Manufacturing Processes Lab – MEM564 version 2 -2017

FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING,

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA (UITM)
LABORATORY REPORT

Program : Bachelor of Engineering (Hons) Mechanical (EM220)

Course : Manufacturing Processes Laboratory
Course Code : MEM564
Laboratory Name : Foundry
Lecturer Name : Mr Ziyadi Zamri / Ms Nur Nabila Binti Mohd Nazali
Title of Experiment : Moulding Preparation and Pouring.
Group : EMD5M5A

No. Student Name Student ID Number Signature

1. Muhammad Nurnajmi Bin Nahar Azmi (K) 2017665766

2. Muhammad Syafiq Bin Roslee 2017806662

3. Muhammad Taufiq Bin Rosli 2017665832

4. Noorain Binti Ariffin 2016229456

Date of Practical Session Staff Certification (Signature)

Date of Report Submission Staff Certification (Signature)

KUMPULAN

42
 Manufacturing Processes Lab – MEM564 version 2 -2017

CONTENTS OF THE LABORATORY REPORT & GRADING CRITERIA

CO Assigned CO
Report Contents Content Description Marks Allocated Marks Obtained
Achievement
1.0 Title Refer to respective lab sheets / instructions for title of ___ x 1
1 mark
experiment. 10
2.0 Objective(s) State the purpose that describes the intention of the ___ x 4
4 mark
experiment, investigation or accomplishment. 10
3.0 Introduction Provide an understanding of the experiment which includes ___ x 10
10 mark
(background & theory) necessary diagrams, theory and equations. 10 CO1: Recognize relevant
4.0 Apparatus List equipment, machine, accessories, components, etc. machineries, processes,
___ x 7
May include a brief description of the instrumentation / set- 7 mark instruments and tools / 40
10
up if necessary. used in manufacturing
4.1 Industrial Apparatus Apparatus in Manufacturing Industry industry.
The different apparatus between faculty laboratory and ___ x 3
3 marks
manufacturing industry (at least 3) 10

5.0 Experimental Procedure Describe procedures or methods used. Equipment handling ___ x 15
15 marks
with picture or diagram if necessary. 10
6.0 Results & Data Analysis Summarize results and present data in tables or figures.
___ x 17
Illustrate trends or comparisons. Show sample calculation, 17 marks
10
graph, diagram etc. Answer any questions required.
7.0 Discussion of Results Discuss what results mean and what conclusions may be
drawn from them. Support results with understanding of ___ x 17
17 marks
theory. May also include alternative methods, accuracy, 10
sources of errors, etc.
CO4: Prepare technical
8.0 Conclusion Summarize the outcome of the experiment based on the ___ x 6
6 marks reports in a professional
results and analysis. Relate this to the objectives. 10 /60
manner
9.0 Recommendation Recognize a need for improvement/modification in the
___ x 5
system. (at least 5) Incorporate innovative ideas in the 5 mark
10
experimental work or set-up.
10.0 References List references to methods and related studies in ___ x 10
10 mark
appropriate style. (at least 10) 10
11.0 Overall Report Report delivery, format and writing skill
___ x 5
The quality of English language in the report 5 marks
10
Please note:
Total: 100 marks
 Include this grading form and TURNITIN summary in your report.
 Manufacturing Processes Lab – MEM564 version 2 -2017

RUBRICS FOR LABORATORY REPORT WRITING

Report Contents Poor (0-2) Fair (3-5) Good (6-7) Excellent (8-10)
1.0 Title Title of the Title was written with Title was written according Title was written with
experiment is out of vague reference to to experiment. elaborate and good
context. experiment. snapshot view on
experiment conducted.
2.0 Objective(s) Objective was not Objective was Provide suffice information Provide reasons with sense
exact and irrelevant. written to address on purpose of an of purpose for completing
the written title of an experiment (investigation). an experiment.
experiment.
3.0 Introduction Missing general Reasonably Well organized with relevant Well organized, structured
(background & relevant background organized but information but not and in-depth relevant
theory) information and missing relevant completely provided information and showed
poorly organized. background (diagrams/theories). effort of literature
information understanding
(diagrams/theories). (diagrams/theories/charts).
4.0 Apparatus Poor identification on Reasonably capable Capable to name and Capable to identify
apparatus/equipment to name and identify identify the apparatus with apparatues and elaborate
used in experiment. apparatus in slight error (i.e in units of on its function and
experiment. measurement or spelling) appropriate/specific
characteristic.
5.0 Experimental Incapable to Able to vaguely Capable describe the Capable describe the
Procedure describe procedures describe the procedures or methods. procedures or methods.
or methods used. procedures or Equipment handling with Equipment handling with
methods. Equipment picture or diagram (process picture or diagram
handling with picture flow charts). (process flow charts) and
or diagram if highlight safety
necessary. conditions/features.
6.0 Results & Data is poorly Some data is Data was tabulated but with Data is well tabulated,
Data Analysis organized and missing and/or error (units representations) correct measurement units
mainly incomplete. presence of errors in with slight deviation from applied and data is within
calculations. expected values. expected norm.
7.0 Discussion of Discussion on result Discussion does not Discussion need some Discussion is
Results is inappropriate with identify appropriate refinement but shows comprehensive, show
lack of concepts, needs reasonable grasp of sstrong grasp of scientific
comprehension of and/or shows weak scientific concepts. concepts and own
scientific concept. grasp of concept. perspective.
8.0 Conclusion Poor self-organised Shows some Able to display scientific Good uncover of findings,
perspective based general personalized understanding and provide relate experiments with
on scientific findings. view and some personalized other experiment/practical
understanding of perspective. work in industry.
scientific findings.
9.0 Poor or not able to Vaguely able to Capable to outline ideas Recommendation includes
Recommendation recommend mention on and additional information new technology application,
additional additional to support experiment safety features/guidelines
information (safety, information to findings. and approach.
usage, preparation support experiment
and/or work method) findings.
10.0 References Poor list of literature References are Refrences includes References includes from
references. ONLY of websites. websites and reading websites, text books and
materials from text books. citation from
journals/magazines.
11.0 Overall Poor format of report Report delivery is Report is written with good Good command of Eglish,
report writing and low suffice, good command of English and great comprehension
quality of English command of good format. Idea flows well displaying understanding
language. English. connecting objectives and and answers the objective
findings. of experiment well.
Manufacturing Processes Lab – MEM564 version 2 -2017