“REVOCATION OF BONDS”

STRATEGIC CONCEPTS & EXECUTION

1). The idea, or the concepts, of revoking the “Fidelity/Surety/Performance Bonds”

of corrupt Public Officials, is not, necessarily, new, as a number of corrupt Public
Officials, over time, have been forced to vacate their offices for their lack of “Fidelity,”
“Surety,” and/or their “Performance.” Unfortunately, most of these cases have been
“permanently sealed” by the Courts.

2). Usurping the Courts, then, becomes the Number #1 consideration for this
“Revocation Program.” The Courts, as we will agree, can ONLY be “Open for
Business” BY THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE! Without the CONSENT, or the WILL, of
the “PEOPLE,” the Court is NOT permitted, nor allowed, to have JURISDICTION,
AUTHORITY, or DISCRETION!

A). Hereʼs a very simple analogy.

If you have a “fender-bender” with a fellow motorist, the first thing you do, is to
exchange “Contact Information,” and “Insurance Information.” Both drivers produce
“ICONS,” or the “Contracts” they have showing “Who they are,” “Their addresses,”
“Their phone numbers,” and that, they are current in their “Sureties,” or their
obligations to keep their “Premiums” to their “Insurers” up to date. Both drivers have
an “Obligation” to “Serve” the other “Person” his “Surety,” or present an opportunity
to the other driver a measure of “Relief,” once the two “individuals” have “agreed,” or
“consented” on who is at fault, and who is “entitled” to this measure of “relief.”

Often times, however, these two individuals cannot agree on whoʼs at fault, and who
is due relief, and must depend on law enforcement to reconstruct the accident, where
the accident report is submitted during the claimʼs process to the “Insurers.” Insurance
agents have some of the best lawyers in the business, who then contact the legal
representative of the other “Insurer.” After “NEGOTIATIONS,” an “AGREEMENT” is
reached between the two “Insurers,” and this “AGREEMENT,” or “CONSENT”
between parties, often results in a measure of “RELIEF” from the “Insurer” of the
driver declared to be at fault. All of this happens WITHOUT the ʻinvolvement,ʼ
ʻintrusion,ʼ the “Jurisdiction,” or the “Authority” of the Courts.

The very last thing either “Insurer” wants, is to have the government involved in
determining “fault,” and “relief,” and messing with their “Bottom Line,” when they,
themselves, as “PEOPLE,” are capable of coming to an “AGREEMENT.” This is not to
say, that, the judiciary does not want to get involved in tons of cases, particularly, when
there is ʻbodily injury,ʼ but even then, lawyers do not like splitting up the pie anymore
than they have to. And, anytime a lawyer must go to the Courts, itʼs going to cost the
“Insurer” a bigger piece of the pie!

3). When reviewing, or implementing this “Revocation Program,” think of two well-
known strategy games; “Dominoes,” and “The Shell Game.” Oh, and donʼt think
about it as a game of “Chess.” “Chess” can be much, too, complicated for most
people, and lawyers love to play “Chess!” It makes them look smarter, than they really
are, and just the idea of “Chess,” makes these attorneys meaner, and more
competitive! No one, especially, a CU Law School graduate, likes to to be known as
“the one who lost a chess match!” Itʼs an “EGO” thing! This “Program” is a simple
plan, drawn on centuryʼs-old strategy, a bit of randomness, chance, and a dollup of luck!

A). Nearly everyone has played “Dominoes,” and most have taken the time,
usually between rounds of “real dominoes,” to stage a beautiful line up of these classic
game pieces, with the anticipation of tapping the first domino in the line, and watching
the “orderly” crescendo, as the pieces collapse. If all the pieces in the chain, or chains,
are aligned, correctly, every domino in the chain will fall with rythmic splendor! The
important thing to consider, here, is that, ALL Games, including Dominoes, have a
beginning, and they have an end! Games that go on forever, ie; “Monopoly,” are no
fun, and they are not very sporting! Time constraints must be in place before the first
play, or action.

B). Understanding the “Shell Game,” to be one of the worst, and most vile game
formats ever known to man, is the key to implementing the “Revocation Program.” The
“Shell Game” has, always, been, and shall, forever, remain, a ʻone-sidedʻ affair, and this
is the “game of choice” of the Courts! Think about it this way. The ʻhost,ʼ or
ʻmanipulator,ʼ of the three shells, and the pea, will win 95% of time, making this type of
game immoral, unethical, and in some cases, illegal! No one, in their right mind, should,
ever, volunteer, or “CONSENT” to play the “Shell Game!”

The Courts, like street corner con artists, have constructed the illusion, that, in order
to have a “CHANCE” at “Liberty,” “Justice,” “Freedom,” “Relief,” or whatever, you must
play their “Shell Game,” because they have everyone “believing,” that they have
possession, and the ultimate control over your “Liberties,” “Lives,” “Freedoms,”
“Intellect,” “Welfare,” and “Well-being!”

The “Shell Game,” from start to finish, is nothing more than a LIE! DO NOT PLAY
THE SHELL GAME! If you see the “Shell Game” being played, your first duty is to try
to expose it, and try to protect your friends, family, neighbors, and the public from harm,
and to call in the SHERIFF, or the MARSHAL! If the Sheriff, or Marshal, does not do
his duty to protect, serve, and defend, the PEOPLE, “Revoke their Bonds!
 Some folks, especially lawyers, and judges, think that, “Life” is just a game, and
these people are very, very, good at conning others to play along. There are many
good, wholesome, games out there to play, but, the “Shell game,” is not one of them!
Play the “Shell Game,” and you will LOSE! Itʼs, really, that Simple!

4). The “Mechanics” of “Bond Revocation” are as simple as the concepts,

themselves. To implement this “Program,” you MUST INVOKE YOUR RIGHTS at
EVERY TURN! There are a variety of different approaches, and all approaches may
need some finessing, but, you may want to use the following format.

CONTENTS

1). “CONTACT INFORMATION”: Page #3

2). “PREFACE”: Pages #4-5

3). “BACKGROUND & CASE HISTORY”: Pages #5-6

4). “CRIME VICTIMʼS STATEMENT”: Pages #7-9

5). “CRIME VICTIMʼS CLAIM FOR RELIEF”: Page #9-10

6). “ORDER FOR REVOCATION OF BONDS”: Page #10-11

7). “LIST OF EXHIBITS”: Page #11

8). “LEGAL DEFINITIONS”: Page #11-13

9). “TRUE BILL OF INDICTMENT (a.k.a. “BILL OF PARTICULARS)”: #13-32

10). “ASSIGNMENT OF JURISDICTION & AUTHORITY”: Page #32-34

11). “TIME LIMITATIONS”: Page #34

12). “SUMMARY”: Page #34

13). “AFFIDAVIT”: Page #35

14). “CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE”: Page #36

 CURRY

VS.

STATE OF COLORADO
CASES #12CV4622/#12M265
Division #9

MESA COUNTY DISTRICT COURT

GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO

SUBMITTED THIS ____DAY OF OCTOBER, 2013

X____________________________________
Steven Duane Curry; DEFENDANT/CRIME VICTIM/P.A.G.

1
 CONTENTS

1). “CONTACT INFORMATION”: Page #3

2). “PREFACE”: Pages #4-5

3). “BACKGROUND & CASE HISTORY”: Pages #5-6

4). “CRIME VICTIMʼS STATEMENT”: Pages #7-9

5). “CRIME VICTIMʼS CLAIM FOR RELIEF”: Page #9-10

6). “ORDER FOR REVOCATION OF BONDS”: Page #10-11

7). “LIST OF EXHIBITS”: Page #11

8). “LEGAL DEFINITIONS”: Page #11-13

9). “TRUE BILL OF INDICTMENT (a.k.a. “BILL OF PARTICULARS)”: #13-32

10). “ASSIGNMENT OF JURISDICTION & AUTHORITY”: Page #32-34

11). “TIME LIMITATIONS”: Page #34

12). “SUMMARY”: Page #34

13). “AFFIDAVIT”: Page #35

14). “CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE”: Page #36

2
 CONTACT INFORMATION

Mesa County Combined Courts

Mesa County, State of Colorado
Court Address: 125 N. Spruce Street,
Grand Junction, CO 81505

Division #1(Trial Court); Judge Craig P. Henderson

Reference: Case #12M265

Division #12 (Appeals Court); Judge Thomas Deister

Reference: Case #2012CV4622

CRIME VICTIM: Steven Duane Curry

21250 Dave Wood Road
Montrose, CO 81403
(970)-249-8879
email: cwheileg@gmail.com

DEFENDANTS in JOINDER:

A). INSURER: COLORADO INTERGOVERNMENTAL RISK SHARING AGENCY

3665 Cherry Creek N. Drive
Denver, CO 80209
(303)-757-5475
(800)-228-7136

B). City of Grand Junction, Colorado

Physical Address: 250 North 5th Street Grand Junction, C0 81501

City Hall Phone: (970) 244-1509

C). GRAND JUNCTION POLICE DEPARTMENT; A.K.A. “CHIEF JOHN CAMPER;”

A.K.A. “COMMANDER MICHAEL NORDEEN;” A.K.A. “DETECTIVE RYAN
PETROWSKI;”

625 Ute Avenue

Grand Junction, CO 81501

(970)-244-3487

3
D). POLICE CHIEF JOHN CAMPER; A.K.A. “GRAND JUNCTION POLICE
DEPARTMENT;”

625 Ute Avenue

Grand Junction, CO 81501

(970)-244-3487

E). POLICE COMMANDER MICHAEL NORDEEN; A.K.A. “GRAND JUNCTION

POLICE DEPARTMENT;”

625 Ute Avenue

Grand Junction, CO 81501

(970)-244-3487

F). POLICE DETECTIVE RYAN PETROWSKI; A.K.A. “GRAND JUNCTION POLICE

DEPARTMENT;”

625 Ute Avenue

Grand Junction, CO 81501

(970)-244-3487

PREFACE

A). “All persons have certain natural, essential and inalienable rights,
among which may be reckoned the right of enjoying and defending their
lives and liberties; of acquiring, possessing and protecting property; and of
seeking and obtaining their safety and happiness.” Colo. Const. Art. II,
Section 3.

B). “Courts of justice shall be open to every person, and a speedy remedy
afforded for every injury to person, property or character; and right and
justice should be administered without sale, denial or delay.” Colo.
Const. Art. II, Section 6.

C). “No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of
law.” Colo. Const. Art. II, Section 25.

4
D). “"Liberty", as used in this section and section 3 of this article, connotes far more
than mere freedom from physical restraint; it is broad enough to protect one from
governmental interference in the exercise of his intellect, in the formation of opinions, in
the expression of them and in action or inaction dictated by his judgment, or choice in
countless matters of purely personal concern.” Zavilla v. Masse, 112 Colo. 183, 147 P.
2d 823 (1944).

BACKGROUND & CASE HISTORY

NOTE: For a thorough background, case history, and all relevant, and material evidence, and
Unconstitutional Rulings & Violations, all reviewers of this document are encouraged to review
the Public Record available through PACER. Reference Cases #12M265 (State V. Curry-Trial
Court), #2012CV4622 (State V. Curry-Appeals Court), #2013CV86 (Curry V. Blaine Reed
Meteorites), #2013CV98 (Curry V. Colorado School of Mines).

1). Mr. Curry recovered his first meteorites in May of 2009 on his private property in Western
Colorado, and spent the next six months researching his finds.

2). In January, 2010, Mr. Curry presented his findings, and research to Dr. Randy Korotev of
Washington University @ St. Louis, Senior Lunar Geochemist, and the world’s No. #1 authority
in Lunar meteorites.

3). In January, 2010, Mr. Curry sent eight specimens to Actlabs of Ontario, Canada, for
quantitative chemical analyses. All eight analyses confirmed the specimen’s origins as being
Lunar and Martian.

4). Dr. Korotev, despite these analyses, refuted Mr. Curry’s findings, even though the
quantitative chemical analyses were identical to his published findings for other Lunar meteorites
recovered in Northwest Africa, Antarctica, and Australia. Mr. Curry’s continuing research,
uncovered numerous inconsistencies with Dr. Korotev’s published science, and the existence of
the illicit Northwest African Contraband Meteorite Trade.

5). Having refuted this scientific evidence, Mr. Curry charged Dr. Korotev for scientific fraud,
something Dr. Korotev had been charged with in 2002, and in 2006, by Mr. Ray DeRuse, and
others. Dr. Korotev admitted his scientific fraud, but was not prosecuted.

6). In retaliation against Mr. Curry, Dr. Korotev issued an “all-points-bulletin” to his colleagues
around the country, not to assist, or accept submissions from Mr. Curry. His colleagues included
Mr. Adam Hupe, Anne Black, Laurence Garvie, John Wasson, Alan Rubin, Alex Ruzicka,
Melinda Hutson, Matthew Benjamin, Michael Zolenski, and Blaine Reed.

7). Between January 2011, and October 2011, Blaine Reed, knowingly & intentionally, mis-
identified, mis-analyzed, and misrepresented over 40 of Mr. Curry’s Lunar, and Martian
meteorites, calling them “Slag,” “Hematite,” “Dinosaur Dung,” “Carbon Steel,” “Man-Made

5
Slag,” “River Rock,” and “River Cobble.” Mr. Reed, in forging his analyses, used a “rigged”
XRF hand-held analyzer, which only detects and displays “Man-Made Mineral Alloys” and is
incapable of detecting, or displaying, extraterrestrial elements like Nickel, Chromium, Iridium,
Platinum, Osmium, Rhodium, or other extraterrestrial elements. This “rigged” XRF was given
to Mr. Reed to “take out Mr. Curry.”

A). In September, 2011, Mr. Curry filed charges against Mr. Reed for over 40 counts of fraud,
with the Delta City Police, the Montrose District Attorney, and the Montrose County Sheriff.
These charges, though never investigated, were dropped by all three agencies, without any
explanation.

8). On October 1, 2011, Mr. Reed, his brother, Blake, and his wife, Linda T. Sakurai, unlawfully
trespassed into Mr. Curry’s Grand Junction retailer, Main Street Minerals, where they secretely
photographed, and videotaped, their purchase of a six gram specimen belonging to Mr. Curry. To
hide his participation, Mr. Reed had his wife make the purchase on her credit card.

9). On, and before, December 7, 2011, Mr. Reed presented his “altered” and “rigged” evidence
to the Grand Junction Police Department, where GJPD Investigator, Officer Petrowski, and Mr.
Reed, conspired to invent false charges against Mr. Curry, for selling “fake meteorites!” This
interview of Mr. Reed, and Detective Petrowski, was suppressed from the Defendant for over 8
months by the Mesa County District Attorney, and Mr. Curry’s own legal counsel until one day
before the trial, and it was not permitted to be entered as evidence, during Mr. Curry’s trial of
October 18, 2012.

A). Had this video been played for the jury, any juror, of average intelligence, would have
had serious doubts as to Mr. Reed’s honesty, and Officer Petrowski’s honesty, integrity, and his
motivations. Among the many infractions apparent in this video, was Mr. Reed’s numerous
admissions, fabrications, and offering a bribe to Officer Petrowski.

10). On January 24, 2012, Mr. Curry received a call from Officer Petrowski, who requested Mr.
Curry travel to Grand Junction, as he was investigating Mr. Curry’s selling of meteorites in
Grand Junction. This “invitation” by Officer Petrowski was elicited under “false pretences,” as
the facts, and circumstances, of this “Interview” are revealed in the following “CRIME
VICTIM’S STATEMENT.”

6
 CRIME VICTIM’S STATEMENT

1). On January 26, 2012, Mr. Curry was interviewed at the Grand Junction Police Station. The
“interview,” most appropriately referred to as a “custodial interrogation,” lasted approximately
80 minutes, during which time, Officer Petrowski never advised Mr. Curry, that, this “custodial
interrogation” was being videotaped, and audio recorded. And; at no time, did Officer Petrowski
advise Mr. Curry, that he was being “Arrested,” nor did Officer Petrowski, ever, give Mr. Curry
his Miranda Rights. Mr. Curry did not know of his “Arrest,” until two days later, when his
“Arrest” was published in the “Police Blog” in the Daily Sentinel newspaper.

A). On January 28, Mr. Curry spoke with Grand Junction Police Commander, Michael
Nordeen, and inquired about the violations of his rights by Officer Petrowski. Commander
Nordeen responded, “Mr. Curry, you have no rights!” Mr. Curry then asked Commander
Nordeen, “What Oath did you take when you took your position with the Grand Junction
Police?” Mr. Nordeen answered, “I never took an Oath to protect your rights!” Mr. Curry then
asked, again, “What Oath did you take?” Commander Nordeen answered, “I took an Oath to
protect and serve the Constitution!” Mr. Curry replied, “Thank You!” At that point, Mr. Curry
hung up the phone.

2). This brings us up to important issues at hand, and the Defendant, and now, “Crime
Victim of Government Fraud,” is, currently, in possession of “NEWLY DISCOVERED
EVIDENCE,” which will, by all means, and measures, ACQUIT, and EXONERATE, the
Defendant of all ʻfabricated charges,ʼ ʻallegations,ʼ his ʻfalse arrest,ʼ his ʻfalse
arraignment,ʼ ʻfalse prosecution,ʼ his ʻsham trial,ʼ and ʻunlawful convictions,ʼ which were
levied against him;

A). This “Newly Discovered Evidence” consists of the “DVD of Grand Junction
Police Detective, Ryan Petrowskiʼs, January 28, 2012, fraudulent & unlawful interview of
the Defendant,” which was suppressed from the Defendant by his own legal counsel,
and the Mesa County District Attorney, until being shown to the jury, and which was
intentionally redacted by Officer Petrowski, where he had, with the knowledge, consent,
and aid, of Police Chief Camper, Police Commander Nordeen, ʻelectronically,ʼ and/or
ʻdigitally,ʼ removed several segments of this “interview,” to cloak, disguise, and
otherwise cover up their true intentions behind this interview. There are, at least, six,
distinct, electronic, and digital, alterations Officer Petrowski, Commander Nordeen, and
Chief Camper, made to this evidence, and, according to a recognized professional
photographer, and computer professional, who analyzed this video from the beginning
to the end, 1 minute, 21 seconds had been removed. {See Exhibit #A}

3). As the Defendant has, long, suspected, and argued, and Trial Court Audio & Video
records will confirm, that, this “GJPDʼs January 28, 2012, Interview of the
Defendant,” had been, intentionally, ʻaltered,ʼ ʻedited,ʼ and otherwise, ʻredacted,ʼ by
GJPD Detective, Ryan Petrowski, Commander Nordeen, and/or Chief Camper. Clear,
and conclusive proof, that two versions of this “Interview” exists, is in the Trial Courtʼs
Audio & Video Record, where it is clear, that, Deputy District Attorney, Danielle Lewis,

7
asks the Defendantʼs legal counsel, Joshua Stritecky, “Would your client like to have the
jury see the Original, or the Redacted version?”

A). The Defendant answered his legal counsel, “The Original.” What was shown to
the jury, was the “Redacted version,” despite the Defendantʼs request for “The Original.”

B). The “Original Version” of this “Interview,” if it, still, exists, and is made available
for review, will, clearly & conclusively, show the above ʻdigital,ʼ redactions, alterations,
and edits, by Officer Petrowski. The status, and location, of the “Original” DVD of “The
GJPD Interview of the Defendant,” is not known to anyone, except, the Mesa County
District Attorney, Officer Ryan Petrowski, Commander Mike Nordeen, and Chief John
Camper, and the GJPD;

C). Just the fact, that, two versions of this “Custodial Interrogation,” existed in the
first place, should have raised a red flag to anyone in the courtroom, particularly Mr.
Curryʼs defense counsel, and had any of the six jurors not been sleeping, and they had
been encouraged, by Mr. Curryʼs legal counsel, to question as to why an “Original,” and
a “Redacted,” version of the same interview, the prosecution would have had been
forced to answer to this ʻmalicious,ʼ and ʻdeceptiveʼ measure, tactic, and practice.

D). Had “Officer Petrowskiʼs Original Interview of Mr. Curry” been played for the jury,
the jury could not, by any means, or measure, have reached its verdict of guilty, without
serious, and grave, questions as to Officer Petrowskiʼs credibility, honesty,
trustworthiness, and general character.

4). The redaction of the “Original” version of Mr. Curryʼs “Custodial Interrogation” by
Officer Petrowski, could not have been performed without the knowledge and/or
consent of Commander Nordeen, or Police Chief Camper, making all three officers
“Principles,” “Conspirators,” and “Accessories After the Fact,” in the concealment
of material, and exculpatory, evidence, and the coverup of this “Fraud” against Mr.
Curry.

5). The “Redacted version,” shown to the jury, did NOT show what the “Original”
version would have shown, as in;

A). Officer Petrowski chastising, admonishing, humiliating, and arguing with the
Defendant;

B). Officer Petrowski closing, and pushing the Defendantʼs books of evidence back
to the Defendant;

C). Officer Petrowski threatening, and intimidating, the Defendant, to sign the pre-
dated “Traffic Citation” dated “10/01/2011;”

D). Officer Petrowskiʼs refusal to accept Mr. Curryʼs offer of additional samples for
an additional analysis, by an independent lab.

8
 E). Officer Petrowskiʼs critical admonishment, where he stated, “Mr. Curry, you
cannot pull the wool over my eyes, like you have done to the poor people of Montrose.
Iʼm much smarter than that!”

F). Officer Petrowski standing over the Defendant, with his finger in the Defendantʼs
face, and stating, “This is an advisory to you Mr. Curry. You are to get out of the
meteorite business!”

6). Throughout these entire proceedings, and in particular, Mr. Curryʼs sham trial, Mr.
Curry had been deprived of his Rights to Due Process, beginning with Officer
Petrowskiʼs, Commander Nordeen, and Chief Camperʼs, malicious, and egregious,
misconduct, and ending with his false convictions, which were brought on, and
perpetuated by Officer Petrowski, Commander Nordeen, and Chief Camper.

A). At trial, Mr. Curry was NEVER permitted, by Judge Henderson, the prosecuting
Deputy District Attorneys, Lewis, and Ricard, or his own legal counsel, Joshua Stritecky,
to present any material, or exculpatory, evidence in his defense, even though Mr. Curry
has spent hundreds of hours in preparation for the trial, and appeared ready to present
his defense, with volumes of peer-reviewed publications, documents, and artifacts, as
the Trial Court Audio & Video records confirm.

1). As the Trial Courtʼs Audio & Video record will confirm, upon entering the
courtroom, and seeing Mr. Curryʼs evidence, documents, and artifacts, Mr. Stritecky
asked Mr. Curry to remove these items from the defense table. Mr. Curry refused to do
so.

B). At trial, Mr. Curry was NEVER permitted, by Judge Henderson, the prosecuting
Deputy District Attorneys, Lewis, and Ricard, or his own legal counsel, Joshua Stritecky,
to present any witnesses on his behalf, despite the fact, that, Mr. Curry had provided his
legal counsel with a list of TWENTY-FOUR (24) witnesses, and Mr. Stritecky did not
subpeona a single witness. Mr. Stritecky stated to Mr. Curry, “I thought you were
going to do that!”

C). Among the top witnesses Mr. Curry had provided to his legal counsel, were Mr.
Curryʼs dealers in Grand Junction, Kevin & Jamie Mahoney. Mr. Stritecky did not
challenge the District Attorney, when they subpeoned Mr. Curryʼs dealers as “witnesses
for the prosecution,” and, despite the requests of Mr. Curry, Mr. Stritecky did not cross
examine these witnesses as to what their actual experiences were, when Mr. Reed, his
brother, and his wife, trespassed into their shop to commit fraud against Mr. Curry.

9
 CRIME VICTIM’S CLAIM FOR RELIEF

1). As a “CRIME VICTIM,” and with “Injuries,” and “Damages,” sustained at the hands of
“government officials,” and by the “Corporation,” a.k.a. “The City of Grand Junction,” and
“Insured” by a “Corporation,” a.k.a. “Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Agency,” Mr. Curry
will seek the “Maximum” Civil & Criminal Penalties, and restitutions, and protections, afforded
him under the Colorado, and US Constitutions, the Colorado Criminal Code, USC Titles #42,
and Title #18, whether stated in particularity, or not;

2). Given the malicious, egregious, and wrongful nature of these acts against him, Mr. Curry
will seek “Tort & Punitive Damages” for “Injuries” sustained since January 24, 2012, to his
“Person,” “Properties,” “Character,” “Reputation,” “Integrity,” “Welfare,” “Freedoms,” and
“Liberties,” which include known, and unknown, “Injuries” to Mr. Curry, his spouse, and his
family’s “Mental, and Emotional Well-being,” “Their Friendships,” and “Their
Relationships;” all of which, have been damaged well-beyond repair.

A). The hostile, and predatory nature of these “Injuries,” and “Damages,” sustained by the
“Crime Victim” are of such weight, and caliber, as to cause the “Victim,” to invoke his
“RIGHTS” to have Officer Petrowski, Commander Nordeen, and Chief Camper, forever
relieved of their positions, authority, and offices, Immediately, and without “Suspension,”
Without the Trust, or Confidence, of these “Officers” to dispatch their “Duties” with “Fidelity,”
or “Honor,” the General Public, and “The People,” are at risk each day they allow these
individuals to serve as their “Employees,” “Protectors,” and “Defenders,” of their “Rights
Under Law.”

3). In addition to the maximum penalities, fines, restitutions, and protections, afforded by the
LAW, Mr. Curry, as a “CRIME VICTIM OF THE STATE,” and having found no favor,
fairness, or relief, whatsoever, from the Courts, or from any attorney, ie; “Officers of the Court,”
had elected to represent himself, and has been doing so since his “Entry of Appearance,” on
November 7, 2012. As a “Pro Se Litigant,” Mr. Curry is entitled to seek “Attorney Fees,”
“Court Costs & Fees,” and “All Litigation Expenditures,” including his ‘retainment fees’ he
had paid to his legal counsel, Joshua Stritecky, who was fired, prior to sentencing, for his
disloyalty, dishonesty, incompetency, and his failure to protect his client from the “acts of fraud”
wrought by Mr. Reed, Mr. Geller, the Colorado School of Mines, the City of Grand Junction, the
Grand Junction Police Department, Officer Petrowski, Commander Nordeen, and Chief Camper.

A). Mr. Curry is entitled to recover, from “CIRSA,” his “Attorney Fees,” retroactive to
January 24, 2012, at the current market rate of $225.00 per hour. Up, and to, the present time,
Mr. Curry has expended Six Thousand One Hundred Sixty (6,160) Hours in his defense
against this “Government Conspiracy to Commit Fraud,” for a total of $1,386,000.

B). Mr. Curry, and his Spouse, are entitled to recover, from “CIRSA,” their expenditures of
$7,020.00 in “Court Fees,” and “Attorney Retainment Fees.”

10
 C). Mr. Curry, and his Spouse, are entitled to recover, from “CIRSA,” their ‘on-going’
“Expenditures & Costs of Litigation” which are currently $15, 890.00.

ORDER FOR REVOCATION OF BONDS

1). Mr. Curry, as a “CRIME VICTIM,” and Pursuant 18 USC § 3771, is entitled to
“execute” this “Order to Revoke the Fidelity/Surety Bonds” of Officer Petrowski,
Commander Nordeen, and Chief Camper, for all violations stated in the attached “True
Bill of Indictment;”

2). Mr. Curry, as a “CRIME VICTIM,” and Pursuant 18 USC § 3771, is entitled to
“execute” an additional “Revocation of the Fidelity/Surety Bonds” of “The City
of Grand Junction,” but will, in his mercy, reserve this “Right to Execute,” providing
“The City of Grand Junction” acts in “Good Faith,” adheres to its “Fiduciary
Duties,” and remains within its “powers to govern,” by “Officially,” and “Publicly,”
“Revoking the Fidelity/Surety Bonds” for these “Officers,” AND; renouncing the
violations, misconduct, and abrogations of “The Grand Junction Police
Department,” and these three “Officers,” and “Public Servants;”

3). Should it be discovered, that, “The City of Grand Junction,” “The Grand
Junction Police Department,” or the “Colorado Intergovernmental Risk
Agency,” are acting in “Bad Faith,” or intend on “aiding & abetting” these three
“Officers,” in any way, form, or fashion, which may be contrued to be an act contrary to
their “Corporate, or Personal Fiduciary Duties,” Mr. Curry, with his legal, and
lawful, entitlements, will “execute” an “Order to Revoke the Fidelity/Surety
Bonds” of the “The City of Grand Junction,” “The Grand Junction Police
Department,” and the “Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Agency,” with the
U.S. Attorney General, the U.S. Marshal, and the Federal Securities &
Exchange Commission.

A). The “Entitlements” of Mr. Curry, as a “CRIME VICTIM,” and as a

“NATURAL, LIVING, BREATHING, FEELING, and, MERCIFUL, HUMAN BEING, to
“Execute” these “Orders,” are NEVER to be construed as “threats,” but as;

“HIS ORDAINED RIGHTS TO PROTECT & DEFEND HIS FREEDOMS,

AND LIBERTIES, AND TO SEEK OUT JUSTICE FOR HIS DEMANDS OF
RELIEF UNDER COMMON LAW!

Any interpretation to the contrary shall be seen as an abrogation to

these RIGHTS, and will NOT be tolerated!

11
 LIST OF EXHIBITS

1). “Officer Petrowski’s “Original” January 26, 2012 Video Interview of Mr.
Curry;” (Available thru PACER, the Mesa County District Attorney, the Mesa County Combined
Court Clerk, Trial Court Judge Craig P. Henderson, the Grand Junction Police Department--
Case #12M265).

2). “Office Petrowski’s “Redacted” January 26, 2012 Video Interview of Mr.
Curry;” (Available thru PACER, the Mesa County Combined Court Clerk, the Mesa County
District Attorney, Trial Court Judge Craig P. Henderson, Appeals Court Judge Thomas Deister,
the Grand Junction Police Department---Case #12M265, and Case #12CV4622).

3). “Trial Court Audio & Video Record of October 18, 2012, and Audio & Video Record of
October 26, 2012 Sentencing Hearing;” (Available thru PACER----Case #12M265).

4). “Trial Court Transcripts of October 18, 2012, and October 26, 2012; (Available for a
nominal cost of “JUSTICE,” @ $1500.00 thru AZTranz of Phoenix, AZ).

5). “Bona fide, material, and prima facia evidence of the Redaction” performed by Officer
Petrowski, and with the knowledge, and consent of Commander Nordeen, and Chief Camper.
This evidence was analyzed by a professional videotographer, and shows the six plus segments
of film, which were removed from the “Original.” (See Attached).

6). “The CRIME VICTIM’S BILL OF RIGHTS;” (Please see Attached).

LEGAL DEFINITIONS

18 USC § 1016 - Acknowledgment of appearance or oath

Whoever, being an officer authorized to administer oaths or to take and certify

acknowledgments, knowingly makes any false acknowledgment, certificate, or
statement concerning the appearance before him or the taking of an oath or
affirmation by any person with respect to any proposal, contract, bond,
undertaking, or other matter submitted to, made with, or taken on behalf of the
United States or any department or agency thereof, concerning which an oath or
affirmation is required by law or lawful regulation, or with respect to the
financial standing of any principal, surety, or other party to any such proposal,
contract, bond, undertaking, or other instrument, shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

FIDUCIARY

12
A person owing a fiduciary duty to another.

DEFINITION FROM NOLO’S PLAIN-ENGLISH LAW DICTIONARY

“A person or company that has the power and obligation to act for another
under circumstances which require total trust, good faith, and honesty.
Fiduciaries can include trustees, business advisers, attorneys, guardians,
administrators of estates, real estate agents, bankers, stock brokers, title
companies, or anyone who undertakes to assist someone who places complete
confidence and trust in that person or company.”
Definition provided by Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary.

SURETY BOND

• in business law family law wex definitions

• Sometimes, when a party owes others legal duties, the party posts a
surety bond to guarantee their performance. The surety bond is like a
security deposit, with the party promising to do something as the renter
and person they owe obligations to, or obligee, is like the landlord. Thus,
if the party that made the promise fails to perform their duty, the obligee
is compensated out of the bond. 
Surety bonds are most frequently used to secure fiduciary relationships, and
international, large, or complex transactions . For example, many jurisdictions
require guardians to post a surety bond before formally taking responsibility for
their wards. Similarly, a company making a large purchase from a foreign
supplier might require the supplier to post a surety bond.

31 USC § 9303 - Use of eligible obligations instead of surety bonds

(a) If a person is required under a law of the United States to give a surety bond, the
person may give an eligible obligation as security instead of a surety bond. The
obligation shall—

(1) be given to the official having authority to approve the surety bond;
(2) as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, have a market value that is
equal to or greater than the amount of the required surety bond; and
(3) authorize the official receiving the obligation to collect or sell the
obligation if the person defaults on a required condition.

13
RULE 65.1. PROCEEDINGS AGAINST A SURETY

Whenever these rules (including the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or

Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions) require or allow a party to give
security, and security is given through a bond or other undertaking with one or
more sureties, each surety submits to the court's jurisdiction and
irrevocably appoints the court clerk as its agent for receiving service of
any papers that affect its liability on the bond or undertaking. The surety's
liability may be enforced on motion without an independent action. The motion
and any notice that the court orders may be served on the court clerk, who
must promptly mail a copy of each to every surety whose address is known.

CRIME VICTIM’S TRUE BILL OF INDICTMENT

(a.k.a. “BILL OF PARTICULARS)

"People have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present "True
Bills" of indictment to a court, which is then required to commence a criminal
proceeding. -- United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352
(1992)

A). The DEFENDANT, a.k.a. “The CRIME VICTIM,” and “AFFIANT;”

PURSUANT “THE LAW OF THE LAND,” HIS “INALIENABLE RIGHTS,” and
HIS “NATURAL LAW;” having been ‘wrongfully & fraudulently accused,”
‘falsely & deceptively detained,’ ‘falsely charged,’ ‘falsely arrested,’ ‘falsely
arraigned,’ ‘falsely finger-printed & mug shot,’ ‘falsely prosecuted,’
‘falsely tried,’ ‘falsely convicted,’ and ‘falsely sentenced;’

...........DOES, on this DAY, THE ____ DAY OF OCTOBER, 2013, INVOKE, and
EXERCISE, these “RIGHTS,” and “PROTECTIONS,” afforded him, to,
“LAWFULLY,” ‘CHARGE,’ ‘INDICT,‘ AND ‘HOLD ACCOUNTABLE,’ the
“PERPETRATORS OF THESE CRIMES,” known to all PEOPLE, as;

“The City of Grand Junction, Colorado,” a.k.a. “The Grand Junction Police
Department,” a.k.a. “Grand Junction Police Chief, John Camper,” a.k.a.
“Grand Junction Police Commander, Michael Nordeen,” a.k.a. “Grand
Junction Police Detective, Ryan Petrowski,” and the “Colorado
Intergovenmental Risk Agency,” a.k.a. “Fidelity & Surety Bond Insurers”
for “The City of Grand Junction,” and for the “individuals,” “public servants,”

14
and/or the “public law enforcement officers,” so named in these “Charges,” and
“Indictments;”

1). AND; PURSUANT 18 USC § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of

law, which states;

“Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom,

willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth,
Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or
immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United
States;”

2). AND; Pursuant 18 USC § 3771 - Crime victims’ rights

(a) Rights of Crime Victims.— A crime victim has the following rights:

(1) The right to be reasonably protected from the accused.

(2) The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court
proceeding, or any parole proceeding, involving the crime or of any release or
escape of the accused.
(3) The right not to be excluded from any such public court proceeding,
unless the court, after receiving clear and convincing evidence, determines that
testimony by the victim would be materially altered if the victim heard other
testimony at that proceeding.
(4) The right to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the district
court involving release, plea, sentencing, or any parole proceeding.
(5) The reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government in the
case.
(6) The right to full and timely restitution as provided in law.
(7) The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay.
(8) The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim’s
dignity and privacy.
(b) Rights Afforded.—
(1) In general.— In any court proceeding involving an offense against a
crime victim, the court shall ensure that the crime victim is afforded the
rights described in subsection (a). Before making a determination described
in subsection (a)(3), the court shall make every effort to permit the fullest
attendance possible by the victim and shall consider reasonable alternatives to
the exclusion of the victim from the criminal proceeding. The reasons for any
decision denying relief under this chapter shall be clearly stated on the record.

15
(2) Habeas corpus proceedings.—
(A) In general.— In a Federal habeas corpus proceeding arising out of a State
conviction, the court shall ensure that a crime victim is afforded the rights
described in paragraphs (3), (4), (7), and (8) of subsection (a).
(B) Enforcement.—
(i) In general.— These rights may be enforced by the crime victim or the
crime victim’s lawful representative in the manner described in paragraphs (1)
and (3) of subsection (d).
(ii) Multiple victims.— In a case involving multiple victims, subsection (d)(2)
shall also apply.
(C) Limitation.— This paragraph relates to the duties of a court in relation to
the rights of a crime victim in Federal habeas corpus proceedings arising out of
a State conviction, and does not give rise to any obligation or requirement
applicable to personnel of any agency of the Executive Branch of the Federal
Government.
(D) Definition.— For purposes of this paragraph, the term “crime victim” means
the person against whom the State offense is committed or, if that person is
killed or incapacitated, that person’s family member or other lawful
representative.
(c) Best Efforts To Accord Rights.—
(1) Government.— Officers and employees of the Department of Justice and
other departments and agencies of the United States engaged in the
detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime shall make their best
efforts to see that crime victims are notified of, and accorded, the rights
described in subsection (a).
(2) Advice of attorney.— The prosecutor shall advise the crime victim that the
crime victim can seek the advice of an attorney with respect to the rights
described in subsection (a).
(3) Notice.— Notice of release otherwise required pursuant to this chapter shall
not be given if such notice may endanger the safety of any person.
(d) Enforcement and Limitations.—
(1) Rights.— The crime victim or the crime victim’s lawful representative,
and the attorney for the Government may assert the rights described in
subsection (a). A person accused of the crime may not obtain any form of
relief under this chapter.
(2) Multiple crime victims.— In a case where the court finds that the number
of crime victims makes it impracticable to accord all of the crime victims the
rights described in subsection (a), the court shall fashion a reasonable
procedure to give effect to this chapter that does not unduly complicate or
prolong the proceedings.
(3) Motion for relief and writ of mandamus.— The rights described in
subsection (a) shall be asserted in the district court in which a defendant is
being prosecuted for the crime or, if no prosecution is underway, in the district

16
court in the district in which the crime occurred. The district court shall take up
and decide any motion asserting a victim’s right forthwith. If the district court
denies the relief sought, the movant may petition the court of appeals for a writ
of mandamus. The court of appeals may issue the writ on the order of a single
judge pursuant to circuit rule or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The
court of appeals shall take up and decide such application forthwith within 72
hours after the petition has been filed. In no event shall proceedings be stayed
or subject to a continuance of more than five days for purposes of enforcing
this chapter. If the court of appeals denies the relief sought, the reasons for the
denial shall be clearly stated on the record in a written opinion.
(4) Error.— In any appeal in a criminal case, the Government may assert as
error the district court’s denial of any crime victim’s right in the proceeding to
which the appeal relates.
(5) Limitation on relief.— In no case shall a failure to afford a right under this
chapter provide grounds for a new trial. A victim may make a motion to re-
open a plea or sentence only if—
(A) the victim has asserted the right to be heard before or during the
proceeding at issue and such right was denied;
(B) the victim petitions the court of appeals for a writ of mandamus within 14
days; and
(C) in the case of a plea, the accused has not pled to the highest offense
charged.
This paragraph does not affect the victim’s right to restitution as provided in
title 18, United States Code.
(6) No cause of action.— Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to
authorize a cause of action for damages or to create, to enlarge, or to imply any
duty or obligation to any victim or other person for the breach of which the
United States or any of its officers or employees could be held liable in
damages. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial
discretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction.
(e) Definitions.— For the purposes of this chapter, the term “crime victim”
means a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the
commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia.
In the case of a crime victim who is under 18 years of age, incompetent,
incapacitated, or deceased, the legal guardians of the crime victim or the
representatives of the crime victim’s estate, family members, or any other
persons appointed as suitable by the court, may assume the crime victim’s
rights under this chapter, but in no event shall the defendant be named as such
guardian or representative.
(f) Procedures To Promote Compliance.—
(1) Regulations.— Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this
chapter, the Attorney General of the United States shall promulgate regulations

17
to enforce the rights of crime victims and to ensure compliance by responsible
officials with the obligations described in law respecting crime victims.
(2) Contents.— The regulations promulgated under paragraph (1) shall—
(A) designate an administrative authority within the Department of Justice
to receive and investigate complaints relating to the provision or violation
of the rights of a crime victim;
(B) require a course of training for employees and offices of the Department of
Justice that fail to comply with provisions of Federal law pertaining to the
treatment of crime victims, and otherwise assist such employees and offices in
responding more effectively to the needs of crime victims;
(C) contain disciplinary sanctions, including suspension or termination
from employment, for employees of the Department of Justice who
willfully or wantonly fail to comply with provisions of Federal law
pertaining to the treatment of crime victims; and
(D) provide that the Attorney General, or the designee of the Attorney General,
shall be the final arbiter of the complaint, and that there shall be no judicial
review of the final decision of the Attorney General by a complainant.

B). In the “Spirit” that “Any Injury to ONE, is an Injury to ALL,” the “Perpetrators
of these Malicious, and Egregious Crimes against Mr. Curry,” are, also, “Malicious,
and Egregious Crimes Against The People,” and “Crimes Against the Constitutions of
Colorado, and the United States;”

1). The “Criminal Violations” listed below are “non-exclusive,” and other “Criminal
& Civil Charges” may be filed at any time by the “CRIME VICTIM,” or by the U.S.
Attorney General, or by “The People,” as they may deem ‘Lawful,’ and
‘Appropriate;’

COUNT #1). 18 USC § 2 - Principals

(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets,
counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as
a principal.
(b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed
by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is
punishable as a principal.

COUNT #2). 18 USC § 3 - Accessory after the fact

18
Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been
committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or
prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.

Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory

after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of
imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half
the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if
the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be
imprisoned not more than 15 years.

COUNT #3). 18 USC § 4 - Misprision of felony

Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a

court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the
same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United
States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

COUNT #4). 18 USC § 1510 - Obstruction of criminal investigations

(a) Whoever willfully endeavors by means of bribery to obstruct, delay, or prevent the
communication of information relating to a violation of any criminal statute of the
United States by any person to a criminal investigator shall be fined under this title, or
imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(b)
(1) Whoever, being an officer of a financial institution, with the intent to
obstruct a judicial proceeding, directly or indirectly notifies any other person
about the existence or contents of a subpoena for records of that financial
institution, or information that has been furnished in response to that
subpoena, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years,
or both.
(2) Whoever, being an officer of a financial institution, directly or indirectly
notifies—
(A) a customer of that financial institution whose records are sought by a
subpoena for records; or
(B) any other person named in that subpoena;
about the existence or contents of that subpoena or information that has been
furnished in response to that subpoena, shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
(3) As used in this subsection—

19
(A) the term “an officer of a financial institution” means an officer, director,
partner, employee, agent, or attorney of or for a financial institution; and
(B) the term “subpoena for records” means a Federal grand jury subpoena or a
Department of Justice subpoena (issued under section 3486 of title 18), for
customer records that has been served relating to a violation of, or a conspiracy
to violate—
(i) section 215, 656, 657, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1014, 1344, 1956, 1957,
orchapter 53 of title 31; or
(ii) section 1341 or 1343 affecting a financial institution.
(c) As used in this section, the term “criminal investigator” means any individual
duly authorized by a department, agency, or armed force of the United States to
conduct or engage in investigations of or prosecutions for violations of the
criminal laws of the United States.
(d)
(1) Whoever—
(A) acting as, or being, an officer, director, agent or employee of a person
engaged in the business of insurance whose activities affect interstate
commerce, or
(B) is engaged in the business of insurance whose activities affect interstate
commerce or is involved (other than as an insured or beneficiary under a policy
of insurance) in a transaction relating to the conduct of affairs of such a
business,
with intent to obstruct a judicial proceeding, directly or indirectly notifies any
other person about the existence or contents of a subpoena for records of that
person engaged in such business or information that has been furnished to a
Federal grand jury in response to that subpoena, shall be fined as provided by
this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
(2) As used in paragraph (1), the term “subpoena for records” means a Federal
grand jury subpoena for records that has been served relating to a violation of,
or a conspiracy to violate, section 1033 of this title.
(e) Whoever, having been notified of the applicable disclosure prohibitions
or confidentiality requirements of section 2709 (c)(1) of this title,
section 626(d)(1) or 627(c)(1) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C.
1681u (d)(1) or 1681v (c)(1)),section 1114(a)(3)(A) or 1114(a)(5)(D)(i) of
the Right to Financial Privacy Act  [1] (12 U.S.C. 3414 (a)(3)(A) or 3414
(a)(5)(D)(i)), orsection 802(b)(1) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50
U.S.C. 436 (b)(1)), [2] knowingly and with the intent to obstruct an
investigation or judicial proceeding violates such prohibitions or
requirements applicable by law to such person shall be imprisoned for
not more than five years, fined under this title, or both.

20
 COUNT #5). 18 USC § 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an
informant

(a)
(1) Whoever kills or attempts to kill another person, with intent to—
(A) prevent the attendance or testimony of any person in an official proceeding;
(B) prevent the production of a record, document, or other object, in an
official proceeding; or
(C) prevent the communication by any person to a law enforcement officer or
judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible
commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation,
parole, or release pending judicial proceedings;
shall be punished as provided in paragraph (3).
(2) Whoever uses physical force or the threat of physical force against any
person, or attempts to do so, with intent to—
(A) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official
proceeding;
(B) cause or induce any person to—
(i) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object,
from an official proceeding;
(ii) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the
integrity or availability of the object for use in an official proceeding;
(iii) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to
produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or
(iv) be absent from an official proceeding to which that person has been
summoned by legal process; or
(C) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or
judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible
commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation,
supervised release, parole, or release pending judicial proceedings;
shall be punished as provided in paragraph (3).
(3) The punishment for an offense under this subsection is—
(A) in the case of a killing, the punishment provided in sections 1111 and
1112;
(B) in the case of—
(i) an attempt to murder; or
(ii) the use or attempted use of physical force against any person;
imprisonment for not more than 30 years; and
(C) in the case of the threat of use of physical force against any person,
imprisonment for not more than 20 years.
(b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades
another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct
toward another person, with intent to—

21
(1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official
proceeding;
(2) cause or induce any person to—
(A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from
an official proceeding;
(B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the
object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding;
(C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to
produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or
(D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been
summoned by legal process; or
(3) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or
judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible
commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation  [1]
supervised release,, [1] parole, or release pending judicial proceedings;
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
(c) Whoever corruptly—
(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other
object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity
or availability for use in an official proceeding; or
(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or
attempts to do so,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
(d) Whoever intentionally harasses another person and thereby hinders, delays,
prevents, or dissuades any person from—
(1) attending or testifying in an official proceeding;
(2) reporting to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States the
commission or possible commission of a Federal offense or a violation of
conditions of probation  [1] supervised release,, [1] parole, or release pending
judicial proceedings;
(3) arresting or seeking the arrest of another person in connection with a
Federal offense; or
(4) causing a criminal prosecution, or a parole or probation revocation
proceeding, to be sought or instituted, or assisting in such prosecution or
proceeding;
or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than
3 years, or both.
(e) In a prosecution for an offense under this section, it is an affirmative
defense, as to which the defendant has the burden of proof by a preponderance
of the evidence, that the conduct consisted solely of lawful conduct and that the
defendant’s sole intention was to encourage, induce, or cause the other person
to testify truthfully.
(f) For the purposes of this section—

22
(1) an official proceeding need not be pending or about to be instituted at the
time of the offense; and
(2) the testimony, or the record, document, or other object need not be
admissible in evidence or free of a claim of privilege.
(g) In a prosecution for an offense under this section, no state of mind need be
proved with respect to the circumstance—
(1) that the official proceeding before a judge, court, magistrate judge, grand
jury, or government agency is before a judge or court of the United States, a
United States magistrate judge, a bankruptcy judge, a Federal grand jury, or a
Federal Government agency; or
(2) that the judge is a judge of the United States or that the law enforcement
officer is an officer or employee of the Federal Government or a person
authorized to act for or on behalf of the Federal Government or serving the
Federal Government as an adviser or consultant.
(h) There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this
section.
(i) A prosecution under this section or section 1503 may be brought in the
district in which the official proceeding (whether or not pending or about to be
instituted) was intended to be affected or in the district in which the conduct
constituting the alleged offense occurred.
(j) If the offense under this section occurs in connection with a trial of a
criminal case, the maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed
for the offense shall be the higher of that otherwise provided by law or the
maximum term that could have been imposed for any offense charged in
such case.
(k) Whoever conspires to commit any offense under this section shall
be subject to the same penalties as those prescribed for the offense
the commission of which was the object of the conspiracy.

COUNT #6). 18 USC § 1519 - Destruction, alteration, or falsification of

records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy

Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a
false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede,
obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within
the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under
title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined
under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

23
 COUNT #7). 18 USC § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation
generally

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or

destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away
any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or
deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any
public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be
fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map,
book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals,
removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be
fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and
shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the
United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the
office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United
States.

COUNT #8). 18 USC § 1951 - Interference with commerce by threats or

violence

(a) Whoever in any way or degree obstructs, delays, or affects commerce or

the movement of any article or commodity in commerce, by robbery or
extortion or attempts or conspires so to do, or commits or threatens physical violence
to any person or property in furtherance of a plan or purpose to do anything in violation
of this section shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years,
or both.

(b) As used in this section—

(1) The term “robbery” means the unlawful taking or obtaining of personal
property from the person or in the presence of another, against his will, by
means of actual or threatened force, or violence, or fear of injury, immediate or
future, to his person or property, or property in his custody or possession, or
the person or property of a relative or member of his family or of anyone in his
company at the time of the taking or obtaining.
(2) The term “extortion” means the obtaining of property from another, with his
consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or
fear, or under color of official right.
(3) The term “commerce” means commerce within the District of Columbia,
or any Territory or Possession of the United States; all commerce between
any point in a State, Territory, Possession, or the District of Columbia and any

24
point outside thereof; all commerce between points within the same State
through any place outside such State; and all other commerce over which the
United States has jurisdiction.
(c) This section shall not be construed to repeal, modify or affect section 17
ofTitle 15, sections 52, 101–115, 151–166 of Title 29 or sections 151–
188 of Title 45

COUNT #9). 18 USC § 2234 - Authority exceeded in executing warrant

Whoever, in executing a search warrant, willfully exceeds his authority or exercises it

with unnecessary severity, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than
one year, or both.

COUNT #10). 18 USC § 241 - Conspiracy against rights

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate

any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in
the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the
Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised
the same; or

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of

another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any
right or privilege so secured—
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or
both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or
if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual
abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill,
they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for
life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

COUNT #11). 18 USC § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully
subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to
the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the
Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or
penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race,
than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts
committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or
threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title

25
or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts
committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to
kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or
an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or
for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

 The term “law enforcement officer” means any officer of the United States, the
District of Columbia, a State, or political subdivision of a State, who is
empowered by law to conduct investigations of, or make arrests because of,
offenses against the United States, the District of Columbia, a State, or a
political subdivision of a State.

COUNT #12). 18 USC § 201 - Bribery of public officials and witnesses

(a) For the purpose of this section—

(1) the term “public official” means Member of Congress, Delegate, or Resident
Commissioner, either before or after such official has qualified, or an officer or
employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any
department, agency or branch of Government thereof, including the District
of Columbia, in any official function, under or by authority of any such
department, agency, or branch of Government, or a juror;
(2) the term “person who has been selected to be a public official” means
any person who has been nominated or appointed to be a public official, or has
been officially informed that such person will be so nominated or appointed;
and
(3) the term “official act” means any decision or action on any question,
matter, cause, suit, proceeding or controversy, which may at any time be
pending, or which may by law be brought before any public official, in such
official’s official capacity, or in such official’s place of trust or profit.
(b) Whoever—
(1) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value
to any public official or person who has been selected to be a public
official, or offers or promises any public official or any person who has been
selected to be a public official to give anything of value to any other person or
entity, with intent—
(A) to influence any official act; or
(B) to influence such public official or person who has been selected to be a
public official to commit or aid in committing, or collude in, or allow, any fraud,
or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or

26
(C) to induce such public official or such person who has been selected to
be a public official to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful
duty of such official or person;
(2) being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly or
indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or
accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return
for:
(A) being influenced in the performance of any official act;
(B) being influenced to commit or aid in committing, or to collude in, or allow,
any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United
States; or
(C) being induced to do or omit to do any act in violation of the official duty of
such official or person;
(3) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers, or promises anything of value
to any person, or offers or promises such person to give anything of value to
any other person or entity, with intent to influence the testimony under oath or
affirmation of such first-mentioned person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or
other proceeding, before any court, any committee of either House or both
Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the
laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or with intent to
influence such person to absent himself therefrom;
(4) directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees
to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or
entity in return for being influenced in testimony under oath or affirmation as a
witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or in return for
absenting himself therefrom;
shall be fined under this title or not more than three times the monetary
equivalent of the thing of value, whichever is greater, or imprisoned for not
more than fifteen years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any
office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.
(c) Whoever—
(1) otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty—
(A) directly or indirectly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any
public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official,
for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such public
official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official; or
(B) being a public official, former public official, or person selected to be a
public official, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of
official duty, directly or indirectly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees
to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of any official
act performed or to be performed by such official or person;
(2) directly or indirectly, gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any
person, for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be

27
given by such person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or other proceeding,
before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress,
or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the United
States to hear evidence or take testimony, or for or because of such person’s
absence therefrom;
(3) directly or indirectly, demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive
or accept anything of value personally for or because of the testimony under
oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness upon any
such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or for or because of such person’s
absence therefrom;
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than two years, or
both.
(d) Paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection (b) and paragraphs (2) and (3) of
subsection (c) shall not be construed to prohibit the payment or receipt of
witness fees provided by law, or the payment, by the party upon whose behalf a
witness is called and receipt by a witness, of the reasonable cost of travel and
subsistence incurred and the reasonable value of time lost in attendance at any
such trial, hearing, or proceeding, or in the case of expert witnesses, a
reasonable fee for time spent in the preparation of such opinion, and in
appearing and testifying.
(e) The offenses and penalties prescribed in this section are separate from and
in addition to those prescribed in sections 1503, 1504, and 1505 of this
title.

COUNT #13). 18 USC § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud

United States

If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States,
or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose,
and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

COUNT #14). 18 USC § 401 - Power of court

A court of the United States shall have power to punish by fine or imprisonment, or
both, at its discretion, such contempt of its authority, and none other, as—

(1) Misbehavior of any person in its presence or so near thereto as to obstruct

the administration of justice;
(2) Misbehavior of any of its officers in their official transactions;
(3) Disobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or
command.

28
 COUNT #15). 18 USC § 1001 - Statements or entries generally

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within
the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the
Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a
material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or
representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to
contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the
offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section
2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an
offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term
of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.

COUNT #16). 18 USC § 1018 - Official certificates or writings

Whoever, being a public officer or other person authorized by any law of the United
States to make or give a certificate or other writing, knowingly makes and delivers as
true such a certificate or writing, containing any statement which he knows to be false,
in a case where the punishment thereof is not elsewhere expressly provided by law, shall
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

COUNT #17). 18 USC § 1025 - False pretenses on high seas and other
waters

Whoever, upon any waters or vessel within the special maritime and territorial
jurisdiction of the United States, by any fraud, or false pretense, obtains from
any person anything of value, or procures the execution and delivery of any
instrument of writing or conveyance of real or personal property, or the signature of
any person, as maker, endorser, or guarantor, to or upon any bond, bill, receipt,
promissory note, draft, or check, or any other evidence of indebtedness, or fraudulently
sells, barters, or disposes of any bond, bill, receipt, promissory note, draft, or check, or
other evidence of indebtedness, for value, knowing the same to be worthless, or
knowing the signature of the maker, endorser, or guarantor thereof to have been
obtained by any false pretenses, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not
more than five years, or both; but if the amount, value or the face value of anything so
obtained does not exceed $1,000, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not
more than one year, or both.

29
 COUNT #18). 18 USC § 1038 - False information and hoaxes

(a) Criminal Violation.—

(1) In general.— Whoever engages in any conduct with intent to convey
false or misleading information under circumstances where such
information may reasonably be believed and where such information
indicates that an activity has taken, is taking, or will take place that would
constitute a violation of chapter 2, 10, 11B, 39, 40, 44, 111, or 113B of this
title, section 236 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2284), or section
46502, the second sentence of section 46504, section 46505(b)(3) or (c),
section 46506 if homicide or attempted homicide is involved, or section 60123
(b) of title 49, shall—
(A) be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;

(b) Civil Action.— Whoever engages in any conduct with intent to convey false
or misleading information under circumstances where such information
may reasonably be believed and where such information indicates that an
activity has taken, is taking, or will take place that would constitute a
violation of chapter 2, 10, 11B, 39, 40, 44, 111, or 113B of this title,
section 236 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2284), or section
46502, the second sentence of section 46504, section 46505 (b)(3) or (c),
section 46506 if homicide or attempted homicide is involved, or section
60123 (b) of title 49 is liable in a civil action to any party incurring
expenses incident to any emergency or investigative response to that
conduct, for those expenses.

COUNT #19). 18 USC § 1031 - Major fraud against the United States

(a) Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, any scheme or

artifice with the intent—
(1) to defraud the United States; or
(2) to obtain money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses,
representations, or promises,
in any grant, contract, subcontract, subsidy, loan, guarantee, insurance, or
other form of Federal assistance, including through the Troubled Asset Relief
Program, an economic stimulus, recovery or rescue plan provided by the
Government, or the Government’s purchase of any troubled asset as defined in
the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, or in any procurement of
property or services as a prime contractor with the United States or as a
subcontractor or supplier on a contract in which there is a prime contract with
the United States, if the value of such grant, contract, subcontract, subsidy,
loan, guarantee, insurance, or other form of Federal assistance, or any

30
constituent part thereof, is $1,000,000 or more shall, subject to the
applicability of subsection (c) of this section, be fined not more than
$1,000,000, or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.

(g)
(1) In special circumstances and in his or her sole discretion, the Attorney
General is authorized to make payments from funds appropriated to the
Department of Justice to persons who furnish information relating to a
possible prosecution under this section. The amount of such payment shall
not exceed $250,000. Upon application by the Attorney General, the court
may order that the Department shall be reimbursed for a payment from a
criminal fine imposed under this section.

COUNT #20). 18 USC § 1621 - Perjury generally

Whoever—(1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in

any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that
he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony,
declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to
such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true;
or

(2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of

perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully
subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true;
is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be
fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This
section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or
without the United States.

COUNT #21). 18 USC § 1622 - Subornation of perjury

Whoever procures another to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury,

and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

COUNT #22). 18 USC § 1623 - False declarations before grand jury or

court

(a) Whoever under oath (or in any declaration, certificate, verification, or

statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28,
United States Code) in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand

31
jury of the United States knowingly makes any false material declaration or
makes or uses any other information, including any book, paper, document,
record, recording, or other material, knowing the same to contain any false
material declaration, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than
five years, or both.
(b) This section is applicable whether the conduct occurred within or without
the United States.
(c) An indictment or information for violation of this section alleging that, in
any proceedings before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United
States, the defendant under oath has knowingly made two or more declarations,
which are inconsistent to the degree that one of them is necessarily false, need
not specify which declaration is false if—
(1) each declaration was material to the point in question, and
(2) each declaration was made within the period of the statute of limitations for
the offense charged under this section.
In any prosecution under this section, the falsity of a declaration set forth in the
indictment or information shall be established sufficient for conviction by proof
that the defendant while under oath made irreconcilably contradictory
declarations material to the point in question in any proceeding before or
ancillary to any court or grand jury. It shall be a defense to an indictment or
information made pursuant to the first sentence of this subsection that the
defendant at the time he made each declaration believed the declaration was
true.
(d) Where, in the same continuous court or grand jury proceeding in which a
declaration is made, the person making the declaration admits such declaration
to be false, such admission shall bar prosecution under this section if, at the
time the admission is made, the declaration has not substantially affected the
proceeding, or it has not become manifest that such falsity has been or will be
exposed.
(e) Proof beyond a reasonable doubt under this section is sufficient for
conviction. It shall not be necessary that such proof be made by any
particular number of witnesses or by documentary or other type of
evidence.

COUNT #23). 18 USC § 2235 - Search warrant procured maliciously

Whoever maliciously and without probable cause procures a search warrant to

be issued and executed, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more
than one year, or both.

32
 COUNT #24). 18 USC § 2381 - Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to
their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is
guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years
and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding
any office under the United States.

COUNT #25). 18 USC § 2382 - Misprision of treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the
commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be,
disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United
States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of
misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than
seven years, or both.

COUNT #26). 18 USC § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force
the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force
the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of
any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the
United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

ASSIGNMENT OF JURISDICTION & AUTHORITY

1). The proper “JURISDICTION & AUTHORITY” for this matter will, FOREVER,
remain “WITH THE PEOPLE,” and it is the “ORDER OF THE CRIME VICTIM,
AND THE PEOPLE,” that the “Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Agency” will
be “The People’s Delegated Jurisdiction & Authority” in this matter, as they
are a “Private Corporation,” with a Board of Directors, comprised of “People;”
who have their own “Fiduciary Duties” to their investors, and shareholders,
who are, also, “People.”

2). This “Revocation of Bonds,” and the “Crime Victim’s Claim for Relief,”
are NOT, AT THIS TIME, SUBJECT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW, nor is this matter a
subject promlogated to JUDICIAL DISCRETION!

33
3). Should the “Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Agency” default, or fail to
perform their “Fiduciary Duties” under this “Assignment By the People,” their
investors, shareholders, the State, or Federal, Constitutions, “The People” will
reassign the “Jurisdiction & Authority” of this matter, to the Federal
Securities & Exchange Commission, wherein, the “CRIME VICTIM,” and “The
People” will, by the Power & Authority vested in them, petition this
Commission to revoke the “Bond(s)” for the “Colorado Intergovernmental
Risk Agency,” and for “CIRSA’S” Board of Directors, Administrators, and
Employees.

4). Should the “Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Agency” default on it’s

“Fiduciary Duties,” they shall, along with their Board of Directors,
Administrators, and Employees, will inherit the entirety of those “charges,” and
“indictments,” levied upon the primary perpetrators, and will be charged, and
indicted, by “The People,” as “Principles,” “Conspirators,” and “Accessories
After the Fact.”

5). Should the U.S. Attorney General fail in his “Constitutional Duties,” and/or
“Constitutional Obligations,” to the Federal Securities & Exchange
Commission, and “The People,” and he refuses to prosecute these Federal
Crimes, “The People,” will petition the U.S. Supreme Court, to revoke the
“Fidelity Bond” of the U.S. Attorney General, Pursuant UBC #42 (5.2), which
states;

“A city, county, state or federal district attorney (including a U.S. district

attorney called a “U.S. Attorney,”) shall lose his bonding and shall not be
bonded: if he fails or refuses to make a reasonably diligent effort to process the
citizens’ complaint (USC Title #42).

18 USC § 1034 - Civil penalties and injunctions for violations

(a) The Attorney General may bring a civil action in the appropriate United
States district court against any person who engages in conduct constituting an
offense under section 1033 and, upon proof of such conduct by a
preponderance of the evidence, such person shall be subject to a civil penalty
of not more than $50,000 for each violation or the amount of compensation
which the person received or offered for the prohibited conduct, whichever
amount is greater. If the offense has contributed to the decision of a court of
appropriate jurisdiction to issue an order directing the conservation,
rehabilitation, or liquidation of an insurer, such penalty shall be remitted to
the appropriate regulatory official for the benefit of the policyholders,

34
claimants, and creditors of such insurer. The imposition of a civil penalty
under this subsection does not preclude any other criminal or civil
statutory, common law, or administrative remedy, which is available by law
to the United States or any other person.
(b) If the Attorney General has reason to believe that a person is engaged in
conduct constituting an offense under section 1033, the Attorney General
may petition an appropriate United States district court for an order
prohibiting that person from engaging in such conduct. The court may issue
an order prohibiting that person from engaging in such conduct if the court
finds that the conduct constitutes such an offense. The filing of a petition
under this section does not preclude any other remedy which is
available by law to the United States or any other person.

TIME LIMITATIONS

1). The “CRIME VICTIM,” with respect and reverence to the “RULE OF SEVENS,”
requires review, deliberation, execution of relief, and full restitution, WITHOUT
DELAY, by “CIRSA,” its Board Members, and/or Administrators, no-later-than
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS, from the receipt of this filing. A Maximum
FOURTEEN (14) DAY EXTENSION may be Granted, providing “CIRSA” is able to
provide the “Claimant” a proper, civil, lawful, legal, and reasonable, cause for
this extension.

2). Should “CIRSA” choose NOT to accept its “Fiduciary Duty,” as in failing to
review, deliberate, execute, provide full restitution, or choose not to
communicate, or act in “Good Faith,” with the “Claimant” after THIRTY-FIVE
(35) DAYS, the “Claimant” will invoke his “RIGHTS” to “REASSIGN
JURISDICTION & AUTHORITY” to the Federal Securities & Exchange
Commission.

SUMMARY

“THE SPIRIT OF LIBERTY”

“We do not rest our hopes too much upon constitutions, upon laws, and upon courts to
preserve the spirit of liberty.” For these are “false hopes,” in which “liberty lies in the hearts
of men and women; when it dies there, no constituion, no laws, no courts can even do much to
help it.” But, “while it lies there it needs no constitution, no law, no court to save it.”----------
Judge Learned Hand; 1944.

35
 AFFIDAVIT

The DEFENDANT, as a “Crime Victim,” and being a NATURAL PERSON OF THE

LAND, AND A CITIZEN of these united States, and residing in an area known as
Colorado, does, HEREIN, swear UNDER OATH, that, this Document is true, correct,
and accurate in every regard to the best of his knowledge.

AND, THAT; as a U.S., and Colorado Citizen, the Defendant; a.k.a. “The Crime
Victim,” has the RIGHT, and the OBLIGATION, to petition the Mesa County District
Court, the U.S Attorney General, the U.S. Marshal, and the U.S. District Court, and the
“Insurers,” for RELIEF against said City of Grand Junction, and its Law Enforcement
Agency; a.k.a. “Grand Junction City Police Department,” its employees, and individuals,
whether elected, selected, or delagated, for extreme, malicious, egregious, and
repeated violations of his RIGHTS TO LIFE, LIBERTY, AND ALL PURSUITS
ALLOWED BY LAW, under the DEFENDANTʼs CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
GUARANTEED BY HIS FIRST, THIRD, FOURTH, FIFTH, SIXTH, SEVENTH, EIGHTH,
NINETH, TENTH, AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS OF THIS CONSTITUTIONAL
DOCUMENT, AND HIS NATURAL, AND INALIENABLE RIGHTS;

AND, THAT; It is, NOW, the duty and obligation of the Co-Defendant, a.k.a. “The
COLORADO INTERGOVERNMENTAL RISK AGENCY,” a.k.a. “CIRSA,” a.k.a. “The
Fidelity & Surety Bond Insurers of the Primary Defendants,” a.k.a. “The City of
Grand Junction,” “The Grand Junction Police Department,” a.k.a. “Grand
Junction Police Chief, John Camper,” a.k.a. “Grand Junction Police Commander,
Michael Nordeen,” and a.k.a. “Grand Junction Police Detective, Ryan Petrowski.”

AND, THAT; The U.S. Attorney General, John Walsh, the U.S. Marshal, John
Kammerzell, and the U.S. District Court, UNDER LAW, are obligated, as well, to hear,
and act upon, these “Orders of Revocation,” “Claims for Relief,” arguments,
charges, and criminal indictments, HEREIN; should “CIRSA” default on their
Constitutional obligations;

SO SIGNED, AND NOTARIZED THIS DAY, THE _____OF OCTOBER, 2013;

X_____________________________________________________
Steven D. Curry/DEFENDANT/CRIME VICTIM/PAG/AFFIANT

X________________________________
Notary Public

SEAL

36
 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing is being served upon the Court Clerk of
Mesa County Justice Center, the Grand Junction Police Department, the City of Grand
Junction Clerk, CIRSA, the U.S. Attorney General, and the U.S. Marshal, on this, the
______ day of OCTOBER, 2013.

X____________________________________
Steven D. Curry; DEFENDANT/CRIME VICTIM/P.A.G

37