Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Number
Type of the
Individual ☒ Collaborative ☒ of 3
activity:
weeks
Moment of Unit
Initial ☐ ☒ Final ☐
evaluation: Intermediate:
Delivery Environment of the
Evaluative score of the activity:
activity: 80 Collaborative Learning
Monitoring and Evaluation
Starting date of the activity: Deadline of the activity:
27/09/2018 18/10/2018
Competence to develop:
The student is able to identify innovation technology opportunities.
The student is able to protect intellectual property rights over
developed technologies.
Topics to develop:
Unit 2. Understanding negotiation process:
Intellectual property protection
Technology licensing
Technology negotiation agreement
Steps, phases of the learning strategy to develop
Step 2 - Analyze main actors and concepts to consider in a technology
negotiation
Activities to develop
Individual:
Once the case is identified from previous step, each student makes
a creative Power Point presentation answering the following:
4. Once all contents have been reviewed, solve the Step 3 - Test 1:
Develop a test of concepts addressed in the course, at the
Monitoring and Evaluation Environment, according to the agenda.
Collaborative:
a. Patents:
What is a patent?
What is the competitiveness regulatory agency of the
Government of Colombia in charge of acting as
the Colombian patent and registration office?
What is a utility model patent?
Is a patent valid in every country?
How long does an innovation patent last?
How long does a utility patent last?
b. Copyrights:
What is copyright?
What is the difference between moral and property rights?
What is the competitiveness regulatory agency of the
Government of Colombia in charge of copyrights
registration?
What can be protected in Colombia, using copyrights?
Are software and videogames protected by copyrights or
patents in Colombia?
c. License agreements:
What is a license agreement?
Each student must evidence its contribution to the presentation on
the Collaborative Learning forum.
Environment
Collaborative Learning Environment
for the
Monitoring and Evaluation Environment
development
Individual:
Cover
Practitioner’s Section Patent License Negotiation:
Best Practices Concept map (Activity 1)
An Empirical Analysis of Intellectual Property
Rights Sharing in Software Development
Outsourcing Comparative table (Activity 2)
Answer to innovation case questions (Activity 3)
Products to References (Use APA guidelines)
deliver by
student Collaborative:
Cover
Abstract
Screenshot of each student participation to
answer the questions related to rights protection
(Activity 5)
Answers to questions (Activity 5)
Conclusions (One per student - Activity 6)
References
General guidelines for the collaborative work
Planning of
activities for References reading
the Individual contribution planning
development Group interaction based on individual contributions
of Products drafting
collaborative Products delivery
work
Roles to Compiler
perform by Reviewer
the student Evaluator
in the Deliveries
collaborative Alerts
group
4. Evaluation rubric
Evaluation rubric
Collaborat
Activity
Individual Activity ☒ ive ☒
type:
Activity
Moment of Unit
the Initial ☐ Intermedi ☒ Final ☐
evaluation ate:
Assessed Performance levels of the individual activity Scor
Aspects High score Media score Low score e
The student
develops the The student
proposed The student does not
concept map and develops just develop the
comparative part of the concept map
Understandi
table evidencing activities or it is and
ng of the
reading and not evidencing a comparative
technology 20
understanding proper contents table of
negotiation
the proposed reading and technology
contents
contents about comprehension. negotiation
technology references
negotiation
(up to 20 (up to 10 (up to 0
points) points) points)
The student The student The
posts a creative posts a Power student does
Technology 30
Power Point Point not post the
innovation
presentation, presentation, innovation
rights describing how including the case
protection to protect and analysis of the analysis, or
negotiate the case, but it is it is not
innovation on the not evidencing related to
selected case, technology the selected
evidencing protection case
contents understanding
appropriation. or not all
questions were
answered.
(up to 30 (up to 15 (up to 0
points) points) points)
Performance levels of the collaborative
Assessed Scor
activity
Aspect e
High score Media score Low score
The student The student The
contributes with participates on student does
relevant the forum, but it not
Collaborativ information to was not relevant participate
e the collaborative enough to in the
10
presentatio research and contribute to the collaborative
n drafting presentation collaborative presentation
building activities drafting
(Up to 10 (Up to 5 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
The student
The student
conclusion is
conclusion does
answering both
not include both
of the generative
of the The student
questions,
generative does not
evidencing the
Activity questions, or it present a
contents studied 10
conclusions does not fit the conclusion
along the step,
100 to 200
also it is 100 to
words
200 words
paragraph.
paragraph
(Up to 10 (Up to 5 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
The presentation
is structured in The document
accordance with is structured in There is
all the items accordance with not product
required, some of the delivery or
evidencing a items required, the
Power Point proper answer to evidences a poor document
Presentatio the rights rights protection does not 10
n structure protection research or it match any
question, also, it has few spelling of the items
has not spelling or grammar required
or grammar mistakes
mistakes
(Up to 10 (Up to 5 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
Final score 80