Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Ratio (OSR). This OSR is based on dry steam and is So*Phi2 in oil sands is between 0.20 and 0.27, with Cold
calculated using 96% or more steam quality. Out of the 32 Lake and Peace River towards the low end of the
pads analyzed only 2 have terminated operations, the A&B spectrum, and Athabasca towards the high end.
wells at Hangingstone (2 well pad) and the Phase B at the UTF Table 1 shows the overall performance of MacKay River,
(3 well pad). Moreover, the Hilda Lake information is for the Foster Creek and Hangingstone, three of the largest SAGD
two existing wells, whose steam chambers have not yet operations in Canada. Both MacKay River and Foster Creek
coalesced, so they perform presently as two separate single- have excellent cOSR, and the recovery is already of the order
well pads. of 30% despite the fact that most of their pads only have a few
years of operation. This emphasizes the statement of ultimate
2.7 recoveries in the 60 to 70% even over entire field
.2 developments. On the other hand Hangingstone, as explained
MacKay River =0 Finished
SR
2.4 .3
O
Foster Creek 0
R=
UTF (Dover) OS before, does not have the same cOSR but it is still fairly good
Hangingstone
2.1 Christina Lake at 0.31, and its recovery has already reached 37%, with only 2
Steam Injected (CEW)/OOIP
Surmont 0 .4
Firebag OS
R= well pairs out of the existing 15 finished. Notice also that these
1.8 Hilda Lake
recoveries, which already match Imperial Oil Cold Lake, are
1.5
Finished
achieved faster than the 15 to 20 years that a typical CSS pad
=0.5
OSR has in their operation [1]. Thus, SAGD does not only look
1.2
promising over the selected pads but also over large field
0.9 developments. Note that all these field developments have
been started in pay zones that are both thick and with a good
0.6 vertical permeabilit, and future expansions try to follow these
0.3
“nice” areas.
cOSR
0.8
0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0.55
10 100% Finished
MacKay River Finished
9 90% Foster Creek
UTF (Dover)
Number of Pads (Frequency)
8 80%
HCPV Produced
6 60%
Hilda Lake
5 50%
4 40% 0.4
3 30%
2 20%
1 10%
0.2
0 0% Hilda Lake and
0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 Surmont have
cOSR Firebag lack suffered of a lack
steam early on of steam
0.0
Figure 2. Histogram of COSR for the 32 pads analyzed, and the 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
cumulative probability of a pad having a given COSR
Months in Production
Figure 4. Rate of production of the different SAGD operations
Another interesting point is the short time over which the analyzed
performance of a pad stabilizes, which in practical terms
means that, if there are no serious operational issues or a lack In summary, it seems that as long as the steam chamber
of steam availability, the performance of a pad can be inferred can growth and there are no steam constrains, the SAGD
within 15 to 25 months after the start of an operation, as can performance tends to be within a certain range in terms of
be seen in Figure 3. Moreover, the cOSR becomes fairly cOSR, ultimate recovery and rate of recovery. Nonetheless
constant with time to some degree although it gets worse with there is significant variability in performance between leases,
time in some of the pads (pad B in Foster Creek), but keeps and between pads within a lease. Consequently, it is worth to
improving for others (pad C in MacKay River). look in detail at some of them to understand what makes a
project a great performer or an average performer. Among the
0.6 issues to consider are the geology, operations, pad size, well
spacing, length, and pressure among others.
0.5 Geology and Thickness
SAGD is considered by many the ‘perfect process for the
perfect reservoir’; but what is the perfect reservoir, and what is
0.4
the impact of heterogeneities in its performance?
PetroCanada’s MacKay River is a great example that geology
COSR
0.1 MacKay - C are contiguous, from East to West, pads A to D. Both A and B
MacKay - D
Hangingstone - AB have 7 well pairs while C and D have 6 and 5 well pairs,
Hangingstone - CDE
respectively (see layout in [2]).
0.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 Figure 5 shows the performance of these four pads, from
Time (months)
their start in August 2002 to December 2005. As seen in the
Figure 3. Evolution of the cOSR with time figure, pads B and C have similar performance both reaching
an OSR of around 0.5 over that time period. The performance
Finally, the rate of recovery of the various projects tend to of the other two pads was not as good, with pad D reaching an
be fairly uniform, especially over their entire operation. Thus OSR of about 0.37 and pad A of about 0.3.
trends for most of the pads of either Foster Creek, Dover or
Hangingstone are easily established as shown in Figure 4.
Moreover, there is a general trend in all of the operations
except the ones previously mentioned that suffered from a lack
of steam. Thus, a 30% recovery has been achieved after 40 to
60 months of production for most of the operations.
IPTC 12860 5
60
2.7
.2
=0
40 ≤ 20m
SR
2.4 ≤ 25m 0.3
O
R=
≤ 35m OS
≥ 35m
2.1
0 1.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 =0.5
OSR
Recovery Factor (% )
1.2
MacKay - A MacKay - B MacKay - C MacKay - D OSR=0.2
OSR=0.3 OSR=0.4 OSR=0.5
0.9
Figure 5. Pad performance in MacKay River from a start date of
August 2002 to December 2005 0.6
0.3
Looking at the MacKay River lease geology and the
typical geology of each pad [2], it is clear that different pads 0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
have different geologies and thicknesses. Although pad A is
the thinnest, more importantly the dominant facies is a breccia HCPV Produced
Figure 6. Average thickness of the different SAGD pads analyzed
rather than a clean sand. Therefore, its oil content and vertical and their performance
permeability would be lower than in the other pads, which is
reflected mainly in the OSR, which is of the order of 0.3 rather Operational Excellence and Optimization
than 0.5 for the best pads. On the other hand, pad C is the While favorable geological conditions are paramount to a
‘perfect reservoir’ mentioned previously, very thick, rich and successful SAGD project, the operation in the field, especially
with no apparent shale baffles. The reason as to why pad D at the pad scale, can either help or hurt the performance. As
does not behave quite as well as B or C seems to be related to examples of both scenarios are pads A and B in Foster Creek
thinning of the reservoir at the heel, less wells in the pad, and [3], whose performance with time is shown in Figure 7. Pad B
different length of wells, ranging from 700 to 500 m from initially looked like a good performer but with time its
north to south. In summary, a contrast in geology is the main performance got worse (OSR around 0.3). On the other hand,
controlling factor of performance in contiguous pads that have the more mature pad A seemed to have a constant OSR of
been operated virtually identically, which highlights why 0.35, and through optimization, has improved to around 0.42.
geology is the key parameter in SAGD. Both pads will be reviewed briefly.
This brings forward three key points from a reservoir point 140
of view for a successful SAGD: 75 months of
• The larger the oil content, the better the performance. This 0 10 20 30 40
Recovery Factor (%)
50 60 70
point is as simple as the more oil is present in the Foster - A Foster - B Foster - C Foster - D OSR=0.2 OSR=0.3
reservoir, the less heat is wasted heating the oil sands (oil, OSR=0.4 OSR=0.5
water and sand). Thus, the SAGD projects in Athabasca Figure 7. Pad performance in Foster Creek A,B,C and D from start
will in general always be better than SAGD in Peace until December 2005
River or Cold Lake as the average saturation in Athabasca
is around 80% and porosity 30-32%, while saturation and Pad B, containing 6 well pairs, has been operated for 51
porosity in Peace River or Cold Lake are around 70% and months up to December 2005. The center well pair (both
28-30%, respectively. injector and producer) was on and off constantly early on and
• Vertical permeability plays a relative role. Shale was shut down after 20 months for 10 months. Injection
laminations within a sand will slow down or even stop the resumed at higher rate 30 months after startup, but it was shut
vertical growth of the steam chamber and the drainage of down again at about 40 months of operations. Thus, the pore
both bitumen and condensate. On the other hand, there is volume of steam injected into this well pair is fairly small
not enough evidence that kv/kh plays a significant role as (8.3% HCPV, which is 10% of the total in the pad). It is
long as the vertical continuity exists and permeability is therefore very likely that the steam chambers did not coalesce
6 IPTC 12860
leading to a decay in performance as the pad was split into a 3 River is only 125 m deep. This means that the operational
well pair pad and another 2 well pair pad, without the pressure gradient is 14 kPa/m, which is above the hydrostatic
efficiency and higher recovery that characterize larger pads. pressure gradient of 10 kPa/m. With this gradient, the process
This highlights the need for operational excellence in is trying to take advantage of a small convective flow.
successful SAGD operations, especially in steam availability However, a higher pressure than that may be unsafe from a
and the advantage of having larger pads. caprock integrity point of view because of the shallow depth.
On the other hand, as seen in Figure 7, the performance of On the other hand, Foster Creek operates at 2800 kPa, but
pad A improved significantly after 75 months of operation. its depth is 380 m. Therefore the pressure gradient is almost 8
Pad A has 4 wells, which were operated with ups and downs kPa/m, lower than hydrostatic, which means that the process
during the first 50 months. At this time, a center pair (both relies mainly on conduction for transfer heat. Thus, from a
injector and producer) was shut down permanently for geomechanical point of view, MacKay River is a high pressure
unknown reasons. However, it is likely that at this point the operation while Foster Creek is a low pressure operation.
steam chambers had coalesced so the pad’s performance Figure 8 and Figure 9 show the performance of different
remained the same. After 75 months the other center injector operations according to their injection pressure and pressure
was shut down, but the producer of that pair remained in gradient, respectively. Among the issues that these figures
operation. Thus, by taking advantage of a big single steam highlight are:
chamber and all the heat stored in the unswept bitumen • There is no clear trend between either injection pressures
between well pairs, a significant improvement in performance or pressure gradients and performance. The performance
was achieved by injecting steam into the side wells and of the different MacKay River pads depends more on the
producing oil from the side wells plus a center well. Note that geology than the pressure.
shutting the center injectors in mature pads accelerates the • Both high and low pressure pads each have excellent
recovery of unswept oil between chambers, as was observed in performers and ‘relatively poor’ performers (Figure 8).
pad A at Foster Creek [3]. • High pressure gradient operations are not better than low
Operational Pressure pressure ones (Figure 9). Therefore, a convective
The issue of high pressure versus low pressure is a component in the heat transfer and a small gain in
constant debate for SAGD operators. The advantages and absolute permeability due to compressibility do not seem
disadvantages of low pressure SAGD are: to be important factors.
• At low pressure, the steam has more latent heat and the
operating temperature in the reservoir is lower, so that the 2.7
.2
energy efficiency is better, which leads to a better OSR.
=0
1750 kPa
SR
0.3
• At low pressure, heat transfer from the steam chamber 2.4
O
2250 kPa
R=
2800 kPa OS
4800 kPa
into the formation has to rely mainly on conduction 2.1
Steam Injected (CEW)/OOIP
.4
because the mean effective stress remains unchanged or OS
R=
0
1.8
increases due to the thermal stresses. Therefore, no
advantage is taken of the non-linear compressibility and 1.5
=0.5
geomechanical behavior of oil sands. OSR
k 0.3
qα
v 0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
The advantages and disadvantages of high pressure SAGD HCPV Produced
are: Figure 8. Impact of operational pressure at different SAGD
• At high pressure, the latent heat is smaller but the operations
operating temperature in the reservoir is higher, so the
energy efficiency is lower, and so is the OSR.
• At high pressure, the transfer of heat into the formation
has a component of convection due to compressibility,
because the mean effective stress becomes lower. This is
because the pressure front travels ahead of the thermal
front.
• Viscosity is lower, therefore the rate of production is
higher.
Therefore the picture is not as straightforward as just latent
heat. Moreover, the definition of high or low pressure is
relative. MacKay River operates at 1750 kPa, which at first
glance may seem like a low pressure SAGD, but MacKay
IPTC 12860 7
.2
UTF Phase B for different pressures, and how it impacts the
=0
7.4 kPa/m
SR
2.4 0 .3
O
12.9 kPa/m R=
14 kPa/m OS time to achieve 55% bitumen recovery (7.5 years at 2250 kPa
15 kPa/m
2.1 16 kPa/m in the field). These times were calculated by adjusting the rate
Steam Injected (CEW)/OOIP
0.4
OS
R= of recovery proportionally to the change of the square root of
1.8
mobility, according to Butler’s model [5].
1.5 11.5
=0.5
OSR
Time to achieve a recovery
1.2 11.0 factor of 55% for different
viscosities, due to different 1500 kPa
0.9 10.5
operational pressures
Viscosity (cP)
0.6 10.0
1750 kPa
0.3
9.5
0.0
9.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
HCPV Produced
8.5
Figure 9. Impact of operational pressure gradient at different 2250 kPa
SAGD operations 8.0
7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5 11.0
This raises the question of the SAGD operating pressure of Time (years)
0.46
The improvement in performance of large pads is due to
7.44 years Recovery Factor is 55% for All Cases the efficient drainage of bitumen between well pairs. Such an
0.45
efficient drainage is the result of both a superposition of heat
0.44
7.44 years
sources that warms the oil between well pairs faster, and the
0.43 ability to drive that oil toward the producers in mature pads
where the steam chambers have coalesced. On the other hand,
cOSR
0.42
10.45 years steam chambers can become very flat on the sides, so gravity
0.41
9 years
drainage is limited even if the steam chamber is still growing
0.40 outwards. Thus, in mature pads, the confined wells produce at
0.39 larger rates than the side wells, something observed in almost
7.44 years
0.38
every mature pad analyzed.
1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 Well Spacing and Length
Injection Pressure (kPa) Well spacing and length are both controversial issues that
Pressure Pressure & Adjusted Viscosity (Mobility) the present study was not able to resolve completely as the
Figure 11. Potential impact on the cOSR at 55 % recovery in the information is scattered. The operators, especially for well
UTF Phase B by changing the injection pressure lengths, usually present it as averages for field developments.
There is a clear trend for operators to use 100 m as a typical
PAD Size well spacing, as seen in Figure 13. Figure 13 indicates that
Well pair interaction between pads has been shown to be spacing of 150 m leads to poorer performance. The two
important in the different pads analyzed at EnCana’s Foster operations using 150 m well pair spacing are Firebag, which is
Creek. Therefore, it is expected that pad size could have a too young to make a judgment yet, and Surmont, which has
meaningful impact on the performance of SAGD operations. suffered from a lack of steam. On the other hand, analysis of
Figure 12 shows that most of the best performers are pads with the UTF Phase B shows that a spacing of 90 m seems most
4 or more well pairs. Thus, the UTF Phase B, which is an economical, and was the basis for the UTF Phase D [6]. This
excellent operation with an excellent reservoir quality, is a 3 seems to indicate that 100 m well spacing is a good choice
well pair pad and may not achieve the level of performance of unless recovery needs to be accelerated significantly, which
bigger pads as in MacKay River, which is a nearby operation. will require closer spacing.
Moreover, it implies that single well pair pilots, such as Hilda
Lake, which are good indicators of whether the steam chamber 2.7
.2
can develop and SAGD operations are feasible, are not good
=0
70 m
SR
2.4 0 .3
O
90 m
indicators of the full performance of SAGD operations, and 100 m OS
R=
will underestimate the cOSR and ultimate recovery that can be 2.1
150 m
Steam Injected (CEW)/OOIP
0.4
expected in multi-well pads. The pads with 10 well pairs OS
R=
1.8
belong to Firebag, and they are underperforming due to two
major reasons: 1.5
• lack of steam for the entire project: not all the 10 well OSR
=0.5
1.2
pairs have been steamed in the pads
• distance between well pairs is 150 m (much larger than 0.9
the typical 100 m spacing of other operation): the steam
chamber will take longer to coalesce. 0.6
0.3
2.7
.2
0.0
=0
2 Wells
SR
2.4 0 .3 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
O
3 Wells R=
4 & 5 Wells OS
6 Wells HCPV Produced
2.1 7 Wells Figure 13. The role of well spacing in the performance of SAGD
Steam Injected (CEW)/OOIP
10 Wells 0.4
R= operations
OS
1.8
1.5
On the issue of well length, the picture is a lot more
OSR
=0.5 unclear as steam chambers always grow in 3D, and it takes
1.2 time to take advantage of the full well length. Moreover, if
0.9
insufficient steam is available, it will be difficult to use the full
well length. Thus, there is no point in using very long wells if
0.6 the supply of steam is insufficient: it can lead to dramatic
situations such as the 1000 m well pair at Surmont, which is
0.3
severely underutilized as shown by their seismic images and
0.0 temperature observation wells [7].
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
Because of the unique relation between steam pressure and
HCPV Produced
temperature, SAGD projects must be designed for a given
Figure 12. Impact of number of well pairs per pad on the efficiency
of SAGD operations operating temperature or pressure, which will fix the other
variable. Then, 2D simulations can give a first-order estimate
IPTC 12860 9
of how much steam will be required to operate the early stages 60% depending on the shale distribution and bitumen
of SAGD. As mentioned earlier, lower temperatures (and content. Thus, the issue of recovery factor can be seen as:
pressures) can be used once the process is mature. Moreover, o SAGD will have a better and faster recovery than
once the steam chamber is large, it is almost impossible to CSS over a single pad where a steam chamber
maintain the original pressure, so any SAGD project usually can be developed.
ends up operating at a lower pressure than at the early stages. o CSS will be better than SAGD as a single full
SAGD vs. CSS field option because the technology is more
The two main technologies to develop oil sand deposities with robust. Nonetheless CSS recovery is still
viscosities above 104 cp are SAGD and CSS. Both significantly affected by the presence of shale
technologies operate very differently, and rely on different baffles or thief zones.
driving mechanisms (although gravity plays a significant role • It seems that, while SAGD is viable only with thin basal
in mature CSS). Among the bigger differences in performance mobile water and not viable with top water or thick basal
and particularities of each technology are: water, CSS is viable but its performance is diminished
• Recovery factors in SAGD showed a trend towards the substantially. In the case of a gas cap, SAGD is not viable
60-70% as long as the steam chamber develops. On the while CSS is. Imperial Oil has successfully carried out
other hand, recoveries at Imperial Oil Cold Lake are CSS with a gas cap by injecting steam into all the pads
between 10 and 60% depending on shale content and before any production occurred. However, recovery
distribution, and oil content [1]. The full field average for expectations are 30 to 40% lower than for similar pads
CSS at Cold Lake is 38%, while the current recovery is with no gas cap [1].
30% for the full leases in MacKay River and Foster • A tailored approach to different reservoir areas seems to
Creek. However, in these two projects all the wells are be the ideal approach. However, the shortcomings of such
still in operation, and some of them are even fairly new. approach are the quality and detail achievable presently
Similarly, Hangingstone has already achieved a 37% for reservoir characterization, especially when flow
recovery to date with 13 out of 15 well pairs still in barriers at the reservoir scale have shown to impact
operation. All these SAGD operations are much younger negatively operations of both SAGD and CSS, although in
than Imperial Oil’s CSS, and a much higher overall different degrees. Moreover, the issue of thief zones
recovery is expected. Notice that the weight cut-off in remains presently unresolved as CSS, the only viable
OOIP for most of the SAGD operations is 10%, while technology currently under such conditions, performs
Cold Lake uses 8%. Therefore the comparison in recovery more poorly than when there are no thief zones.
terms is not straightforward, but one way to interpret this • Optimization seems more likely in SAGD as the process
difference is that CSS can be applied in leases that are not is based on gravity, which is a stable process. On the other
as rich as the leases where SAGD is being deployed. hand, CSS under fracturing conditions, which is necessary
• cOSR in the best CSS (Imperial Oil’s) is 0.34 (dry steam in bitumen reservoirs, is very unpredictable. Steam
basis) on average over the full field, which is comparable distribution is controlled by both reservoir and stress field
to an average SAGD such as Hangingstone. However, it heterogeneities, which are impossible to quantify with the
cannot compete with the best SAGD projects such as necessary precision and coverage to control the process.
Foster Creek or MacKay River that have cOSR of 0.39 Moreover, fracturing in oil sands is poorly understood, yet
and 0.46, respectively, in their field developments. key to CSS.
However, SAGD can only be deployed in areas of the Conclusions
reservoir with good vertical connectivity, no gas cap, A review of SAGD field performance has been carried out in
small mobile water zones and relatively thick pay zones. order to understand why SAGD has become the preferred
• All of the SAGD operations analyzed except Hilda Lake technology to develop the oil sands in-situ over the last ten
are in the Athabasca deposit, whose in-situ viscosity is years, and to try and gain insights as to what makes a SAGD
around 106 cp, while most of the CSS projects are in project successful. From this study it was established that:
reservoirs with in-situ viscosity around 105 cp or less. It • The key parameter for a successful SAGD process is the
should be noted that the GOR in both Cold Lake and geology. SAGD targets must be reservoir areas with
Peace River bitumen is between 8 and 10 m3/m3, while average pay thickness above 15 m, good vertical
the Athabasca bitumen is mostly a dead oil. In addition, communication and no thief zones. If one of these
gas drive has been identified as a relevant mechanism for conditions is not meet, the performance of a SAGD
recovery in CSS [8]. Therefore, SAGD has been deployed project will be hindered up to the point where it may not
successfully in reservoirs with a dead oil, while CSS is be viable. Moreover, slight differences in geology can
unlikely to work in a dead oil reservoir. easily reveal contrasting performances even over
• Despite the fact that CSS is a more robust process, contiguous pads.
especially in the presence of shale baffles, these baffles • The second most important parameter for a successful
affect the energy efficiency and ultimate recovery as well, SAGD is the operation itself. SAGD operations
and their effect can be significant depending on their performance is badly compromised by mainly lack of
continuity. Evidence of that has been shown by Imperial steam, but also by long boiler shut downs, and by the loss
Oil [1] where recoveries can fluctuate between 10 and of confined injectors early on in the process, which has
led to splitting big pads into small pads.
10 IPTC 12860
Christina Lake EnCana A2+A3 2 900 518 42.8 0.48 1.21 0.58 90 25 700 Oct-02 Apr-07 54
A4 1 450 159 35.3 0.38 0.92 0.35 90 25 700 Oct-03 May-06 31
A5+A6 2 683 160 23.4 0.38 0.61 0.23 90 20 450 Sep-04 May-06 20
Foster Creek EnCana A 4 1746 1048 60.0 0.43 1.41 0.60 100 30 700 May-97 May-06 108
B 6 2844 768 27.0 0.29 0.92 0.27 100 27 700 Nov-01 May-06 54
C 6 3114 1183 38.0 0.40 0.95 0.38 100 30 700 Nov-01 May-06 54
D 6 3237 1360 42.0 0.43 0.99 0.42 100 30 700 Nov-01 May-06 54
E 6 3133 1128 36.0 0.36 0.99 0.36 100 25 700 Nov-01 May-06 54
Exp1 6 2690 565 21.0 0.40 0.53 0.21 100 24 700 Nov-03 May-06 30
Exp2 4 1960 235 12.0 0.42 0.28 0.12 100 26 700 Nov-04 May-06 18
F 6 3502 210 6.0 0.50 0.12 0.06 100 31 700 Sep-05 May-06 8
G 6 2574 180 7.0 0.48 0.15 0.07 100 23 700 Oct-05 May-06 7
Surmont ConocoPhillips A+B 2 1128 278 24.6 0.33 0.75 0.25 120 47 300 Oct-97 Mar-07 113
C 1 1214 68 5.6 0.25 0.22 0.06 150 41 700 Jun-00 Mar-07 81
MacKay River Petro-Canada A 7 2073 490 1583 23.6 0.27 0.89 0.24 100 19 700 Nov-02 Sep-06 46
B 7 3578 1171 2522 32.7 0.48 0.68 0.33 100 25 700 Nov-02 Sep-06 46
C 6 4358 1169 2447 26.8 0.53 0.50 0.27 100 34 700 Nov-02 Sep-06 46
D 5 2581 790 1742 30.6 0.36 0.85 0.31 100 29 700 Nov-02 Sep-06 46
Hanginstone JACOS A+B 2 757 555 1848 73.3 0.29 2.52 0.73 100 20 500 Jun-99 Dec-06 90
C+D+E 3 998 460 1420 46.1 0.29 1.59 0.46 100 20 750 Jul-00 Dec-06 77
F+H+I 3 949 469 1299 49.4 0.32 1.52 0.49 100 18 750 Feb-02 Dec-06 58
J+K 2 996 277 776 27.8 0.34 0.82 0.28 100 20 750 Aug-03 Dec-06 40
L+M+N 3 1217 280 662 23.0 0.39 0.60 0.23 100 22 700 Jul-04 Dec-06 29
O+P+Q 2 808 101 298 12.5 0.32 0.39 0.13 100 22 700 Aug-05 Dec-06 16
Dover Petro-Canada Phase B 3 1065 697 1661 65.4 0.42 1.57 0.65 70 16 500 Jan-93 Feb-05 145
Phase D 2 851 440 1019 51.7 0.35 1.47 0.52 90 22 750 Jun-96 Feb-05 104
Phase E 1 504 155 350 30.8 0.35 0.87 0.31 90 22 750 Jun-99 Feb-05 68
Phase F&G 2 930 46 125 4.9 0.27 0.18 0.05 90 22 750 Dec-03 Feb-05 14
Firebag Suncor Pad1 10 19100 2157 6.5 0.32 0.35 0.11 150 44 900 Feb-04 Feb-07 36
Pad2 10 18000 1321 3.8 0.26 0.28 0.07 150 39 900 Feb-04 Feb-07 36
Hilda Lake BlackRock I1P1 1 509 170 702 33.4 0.29 1.15 0.33 - 23 1000 Oct-97 May-07 115
I3P3 1 509 102 399 20.1 0.22 0.91 0.20 - 23 1000 Oct-00 May-07 79