ISSUE: 20181011- Re: The theft of our democracy, etc & the constitution-Supplement 20-Monies issues

As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the constitution.

* Gerrit, did you notice Bill shorten (ALP) and claiming education funding should not involve
politics?
**#** INSPECTOR-RIKATI®, when a politician is in opposition they somehow know how to
make claims but when they are in government they ignore the same. Reality is that to take
politics out of education means that the Parliament merely has to legislate that education issues is
to be administrated by the (Section 101) Inter-State commission. Then experts in education and
not politicians will be determining what is best, subject to the constitution obviously!
* What about Daniel Andrews supporting Catholic schools?
**#** Our constitution was based upon separation of powers between church and state. As such,
it should not make one iota difference if a private school is of any kind of religious doctrine. All
that is relevant is that any funding is not used for religious purposes. If for example the private
school was to use funding for a chapel or other religious room then this would be
unconstitutional. However, if the funding was on basis of a need of the student, for example
Centrelink related sliding scale funding per student then this would be in my view appropriate.
This means low income families may get a greater financial support then those on high income
for their own or their children studies. In my view we have too often political interferences both
federal and state and in the end it seems the students are worse for it.
* You oppose any specific grants to religious or private education?
**#** As I indicated they are all private schools as they were set up and/or continued when the
State (then colony)commenced public education. The private school education is entitled to teach
or not to teach religious doctrines provided it is not part of the curriculum paid for by taxpayers.
As such say 2 students are residing next door to each other and one goes to a private school and
the other to a public school. Then if the income of their families are equal then so should be the
funding to the relevant schools. I have as son who has 2 of my grandchildren attending to a
private SCHOOL. He is not rich at all but simply desire to have his children attending to a
private school. He is entitled to his choice. He should be entitled to the same funding as any other
family has earning the same regardless if their child attended to a public school.
* So, from this the issue should not be what kind of school any student attends to but that the
funding is not used for religious purposes either directly or indirectly, is that it?
**#** Correct.
* May I ask what about private school vetting who shall or shall not be permitted to become or
be a student and so with teachers?
**#** With private schools they are private for a particular purpose, and hence I view they are
entitled to ensure that the kind of students/teachers they have are in conformity with the

p1 11-10-2018 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
principles of this private school education issues. If private schools were compelled to operate
like a public school then you deny them the very purpose of being private.
*.Are there any recent decisions/authorities in that regard?
**#**
The following may indicate that the bakers in that case refused to provide a description that was
contrary to their religious views. As such, it is not if the customer was a gay person or not it was
that the product they ordered was contrary to the religious views of the baker.
https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2017-0020.html
QUOTE
LADY HALE: (with whom Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Hodge and Lady Black agree) 1. The substantive
question in this case is whether it is unlawful discrimination, either on grounds of sexual orientation, or on
grounds of religious belief or political opinion, for a bakery to refuse to supply a cake iced with the message
“support gay marriage” because of the sincere religious belief of its owners that gay marriage is inconsistent
with Biblical teaching and therefore unacceptable to God. If the prima facie answer to either question is
“yes”, then questions arise as to the rights of the bakery and its owners to freedom of religion and freedom of
expression, under articles 9 and 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and what difference, if
any, those rights might make to that prima facie answer.
END QUOTE

If therefore a homosexual were to apply for a teacher position but his/her conduct is beyond
reproach and the persons private sexual conduct is not demonstrated during education of students
or otherwise may be presented to them then the sexual/gender private views of the teacher would
be separate from the education facilities. However, if the person were to teach at some religious
education facility where this homosexual conduct is opposed and this teacher nevertheless goes
about making known his/her sexual preferences, etc, then I view the private school is well
entitled to terminate this teacher. After all the teacher would be undermining the specific private
school purposes. Likewise the same could be applied to a student who at some point of time were
to exto be homosexual, etc. then I view the private school could terminate the students from
attending further classes. As to avoid other students to be subjected/affected to this. After all
parents specifically choose a private school for certain purposes and not be caused to accept
something that they oppose for their children.
http://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/a-step-backwards-parents-hit-back-at-right-for-
schools-to-discriminate/ar-BBObTFZ
'A step backwards': Parents hit back at right for schools to discriminate
It is in my view not a discrimination when a private school denies a person to become or remain
to be a student who is acting/conducting himself/herself contrary to the principles of this private
school. We are in a democracy where the majority view governs and not that the minority can
dictate the majority!
*. Are you concerned about the federal government school publications?
**#** Let there be a lesson from the following link!
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-45793598
QUOTE

A legal battle for compensation by thousands of Morrisons staff whose personal details were posted
online by a disgruntled employee has reached the Court of Appeal.

The High Court ruled last year that the supermarket was liable for the release of information and its
employees were entitled to compensation.

The case is the first data leak class action in the UK.

The proceedings are due to take place on Tuesday.

p2 11-10-2018 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 Morrisons' appeal has significant implications for other organisations, who could also be found liable to pay
compensation for the acts of rogue employees.

END QUOTE

There are numerous rough persons who may decide to publish incorrect details and who wants to
have his/her child named or even the education facility where this could have an adverse
response by others to the student and/or his/her education facility.
It never should be a conquest between schools but it should be what is appropriate for each
student. The variables can be huge. I know too well from my own past. Ay primary school I
hated it because of various issues and well skipped school often and ended up doing grade 5 3
times at 2 different school. Then I blossomed (Ok it was because of a girl) and suddenly I not just
became the best of the class (according to the teacher) but was even assisting other students in
brakes and lunch times. When then I commenced to attend to a technical school the director
requested my parents to get me transferred to a university. I refused as I wanted to learn to use
my hands. Years after I left the technical school the Principal came to my wedding and
announced I was the best student he ever had. Therefore let no one be deterred about alleged
failures in early life because you just get over it and well you can succeed in your own way. This
is also why I view that too much politics is into education which causes more problems than
resolve them. Where my son is willing to sacrifice a part of his income to have his children
attending to a private school then he is entitled to expect the school will honour its principles
upon which my son made his decisions. After all why spend a huge amount of moneys on a
private school education if in the end they are forced to operate as to the public education
system?
Other grandchildren attend to public schools and to me that is a matter of my children’s choices.
*.So, the Inter-State Commission is the way to go?
**#** Yes. I am tired of hearing how some politicians went to some private or Catholic school as
they are all private schools. Also, funding should be equal for federal purposes regardless if the
school is public or private. For the State they are only entitled to find public schools.
Hansard 2-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE

Mr. REID.-I suppose that money could not be paid to any church under this Constitution?

Mr. BARTON.-No; you have only two powers of spending money, and a church could not receive the
funds of the Commonwealth under either of them.

END QUOTE

Hansard 2-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

QUOTE

Mr. HIGGINS.-That is the question-are those dangers non-existent?

Mr. BARTON.-I do not think the fact that we may be held by law to be a Christian community is any
reason for us to anticipate that there will be any longer any fear of a reign of Christian persecution-any fear
that there will be any remnant of the old ideas which have caused so much trouble in other ages. The whole
of the advancement in English-speaking communities, under English laws and English institutions, has shown
a less and less inclination to pass laws for imposing religious tests, or exacting religious observances, or to
maintain any religion. We have not done that in Australia. We have abolished state religion in all these
colonies; we have wiped out every religious test, and we propose now to establish a Government and a
Parliament which will be at least as enlightened as the Governments and Parliaments which prevail in various
states; therefore, what is the practical fear against which we are fighting?
END QUOTE

p3 11-10-2018 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
*.What about the so called Safe /School program?
**#** To me this actually makes the schools very unsafe. Let children be children.
*.What about the anti-vaccination issue?
**#** I had this email
(http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0011ll_VsA3h7UMJFyBtVl7Tbkp0eoSwcUd4XV07ci8h7LFs7NE76KAYk8ASFMFxh
K3tsyRHun6f7_9ky1lLCULsIZPLZjco0YbarJ9-
TDIq5FKYb1vv3rJfvVenoC4DO9S69n50AQwERUpOKpfDZRysL3qPmxWS74RJYv7-
U586osWfQMQwjKkX5vISywiRcAwh0zMmi1V_M9hcF1jNFoYI3eo3nWJgjj-
rnFq0ctV55yvZFF1k96vkkgIrisCS9j6ZJhej7TL0s175nFt-LiHDQ==&c=16uyo1cQ0zc2GYxv-
FPQLIbtRK89cHsUJ2QGGivoj6HuhDUvE2fsmQ==&ch=WlR-ye5bGnS8C1PdKyj9NUCFyA5ygTUZgj-
lIWZKoADFk5L3jWtFrw== )

QLD MPs call for censorship of AVN's Billboard and latest news
Fw: QLD MPs call for censorship of AVN's Billboard and latest news
Children are forced to be vaccinated never mind if they die as result because those who enforce
this are not held liable, but should be!
Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step, not beyond
the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the different colonies, and say
that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous principle that the Ministers of the
Crown and their officials shall be liable for any arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as
any private person would be.
END QUOTE

While the State could legislate for criminal offences and if you violate a criminal provision you
can be held legally accountable, but to argue that you must have a child vaccinated even so not a
criminal offence not to do so is ab surd.
More over to pursue to indoctrinate that the government somehow knows better than the parents
is a gross absurdity. I like to see that there is legislation that if the politician promoting
something turns out to be harmful then the politician can be sued personally.
We have the right to freedom of speech and thinking!
Hansard 21-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
I want to know from what point of view this can be called federal? We keep our
property; we are left to the free exercise of our brains and bodies; there is no
interference with the individual; state rights are to be preserved. Surely, collaterally
with that, state rights ought to be preserved too.

END QUOTE

The following will also make clear that the Framers of the Constitution intended to have CIVIL
RIGHTS and LIBERTIES principles embedded in the Constitution;
HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
Australasian Convention)
QUOTE Mr. CLARK.-
the protection of certain fundamental rights and liberties which every individual citizen is entitled to
claim that the federal government shall take under its protection and secure to him.
END QUOTE

Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

QUOTE
Mr. HIGGINS.-Suppose the sentry is asleep, or is in the swim with the other power?

p4 11-10-2018 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 Mr. GORDON.-There will be more than one sentry. In the case of a federal law, every member of a
state Parliament will be a sentry, and, every constituent of a state Parliament will be a sentry.
As regards a law passed by a state, every man in the Federal Parliament will be a sentry, and the whole
constituency behind the Federal Parliament will be a sentry.
END QUOTE

HANSARD18-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
Australasian Convention)
QUOTE Mr. ISAACS.-
The right of a citizen of this great country, protected by the implied guarantees of its Constitution,
END QUOTE

HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

QUOTE
Mr. BARTON.- Of course it will be argued that this Constitution will have been made by the Parliament of
the United Kingdom. That will be true in one sense, but not true in effect, because the provisions of this
Constitution, the principles which it embodies, and the details of enactment by which those principles
are enforced, will all have been the work of Australians.
END QUOTE

It is well overdue that politicians are standing up for the true meaning and application of the
constitution and we protect our children from undue government interference regardless of being
State and/or federal
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® (Our name is our motto!)

p5 11-10-2018 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati