Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=black.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the
scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that
promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Blackwell Publishing and American Anthropological Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to American Ethnologist.
http://www.jstor.org
infinitywithinthe brackets
documents
Conversation and practice within national, regional, and international institutions in many
parts of the world proceed according to readily accepted and largely implicit understandings
about proper bureaucratic behavior,1 and an essential element of this practice involves the
production, evaluation, dissemination, and collection of documents. Weber long ago drew
attention to the role of documents in what he termed "rationality":
Themanagement of themodernofficeis baseduponwrittendocuments["thefiles"],which arepreserved
in theiroriginalor draughtform.Thereis, therefore,a staffof subalternofficialsand scribesof sorts.The
body of officialsactivelyengaged in a "public"office, alongwith the respectiveapparatusof material
implementsandthe files, makeup a "bureau."[1991:97]
Spurredby calls to "anthropologize the West" (Rabinow 1986:241), a wealth of sophisticated
ethnography has emerged on the character of knowledge in late modern institutions (e.g.,
Brenneis 1994; Ferguson 1990; Haraway 1992; Herzfeld 1992; Malkki 1995; Rabinow 1989).
Few anthropological studies, however, have considered legal documents (and other artifactsof
bureaucratic knowledge) as aesthetic objects with uses distinct from their qualities as "texts"
(Smith 1990). What little attention has been given to documents has, for the most part, focused
narrowly on documents as instrumentsof political or ideological control.2 This attention to the
hidden politics of meaning (cf. Foucault 1979) has its uses.3 Yet where the "norms" are not
hidden but are excessively explicit and located on the surface, insistently posed and restated at
every turn,the documents themselves may have differentuses altogether, and so might the work
of anthropological analysis. Ratherthan uncover the norms latent in the forms (Rabinow 1989),
anthropologists might instead seek to visualize the forms latent in the norms themselves.
In this article I aim to understand one such documentary form, the international legal
instrument negotiated at global United Nations (UN) conferences. In September 1995, the UN
convened a three-week "global conference" of governments to assess the condition of women
and to formulate proposals for its improvement. The Conference of Non-Governmental Organ-
isations in Consultation with the UN Economic and Social Council (CONGO) convened a
parallel nongovernmental organizations (NGO) meeting. Known officially as the United Nations
Fourth World Conference on Women (FWCW or "Beijing Conference") in reflection of its
kinship with three previous UN women's conferences since 1975 (e.g., Fraser 1987; Nadel
a layered form
The Pacific Platform for Action (South Pacific Commission 1994), a text of some 20 pages
plus appendixes, enshrines an agreement of Pacific Island governments concerning national,
regional, and international development policies toward women. Negotiated at a 1994 inter-
governmental conference convened under the auspices of the South Pacific Commission (SPC)
in preparation for the FWCW,7 the text of the agreement, now printed as a glossy color
"document," sits on the shelves of the offices of governmental and nongovernmental organiza-
tions throughout the Pacific, amid scores of other similar documents. The image on the cover
PACIFIC PLATFORM
FOR ACTION
/<. SOUTHPACIFIC
COMMISION1994.
Figure 1. Cover design, Pacific Platform for Action (Noum6a: South Pacific Commission, 1994). Original
artworkby Jipe Lebars. Used by permission of the Secretariatof the Pacific Community (SPC).
a distinct turn to the visual, as one kind of mental apprehension (counting) gave way to another
(seeing). Another way of describing this turn to pattern is that the boundaries of the artifactwere
no longer foregrounded. Instead, when the mats were laid on the floor of a ceremonial space,
Figure3. Women layeringmats for the installationof the Roko Tui Bau, RatuJoni Madraiwiwi,November 10,
1995. Note that as the mats are layered, the continuation of the pattern beyond the artifactonto
the weave of the walls also becomes visible.
Ifthe generation of meaning through the transformativepower of analysis is not the objective
of negotiation, how does this institutional knowledge achieve its effects, and what effects does
it achieve? As we will see, the document's principal aesthetic device involves an alternation
between concreteness (the document as object) and abstraction (the document as pattern).We
can understandthe elicitation of this double view, that is, the alternation between object and
pattern, as negotiators' principal endeavor; it is the work of producing the document. There are
two central devices through which this effect is achieved. The first is the bracket.
Forthe most part, the layered collage on the cover of the Pacific Platformfor Action (Figure
1) consists of representationalimages; the photographs of negotiators or the text in the title point
to particular people or things. Yet in the case of the mats photographed in the image the
magnitude of detail is such that it is impossible to identify with any degree of certitude the kind
of mats shown in the photograph or their place of origin. As one progresses toward the upper
layers of the composition to the mat fabric directly beneath the title words, the camera zooms
in so closely that the shape of the mat is lost altogether, leaving only an abstractpatternof shapes
and colors. Inthe eye of the close-up lens, representationfades into patternas the camera moves
from one scale to the next.
Justas the background of the image on the Pacific Platformfor Action cover of layers of mat
and paper made visible through their gaps evokes the sense of levels behind levels, behind
every InstitutionalArrangements section, behind every use of the phrase "universal rights,"or
indeed behind every document and conference, delegates knew, lay countless others of the
same genre, artifactsof activity at other levels. Although negotiators always "knew" this, from
time to time the apprehension that each document, survey, or position paper was layered upon
countless others overtook them. They commented on the numberof people, the amount of time,
the amount of paper at stake in preparations to this point. For a moment, at least, the
apprehension of the seemingly infinite amount of texts or labor that text or labor concealed
imbued the events with a weightiness that was almost overwhelming.
Bringing such levels of action into view was a paramount concern. On returning from the
Beijing Conference, for example, the leader of the Fijidelegation argued vehemently in a major
speech to community groups that the ultimate purpose of the great expenditure of time and
public funds had been "to make an impact as a region, not as a country." Documents made a
region or level "visible"at the next level of negotiation, and Pacific delegates spoke with pride
of the new-found "visibility"of the Pacific "at the regional level." The national preparatory
conferences held in Fiji explicitly sought to replicate all of the UN processes "at the national
level" by organizing plenaries, working groups, and main committees, by tabling working
papers, and by producing agendas in standardized form. The aesthetic may have puzzled
These brackets were visual phenomena. Fijian negotiators noted in conversation that they
preferred some versions of the draft Platform for Action and the Beijing Declaration because
brackets were marked in bold font, thus making each instantly noticeable on the page. At Fiji's
national consultation, delegates carefully and laboriously marked the brackets with bright
highlighter pen on their copies so that these stood out in fluorescent yellow against the
remainder of the black type. Moving through the text involves focusing on one bracket after
another ratherthan proceeding evenly from one line to the next, as in ordinary reading. For
these Fijian delegates, the bracket was more than a representational marker of the lack of
consensus among states. It was also a self-representational graphic entity, and the project of
removing bracketsengendered a commitment that was independent of their commitment to the
conference's substantive political goals. For negotiators brackets were not asides, pauses, or
explanatory devices but focal points to which attention was immediately drawn (Riles in press).
The argument happened within the brackets.
More difficult to appreciate is the fact that the bracket was also a point of potentially infinite
internal expansion. The rule of such negotiations is that although one cannot alter nor add to
text outside the brackets, within the brackets a state can add as much as it wishes. Theoretically,
at least, a delegation could therefore propose within the scope of any one bracket an entirely
new text that would overtake and engulf the whole. Yet this potential infinity of text within the
brackets is contained within the concrete graphic parametersof the bracket on the page.
The bracket is an expansive moment in at least one other sense. When negotiators focused
their attention on the bracket, when they peered into its infinite potential, what was visible were
the layers and levels of language, of other documents, and of alternative possibilities out of
which the text had been created, as proposed amendments were taken largely from documents
produced at other levels. As noted earlier, these successive layers of previous debates, previous
interventions, or previous drafts and amendments all partook of a similar patterning of words,
phrases, paragraphs, and sections. Text within brackets had the potential for endless internal
fragmentation. Forexample, at Fiji'snational consultation debate over the resolution of a single
bracket among the delegates with whom I worked decomposed into a conversation about the
languages in which chemicals are labeled in Fiji, the programmingon national television, the
recent death of one of their members, or the impeding privatization of the hospital; for to focus
Negotiators seeking to mask infinity within the brackets found what from an academic point
of view seems like an improbable ally in language, and, in particular, in the second principal
device of their aesthetic activity, the quotation. In negotiations, the chair directed negotiators'
attention to a particularbracket, and, as they turned their attention away from the text as a whole
to the specific bracket, gaps among proposed versions of the language collected within the
bracket came into view. Forexample, in paragraph223 (reprintedabove), the chair might direct
negotiators' attention to the distance between the two final bracketed phrases ("[Therefore,the
unique reproductive . . . ]" and "[Changes in both men's and women's consciousness ....").
Inside the bracket itself, therefore, the same pattern of gaps that characterized the bracket's
relationship to the main text reemerged. "Could any delegation suggest language that might
bridge this gap?"the chair asked. And negotiators began to "bring in language" to attempt to
close it. At this stage, as one of the Pacific's most skilled negotiators explained to NGOs,
everything but language and politics was left behind-women, the Pacific, the issues. What
NGOs should do, she instructed them, was to propose language that would "bridgethe gaps"
among the texts suggested by the major delegations, for this was the only way to participate
effectively.
Proposing language to bridge the gaps was not a process of thinking of an evocative phrase
or of putting meaning into words. Indeed, as paragraph 233 illustrates, negotiated language
often fails to conform to what academics would consider standardsof proper grammar, let alone
elegant form. Rather,delegates know that there are certain words that they would like to see
included in the brackets, and others that they cannot allow. Bridging the gap is a matter of
I have described a double view. First,just as the patternofthe vivivi emerged from the layering
of one mat onto the next, we saw that the apprehension of the PlatformforAction and the Beijing
Declaration entailed a loss of representation-as happened at the point at which counting of
brackets, like the counting of mats, failed-and that this loss also enabled the realization of "the
pattern which connects" (Bateson 1980:8) one level (of documents, of conferences, of text) to
the next. In this apprehension of pattern, the difference of scale that separated the negotiator
from the document or the global from the local was no longer foregrounded.
There were also points at which the document, as an object, was distinct from the patterns
of conference procedure and the patterns in delegates' minds. Such moments were also those
at which only one level of language was accessible, while others were (temporarily)closed.
The concrete document was an encapsulation of the infinity of pattern within something that
stood on its own, just as the vivivi could be rolled up and taken away. The possibility of the
further extension of the pattern always remained: a copy of the document could always be
reproduced an infinite number of times. Yet for infinity to emerge anew would require some
notes
Acknowledgments. Ithank Leigh Bienen, Don Brenneis,John Comaroff,Tim Earle,James Ferguson, Bryant
Garth, Michael Herzfeld, David Kennedy, Hiro Miyazaki, Adam Reed, Claire Slatter, Verena Stolcke,
Marilyn Strathern,Chris Tennant, Nicholas Thomas, Christina Toren, and four anonymous reviewers for
helpful criticism, and Jane Campion and Mike Przyuskifor assistance in preparingthe manuscript. I am also
grateful to the Fiji Government's Department of Women and Culture and to the many members of the Fiji
NGO community for their generous assistance. This research was funded by grants from the Cambridge
Commonwealth Livingstone and Overseas Trust, the Ford Foundation, the Smuts Fund, Trinity College,
Cambridge, the William Wyse Fund, and the American BarFoundation. Portionswere presented at the 1995
Annual Meeting of the American Ethnological Society in San Juan, Puerto Rico.
1. This article draws upon 18 months of fieldwork in Suva, Fiji, and at UN meetings. Suva is the
administrativehub for a wide range of regional and internationalorganizations working in the South Pacific.
The major UN development institutions-the UN Development Fund (UNDP), the UN Fund for Women
(UNIFEM),the UN Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA), the UN Children's Fund (UNICEF),and
others-have offices in Suva from which they direct projectsthroughout the Pacific, as do large governmental
and international aid agencies such as AusAID (the Australian national aid agency) or the World Council
of Churches, and international pressure groups such as Greenpeace. During the period of 1994-96 when I
conducted fieldwork, typical projects included providing training courses in areas such as "ruraldevelop-
ment skills" or "data management," sponsoring regional and international meetings on banking policies or
water sanitation methods, producing legal documents and pamphlets for popular audiences, lobbying
Pacific Island governments for the ratifications of international agreements, gathering demographic data,
and mounting public awareness campaigns.
Suva also serves as the administrative base for numerous regional intergovernmentalbodies. The SPC, an
organization of Pacific Island states and formercolonial powers in the region, operates many of its programs
from Suva. Similarly, Suva hosts the headquartersof the secretariatof the South Pacific Forum, an economic
and political alliance of Pacific Island states devoted to political and legal harmonization of law and policy
in areas such as trade, maritime, environmental, defense, and foreign policy. The work of these organizations
included negotiating regional and international agreements, devising and implementing developmental
programs, conducting studies, maintaining databases, providing "technical assistance" to Pacific Island
governments and representing Pacific concerns in other internationalforums. At the top management level,
these organizations were staffed by university-educated Pacific Islanderswith diplomatic experience drawn
from the region at large, or, in some cases, by expatriates. Most of the remaining staffers in the Fiji offices
were Fijicitizens of diverse cultural and educational backgrounds.
2. For example, Malkki (1995), following Foucault (1979), considers the extent to which UN identity
cards define refugee identities:
documentation can come to be a very efficient technique of power by means of which people can be
fixed and objectified and, in the process, rendered more visible as objects of knowledge and targets of
"care and control." [1995:1 70]
Foster (1995) has called attention to the role of the "rhetorical form" in collective imaginations of
nationhood. His interest is in "forms"such as flags and advertisements as "markersof... shared subjective
identity" (1997:154) and in advertisement rhetoric as a medium for the transfer of (hidden) meaning
(1997:155 et passim), that is, in the interpretationof the symbolic politics of forms. The knowledge practices
at stake in global UN meetings, however, foreclose the possibility of such interpretive moves.
3. Rabinow has recently commented on the "relentless, omnivorous, and insatiable demands" on
"knowledge-producers" to generate "meaning" (1996:xiv).
4. For its part, the NGO Forum was designed as a formal counterweight to the governmental meeting; it
was precisely what that meeting was not. From structural adjustment to yoga, the program of activities
advertised a choice of 350 workshop topics each day. As one NGO newsletter emphasized,
The Forumis not designed to take formal positions; it has no fixed "agenda,"and does not adopt resolutions
as a body. ... It is a means of creating and exchanging ideas, and not an end in itself... its success lies
in the follow-up activities at the national level. [Asian and Pacific Development Center 1994:5]
5. Officially, the PrepCom was also the annual meeting of the Commission on the Status of Women
(CSW), an organization of member states elected on a rotating basis from the membership of the UN's
Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC),the major UN organ of which the CSW is a part. All UN member
states and official observers were invited to send delegations to the PrepCom and the FWCW.
6. In addition to the actual intergovernmental agreements, many other kinds of "documents" are also
produced in the course of this process, including shadow documents drafted by NGOs, newspaper articles,
newsletters, films, and demonstrations. In this article I limit discussion to the official negotiated document.
references cited