Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Fundamental Properties of
Supercritical Fluids
Christopher E. Bunker
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio
Harry W. Rollins
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho
Ya-Ping Sun
Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina
I. INTRODUCTION
Supercritical fluids∗ have been studied extensively for the past two decades in at-
tempts to gain accurate and detailed knowledge of their fundamental properties.
Such knowledge is essential to the utilization and optimization of supercritical
fluid technology in materials preparation and processing. Among the most im-
portant properties of a supercritical fluid are the low and tunable densities that
can be varied between those of a gas and a normal liquid and the local density
effects observed in supercritical fluid solutions (most strongly associated with
near-critical conditions). A supercritical fluid may be considered macroscopi-
cally homogeneous but microscopically inhomogeneous, consisting of clusters
of solvent molecules and free volumes. That a supercritical fluid is macroscop-
ically homogeneous is obvious—the fluid at a temperature above the critical
temperature exists as a single phase regardless of pressure. As a consequence,
∗ A supercritical fluid is defined loosely as a solvent above its critical temperature because under those
conditions the solvent exists as a single phase regardless of pressure. It has been demonstrated that
a thorough understanding of the low-density region of a supercritical fluid is required to obtain a
clear picture of the microscopic properties of the fluid across the entire density region from gas-like
to liquid-like (1–3).
∗ The E (30) solvent polarity scale is based on the spectral shift of a betaine dye (Riechardt dye)
T
in a large number of solvents and correlates the dye’s spectral shift to the ability of the solvent to
stabilize the probe molecule via dielectric solute–solvent interactions (18). The ET (30) scale has
found limited application in the investigation of supercritical fluids, mainly because of solubility
issues.
Figure 2 Plot of π∗ vs. reduced density (ρ/ρc ) for the five fluids. (From Ref. 22.)
Figure 3 Transition energy (ET ) and isothermal compressibility vs. density for phenol
blue in ethylene: (䊊) 25◦ C, (䉭) 10◦ C, (–––) calculated E0 T . (From Ref. 26.)
fluoroform, and ethane (32,33). The results of these studies showed the char-
acteristic density dependence of solvation in supercritical fluids, supporting the
solute–solvent clustering concept.
Structure 2
Figure 5 Py values in the vapor phase (䊏) and CO2 at 45◦ C with excitation at 314 nm
(䊊) and 334 nm (䉭). (From Ref. 2.)
Figure 6 Py values in CO2 at 45◦ C plotted against a dielectric cross term f (ε, n2 ).
The line, Py = 0.48 + 0.02125 f (ε, n2 ), is a reference relationship for the calculation
of local densities. (From Ref. 2.)
the pyrene fluorescence spectrum is very broad, lacking the characteristic struc-
tural detail observed in the room-temperature spectrum (49). The fluorescence
spectrum for low and high densities is essentially the same; however, the fluo-
rescence excitation spectrum maintains its characteristic vibronic structure and
displays a small but measurable red shift with increasing fluid density (49). A
plot of the fluorescence excitation spectral maximum as a function of the re-
duced density of supercritical hexane (Figure 7) shows the same characteristic
pattern observed for pyrene in supercritical CO2 (2,3); and the results can be
explained in terms of the three-density-region solvation model (1–3). It appears
that even in the high-temperature supercritical fluids, solute–solvent clustering is
prevalent. This is supported by results obtained from the investigation of super-
critical hexane using Raman spectroscopy, where the spectral shifts and relative
intensities of the C-H stretch transition of hexane were measured at different
densities (Figure 7) (49).
Structure 3
The shifts of the TICT band maximum in normal liquid solvents correlated
well with those of P , confirming the linear relationship predicted by classi-
cal continuum theory. However, the results in supercritical fluoroform deviated
significantly from the relationship, indicating that the effective polarities in su-
percritical fluoroform were significantly larger than expected (Figure 10) (51).
According to Kajimoto et al. (51), the deviation may be attributed to unusual
solute–solvent interactions (or solute–solvent clustering) in supercritical fluid
solutions. From the results at low fluid densities, they were able to determine
the number of solvent molecules about the solute using a simple model with
solute–solvent interaction potentials (51,52,54,55).
Sun et al. carried out a more systematic investigation of the TICT molecules
DMABN and ethyl p-(N ,N -dimethylamino)benzoate (DMAEB) in supercritical
fluoroform, CO2 , and ethane as a function of fluid density (1). They found
that the absorption and TICT emission spectral maxima shifted to the red with
increasing fluid density. The results were comparable to those reported by Ka-
jimoto et al. (51–55). More importantly, the spectral shifts and the fractional
contribution of the TICT state emission changed with fluid density following the
characteristic three-density-region pattern (Figures 11 and 12) (1). In fact, these
results furnished the impetus for the development of the three-density-region sol-
vation model for solute–solvent interactions in supercritical fluid solutions (2,3).
Structure 4
1. Unimolecular Reactions
Unimolecular reactions that have been used to investigate the solvation proper-
ties of supercritical fluids include tautomeric reactions (67–71), rotational iso-
merization reactions (72–78), and radical reactions (79–83). O’Shea et al. used
the tautomeric equilibrium of 4-(phenylazo)-1-naphthol to examine the solvent
strength in supercritical ethane, CO2 , and fluoroform and to determine its depen-
dence on density (67). The equilibrium is strongly shifted to the azo tautomer in
supercritical ethane and the hydrazone tautomer in supercritical chloroform; and
2. Vibrational Spectroscopy
A number of investigations of supercritical fluids have been conducted using
vibrational spectroscopy methods, including infrared absorption (19,84–89), Ra-
man scattering (90–100), and time-resolved vibrational relaxation and collisional
deactivation (101–112). The results of these investigations have significantly
aided the understanding of solute–solvent interactions in supercritical fluid sys-
tems. For example, Hyatt used infrared absorption to examine the spectral shifts
of the C=O stretch mode for acetone and cyclohexanone and those of the N-
H stretch mode for pyrrole in liquid and supercritical CO2 to determine the
solvent strength of CO2 relative to normal liquid solvents (19). Blitz et al.
Scheme 1
3. Rotational Diffusion
Another important topic in the study of supercritical fluids is viscosity effects.
Several research groups have used well-established probes to examine the effect
of viscosity on rotational diffusion in supercritical fluid systems.
The time for rotational diffusion τrot can be related to the viscosity η using
the modified Stokes–Debye–Einstein equation (115):
τrot = (ηVp /kB T )f C (6)
where Vp is the volume of the probe molecule, kB is the Boltzmann constant,
T is the temperature in K, and f and C are correction factors. The factor f
corrects for the shape of the probe molecule, whereas the factor C takes into
account variations in hydrodynamic boundary conditions. In the absence of these
corrections (both factors being unity), the rotational diffusion time τrot is linearly
Structure 5
primarily by the intrinsic properties of the neat fluid over the three density
regions.
The behavior in the gas-like region at low densities is probably dictated
by short-range interactions in the inner solvation shell of the probe molecule.
The strong density dependence of the spectroscopic and other responses is
probably associated with a process of saturating the inner solvation shell. Be-
fore saturation of the shell, microscopically the consequence of increasing the
fluid density is the addition of solvent molecules to the inner solvation shell
of the probe, which produces large incremental effects (Figure 17a). In the
near-critical region, where the responses are nearly independent of changes in
density, the microscopic solvation environment of the solute probe undergoes
only minor changes. Such behavior is probably due to the microscopic inho-
mogeneity of the near-critical fluid—a property sheared by all supercritical flu-
ids. As discussed in the introduction, a supercritical fluid may be considered
macroscopically homogeneous (remaining one phase regardless of pressure) but
microscopically inhomogeneous, especially in the near-critical density region.
Although the solvent environment is highly dynamic, on the average the fluid in
the near-critical region can be viewed as consisting of solvent clusters and free
volumes that possess liquid-like and gas-like properties, respectively. Changes
in bulk density through compression primarily correspond to decreases in the
free volumes, leaving solute–solvent interactions in the solvent clusters largely
unaffected (Figure 17b). This explains the insensitivity of the responses of the
probe molecules to changes in bulk density in the near-critical region. Above
a reduced density of about 1.5, the free volumes become less significant (con-
sumed), and additional increases in bulk density again affect the microscopic
solvation environment of the probe. The solvation in the liquid-like region at
high densities should be similar to that in a compressed normal liquid solvent
(Figure 17c).
Structure 6
shift the equilibrium toward the keto tautomer. For ethanol and trifluoroethanol
as cosolvents, the equilibrium was found to shift back toward the enol form with
increasing density. It was also found that the position of the keto-enol equilib-
rium in the near-critical region of the solvent was more toward the keto form
than what would be predicted on the basis of the bulk cosolvent concentration. It
was concluded that the clustering of cosolvent molecules about the Schiff base
was responsible for these results. (See Scheme 3.)
B. Bimolecular Reactions
Studies of the entrainer effect discussed above demonstrate that the solute in su-
percritical fluid–cosolvent mixtures is, in many cases, surrounded preferentially
by the cosolvent molecules. Since the cosolvent may be regarded as a second
solute, the solute–cosolvent clustering may be considered as a special case of
solute-solute clustering. An important consequence of the entrainer effect is en-
hancement in solute–cosolvent interactions or reactions. Similarly, solute-solute
clustering in supercritical fluid solutions may enhance bimolecular reactions
between the solute molecules. Extensive investigation of the solute-solute clus-
tering phenomenon by many research groups has been prompted by the prospect
of being able to influence bimolecular interactions and reactions under supercrit-
ical fluid conditions and, as a result, increase reaction yields and alter product
distributions. Spectroscopic and other instrumental techniques combined with
molecular probes that undergo well-characterized bimolecular processes or re-
actions (such as the formation of an excimer or exciplex, photodimerization, and
fluorescence quenching) have been used.
Figure 19 Excimer formation in dilute supercritical fluid solutions. (From Ref. 40.)
Figure 23 The FD /FM ratios (normalized at the reduced density of 1.9) for the in-
tramolecular excimer formation in 1,3-di(2-naphthyl)propane (䊊) and the intermolecular
excimer formation in pyrene [䊐] in supercritical CO2 at 40◦ C. (From Ref. 172.)
2. Photodimerization
Photodimerization reactions in supercritical fluid solutions have been used to
probe the effects of possible solute-solute clustering. Kimura et al. investigated
the dimerization of 2-methyl-2-nitrosopropane in CO2 , chlorotrifluoromethane,
fluoroform, argon, and xenon (173–176). Their results show that the density
dependence of the dimerization equilibrium constant is rather complex, probably
due to the existence of various dimerization mechanisms in different density
regions.
Hrnjez et al. evaluated the product distribution of the photodimerization
of isophorone in supercritical fluoroform and CO2 (177). The reaction typically
produces a mixture of various regioisomers and stereoisomers. Relative yields
of the regioisomers are fluid density dependent in the polar fluid fluoroform
but exhibit little or no change with fluid density in CO2 . On the other hand,
relative yields of the stereoisomers are affected by changes in the fluid density
in both fluoroform and CO2 . The results were discussed in terms of solvation
and various degrees of solvent reorganization required for the various products.
(See Scheme 5.)
Tsugane et al. used Fourier transform infrared absorption spectroscopy to
investigate the dimerization reaction of benzoic acid in saturated supercritical
Scheme 5
3. Fluorescence Quenching
The formation of an excimer or exciplex is a fluorescence quenching process in
which the monomer excited state is quenched by the ground-state molecule to
form an excited-state complex. However, the fluorescence quenching discussed
here is somewhat different in that the quenching results in no complex be-
tween the molecule being quenched and the quencher. The absence of excimer
or exciplex formation in these systems that undergo bimolecular fluorescence
quenching eliminates some of the complications in the probing of solute–solute
interactions in supercritical fluid solutions (180).
Bunker and Sun studied the quenching of 9,10-bis(phenylethynyl)anthra-
cene (BPEA) fluorescence by carbon tetrabromide (CBr4 ) in supercritical CO2
at 35◦ C using time-resolved fluorescence methods (180). The bimolecular re-
action of the photoexcited anthracene derivative BPEA with CBr4 is known to
be diffusion controlled in normal liquid solutions (35). Because fluorescence
is the only decay pathway of the excited BPEA in the absence of quenchers
(fluorescence yield of unity), the bimolecular fluorescence quenching process is
clean and simple, involving no competing reaction processes and no formation
of an emissive excited-state complex (35). For the quenching of the fluorescence
lifetime, the Stern–Volmer equation is as follows:
τf 0 /τf = 1 + KSV [CBr4 ] = 1 + kq τf 0 [CBr4 ] (7)
where τf 0 and τf are fluorescence lifetimes of BPEA in the absence and presence
of quenchers, respectively, KSV is the Stern–Volmer quenching constant, and
kq is the quenching rate constant. When the process is diffusion controlled,
kq should be equal to kdiff . The diffusion rate constant kdiff is typically estimated
from the Smoluchowski equation with a correction factor f .
kdiff = f kSE (8)
kSE = (4 × 10−3 )πN (rBPEA + rCBr4 )(DBPEA + DCBr4 ) (9)
where rBPEA and rCBr4 are the molecular radii of BPEA and CBr4 , respectively,
and D represents the diffusion coefficients.
Di = kT /6πηri (10)
Structure 8
particularly efficient in the near-critical density region (Figure 27) (184). The
enhancement in the reactions was attributed to the clustering of hydrogen donor
molecules around the solute benzophenone, conceptually similar to the entrainer
effect. The same reactions were also carried out in supercritical ethane and fluo-
roform, yielding similar results (185); however, it is difficult to understand why
no clustering-related enhancements were observed in the same reactions of ben-
zophenone with triethylamine and 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (186). Also no
solute-solute effect on the triplet-triplet annihilation reaction of benzophenone
in several supercritical fluids and mixtures was observed (187,188). On the other
hand, the results for the triplet-triplet annihilation of anthracene in supercritical
water may invoke a solute-solute clustering explanation (189).
Electron transfer reactions have also been used in the probing of solute–
solute interactions in supercritical fluid solutions. For example, Takahashi and
Jonah examined the electron transfer between biphenyl anion and pyrene in
supercritical ethane (192). Worrall and Wilkinson studied triplet-triplet energy
transfer reactions for a series of donor–acceptor pairs, including anthracene-
azulene in supercritical CO2 -acetonitrile and supercritical CO2 -hexane and ben-
zophenone-naphthalene in supercritical CO2 -acetonitrile (193). The high effi-
ciency of the energy transfer reactions at low cosolvent concentrations was
attributed to the effect of solute-solute clustering.
Randolph and Carlier used EPR spectroscopy to study the Heisenberg spin
exchange reaction of nitroxide free radicals in supercritical ethane (194). The
Figure 28 Ratio of observed bimolecular rate constant for spin exchange in ethane
to the rate constant predicted from the Stokes–Einstein relationship as a function of
pressure. Temperatures are 308 K (circles), 313 K (diamonds), and 331 K (squares).
(From Ref. 194.)
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES