Course 5

LEGAL TRANSLATIONS

1. University degrees or diplomas

a) Authorised institution:
West University of Timişoara…

b) Academic justification:
… taking into account that the candidate has successfully passed the examination of degree…

c) Purpose of document:
… does hereby confer upon Ms. Mary Jones the degree of…

d) Rights and honours:

… with all the rights, privileges and honours thereunto appertaining…

e) Place and date of document:

Given under the authority of Cambridge University, this first day of June, nineteen hundred and
ninety-nine.

f) Signatures and seals:

Rector of the university; Dean of the university; Secretary of the university

2. Certificates

a) Heading of certificate (optional):

To whom it may concern…

b) Beginning of document:
This is to certify that
… hereby certifies that…

c) Ending, signatures and seals:

Timişoara, 15th of June 2006

3. Contracts

a) Premises:
This Agreement is by and between The Topps Company, Inc. with offices at One Whitehall Street,
New York, NY 10004-2109 (hereinafter "Licensee"), and NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
PLAYERS ASSOCIATION, a corporation with offices at 2021 L Street, N.W., Suite 600,
Washington, D.C., 20036 (hereinafter "NFLPA" or "Licensor"). [Licence agreement]
b) Recitals:
WHEREAS
(A) By a hotel trademark license agreement dated 22nd January 2007 the Licensor granted
to the Old Licensee certain rights to use intellectual property in connection with the
operation of an Ambassador Hotel (as defined therein) at a specified licensed location.
(B) The Old Licensee wishes to be released and discharged from the License Agreement and
the New Licensee wishes to take up the rights and benefits of the License Agreement and
to assume the obligations and liabilities of the Old Licensee under the License
Agreement whether arising on or before or after the date hereof.
(C) The Licensor has agreed to release and discharge the Old Licensee upon the terms that,
inter alia, the New Licensee undertakes to perform the License Agreement in lieu of the
Old Licensee and agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of the License
Agreement.

c) Operative provisions:
NOW IT IS HEREBY AGREED
In consideration of $100 paid by each of the Licensor and the Old Licensee to the New Licensee,
receipt and sufficiency of which the New Licensee hereby acknowledges:

d) Definitions:
1.1 "Confidential Information" means any information disclosed by one party to the other party
marked "confidential" or disclosed under circumstances that would lead a reasonable person to
conclude that the information was confidential.
1.2 "End User" means any customer that purchases or may purchase one or more Product or
Special Product licenses for use in accordance with this End User License Agreement. Typically,
the End User will be a corporation or other similar entity.
1.3 "Product(s)" means the designated source, object, script or text form of the software products
as listed in Exhibit A on the platforms specified in Exhibit A. ProVantage may add to the
Products listed in Exhibit A from time to time.
1.4 "Special Product" means the combination of additional goods or services and any Product as
an integrated solution or application as listed in Exhibit B.

e) Consideration:
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual representations, warranties, covenants and
other terms and conditions contained herein, Buyer and Seller agree as follows: ...

f) Representation and warranties:

ProVantage represents and warrants that its hardware, software and firmware utilized in
providing services hereunder shall accurately process date data (including without limitation
calculating, comparing and sequencing), within, from, into and between centuries (including, but
not limited to, the twentieth and twenty-first centuries), including leap year calculation. The
hardware, software and firmware will be reviewed to ensure compliance with the foregoing and
shall include, without limitation, date data century recognition, calculations that accommodate
same century and multi-century formula and date values and date data interface values to reflect
the century.

2
 g) Applicable or governing law:
This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
California, United States of America, as applied to agreements among California residents
entered into and wholly to be performed within the State of California (without reference to any
choice or conflicts of laws rules or principles that would require the application of the laws of
any other jurisdiction).

h) Severability clause:
If any provision in this Agreement is found or held to be invalid or unenforceable, then the
meaning of such provision will be construed, to the extent feasible, so as to render the provision
enforceable, and if no feasible interpretation would save such provision, it will be severed from
the remainder of this Agreement which will remain in full force and effect unless the severed
provision is essential and material to the rights or benefits received by any Party. In such event,
the Parties will use their respective best efforts to negotiate, in good faith, a substitute, valid and
enforceable provision or agreement which most nearly effects the Parties intent in entering into
this Agreement.

i) Testimonium:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed and delivered
by their respective duly authorized representatives as of the date first above written.

j) Signatures:
Signed by ) Authorised signatory /s/ Jay Anthony Barnes
for and on behalf of Hard Rock ) Full name Jay Anthony Barnes
Café Ltd., acting by its
authorised signatory:- )
)
in the presence of: )

/s/ Stephanie K. Barnes

Signature of Witness

Stephanie K. Barnes

k) Schedules

4. Judgements

a) Introduction:
This cause came before the court by the parties Stipulation and Request to Hear Uncontested
cause on the Petitioner's Petition for Dissolution of Marriage. The Petitioner, JOE JONES,
appeared in open court in person and by his attorney, STEVEN KLINE.

3
b) Premises:

1. This court has jurisdiction over the Petitioner:

a. The Petitioner was a resident of Illinois at the time the action was commenced, and
has maintained that residence for at least ninety (90) days next preceding the making
of this finding.
2. This court has jurisdiction over the Respondent, MARY JONES.
3. This court has jurisdiction over the subject matter.
4. The parties were married on May 12, 1996, and their marriage was registered in Chicago,
Illinois.
5. That irreconcilable differences have occurred between said parties hereto which could not be
resolved, and have caused an irretrievable breakdown of their marriage.
6. That one child (NIGEL JONES, age 4, born 3-8-97) was born to the parties; no children were
adopted by the parties; and that Respondent is not now pregnant.
c) The final decision:

WHEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

A. The Petition for Dissolution of Marriage is granted. The bonds of matrimony between JOE
JONES AND MARY JONES are hereby dissolved and the parties are awarded a judgment of
dissolution of marriage.
B. The parties shall execute, carry out, and perform all of the terms of this Judgment.
C. This Court shall, and it does, retain jurisdiction of the subject matter of this cause and of the
parties for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Judgment.
D. That the parties are barred from seeking maintenance and/or support (heretofore termed
"alimony"), whether past, present or future.
E. That the Marital Settlement Agreement dated___________, 2007 shall be incorporated into
said Judgment as well as the Joint Parenting Agreement.
F. That the Respondent shall have the right to regain the use of her maiden name, MARY
SMITH.