Lorraine Kutondo.

Medication
errors Assignment 2 HSNS 206
.pdf
by Lorraine Kutondo

Submission date: 27-Aug-2018 07:52PM (UT C+1000)

Submission ID: 993690980
File name: 152260_Lorraine_Kutondo_Lorraine_Kutondo_1393361_748602692.pdf
Word count: 2099
Character count: 11828
 1

Awk.

Awk.

Cit ing old7ref erences

 8

9
Awk.

10

Awk.

11

12

Awk.

13

14

15

Awk.

Awk.

16
17

18

19
20
Lorraine Kutondo.Medication errors Assignment 2 HSNS 206
.pdf
ORIGINALITY REPORT

19 %
SIMILARIT Y INDEX
10%
INT ERNET SOURCES
4%
PUBLICAT IONS
17%
ST UDENT PAPERS

PRIMARY SOURCES

1
Submitted to University of New England
St udent Paper 8%
2
Submitted to Charles Sturt University
St udent Paper 2%
3
Submitted to Napier University
St udent Paper 2%
4
www0.health.nsw.gov.au
Int ernet Source 2%
5
Submitted to Edith Cowan University
St udent Paper 1%
6
Susan Montenery. "Problem-Based Learning
for Didactic Presentation to Baccalaureate
1%
Nursing Students", Creative Nursing, 2017
Publicat ion

7
Submitted to University of Western Sydney
St udent Paper 1%
8
Submitted to Chester College of Higher
Education
1%
 St udent Paper

9
Submitted to University of Cumbria
St udent Paper 1%
10
Submitted to TAFE Queensland Brisbane
St udent Paper <1%
11
www.health.nsw.gov.au
Int ernet Source <1%
12
Submitted to University of Newcastle
St udent Paper <1%
13
www.proftlj.com
Int ernet Source <1%
14
www.hsj.gr
Int ernet Source <1%
15
eprints.soton.ac.uk
Int ernet Source <1%

Exclude quotes Of f Exclude matches Of f

Exclude bibliography Of f
Lorraine Kutondo.Medication errors Assignment 2 HSNS 206
.pdf
GRADEMARK REPORT

FINAL GRADE GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

18
PAGE 1
/35

PAGE 2

Comment 1
this essay is about registered nurses an Adverse Drug reaction consider keeping this in mind
when writing your introduction

Comment 2
T his is really not what the case study is about consider providing inf ormation that's is specif ic
to the content of the assignment.

QM Awk.
Awkward:
T he expression or construction is cumbersome or dif f icult to read. Consider rewriting.

QM Awk.
Awkward:
T he expression or construction is cumbersome or dif f icult to read. Consider rewriting.
Additional Comment

Consider using the f ollowing wording :

T he f ollowing essay will identif y and discuss ...

Comment 3
errors that lead to
 Comment 4
yes great

Comment 5
yes well done

Comment 6
excellent

Comment 7
who is they

QM Citing old ref erences

Be caref ul about citing old ref erences. the rule of thumb is to go back at most f ive to six years.

PAGE 3

Comment 8
not trainee student registered nurse

Comment 9
Yes

PAGE 4

QM Awk.
Awkward:
T he expression or construction is cumbersome or dif f icult to read. Consider rewriting.

Comment 10
what is trimethoprim and what is its pharmacological action ?What is methotrexate and what is
its pharmacological action ?

QM Awk.
Awkward:
T he expression or construction is cumbersome or dif f icult to read. Consider rewriting.

Comment 11
Yes but what are these in relation to the case study
 Yes but what are these in relation to the case study

Comment 12
T his is not neglect its negligence and breach of duty of care due to insuf f icient medication
knowledge

QM Awk.
Awkward:
T he expression or construction is cumbersome or dif f icult to read. Consider rewriting.

Comment 13
What is the potential interaction explain this in f urther detail

Comment 14
Combining trimethoprim and methotrexate is associated with a potential drug interaction that
increase methotrexate toxicity. T here is an increased risk of haematological toxicity.

Comment 15
Yes but what caused the medication error in this case study

QM Awk.
Awkward:
T he expression or construction is cumbersome or dif f icult to read. Consider rewriting.
Additional Comment

yes but how does this relate to Mrs Mendez

QM Awk.
Awkward:
T he expression or construction is cumbersome or dif f icult to read. Consider rewriting.
Additional Comment

A patient is not under methotrexate they are prescribed methotrexate

Comment 16
Yes exactly

PAGE 5

Comment 17
Yes but what are these guidelines and policies ?
 Comment 18
Any error in administration must be reported to prescriber and IIMS f illed in and Mrs mendez
would need immediate review and bloods

Comment 19
Yes and what does that mean what policy does it ref er to ? High risk medications policy,
medication handling and cytotoxic waste management policy.

PAGE 6

Comment 20
Yes absolutely

PAGE 7

PAGE 8

PAGE 9
RUBRIC: HSNS20 6 WRITTEN 2 T3 20 18 50 / 10 0

CRIT ERION 1 (30%) 50 / 100

Interpret the dif f erences between the roles and responsibilities of the Registered Nurse (RN) and the
student nurse in relation to responsibility and accountability f or medication administration

HD A comprehensive discussion have been undertaken of the dif f erences in roles and
(100) responsibilities of the RN and the student nurse in relation to responsibility and
accountability of medication administration

HD A comprehensive discussion have been undertaken of the dif f erences in roles and
(95) responsibilities of the RN and the student nurse in relation to responsibility and
accountability of medication administration

HD A comprehensive discussion have been undertaken of the dif f erences in roles and
(85) responsibilities of the RN and the student nurse in relation to responsibility and
accountability of medication administration

D A detailed discussion have been undertaken of the dif f erences in roles and
(80) responsibilities of the RN and the student nurse in relation to responsibility and
accountability of medication administration

D A detailed discussion have been undertaken of the dif f erences in roles and
(75) responsibilities of the RN and the student nurse in relation to responsibility and
accountability of medication administration

C An adequate discussion have been undertaken of the dif f erences in roles and
(70) responsibilities of the RN and the student nurse in relation to responsibility and
accountability of medication administration

C An adequate discussion have been undertaken of the dif f erences in roles and
(65) responsibilities of the RN and the student nurse in relation to responsibility and
accountability of medication administration

P Minimal discussion have been undertaken of the dif f erences in roles and
(60) responsibilities of the RN and the student nurse in relation to responsibility and
accountability of medication administration

P Minimal discussion have been undertaken of the dif f erences in roles and
(55) responsibilities of the RN and the student nurse in relation to responsibility and
accountability of medication administration

P Minimal discussion have been undertaken of the dif f erences in roles and
(50) responsibilities of the RN and the student nurse in relation to responsibility and
accountability of medication administration

N T here is no clear discussion of the dif f erences in the roles and responsibilities of the
(45) RN and the student nurse OR in relation to responsibility and accountability of
medication administration

N T here is no clear discussion of the dif f erences in the roles and responsibilities of the
(40) RN and the student nurse OR in relation to responsibility and accountability of
 medication administration

N T here is no clear discussion of the dif f erences in the roles and responsibilities of the
(35) RN and the student nurse OR in relation to responsibility and accountability of
medication administration

CRIT ERION 2 (30%) 50 / 100

Identif y and discuss the contributing f actors f or medication errors within nursing practice

HD Identif ied the major contributing f actors f or medication errors and have discussed
(100) them extensively

HD Identif ied the major contributing f actors f or medication errors and have discussed
(95) them extensively

HD Identif ied the major contributing f actors f or medication errors and have discussed
(85) them extensively

D T here is a detailed discussion of the contributing f actors f or medication errors

(80)

D T here is a detailed discussion of the contributing f actors f or medication errors

(75)

C T here is an adequate discussion of the contributing f actors f or medication errors

(70)

C T here is an adequate discussion of the contributing f actors f or medication errors

(65)

P T here is minimal discussion of the contributing f actors f or medication errors

(60)

P T here is minimal discussion of the contributing f actors f or medication errors

(55)

P T here is minimal discussion of the contributing f actors f or medication errors

(50)

N No contributing f actors have been identif ied f or medication errors OR no discussion

(45) has been undertaken

N No contributing f actors have been identif ied f or medication errors OR no discussion

(40) has been undertaken

N No contributing f actors have been identif ied f or medication errors OR no discussion

(35) has been undertaken

CRIT ERION 3 (20%) 45 / 100

Critically analyse the relevant medication policies and guidelines, competency standards in relation to the
case study presented
HD Evidence of critical analysis in relation to all of the relevant medication policies,
(100) guidelines and competency standards has been undertaken and applied to the case
study

HD Evidence of critical analysis in relation to all of the relevant medication policies,

(95) guidelines and competency standards has been undertaken and applied to the case
study

HD Evidence of critical analysis in relation to all of the relevant medication policies,

(85) guidelines and competency standards has been undertaken and applied to the case
study

D Evidence of critical analysis in relation to some of the relevant medication policies,

(80) guidelines and competency standards been undertaken and applied to the case study

D Evidence of critical analysis in relation to some of the relevant medication policies,

(75) guidelines and competency standards been undertaken and applied to the case study

C Evidence of analysis in relation to medication policies, guidelines and competency

(70) standards has been undertaken and applied to the case study

C Evidence of analysis in relation to medication policies, guidelines and competency

(65) standards has been undertaken and applied to the case study

P Minimal analysis of the medication policies, guidelines and competency standards has
(60) been undertaken and applied to the case study

P Minimal analysis of the medication policies, guidelines and competency standards has
(55) been undertaken and applied to the case study

P Minimal analysis of the medication policies, guidelines and competency standards has
(50) been undertaken and applied to the case study

N No evidence of analysis has been undertaken and there is no application of any

(45) policies, guidelines and competency standards to the case study

N No evidence of analysis has been undertaken and there is no application of any

(40) policies, guidelines and competency standards to the case study

N No evidence of analysis has been undertaken and there is no application of any

(35) policies, guidelines and competency standards to the case study

CRIT ERION 4 (10%) 50 / 100

Structure, presentation grammar and spelling.

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writing conventions Introduction

(100) & conclusion are succinct and ef f ective; paragraphs are well-developed and have
strong topic sentences Adhered to grammatical conventions with no errors Logically /
well and succinctly structured assignment

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writing conventions Introduction

(95) & conclusion are succinct and ef f ective; paragraphs are well-developed and have
 strong topic sentences Adhered to grammatical conventions with no errors Logically /
well and succinctly structured assignment

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writing conventions Introduction

(85) & conclusion are succinct and ef f ective; paragraphs are well-developed and have
strong topic sentences Adhered to grammatical conventions with no errors Logically /
well and succinctly structured assignment

D Mostly accurate and consistent adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions

(80) Introduction, conclusion & paragraph development are competent; paragraphs are
occasionally and/or underdeveloped; topic sentences are generally good Adhered to
grammatical conventions with f ew errors Logically and well-structured assignment

D Mostly accurate and consistent adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions

(75) Introduction, conclusion & paragraph development are competent; paragraphs are
occasionally and/or underdeveloped; topic sentences are generally good Adhered to
grammatical conventions with f ew errors Logically and well-structured assignment

C Partial but close adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions Adequate

(70) introduction and conclusion. Paragraph development have inconsistencies; topic
sentences are present but are inef f ective Adhered to grammatical conventions, but
with f requent errors Mainly well- structured assignment, lacking cohesion in places

C Partial but close adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions Adequate

(65) introduction and conclusion. Paragraph development have inconsistencies; topic
sentences are present but are inef f ective Adhered to grammatical conventions, but
with f requent errors Mainly well- structured assignment, lacking cohesion in places

P Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions Introduction or conclusion is

(60) inadequate or missing; paragraphs are underdeveloped or weak; topic sentences are
missing or unf ocused Minimal adherence to grammatical conventions with multiple
errors Weakly structured assignment, f requently lacking cohesion

P Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions Introduction or conclusion is

(55) inadequate or missing; paragraphs are underdeveloped or weak; topic sentences are
missing or unf ocused Minimal adherence to grammatical conventions with multiple
errors Weakly structured assignment, f requently lacking cohesion

P Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writing conventions Introduction or conclusion is

(50) inadequate or missing; paragraphs are underdeveloped or weak; topic sentences are
missing or unf ocused Minimal adherence to grammatical conventions with multiple
errors Weakly structured assignment, f requently lacking cohesion

N Little or no attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writing conventions Introduction and

(45) conclusion are missing. Sentence structure is poor. Multiple grammatical errors with
minimal attention to writing / spelling conventions that signif icantly distract the reader
f rom the content A poorly structured assignment which lacks cohesion.

N Little or no attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writing conventions Introduction and

(40) conclusion are missing. Sentence structure is poor. Multiple grammatical errors with
minimal attention to writing / spelling conventions that signif icantly distract the reader
f rom the content A poorly structured assignment which lacks cohesion.
N Little or no attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writing conventions Introduction and
(35) conclusion are missing. Sentence structure is poor. Multiple grammatical errors with
minimal attention to writing / spelling conventions that signif icantly distract the reader
f rom the content A poorly structured assignment which lacks cohesion.

CRIT ERION 5 (10%) 60 / 100

APA (6th Edition) and the application of evidence

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to APA (6th Edition) ref erencing style Explicitly
(100) acknowledges all sources used throughout the assignment as well as within the
ref erence list

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to APA (6th Edition) ref erencing style Explicitly
(95) acknowledges all sources used throughout the assignment as well as within the
ref erence list

HD Accurately and consistently adheres to APA (6th Edition) ref erencing style Explicitly
(85) acknowledges all sources used throughout the assignment as well as within the
ref erence list

D Mostly of f ers accurate and consistent APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions
(80) within essay Principally acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment as
well as within the ref erence list inf requent errors (suggested: f ewer than 1 error per
page

D Mostly of f ers accurate and consistent APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions
(75) within essay Principally acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment as
well as within the ref erence list inf requent errors (suggested: f ewer than 1 error per
page

C A number of inaccurate and inconsistent APA (6th Edition) ref erences within the
(70) essay Mostly acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment and the
ref erence list f requency of errors detracts f rom strength of paper (suggested: 1-2
errors per page

C A number of inaccurate and inconsistent APA (6th Edition) ref erences within the
(65) essay Mostly acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment and the
ref erence list f requency of errors detracts f rom strength of paper (suggested: 1-2
errors per page

P Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA (6th Edition) ref erences within the essay
(60) Minimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment and ref erence
list f requency of errors obstructs clarity f or reader (suggested: 3-4 errors per page)

P Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA (6th Edition) ref erences within the essay
(55) Minimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment and ref erence
list f requency of errors obstructs clarity f or reader (suggested: 3-4 errors per page)

P Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA (6th Edition) ref erences within the essay
(50) Minimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment and ref erence
list f requency of errors obstructs clarity f or reader (suggested: 3-4 errors per page)
N Did not adhere to the APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions or use APA
(45) ref erencing style Little or no acknowledgment of sources used throughout the
assignment No ref erence list f ive or more errors per page

N Did not adhere to the APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions or use APA
(40) ref erencing style Little or no acknowledgment of sources used throughout the
assignment No ref erence list f ive or more errors per page

N Did not adhere to the APA (6th Edition) ref erencing conventions or use APA
(35) ref erencing style Little or no acknowledgment of sources used throughout the
assignment No ref erence list f ive or more errors per page