Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Imp Case Law Judical Academy Madras
Imp Case Law Judical Academy Madras
Part-5
Compiled by
mere delay of 3 years in filing application for amendment of written statement not a ground for
rejection when no serious prejudice is shown to have been caused to plaintiff so as to take away
any accrued right – in case of amendment of the courts are inclined to be more liberal in allowing
amendment of the written statement than of plaint and question of prejudice is less likely to
operate with same rigour in the former than in the latter case, commencement of trial as used in
proviso to Order 6 Rule 17 in the Code of Civil Procedure must be understood in the limited
sense as meaning the final hearing of the suit, examination of witnesses, filing of documents and
Evidence Act, 1872, Sections 101 & 102 – Burden of Proof – Burden of proving fact
rests on person who substantially asserts affirmative issues and not party who denies it – Said
rule is not universal and there may be exceptions to it – Burden of proof is used in three ways:
(a) to indicate the duty of bringing forward evidence in support of a proposition at the beginning
58
or later; (b) to make that of establishing a proposition as against all counter evidence; and (c) an
indiscriminate use in which it may mean either or both of the others – The elementary rule in
Section 101 is inflexible – Initial onus is always on plaintiff and if he discharges that onus and
makes out case which entitles him to relief, then onus shifts to Defendant to prove those
59
HIGH COURT CITATIONS
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 4 – Objections regarding jurisdiction and
applicability of new Act should be raised at earliest point of time – Party appeared before
Arbitrator and participated in proceedings without raising objections and with definite intention
that new Act would apply – Parties had also contested application under Section 9 – Party shall
be deemed to have waived plea regarding jurisdiction in not having raised same at earliest point
of time.
Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1960 [Act 18 of 1960 as amended by
Act 23 of 1973], Section 10 – Denial of title – Plea of – When once tenant admits relationship of
landlord and tenant and also pays the rental arrears, such person is estopped from contending that
there is no landlord and tenant relationship between parties – Rent Controller can prima facie
decide the title of landlord to decide whether denial of title is bona fide or not.
60
TLNJ 2006 (3) 667 (Civil)
M.N. Abdul Wahab Vs. Salem City Municipality Corporation, rep. by its
Commissioner, Corporation Office, Salem.
Civil Procedure Code 1908 as amended – Order 9, Rule 13 – Exparte decree – Petition to
set aside – delay – petition allowed – revision against order – certain amounts of latitude is
permissible in the case of Government or local body which is working through its officers or
Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 - Master and Servant – Power of Master to
suspend employee from service – Power to suspend servant under ordinary Law of master and
servant without pay could not be implied as term in ordinary contract of service – Such power to
suspend without pay must arise either from express term in contract of statutory provision
governing such contract – Order of suspension can be passed against employee pending enquiry
into his conduct even in the absence of any specific provision to that effect – Employee would be
entitled for remuneration for the period of his interim suspension in absence of specific provision
to suspend employee pending enquiry – Employee in such case would be entitled to his
remuneration for period of his interim suspension if there is no Statute or Rule under which such
Para 9. In the result, we hold that the Division Bench decision in The Special Officer,
Vellakovil Primary Agricultural Co-operative Bank, Vellakovil, Erode District, 2004 (5) CTC
61
299, does not lay down the correct law. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal fails and the same is
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), Section 125 – Hindu Marriage Act (25 of
1955) – Restitution of conjugal rights – Claim for maintenance by wife and minor daughter
granted – Said order challenged by husband on ground wife not complied with order of
restitution of conjugal rights against her – She not returned to matrimonial home – Admission by
husband on maintenance proceedings that he assaulted wife and daughter and turned them out of
home – Such assault sufficient ground for claiming maintenance – Hence wife not estopped by
conjugal rights, if there is an intervening circumstance providing sufficient ground for claiming
maintenance.”
Criminal Procedure Code (2 of 1974), Section 227 – Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860),
Sections 384, 30 – Accused petitioners, alleged, forcibly took 2 promissory notes and one cheque
for Rs.5,00,000/- from complainant, attacking him – Discharge petition by accused dismissed –
Both the promissory notes and the cheque allegedly snatched from complainant, invalid on date
of occurrence – Said documents, hence, not ‘valuable securities’ – Besides said documents not
recovered, not available – in the absence of said documents, allegation of offence under section
62
384 unbelievable – complainant although allegedly attacked, did not go to Government hospital
for treatment – Medical prescription a concocted document – No ground to raise grave suspicion
“When framing charges under Section 227, Criminal Procedure Code the magistrate has
power to sift and weigh the evidence to find out whether a prima facie case against accused
exists. The court shall discharge the accused if there is no sufficient ground for putting the
accused on trial.”
company and its directors – Director resigning long before the Commission of the offence of the
Copy Right Act (14 of 1957), Section 63 – Infringement of copy right – Registration of
Criminal Procedure Code (2 of 1974), Section 193 – Scheduled Castes and Scheduled
Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (33 of 1989), Sections 2 (1) (d), 14 - Jurisdiction to try the
63
offence – Special Court constituted under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
(Prevention of Atrocities ) Act – Cognizance of offence under Section 3 (1) (x) of the Act –
Taking direct cognizance by Special Judge upon final report of Investigating Officer – Without
the case being committed to it by Jurisdiction Magistrate – Entire trial proceedings vitiated –
“Neither in the Code of Criminal Procedure nor in the Act (33 of 1989) is there any
provision whatsoever, not even by implication, that the specified Court of Session (Special
Court) can take cognizance of the offence under the Act as a Court of original jurisdiction
without the case being committed to it by a Magistrate. Taking direct cognizance by Special
Court on the basis of the final report filed by the Investigating Officer and subsequent trial are
vitiated.”
Criminal Procedure Code. Sections 207, 164 - When it does not fall under the
classification of confession or statement of the accused as contemplated under Section 164 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure and when the said document is not going to be relied upon by the
prosecuting agency, there is no necessity to furnish a copy of the said document to the petitioners
herein – Petitioners have come out with the frivolous petitions before this Court without any
64
Criminal Rules of Practice, Rule 339 – Issuance of certified copies of record of criminal
case to parties – Rule 339 stipulates that copies of portion of record of criminal case must be
furnished to parties concerned on payment of proper stamp and authorised fee for copying –
Trial Court cannot refuse to receive copy Application but is bound to follow Rule 339 –
Directions issued.
Custodial death – Petitioner's husband taken to the police station without any reason (or)
any complaint – died in custody – due to beating indiscriminately by police officer – RDO
enquiry under Rule 145 of Indian Police Standing Order – charges proved and enquiry officer
(RDO) recommended prosecution under Rule Section 304-A and 203 IPC against them –
petitioner claimed compensation of a sum of Rs.5 lakhs – state paid Rs.50,000/- as per GO's –
Held: State is bound to compensate the petitioner and other family member of the
deceased having regard to the standard of living of the petitioner and other family members of
the deceased and act of custodial death – amount enhanced to Rs.3 lakhs from Rs.50,000/- - Writ
petition allowed.
Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act (Act 14
65
“When detenu, a hireling, is continuously involved in serious crimes, the nature and
gravity of which are prejudicial to maintenance of public order, the detention order is valid and
sustainable.”
and her child – See I.P.C., Sections 417, 294(b), Evidence Act, Section 112, Constitution of
Held: The accused and the complainant, factually are not married. It is also a fact that
the complainant has given birth to a child. The accused in the eyes of law is not the husband of
the complainant since there is no marriage between them. More so, the accused disowned the
paternity of the child. Therefore, on the complaint of K, the respondent/police filed a case
The principles laid in the ruling (2004 (1) CTC 758) squarely applicable to the facts on
hand. Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act is not applicable to the facts on hand as there is no
relationship of wife and husband exists between the complainant and the accused. In fact, the
trial Court has taken note of the principles laid down in the rulings referred to above and passed
an order that D N A typing test is must for the case under Section 417 IPC and accordingly
allowed the petition of the prosecution. I do not find any infirmity in the finding of the trial
Court.
66
Arunachalam Vs. Inspector of Police, Kunnam Police Station,
Perambalur District.
Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), Section 302 – Murder – Circumstantial evidence - Proof
by – Guilt of accused must be established without any missing link – The circumstances
established in this case – Not sufficient to hold the accused guilty of murder – Conviction set
aside.
“In the case of circumstantial evidence it can be relied on for conviction only if the guilt
“13. The weakness of the evidence based on tracker dogs has been dealt with in an
article “Police and Security Dogs”. The Possibility of an error on the part of the dog or its
master is the first among them. The possibility of misunderstanding between the dog and its
master is close to its heels. The possibility of a misrepresentation or a wrong inference from the
behavior of the dog could not be ruled out. Last, but not the least, is the fact that from a
scientific point of view, there is little knowledge and much uncertainty as to the precise faculties
which enable police dogs to track and identify criminals. Police dogs engage in these actions by
Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), Section 302 – Murder – Appreciation of evidence –
Accused charged with killing of his superior in office by shooting him with gun – Strong motive
67
for the offence established – Evidence of P.W.1 son of the deceased, was inspiring – Variance in
his evidence before the court and his complaint to the police regarding number of gun shots fired
at the victim – Cannot be considered as vital as to affect his evidence – Evidence regarding oral
dying declaration made by deceased to his close relatives found to be convincing – Fact that
P.W.1 did not make any mention in the complaint about the dying declaration made to him
would not vitiate his evidence – Report of the ballistic expert showing that the cartridge
recovered could not have been fired from the weapon produced by the Police – Is not significant,
in view of the overwhelming evidence available in this case – Accordingly the conviction and
“From the mere fact that the report of the Ballistic Expert shows that the cartridge
recovered could not have been fired from the weapon produced in the Court, it cannot be
concluded that the whole prosecution case must fall to the ground, when there is no other
I.P.C., Sections 467, 471, 474, 34, Criminal P.C., Section 482 – Petition to quash
proceedings launched as against the petitioners and others for offences under Sections 467, 471,
472 and 474 read with Section 34 of I.P.C. – Petitioners would submit that as the civil dispute
between the parties relating to the property in question was already decided by the Courts, the
68
Held: With very vague allegation, the respondent has come out with a private complaint
having failed in his attempt to convince the Police authorities to register a case, based on the
complaint preferred by him after withdrawing the Criminal Original Petition filed before this
Court – Civil Court had thoroughly analysed the history of title and ultimately recorded the
Respondent having failed in all his attempts has now come out with a vexatious
complaint to rope in the petitioners herein, in a case of forgery – No party can be permitted to
wreak vengeance as against the counter party who succeeded before various Civil Courts in the
hierarchy in the civil lis laid by him – Respondent/complainant has unnecessarily dragged the
petitioners and others out of frustration over the outcome of the civil lis brought against him –
Such a criminal proceeding cannot be allowed to work hardship not only as against the
petitioners herein and also against the other accused in C.C. – In the result, the criminal
proceeding pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Poonamallee, not only
against the second and third accused, but also as against the other accused in the said case, stands
Madras Police Standing Orders, Clause I – Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) Sections 224,
226 and 506 (ii) – Case and counter case – Accused charged with offences under Sections 224,
226 and 506 (ii), I.P.C – Complaint against the prosecution party – Police charge sheeting the
accused without investigating the compliant filed by them – When there is a case and counter
case, police are bound to investigate both and find out who is the aggressor – Then only it can
69
file the charge sheet against the aggressor – As this procedure was not followed, conviction of
Motor Vehicles Act 1988 – Section 173 – Motor Accident Claims – Victim proceeding in
an auto – Rash and negligent driving by driver – Auto dashed against a road side tree – fracture
on the left leg below the knee to claimant – compensation of Rs.81,000/- awarded by tribunal –
appeal by Insurance Company – Non wearing of the badge to drive an auto while holding the
driving licence to drive the light motor vehicle will absolve liability of the insurance company
from paying compensation to third parties in a case of rash and negligent driving.
Held: Minor and inconsequential deviations with regard to licensing condition would
fasten the insured to indemnify the insurer as against third parties to pay the compensation –
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 168 – Power of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal to
under any head should be adequate and reasonable to achieve Statutory goal – Approach of
Tribunal in awarding compensation should be on larger perspective of justice, equity and good
70
accordance with injury and injury may bring about many consequences like loss of earning
capacity, loss of mental pleasure and may such consequential losses – It is open to Tribunal to
award different sums of damages higher than those claimed under particular head of damages so
long as Tribunal does not exceed total amount claimed – Damages awarded for non-pecuniary
damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenities cannot be reduced even if quantum of
pecuniary damages payable is high – Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal should itemise award
under each of head namely Pecuniary Losses and Non-pecuniary Losses – Under head Non-
pecuniary Losses Tribunal shall consider (a) pain and suffering; (b) loss of amenity; (c) loss of
expectation of life, hardship, mental stress, etc. and (d) loss of prospect of marriage – Under
head Pecuniary Losses, Tribunal shall consider loss of earning capacity and loss of future
earnings as one component apart from medical and other expenses and loss of earning if any
from date of accident till date of trial – When loss of earning capacity is compensated as also
non-pecuniary losses under (a) to (d) permanent disability need not be separately itemized.
Negotiable Instruments Act (26 of 1881), Section 138 – Accused convicted under, for
dishonour of the cheque – Before punishment is imposed the parties filing a compromise memo,
stating that the dispute has been settled – The comprise is valid in law – Court should record the
“A compromise entered into between the parties after the accused is convicted under
71
2006 (2) M.L.J (CRL.) 543 (DB)
K. Gopalakrishnan Vs. Karunakaran rep. by the Power of Attorney
Holder Dhandapani
Negotiable Instruments Act (26 of 1881), Sections 138, 141, 142 (a) – Power of
Attorney Act (7 of 1882), Section 2 – Criminal Procedure Code (2 of 1974), Sections 2 (d), 190,
200 - Competency of Power of Attorney to prefer a complaint on behalf of the payee or holder
in due course of the cheque – Complaint even if not signed by the Power of Attorney on behalf
of the complainant but signed in his own name is maintainable and not bad in law – Examination
of Power of Attorney Holder upon oath and reduced into writing the substance of such
examination at the time of presentation of the complaint shall be sufficient compliance of the
procedure contemplated under the Code – Court can take cognizance upon sworn statement of
Power of Attorney Holder – It is not required to record the Sworn affidavit of the complainant
also on future date to enable the Court to exercise its discretion under Sections 202 and 203 of
Cr.P.C. – Deed of Power of Attorney or affidavit of the complainant in proof of execution can be
rectified by producing at subsequent stage of the proceedings as and when the validity of the
Power of Attorney is questioned by the accused, the Court can called upon to decide the
Narayanan, Proprietor, 7th Channel Communications, rep. by its Power of Attorney Agent,
“The Power of Attorney holder of the payee or the holder in due course of the cheque,
will be competent to make a complaint. Only when the validity of the Power of Attorney is
questioned, the Court could be called upon to decide the genuineness or its validity at a later
stage of proceedings.”
72
2006 (2) L.W. (CRL.) 689
The Tamil Nadu retrenched Census Employees Association and others Vs. K.
Thennan
dishonouring of, whether is a ‘debt’ – Complaint was filed before the Magistrate by the
respondent herein (Advocate) stating that the cheques issued respectively by the petitioners
herein towards Advocate fees and other expenditure due to the respondent, were returned
dishonoured with endorsement “Stop Payment” – Accused filed this petition (Crl.O.P) to quash
the complaint, contending that there was no due payable by the petitioners to the respondent; at
any rate, the arrears of the legal fees cannot be classified as a legally enforceable debt, and that
such a noble relationship cannot be degraded to the category of a debtor and a creditor
relationship.
Held: Rejecting the contention, when the amount payable to the Advocate towards fees
is found due, then it becomes a debt – Such debt is legally enforceable – Though the Advocate in
the legal profession is supposed to do service to the public, he is entitled under law to receive
fees for the service he renders – When such amount is not paid when it becomes due, it becomes
2006-2-L.W.(Crl.) 703
Ramaswamy Vs. M/s. Dhanalakshmi Bankers rep. by its Managing Partner Mr.
Kandaswamy
Negotiable Instruments Act (1881) Section 138, - Criminal Procedure Code, Section 245
– Revision against the dismissal of the discharge petition filed under Section 245 Cr.P.C. – Plea
73
urged that the entire loan amount for which the cheques were issued was discharged but despite
the same, the complainant has not returned the said two cheques and that the cheque has been
materially altered which can be seen from the difference in ink and as such, the complaint is not
maintainable.
Held: The learned Judicial Magistrate recorded finding that the date 29.02.2001
mentioned in the cheque issued by the accused will not in any manner affect the case of the
complainant and that the case has been pending for two years and the examination of witnesses
on the side of the complainant has been completed – Inasmuch as the criminal case C.C.No.253
of 2001 is a summons case and initiated under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act,
against the revision petitioner/accused, it is not open to the revision petitioner/accused to seek
Schedule Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (33 of 1989) –
Section 3 (1) (x) – Section 23 – Rule – 7 – Investigation by Inspector of Police vitiates the entire
members of SC/ST. But since it is easy to foist a case of this nature, in order to ensure that the
provisions of the Act are not misused, Rule 7 requires that investigation be done by an officer not
74
ROC.No. 44 / 2006 / JA November 2006
To
Sir / Madam,
The important case laws compiled by Tamil Nadu State Judicial Academy for the
month of October 2006 (Part 6 of Vol. I) is enclosed herewith and the same is sent for circulation
Yours faithfully,
DIRECTOR
75