See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/311439252

Seismic Analysis: Response Spectrum Analysis Method with MATLAB

Technical Report · December 2016

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34273.30563

CITATIONS READS

0 983

1 author:

Makara Rith
Gangneung-Wonju National University
7 PUBLICATIONS   2 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Makara Rith on 06 December 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 강릉원주대학교

GANGNEUNG-WONJU NATIONAL UNIVERSITY

DEPARTMENT OF GEOTECHNICAL AND PAVEMENT ENGINEERING

Advanced Structural Analysis

Prof. Jung Woo Young

Term Project

“Seismic Analysis – Response Spectrum Analysis for MDOF System”

by Rith Makara

ID: 20168061

2016-11-28
 CONTENT

CONTENT .......................................................................................................................................... 1

1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 2

2. Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 3

2.1 Procedure of Research ........................................................................................................... 3

2.2 Response Spectrum Construction .......................................................................................... 3

2.3 Response Spectrum Analysis Method .................................................................................... 6

3. Application In Matlab.................................................................................................................... 8

References ............................................................................................................................................ 9

Appendix 1 – A_ground_input.m ................................................................................................... 10

Appendix 2 – Input_file.m ............................................................................................................... 11

Appendix 3 – newmark_modified.m .............................................................................................. 12

Appendix 4 – modal_analysis.m ..................................................................................................... 13

Appendix 5 – Output_Modal_Analysis.m...................................................................................... 17

Written by: Rith Makara 1

1. INTRODUCTION

Seismic analysis is a part of structural analysis that determines the structural response of a
building subjected to the earthquake activity. The structural responses created by earthquake motion
are very important for the design of a structure. In order to perform the seismic analysis and design
of a structure to be built at a particular location, the actual time history record (i.e. displacement,
velocity and acceleration of ground motion as shown in Fig. 1) is required. However, it is not
possible to have such records at each and every location. Additionally, the seismic analysis of
structures cannot be simply based on the peak value of the ground acceleration to determine the
response of the structure with the frequency content of ground motion and its own dynamic
properties.

Fig. 1. Ground Acceleration, Velocity and Displacement recorded at the Imperial Valley Irrigation
District Substation, EL Centro, California, during the Imperial Valley Earthquake of May 18, 1940

To solve this problem, Earthquake Response Spectrum Analysis is the most well-known
tool in the seismic analysis of the structures. Response Spectra are curves plotted between
maximum responses of SDOF (Single Degree of Freedom) system subjected to specified earthquake
ground motion and its time period (or frequency) as shown in Fig. 3. The response of a structure can
be defined as a combination of many special shapes modes which is determined from the design or
response spectrum based on the modal natural frequency and the modal mass.

Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop a seismic analysis of MDOF (Multi-
Degree of Freedom) Structure based on Response Spectrum Method. This analysis tool is written in
Written by: Rith Makara 2
MATLAB software to determine structural responses or a combined response of each mode shape.

This report is divided into three main sections. Section one describes the introduction of
seismic analysis, analysis method and the purpose of this report. In section two, literature review of
seismic analysis method and the development procedure are indicated. The application of seismic
analysis tools in MATLAB software are reported in section three.

2. METHODOLOGY

2.1 Procedure of Research

Seismic analysis of MDOF structure is linearly developed based on Response Spectrum

Analysis Method. MDOF structure is considered as symmetric plan system and composed of
lumped mass and stiffness of each floor of the structure as shown in Fig. 2. The damping ratio
corresponding to the category of building is assumed. Ground motion acceleration due to
earthquake activity is required as the input of this analysis. Further, the response spectra are
developed in MATLAB to determine the peak response of each mode shape based on its modal
natural frequency and modal mass. Afterward, the equivalent static lateral force of each floor is
automatically computed in MATLAB based on the Response Spectrum Analysis approach.

Fig. 2. Two Story Building of MDOF System

2.2 Response Spectrum Construction

Response spectrum is a plot of the maximum response (maximum displacement, velocity,

acceleration, or any other quantity of interest to a specified load function for all possible SDOF
system (Mario, 1980). The abscissa of the spectrum is the natural frequency (or period) of the
system, and the ordinate of the maximum response as shown in Fig. 3.

Written by: Rith Makara 3

Fig. 3. (a) Ground Acceleration, (b) Deformation Response of Three SDOF System with Damping
Ratio ζ=2% and Tn=0.5, 1, and 2sec; (c) Deformation Response Spectrum for ζ=2%

The response spectrum for a given ground motion component 𝑢𝑔̈ (𝑡) can be developed by
implementation of the following steps:

① Numerically define the ground acceleration 𝑢𝑔̈ (𝑡); typically, the ground motion ordinates
are defined at every 0.02 sec.

② Select the natural vibration period T n and damping ratio ζ of an SDF system.

③ Compute the deformation response u(t) of this SDF system due to the ground motion 𝑢𝑔̈ (𝑡)
by numerical method: Newmark’s Method for Linear System. In obtaining the responses as
shown in Fig. 3, the exact solution of Eq.1 for ground motion assumed to be piecewise
linear over every ∆t = 0.02 sec was used. Procedure of Newmark’s Method is illustrated in
Table 1.

ü + 2𝜁𝜔𝑛 u̇ + 𝜔𝑛 2 u = −ü 𝑔 (𝑡) [Eq. 1]

Written by: Rith Makara 4

 Table 1. Newmark's Method: Linear Systems (Chopra, 2012)

④ Determine u 0 , the peak value of u(t).

⑤ The spectral ordinates are D=u 0 , V=(2π/T n )D, and A=(2π/T n )2D.

⑥ Repeat steps 2 to 5 or a range of T n and ζ values covering all possible systems of

engineering interest.

⑦ Present the results of steps 2 to 6 graphically to produce three separate spectra like those in
Fig. 4(A) or a combined spectrum like the one in Fig. 4(B)

(A) (B)

Fig. 4. (A) Response Spectra (ζ=0.02) for EL Centro ground motion: (a) deformation response
spectrum; (b) pseudo-velocity response spectrum; (c) pseudo-acceleration response spectrum; (B)
Combined D-V-A response spectrum for El Centro ground motion; ζ=0, 2, 5, 10, and 20%

Written by: Rith Makara 5

2.3 Response Spectrum Analysis Method

Response Spectrum Analysis (RSA) is not an exact predictor of peak response, but it
provides an estimate that is sufficient accurate for structural design applications. MDOF systems are
usually analyzed using Modal Analysis. This system when subjected to ground motion undergoes
deformations in number of possible ways. These deformed shapes are known as modes of vibration
or mode shapes. Each shape is vibrating with a particular frequency. Total unique modes for each
MDOF system are equal to the possible degree of freedom of system. The equation of motion for
MDOF system is given by Eq. 2.

[𝑚]ü + [𝑐]u̇ + [𝑘]u = −[𝑚]{𝑟}ü 𝑔 (𝑡) [Eq. 2]

Where: [m] = Mass Matrix; [k] = Stiffness Matrix; [c] = Damping Matrix and
{r}=influence Coefficient Vector

The procedure to compute the peak response of an N-story building with plan symmetric
about two orthogonal axes to earthquake ground motion along an axis of symmetry, characterized
by a response spectrum or design spectrum, is summarized in step-by-step form:

① Define the structural properties

A. Determine the mass matrix [m] and lateral stiffness matrix [k]

B. Estimate the modal damping ratio

Table 2. Recommended Damping Values (Chopra, 2012)

② Determine the natural frequencies ωn (natural periods T n = 2π/ωn ) and natural modes φn of
vibration by characteristic equation (Eq.3):

Written by: Rith Makara 6

 {[𝑘] − 𝜔𝑖2 [𝑚]}𝜙𝑖 = 0 [Eq. 3]

Where: ω i 2 = Eigen values of the ith mode

φ i = Eigen vector or mode shape of the ith mode

ω i = Natural Frequency in the ith mode

③ Compute the peak response in the nth mode by the following steps to be repeated for all
modes, n = 1,2,……,N:

A. Corresponding to natural period T n and damping ratio ζ n , read D n and A n , the

deformation and pseudo-acceleration, from the earthquake response spectrum or
the design spectrum

B. Compute the floor displacements (Eq. 4)and story drifts (Eq. 5)

u𝑗𝑗 = Γ𝑛 𝜙𝑗𝑗 𝐷𝑛 [Eq. 4]

Δ𝑗𝑗 = Γ𝑛 �𝜙𝑗𝑗 − 𝜙𝑗−1,𝑛 �𝐷𝑛 [Eq. 5]

Where D n = D(T n ,ζ n ), the deformation spectrum ordinate corresponding to natural

period T n and damping ratio ζ n ; D n = A n /ω2 n

Γ n = Modal participation factor for ith mode expressed by:

{𝜙 }𝑇 [𝑚]{𝑟}
Γ𝑖 = {𝜙 𝑖}𝑇 [𝑚]{𝜙 } [Eq. 6]
𝑖 𝑖

j = Mode Shape Number

n= Floor Number

C. Compute the equivalent static lateral forces f n from Eq. 7

f𝑗𝑗 = Γ𝑛 𝑚𝑗 𝜙𝑗𝑗 𝐴𝑛 [Eq.7]

D. Compute the story forces-shear and overturning moment-and element force-

bending moments and shears by static analysis of the structure subjected to lateral
forces f n

④ Determine an estimate for the peak value r of any response quantity by combing the peak
modal values r n according to the SRSS (Square Root of Sum of Squares) rule, Eq. 8.

r𝑚𝑚𝑚 = �∑𝑛𝑖=1 ∑𝑛𝑗=1 𝑟𝑖 𝛼𝑖𝑖 𝑟𝑗 [Eq.8]

Written by: Rith Makara 7

3. APPLICATION IN MATLAB

Seismic Analysis of MDOF system based on Response Spectrum Analysis approach is

developed in MATLAB. Five MATLAB files are written to perform the analysis. Those are

 A_ground_input.m: Input of Ground Motion Acceleration (Appendix 1)

 Input_file.m: Input of MDOF Structure Properties (Appendix 2)

 newmark_modified.m: Response Spectra Construction based on Newmark’s Method

(Appendix 3)

 modal_analysis.m: Calculation file based on Response Spectrum Analysis approach

(Appendix 4)

 Output_Modal_Analysis.m: Results from Response Spectrum Analysis approach.

(Appendix 5)

The procedure of using this tool is described as following:

Step 1: Insert the acceleration of ground motion in the A_ground_input.m file.

Step 2: Insert the number of floor, mass and stiffness of each floor in the input_file.m
file. Damping ratio corresponding to the building type is also input. Additionally,
choose the number of mode to display the displacement animation of the
selected mode shape.

Step 3: Run the input_file.m file and then the displacement animation of the building
will be displayed as shown in Fig. 5.

Step 4: Results from Responses Spectrum Analysis can be found in the

Output_Modal_Analysis.m file.

Written by: Rith Makara 8

 Fig. 5. Displacement Animation at each Floor for a given Mode Shape

REFERENCES

Chopra, M., 2012. Structural dynamics: theory and computation. Springer Science & Business

Mario, P. and William, L., 1980. Structural dynamics, theory and computation. Varl Nostrand
Reinkold, New York.

Written by: Rith Makara 9

 Appendix 1 – A_ground_input.m

% El Centro Ground Motion

At=[0 0
0.02 0.0063
0.04 0.00364
0.06 0.00099
0.08 0.00428
0.1 0.00758
0.12 0.01087
0.14 0.00682
0.16 0.00277
0.18 -0.00128
0.2 0.00368
0.22 0.00864
0.24 0.0136
0.26 0.00727
0.28 0.00094
0.3 0.0042
0.32 0.00221
0.34 0.00021
0.36 0.00444
0.38 0.00867
…];

Written by: Rith Makara 10

 Appendix 2 – Input_file.m

clc
clear

%Please Insert the following information

% FL.Nº Mass,m [kg] Stiffness,k [N/m]
input = [1 10000 16357.5e3
2 10000 16357.5e3
3 10000 16357.5e3
4 10000 16357.5e3
5 10000 16357.5e3
6 5000 16357.5e3 ];

%Damping Ratio, zeta

zeta = 0.02;

%Acceleration Groundmotion Data

A_ground_input

%Animation - Choose Mode Number of Vibration to show

Mode_Numb=1;

%Call modal_analysis.m to run the Modal analysis

modal_analysis

Written by: Rith Makara 11

 Appendix 3 – newmark_modified.m

%Function of Newmark's Method: Linear System

%Tn - Period
%zeta - Damping Ratio
%delta_t - Time step
%At - Acceleration of Ground Motion
function [Resp] = newmark_modified(Tn,zeta,delta_t,At)
%Initial Condition
gamma = 0.5;
beta = 1/6;
m = 10000; %Assumption of Mass of system
k = m*(2*pi/Tn)^2; %Stiffness of System
c = zeta*2*sqrt(k*m); %Damping

%Initial Calculation
[x,y] = size(At); %Determine the number of ti
a1 = (m/(beta*(delta_t^2))) + (gamma/(beta*delta_t))*c;
a2 = (m/(beta*delta_t)) + ((gamma/beta)-1)*c;
a3 = m*((0.5/beta)-1) + delta_t*((gamma/(2*beta))-1)*c;
k_prime = k + a1;
Resp = zeros(x,4);
Resp(1,1) = At(1,1);
Resp(1,3) = 0; %Initial Velocity
Resp(1,2) = 0; %Initial Displacement
Resp(1,4) = (-m*9.81*At(1,2)-(c*Resp(1,3))-(k*Resp(1,2)))/m;

for i = 2:x
p_prim = -m*9.81*At(i,2)+a1*Resp(i-1,2)+a2*Resp(i-1,3)+a3*Resp(i-1,4);
Resp(i,1) = At(i,1);
Resp(i,2) = p_prim/k_prime;
Resp(i,3) = (gamma/(beta*delta_t))*(Resp(i,2)-Resp(i-1,2))+(1-
(gamma/beta))*Resp(i-1,3) + delta_t*(1-(gamma/(2*beta)))*Resp(i-1,4);
Resp(i,4) = (1/(beta*delta_t^2))*(Resp(i,2)-Resp(i-1,2))-
(1/(beta*delta_t))*Resp(i-1,3)-(1/(2*beta)-1)*Resp(i-1,4);
end

Written by: Rith Makara 12

 Appendix 4 – modal_analysis.m

% Construction of Mass Matrix

[DOF ay] = size(input);
M = zeros(DOF,DOF);
for i = 1:DOF
M(i,i) = input(i,2);
end

% Construction of Stiffness Matrix

K = zeros(DOF,DOF);
for i = 1:DOF
if i < DOF
K(i,i) = input(i,3)+input(i+1,3);
K(i+1,i) = -input(i+1,3);
K(i,i+1) = -input(i+1,3);
else
K(i,i) = input(i,3);
end
end

%Finding Eigenvalue (Natural Frequency) and Eigenvectors (Mode Shape)

[p w2] = eig(K,M);
% w : Natural Frequency
w = sort(sqrt(diag(w2)));
for i = 1:DOF
if p(1,i) < 0
p(:,i) = -p(:,i);
end
% phi : Mode Shape
phi(:,i) = p(:,i)/p(1,i);

% r : Influence Coefficient Vector

r(i,:) = 1;
end

for i = 1:DOF
% Calculate Modal Participation Factors
% Gamma
gamma(i,:) = phi(:,i)'*M*r/(phi(:,i)'*M*(phi(:,i)));

% T : Natural Period
Tn(i,:) = 2*pi/w(i,:);

end

% Find Sd and An from Response Spectrum Corresponding to T and zeta

% Following Response Spectrum
Ud_t = zeros(length(At),DOF+2);
for i = 1:DOF % i : number of mode
Resp = newmark_modified(Tn(i),zeta,0.02,At);
for j = 1:DOF % j : number of floor
% Maximum Displacement at each floor for each mode shape
Ud(j,1)= j;
Ud(j,i+1)= gamma(i)*phi(j,i)*max(abs(Resp(:,2)));

% Equivalent Static Lateral Forces fn for each mode shape

fn(j,1) = j;
fn(j,i+1) = gamma(i)*input(j,2)*phi(j,i)*Ud(j,i+1)*w(i)^2;

[Continue…]

Written by: Rith Makara 13

 [Continue…]

end
%Sd(i,3)= Sd(i,2)*2*pi/Tn(i); %Pseudo-Velocity Response
%Sd(i,4)= Sd(i,2)*(2*pi/Tn(i))^2/9.81; %Pseudo-Accleration Response
end

Ud;
fn;
Ud_t;

% Modal Combination Rule

% 1. Absolute Sum (ABSSUM) Method
% 2. Square root of sum of squares (SRSS) Method, and
% 3. Complete quadratic combination (CQC) Method

% Displacement - Modal Combination Rule

% 1. Absolute Sum (ABSSUM) Method
ABSSUM_DISP = ABSSUM(Ud);

% 2. Square Root of Sum of Squares (SRSS) Method,

SRSS_DISP = SRSS(Ud);

% Equivalent Static Lateral Forces - Modal Combination Rule

% 1. Absolute Sum (ABSSUM) Method
ABSSUM_fn = ABSSUM(fn);

% 2. Square Root of Sum of Squares (SRSS) Method,

SRSS_fn = SRSS(fn);

% Print the Result Output.m

FID = fopen('Output_Modal_Analysis.m','w');
fprintf(FID,'Gangneung-Wonju National Unversity\n');
fprintf(FID,'Civil Engineering Department\n');
fprintf(FID,'Advanced Structural Analysis - MDOFs Modal Analysis of Dynamic
Structure\n');
fprintf(FID,'Prof. \n');
fprintf(FID,'Student Name: Rith Makara\n');
fprintf(FID,'StudentID: 20168061\n\n');
fprintf(FID,' MDOFs Modal Analysis Result\n');
fprintf(FID,'----------------------------------------------------------------------
------\n');

%Print the Input Parameters

fprintf(FID,'I. Input\n');
fprintf(FID,' Floor Nº Mass,m [kg] Stiffness,k [N/m] Damping Ratio,
Zeta\n');
for i = 1:DOF
fprintf(FID,' %g %4.0f %4.0f %4.3f\n',i,input(
i,2),input(i,3),zeta);
end

%Print the Results

%Natural Frequency, Omega (Eigenvalue) and Natural Period, Tn
fprintf(FID,'\n\nII. Results\n');
fprintf(FID,' II.1. Natural Frequency, Omega (Eigenvalue) and Natural Period,
Tn\n');
fprintf(FID,' Mode Nº w[] Tn []\n');
for i = 1:DOF
fprintf(FID,' %g %4.3f %4.3f\n',i,w(i),Tn(i));
end

%Mode Shape (Eigenvector)

fprintf(FID,' \n\n II.2. Mode Shape, phi (Eigenvector)\n');
fprintf(FID,' Mode Floor Nº Mode Shape,phi\n');
for i = 1:DOF
for j = 1:DOF
[Continue…]

Written by: Rith Makara 14

 [Continue…]

for j = 1:DOF
fprintf(FID,' %g %g %4.3f\n',i,j,phi(j,i));
end
end

%Modal Participation Factor (gamma)

fprintf(FID,' \n\n II.3. Modal Participation Factor (gamma)\n');
fprintf(FID,' Mode Nº gamma\n');
for i = 1:DOF
fprintf(FID,' %g %4.3f\n',i,gamma(i));
end

%Displacement and Pseudo-Acceleration Response Spectrum Corresponding to

%each mode shape
fprintf(FID,' \n\n II.4. Displacement Response Spectrum Corresponding to each mode
shape\n');
fprintf(FID,' Mode Nº Tn zeta Sd\n');
for i = 1:DOF
Resp = newmark_modified(Tn(i),zeta,0.02,At);
fprintf(FID,' %g %4.3f %4.3f %4.5f\n',i,Tn(i),zeta,max(abs(Resp(
:,2))));
end

%Modal Analysis Response: Displacement at each Floor

fprintf(FID,' \n\n II.5. Modal Analysis Response: Displacement at each Floor\n');
fprintf(FID,' Mode Floor Nº Ud [m]\n');
for i = 1:DOF
for j = 1:DOF
fprintf(FID,' %g %g %4.5f\n',i,j,Ud(j,i+1));
end
end

%Modal Combination Method - Displacement

fprintf(FID,' \n\n Modal Combination Method ABSSUM & SRSS - Displacement at each
floor');
fprintf(FID,' \n Floor Nº ABSSUM [m] SRSS [m]\n');
for i = 1:DOF
fprintf(FID,' %g %4.5f %4.5f\n',i,ABSSUM_DISP(i),SRSS_DISP(
i));
end

%Modal Analysis Response: Equivalent Lateral Force at each Floor

fprintf(FID,' \n\n II.6. Modal Analysis Response: Equivalent Lateral Force at each
Floor\n');
fprintf(FID,' Mode Floor Nº fn [N]\n');
for i = 1:DOF
for j = 1:DOF
fprintf(FID,' %g %g %4.3f\n',i,j,fn(j,i+1));
end
end

%Modal Combination Method - Equivalent Lateral Force at each floor

fprintf(FID,' \n\n Modal Combination Method ABSSUM & SRSS - Equivalent Lateral
Force at each floor');
fprintf(FID,' \n Floor Nº ABSSUM [N] SRSS [N]\n');
for i = 1:DOF
fprintf(FID,' %g %4.3f %4.3f\n',i,ABSSUM_fn(i),SRSS_fn(i));
end

close all
y=0:DOF;
%Animation of Displacement and Time
% Displacement at time t (For animation)

Resp_t = newmark_modified(Tn(Mode_Numb),zeta,0.02,At);
[Continue…]

Written by: Rith Makara 15

 [Continue…]

for j= 1:DOF
for t=1:length(At)
Ud_t(t,1)= At(t,1);
Ud_t(t,2)= 0;
Ud_t(t,j+2)= (gamma(Mode_Numb)*phi(j,Mode_Numb)*(Resp_t(t,2)));
end
end

%Plot Animation Figure

for i = 1:length(Ud_t)
cla;
subplot(2,1,1);
plot(At(:,1),At(:,2),'b',[At(i,1) At(i,1)] ,[-0.4;0.4],'r');
title('Acceleration Ground Motion','Color','b');
xlabel('Time [sec]');
ylabel('Acceleration [g]');
subplot(2,1,2);
f = plot(Ud_t(i,2:(DOF+2)),y','-
o','LineWidth',2,'MarkerSize',8,'MarkerFaceColor',[.49 1 .63]);
title(['Displacement of each floor for Mode ',num2str(Mode_Numb)],'Color','b');
xlabel('Displacement [m]');
ylabel('Floor Nº');
if Mode_Numb > 1
x_minus = -3*10^-Mode_Numb;
x_plus = 3*10^-Mode_Numb;
else
x_minus = -0.3;
x_plus = 0.3;
end
axis([x_minus x_plus 0 DOF+2]);
drawnow
movegui(f,'center');
%pause(0.01);
end

Written by: Rith Makara 16

 Appendix 5 – Output_Modal_Analysis.m

Gangneung-Wonju National Unversity

Civil Engineering Department
Advanced Structural Analysis - MDOFs Modal Analysis of Dynamic Structure
Student Name: Rith Makara
StudentID: 20168061

MDOFs Modal Analysis Result

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Input
Floor Nº Mass,m [kg] Stiffness,k [N/m] Damping Ratio, Zeta
1 10000 16357500 0.020
2 10000 16357500 0.020
3 10000 16357500 0.020
4 10000 16357500 0.020
5 10000 16357500 0.020
6 5000 16357500 0.020

II. Results
II.1. Natural Frequency, Omega (Eigenvalue) and Natural Period, Tn
Mode Nº w[] Tn []
1 10.558 0.595
2 30.955 0.203
3 49.242 0.128
4 64.173 0.098
5 74.732 0.084
6 80.197 0.078

II.2. Mode Shape, phi (Eigenvector)

Mode Floor Nº Mode Shape,phi
1 1 1.000
1 2 1.932
1 3 2.732
1 4 3.346
1 5 3.732
1 6 3.864
2 1 1.000
2 2 1.414
2 3 1.000
2 4 0.000
2 5 -1.000
2 6 -1.414
3 1 1.000
3 2 0.518
3 3 -0.732
3 4 -0.897
3 5 0.268
3 6 1.035
4 1 1.000
4 2 -0.518
4 3 -0.732
4 4 0.897
4 5 0.268
4 6 -1.035
5 1 1.000
5 2 -1.414
5 3 1.000
5 4 -0.000
5 5 -1.000
5 6 1.414
6 1 1.000
6 2 -1.932
6 3 2.732
6 4 -3.346
6 5 3.732
6 6 -3.864
[Continue…]

Written by: Rith Makara 17

 II.3. Modal Participation Factor (gamma)
Mode Nº gamma
1 0.328
2 0.285
3 0.210
4 0.124
5 0.049
6 0.006

II.4. Displacement Response Spectrum Corresponding to each mode shape

Mode Nº Tn zeta Sd
1 0.595 0.020 0.07853
2 0.203 0.020 0.01043
3 0.128 0.020 0.00325
4 0.098 0.020 0.00180
5 0.084 0.020 0.00105
6 0.078 0.020 0.00103

II.5. Modal Analysis Response: Displacement at each Floor

Mode Floor Nº Ud [m]
1 1 0.02573
1 2 0.04971
1 3 0.07030
1 4 0.08610
1 5 0.09603
1 6 0.09942
2 1 0.00297
2 2 0.00420
2 3 0.00297
2 4 0.00000
2 5 -0.00297
2 6 -0.00420
3 1 0.00068
3 2 0.00035
3 3 -0.00050
3 4 -0.00061
3 5 0.00018
3 6 0.00071
4 1 0.00022
4 2 -0.00012
4 3 -0.00016
4 4 0.00020
4 5 0.00006
4 6 -0.00023
5 1 0.00005
5 2 -0.00007
5 3 0.00005
5 4 -0.00000
5 5 -0.00005
5 6 0.00007
6 1 0.00001
6 2 -0.00001
6 3 0.00002
6 4 -0.00002
6 5 0.00002
6 6 -0.00002

Modal Combination Method ABSSUM & SRSS - Displacement at each floor

Floor Nº ABSSUM [m] SRSS [m]
1 0.02966 0.02591
2 0.05446 0.04989
3 0.07400 0.07036
4 0.08693 0.08610
5 0.09931 0.09608
6 0.10465 0.09951

II.6. Modal Analysis Response: Equivalent Lateral Force at each Floor

Mode Floor Nº fn [N]
1 1 9398.188
1 2 35074.516
1 3 70149.032
1 4 105223.549
1 5 130899.877
1 6 70149.032
[Continue…]

Written by: Rith Makara 18

 2 1 8090.140
2 2 16180.279
2 3 8090.140
2 4 0.000
2 5 8090.140
2 6 8090.140
3 1 3471.098
3 2 930.078
3 3 1860.156
3 4 2790.234
3 5 249.214
3 6 1860.156
4 1 1133.396
4 2 303.693
4 3 607.385
4 4 911.078
4 5 81.374
4 6 607.385
5 1 140.200
5 2 280.401
5 3 140.200
5 4 0.000
5 5 140.200
5 6 140.200
6 1 2.129
6 2 7.947
6 3 15.894
6 4 23.840
6 5 29.658
6 6 15.894

Modal Combination Method ABSSUM & SRSS - Equivalent Lateral Force at each floor
Floor Nº ABSSUM [N] SRSS [N]
1 22235.152 12927.841
2 52776.914 38640.123
3 80862.807 70641.249
4 108948.701 105264.482
5 139490.462 131149.980
6 80862.807 70641.249

Written by: Rith Makara 19

View publication stats