Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Where are the traces of those pre-roman peoples? (peoples meaning several tribal patterns)
Scholars argue to this day over the precise nature of the stones
what also becomes clear when looking at Stonehenge is that people back in the day
linked their own faith with that of the stars and the Universe
one major objects that give us more information about that time are arrowheads
• bronze was introduced and through that a trade was established between what is today’s
Ireland and the main British Isle
• bronze was a very precious commodity to trade with
• the cultural contact accelerated through this innovative trading
• the creation of an ax industry – ax-heads became a very desirable product
• you could find these ax-heads all over the British Isles which testifies to their popularity
• ax-heads had a ‘status’ of currency - you could use ax-heads and trade them
Fact: Pre-roman peoples (the different tribal patterns) were very much concerned with nature,
God and many religious associations. Religious associations were linked closely to nature: spring
wales, trees etc. which gave them a sacred quality.
• when the first Romans entered the British Isles (which was no Britain at that time), they found
the Celtic population all over the Isles
• the Celts spoke Celtic
• habits: they were using iron
they had agricultural settlements
they were organized in tribes
you couldn’t find a united Celtic nation (were not a homogenous nation but scattered
into different groups) on the island but instead there were very different tribal communities,
who have fought each other all the time
• today: the descendants of the Celtic population live mainly in parts of Scotland, Wales and
Ireland and the Celtic languages are still present there
• arrival of the Romans: there was no coherent military force, but they met with many different
and small tribes on the Isles, which is a completely different military challenge
• the Celts on the Isles shared a common culture with the Celts in mainland Europe as the map
indicates
We could say it is a Counter part to Germanic languages, romans languages or Slavonic languages.
The origin of the word ‘Celts’ – the languages as the most lasting evidence
Etymology – looks at the source or the first appearances of words and tries to find out how words and
meanings develop and change over the centuries
HEAD CULT
HUMAN SACRIFICES
• they would use human sacrifice as a conviction to their gods (they had many gods)
• those gods could only be satisfied by ritual murder like burning, hanging or drowning
• there are archeological findings which prove that this was in fact part of their culture
Kinship groups: Groups where all the members are related to each other. Kinship groups as the
dominant category of how Celts thought of themselves. The kinship was very central.
• on the eve of Roman invasion we can see a broad contrast between the South of England (like in
Shakespeare’s notion), which was much more advanced and had progressed a lot more than those
poorer regions in Ireland, Wales or parts of Scotland
• today: contrast between the wealthy regions of London, the South part of England in general
and the poorer regions in the North of England (the broad contrast isn’t a new characteristic)
Trade
• in the south of Britain, we have a lively trade with Celtic trades in today’s Belgium and in today’s
France
• there were very close relations developed
• the people from the British Isles exported cattle, grain and slaves
• they imported e.g. wine and glass from mainland Europe
• the Romans romanized this Celtic word and called the Isles Brettaniai
• there is also a more poetical name which is Albion (this is the original roman name for Britain
and the cliffs of Dover might be the idea behind this name)
• other Roman names were: Caledonia, Britannia for England, Hibernia for Ireland etc.
Fact: We have Greek-Roman scholars of history who write about the barbarians in the north. They claim
that the most civilized people in the British Isles lived in the very east of the main island.
They also claim that the further you go inland, the more savage the people become.
(savage: people who dress themselves in skins of animals, that was seen as very bankrupt by the
Romans)
The Romans found it ‘exciting’ to colonize the British Isles because it was seen as the edge of the world,
they were the ‘outskirts’ of Europe. A ‘country’ very far away from Rome.
Julius Caesar
Julius Caesar’s invasions of 55 and 54 B.C. (first person to be known in British history)
• British history starts with the Romans (British history meaning the written documents and the
beginning of continuous tracing of British history)
• first person known in British history: Julius Caesar (he was the proconsul of Gaul)
Summary
Persecution of the Druids (A druid was a member of the high-ranking professional class in
ancient Celtic cultures)
• the Romans also tried to exterminate those the religious traces of the Celts (most probably the
Druids)
• there are many stories of the Druids (very mysterious qualities are attached to these stories)
• unfortunately many of those Druids died in the first years of the Roman rule since they were
seen as the centers of persistence against Roman rule
• although the Romans followed this course of conquest (Eroberung) and colonization
(Besiedlung), they never got beyond the sitting points: Romans stopped roughly in the middle of
the Isles
Hadrian’s Wall
• Roman invasion imposed one culture upon another: as a very basic statement we could say it
was a form of colonization the Romans colonized parts of the British Isles and imposed their
own culture upon the Celts
• what is still unclear is to what degree the Celts tolerated this kind of modernization brought by
the Romans
• modernization of the various tribal societies in Britain: the Romans romanized the various tribal
societies in Britain
• they ended this kind of tribal and scattered patterns within the British Isles instead there was
one great region which was ruled by one central source very typical pattern of Roman rule
• by the end of the first century AD all those small tribal monarchies in the south of Britain had
given a way to the Roman rule as one centralized monarch
• first half of the 4th century: ‘golden age’ for Roman Britain
period of great prosperity and wellness, many parts of the British Isles were densely
cultivated Britain had never been more prosperous than under roman rule in the 4th century
- all these facts show the ambiguity of this whole invasion and its subsequent history -
Why should Celtic people under Roman rule also take on the religion of the Romans, why not stick to
their Celtic gods?
Answer:
1.) The main reason for that is much more personal. Christianity offered the idea, it promised the
idea of a better afterlife.
2.) Also, Christianity is a monotheistic faith meaning there is only one God. The monotheistic faith
replaced the many gods of the Celts. There was finally one God and one ruler, which mirrored
the worldly conception of society which seemed more logical to them.
3.) Christianity was a religion based on written sources, so you could follow the instructions of the
religion if you were able to read, which offered guidance.
4.) The last and most attractive reason is that Christianity made you more fashionable than your
neighbor since it was the religion of the powerful, the wealthy and the successful. It had a great
appeal among the elite of the British society. It also trickled down to the common people
increasingly. Trickle down meaning gradually benefitting the poorest as a result of the
increasing wealth of the richest.
She managed to unite some of those Celtic tribes against the Romans. Through uniting the tribes, she
presented an altogether different scenario. She was very successful in her first battles against the
Romans. In this conflict between Boudica and her forces with the Romans, we also have the first hint of
London that was probably called Londonium as the Roman train center. The Romans moved back to
Londonium trying to keep up this fortified terror against Boudica, but the Roman were crushed.
Boudica successfully chased the Romans out of Londonium. There was a war and thousands of people
were killed. Finally, the romans have realized that they should bring in fresh troops from their Germanic
regions. Thanks to those fresh troops, Boudica’s rebellion seemed doomed. The main problem is that
when you fight the Romans (the most advanced military force in the world), you should not use their
own tactics and strategies. Fighting against the Romans was only successful when you employed some
sort of guerrilla tactics, meaning not meeting the Romans in the open field, having small attacks and
then vanishing again. that was the successful strategy
In Boudica’s war both parties met in the open field, which was a very sinister decision. She had no
chance to defeat the Romans. Unfortunately, she was defeated. She didn’t want to fall to the hands of
the Romans, so she poisoned herself. The rebellion was over.
Boudica is still remembered in British history as one of its major heroes. As a mythical figure, she
symbolizes British or English unity and ‘exercise of resistance’.
- the north of England was less influenced and less shaped of Roman ways of life
• Ireland, parts of Scotland and the tribal kingdoms of Wales were largely untouched by the
Romans (Romans did not go for Ireland and Scotland)
• the development within the British Isles was quite different at that time already those
differences would become more pronounced throughout the century reason why Scotland,
England and Ireland are quite distinct parts of England today (and have different
traditions as well)
There were several reasons to why the Romans were not wanted anymore:
• they have become weak due to the developments in Rome itself
• lessened military power
• the internal pressure in the British Isles and external attacks from Germanic tribes in
northern Europe
• there was also a loss of confidence in the system of the Roman emperor he could not
command such respect any longer as in the peak of Roman rule in the couple of centuries
before
• they weren’t able to send troops to help deromanized tribes against those tribes in the
north Rome wasn’t able to keep its colonies safe so why should the British accept the
Roman presence in their land?
• the Romans decided they didn’t have the resources to keep up the Roman colony
resources were reduced this gave more power to local chiefs and tribes
• also, the barrier that the Romans have built wasn’t a barrier any longer: it had been difficult
for the Romans to maintain it, but in the final decades of the 4th century this power became
nonexistent
The whole structure of the Roman rule crumbled in those years.
Dissolution of roman empire
• what had once been a very homogenous Roman region of influence became fragmented into
different soils of influence
• Germanic tribes were occupying large parts of the Roman empire (perhaps very specifically the
north of Africa, which became the kingdom of vandals) that was a region in Roman history
very famous for its corn fields back in the heyday
• with this region not being under Roman rule any longer the romans lost a lot of money
• when your wealthy provinces fall apart, you have no way of raising any money to keep all
provinces guarded and protect them this was the misery that the Romans experienced
Schedule:
•Who were the Anglo-Saxons and why did they go to the British Isles?
1. The Anglo-Saxon World, 400-800 The Period called `The Dark Ages´
Two reasons:
2. because there were only a few traces left (which is a more physical reason) – it is dark to us
because we do not know much about it, there are very few traces reason: after the Romans
left, they also took their language and their written documents with them we have very
scarce sources that can help historians shed light on what happened on the British Isles in those
centuries after 400AD
Most of what we know about the developments that took place back then, we know from the
sources dating from the 7th and 8th centuries – the time when the first historians tried to shed light
on and write down the history of the Germanic and English people.
Many of the inhabitants were still descendents from the Celtic people (the ‘old people’).
• the Roman empire was quickly crumbling away, their political influence was declining making room
for other peoples from the Germanic tribes like the Goths or the Vandals etc.
this kind of political void wasn’t filled for centuries on the British Isles- there was no new central
authority that would govern
after 410 archaeologists have found out that there were no new coins minted always a symbol for
economic prosperity (shows that there must have been some progress in economical terms)
the Roman towns in the south got emptier and emptier people were leaving the towns
Roman roads
- there was a drastic depopulation on the isles, many of its inhabitants fled from those formal
Roman territories to the West (to what is Wales), where the Celtic people were still reigning
- many communities stopped their trade with the European continent (especially with what is
today’s Belgium, since trade was simply not a prosperous undertaking any longer)
- there was a long chain of migrations going on in those areas where the Romans had left
- this is also due to the fact that when they left, no one knew any longer how to build stone
buildings, so stonemasons and the knowledge about stonemasonry went away with the
Romans when the new buildings were built, settlements and buildings were again made
of wooden structures in some ways we see a return to kind of Pre-Roman ways of living
new arrival – new groups sailed to Britain scholars speak of a new start on the British Isles,
which was very unique in Western Europe
we see the arrival of a new population on the British Isles, from the 430ies onwards, Germanic
settlers arrived in large numbers in eastern England and then spread through many parts of the
British Isles
historians always mention ‘the Celts and the Anglo-Saxons’, but in reality we had more than these
two tribes; the Saxons were the most powerful, but also the cruelest ones from the Germanic
settlers
- there were people from four different groups:
the Angles
the Saxons
the Jutes
the Frisians BUT WHERE DID THEY COME FROM?
They came from what is today’s Schleswig Holstein – and also parts of the today’s Denmark and
Netherlands.
Anglo-Saxon reasons for the invasion
they travelled from their homelands to the eastern coast of the British Isles and their intention
was to plunder on the coasts of Britain and to get their riches (in this period, the Saxons were
referred to as pirates, as very ferocious or cruel warriors)
they also wanted to settle there and establish their own territories
Historians argue to this day why this sublime migration took place; one of the main explanation
for their immigration could be that the sea levels were rising in that period, so many isles and
regions were swamped or put under water- this reduced the space for people to live and to
sustain themselves – we also see shifts in population in northern Europe – new groups arriving,
pushing away those groups who were formally inhabiting those regions – that was a great
dynamic of migration also going on in Northern-Europe this led to the spread from Northern-
Europe to the British Isles
Argument: Where do we find the roots of Anglo-Saxons? Were they allies or invaders?
Thesis: When the Romans had left, the British felt defenceless. They needed to be defended from those
tribes in the north (the Picts), they were threatened and they were allegedly calling the Anglo-Saxons for
help. The Saxons were also known as mercenaries (=soldiers you could pay to fight for you). Supposedly,
the ‘Britains’ called the Anglo-Saxons to help them out (=they hired
Anglo-Saxon soldiers from abroad to help them fight against the north).
The Anglo-Saxons didn’t help the Britains, but they helped
themselves get those British territories. This was a very common strategy
used back then. The Romans used foreign troops to fight their battles,
because it was a lot cheaper than using Roman soldiers that you had to
bring along from Rome. Those Anglo-Saxon groups of mercenaries
were led by two brothers (this is not a proven fact) Hengist and
Horsa, who founded the kingdom of Kent in 450.
Hengist and Horsa being welcomed by an English king, who needed help in his battles against the northern tribes
The two brothers weren’t happy with just helping out and instead they defeated the local British tribes and
founded their own kingdom, the first Anglo-Saxon kingdom on the British Isles. At the same time, the Jutes
and the Frisians were making their way across the North Sea, symbolizing the multiple streams of migration
in the 5th century.100 years later, by the end of the 6th century, invaders controlled half of the island.
They (the local kings) often gave themselves the title ‘Bretwalda’ (an Anglo-Saxon term meaning ‘Lord of
Britain’), ‘Bret’ for Brettania, ‘Walda’ for king or leader.
In those different regions, those groups also behaved quite differently. In some areas, like in Sussex, the
original native population was almost wiped out, killed. In other regions, like in the northern regions, the
invaders had a kind of uneasy, but nevertheless more peaceful relationship. There was a very complex
mixture of cultures between those Germanic peoples.
Anglo-Saxon Society
The Anglo-Saxon languages, religion and culture
the Anglo-Saxons were Germanic tribes speaking Germanic languages (Anglo-Saxon replaced
Latin as the so-called Lingua franca: common language of communication)
the English language is born with the arrival of the Anglo-Saxons, their culture and also their
language Anglo-Saxons brought new society, new religion and new political values
they believed in Germanic gods, some of those gods gave their names to days of the week (see
below)
we can still see traces of this Germanic heritage in the English language today
those Germanic tribes were strictly patriarchal (we had a very traditional society that was based
on the rule of men over women, they also passed on their properties on the eldest son they
formed this new society
they also brought their own laws that quickly replaced the Roman jurisdiction/law
the Celtic population (the original inhabitants on the British Isles) saw them as Barbarians ‘those
barbaric Anglo-Saxons’
many of those Celtic people were Christian and they met new comers of pagan religious
persuasion confrontation in terms of religion and value systems
both were tribal cultures with small kingdoms next to each other and were quite often at war
there was no centralized political structure as with the Romans
dominance of villages
We know very little about the early Saxon invaders coming to the British Isles, so where do we get our
facts from?
documents written by religious scholars in the 7th and 8th centuries – 300 years later
information from stories
archaeology (see below)
Anglo-Saxon map
archeology: we can still find traces of those tribes coming to the British Isles
the most famous locations for these places are Sutton Hoo
1939: shortly before the second world war broke out, remains of a great burial site were
discovered: Sutton Hoo, on the East Anglian coast (this is where the first invaders arrived)
Anglo-Saxon king was buried in a ship (wooden structure); an amount of earth was heaped upon
the ship very typical burial method
buried with armour, weapons, treasures communities thought about the afterlife what
happens when we die, they thought ‘obviously, there must be something’, that’s why they have
riches to accompany them to the next world wherever that is
Sutton Hoo is a symbol that those Anglo-Saxon groups placed huge emphasis on the leader, the
king; as the richest individual shows his position in the kingdom or the tribe
shows royal wealth, but also: no dynastic reign; there were no dynasties otherwise the riches
would have been given to the son and the dead king would have not taken his riches with him
there was no line of succession established
these were the early stages of kinghood, of the way kings are selected and the way this kind of
selection is continued
Anglo-Saxon kingdoms (7 of them) HEPTARCHY term used by scholars to refer to those political
units of early Anglo-Saxon England
• Canterbury, York, Winchester, Worcester –> the most prominent urban centres in Anglo-Saxon
England
• building of cathedrals
• many of the English towns that became established were formally Roman settlements
shows the legacy of the Romans + they largely defined the spaces of future towns and cities
in England
• place names that give away a lot about history e.g. place names ending with ‘ham’ like
Tottenham, Nottingham etc. settlements founded by Anglo-Saxon arrivals, very clearly linked
to their language and culture
• the Anglo-Saxons also brought a new way of governing/a government
originally the Anglo-Saxons did not use writing, they would use runes instead
introduced lower-case letters as well as some specific to Anglo-Saxon pronunciation, such as the
letters thorn (þ), eth (ð), wynn(Ƿ), yogh (Ȝ), ash (æ), and ethel(œ) ( innovations of the Anglo-
Saxon language), some of which derive from runes
linked the British Isles to northern Europe, whereas the Celts before were mainly linked to
southern Europe and middle Europe like France or Austria (which is often referred to as the
birth place of the Celts, cultural and geographical shift with the arrival of the Anglo-Saxons)
very evident in one of the Anglo-Saxon epic tangles Beowulf, setting: nowadays Denmark – link
between Anglo-Saxon literature and northern Europe, very clearly
Relationship between Anglo-Saxons and British (Britains – still meaning the Celtic groups)
they were usually enemies
mainly antagonistic, hostile, colonizers vs. colonized
Offa’s Dyke
Mercian king Offa (757-96) as the most powerful English king before Alfred
one great visual legacy of this relationship is Offa’s Dyke another trace that can still be seen
in parts of England, specifically Wales
it is a continuous barrier that was erected between England and Wales in order to separate
groups; clear signal that the Celtic population in Wales and the English, or the Anglo-Saxons
population of Mercia was on bad terms, this can be seen in many regions of England, where we
see traces of battles and confrontations between the Anglo-Saxon invaders and the native
Britains
in many regions we don’t see any ethnic blending (mixture of communities of different ethnic
origins), the DNA analysis shows clearly that in many regions of England there was no mixture
between the native population and the Anglo-Saxons, in other regions this mixture was more
pronounced shows clearly that there were many different procedures on the isles and that
there is not just one way to describe the relationships or the situation between Britains and
Anglo-Saxons
Offa governed in the 8th century – towards the very end of Anglo-Saxon settlement period –
• the first king who saw himself as the king of the English very crucial – a process
towards unification, a process towards a kind of English nationhood tells us that
the process of homogenization or centralization was clearly on the way in Anglo-
Saxon England later on
• Offa was also a contemporary of the German emperor (Karl der Große) saw Offa
as some likewise King Offa must have been a very powerful and influencial king
on the British Isles recognized as equal by Karl
King Arthur
was allegedly a British king, meaning a king of the Britains fighting against the Anglo-Saxons
he was brought into public consciousness in the medieval period – it was French author
Geoffrey of Monmouth wrote the Historia Regum Britanniae (he wrote about this mythical famous king
Arthur, who few hundred years back once reigned in Britain)
the myth, the legend of Arthur has been very profound in British and English history we see a
king of the defeated group of the Britains who tries to re or bring the Britains back to power
against the Anglo-Saxon invaders and tragedy is always attractive to scholars and author alike
King Arthur has been present since the middle ages, although we still don’t know whether he
existed or not, although he is one of the very few individual names we can link with the period
Britain (the Anglo-Saxons, the Normans, the Tudors all claimed that king Arthur was part of their
own history, their own king attraction of the idea of King Arthur
presence in popular culture, dozens of films made
Christianity had actually survived in Wales and also in parts of Ireland after the Romans had left,
however when the Anglo-Saxons arrived, they crushed Christianity where they’ve found it (they
did not go to wales or Northern Ireland so Christianity did survive in those territories)
the Heptarchy seemed to be a very promising field for re-Christianization
Pope Gregory (the Great) sent Augustine to Kent, who became the first archbishop of
Canterbury in 598 he gave Augustine the mission to Christianize Kent and start a process by
which Anglo-Saxon England would become a Christian territory
When Augustine was sent to England, he was very much afraid to go and some of his followers even
turned around and travelled back to Rome. They were afraid of the Anglo-Saxons, because they were
seen as notorious, cruel communities. However, pope Gregory wrote a heartfelt letter saying they
shouldn’t fear anyone and that they have to do it in the name of God. Augustine and their followers
returned to England and started their mission. They became very successful in the end. This whole
process is called the Gregorian mission after pope Gregory.
We have to consider the relationship between the king and the church – generally we can say that kings
helped the church to grow and to become more powerful. The reason for that is that the church
enhanced the status of the king. Both institutions helped fortify and strengthen each other – which was
a win-win situation.
The king was regarded as God’s chosen and anointed royalty. In terms of government, Christianity also
brought back literacy to the British Isles. This means that there was a reintroduction of written
documents by the church. The leaders quickly saw the advantages of the new faith which offered them a
link with the Roman past.
Being a Christian king gave you some participation in the idea of a glorious Roman rule. Throughout the
whole medieval period, the era of the roman empire was seen as the golden age of power. Many
medieval kings in England, but also in Europe everywhere tried to style themselves in the tradition of the
roman emperors, so it did have a lot of appeal to be linked to the Roman church. It was kind of an
honour to be linked to the fallen, yet still very powerful concept of the Roman empire.
Interesting finding – proof of the Christian and Pagan religious beliefs mixture-
in 2012 a grave was found – rare discovery – Anglo-Saxon teenage girl was buried in a wooden bed
with a cross
a mixture of Pagan beliefs but also the acceptance of the new religious dogma – the cross
the idea of burying a body with its possessions/riches was an ancient idea (not a Christian idea,
but choosing the Christian symbol clearly shows that the new faith had arrived and this makes
this burial method even very interesting to scholars)
symbolizes this process when the new is kind of accepted but the old is not yet discarded –
interesting combination of the new Christian system and old Pagan beliefs
Christianity and the Anglo-Saxon World
The Anointment
Church and kingly power became more intertwined and dependent on each other
most visible sign: anointment, to anoint – usually done by the archbishop of Canterbury
he gave divine blessing to the new king he legitimized the power of the king
the church helped support the right candidate (helped the king choose his successor)
important foundation of kingly rule and kingly succession
coronation of King Edgar, 973: church and king together shaped or defined who was in charge
tells you a lot about the role and importance of religion in the Anglo-Saxon England
it set the king above human laws - by investing him with this kind of a divine, godlike power a win-
win situation of kind and church in the period
Why is he important:
a lot of the things that we know about early English history, we know because the monk once
wrote it down and the document survived
wrote the Ecclesiastical (religious) History of the English People and completed it in 731
Monk Bede is quite often called the father of English history – because we owe him so much for
his writings was the first one to write down any kind of history of England in the 8th century
Sources:
https://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/england-arrival-of-the-anglo-saxons-in-britania-
nachrichtenfoto/515463082?esource=SEO_GIS_CDN_Redirect#england-arrival-of-the-anglosaxons-in-britania-hengist-and-horsa-
with-picture-id515463082
http://www.tha-engliscan-gesithas.org.uk/education/months-days-and-time
http://slideplayer.com/slide/10419277/35/images/8/Anglo+Saxon+Society+Feudalism+–
+A+societal+structure+in+which+a+King+is+at+the+top+and+peasants+are+at+the+bottom..jpg
https://image.slidesharecdn.com/the-anglosaxons-and-beowulf-1228259838240543-9/95/the-anglosaxons-and-
beowulf-6-728.jpg?cb=1228230949
http://slideplayer.com/slide/7830437/25/images/19/Sutton+Hoo+Located+in+Woodbridge,+Suffolk,+England+Dis
covered+in+1939.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e4/Witan_hexateuch.jpg
https://i.guim.co.uk/img/static/sys-images/Politics/Pix/pictures/2012/3/15/1331825567099/The-gold-cross-found-
in-t-007.jpg?w=300&q=55&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&s=e1a7beaed25aacf9cb529335ec5de0f0
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7a/Depiction_of_St._Bede_the_Venerable_%28at_St
._Bede%27s_school%2C_Chennai%29_-_Image_has_been_cropped_for_better_presentation.jpg/170px-
Depiction_of_St._Bede_the_Venerable_%28at_St._Bede%27s_school%2C_Chennai%29_-
_Image_has_been_cropped_for_better_presentation.jpg
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beda_Venerabilis#/media/File:Bede,_Ecclesiastical_History,_Cotton_Tiberius_C_II,_f
ol._87v.jpg
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/0b/6f/a9/0b6fa9c0098c46e3d3b66142c88e48f5--the-remains-anglo-saxon.jpg
https://financialtribune.com/sites/default/files/field/image/ordi/12_Literacy.jpg
https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Map-England-Invasions_c.jpg
Lecture 3: Vikings and Normans, 800-1066
Schedule:
•Who was King Alfred and why is he an important figure in early English history?
Term Viking ‘Scandinavian pirates who plundered the coasts of Europe from the 8 th to 10th centuries’, ‘a sea-
roving bandit’
old English word for ‘pirate’ –but it wasn’t used at that time, only much later at the end of the 19 th century; the
usage of the word is very modern
❖ arrival of the Vikings from the end of the 8th century onwards (around 800)
❖ the Vikings arrived raiding all the monasteries, slaughtering monks and attacking those sacred places on
the east coast of Britain
❖ historians claim that the post-Roman centuries came to an end with the arrival of the Vikings making
room for another period in British and English history
❖ the Anglo-Saxons had hardly established their own kingdoms, pushing the Britains to the west and to the
north and there we already had a new force threating the Anglo-Saxons (who themselves had been
invaders a couple of centuries before)
❖ Vikings: Danes (Danish people) and “Norsemen” (i.e. people from the North- Norway, Denmark) started
attacking the English coasts in the late 8th century
❖ the Vikings started attacking many regions in Europe, which was not an isolated movement - you could
find them in many places in western Europe and in today’s Russia
❖ England was in a state of shock at the end of the 8th century, there were new invaders in the north
large problems were rising with the arrival of another group struggling for the riches and the wealth of
those territories under English rule
England or the English regions must have been rich – like the Romans and Anglo-Saxons before, the Vikings
were attracted by those wealthy regions on the British Isles seemed to be the perfect object for London
ships
weapons
the strange helmets with the horns (seems to be an invention of the 19th century)
Our view on the Vikings is very much coloured and shaped by those historians before our period like the
Victorian age. In the Victorian Age, there was a great fascination with the Vikings and their history.
Viking advantages – What made the Vikings that successful in their attempts of colonizing and raiding
English territories?
crucial invention of the longship (Viking ship) the Vikings were the most professional sailors of their
day
longships could sail 50 miles in a day (quite spectacular if you look at the standards of travel from a
1000 years ago) Vikings were able to dominate the sea and the Northwestern Europe and also to
establish settlements along the coasts of Britain but also in Ireland the Viking communities remained
in existence for the centuries to come in some regions the Viking presence was very stable and long-
lasting
DNA analysis: the English gene has 1% Norwegian roots and 4-5% Danish roots tells us that some
Viking communities were able to mix with the English population
❖ one around the north of Scotland to the Western Isles, the other to the east and south coasts of England
and to Gaul
❖ they even sailed into the Mediterranean
❖ debate: some Vikings have even established the Russian empire
❖ the Vikings travelled to England, Scotland, parts of Ireland, Iceland, Greenland and America (new found
land) making the claim that Columbus was the first one to discover America insecure
❖ during the 9th century Viking trading posts came into existence in Ireland it was the Vikings who
founded Dublin, Cork and Limerick
❖ the Germanic and Scandinavian peoples were deeply related Anglo-Saxons (or the English) and the
Vikings had much in common, they could understand each other because the language was not so
different
❖ the Anglo-Saxons or the English shared more with the Vikings than with the Britains in the west (in Wales)
❖ the English language today is filled with Scandinavian words e.g. sky, die, skin, bread, eggs etc. Old
Norse words entering Old English
❖ the Vikings were not literate and they were not using written language, they were using runes a very
restricted system of delivering information
❖ being alliterate is not a new characteristic the Anglo-Saxons were oral people with oral traditions as
well
❖ the Vikings were a Pagan group and they spoke Old Norse the sentence structure of Old English took
the grammatical features of Old Norse, we still use grammatical categories and parts that were
introduced by the Vikings
How did the English react to the invasion of the Vikings? How did they cope with the
threat of becoming overrun by the Vikings?
❖ today King Alfred is known as the King, who saved England from a seemingly hopeless situation of Viking
dominance
the saviour of the English preventing England from being turned into a Viking area’
❖ King of Wessex
❖ first writer known to use ‘Angelcynn’ (literally ‘the land of the English folk’) in his official dealings with this
adding to the idea of an overarching English identity
❖ he is famous for his interest in learning: he gathered a circle of court intellectuals around him, he even
translated books, was very interested in religion, learning and Latin, which was not very common for a
medieval king back in the day
❖ his most famous moment however is a decisive battle: the battle of Eddington
Battle of Eddington
❖ in this battle, Alfred managed to keep the Vikings at distance and to defend the territories of the English
❖ he defeated a huge Viking force
❖ historians always like to speculate what would’ve happened if: their claim is that if Alfred had lost this
battle in Eddington, there would be no England today or that England would’ve turned into a part of the
Scandinavian empire (like a colony) shows the status of King Alfred
❖ defeating the Vikings didn’t mean that they would go away, but through Alfred’s negotiation, the Vikings
would stay in one part of the country and the English in another uneasy peace between the two
groups that would last for a couple of decades throughout most of the 10th century
❖ Alfred was not strong enough to chase the Vikings out England, that was impossible, but he could keep an
English identity
❖ his reign was significant both for the direction of the country’s development and for the riches of his
descendants
❖ Wessex was one of the seven kingdoms of the Heptarchy, however because of his victories he was seen as
the King of all English helped spread the influence of Wessex Wessex became the dominant
kingdom of all those other kingdoms on the British Isles
❖ the whole east of England and London was given to the Danes in that period (more than half of England
was governed by Scandinavian or Viking groups)
❖ struggles for power between various Viking groups
❖ along the east coast of Britain, Anglo-Saxon England ceased to exist, replaced largely by a pagan, oral
culture, which looked to Denmark and Norway
❖ ‘Danelaw’ = those regions of England were not just occupied by the Danes, but also governed and
administered by Danish people
The ‘Age of Wessex’ in the 10th Century – England was divided between English and Viking
regions this struggle is not to be solved in that period
the 10th century is often called the Age of Wessex Wessex became more centralized and militarized
❖ it’s in this period that this part of England or this region becomes predominant
❖ King Alfred’s efforts were quite successful in keeping the Danes at bay
❖ Wessex had to react to the dangers that the Vikings brought with them
❖ Best way to fight an external danger trying to occupy your territory?
o You have to do military reforms & reforms of administration.
❖ an interesting consequence is that Wessex became more centralized and militarized the English
kingdom was getting stronger and stronger in its desire to fight off the Danes
Strategies of Wessex kings trying to deal with the Danes, their neighbours
❖ Christianization (Vikings were Pagans, but not all of them stayed Pagan) King Alfred
baptized the Danish king and tried to make him a Christian as well in order to establish cultural
links
❖ Danegeld – he paid the Danes for not invading English territories – it is a specific historical
term that was already used in that period
Age of Feudalism (as a system)
process of centralization
the situation remained very tense, but feudalism helped raise resources
King on top, he owns all the land and he gives his land to the nobles that are loyal to
him, he makes sure that the noblemen support him
the nobles have to provide military services if they want the king to keep giving
them land
The king himself can’t fight the Danes, but having loyal vassels that provide military
support makes it more efficient and easier
the nobles give their land to the knights and vassels, who own military service to
the noblemen
the knights and the vassels give their land to the peasants to work upon it and to
make it productive
this system of power becomes more established in the 10th century in Wessex and
in most parts of Europe
Feudalism is the system on which political power is exercised
The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle
the second most important source of information in history for that period in England
an old English manuscript that was created in the late 9th century during the reign of King Alfred
❖ 1016 was a very interesting date in English history England had no English king
❖ 1016: Dane Cnut became king (1016-1035) Cnut as English king in 1016 reigning for almost 20 years
❖ the Danes were so strong in that period that they could establish their own royal line in England
❖ in this period England seemed to be a virtual colony in England, inferior as a part of a Scandinavian empire
❖ it took another almost 1000 years for Denmark and England to become part of one political structure
again, the European Union
❖ the period in which the future of England seemed very remote and insecure (was very likely for Britain to
become a Scandinavian territory with Scandinavian traditions)
❖ apart from England:
✓ there were Vikings as reigned in Dublin (Ireland) and in Wales
✓ much of Wales remained under the dominance of the English
✓ the history of the English is more illuminated to us than the history of the other groups
- there was no interest in the Scandinavian, Pagan part of English history until the 19th century
- historians were looking at other periods and groups, mostly at Greek and Roman civilization
- interest in Viking history was revived because Victorians were fascinated by them, for they were fierce, brutal
warriors, always successful, they had this manly warrior-like spirit, the Victorians even compared themselves to
the Vikings ‘bravery’
- 19th century: Scandinavians used the Vikings as a positive example of national history – they were seen as the
birth of Scandinavian nations and they were firmly incorporated in national traditions
❖ the Vikings didn’t really conquer England, although they occupied parts of it
❖ the Norman invasion is very different, because it was a conquest: it captured the home of England
❖ most historians claim that this is the most decisive date in English history
General information about Edward - a king from the Wessex royal line -
❖ the word confessor denotes a religious dimension, it stresses the religious characteristic, his
intention to lead a line of godly disposition
❖ Edward himself grew up in Normandy and not in England important link – he had to flee from
England to Normandy because the Danish royal dynasty was taking more and more control in
England
❖ all the people from the Anglo-Saxon royal line were rivals and persecuted
❖ he was one of the few kings who didn’t fight any wars, he wasn’t interested in military welfare
❖ he was interested in raising and discussing religion, but also making people more religious
Historical details
❖ there was a Danish king on the throne, but he died in 1034, so a new king was sought
❖ unfortunately, the Danish king had no children
❖ first there was another Danish king on the throne, but in 1042 the line of Wessex was restored
through Edward the Confessor an English king on the throne of England final years of the
history of Anglo-Saxons, he was the last king of the Anglo-Saxon royal dynasty
Edward the Confessor died, so there were two claimants of the throne now: HAROLD and
WILLIAM
❖ Godwin’s son Harold – Godwin was the most powerful and richest man in England
❖ the Godwin family was a very wealthy and influential aristocratic family, they have influenced English
politics for decades
❖ when Edward died, Harold claimed that he had been given the throne of England by the dying Edward
no one could ever prove this, but the circle of noblemen elected Harold as the rightful king of England
unfortunately, this was soon questioned by the Lords, because William, the duke of Normandy
claimed that the English crown had to be given to him and not to Harold
But what right did William have to claim that the throne belonged to him?
❖ William and Edward were cousins, so the mother of Edward the Confessor was a Norman princess, Emma
❖ Emma was the mother of Edward the sister of Robert and Robert was the father of William
brother and sister and their children, Edward and William
❖ William’s claim bloodline, relation to Edward (the last king of the Anglo-Saxons) naturally William
would be the next in line, because Harold wasn’t related to Edward
❖ Harold was only the son of the most powerful man in England, there was no blood relation
❖ conflicts were arising between king Harold the first - legally crowned monarch- and William, who was
across the channel of Normandy waiting to conquer the crown and make himself king of England
❖ history is written by the winner, the winner in this contest was William
❖ the Normans claimed that they were the rightful heirs to the English crown
❖ they presented a story – that a couple of years before, Harold once shipwrecked in Normandy and he had
to promise William that William will be the next king and that Harold would not press a claim to the
English king – story told by Norman sources -
❖ Harold realized there is a rival in Normandy, just across the channel, wanting to raise an army
❖ ‘I will fight William for the crown of England, I want to keep the English crown’
❖ William himself also had some problems -he was an illegitimate child, he was born out of wedlock - so
throughout his life, William was very careful to make sure that he was the most powerful one that no one
could dispute his rightful decision as the duke of Normandy
❖ English and Norman sources about this period are very different – but it’s the Norman version of the story
that has been mostly accepted throughout the subsequent centurie
❖ William and Harold were trying to raise armies, William wants to invade England to get the crown, but he
wasn’t alone
❖ there was another claimer of the throne: King Harald, the Viking king of Norway
Long story short: William was a distant cousin of Edward the Confessor and wanted to be the next
king. He claimed that both Edward and Harold had promised him the throne, but English supporters of
Harold challenged this.
When Edward was a boy in 1016, King Canute invaded England and Edward ran away to Normandy for
safety. Edward stayed in Normandy until he became King of England in 1042. Edward invited William
of Normandy to his court in 1051 and supposedly promised to make him heir.
(http://www.primaryhomeworkhelp.co.uk/bt/claimants.htm)
❖ we have the English on top defending the territory, we have the Normans pressing up uphill,
the English were on foot and had arches
❖ the Normans are also on foot and had some kind of arches but they had something else:
troops on horseback, the cavalry (in the back)
❖ trick by king William: William acted like he was defeated, so he pretended to escape
❖ the English realized ‘Yes, we are victorious, let’s rush down the hill and kill those escaping
troops.’
❖ this was only fiction, so the English gave out their position on top and rushed down the
valley unfortunately, they were slaughtered by the cavalry waiting in the back
❖ finally, it was only king Harold and his bodyguards left
❖ King Harold was allegedly killed with an arrow that was shot through his eye
❖ the last English king was killed in the battle of Hastings
❖ the Normans were successful, but winning one battle doesn’t really mean victory, you had
to make sure that all England would submit to you
William the first takes power
How did William consolidate his victory?
❖ William the first: was crowned at Westminster Abbey on Christmas Day (in London)
❖ the ceremony of the crowning was given in French spoken by the Normans
❖ William tried to make himself appear as someone, who would value and cherish the traditions of Anglo-
Saxon England
❖ ‘it was not a military defeat of the English, it was just the chasing of an illegitimate king, namely king
Harold’ story fabrication by the Normans
❖ tactic: bringing a lot of Norman noblemen (who didn’t have any possessions in Normandy) to England and
he gave them English territories he pushed out the Anglo-Saxon elite on top and replaced the top line
of society with Norman noblemen, who’d be loyal to him substitution of the English upper rank
❖ he brought a new military invention to England, something England didn’t have before his succession,
namely: the castle (the castle is a truly French, Norman innovation)
❖ the Normans built the famous tower of London
❖ the tower of London was built by William the first, shortly after his arrival in London, showing us that
London must’ve been an important centre already back in the day
❖ Normans took control of England and they claimed they they would just continue the traditions of Anglo-
Saxon England
❖ the control of the Normans didn’t make that much of a difference for many, e.g. the English peasants
didn’t really care whether they were supressed and exploited by Anglo-Saxon lords or Norman ones
❖ the end of English rule and the beginning of a new Norman dynasty
The Emergence of England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland
The Vikings in hindsight
❖ in the 5th century, when the Romans had left, Scotland didn’t really exist, there was no Scotland
❖ the Irish, the Picts, the Britains and the Anglo-Saxons all struggled for supremacy in the territories of
today’s Scotland
❖ in the 11th century half of England was linked to Denmark and in the second half of the 11 th century
England was linked to Normandy
❖ the beginning of a Scottish identity developing: in the 9th century, when King Alfred defeated the Danes in
the battle of Eddington – the groups in the north were alliterate, we don’t have much written information
on this topic
❖ we only know a lot about the English because of Monk Bede, but we can’t say much on the history of the
Scottish because there was no historian writing it down for us in the early medieval period
❖ the 10th and the 11th centuries make the division between the four main regions of the British isles very
clear division of England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales we could then speak of those four regions
that remain with us until today
Sources:
https://www.enjoy-irish-culture.com/images/ireland-history-viking-boat-500-wm.jpg
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/05/44/ae/0544ae249028b4255873d83cb1d5e3c2.jpg
https://previews.123rf.com/images/ivanmogilevchik/ivanmogilevchik1507/ivanmogilevchik15070000
8/43537427-set-of-monochrome-viking-elements-isolated-on-white-background-Stock-Vector.jpg
http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/rmhttp/schools/primaryhistory/images/vikings/who_were_the_vikings/
vk_map_whowerethey.jpg
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02797/alfred1_2797968b.jpg
https://extechops.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/england-danelaw-map.jpg
https://hitchhikeamerica.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/edward_confessor3.jpg
http://cdn-7.medievalchronicles.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Feudalism-The-Feudal-
Pyramid.png?e2299c
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/content/images/story-england/early-medieval/battle-hastings-
painting
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2c/Tower_of_London_viewed_from_the_River
_Thames.jpg
Schedule
1. The Norman Centuries, 1100-1300
2. English Monarchs
1. Norman Britain
❖ revolutionary changes in English society
❖ South of England: as the first region to be influenced by the invaders, then the rest of the Isles
followed
❖ no other conquest in European history had such disastrous consequences for the defeated (in
this case the English)
❖ the Scandinavian context of English history vanished never again did Scandinavians or Vikings
have the same power over the English as before their influence was gone
❖ colonial character of society (it is tricky to use the term ‘colonization’ in the early medieval
sense, because colonization is a modern concept, starting from the 16th century onwards
❖ BUT! There was this process: younger sons of Norman families went to England and they were
given land by the king, replacing the Anglo-Saxon nobility
❖ very typical for a colonial society: the native elite gets replaced by the victorious newcomers
❖ the Anglo-Saxons gained a second class, inferior status
❖ there was a partition between the Normans (the ruling class) and the English (the Anglo-Saxon
rest of society)
two class society - upper class speaking French and the lower class speaking English
❖ for a long time, the conquerors and the conquered remained separate there were very few to
no marriages between the Normans and the English in the first decade (rigid division)
❖ mixing between the two groups in the subsequent centuries
❖ William the first conquering England: you need more than battles and armies to rule- strategies
that were used by William the first that helped him fortify his victory and his claim to be the king
of England: - the Domesday book
The Domesday Book, 1086
❖ it is a strange title, but there is a reason behind it: no one could ever escape this
survey, ‘no one would be spared, it would be as strict as the day of judgement’ it
would list ALL PROPERTY in the land
❖ more than 90% of the English population lived on the country side
❖ 25% were servants
❖ 75% were free and not bound to a master by obligation
England & Normandy two territories joined together with William the first as the
monarch
❖ a cross-Channel political community with a single Anglo-Norman aristocracy
❖ two regions bound together it was one kingdom that was governed by one single monarch, a
Norman monarch
❖ 50 years before there was a Danish king on the throne and England was kind of an attachment
for/to Denmark – now we had Normandy as the dominant territory
❖ England was dominated by Norman customs and politics
❖ Interesting relationship: William was the king of England but not king of Normandy. There was
already a French king and interestingly, William had to be loyal to him. William was the vassal
of the French king.
❖ William owned allegiance to the French king
❖ the French king wasn’t happy about the fact that William was a king too he saw it as a
problem
‘One of the people that he governed was almost as powerful as him.’
❖ this relationship between France and England remained troubled for the centuries to come
The king gave the land to the noblemen and the barons. They had to promise
that they’d support the king in military, in further conquests and in internal
rebellions within England as well.
Each baron had to provide a number of nights for the king to serve in the royal
army.
Those nights would be gathered when there was a reason for fighting and there
was no standing army. William had complete power and he always had an army
at hand when it was necessary due to the feudal obligations.
❖ Names changed: names like Aidan, Selwin etc. of Anglo-Saxon origin became less and less frequent
after the Norman conquest
❖ the Normans bought their own names with them, replacing the names of the Anglo-Saxons: Robert,
Henry, William Norman names still very present today
❖ the Normans also gave the English the idea of an inherited surname (unknown in Anglo-Saxon
England)
❖ the influence of the French entered the English language (the English language has a lot of
words and synonyms because thousands of words of another language were imported in the
process of the Norman conquest)
❖ old English as a language changed drastically
❖ French-speaking elite (the well-educated) English men spoke three languages now: English,
French and Latin
❖ rigid separation between the two languages at first mix of vocabulary later on
❖ meeting of two languages, of old English and old French is called Middle English
❖ starting point of Middle English as a distinct language spoken from the 1060ies onwards
A few examples, new words, old French words side by side to the English expressions:
bow –beef (boeuf); calf –veal (veau); pig –pork (porc); sheep –mutton (mouton), chicken –poultry
(poulet)
❖ the British Isles are part of a wider empire, which included more parts of
France
❖ we can’t speak about English monarchs or English history in this period, since it
was clearly dominated by the Normans
❖ way of living: we have the old French language and the Norman perspective as
dominant
❖ all affairs of the state were dealt with in French and Latin
❖ the English kings spoke French, they didn’t know any English for a couple of
centuries
Further Norman strategies
The Role of Castle, Church & Borough instruments of power
The Great Tower at Chepstow Castle, one of the earliest Norman stone structures in the British Isles.
(Getty)
❖ the Normans have rebuilt many cathedrals and churches as another way
of showing
‘Who has the power now?’
❖ The Normans didn’t just bring their system of rule, armies and castles,
they’ve rebuilt the Anglo-Saxon church and made it similar to the Norman
ways of practising religion
❖ instrument or a tool to make sure that the English would be obedient
❖ the church underwent interesting changes
❖ after 1066 almost every English cathedral was destroyed and substituted
by Norman architecture
❖ Change in the way of practising religion for priests
Anglo-Saxon time: priests could have children and they passed on their
priesthood to them
problematic for the Normans: they had to cut the ties between the
generation of the Anglo-Saxon priests
local, hereditary priesthood replaced by a celibate clergy
❖ they built more churches than the Anglo-Saxons, every village was given
its own church strengthening the social control of the population
❖ monasteries were also changed by the Normans new religious orders
came into existence
Hales, one of the first and smallest Norman churches
The Normans beyond England they also dominated regions beyond England, greatly
influencing the further history of those regions
‘Scotland’,
- Wales used to be a region where the British still ruled, where the Anglo-Saxons have not
penetrated into
- this wasn’t the case with the Normans
- they conquered the Welsh borders and that they’ve established themselves as the Lords of
wales
- by the 14th century, most of Wales was occupied by the Norman ruling class
- Wales: Normans imposing their language and their customs on the Welsh population (similar
to the history of England before)
‘Ireland’
‘Norman Yoke’
- this very negative and disastrous term came up 600 years later, in the 17 th century the
reason why this idea of Norman oppression gained population after a period that was long
gone by, is that there was a significant feeling of an anti-French sentiment in the 17th century
the Normans were seen as French, so their - role in the English history was very criticized
- the term Norman yoke was invented and given later in history by subsequent generations
General conclusion:
There are differing opinions, it’s hard to form an objective judgment when looking at the Norman
conquest, but we can say that the Normans reformed English society, made it more modern, and also
introduced cultural and political innovations.
13th Century – 1215 – key date in English history in which Magna Carta was first published or
written
❖ the beginnings of a circle of noblemen that were there to give advice to the king and share
their opinion
❖ occasionally, the king called these members of the parliament together and certain issues
were discussed and debated
❖ it wasn’t a parliament as we know it (not an institution), but the first beginnings of widening
of power, participation of broader levels of the English upper class
❖ Magna Carta was always celebrated as the birth of democracy or as the beginning of a
modern liberal tradition in European or Western politics
❖ today this document is seen as the birth of democracy, which is very misleading
❖ after Magna Carta was written down, it was almost forgotten for a few centuries
❖ a few centuries later, it was revived when people thought about the tradition of English
politics
❖ interesting example of how national identity is created
❖ selection: historians look at the past and they select certain events, figures and claim this is
our history
❖ invention, tradition and history of the past is always invented by later generations, who
decide what is important and then they take these parts of history and they celebrate it
❖ they write books about it and also create a tradition that is continuous
❖ selection of history: tradition is a creation and invention to some degree
❖ example: Magna carta – nowadays it is treated as a document of high important, which wasn’t
the case for many centuries
❖ history serves certain needs – a typical English trend is to establish an English identity - which
places a lot of focus on liberty or freedom
❖ Historical circumstances around the time must be kept in focus otherwise we create a false
image of history
Interpretation: liberty is a very vital value; the barons claim they can’t be imprisoned by the king
without a legal complaint and a legal preceding – the common people were not concerned by the
Magna carta.
Struggles within the ruling class Magna Carta was produced by the Barons for the Barons.
❖ mythical figures in English history – most famous character living on as an English idea - we
don’t know whether he existed or not- completely unimportant since he lives as a part of the
English tradition- celebrating a hero who gave to the poor and took from the rich (very
modern idea).
‘English Monarchs’
❖ there were no English monarchs at that time, we had French or Norman ones
❖ in the first 250 years after the Norman conquest, no king spoke English, they were all Normans
with Norman values
❖ He is known with three different names William I., William the Conqueror, William the
Bastard
❖ William the Bastard: William himself was an illegitimate son, his name is not justified, since
his mom was a peasant woman and not a Queen or nobility
❖ his father died when he was 8 years old, so William became the Duke of Normandy (Herzog), a
vassal to the French king
❖ he was very known for being a very mean and brutal ruler – he always had to make sure that
all would accept that he was the lawful ruler (which is more common when considering the
fact that he was perceived as illegitimate)
❖ William the Conqueror died, he had ruled England for 22 years and he divided his kingdom
into two regions: England to one son, Normandy to another - political union between England
and Normandy was finished for a specific period but later the parts became united again with
the next king
❖ interesting story about the death of king William: kings who were Normans were never buried
in England, they needed England because it gave them the title of a king, but they were not
really seeing themselves as kings of the English (burial in Normandy)
ruling in the 12th century, he marks the beginning of a specific dynasty of rulers called the Plantagenet
❖ beginning of the ‘Plantagenet’-era, dynasty took its name from the ‘Planta Genets’ (French
term for today’s broom, a flower)
❖ Geoffrey of Anjou, husband of Empress Mathilda and father of Henry II always used a part of
the planta genesta, he would put it on his hat, he was given the title of Henry Plantagenet
(another theory is that the name came from the habit of planting broom in order to improve
his hunting covers)
❖ Plantagenets would rule England for 331 years
❖ Henry II: the most powerful and famous monarch in English history
❖ he ruled England, Normandy and Aquitaine a region that was more than half of France
back in the day
❖ he was married to Eleanor
❖ Henry the 2nd seemed more powerful than he French king but still he was the vassal of the
French king (French king was enraged by the power of the English monarch – as always Lol)
❖ he is very famous because he was one of the most powerful emperors at that time, the only
one more powerful in Europe was Friedrich Barbarossa – they were both ruling at the same
time - in that period England gained wide recognition as a well-structured kingdom that was
quite powerful
❖ this was quite new because the most powerful regions at that time were France and the
German regions and territories
❖ Henry II put England on the map of powerful European countries
Edward I (1272-1307)
http://medievaleurope.mrdonn.org/wh_normans.gif
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f8/Norman-conquest-1066.svg/1200px-
Norman-conquest-1066.svg.png
https://image.slidesharecdn.com/englishlanguagetimeline-150709221918-lva1-app6892/95/english-
language-timeline-29-638.jpg?cb=1436481008
http://cdn3.historyextra.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/623px_wide/Normans%202.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normans#/media/File:1000-1100,_Norman._-_033_-
_Costumes_of_All_Nations_(1882).JPG
http://www.travelwessex.com/images/xDomesday-Book.gif.pagespeed.ic.5GkEJWRq0B.png
http://cdn-1.mrdowling.com/images/703normandy.png
http://www.historyextra.com/period/norman/castles-of-the-conqueror/
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-
qsTpnpuKucU/VZpkEpMcyHI/AAAAAAAAG6Q/6AWeupy0fHc/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2015-07-
06%2Bat%2B8.40.00%2Bpm.png
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Districts_of_England.svg/1200px-
Districts_of_England.svg.png
http://cdn.history.com/sites/2/2015/03/LIST-10-things-you-may-not-know-about-william-the-conqueror-E.jpeg
http://www.norfolkchurches.co.uk/hales/images/DSCF7273.JPG
Lecture 5: The Later Middle Ages, 1300-1485
Schedule:
1. The Hundred Years’ War
• How did the status of the English language change during the later Middle Ages?
• What were the ‘Wars of the Roses’ and what was their result?
Historical Periodisation
- Historical periods have a clumsy nature
- the term Middle Ages didn’t exist at that time – it was a term given to the Middle Ages later on in
order to mark them off from other periods
- no one in the middle ages has actually thought ‘yay I am living in the Middle Ages’ It was a
completely unknown concept to them.
- periods are always constructions; they are invented by scholars who are trying to make sense of
how history developed
- We use periods to understand more about those specific time frames.
The Hundred Years War, 1338-1453 – raged for more than 100 years!
The Age of War & Political Turmoil
2.) the fraction in Burgundy, the Burgundians made a pact with the English showing support
two main fractions in France competing against each other having regions in France
supporting the idea of an English king was an advantage for the English
from 1337 onwards there were military confrontations between the English and the French
Edward III claimed that he was the only legal successor to the French king
he carried out military campaigns to finally become the King of France
group of English men that was quite inferior to the French army (inferior in numbers)
it looked as if it was impossible for the English to win, but miraculously they remained victorious
reason for their success: their weapons
the French had the crossbow (effective weapon), but the English came up with an invention
that was super powerful: the longbow
superior military technology of the English (the longbow was a lot more powerful than the
crossbow) helped them win and they remained dominant for a long period, they could push the
French out of their own territories, since the war was raging in France and not in England
there was much fighting over Gascony
French and English fighters in the battle of Crécy
this wasn’t one long war, but rather periods of fighting and then long periods with no actual
battles frozen conflict
military revolutions: first use of English cannon, first use of artillery in a European battle
climax of English domination was reached with Henry V
Henry V (1413-1422) managed to defeat the French in several battles
he was even promised the French crone after the French king had died
another famous battle was the Battle of Agincourt
1453: English territories in the South-West were entirely lost: the war was at an end and the
English had not won the war
they had even lost most of their possessions in France
the origin of the V sign: the French had this habit of cutting off the fingers of the English longbow
men (punishment to make them incapable of using their weapons)
if the English showed the V sign, it meant ‘I still have my fingers, I can still use my bow and kill
you)
French warrior
Jeanne d’Arc, Joan of Arc, Saint Joan (1412-31)
most important woman in the conflict
she was the daughter of a poor peasant, but she had this idea that
God had spoken to her to resist the English and summon the
French troops, so she revived them with stamina
she managed to raise a national movement against the English
(bottom up resistance from the common people)
she was so successful, that they could defeat the English at
Orléans and crush the English troops that had invaded the city
she had a big contribution in this
the French didn’t pay her back for her contribution, they even imprisoned her after the battle
was won and then they sold her to the English (poor gal )
What did the English do to her? They accused her of witchcraft, of being a witch and then she
was burned at the stake. The English took revenge.
she remains one of the earliest French heroes
the borderline between English and the Scottish was truly disputed in that time
the 100 Year war brought confrontations between the English and the Scottish as well
key event: battle of Bannockburn in 1314
the Scottish managed to defeat the English and to keep their independence
the English on horseback, superior in weaponry, advanced military technology, sophisticated
military campaign <-> the Scottish looking like peasants, yet they still managed to fight the English
this idea of the Scottish as underdogs and the English as the superior English men has been part
of Scottish mentalities ever since
‘the English are far more powerful than we are, but we are honest, common, simple but we
cherish our Scottish identity’
club, organization that was founded by the English king, Edward the III
he wanted to collect the most courageous knights of his kingdom, bring them together in unity
they would meet regularly and celebrate their brotherhood
Edward III was very impressed by the literary romance about Arthur some centuries prior, so he
wanted to recreate this idea of a brave knight in community with other knights
he used a literary example to fashion or style his own club
the club still exists today, the English kept this tradition alive for centuries
it is one of the highest orders in England
the Queen gives membership to this order to specific selected people, who are known and
respected in English society (‘important people’ that have contributed in some way or another)
The Garter only has 24 members, the Queen can only appoint a new member when one of them
dies, because the members are elected for life (quite exclusive ;))
Idea behind the club: inventing, keeping up traditions in order to celebrate national identity,
Englishness
Chivalry (Ritterlichekit)
a very popular concept celebrated all along the medieval period a knight had to embody certain
character traits and values e.g. main aspects of chivalry were: courage, loyalty, honesty, friendship,
sacrifice and dedication
English Politics, Society & Culture
The Black Death – Pest
in the middle of the 100 Year war, England was not only tormented by chaos, but also by bacteria
was called ‘the great mortality’ back in the day
arrived from ships from the east (probably from Crimea)
those ships carried rats that were infested with the plague
Disaster in Europe: roughly 35 percent of the people in England died- every third person died as a
result of the plague
Catastrophic demographic situation
Consequences of the plague
+ this set emotion and development that was quite unique in England
+ centuries later in the industrial revolution: English labourers were paid more than workers of the
continent
church remained the main institution that governed your existence by giving importance to the
events in your life and through that structuring your life
the Pope was the European supreme authority – his institution organized the crusades – famous
phenomenon of the medieval period
The pope also controlled the bishops of the respective kingdoms of Europe
The struggle between King and the Church – German history date signifying the struggle in 1076 –
the German emperor walking around with naked feet to beg for forgiveness from the pope- they
struggled for authority - the church regarding himself as the highest authority, but the King said
his authority should be higher
The whole western world was structured by this conflict
Political power
The English nobility - ENGLISH NOBILITY is a complex phenomenon with many different levels.
Ascending order
The prince of wales standing next to the king
The royal dukes (Herzöge) – were usually the closest piers of the king
The marquesses
The earls (Graf)
Viscounts
Barons
All different levels of nobility were guarded fiercely.
it looked like the rebellion of the peasants would take over London
the English king at that time Richard II (who was 14 at that time) promised them that he would
meet their demands and that he would take care of their worries and their problems; he begged
them to go back to their villages
the peasants did go home but Richard did not take care of their worries
The rebellion was crushed, the king had made a very clever move
he gained the upper hand over the peasants
Groups of peasant rebelling wasn’t much organized and unified, very easy to for the nobility to
play off the fractions against each other -> causing internal confrontation between the peasants
themselves and all these factors contributed to the fame of the peasant’s revolt
Greatest social unrest in English history for a long time
The greatest rebellion in English history started by the common people
The Lollards
demanded important changes from the king
religious background
Lollardy (name probably derived from lollaer, a mumbler (of prayers)
Movement that criticized the power and the unchristian nature of the church
Claim: clergymen are unworthy of their office
they were drinking and not following the demands of their people and the church itself had to
be reformed
they believed that organized religion like the Roman church was manipulated- it led people
astray, away from the one true God, and the church itself was a corrupt institution in the eyes of
this group
purification of the church was required
many Lollards in England were punished severely (burnt at the stake and they were quite often
executed)
they questioned the power of the church
social situation in that period was full of struggle
The Revival of English – feelings of patriotism
English lost its status as the dominant language after the Norman conquest took place
In the first centuries after 1066: the king and the noblemen didn’t speak English and it was just a
local, inferior language
This changed in the later medieval period, because of the spread of literacy
More people were needed for working in official jobs of the government had to be able to
read and write
The revival of English also had to do with the War against France, because French suddenly
became the language of the enemy
The French language lost its prestigious status within England Return to English Rise of
English as the dominant language started again after being supressed for centuries
English was common for formal business, but there wasn’t one English language at that time, just
many dialects spoken in England (e.g. West-Saxon, West-Anglian etc.)
the midland’s dialect became more dominant than the other in business administration and it
was spoken in the middle of England
many people that spoke the dialect moved to London for trade, their language set the standard
for communication
1362: English became the official, national language after the French dominance
spread of literacy and the increased use of the English language
English became common for formal business
English Literature
English literature became widespread and popular
Not so much prose literature, but verse like poems, poetic forms as the superior form
lyric and romance, comedy and tragedy, allegory
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Piers Plowman as outstanding works ( + The Canterbury Tales:
most famous literary text in the whole medieval period of England)
English miracle and mystery plays on stage – dramatic performance becoming a major part of
entertainment in villages and towns
The mistery plays usually took texts or situations from the bible and illustrated them for the
common people
Main goal: show the people the rights and wrongs of behaviour
An Age of Decadence? Dark and sinister age, where morality is at its lowest.
Wales
Ireland
London
1453: the 100 Years War ended in humiliation for the English
they have been kicked out of France
they could only still keep some tiny spots in France like Calais
losing a war is never good for a king, it makes the nobility dissatisfied and makes them rebellious
Henry VI – became king when he was two months old – his carrier as king was always dominated
by external advisers like powerful Barons who wanted to have the crown for themselves (and not
to serve a child)
Rivalry developing between the houses of Lancaster and York
two powerful noble houses in England that were even related to each other
They struggled for dominance starting the wars of the roses, raging for 30 years in England
Series of battles and conflicts – not one continuous war – emergence of several confrontations
The Lancasters were victorious supporting the king - but Henry VI was pushed out of his throne
by the Yorks in 1416 (the Yorks were successful)
Edward was on the throne, struggle for dominance extends in the 1480ies
7 August 1485, Henry Tudor, Earl of Richmond, landed in Wales – first king of the Tudor dynasty,
he was part of the Lancastrian camp
the Lancastrians needed a new figure head to rule and to guide the troops and they were using
the noblemen of Welsh origin - Henry Tudor
1483: the battle of Bosworth – two rivals Henry Tudor was fighting Richard III (Yorkest King) for
the Lancastrians
Henry Tudor was victorious, his army defeats Richard the III and his men – the Wars of the Roses
end and the Lancastrian family wins – they establish a new dynasty the ‘Tudor dynasty’
red rose(Lancaster) and the white rose(York).
Consequences
Sources
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9c/Rivers_%26_Caxton_Presenting_book_to_Edward_IV.JPG/3
00px-Rivers_%26_Caxton_Presenting_book_to_Edward_IV.JPG
https://www.heritagedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/med1.jpg
http://cdn.history.com/sites/2/2015/06/hith-wars-of-roses-istock-E.jpeg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d7/Roses-Lancaster_victory.svg/500px-Roses-
Lancaster_victory.svg.png
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Crécy
https://www.biography.com/.image/t_share/MTE5NDg0MDU1MDExOTUyMTQz/joan-of-arc-9354756-1-402.jpg
https://timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/140709-winston-churchill-eisenstedt-feat.jpg?quality=85
http://l7.alamy.com/zooms/f317f05641d64f55a611599c7bcdbcd3/scots-rout-the-english-army-at-the-battle-of-
bannockburn-1314-dy2gff.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/32/White_Rose_Badge_of_York.svg/2000px-
White_Rose_Badge_of_York.svg.png
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d8/2d/e9/d82de9181f49c00b4ee65a1b91bd1403.jpg
http://c8.alamy.com/comp/E1M99R/a-london-street-during-the-15th-century-E1M99R.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4f/WycliffeYeamesLollards_01.jpg
https://www.wpclipart.com/world_history/punishment/burned/Lollards_hanged_and_burned.png
https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/spiked-online.com/images/peasants_revolt.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/21/Polish_magnates_1697-1795.PNG
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/c6/89/dd/c689dd549cb080516ecb1db0891b94ea--chivalry-king-arthur.jpg
https://img.purch.com/w/660/aHR0cDovL3d3dy5saXZlc2NpZW5jZS5jb20vaW1hZ2VzL2kvMDAwLzAxOS82MzYvb3JpZ2l
uYWwvMDgwNDI4LWJsYWNrLWRlYXRoLTAyLmpwZw==
Lecture 6: The Sixteenth Century
Early modern period
Schedule:
• 1. The Tudors
• Describe the impact of the Reformation on England and on the British Isles.
• Outline English foreign policy in the 16th century and also consider England’s
Tudor achievements
❖ the Tudors reformed the government
❖ they chose London as the permanent seat and center of government
❖ kings usually travelled around the country, having theirs courts in a mobile fashion with them,
which was necessary in order to control the regions and to curb any rebellions
❖ the Tudors weren’t mobile, decided to have a more stationary seat of power, in this case
London and its surroundings
❖ London was the biggest city in the Western world in this period
❖ the court itself became the center of power and access to the monarch, the greatest privilege
for any noblemen
❖ English nationhood prospered, because the Tudors had this idea that in order to keep the nation
together, national identity was required they spread the idea of the Tudors as an English
dynasty – rooted in English history and traditions
❖ Ironically, the Tudors were of Welsh origin, and not of English
❖ power was related to symbols and performance – the Tudors loved possessions, they loved to
show kingly power and to demonstrate it in public relevance of showing off and of impressive
performances
❖ rise of the lower gentry (see below)
❖ when the Tudor left with the death of Queen Elizabeth, there was a Scottish dynasty replacing
them
The Wars of the Roses were very destructive. The conflict between the two houses almost killed the
whole aristocracy of England. In the 1450ies we had more than 50 members of aristocratic origin, but
this number was reduced to only 8 in the 1485ies, when the war ended. Whole families were wiped out
and since there was not enough aristocracy left, Henry VII had to use people from the lower gentry as
his advisers and chosen politicians. Because of this phenomenon, the boundaries between aristocracy
and simple people became weaker, making it a lot easier for common English people to rise up the social
scale. This was not the case in other regions in Europe.
Tudor struggles/problems
❖ the biggest problem of this dynasty was legitimacy – people of Welsh origin on the
English throne
❖ people were always questioning if it was right to have people of Welsh origin on the
throne
❖ another problem was linked to religion – the change of religion in England produced a
lot of insecurity and hate in England, for there were a lot of people who weren’t happy
with the changes enemies threatening to the Tudors
❖ external threats such as external agents (e.g. Spain and France) intend upon damaging
England or English rule
The Tudor myth is still alive today and it represents the idea of contemporary or modern beauty
standards.
A new age? Can we justify calling the 16th century ‘a new age’?
Justification of calling the 16th century a new age:
❖ 1492: discovery of America by European sailors
(Many historians, especially American ones, claim that this is the single most important
date in history, which is a popular idea but very arguable.)
❖ 1492 is seen by many as a diving line between medieval history and early modern
history only happened in hindsight, because when Columbus died, he still thought he
had discovered India
❖ England in 1500: almost everyone on the British Isles followed one coherent religion,
which was Catholicism
❖ All English, Scottish, Irish and Welsh belonged to great community of Christianity with
the pope as the spiritual leader and supreme authority
❖ Situation in England: the wars between England and France were now over, just like the
conflict of the houses (The War of the Roses)
❖ there was enormous potential for new developments
❖ gradual emergence of an English empire England’s influence abroad becomes
stronger
Renaissance (French: rebirth) – Italian ‘rinascimento’
❖ ‘invented’-the idea by a rebirth was created by the scholars in the 19th century (see below)
❖ there was an immense interest arising in the 19th century regarding this period
❖ beginning of the Renaissance: hard to say, but around 1453 in Europe
(England: end of The Wars of the Roses; Europe: fall of Constantinople and the end of the
Byzantine empire in Europe)
The changes brought by Renaissance were visible in terms of art and literature.
❖ many Byzantine or Greek scholars migrated to Europe (they were not wanted in their own
countries anymore) and enriched the continent with their knowledge
❖ the revival/rediscovery of Greek and Roman antiquity is the most crucial element of the
Renaissance
❖ Renaissance in art: in terms of subjects and architecture (e.g. Gothic and Mediterranean)
❖ Celebration of the human body in art (before this the human body was only present in the form
of Christ on the cross)
❖ Humanism is linked with the Renaissance, they go hand in hand; ‘you can’t think of the one
without the other’
Humanism
❖ a philosophy that puts the human being and its potentials in the center,
❖ replaces Scholasticism (medieval religious practice of looking at texts and phenomenon)
❖ Closely linked to humanism is a technological innovation which was the printing culture
and press in Germany and in England with Johannes Gensfleisch aka Gutenberg (ca.
1400-1468) and William Caxton
❖ Gutenberg is seen as one of the most influential people of all time, because the
invention of the printing press changed everything (e.g. it changed literacy levels,
changed how information spread and generally speaking, the whole way of looking at
life through the newly earned knowledge)
Why was the catholic church so bad? Why did Luther, Calvin and Zwingli want to
reform the it?
It was too
These factors brought forward the rise of Protestantism as a rival fraction of the Catholic church.
Protestantism:
❖ the Protestants refused to accept the pope (and its cardinals and bishops) as the dominant
religious authority
❖ protestants emphasized that there was no need for the pope, but rather the individual relation
to God was the most important factor
❖ everyone could practice religion, so there was no need for an interference of other institutions
only God, the individual and God’s word, the Bible
Henry VIII and the Break with Rome: The English Reformation
❖ Henry was very interested in religion, heard sermons for hours on a daily basis, wrote religious
texts etc.
❖ Henry’s wife didn’t bear him a male heir; she only gave him a daughter, but Henry needed a
male heir for his succession
❖ Henry wanted to divorce Catherine of Aragon because she was already 40 and she would
probably not bear him a male heir anymore, so Henry informed Pope Clement VII that he
wanted a divorce
❖ Pope had to allow the divorce but he refused
reason: the pope was very much in tune with the French and the Spanish: Katherine was a
Spanish princess
❖ Henry couldn’t legally divorce her, he decided to get rid of the pope’s authority in England
❖ he started a gradual abandonment of the allegiance of England to Rome and the Roman church
❖ he used several laws to do this:
• Act of Appeals (1533) – proclaimed that the king was the sacred emperor and that
authority comes from the king and not from the Pope
• Act of Supremacy (1534)- made the English king the highest religion authority in
England, he became the supreme head of the church
• Act of Succession (1534)- tackled the idea of royal succession without the interference
of the pope
• Act against the Pope’s Authority (1536) – the pope shouldn’t have a say on religious
‘matters’ in England
❖ This string of acts together finished the link between the Roman church and England
The pope’s power was gone, Henry married a few other women:
❖ Anne Boleyn (the mother of Queen Elizabeth, no son, but gave birth to the future Queen)
❖ Elizabeth in 1533, still no male
❖ Henry then married Jane Seymour, she brought forth a legitimate male heir, Edward VI (Jane’s
childbirth lasted two nights and three days, she became ill and died)
❖ Anne of Cleves (divorced)
❖ Catherine Howard (executed in 1542 for adultery)
❖ final wife was Catherine Parr
❖ ^very few English kings who had the same impact as Henry the VIII
❖ he changed the makeup of the English society and had a great impact on people regarding
religion
❖ Henry died as one of the greatest English monarchs of all time
❖ he had established the church of England, an institution that has survived until today
❖ changed religion but rebellions have been avoided during the reign of King Henry
❖ Henry had to fight the pope and Catholic dogma, but he hadn’t adopted a protestant alternative
because his dissatisfaction with religion was purely personal
Protestantism
❖ wealth and power in the center of the Catholic church
❖ the protestant church’s conviction wasn’t based on wealth but rather on a church that
allowed people to ‘meet God’ on a personal level
❖ direct meeting with God, church as no worldly institution
❖ protestants abandoned the colorful ways of Catholicism, the Protestant religion was
much more logical
❖ most people in the villages were not interested in the Anglican church because they
liked their colorful traditions and rituals (they stood for Catholicism)
❖ term ‘puritan’ – used as a very negative, abusive term – someone who would be a
religious rebel
Edward VI and Mary I.
❖ Henry VIII died in 1547
❖ his son Edward VI (only 9 at that time) was crowned, he needed
advisers to guide him
❖ Edward VI died in 1553
❖ Lady Jane (16) proclaimed Queen of England, she was only
Queen for a couple of days and then she was imprisoned and beheaded by those fractions
that were not happy about her crowning
❖ Queen Mary I: 1553-1558 – first child of Henry VIII became the Queen of England
❖ she reigned for five years
❖ often called Bloody Mary (John Foxe’s Book of Martyrs (1563)): when she first came to the
throne, she married a Spanish prince, and Spain at that time still had the Catholic faith
❖ Mary was keen on bringing England back on the road of the Catholic faith
❖ she saw it as her great mission to introduce Catholicism to England
❖ abandon the reformation that her father successfully carried out
❖ she is most famous because she imprisoned more than 280 protestants and then burned them
on stakes
❖ Scotland became protestant and founded its own church: the Scottish church (distinct from the
Anglican church)
❖ Ireland remained Catholic
❖ it cut off the British Isles from the rest of Europe (France and Spain remained Catholic), so the
countries became rivals
❖ Catholic minority in England, not all English people accepted the new faith (no coherent group
of worshippers in England)
❖ nearest friendly ports for Protestant ships from London were in Germany Bremen and
Hamburg, French and Spanish ports were seen as hostile
❖ religion was seen as the dominant factor shaping one’s identity
❖ interested in bringing religious peace in England she wanted to solve the problems linked to
her sister’s rebellion on the throne
religious settlement of 1559: ‘Act of Supremacy’ & ‘Act of Uniformity’ (established in
common Protestant ritual) – two laws that tried to achieve religious tolerance and a common
protestant ritual
Mary Stuart (not Queen Mary, she was daughter of the French Queen, Queen of the Scots
from the age of 6, she was also the cousin of Elizabeth the 1 st
❖ there were struggles for power in Scotland and she had lost her husband; she remained
vulnerable and decided to escape to England
❖ the favorite of all those Catholic people in England (she was a Catholic)
many claimed that she was the rightful heir to the kingdom of England
❖ Elizabeth put Mary Stuart under arrest – remained that way for 18 years – she was
discovered in making plans to push Elizabeth off the throne and to murder her even
(Catholic plot)
❖ Elizabeth had to decide to have Mary Stuart executed – DEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD
❖ her reign seemed more secure after executing her cousin
Literary history:
❖ 1586: Mary Stuart lured into giving consent to plot to murder Elizabeth,
❖ Schiller’s play Maria Stuart (1800) which sentimentalizes the Scottish Queen as a Catholic victim
❖ Elizabeth is the heartless one killing the innocent Mary
❖ reality was a different story
Wales
Ireland
❖ Ireland as prime attraction for colonists from Scotland, Wales and England
❖ it had fertile ground, attractive region, not many enemies – process of colonization in that
period
❖ England became interested in Ireland during the rule of the Tudors
because the population in England grew too rapidly over time, Ireland was a very appealing
destination for settlers
❖ the Irish was seen as 2nd class people, as inferior barbarians
convinced the English that this was actually a region worth occupying
❖ Ireland as a perfect new destination for settlers
❖ Ireland remained Catholic and it could make pacts with European powers – England was still
protestant danger to England, more English influence was required
England
• Ulster
• The Nine Years’ War (also known as Tyrone’s Rebellion): 1594 to 1603
5. Foreign Policy
England in the 1600s – approaching the final years of the Tudor Age
❖ new safety for England: the French did not seem interested enough in warfare with the English,
the Irish were mainly controlled by the English, the Welsh have been elapsed by the English, the
Scotts had been made more compromising and obedient within the English and Scottish ruling
dynasties
❖ heart of England became one of the safest locations in the world – there was less violence in
England than in other European regions sign of a very well-organized administration
❖ England must’ve been quite well governed in that period
❖ Spain was not only an enemy in terms of Europe and religion – Spain was the first to exploit the
discovery of this new continent America by claiming immense parts as Spanish colonies
❖ Spanish increased their power in Europe to a great degree
❖ the English realized they should also start some kind of exploration and occupation of those
foreign lands
❖ England envied the Spanish because of the gold and the silver they brought from America
❖ they were preoccupied with the reformation and the idea of succession, it was the first in the
very late 16th century that the first geographical expeditions took place,
❖ the English were too late and by 1600 there was still not a single English colony
❖ the first American presence of the English only happened in1606: first successful English
settlement (Jamestown)
❖ 1600: foundation of East India Company – economic venture to exploit trade with non-European
territories
❖ the English imitated the Dutch, the Dutch had founded their own company before
Schedule
1. The Stuarts
3. What was the ‘Glorious Revolution’ and what were its effects?
1. The Stuarts
• James I (1603-1625)
• Charles I (1625-1649)
• Charles II (1660-1685)
• James II (1685-1688)
There was a unification between Scotland and England. King James had
been king of Scotland for 36 years. Up until the beginning of the 17th
century, England and Scotland were two independent kingdoms.
Unfortunately, Elizabeth I, the Queen of England died unmarried and
childless. The English crown is always passed down to the next available
heir. This time it was her cousin James VI, who was the King of
Scotland at that time. As a result, England and Scotland now shared
the same monarch, that’s what we call the union of the crowns.
There was one crown for James I, but he was the king of two
kingdoms.
✓ He was male- easier to have a male successor, for there would be less arguing and
discussions
✓ He was protestant (which was very important)
✓ Very interested in the job, was the son of Mary Stuart who had been beheaded by
Queen Elizabeth
‘Union of the Crowns’ in 1603
❖ the Union of the Crowns was a great advantage for the English, because they
felt they could remove the enemy in the north
❖ made it almost impossible for the English and Scottish to go to war against each
other, but they did go to war
❖ after three years on the throne, he decided there should be one flag for
England and Scotland
James I and Great Britain – James’ aspirations to bring about a unified kingdom
- the civil war happened between two parties – the King (crown, monarchy)
VS the great rival, the parliament
- these two institutions were fighting for supremacy it is often called
the ‘English revolution’
- in reality, this was a war focused on religion
- very similar to what happened on the European continent at the same
time: 30 Years war mainly fought in Germany
-
- to make their ideas legitimate, they always needed the consent of the
people
- when the king needed money, he had to contact the parliament to get
their affirmation to be able to raise taxes
- Upper chamber: the members of the upper chamber were the aristocrats
and men of the church: religious holders of office and the nobility
- Lower chamber: elected, only landowners could vote at that time, about
3% of the population were landowners
- the decisions of the parliament weren’t the decision of all the population,
because only the landowners (the ruling class) had any say in this
- democracy in that period was basically non-existent
- English kings claimed that they were chosen by God, so nobody could reject or
criticize them
- divine right of kings clever idea because it meant that the decisions of the
king were always right
- it led to a conflict between the parliament and the king
Parliament: ‘we are powerful, we support you, we always want to participate in
decisions’
- King: ‘I am the chosen successor and I don’t need to consult anyone.’
The conflict between parliament and king was already existent, but there were a
few conflicts that were added to it:
Religion was a very crucial issue in the 16th and 17th century. There was the 30 Year War in
Germany, which was quite strongly based on religion. The struggle between the Catholics
and the Protestants was a broader feature of European politics in the period.
- two groups that became very dominant and famous as opponents of the king
- Puritans: characterized by: a group that advocated the relationship within the
individual and God, without any interference of the established Church
- their idea was there should be a religious democracy in England
- they were bitterly opposed to the King, they saw the King as a danger: danger to
their own goals and achievements
The wood cut was a very dominant medium in the 17th century. Illustrations were
more important back then then they are today, because many people couldn’t
read and weren’t literate. Through wood cut and illustrations everyone could get
the message.
The Outbreak of the Civil War
- the struggle between the parliament and the king couldn’t be solved
- outbreak of war between the two groups
- the relations between King and Parliament were hopeless by 1642
there was no common ground any longer
- since Charles felt increasingly in danger of being taken captive by the
parliament, he left his seat of power and fled to Oxford
- in Oxford he tried to build up an army to fight for his crown
- the composition of the army: no regular army in this century, only brought
together when there was a need to fight
- parliament and the king had to convince the people in the country to follow their
camp and fight for them
- early 1640ies: two armies coming into existence
- both were raised and they finally clashed
- the conflict could only be solved by military confrontation
- ‘Battle of Edgehill’ in October 1642 – marks the starting point of the civil war in
England
Parliamentarians or Roundheads (because of their hairstyles) vs. Royalists or
Cavaliers (the word cavalier: chivalry, royal quality, aristocratic expression,
opposed to roundheads) – two names given to the armies
- different territories, different allegiances (King: north and west of England,
Parliament: forces in the south, south-east and London)
- Marston Moor near York in June 1644- brutal battle with a lot of casualties -
one of the largest battles ever fought in England
- The region that supported the king shrank from year to year
in the long run the forces of the king was inferior to the forces of the
parliament the parliament was stronger
Why was the parliament stronger in the end? Why did the king have to give in in the end?
But! With this wasn’t the case with the New Model Army:
➢ the leader should be the one who is the most successful and not the richest
ones
➢ based on soldiers were paid regularly; made it very stable and motivated
➢ strict discipline and training professional armed force fighting for the
parliament (second main reason for its victory)
➢ institution that introduced the red coats: the famous red coats can still be seen
today as a reenactment of the civil war battles
➢ the Civil War was over with the defeat of the Scots at Preston
➢ the parliament defeated the king
➢ they debated what to do with the imprisoned King
➢ fierce discussions:
1.) majority wanted to restore the king: ‘We need the monarchy and bring him back
to senses and make him restore our rights.’
2.) the second part thought ‘Let’s put the king on trial, accuse him of crimes against
nature.’
3.) there were very radical parts in parliament that realized that the majority will
never abolish the monarchy and kill the king
Tricks of the parliament when they realized that most people didn’t want to abolish the
monarchy:
➢ they only let people enter the parliament who would support the radical measure of
killing the king
➢ The rest was kept from entering the building
➢ Parliament only consisted of those in favor of killing the King
➢ 46 members allowed to enter the parliament, only 26 voted for executing the king
➢ Charles decided not to acknowledge their accusations
➢ himself claimed that the parliament has no right to accuse him of anything since his
ruling was of divine nature
➢ he didn’t recognize the parliament as having the power of putting the king on trial
➢ ignoring their accusations didn’t keep him alive
the legal execution of an English King was the first in English history
for the very first time in English history, there was no monarch (exceptional
character of this century)
Oliver Cromwell
- most powerful ruler of the British Isles since the fall of Rome
- leader of the new model army, the king’s fiercest opponent
- was very committed to puritanism – a very religious man
- all his decisions were clothed in religious metaphors
- most powerful ruler of the British Isles since the Romans had left
be brought the different nations of the British Isles together: England and
Scotland and Ireland were forged into one United Kingdom
massive military force, the military campaigns were always successful
ruled the country as the ‘Lord protector’ (new title) Head of state for five
years
- Parliament decided they wanted to bring back the monarchy (because that’s
what people were used to) and make Oliver Cromwell the king of England
- Was offered to become King of England said no, didn’t want to take the title
of the king
- all of the British Isles were controlled by London, by one government
- King is gone, parliament firmly involved
Historians speculated ever since: What make him reject the title of a king?
- religious reasons: many soldiers in the new model army were deeply hostile of
the idea of a monarchy
- he would’ve lost the support of the influential parts of the army and endanger
his power
- Irony: Cromwell wasn’t a king; his power was bigger than that of any king before
and after in England
Why didn’t the Republic last? Why was monarchy reintroduced?
- the reason lied in the army: dictatorship those who governed the army had
the power
- parliament felt threatened by the army who could in one stroke take away its
power
- we need to control the army
- the idea of a Lord Protector was also rejected out of fear
- the parliament was familiar with the power of a king; with what he could or
couldn’t do (unlike Lord Protector, his power was immense, because it couldn’t be
controlled by the parliament and it constantly had an army)
- common people were used to having a king, they supported the idea of having a
monarch
Rising criticism of Puritans:
- were empowered, parliament was dominated by them and they brought very
strict rules with them: they believed that everyone should live their lives
according to the Bible
- If you work hard, you go to heaven, but every form of enjoyment was rejected.-
- examples: people couldn’t go to the theater, females had to dress properly and
wear long black dresses, traditional Christmas decorations were banned etc.
- people were fed up with the power of the Puritans, because they took away all
the pleasure
- they decided to support the idea of a monarchy
- disintegration of English Puritanism, they were in power for 11 years but their
influence was finally declined
- the church of England weakened realization that religious differences could
bring in a lot of conflict
- Idea: let’s tolerate all religious practice: RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE grew a lot
after 1660 Religion wasn’t that important anymore.
- conflicts over religious affairs were over, senseless, not worth the trouble
- trauma of regicide (means killing of a king) many felt it was too far, wasn’t
the right decision to kill the king
- parliament decided to bring back the king: Charles II was restored 1660
- Charles the first was dead, but his son was an exile in the Netherlands
- they wanted to make Charles II the king of England
- first discussions in the Netherlands with the advocates of the parliament and
the soon to be English king
- He agreed to not pursue any of the people that killed his father 11 years ago
- You can keep your power, but we keep our rights- said the parliament
- people joyfully welcomed him back in London and were happy about the
restoration of the monarchy
- reintroduction of the old traditional system of government in England
- King of partying: royal splendor, possessions, kingly power
the less powerful the monarch was, the more powerful his demonstrations of
power became
- Power as a decoration and not as a real asset
- When Charles took the throne, it was decided that his reign had officially
started when the father died (1648) English trying to cover up their mistake
(reign only started 11 years later)
- one of his orders was to dig up the corpse of Chrownwell and hang him up in
public, because he was responsible for this father’s death
- basically his main purpose was to humiliate the dead man who killed his father
- were the communities or people who didn’t belong to the church of England
- many formally Puritan people were now called the dissenters
- religious conflict was still there, but they were not powerful enough to start a
war (there were debates in writings, arguments about it but no military
disputes)
- Exclusion Crisis of 1678-81: challenge for Charles II - parliament wanted to
decide/establish a law that there should never be a Catholic king on the throne
of England
- Parliament wasn’t successful
James II (1685-88)
- the members of the parliament who were unhappy with the situation made up a plan
Let’s invite another one to become the king of England:
• plan to invite William of Orange (Leader of the United Provinces)
- William was married to Mary, who was the daughter of Charles I
- he wasn’t a foreigner because he was married to an English princess
- very powerful Protestant ruler (which was very important)
- he was also at war with France
- Let’s make a pact with the Dutch and choose William as the king of England
- enters England together with Mary, crowned becomes the King of England
- Mary was the daughter of James II chased away her own father
- parliament had to use a trick to make the people accept a foreign king- this trick
made Mary and William joined monarchs
- Mary was Queen in her own right, both were rulers together King AND Queen
Did James II fight for the throne of England?
- Should I fight for the throne against the new invader that is supported by the
parliament?
- He didn’t have the power
- James fled the country
- Parliament was clever: ‘we have to have so many rights, that the king can never it
away from us’
- Parliament chose the king: King wasn’t the dominant one
- Package of laws that make it very clear that the parliament is in power and the King
is in subject of them
- the king couldn’t make decisions that the parliament wouldn’t accept
- this revolution was bloodless, no battles or conflicts
- The Bill of Rights became one of the most important documents in the history of
England
- the beginning of constitutional monarchy was introduced with this document
- Birth of modern Britain, modern system of government
- expression ‘Glorious Revolution’ was first used in 1689
- The Bill of Rights weakened the power of the parliament – this development was
never reversed ever since
Lecture 8
Schedule:
On this date, the Scottish Parliament and the English Parliament united to
form the Parliament of Great Britain, based in the Palace of Westminster in
London. The acts are therefore also known as the Union of the Parliaments.
http://history.parkfieldict.co.uk/stuarts/acts-of-union-1707
Queen Anne
▪ she receives the documents that outline the ideas of the Union and those legal acts
▪ the idea was let’s dissolve the Scottish parliament, because the Scots don’t need their
own parliament
▪ Great Britain was founded with the Act of Union
▪ there was no separated England any longer
▪ Wales was conquered by Edward I in the 13th century, it was linked to England in a
formal way with Henry VIII, he decided Wales has to belong to England
▪ England and Wales had been joined before, now it was the turn of Scotland
▪ it was not a symmetrical union: the English were in the strong position, the Scottish had
a weak role
▪ people didn’t really celebrity this union, it was more seen as a very practical step
▪ the English saw it as an annexation ‘Yay. Now Scotland is added to England as well.’
▪ from this period onwards, there would be a British state, a British monarchy, a British
Parliament (instead of an English and Scottish one), a British Government, a British
Empire, a British army etc.
Unification of the Kingdom of Great Britain and the Kingdom of Ireland, 1800/1801:
▪ there was still one region of the British Isles missing
▪ another ’Act of Union’ took place in 1800: it was decided that Ireland should formally join
Great Britain as well
▪ Ireland was included in the Union flag (see above)
▪ one Parliament of the United Kingdom
▪ in 1714: British kings were automatically declared kings of Ireland as well
▪ Ireland consent 100 members to the House of Commons in Westminster, but it lost its
parliament
▪ from that point on, there was only one parliament in Britain in London
▪ first time in history: the whole of the British Isles was places directly under one British
ruler crucial significance of 1800/1801 in the history of Great Britain
Why would the English invite Hanoverian (German) nobility to become the ruler of
England?
Hanoverian rulers were picked to become king of Great Britain. 30 years before the English
were getting someone from the Dutch to fulfil that purpose, but now the English were inviting a
German nobility to become the king of Great Britain. The reason for this is that the Hanoverian
dynasty was the closest to the throne of England. There were a lot of other nobles that could’ve
been picked, but they were Catholic. The Hanoverian dynasty became the focus for the future
monarch, because England DIDN’T want a Catholic monarch.
George I
▪ only a very short period before Anne died in 1714, Sophia of Hanover died as well, so
the next monarch should be Sophia’s son
▪ crowned in August 1714: George I – he was the first one to be crowned as a British
monarch
▪ the four Georges reigned until 1820 – period called Georgian England
▪ when George I arrived in 1714, he couldn’t speak any English (this remained the case
until the end of the reign – the British had a king of the throne who wasn’t English and
who didn’t speak any English)
▪ he imported his most important advisers from Germany strange situation the very
top of the British society was made up of German people
▪ the English noblemen didn’t like this at all they saw it as a foreign dynasty
▪ the British important a new Hanoverian monarch, but this wasn’t as important as it
would’ve been 200 years ago – being a British king wasn’t what it used to be decline
of monarchy ongoing since the Civil War – Parliament was the boss :D
▪ the power of the monarchy decreased with the Georges on the throne
The Rise of the Middle Class – another shift within British society
▪ non-aristocratic parts of society and those who did not do any manual work in
agriculture, manufacture and industry they did not own land
▪ the origins of this level of society can be found in the medieval period: bankers, traders
etc.
▪ many of them had a commercial background
▪ reasons:
- growth of commerce and trade throughout the era
- the whole period witnesses a massive rise in the business of trade within the British
Isles and also with the European continent, and the established colonies
- the upper class needed clever people, who would make them richer they needed
bankers and business men
Consequences of the rise of the Middle Class
▪ increasing literacy – more men and women (not to the same extent) learned to read and
write
▪ development of new gender roles – the men had to do work, the women had to stay at
home and raise children (Middle Class moral)
▪ the people beneath the Middle Class couldn’t afford the luxury of having their wives stay
at home, both wife and husband had to work to sustain their living
▪ being from the Middle Class meant that man usually earned enough to sustain his family
▪ idea of gender relations that the woman ruled in the domestic sphere (the home),
whereas the man had to go out into the world and sustain his family this idea survived
up until today
▪ the parliament itself became more focused on the Middle Class – their political power
developed as well, it wasn’t just about aristocracy anymore
▪ bourgeois: a term describing the Middle class
▪ bourgeois revolutions in Europe, but not in England, since England wasn’t a place for
revolutions any longer
The Enlightenment
▪ had its roots in Renaissance (the idea of the individual)
▪ very broad movement that shaped the topic and mental life of the whole era, not just in
Britain, but also in Europe
▪ the Enlightenment developed the idea of the individual further
▪ its emphasis is on ‘reason’ opposite to ‘emotions’, but also on ‘rationality’, ‘freedom’, also
‘democracy’ to some degree
▪ the rise of modern philosophy closely linked to the ‘Enlightenment thinking’
▪ there was a stronger emphasis on Empiricism (to gain knowledge by experiencing and
observing the world) and Positivism (similar to Empiricism, rational recognition of the
world, and the idea of getting knowledge from empirical observation and experiment)
▪ medieval period: getting knowledge only from the Bible
Humanism
▪ triple emphasis on reason (rationality), freedom, and (increasingly) democracy
(opposite to England was India: it had millions and millions of workers and a huge textile
industry, but the workers were so cheap that no one needed to think about changing anything)
Second reason
You need a great source of energy for machines to work properly. The main source of energy in
the 18th century was coal. Britain was very rich in coal and it was very cheap to gain it.
#cheapsourceofenergy
Third reason
We must go back to the Glorious revolution in the 17th century, when the Bill of Rights was
established. This document protected the interests of commerce and of trade. If you were a
businessman, you could invest your money without having to fear loss, since your business was
protected by the government. The constitutional monarchy granted you the security of no one
being able to take away your assets.
The fearless investments in technology and machinery by the British businessmen pushed
forward the British economy, making Britain more advanced than any other country in the world.
Steam Engine
▪ enlightened thinking and emphasis on experiment let’s improve and experiment
▪ important invention: steam engine (Thomas Newcomen, 1705, improved by James Watt
in 1769)
▪ there was no Industrial Revolution in 1705, but James Watt improved it in 1769 made
all the difference, because it was cheaper and more effective to use steam engines
(replacing manual labour)
▪ first use of steam engine was in coal mines
▪ also applied in the textile industry
Consequences of Industrialization
▪ losers of the industrialization: many small manufacturers in the villages lost their income
unemployment
▪ the factory system changed the landscape of British labour
▪ the British could produce textiles for a very cheap price, no one else could compete with
them
▪ emergence of the modern working class (18th century gives us the Middle AND the
working class)
▪ most powerful nation in the world in the course of this period
▪ France: the most famous French king, Louis XIV made France the dominant nation in
Europe, now it was the renewed enemy of England
▪ the War of Spanish was a conflict between the British and the French (also some
Germans involved)
▪ Britain was on the side of winners
▪ Treaty of Utrecht 1713 in the Netherlands: gave French and Spanish territories to the
British
Developments in America
▪ string of colonies developing on the eastern coast of America
▪ 13 British colonies that helped the British gain international recognition and dominance
The 1750s and 1760s – making Britain the number one in the world
▪ Seven Years’ War (1756-1763): the British decided they wanted to beat France, but it
was difficult to beat the French since they were super powerful
▪ the British looked for other territories that weren’t content with France
▪ they made a pact with Prussia, stating that Prussia would attack French territories in
Europe
▪ France would have to fight against several armies and their chances of success would
be low exactly what happened
▪ the French were beaten in those seven years
▪ successes of the Seven Years’ War: British attacked trading points of the French in
America, they seized French ships, they invaded French territories in America and in
Canada first global war, France and Britain fighting in America, India and in the
Caribbean regions
▪ the British won this war, humiliating defeat for France,
▪ Britain won the main areas of the French territories in America, they gained Spanish
Florida, the Caribbean islands (also from the French) and in India
▪ ‘annus mirabilis’ of 1759: Britain gained a lot of military victories, which changed the
relations of global power
Europeans in India
▪ they have established trading points on the Indian coasts, to trade with the very rich
Indian and Chinese regions
▪ the Europeans were rivals
▪ a string of European conflicts took place in India between France and England
▪ finally, the British established their dominant on the Indian subcontinent as well
The American War of Independence (1775-1783) – Britain also had some losses
▪ American Revolutionary War (1775–83, also known as American War of Independence)
▪ British settlers in America became very dissatisfied with the idea of having to pay taxes
to Britain, without any political representation
▪ 16 December 1773: Boston Tea Party
▪ July 1776: American Congress issued the ‘Declaration of Independence’
▪ war ended with American victory in October 1781
▪ ’American revolution’ of 1775-1783: parallels to the civil war of the 17th century, between
the cultures of Church and dissent (Puritans)
▪ the British lost the American colonies in the 1870ies major setback of the British
empire
▪ ‘First British Empire’
India
▪ huge difference between India and America
▪ in America, the British didn’t need any severe resistance, since the American coast was
thinly populated and the British were superior (military technology)
▪ India was completely different – the British met an ancient civilization that was very rich
and powerful
▪ the strategy of colonial rule was very different in India
▪ the British couldn’t just go to India and rule it like they did with the American colonies
▪ idea of an informal rule
▪ if we want to exploit this huge region, we need to make pacts with the local leaders ‘we
have to leave them in power, officially’, otherwise we won’t be able to control them
▪ ’Second British Empire’:
▪ ’India Act’ (1784):
Australia
It is commonly reported that the colonisation of Australia was driven by the need to address
overcrowding in the British prison system, and the fact of the British losing the United States of
America from the American Revolution; however, it was simply not economically viable to
transport convicts halfway around the world for this reason alone. Many convicts were either
skilled tradesmen or farmers who had been convicted for trivial crimes and were sentenced to
seven years, the time required to set up the infrastructure for the new colony. Convicts were
often given pardons prior to or on completion of their sentences and were allocated parcels of
land to farm.
Sir Joseph Banks, the eminent scientist who had accompanied Lieutenant James Cook on his
1770 voyage, recommended Botany Bay as a suitable site.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Banks)
Sources: http://www.vam.ac.uk/__data/assets/image/0010/185617/2009BX1964_beggars_opera_blake_after_hogarth.jpg
https://janeaustensworld.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/1820-edward-villiers-rippingille-the-post-office-2.jpg?w=500&h=327
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/73/5d/86/735d8621859db8dc5c0939f82789b095.png
https://res.cloudinary.com/jpress/image/fetch/w_700,f_auto,ar_3:2,c_fill/https://www.sleafordstandard.co.uk/webimage/1.79
32480.1493135371!/image/image.jpg
Schedule:
changing society?
▪ the 19th century is often called the Victorian Age, which isn’t quite correct
▪ the Victorian era began with Queen Victoria on the throne of Britain in 1837, which was toward
the middle of the 19th century
Victorianism:
▪ another concept to describe the period, especially the clichés about the Victorian age as a very
strict moral period and also as the rise of very fixed gender roles
▪ 1850ies onwards: British people considered themselves living in the Victorian age
The Victorian Age: Queen Victoria (1837-1901) – 64 impressive years on the throne
▪ the number is superseded by Queen Elizabeth, who is now on the throne of England
▪ ascended the throne in 1837
▪ she was 18 when she started reigning
▪ people thought a woman on the throne is always problematic ‘It’s going to be a short reign.’
▪ no one would remember Queen Victoria
▪ she managed to keep a presence throughout the whole period
▪ the real power of a king or a queen can be quickly destroyed, but she functioned as a symbol for
British national identity
▪ strong ties with Germany – she spoke German in private, married a German prince
▪ she even became an empress (Kaiserin)
▪ Origins: British society changed due to the innovations in the British industry
▪ Britain was called the workshop of the world’ by a famous politician (Disraeli) in 1838 – it has
become a famous expression to describe the 19th century in Britain – most powerful power in
Europe
▪ urbanization: urban spaces were reshaped by industrialization
Why in Britain?
▪ for a few centuries, the most important financial center in Europe was Amsterdam
▪ Amsterdam was the center for the emerging financial industries
▪ the position of Amsterdam changed London took over this position as the dominant financial
center in Europe
▪ Britain left European neighbors behind in terms of technology and finance
Railways
Urbanization
▪ suburbanization: towns became larger, many parts of the towns situated on the outskirts
▪ urbanization: the movement of people from the countryside and the villages to towns and cities
▪ people would travel in the center every day and come back in the evening
▪ first state to generate a predominantly urban society
▪ rapidly growing cities: Manchester, Glasgow, Birmingham industrial powers
▪ new industrial towns: only developed with the Industrial revolution, these were the places
where the factories were
▪ British economy in the 1850s and 1860s: extraordinary success, decades where the wealth
of Britain was most superior
▪ Philosophy of ‘Free Trade’: the state should leave its hands off the economy and not
interfere ‘economy works best, when left alone’
▪ ‘Great Exhibition’ of 1851: decisive year because for the very first time in British history
more people lived in towns and cities than in the rural areas
▪ not so perfect living conditions in the cities: polluted water, diseases etc.
▪ period with lots of poverty
▪ self-health and individuality in the Victorian age: everyone is responsible for himself,
everyone can provide for themselves – no one needs support from the state
How did the Victorians know that they were ahead of the world?
▪ famous philosophy Marx and Engels: communism described the evils of capitalism and the
inhumane system of economy in Great Britain
▪ in their opinion, Industrialization brought about a mass of very poor workers, misery all over the
country e.g. children having to work in the mines
▪ historian’s different view: this process was often grim, but also necessary, alternatives were
worse there had been such a dramatic growth of the population in the early Victorian period,
that it was simply necessary to have this period of innovation
▪ 1860ies, 1870ies: living standards rose all over the country, for all classes (that was the point
where Engels and Marx started criticizing the horrible working conditions made their idea
anachronistic)
▪ second country in Europe to have an industrialized economy: Belgium used Britain’s way of
production
▪ reasons: the British were very envious of their inventions, they didn’t want any other European
country to have the same technology (they would’ve lost their power of superiority)
▪ exporting machines was banned
▪ one textile machine was smuggled to Gent (Belgium) making it the second wealthiest country
▪ soon other European nations would follow this trend
▪ abolishing tolls
▪ erecting high tariff walls
▪ investing in infrastructure and transportation
▪ system of universal education
▪ working class gained a reputation as a distinct group from other groups: developments of
factories
▪ new social hierarchy in the 19th century: the worker as a dominant, new force in British society
▪ between 1860 and 1914 real wages doubled
Charles Booth’s Life and Labour of the People in London in the late 1880s:
Six main categories:
1. ‘highpaid labour’
4. ‘intermittent earnings’
5. ‘casual earnings’
6. ‘lowest class’
1.) those working in the professions: doctors, lawyers, the clergy, civil servants that worked in
administration
2.) the manufacturing middle class: owners of factories, of shops, they had their own businesses
Middle Classes: Separate Spheres (meaning there’s a separate field for men: the world of business, the
outer world & the sphere for women: the domestic, interior sphere)
• Victorian ideology:
- emphasized the public role of men and the private role of women
- the Queen and her husband, Albert were seen as role models and they embodied the idea of a
Middle class home
- it was almost impossible for a woman of the Middle Class to have a professional carrier
- there were very few opportunities of finding a job
- the nearest women could get to a carrier was a.) nursing or b.) taking care of the children of
other people (or being teachers)
- not all women conformed
- Coventry Patmore’s “The Angel in the House” (1854) – literature shaped the way of how women
should behave
The 19th century is the first century where we have photography as a medium.
The First Reform Act, 1832: a string of laws in order to redistribute power in Britain
▪ most visible results: abolished 56 rotten boroughs – every borough could send members of
parliament to Westminster
▪ problem: the distribution of the boroughs was very unfair
▪ the population changed drastically in the middle of the 18th century, but the boroughs hadn’t
▪ a very strange situation: a royal borough could send 20 men to Westminster (although it had
almost no population), whereas a new industrialized city like Manchester could only send 5
men to Westminster, while it had an immense population
▪ those boroughs with almost no population were called rotten
▪ the Reform Act tried to give representation to all the new centers within Britain
▪ many got their political representation for the first time due to the abolition
▪ Workhouse was an institution that was introduced in 1834 via the Poor Law Amendment Act
▪ idea: there are people in Britain that are too poor and they can’t earn a living (because of
disease, missing qualification etc.) let’s give them work and shelter them at the Workhouse
▪ everyone should leave the workhouse as soon as they find a job
▪ very bad conditions, no one wanted to stay there out of free will
▪ a very sinister, gloomy institution mirroring the idea of the Victorian era of ‘self-health’
▪ 1867 and 1884 Reform Acts: had the same goal which was raising the number of those who
could vote and take part in the political process
▪ increased the electorate meaning the group of people who were allowed to vote (from 20% to
60% of adult men in the towns)
▪ still, the voting right was still not given to everybody
▪ only those that had proper jobs and owned a house/property were qualified to vote
▪ poor, no landowners were excluded
▪ the group of those who could would was made larger and larger with time (changes should be
gradual)
▪ national debate allowed for the first time
Educational Reform
▪ the classical way of education was still the ‘liberal education’ (Latin and Greek) remained
dominant among those – but only for the Middle and the Upper Class
▪ 1860ies: more needed to be done for the working classes who were uneducated
▪ Education Act in 1870: made a primary education compulsory – every child had to spend a
specific amount of years in school
▪ 1880: attendance at school was made compulsory for all classes and regions
▪ the state took responsibility for the education of the children
▪ the role of the church (which had provided education before) became weaker and weaker
The 19th century is often called the Age of Reform, mainly to make the working class take part in the
political process in a minor position.
Scotland
Wales
Ireland
Result:
▪ massive emigration: it is estimated that more than one million people died due to this famine,
so several millions of people immigrated (mostly to the United States)
▪ Ireland was the only country in Europe where the population decreased
▪ Fenian Irish independence movement of the 1860s: it became more popular and gained support
in the Irish population, they wanted an independent Ireland and straightening the ties with
England influence by the poor and miserable conditions
Sources
https://cf.ltkcdn.net/fashion-history/images/std/210909-745x450-Power-loom-1882.jpg
http://gaukartifact.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/lauren_adams_porcelain_pottery_1.jpg
Schedule:
The British empire in the 19th century (in the Victorian period)
What you should know:
1. Provide an overview of major developments of the British Empire in the Victorian period.
The Victorians had a difficult relationship with Italy as well, even though they loved Italy
(the countryside, the ruins, but not the people because they were Catholics). It was also
the home of the Roman empire. They liked to compare themselves to the Roman
empire.
Victorian mentality:
The source of the Victorian idea of a hierarchy between the nation was Charles Darwin’s
book. They believed in the survival of the fittest, which was actually only based on
nature, but they thought of themselves as the fittest society (the logic were: survive or
parish, the fittest one survives). This hierarchy is supposedly based on biological ‘facts’.
Reasons for the rise of the 2nd British empire in the late 18th century onwards
How did Britain manage to become the global ruler?
1.) European balance of power after 1850
- restructuring of the European landscape
- Napoleon was defeated, the French aggression in Europe was curbed/finished
- there was a new balance in Europe
- the British made sure the balance would stay, because it made them a very powerful
country in Europe
- political period in Europe, the British could direct all of their energy to their empire
and to non-European territories
2.) East Asian empires were very weak
- for 1000 years China had been the most powerful country in the world
- in the 15th century, the influence of the Chinese declined
- they didn’t have the superior weapons or an Industrialization
- this made it easy for the British to attack Chinese ports to show them who was
superior
- the Chinese had to give in and accept British ideas of trade
- China didn’t want to trade at first
3.) Britain’s advantage over most trading nations
Most advanced financial sector – very easy to borrow money in the British system and
you could get credit and use that money to invest and ‘make’ risky operations that
advanced trade + their economy experienced ‘boom’ (… coal etc.)
4.) British colonies are markets, the British could use their huge areas to sell their products
to, to strengthen their own local economy
•6. settlement at the end of the First World War: the greatest extend of British empire was not
in the Victorian period, but after the first WW. The British got the colonies and the British also
got Germany’s Namibia, for example.
Biological explanation for the British supremacy from the Victorian point of view
- one dominant scientific theory was looking at the heads and skulls of people you can
measure those heads which gives away ideas about the intelligence of the person
The Settler Colonies
- the Victorian period saw an interesting demographic developemtn, the British population
rose many people immigrated ‘flood’ of emigration overseas throughout the 19th
century
- the British promised the settlers land and financial support to establish themselves
- the British turned some regions of the world ‘white’ referring to skin colour
- the British thought ‘you can’t treat White settlers in the same way as you treat colonized
people and natives’ they gave more political power to the white regions to keep them
happy political acts giving a lot of autonomy to the regions: ‘Dominion of Canada Act’
in 1867 and the ‘Commonwealth of Australia Act’ in 1900
- the chance of the regions rebelling against Britain was minimized
Africa: Egypt
•importance? Suez Canal
•inflow of capital
Africa
•device of the Chartered Company:
•Nigeria, East Africa and Rhodesia
•East and Central Africa: David Livingstone
•‘Cotton, Commerce, Christianity’
•‘Scramble for Africa’, Berlin Conference1884: Germany
South Africa
•South Africa: colonial rule as means of economic control
•events complicated by the Boers
South Africa
•Zulu wars
•Transvaal and Orange Free State as Boer territories
1. Provide examples of the emergence of the welfare state in early 20th century Britain.
Introduction
- death of Victoria: ‘death’ of an age (in 1901) signals some sort of death of that era
- many Victorians were convinced that an age has died as well with its economic power,
Englishness
- reign of a new monarch: Edward VII
• Burial: Her body was dragged through the streets of London
• Edwardian Age lasted until 1914
- first telephones
- the Victorian world ‘vanished’, it seems quite far away due to the technical innovations the lifestyle
of the British became a lot more modernized start of the modern period
Initiatives:
• 1907: free meals were provided in schools
• introduction of pensions
• 1911: national insurance bill: compulsory insurance for workers e.g. in times of unemployment or
sickness
• the British economic superiority that was visible back in the 19th century was gone, a more
complicated climate for Britain emerged
• Germany, France, Russia were the new powers, gaining authority very fast
• Britain found itself as one power among many other powers
• British superiority was a fragile act, it required certain conditions
• it would be best for Britain if the European continent was at peace, then Britain wouldn’t
have to interfere with European superpowers and it could concentrate on redeveloping its
own empire
• Britain needed its colonies to be quiet, but we see the first independence movement in India
against the British colonizers (big problem for the British)
• The United States had to be an ally and not an enemy the British had to have friendly
relationships to the USA (based on their common legacy as a colonizing power)
• the maintenance of the British empire became more and more expensive
• having many enemies and safeguarding the empire cost a lot of money
• there was a gradual increase in money that had to be given for the administration of the British
empire
• it was expensive and it made the British question whether the British empire was still needed and
beneficial
The Great War, 1914-1918
Reasons:
• the point that led to this process of nations declaring war on each other was the assassination of
the Austrian archduke Franz Ferdinand at Sarajevo on 28 June
• the Austrian-Hungarian empire tumbled into a major crisis
• Germany was allied with it
• the allocation of allegiance of Europe around that time
• Germany showed loyalty to the Ottoman and the Austrian-Hungarian empire
• while France, Britain and Russia also linked together in alliance
• phase of a very volatile economic activity in the years leading up to the war
• economic insecurity raised tension as well
Question: How could such smart nations lead such a ferocious, deadly war?
Book: the sleepwalkers famous historian tries to answer the above asked question he claims Europe
was sleepwalking into this conflict nobody really intended it events led to other events no one
would back down or retreat major conflicts came about by these policies
• The British Empire got bigger, because the British took the German colonies in Africa, they were
given responsibility for German colonies (e.g. Namibia)
• biggest extent of the British empire after the first world war
• The British gained control over many parts of the Middle East in Palestine, Jordan, Iraq
• dividing Syria and Iraq was an agreement between the British and the French
• the British took Iraq, the French took Syria, the boundary between those two soon to be
countries was very artificial
• larger doesn’t mean more powerful – these new territories in the Middle East the British had to
pay more to establish an administration and to provide a colonial rule over this region
• the mass of land became very impractical and difficult to rule
• India: most important British colony growing unrest, independence movement making it
more difficult for the British to defend and to legitimize their rule
• the British Empire was immense now, but there was this growing weakness as well, an inability to
sustain themselves
• 1926: the ‘white colonies’ (Canada, Australia New Zealand, South Africa) were given the name
‘Common Wealth’, to stress the idea of ‘equal’, given the same status as Britain and other equals
with some common interests and goals
• immense: coal mines, railways and shipping were taken under state control
• the government realized they needed to take care of the important tools of industry in order to
regain their power
• the era of emancipation for women: 1.) women were the prime beneficiaries of the First World
War, a lot of them served as nurses on the front and 2.) since many of the men had to fight on
the front, the women took the jobs of the men in the British industry there were brand new
options available for women now that have not been available before
1000s of them served as nurses, it was women who took the jobs of the men in the British industry
• 1918 franchise reforms extended the electorate from about 8 million to over 21 million
• women gained to vote for the very first time, but only those over 30
• 1928: all women over 18 were given the right to vote
• increased the electorate in general, making it possible for every man to vote and have this
political representation
Many say that the Second World War did not start in Europe, but in China with
the Japanese attacking China in 1937. Japan was also very aggressive in the
Second World War.
• Churchill now emerged as wartime prime minister, he became the symbol of British resistance
• was very famous for his speeches, he was trying to give strength to the public to be able to resist
the invasion by the German
• attacking British cities was not enough for invading those cities, because the British pilots
successfully defended airspace it became clear to Hitler that he couldn’t defeat Britain with
this strategy
• although the ‘blitz’ on London and other cities continued, Churchill’s reputation soared
• by the end of 1940 the idea of invading Britain had passed
• another reason was that half a year later in 1941 Hitler attacked the Soviet Union, opening up
another front with the East
• Britain saw itself as the only power still not dominated by the Germans, remained independent
• June 1944: invasion of France from the Normandy beach-heads by Allied forces fighting back,
regaining greater parts of Europe and pushing the German armies back into German territories
• British casualties in the Second World War were far fewer than in the First World War
• the First World War was the dominant catastrophe for the British
• 1945: Hitler commits suicide, Germany surrendered in May, Japan in August, the Americans
dropped their atomic bomb over Hiroshima end of WW2
Lecture 12
The Twentieth Century II and the British Isles Today
Schedule:
1. Post-War Britain
1. Describe the domestic policy of Great Britain after the end of the Second World War.
2. Explain how the status of Great Britain as a ‘world power’ changed after 1945.
Post-War Britain
The End of WW2:
• the British had time to reflect about the future and how social security should be organized
• it claimed that there needed to be more programs of social security, these programs should be
paid for by taxation
• taxes had to be raised to provide for the poorer fractions of British society
these new measures included maternity benefits (allowances given to young mothers),
health insurance was modernized, employment ensurance was another initiative
• they first have been nationalized after the First World War, then they’ve been privatized again
and then there was a greater policy of greater nationalizing major industries again e.g.
electricity, gas, road transport, coal, railways
• roughly 20% of the whole industry was taken into the public sector, making it possible to the
government to greatly influence these branches
• National Health Service introduced in 1946: institution that the British are very proud of –
provided free health care for British citizens
• the country followed left-wing policies, dominant atmosphere after the war, wanting to provide
for the citizens
Education
• large sections of the working class had no education at all (secondary education was still not
universal)
• Butler Education Act of 1944: introduces a new system of secondary schools, makes it possible
to have a free secondary and compulsory education for everyone
no children would miss out on education any longer
• this act helped enhance occupational mobility: it made it easier for social mobility between the
classes due to occupational careers that were open to working class children as well (because of
the extension of secondary education)
• Britain’s main policies after the war were greater social security, more education and
nationalization
1.) The end of the British relationship with the four white dominions: Canada, New Zealand,
South Africa and Australia
- they realized that Britain could not support them at all, so the policy ended
Indian Independence
• 1947 is often called ‘annus horribilis’ by scholars because it was a horrible year for the United
Kingdom: The Independence of India took place
• during the WW2, Indian troops fought side by side with the British, even though they were
instructed to do so
• rising Indian national congress with Gandhi on top
• it seemed as the Indians would help the British fight the Japanese in Asia, but this came with a
price: ‘after WW2 you had to give us independence’
• after 1945 and 1946 there were some negotiations between England and India
• 1947: India is released from the British empire, entering history as an independent nation
• not a peaceful transition, there were bloody confrontations in India (conflict between Muslim
and Hindu India) results: partition of India cost more than a million lives
• still debated, whether the British were responsible for this
• the British had left very quickly, because they saw that there was no chance for them of keeping
India anyway
• India was the major asset of Britain: it brought a lot of wealth and political influence for them
very severe reprocussion for all the other colonies
• India was the first colony to leave the British empire
Decolonisation
• January 1968: PM Wilson declared the end of Britain’s ‘East of Suez’ commitment
those countries still linked to Britain in the Common Wealth could not expect England to
safeguard them any longer, e.g. the United Arab Emirates
• the age of British dominance was over once and for all
• by the late 1960ies Britain gave up all of his territories, there were only very few still left under
British rule
- the Asian empires were weak empires that couldn’t offer resistance
- there was no competitor in Europe at that time that would match the navy of the English
• their famous moment was gone after the Second World War
• a new prestige for Britain: the peaceful liberation of their colonies (without any conflict or
bloodshed) peaceful transition for most of the regions
• many of the young nation states kept a close relationship to the formal ‘mother country’ no
bitter hatred like it was the case with France and its formal territories
• most historians say that the British Imperialism is mostly seen of the great evils of world history
British Empire greedily grasping other territories, supressing and robbing those colonies of
their wealth gaining wealth but offering not much in return
• other historians saying there were some benefits in the British empire:
creation of an infrastructure, arrival of modern medicine, immergence of those colonial
regions into the global economy
the expert of democracy in India (biggest democracy in the world with more than one billion
people)
Post-imperial Britain
• 1973: Britain joined the European common market, which would later become the European
Union they joined only because of economic reasons (it was clear that the rest of the
European countries were more successful, they wanted to benefit from them)
• joining the UN clearly not out of emotional reasons, because they decided to leave the UN once
again
- still 20 islands that officially belong to Britain, Bahamas for example
- all in one it’s a population of 20000 that are still British subjects
- most of the islands are very unknown for example the Christmas Island
- there was a war in 1982 for the islands of England
Sources
http://cdn.history.com/sites/2/2014/01/kissing_the_war_goodbye-P.jpeg
http://academicearth.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/how_the_end_of_ww2_made_us_fat-
700x400.jpg
https://3c1703fe8d.site.internapcdn.net/newman/gfx/news/hires/2016/mostpeoplein.jpg