Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
n/a = not applicable
treated
Author Outcome Duration N Comparison(s)
Henry, et al.
2007
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
10 - 140
Weeks
374
MND w/ CTR vs.
No MND, no CTR ● ○ ● ● ● n/a n/a
Henry, et al.
2007
Neuropathic Pain Syndrome
10 - 140
Weeks
374
MND w/ CTR vs.
No MND, no CTR ● ○ ● ● ● n/a n/a
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Young, et al.
2003
Pain free 7 Years 85
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × ● ○ ○ ○ × n/a n/a
McQueen, et al.
1996
Complications n/a 109
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × ● ○ ○ ● × n/a n/a
Abbaszadegan, et al.
1990
Function - VAS 8 Weeks 46
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Abbaszadegan, et al.
1990
Pain - VAS 8 Weeks 46
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Abbaszadegan, et al.
1990
Function - VAS 12 Weeks 46
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Abbaszadegan, et al.
1990
Pain - VAS 12 Weeks 46
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Abbaszadegan, et al.
1990
Function - VAS 24 Weeks 46
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Abbaszadegan, et al.
1990
Pain - VAS 24 Weeks 46
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Abbaszadegan, et al.
1990
Function - VAS 1 Year 46
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Abbaszadegan, et al.
1990
Pain - VAS 1 Year 46
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Howard, et al.
1989
Complications n/a 50
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Pring, et al.
1988
Complications n/a 67
Bipolar fixation vs.
Cast × × ○ × ● ● n/a n/a
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Krukhaug, et al.
2009
DASH 1 Year 71
External fixation - non-bridging vs.
External fixation - dynamic bridging × ● ○ ● ● ● n/a n/a
Egol, et al.
2008
DASH 3 Months 77
External fixation - bridging and K wires vs.
Volar locking plate ● ● ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Egol, et al.
2008
Pain - VAS 3 Months 77
External fixation - bridging and K wires vs.
Volar locking plate ● ● ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Egol, et al.
2008
DASH 6 Months 77
External fixation - bridging and K wires vs.
Volar locking plate ● ● ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Egol, et al.
2008
Pain - VAS 6 Months 77
External fixation - bridging and K wires vs.
Volar locking plate ● ● ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Egol, et al.
2008
DASH 1 Year 77
External fixation - bridging and K wires vs.
Volar locking plate ● ● ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Egol, et al.
2008
Pain - VAS 1 Year 77
External fixation - bridging and K wires vs.
Volar locking plate ● ● ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Leung, et al.
2008
Social activity
(none- slight)
n/a 144
External fixation - bridging and K-wires vs.
Plate(s) ● ● ○ ○ ● × n/a n/a
Leung, et al.
2008
Activities of daily living
(none- slight)
n/a 144
External fixation - bridging and K-wires vs.
Plate(s) ● ● ○ ○ ● × n/a n/a
Leung, et al.
2008
Normal work
(none- slight)
n/a 144
External fixation - bridging and K-wires vs.
Plate(s) ● ● ○ ○ ● × n/a n/a
vanManen, et al.
2008
DASH 1 Year 32
Bio-resorbable plate vs.
Metal plate × ● ● ● ● × n/a n/a
Kreder, et al.
2005
SF-36 (bodily pain) n/a 118
Indirect reduction and percutaneous fixation vs.
Open reduction and internal fixation ● × ○ ○ ○ × n/a n/a
Kreder, et al.
2005
MFA upper limb n/a 118
Indirect reduction and percutaneous fixation vs.
Open reduction and internal fixation ● × ○ ○ ○ × n/a n/a
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Harley, et al.
2004
DASH 6 Months 41
Augmented external fixation - bridging vs.
Percutaneous pinning × × ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Harley, et al.
2004
SF-36 (physical) 6 Months 41
Augmented external fixation - bridging vs.
Percutaneous pinning × × ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Harley, et al.
2004
SF-36 (mental) 6 Months 41
Augmented external fixation - bridging vs.
Percutaneous pinning × × ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Harley, et al.
2004
DASH 12 Months 33
Augmented external fixation - bridging vs.
Percutaneous pinning × × ○ ● ○ × n/a n/a
Harley, et al.
2004
SF-36 (physical) 12 Months 33
Augmented external fixation - bridging vs.
Percutaneous pinning × × ○ ● ○ × n/a n/a
Harley, et al.
2004
SF-36 (mental) 12 Months 33
Augmented external fixation - bridging vs.
Percutaneous pinning × × ○ ● ○ × n/a n/a
Krishnan, et al.
2003
Pain - VAS 6 Weeks 60
External fixation - bridging vs.
External fixation - non-bridging × ● ○ ○ ● × n/a n/a
Krishnan, et al.
2003
Pain - VAS 26 Weeks 60
External fixation - bridging vs.
External fixation - non-bridging × ● ○ ○ ● × n/a n/a
Werber, et al.
2003
Complications n/a 50
External fixation - four pins, bridging vs.
External fixation - five pins, bridging ○ × ○ ○ ● × n/a n/a
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Hahnloser, et al.
1999
Pain - VAS (none) n/a 46
Dorsal plate vs.
Two 1/4 tube plates ○ ○ ● ○ ● × n/a n/a
Hahnloser, et al.
1999
Activities of daily living n/a 46
Dorsal plate vs.
Two 1/4 tube plates ○ ○ ● ○ ● × n/a n/a
Hahnloser, et al.
1999
Pain - VAS (mild, 0-3) n/a 46
Dorsal plate vs.
Two 1/4 tube plates ○ ○ ● ○ ● × n/a n/a
Hahnloser, et al.
1999
Pain - VAS (moderate, 4-7) n/a 46
Dorsal plate vs.
Two 1/4 tube plates ○ ○ ● ○ ● × n/a n/a
Hahnloser, et al.
1999
Pain - VAS (severe, 8-10) n/a 46
Dorsal plate vs.
Two 1/4 tube plates ○ ○ ● ○ ● × n/a n/a
McQueen, et al.
1998
Pain 1 Year 56
External fixation - bridging vs.
External fixation - non-bridging × ● ○ × ● ● n/a n/a
McQueen, et al.
1998
Pain - VAS 1 Year 56
External fixation - bridging vs.
External fixation - non-bridging × ● ○ × ● ● n/a n/a
McQueen, et al.
1998
Pain, DRUJ 1 Year 56
External fixation - bridging vs.
External fixation - non-bridging × ● ○ × ● ● n/a n/a
McQueen, et al.
1998
Pain, carpal 1 Year 56
External fixation - bridging vs.
External fixation - non-bridging × ● ○ × ● ● n/a n/a
Ludvigsen, et al.
1997
Complications n/a 60
Percutaneous pinning vs.
External fixation - bridging × ● ○ ○ ● ○ n/a n/a
Hutchinson, et al.
1995
Complications n/a 85
Pins and plaster vs.
External fixation - bridging × × ○ ○ ● × n/a n/a
Pritchett, et al.
1995
Complications n/a 100
External fixation - bridging vs.
Medullary pinning × × ○ ○ ● × n/a n/a
Raskin, et al.
1993
Activities of daily living
Final
Followup
60
Pins and Plaster vs.
External fixation - bridging × × ○ ○ ● × n/a n/a
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Azzopardi, et al.
2005
Pain - VAS 1 Year 57
Percutaneous pinning vs.
Cast ● × ○ ○ ● × n/a n/a
Azzopardi, et al.
2005
SF-36 (mental) 1 Year 57
Percutaneous pinning vs.
Cast ● × ○ ○ ● × n/a n/a
Azzopardi, et al.
2005
SF-36 (physical) 1 Year 57
Percutaneous pinning vs.
Cast ● × ○ ○ ● × n/a n/a
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Function - difficulty lifting cup 6 Weeks 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Function - difficulty w/ fine hand
coordination
6 Weeks 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Function - difficulty w/ heavy
load bearing
6 Weeks 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Function - difficulty wringing 6 Weeks 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Pain, radiocarpal 6 Weeks 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Pain, radioulnar 6 Weeks 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Pain, ulnocarpal 6 Weeks 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Function - difficulty lifting cup 3 Months 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Function - difficulty w/ fine hand
coordination
3 Months 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Function - difficulty w/ heavy
load bearing
3 Months 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Function - difficulty wringing 3 Months 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Pain, radiocarpal 3 Months 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Pain, radioulnar 3 Months 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Pain, ulnocarpal 3 Months 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Function - difficulty lifting cup 1 Year 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Function - difficulty w/ fine hand
coordination
1 Year 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Function - difficulty w/ heavy
load bearing
1 Year 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Function - difficulty wringing 1 Year 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Pain, radiocarpal 1 Year 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Pain, radioulnar 1 Year 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Hegeman, et al.
2004
Pain, ulnocarpal 1 Year 32
External fixation - bridging vs.
Cast × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
External fixation - following
Roumen, et al.
1991
Pain (continuous) 26 Weeks 101 redisplacement vs.
Cast - following redisplacement
× × ○ × ● × n/a n/a
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
n/a = not applicable
treated
Author Outcome Duration N Treatment(s)
Oshige, et al.
2007
Complications n/a 62
Intrafocal pinning vs.
Volar locking plate ● ● ● ● ● n/a n/a
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Tumia, et al.
2003
Pain - Likert 10 Days 182
Cast vs.
Functional brace ● × ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Tumia, et al.
2003
Pain - Likert 5 Weeks 182
Cast vs.
Functional brace ● × ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Tumia, et al.
2003
Pain - Likert 8 Weeks 182
Cast vs.
Functional brace ● × ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Tumia, et al.
2003
Pain - Likert 12 Weeks 182
Cast vs.
Functional brace ● × ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Tumia, et al.
2003
Pain - Likert 24 Weeks 182
Cast vs.
Functional brace ● × ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Moir, et al.
1995
Pain - VAS 10-14 Days 79
Full forearm cast vs.
Brace ● × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Moir, et al.
1995
Pain - VAS 5-6 Weeks 79
Full forearm cast vs.
Brace ● × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Moir, et al.
1995
Pain - VAS 8 Weeks 79
Full forearm cast vs.
Brace ● × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Moir, et al.
1995
Pain - VAS 13 Weeks 79
Full forearm cast vs.
Brace ● × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Moir, et al.
1995
Pain - VAS 26 Weeks 79
Full forearm cast vs.
Brace ● × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Ledingham, et al.
1991
Complications n/a 57
Below elbow cast vs.
Functional brace × × ○ × ● × n/a n/a
Bunger, et al.
1984
Complications n/a 136
Below or above elbow cast vs.
Functional brace in supination × × ○ × ● × n/a n/a
Stewart, et al.
1984
Complications n/a 235
Below elbow cast vs.
Above elbow cast-brace in supination ○ ○ ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
O'Connor, et al.
2003
Pain - VAS 1 Week 66
Below elbow cast vs.
Elastic/aluminum brace ○ ○ ○ ● ● ● n/a n/a
O'Connor, et al.
2003
Pain - VAS 2 Weeks 66
Below elbow cast vs.
Elastic/aluminum brace ○ ○ ○ ● ● ● n/a n/a
O'Connor, et al.
2003
Pain - VAS 6 Weeks 66
Below elbow cast vs.
Elastic/aluminum brace ○ ○ ○ ● ● ● n/a n/a
Tumia, et al.
2003
Pain - Likert 10 Days 147
Cast vs.
Functional brace ● × ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Tumia, et al.
2003
Pain - Likert 5 Weeks 147
Cast vs.
Functional brace ● × ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Tumia, et al.
2003
Pain - Likert 8 Weeks 147
Cast vs.
Functional brace ● × ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Tumia, et al.
2003
Pain - Likert 12 Weeks 147
Cast vs.
Functional brace ● × ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Tumia, et al.
2003
Pain - Likert 24 Weeks 147
Cast vs.
Functional brace ● × ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Abbaszadegan, et al.
1989
Pain - VAS 11 Days 68
Dorsal plaster cast vs.
Elastic bandage × × ○ × ● × n/a n/a
Abbaszadegan, et al.
1989
Pain - VAS 4 Weeks 68
Dorsal plaster cast vs.
Elastic bandage × × ○ × ● × n/a n/a
Abbaszadegan, et al.
1989
Pain - VAS 8 Weeks 68
Dorsal plaster cast vs.
Elastic bandage × × ○ × ● × n/a n/a
Abbaszadegan, et al.
1989
Pain - VAS 1 Year 68
Dorsal plaster cast vs.
Elastic bandage × × ○ × ● × n/a n/a
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Davis, et al.
1987
Pain - VAS 4 Weeks 52
Below elbow cast vs.
Elastic tubular brace × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Davis, et al.
1987
Pain - VAS 6 Weeks 52
Below elbow cast vs.
Elastic tubular brace × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Davis, et al.
1987
ADL - handling coin >5 Weeks 52
Below elbow cast vs.
Elastic tubular brace × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Davis, et al.
1987
ADL - use of knife/fork >5 Weeks 52
Below elbow cast vs.
Elastic tubular brace × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Davis, et al.
1987
ADL - using a can opener >5 Weeks 52
Below elbow cast vs.
Elastic tubular brace × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Davis, et al.
1987
ADL - turning key >5 Weeks 52
Below elbow cast vs.
Elastic tubular brace × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Davis, et al.
1987
ADL - carrying shopping bag >5 Weeks 52
Below elbow cast vs.
Elastic tubular brace × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Bong, et al.
2006
DASH 1-2 Weeks 85
Sugar tong cast vs.
Radial gutter cast ● × ○ ○ ○ × n/a n/a
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Varitimidis, et al.
2008
DASH 3 Months 40
Arthroscopy and Fluoroscopy vs.
Fluoroscopy only × ● ● ● ● × n/a n/a
Varitimidis, et al.
2008
DASH 12 Months 40
Arthroscopy and Fluoroscopy vs.
Fluoroscopy only × ● ● ● ● × n/a n/a
Varitimidis, et al.
2008
DASH 24 Months 40
Arthroscopy and Fluoroscopy vs.
Fluoroscopy only × ● ● ● ● × n/a n/a
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
treated
Author Outcome Duration N Comparison(s)
Ruch, et al.
2004
DASH
12-17
Months
30
Arthroscopy and Fluoroscopy vs.
Fluoroscopy only ● × ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Varitimidis, et al.
2008
DASH 3 Months 40
Treatment of ligament injuries vs.
No treatment × ● ● ● ● × n/a n/a
Varitimidis, et al.
2008
DASH 12 Months 40
Treatment of ligament injuries vs.
No treatment × ● ● ● ● × n/a n/a
Varitimidis, et al.
2008
DASH 24 Months 40
Treatment of ligament injuries vs.
No treatment × ● ● ● ● × n/a n/a
Harness, et al.
N
25
Radiograph plus
2D CT and/or 3D CT
n/a = not applicable
● = Yes ○ = No ? = Not Reported
Operative findings
Reference Standard
Spectrum bias
avoided
Page 61 of 138
Appropriate reference standard
Evidence Table 32
described
Advanced Imaging for Intra-articular Distal Radius Fractures
Withdrawals explained
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Evidence Table 33
Advanced Imaging for Intra-articular Distal Radius Fractures
Diagnostic Accuracy Studies DATA
Author N Index Test Reference Standard True Positives False Positives False Negatives True Negatives
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Rajan, et al.
2006
Activities of daily living
(moderate - severe)
12 Months 90
Allograft vs.
Autograft ○ ○ ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Rajan, et al.
2006
Activities of daily living
(none- slight)
12 Months 90
Allograft vs.
Autograft ○ ○ ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Rajan, et al.
2006
Pain - VAS
(discomforting - intense)
12 Months 90
Allograft vs.
Autograft ○ ○ ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Rajan, et al.
2006
Pain - VAS
(none - mild)
12 Months 90
Allograft vs.
Autograft ○ ○ ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Cassidy, et al.
2003
Complications n/a 294
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting or External Fixation ○ × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Zimmermann, et al.
2003
DASH - function/symptom
21 - 29
Months
52
Calcium phosphate vs.
Percutaneous Pinning × × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Zimmermann, et al.
2003
DASH - music/sport/work
21 - 29
Months
52
Calcium phosphate vs.
Percutaneous Pinning × × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radiocarpal - VAS
(none)
3 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radiocarpal - VAS
(mild)
3 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radiocarpal - VAS
(moderate)
3 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radiocarpal - VAS
(severe)
3 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radioulnar - VAS
(none)
3 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radioulnar - VAS
(mild)
3 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radioulnar - VAS
(moderate)
3 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radioulnar - VAS
(severe)
3 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radiocarpal - VAS
(none)
6 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radiocarpal - VAS
(mild)
6 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radiocarpal - VAS
(moderate)
6 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radiocarpal - VAS
(severe)
6 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radioulnar - VAS
(none)
6 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radioulnar - VAS
(mild)
6 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radioulnar - VAS
(moderate)
6 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radioulnar - VAS
(severe)
6 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radiocarpal - VAS
(none)
12 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radiocarpal - VAS
(mild)
12 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radiocarpal - VAS
(moderate)
12 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radiocarpal - VAS
(severe)
12 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radioulnar - VAS
(none)
12 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radioulnar - VAS
(mild)
12 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radioulnar - VAS
(moderate)
12 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Sanchez-Sotelo, et al.
2000
Pain, radioulnar - VAS
(severe)
12 Months 110
Calcium phosphate vs.
Casting ● × ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Kopylov, et al.
1999
Function - VAS 5 Weeks 40
Calcium phosphate vs.
External fixation × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Kopylov, et al.
1999
Pain - VAS 7 Weeks 40
Calcium phosphate vs.
External fixation × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Kopylov, et al.
1999
Function - VAS 1 Year 38
Calcium phosphate vs.
External fixation × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Kopylov, et al.
1999
Pain - VAS 1 Year 38
Calcium phosphate vs.
External fixation × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
McQueen, et al.
1996
Complications n/a 109
Autograft vs.
Casting or External Fixation × ● ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Schmalholz, et al.
1990
Pain free 2 Months 48
Methylmethacrylate vs.
External Fixation ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ n/a n/a
Schmalholz, et al.
1990
Pain free 3 Months 48
Methylmethacrylate vs.
External Fixation ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ n/a n/a
Schmalholz, et al.
1990
Pain free 6 Months 48
Methylmethacrylate vs.
External Fixation ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ n/a n/a
Schmalholz, et al.
1990
Pain free 12 Months 48
Methylmethacrylate vs.
External Fixation ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ n/a n/a
Schmalholz, et al.
1989
Pain free 2 Months 47
Methylmethacrylate vs.
Casting ○ ○ ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Schmalholz, et al.
1989
Pain free 3 Months 47
Methylmethacrylate vs.
Casting ○ ○ ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Schmalholz, et al.
1989
Pain free 6 Months 47
Methylmethacrylate vs.
Casting ○ ○ ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Schmalholz, et al.
1989
Pain free 12 Months 47
Methylmethacrylate vs.
Casting ○ ○ ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Schmalholz, et al.
1989
Pain free 18 Months 47
Methylmethacrylate vs.
Casting ○ ○ ○ ○ × × n/a n/a
Uninterpretable/Intermediate test
Partial verification bias avoided
Appropriate reference standard
Withdrawals explained
Clinical review bias
● = Yes ○ = No ? = Not Reported
result(s) reported
Test review bias
Spectrum bias
described
avoided
avoided
avoided
avoided
avoided
avoided
n/a = not applicable
Barrett-Connor, et al.
2008
158940
Incident Distal Radius
Fracture
Subsequent Fragility
Fracture ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Schousboe, et al.
2005
9704
Incident Distal Radius
Fracture
Subsequent Fragility
Fracture ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Gunnes, et al.
1998
29802
Incident Distal Radius
Fracture
Subsequent Fragility
Fracture ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Mallmin, et al.
1993
2676
Incident Distal Radius
Fracture
Subsequent Fragility
Fracture ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Gardsell, et al.
1989
1076
Incident Distal Radius
Fracture
Subsequent Fragility
Fracture ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Cooper, et al.
1988
900
Incident Distal Radius
Fracture
Subsequent Fragility
Fracture ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
n/a = not applicable
treated
Author Outcome Duration N Comparison(s)
Lindau, et al.
2000
Pain - VAS (at rest) >1 Year 76
Unstable DRUJ vs.
Stable DRUJ ● ● ● ● ● n/a n/a
Lindau, et al.
2000
Pain - VAS (at load) >1 Year 76
Unstable DRUJ vs.
Stable DRUJ ● ● ● ● ● n/a n/a
Roysam, et al.
1993
Pain free 6 Weeks 170
DRUJ involvement vs.
No DRUJ involvement ● × ● ● ● n/a n/a
Roysam, et al.
1993
Pain free 6 Months 170
DRUJ involvement vs.
No DRUJ involvement ● × ● ● ● n/a n/a
Roysam, et al.
1993
Pain free 1 Year 170
DRUJ involvement vs.
No DRUJ involvement ● × ● ● ● n/a n/a
Uninterpretable/Intermediate test
Partial verification bias avoided
Appropriate reference standard
Withdrawals explained
Clinical review bias
● = Yes ○ = No ? = Not Reported
result(s) reported
Test review bias
Spectrum bias
described
avoided
avoided
avoided
avoided
avoided
avoided
n/a = not applicable
Nakamura, et al.
1995
56
Bilateral, standard
lateral x-rays
CT ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ? ? ? ● ●
Mino, et al.
1985
15 True lateral x-ray CT ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ? ? ? ● ●
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Krischak, et al.
2009
PRWE 6 Weeks 46
Supervised therapy vs.
Home based × × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Maciel, et al.
2005
PRWE - Activity 6 Weeks 35
Supervised therapy vs.
Home based × ● ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Maciel, et al.
2005
PRWE - Pain 6 Weeks 35
Supervised therapy vs.
Home based × ● ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Maciel, et al.
2005
PRWE - Participation 6 Weeks 35
Supervised therapy vs.
Home based × ● ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Maciel, et al.
2005
PRWE Total 6 Weeks 35
Supervised therapy vs.
Home based × ● ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Maciel, et al.
2005
PRWE - Activity 24 Weeks 33
Supervised therapy vs.
Home based × ● ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Maciel, et al.
2005
PRWE - Pain 24 Weeks 33
Supervised therapy vs.
Home based × ● ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Maciel, et al.
2005
PRWE - Participation 24 Weeks 33
Supervised therapy vs.
Home based × ● ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Maciel, et al.
2005
PRWE Total 24 Weeks 33
Supervised therapy vs.
Home based × ● ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Kay, et al.
2000
Function - VAS 3 Weeks 39
Supervised therapy vs.
Home based ● × ○ ● ● ● n/a n/a
Kay, et al.
2000
Pain - VAS 3 Weeks 39
Supervised therapy vs.
Home based ● × ○ ● ● ● n/a n/a
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Kay, et al.
2000
Function - VAS 6 Weeks 39
Supervised therapy vs.
Home based ● × ○ ● ● ● n/a n/a
Wakefield, et al.
2000
Pain - VAS 6 Weeks 96
Supervised therapy vs.
Home based ● × ○ ○ ● × n/a n/a
Kay, et al.
2000
Pain - VAS 6 Weeks 39
Supervised therapy vs.
Home based ● × ○ ● ● ● n/a n/a
Wakefield, et al.
2000
Pain - VAS 3 Months 90
Supervised therapy vs.
Home based ● × ○ ○ ● × n/a n/a
Wakefield, et al.
2000
Pain - VAS 6 Months 66
Supervised therapy vs.
Home based ● × ○ ○ ○ × n/a n/a
Taylor, et al.
1994
Number of days to discharge n/a 30
Supervised therapy vs.
Sham therapy × × ● × ● ● n/a n/a
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 100 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 54
Immediate Active Finger Motion after Diagnosis of Distal Radius Fracture
Included and Excluded Articles
Included or
Author Title
Reason for Exclusion
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 101 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 55
Post-operative Wrist Motion for Distal Radius Fractures
Included and Excluded Articles
Included or
Author Title
Reason for Exclusion
Lozano-Calderon, et al.
2008
Wrist mobilization following volar plate fixation of fractures of the distal part of the radius INCLUDED
Allain, et al. Trans-styloid fixation of fractures of the distal radius. A prospective randomized comparison between 6-
1999 and 1-week postoperative immobilization in 60 fractures INCLUDED
McQueen, et al. Redisplaced unstable fractures of the distal radius: a prospective randomised comparison of four methods
1996 of treatment INCLUDED
Yamamoto, et al.
Treatment for unstable Colles' fractures using external fixation Could not obtain
2004
VangHansen, et al. Does not enroll operatively
A comparison of 3 and 5 weeks immobilization for older type 1 and 2 Colles' fractures
1998 treated patients
Millett, et al. Does not enroll operatively
Early mobilization in the treatment of Colles' fracture: a 3 year prospective study
1995 treated patients
Dias, et al. Does not enroll operatively
The value of early mobilisation in the treatment of Colles' fractures
1987 treated patients
McAuliffe, et al. Does not enroll operatively
Early mobilisation of Colles' fractures. A prospective trial
1987 treated patients
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 102 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 56
Post-operative Wrist Motion for Distal Radius Fractures
Quality and Design of Randomized Controlled Trials
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Lozano-Calderon, et al.
2008
DASH 3 Months 56
Early motion vs.
Late motion ● × ○ ○ ● × n/a n/a
Lozano-Calderon, et al.
2008
Pain - ordinal 3 Months 56
Early motion vs.
Late motion ● × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Lozano-Calderon, et al.
2008
DASH 6 Months 54
Early motion vs.
Late motion ● × ○ ○ ● × n/a n/a
Lozano-Calderon, et al.
2008
Pain - ordinal 6 Months 54
Early motion vs.
Late motion ● × ○ ○ ● ● n/a n/a
Allain, et al.
1999
Pain - VAS 4 Weeks 60
Early motion vs.
Late motion ○ ○ ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
Allain, et al.
1999
Pain - VAS 1 Year 60
Early motion vs.
Late motion ○ ○ ○ ● ● × n/a n/a
McQueen, et al.
1996
Complications n/a 54
Early motion vs.
Late motion × ● ○ ○ ● × n/a n/a
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 103 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 57
Post-operative Wrist Motion for Distal Radius Fractures
Randomized Controlled Studies DATA
Author Outcome Duration N Comparison(s) Early motion Late motion
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 104 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 58
Removal of Percutaneous Pins and/or External Fixator in Distal Radius Fracture
Included and Excluded Articles
Included or
Author Title
Reason for Exclusion
Haddad, et al.
2000
External fixation of distal radial fractures: 3 or 5 weeks of external fixation INCLUDED
Kaempffe, et al.
2000
External fixation for distal radius fractures: effect of distraction on outcome INCLUDED
Kaempffe, et al. Severe fractures of the distal radius: effect of amount and duration of external fixator distraction on
1993 outcome INCLUDED
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 105 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 59
Removal of Percutaneous Pins and/or External Fixator in Distal Radius Fracture
Quality and Design of Prospective Non-Randomized Controlled Studies
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
n/a = not applicable
treated
Author Outcome Duration N Comparison(s)
Haddad, et al.
2000
Solgaard score
Final
follow-up
37
3 weeks external fixation vs.
5 weeks external fixation ● × ● ○ ● n/a n/a
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 106 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 60
Removal of Percutaneous Pins and/or External Fixator in Distal Radius Fracture
Quality and Design of Prognostic Studies
Goodness-of-fit reported
10 patients per variable
● = Yes ○ = No × = Not Reported
Test of collinearity
Model validation
n/a = not applicable
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 107 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 61
Removal of Percutaneous Pins and/or External Fixator in Distal Radius Fracture
Prospective Non-Randomized Controlled Studies DATA
Author Outcome Duration N Comparison(s) 3 weeks 5 weeks
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 108 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 62
Sustained Wrist Distraction with External Fixation of Distal Radius Fracture
Included and Excluded Articles
Included or
Author Title
Reason for Exclusion
Kaempffe, et al.
2000
External fixation for distal radius fractures: effect of distraction on outcome INCLUDED
Kaempffe, et al. Severe fractures of the distal radius: effect of amount and duration of external fixator distraction on
1993 outcome INCLUDED
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 109 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 63
Sustained Wrist Distraction with External Fixation of Distal Radius Fracture
Quality and Design of Prognostic Studies
Goodness-of-fit reported
10 patients per variable
● = Yes ○ = No × = Not Reported
Test of collinearity
Model validation
n/a = not applicable
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 110 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 64
Vitamin and Mineral Adjuvant Treatments for Distal Radius Fractures
Included and Excluded Articles
Included or
Author Title
Reason for Exclusion
Zollinger, et al. Can vitamin C prevent complex regional pain syndrome in patients with wrist fractures? A randomized,
2007 controlled, multicenter dose-response study INCLUDED
Zollinger, et al.
1999
Effect of vitamin C on frequency of reflex sympathetic dystrophy in wrist fractures: a randomised trial INCLUDED
Rozental, et al. Comparison of radiographic fracture healing in the distal radius for patients on and off bisphosphonate
Not best available evidence
2009 therapy
Does not report patient
Itoh, et al. Treatment of distal radius fractures with a wrist-bridging external fixation: The value of alternating electric
oriented outcomes
2008 current stimulation
quantitatively
Patil, et al. Does not report patient
Prospective, double blind, randomized, controlled trial of simvastatin in human fracture healing
2008 oriented outcomes
Challis, et al. Cyclic pneumatic soft-tissue compression enhances recovery following fracture of the distal radius: a Does not report patient
2007 randomised controlled trial oriented outcomes
Costantino, et al. Less than 10 patients per
Treatment of wrist and hand fractures with natural magnets: preliminary report
2007 group
Talbot, et al. Secondary prevention of osteoporosis: Calcium, Vitamin D and bisphosphonate prescribing following distal Does not report patient
2007 radial fracture oriented outcomes
Cheing, et al.
Ice and pulsed electromagnetic field to reduce pain and swelling after distal radius fractures See Recommendation 27
2005
Frankel, et al.
Management of non-union with pulsed low-intensity ultrasound therapy--international results Non-Union
2002
Does not report patient
Adolphson, et al. Clodronate increases mineralization of callus after Colles' fracture: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-
oriented outcomes
2000 controlled, prospective trial in 32 patients
quantitatively
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 111 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 64
Vitamin and Mineral Adjuvant Treatments for Distal Radius Fractures
Included and Excluded Articles
Included or
Author Title
Reason for Exclusion
Basso, et al. The effect of low frequency, long-wave ultrasound therapy on joint mobility and rehabilitation after wrist Does not report patient
1998 fracture oriented outcomes
Cook, et al. Not relevant, comparison of
Acceleration of tibia and distal radius fracture healing in patients who smoke
1997 smoking status
Kristiansen, et al. Accelerated healing of distal radial fractures with the use of specific, low-intensity ultrasound. A
See Recommendation 27
1997 multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Thomas, et al. The use of an oral prostaglandin inhibitor following splintage in fractures of the distal radius--a prospective Not relevant, not considered
1986 trial for this guideline
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 112 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 65
Vitamin and Mineral Adjuvant Treatments for Distal Radius Fractures
Quality and Design of Randomized Controlled Trials
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Zollinger, et al.
2007
Complex Regional Pain
Syndrome
1 Year 427
Vitamin C (all doses) vs.
Placebo ● ● ● ● ● ● n/a n/a
Zollinger, et al.
2007
Complex Regional Pain
Syndrome
1 Year 217
Vitamin C 1500 mg vs.
Placebo ● ● ● ● ● ● n/a n/a
Zollinger, et al.
2007
Complex Regional Pain
Syndrome
1 Year 213
Vitamin C 500 mg vs.
Placebo ● ● ● ● ● ● n/a n/a
Zollinger, et al.
2007
Complex Regional Pain
Syndrome
1 Year 195
Vitamin C 200 mg vs.
Placebo ● ● ● ● ● ● n/a n/a
Zollinger, et al.
1999
Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy 1 Year 115
Vitamin C 500 mg vs.
Placebo ● ● ● ● ● ● n/a n/a
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 113 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 66
Vitamin and Mineral Adjuvant Treatments for Distal Radius Fractures
Randomized Controlled Studies DATA
Author Outcome Duration N Treatment(s) Adjuvant Therapy Control Group
Zollinger, et al. Complex Regional Pain Vitamin C (all doses) vs. 2.4% 10%
1 Year 427
2007 Syndrome Placebo (8/328 patients) (10/99 patients)
Zollinger, et al. Complex Regional Pain Vitamin C 1500 mg vs. 2% 10%
1 Year 217
2007 Syndrome Placebo (2/118 patients) (10/99 patients)
Zollinger, et al. Complex Regional Pain Vitamin C 500 mg vs. 2% 10%
1 Year 213
2007 Syndrome Placebo (2/114 patients) (10/99 patients)
Zollinger, et al. Complex Regional Pain Vitamin C 200 mg vs. 4% 10%
1 Year 195
2007 Syndrome Placebo (4/96 patients) (10/99 patients)
Zollinger, et al. Vitamin C 500 mg vs. 8% 22%
Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy 1 Year 115
1999 Placebo (4/52 patients) (14/63 patients)
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 114 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 67
Mechanical Adjuvant Treatments for Distal Radius Fractures
Included and Excluded Articles
Included or
Author Title
Reason for Exclusion
Cheing, et al.
2005
Ice and pulsed electromagnetic field to reduce pain and swelling after distal radius fractures INCLUDED
Kristiansen, et al. Accelerated healing of distal radial fractures with the use of specific, low-intensity ultrasound. A
1997 multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study INCLUDED
Rozental, et al. Comparison of radiographic fracture healing in the distal radius for patients on and off bisphosphonate
Not best available evidence
2009 therapy
Does not report patient
Itoh, et al. Treatment of distal radius fractures with a wrist-bridging external fixation: The value of alternating electric
oriented outcomes
2008 current stimulation
quantitatively
Patil, et al. Does not report patient
Prospective, double blind, randomized, controlled trial of simvastatin in human fracture healing
2008 oriented outcomes
Challis, et al. Cyclic pneumatic soft-tissue compression enhances recovery following fracture of the distal radius: a Does not report patient
2007 randomised controlled trial oriented outcomes
Costantino, et al. Less than 10 patients per
Treatment of wrist and hand fractures with natural magnets: preliminary report
2007 group
Talbot, et al. Secondary prevention of osteoporosis: Calcium, Vitamin D and bisphosphonate prescribing following distal Does not report patient
2007 radial fracture oriented outcomes
Zollinger, et al. Can vitamin C prevent complex regional pain syndrome in patients with wrist fractures? A randomized,
See Recommendation 26
2007 controlled, multicenter dose-response study
Frankel, et al.
Management of non-union with pulsed low-intensity ultrasound therapy--international results Non-Union
2002
Does not report patient
Adolphson, et al. Clodronate increases mineralization of callus after Colles' fracture: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-
oriented outcomes
2000 controlled, prospective trial in 32 patients
quantitatively
Zollinger, et al.
Effect of vitamin C on frequency of reflex sympathetic dystrophy in wrist fractures: a randomised trial See Recommendation 26
1999
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 115 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 67
Mechanical Adjuvant Treatments for Distal Radius Fractures
Included and Excluded Articles
Included or
Author Title
Reason for Exclusion
Basso, et al. The effect of low frequency, long-wave ultrasound therapy on joint mobility and rehabilitation after wrist Does not report patient
1998 fracture oriented outcomes
Cook, et al. Not relevant, comparison of
Acceleration of tibia and distal radius fracture healing in patients who smoke
1997 smoking status
Thomas, et al. The use of an oral prostaglandin inhibitor following splintage in fractures of the distal radius--a prospective Not relevant, not considered
1986 trial for this guideline
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 116 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 68
Mechanical Adjuvant Treatments for Distal Radius Fractures
Quality and Design of Randomized Controlled Trials
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Cheing, et al.
2005
Pain - VAS 3 Days 38
Ice vs.
Control × × ○ × ● ● n/a n/a
Cheing, et al.
2005
Pain - VAS 3 Days 38
PEMF vs.
Control × × ● × ● ● n/a n/a
Cheing, et al.
2005
Pain - VAS 3 Days 39
PEMF + Ice vs.
Control × × ○ × ● ● n/a n/a
Cheing, et al.
2005
Pain - VAS 5 Days 38
Ice vs.
Control × × ○ × ● ● n/a n/a
Cheing, et al.
2005
Pain - VAS 5 Days 38
PEMF vs.
Control × × ● × ● ● n/a n/a
Cheing, et al.
2005
Pain - VAS 5 Days 39
PEMF + Ice vs.
Control × × ○ × ● ● n/a n/a
Kristiansen, et al.
1997
Number of fractures healed 6 Weeks 61
Ultrasound vs.
Placebo ● ○ ● ● ● ● n/a n/a
Kristiansen, et al.
1997
Number of fractures healed 8 Weeks 61
Ultrasound vs.
Placebo ● ○ ● ● ● ● n/a n/a
Kristiansen, et al.
1997
Number of fractures healed 10 Weeks 61
Ultrasound vs.
Placebo ● ○ ● ● ● ● n/a n/a
Kristiansen, et al.
1997
Number of fractures healed 12 Weeks 61
Ultrasound vs.
Placebo ● ○ ● ● ● ● n/a n/a
Kristiansen, et al.
1997
Time to healing n/a 61
Ultrasound vs.
Placebo ● ○ ● ● ● ● n/a n/a
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 117 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 69
Mechanical Adjuvant Treatments for Distal Radius Fractures
Randomized Controlled Studies DATA
Author Outcome Duration N Treatment(s) Adjuvant Therapy Control Group
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 118 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 70
Treatment of Concomitant Distal Ulna Fractures
Included and Excluded Articles
Included or
Author Title
Reason for Exclusion
Zenke, et al. The effect of an associated ulnar styloid fracture on the outcome after fixation of a fracture of the distal
2009 radius INCLUDED
Ekenstam, et al.
1989
Repair of the triangular ligament in Colles' fracture. No effect in a prospective randomized study INCLUDED
Ruchelsman, et al. Outcome Following Acute Primary Distal Ulna Resection for Comminuted Distal Ulna Fractures at the
Not best available evidence
2009 Time of Operative Fixation of Unstable Fractures of the Distal Radius
Souer, et al. Effect of an unrepaired fracture of the ulnar styloid base on outcome after plate-and-screw fixation of a
Not best available evidence
2009 distal radial fracture
Seitz, et al. Resection of comminuted ulna head fragments with soft tissue reconstruction when associated with distal Does not report validated,
2007 radius fractures patient oriented outcomes
Ring, et al. Condylar blade plate fixation of unstable fractures of the distal ulna associated with fracture of the distal
Retrospective case series
2004 radius
May, et al. Ulnar styloid fractures associated with distal radius fractures: incidence and implications for distal
Retrospective case series
2002 radioulnar joint instability
Stoffelen, et al. Does not report validated,
The importance of the distal radioulnar joint in distal radial fractures
1998 patient oriented outcomes
Biyani, et al. Does not report validated,
Fractures of the distal radius and ulna
1995 patient oriented outcomes
Tsukazaki, et al. Does not report validated,
Poor correlation between functional results and radiographic findings in Colles' fracture
1993 patient oriented outcomes
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 119 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 71
Treatment of Concomitant Distal Ulna Fractures
Quality and Design of Randomized Controlled Trials
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
Patients Blinded
n/a = not applicable
Ekenstam, et al.
1989
Pain free 2 Years 40
Operative treatment of ulna vs.
Non-operative treatment of ulna ○ ○ ○ × ● × n/a n/a
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 120 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 72
Treatment of Concomitant Distal Ulna Fractures
Quality and Design of Prospective Non-Randomized Controlled Studies
Crossover - equal
Crossover - equal
n/a = not applicable
treated
Author Outcome Duration N Comparison(s)
Zenke, et al.
2009
DASH 1 Week 118
No ulnar styloid fracture vs.
Fracture of base or tip of ulnar styloid ● ● ● ● ● n/a n/a
Zenke, et al.
2009
DASH 2 Weeks 118
No ulnar styloid fracture vs.
Fracture of base or tip of ulnar styloid ● ● ● ● ● n/a n/a
Zenke, et al.
2009
DASH 4 Weeks 118
No ulnar styloid fracture vs.
Fracture of base or tip of ulnar styloid ● ● ● ● ● n/a n/a
Zenke, et al.
2009
DASH 8 Weeks 118
No ulnar styloid fracture vs.
Fracture of base or tip of ulnar styloid ● ● ● ● ● n/a n/a
Zenke, et al.
2009
DASH 12 Weeks 118
No ulnar styloid fracture vs.
Fracture of base or tip of ulnar styloid ● ● ● ● ● n/a n/a
Zenke, et al.
2009
DASH 24 Weeks 118
No ulnar styloid fracture vs.
Fracture of base or tip of ulnar styloid ● ● ● ● ● n/a n/a
Zenke, et al.
2009
Pain, ulnar wrist
Final
Followup
118
No ulnar styloid fracture vs.
Fracture of base or tip of ulnar styloid ● ● ● ● ● n/a n/a
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 121 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 73
Treatment of Concomitant Distal Ulna Fractures
Randomized Controlled Studies DATA
Non-operative
Author Outcome Duration N Treatment(s) Operative treatment
treatment
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 122 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 74
Treatment of Concomitant Distal Ulna Fractures
Prospective Non-Randomized Controlled Studies DATA
No ulnar Ulnar base Ulnar tip
Author Outcome Duration N Comparison(s)
fracture fracture fracture
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 123 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 75
Concurrent Operative Treatments for Depressed Lunate Fossa or 4-part Distal Radius Fracture
Included and Excluded Articles
Included or
Author Title
Reason for Exclusion
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 124 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 76
Articles Excluded at Full Text Review (not reported elsewhere)
Author Title Reason for Exclusion
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 125 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 76
Articles Excluded at Full Text Review (not reported elsewhere)
Author Title Reason for Exclusion
Cardone, et al.
Technique to assess the rigidity of callus bone during external fixation of distal radial fractures Abstract
2006
Ginn, et al. Use of a distraction plate for distal radial fractures with metaphyseal and diaphyseal comminution. Surgical
Surgical Technique
2006 technique
Jupiter, et al. A prospective randomized trial of nonbridging external fixation using multiplanar K-wires versus volar
Abstract
2006 plating for unstable fractures of the distal radius
Lozano-Calderon, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of early vs. late wrist mobilization after volar plate fixation of distal
Abstract
2006 radius fractures
Rozental, et al. Functional outcome and complications after volar plating for dorsally displaced, unstable fractures of the
Retrospective case series
2006 distal radius
Sahin, et al. Not relevant, non-DRF
Efficacy of salmon calcitonin in complex regional pain syndrome (type 1) in addition to physical therapy
2006 diagnosis
Beeres, et al. Not relevant, non-DRF
Outcome of routine bone scintigraphy in suspected scaphoid fractures
2005 diagnosis
Boutroy, et al. In vivo assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative
Healthy population
2005 computed tomography
Cooper, et al.
The effects of early therapeutic intervention for patients following fractured distal radius [thesis] Thesis
2005
Fawzy, et al.
Open reduction and internal fixation of distal radial fractures using the Pi-plate Retrospective case series
2005
Goldfarb, et al. Not relevant, non-DRF
Functional outcome after fracture of both bones of the forearm
2005 diagnosis
Grala, et al. Less than 10 patients per
Hybrid external fixation of unstable distal radius fractures: Initial experience
2005 group
Kamano, et al.
Palmar plating for AO/ASIF C3.2 fractures of the distal radius with arthroscopically assisted reduction Retrospective case series
2005
Mittal, et al. Use of bio-resorbable implants for stabilisation of distal radius fractures: the United Kingdom patients'
Not relevant, opinion survey
2005 perspective
Petersen, et al.
Ulnar shortening osteotomy after Colles fracture Osteotomy
2005
Puchalski, et al. Complex regional pain syndrome type 1 after fractures of the distal radius: a prospective study of the role Not relevant, specific to
2005 of psychological factors CRPS diagnosis
Rieger, et al.
CT virtual reality in the preoperative workup of malunited distal radius fractures: preliminary results Malunion
2005
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 126 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 76
Articles Excluded at Full Text Review (not reported elsewhere)
Author Title Reason for Exclusion
Slutsky, et al.
Nonbridging external fixation of intra-articular distal radius fractures Cadaver study
2005
Dailiana, et al. Not relevant, non-DRF
Scaphoid nonunions treated with vascularised bone grafts: MRI assessment
2004 diagnosis
Dicpinigaitis, et al.
Can external fixation maintain reduction after distal radius fractures? Retrospective case series
2004
Durmus, et al. Not relevant, specific to
The efficiency of electromagnetic field treatment in Complex Regional Pain Sydrome Type I
2004 CRPS treatment
George, et al. The Sauve-Kapandji procedure and the Darrach procedure for distal radio-ulnar joint dysfunction after
Malunion
2004 Colles' fracture
Goldfarb, et al.
Arthroscopically assisted fracture fixation Commentary
2004
Hartigan, et al.
Opinion: Fixation of both fractures Commentary
2004
Keller, et al. The (pi) plate: An implant for unstable extension fractures of the distal radius in patients with osteoporotic
Surgical Technique
2004 bone
Livani, et al. Not relevant, non-DRF
Bridging plate osteosynthesis of humeral shaft fractures
2004 diagnosis
Senall, et al. Not relevant, non-DRF
Ultrasound for the early diagnosis of clinically suspected scaphoid fracture
2004 diagnosis
Smith, et al.
The 45 degrees pronated oblique view for volar fixed-angle plating of distal radius fractures Surgical Technique
2004
Abe, et al. Not relevant, non-DRF
A benefit of the volar approach for wrist arthroscopy
2003 diagnosis
Afzal, et al.
Treatment of fractures of the distal radius with external fixator Could not obtain
2003
Anglen, et al.
The clinical use of bone stimulators Could not obtain
2003
Grigoryan, et al. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of closed fracture healing using computed tomography and
Intervention not reported
2003 conventional radiography
McKee, et al. Hydroxyapatite cement was not as effective as intrafocal Kirschner-wire fixation for acute fractures of the
Commentary
2003 distal part of the radius [comment]
Shabat, et al.
Simultaneous distal radius and hip fractures in elderly patients--implications to rehabilitation Retrospective case series
2003
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 127 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 76
Articles Excluded at Full Text Review (not reported elsewhere)
Author Title Reason for Exclusion
Strohm, et al. Comparison of two different osteosynthetic management methods of distal Colles-type radius fractures
Foreign language
2001 with Kirschner wires
Emami, et al.
A safer pin position for external fixation of distal radial fractures Commentary
2000
Franck, et al. Distal radial fractures - Is the small non-bridging external fixator an alternative? A randomised, prospective
Foreign language
2000 study
Russe, et al.
The bioresorpable osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures Foreign language
2000
Sanchez, et al.
Treatment of distal radius fractures with remodelable bone cement Duplicate study
2000
Angelov, et al.
Observations on Ulson fixation for fractures of the distal radius Foreign language
1999
Bretlau, et al. Not relevant, non-DRF
Diagnosis of scaphoid fracture and dedicated extremity MRI
1999 diagnosis
Fischer, et al. Includes more than 20%
The radio-radial external fixator in the treatment of fractures of the distal radius
1999 pediatric patients
Korner, et al.
The use of biodegradable pins in the operative treatment of distal radial fractures Abstract
1999
Kreder, et al. A randomized controlled trial of indirect reduction & percutaneous fixation versus ORIF for displaced intra-
Abstract
1999 articular distal radius fractures
Schurmann, et al. Assessment of peripheral sympathetic nervous function for diagnosing early post-traumatic complex Not relevant, specific to
1999 regional pain syndrome type I CRPS diagnosis
Bickley, et al. Not relevant, non-DRF
Self-tapping versus standard tapped titanium screw fixation in the upper extremity
1998 diagnosis
Cooney, et al.
Distal radius fractures: external fixation proves best Commentary
1998
David, et al.
One-year results of the osteosythesis of distal radius fractures with resorpable pins Foreign language
1998
Fikry, et al.
Distal radial fractures: Kapandji's or Py's pinning? Foreign language
1998
Flinkkila, et al. AO and Frykman's classifications of Colles' fracture. No prognostic value in 652 patients evaluated after 5
Retrospective case series
1998 years
Illarramendi, et al. Evaluation of simplified Frykman and AO classifications of fractures of the distal radius. Assessment of
Could not obtain
1998 interobserver and intraobserver agreement
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 129 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 76
Articles Excluded at Full Text Review (not reported elsewhere)
Author Title Reason for Exclusion
Kafury, et al.
Primary wrist arthrodesis in a severe intra-articular distal radial fracture Case report
1998
VanGelderen, et al. Short tau inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging in occult scaphoid injuries: effect on Not relevant, non-DRF
1998 management diagnosis
Fellmann, et al. Clinical and radiological results 12 years after conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: A long
Foreign language
1997 term follow-up study
Field, et al. Not relevant, specific to
Algodystrophy is an early complication of Colles' fracture. What are the implications?
1997 algodystrophy diagnosis
Franck, et al. Prospective randomised study on the functional therapy of distal radius fracture with non-joint overlapping
Foreign language
1997 fixture externally verses Spick-wire osteosynthesis with lower-arm plaster
Kendall, et al. Haematoma block or Bier's block for Colles' fracture reduction in the accident and emergency department- Not relevant, anaesthesia
1997 which is best? study
Laulan, et al. The different types of algodystrophy after fracture of the distal radius. Predictive criteria of outcome after 1 Not relevant, specific to
1997 year algodystrophy diagnosis
Muller, et al.
Osteosynthesis of radius fracture loco typico with new resorpable polyactide pins Foreign language
1997
Nagy, et al.
Long-term results of radioscapholunate fusion following fractures of the distal radius Non-acute DRF
1997
Rahamimov, et al.
The effect of malunion of distal radial fractures on hand function Foreign language
1997
Richards, et al. Not diagnostic accuracy,
Arthroscopic diagnosis of intra-articular soft tissue injuries associated with distal radial fractures
1997 incidence study
Borrero, et al.
Molded Kirschner wire for fixation of Barton's fracture dislocations of the radius Could not obtain
1996
Geissler, et al. Not diagnostic accuracy,
Intracarpal soft-tissue lesions associated with an intra-articular fracture of the distal end of the radius
1996 incidence study
Neumann, et al.
External fixation or percutaneous pin fixation in distal intraarticular radius fractures in elderly patients Foreign language
1996
Geissler, et al.
Arthroscopically assisted reduction of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius Surgical Technique
1995
Mikic, et al. Treatment of acute injuries of the triangular fibrocartilage complex associated with distal radioulnar joint Not relevant, non-DRF
1995 instability diagnosis
O'Bierne, et al. Not relevant, non-DRF
Wrist arthrodesis using a dynamic compression plate
1995 diagnosis
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 130 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Evidence Table 76
Articles Excluded at Full Text Review (not reported elsewhere)
Author Title Reason for Exclusion
Roth, et al.
Healing of extra-articular angulated apex volar fractures of the distal radius Malunion
1988
Solgaard, et al. Displaced distal radius fractures. A comparative study of treatment by external fixation, dorsal plaster
Duplicate study
1988 immobilisation and functional bracing in supination
Kongsholm, et al. not relevant, method of
Reduction of Colles' fractures without anaesthesia using a new dynamic bone alignment system
1987 reduction
Wechsler, et al. Less than 10 patients per
Computed tomography diagnosis of distal radioulnar subluxation
1987 group
Ametewee, et al. Not relevant, includes
Fractures of the distal radius with anterior displacement: Smith's and Barton's fractures
1986 pediatric patients
Kongsholm, et al. Does not report patient
Carpal tunnel pressure in the acute phase after Colles' fracture
1986 oriented outcomes
Solgaard, et al.
Early displacement of distal radius fracture Retrospective case series
1986
Falch, et al. 3 years treatment with 1.25(OH)2 Vitamin D3 does not reduce bone loss or fracture rate in
Could not obtain
1985 postmenopausal women with fracture of the distal forearm
Mortier, et al.
The importance of the posteromedial fragment and its specific pinning in fractures of the distal radius Foreign language
1983
Chapman, et al.
Complications of distal radial fractures: pins and plaster treatment Retrospective case series
1982
Krolner, et al. Bone mass of the axial and the appendicular skeleton in women with Colles' fracture: its relation to
Could not obtain
1982 physical activity
Cooney, et al.
Complications of Colles' fractures Retrospective case series
1980
Frykman, et al. Fracture of the distal radius including sequelae--shoulder-hand-finger syndrome, disturbance in the distal
Could not obtain
1967 radio-ulnar joint and impairment of nerve function. A clinical and experimental study
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 132 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Systematic Reviews Screened for Additional Articles
Author Title
Busse, et al. 2009 Low intensity pulsed ultrasonography for fractures: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials
Functional assessment in patients with osteoporotic wrist fractures treated with external fixation: A review of randomized
Hoang-Kim, et al. 2009
trials
Bajammal, et al. 2008 The use of calcium phosphate bone cement in fracture treatment. A meta-analysis of randomized trials
Goldhahn, et al. 2008 Influence of osteoporosis on fracture fixation--a systematic literature review
Handoll, et al. 2008 Different methods of external fixation for treating distal radial fractures in adults
Handoll, et al. 2008 Bone grafts and bone substitutes for treating distal radial fractures in adults
McHardy, et al. 2008 Chiropractic Treatment of Upper Extremity Conditions: A Systematic Review
Mollon, et al. 2008 Electrical stimulation for long-bone fracture-healing: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Schadel-Hopfner, et al. 2008 Evidence-based hand surgery: the role of Cochrane reviews
Handoll, et al. 2007 External fixation versus conservative treatment for distal radial fractures in adults
Handoll, et al. 2007 Percutaneous pinning for treating distal radial fractures in adults
Margaliot, et al. 2005 A meta-analysis of outcomes of external fixation versus plate osteosynthesis for unstable distal radius fractures
Paksima, et al. 2004 A meta-analysis of the literature on distal radius fractures: review of 615 articles
Haentjens, et al. 2003 Colles fracture, spine fracture, and subsequent risk of hip fracture in men and women. A meta-analysis
From evidence to best practice in the management of fractures of the distal radius in adults: working towards a research
Handoll, et al. 2003
agenda
Handoll, et al. 2003 Surgical interventions for treating distal radial fractures in adults
Handoll, et al. 2003 Closed reduction methods for treating distal radial fractures in adults
Handoll, et al. 2003 Conservative interventions for treating distal radial fractures in adults
Busse, et al. 2002 The effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy on time to fracture healing: a meta-analysis
Managing fractures of the distal radius in adults. Clinical and research implications from systematic reviews of existing
Handoll, et al. 2002
trials
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 133 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Systematic Reviews Screened for Additional Articles
Author Title
Handoll, et al. 2002 Anaesthesia for treating distal radial fracture in adults
McKay, et al. 2001 Assessment of complications of distal radius fractures and development of a complication checklist
duKamp, et al. 2000 The advantages and disadvantages of Bier's blocks and haematoma blocks for Colles' fractures in A&E
Klotzbuecher, et al. 2000 Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis
Larsen, et al. 1997 Nonunion rates of limited carpal arthrodesis: a meta-analysis of the literature
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 134 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Narrative Reviews Screened for Additional Articles
Author Title
Berglund, et al. 2009 Complications of volar plate fixation for managing distal radius fractures
Brodeur-Lyons, et al. 2009 It's all in the hands. Distal radius fractures: common and complicated
Patel, et al. 2009 Bone Graft Substitutes: Current Uses in Hand Surgery
del, et al. 2008 Dry arthroscopy of the wrist: its role in the management of articular distal radius fractures
Keast-Butler, et al. 2008 Biology versus mechanics in the treatment of distal radial fractures
Korsic, et al. 2008 Non-hip peripheral osteoporotic fractures: epidemiology and significance
Parkinson, et al. 2008 Whole bone geometry and bone quality in distal forearm fracture
Siska, et al. 2008 External adjuncts to enhance fracture healing: What is the role of ultrasound?
Suhm, et al. 2008 Injectable bone cement augmentation for the treatment of distal radius fractures: a review
Gofton, et al. 2007 Distal radius fractures: nonoperative and percutaneous pinning treatment options
Raia, et al. 2007 What's new in distal radius fracture treatment for 2007
Schurmann, et al. 2007 Early diagnosis in post-traumatic complex regional pain syndrome
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 135 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Narrative Reviews Screened for Additional Articles
Author Title
Dennison, et al. 2006 Median nerve injuries associated with distal radius fractures
Glickel, et al. 2006 Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning for Distal Radius Fractures
Osterman, et al. 2006 Arthroscopy in the Treatment of Distal Radial Fractures with Assessment and Treatment of Associated Injuries
Raskin, et al. 2006 Distal Radius Fractures: External Fixation and Supplemental K-Wires
Fragment-Specific Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures Using the 2.4 mm Synthes Locking System-A Rationale for
Rikli, et al. 2006
Treatment
Szabo, et al. 2006 Distal radioulnar joint instability
Gutow, et al. 2005 Avoidance and treatment of complications of distal radius fractures
Medoff, et al. 2005 Essential radiographic evaluation for distal radius fractures
Smith, et al. 2004 Early active rehabilitation for operatively stabilized distal radius fractures
Gaebler, et al. 2003 Ulnar procedures for post-traumatic disorders of the distal radioulnar joint
Ladd, et al. 2003 Bone graft substitutes in the radius and upper limb
Ruch, et al. 2003 Open reduction and internal fixation of the distal radius
Smith, et al. 2002 Comprehensive management of soft-tissue injuries associated with distal radius fractures
Eastell, et al. 2001 Secondary prevention of osteoporosis: when should a non-vertebral fracture be a trigger for action?
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 136 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Narrative Reviews Screened for Additional Articles
Author Title
Rubin, et al. 2001 The use of low-intensity ultrasound to accelerate the healing of fractures
Geissler, et al. 2000 Percutaneous and limited open reduction of intra-articular distal radial fractures
Seitz, et al. 2000 Perils and pitfalls of external fixation for distal radius fractures
Warden, et al. 2000 Acceleration of fresh fracture repair using the sonic accelerated fracture healing system (SAFHS): a review
Rodriguez-Merchan, et al. 1998 Management of comminuted fractures of the distal radius in the adult. Conservative or surgical?
Trumble, et al. 1998 Intra-articular fractures of the distal aspect of the radius
Whipple, et al. 1998 The role of arthroscopy in the treatment of wrist injuries in the athlete
Cohen, et al. 1997 Calcium phosphate bone cement--the Norian skeletal repair system in orthopedic surgery
Gilbert, et al. 1997 Imaging of acute injuries to the wrist and hand
Lips, et al. 1997 Epidemiology and predictors of fractures associated with osteoporosis
Kaempffe, et al. 1996 External fixation for distal radius fractures: adverse effects of excess distraction
Metz, et al. 1996 Update on imaging techniques of the wrist and hand
Black, et al. 1995 Why elderly women should be screened and treated to prevent osteoporosis
Cummings, et al. 1995 Bone mass measurements and risk of fracture in Caucasian women: A review of findings from prospective studies
Whipple, et al. 1995 The role of arthroscopy in the treatment of intra-articular wrist fractures
Breslau, et al. 1994 Calcium, estrogen, and progestin in the treatment of osteoporosis
Seitz, et al. 1994 Complications and problems in the management of distal radius fractures
Agee, et al. 1993 External fixation. Technical advances based upon multiplanar ligamentotaxis
Metz, et al. 1993 Imaging techniques for distal radius fractures and related injuries
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 137 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09
Narrative Reviews Screened for Additional Articles
Author Title
Seitz, et al. 1993 External fixation of distal radius fractures. Indications and technical principles
Solgaard, et al. 1993 Distal radius fractures. Classification, function and recommendations to treatment
AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines Unit Page 138 of 138 v 1.0 12.05.09