Você está na página 1de 12

Accelerating Network and Business Transformation

Pole Structural Analysis

Site ID: KC_OP_010_OD


Latitude: 38.955761°
Longitude: -94.719339°
Address/Cross Street: 11149 W 95th Street
City. State, Zip: Overland Park, KS 66214

Prepared for

908 Broadway Boulevard


Kansas City, MO 64105

Prepared by: Sahnoune Abed, E.I.T.

Engineer of Record: Ronald J. Jackson, P.E.


National Director of A&E Services

11/04/2016

NEXIUS MA Office: 7 A Lyberty Way, Westford, MA 01886

1
Accelerating Network and Business Transformation

Executive Summary

This structural analysis report performed by Nexius Solutions, Inc. summarizes the
capacity of the existing street light pole to carry the additional equipment loading
proposed by Google to install at the above referenced location.

The analysis shows that the controlling reaction at the pole base is less than the
allowable pole capacity. Therefore, the existing street light pole is structurally
adequate and can safely support the additional wind load and gravity load resulting
from all the proposed Google equipment.

Table of Contents:

Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 2


1) Site Information: ............................................................................................................................... 3
2) Purpose of the analysis: .................................................................................................................. 3
3) Information and Data: ..................................................................................................................... 3
4) Analysis Criteria and Primary Design Parameters: .................................................................... 3
5) Analysis and Calculation: ................................................................................................................. 4
6) Loading:............................................................................................................................................... 4
7) Conclusion and Recommendations: ................................................................................................. 5
8) Assumptions & Disclaimers: .............................................................................................................. 5

APPENDIX (Structural Analysis Calculations).

NEXIUS MA Office: 7 A Lyberty Way, Westford, MA 01886

2
Accelerating Network and Business Transformation

1) Site Information:
Basic site information of the analyzed street light pole is listed below:

Site ID #: KC_OP_010_OD
Address/Cross Street: 11149 W 95th Street
City, State, ZIP: Overland Park, KS 66214
County: Johnson County
Structural Type: Steel Pole with Four Shoebox Light Fixtures
Property owner: City of Overland Park

2) Purpose of the analysis:

The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate the existing pole structural capacity to
support the additional loads resulting from the proposed Google installation.

3) Information and Data:

The pole and loading information used to complete this analysis was obtained from
some of the following documents:

• Construction drawings prepared by Nexius Solutions, Inc., dated 11/04/2016


• Site survey documents (site walk photos, measurements, etc.) obtained by
Nexius Solutions, Inc.
• RFDS Sheet for KC_OP_010_OD Rev.0, printed on 10/26/2016, provided by
Google.
• Structural specifications for round tapered steel poles, DWG. No. 730B1, dated
08/08/1992, provided by Millerbernd.

4) Analysis Criteria and Primary Design Parameters:

The analysis was performed according to following codes and standards:

• Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires,


and Traffic Signals, 6th Edition 2013 (AASHTO).
• International Building Code 2012 (adopted by the state of Kansas).
• ASCE 7-10 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures.

NEXIUS MA Office: 7 A Lyberty Way, Westford, MA 01886

3
Accelerating Network and Business Transformation

Primary design parameters determined according to above codes and standards are:

Wind speed w/o ice 90 mph (3-second gust)


Height and exposure factor Kz 1.00
Gust effect factor G 1.14
Wind importance factor, Ir 1.00
Velocity Conversion Factor, Cv 1.00
Design Life: 50 years

5) Analysis and Calculation:


The structural loads due to wind and self-weight are determined according to the above
listed codes and standards. (See Appendix for details of the structural analysis)
6) Loading:

The following describes the proposed Google equipment loading on the existing pole:

Proposed Loading

Elevation Qty. Equipment


Alpha Wireless AW3374
24’0” 1 13.7"x3”x3"
Net Weight = 3.3 lb.
Alpha Wireless AW3374
21’6” 1 13.7"x3”x3"
Net Weight = 3.3 lb.
Nokia AIO FW2QC
19’0” 2 8.66"x14.96"x5.43"
Net Weight = 19.84 lb.

Existing Loading

In addition to the existing pole structure and all applicable street lights and extension
arms, there are maybe other existing loads to consider which include sign panels, traffic
signals, banners, etc.

NEXIUS MA Office: 7 A Lyberty Way, Westford, MA 01886

4
Accelerating Network and Business Transformation

7) Conclusion and Recommendations:

The street light pole was analyzed in this calculation with the existing loading and the
proposed Google equipment loading.

The analysis shows that the combined bending and axial compression stresses at the
pole base are less than the allowable pole capacity. The analyzed street pole is
structurally adequate for the proposed Google installation.

8) Assumptions & Disclaimers:

• The accuracy of the proposed equipment loads listed in this report is the
responsibility of Google. This analysis was performed under the assumption that
all information provided to Nexius is current and accurate. If the proposed
equipment loads are different than those analyzed, this report should be
considered obsolete and further analysis will be required.
• It is the responsibility of the client and/or the structure owner to ensure that no
un-documented equipment is installed on the structure between now and the
construction phase. If additional equipment is installed on the structure, then this
report should be considered obsolete and further analysis will be required.
• This analysis assumes that the structural components, including all steel sections
and attachment hardware, are in good working condition, free of rust or other
forms of corrosion. Furthermore, it is assumed that the superstructure and the
foundation have been properly maintained and monitored since the original
installation. This report should be considered obsolete and further analysis will be
required if the structure and/or foundation does not meet all of the above criteria.
• Contractor shall field verify and measure all dimensions of the structure before
commencing construction.
• The superstructure and foundation are assumed for the purpose of this analysis to
have been properly fabricated, constructed, well maintained and to be in good
condition with no structural defects beyond those stated in the above mentioned
inspection report.

NEXIUS MA Office: 7 A Lyberty Way, Westford, MA 01886

5
Accelerating Network and Business Transformation

APPENDIX
Structural / Loading Analysis and Calculations

(6 pages)

NEXIUS MA Office: 7 A Lyberty Way, Westford, MA 01886

6
Subject: Street Light Pole Stuctural Analysis Sheet No.: 1
Site ID: KC_OP_010_OD Prepared by: SA
AcceleraƟng Network and Business TransformaƟon Lat & Long: 38.955761° / -94.719339° Engineer of Record: RJJ
Date: 11/4/16

Applicable Codes:

- International Building Code 2012 (adopted by the state of Kansas)


- Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires, and Traffic Signals,
6th Edition 2013 (AASHTO).
- ASCE 7-10 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures

Scope of Calculation: The structural Analysis Report is to determine if the existing pole has adequate
capacity to support the proposed Google equipment loading.
Equipment Specifications:

(2) Alpha AW 3374 (L xW x D) 13.7" x 3" Net Weight = 3.3 lbf


(2) Nokia AIO FW2QC (L x W x D) 8.66" x 14.96" x 5.43" Net Weight = 19.84 lbf

Units:

psf ≔ ―― kips ≔ 1000


2

Material:

ρsteel ≔ 490

Geometry:

- pole
Lengthpole ≔ 30 Thkpole ≔ 0.1196

Concrete_pier ≔ 40 C_pier ≔ Concrete_pier

Dpole_base ≔ 7.375 Dpole_top ≔ 3.25

Lengthpole 2
PApole ≔ ⎛⎝Dpole_top + Dpole_base⎞⎠ ⋅ ―――― = 13.3
2
2
temp ≔ ⎛⎝Dpole_top − 2 ⋅ Thkpole⎞⎠ + ⎛⎝Dpole_top − 2 ⋅ Thkpole⎞⎠ ⋅ ⎛⎝Dpole_base − 2 Thkpole⎞⎠
2
D2pole_hollow ≔ temp + ⎛⎝Dpole_base − 2 Thkpole⎞⎠
⎛⎝D2pole_hollow⎞⎠ ⋅ Lengthpole 3
Vpole_hollow ≔ ⋅ ――――――――= 4.44
4⋅3

⎛D 2 2⎞
⎝ pole_top + Dpole_top ⋅ Dpole_base + Dpole_base ⎠ ⋅ Lengthpole 3
Vpole_out ≔ ⋅ ―――――――――――――――――= 4.85
4⋅3
3
Vpole ≔ Vpole_out − Vpole_hollow = 0.41

ρpole ≔ ρsteel Wtpole ≔ Vpole ⋅ ρpole = 199.18

NEXIUS MA Office: 7A Lyberty Way, Westford, MA 01886


Subject: Street Light Pole Stuctural Analysis Sheet No.: 2
Site ID: KC_OP_010_OD Prepared by: SA
AcceleraƟng Network and Business TransformaƟon Lat & Long: 38.955761° / -94.719339° Engineer of Record: RJJ
Date: 11/4/16

2 Dpole_top + Dpole_base
zpole ≔ ―――――――― Lengthpole = 13.06 offseth_pole ≔ 0
3 ⎛⎝Dpole_top + Dpole_base⎞⎠

offsetz_pole ≔ zpole + C_pier = 16.39

- Shoebox (HxWxD): 22.8"x22.8"x14.2" Wt = 43 lbf (approx.)

offsetz_4_shoebox ≔ 33 +1 + C_pier = 36.4 offseth_4_shoebox ≔ 0 =0

2
PA4_shoebox ≔ 4 ⋅ 22.8 ⋅ 14.2 = 8.99 Wt4_shoebox ≔ 4 ⋅ 43 = 172

⎡ PApole ⎤ ⎡ 13.28 ⎤ 2
⎡ Wtpole ⎤ ⎡ 0.2 ⎤
PAex ≔ ⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥ Wtex ≔ ⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥
⎣ PA4_shoebox ⎦ ⎣ 8.99 ⎦ ⎣ Wt4_shoebox ⎦ ⎣ 0.17 ⎦

⎡ offseth_pole ⎤ ⎡ 0 ⎤ ⎡ offsetz_pole ⎤ ⎡ 16.39 ⎤


offseth_ex ≔ ⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥ offsetz_ex ≔ ⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥
⎣ offseth_4_shoebox ⎦ ⎣ 0 ⎦ ⎣ offsetz_4_shoebox ⎦ ⎣ 36.42 ⎦

Wind Load Factors

V ≔ 90 miles per hour, 3 sec gust


zh ≔ Lengthpole + C_pier = 33.33 zg ≔ 900 α ≔ 9.5
2

α
⎛ zh ⎞
Kz ≔ 2.01 ⋅ ⎜―⎟ Kz = 1
⎝ zg ⎠
Gust ≔ 1.14 Gust Effect Factor, min = 1.14 (corresponding to 1.3 (proved to be a
good value for design) gust coefficient for fastest mile wind speend)
Ir ≔ 1.0 Wind Importance Factor, Design Life = 50 yrs
Cv ≔ 1.0 Velocity Conversion Factor, Design Life = 50 yrs

Wind Load Factors - Wind Drag Coefficients

dpole ≔ Dpole_top = 3.25

For all cases of single member (conservatively):


Cd_pole ≔ 1.1

Cd_lum_flat ≔ 1.2 Luminaire with Generally - Flat Side Shapes Cd_shoebox ≔ Cd_lum_flat

⎡ Cd_pole ⎤
Cd_ex ≔ ⎢ ⎥
⎣ Cd_shoebox ⎦

NEXIUS MA Office: 7A Lyberty Way, Westford, MA 01886


Subject: Street Light Pole Stuctural Analysis Sheet No.: 3
Site ID: KC_OP_010_OD Prepared by: SA
AcceleraƟng Network and Business TransformaƟon Lat & Long: 38.955761° / -94.719339° Engineer of Record: RJJ
Date: 11/4/16

⎡ “antenna_3374” 13.7 3 3 3.3 24 +0 15 0.5 ⎤


⎢ “antenna_3374” 13.7 3 3 3.3 21 +6 15 0.5 ⎥
⎢ ⎥
Eqnew ≔ ⎢ “Nokia BTS” 8.66 14.96 5.43 19.84 19 +0 6 1.2 ⎥
⎢ “mounting pipe” 12 2.375 2.375 4 23 +0 15 0.5 ⎥
⎢⎣ “mounting pipe” 12 2.375 2.375 4 20 +6 15 0.5 ⎥⎦

⎡ 0.14 ⎤
⎢ 0.14 ⎥
――― ⟨ ⟩
――→ ⟨ ⟩
――⟨― ⟩
―― ⟨ ⟩
――→ ⟨ ⟩ ⎢ ⎥ 2 2
PAnew ≔ Eqnew⟨1⟩ ⋅ Eqnew⟨2⟩ xPAnew ≔ Eqnew⟨1⟩ ⋅ Eqnew⟨2⟩ ⋅ Eqnew⟨7⟩ = ⎢ 1.08 ⎥ ∑ xPAnew = 1.6
⎢ 0.1 ⎥
⎢⎣ 0.1 ⎥⎦

⟨ ⟩ ⟨ ⟩ ⟨ ⟩ ⟨ ⟩
Wtnew ≔ Eqnew⟨4⟩ offsetz_new ≔ Eqnew⟨5⟩ offseth_new ≔ Eqnew⟨6⟩ Cd_new ≔ Eqnew⟨7⟩

Wind Pressure ――――――――― ―――→


⎛ V ⎞2 ⎡ 26.11 ⎤
Pz_ex ≔ 0.00256 ⋅ Kz ⋅ Gust ⋅ ⎜――⎟ ⋅ Ir ⋅ Cd_ex ⋅ psf = ⎢
⎝ ⎠ ⎣ 28.49 ⎥⎦

⎡ 11.87 ⎤
――――――――― ― ― ― ― → ⎢ 11.87 ⎥
⎛ V ⎞2 ⎢ ⎥
Pz_new ≔ 0.00256 Kz ⋅ Gust ⋅ ⎜――⎟ ⋅ Ir ⋅ Cd_new ⋅ psf = ⎢ 28.49 ⎥
⎝ ⎠
⎢ 11.87 ⎥
⎢⎣ 11.87 ⎥⎦

⎡ 3.39 ⎤
⎢ 3.39 ⎥
―――→ ⎡ 346.83 ⎤ ――――→ ⎢ ⎥
WLex ≔ Pz_ex ⋅ PAex = ⎢ WLnew ≔ Pz_new ⋅ PAnew = ⎢ 25.63 ⎥
⎣ 256.21 ⎥⎦
⎢ 2.35 ⎥
⎢⎣ 2.35 ⎥⎦
Wind Load Total WLtotal ≔ ∑ WLex + ∑ WLnew = 0.64

Dead Weights Wttotal ≔ ∑ Wtex + ∑ Wtnew = 0.406

Base bending moment due to dead weight

―――――→ ⎡ 0 ⎤
Mbase_wt_ex ≔ Wtex ⋅ offseth_ex = ⎢ ⎥ ⋅
⎣0⎦

⎡ 0.004 ⎤
⎢ 0.004 ⎥
―――――→ ⎢ ⎥
Mbase_wt_new ≔ Wtnew ⋅ offseth_new = ⎢ 0.01 ⎥ ⋅
⎢ 0.005 ⎥
⎢⎣ 0.005 ⎥⎦
Base bending moment due to wind

―――――→ ⎡ 5.685 ⎤
Mbase_wl_ex ≔ WLex ⋅ offsetz_ex = ⎢ ⋅
⎣ 9.33 ⎥⎦

NEXIUS MA Office: 7A Lyberty Way, Westford, MA 01886


Subject: Street Light Pole Stuctural Analysis Sheet No.: 4
Site ID: KC_OP_010_OD Prepared by: SA
AcceleraƟng Network and Business TransformaƟon Lat & Long: 38.955761° / -94.719339° Engineer of Record: RJJ
Date: 11/4/16

⎡ 0.081 ⎤
⎢ 0.073 ⎥
―――――→ ⎢ ⎥
Mbase_wl_new ≔ WLnew ⋅ offsetz_new = ⎢ 0.487 ⎥ ⋅
⎢ 0.054 ⎥
⎢⎣ 0.048 ⎥⎦
Bending moment at base
⎛ ⎞
Mbase_wl_sum ≔ ⎜ ∑ ⎛⎝Mbase_wl_ex⎞⎠ + ∑ ⎛⎝Mbase_wl_new⎞⎠⎟ = 15.759 ⋅
⎝ ⎠

⎛ ⎞
Mbase_wt_sum ≔ ⎜ ∑ ⎛⎝Mbase_wt_ex⎞⎠ + ∑ ⎛⎝Mbase_wt_new⎞⎠⎟ = 0.028 ⋅
⎝ ⎠

Mbase_sum ≔ ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
⎛⎝Mbase_wl_sum⎞⎠ 2 + ⎛⎝Mbase_wt_sum⎞⎠ 2 = 15.759 ⋅

Moment increase due to the proposed loading

∑ ⎛⎝Mbase_wl_new⎞⎠ + ∑ ⎛⎝Mbase_wt_new⎞⎠
―――――――――――――――――――― = 0.051
⎛ ⎞
Mbase_wl_sum + Mbase_wt_sum − ⎜ ∑ ⎛⎝Mbase_wl_new⎞⎠ + ∑ ⎛⎝Mbase_wt_new⎞⎠⎟
⎝ ⎠

Loading point offset Torsion


horizontal contribution
⎡ 0.004 ⎤
⎢ 0.004 ⎥
―――――→ ⎡ 0 ⎤ ――――――→ ⎢ ⎥
Tbase_ex ≔ WLex ⋅ offseth_ex = ⎢ ⎥ ⋅ Tbase_new ≔ WLnew ⋅ offseth_new = ⎢ 0.013 ⎥ ⋅
⎣0⎦
⎢ 0.003 ⎥
⎢⎣ 0.003 ⎥⎦
Torsion at base Tbase_sum ≔ ∑ ⎛⎝Tbase_ex⎞⎠ + ∑ ⎛⎝Tbase_new⎞⎠ = 0.027 ⋅

Stress Analysis (bending controls)

Epole ≔ 29000 Fy ≔ 55 A595

⎛ 2
2⎞
⎝Dpole_base − ⎛⎝Dpole_base − 2 ⋅ Thkpole⎞⎠ ⎠
Section Area Apole_round ≔ ⋅ ――――――――――――= 2.73 2

Wttotal
Compression stress fa ≔ ―――― = 0.15 Fa ≔ 0.6 Fy = 33
Apole_round
⎛ 4⎞
⋅ ⎝Dpole_base 4 − ⎛⎝Dpole_base − 2 ⋅ Thkpole⎞⎠ ⎠
Section Modulus Spole_round ≔ ――――――――――――― = 4.87 3

32 Dpole_base

⎛ ⎞

NEXIUS MA Office: 7A Lyberty Way, Westford, MA 01886


Subject: Street Light Pole Stuctural Analysis Sheet No.: 5
Site ID: KC_OP_010_OD Prepared by: SA
AcceleraƟng Network and Business TransformaƟon Lat & Long: 38.955761° / -94.719339° Engineer of Record: RJJ
Date: 11/4/16

⎛ 3
3⎞
⎝Dpole_base − ⎛⎝Dpole_base − 2 ⋅ Thkpole⎞⎠ ⎠ 3
Zpole_round ≔ ――――――――――――= 6.3
6

Mbase_sum
Bending stress fb ≔ ―――― = 38.86
Spole_round
3
⎛ Dpole_base − Thkpole ⎞
Polar MoI Jpole_thin ≔ 2 ⋅ Thkpole ⋅ ⎜―――――― ⎟ = 35.88
4

⎝ 2 ⎠
⎛ 4
4⎞
⎜⎛ Dpole_base ⎞ ⎛ Dpole_base − 2 ⋅ Thkpole ⎞ ⎟ 4
Jpole_thick ≔ ― ⎜―――⎟ − ⎜――――――― ⎟ ⎟ = 35.89
2 ⎜⎝⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎠

Dpole_base
Tbase_sum ⋅ ―――
2 WLtotal
Shear stress fv ≔ ――――――― + ―――― = 0.27
Jpole_thin Apole_round

Dpole_base
Wall-Thickness Ratio λ ≔ ―――= 61.7
Thkpole

Epole
Compact Limit λp_round ≔ 0.13 ⋅ ――= 68.5
Fy

Epole
Non-Compact Limit λr_round ≔ 0.26 ⋅ ――= 137.1
Fy

Epole
Maximum Limit λmax_round ≔ 0.45 ⋅ ――= 237.3
Fy

Polecompactness ≔ if λ ≤ λp_round | = “compact”


‖ “compact” |
‖ |
else if λ > λp_round ∧ λ ≤ λr_round |
|
‖ “noncompact” |

else if λ > λr_round ∧ λ ≤ λmax_round|
|
‖ “slender” |
‖ |
else |
‖ “over the limit”
‖ |

Fb_round ≔ if Polecompactness = “compact”| = 36.3


‖ 0.66 F |
‖ y |
else |
|
‖ “not programmed”
‖ |

NEXIUS MA Office: 7A Lyberty Way, Westford, MA 01886


Subject: Street Light Pole Stuctural Analysis Sheet No.: 6
Site ID: KC_OP_010_OD Prepared by: SA
AcceleraƟng Network and Business TransformaƟon Lat & Long: 38.955761° / -94.719339° Engineer of Record: RJJ
Date: 11/4/16

CA ≔ if Lengthpole ≤ 49.2 CA ≔ 1 |=1


‖ 1.0 |
‖ |
else |
‖ “P-delta effects are significant, needs to be programmed” |
‖ |

2|

3|
⎛ Epole ⎞
Fv ≔ if λ ≤ 1.16 ⋅ ⎜―― ⎟ | = 18.2
⎝ Fy ⎠ |
‖ 0.33 F |
‖ y |
else |
‖ 0.41 E |
‖ ―――― pole |
‖ 3 |
― |
‖ ((λ)) 2
‖ |

⎛ 2⎞
⎜⎛ fa fb ⎞ 3 ⎛ 3 fv ⎞ ⎟
⎜⎜―
+ ――――⎟ ⋅ ―+ ⎜―― ⎟ ⎟ = 0.81 <1, OK
⎝⎝ Fa CA ⋅ Fb_round ⎠ 4 ⎝ 4 Fv ⎠ ⎠

NEXIUS MA Office: 7A Lyberty Way, Westford, MA 01886