Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Abstract: Frost related damage in pavements is a major concern for highway engineers in cold regions. The existing methods for
mitigating frost damage in flexible pavements are expensive; they require greater construction control and are not fully effective. This
paper investigates an alternative approach for reducing frost penetration into the pavement layers by engineering a less conductive asphalt
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Monash University on 11/09/12. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
surface layer. It proposes a less conductive pavement by replacing conventional aggregate in the asphalt mix with lightweight aggregate
共LWA兲. The paper discusses, in the context of the larger research program, the development of an optimized design of LWA-asphalt mix.
It is has been demonstrated in work published elsewhere that because of its superior insulating behavior, LWA-asphalt mix can reduce
frost penetration into the underlying pavement layers. Thus maintenance cost associated with frost damage can be reduced. This paper
presents the physical properties of LWA, the lessons learned from the mix design process, as well as the preliminary thermal and
mechanical properties of the optimized LWA-asphalt mix.
DOI: 10.1061/共ASCE兲0899-1561共2010兲22:2共171兲
CE Database subject headings: Aggregate; Asphalt; Mixtures; Flexible pavements; Damage; Thermal factors.
Author keywords: Lightweight aggregate; Asphalt mix; Flexible pavements; Frost damage; Thermal properties.
90
Blending Sand
80
70
% passing
60
50
40 Pumice
30 Aggregate A
20 Aggregate B
Aggregate C
10
Aggregate D
0
0.075 0.15 0.3 0.6 1.18 2.36 4.75 6.3 9.5 12.5 19.0
Sieve Size (mm) to power 0.45
LWA-asphalt mix
according to the ASTM C136 test method. Test results for pumice
were not encouraging. gradation analysis 共Fig. 1兲 for pumice
Objective showed that the material has a high dust content of 22.5%. Mi-
crodeval abrasion test resulted in a 40% loss in mass, which ex-
This paper is part of a larger study that investigates an alternative ceed the maximum allowable limit of 16% according to the
approach for mitigating frost damage by engineering a less con- NBDOT standard specifications. A trial mix containing pumice
ductive pavement structure. The benefits and effectiveness of and 15% asphalt binder exhibited severe stripping problem
using LWA asphalt and LWA aggregates in other pavement layers 共Fig. 2兲. From these results it was decided to stop any further
were demonstrated in the context study and published in recent investigation of pumice as a paving material. Consequently, the
paper by the writers Khan et al. 共2008兲. Also, the larger study remainder of this paper deals with the expanded shale LWA. For
dealt with the determination and measurement of thermal proper- simplicity, only the term LWA will be used in this paper instead of
ties of LWA-asphalt mixes; this work has been published in a expanded shale LWA.
recent article 共Khan and Mrawira 2008兲. This paper focuses on Depending on where it is manufactured, the bulk density of
the mix design for LWA-asphalt mix and initial characterization LWA is roughly about half the bulk density of a conventional
of such a mix for possible use in flexible pavements in frost aggregate ranging from 480 to 1,000 kg/ m3 共Gallaway 1997兲. In
susceptible areas. The scope of this laboratory study is the physi- this study, bulk densities of the LWA and a conventional aggre-
cal characterization of LWA, development of the optimum gate were determined according to ASTM C29 and were found
LWA-asphalt mix design and the mechanical and thermal charac- to be 820 and 1,754 kg/ m3, respectively. It is worth noting that
terization of the resulting LWA-asphalt mix. The structural per- the conventional aggregate used for comparison in this study is
formance of a hypothetical LWA pavement section is evaluated from Springhill Construction Ltd. quarry in Fredericton, New
using the Asphalt Institute mechanistic-empirical relationships. Brunswick.
Specific gravity of an aggregate is useful in making weight-
volume conversions and in calculating voids in mineral aggregate
Material Characterization 共VMA兲 in the compacted asphalt mix. Specific gravity and ab-
sorption of the coarse fraction 共12.5–4.75 mm兲 and fine fraction
Materials used for this study consist of expanded shale LWA ob- 共passing 4.75 mm兲 of LWA were determined according to ASTM
tained from Northeast SOLITE Corporation; blending sand from C127 and ASTM C128, respectively. The two standards specify
Colter pit 共natural deposit兲, New Brunswick; and asphalt binder soaking the aggregates for 24 h. However, given the higher pro-
from Irving Oil Limited. The asphalt binder is a straight-run PG portion of interconnected pores in LWA, these specifications may
58-28 in the Superpave binder grading system. The LWA was not be appropriate for LWA. It was therefore proposed to soak the
crushed to achieve aggregate gradations that satisfy Superpave LWA in water for 72 h so as to ensure saturation of all the open
mix design criteria. Physical properties of pumice 共another type pores. Test results for both coarse and fine aggregate are tabulated
of LWA兲 were also studied. Pumice was supplied by Great Pacific in Table 1. As seen from the table, the specific gravity of the LWA
Pumice Inc. Fig. 1 shows the gradation curves of the four light- fine fraction is 11.7%; more than a percent higher compared to the
weight aggregates, pumice, and the blending sand that were in- LWA coarse fraction. Also, as expected given the higher porosity,
vestigated in this study. the absorption values for LWA are 6 to 10 times higher than those
Before undertaking the mix design, the physical properties of for conventional aggregates.
LWA were evaluated to determine if in fact, LWA can be used in The freeze-thaw durability test was performed according to the
flexible pavements. This phase consisted of testing two types of Ministry of Transportation Ontario 共MTO兲 test procedure MTO
LWA: pumice and expanded shale. Physical properties of the ag- LS-614. The test determines the resistance of coarse aggregate
gregates have significant effects on the performance of pavement. 共retained on the 4.75-mm sieve兲 to disintegration by repeated
The criteria used in this study are the New Brunswick Department freezing and thawing in a sodium chloride solution. The test pro-
of Transportation 共NBDOT兲 standard specifications. The follow- vides a laboratory assessment of the soundness of LWA subject to
ing tests were performed: particle gradation analysis, determina- freezing and thawing action. The durability test results are pre-
tion of bulk density, specific gravity, absorption test, freeze-thaw sented in Table 1. LWA showed only 2% mass loss; this is well
durability test, flat and elongated particles test, and microdeval below the NBDOT maximum allowable limit of 14%. The results
abrasion test. show that LWA is extremely resistant to freezing and thawing
Gradation analysis was performed for each type of aggregate action.
Loose bulk density 共kg/ m3兲 820 1750 — graded 12.5 mm maximum size with only about 34% retained on
Note: Gb = bulk specific gravity; — = not specified. the 4.75-mm sieve.
In order to select the optimum working aggregate skeleton that
can be produced in the asphalt mix plant, the four aggregate gra-
The flat and elongated particles test was performed according dations were combined in the trial and error method 共mathemati-
to MTO LS-608 standard test method. The test determines the
cally兲 to meet Superpave specifications. The common practice in
percentage of flat and elongated particles in coarse aggregate
mix design is to evaluate several aggregate blends of the available
共12.5–4.75 mm兲 by measurement of individual particles. Flat and
aggregates before selecting the best blend for mix design. Typi-
elongated pieces are defined as those whose greatest dimension in
cally the evaluation proceeds by preparing a compacted HMA
the longitudinal axis exceeds the ratio of 4:1 compared to the least
briquette of each aggregate blend at an estimated optimum binder
dimension in a plane perpendicular to the longitudinal axis. Ex-
cessive proportions of flat and elongated particles may cause content and determining the volumetric properties—air voids,
compaction problems and reduce the overall performance of the VMA, and voids filled with asphalt 共VFA兲. The trial blend is also
pavement. As seen in Table 1, LWA tested had only 0.5% of flat evaluated to meet the Superpave compaction requirements. The
and elongated particles by weight. The maximum allowable limit compaction requirements are specified in terms of VMA, VFA,
set by NBDOT is 20%. and maximum theoretical specific gravity at three numbers of
The microdeval abrasion test determines the abrasion loss of gyrations: initial number of gyrations 共Nini兲, design number of
aggregate in the presence of water and an abrasive charge gyrations 共Ndes兲, and maximum number of gyrations 共Nmax兲. For a
共9.5⫾ 0.5 mm steel balls兲. The test was performed according to design traffic load of 3 to 30 million equivalent single axle loads
Test Method LS-618 developed by MTO. The LWA tested 共ESALs兲, NBDOT specifies Nini, Ndes, and Nmax of 8, 100, and
showed a 21% loss 共Table 1兲 in mass; which is slightly higher 160, respectively.
than the allowable limit of 16% specified by NBDOT for the Table 2 summarizes the evaluation of aggregate trial blends
wearing course of flexible pavements. However, as noted before, undertaken in this study. As seen on the table, eight blends were
the LWA showed superior freeze-thaw resistance in addition to its first tried using Aggregates A and B and varying proportions of
better insulative property. It is therefore expected that LWA- blending sand. The goal was to achieve an asphalt mix with
asphalt mix will provide acceptable durability despite the low 12.5 mm nominal maximum size. None of them met the mix
abrasion resistance. Also, given the surface of LWA is vesicular design requirements—especially the air voids requirement. Next,
and more textured than conventional aggregate, higher frictional two blends were tried using only Aggregate B with blending sand.
resistance is expected from LWA asphalt surface mix. The litera- Again, these blends did not meet the requirements. Finally, the
ture shows that in a ranking of polished stone values 共PSVs兲 of trial blends using Aggregates C and D were evaluated. The focus
over 60 different aggregate samples from lowest value to the here was changed to evaluate surface mixes with 9.5 mm nominal
highest, the LWA ranked at top with the PSV of 51 共Gallaway maximum size. As seen on the table, Trial Blends #11 and #12
1997兲. were very close to meeting the volumetric requirements. By
reducing the proportion of blending sand, the Trial Blend #13
was successful in meeting the design requirements. This trial
Design of Lightweight Aggregate-Asphalt Mix blend was selected as the design aggregate skeleton to be evalu-
ated in the final step of mix design—selection of optimum binder
Design Considerations and Aggregate Gradation content. Fig. 3 shows design aggregate gradation that was further
Generally speaking, mix design is a laboratory simulation that investigated for optimized LWA-asphalt mix.
aims to approximate the actual hot-mix asphalt 共HMA兲 plant pro- It is worth noting that the binder used in the evaluation is a
duction, placement, and in-service performance as close as pos- PG58-28, the typical binder specified for medium traffic loading
sible. The laboratory mix design allows an engineer to predict in New Brunswick. The bulk specific gravity of each compacted
the type of mix design that is best for a particular application briquette was determined according to ASTM D2726. Theoretical
and how it will perform. In this paper, the mix design goal was maximum specific gravity of each uncompacted 共loose兲 asphalt
to identify an optimized LWA-asphalt mix that can meet techni- mix was determined according to ASTM D2041. The bulk spe-
cal requirements for paving material with respect to NBDOT or cific gravity value is used not only, as an input in estimating the
Superpave mix design standards. We followed common labora- percentage air voids, but also in calculating specific heat capacity
tory procedures of developing the job mix formula to ensure of the asphalt specimens when thermal diffusivity and thermal
that the optimized mix can be produced in the conventional as- conductivity are known.
Design Binder Content fication curve, relating the number of gyrations and the average
maximum theoretical specific gravity 共% Gm兲, was plotted as
In the Superpave mix design method, the optimum binder content
shown in Fig. 5.
共% by weight of total mix兲 is normally selected as that binder
The maximum theoretical specific gravity of the mix at Nini,
content that results in 4% air voids at Ndes. This binder content
Ndes, and Nmax was obtained from the densification curve and was
must also meet other requirements including VMA, VFA, and the
used to calculate the air voids 共%兲 at the three gyration levels.
Superpave compaction requirements. The optimum binder content
According to Roberts et al. 共1996兲, the densification behavior of
is identified by evaluating the effect of varying binder content on
an asphalt mix can be used to predict construction behavior of the
the three volumetric properties—air voids, VMA, and VFA of the
mix. It is desirable for example, for the mix to be easy to compact
design aggregate blend. Three HMA briquettes were prepared at
each binder content, at four levels of increasing binder content 共in
steps of 0.5%兲 from below the estimated optimum. The volumet- 6
ric properties of each asphalt mix were determined at Ndes. Fig. 4
% Air Voids
shows the air voids, VMA, and VFA for the mixes. Starting with 4
air voids graph, the binder content that gives 4% air voids is
selected as the optimum binder content. VMA and VFA at the
2
optimum binder content are found from the corresponding graphs.
As seen in Fig. 4, the optimum binder content, the corresponding
0
VMA and VFA are 12.8, 15.18, and 74%, respectively.
11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14
% Asphalt Binder
Densification of LWA-Asphalt Mix
16.0
Two Superpave briquettes of the optimized LWA-asphalt mix
were compacted at Nmax and the corresponding height data of the 15.5
% VMA
briquettes for each number of gyrations was recorded. The densi- 15.0
14.5
100
14.0
90
11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14
Maximum Density Line % Asphalt Binder
80
70 90
% Passing
60
Upper Limit 80
50
% VFA
Optimized LWA-HMA
40 70
30
20
60
Low er Limit
10
50
0
0.075 0.15 0.3 0.6 1.18 2.36 4.75 6.3 9.5 12.5 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14
Sieve Size (mm) to power 0.45 % Asphalt Binder
Fig. 3. Design aggregate gradation investigated for an optimized Fig. 4. Asphalt content versus air voids, VMA, and VFA of the
LWA-asphalt mix optimized LWA-asphalt mix
95
% Gm.
90
85
80
1 10 100
Number of Gyrations (log scale) Fig. 6. Test specimens after undergoing indirect split tensile test
mens. One subset was used for freeze-thaw conditioning, one for
moisture conditioning and the last subset was used as the control
and not become gummy during rolling. A Superpave mix should subset.
have air voids of at least 11% at Nini 共i.e., its density must be less The specimens for freeze-thaw subset were first subjected to
than 89% of Gm兲 in order to avoid the characteristics of a tender partial vacuum saturation of 55–80%, then wrapped in plastic
mix. A Superpave mix should also have air voids of at least 2% bags along with 3 mL of water and finally put in a freezer for
共i.e., its density must be less than 98% of Gm兲 at Nmax otherwise 18 h at a temperature of −20° C. The specimens were then placed
the mix would be susceptible to rutting. The optimized LWA- in a hot water bath for 24 h at a temperature of 60° C. Specimens
asphalt mix satisfied all these requirements. Table 3 presents the of the moisture conditioning subset were also subjected to partial
volumetric and mechanical properties of the optimized LWA- vacuum saturation 共55–80%兲 and then kept in a water bath for
asphalt mix. 24 h at a temperature of 60° C. After 24 h, specimens of both the
moisture conditioning subset and freeze-thaw subset were re-
Moisture Sensitivity of the Optimized LWA-Asphalt Mix moved from hot water bath and placed in another water bath at a
temperature of 25° C for 45 min.
As a final step of Superpave mix design method, the moisture The tensile strength of each specimen of all the three subsets
sensitivity of the optimized LWA-asphalt mix was evaluated ac- was determined by conducting indirect tensile strength 共splitting兲
cording to ASTM D4867. A set of nine Marshall Test specimens test at 25° C. Test results are tabulated in Table 4. Moisture sus-
having approximately 102-mm diameter and 64-mm height were ceptibility is reported as the tensile strength ratio 共TSR兲 of the
compacted to an air void content of 6 to 8%. The specimens were moisture conditioned subset or freeze-thaw conditioned subset to
then divided into three subsets, each consisting of three test speci- that of the unconditioned subset 共control兲. Mixtures with a TSR
value of less than 80% are considered moisture susceptible. Av-
erage TSR of the optimized LWA-asphalt mix was found to be
Table 3. Volumetric and Mechanical Properties of the Optimized LWA- 90%. It is therefore concluded that the optimized LWA-asphalt
Asphalt Mix mix is not susceptible to moisture damage. No visual stripping of
Property Result Specification
the test specimens was observed after splitting the specimens
共Fig. 6兲. This indicates that the optimized LWA-asphalt mix has
VMAs 共%兲 15.2 艌15 adequate asphalt film thickness to ensure durability.
VFA 共%兲 74.0 65–77
Air Voids 共%兲 4.0 3–5
Binder Content, Performance, and Cost Comparison
Maximum specific gravity % Gm at Nini 86.1 ⬍89%
of LWA-Asphalt versus Conventional AC
Maximum specific gravity % Gm at Nmax 97.8 ⬍98%
Bulk specific gravity Gb 1.591 — Binder Content and Cost
Maximum specific gravity Gm 1.658 — Binder content in paving contracts is usually specified as a per-
Asphalt absorption 共%兲 6.4 — cent of the total weight of the mix. At 12.8% by weight, the
Film thickness 共m兲 8.9 艌8.5 binder content of the optimized LWA-asphalt mix appears to be
Dynamic modulus 共MPa兲 2650 — high compared to a conventional asphalt concrete 共AC兲. However,
Marshall stability 共N兲 19,733 艌8,000 since the bulk density of LWA mix is only about 67% of the bulk
Marshall flow 共0.25 mm兲 15 12–18 density of conventional asphalt mix, a given tonnage of LWA-
price rather than by weight price only. This would bring all the
materials on an equal competitive basis by correctly adjusting for 10
-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10
the large differences in volume to weight ratio.
Log of Reduced Time (s)
(a)
Mechanical Characterization of LWA-Asphalt Mix 100000
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Monash University on 11/09/12. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
pared to a conventional mix. The indirect tensile strength and Log of Reduced Time (s)
tensile strain at failure of both the mixes were almost the same.
CBR of LWA was also determined to evaluate its potential use in (b)
road base and/or subbase, and was found to be 21 which is ac-
Fig. 8. Master curve of the dynamic moduli of 共a兲 LWA-asphalt mix;
ceptable for subbase and base course construction. On the basis of
共b兲 conventional mix
these test results, it was concluded that LWA in flexible pave-
ments can result in adequate pavement performance.
Marshall test is an empirical test that gives a reasonable pre- sorbs higher asphalt and therefore requires additional asphalt to
diction of pavement performance. Presently, although research achieve adequate film thickness around the aggregate. However,
efforts have been directed toward developing mechanistic- Lee et al. 共1993兲 suggested that the absorption of asphalt into
empirical pavement design methods, many agencies still rely on aggregate pores can also increase the physical interlocking of the
empirical test methods such as the Marshall test to assess stiffness binder and the aggregate, thereby resulting in increased pavement
of an asphalt mix. Marshall test was conducted on three cylindri- strength.
cal test specimens 共having 102-mm diameter and 64-mm height兲
of the optimized LWA-asphalt mix according to ASTM D5581.
Each test established two parameters: stability and flow. Stability Thermal Properties of LWA-Asphalt Mix
is the measure of AC resistance to deformation under traffic loads
whereas flow measures the amount of deformation resulting from Thermal properties 共thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity
such loads 共Asphalt Institute 1998兲. As seen in Table 3, the opti- heat capacity兲 of the optimized LWA-asphalt mix and a conven-
mized LWA-asphalt mix showed good stability and flow values tional asphalt mix were investigated using the k-alpha tester de-
and satisfied NBDOT specifications. As expected, the vesicular veloped at the University of New Brunswick 共Luca and Mrawira
and more textured surface of the LWA results in increased stabil- 2005兲. The measurement and determination of thermal properties
ity. of the optimized LWA-asphalt mix is detailed in a recent paper by
The new mechanistic-empirical pavement design method 关Na- the writers Khan and Mrawira 共2008兲. The thermal conductivity
tional Cooperative Highway Research Program 共NCHRP兲 2004兴 and thermal diffusivity of the optimized LWA-asphalt mix was
requires dynamic modulus as a strength parameter for pavement found to be 58 and 55% lower than that of the conventional
thickness design and performance analysis of flexible pavements. asphalt mix respectively 共Table 6兲. The specific heat capacity of
Dynamic modulus test was performed at temperatures of ⫺15, 5, the optimized LWA-asphalt mix was found to be 38% higher than
10, 23, 33° C and at the loading frequencies of 25, 10, 5, 1, and that of the conventional asphalt mix. However, because of the
0.1 Hz. Dynamic modulus values measured over a range of tem- lower bulk density of LWA-asphalt mix, its volumetric heat ca-
peratures and loading frequencies were used in the development pacity was found to be 7% lower than that of the conventional
of master curve for characterizing LWA-asphalt mix for pavement
thickness design and performance analysis. Fig. 8 shows the mas-
ter curves of the dynamic moduli for the optimized LWA-asphalt Table 6. Thermal Properties of Conventional AC and LWA-Asphalt
mix and the conventional mix. Test results show acceptable dy- Mixes
namic modulus values for the optimized LWA-asphalt mix. A LWA-asphalt Conventional
typical dynamic modulus of the mix given in Table 3 is based at Property mix asphalt mix
23° C and a frequency of 25 Hz 共0.04 s of loading rate兲, which
Thermal conductivity 共W m K兲 0.79 1.87
represents pavement condition during the summer season under
Thermal diffusivity⫻ 10−7 共m2 / s兲 2.09 4.60
moderate to high traffic speed 共Barksdale et al. 1997兲.
Specific heat capacity 共J kg K兲 2,363 1,710
It is worth noting that because of its porous nature, LWA ab-