Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Microsoft Access II
Pennsylvania Deer Problem
Background Information
The Pennsylvania Game Commission is a state agency charged
with managing wildlife resources throughout the
Commonwealth. An integral part of this job is managing the
population of deer to provide hunting opportunities for
Pennsylvania’s outdoorsmen.
To help with management, the Game Commission has divided Pennsylvania into a
series of Wildlife Management Units (WMUs), which are areas that share a similar
locale and geographic characteristics. The WMUs serve as the basis for the Game
Commission’s efforts to provide a sustainable deer population.
Problem Statement
In this project, students will explore data released by the Pennsylvania Game
Commission from 2004 to 2007 concerning the deer harvest for each Wildlife
Management Unit. By analyzing this data, trends within the various Units can be
investigated.
Project Instructions
NOTE: This project requires a version of Microsoft Office 2007 that provides support
for importing XML files.
IMPORTANT: Complete the below steps in the order they are given. Completing the
steps out of order may complicate the project or result in an incorrect result.
Microsoft Access II
Pennsylvania Deer Problem
b. harvest.xml – Data on annual deer harvests and license sales for each
Wildlife Management Unit.
Table: Harvest
Field Name Type Description
HarvestYear Number Part of composite key. Year the
hunting season began.
WMU Text Part of composite key. Wildlife
Management Unit.
FirearmAntleredHarvest Number Total bucks harvested with a gun (non-
muzzleloader), for this WMU and year.
FirearmAntlerlessHarvest Number Total does harvested with a gun (non-
muzzleloader), for this WMU and year.
ArcheryAntleredHarvest Number Total bucks harvested with a bow, for
this WMU and year.
ArcheryAntlerlessHarvest Number Total does harvested with a bow, for
this WMU and year.
MuzzleloaderAntleredHarvest Number Total bucks harvested with a
muzzleloader, for this WMU and year.
MuzzleloaderAntlerlessHarvest Number Total does harvested with a
muzzleloader, for this WMU and year.
AntlerlessLicenses Number Number of licenses allocated for
hunting does (antlerless deer).
Microsoft Access II
Pennsylvania Deer Problem
b. Enter records for all Wildlife Management Units below.
HINT: Run your queries to test them. Make sure that they display all and only
the records that you would expect to appear.
a. Create a new query. For each year, sum the total number of deer taken
in each category (antlered firearms, antlerless firearms, antlered archery,
antlerless archery, antlered muzzleloaders, and antlerless muzzleloaders)
and the total number of antlerless licenses.
Microsoft Access II
Pennsylvania Deer Problem
b. Create a new query that, for each year and WMU, displays the region
name, the total number of antlerless deer harvested, and the number of
antlerless licenses. You should also include a calculated field that
determines the percentage of the antlerless licenses that were actually
used.
You can calculate the number of antlerless deer harvested using the
formula:
. .
.
You can calculate the number of used antlerless licenses using the
formula:
Antlerless Deer Harvested
.
Microsoft Access II
Pennsylvania Deer Problem
d. Create a new query that for each region, WMU, and year, calculates the
total number of deer harvested. You should also include a calculated field
to determine the percentage of deer harvested by each of the three
hunting methods (firearms, archery, and muzzleloaders).
You can calculate the total number of deer harvested using the formula:
. .
. .
. .
Make a new query that lists each region and a sum of the total number of
deer harvested in 2006. For each region in 2006, you should also find the
average percentage of deer killed each by firearms, archery and
muzzleloaders.
Do not show the year field in the results. Give your calculated fields
appropriate names (don’t use the automatically-generated names).
Microsoft Access II
Pennsylvania Deer Problem
f. We would like to see if there is any relationship between the health of a
WMU and the region in which it is located. Create a new query that lists
each region, each health category, a count of how many WMUs within that
region are in each health category, and the average regeneration rate for
each region/health category combination.
Answer four of the five below questions, one question per record. Specifically
indicate the question you are answering for each record.
a. Are there any noticeable patterns in the type of hunting used in the
various parts of the state? Why might this be the case?
b. Why might Pennsylvania want to specifically limit the number of antlerless
(female) deer harvested?
c. Suppose that too many deer are being harvested. In the short run, this
would allow hunters to take more deer and landowners would benefit from
reduced amounts of crop damage. What might be longer-term
consequences of overharvesting deer?
Introduction to Computer Applications Page 6 of 7 Version 3.0
West Virginia University Modified 4/1/2009
HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT
Microsoft Access II
Pennsylvania Deer Problem
d. In Query6G, you looked at forest health data versus number of deer
harvested. Is there a relationship between forest health and the deer
harvest? Why or why not?
e. The Pennsylvania Game Commission has recently switched from
managing the deer population on the basis of counties to the basis of
Wildlife Management Units. There are fewer WMUs than counties,
effectively making each management area larger, but the WMUs are
organized by grouping geographically similar areas. What might be some
advantages and disadvantages to this change?
8. Run the COMPACT AND REPAIR DATABASE utility on your database.
Curriculum Information
Project Type
Microsoft Access database
Grading Rubric
This project will be graded based upon the following components. The instructor
may adjust the below percentages as he or she feels appropriate:
Step 3 5% Steps 6a-e 7.5% each
Steps 4a-b 10% total Steps 6f-g 10% each
Steps 5a-b 7.5% total Steps 7a-e (pick 4 of 5) 5% each