+l1o) region of
ZnSe.Te1•• alloy with x-composition increments of 0.1 [4]. The importance of the re-
fractive index in the operation of an injection laser is its role in the confinement of the
emitted radiation to the intermediate vicinity of an active region. Smaller Eo-gap mate-
rial usually has a larger value of the refractive index. If the refractive index in the ac
Dl8 ZINC SELENO-TELLURIDE (ZnSe.Te 1•• ) 577
3.2
ZnSeXTe1_X
3.0
c: 2.8
2.6
2.4
tive region of an injection laser is smaller than the index of the cladding layer on both
sides, the effect is like that of an antiwaveguide configuration which does not confine
radiation to the neighborhood of the active region. This effect cause optical loss in the
waveguide, leading to an increase of the threshold current. We can expect, based on
Fig. DI8-3, such an antiwaveguiding behavior in ZnSeXTe1.JZnTe waveguides (x<OA)
at photon energies close to the lowest direct gap (Eo). This anomaly in the refractive
index corresponds to the anomalous variation of the Eo-gap energy with x.
REFERENCES
1. D. B. Eason, W. C. Hughes, J. Ren, M. Riegner, Z. Yu, J. W. Cook, Jr., J. F.
Schetzina, G. Cantwell, and W. C. Harsch, Electron. Lett. 30, 1178 (1994).
2. M. Aven and W. Garwacki, Appl. Phys. Lett. 5, 160 (1964).
3. M. Aven, R. B. Hall, and J. S. Prener, l. Electrochem. Soc. 115,846 (1968).
4. S. Ozaki and S. Adachi, lpn. l. Appl. Phys. 32, 2620 (1993).
5. F. S. Turco-Sandroff, R. E. Nahory, M. J. S. P. Brazil, R. J. Martin, and H. L.
Gilchrist, Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 1611 (1991).
6. B. Freytag, P. Pavone, U. Rossler, K. Wolf, S. Lankes, G. Schotz, A. Naumov, S.
Jilka, H. Stanzl, and W. Gebhardt, Solid State Commun. 94, 103 (1995).
7. M. J. S. P. Brasil, R. E. Nahory, F. S. Turco-Sandroff, H. L. Gilchrist, and R. J.
Martin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 58,2509 (1991).
8. K. Sato and S. Adachi, l. Appl. Phys. 73,926 (1993).
578 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
E,eV
2.G
2.4
2.2
2.0
1.8
1.6
20 40 GO 80
CdS CdSe, mol. 0/0
Figure 019·1 Reflectance maxima at the Eo edge of CdSxSel_xalloy at 300 K. Note that peak A
is observed only for E.lc while B and C are found for both E.lc and E II c. (From Lisitsa et al.
[1].)
579
580 IT-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
with linearly polarized light by Hengehold and Fraime [8]. We reproduce their results
in Fig. 019-3 [8]. Energies of some CPs, such as EI , Eo', E2 , and EI', as a function of x
were determined. The CPs were also correlated with various electronic transitions in
the BZ.
II
t 1.6
c::
2.5
1.J
11
1.1
2.0 CdSxSe1-x
I.gL-~~'~~A~~~--~~~--L-~~
I:VVV 6IJ«J 11J()(}O 141J(J() 181J()(}
v(cm- I ) -
Figure D19-2 Refractive-index dispersion for CdS.Sel... alloy with x=O (curves 6), 0.36 (5),
0.58 (4), 0.79 (3), 0.92 (2), and 1.0 (1). The solid and open symbols correspond to those for
E.Lc (nO> and E II c (n.), respectively. (From Lisitsa et at. [6].)
D19 CADMIUM SULPHO-SELENIDE (CdS.Sel.•) 581
(b)
EJ.C 90 K EIIC 90 K
2500 2000
WAVELENGTH (lJ
Figure D19-3 UV reflectivity spectra for CdS.Se l.• alloy at 90 K for (a) E.lc and (b) E II c.
(From Hengehold and Fraime [8].)
REFERENCES
1. M. P. Lisitsa, V. N. Malinko, and S. F. Terekhova, Sov. Phys.-Semicond. 3,491
(1969).
2. J. F. Parrish, C. H. Perry, O. Brafman, I. F. Chang, and S. S. Mitra, in II-VI Semi-
conducting Compounds, edited by D. G. Thomas (Benjamin, New York, 1967), p.
1164.
3. H. W. Verleur and A. S. Barker, Jr., Phys. Rev. 155,750 (1967).
4. R. Beserman and M. Balkanski, Phys. Rev. B 1,608 (1970).
5. R. Beserman, Solid State Commun. 23, 323 (1977).
6. M. P. Lisitsa, L. F. Gudymenko, V. N. Malinko, and S. F. Terekhova, Phys. Status
Solidi 31, 389 (1969).
7. E. C. Fox, E. J. Canto-Said, and H. M. van Driel, Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 1878
(1991).
8. R. L. Hengehold and C. R. Fraime, Phys. Rev. 174, 808 (1968).
D20 MERCURY ZINC TELLURIDE
(Hg1_~nxTe)
Resent study by Volz et al. [4] suggests the value of £w(x) at 295 K
582
D20 MERCURY ZINC TELLURIDE (Hgl .•Zn.Te) 583
2.0
1.5
D-
g, 1.0
~
~
0.5 --.JA--r--.o.
It should be noted that for x<O.5 the refractive-index curve ofEq. (D20A) deviates con-
siderably from Le Bastard's result of Eq. (D20.2). Large optical absorption observed in
the Hg1...znzTe/ZnTe waveguides (~O.5) may be one reason of this difference [7].
Optical absorption spectra at the fundamental absorption edge of Hg1.,zn..Te have
been measured by several authors [2,6,8]. These measurements demonstrate the sensi-
tivity afforded optical absorption measurements in determining the lowest-direct-gap
energies in pure (ZoTe) and alloyed samples [2,6,8] and their temperature coefficients
[2,6].
SE study on Hg1.,znzTe alloy has been carried out by Castaing et al. [9,10] in the
photon-energy range from 0.75 to 5.7 eV at room temperature. We reproduce in Fig.
D20-2 their obtained results [10]. The samples used in this study were grown by a trav-
eling-heater method with Te as the solvent. The variations with x of the CP parameters,
Eo+~, E 1, E1+d l , etc., have been determined by performing an SCP analysis [9,10].
REFERENCES
1. A. Rogalski, Prog. Quantum Electron. 13,299 (1989).
584 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
·2
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
E (eV) E(eV)
Figure D20-2 (a) £I(E) and (b) q(E) spectra for Hg1.•Zn.Te alloy with x=O (HgTe), 0.216,
0.484,0.814, and 1.0 (ZnTe) measured by SE at 293 K. (From Castaing et al. [10].)
D21 MERCURY CADMIUM SELENIDE
(Hg1.xCd.-Se)
REFERENCES
585
586 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
(a)
>
..!t
CI
w
~
•
•a.c
•
9'
0.40
l!
.! 0.20
~
I Experiment TIKI
t!' 0 • 10
-- ... 100
~.2O ---- • 200
I~
IQ
8
ti
z
OIL-~------~----~------~5~--~6
'1K.J(eV)-
Figure D21·2 e(E) spectra for Hg1_.Cd.Se with x=o (HgSe), 0.03, and 0.11 measured by SE at
300 K. (From Kumazaki etal. [4].)
D22 MERCURY CADMIUM TELLURIDE
(Hg1_~dxTe)
1.8 ,...----.-----,--..-----,---,--.----.--.----.----,
1.6
1.4
1_2
1
>
Q)
0.8
t.ff 0.6
0.4
0.2
.. Magneto-optical Data Figure D22-1 A plot of the
o • Optical Absorption Data lowest absorption edge of
-0.2 Hg1_.Cd.Te as a function of
x at 80 K. (From Hansen et
- 0.4 L - -..........- - ' - - - I ' - -..........--'---''--~__'_--''---'' al. [1].)
o 0.2 0.4 0_6 0.8 1
X (Mole Fraction)
588
D22 MERCURY CADMIUM TELLURIDE (HgI<.Cd.Te) 589
Laurenti et al. [2] have shown that the x and T dependence of the fundamental absorp-
tion edge of this alloy can be accounted well for using a simple empirical formula (in
eV):
Eo(x,T) = -0.303(1- x) + 1.606x - 0.132x(l- x)
[6.3(1- x) - 3.25x - 5.92x(l- x)] x 1O-4 T 2
+----------------~---------- (D22.1)
l1(1-x) +78.7x+T
with
0. ={500 + 5600x (at 77 K)
(D22.5)
g 80+ 7900x (at 300 K)
0
3 • • 0 •
• 0
• •
0
.,.
~
0 0
•
0 0
• • 0 0 0
0
..J
0
• 0
•
0
•
0 0
0
• 0 • 0
• HO i _. Cd. Te
0
0 • 300K
0
• •
0
2 0
• •
X = 0.170 0.200 0.226 0.276 0.330 0.366 0.416 0.443
E,= 0.1240.161 0.200 0.273 0.347 0.396 • 0.470 0.007 (eV)
Figure D22-2 Optical absorption spectra for Hg1 .•Cd.Te with x=0.170-0,443 measured at 300
K. The vertical arrows indicate the positions of the band-gap energy. (From Chu et al. [16].)
X=0.292
3.4
3.8 x.0.180
c (
c
3.2 r~0397
0.459
3.0~
0.522
2.6 (b) 80 K
Liu et al. [21] have shown that the temperature dependence of n(A) can be expressed
well by the following equation:
022 MERCURY CADMIUM TELLURIDE (Hg1_.Cd.Te) 591
B
n(A.,T)2 =A+ 1-(C/A.) 2 +DA.2 (D22.7)
where A, B, C, and D are fitting parameters which vary with composition x and tem-
perature T. This formula was obtained from the experimental data for samples with
x--O.200-O,443 at T=4.2-300 K. The formula can also be used for HgI_.Cd.Te with x up
to 0.540 at different temperatures and with x=0.54-1.0 at room temperature by com-
parison with other experimental results [21].
The fundamental reflectivity spectra in the interband transition region (E=1.5-4 eV)
of Hgl_.Cd.Te have been measured at 315 K by Galazka and Kisiel [22J. The spectra
revealed structures at the EI and E1+d l CPs.
Optical properties in the interband transition region of Hgl_.Cd.Te have been studied
using SE at room temperature in the 1.8-5.5-eV spectral region by Vifia et al. [23] and
in the 1.5-6.0-eV region by Arwin and Aspnes [24]. The crystals used were grown by a
traveling-heater method [23] or by zone-melt refining [24]. Figure D22-4 shows the
e(E) spectra for Hgl_xCd.Te (O$x~1.0) measured by Vifia et al. [23]. Structures at ener-
gies of the E 1, E1+d1, and E,. CPs have been identified from these spectra.
The temperature dependence of the SE e(E) spectra of Hgl_xCdxTe has been dis-
cussed by Kim and Sivananthan [25]. SE has also been used by several authors to char-
acterize the surfaces of HgI_.Cd~Te [26-8]. More recently, Benson et al_ [29] have
15 15
(b)
10
10
£1
5 £2
5
0
Hg1-xCdxTe
-5 0
6 6
Figure D224 E(E) spectra for HgI_.Cd.Te measured by SE at 300 K. (From Vifia et al. [23].)
592 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
REFERENCES
1. G. L. Hansen, 1. L. Schmit, and T. N. Casselman, f. Appl. Phys. 53,7099 (1982).
2. 1. P. Laurenti, 1. Camassel, A. Bouhemadou, B. Toulouse, R. Legros, and A. Lus-
son, f. Appl. Phys. 67,6454 (1990).
3. C. T. Elliott, in Properties of Narrow Gap Cadmium-Based Compounds, EMIS
Datareviews Series No. 10, edited by P. Capper (INSPEC (lEE), London, 1994), p.
311.
4. I. M. Baker, in Properties of Narrow Gap Cadmium-Based Compounds, EMIS
Datareviews Series No. 10, edited by P. Capper (lNSPEC (lEE), London, 1994), p.
323.
5. 1. D. Patterson, W. A. Gobba, and S. L. Lehoczky, f. Mater. Res. 7,2211 (1992).
6. A. N. Pikhtin and A. D. Yas'kov, Sov. Phys.-Semicond. 22, 613 (1988).
7. 1. Baars and F. Sorger, Solid State Commun. 10, 875 (1972).
8. D. N. Talwar and M. Vandevyver, f. Appl. Phys. 56,1601 (1984).
9. S. P. Kozyrev, V. N. Pyrkov, and L. K. Vodop'yanov, Sov. Phys. Solid State 34,
1984 (1992).
10. D. Bagot, R. Granger, and S. Rolland, Phys. Status Solidi B 183,395 (1994).
11. S. P. Kozyrev, L. K. Vodopyanov, and R. Triboulet, Phys. Rev. B 58, 1374
(1998).
12. M. W. Scott, f. Appl. Phys. 40, 4077 (1969).
13. E. Finkman and Y. Nemirovsky, f. Appl. Phys. 50,4356 (1979).
14. L. D. Saginov, V. P. Ponomarenko, V. A. Fedirko, and V. I. Stafeev, Sov. Phys.
Semicond. 16,298 (1982).
15. E. Finkman and S. E. Schacham, f. Appl. Phys. 56,2896 (1984).
16. 1. Chu, Z. Mi, and D. Tang, Infrared Phys. 32,195 (1991).
17. B. Li, 1. H. Chu, Y. Chang, Y. S. Gui, and D. Y. Tang, Infrared Phys. Technol. 37,
525 (1996).
18. V. Nathan,f. Appl. Phys. 83, 2812 (1998).
19. 1. Chu, B. Li, and D. Tang, 1. Appl. Phys. 75,1234 (1994).
20. Z. Kucera, Phys. Status Solidi A 100,659 (1987).
21. K. Liu, 1. H. Chu, and D. Y. Tang,]. Appl. Phys. 75, 4176 (1994).
22. R. R. Galazka and A. Kisiel, Phys. Status Solidi 34, 63 (1969).
23. L. Vina, C. Umbach, M. Cardona, and L. Vodopyanov, Phys. Rev. B 29, 6752
(1984).
24. H. Arwin and D. E. Aspnes, 1. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2,1316 (1984).
25. C. C. Kim and S. Sivananthan,]. Electron. Mater. 26,561 (1997).
26. D. E. Aspnes and H. Arwin, 1. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2, 1309 (1984).
27. D. R. Rhiger,]. Electron. Mater. 22, 887 (1993).
D22 MERCURY CADMIUM TELLURIDE (Hg1_xCdxTe) 593
28. G. J. Orloff and P. B. Smith, 1. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 12, 1252 (1994).
29. J. D. Benson, A. B. Comfeld, M. Martinka, K. M. Singley, Z. Derzko, P. 1.
Shorten, J. H. Dinan, P. R. Boyd, F. C. Wolfgram, B. Johs, P. He, and 1. A.
Woollam, 1. Electron. Mater. 25, 1406 (1996).
D23 ZINC-BASED SEMIMAGNETIC TERNARY
ALLOYS
(Zn1_..Mn,.8, Zn1_..Mn,.8e, etc.)
594
D23 ZINC-BASED SEMIMAGNETIC TERNARY ALLOYS 595
-T.19K
--T.83K
. ---- T. 293K
10° t,!--:!-:~:::!-:::--::IL;;-+';--:~--;;l,;-~
3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6
Photon Energy (eV) Photon Energy (eV)
Figure D23-1 Absorption spectra for Zn1_xMnxS (x=0.15) for (a) Ell c at T=19, 83, and 293 K
and (b) those for E II c and EJ.c at T=19 K. (From MacKay et al. [6].)
was found that the core-level and interband transitions are affected much less by the
interaction of the Mn 3d states with the anion derived upper valence bands than the CP
transitions below 11 eV.
15
(a) E1 16 Zn 1·xMnxSa
x- 0
(b)
10 0.022 12
£1 0.053
x=
0.069 8
5 £2 0
0.108
4
0.144
0
0
Zn1•xMnxSa
0.144
-5 -4
2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5
E (eV) E (eV)
Figure D23·2 £(E) spectra for ZnI...Mn.8e (x=O-O.144) at 300 K. Spectra are offset by incre-
ments of2 relative to the center spectrum of the 5.3% sample. (From Kim et al. [13].)
(a) (b)
x-0.10
x_O.30
4 5 678 9 10 10 12 14 16 1e 20 22 24
Energy (eV) Energy (eV)
Figure D23·3 Reflectivity spectra for ZnI-xMn.Se (x=O, 0.10, and 0.30) at 300 K. (From Kisiel
et at. [14].)
45 ~
x=O.632
h x=O.508
40
~O.330
-==
..........
~
35 ,1-,,,,,.,,.
>-
~., x=O.119
= 30
>
~tX=O'073
u
Q)
00-
Q)
.....
Figure D23-4 Reflectivity spectra
x=O.Ot4 near the Eo-edge region of Zn,.
t··
25 ,Mn,Te (~O.632) at 6 K. Ex-
cept for ZnTe (x=O) all spectra are
zero-shifted for clarity. (From
Mertins et al. [17].)
20
(d) ZnlJexSe--The solubility of transition metals in ZnSe varies within wide limits.
The monophase zinc-blende structure of Zn 1•xFexSe can be preserved even up to 13% of
Fe [19]. The absorption coefficients of Zn 1_xFexSe (.x=0, 0.01, and O.OS) were measured
below the fundamental absorption edge of the ZnSe host compound at 300 K using
photoacoustic technique [20]. The samples with .x=0.01 and O.OS showed two structures
at 1.4 and 1.S eV that can be interpreted as due to weak, spin forbidden 5E~3Tl [Fe2+
(3d') d~d*] transitions.
Optical properties in the interband transition region of Zn 1_xFexSe have been studied
using SE at 300 K in the 3.5-S.5-e V region by Kim et al. [13]. The samples were grown
by MBE on (OOl)GaAs substrates. We reproduce in Fig. D23-S the £(E) spectra for Zn 1_
xFexSe (.x=0---{).122) measured by Kim et al. [13]. Distinct structures at energies of the El
and El+LlI CPs can be easily identified; note, however, that these structures broaden to
merge into a single broad peak as x increases. Note also that extra structures below 4 eV
for some samples (see, e.g., .x=0.022) arise from interference effects due to the small
thickness of the samples used.
The fundamental reflectivity spectra of Znl_~exSe have been studied in the 4-2S-eV
range at 77 and 300 K by Kisiel et al. [14] (.x=0-0.1). As in Zn 1_xMnxS(Se) [9] ([14]),
the core-level and interband transitions in Zn 1_xFexSe are found to be affected much less
by the interaction of the Fe 3d states with the anion derived upper valence bands than
the CP transitions below 11 eV (see Fig. D23-3).
£1:: '~~5~
(0) E,
: ~:~
o O.122~~\~
Zn 1-)(FexSe
-4 ~~ __~__~~__~__L-~ -3 ~--L_ _...J.-_ _.L----L_ _- ' -_ _- ' - - - '
-.
25~----------------------~
....
2.0
'; rr
• x=O.OIS
....... I
::i
<"d
~ 15 •
1
... , I
.".,' i
.. .
"-,'., ;;'"'. . ""'" II ...----11
III
o
.~ 1.0
JJ' 1 • • '- ~
g .: A..A
~
9 'V · I ..
.8
0~:"
05 ,
Il.. :
~UP_......
..... _-u-..,)
0.0' \t 0 .. '. ...
SE has been used to study optical properties of Znl_.Co.Se in the 3.5-5.5-e V region at
room temperature [13]. The samples were epitaxial films grown by MBE on (lOO)GaAs
substrates (.x=0-0.094). CP parameters of the EI and E1+d l gaps as a function of x were
successfully determined by performing an SCP analysis.
The fundamental reflectivity spectra of Znl-xCo.Se (.x=0-0.05) have been studied in
the 4-25-eV range at 77 and 300 K by Kisiel et al. [14]. Figure D23-7 reproduces the
results of Kisiel et al. [14]. As in Znl_.Mn.S [9] and Zn1-xMn(Fe).Se [14]. the core-level
and interband transitions in Znl_.Co.Se are found to be affected much less by the inter-
600 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
(b)
x-O
~.03
x=0.05
x=0.05
5 678 9 10 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Energy (eV) Energy (eV)
Figure D23·7 Reflectivity spectra for Zn1.xCoxSe (x=0-0.05) at 300 K. (From Kisiel et al. [14].)
raction of the Co 3d states with the anion derived upper valence bands than the CP tran-
sitions below 11 eV. Kisiel et al. [14] also reported the R(E) spectra of Zn o.99 Me o.QlSe
(Me=Ti, V, Cr, and Ni) measured at 77 and 300 K.
REFERENCES
1. J. K. Furdyna and J. Kossut, in Semiconductors and Semimetals, edited by R. K.
Willardson and A. C. Beer (Academic, Boston, 1988), Vol. 25.
2. J. W. Richardson and G. J. M. Janssen, Phys. Rev. B 39, 4958 (1989).
3. D. S. McClure,J. Chern. Phys. 39,2850 (1963).
4. D. Langer and S. Ibuki, Phys. Rev. 138, A809 (1965).
5. H. E. Gumlick, R. L. Pfrogner, J. C. Shaffer, and F. E. Williams, J. Chern. Phys.
44,3929 (1966).
6. J. F. MacKay, W. M. Becker, J. W. Richardson, J. K. Furdyna, and W. Giriat,
Phys. Rev. B 40,11940 (1989).
7. O. Goede, W. Heimbrodt, M. Lamia, and V. Weinhold, Phys. Status Solidi B 146,
K65 (1988).
8. M. Zimnal-Starnawska, M. Podg6my, A.Kisiel, W. Giriat, M. Demianiuk, and J.
Zmija,J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 17,615 (1984).
9. E. Flach, H.-E. Gumlich, Ch. Jung, and M. Krause, Phys. Status Solidi B ISS, 317
(1989).
10. J. E. Morales, W. B. Becker, B. I. Wang, U. Debska, and J. W. Richardson, Phys.
Rev. B 40, 1186 (1989).
11. L. Martinez, L. R. Gonzalez, and W. Giriat, Phys. Status Solidi B 180,267 (1993).
D23 ZINC-BASED SEMIMAGNETIC TERNARY ALLOYS 601
12. S. Yes, K. Strossner, W. Gebhardt, and M. Cardona, Solid State Commun. 57,335
(1986).
13. Y. D. Kim, S. L. Cooper, M. V. Klein, and B. T. Jonker, Phys. Rev. B 49, 1732
(1994).
14. A. Kisiel, M. Piacentini, D. Dybowska, N. Zema, F. Lama, M. Zimnal-Stamawska,
W. Giriat, A. Holda, and R. Markowski,l. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9, 8767 (1997).
15. J. E. Morales Toro, W. M. Becker, B. I. Wang, U. Debska, and J. W. Richardson,
Solid State Commun. 52,41 (1984).
16. S. Yes, K. Strossner, W. Gebhardt, and M. Cardona, Phys. Rev. B 33, 4077 (1986).
17. H.-C. Mertins, H.-E. Gumlich, and Ch. Jung, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 8, 1634
(1993).
18. D. Dybowska, A. Kisiel, A. Rodzik, F. Antonangeli, N. Zema, M. Piacentini, and
W. Giriat, Solid State Commun. 70, 699 (1989).
19. I. Hwang, H. Kim, J.-E. Kim, H. Y. Park, and H. Lim, Phys. Rev. B 50, 8849
(1994).
20. A. C. Felici, F. Lama, M. Piacentini, T. Papa, D. Debowska, A. Kisiel, and A.
Rodzik, 1. App. Phys. 80, 6925 (1996).
D24 CADMIUM-BASED SEMIMAGNETIC
TERNARY ALLOYS
(Cd1_..Mn~e, Cd 1_..Mn xTe, etc.)
602
D24 CADMIUM-BASED SEMIMAGNETIC TERNARY ALLOYS 603
value). Note that some of the III-V alloys (e.g., Ga)nl.xAsySb l) show such a refrac-
tive-index anomaly (see Ref. [4]). RS data also suggested that cubic Cdl_xMnxSe alloy
system is of the two-mode type in the lattice vibronic properties [3].
T - 10K
Z
0
t5«
0:
LL
W
0:
LL
0
X
W
0
~
w
2::
!«..J
W
0:
1.0 1.2
PHOTON
Figure D24·1 Relative refraction index of CdSe, Cdo.25Zno.7sSe, and Cdo.25 Mllo.7sSe at T=lO K.
(From Alonso et al. [3].)
Wavelength I nm I
750 730 710 690 670
~~~~~~~
.
e+
Figure D24·2 Absorption spectra of MBE-grown Cd1o.Mn.Te (x=0.09) for B=O to 5 T with
right- (e+) and left-circularly (eJ polarized lights at T=l K. (From Limmer et at. [9].)
(D24.1)
Figure D24-3 represents the nee) curves for 0.12::;X::;0.70, as given by Eq. (D24.1) [16].
3.00
2.90
2.60
2.70
I=l
2.60
2.50
2.40
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Energy (eV)
Figure D24-3 neE) curves for different Mn concentrations of Cd(_,Mn,Te films (T=300 K), as
given by Eq. (D24.1). (From Schubert et al. [16].)
x up to 0.20 [22],
(c) CdI_xFexSe-Cdl_xFe,Se crystallizes in the wurtzite structure for
and the fundamental energy gap varies from 1.83 e V for x=O to 1.92 eV for x=0.07 at
T= 10 K [23]. The absorption coefficients of Cd(_xFexSe (x=O, 0.01, and 0.02) were
measured below the fundamental absorption edge of the CdSe host compound at 300 K
606 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
12r-----------~------~--~
(b)
9
Cdl-x Mn xTe
3
(a) 3 _._.-x=O.O(CdTel
------ x=Q20
- - x =0.45
O~+-~--~--+--+--~-9~,~
---x =0.70
2 3 4 5\ '"
E (eV) \
\
~~----------------------~~
Figure D24-4 E(E) spectra for Cdl..Mn.Te (x=0. 0.20.0.45. and 0.70) at 300 K. (From Lauten-
schlager et al. [20].)
using photoacoustic technique [24]. The alloyed samples (x=O.Ol and 0.02) showed
two structures at 1.4 and 1.48 e V that can be interpreted as due to weak. spin forbidden
sE--+3T, [Fe2+ (3£f) d--+d*] transitions. Magnetoreflectance measurements at the exciton
resonance of Cd,-xFexSe (xg).13) have also been made to study exchange interaction
between the band electrons and localized Fe 3d electrons [25].
The fundamental reflectivity in the interband transition region of Cd,..FexSe has been
studied in the. 1-12-eV spectral range (0~0.12) [22]. in the 4-1O-eV range
(0~O.l5) [26]. and in the 1O-25-eV range (0~SO.l4) [27]. Most of the CP structures
are broadened owing to structural. chemical. and also magnetic disorders.
REFERENCES
1. J. K. Furdyna and J. Kossut, in Semiconductors and Semimetals, edited by R. K.
Willardson and A C. Beer (Academic, Boston, 1988), Vol. 25.
2. S. Jiang, S. C. Shen, Q. G. Li, H. R. Zhu, G. L. Ju, and W. Giriat, Phys. Rev. B 40,
8017 (1989).
3. R. G. Alonso, Y. R. Lee, E. Oh, A K. Ramdas, H. Luo, N. Samarth, J. K. Furdyna,
and H. Pascher, Phys. Rev. B 43, 9610 (1991).
4. S. Adachi, 1. Appl. Phys. 61,4869 (1987).
5. Y. R. Lee and A K. Ramdas, Solid State Commun. 51,861 (1984).
6. B. P. Clayman, T. A Orlowski, and P. Becla, 1. Appl. Phys. 66,835 (1989).
7. R. Sudharsanan, Z. C. Feng, S. Perkowitz, A Rohatgi, K. T. Pollard, and A Erbil,
1. Electronic. Mater. 18, 453 (1989).
8. Y. R. Lee and A K. Ramdas, Solid State Commun. 51,861 (1984).
9. W. Limmer, S. Bauer, H. Leiderer, W. Gebhardt, and R. N. Bicknell-Tassius, 1.
Phys.: Condens. Matter 2,8669 (1990).
to. J. A Gaj, R. R. Galazka, and N. Nawrocki, Solid State Commun. 25, 193 (1978).
11. G. Babonas, R. R. Galazka, G, Pukinskas, and A Sileika, Phys. Status Solidi B
154,389 (1989).
12. H. J. Jimenez-Gonzalez, R. L. Aggarwal, and P. Becla, Phys. Rev. B 45, 14011
(1992).
13. G. Couturier, D. Kaiser, S. von Molnar, and P. Becla, Phys. Rev. B 39, 1663
(1989).
14. H. Minami, T. Masumi, 1. Souma, and Y. Oka, Solid State Commun. 72, 31
(1989).
15. J. P. Lascaray, D. Coquillat, J. Deportes, and A K. Bhattacharjee, Phys. Rev. B 38,
7602 (1988).
16. D. W. Schubert, M. M. Kraus, R. Kenklies, and C. R. Becker, Appl. Phys. Lett. 60,
2192 (1992).
17. T. Kendelewicz, Solid State Commun. 36, 127 (1980).
18. M. Zimnal-Starnawska, M. Podgomy, AKisiel, W. Giriat, M. Demianiuk, and 1.
Zmija, l. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 17,615 (1984).
19. A Kisiel, M. Piacentini, F. Antonangeli, J. Oleszkiewicz, A Rodzik, N. Zema,
and A Mycielski, 1. Phys. C: SoUd State Phys. 20,5601 (1987).
20. P. Lautenschlager, S. Logothetidis, L. Vina, and M. Cardona, Phys. Rev. B 32,
3811 (1985).
21. S. Chandra, L. K. Malhotra, and A. C. Rastogi, 1. Appl. Phys. 78,5645 (1995).
22. A. Sarem, B. J. Kowalski, and B. A. Orlowski, 1. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2, 8173
(1990).
23. J. Stankiewicz, 1. Appl. Phys. 70, 3937 (1991).
24. A C. Fe lic i , F. Lama, M. Piacentini, T. Papa, D. Debowska, A. Kisiel, and A.
Rodzik,1. App. Phys. 80, 6925 (1996).
608 II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
25. A. Twardowski, K. Pakula, 1. Perez, P. Wise, and 1. E. Crow, Phys. Rev. B 42,
7567 (1990).
26. A. Kisiel, M. Piacentini, F. Antonangeli, N. Zema, and A. Mycielski, Solid State
Commun. 70, 693 (1989).
27. M. Piacentini, D. D~bowska, A. Kisiel, R. Markowski, A. Mycielski, and N.
Zema, 1. Phys.: Condens. Matter 5, 3707 (1993).
28. A. Mycielski, l. Appl. Phys. 63, 3279 (1988).
29. A. M. Witowski, A. Twardowski, H. Pohlmann, W. J. M. de Jonge, A. Wieck, A.
Mycielski, and M. Demianiuk, Solid State Commun. 70,27 (1989).
30. A. Holda, A. Rodzik, A. A. Mielnikow, and P. W. Zukowski, Phys. Status Solidi
B 189,543 (1995).
31. D. D~bowska, M. Zimnal-Stamawska, A. Rodzik, A. Kisiel, M. Piacentini, N.
Zema, and W. Giriat, 1. Phys.: Condens. Matter 5, 9355 (1993).
D25 QUATERNARY ALLOYS
(Zn1_,.Mg..sySe1_y and Mg..lnyCd1-X-ySe)
609
61()
4.4
S; 4.2 'fl",,,,,,·"
'/1'~A
~ 4
~3.S
~ 3.6
t>I) ,/ 1 " " '' '' ''
~3.4
&1
~ 3.2
3Wj~U
~~
2.S
photon E
3.0 ner~ le"l
Z.O
'\ . 5
3.5 M9xlZ,nO.4
&Cd o.62.) se
• ,\-X
"1.:= 0
.. 0.'\0
a 0.20
• 0.36
o 0.52 F ig u re 1>
• index 25-2 Refr ctive
_ 0M.6s3EO
__ dis a -
Mg.(2noA persion for
SCdo.5l)1..
tice_matc S e lat-
h
solid cuf' ed to 1nP. 'ftl.e
les represe
calculated nt the
modified results of the
model. (fro single-osc
m Moritailla tof
et at.
t11l.)
40 5 0 0
0 600 700
\JV8"e\e 600
Ogt h ( o
tn )
D25 QUATERNARY ALLOYS 611
experiment was not quoted. The measured n(E) data were fitted by the modified single-
oscillator model. The solid curves in Fig. D25-2 represent the results of this fitting.
REFERENCES
1. M. A. Haase, J. Qiu, J. M. DePuydt, and H. Cheng, Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 1272
(1991).
2. H. Jeon, 1. Ding, W. Patterson, A. V. Nurmikko, W. Xie, D. C. Grillo, M. Kobaya-
shi, and R. L. Gunshor, Appl. Phys. Lett. 59,3619 (1991).
3. H. Okuyama, K. Nakano, T. Miyazima, and K. Akimoto, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 30,
L1620 (1991).
4. H. Okuyama, T. Miyajima, Y. Morinaga, F. Hiei, M. Ozawa, and K. Akimoto,
Electron. Lett. 28,1798 (1992).
5. K. L. Teo, Y. P. Feng, M. F. Li, T. C. Chong, and J. B. Xia, Semicond. Sci. Tech-
nolo 9, 349 (1994).
6. Q. Guo, H. C. Poon, Y. P. Feng, and C. K. Ong, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 10,677
(1995).
7. M. Ukita, H. Okuyama, M. Ozawa, A. Ishibashi, K. Akimoto, and Y. Mori, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 63,2082 (1993).
8. U. Lunz, B. Jobst, S. Einfeldt, C. R. Becker, D. Hommel, and G. Landwehr, J.
Appl. Phys. 77,5377 (1995).
9. U. Lunz, C. Schumacher, J. NUrnberger, K. SchUll, A. Gerhard, U. SchUssler, B.
Jobst, W. Faschinger, and G. Landwehr, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 12,970 (1997).
10. T. Morita, A. Kikuchi, 1. Nomura, and K. Kishino, J. Electron. Mater. 25, 425
(1996).
11. T. Morita, H. Shinbo, H. Shinbo, T. Nagano, 1. Nomura, A. Kikuchi, and K. Ki-
shino, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 7575 (1997).
E
IV-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
E1 LEAD SULPHIDE
(PbS)
lattice of PbS is a face-centered cubic lattice, the fITst BZ of this material is the same as
that of the diamond and zinc-blende materials (Le., truncated octahedron). Figure El-I
shows the energy-band structure of PbS as calculated with an EPM by Kohn et al. [4].
The electronic states are labeled with the use of a notation for the double-group repre-
sentations. The locations of several interband transitions are included in the figure.
These are the transitions which may play an important part in the analysis of various
optical-constant spectra. Table El-l lists the CP energies in PbS obtained experimen-
tally [7,8].
The valence-band maximum and the conduction-band minimum in PbS occur at the L
point. This material has, thus, a direct band gap, Eo=Ec(L6-)-E.(L6+)' at the L point. The
existence of a second, i.e., subsidiary, valence-band maximum on the L axis is also in-
dicated [4]. The dominant fundamental reflectivity features observed for photon energi-
es E<6 eV are the first shoulder, E1 , the highest peak in the reflectivity spectrum, E2 ,
and a high-energy shoulder on the main peak, E3 [8]. These transitions are expected to
take place at L (E 1), d (E2 ), and d (E3 ), respectively (see Fig. El-l). Reflectivity meas-
urements reveal additional weak peaks, E4 , E 5 , and E6, at energies higher than 8 eV [7].
10
PbS
8
~====== L~.s ..
K K X X rr A L
Figure El·l Electronic energy-band structure of PbS as calculated with an EPM. (From Kohn
et al. [4].)
El LEAD SULPHIDE (PbS) 615
TABLE El-l Energies of the CPs in the optical spectra of PbS at 300 K.
CPs eV
Eo 0.42
1.94
3.14
5.27
8.1
9.8
13.9
Table El-2lists the room-temperature values of £=£I+i€,z, n*=n+ik, a, and R for PbS.
A complete set of the optical constants for E-:;'0.07 eV were obtained from the rest-
strahlen parameters of Geick [9]. The Drude term was not included in this calculation.
The optical absorption constants, k and a, for 0.1~-:;'0.4 eV were taken from Vakulen-
ko et ai. [15]. A set of the optical constants for 0.1~-:;'1.3 e V were taken from Schoolar
and Dixon [13], while those for 1.5~-:;'5.3 eV were obtained from Kanazawa and Ada-
chi [8]. The absorption constants k and a for EC.37 eV were taken from Cardona and
Haensel [20].
The (£1' €.z), (n, k), a, and R values in Table EI-2 are graphed in Figs. EI-2-EI-5,
respectively. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of each CPo It has
been shown [8] that such optical-constant spectra can be successfully explained by the
MDF.
REFERENCES
1. R. Dalven, in Solid State Physics, edited by H. Ehreinreich, F. Seitz, and D. Turn-
bull (Academic, New York, 1973), Vol. 28, p. 179.
2. See, for instance, G. P. Agrawal and N. K. Dutta, Semiconductor Lasers (Van
Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1993).
3. P. J. Lin and L. Kleinman, Phys. Rev. 142,478 (1966).
4. S. E. Kohn, P. Y. Yu, Y. Petroff, Y. R. Shen, Y. Tsang, and M. L. Cohen, Phys.
Rev. B 8, 1477 (1973).
5. S.-H. Wei and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 55, 13605 (1997).
6. G. Guizzetti and A. Borghesi, in Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, edited
by E. D. Palik (Academic, Orlando, 1985), p. 525.
7. M. Cardona and D. Greenaway, Phys. Rev. 133, A1685 (1964).
8. H. Kanazawa and S. Adachi, I. Appl. Phys. 83, 5997 (1998).
9. R. Geick, Phys. Lett. 10,51 (1964).
10. J. R. Dixon and H. R. Riedl, Phys. Rev. 140, A1283 (1965).
11. R. B. Schoolar and J. N. Zemel,I. Appl. Phys. 35,1848 (1964).
12. H. R. Riedl and R. B. Schoolar, Phys. Rev. 131,2082 (1963).
13. R. B. Schoolar and J. R. Dixon, Phys. Rev. 137, A667 (1965).
14. J. N. Zemel, J. D. Jensen, and R. B. Schoolar, Phys. Rev. 140, A33o-(1965).
15. O. V. Vakulenko, M. P. Lisitsa, and Ya. F. Kononets, Sov. Phys.-Solid State 8,
1356 (1966).
16. E. D. Palik, D. L. Mitchell, and J. N. Zemel, Phys. Rev. 135, A763 (1964).
17. P. R. Wessel, Phys. Rev. 153, 836 (1967).
18. C. E. Rossi and W. Paul, I. Appl. Phys. 38, 1803 (1967).
19. M. Cardona, C. M. Penchina, E. E. Koch, and P. Y. Yu, Phys. Status Solidi B 53,
327 (1972).
20. M. Cardona and R. Haensel, Phys. Rev. B 1,2605 (1970).
El LEAD SULPHIDE (PbS) 617
35~~--~--~--~~--~
30
PbS
25
20
E3
15
w
10
1
5
o
-5
-100
12345 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure El-2 £1(E) and ez(E) spectra for PbS at 300 K.
o 1 2 3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure El-3 neE) and k(E) spectra for PbS at 300 K.
618 IV-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
107 !
E2! E3
Ell
106
GIl TO Eo
! f\
105
!
-
IE 104
0
~ 103
PbS
101
0.7
E2!
0.6
El
II: 0.5 !
PbS
1 23456
Photon energy (eV)
Figure El·5 R(E) spectrum for PbS at 300 K.
E1 LEAD SULPHIDE (PbS) 619
eV 10 1 102 n k a (cm· 1) R
0.001 151.7 3.280 12.32 0.133 1.35E+01 0.722
0.002 156.9 7.093 12.53 0.283 5.74E+01 0.726
0.003 166.5 12.20 12.91 0.472 1.44E+02 0.733
0.004 182.3 20.03 13.52 0.741 3.00E+02 0.744
0.005 207.5 33.80 14.45 1.169 5.93E+02 0.759
0.006 248.9 62.46 15.90 1.965 1.20E+03 0.780
0.0065 279.0 90.02 16.91 2.661 1.75E+03 0.794
0.007 316.7 137.2 18.19 3.771 2.68E+03 0.810
0.0075 356.5 223.4 19.71 5.667 4.3IE+03 0.829
0.008 361.8 381.6 21.07 9.057 7.35E+03 0.852
0.0085 210.5 589.0 20.45 14.40 1.24E+04 0.877
0.009 -108.4 589.9 15.67 18.82 1.72E+04 0.901
0.0095 -260.7 382.9 10.06 19.03 1.83E+04 0.917
0.01 -255.5 224.5 6.505 17.26 1.75E+04 0.927
0.0125 -103.6 35.52 1.720 10.32 1.3IE+04 0.940
0.015 -50.70 12.76 0.889 7.176 1.09E+04 0.935
0.0175 -27.39 6.285 0.597 5.268 9.35E+03 0.921
0.02 -14.76 3.639 0.470 3.871 7.85E+03 0.890
0.0225 -7.031 2.325 0.433 2.687 6. 13E+03 0.813
0.025 -1.906 1.588 0.536 1.481 3.75E+03 0.529
0.0275 1.688 1.138 1.365 0.417 1.16E+03 0.053
0.03 4.316 0.847 2.087 0.203 6. 17E+02 0.128
0.0325 6.301 0.648 2.513 0.129 4.25E+02 0.187
0.035 7.839 0.508 2.801 0.091 3.22E+02 0.225
0.04 10.04 3.169 0.271
0.05 12.55 3.542 0.313
0.06 13.87 3.725 0.333
0.07 14.66 3.829 0.343
0.1 15.13 0.10 3.89 0.012 1.25E+02 0.349
0.15 16.40 0.027 4.05 0.0033 5.00E+01 0.365
0.2 16.89 0.013 4.11 0.0016 3.20E+01 0.370
0.25 17.06 0.0078 4.13 0.00095 2.40E+01 0.372
0.3 17.39 0.0055 4.17 0.00066 2.00E+01 0.376
0.36 18.06 0.0056 4.25 0.00066 2.40E+01 0.383
0.38 18.40 0.0062 4.29 0.00073 2.80E+01 0.387
0.4 18.75 0.016 4.33 0.0018 7.50E+01 0.390
0.42 19.09 0.55 4.37 0.063 2.70E+03 0.394
0.44 19.43 1.03 4.41 0.12 5.20E+03 0.398
0.46 19.05 1.87 4.37 0.21 1.00E+04 0.395
0.48 18.87 1.97 4.35 0.23 1.10E+04 0.393
0.5 18.60 2.22 4.32 0.26 1.30E+04 0.391
0.6 17.89 2.51 4.24 0.30 1.80E+04 0.384
0.7 17.88 2.63 4.24 0.31 2.20E+04 0.384
0.8 17.86 2.93 4.24 0.35 2.80E+04 0.385
0.9 17.99 3.36 4.26 0.39 3.60E+04 0.388
1 18.30 3.73 4.3 0.43 4.40E+04 0.392
1.1 18.60 4.20 4.34 0.48 5.40E+04 0.396
1.2 19.07 4.77 4.4 0.54 6.60E+04 0.402
1.3 19.70 5.44 4.48 0.61 8.00E+04 0.411
620 N-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
eV £1 £2 n k ex (cm'l) R
1.5 20.24 7.184 4.567 0.787 1.20E+05 0.422
1.55 20.13 8.094 4.573 0.885 1.39E+05 0.426
1.6 20.16 8.830 4.592 0.961 1.56E+05 0.429
1.65 20.25 9.417 4.614 1.020 1.71E+05 0.433
1.7 20.25 10.10 4.631 1.090 1.88E+05 0.437
1.75 20.03 11.00 4.631 1.188 2. 11E+05 0.441
1.8 19.70 11.84 4.619 1.281 2.34E+05 0.444
1.85 19.08 12.64 4.581 1.379 2.59E+05 0.446
1.9 18.30 13.13 4.518 1.453 2.80E+05 0.445
1.95 17.60 13.31 4.453 1.494 2.95E+05 0.443
2 16.96 13.52 4.396 1.538 3. 12E+05 0.441
2.05 16.71 13.56 4.372 1.550 3.22E+05 0.441
2.1 16.67 13.61 4.370 1.557 3.32E+05 0.441
2.15 16.69 13.81 4.379 1.576 3.44E+05 0.443
2.2 16.74 14.12 4.396 1.607 3.58E+05 0.445
2.25 16.81 14.51 4.416 1.642 3.75E+05 0.449
2.3 16.86 14.99 4.440 1.688 3.94E+05 0.453
2.35 16.89 15.53 4.463 1.740 4. 14E+05 0.457
2.4 16.86 16.27 4.489 1.812 4.4IE+05 0.463
2.45 16.79 17.14 4.515 1.898 4.7IE+05 0.469
2.5 16.70 17.89 4.537 1.972 5.00E+05 0.475
2.55 16.26 18.80 4.534 2.073 5.36E+05 0.481
2.6 15.79 19.71 4.530 2.176 5.73E+05 0.487
2.65 15.20 20.61 4.517 2.281 6.13E+05 0.493
2.7 14.48 21.51 4.495 2.392 6.55E+05 0.499
2.75 13.75 22.39 4.473 2.503 6.98E+05 0.506
2.8 12.74 23.21 4.428 2.621 7.44E+05 0.513
2.85 11.67 24.04 4.381 2.743 7.93E+05 0.520
2.9 10.55 24.72 4.326 2.857 8.40E+05 0.526
2.95 9.115 25.43 4.250 2.992 8.95E+05 0.534
3 7.666 25.88 4.163 3.108 9.45E+05 0.541
3.05 6.062 26.24 4.061 3.230 9.99E+05 0.549
3.1 4.514 26.40 3.956 3.337 1.05E+06 0.557
3.15 2.967 26.38 3.842 3.434 1.10E+06 0.564
3.2 0.934 26.13 3.680 3.550 1.15E+06 0.573
3.25 -0.827 25.42 3.508 3.624 1.19E+06 0.581
3.3 -2.157 24.96 3.383 3.688 1.23E+06 0.588
3.35 -3.623 23.80 3.198 3.721 1.26E+06 0.594
3.4 -4.688 22.72 3.042 3.734 1.29E+06 0.598
3.45 -5.775 21.32 2.856 3.732 l.3IE+06 0.603
3.5 -6.521 19.90 2.686 3.706 1.31E+06 0.607
3.55 -7.098 18.60 2.530 3.674 1.32E+06 0.610
3.6 -7.489 17.19 2.373 3.622 1.32E+06 0.613
3.65 -7.657 16.20 2.265 3.576 1.32E+06 0.614
3.7 -7.723 14.94 2.133 3.503 1.3IE+06 0.614
3.75 -7.645 14.00 2.037 3.435 1.3IE+06 0.612
3.8 -7.448 12.93 1.933 3.344 1.29E+06 0.609
3.85 -7.236 12.16 1.860 3.270 1.28E+06 0.606
3.9 -6.989 11.48 1.796 3.196 1.26E+06 0.602
El LEAD SULPHIDE (PbS) 621
622
E2 LEAD SELENIDE (PbSe) 623
>-
(9
n:
w
z
w
-10
PbSe
-12
X K,U r
Figure E2·1 Electronic energy-band structure of PbSe as calculated with an EPM. (From Mar-
tinez et at. [5].)
624 IV-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
TABLE E2·1 Energies of the CPs in the optical spectra of PbSe at 300 K.
CPs eV
Eo 0.31
E) 1.60
E2 2.73
E3 4.10
E4 7.1
E5 9.1
E6 12.5
Drude term. A set of the reststrahlen parameters obtained by Burkhard et al. [10] at 300
K were: 10,=203, 10_=23, ffiTQ=39 cm- I (ffiLQ=116 cm-I ), ')'=24 cm- I , ffi p=87 cm-I, and r=20
cm-I [see Eq. (2.14)]. These parameters are slightly different from those obtained by
Amirtharaj et al. [11]: 10,=212, 10_=23.4, ffiTQ=45 cm- I (ffiw=135 cm- I ), and ')'=19.6 cm-I .
Burkhard et al. [10] also reported the reststrahlen parameters at 77 and 5 K.
The refractive-index dispersion near the Eo edge of PbSe has been measured by sev-
eral authors [12-15]. The samples were epitaxially grown on alkali-halide and BaF2
substrates. The measured n data showed a clear peak near the Eo edge [12,14,15]. This
peak shifted to lower energies as the temperature increased. Note, however, that the n
values of Herman et al. [14,15] are considerably smaller than those reported by others
[12,13] (e.g., n-4.5 at E=O.2 eV and T=300 K [14,15], while n-5.1-5.2 at the same
energy and temperature [12,13]). The temperature-dependent n data were also reported
in Refs. [12-15] (see Fig. 5.26 in Sec. 5.2.3).
The fundamental absorption spectra near the Eo edge of PbSe have been studied both
theoretically [16] and experimentally [13,17,18]. The fundamental reflectivity spectra
in the interband transition region of PbSe have also been measured by several authors
[8,19,20]. The CPs observed in these studies were correlated with various electronic
transitions in the BZ [8,20]. By performing the KK analysis, the (n, k) values were ex-
tracted in Ref. [8].
The 300-K (101, fz) data for PbSe have been determined using SE in the 1J5-5.4-eV
spectral region by Suzuki and Adachi [9]. The PbSe single crystals used were grown by
the Bridgman method. These authors studied a chemical treatment method to obtain
PbSe surfaces of high quality, which should be useful for the preparation of surfaces for
optical measurements. The (£1' Ez) spectra taken on a best-prepared sample revealed
distinct structures at energies of the E), E2, and E3 CPs. The fz value at the E2 peak is
-34. Note that this value is much larger than that obtained from (n, k) of Cardona and
Greenaway (Ez=2nk-15) [8], indicating better surface quality of the former. Dielectric-
related optical constants of PbSe, such as the complex refractive index (n*=n+ik), ab-
sorption coefficient (a.), and normal-incidence reflectivity (R), were also reported [9].
The reflectivity spectra in the far-UV range (18-26 eV) of PbSe were measured us-
ing synchrotron radiation by Martinez et al. [21]. In this spectral range we can expect to
observe transitions from the cation core d-Ievels into the conduction-band states. Indeed,
E2 LEAD SELENIDE (PbSe) 625
several reflectivity peaks were identified and correlated with various core (Pb
5d)--conduction-band transitions.
We list in Table E2-2 the room-temperature values of c=cI+iEz, n*=n+ik, a, and R
for PbSe. A set of the optical constants for E:5:0.11 eV were calculated from the rest-
strahlen parameters of Burkhard et al. [lO] (n-10 17 cm-3). The Drude term was included
in the calculation. The real refractive indices n for 0.125::;£:5:0.475 eV were taken from
Zemel et al. [12]. The imaginary optical constants, k and a, for 0.3::;£:5:1.1 eV were
from Globus et al. [17]. A complete set of the optical constants for D-1.15 eV were
taken from Suzuki and Adachi [9].
The (CI' Ez), (n, k), a, and R values in Table E2-2 are plotted in Figs. E2-2-E2-5, re-
spectively. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of each CP. It has
been shown [9] that such optical-constant data can be successfully explained by the
MDF.
REFERENCES
1. Z. Shi, M. Tacke, A. Lambrecht, and H. Bottner, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 2537
(1995).
2. R. Dalven, in Solid State Physics, edited by H. Ehreinreich, F. Seitz, and D. Turn-
bull (Academic, New York, 1973), Vol. 28, p. 179.
3. P. J. Lin and L. Kleinman, Phys_ Rev. 142,478 (1966).
4. S. E. Kohn, P. Y. Yu, Y. Petroff, Y. R. Shen, Y. Tsang, and M. L. Cohen, Phys.
Rev. B 8, 1477 (1973).
5. G. Martinez, M. SchlUter, and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 11,651 (1975).
6. S.-H. Wei and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 55, 13605 (1997).
7. G. Bauer and H. Krenn, in Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, edited by E.
D. Palik (Academic, Orlando, 1985), p. 517.
8. M. Cardona and D. Greenaway, Phys. Rev. 133, A1685 (1964).
9. N. Suzuki and S. Adachi,J. Appl. Phys. 77,1249 (1995).
10. H. Burkhard, R. Geick, P. Kastner, and K.-H. Unkelbach, Phys. Status Solidi B 63,
89 (1974).
11. P. M. Amirtharaj, B. L. Bean, and S. Perkowitz, f. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 939 (1977).
12. J. N. Zemel, J. D. Jensen, and R. B. Schoolar, Phys. Rev. 140, A330 (1965).
13. M. Baleva, M. Maksimov, and M. Sendova, Infrared Phys. 27, 389 (1987).
14. K. H. Herrmann, V. Melzer, and U. Miiller, Infrared Phys. 34,117 (1993).
15. K. H. Herrmann and V. Melzer'/njrared Phys. Technol. 37,753 (1996).
16. H. Krenn, S. Yuan, N. Frank, and G. Bauer,Phys. Rev. B 57,2393 (1998).
17. T. R. Globus, A. O. Olesk, and S. A. Olesk, Sov. Phys. Semicond. 24,22 (1990).
18. A. N. Veis and N. A. Suvorova, Semicond. 30, lO89 (1996).
19. M. L. Belle, Sov. Phys.-Solid State 7, 480 (1965).
20. M. Cardona, C. M. Penchina, E. E. Koch, and P. Y. Yu, Phys. Status Solidi B 53,
327 (1972).
626 IV-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
40.--.---.--~--,---~~
35
30 PbSe
25
20
15
10 1
5
o
-5
-10
-150
1 2 3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure E2-2 E1(E) and E2(E) spectra for PbSe at 300 K.
PbSe
k
2
n
1 !Eo
o 1 2 3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure E2-3 neE) and k(E) spectra for PbSe at 300 K.
E2 LEAD SELENIDE (PbSe) 627
PbSe
0.7 ! E2 E3
!
0.6
II:
0.5
PbSe
0.4
0.30
1 2 3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure E2-S R(E) spectrum for PbSe at 300 K.
628 N-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
631
c:I'I
~
N
12
L;'l-
- 6
E (eV) PbTe l, +
X'6 l6
8
~. r;
17
~_ 6
,-.
r6-
0
rl-
K,
r-6
K'r---4
Xi A:'C~
A.
K,~
X,
-. X-
•
~
r;~ X'6
--..:::L. ---t K, t--- [).. ~r:t ~ iL:
-8
~
......
VJ
:.~t t. - 6, jr:t A.
jK.tj X: t + ~
r K K X X r r r5
~
Figure E3-1 Electronic energy-band suucture of PbTe as calculated with an EPM. (From Kohn R
et al. [3].)
~
VJ
E3 LEAD TELLURIDE (PbTe) 633
TABLE E3·1 Energies of the CPs in the optical spectra ofPbTe at 300 K.
CPs eV
0.32
1.08
2.02
3.25
6.3
7.8
11.2
analysis, the (n, k) or (£1' Ea) values were extracted [3.4,28]. The CPs observed in these
studies were correlated with various electronic transitions in the BZ [3.4,27,28].
SE study has been carried out by Suzuki and Adachi [5]. They developed a polishing
method to obtain PbTe surfaces of high quality, which should be useful for the prepa-
ration of surfaces for optical measurements. They measured the SE data on a best-
prepared sample in the 1.1-5.4-eV spectral region.
We can fmd systematic differences between the data of Suzuki and Adachi [5], who
used a chemomechanically polished sample, and those obtained by Cardona and Gre-
enaway [3], who used a cleaved bulk material, or by Kom and Braunstein [28], who
worked on a polished and electrochemically etched sample. The Ea values at the E2 peak
derived from the reflectivity measurements at 300 K are much smaller (-20, Ref. [3])
or, conversely, larger (-64, Ref. [28]) than the SE result (-50, Ref. [5]). The "biggest is
best" criterion [29,30], if we adopt, suggests that the sample with the cleanest surface is
that of Kom and Braunstein [28]. Unfortunately, these authors did not present details of
their used sample preparation technique. Although various surface chemical treatments
were tried in Ref. [5], no such a large Ea(E~ value was achieved in SE measurements.
Optical absorption spectra in the vacuum-UVregion (36-150 eV) of some II-VI and
IV-VI compounds, including PbTe, have been reported by Cardona and Haensel [31].
The film used by these authors was obtained by vacuum evaporation on a noncrystalli-
ne substrate, and thus it was polycrystalline. The measured a(E) spectrum showed a
broad peak at E-80 eV.
The reflectivity spectra in the far-UV range (18-26 eV) ofPbTe were studied using
synchrotron radiation by Martinez et al. [32]. Several reflectivity peaks were identified
and correlated with various core (Pb 5d)-conduction-band transitions.
Table E3-2 lists the room-temperature values of e=el+iEa, n*=n+ik, a, and R for
PbTe. A complete set of the optical constants for E~O.1 eV were calculated from the
reststrahlen parameters of Bauer and Krenn (n=1018 cm-3, Ref. [13]). The n values for
0.15g~.6 eV were taken from Globus et al. [22]. The k and a for 0.15g~.3 eV
were taken from Riedl (n=2.5xlO18 cm-l, Ref. [18]) and those for 0.31g~0.6 eV from
Globus et al. [22]. The optical-constant data in the interband transition region were ta-
ken for 0.8g~1.0 eV from Kom and Braunstein [28] and for 1.13g~5.4 eV from Su-
zuki and Adachi [5]. The optical absorption data, k and a, for ~30 eV were taken
from Cardona and Haensel [31].
The (£1' £0, (n, k), a, and R values in Table E3-2 are plotted in Figs. E3-2-E3-5, re-
spectively. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of each CP. It has
been shown [5] that such optical spectra can be successfully explained by the MDF.
REFERENCES
1. R. Dalven, in Solid State Physics, edited by H. Ehreinreich, F. Seitz, and D. Turn-
bull (Academic, New York, 1973), Vol. 28, p. 179.
2. Z. Feit, D. Kostyk, R. J. Woods, and P. Mak, Appl. Phys. Lett. 58,343 (1991).
E3 LEAD TELLURIDE (PbTe) 635
60
50 PbTe
o
-10
-20
0~~1--~2---3L--4L-~5--~6
8
7
PbTe
6
5
~
c: 4 E1
3 !
k
2
Eo
1 ! n
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure E3-3 n(E) and k(E) spectra for PbTe at 300 K.
E3 LEAD TELLURIDE (PbTe) 637
107
106
~ 105
CAITO
I
E !
.2. 104
~
103
PbTe
0.8 r---r---,---r---r------.-----.
0.7
a:
0.6
0.5
PbTe
0.40~~1--!:2--3L----L4-...l5--.J6
641
C'I
~
12r,--------------------,
E leV) x+,
8 x;
r+r+
r;7. ~ ._ ~X~!;~
ri Is
r-,
t -t x;
0
r-a
r-, x; A,
x-,
-4 X-6
r:LI, x', A,
~"'---
~L:
-8
A. A. ....~
>, til
~~:t
r
]"'0 X: t
K K X x
yt
r r
l
L
~
R
Figure E4-1 Electronic energy-band structure of SnTe as calculated with an EPM. (From Tung ~
and Cohen [1].) ~
~
til
E4 TIN TELLURIDE (SnTe) 643
TABLE E4·1 Energies of the CPs in the optical spectra ofSnTe at 300 K.
CPs eV
Eo -0.2
E) 1.20
E2 1.69
E3 2.45
E4 6.1
E5 7.4
E6 9.1
[S-9].
IR optical properties of SnTe have been studied in the wavelength range 1-100 11m
by Riedl et al. [6], in the range I-IS 11m by Bis and Dixon [9], and in the range
200-4000 cm') by Siapkas et al. [10]. The IR optical spectra were taken on p-type bulk
samples [6,9] and on epitaxial films grown on alkali-halide substrates [6,9,10]. The
optical constants, n, k, a, and R, were deduced from interference extrema in the reflec-
tance and transmittance spectra of SnTe [10]. However, no fit study of the IR optical
spectra using a classical oscillator model has been made so far on SnTe. No detailed
information is, thus, available on the reststrahlen parameters of this material.
Optical spectra from a classical free-carrier absorption region up to 3.8 eV have been
studied by Schoolar and Dixon [7]. The refractive indices and absorption coefficients
were determined from the analysis of normal reflectance and transmittance (T) meas-
urements on epitaxial films ranging in carrier concentration from p=3.6xl0 19 to
6.8xlOz0 cm·3 • The error of R and T was estimated to be less than ±3%. Temperature
dependence of the refractive index and absorption coefficient of p-SnTe has also been
studied at 12, 77, and 300 K on epitaxial film with a hole concentration of3.6x10 19 cm·3
[8]. The 300-K data are in good agreement with those obtained by Schoolar and Dixon
[7].
The fundamental reflectivity in the interband transition region of SnTe has been
measured by Cardona and Greenaway [2] and Kom and Braunstein [11]. Cleaved SnTe
sample was used below 6 eV and an "as-grown" epitaxial layer in the vacuum-UV re-
gion [2]. In Ref. [11], samples were cut from a Czochralski-grown SnTe ingot, ground,
hand polished, and finally electrochemically etched to produce optical quality surfaces.
By performing the KK analysis, these authors extracted the (n, k) and (£1' Ez) values.
The CPs found in these optical spectra were also correlated with various electronic
transitions in the BZ.
A set of the optical constants for SnTe at room temperature have been determined
using SE in the 1.13-S.5-eV spectral region by Suzuki and Adachi [3]. The SE meas-
urements were made on a bulk sample grown by the Bridgman method. The best SE
spectra were obtained for a sample chemomechanically polished with a solution of Br2
in methanol. These spectra revealed distinct structures at energies of the E1, Ez, and E3
CPs. The Ez value at the Ez peak measured by SE was -S7 [3]. Note that this value is
644 N-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
much larger than those of Cardona and Greenaway (~-37) [2] and of Kom and Braun-
stein (~-53) [11], indicating higher surface quality of the sample used in the SE meas-
urements.
Optical absorption in the 2-120-eV region of SnTe has been measured using syn-
chrotron radiation at 80 K by Fukui et al. [12]. The absorption spectra both in the crys-
talline and amorphous phases were obtained. The Sn 4d and Te 4d core levels were
identified at -26 and 42 eV, respectively. However, only the optical density was deter-
mined in this study.
We list in Table E4-2 the 300-K values of E=EI+i~, n*=n+ik, IX, and R for SnTe. A
set of the optical constants for £:5;1 eV were taken from Burke and Riedl (p=3.6x10 19
cm-3 , Ref. [8]). The optical constants in the range between 1.13 and 5.5 eV correspond
to those of Suzuki and Adachi [3].
The (E I, ~, (n, k), IX, and R values in Table E4-2 are graphed in Figs. E4-2-E4-5,
respectively. The vertical arrows in the figures indicate the positions of each CPo It has
been shown [3] that such optical-constant spectra can be successfully explained by the
MDF.
REFERENCES
70.--.---.--.---.-~---,
60
50 SnTe
40 "1,
,,
30 ,
,
w 20 :
,,
10 ,
v'
o
-10
-20 L -__ __ __ __
o
L-~~~ ~ ~ ~
1 2 3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure E4-2 E1(E) and ElE) spectra for SnTe at 300 K.
5 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure E4-3 n(E) and k(E) spectra for SnTe at 300 K.
646 N-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
SnTe
10°
Photon energy (eV)
Figure E4-4 aJ..E) spectrum for SnTe at 300 K.
0.9
0.8
Ell
! E2 !E3
0.7 tEo
0.6
0.5
a:
0.4
0.3
SnTe
0.2
0.1
0 1 2 4 3 5 6
Photon energy (eV)
Figure E4-5 R(E) spectrum for SnTe at 300 K.
E4 TIN TELLURIDE (SnTe) 647
Table E4·2 Optical constants ojSnTe at 300 K.
eV EI E2 n k a (cm· l ) R
0.142 11.8 4.6 3.5 0.66 9.50E+03 0.323
0.163 21.9 3.8 4.7 0.41 6.70E+03 0.424
0.188 29.1 3.0 5.4 0.28 5.30E+03 0.474
0.214 34.8 2.3 5.9 0.20 4.30E+03 0.505
0.248 37.2 1.8 6.1 0.15 3.80E+03 0.516
0.275 39.7 1.6 6.3 0.13 3.60E+03 0.527
0.306 42.2 1.5 6.5 0.11 3.50E+03 0.538
0.335 44.9 1.5 6.7 0.11 3.80E+03 0.548
0.362 47.6 2.1 6.9 0.15 5.60E+03 0.558
0.395 49.0 3.0 7.0 0.21 8.60E+03 0.563
0.419 51.8 3.8 7.2 0.27 1.13E+04 0.572
0.5 0.47 2.36E+04
0.6 0.69 4.20E+04
0.7 0.96 6.80E+04
0.8 1.36 1.10E+05
0.9 1.75 1.60E+05
1 2.17 2.20E+05
1.13 43.08 42.28 7.192 2.939 3.37E+05 0.620
1.15 42.09 43.49 7.163 3.036 3.54E+05 0.622
1.2 39.04 46.48 7.062 3.291 4.00E+05 0.627
1.25 35.59 48.78 6.927 3.521 4.46E+05 0.632
1.3 32.32 51.27 6.817 3.761 4.96E+05 0.638
1.35 28.99 53.20 6.692 3.975 5.44E+05 0.643
1.4 25.18 55.D1 6.545 4.202 5.96E+05 0.649
1.5 16.76 57.22 6.180 4.630 7.04E+05 0.661
1.55 11.98 57.34 5.940 4.827 7.58E+05 0.667
1.6 7.072 57.00 5.679 5.018 8. 14E+05 0.675
1.65 3.056 56.27 5.450 5.162 8.64E+05 0.681
1.7 -2.289 54.95 5.134 5.352 9.22E+05 0.690
1.75 -6.45 52.69 4.829 5.456 9.68E+05 0.697
1.8 -10.47 50.D1 4.507 5.548 1.0IE+06 0.705
1.85 -13.82 46.47 4.163 5.581 1.05E+06 0.712
1.95 -17.89 38.75 3.521 5.503 1.09E+06 0.722
2 -18.60 34.54 3.211 5.377 1.09E+06 0.725
2.05 -18.64 30.96 2.958 5.233 1.09E+06 0.725
2.1 -18.12 27.67 2.735 5.060 1.08E+06 0.723
2.15 -17.38 25.16 2.569 4.897 1.07E+06 0.720
2.2 -16.50 23.10 2.438 4.737 1.06E+06 0.715
2.25 -15.55 21.32 2.328 4.579 1.04E+06 0.709
2.3 -14.71 20.02 2.251 4.447 1.04E+06 0.703
2.35 -13.90 18.98 2.194 4.326 1.03E+06 0.696
2.4 -13.29 18.17 2.148 4.231 1.03E+06 0.691
2.45 -12.64 17.35 2.101 4.130 1.03E+06 0.685
2.5 -12.25 16.79 2.065 4.064 1.03E+06 0.681
2.55 -11.93 16.13 2.016 3.999 1.03E+06 0.679
2.6 -11.70 15.47 1.962 3.943 1.04E+06 0.677
2.65 -11.50 14.83 1.906 3.890 1.05E+06 0.677
2.7 -11.28 14.15 1.847 3.833 1.05E+06 0.676
2.75 -11.11 13.58 1.793 3.786 1.06E+06 0.676
2.8 -10.93 12.97 1.736 3.734 1.06E+06 0.676
648 N-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
0.49ST2
Eg(x,T) =148.8+ 40.7+T -(0.179T+883)x meV (ES.I)
On the other hand, a form of Eg(x,T) obtained by Strauss [3] is simply given by
Eg(x,T) =I30-890x+0.4ST meV (ES.2)
At T=300 K the composition at which the L/ states crossover is x-O.3 (see also Ref.
[6]).
The optical dielectric constant £~ reported for Pbl_xSnxSe at 300 K gradually increases
from 24.0 (x=0) to 29.3 (x=0.23) [7]. The far-IR magnetoplasma spectra have also been
measured on p- and n-type bulk samples with OSx:S;0.2S [7] and on epitaxial n-Pb l _
xSnxSe films (0.04Sx:S;0.21) grown on BaF2 substrates [8].
The long-wavelength edge of fundamental absorption and absorption by free carries
in n-Pbl_xSnxSe (x=0.06) with n=1.0xlOI7-S.0xlOls cm-3 was investigated by Luchytskii
et at. [9] at T=77-4S0 K. In samples with n>SxlO l7 cm-3 the absorption edge was de-
scribed by the Urbach rule only at high temperatures. At low temperatures the
Burstein-Moss effect was found to dominate the absorption edge shape. More recently,
Veis and Suvorova [10] have measured the optical absorption spectra in undoped p-Pb 1_
649
6S0 N-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
300
Pb Sn Se
1-x x
T=300 K
200
>E
- 100
0r-----------------------~~----------~
-100
o 10 20 30 40
Composition (Ufo)
Figure ES·l Energy gap Eg vs. composition x for Pbl",Sn.,Se at 300 K. The solid and dashed
lines represent the calculated results of Eqs. (E5.1) and (E5.2), respectively. (From Charar et al.
[5].)
REFERENCES
1. H. Krebs, K. GrUn, and D. Kallen, Z. Anorg. Allgern. Chern. 312,309 (1961).
2. H. Zogg, A. Fach, J. John, P. Muller, C. Paglino, and A. N. Tiwari, Proc. SPlE
3182,26 (1998).
3. A. J. Strauss, Phys. Rev.lS7, 608 (1967).
4. H. Preier,Appl. Phys. 20,189 (1979).
5. S. Charar, A. Obadi, C. Fau, M. Averous, V. D. Ribes, S. Dal Corso, B. Liautard,
J. C. Tedenac, and S. Brunet, Int. f. Infrared Milli. Waves 17,365 (1996).
6. J. O. Dimmock, I. Melngailis, and A. J. Strauss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 1193 (1966).
E5 LEAD TIN SELENIDE (Pbl_.Sn.Se) 651
7. I. V. Kucherenko, Yu. A. Mityagin, L. K. Vodop'yanov, and A. P. Shotov, Sov.
Phys. Semicond. 11,282 (1977).
8. A. A. Kopylov, V. A. Moshnikov, and A. N. Kholodilov, Semicond. 31, 1132
(1997).
9. R. M. Luchytskii, V. S. Manzhara, and P. M. Staryk, Phys. Status Solidi B 94, 381
(1979).
10. A. N. Veis and N. A. Suvorova, Semicond. 32, 397 (1998).
11. Y. Shani, R. Rosman, and A. Katzir, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE·21 , 51
(1985).
-
c
.~
u
2
z
iE
~ 1.5 a
u
c
o
-
;
u
.E 0.5
x
W o~~~-~-~-~~--~~--~--~--~--~------~
0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.45
Energy (eV)
Figure ES·2 (a) Refractive index and (b) extinction coefficient of Pbl_.Sn.Se (x=O.l) deter-
mined from optical reflection and transmission measurements at different temperatures. (From
Charar et al. [5].)
E6 LEAD TIN TELLURIDE
(Pb1_..8nxTe)
Figure E6-1 Schematic representation of the valence and conduction bands at 12 K for (a)
PbTe, (b) Pbl ....SnzTe (E,=O eV), and (c) SnTe. (From Dimmocketal. [4].)
652
E6 LEAD TIN TELLURIDE (Pb1 .•Sn.Te) 653
(L6)]. According to the band inversion model of Dimmock et al. [4], the band-gap en-
ergy Eg of Pb1 .•Sn.Te initially decreases as x increases, vanishing for an intermediate
alloy composition, and then increases with further increase of x. The composition at
which the band inversion occurs increases from 0.35 to 0.65 as the temperature in-
creases from 4 to 300 K [4]. Takaoka et al. [5] found from the far-IR magnetoplasma
measurements that the band-edge masses and band-gap energies seem not to reach zero
at the band inversion composition 0.15<x<OAO (T=4.2-20 K) in 1 at.% In-doped Pb l.
•SnxTe single crystals. However, they could not conclude whether the nonzero effect of
these band parameters is an essential phenomenon in Pbl.xSnxTe or occurred as a result
of the In doping.
The Pbl.xSnxTe alloy can be characterized by large static (ej and optical dielectric
constants (e..). The e, value at 300 K is in the range 230-450 (0$x$0.2) [6], while the
300-K e~(x) value can be simply given by 33+48x for O~OA [7]. It has also been re-
ported [8] that e, increases with increasing x and decreases with increasing temperature
T.
IR optical properties of Pbl.xSnxTe were investigated only for a few on the Pb-rich
side (x::;O.25) [9-12]. Epitaxial films [9-11] and bulk sample [12] were used in these
measurements. A Pbo.SsSno.12Te epitaxial film oflow carrier concentration (p_10 16 cm·3)
grown on a high-carrier-density (p_10 18 cm·3) Pbo.7sSn0.22Te substrate enabled an analy-
sis of the reflectivity data at T=77 and 300 K using a two-oscillator dielectric function
including a Drude term [9]. The 3OO-K reststrahlen parameters derived from this analy-
sis were: e~=39, ooTO=32 cm'l, ooLO=115.7 cm'l, and r19 cm· l . It is known that the ad-
dition of In into Pbl.xSnxTe results in a striking modification of the material properties
(see Ref. [12]). Far-IR reflectivity spectra for In-doped Pbl.xSnxTe have been measured
for samples with a doping level of 0.5 at.% [12] and above 0.5 at.% [11]. These data
showed that the plasma frequency oop decreases on cooling from T=300 to 40 [11] or 30
K [12]. Further decrease of T results in a drastic increase in oop [11,12]. Examples of
these results are shown in Fig. E6-2 [12]. A local mode due to In vibration was ob-
served at 160 cm·1 in In-doped Pbl.xSnxTe [13].
Optical absorption spectra for Pbl.~nxTe with x=O.1 and 0.2 were measured at 300 K
in the photon-energy range between 0.2 and 0.8 eV [14]. The samples were single-
crystalline epitaxial films grown by thermal evaporation on mica or NaCl. A fit with
theoretical model suggested that the discrepancy at higher photon energies can be at-
tributed to deviations from Kane's dispersion law in the direction of stronger non-
parabolicity. Study on the absorption coefficient ofPb1.xSnxTe has also been performed
theoretically using the k·p band parameters and including the Burstein-Moss shift of
the absorption edge [15].
The refractive indices of Pbl .• Sn.Te have been determined by Jager and Schubert
[16] for a number of alloy compositions (0$x:5:0A2) in the vicinity of the fundamental
absorption edge. The Pb1 .•SnxTe layers were evaporated on single-crystalline Si and
polycrystalline Ge substrates. The evaporated layers were polycrystalline and of p-type
conductivity with a carrier concentration between 1 and 3xlO18 cm·3 • Measurement was
based on the interference fringes in the transmission spectra. We reproduce in Fig. E6-3
654 IV-VI SEMICONDUCTORS
PbO.7SSnO.2STe
300K
1.0
o
t
0.5
0
1
0
1
§
,.,
~
~
~., 0
a: 1
0
0.5 1
o
1
5K o
0.5
the results measured by these authors [16]. A plot of n at a wavelength of 10 IJ.m vs.
alloy composition x showed that n increases with increasing x at a rate of 0.013 per
mole per cent. No clear difference in the n data was observed for the layers evaporated
on Si and Ge substrates.
Shani et at. [17] have modeled the refractive-index dispersion near the fundamental
absorption edge ofPb-based alloys, including Pb1_zSnzTe. The KK relation is used as
E6 LEAD TIN TELLURIDE (Pb1_.Sn.Te) 655
• 0 From maxima
)( + From minima
Pb,_xSn J( Te
x =0·32~ x- 0·42 Layers on
~ "xe/ Si-substrates
.Y--;
, + "X
x:O'19~ b.I- ~
..... -~-+:x.~
6·0 X:O'I~~
,.. ~
PbTe~ "lte><...~
~ .xe>;<
0
'" ~ x...~x...
.Ht~ •
•X\~
5'5
.......~.
x of
5 10 15
Wavelength (A m)
Figure E6·3 Room-temperature refractive indices for polycrystalline Pb1_.Sn.Te layers
(x=O--O.42) deposited on Si substrates measured from the interference fringes in the transmis-
sion spectra. (From Jager and Schubert [16].)
5.5-eV photon-energy range at 300 K measured by SE. The bulk samples were grown
by a conventional Bridgman method. We show in Fig. E6-4 their obtained nee) and
k(E) spectra of PbzSnl.zTe (O$.x$].O) [19]. These spectra reveal distinct structures at
energies of the E1, E2 , and E3 CPs. Dielectric-related optical constants, such as the com-
plex dielectric function '(c=cI+iEz), absorption coefficient (ex), and normal-incidence
reflectivity (R), were also presented in Ref. [19].
1E,
8r-------------------~
7
5 --x..o.OO
6 0.16
0.35
--x..o.OO 0.56
5 0.16 0.78
0.35 1.00
c 4 0.56
0.78
1.00
3 3
2
2
(a) (b)
2 3 4 5 6 11 2 3 4 5 6
Photon energy (eV) Photon energy (eV)
Figure E6-4 (a) nee) and (b) k(E) spectra of Pbl.zSnzTe (0::;x:51.0) measured by SE at 300 K.
(From Suzuki and Adachi [19].)
REFERENCES
1. H. Preier, Appl. Phys. 20, 189 (1979).
2. A. Rogalski, Infrared Phys. Technol. 38, 295 (1997).
3. D. L. Partin, in Semiconductors and Semimetals, edited by R. K. Willardson and
A. C. Beer (Academic, Boston, 1991), Vol. 33 (Volume Editor, T. P. Pearsall), p.
311.
4. J. O. Dimmock, 1. Melngailis, and A. J. Strauss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 1193 (1966).
5. S. Takaoka, S. Shimomura, H. Takahashi, and K. Murase, Phys. Rev. B 40, 5642
(1989).
6. H. Lehmann, G. Nimtz, L. D. Haas, and T. Jakobus,Appl. Phys. 25,291 (1981).
7. J. R. Lowney and S. D. Senturia, J. Appl. Phys. 47,1771 (1976).
8. S. Nishi, H. Kawamura, and K. Murase, Phys. Status Solidi B 97, 581 (1980).
9. W. E. Tennant and J. A. Cape, Phys. Rev. B 13,2540 (1976).
E6 LEAD TIN TELLURIDE (Pb1.xSnxTe) 657
10. P. M. Amirtharaj, B. L. Bean, and S. Perkowitz, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67,939 (1977).
11. S. W. McKnight and M. K. EI-Rayess, Solid State Commun. 49,1001 (1984).
12. N. Romcevic, Z. V. Popovic, D. Khokhlov, A. V. Nikorich, and W. Konig, Infra-
red Phys. 31,225 (1991).
13. S. Takaoka and K. Murase,J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 52, 25 (1983).
14. 1. A. Drabkin, L. Ya. Morgovskii, 1. V. Nel'son, and Yu. 1. Ravich, Sov.
Phys.-Semicond. 6, 1156 (1973).
15. W. W. Anderson, Infrared Phys. 20, 363 (1980).
16. H. Jager and G. Schubert, Infrared Phys. 13,29 (1973).
17. Y. Shani, R. Rosman, and A. Katzir, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-21 , 51
(1985).
18. D. M. Kom and R. Braunstein, Phys. Rev. B 5,4837 (1972).
19. N. Suzuki and S. Adachi, J. Appl. Phys. 79, 2065 (1996).
F
AMORPHOUS SEMICONDUCTORS
F1 a-DIAMOND-LIKE CARBON
(a-DLC)
the higher-energy peak is mainly due to the 0-0* transitions in Sp3 bonded clusters [27].
Wagner et al. [28] obtained a peak of the 1t-1t* transitions at 3.5 eV, and Fink et al.
[10] put the 1t-1t* transitions in the energy range of 3.5-6.5 eV. On the other hand, an
absorption peak due to the 0-0* transitions was observed at -12 e V by Fink et al. [10]
and Yokoyama et al. [13].
To our knowledge, there are no experimental data on the optical constants of amor-
phous diamond (Le., 100% Sp3 bonded). Because of this, Smith [9] relied on
"smoothed" values of ~\ and ~ derived from measurements on crystalline diamond for
the use of EMA analysis.
a-DLC films graphitize above a few hundred degree Celcius [8,9,15,16]. The optical
spectra of graphitized films are quite different from a-DLC, e.g., in the lack of an opti-
cal absorption edge. Thin films deposited by sputtering or flash evaporation may con-
tain over 80% sp2-bonded sites. The absence of optical absorption edge has been found
in such films [15,29] and also in glassy carbon [30]. These materials may, thus, show
almost metallic conductivity. The refractive-index dispersion near the K edge of amor-
phous carbon has been determined by measuring the shift in the Bragg angle caused by
refraction [31].
REFERENCES
1. J. Koskinen, J. Appl. Phys. 63,2094 (1988).
2. D. R. McKenzie, D. Muller, and B. A. Paithorpe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67,773 (1991).
3. P. J. Fallon, V. S. Veerasamy, C. A. Davis, J. Robertson, G. A. J. Amaratunga, W.
1. Milne, and J. Koskinen, Phys. Rev. B 48,4777 (1993).
4. J. A. Mucha, D. L. Flamm, and D. E.lbbotson, J. Appl. Phys. 65,3448 (1989).
5. A. Bubenzer, B. Dischler, G. Brandt, and P. Koidl, J. Appl. Phys. 54,4590 (1983).
6. B. Dischler, A. Bubenzer, and P. Koidl, Solid State Commun. 48, 105 (1983).
7. D. R. McKenzie, R. C. McPhedran, N. Savvides, and D. J. H. Cockayne, Thin
Solid Films 108, 247 (1983).
8. F. W. Smith,J. Appl. Phys. 55, 764 (1984).
9. J. Fink, Th. MUller-Heinzerling, J. PflUger, B. Scheerer, B. Dischler, P. Koidl, A.
Bubenzer, and R. E. Sah, Phys. Rev. B 30,4713 (1984).
10. S. Orzeszko, J. A. Woollam, D. C. Ingram, and A. W. McCormick, 1. Appl. Phys.
64,2611 (1988).
11. S. A. Alterovitz, R. M. Sieg, N. S. Shoemaker, and 1. 1. Pouch, Mat. Res. Soc.
Symp. Proc. 152,21 (1989).
12. A. P. Malshe, S. M. Kanetkar, and S. B. Ogale, J. Appl. Phys. 68,5648 (1990).
13. H. Yokoyama, M. Okamoto, T. Yamasaki, K. Takahiro, Y. Osaka, and T. Imura,
lpn. 1. Appl. Phys. 29,2815 (1990).
14. D. Sunil, V. D. Vankar, and K. L. Chopra, I. Appl. Phys. 69,3719 (1991).
15. P. Kovarik, E. B. D. Bourdon, and R. H. Prince, Phys. Rev. B 48,12123 (1993).
16. S. Logothetidis, J. Petalas, and S. Yes, I. Appl. Phys. 79, 1040 (1996).
662 AMORPHOUS SEMICONDUCTORS
663
664 AMORPHOUS SEMICONDUCTORS
Optical absorption at the fundamental absorption edge of a-Si has been investigated
[7,9-12]. The optical band gap Eo, determined from the optical absorption spectrum for
sample deposited by rf sputtering in pure Ar, was -LOS eV [12]. It was considerably
smaller than that for sample rf-sputter-deposited in a mixture of Ar and Hz (-1.35 eV)
or those for glow-discharge a-Si:H samples (-1.63-1.S0 eV) [12]. Brodsky et al. [9]
found that in Ar-sputtered a-Si films the absorption edge moves towards higher photon
energies with increasing annealing temperature. The decreasing spin density, which
accompanies the shift in the absorption edge, strongly suggests that this behavior re-
sults from a reduction in the density of gap states when some of the structural defects,
probably associated with multivacancies are annealed out. The pressure-dependent op-
tical absorption properties of a-Si and a-Si:H were discussed in Ref. [11].
The fundamental reflectivity spectra of a-Si have been measured by Pierce and
Spicer [13] from 0.4 to 11 eV at 300 K. Near-normal-incidence R measurements were
made on a 600-A thick a-Si fabricated bye-gun evaporation. By performing the KK
analysis, the (n, k) and (£I'~) values were extracted. The optical constants above 12 eV
were also obtained in Ref. [13] from an extrapolation of the measured reflectance and
transmittance and are less accurate (see Ref. [14]).
SE study on a-Si has been carried out by Aspnes et al. [15] in the 1.5-6.0-eV range,
by Fried et al. [16] in the 1.8-4.5-eV range, and by Jellison et al. [17] in the 1.5-5.2-
e V range. The samples studied were grown by CVD [15,17] or prepared by Si+-ion im-
plantation [16]. The measured ~(E) spectra showed a single broad peak that is typically
observed in tetrahedrally-bonded amorphous semiconductors. The dielectric function
exhibiting the largest ~ peak is most representative of a bulk sample of completely co-
ordinated amorphous material. The ~ peak values obtained in these studies were -29.5
atE-3.6-3.7 eV [15-17].
The soft X-ray absorption spectrum of e-gun-evaporated a-Si have been measured by
Brown and Rustgi [IS]. The spectrum for a-Si showed none of the detailed structure
observed in c-Si.
Table F2-1lists the room-temperature values of £;:£I+i~, n*=n+ik, a, and R for a-Si.
They were obtained for E~0.OS06 eV from Brodsky and Lurio [6], for 0.5~~1.6 eV
from Hirose et al. [7], for 1.7~~6 eV from Aspnes et al. [15], for S~~S eV from
Piller [14], and for F2.99 eV from Brown and Rustgi [IS].
The (£1' £Z), (n, k), and a values in Table F2-1 are shown in Figs. F2-I-F2-3, respec-
tively.
F2 a-SILICON (a-Si) 665
30
20
o 3 6 9 12 15
Photon energy (eV)
Figure F2-! E1(E) and ~(E) spectra for a-Si at 300 K.
4
~
c:- 3
0 2 4 6 8 10
Photon energy (eV)
Figure F2-2 n(E) and k(E) spectra for a-Si at 300 K.
666 AMORPHOUS SEMICONDUCTORS
107~~~~~~~~~~~
106
a-Si
105
.--..
IE 104
~
c:s 103
102
101
200
o . o,l...lo~:mIoO""""=
400 500 600 700 800 800 900 1000 2000 2100 2200
Frequency (cm'l)
Figure F2·4 IR absOIption spectra of a-Si:H films deposited by plasma-assisted CVD (solid
lines) and magnetron sputtering (dashed lines) in the (a) wagging, (b) bending-scissors, and (c)
stretching mode regions. From bottom to top, the hydrogen content C(H) is 7% (7%), 13%
(14%), 20% (20%), and 24% (30%) for plasma-assisted CVD (magnetron-sputtered) films.
(From Langford et al. [21].)
670 AMORPHOUS SEMICONDUCTORS
structural disorder [24]. Concomitantly, it is often found that there is a shift in the opti-
cal gap towards lower energies with greater levels of disorder. However, it has recently
been shown [26] that while the breadth of the absorption tail is a strong function of the
disorder, the mean energy gap is insensitive to the amount of disorder, even as the dis-
orderless limit is approached.
At very low absorption part, one can see another exponential part in the optical ab-
sorption spectrum. This region arises from transitions involving defect states within the
gap, and is highly sensitive to doping and deposition conditions [27].
Freeman and Paul [28] reported the effects of hydrogen on the refractive index of a-
Si:H fIlms rf-sputter-deposited on Coming 7059 glasses in a mixture of Ar and H2 •
They found a large drop in n measured at E=O.3 eV by an addition of~, followed by a
slow decrease of n with further increase of the ~ partial pressure, PH' They also ob-
tained a trend for a-Si:H to lower densities as PH is increased. In crystalline semicon-
ductors, the general trend that a higher band-gap material (or, equivalently, a smaller
density material) has a lower n value is well known (see, e.g., Fig. 5.16). Akimoto and
Gekka [29] also reported that the refractive index at N=6328 A of rf-sputtered a-Si:H
decreases with increasing hydrogen content.
The dependence of the dielectric function on hydrogen content in a-Si:H has been
studied using SE by Feng et al. [30] and Haage et al. [31]. The samples used in these
studies were deposited by the method of dc magnetron sputtering [30] or in a rf glow
discharge reactor [31]. The hydrogen content of the films was determined from IR
spectroscopy. Figures F2-5 (a) and (b) show the pseudodielectric function spectra
<e(E» of a-Si:H measured at 300 K by Feng et al. [30]. These spectra represent the
bulk dielectric functions of the fIlms modulated by the surface microroughness. Alt-
hough the thickness of the surface microroughness was estimated to be within 10 A, its
effect on the measured pseudodielectric function was significant, especially in the high-
energy part of the spectrum due to the small optical penetration depth in that region, as
shown in Fig. F2-5 (c).
The pseudodielectric-function <e(E» and dielectric-function spectra ~(E) in Fig.
F2-5 display systematic changes with increasing hydrogen content, C(H). The C(H)=O
at.% sample has its peak value of ~=27.4 at -3.6 eV. The spectrum of the hydrogenat-
ed sample shifts toward higher photon energy with lowering its ~ value. This shift cor-
responds to the blue (red) shift of the optical absorption edge with increasing (decreas-
ing) hydrogen content [24,25]. It has been reported [31] that the ~(E) peak value re-
duces with decreasing material density or, equivalently, with increasing hydrogen con-
tent. The blue shift of the spectrum is thought to be caused by the redistribution of the
electronic states in the valence band due to the formation of strong Si-H bonds in the
network [30-2].
REFERENCES
1. R. J. Temkin, W. Paul, and G. A. N. Connell, Adv. Phys. 22, 581 (1973).
F2 a-Sll..ICON (a-Si) 671
~r-.-.--r-c-.--r-.-~
20
15
A_ 10
W
V 5
30
o
-5 25 (c)
-10 L--'----'--'---'---'~'___'__l
20
30r-'-'--'-'-'--r-.-~ £2
IS
25
10
20
A
N
W 15 a-Si:H
V 0
10
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5
5 Photon Energy (eV)
OL·-L--'__'--_'_--'--'---'---l
. 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5
Photon Energy (eV)
Figure F2-S (a) Real <£I(E» and (b) imaginary parts <£2(E» of the pseudodielectric function
of a-Si:H films deposited by de magnetron sputtering. C(H) is the hydrogen content in the film.
(c) Imaginary part Ez(E) of the dielectric function of a-Si:H derived after the correction for the
surface microroughness of d=6-1O-A thick in (b). (From Feng et at. [30].)
F3 a-GERMANIUM
(a-Ge)
673
674 AMORPHOUS SEMICONDUCTORS
that the n-4.5 at 1..=2.2 11m reported is considerably smaller than the crystalline value of
n-4.0 (_€.If2_E.'f2) [6]. Connell and Pawlik [3] also reported the optical absorption
properties of rf-sputtered a-Ge films for photon energies below and above 0.15 eV up
to 0.6 eV (see Fig. F3-4 below).
The optical constants of vacuum-evaporated a-Ge were determined in the 0.1-25-eV
spectral range by analysis of precise reflectance and transmittance data [9]. A single
broad peak was observed in the measured k(E) and Ea(E) spectra at E- 3.8 and -2.8 e V,
respectively. The maximum Ea value at E-2.8 eV was found to be -19. Connell et al.
[10] have also determined the optical constants of sputter-deposited a-Ge films between
0.05 and 4.5 eV by a combination of reflectance, transmittance, and ellipsometric
measurements. They obtained the maximum Ea value of -23 at E-2.9 eV. This value
has been shown to be an apparently limiting peak value of a-Ge, Le., the corresponding
spectrum should represent the "intrinsic" dielectric properties of dense a-Ge.
Table F3-1lists the room-temperature values of E=E1+iEa, n*=n+ik, a, and R for a-Ge.
They were obtained for Eg).0421 eV from Brodsky and Lurio [4] and for &::0.055 eV
from Connell et al. [10]. The imaginary optical constants, k and a, for 0.6~::;;1.3 eV
were taken from del Pozo and Dfaz [8].
The (Elt Ea), (n, k), and a values in Table F3-1 are graphed in Figs. F3-1-F3-3, re-
spectively.
30.-~.-~.-~.-~-.~~
25 a-Ge
20
15
10
o
-5 __ __~~~~
o
L-~-L~ L-~~
1 2 3 4 5
Photon energy (eV)
Figure F3·t £I(E) and q(E) spectra for a-Ge at 300 K.
F3 a-GERMANllJM (a-Ge) 675
5 a-Ge
n
4
~
r:: 3
k
2
0 2 3 4 5
Photon energy (eV)
Figure F3·2 n(E) and k(E) spectra for a-Ge at 300 K.
107~r-~~~~~~~~~
106
a-Ge
-
105
IE 104
.2-
c:s 103
102
101
100~~~~~~~~~~~~
10-2 10-1 100 101
Photon energy (eV)
Figure F3-3 a(E) spectrum for a-Ge at 300 K.
676 AMORPHOUS SEMICONDUCTORS
6
•• 6
l 6tt.".· a 0
//.. i·
Ie /. x 6.
a 0
a 0
..
u a 0
~ 103 a 0
l-
~ aa 8
Z
W
u • •••• 6f Jl8
i:i: ri' ~e
.,1
6
lL. ,f. x 66
W x.
8 I
6 CI ••
//
I
I /0/
I. I . / 0,
I
I ./ 0 I
/./ o·
,-'I • I
_._.-' 0 I
• I
• I i
• •• III I a-Ge:H
, i
100 12
Figure F3-4 Absorption spectra of a-Ge:H films deposited by rf sputtering. From left to right,
the hydrogen content C(H) is 0 (solid circles), 1.0, 2.8, 3.0, 5.1, and 8.0 at.% (open circles).
Error estimates on C(H)=O and 8 at.% data are shown by the dashed and dash-dotted lines, re-
spectively. (From Connell and Pawlik [3].)
F3 a-GERMANlliM (a-Ge) 679
20 22
20
15
18
10 /0 16
EI / Ez
/ 14
/
12
a-Ge:H 10
-5 8
1.5 4.5
[14]. It has been concluded [15] that hydrogenation has similar effects on the optical
properties of amorphous Ge as it does on those of amorphous Si. In particular, one ob-
serves an increase in the optical gap, an increase in the energy position of the ~ peak,
and a shift to higher energies of the function which describes the number of electrons
per atom contributing to optical absorption [see Eq. (1.29)].
REFERENCES
681
682 AMORPHOUS SEMICONDUCTORS
Si-H3 J J
CHnJ
Si-H
J n
. ..........
~ .......
~
-----"""'
........
.
w
U
z ..................
«
(l) ...... ..........
....... .. '
0:::
o
(f)
(l)
«
.. ' .'
3000 500
WAVENUMBER (cm- 1 )
Figure F4-1 IR transmission spectra of a-Si1"Cx:H layers deposited on (lOO)Si substrates by
electron cyclotron resonance plasma at temperatures below 150°C with the gas flow ratio
r=[CH4]/[SiH4] from 0.66 to 8 (solid lines). The IR reflection spectra are also shown by the
broken lines (r=0.66-4). (From Gomez et al. [5].)
annealing at 900 K. We can see that the optical gap Eo occurs at appreciably higher en-
ergies than that for the as-deposited sputtered material (curve E). Annealing of a sput-
tered specimen shifts Eo towards higher energies (curve D) whereas, in the glow-
discharge-deposited films, increasing T, has the opposite effect. In Ar-sputtered a-Si
films [12], the absorption edge moved toward higher photon energies with increasing
annealing temperature. The decreasing spin density which accompanies the shift in the
absorption edge suggests that this behavior results from a reduction in the density of
gap states when some of the structural defects, probably associated with multivacancies
F4 a-SILICON-CARBON (a-Sil_xC.) 683
J
500 • J
/
• •
•
I I
•
(x=O.65) ,•/ •I
~~ ~}C\J
,--.3 E • •I
• j
I
u 400
+~\C\J
15 ><:;
'--"
./ !
~C ~ B •I
/ fA
•
300 D i 1 •
I
I
rj j •
f
•
II / I
• • (•
It.',
,'/ I.1
200 •
•
I
I
rt
I I
~
.'
fl•
,' ], / J,•
I ':'
100
,. I'· , .I,
I /-/,?,' I.l ,
I., I
, , ,/ I
are annealed out. Similar behavior can be expected for sputtered Si-C alloy (curves D
and E in Fig. F4-2). In glow-discharge films, on the other hand, the larger loss of hy-
drogen may occur at higher substrate temperature T,. This may cause a decrease in the
optical gap Eo with increasing T" as observed in a-Si:H.
The tendency of Si atoms to bond preferentially to C atoms leads to so-called
"chemical bonding," complete in the case of the silicon carbide structure in which only
Si-C bonds occur. Mui and Smith [13] studied theoretically the effects of chemical
ordering on the dielectric function of a-Sil-xCx based upon a scaling law of Aspnes et al.
[14]. They considered three different types of chemical ordering [13]: (1) complete
chemical ordering with homogeneous dispersion, (2) complete chemical ordering with
phase separation, and (3) no chemical ordering. If the Si-C bonds are randomly disper-
sed throughout the film, then the chemical ordering is said to be homogeneous. If, how-
684 AMORPHOUS SEMICONDUCTORS
ever, they are clustered, then in addition to chemical ordering there is also phase sepa-
ration.
Reflectance and transmittance measurements have been performed to determine the
optical constants of a-Si1_xCx:H films prepared by rf glow-discharge decomposition of
SiH4 and ~H2 (x=O-1.O) [4] and of SiH4 and CH4 (x=O.26 and 0.39) [15]. The optical
data in Ref. [4] conflrmed the existence of chemical ordering with homogeneous dis-
persion [4]. The data in Ref. [15] also confirmed a high degree of chemical ordering
although no determination of its type was made (homogeneous or phase separated)
[15].
SE study has been performed on a-Si1_xCx:H films with x-O.5 deposited by electron
cyclotron resonance plasma [5,10], withx=O-O.22 deposited by plasma-enhanced CVD
[6], with x-0.55 deposited by rf sputtering [16], and with x-0.05 deposited by plasma-
enhanced CVD [17]. Figure F4-3 shows, as an example, the pseudodielectric functions
at 200°C of a-Si1_xCx:H films deposited by plasma-enhanced CVD [6]. The solid lines
25
0 x=O
0 x=0.05
20 x=0.10
"
v x=0.22
15
W
10
5
a-S i l-xCx
O~--+---+----t----t-----j
25
in the figure represent the best fits to the formulas of Ref. [18]. We can recognize a sin-
gle broad peak in £Z(E) that is typically observed in tetrahedrally-bonded amorphous
semiconductors.
The SE £(E) data measured by Kalomiros et al. [16] were found to be in sufficient
agreement with the calculated results assuming no chemical ordering [13]. Note that
this conclusion is in direct contrast to those of Refs. [4,15]. Further, the experimental
£(E) values reported in Ref. [4] are generally lower than those in Ref. [16]. The rela-
tively low values of the optical constants in Ref. [4] may be a result of excess hydro-
genation, or may be due to the effect of surface microroughness.
Gomez et al. [10] reported that rapid thermal annealing leads to nearly complete de-
hydrogenation of the a-Sil ...C.:H layers as deduced from SE and IR spectroscopy. On
the contrary, Janowitz et al. [19] studied the effects of ex-situ hydrogenation of rf-
sputtered a-Sil"'C, films in a rf hydrogen glow discharge using SE and found a drastic
change in £(E) which can be explained by the formation of a surface hydrogenated
polycrystalline carbon layer with a small oxygen content [20].
REFERENCES
1. D. Girginoudi and A. Thanailakis, J. Appl. Phys. 69, 1490 (1991).
2. D. A. Anderson and W. E. Spear, Phil. Mag. 35, 1 (1977).
3. T. Shimada, Y. Katayama, and K. F. Komatsubara, J. Appl. Phys. 50, 5530
(1979).
4. K. Mui, D. K. Basa, F. W. Smith, and R. Corderman, Phys. Rev. B 35, 8089
(1987).
5. F. J. Gomez, J. Martinez, J. Garrido, C. Gomez-Aleixandre, and J. Piqueras, J.
Non-Cryst. Solids 191,164 (1995).
6. S. Kim, J. S. Burnham, J. Koh, L. Jiao, C. R. Wronski, and R. W. Collins, J. Appl.
Phys. 80, 2420 (1996).
7. I. Pereyra, M. N. P. Carreno, M. H. Tabacniks, R. J. Prado, and M. C. A. Fantini, J.
Appl. Phys. 84, 2371 (1998).
8. A. Guivarc'h, J. Richard, M. Le Contellec, E. Ligeon, and J. Fontenille, J. Appl.
Phys. 51, 2167 (1980).
9. A. Matsuda, T. Yamaoka, S. Wolff, M. Koyama, Y. Imanishi, H. Kataoka, H.
Matsuoka, and K. Tanaka, J. Appl. Phys. 60,4025 (1986).
10. F. J. Gomez, J. Garrido, J. Martinez, and J. Piqueras, J. Electrochem. Soc. 143,
271 (1996).
11. F. J. G6mez, P. Prieto, E. Elizalde, and J. Piqueras, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 773
(1996).
12. M. H. Brodsky, R. S. Title, K. Weiser, and G. D. Pettit, Phys. Rev. B 1, 2632
(1970).
13. K. Mui and F. W. Smith, Phys. Rev. B 35, 8080 (1987).
14. D. E. Aspnes, A. A. Studna, and E. Kinsbron, Phys. Rev. B 29, 768 (1984).
686 AMORPHOUS SEMICONDUCTORS
687
688 AMORPHOUS SEMICONDUCTORS
GaP showed a weak structure at -21 eV [d (Ga)]. Optical properties in the far-IR [8]
and near-IR-visible regions of a-GaP:H [1,9] have also been reported.
Table F5-1 lists the room-temperature values of £=el+i~, n*=n+ik, <x, and R for a-
GaP. They were obtained for Eg).0421 eV from PrettI et al. [4] and for 0.5Q':S;6.0 eV
from Gheorghiu and Theye [5] (flash-evaporated at 140 K and annealed subsequently
at 300 K). The imaginary optical constants, k and <x, for F217 eV were taken from Gu-
dat et al. [7].
The (e l, ~, (n, k), and <X values in Table F5-1 are plotted in Figs. F5-1-F5-3, re-
spectively.
REFERENCES
1. N. Matsumoto and K. Kumabe, lpn. l. Appl. Phys. 18, 1011 (1979).
2. M. Onuki and H. Kubota, lpn. l. Appl. Phys. 26, 1404 (1987).
3. N. Elgun and E. A. Davis, l. Phys.: Condens. Matter 6,779 (1994).
4. W. PrettI, N. J. Shevchik, and M. Cardona, Phys. Status Solidi B 59,241 (1973).
5. A. Gheorghiu and M.-L. Theye, Phil. Mag. B 44, 285 (1981).
6. J. Stuke and G. Zimmerer, Phys. Status Solidi B 49, 513 (1972).
7. W. Gudat, E. E. Koch, P. Y. Yu, M. Cardona, and C. M. Penchina, Phys. Status
Solidi B 52, 505 (1972).
8. Z. P. Wang, L. Ley, and M. Cardona, Physica 117B&118B, 968 (1983).
9. J. C. Knights and R. A. Lujan, l. Appl. Phys. 49,1291 (1978).
a-GaP
15
10
2 4 6 8
Photon energy (eV)
Figure FS·l £1(E) and q(E) spectra for a-GaP at 300 K.
F5 a-GALLIUM PHOSPHIDE (a-GaP) 689
a-GaP
4
n
2
k
o 2 4 6 8
Photon energy (eV)
Figure FS-2 nCE) and kCE) spectra for a-GaP at 300 K.
106 a-GaP
105
~
5 104
'-"
~
<:j
103
102
101~~~~~~~~cl-~~
10-2 10-1 100 10 1 102
Photon energy (eV)
FigureFS-3 aCE) spectrum for a-GaP at 300 K.
690 AMORPHOUS SEMICONDUCTORS
692
F6 a-GALLIUM ARSENIDE (a-GaAs) 693
otherwise perfect crystal. At sufficiently high-ion fluencies, the damage tracks and the
crystalline solid becomes indistinguishable from amorphous material prepared in other
ways. Several reports have been published describing the optical properties of ion-
implanted GaAs [7-14]. The maximum ~ value of -16.7 at E-3.4 eV was obtained
from As+-ion-implanted GaAs with a fluence of lx1014 cm-2 at an energy of 270 keY
[9]. Note that this value is slightly smaller than the flash-evaporated a-GaAs value of
Gheorghiu and Theye [3] (~-17.0 at E-3.4 eV). Optical properties in the far-IR
[15-17] and near-IR-visible regions [17-22] of hydrogenated amorphous GaAs (a-
GaAs:H) have also been investigated.
We list Table F6-1 the room-temperature values of £=£I+i~, n*=n+ik, a, and R for
a-GaAs. They were obtained for Eg).0496 eV from Pretti et al. [2] and for 0.5SE$;6.0
eV from Gheorghiu and Theye [3] (flash-evaporated at 100 K and annealed subse-
quently at 300 K). The imaginary optical constants, k and a, for &16 eV were taken
from Oudat et al. [6].
The (£1' £Z), (n, k), and a values in Table F6-1 are shown in Figs. F6-1-F6-3, respec-
tively.
REFERENCES
a-GaAs
20
15
I.U 10
a-GaAs
5
n
4
..!:oI::
c: 3
2
k
1
o 1 2 43 5
Photon energy (eV)
Figure F6-2 n(E) and k(E) spectra for a-GaAs at 300 K.
106 a-GaAs
698
F7 a-GALLIUM ANTIMONIDE (a-GaSb) 699
GaSb. They were obtained for Eg).0471 eV from PrettI et al. [1] and for 0.2Q'~12 eV
from Stuke and Zimmerer [4]. The imaginary optical constants, k and a, for D-16 eV
were taken from Gudat et al. [6].
The (£1'~' (n, k), and a values in Table F7-1 are shown in Figs. F7-1-F7-3, respec-
tively.
REFERENCES
1. W. PrettI, N. J. Shevchik, and M. Cardona, Phys. Status Solidi B 59,241 (1973).
2. J. H. Dias da Silva, J. I. Cisneros, M. M. Guraya, and G. Zampieri, Phys. Rev. B
51,6272 (1995).
3. B. S. Naidu and P. J. Reddy, Thin Solid Films 61, 379 (1979).
4. J. Stuke and G. Zimmerer, Phys. Status Solidi B 49, 513 (1972).
5. A. Gheorghiu, T. Rappeneau, J. P. Dupin, and M. L. Theye, J. Phys. Colloq. 42,
C4-881 (1981).
6. W. Gudat, E. E. Koch, P. Y. Yu, M. Cardona, and C. M. Penchina, Phys. Status
Solidi B 52, 505 (1972).
7. Z. P. Wang, L. Ley, and M. Cardona, Physica 117B&118B, 968 (1983).
8. Yu-X. Zheng, Y.-H. Qian, L.-Y. Chen, S.-M. Zhou, Ya-D. Wang, C.-Lu Lin, Z.-P.
He, and An-S. Zheng, Solid State Commun. 96, 593 (1995).
32
28
a-GaSb
24
20
16
w
12
8
4
0
-4 2
0 4 6 8 10 12
Photon energy (eV)
Figure F7-1 £l(E) and £2(E) spectra for a-GaSb at 300 K.
700 AMORPHOUS SEMICONDUCTORS
5 a-GaSb
4
~
r:: 3
2
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Photon energy (eV)
Figure F7-2 neE) and k(E) spectra for a-GaSb at 300 K.
107
106
105
'I
r
-~
<:S
104
103
102 a-GaSb
703
704 AMORPHOUS SEMICONDUCTORS
REFERENCES
1. M. L. Theye, A. Gheorghiu, D. Udron, C. Senemaud, E. Belin, J. von Bardeleben,
S. Squelard, and J. Dupin, W. Pretti, N. J. Shevchik, and M. Cardona, Phys. Status
Solidi B 59, 241 (1973).
2. 1. Stuke and G. Zimmerer, Phys. Status Solidi B 49,513 (1972).
3. See, for instance, U. G. Akano, I. V. Mitchell, F. R. Shepherd, and C. J. Miner,
Can. f. Appi. Phys. 70, 7S9 (1992).
4. S. H. Baker, S. C. Bayliss, S. J. Gurman, N. Elgun, and E. A. Davis, f. Phys.:
Condens. Matter 8,1591 (1996).
5. W. Gudat, E. E. Koch, P. Y. Yu, M. Cardona, and C. M. Penchina, Phys. Status
Solidi B 52, 505 (1972).
18~~~~~~~~~~~'
16
a-lnP
14
2 4 6 8 10 12
Photon energy (eV)
Figure F8·1 £'1(E) and £'2(E) spectra for a-InP at 300 K.
F8 a-INDIUM PHOSPHIDE (a-InP) 705
a-lnP
4
3
c:
2
o 2 4 6 8 10 12
Photon energy (eV)
Figure FS-2 n(E) and k(E) spectra for a- InP at 300 K.
a-lnP
103~~~--~~~--~~~
100 101 102
Photon energy (eV)
Figure FS-3 aJ.E) spectrum for a-InP at 300 K.
706 AMORPHOUS SEMICONDUCTORS
REFERENCES
707
708 AMORPHOUS SEMICONDUCTORS
16 a-lnAs
12
l.U 8
o
-4~~~~~-L~~~~~
o 2 4 6 8 10 12
Photon energy (eV)
Figure F9-1 £I(E) and £2(E) spectra for a-InAs at 300 K.
a-lnAs
4
3
..lo::
c:::
2
o 2 4 6 8 10 12
Photon energy (eV)
Figure F9·2 n(E) and k(E) spectra for a-InAs at 300 K.
F9 a-INDIUM ARSENIDE (a-InAs) 709
107
106 a-lnAs
105
~
,
--5
ij
104
~
103
102
101 10_2
10-1 10° 101 102
Photon energy (eV)
Figure F9·3 C1i...E) spectrum for a-InAs at 300 K.
711
712 AMORPHOUS SEMICONDUCTORS
REFERENCES
1. J. Stuke and G. Zimmerer, Phys. Status Solidi B 49,513 (1972).
2. S. Adachi, T. Miyazaki, and S. Hamadate,l. Appl. Phys. 71,395 (1992).
3. T. Ojima and S. Adachi, f. Appl. Phys. 82, 3105 (1997).
4. W. Gudat, E. E. Koch, P. Y. Yu, M. Cardona, and C. M. Penchina, Phys. Status
Solidi B 52, 505 (1972).
a-lnSb
IAJ 12
B
4
0
-4
-BO 2 4 6 B 10 12
Photon energy (eV)
Figure FIO-I £1(E) and £2(E) spectra for a-InSb at 300 K.
FlO a-INDIUM ANTIMONIDE (a-InSb) 713
a-lnSb
8 10 12
Photon energy (eV)
Figure FIO·2 neE) and k(E) spectra for a-InSb at 300 K.
a-lnSb
10° 101
Photon energy (eV)
Figure FlO·3 acE) spectrum for a-InSb at 300 K.
714 AMORPHOUS SEMICONDUCTORS