Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Daniela Rocha
Guzman
6 November, 2018
In the United States, one in every five women and one in every 71 men will be raped at
some point in their lives, according to the National Sexual Violence Resource Center. The people
who commit rape or any other sexual crime are titled as sexual offenders. The general minimum
penalty for sexual offenders is probation and maximum penalty of 15 years. The American Legal
System ought to set more punitive sentences, making sexual assault a capital crime, due to the
danger these criminals bring to communities, to themselves and general populations in prison.
California’s criminal justice system currently separates sex offenders into three different
tiers depending on severity of the crime/s committed. Tier 1 is misdemeanors such as public
urination or nudity. Tier 2 is attempt of sexual acts towards one who can not give consent,sex
trafficking, child pornography and sexual abuse. Tier 3 is forced sexual acts, kidnapping with
sexual intent/acts, and sexual contact with a minor of 12 years of age or younger. Offenders who
fall under Tiers 2 and 3 can be listed as a registered sex offenders for a period of time ranging
from 20 years to life. The justice system can do more to punish these criminals by making Tier 2
and 3 crimes liable for life sentences and potentially the death penalty.
When a sex offender is released into the public, restoration is priority. Limitations are
established prior to releasement which include proximity to schools, parks, and any family
Rocha 2
events. To ensure these rules are abided by, a Sex Offender Registry allows the public access to
most recent information concerning sex offenders. This Sex Offender Registry otherwise known
as Megan’s Law, was enacted in 1996 after seven year-old Megan Kanka was raped and killed
by a “known child molester who had moved across the street from the family without their
knowledge” (Megan’s Law 1). California is required to notify the public and local law
enforcement of specified registered offenders who may be a potential risk. Every other state in
the U.S. follows some form of Megan’s Law. Now everyone and anyone is allowed access to this
information for safety purposes, especially for children’s sake. The law was originally
established to protect society from child sex offenders but is now holding all sex offenders liable
of their actions.
The Sex Offender Registry creates a safer community but that does not mean citizens
should lower their guard. There is a 37% reoffense rate for offenders with previous sex related
crimes, according to the HRT. This shows a possibility of 276,930 new sex offense cases within
the release of America’s current sex offenders. Like most, there is worry that children may be
harmed. Luckily there are laws such as Megan’s Law to protect kids not only from sex offenders
The presence of sex offenders is not only risking safety within a community but also has
a negative impact on the communities economy. According to the National Bureau of Economic
Research, “when a sex offender moves into a neighborhood, houses within a one-tenth mile area
around the sex offenders home fall”. This is caused by America’s Megan Law, which evidently
affects local property value. It does not matter if the offender is reformed or not, there will be a
Rocha 3
4% decrease in value. Neighbors may find it difficult to live near an offender for the simple fact
This puts the offenders at risk when released into society. Growing up we learn crimes are
unacceptable and those who commit crimes are dangerous. Because of this, there is a negative
behavior towards criminals especially sex offenders. This form of behavior may lead to the harm
or even murder of an offender. The article “4 men charged with murdering Redondo Beach sex
offender” by Larry Altman reviews the the death of John Haig Marshall, a registered sex
offender. On November of 2017, four men were charged for the murder of a sex offender in
Redondo Beach, California. The victim, John Haig Marshall, had five years previously drugged a
young friend, shaved his body hair then continued to rape him. “ [Marshall] had also molested
more than a dozen other victims since the 1970’s” (Altman). Unlike the four men, Marshall was
never eligible for life in prison because his crimes were not “severe”. Not only does this case
allow people to understand negatives of releasing sex offenders but also difference in charges
between crimes.There is an unjust when it comes to the sentencing of sex offenders, who too
take away the lives of their victims. The four men who killed Marshall could potentially be put
away for life. If Marshall was rightfully charged for his crimes, these four men would not have
Adding onto how difficult rehabilitation is for sex offenders, countless numbers of jobs
hesitate on hiring convicts. It is understandable as to why sex offenders are not the top choice of
criminals to hire, given that about 45% of EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commision)
28,000 harassment claims are sex-based. This statistic does not even include the 84-97% of
Rocha 4
people who choose to never report a formal complaint. A workplace is meant to be a safe
environment. The average reoffense rate of sex offenders is too high to risk for employers. So
not only will the release of a sex offender put them in a potentially dangerous situation with
neighbors but also leave them with little chance of being employed. There is no positive outcome
Sex offenders also have a difficult time when fitting into jail because even other criminals
see sex crimes as non-tolerable. Surviving prison is difficult enough but when a sex offenders
crimes relate to the harming of a minor/child, there is a high risk of being molested. When these
offenders are released to general population, “regular” criminals are likely to harm them as an act
of vengeance for victims. Because rates of being sexually assaulted are so high, it is likely other
criminals know victims of sexual assault or are even victims themselves. Shaun Atwood, a
London author who focuses on prison life states “There is no mercy for sex offenders in prison.
Some of the most brutal violence I’ve seen” (Atwood 4). Atwood had previously been in jail
after being caught as one of America’s Ecstasy kingpins and decided to share his knowledge of
jail with the world. Along with other prisoners, he too felt a hate towards sex offenders. A hate
that could lead to murder. According to the article “Sex offenders 'marked men' in California
prison as many are killed at higher rate” by the Associated Press in Sacramento, sex offenders
make up 30% of homicide victims in jail when released into the general population of criminals.
As a result, state governments are left with expensive medical bills to pay for. It is cheaper to
charge sex offenders with the death penalty. According to CBS News an annual cost of an
offender in California is $173,000 meanwhile a criminal under the death penalty costs $90,000
annually. If sex crimes were to become capital crimes, society will not have to deal with the
Rocha 5
troubles of sex offenders’ attempted rehabilitation. Being separated from G.P. prisoners til
The opposer may argue sex offenders deserve second chance at life but there are not
enough resources to fulfill the rehabilitation of sex offenders. There are sex offenders out there
who are registered for actions as small as urinating in public. In these situations, it is necessary
to address the intensity of the crime. It would not be fair to charge delinquents with lifetime
sentences for minor idiotic actions. When rape is the sexual crimet acted, that is when it is
necessary to charge with long term sentences or even the death penalty. As stated previously
there is a 37% chance of sexual offenders having a reoffense. This is why it is safer to just keep
them off the streets and also cheaper for the taxpayers.
One crime , such as sexual assault, becomes a large scale issue. This affects not only the
criminal and victim but also anyone near the presence of the sexual offender. Organizations like
SOMP (Sex Offender Management Program) focus on the separation of sex offenders from
general population, keeping the offender and others safe. It is necessary to further fund these
Works Cited
Atwood, Shaun. “What Happens to Sex Offenders in Prison?”. Shaun Attwood. Penguin Books.
fffff2018.
Altman, Larry. “4 Men Charged with Murdering Redondo Beach Sex Offender.”. The Beach
fffff-murdering-redondo-beach-sex-offender/articffffle_23e2595c-fa1a-11e7-b3fb-5f89e1d55ba4
Francis, David R. “Megan's Law Hits Local Property Prices.”. NBER. NBER. 7 May 2012.
Black, Basile. “Get Statistics.” Sexual Assault Statistics | National Sexual Violence Resource
Greenblatt, Alan. “States Struggle To Control Sex Offender Costs.” NPR. NPR. 28 May 2010.
Yoder, Steven. “New Evidence Says US Sex-Offender Policies Are Actually Causing More
Yoder, Steven. “New Evidence Says US Sex-Offender Policies Are Actually Causing More
Sacramento, Associated Press in. “Sex Offenders 'Marked Men' in California Prison as Many
fffffAre Killed at Higher Rate.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 16 Feb 2015.
fffffwww.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/feb/16/sex-offenders-killed-higher-rate-california-priso