Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Lecture 1: Introduction
Laurent Bach
ESSEC Business School
Autumn 2018
General info
Instructor: Laurent Bach
French, but spent seven years in Stockholm, Sweden
My research:
Do family firms face particular governance and financing challenges?
Is shareholder voting efficient and useful?
Do rich people invest their money better than you and me?
Office: A420
Email: bach@essec.edu
9
Some Vocabulary: Financial Restructurings
10
The M&A market: U.S.
Source: Thomson Financial / SDC deals
14,000 2,800
U.S. M&A Activity Deal value 2,590
2,600
USD Bn. (right-hand scale)
12,000 2,400
2,200
2,077
10,000 2,000
1,813
1,800
1,653 1,640
1,583
8,000 1,5171,484 1,600
1,458
1,409 1,393
Number of deals 1,400
1,287
with disclosed value
6,000 (left-hand scale) 1,098 1,200
1,000
859 849
4,000 730 752 800
698
575 565
600
488
427
2,000 318 400
229
171
130 142 200
0 0
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
11
The M&A market: Western Europe
Source: Thomson Financial / SDC deals
5,000 2,200
Western Europe M&A
4,500 Deal value in USD Bn. 2,000
(right-hand scale)
1,800
4,000
1,600
3,500
1,383
1,400
3,000
1,157 1,127 1,200
1,097
2,500 Number of deals 1,036
with disclosed value 1,000
894 880
(left-hand scale)
2,000
752 759 800
690 692
644
1,500 587 610
524 600
485
440 445
1,000 412 426
400
297
257
500 177 153 168 182 162 200
0 0
12 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
M&A Forms of payment
Stock, cash, debt or some combination of the three
cash merger: target shareholders receive a fixed payment per share
stock-for-stock merger: target shareholders receive a fixed
number of acquirer shares in exchange for each target share
This number is called the exchange ratio
13
M&A Forms of payment
Source: Mergermarket
14
Further M&A Features from the U.S.
Source: Thomson Financial/SDC Deals
15
The M&A Cast of Characters
ACQUIROR FIRM TARGET FIRM
FIRM ASSETS
Employees
Business relationships
16
ACQUIROR FIRM TARGET FIRM
MANAGEMENT
FIRM ASSETS
17 Employees
Business relationships
ACQUIROR FIRM TARGET FIRM
MANAGEMENT
Board of directors
FIRM ASSETS
18 Employees
Business relationships
ACQUIROR FIRM TARGET FIRM
MANAGEMENT
Board of directors
FIRM ASSETS
19 Employees
Business relationships
MERGER PROFESSIONALS
M&A Advisory: Investment bank boutiques
Financial Advisory: Investment bankers
Legal advisory: Lawyers
Due Diligence: Auditors
Tax advisory: Accountants
Other: Insurance, Environmental,…
MANAGEMENT
Board of directors
FIRM ASSETS
20 Employees
Business relationships
MERGER PROFESSIONALS
M&A Advisory: Investment bank boutiques
Financial Advisory: Investment bankers
Legal advisory: Lawyers
Due Diligence: Auditors
Tax advisory: Accountants
Other: Insurance, Environmental,…
MANAGEMENT
Board of directors
SHAREHOLDERS
SHAREHOLDERS
CEO and senior officers
FIRM ASSETS
21 Employees
Business relationships
Any Other Third
Parties Involved?
22
23
24
25
“SOCIETY”
Unions
NGOs
26 Politicians
Financial Advisors on US market (2016)
Source: Factset
27
Are mergers beneficial to the economy?
Michael C. Jensen
Harvard University
28
Are mergers beneficial to the economy?
Warren Buffett
CEO, Berkshire Hathaway
Robert Reich
29 Harvard University
An Overview of Valuation
Just as for any acquisition, eventually it’s all about the price
30
An Overview of Valuation
Base case Worst case
31
An Overview of Valuation
Base case Worst case
32
An Overview of Valuation
Base case Worst case
33
An Overview of Valuation
Base case Worst case
34
An Overview of Valuation
Base case Worst case
35
An Overview of Valuation
Base case Worst case
36
An Overview of Valuation
Base case Worst case
37
Reorganizing Accounting Data
This where you start from…
38
Reorganizing Accounting Data
This is what financial analysts care about…
Long-term Equity
Operating Assets + Capital stock
+ Retained earnings
Total
Invested
Capital Financial Debt
Operating + Long-term debt
Working Capital** + Non-operating ST debt
Excess cash
Taxes?
= Operating CF: amount of taxes paid if the business did not have
financing debt (i.e. had only operating debt)
= Financing CF: amount of taxes saved thanks to the existence of tax-
deductible interest on the financing debt.
41
Steps in calculating cash-flow
Step 1: Distinguish operating vs. non-operating (i.e. financing) items (Bal. Sh.)
Cash?
= Operating cash: if necessary to make payments related to the business
= Non-operating (or excess) cash: if the CFO could use it to pay
back debt or pay a dividend or to make an acquisition soon without
affecting current operations
43
A few remarks on cash-flow
1. You have two equivalent ways of calculating OCF:
Historical Cash-flow
= EBIT 8,984 9,450 11,540 13,224 14,460 13,988
Margin % 21.2% 21.0% 23.6% 25.2% 26.0% 25.4% 23.7%
- Operating taxes 2,995 2,931 3,997 4,783 4,939 4,486
Effective tax rate 33.3% 31.0% 34.6% 36.2% 34.2% 32.1% 33.6%
'= EBIT After Operating Taxes 5,989 6,519 7,543 8,441 9,521 9,502
+ Depreciation and Amortization 1,784 1,957 2,064 2,132 2,320 2,586
=Operating Cash-flow 7,773 8,476 9,607 10,573 11,841 12,088
- Change in Net Working Capital 416 1,043 -540 -98 1,517 752
Net reinv., excl Acq. & Divest. 1,584 -204 1,787 2,231 936 285
47 Net reinv.rate, excl Acq. & Divest. 26.4% -3.1% 23.7% 26.4% 9.8% 3.0% 14.4%
Disney’s Investment Policy
Disney Historical Cash-Flow Calculation
Historical Cash-flow
= EBIT 8,984 9,450 11,540 13,224 14,460 13,988
Margin % 21.2% 21.0% 23.6% 25.2% 26.0% 25.4% 23.7%
- Operating taxes 2,995 2,931 3,997 4,783 4,939 4,486
Effective tax rate 33.3% 31.0% 34.6% 36.2% 34.2% 32.1% 33.6%
'= EBIT After Operating Taxes 5,989 6,519 7,543 8,441 9,521 9,502
+ Depreciation and Amortization 1,784 1,957 2,064 2,132 2,320 2,586
=Operating Cash-flow 7,773 8,476 9,607 10,573 11,841 12,088
- Change in Net Working Capital 416 1,043 -540 -98 1,517 752
Net reinv., excl Acq. & Divest. 1,584 -204 1,787 2,231 936 285
48 Net reinv.rate, excl Acq. & Divest. 26.4% -3.1% 23.7% 26.4% 9.8% 3.0% 14.4%
Discounting Methods: Weighted Average
Cost of Capital (WACC)
In the absence of specific costs/benefits of debt, all methods lead to
exact same result
Methods diverge only if debt has an impact on funding cost
With the WACC, he impact of debt financing occurs via the discount
rate:
𝐹𝐶𝐹𝑡
𝑉𝑊𝐴𝐶𝐶 =
(1 + 𝑟𝑊𝐴𝐶𝐶 )𝑡
𝑡
49
Discounting Methods: Adjusted Present
Value (APV)
In the APV, the value of debt financing is calculated explicitly:
50
Discounting Methods: WACC vs. APV
51
Where does the WACC come from?
𝑟𝐸 = 𝑟𝑓 + 𝛽𝐸 × (𝑟𝑚 -𝑟𝑓 )
Cost of levered equity = Risk-free rate + Beta of levered equity*Market risk premium
𝐷 𝐸
𝑟𝑊𝐴𝐶𝐶 = × 𝑟𝐷 × (1 − 𝑡𝑐 ) + × 𝑟𝐸
𝐷+𝐸 𝐷+𝐸
52
WACC weights: How do you compute them?
Only way out: infer from the case what is the desired level of leverage
Looking at leverage in comparable traded companies helps
53
WACC weights: Gross debt or net debt?
Net debt = total financial debt minus excess cash
Very often used in the WACC formula above instead of gross debt
The discount rate obtained from the WACC will be different, but
usually the difference will be small.
54
WACC weights: Gross debt or net debt?
In practice there are many difficult issues involved in using net debt:
55
Please estimate the cost of capital for Disney in 2014, using gross and
net debt.
56
57
58
59
60
61
Leveraging and re-leveraging
What would happen to the WACC of Disney if the firm decided to
implement a debt ratio of 40% (using gross debt to simplify)?
62
Leveraging and re-leveraging
Current leverage
D / (D+E) 14%
D/E 16%
Rating A
Spread 1.00%
Cost of debt RD 3.45%
Implicit debt beta* 0.1667
Levered equity beta 1.390
Cost of equity RE 10.79%
RWACC 9.64%
Deleveraging using MM II
New leverage
D / (D+E) 40%
D/E 67%
Rating BBB
Spread 1.80%
Cost of debt RD 4.25%
Implicit debt beta 0.3000
Levered equity beta 1.303
Cost of equity RE**** 10.27%
63 RWACC† 7.29%
Unlevering and Relevering Betas:
Remember Modigliani & Miller Proposition:
𝐷
𝛽𝐸 = 𝛽𝑈 + 𝛽𝑈 − 𝛽𝐷
𝐸
In the presence of corporate taxes, this formula must be adjusted
If the firm currently has debt level D:
𝐷
𝛽𝐸 = 𝛽𝑈 + (1 − 𝜏) 𝛽𝑈 − 𝛽𝐷
𝐸
64
Computing the APV discount rate
𝑟𝑈 = 𝑟𝑓 + 𝛽𝑈 × (𝑟𝑚 -𝑟𝑓 )
Cost of unlevered eq. = Risk-free rate + Beta of unlevered eq.*Market risk premium
𝐹𝐶𝐹𝑡
𝑉𝐴𝑃𝑉 =
(1 + 𝑟𝑈 )𝑡
𝑡
𝑀𝑖𝑛[𝑃𝑟𝑒 − 𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑡 𝑡𝑎𝑥𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒 × 𝑡𝑐 ; 𝐷𝑒𝑏𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑠 × 𝑡𝑐 ]𝑡
+
(1 + 𝑟𝐷 )𝑡
𝑡
[𝐼𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒\𝑅𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑦𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠]𝑡
+
(1 + 𝑟𝐷 )𝑡
𝑡
+ PV of additional benefits of debt
- PV of costs of financial distress
65
Discounting Methods: WACC vs. APV
WACC is simpler to compute and interpret
APV takes a bit more efforts of interpretation but is more flexible
Allows for a more complex computation of debt tax shields: what if the
firm is currently making losses? If it has a lot of past losses to carry
forward?
To be considered when a target has made or is making a lot of losses
Works even when leverage is not going to remain constant but will
gradually increase/decline
Very often the case with financial restructurings
WACC can work with changes in leverage but tedious (one WACC per period)
Allows for potential costs of leverage, such as expected costs of financial
distress, and additional benefits of debt
Very important in highly-levered transactions
APV does not have a circularity problem because it focuses on debt
66
amounts, not ratios
Terminal Value (or Continuing Value)
Difficult to forecast FCF beyond a certain number of years…
The precise number depending on industry characteristics
The last year of forecast is the terminal date
Terminal value
67
Terminal Value can be very large
68
Calculating Terminal Value
69
Calculating Terminal Value
For most businesses in
steady-state growth, Capex
FCFT 1 EBITT 1 1 tc Dep. and ΔNWC are negative.
Let’s sum them up, subtract
CapexT 1 depreciation and call it Net
NWCT 1 Investment
It can be shown that IR
FCFT 1 EBITT 1 1 tc 1 IR equals the growth rate of
g after-tax EBIT divided by
IR g IR RONIC the Return on New Invested
RONIC Capital (RONIC)
1 EBIT 1 tc 1 g RONIC
Terminal Value
RWACC ,T 1 g
1 R
T
WACC ,t
t 1
70
Estimating TV Parameters
Steady-state after-tax EBIT? Level of after-tax operating earnings
normalized to the mid-point of the business cycle
Revenues and costs should be based on long-term trends and on
sustainable margin levels
Taxes should be based on long-term levels
WACC reflecting steady-state capital structure? Should be
based on a sustainable target capital structure consistent with:
Industry competitive conditions
Capital market demands
Remark: You can use the WACC terminal value formula in an APV
valuation, if after the forecast period the capital structure stabilizes
around a given target value
71
Estimating TV Parameters
Steady-state growth rate of FCF g? You may pick:
Long-term consumption nominal growth rate for industry’s
products
Economy-wide (GDP) nominal growth rate
Inflation rate [assumes zero real growth]
74
Putting it all together: calculate share value
75
Disney DCF Valuation summary
USD millions
Valuation date: Jan-01-2017
EBITDA
RONIC
multiple at
perpetual
end of
growth model
forecast
WACC 9.84% 11.0x EBITDA multiple
Return on new invested capital (RONIC) 9.84% 20,176 EBITDA @ horizon
Steady state growth rate 2.30%
Implied Net Reinvestment Rate 23.38%
EBIT after tax at T+1 11437.3 TEV/EBITDA
+ Value during forecast horizon 29,200.9 29,200.9 multiple in 2017
+ Terminal value 72,704.3 138,937.4
= Enterprise value 101,905.1 168,138.2
EV incl. mid-year discounting adjustment 95,021.6 156,780.9
+ Excess marketable securities 4,610.0 4,610.0
= Total asset value 99,631.6 161,390.9
- Value of outstanding debt 25,291.0 25,291.0
- Preferred Equity 0.0 0.0
- Minority Interests 4,837.0 4,837.0
= Equity value 69,503.6 131,262.9
77
Why DCF Matters
Advantages
Forces collective brainstorming to produce forecasts
Generates lots of information
WACC is analogous to calculation of an internal rate of return
Very good for performing sensitivity / scenario analysis
Often produced to justify a price
Obtain IRR for investors (PE deals)
Disadvantages
Time consuming
Requires careful analysis of underlying assumptions
Industry knowledge is very important
Dependent on accounting data
Special care needed when calculating terminal value
Best results if done with inside knowledge about the firm
78
Why DCF Matters
Biggest advantage of DCF methods: force the analyst to think WHY
the company creates value
This advantage far surpasses all its disadvantages
79