Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
State of Ohio,
Plaintiff
versus
Michael H. Disabato,
Defendant Case No. 17 CRBOI0I0
Journal Entry
This matter came on for a jury trial on the 28th day of August 2018. Defendant came innto
Jeff Ratliff and Rocky Ratliff, Defendant having entered a plea of
Court represented by Attorneys
the charge of Telecommunications Harassment in violation of Ohio Revised Code
not guilty to
Section 2917.212 (a) 5.
Wherefore th trial began on August 28th 2018 and having heard all the testimony adduced by both
parties, the jury in writing made its findings, to wit: Guilty as to the charge.
Sentencing was continued to October 18,2018.
Counsel for the defendant having been given anopportunity to speak on behalf of
Defendant, and Defendant personally having been given an opportunity to make a statement on
his own behalf and present information in mitigation, and no good and sufficient cause being
and nothing said by defendant to why sentence should not now
shown mitigate
to punishment as
Wherefore, Defendant was advised of his right to appeal and to do so without cost, his
counsel if unable to obtain counsel, and his right to documents required in that
right to appointed
without and his right to have motion of appeal timely filed on his behalf. As the
appeal cost; a
result of these admonitions and Defendant's replies thereto, appellate Counsel was not asked for
or appointed.
??
.
?
__ ? __
?? __
?L-?????+- __
20t?OCT 18 Mi 9: 13