Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
ROBERT I. McLAREN
1
Robert I. McLaren, "Pollution Probe in the Global Village," Inter-
national Journal XXX (Winter, 1974-75), 127-40.
558
2
For an analysis of the results of these changes in the 1960’s, see Robert
I. McLaren, "Equitable Geographical Distribution in the UN—IMCO,
A Case Study," India Ouarterly XXIX (April-June, 1973), 151-54.
3
IMCO/C.XXX/SR.5/1, p.2.
Germany related how his nominee &dquo;... had represented his coun-
try at every Council and Assembly session as well as at every
IIWiCO diplomatic conference,&dquo; but added as well that the West
German government had long wanted to have one of its nationals
in a key United Nations post and the election of its nominee would
certainly &dquo;... do much to increase the interest taken by its people
and its Parliament in United Nations work.&dquo;’
The representative from France stressed the fact that his candi-
date had been Deputy Secretary-General of IMCO for the previous
five years and had thus &dquo;... acquired wide experience of the
Organization’s work&dquo; to complement his personal qualifications as
&dquo;... a sailor, an administrator and a lawyer.&dquo; Furthermore, the
election of this candidate would &dquo;... have the advantage of free-
ing the post of Deputy Secretary-General which could be occupied
by a representative of a developing country.&dquo;6 (The cynic would
suggest that France’s traditional motto of &dquo;liberty, equality, and
fraternalism&dquo; had become &dquo;liberty, equality, and paternalism.&dquo;)
Finally, the Indian representative spoke, thanking Ghana and
the Netherlands for their support, and stressing Mr. Srivastava’s
abilities and experience with the Indian Merchant Marine and with
diplomatic duties for the Indian Prime Minister and UNCTAD’s
Committee on Shipping.7 Although Mr. Srivastava had both
domestic and international experience in the matters that IMCO
regulated, it could be said that, of the three candidates, he had
the least amount of actual experience with IMCO, itself.
Mr. Srivastava won the election on the first ballot, being named
by 14 of the 18 delegations.8 The countries represented on the
IMCO Council at that time were Algeria, Australia, Belgium,
Brazil, Canada, France, Ghana, Greece, India, Italy, Japan,
Netherlands, Norway, Poland, United Kingdom, United States of
America, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and West Germany.
4
Ibid.
5
Ibid. pp.2-3.
6
Ibid, p.3.
’ Ibid.
8
Ibid, p.4.
9
Ibid.
10
For example, see Daniel Katz and Robert L. Kahn, The Social Psycho-
logy of Organizations (New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc., 1966), 313-
15.
ship. About the only benefit accruing to the Netherlands from its
Note Verbale is the attribution that all of the constitutional
changes that have occurred in IMCO in the mid-1970’s are usually
said to have stemmed from &dquo;The Netherlands Proposal.&dquo; Did the
Netherlands expect more?
11
12
IMCO/C/ES.VII/14.
IMCO/A.IX/SR.7, p.7.
IMCO, and the Netherlands lost its seats on the IMCO Council
and the MSC.’3
The Netherlands Proposal, itself, went forward from IMCO’s
Council to the Eighth General Assembly, having been fully dis-
cussed and especially approved by Belgium, France, Ghana, Kenya,
and West Germany. In addition, the last of these had submitted a
note on IMCO’s work Programme and Budget for the forthcoming
Financial Period in which it suggested that the developing coun-
tries did not seem to regard IMCO favourably and that constitu-
tional changes seemed to be required in IMCO, especially in
delimiting IMCO’s functions vis-a-vis other international organiza-
tions;’~ this, too, went forward to the Assembly, although kept
separate from the Netherlands Proposal.
At IMCO’s Eighth Assembly, as could be expected in an inter-
national organization, discussion of the item was focussed prin-
cipally on the procedural question of how to deal with the matter,
rather than with its substance. Should the Netherlands propose
its amendments directly to an Extraordinary Session of the Assem-
bly or should the matter be turned over to a Working Group
which could then receive proposals from other countries before
making a final recommendation to an Extraordinary Session? The
latter was the majority’s view and Assembly Resolution No. 314
13
Private interviews, IMCO, Tenth Assembly, London, 8-16 November
1977.
14
IMCO/A.VIII/24/1and Corr. 1.
15
IMCO/A.VIII/C.1/SR.2, pp.7-8.
16
IMCO/A/ES.V/4.
21
22
IMCO/WGTC.1/5, p.2.
IMCO/TC.XII/12, p.2; IMCO/TC.XIII/7, pp.2-4.
23
IMCO/C.XXXVIII/ 15, pp.98-101; and Annexes III, IV.