Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Review
PII: S0308-8146(16)32083-0
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.12.057
Reference: FOCH 20349
Please cite this article as: Villamil, O., Váquiro, H., Solanilla, J.F., Fish viscera protein hydrolysates: production,
potential applications and functional and bioactive properties, Food Chemistry (2016), doi: http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.12.057
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers
we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and
review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
1 Fish viscera protein hydrolysates: production, potential applications and functional
7 *Corresponding Author:
9 Helena A.A. 546, Ibagué, Colombia. Tel-Fax: +57 (8) 2771212 ext. 9712. E-mail:
10 jfsolanilla@ut.edu.co
11
12 ABSTRACT
13
14 The aquaculture and fishery chain is an important part of the economy of many countries
15 around the world; in recent years it has experienced significant growth that generates more
16 and more quantities of waste, which are mostly discarded, impacting the environment,
17 despite having a useful chemical composition in various industrial sectors. This article
19 source for obtaining native protein and hydrolysates, explaining their production process,
20 chemical composition and functional and bioactive properties that are important to the
22
24
25 1. Introduction
26
27 The continuous growth of fish production, at an average annual rate of 3.2%, and the
28 increase in per capita fish consumption from 9.9 kg in 1960 to 19.2 kg in 2012 (FAO,
29 2014) have generated greater amounts of organic wastes that are discarded during primary
30 processing because they contain microorganisms and enzymes responsible for autolysis and
31 high perishability of comestible tissues (Feltes et al., 2010). These wastes generally consist
32 of viscera, carcass, head, skin and bones which have a high agroindustrial potential as a
33 source of co-products; their percentage can vary between 50 and 70% of the fresh weight,
34 according to each species (Guerard, Dufosse, De La Broise, & Binet, 2001; He, Franco, &
35 Zhang, 2013; Silva, Ribeiro, Silva, Cahú, & Bezerra, 2014). 50% of the aforementioned
36 waste is discarded and only 30% is used in activities that have low value added, such as
37 animal feed, fertilizer agents and silage production. (Arvanitoyannis, 2010; He et al., 2013;
38 Hsu, 2010; Je, Qian, Byun, & Kim, 2007). This is due to ignorance about the effective
39 management of waste and the benefits that it provides, leading to its disposal in rivers,
40 streams, seas and many more (Ezejiofor, Enebaku, & Ogueke, 2014).
41
42 Fish co-products are a significant source of protein, and other components, such as
44 (Shirahigue et al., 2016), which make them attractive for various uses in technological
45 applications that promote product development and significant advances in the fish industry
47
48 Based on the above, there have been studies and investigations directed towards finding
50 (Sheriff, Sundaram, Ramamoorthy, & Ponnusamy, 2014). Protein hydrolysates have been
51 gaining great interest in recent years (Šližytė, Daukšas, Falch, Storrø, & Rustad, 2005)
54 food and nutraceutical sectors (Klompong, Benjakul, Kantachote, & Shahidi, 2007;
56
57 Accordingly, the aims of this study are to present a review of the agroindustrial potential of
58 fish waste, especially viscera, as a source for obtaining native protein and hydrolysates, and
59 to explain their production process, chemical composition and functional and bioactive
60 properties.
61
63
64 Fish processing begins with size classification and removal of scales, carcass and fins by
65 washing; viscera is removed when fish is not marketed fresh or frozen, and the process then
66 continues to produce fillets, canned fish and others (Feltes et al., 2010). The co-products
67 obtained in percentage terms are composed of muscle cuts (15-20%), skin and fins (1-3%),
68 bones (9-15%), heads (9-12%), viscera (12-18%) and scales (5%) (Martínez-Alvarez,
69 Chamorro, & Brenes, 2015), all of which are susceptible to microbial degradation
73
74 As seen in table 1, fish viscera have both high protein and lipid content whose variability in
75 composition depends on the species, seasonality, age, sex, nutrient intake and other factors
76 (Huss, 1995). Different fish muscles and tissues are composed by structural, myofibrillar
77 and sarcoplasmic proteins that have all the essential amino acids, among which
78 predominate lysine, phenylalanine and valine (Hayes & Flower, 2013). They also have
80 which can be used to hydrolyze proteins (Vannabun, Ketnawa, Phongthai, Benjakul, &
81 Rawdkuen, 2014). Furthermore, collagen and gelatin, in tissues, such as bone and skin,
83 collagen for food and pharmaceutical applications (Karim & Bhat, 2009). In addition, the
84 lipid fraction of waste contains omega-3, squalane, phospholipid, cholesterol and fat-
85 soluble vitamins (Rai, Swapna, Bhaskar, Halami, & Sachindra, 2010). Its utilization has
86 been directed towards the food and nutraceutical industries and the energy sector in the
88
90 3.1. General
91
92 The aim of producing protein hydrolysates is the solubilization of the protein source to
93 improve its biological and nutritional value to obtain products of high added value and
96 Fonseca, & Prentice, 2014). Protein hydrolysis has shown continuous development over
97 time, but in a general context, this process is still in the early stages of discovering peptides
98 and individual amino acid combinations to produce desired effects for different applications
99 (Pasupuleti & Braun, 2010). Obtaining hydrolysates from co-products of the fishing and
100 aquaculture industries, such as viscera (Figure 1), involves processes of isolation or
101 pretreatments, followed by hydrolysis and protein recovery (He et al., 2013).
102
104
106 proteins. Additionally, their objective is to prepare homogeneous mixtures of water and
107 chopped viscera with the lowest possible percentage of fat and other undesirable
108 components for subsequent hydrolysis (He et al., 2013), since these components contribute
109 to oxidation and coloration of the final product (Kristinsson & Rasco, 2000) and the
110 formation of unpleasant smells and tastes and highly toxic compounds (Dong et al., 2008).
111
112 Several methods have been used to remove fat from different tissues of fish. In the case of
113 viscera, heat treatment is a very conventional practice, because it has the dual purpose of
114 inactivating enzymes and removing fat (Guerard et al., 2001). Then the solid fraction is
115 mechanically separated by centrifugation (Bhaskar et al., 2008). On the other hand,
116 pressing has also been used for this purpose; it is followed by 2-3 hours of heat treatment to
117 yield a solid which is dried to a moisture percentage lower than 10% (Valenzuela,
120 The use of solvents is another useful defatting procedure that involves the heating of a
121 mixture composed of minced raw material and alcohols, such as ethanol or isopropyl
122 alcohol, with constant stirring during a certain period of time (Dong et al., 2008; Klompong
123 et al., 2007). This technique minimizes bacterial degradation (Kristinsson & Rasco, 2000)
124 and eliminates the characteristic odour of fish and bitter flavours (Hoyle & Merritt, 1994).
125 However, protein solubility and dispersibility are usually affected, whereby lower degrees
126 of hydrolysis are obtained in comparison to non-defatted protein (Klompong et al., 2007),
127 which has a negative effect on hydrolysis efficiency and properties of protein hydrolysates
129
130 Some studies have used a new technology to isolate proteins from fish tissues. It consists of
132 filtration in order to remove insoluble compounds; once removed, the proteins are
133 precipitated by adjusting the pH to the isoelectric point and are recovered by centrifugation
135
137
138 Protein hydrolysis consists of the cleavage of peptide bonds to obtain free amino acids and
139 low molecular weight peptides, consuming a molecule of water for each broken bond.
140 (Rutherfurd & Gilani, 2009). The hydrolysis process (chemical or biochemical) has
141 recently been used in aquaculture and fisheries to produce more acceptable and profitable
144 The conventional acid hydrolysis method is based on sample treatment in excessively
145 acidic solutions accompanied by high temperatures and, in some cases, at high pressures
146 over a given time (Kristinsson & Rasco, 2000). It is a low cost, quick and simple operation,
147 which makes it applicable at the industrial level (Gao, Hirata, Toorisaka, & Hano, 2006).
148 However, essential amino acids, such as tryptophan, methionine, cystine and cysteine, are
149 usually destroyed. Furthermore, asparagine and glutamine are converted into aspartic acid
150 and glutamic acid, respectively (Pasupuleti & Braun, 2010). Additionally, obtained
151 hydrolysates have poor functional properties due to the formation of salts after the
152 neutralization process (Kristinsson & Rasco, 2000). Therefore, several removal methods,
153 such as nanofiltration and use of ion exchange resins, have been proposed with excellent
154 results (Pasupuleti & Braun, 2010). Acid hydrolysis of fish co-products has been widely
155 studied to produce low cost fertilizers (Kristinsson & Rasco, 2000), silages (Vidotti,
156 Viegas, & Carneiro, 2003) and alternative substrate for lactic acid production using
157 improved hydrolysis in order to enhance nutritive value (Gao et al., 2006).
158
159 Alkaline hydrolysis is a very simple process, the sample is solubilized by heating and
160 mixed with alkaline solutions, then the reaction temperature is maintained until reaching
161 the desired degree of hydrolysis (Pasupuleti & Braun, 2010). Its main drawback is the
162 production of hydrolysates with low amino acids content, such as cystine, lysine, arginine,
163 serine, threonine, isoleucine and residues like lanthionine and lysinoalanine (Tavano,
164 2013). Alkaline hydrolysis has been widely used in the industrial field, but little in
166
167 Unlike chemical methods, enzymatic hydrolysis uses mild conditions and is easy to control,
168 and is more precise in the cleavage of peptide bonds; furthermore, there are no side
169 reactions or decrease in the nutritional value (Tavano, 2013), and it exhibits greater ease in
170 protein recovery and purification of some peptides (Pasupuleti & Braun, 2010). For these
171 reasons, it has gained more and more attention to produce hydrolysates with better and
172 more defined nutritional, functional and bioactive properties (Benjakul et al., 2014).
173 Nevertheless the majority of the studies on enzymatic hydrolysis have not been scaled and
174 its biggest drawback is the high production costs compared to chemical hydrolysis (He,
176
177 The enzymatic hydrolysis process is usually performed in a reactor with temperature, pH,
178 agitation and time controls (Benítez, Ibarz, & Pagan, 2008). Initially, the temperature and
179 pH of the homogeneous mixture obtained from pretreatment are adjusted according to the
180 ideal working conditions of the enzyme. When protease is added, the reaction between
181 enzyme and substrate causes changes in the pH of the solution due to the cleavage of
182 peptide bonds to form new amino or carboxyl groups able to release or accept protons.
183 Faced with the above, some methods rely on the addition of buffer solution in order to
184 moderate pH changes (Ovissipour et al., 2009; Ovissipour et al., 2012; Shirahigue et al.,
185 2016). However, it is considered that the presence of salts in buffer solutions can affect
186 functional properties of interest, such as the emulsifying and foaming capabilities
187 (Kristinsson & Rasco, 2000). Meanwhile, other studies choose to maintain the optimal pH
188 of enzyme activity by constant addition of neutralizing solution during the hydrolysis
189 process (Dong et al., 2008; Hsu, 2010; Kechaou et al., 2009; Klompong et al., 2007; C. M.
190 Silva et al., 2014). In both processes, when the expected degree of hydrolysis is obtained,
191 peptidase is deactivated by changes in temperature, pH or both variables simultaneously
193 The choice of enzyme depends both on the final product and the price (Benjakul et al.,
194 2014). It is also important to consider the amino acid composition of the protein because
195 some proteases have preferences for the cleavage of certain peptide bonds (Pasupuleti &
196 Braun, 2010). It bears mentioning that the medium in which the enzymes work is a factor of
197 choice, for example those whose optimum pH is acidic can inhibit bacterial growth, but
198 have low recovery percentages of protein and decreased nutritional and functional value in
199 comparison to alkaline and neutral proteases (Kristinsson & Rasco, 2000). This is the
200 reason why microbial proteases with high proteolytic activity are the most commonly used
201 and suitable in the production of hydrolysates from fish tissues (Benjakul et al., 2014) as
203
204 Protein hydrolysates can also be obtained by use of proteases present in the digestive
205 system of fish, such as pepsin, trypsin, chymotrypsin, collagenase and elastase (Vannabun
206 et al., 2014). Autolysis has been widely used to obtain fish sauce and silages (Kristinsson &
207 Rasco, 2000). Bougatef et al. (2008) produced protein hydrolysates from heads and viscera
208 of sardinella Sardinella aurita by autolysis temperatures ranging from 40°C to 50°C and
209 pH 8, finding that the addition of an external enzyme can accelerate reaction and increase
210 the degree of hydrolysis. Motamedzadegan, Davarniam, Asadi, Abedian, and Ovissipour
211 (2011) optimized the autolytic sequential process with neutrase applied to yellowfin tuna,
212 concluding that enzymatic activity of 39.61 AU/kg protein, 53°C and 141 min are the
213 recommended parameters to achieve a hydrolysis degree of about 30%. Vannabun et al.
214 (2014) characterized acidic and alkaline proteases, which showed better activity in acidic
215 and alkaline media and an optimal temperature of 40°C and 60°C, respectively. However,
216 the enzymes did not show high stability in media with high salt concentration. Autolysis is
217 an economical procedure, but is difficult to standardize and control because endogenous
218 enzymes depend on several factors, including seasonality, type and amount of enzymes,
220
221 The process efficiency is measured by quantifying the degree of hydrolysis, which is
222 defined as the amount of peptide bonds cleaved out of the total amount of peptide bonds in
223 native protein (Benítez et al., 2008; He et al., 2013). Degree of hydrolysis is influenced by
224 different parameters, such as E/S ratio, pH, temperature and incubation time; the first three
225 have an effect on reaction rate, while the latter only impacts the degree of hydrolysis
226 (Benítez et al., 2008). It may be the most suitable measuring method as the interaction of
227 the aforementioned factors with the choice of substrate and enzyme are directly related to
228 the amount of low molecular weight peptides, protein recovery (Ovissipour et al., 2009)
229 and bioactive and functional properties of hydrolysates (Klompong et al., 2007).
230
232
233 FVPH can be purified by various methods depending on the final use of the hydrolysates,
234 which are centrifugation, nano-filtration, ultrafiltration, microfiltration and ion exchange
235 chromatography (Pasupuleti & Braun, 2010). Centrifugation has been the most used of the
236 above, from which four phases are obtained: oil fraction, emulsion layer, FVPH and sludge
237 (Ramakrishnan, Ghaly, Brooks, & Budge, 2013; Šližytė et al., 2005). After separating
240 final product is usually a creamy white powder with enhanced functional and bioactive
241 properties (He et al., 2013). All kinds of hydrolysates must be stored taking into account
242 parameters, such as moisture content and glass transition temperature, which generally
243 tends to decline while the degree of hydrolysis is increasing (Rao, Klaassen Kamdar, &
244 Labuza, 2016). Therefore FVPH are commonly stored below 0°C to ensure stability over
246
247 It is noteworthy that laboratory scale subsequent processes have been proposed to separate
248 different peptide fractions according to the molecular weight (He et al., 2013), because the
249 relationship between peptide size and certain bioactive and antioxidant properties has been
250 demonstrated in several studies (Robert et al., 2015). However, there are difficulties for
252
254
255 Proximate composition of FVPH is shown in table 3. These products have high protein
256 content due to protein solubilization during hydrolysis and removal of insoluble material
257 and most of the fat layer during recovery processes (Chalamaiah, Hemalatha, &
258 Jyothirmayi, 2012). Moisture content, generally below 10%, is caused by the concentration
259 and drying processes, while ash content is linked to the neutralization process during
260 hydrolysis (Dong et al., 2008; Gbogouri, Linder, Fanni, & Parmentier, 2004; Kristinsson &
262
263 Amino acids have an important role in protein synthesis as compound carriers of hydrogen,
264 vitamins, carbon dioxide, enzymes and structural proteins (Chalamaiah et al., 2012) and
265 they also influence bioactive and functional properties. Table 4 shows amino acid
266 composition of several FVPH whose variation depends on raw material, enzyme type and
267 hydrolysis parameters (Bhaskar et al., 2008; Klompong et al., 2009). FVPH have all the
268 essential and non-essential amino acids, which is why they are considered to be high
270
272
273 Functional properties are physicochemical characteristics that influence the performance of
274 the protein in different food systems during different stages from processing to
275 consumption (Kristinsson & Rasco, 2000; Šližytė et al., 2005). Native proteins present
276 good functionality, however their use is limited because most foods have pH close to the
277 isoelectric point, therefore protein hydrolysis has become an increasingly common
279 levels (de Castro, Bagagli, & Sato, 2015; de Castro & Sato, 2014).
280
281 The parameters that affect protein functionality are: substrates, enzymes used and degree of
282 hydrolysis. Protease specificity influences molecular weight and hydrophobic character
283 and, as a result, protein behaviour (Kristinsson & Rasco, 2000). Thus, hydrolysates with
284 different molecular weights can be obtained by appropriately selecting enzymes and
285 substrates according to desired requirements. Proteins with a lower degree of hydrolysis
286 show exceptional functional properties because they still retain amphiphilic quality, which
287 does not happen with those whose hydrolysis has been excessive despite the fact that
288 solubility, in most cases, has increased (Klompong et al., 2007). Additionally, functional
289 behaviour of proteins can also vary by extrinsic conditions, such as the nature of the matrix,
290 along with storage and processing parameters (Benjakul et al., 2014).
291
292 Protein functional properties are classified in hydrodynamic properties, such as solubility,
293 viscosity, gelling capacity and water absorption, and surface active properties, such as
294 emulsifying capacity, foaming and film formation (de Castro et al., 2015). Solubility is
295 considered by many researchers as the most important functional property because it
296 significantly affects all others (Benjakul et al., 2014). There is direct correlation between
297 solubility and degree of hydrolysis; it can be explained by the fact that longer hydrolysis
298 times produce proteins and peptides with smaller molecular weight generating greater
299 exposure of ionizable and polar groups on the protein surface, which influences the
300 improvement of their ability to form hydrogen bonds with water (de Castro & Sato, 2014;
301 He et al., 2013; Yin, Tang, Wen, Yang, & Li, 2008).
302
303 Fish protein hydrolysates present improved solubility in comparison with native proteins
304 (Dong et al., 2008; Klompong et al., 2007). Protein hydrolysates made with trypsin, pepsin
305 and chymotrypsin from muscle, skin, bones and viscera of horse mackerel and croaker
306 showed solubility greater than 65% over a wide pH range (Kumar, Nazeer, & Ganesh,
307 2012). Similar results were obtained by Liu et al. (2014), who studied solubility in surimi
308 by-products, including fish meat leftover on bones, head, skin, and viscera; they reported an
309 increase from 10% in native protein up to 65% and more in protein hydrolysates made with
310 protamex and alcalase in a wide pH range. Souissi, Bougatef, Triki-Ellouz & Nasri (2007)
311 found that alcalase hydrolysates obtained from heads and viscera of sardinella showed
313 around 10%. These results indicate that fish protein hydrolysates can be used easily in food
314 formulations.
315
316 Water-holding capacity consists of the ability of the protein to capture water in the food
317 matrix preventing its flow by gravitational force (Kristinsson & Rasco, 2000), it is
318 important to the food industry because it influences texture (Pires & Batista, 2013). Fish
319 protein hydrolysates from cod Gadus morhua by-products function as good water
320 scavengers in food systems by adding them to comminuted fish and then freezing the fish
321 in order to observe the influence of these components on water retention during thawing
322 (Šližytė et al., 2005). Furthermore, Balti et al. (2010) observed the increase of water-
323 holding capacity with the extent of hydrolysis, concluding that there is a direct correlation
324 between such variables probably due to the exposure of polar groups as the hydrolysis
326
327 Oil holding capacity or fat absorption refers to the quantity of oil absorbed and retained by
328 the protein; it is related to emulsifying capacity and may be affected by bulk density, degree
329 of hydrolysis and enzyme – substrate specificity (Pires & Batista, 2013; Kaur & Singh,
330 2007). Oil holding capacity in fish by-product hydrolysates has been studied. FVPH
331 obtained from viscera and heads of sardinella Sardinella aurita presented improved fat
332 absorption compared to native protein and showed better results than casein at a degree of
333 hydrolysis of 9.33% (Souissi et al., 2007); similar results were collected by Balti et al.
334 (2010), hydrolysates produced from skin and viscera of cuttlefish Sepia officinalis revealed
335 excellent oil holding capacity that enables their use in formulations for the food and
337
338 Proteins are good emulsifiers because they have an amphipathic structure that facilitate
339 their absorption at the oil-water interface (Pires & Batista, 2013), this property in
340 hydrolysates is mainly influenced by the size and molecular weight of peptides, surface
341 hydrophobicity, enzyme, amino-acid composition (Liu et al., 2014), volume fraction of oil,
342 protein concentration, equipment used to form the emulsion (Šližytė et al., 2005) and
343 solubility (Klompong et al., 2007). Many studies have reported emulsifying properties in
344 fish co-products hydrolysates. Souissi et al. (2007) showed that fish hydrolysates from
345 heads and viscera of Sardinella aurita, at a degree of hydrolysis of 6.67%, have
346 emulsifying capacity greater than casein, but this capacity decreases with the extent of
347 hydrolysis. These results coincide with those of Klompong et al. (2007), however Balti et
348 al. (2010) reported that protein hydrolysate from skin and viscera of cuttlefish Sepia
349 officinalis at a degree of hydrolysis of 5% showed lower emulsifying capacity than those
350 with a degree of hydrolysis of about 10 and 13.5%, probably due to the liberation of
351 peptides with medium weight as hydrolysis proceeds, which increased the flexibility of
352 such peptides and consequently their surface size and ability to form emulsions. The
353 emulsifying properties of FVPH and others obtained from different co-products have
354 proven to be more effective than commercial food-grade emulsifiers, this represents a high
355 potential in the use of FVPH in food formulations (He et al., 2013).
356
357 At present, several fish protein hydrolysates have been successfully incorporated into food
358 systems, such as cereals, cookies, desserts and meat products (Chalamaiah et al., 2012;
359 Kristinsson & Rasco, 2000), however there is insufficient information about the
360 performance of hydrolysates from viscera and other co-products in food matrices and
361 commercial formulations, although they were found to be potential ingredients in food
363
365
366 Current research is focused on bioactive peptides (Sarmadi & Ismail, 2010) due to their
367 biological roles which are beneficial to human health and useful to the food industry
368 (Sarmadi & Ismail, 2010; Wu et al., 2015), such peptides consist of short amino acid chains
369 that are inactive within the precursor protein. (Hayes & Flower, 2013). The performance of
370 hydrolysates from several fish protein sources as antioxidant, antihypertensive and
371 antimicrobial agents has been reported (Ryan, Ross, Bolton, Fitzgerald, & Stanton, 2011).
372 Souissi et al. (2007) evaluated hydrolysates obtained from heads and viscera of sardinella
373 Sardinella aurita in terms of scavenging effect on DPPH free radical and Inhibition of
374 linoleic acid autoxidation, the results indicate that the aforementioned peptides exhibited
375 more than 50% inhibition of linoleic acid peroxidation and an antioxidant activity of about
376 41%. Kumar, Nazeer, and Jaiganesh (2011) purified and characterized an antioxidant
377 peptide from horse mackerel Magalaspis cordyla viscera protein whose sequence was
378 determined as Ala–Cys–Phe–Leu (518.5 Da), it showed 59.1 and 89.2 percentage of
379 scavenging of hydroxyl radicals and DPPH respectively, using a concentration of 0.2
380 mg/ml. It also was found to be better than α-tocopherol in terms of inhibition of lipid
381 peroxidation. Nazeer and Kumar (2011) evidenced that fish viscera protein hydrolysates
382 obtained from Parastromateus niger have a protective effect on DNA against damage
383 caused by hydroxyl radicals. All those outcomes suggest the presence of antioxidant
385
386 Hypertension is one of the main risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease; it is
387 caused by angiotensin-I-converting enzyme (EC 3.4.15.1; ACE) which plays an important
388 role in the blood pressure control producing angiotensin II, a powerful vasoconstrictor and
389 destroyer agent of vasodilators like bradykinin (Barbana & Boye, 2010; Herpandi, Rosma,
390 & Wan Nadiah, 2011). The inhibition of this enzyme is the key factor to prevent and treat
391 hypertension. Currently, synthetized chemical compounds have been used for that purpose,
392 but their side effects have led to the search for peptides with ACE inhibitory activity from
394
395 Many studies have evidenced the ACE inhibitory activity of fish co-products peptides
396 (Harnedy & FitzGerald, 2012; Hayes & Flower, 2013; Herpandi et al., 2011; Kim, Ngo, &
397 Vo, 2012; Raghavan & Kristinsson, 2009; Wu et al., 2015). Bougatef et al. (2008)
398 produced sardinella Sardinella aurita head and viscera protein hydrolysates using alcalase,
399 chymotrypsin, crude enzyme preparation from Aspergillus clavatus ES1, alkaline proteases
400 from B. lincheniformis NH1 and crude enzyme extract viscera of sardine Sardina
401 pilchardus. The fish co-product hydrolysates were found to be good ACE inhibitors, whose
402 IC50 values ranged from 1.24 to 7.40 mg/ml. Balti et al. (2010) obtained cuttlefish Sepia
403 officinalis skin and viscera protein hydrolysates whose IC50 was about 1.00 mg/ml at 13.5%
404 degree of hydrolysis. Both studies agree that the enzyme plays a decisive role in the
405 cleavage of peptide bonds due to its specificity and that these results suggest that peptides
406 from such materials can be used as ingredients in functional products for the prevention and
407 treatment of hypertension. However, the bioactivity of fish co-products peptides has not
408 been as extensively studied as milk and plant peptides (Rustad & Hayes, 2012), more
410 derived from different fish tissues is needed (Halim, Yusof, & Sarbon, 2016). Also, there is
411 limited information about the behaviour of these peptides on several food matrices and their
412 stability throughout industrial processing (Samaranayaka & Li-Chan, 2011), as well as
413 during gastrointestinal absorption (Sarmadi & Ismail, 2010). Additionally, the production
414 of FVPH is a huge challenge because of sensory problems, high costs and difficulties to
415 ensure reproducibility (Rustad & Hayes, 2012) which represent new fields to research.
416
418
419 The use of fish tissues as a source of nutrients for microorganisms has been known for
420 decades; several studies with the aim of exploring the use of fish peptones as a component
421 of microbial growth substrates have been reported. Proteins obtained from tuna, cod,
422 salmon and unspecified fish were compared with casein peptone by the simulation model
423 Gompertz applied to microbial growth of six species of bacteria, yeast and mold, and
424 results revealed that fish peptones were effective (Guerard et al., 2001). Also, fish viscera
425 peptones from tuna, yellow stripe, swordfish, rainbow trout and squid were evaluated as
426 growth medium for different types of microorganisms (Pseudomonas, Vibrio and
427 Roseobacter) that are of interest to aquaculture due to their pathogenic or probiotic
428 character. The outcomes showed that the effectiveness of such culture media was even
429 better than the commercial ones (Vázquez, González, & Murado, 2004). In addition, the
430 potential of peptones from Atlantic cod viscera for growth of five different microorganisms
431 (Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Lactobacillus sakei, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and
432 Aspergillus niger) was also reported, verifying that it is a promising alternative nitrogen
433 source against currently available commercial products (Aspmo, Horn, & Eijsink, 2005).
434 Peptones obtained from cod stomachs showed higher performance than commercial
435 products for the growth of pathogens like Vibrio anguilarum and Aeromonas salmonicida
436 (Gildberg, Dahl, Mikkelsen, & Nilsen, 2010). Similarly, yellowfin tuna viscera
437 hydrolysates were effective for such purposes in Escherichia coli y Staphylococcus aureus
438 (Klompong, Benjakul, Kantachote, & Shahidi, 2012). It is worth highlighting that the
439 exploration of new resources is still open because each peptone has its own characteristics
440 and none by itself can meet all the requirements of microorganisms during cell culture
442
443 On the other hand, seasonal variation influences composition of biological resources like
444 fish viscera and, as a result, affects the performance of peptones as a culture media,
445 especially for fastidious microorganisms, such as Lactobacillus sakei (Horn, Aspmo, &
446 Eijsink, 2007). Likewise the influence of hydrolysis parameters, such as enzyme used, type
447 and degree of hydrolysis on its aptitude as culture media was evidenced (Klompong et al.,
448 2012). There are still questions about the standardization of the raw material as it is
449 considered a critical point because its composition can vary from one production batch to
450 another. It is also necessary to investigate about what degree of hydrolysis is suitable for
451 the growth of certain microorganisms and how to scale an economical production of
452 peptones by enzymatic hydrolysis (He et al., 2013; Klompong et al., 2012).
453
454
455 8. Conclusions
456
457 FVPH are promising high added value products due to their relevant nutritional content,
458 bioactive and functional properties that can be applied in the food and pharmaceutical
459 industries, as well as other uses as microbial growth media. However, most experiments
460 about FVPH’s bioactivity have been carried out in vitro and further investigation about
461 other bioactivities and the performance and stability of FVPH in food matrices and
462 commercial formulations are needed. The production and use of FVPH, whether chemical
463 or biological, is becoming popular as a sustainable alternative, but there are huge
464 challenges in raw material and product quality assurance, development of low-cost
465 processes, industrial scaling and isolation and recovery of peptide sequences that are
466 potentially desirable during food processing and food supplementation. Addressing these
467 concerns could generate the commercial development of FVPH products within the
469
470 Acknowledgements
471
472 The authors acknowledge financial support from Research Fund of Universidad del Tolima
473 (Colombia) and the Administrative Department of Science, Technology and Innovation of
474 Colombia.
475
476 The authors have no conflicts of interest concerning this research or its funding.
477
478 References
479
480 Ambigaipalan, P., & Shahidi, F. (2015). Antioxidant potential of Date (Phoenix dactylifera
481 L.) seed protein hydrolysates and carnosine in food and biological systems. Journal
483 Arvanitoyannis, I. S. (2010). Waste management for the food industries. Academic Press.
484 Aspmo, S. I., Horn, S. J., & Eijsink, V. G. (2005). Hydrolysates from Atlantic cod (Gadus
487 Balti, R., Bougatef, A., El‐Hadj Ali, N., Zekri, D., Barkia, A., & Nasri, M. (2010).
490 (Sepia officinalis) by‐products. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,
492 Barbana, C., & Boye, J. I. (2010). Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory activity of
493 chickpea and pea protein hydrolysates. Food Research International, 43(6), 1642-
494 1649.
495 Batista, I., Ramos, C., Coutinho, J., Bandarra, N. M., & Nunes, M. L. (2010).
499 Bechtel, P. J. (2003). Properties of different fish Processing by-products from pollock, cod
500 and salmon. Journal of food processing and preservation, 27(2), 101-116.
501 Benítez, R., Ibarz, A., & Pagan, J. (2008). Hidrolizados de proteína: procesos y
506 (pp. 237-281). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
507 Bezerra, R. S., Lins, E. J. F., Alencar, R. B., Paiva, P. M. G., Chaves, M. E. C., Coelho, L.
508 C. B. B., & Carvalho, L. B. (2005). Alkaline proteinase from intestine of Nile
510 Bhaskar, N., Benila, T., Radha, C., & Lalitha, R. G. (2008). Optimization of enzymatic
511 hydrolysis of visceral waste proteins of Catla (Catla catla) for preparing protein
513 Bkhairia, I., Mhamdi, S., Jridi, M., & Nasri, M. (2016). New acidic proteases from Liza
516 Bougatef, A., Nedjar-Arroume, N., Ravallec-Plé, R., Leroy, Y., Guillochon, D., Barkia, A.,
517 & Nasri, M. (2008). Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activities of
519 treatment with microbial and visceral fish serine proteases. Food Chemistry, 111(2),
520 350-356.
521 Castillo-Yánez, F. J., Pacheco-Aguilar, R., García-Carreño, F. L., & de los Ángeles
524 Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 140(1),
525 91-98.
526 Chalamaiah, M., Hemalatha, R., & Jyothirmayi, T. (2012). Fish protein hydrolysates:
529 de Castro, R. J. S., & Sato, H. H. (2014). Comparison and synergistic effects of intact
530 proteins and their hydrolysates on the functional properties and antioxidant
533 de Castro, R. J. S., Bagagli, M. P., & Sato, H. H. (2015). Improving the functional
536 Dong, S., Zeng, M., Wang, D., Liu, Z., Zhao, Y., & Yang, H. (2008). Antioxidant and
539 Dufossé, L., De La Broise, D., & Guerard, F. (2001). Evaluation of nitrogenous substrates
540 such as peptones from fish: a new method based on Gompertz modeling of
542 Ezejiofor, T. I. N., Enebaku, U. E., & Ogueke, C. (2014). Waste to wealth-value recovery
545 FAO. (2014). El Estado Mundial de la Pesca y la Acuicultura, 2014. Roma: Food &
547 Feltes, M. M. C., Correia, J. F. G., Beirão, L. H., Block, J. M., Ninow, J. L., & Spiller, V.
551 Carvalho Jr., L. B, Oliveira, V., Bezerra, R. S. (2012). Giant Amazonian fish
552 pirarucu (Arapaima gigas): its viscera as a source of thermostable trypsin. Food
554 Gao, M. T., Hirata, M., Toorisaka, E., & Hano, T. (2006). Acid-hydrolysis of fish wastes
556 Gbogouri, G. A., Linder, M., Fanni, J., & Parmentier, M. (2004). Influence of hydrolysis
559 Gildberg, A., Dahl, R., Mikkelsen, H., & Nilsen, K. (2010). Peptones from Atlantic cod
560 Stomach as nitrogen sources in growth media to marine bacteria. Journal of Aquatic
562 Gómez-Guillén, M. C., Turnay, J., Fernández-Díaz, M. D., Ulmo, N., Lizarbe, M. A., &
563 Montero, P. (2002). Structural and physical properties of gelatin extracted from
564 different marine species: a comparative study. Food Hydrocolloids, 16(1), 25-34.
565 Guerard, F., Dufosse, L., De La Broise, D., & Binet, A. (2001). Enzymatic hydrolysis of
566 proteins from yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) wastes using Alcalase. Journal of
568 Halim, N. R. A., Yusof, H. M., & Sarbon, N. M. (2016). Functional and bioactive
569 properties of fish protein hydolysates and peptides: a comprehensive review. Trends
571 Harnedy, P. A., & FitzGerald, R. J. (2012). Bioactive peptides from marine processing
572 waste and shellfish: a review. Journal of Functional Foods, 4(1), 6-24.
573 Hathwar, S. C., Bijinu, B., Rai, A. K., & Narayan, B. (2011). Simultaneous recovery of
574 lipids and proteins by enzymatic hydrolysis of fish industry waste using different
576 Hayes, M., & Flower, D. (2013). Bioactive peptides from marine processing byproducts. In
578 Foods: Plant and Animal Sources (pp. 57-71). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons
579 Ltd.
580 He, S., Franco, C. M. M., Zhang W. (2015). Economic feasibility analysis of the industrial
583 He, S., Franco, C., & Zhang, W. (2013). Functions, applications and production of protein
586 Herpandi, N. H., Rosma, A., & Wan Nadiah, W. A. (2011). The tuna fishing industry: a
587 new outlook on fish protein hydrolysates. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science
589 Horn, S. J., Aspmo, S. I., & Eijsink, V. G. H. (2005). Growth of Lactobacillus plantarum in
592 Horn, S. J., Aspmo, S. I., & Eijsink, V. G. H. (2007). Evaluation of different cod viscera
593 fractions and their seasonal variation used in a growth medium for lactic acid
595 Hoyle, N. T., & Merritt, J. (1994). Quality of fish protein hydrolysates from herring
598 hydrolysates of tuna dark muscle by-product. Food Chemistry, 122(1), 42-48.
599 Huss, H. H. (1995). Quality and quality changes in fresh fish. FAO Fisheries Technical
601 Jamilah, B., & Harvinder, K. G. (2002). Properties of gelatins from skins of fish—black
602 tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) and red tilapia (Oreochromis nilotica). Food
604 Je, J. Y., Qian, Z. J., Byun, H. G., & Kim, S. K. (2007). Purification and characterization of
607 Je, J. Y., Qian, Z. J., Byun, H. G., & Kim, S. K. (2007). Purification and characterization of
610 Jung, W. K., Karawita, R., Heo, S. J., Lee, B. J., Kim, S. K., & Jeon, Y. J. (2006).
613 2097-2100.
614 Karim, A. A., & Bhat, R. (2009). Fish gelatin: properties, challenges, and prospects as an
616 Kaur, M., & Singh, N. (2007). Characterization of protein isolates from different Indian
617 chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars. Food Chemistry, 102(1), 366-374.
618 Kechaou, E. S., Dumay, J., Donnay-Moreno, C., Jaouen, P., Gouygou, J. P., Bergé, J. P., &
620 sardine (Sardina pilchardus) viscera using commercial proteases: effects on lipid
621 distribution and amino acid composition. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering,
623 Kim, S. K., Ngo, D. H., & Vo, T. S. (2012). Marine fish-derived bioactive peptides as
624 potential antihypertensive agents. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research, 65,
625 249-260.
626 Klomklao, S., Benjakul, S., Kishimura, H., & Chaijan, M. (2011). 24kDa trypsin: A
627 predominant protease purified from the viscera of hybrid catfish (Clarias
629 Klomklao, S., Kishimura, H., & Benjakul, S. (2013). Use of viscera extract from hybrid
630 catfish (Clarias macrocephalus × Clarias gariepinus) for the production of protein
631 hydrolysate from toothed ponyfish (Gazza minuta) muscle. Food Chemistry, 136(2),
632 1006-1012.
633 Klompong, V., Benjakul, S., Kantachote, D., & Shahidi, F. (2007). Antioxidative activity
634 and functional properties of protein hydrolysate of yellow stripe trevally (Selaroides
635 leptolepis) as influenced by the degree of hydrolysis and enzyme type. Food
637 Klompong, V., Benjakul, S., Kantachote, D., & Shahidi, F. (2012). Use of protein
638 hydrolysate from yellow stripe trevally (Selaroides leptolepis) as microbial media.
640 Klompong, V., Benjakul, S., Yachai, M., Visessanguan, W., Shahidi, F., & Hayes, K. D.
641 (2009). Amino acid composition and antioxidative peptides from protein
645 biochemical, and functional properties. Critical Reviews in Food Science and
647 Kumar, N. S., Nazeer, R. A., & Ganesh, R. J. (2012). Functional properties of protein
648 hydrolysates from different body parts of horse mackerel (Magalaspis cordyla) and
651 Kumar, N. S., Nazeer, R. A., & Jaiganesh, R. (2011). Purification and biochemical
654 Liu, Y., Li, X., Chen, Z., Yu, J., Wang, F., & Wang, J. (2014). Characterization of
655 structural and functional properties of fish protein hydrolysates from surimi
657 Martínez-Alvarez, O., Chamorro, S., & Brenes, A. (2015). Protein hydrolysates from
660 Mendis, E., Rajapakse, N., & Kim, S. K. (2005). Antioxidant properties of a radical-
661 scavenging peptide purified from enzymatically prepared fish skin gelatin
663 Morimura, S., Nagata, H., Uemura, Y., Fahmi, A., Shigematsu, T., & Kida, K. (2002).
664 Development of an effective process for utilization of collagen from livestock and
669 Muralidharan, N., Shakila, R. J., Sukumar, D., & Jeyasekaran, G. (2013). Skin, bone and
670 muscle collagen extraction from the trash fish, leather jacket (Odonus niger) and
671 their characterization. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 50(6), 1106-1113.
672 Nagai, T., Araki, Y., & Suzuki, N. (2002). Collagen of the skin of ocellate puffer fish
674 Nagai, T., Izumi, M., & Ishii, M. (2004). Fish scale collagen. Preparation and partial
675 characterization. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 39(3), 239-
676 244.
677 Nazeer, R. A., & Kumar, N. S. S. (2011). Purification and identification of antioxidant
678 peptide from black pomfret, Parastromateus niger (Bloch, 1975) viscera protein
680 Ngo, D. H., Ryu, B., & Kim, S. K. (2014). Active peptides from skate (Okamejei kenojei)
681 skin gelatin diminish angiotensin-I converting enzyme activity and intracellular free
683 Nilsang, S., Lertsiri, S., Suphantharika, M., & Assavanig, A. (2005). Optimization of
686 Nolsøe, H., & Undeland, I. (2009). The acid and alkaline solubilization process for the
687 isolation of muscle proteins: state of the art. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 2(1),
688 1-27.
689 Ovissipour, M., Abedian, A., Motamedzadegan, A., Rasco, B., Safari, R., & Shahiri, H.
690 (2009). The effect of enzymatic hydrolysis time and temperature on the properties
691 of protein hydrolysates from Persian sturgeon (Acipenser persicus) viscera. Food
693 Ovissipour, M., Kenari, A. A., Motamedzadegan, A., & Nazari, R. M. (2012). Optimization
696 Pasupuleti, V. K., & Braun, S. (2010). State of the art manufacturing of protein
698 Netherlands.
699 Pires, C., & Batista, I. (2013). Functional properties of fish protein hydrolysates. In R.
700 Pérez-Gálvez & J.P. Bergé (Eds.) Utilization of fish waste (pp. 59-75). Boca Raton,
702 Raghavan, S., & Kristinsson, H. G. (2009). ACE-inhibitory activity of tilapia protein
704 Rai, A. K., Swapna, H. C., Bhaskar, N., Halami, P. M., & Sachindra, N. M. (2010). Effect
705 of fermentation ensilaging on recovery of oil from fresh water fish viscera. Enzyme
707 Ramakrishnan, V. V., Ghaly, A. E., Brooks, M. S., & Budge, S. M. (2013). Extraction of
708 proteins from mackerel fish processing waste using Alcalase enzyme. Journal of
710 Rao, Q., Klaassen Kamdar, A., & Labuza, T. P. (2016). Storage stability of food protein
711 hydrolysates: a review. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 56(7), 1169-
712 1192.
713 Ratnasari, I., Yuwono, S. S., Nusyam, H., & Widjanarko, S. B. (2013). Extraction and
714 characterization of gelatin from different fresh water fishes as alternative sources of
716 Robert, M., Zatylny-Gaudin, C., Fournier, V., Corre, E., Le Corguillé, G., Bernay, B., &
720 Rustad, T., & Hayes, M. (2012). Marine bioactive peptides and protein hydrolysates:
722 M. Hayes (Ed.) Marine Bioactive Compounds (pp. 99-113). New York: Springer.
723 Rutherfurd, S. M., & Gilani, G. S. (2009). Amino acid analysis. Current Protocols in
725 Ryan, J. T., Ross, R. P., Bolton, D., Fitzgerald, G. F., & Stanton, C. (2011). Bioactive
726 peptides from muscle sources: meat and fish. Nutrients, 3(9), 765-791.
727 Sai-Ut, S., Benjakul, S., Sumpavapol, P., & Kishimura, H. (2014). Effect of drying methods
730 1559.
731 Salwanee, S., Wan Aida, W. M., Mamot, S., & Maskat, M. Y. (2013). Effects of enzyme
733 extract from viscera of tuna (Euthynnus affinis) by using alcalase. Sains
738 Sarmadi, B. H., & Ismail, A. (2010). Antioxidative peptides from food proteins: a review.
740 Sheriff, S. A., Sundaram, B., Ramamoorthy, B., & Ponnusamy, P. (2014). Synthesis and in
742 kanagurta by proteolytic enzymes. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 21(1), 19-
743 26.
744 Shirahigue, L. D., Silva, M. O., Camargo, A. C., Sucasas, L. F. D. A., Borghesi, R., Cabral,
745 I. S. R., Savay-da-Silva, L. K., Galvão, J. A. & Oetterer, M. (2016). The feasibility
748 Silva, C. M., dos Santos da Fonseca, R. A., & Prentice, C. (2014). Comparing the
752 Silva, J. F. X., Ribeiro, K., Silva, J. F., Cahú, T. B., & Bezerra, R. S. (2014). Utilization of
753 tilapia processing waste for the production of fish protein hydrolysate. Animal Feed
755 Šližytė, R., Daukšas, E., Falch, E., Storrø, I., & Rustad, T. (2005). Characteristics of protein
756 fractions generated from hydrolysed cod (Gadus morhua) by-products. Process
761 Taheri, A., Anvar, S. A. A., Ahari, H., & Fogliano, V. (2012). Comparison the functional
762 properties of protein hydrolysates from poultry byproducts and rainbow trout
763 (Onchorhynchus mykiss) viscera. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences, 12(1), 154-
764 169.
765 Tang, L., Chen, S., Su, W., Weng, W., Osako, K., & Tanaka, M. (2015). Physicochemical
766 properties and film-forming ability of fish skin collagen extracted from different
768 Tavano, O. L. (2013). Protein hydrolysis using proteases: An important tool for food
771 O., Plascencia-Jatomea, M., & Ezquerra-Brauer, J. M. (2011). Giant squid skin
774 Valenzuela, A., Sanhueza, J., & de la Barra, F. (2012). El aceite de pescado: Ayer un
775 desecho industrial, hoy un producto de alto valor nutricional. Revista Chilena de
777 Vannabun, A., Ketnawa, S., Phongthai, S., Benjakul, S., & Rawdkuen, S. (2014).
778 Characterization of acid and alkaline proteases from viscera of farmed giant catfish.
781 different fish peptones and comparative study of the growth of selected species of
783 Vidotti, R. M., Viegas, E. M. M., & Carneiro, D. J. (2003). Amino acid composition of
784 processed fish silage using different raw materials. Animal Feed Science and
786 Wu, R., Wu, C., Liu, D., Yang, X., Huang, J., Zhang, J., Liao, B., He, H. & Li, H. (2015) .
787 Overview of antioxidant peptides derived from marine resources: the sources,
790 Yin, S. W., Tang, C. H., Wen, Q. B., Yang, X. Q., & Li, L. (2008). Functional properties
791 and in vitro trypsin digestibility of red kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) protein
793 Zhang, Y., Liu, W., Li, G., Shi, B., Miao, Y., & Wu, X. (2007). Isolation and partial
796
797
798
799
800 Figure 1. Flow chart of the generic process of obtaining fish viscera protein hydrolysates (FVPH).
801
802
803 Source: (He et al., 2013; Pasupuleti & Braun, 2010) with modifications.
804 Table 1. Proximate composition of fish viscera and fish viscera protein hydrolysates
805
Proximate composition of fish viscera 806
Species Protein (%) Lipids (%) Moisture (%) Ash(%) Reference 807
Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares) Ovissipour, Kenari, Motamedzadegan,808 &
21.5±0.50 5.08±1.53 69.66±2.32 4.46±1.21
Nazari (2012) 809
Tuna (Euthynnus affinis) Salwanee, Wan Aida, Mamot, & Maskat
65.04±1.40 11.77±1.41 75.73±0.33 3.12±0.11 810
(2013)
811
Catla (Catla catla) 8.52±0.95 12.46±1.45 76.25±0.25 2.50±0.04 Bhaskar, Benila, Radha, & Lalitha (2008)
812
Cod (Gadus morhua) 14.90±2,30 2.00±0.50 60.00±0.00 4.40±0.30 Šližytė et al. (2005)
Sardine (Sardina pilchardus) 15.76±1.10 4.89±0.11 77.46±0.02 1.90±0.00 Kechaou et al. (2009) 813
Rainbow Trout (Onchorhynchus 814
15.00±0.06 13.00±0.76 71.65±0.89 2.73±0.89 Taheri, Anvar, Ahari, & Fogliano (2012)815
mykiss)
Pink Salmon (Oncorhynchus 816
15.30±0.40 2.00±0.30 81.20±0.70 1.70±0.10 Bechtel (2003)
gorbuscha) 817
Parastromateus Niger 14.40±0.50 3.90±0.30 74.00±0.50 3.40±0.40 Nazeer & Kumar (2011) 818
Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)* 14.62±0.79 10.75±0.97 60.44±0.27 4.90±0.61 Shirahigue et al. (2016) 819
Fish viscera protein hydrolysate 820
Persian sturgeon (Acipenser 821
65.82±7.02 0.18±0.40 4.45±0.67 7.67±1.24 Ovissipour et al. (2009)
persicus) 822
Yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) 72.34±3.20 1.43±0.57 2.82±2.74 22.34±1.38 Ovissipour et al. (2012) 823
Sardinella (Sardinella aurita) (6.62% 824
75.01±1.72 8.53±1.11 1.35±0.55 14.81±0.14
hydrolysis)**
825
Sardinella (Sardinella aurita) (9.31%
72.99±1.82 10.21±1.58 2.83±0.42 13.06±0.13 826
Souissi, Bougatef, Triki-Ellouz & Nasri (2007)
hydrolysis)**
Sardinella (Sardinella aurita) (10.16% 827
73.05±1.91 10.29±1.76 4.56±0.27 12.10±0.12 828
hydrolysis)**
Rainbow trout (Onchorhynchus 829
88.32±0.07 0.80±0.60 3.45±0.02 1.14±0.88 Taheri et al. (2012) 830
mykiss)
831
832 * Total co-products (viscera, bones, head, scales), **viscera and heads
833 Table 2. Species, enzymes and parameters used for obtaining protein hydrolysates from fish
834 viscera.
835
Specie Enzyme Parameter Reference
Yellowfin tuna E/S=0.2 - 3%; T=50°C;
Alcalase 2.4L Guerard et al. (2001)
(Thunnus albacares) pH=8.0
E/S=0.1%; T=50°C;
Flavorzyme 500L
Cod (Gadus morhua pH=7.0
Šližytė et al. (2005)
L.) E/S=0.3%; T=50°C;
Neutrase 0.8L
pH=7.0
Sardinella (Sardinella E/S=727.26 U/g;
Alcalase Souissi et al. (2007)
aurita) T=50°C; pH=8.0
E/S=1.5%; T=55°C;
Catla (Catla catla) Alcalase (0.6 AU/g) Bhaskar et al., 2008
pH=8.5
Persian Sturgeon E/S=0.1 AU/g; T=55°C; Ovissipour et al.
Alcalase 2.4L
(Acipenser persicus) pH=8.5 (2009)
E/S=0.1% w/w;
Protamex
T=50°C; pH=8.0
Sardine (Sardina E/S=0.1% w/w;
Alcalase 2.4L Kechaou et al. (2009)
pilchardus) T=50°C; pH=8.0
E/S=0.1% w/w;
Flavorzyme 500MG
T=50°C; pH=8.0
Batista, Ramos,
Black scabbardfish E/S=0.5 - 4%; T=50°C;
Protamex Coutinho, Bandarra, &
(Aphanopus carbo) pH=7.5
Nunes (2010)
Alcalase (0.6 AU/g) E/S=0.5% w/v; T=40°C
Neutrase (1.5 AU/g) E/S=0.5% w/v; T=40°C
Rohu (Labeo rohita) Hathwar, Bijinu, Rai, &
Protex 7L E/S=0.5% w/v; T=40°C
Catla (Catla catla) Narayan (2011)
Protease-P-Amano
E/S=0.5% w/v; T=40°C
(60000 U/g)
Pepsin
E/S=1.0% w/v; Nazeer & Kumar
Parastromateus Niger Trypsin
T=37°C; pH=2.5 (2011)
α-Chymotrypsin
Tuna (Euthynnus E/S=1.5%; T=40°C;
Alcalase Salwanee et al. (2013)
affinis) pH=8
Tilapia (Oreochromis E/S=0.5%; T=55°C;
Neutrase Shirahigue et al. (2016)
niloticus) pH=7.0
836
837
838 Table 3. Functional properties and applications of fish wastes
Hake (Merluccius
6.5
merluccius, L.)
Black tilapia Gelatins from black and red
(Oreochromis 5.39 tilapia were obtained. The
0.2% Sulfuric acid/1% citric acid. Jamilah &
mossambicus) results suggest that they can be
45ºC – 12h Harvinder (2002)
for applications different from
Red Tilapia cold water fish gelatin.
7.81
(Oreochromis nilotica)
Pangas catfish
22
(Pangasius pangasius) The fishes investigated were
Asian redtail catfish potential alternative sources of
21.28 Ratnasari, Yuwono,
(Hemibagrus nemurus) % (1:3 b/v) citric acid (pH 3) for 12 h. gelatin in spite of showing lower
Nusyam, &
Striped snake head 60°C – 6h physicochemical and rheological
20.25 Widjanarko (2013)
(Channa striata) properties compared to the
Nile tilapia commercial gelatin.
21.93
(Oreochromis niloticus)
D. gigas skin gelatin has Uriarte-Montoya et
Squid (Dosidicus gigas) 0.05M Acetic acid for 3h. 65°C - 12h 7.5
potential as a source of al. (2011)
functional component for
different industrial applications.
Collagen
Yield (% on a
Source Pre-treatment extracting conditions Outcome Reference
weight basis)
Sardine (Sardinops
50.9
melanostictus) Decalcification 0.05 m Tris–HCl (pH
7.5) containing 0.5 m EDTA-4Na for 2
Fish scales have potential as an
d. Disaggregation 0.1 m Tris–HCl (pH
alternative source of collagen Nagai, Izumi, &
8.0) containing 0.5 m NaCl, 0.05 m
for use in the cosmetic and Ishii (2004)
Red sea bream (Pagrus EDTA-2 Na and 0.2 m 2-
37.5 medical fields.
major) mercaptoethanol (2-ME) for 3 d and
limited pepsin digestion.
842
843 Table 4. Fish viscera protein hydrolysates amino acid composition
Fish specie
albacares) (Ovissipour
(Bhaskar et al., 2008)
morhua) (Horn,
Tuna (Thunnus
2009) Alc 2.4L
2005) Endo
2005) Pap
2005) Alc
Alc 2.4L
Amino acids (g / 100 g)
Histidine 2.08 2.06 8.45 1.20 1.00 1.10
Isoleucine 3.80 3.60 6.93 3.30 2.90 3.10
Leucine 7.13 7.17 7.70 5.30 5.10 5.10
Lysine 6.80 7.07 1.87 3.30 3.70 3.70
Essential
utamine
Glycine 5.40 10.99 5.87 7.10 7.40 6.60
Alanine 6.30 7.04 2.23 5.10 4.90 4.80
Proline/hydro
3.46 6.24 N.R. 4.30/1.40 4.20/1.60 4.00/1.20
xyproline
Cystine N.R. 0.23 N.R. N.R. N.R. N.R.
Taurine N.R. N.R. N.R. 2.70 2.50 3.30
Serine 4.20 4.34 6.81 4.10 4.00 4.10
844 N.R.: No report, Alc: Alcalase, Pap: Papain, Endo: Endogenous enzymes
845
846
847
848
849
850
852
853
854 Highlights
855 Fish viscera protein hydrolysates (FVPH) are promising high added value products.
856 Nutritional, bioactive and functional properties of FVPH are useful to the industry.
857 Further research about the performance and stability of FVPH are needed.
858 FVPH production is considered sustainable, however there are huge challenges ahead.
859