DIPLOMA IN MARINE INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY

RUBRIC OF ASSIGNMENT 1 & 2

INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION (DMR 2123)

No. Description Full Marks Marks Given

1 Introduction 5

2 Methodology 5

3 Results and discussion 5

4 Conclusion 5

5 References 5

Total 25

Evaluation Guidelines:

No Title Score Description

1 Introduction 5 The purposes and aim of the study were
clearly stated; an in-depth coverage of the
background; showed the previous and recent
knowledge of the topic to support the aims of
the study; hypothesis was clearly stated in a
testable form with detailed explanation
4 The purposes and aim of the study were
clearly stated; some in-depth background
was shown; Previous and recent knowledge
was showed in a descriptive way with little
support to the aims of the study; hypothesis
was clearly stated with basic explanation
3 The purposes and aim of the study were
briefly stated; only covered the background
at a basic level; only described the previous
and recent knowledge; hypothesis was only
described without explanation
2 The purpose and aim were not stated; briefly
mentioned the background information and
knowledge of the study; hypothesis was
stated without explanation
1 No introduction
DIPLOMA IN MARINE INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY

2 Methodology 5 Methodology using suitable approach and

calculation, procedures arrange properly and
in logical order, detailed and clearly stated.
4 States relevant methodology, approach and
calculation clearly.
3 States relevant methodology, approach and
calculation.
2 Only part of methodology stated.
1 No methodology.

3 Results and 5 Results were arranged neatly and meet the

discussion requirements of questions with accurate
explanation. Information presented supported
project done and in line with arguments
given.
4 Results of the project included and meet the
requirements of questions. Explanation on
result was good, accurate and
understandable.
3 Results and explanation included but fail to
meet the requirements of questions. Fair
explanation and arguments.
2 Explanation of results was inadequate and
fails to meet the requirements of questions.
1 No explanation or no results.
4 Conclusion 5 Conclusion is very relevant to problem
statement of the project.
4 Conclusion satisfactory, complete and
accurate in term of project success and
understandable.
3 Conclusion given with fair project outcome.
2 Not clear conclusion.
1 No conclusion.
5 References 5 State more than 5 relevant references.
4 State between 4 to 5 relevant references.
3 State 3 or less relevant references.
2 State 3 or less irrelevant references.
1 No references.