9/6/2018 Why is ExxonMobil Still Funding Climate Science Denier Groups?

- Union of Concerned Scientists

 About Join Donate

[ BLOG ] UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS

Why is ExxonMobil Still Funding Climate Science Denier Groups?

ELLIOTT NEGIN, SENIOR WRITER | AUGUST 31, 2018, 12:42 PM EDT

https://blog.ucsusa.org/elliott-negin/exxonmobil-still-funding-climate-science-denier-groups?_ga=2.247774855.1252715172.1536234782-1195007485.1536234782 1/8
9/6/2018 Why is ExxonMobil Still Funding Climate Science Denier Groups? - Union of Concerned Scientists

Like 836 Tweet

A decade after pledging to end its support for climate science deniers, ExxonMobil gave $1.5 million last year to
11 think tanks and lobby groups that reject established climate science and openly oppose the oil and gas giant’s
professed climate policy preferences, according to the company’s annual charitable giving report released this
week.

Nearly 90 percent of ExxonMobil’s 2017 donations to climate science denier groups went to the US Chamber of
Commerce and three organizations that have been receiving funds from the company since it started
bankrolling climate disinformation 20 years ago: the American Enterprise Institute, Manhattan Institute and
American Legislative Exchange Council, which — in a surprise move — ExxonMobil recently quit. (More on
that later.)

The other ExxonMobil denier grantees last year were the Center for American and International Law
($23,000), Federalist Society ($10,000), Hoover Institution ($15,000), Mountain States Legal Foundation
($5,000), National Black Chamber of Commerce ($30,000), National Taxpayers Union Foundation ($40,000),
and Washington Legal Foundation ($40,000).

ExxonMobil’s funding priorities belie the company’s purported support for a carbon tax, the Paris climate
agreement and other related policies, which it reaffirmed in a January blog post by its public affairs director,
Suzanne McCarron. If, as McCarron claims, ExxonMobil is “committed to being part of the solution,” why is the
company still spending millions of dollars a year on groups that are a major part of the problem?

ExxonMobil’s history of deceit

There is ample evidence that Exxon was fully aware of the danger its products pose to the planet since the
1980s and likely even earlier. Nonetheless, the company helped initiate a fossil fuel industry-backed climate

https://blog.ucsusa.org/elliott-negin/exxonmobil-still-funding-climate-science-denier-groups?_ga=2.247774855.1252715172.1536234782-1195007485.1536234782 2/8
9/6/2018 Why is ExxonMobil Still Funding Climate Science Denier Groups? - Union of Concerned Scientists

disinformation campaign in 1998, a year before it merged with Mobil.

The company’s behind-the-scenes role went largely unnoticed for nearly a decade, but in early 2007, a report by
the Union of Concerned Scientists revealed that it had spent at least $16 million between 1998 and 2005 to fund
a network of more than 40 think tanks and advocacy groups to manufacture doubt about climate science under
the guise of being neutral, independent analysts.

In response to the negative press generated by the UCS report, ExxonMobil vowed in its “2007 Corporate
Citizenship Report” to “discontinue contributions [in 2008] to several public policy research groups whose
positions on climate change could divert attention from the important discussion on how the world will secure
the energy required for economic growth in an environmentally responsible manner.”

Note that the company only promised to stop funding several policy groups, not all, and it did in fact drop some
high-profile grantees, including the Cato Institute, Competitive Enterprise Institute, Heartland Institute and
Institute for Energy Research. But it never completely ended its support for the disinformation network. From
1998 to 2007 — the year of the pledge — it spent nearly $23 million on it. From 2008 through last year, it spent
another $13.17 million, for a total of $36.13 million over the last 20 years. As far as anyone has been able to
determine from publicly available data, only Charles and David Koch, the multibillionaire owners of Koch
Industries, have spent more to deceive the public about climate science and block government action on climate
change.

Last year, $1.35 million of the $1.5 million ExxonMobil spent went to the following four organizations:

US Chamber of Commerce: Sponsoring slanted studies

In 2014, ExxonMobil committed to give $5 million to the US Chamber of Commerce’s Capital Campaign in $1
million-a-year increments on top of its annual dues, despite the lobby group’s history of misrepresenting
https://blog.ucsusa.org/elliott-negin/exxonmobil-still-funding-climate-science-denier-groups?_ga=2.247774855.1252715172.1536234782-1195007485.1536234782 3/8
9/6/2018 Why is ExxonMobil Still Funding Climate Science Denier Groups? - Union of Concerned Scientists

climate science and the economics of transitioning to clean energy. Last year, the company kicked in another
$15,000 for the Chamber’s Corporate Citizenship Center, bringing its total donation to $1,015,000.

If one takes ExxonMobil’s climate policy claims at face value, the Chamber’s positions are polar opposite.

ExxonMobil has been very vocal about its support for the Paris climate agreement, for example, and during its
former CEO Rex Tillerson’s brief stint as US secretary of state, he reportedly implored President Trump to keep
the United States in it. What did Trump cite last year when he announced he was pulling out of the accord? A
widely debunked report from the US Chamber of Commerce.

Cosponsored by a former ExxonMobil grantee — the American Council for Capital Formation (ACCF) — the
report maintained that the Paris accord would cost the US economy nearly $3 trillion over the next several
decades and eliminate 6.5 million industrial sector jobs by 2040.

According to analyses by the Associated Press (AP), Politifact and The Washington Post, however, the Chamber
and ACCF cooked the books. As the AP put it: “The study makes worst-case assumptions that may inflate the
cost of meeting US targets under the Paris accord while largely ignoring the economic benefits to US businesses
from building and operating renewable energy projects.”

American Enterprise Institute: Undue faith in the market

The American Enterprise Institute (AEI), an 80-year-old free-market think tank in Washington, D.C., has
received more from ExxonMobil than any other climate science denier organization. In 2017, ExxonMobil gave
AEI $160,000, bringing its total to $4.49 million since 1998.

Economist Benjamin Zycher, the only AEI staff member who writes regularly about climate issues, rejects
mainstream climate science, insists a carbon tax would be “ineffective,” and has called the Paris agreement an

https://blog.ucsusa.org/elliott-negin/exxonmobil-still-funding-climate-science-denier-groups?_ga=2.247774855.1252715172.1536234782-1195007485.1536234782 4/8
9/6/2018 Why is ExxonMobil Still Funding Climate Science Denier Groups? - Union of Concerned Scientists

“absurdity.” He not only disagrees with ExxonMobil’s professed climate policy positions, he has attacked the
company for taking them.

Zycher’s colleague Mark Thiessen, a regular contributor to The Washington Post, also dismisses the Paris
accord, maintaining that “free enterprise, technology, and innovation—not pieces of parchment signed in Paris
and Kyoto — will revolutionize how we produce and consume energy.” Never mind that it often takes
regulations to drive innovation and force corporations to adopt cleaner technology. Without federally mandated
air pollution controls, for example, power plants and other industrial facilities would be emitting considerably
more toxic pollution than they do today.

Manhattan Institute: Propaganda masquerading as news

Another free-market think tank, the Manhattan Institute, received $115,200 from ExxonMobil last year for its
Center for Energy Policy. Since 1998, it has received $1.25 million. Like Zycher and Thiessen at AEI, Manhattan
Institute fellows oppose a carbon tax and the Paris accord.

Earlier this year, the New York City-based organization hired longtime TV newsman John Stossel, former host
of Fox Business Network’s “Stossel” and ABC’s “20/20,” to interview Manhattan Institute Senior Fellow Oren
Cass for a slickly produced, 4-minute YouTube segment titled “The Overheated Costs of Climate Change.”

Cass, who regularly testified before Congress against Obama administration climate efforts, told Stossel that the
Paris climate agreement “was somewhere between a farce and a fraud.” Stossel wholeheartedly agreed. “The
Earth is warming,” Stossel intoned in his wrap-up. “Man may well be increasing that. But the solution isn’t to
waste billions by forcing emissions cuts here while other countries do nothing. Well, pretend to make cuts.
Trump was right to repudiate this phony treaty.”

https://blog.ucsusa.org/elliott-negin/exxonmobil-still-funding-climate-science-denier-groups?_ga=2.247774855.1252715172.1536234782-1195007485.1536234782 5/8
9/6/2018 Why is ExxonMobil Still Funding Climate Science Denier Groups? - Union of Concerned Scientists

Waste billions while other countries do nothing? Besides the fact that it is now cheaper to produce electricity
from utility-scale solar and wind energy in the United States than nuclear, coal and even natural gas, as of last
November — a year after the Paris agreement officially went into effect — China, India and other major carbon
emitters were already making significant progress in meeting their Paris accord commitments.

The other glaring problem with the segment is it’s a prime example of fake news. With a former network news
show host playing anchor, viewers could easily mistake the piece as a clip from of a legitimate newscast. At least
one member of the conservative echo chamber treated it that way. The Washington Free Beacon, an online
news organization funded by GOP megadonor Paul Singer, ran a news story about the Stossel-Cass interview on
March 19.

American Legislative Exchange Council: Fossil fuel industry ‘bill mill’

On July 12, ExxonMobil announced it had ended its longtime membership in the American Legislative
Exchange Council after a disagreement over the corporate lobby group’s climate policy. From 1998 through last
year — when Exxon Mobil reported it gave the group $60,000 — ALEC received $1.93 million from the oil
company.

Over the last two decades, ALEC has routinely featured climate science deniers at its conferences and supplied
state lawmakers with a range of fossil fuel industry-drafted sample legislation, including bills that would
restrict investment in renewables, eliminate incentives for electric vehicles, and hamper the solar industry from
selling electricity directly to residential and business customers.

Since 2012, more than 100 corporations, including BP, ConocoPhillips, Royal Dutch Shell and electric utilities
Entergy, Pacific Gas & Electric and Xcel Energy, have severed ties with ALEC, in many cases because of its
regressive policy positions.

https://blog.ucsusa.org/elliott-negin/exxonmobil-still-funding-climate-science-denier-groups?_ga=2.247774855.1252715172.1536234782-1195007485.1536234782 6/8
9/6/2018 Why is ExxonMobil Still Funding Climate Science Denier Groups? - Union of Concerned Scientists

ExxonMobil’s exit from ALEC came just months after the company fought to defeat a draft resolution
sponsored by the Heartland Institute — an ExxonMobil grantee from 1998 through 2006 — calling on the
Environmental Protection Agency to “reopen and review” its “flawed” conclusion that climate change poses a
threat to human health. The EPA’s “endangerment finding” requires the agency to regulate carbon dioxide and
other global warming emissions as hazardous pollutants under the Clean Air Act.

After ExxonMobil and the Edison Electric Institute (EEI), a utility trade group, objected to the resolution, the
Heartland Institute withdrew it and accused the two of being in league with the likes of Greenpeace and the
Sierra Club.

“Big corporations like ExxonMobil and trade groups like EEI have long been members of the discredited and
anti-energy global warming movement,” Heartland’s president, Tim Huelskamp, said in a December 7 press
release. “They’ve put their profits and ‘green’ virtue signaling above sound science and the interests of their
customers.”

Huelskamp’s ludicrous assertion notwithstanding, some might construe ExxonMobil’s exit from ALEC as a
welcome change in direction. The company’s money trail, however, clearly shows that it is still financing
climate science denier groups that denigrate any and all climate policy options and provide cover for Congress
and the current administration to do nothing. Until ExxonMobil stops funding these groups, its avowed support
for a carbon tax, the Paris agreement and other climate initiatives can’t be seen as anything more than a cynical
PR ploy.

Like 836 Tweet

Posted in: Energy, Global Warming Tags: carbon tax, Climate Denier, Climate Science, ExxonMobil, fossil fuel,
Global warming
Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

https://blog.ucsusa.org/elliott-negin/exxonmobil-still-funding-climate-science-denier-groups?_ga=2.247774855.1252715172.1536234782-1195007485.1536234782 7/8
9/6/2018 Why is ExxonMobil Still Funding Climate Science Denier Groups? - Union of Concerned Scientists

Hide Comments

Comment Policy

UCS welcomes comments that foster civil conversation and debate. To help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion, please focus comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand, and
refrain from personal attacks. Posts that are commercial, self-promotional, obscene, rude, or disruptive will be removed.

Please note that comments are open for two weeks following each blog post. UCS respects your privacy and will not display, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.

0 Comments The Equation 

1 Login

Sort by Best
 Recommend ⤤ Share

Start the discussion…

LOG IN WITH
OR SIGN UP WITH DISQUS ?

Name

Be the first to comment.

✉ Subscribe d Add Disqus to your siteAdd DisqusAdd 🔒 Disqus' Privacy PolicyPrivacy PolicyPrivacy

https://blog.ucsusa.org/elliott-negin/exxonmobil-still-funding-climate-science-denier-groups?_ga=2.247774855.1252715172.1536234782-1195007485.1536234782 8/8