The document is a rubric for evaluating group presentations. It provides criteria in four categories: content, organization, presentation, and collaboration. Each category lists descriptors for performance levels rated 2, 4, 6, or 8 points. The highest level of performance - worth 8 points - includes having valuable, accurate content; well-organized structure that is easy to follow; confident, engaging presenters who rehearsed well; and equal contribution and collaboration from all group members.
The document is a rubric for evaluating group presentations. It provides criteria in four categories: content, organization, presentation, and collaboration. Each category lists descriptors for performance levels rated 2, 4, 6, or 8 points. The highest level of performance - worth 8 points - includes having valuable, accurate content; well-organized structure that is easy to follow; confident, engaging presenters who rehearsed well; and equal contribution and collaboration from all group members.
The document is a rubric for evaluating group presentations. It provides criteria in four categories: content, organization, presentation, and collaboration. Each category lists descriptors for performance levels rated 2, 4, 6, or 8 points. The highest level of performance - worth 8 points - includes having valuable, accurate content; well-organized structure that is easy to follow; confident, engaging presenters who rehearsed well; and equal contribution and collaboration from all group members.
Group # _______________ Section ________________ Date ________________
Group Presentation Rubric
Category Criteria Points
2 4 6 8 Content Presentation Presentation had Presentation had a Presentation had Did the contained little to moments where good amount of an exceptional presentation no valuable valuable material material and amount of have valuable material. was present but as benefited the valuable material material? Presentation a whole content class. Presentation and was extremely contains inaccurate was lacking. contains few beneficial to the information. Presentation inaccurate class. Presentation contains some information. contains accurate inaccurate information. information. Organization The presentation There were The presentation The presentation Was the lacked minimal signs of had organizing was well presentation organization and organization or ideas but could organized, well well organized had little evidence preparation. have been much prepared and easy and easy to of preparation. stronger with to follow. follow? better preparation. Presentation Presenters were Presenters were Presenters were Presenters were all Did the presenters unconfident and not consistent with occasionally very confident in speak clearly? demonstrated little the level of confident with delivery and they Did they engage evidence of confidence/ their presentation did an excellent the audience? planning prior to preparedness they however the job of engaging Was it obvious the presentation. showed the presentation was the class. material had classroom but had not as engaging as Preparation is very been rehearsed? some strong it could have been evident. moments. for the class. Collaboration The teammates The teammates The teammates The teammates Did everyone never worked sometimes worked worked from always worked contribute to from others’ ideas. from others’ ideas. others’ ideas most from others’ ideas. the It seems as though However it seems of the time. And It was evident that presentation? only a few people as though certain it seems like every all of the group Did everyone worked on the people did not do did some work, members seem well presentation. as much work as but some people contributed versed in the others. are carrying the equally to the material? presentation. presentation.
Visual Aids Presentation Presentation had Presentation had a Presentation had
Did the group use contained little to moments where good amount of an exceptional visual components no valuable visual component visual component amount of that support the visual component. was present but as and supported the visual component main points of their a whole did not main points of the that elaborated the topic? support the main topic. main points of the points of the topic. topic.