NOTICE and DEMAND

From: [Your strawman name] Date:_______________

100 Any Street.
Any Town, Any Prov. PO Code SIN: ___________________

Attention;
THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE
COMMISSIONER FOR CRA
CRA (Area Office)

Re: Non-Payment of Demanded Refund Of Withheld Wages

Take notice that a T1 Return of Income for the taxpayer, (strawman name) was filed on or
about ( date), for the taxation year _________ , and, as no income tax was owing, as shown
on that T1 Return of Income, the wages of the undisclosed principal for whom this party is
agent in commerce and trustee in trust of all monies or assets collected for and held in
account for the undisclosed principal who is a living free will adult man, and who was and is
not subject to any provisions of the Income Tax Act of Canada nor subject to the harvesting
of the fruits of the labour of a slave owned by the corporate Crown in Right of Canada by
way of an income tax, were demanded to be refunded in full in that T1 Return of Income.

Any and all monies, currency or other asset values collected by, and under the name,
(strawman name), is a trust situation, and thus not the property of, nor the equitable
possession of (strawman name), who is a mindless and bodyless entity incapable of giving
value to anything by way of exchange of labour for currency.

You are hereby placed on notice that whereas, all assets, monies or other property received
and held in trust by the entity (strawman name) are for the undisclosed principal and
primary creditor, the free will adult man commonly called (John) of the (Doe) family, who
has a superior ‘claim in equity’ upon all such assets, monies and property held or collected
by (strawman name).

And whereas, the free will adult man commonly called John of the Doe family is the source
of labour which has been converted to assets, monies and property held in trust by the
fictional entity, (strawman name).

And whereas, the free will adult man commonly called John of the Doe family only uses
Her Majesty’s property, the legal name, (strawman name), by and under PRIVATE
NECESSITY only. The free will adult man has not voluntarily attached himself to that legal
identity name, and therefore is not surety or guarantor of any debts imposed upon that
legal identity name, nor is he the property of Her Majesty or Crown by way of attachment.

And whereas, CRA and/or The Crown in right of Canada has only ‘legal claim’ for debts
imposed by the Crown upon the Crown owned entity, (strawman name), and has no right of
claim against the equity assets, monies and property held in trust by (strawman name) for
the free will adult man commonly called John of the Doe family. Equity prevails over law
(legal).

1
This notice is not disputing the right of Canada to impose the income tax upon ‘persons’,
the Crown owned legal name, and any adult human who is knowingly and voluntarily
attached to the legal identity name as a natural person, or, upon artificial persons; but
Canada, or the Crown in Right of Canada, has no right or authority to impose the income
tax upon a living free will adult man, where that party has not voluntarily
accepted/acknowledged that legal name as being ‘one and the same’ as him or her self.

And whereas, CRA legal claims, or imposed debts upon the bankrupt entity, (strawman
name) are not the responsibility of the beneficiary of trust, thus garnishment or the non-
refunding when demanded to do so of the assets in trust is an unlawful act by CRA against
the beneficiary.

And, since the legal name, (strawman name) is the property of the Crown in Right of
Canada, or of a Province of Canada, and Canada Revenue Agency is an agency of the
Crown in Right of Canada, therefore, a trust where the Crown owned legal name is trustee
in trust, and the Crown owned CRA corporate agency confiscates or converts currency,
monies or assets held in that Crown trust by way of extorting that in trust asset through the
excuse of taxation of the Crown ‘trustee in trust’, where the beneficiary is not Crown owned
property, there appears to be a Criminal Breach of Trust, as per the Criminal Code of
Canada, Section 336:

Criminal breach of trust

336. Every one who, being a trustee of anything for the use or benefit, whether in whole
or in part, of another person, or for a public or charitable purpose, converts, with intent to
defraud and in contravention of his trust, that thing or any part of it to a use that is not
authorized by the trust is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a
term not exceeding fourteen years.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 296.

And, relative to a demanded refund, I refer you to the Criminal Code of Canada, Section
337 :

Public servant refusing to deliver property

337. Every one who, being or having been employed in the service of Her Majesty in
right of Canada or a province, or in the service of a municipality, and entrusted by virtue
of that employment with the receipt, custody, management or control of anything, refuses
or fails to deliver it to a person who is authorized to demand it and does demand it is
guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding
fourteen years.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 297.
As ‘Trustee in Trust’, this party/person, (strawman name) hereby demands the requested
refund as stated in the T1 Return of Income heretofor mentioned in this notice be sent to
this party forthwith. As ‘trustee in trust’ this party is authorized by the undisclosed
principal and beneficiary to make this demand.

Sincerely,

I, commonly called John of the Doe family, a free will adult man,
and scribe for the entity, (strawman name written) for Her Majesty in right of Canada

2
3
 ASSERVATION and NOTICE
Court name and location (if applicable)
Page 1 of 3
Affiant: (Strawman name) Case # ___________________

Respondent: Her Majesty, the Queen in Right of Canada Date: _____________

*The Crown Attorney
*Presiding Judge
(* or. Canada Revenue Agency Appeals Commissioner

1. Comes (Strawman name) as agent for the free will man, commonly called _____________ of
the ________________ family, the undisclosed principal, and says:

2. Whereas, this party believes that where Her Majesty is referred to in this asservation, it means
Her Majesty, The Queen of the vassal State of Great Britain, as agent for the corporate Crown of
the City of London, which in turn, is the agent for the Holy Roman Empire of the Pontiff of
Rome.

3. Whereas, this party believes that the legal identity name, (Strawman name) is the property of
the Her Majesty in right of the Province of ____(birth province)_________, under agency, and
was provided by that corporate entity to be agent in commerce for the free will adult man (male
or female) commonly called ________ of the __________ family, and trustee in trust of all value
created through exchange of labour or through risk by that free will adult man, commonly called
________ of the __________ family - this being the only lawful use of the legal identity name by
Her Majesty, or by the free will adult man with whom it is associated.

4. And whereas, this party believes that the primary reason for this arrangement was/is that there
is no asset value money available in the land called Canada to pay for anything, either by a
contractor/ employer or by any human in any capacity within society or living on the land.

5. And whereas, this party believes that the adult man to which the legal identity, (Strawman
name), is associated is mandatorily obligated to use the legal identity name in all transactions
with the currency, with corporations and with Government, under the rule of private necessity to
sustain his or her life, and to avoid harassment, intimidation tactics and possible physical injury
and damage to themselves by ignorant officers of the Crown who do not know the difference
between an adult free man, and a person, a corporate property of the Crown, and thus, they
assume that all men are persons and property of the Crown.

6. And whereas, this party believes that this mandatory obligation imposed upon the free will
adult man can not, and does not, by use of, association with or attachment to the legal identity,
impose a voluntary contract of servitude upon, nor invoke the legal maxim, 'accessio cedit
principali' upon the associated free will man, that would change his or her status to 'citizen,
subject, person or freeman' - any of those status being an adult man claimed to be subject to, or
owned as property by Her Majesty, or by the corporate Crown of the City of London. If such
status of subject is imposed under colourable authority by some agency of government upon an
adult free will man, it would constitute unlawful involuntary servitude being imposed upon that
free will man.

4
 ASSERVATION and NOTICE
Court name and location (if applicable)
Page 2 of 3

Affiant: (Strawman name) Case # ___________________

Respondent: Her Majesty, the Queen in Right of Canada Date: _____________

The Crown Attorney
Presiding Judge

6. And whereas, this party believes that even though the legal identity name, (Strawman name),
may be erroneously shown to be an 'employee', 'payee', 'beneficiary', 'owner', or other recipient of
valuable assets found on documents received by, or found by, agents of Canada Revenue Agency,
or by a Crown Attorney, that legal identity name has added no value to it, as that party has no
mind or body, and thus no mental and/or physical labor to exchange for currency or for any
valuable assets.

7. And whereas, this party believes that the free will adult man to which the legal identity name,
(Strawman name), is associated is the party who has exchanged his or her labor, under the
unalienable right of property with claim of right in equity, a claim superior to a legal claim made
by the Crown or Her Majesty, or by any party not having lawful equitable claim to those assets;
and thus, is creditor of all assets collected or held in trust in the name of (Strawman name), a
debtor. A free will adult human is subject only to his Creator diety, and is not subject to another
man, or fictional corporate body acting in any capacity.

8. And whereas, this party believes that the free will adult man, for whom the legal identity name,
(Strawman name) is agent in commerce and trustee in trust, naturally has license to exercise and
use all unalienable rights available to free men. Those include, but are not limited to: life, liberty,
property, due process of law, and the pursuit of happiness; and, all of these are not subject to the
legislative restrictions which may be imposed upon men who are, or may be property of the
Crown, with that being imposed by contract or by association with the Crown owned legal
identity name in a voluntary and disclosed manner by that free will adult man.

9. Therefore notice. Any party that has a claim upon, or that may claim against, the legal identity
name owned by Her Majesty (strawman name), and has, or is considering the issuance of a, bill,
charge, fine, order, judgment, invoice, warrant, execution, or any other thing to or against the
legal identity name, (strawman name) for the payment of money or performance of an obligation,
any such claim has no applicability nor obligation of surety imposed upon the adult free will man,
the undisclosed principal and undisclosed beneficiary to and for whom the legal identity name
(strawman name) is associated as agent in commerce and trustee in trust; as, the free will man is
not subject to any acts, statutes, laws, rules or regulations of the fictional entity called
Government, or any other corporate body, nor to the enforcement of any of these upon him or her
by an officer or agency of the Crown in right of any division or branch of Government. Such
unlawful action by the Crown would/will be an act of piracy and plunder against a ‘free lawfully
commanded vessel’ – the free will adult man, who is subject only to God’s Law - “Do no harm”.

5
 ASSERVATION and NOTICE
Court name and location (if applicable)
Page 3 of 3
Affiant: (Strawman name) Case # ___________________

Respondent: Her Majesty, the Queen in Right of Canada Date: _____________

*The Crown Attorney
*Presiding Judge
(* or. Canada Revenue Agency Appeals Commissioner

10. Caveat: Failure by the named respondents to respond with full rebuttal of any and all points
on this affidavit will be an admission of intent of malfeasance against this affiant by the named
respondents, and shall be deemed to be an act of treason against this sovereign adult free will man
who is obligated by necessity to use Her Majesty's property/legal identity name in commerce.

Sincerely and by the truth,

I, commonly called John of the Doe family for ___ (Strawman name hand written) ____
for Her Majesty in right of Canada

[These documents are templates, so add to, alter or delete as your own situation demands.]

[Delete notes and instructions in brackets within text]

[Note: Hand write a check signing signature for strawman - remainder typed]
[Signature should be witnessed by a Notary Public - if refused by notary, then get 3 people to
witness your signature and sign {Witness _______________________} Add this note:
{Note: Witness of signature refused by Notary Public, (name, if available)} ]