Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
1. Reflect. I know this seems very unpractical and I am all about taking action but sometimes we need to stop and think about how we got to where
we got to in the first place. Reflecting allows us to see where we could have made a difference and where circumstances beyond our control simply
got the best of us. Reflecting, in some sense, can give us closure.
2. Do something active. I know this may seem silly but exercise does give you endorphins. (When you exercise, your body releases chemicals
called endorphins. These endorphins interact with the receptors in your brain that reduce your perception of pain. Endorphins also trigger a
positive feeling in the body, similar to that of morphine) The mere release of emotions from being physically active is also healthy for you. Freedom
from frustration in disappointments is sometimes found in a 5-mile run or an hour strength-training session or yoga or swimming or just talking a
long walk somewhere.
3. Get (more) spiritual. Well, I’m Catholic so for me daily mass is pretty much available if I ever just feel my spirit is restless. Taking all the
institutionalization aside, one of the places I truly find peace of mind is in church. I know people may disagree, but I think spirituality is very
important, however once chooses to practice it. And when you’re disappointed, your soul needs food. Feed it.
4. Do something of service. It may seem pretentious to want to give to others when you feel disappointed. But I think serving others reminds us all
that however much we think we have, we are all ultimately in want, sometimes in need. And that is humbling. Moreover, when we serve those who
are not as fortunate as we are, we understand that our disappointments are really not that big a deal in the grand scheme of things.
5. Take a day off. Sometimes we need a day off especially if it just seems little disappointments keep knocking us to the ground. Many of us are
much stronger than we think but there are days we will have where even getting out of bed seems like too much to ask. In our go-go society, we
obviously can’t have too many of these days. But if you need it, just take a day off and sleep and eat and be. You’re a human being not a machine.
6. Be with someone you love. Facing disappointments can be hard if we’re doing them alone. Whether it’s calling your parents who will always
remind you of how wonderful you are or calling a good friend who you can viciously vent to or being held by a significant other, you’re reminded
that whatever you’re facing, someone out there loves you and is rooting for you. And with that, take your disappointments in your stride and let
them make you stronger but not bitter, better but not conceited, and always wanting to bring more love and goodness into the world despite
whatever pain life’s little disappointments might have left you with.
The 25 Most Influential Directors of All
Time
By Jennifer M. Wood on July 7, 2002
11
As time passes, new models inevitably emerge. In art, politics and history, each generation finds
its own heroes.
In the motion picture industry, though, is that really the case?
The innovators who shaped the art form are the ones still asserting
the most influence on moviemakers today. Or so says a stellar assembly
of directors, writers, actors, critics and others we polled with
this question: Who are the 25 most influential directors of all
time?
The question is an important one. Influence is defined as that intangible power which can affect a
person, thing or course of events. Many believe that motion pictures,
more than any other art form in the past century, have had a profound
influence on modern life. If one also accepts the generally held
premise that directors, more than any other creative force in the
film industry, are responsible for steering and shaping motion pictures,
then perhaps film directors as a group have had a vastly underestimated
effect on the way society thinks and behaves.
But who has had the most influence on other
directors, as well as the public? In the past 100 years,
which directors have made an indelible impact on our lives, and
on the face of the movie industry? In what ways have these directors
helped to define cinema as we know and see it today? With the help
of some of our most celebrated moviemakers and industry professionals,
we have counted down the directors who made the most difference—and
continue to do so today.
1. Alfred Hitchcock (1899 – 1980)
Alfred Hitchcock did not invent modern cinema, but
for much of the past century he has defined it. Inarguably the
most imitated motion picture artist of all time, a slew of spine-tingling
hits including Rebecca, Rear Window, Vertigo and North
by Northwest brought international acclaim to the London-born
director, earning him the moniker “The Master of Suspense.”
While Hitchcock’s work certainly tended toward the
thrilling, it was not as much his ability to keep audiences on
the edge of their seats as it was to pull them out of their chairs
that made him a legend—drawing moviegoers into his films and challenging
the role of viewer as detached spectator. Widely hailed as his
masterpiece, 1960’s Psycho took audiences into the recesses
of a disturbed mind, making use of a fast-paced, adrenaline-inducing
editing style and a succession of POV shots. With a perfectly
measured combination of style and innovation and seamlessly blended
bits of humor and romance throughout his work, Hitchcock’s films
are a whole experience, usually playing upon a variety of human
emotions.
Though he was considered a legend in his own time,
making more than 65 films in a career that spanned over half a
century, the only Academy Award Hitchcock ever won for directing
was an honorary one given in 1976, when he made history once again
by uttering the briefest speech in Oscar history: “Thank you.”
changing) article
Before we can get to the numbers, here are some key phrases you’ll
need to know to understand Hollywood economics…
Domestic – The release of the film in America and Canada, also known as “North America”.
International – The release of the film in the rest of the world combined. In some cases,
studios will only have the rights to release a movie domestically, with another company picking up
the international rights (or vice verse). For example, Paramount have the rights to distribute The
Adventures of Tintin domestically while Sony controls the international rights.
Theatrical – Relating to the cinema release (i.e. in movie theatres).
Home Entertainment (or “Home Video” or “Home Ent”) – The release of the film on DVD, Blu-
Ray, previously VHS and online streaming services.
Pay TV – Subscription television channels. In the UK this includes Sky Cinema and in the US
cable networks such as HBO.
Free TV – Free to air television, typically either public service broadcasting or ad supported. In
the UK this includes the BBC and in the US ABC.
Video on Demand (VOD) – Online streaming services (such as iTunes, Netflix and Amazon
Prime).
Pay Per View (PPV) – An old form of VOD which is still active in some places involving the
viewer paying to watch an encrypted, scheduled transmission of the movie.
Ok, enough terminology – let’s start our journey into what Hollywood blockbusters cost and what they
make back.
The first huge cost – The budget
The starting point for working out the final costs of releasing a
movie is to look at how much it cost the studio to shoot the film (i.e. the film’s budget). In the industry,
this is often called the ‘Negative Cost’ as it’s the cost of producing the very first version of the film (which
used to be a film negative). This includes…
The studios found themselves in an ever-increasing spiral whereby blockbusters were getting more
expensive to make, meaning that they needed to spend more on marketing to offset the risk, which
meant they needed to ensure their films are the biggest of the season, which inflated the budgets and
the circle continues to turn.
Many feel that this cycle is not sustainable and a few years ago some industry watchers felt that a huge
crash was imminent (Steven Spielberg and George Lucas both predicted an industry ‘implosion’). In the
end, it seems that Hollywood has just reigned in spending with 2014 and 2015 having just 21 movies
apiece, far below 2011’s high of 34.
So the average $100m+ Hollywood blockbuster actually cost $19 million more than is stated on
Wikipedia (i.e. 12.5% more).
For reference, the average budget for the blockbusters in my dataset was $150,567,000.
Other costs of making a movie
Marketing – It could be argued that success in the business of Hollywood blockbusters is more
dependent on the art of marketing than the art of filmmaking. This is the biggest category of costs
for a movie, outside of the budget. Most Hollywood blockbusters only have one or two weeks
when they are ‘The Big Movie’ in cinemas, so studios need to build and channel the awareness /
excitement for a movie to ensure that everyone goes to see it during this period.
Prints – The physical copies of the films which are given to cinemas. Historically, they were on
35mm celluloid film but today most countries use a hard drive with a specially encoded digital
video file called a Digital Cinema Print (DCP). This hard drive has a huge copy of the film (10s or
100s of Gigabytes) and a tiny file which controls the permissions to the large video file. This
means that hard drives can be shipped to cinemas in advance, without worry that the film will be
viewed ahead of its official release. Complex permissions can be set, permitting screenings only
at certain times or on certain digital projectors. Also, copies of the film in other formats will need
to be created to give to third parties distributors and exhibitors, such as TV stations who broadcast
the film.
Residuals – Unions for the cast and crew have agreed deals with Hollywood studios which
ensure that their members receive additional payments from the income the film generates.
Financing costs – These can include costs involved with borrowing money to make the film
(interests and brokerage fees) and currency conversions (for overseas shoots).
Overhead – Studios charge their own productions an overhead fee which covers the time studio
staff spend on the project, the costs of deals which apply to all films the studios make and the
benefit a production is regarded as receiving from operating under the studio brand. It may seem
strange to charge oneself money but these costs come off before “profit” is calculated, meaning
that productions which pay an overhead have smaller official profits, meaning that the studio has
smaller cheques to cut to people with profit participation deals. The old joke in Hollywood is that
the studios charge overhead on interest and interest on overhead (and if you find that funny you
really are down the rabbit hole of Hollywood economics!)
Looking at my dataset we can see the average costs breakdown below…
To give you a little more detail and context, below are some notes on each of the main cost areas…
Marketing costs
In 2005, Dreamworks overestimated the number of Shrek 2 DVDs they would sell in the US by 5 million
units. This caused the studio to missing their quarterly earnings target by 25% and their shares fell as a
result.
Profit participation
Giving these people a share of the income is a good way for the studio to hedge against poor box office
performance and it also defers the moment they have to pay up. Key talent often
seek ‘participation points’ as a way of increasing their income and to share the spoils if a film performs
much better than expected.
On the flipside, studios have got rather good at using creative accounting techniques to show that they
made a loss on paper in order to get out of paying such fees. In 2010, a leaked profit participation
report from the fifth Harry Potter film showed that two years after the film’s release, Warner Brothers
was claiming that the picture had lost $167 million. Other movies hit with such claims are the three Lord
of the Rings films (which combined grossed almost $3 billion in cinemas worldwide), My Big Fat Greek
Wedding, Spider-Man, Return of the Jedi, Coming To America, JFK, Fahrenheit 9/11 and Forest Gump, to
name but a few.
The movie in my dataset which gave the largest share of income to participants gave 18%. It’s worth
noting that participation isn’t always dependent on there being profits. As people get wise to the
studios’ game of creative accounting they are asking for more than just “a share of the profits”. The
biggest names will demand ‘First Dollar Gross‘ deals, which give them a share of every dollar earned,
calculated before costs are taken off. On average, the films which lost money in my dataset still paid out
5% of their income to participants (profitable films spent an average of 9% of their income on
participants).
Movies may start in cinemas but they are far from the only place they earn money. Each stage at which
a movie reaches a new type of platform (i.e. DVD, TV, etc) is called a “Release Window”. In recent years
release windows have shifted around (including the elimination of a previously-profitable exclusive
window called “Video Rental” – remember renting a VHS at Blockbusters, anyone?) but most Hollywood
movies follow the same path.
Theatrical – Once you’ve gone to the time and expense of
creating a blockbuster you’ll want to ensure you pick a release timetable which maximises possible
returns and so studios carefully plan each movie’s release strategy. Studios announce their cinema
release dates way in advance in order to claim coveted release spots, such as Warner Brothers
who announced a release date for their superhero movie ‘Cyborg‘ 1,411 days ahead of time (it’s out
in America on 3rd April 2020). I don’t have time to go into the cinema scheduling patterns of
blockbusters here but I have written about release calendars in the
past stephenfollows.com/hollywood-movie-release-pattern.
Airlines and Hospitality – After the theatrical window, the movie will appear on airlines and
premium Pay Per View (PPV) services such as in hotels. If you’re rather well-off then you can get
access to this release window by forking out$35,000 for a Prima box and $500 per 24-hour movie
rental. However, most of us mere mortals need to wait for the all-important third window – Home
Entertainment.
‘Home Entertainment’ used to be split into a rental window and then a retail window, however
currently they tend to appear on shelves at the same time. The length of time between the
Theatrical and Home Entertainment windows is a hot topic in the industry. Studios want to reduce
the time it takes for movies to move from cinemas to stores in order to capitalise on marketing
efforts and to make sure the DVD is on sale when the movie is still fresh in the minds of
consumers. However, cinemas saw what happened to the rental window (which was chipped away
to nothing, leading to the destruction of the video rental store industry) and so they guard their
exclusive period viciously. In 2015, the average release window between theatrical and Home
Entertainment was 3 months and 23 days.
If instead of playing with Hollywood you invested that same money in a standard high street bank paying
3% annually, over ten years your $115 million would become $156 million (an increase of 35%). And I
am sure this is a fairly low return for that kind of cash.
Maybe instead of taking 1% of all the movies combined, you could try and spot the winners ahead of
time. Let’s have a look at how the profit splits between the individual films…
So if you managed to put all of your money into ‘Movie 1’, then you would have a return of 122% (i.e. a
$265.3 million return on an $119.5 million investment). The only problem is – how do you spot the hits?
Hollywood currently employs the smartest, best informed and most profit-focused people in an effort to
exclusively make profitable movies and yet half of their movies lose money. In fact, their combined best
efforts only produce a 3.7% profit margin.
Q1: Are the films that make money better than those that lose money?
Yes, but only by a very small margin. The average Metacritic score (i.e. average of film critics out of 100)
for profitable films was 55 and for unprofitable movies it was 49. Similarly, IMDb audiences rated the
profitable films an average of 6.5 out of ten and the loss-making films an average of 6.1.
So it doesn’t seem as though the Hollywood studios have any financial incentive to make their films
better. Shame.
Q2: Does the amount they spend on marketing correlate with financial success?
In answering this question we have to be careful not to fall foul of the Statisticians’ Mantra that
‘Correlation is not causation‘. Studios don’t have to lock in their marketing commitments until they get
close to the movie’s release date and so it could be that they choose to double down on the marketing
when they know they have a film which is likely to perform well. Likewise, if they think they have a real
turkey on their hands they could dial back the marketing spend so as not to throw good money after bad.
From this data, we can’t tell why the correlation exists.
However, we can say that, yes, movies with the biggest marketing budgets do seem to gross the highest
amounts at the box office.
As you can see, the majority of the money collected at the box office does indeed come from countries
outside of the US and Canada. However, studios spend a higher proportion of their marketing money in
North America. This could be for a number of reasons including the higher cost of advertising in
America, the temptation to spend more in the country which studio execs actually live in and because
the US is often the first place a movie is released and the media enjoy reporting on huge opening
weekends (and decrying massive flops).
What’s fascinating is that once you deduct the release and marketing costs (known as the “Prints and
Advertising” or “P&A”) almost all (i.e. 99.1%) of the theatrical margin left over comes from outside North
America. This is the result of high fixed costs involved in releasing and marketing a movie in North
America, the paper thin margins in the business (as we saw above, it’s under 4% across all these movies)
and the more reliable nature of international returns. Together, they mean that only 12 of my 29 movies
made money at the domestic box office, whereas 20 made money at the international box office.
Alongside this, the losses at the domestic theatrical market were much worse than internationally. The
poorest performing movie at the domestic theatrical market lost $49.3 million whereas the poorest
performing film at the international theatrical market only lost $14.8 million.
1. It’s cheaper to market movies internationally, with the average movie in my dataset costing $55
million to market in the US and Canada and $44 million for every other country the film was released in
combined. For a sense of scale, IMDb lists release dates for Avatar in 69 countries, and I suspect the
real number is slightly higher.
2. The margin is more reliable and less prone to huge theatrical losses. As we saw above, the risk
associated with releasing a big movie in North America is far greater than that associated with its
international release.
3. It has the most potential for growth in the near future as the North American market is saturated
with cinemas and movies. For example, between 2009 and 2013, cinema admissions in China rose by
239%, whereas in the US over the same period they shrunkby 5%. You can read more about the
enormous growth in the movie business in China here stephenfollows.com/film-business-in-china
Q4: Is there a rule of thumb for guessing which Hollywood blockbusters are in profit?
In the UK, the BFI developed a rule of thumb which stated that a
movie was reasonably likely to be ‘profitable’ if it generated twice its budget at the global box office.
They reached this conclusion by studying the full financial records of the movies they were involved with
and also checking their hypothesis with independent professional film financiers. But their dataset
would have included few (if any) films budgeted over $100 million, and so it’s interesting to see if it also
applies to my dataset of Hollywood blockbusters.
So the question is… If we only had two pieces of information – the global box office gross (as reported
on Box Office Mojo) and the production budget (as reported on Wikipedia) – how accurately could we
guess how many $100m+ movies made money?
Well, you’d be right 83% of the time. Using this rule, I was able to correctly identify all of the profit-
making films and correctly identify ten as loss-making, however, this system incorrectly marked five loss-
making movies as being profitable. (I also tested the theory against the true budget figures due to the
fact that Wikipedia budgets are mostly inflated, as previously discussed, but this only improved accuracy
to 86%). In short, the rule works in around four out of five cases. Not as reliable as one might have liked
(and way below the accuracy the BFI found when the rule is applied to smaller films) but certainly
interesting.
So far, I’ve been using a dataset of 29 movies in my investigations. But what happens if we apply this
BFI rule to all $100m+ Hollywood blockbusters? I used just the published budget and box office gross to
look at the 263 $100m+ movies released between 2000 and 2015.
This rule suggests that 70% of Hollywood blockbusters budgeted over $100m and released between
2000-15 were profitable. Since 2004, the percentage of movies in profit has been slowly increasing, from
46% in 2004 to 76% of those released in 2015. Most interestingly, it doesn’t seem that the huge number
of releases in 2011 hurt profitability.
Epilogue
The biggest question some readers may have at this stage is – how did he get this data? Most of the
raw data for today’s research is already publicly available via releases and leaks from major Hollywood
studios, it’s just that I have spent the time to piece it together. I was also helped by a few well-placed
friends in the industry who were able to fill in the blanks and confirm the veracity of some of the data
points. I also used data from IMDb, Box Office Mojo, The Numbers, Metacritic and Wikipedia.
I am completely confident that the information in this article is a true representation of how these
Hollywood blockbusters make money. The reason I am being a bit cagey about exactly where the data
is from is partly to protect sources/ friends but also to avoid inviting lawsuits. The purpose of this site is
educational and my sole intention is to help explain how our industry works. In the past, I have been
contacted by lawyers for various companies, trying to prevent the sharing of key data points relating to
their business. So far, I have managed to avoid lawsuits and also to avoid having to take any articles
down, but if I were to offer the full figures as a download (or details of how to do the same piecing
together I have) then I suspect I would get the wrong kind of attention.
So, if you want to know any more about these movies, please add your question in the comments below.
I’ll do my best to answer them all, including going back to the dataset if needed.
ll-Time (Domestic) Box-Office Hits and Top Films By Decade and Year:
Box-office earnings have often been a great predictor of the feature-length films that have been the most favorite,
successful, and popular. However, they do not necessarily reflect the best (or greatest) films of the year or decade.
They also provide a window into the era when the film was originally released. Although box-office records are often
contradictory, spotty, unreliable and sometimes non-existent (the further you go back in cinematic history), it has been
possible to compile listings of the top domestic hits all the way back to 1913 - both by decade (beginning with the
silents and the 1920s) and by individual year, up to the present year.
Rankings of the top US feature-length films by decade (based on domestic gross revenue) are presented below.
Also, rankings of the top films by year are included. In earlier days stretching from the 1920s to the 1940s,
exact dollar grosses for films at the box-office were often tallied differently, and therefore remain
somewhat unreliable.
Note: Complications in determining accurate box-office totals include the fact that many films have had multiple
releases (such as Disney animated feature films), re-issues or re-releases, special editions, director's cuts, and
subsequent 3-D and IMAX releases - a situation that can have a significant impact on standings. For some films,
there are two figures: domestic gross revenue and lifetime domestic gross revenue.
Box-Office Index
Top 100 (Domestic) | Top 100 (Inflation-Adjusted) | Top 100 (Worldwide) | Film Franchises - Box-Office | Summer Blockbusters
Top Films (By Decade and Year) | Highest-Grossing Films By Genre Type | Greatest Box-Office Bombs, Disasters, and Flops
9. Superman (1978)
10. Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1977/80)
11. Smokey and the Bandit (1977)
9. Spider-Man 2 (2004)
10. The Passion of the Christ (2004)
5. Titanic (1997)
Romance, life-or-death stakes and spectacular effects make household names of director James Cameron
and star Leonardo DiCaprio.
7. Jaws (1975)
Spielberg defines summer blockbuster with a shark flick featuring one of the most memorable theme songs
in movie history.
54. The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003)
Building on the success of the first two installments, the last Lord of the Rings movie tops the awards and
box office.
82. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001)
In the first of the series, world-class actors Ian McKellen, Hugo Weaving, and Viggo Mortensen play
wizards, elves and warriors.
4. Jurassic World (2015) 3. The Sound of Music (1965) 4. Jurassic World (2015)
7. Rogue One: A Star Wars 6. The Ten Commandments 7. Avengers: Age of Ultron
Story (2016) (1956) (2015)
8. Finding Dory (2016) 7. Jaws (1975) 8. Harry Potter and the Deathly
Hallows, Part 2 (2011)
9. Star Wars: Episode I - The 8. Doctor Zhivago (1965)
Phantom Menace (1999) 9. Frozen (2013)
9. The Exorcist (1973)
10. Star Wars: Episode IV - A 10. Iron Man 3 (2013)
New Hope (1977) 10. Snow White and the
11. Minions (2015)
Seven Dwarfs (1937)
11. Avengers: Age of Ultron
12. Captain America: Civil War
(2015) 11. Star Wars: Episode VII - The (2016)
Force Awakens (2015)
12. The Dark Knight Rises (2012) 13. Transformers: Dark of the
12. 101 Dalmatians (1961) Moon (2011)
13. Shrek 2 (2004)
13. Star Wars: Episode V - The 14. The Lord of the Rings: The
14. E. T. The Extra-Terrestrial Empire Strikes Back (1980) Return of the King (2003)
(1982)
14. Ben-Hur (1959) 15. Skyfall (2012)
15. Beauty and the Beast (2017)
15. Avatar (2009) 16. Transformers: Age of
16. The Hunger Games: Extinction (2014)
Catching Fire (2013) 16. Star Wars: Episode VI -
Return of the Jedi (1983) 17. The Dark Knight Rises (2012)
17. Pirates of the Caribbean:
Dead Man's Chest (2006) 17. Jurassic Park (1993) 18. Toy Story 3 (2010)
18. The Lion King (1994) 18. Star Wars: Episode I - The 19. Pirates of the Caribbean:
Phantom Menace (1999) Dead Man's Chest (2006)
19. Toy Story 3 (2010)
19. The Lion King (1994) 20. Rogue One: A Star Wars
20. Iron Man 3 (2013)
Story (2016)
20. The Sting (1973)
21. Captain America: Civil War
(2016) 21. Raiders of the Lost Ark 21. Pirates of the Caribbean: On
(1981) Stranger Tides (2011)
22. The Hunger Games (2012)
22. The Graduate (1967) 22. Jurassic Park (1993)
23. Spider-Man (2002)
23. Fantasia (1940) 23. Finding Dory (2016)
24. Jurassic Park (1993)
24. Jurassic World (2015) 24. Star Wars: Episode I - The
25. Transformers: Revenge of the Phantom Menace (1999)
Fallen (2009) 25. The Godfather (1972)
25. Alice in Wonderland (2010)
26. Frozen (2013) 26. Forrest Gump (1994)
26. Zootopia (2016)
27. Harry Potter and the Deathly 27. Mary Poppins (1964)
Hallows, Part 2 (2011) 27. The Hobbit: An Unexpected
28. Grease (1978) Journey (2012)
28. Finding Nemo (2003)
29. Marvel's The Avengers 28. The Dark Knight (2008)
29. Star Wars: Episode III - (2012)
Revenge of the Sith (2005) 29. Beauty and the Beast (2017)
30. Thunderball (1965)
30. The Lord of the Rings: The 30. Harry Potter and the
Return of the King (2003) 31. The Dark Knight (2008) Sorcerer's Stone (2001)
31. Spider-Man 2 (2004) 32. The Jungle Book (1967) 31. Despicable Me 2 (2013)
32. The Passion of the Christ 33. Sleeping Beauty (1959) 32. The Lion King (1994)
(2004)
34. Ghostbusters (1984) 33. The Jungle Book (2016)
33. The Secret Life of Pets
(2016) 35. Shrek 2 (2004) 34. Pirates of the Caribbean: At
World's End (2007)
34. Despicable Me 2 (2013) 36. Butch Cassidy and the
Sundance Kid (1969) 35. Harry Potter and the Deathly
35. The Jungle Book (2016) Hallows, Part 1 (2010)
36. Deadpool (2016) 37. Love Story (1970)
36. The Hobbit: The Desolation of
37. Inside Out (2015) 38. Spider-Man (2002) Smaug (2013)
38. Furious 7 (2015) 39. Independence Day (1996) 37. The Hobbit: The Battle of the
Five Armies (2014)
39. Transformers: Dark of the 40. Home Alone (1990)
Moon (2011) 38. Finding Nemo (2003)
41. Pinocchio (1940)
40. American Sniper (2014) 39. Harry Potter and the Order of
42. Cleopatra (1963) the Phoenix (2007)
41. The Lord of the Rings: The
Two Towers (2002) 43. Beverly Hills Cop (1984) 40. Harry Potter and the Half-
Blood Prince (2009)
42. Zootopia (2016) 44. Goldfinger (1964)
43. The Hunger Games: 41. The Lord of the Rings: The
45. Airport (1970)
Mockingjay - Part 1 (2014) Two Towers (2002)
46. American Graffiti (1973) 42. Shrek 2 (2004)
44. Spider-Man 3 (2007)
47. The Robe (1953)
45. Minions (2015) 43. Harry Potter and the Goblet of
48. Pirates of the Caribbean: Fire (2005)
46. Alice in Wonderland (2010)
Dead Man's Chest (2006)
44. Spider-Man 3 (2007)
47. Guardians of the Galaxy
49. Around the World in 80 Days
(2014) 45. Ice Age: Dawn of the
(1956)
Dinosaurs (2009)
48. Batman v Superman: Dawn
50. Bambi (1942)
of Justice (2016) 46. Spectre (2015)
53. The Bells of St. Mary's (1945) 48. Ice Age: Continental Drift
51. Shrek the Third (2007) (2012)
52. Transformers (2007) 54. The Lord of the Rings: The 49. The Secret Life of Pets (2016)
Return of the King (2003)
53. Iron Man (2008) 50. Batman v Superman: Dawn of
55. Finding Nemo (2003) Justice (2016)
54. Harry Potter and the
Sorcerer's Stone (2001) 56. The Towering Inferno (1974)
51. The Lord of the Rings: The
57. Rogue One: A Star Wars Fellowship of the Ring (2001)
55. Indiana Jones and the
Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Story (2016) 52. The Hunger Games: Catching
(2008) Fire (2013)
58. Cinderella (1950)
56. The Lord of the Rings: The 53. Inside Out (2015)
Fellowship of the Ring (2001) 59. Spider-Man 2 (2004)
54. Star Wars: Episode III -
57. Iron Man 2 (2010) 60. My Fair Lady (1964) Revenge of the Sith (2005)
58. Star Wars: Episode II - Attack 61. The Greatest Show on Earth 55. Transformers: Revenge of the
of the Clones (2002) (1952) Fallen (2009)
59. Pirates of the Caribbean: At 62. National Lampoon's Animal 56. The Twilight Saga: Breaking
World's End (2007) House (1978) Dawn, Part 2 (2012)
74. The Chronicles of Narnia: 79. Rocky (1976) 73. The Amazing Spider-Man
The Lion, the Witch and the (2012)
Wardrobe (2005)
80. The Best Years of Our
Lives (1946) 74. The Hunger Games:
75. Man of Steel (2013) 81. The Poseidon Adventure
Mockingjay - Part 1 (2014)
(1972) 75. Shrek Forever After (2010)
76. Star Wars: Episode V - The
Empire Strikes Back (1980) 82. The Lord of the Rings: The 76. X-Men: Days of Future Past
Fellowship of the Ring (2001)
77. Harry Potter and the Goblet (2014)
of Fire (2005) 83. Twister (1996)
77. Madagascar 3: Europe's Most
78. Monsters, Inc. (2001) 84. Men in Black (1997) Wanted (2012)
The Domestic, Unadjusted (for inflation) list of box-office champs is top heavy with recent films. Rankings
may change daily with every new blockbuster release. There are few films that are classics or films from
Hollywood's Golden Era in this list. Top-grossing, financially-successful films often rate lower in artistic
achievement. Blockbusters, special effects wonders, films with sequels and expensive campaign and
publicity ads fill many of the positions. (Notice that there are very few pre-1980 films in the unadjusted list.)
The Domestic, Adjusted (for inflation) list of box-office champs - with rankings that don't vary much from
month to month (and therefore is not updated as regularly) - takes into account inflationary factors such as
ticket prices and any re-issues or re-releases, and is more reflective of a film's actual appeal. [It is inflation-
adjusted to the 2017 average ticket price of $8.65. Most pre-1980 pictures achieved their totals through
multiple releases.] The escalating price of theatre tickets would otherwise bias a list of all-time blockbuster
films to recent releases. See more details.
The Worldwide list of box-office-champs - in some cases, the gross earnings were made with multiple
releases. Currently, only about a tenth of the films were not in the decade of the 2000s or 2010s.
Ran No. of
k Rating Title Reviews
50. 100% The 400 Blows (Les Quatre cents coups) (1959) 54
64. 92% Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens (2015) 365
73. 97% The Good, the Bad and the Ugly (1966) 68
90. 96% Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 2 (2011) 310
76. M (1931)
8.3
77. Requiem for a Dream (2000)
8.3