Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
www.elsevier.nl/locate/sedgeo
Abstract
The Sant LlorencË del Munt fan-delta succession forms a clastic wedge (ca. 3 My duration) that built out into the NE Ebro
Basin in response to transpression and uplift along the Paleogene Catalan Coastal Range. This fan-delta succession is arranged
in a series of transgressive±regressive sequences of different scales. A large-scale composite megasequence (the Milany
megasequence) includes the whole fan-delta succession. This megasequence is subdivided in seven composite sequences
that, in turn, can be subdivided into fundamental sequences. The Vilomara composite sequence (the Vilomara Unit) is located
in the regressive part of the Milany megasequence. The regressive part of the Vilomara composite sequence, consisting of a
seaward-stepping set of fundamental sequences (the Vilomara unit), has been studied to understand the facies relations,
geometries, and the characteristics of key surfaces in progradational settings.
The Vilomara regressive sequence set is formed by stacked alluvial fan, fan-delta plain, proximal and distal fan-delta front,
fan-delta slope (within the regressive part of fundamental sequences) and carbonate platform (usually within the transgressive
part of fundamental sequences) deposits.
The Vilomara regressive unit shows a sigmoidal geometry in contrast to the underlying El Marcet transgressive unit, which
thickens landwards. This sigmoidal geometry for the regressive unit and landward thickening for the transgressive unit is
common for all scales of sequence (composite megasequences, composite sequences and fundamental sequences).
There are evident facies arrangement differences between transgressive and regressive deposits within a fundamental
sequence. Key surfaces have been recognised from vertical-trend changes (from transgressive to regressive and vice versa).
The facies successions immediately above and below the surfaces bounding fundamental sequences may indicate, at different
stratigraphic levels, a basinward or a landward shift of facies belts. q 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Eocene; Fan delta; Coastal deposits; Sequence stratigraphy; Shoreline trajectory
variations; these are the determining factors for the the whole Vilomara composite sequence. The Vilo-
sequential arrangement and evolution. mara composite sequence was constructed from the
A reasonably good bi-dimensional study is possible transgressive±regressive arrangement of seven small-
in the Sant LlorencË del Munt ®eld area due to the avail- scale transgressive±regressive sequences named
ability of an excellent exposure in a ªforeshortened,º fundamental sequences (LoÂpez-Blanco, 1991, 1993,
depositional dip-oriented transect from nonmarine to 1996; LoÂpez-Blanco et al., 2000b).
deep marine (Fig. 1b). This ªforeshorteningº allows This Vilomara composite sequence has been the
con®dent physical stratigraphic correlation from prox- subject of several detailed studies and this paper
imal alluvial fan conglomerates to fan-delta slope deals with the nature of its regressive tract (see also
deposits (with fan-delta front deposits in between). Siggerud and Steel, 1999; Siggerud et al., 2000; Steel
The studied cross-section in Fig. 1b has been et al., 2000).
constructed based on detailed (1:5000) geological
mapping and the correlation of six vertical strati- 1.2. Aims of the work
graphic logs including the whole succession. More
detailed graphs are based on the detailed correlation The aims of the present work are to focus on
of 11 vertical stratigraphic logs measured on the features shown by regressive tracts in a succession
regressive part of the Vilomara composite sequence. of fundamental sequences that have been stacked in
All of these sections have been measured along the a prominently progradational seaward-stepping
NE-side of a SE±NW-oriented valley (Santa Creu manner within the regressive part of the Vilomara
valley) located in the northwestern part of the Sant composite sequence. A companion paper by Steel et
LlorencË del Munt system. al. (2000) deals with the underlying, transgressive set
of fundamental sequences, the lower part of the Vilo-
1.1. Tectonic and stratigraphic setting mara composite sequence. The main aspects being
examined and evaluated are:
The study succession occurs within a fan-delta
system that built out into the northeastern Ebro fore- 1. The thickness of the regressive tracts compared to
land basin (Fig. 1a) in response to Paleogene uplift the related transgressive tracts of the fundamental
associated with transpression along the Catalan sequences, as well as the overall thickness varia-
Coastal Range. This transpression was related to the tion of the ªregressiveº strata in this seaward-
convergence between the Iberian and European plates stepping sequence set.
(GuimeraÁ, 1984; AnadoÂn et al., 1985; LoÂpez-Blanco 2. The volume of transgressive deposits relative to
et al., 2000a). regressive deposits within fundamental sequences.
The Sant LlorencË del Munt fan-delta system devel- 3. The nature and geometric arrangement of the
oped during the late Eocene (Bartonian) (AnadoÂn and fundamental sequence boundaries.
Marzo, 1986). Its evolution generated a transgres- 4. The geometry of individual regressive and trans-
sive±regressive megasequence (Milany sequence of gressive tracts of fundamental sequences.
PuigdefaÁbregas et al., 1986) of ,3 My duration (see 5. The overall trends within the regressive part of the
LoÂpez-Blanco et al., 2000b). Within this mega- composite sequence.
sequence seven composite sequences have been
de®ned, each with transgressive±regressive charac-
teristics (LoÂpez-Blanco, 1996). The Vilomara compo-
site sequence developed during the regressive stage of 2. Facies associations
the Milany megasequence consists of a lower trans-
gressive tract (El Marcet unit) and an upper regressive Rasmussen (1993, 2000) has described the main
tract (Vilomara unit) separated by a maximum ¯ood- facies associations, both in the transgressive and
ing surface (Fig. 1b). Based on the combined biostra- regressive limbs of the fundamental sequences, except
tigraphy and magnetostratigraphy, LoÂpez-Blanco et for the association of the fan-delta slope environment,
al. (2000b) have argued for a ,0.09 My duration for which will be discussed here. Fig. 1b is a schematic
M. LoÂpez-Blanco et al. / Sedimentary Geology 138 (2000) 143±159
Fig. 1. (a) Geological sketch map of the northeastern Iberian Peninsula showing the location of the Sant LlorencË del Munt system; (b) Correlation panel using six lithological logs
located approximately updip±downdip along the Santa Creu valley. This shows the continental-to-marine transitions on the Vilomara composite sequence.
145
146 M. LoÂpez-Blanco et al. / Sedimentary Geology 138 (2000) 143±159
spatial arrangement of the different facies belts on the transgressive El Marcet unit and the overlying
studied cross-section of the Vilomara sequence. regressive Vilomara unit (LoÂpez-Blanco, 1991,
1993, 1996; LoÂpez-Blanco et al., 2000; Steel et al.,
2.1. Fan-delta slope 2000). The thickness of the Vilomara composite
sequence is 132 m along the studied 3.5 km cross-
The fan-delta slope facies belt crops out in the section. The whole composite sequence can be
northern part (basinward) of the studied section (Fig. subdivided in seven fundamental sequences. The
1b), and comprises marls, sandstones and conglomer- composite sequence geometry illustrated in Fig. 1b
ates. The facies belt can likely be divided into three shows an initial thickening trend towards the slope
main facies associations. They are all resedimented zone in the regressive unit and then a thinning distally.
deposits, but differences among them relate to the The transgressive unit thins from proximal to distal
resedimenting processes. environments.
The regressive part of the Vilomara composite
1. The prodelta-offshore facies association comprises
sequence (Vilomara unit or Vilomara sequence set)
mainly blue-grey marls with intercalated thin sand-
varies from 82 m in the proximal part, where it is
stones beds; this facies is interpreted to have been
dominated by coarse-grained ¯uvial and ®ne-grained
deposited either from the suspension of clay and
¯ood-plain/¯ood-basin deposits, to more than 113 m
sand or from low-density turbidity currents. This
in its basinal reaches, where fan-delta slope deposits
material may have been: (a) transported to the
intercalate with minor carbonate, fan-delta front and
marine basin from subaerial environments (alluvial
subaerial deposits. The regressive part of the compo-
and ¯uvial); or (b) transported from the nearshore
site sequence comprises four and a half fundamental
and shallower slope through turbidity currents
sequences, which are arranged in an aggradational-to-
(with associated sandstone thin beds).
progradational stacking pattern (Fig. 1b).
2. The sediment gravity ¯ow facies association (Fig.
During the regressive development of the Vilomara
2) comprises: (a) sandy and conglomeratic channel
unit, the shoreline is inferred to have made a seaward
deposits ®lling erosive surfaces cut into the fan-
advance of 5050 m, with some 132 m of aggradation.
delta slope; (b) tabular and large-scale lenticular
This is a typical normal regression pattern (regression
sandstone beds interpreted to be overbank or levee
during rising relative sea level, Posamentier et al.,
deposits laterally related to the sandy and conglom-
1992), but it is interrupted by transgressive episodes
eratic channels; and (c) marls and tabular to convex-
with landward shoreline transits.
up sandstones and conglomerates, which likely
The regressive sequence set has a characteristic
were deposited in small, turbiditic lobes (apron)
broad (up to 2.5 km updip±downdip) delta front
fed by the sandy and conglomeratic channels.
facies belt within individual fundamental sequences,
3. The slumps and slides facies association formed as
a feature in marked contrast to the narrow delta front
synsedimentary fault blocks and rotated slumps
facies belts of the underlying transgressive sequence
involving fan-delta front facies and other fan-delta
set (see Siggerud and Steel, 1999; Steel et al., 2000).
slope deposits. Extensional structures occur as
normal faults, rollover anticlines, listric faults
(Fig. 3) and schistosity (developed in an extensional 3.1. Sequence 3
zone on the head of slump or slide zones). Compres-
Fundamental sequence 3 is shared between the El
sional structures such as horses, duplexes, down-
Marcet transgressive unit and Vilomara regressive
slope verging folds and thrusts occur in the toe
unit. The lower part (transgressive) belongs to the El
zone of slumps, where downdip movement ceased.
Marcet transgressive unit, and the upper part to the
Vilomara regressive unit. This sequence has been
traced downdip for 3.5 km. It is 19 m thick at the
3. Vilomara sequence set most proximal site (Fig. 4a), where it consists of red
siltstones and ®ne sandstone beds alternating with
The Vilomara composite sequence consists of the grey, channeled conglomerates. Its thickness
M. LoÂpez-Blanco et al. / Sedimentary Geology 138 (2000) 143±159 147
Fig. 2. Sandy sediment gravity ¯ow deposits within the ªslopeº association of the regressive tract of fundamental sequence 4 of the Vilomara
composite sequence. Note the convex-up geometry (lobe) of the lower bed and the presence of rip-up clay chips. The hammer is 34 cm long.
increases seawards up to 35 m in the middle part of Because this study focuses on the regressive Vilo-
the section. There, it consists of nearshore conglom- mara unit, the lower boundary for the study is the
erates, sandstones and prodelta marls arranged in a maximum ¯ooding surface of fundamental sequence
shallowing-upwards sequence, which rests above a 3. This surface is the top of a carbonate bed that has a
carbonate horizon belonging to the transgressive El relatively high content of nummulites and oyster frag-
Marcet unit. In more distal zones, the unit thickens ments and which, in more proximal areas, comprises
to 55 m of turbiditic channeled conglomerates and coarse-grained conglomerate with bored clasts at the
sandstone beds intercalated in fan-delta slope marls. base. The basal surface of the conglomerate lag cuts
148
M. LoÂpez-Blanco et al. / Sedimentary Geology 138 (2000) 143±159
Fig. 3. Slided sandy deposits in the regressive tract of fundamental sequence 4 of the Vilomara composite sequence. Note the convex-up roll-over geometry of the beds related to a
concave normal listric fault related to gravitational processes. The outcrop is 4 m high.
M. LoÂpez-Blanco et al. / Sedimentary Geology 138 (2000) 143±159 149
Fig. 4. Individual cross-sections of the component fundamental sequences of the Vilomara regressive unit: (a) sequence 3; (b) sequence 4;
(c) sequence 5; (d) sequence 6; and (e) sequence 7.
150 M. LoÂpez-Blanco et al. / Sedimentary Geology 138 (2000) 143±159
Fig. 5. Details of vertical trends within fan-delta front deposits in fundamental sequence 3, which corresponds to the Casa Nova, Meandro and
Cal Pedrer logs in Fig. 1b. Note the coarsening-upwards cycles, which correspond to a shallowing related to the progradation of the fan-delta
front. Minor coarsening-upwards cycles correspond to minor prograding events. Sh shale, Sd sand, Cg conglomerate. White beds
represent marine grey shales. Black beds represent subaerial red shales. Vertical scale expressed in metres. No horizontal scale.
into red beds with some paleosol development. geometry forced by the geometry of the previous
Seaward, this conglomerate passes ®rst to a biotur- depositional unit. The dip steepens from the subaerial
bated horizon of sandstone, and then to a packstone and coastal facies to the slope facies and then ¯attens
of nummulites, oysters and other bivalves. Above this to the basin ¯oor. As seen in Fig. 6, the sigmoidal
surface is the regressive part of fundamental sequence geometry of the regressive parts of fundamental
3. Its thickness ranges from 9 m in the proximal area sequences is controlled by the geometry of previously
to 54 m in the distal area. It comprises distal alluvial- deposited transgressive parts. The narrow and stubby
fan deposits, passing seawards to proximal fan-delta nature of transgressive tracts forms a natural slope
facies and fan-delta slope deposits (Fig. 4a). break for the overlying regressive tract, resulting in
Stratigraphic logs through the regressive part of a sigmoidal geometry between successive clinoforms
sequence 3 show a gradual shallowing and coarsening (Fig. 6). The low-angle shoreline trajectory implies a
upward trend in fan-delta front environment (Fig. 5). sediment supply larger than the increase of accommo-
Landwards, the deposits grade to distal alluvial-fan dation space.
deposits (¯ood plain red mudstones and sandstones
and alluvial conglomerates). Seawards, they pass to 3.2. Sequence 4
fan-delta slope deposits, with a high percentage of
sediment gravity ¯ow deposits and slumped and tilted Fundamental sequence 4 in the Vilomara composite
blocks. The sequence 3 shoreline shows a seaward sequence has been followed laterally for 4 km (Fig.
advance of 2.8 km and some 9 m of aggradation 4b) and ranges from 18 m thick in the distal alluvial
(without decompacting the sequence). fan to more than 60 m thick in fan-delta slope envir-
The regressive part of fundamental sequence 3 onments (Figs. 1b and 4b). Volumetrically, transgres-
shows a typical normal regression pattern (regression sive deposits appear to represent roughly one-sixth of
during rising relative sea level) and has a sigmoidal the whole sequence.
M. LoÂpez-Blanco et al. / Sedimentary Geology 138 (2000) 143±159 151
transgressive deposits appear to represent one-®fth of coarsening and thickening upward trends in the fan-
the fundamental sequence. delta front deposits. In these regressive deposits,
The lower boundary of this sequence, in basinward marine conglomerate beds can be cross-strati®ed
areas, is coincident with a surface of maximum and truncated by a toplap surface at the top of the
regression and a transgressive surface situated at the sequence. In the fan-delta slope environment, gravity
base of a limestone bed. There are no obvious erosive ¯ow and slumped deposits are not present. The regres-
surfaces (marine or subaerial). This boundary is indi- sive shoreline shows a seaward advance of 3.1 km and
cated by a conglomeratic lag of bored clasts located it aggrades some 15 m during this advance.
below the limestone bed and, in other sections, by Fundamental sequence 5, as the underlying
very bioturbated sandstone and conglomerate beds. sequence, shows three steps of development: (1)
Landwards, the sequence boundary can be traced to erosional (non-accretionary) transgression; (2) accre-
the base of the conglomeratic channeled bodies later- tionary transgression; and (3) normal regression.
ally equivalent to the beach deposits. This sequence The sigmoidal geometry shown by the fundamental
boundary represents a turnaround from regression to sequence is controlled by the geometry of previously
transgression without marked erosion, and is asso- deposited ªunitsº or sequences.
ciated with only a slight landward shift of the facies
belts, with carbonate platform facies deposited above 3.4. Sequence 6
fan-delta front sandstones. In more proximal areas,
the landward shift is more evident because there are Fundamental sequence 6 in the Vilomara composite
proximal fan-delta front conglomerates deposited sequence can be traced laterally (downdip) for at least
above subaerial deposits of the previous sequence. 4.5 km (Fig. 4d). The sequence thickness is nearly
The transgressive part of this sequence varies from constant, ranging from 17 m landwards to 19 m
2.5 m thick in the distal zones to 7 m thick proximally. distally (Fig. 1b). Volumetrically, the ratio between
This transgressive tract consists of a nummulitic lime- transgressive and regressive parts of the sequence is
stone bed and its lateral equivalent bioturbated sand- about 1:4 at the studied section.
stones, beach conglomerates, red mudstones and The lower sequence boundary is a surface of maxi-
sandstones and alluvial conglomeratic channels. mum regression located just below the base of a
Because it is laterally equivalent to the limestones, nummulitic packstone. Landwards, it is coincident
the conglomeratic in®ll of the channels can also be with the base of a bioturbated sandstone bed. In the
considered as part of the transgressive tract. The proximal fan-delta environment, it is located in the
marine conglomerates above the channels are also upper part of a coarsening upwards sequence, at the
transgressive, at least up to a level just above a pave- base of a bed with a high content of bored boulders.
ment of bored clasts situated in the middle of this Further landwards, the surface of maximum regres-
marine conglomeratic succession. The shoreline of sion is considered to be the base of a channeled, later-
this transgressive tract shows a landward retreat of ally continuous, conglomeratic bed. It cannot be
18 km and an aggradation of 7 m. followed further landwards because of cover. This
The surface of maximum transgression is inter- sequence boundary is associated with an abrupt facies
preted to be the top of the limestone bed in distal shift. Facies belts suffered a notable (ca. 1 km) land-
zones, the top of bioturbated sandstones, the top of wards displacement above the boundary (Fig. 7),
the conglomeratic beaches over continental facies and which produced an abrupt deepening of the overlying
the top of the laterally continuous channeled facies.
conglomerate. This surface is coincident with the The transgressive tract of fundamental sequence 6
maximum landward position of the marine facies shows a ®ning-upwards trend and its thickness ranges
and, thus, is the maximum ¯ooding surface. from 4 m in the proximal areas to 1 m distally. It is
The overlying regressive tract of the sequence formed by a packstone of nummulites and its lateral
ranges in thickness from 15 m in the proximal part shoreface equivalents, bioturbated sandstones and
of the system to 27.5 m in more distal areas. This beach conglomerates (with a high content of bored
regressive tract is characterised by shallowing, and clasts), and distal alluvial fan red mudstones and
M. LoÂpez-Blanco et al. / Sedimentary Geology 138 (2000) 143±159 153
is represented there by a 16 m thick, transgressive- along a 4 km stretch of the study traverse. The follow-
regressive sequence formed by marine deposits. In ing points can be made from Fig. 8.
this area, the sequence shows the same type of
three-fold development as seen in the underlying 1. In the proximal parts of the system, the vertical
sequences, as well as the same type of overall pro®les of the regressive tracts show a coarsen-
sigmoidal geometry. ing-upwards trend from marine siltstones and sand-
The overall stacking pattern of the series of funda- stones near the maximum ¯ooding surface to
mental sequences in the Vilomara regressive unit marine conglomerates, and then up to nonmarine
shows a progressive evolution from aggradation to facies (Fig. 8). In the distal parts of the same tract,
progradation. Shoreline trajectories for individual the vertical pro®les show the same coarsening-
sequences were calculated by joining the point of upward trend, with the marine siltstones punctu-
maximum seaward advance of the subaerial deposits ated by slope association sandstones and conglom-
with the point of maximum landward position of the erates of sediment gravity ¯ow, slump, and slide
coastal facies (Fig. 7). If the plotted dip of the origin (Fig. 8).
trajectory is low, the vertical component of shore- 2. Individual parasequences in the regressive tracts
line trajectory is less important than the horizontal are initiated by ¯ooding events. In proximal and
component, and vice versa. Comparing the dips intermediate zones at the top of these parase-
obtained separately for the regressive and the trans- quences, there are common conglomeratic lag
gressive parts of each fundamental sequence (Fig. 7), pavements. Although these conglomeratic lags
it is evident that the dip decreases progressively are never present in the distal regressive tract,
through time in both the transgressive and regressive they are common in the distal areas of the trans-
tracts. gressive tracts (Fig. 9).
This analysis strongly suggests a progressive lower- 3. Transgressive tracts show a crude ®ning-upward
ing of the accommodation-to-sediment supply ratios trend. The common succession is from nonmarine
through time and, thus, the tendency to generate to marine conglomerates, sandstones, and silt-
unconformities at the youngest of the series of stones in the proximal and intermediate zones
sequence boundaries (e.g. the base and top of funda- and from conglomerate (lag) to bioturbated sand-
mental sequence 7). stones to bioclastic limestone and marls in the
Fig. 7 also shows the different geometries of the distal zones (Fig. 10).
transgressive and regressive tracts of the fundamen- 4. The most marked difference between the trans-
tal sequences. While there are some exceptions (as gressive and regressive tracts is the presence of
with the regressive tract of fundamental sequence 4 thick successions of fan-delta slope deposits in
and the transgressive tract of sequence 7), in the latter and their absence in the former. This
general, the regressive tracts have larger horizontal was caused by an increase in accommodation
components than the transgressive tracts. The fact beyond the slope-break during regression and
that the regressive tracts of the fundamental sequences the tendency for sediment to bypass most of
have a larger horizontal component gives the the coastal plain during regression, and to be
Vilomara composite sequence its ®nal regressive preferentially stored in the coastal plain during
character. transgression.
5. Lithology logs from the landward reaches of the
system are dominated by nonmarine facies. While
4. Log characteristics of regressive versus it can be dif®cult to locate the precise level of
transgressive tracts in fundamental sequences sequence boundaries and maximum ¯ooding
surfaces at the landward end, these surfaces can be
The difference between the transgressive and traced by ªwalking outº and following equivalent
regressive parts of fundamental sequences, expressed layers or surfaces. Maximum ¯ooding surfaces are
as vertical log signatures, is of some interest. Fig. 8 traced landwards from the ®nal landward pinch-out
shows a proximal to distal array of lithology logs of the most landward-extended marine horizons.
M. LoÂpez-Blanco et al. / Sedimentary Geology 138 (2000) 143±159 155
Fig. 8. Typical vertical logs through the distal, intermediate, intermediate-proximal and proximal-intermediate parts of fundamental sequences
3, 4 and 5. Sh shale, Sd sand, Cg conglomerate. White beds represent marine grey shales. Black beds represent subaerial red shales.
Vertical scale expressed in metres. No horizontal scale. For location of logs see Fig. 1b.
Fig. 9. Photo of a carbonate bed within the fundamental sequence 5 transgressive tract with a pebble lag at the base. The hammer is 34 cm long.
Fig. 10. Series of vertical logs showing the ®ning upwards trends in the transgressive part of fundamental sequence 6. Sh shale, Sd sand,
Cg conglomerate. White beds represent marine grey shales. No horizontal scale. For location see Fig. 1b.
3. An abrupt change up to shallower deposits indi- The regressive part of the Vilomara composite
cates a basinward shift of facies and suggests sequence consists of four and a half fundamental
that a relative fall in sea level has forced the sequences, arranged in a marked seaward-stepping,
sequence boundary and the downward shift of but aggradational stacking pattern.
facies belts. The deposits of both the transgressive and
4. An abrupt change up to deeper deposits indicates a regressive tracts of the fundamental sequences within
landward shift of facies, and transgression. the larger-scale Vilomara regressive unit originated
Commonly, there is a wave-ravinement surface from distal alluvial fan, fan-delta plain and fan-delta
that erodes into older, shallower deposits (even front environments.
the subaerial unconformity, if present) during In the regressive tracts of the fundamental
transgression. The generation of this surface can sequences, these sediments are arranged in a progra-
be interpreted as the result of a nonaccretionary dational to aggradational manner, resulting in shal-
erosional transgressive phase. This transgressive lowing-upwards successions. Sediment transport is
phase may have been preceded by either a mainly NW-directed and fan-delta front deposits
relatively insigni®cant fall in sea level (generating grade basinwards to fan-delta slope marls, which
a slightly erosive surface) or could be related to a include an important volume of resedimented, slide,
slow rise in relative sea level if it occurred over a and slump sandstones and conglomerates. These
long enough time period to erode previous regressive tracts thicken seawards and eventually
shallower sediments. However, if there were sedi- thin out to the basin ¯oor, resulting in a general
ments accreting behind the shoreline area during sigmoidal geometry.
the ravinement time, an accretionary transgression In the transgressive tracts of the fundamental
would be inferred. sequences, sediments are arranged in a retrograda-
tional to aggradational manner, resulting in deepen-
ing-upwards successions. Fan-delta front deposits
6. Conclusions grade basinwards to mixed shelf and carbonate plat-
form deposits. There are no slope deposits as
The studied section across the Sant LlorencË del described in the regressive tracts. Delta-front deposits
Munt system has provided useful bi-dimensional show a higher degree of reworking (by bioturbation or
data of the anatomy and sequential arrangement (at marine currents and waves) when compared to the
different scales) of the fan-delta system. That section delta-front deposits of the regressive tracts. The trans-
has the advantage of showing an outcrop some 4 km gressive tracts of the fundamental sequences show a
in length and approximately 200 m high cut parallel to clear basinward-thinning geometry. Sometimes
the main transport direction of the fan delta. Addition- abrupt thinning creates a ªbreak of slopeº morphol-
ally, the section includes widespread fan-delta front ogy, across which the slope deposits of the subsequent
deposits, which are useful in the evaluation of shore- regressive tract develop.
line variations. Differences in the geometry of the regressive and
158 M. LoÂpez-Blanco et al. / Sedimentary Geology 138 (2000) 143±159
transgressive tracts can be due to changes in accom- by the European Commission DG XII (contract
modation to sediment supply ratios (A/S ratio) or to JOU2-CT92-0110), the ªMinisterio de EducacioÂn y
changes in how available sediment volumes are parti- Cienciaº (DGICYT project no. PB91-0801), the
tioned differently within each of those tracts. Either of ªComissionat per Universitats i Recerca de la Gener-
these mechanisms may also account for the alitat de Catalunya (Grup de Qualitat GRQ94-1048)º.
differences between regressive tracts with sigmoidal The manuscript has been improved by the comments
geometry and large amounts of slope sediments and of Ron Steel and the reviewers Jeff P. Crabaugh and
transgressive tracts with a simple, tapering geometry Jack Deibert.
and no slope deposits.
Maximum transgressive surfaces and maximum
regressive surfaces bound the transgressive and References
regressive tracts of the fundamental sequences,
respectively. These are easily recognised along the AnadoÂn, P., Cabrera, L., GuimeraÁ, J., Santanach, P., 1985. Paleo-
shoreline reaches of the system, but are more dif®cult gene strike-slip deformation and sedimentation along the south-
to pinpoint both in the proximal alluvium and in the eastern margin of the Ebro Basin. Strike-slip deformation, basin
formation and sedimentation. Soc. Econ. Paleontol. Mineral.
distal slope marls. Spec. Publ. 37, 303±380.
At this sequence scale, the boundaries of AnadoÂn, P., Marzo, M., 1986. Sistemas deposicionales eocenos del
fundamental sequences are surfaces marking a turn- margen oriental de la cuenca del Ebro: sector Igualada-Montser-
around from regressive to transgressive depositional rat. Exc. 4, XI Congreso EspanÄol de sedimentologia, pp. 41±42.
phase. These boundaries may be associated with a GuimeraÁ, J., 1984. Paleogene evolution and deformation in the
northeastern Iberian peninsula. Geol. Mag. 121, 413±420.
slight basinward shift of facies or, more commonly, LoÂpez-Blanco, M., 1991. EstratigrafõÂa y sedimentologõÂa del sector
with a landward shift in facies. Either case may be occidental del abanico costero de Sant LlorencË del Munt al este
operative depending on whether there was a slight fall de Sant VicencË de Castellet (Eoceno, Cuenca de antepaõÂs surpir-
in relative sea level at this boundary or simply an enaica). MSc Thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, 135 pp.
increase in the rate the sea level rose. The ability of LoÂpez-Blanco, M., 1993. Stratigraphy and sedimentary develop-
ment of the Sant LlorencË del Munt fan-delta complex (Eocene,
the ravinement surface to erode previous (transgres- southern Pyrenean foreland basin, northeast Spain). Spec. Publ.
sive or regressive) sediments is an additional compli- Int. Assoc. Sediment. 20, 67±90.
cating factor when trying to unravel boundary LoÂpez-Blanco, M., 1996. EstratigrafõÂa secuencial de sistemas deltai-
conditions. cos en cuencas de antepaõÂs: ejemplos de Sant LlorencË del Munt,
The regressive Vilomara unit shows a general Montserrat y Roda (Paleogeno, cuenca de antepaõÂs surpire-
naica). PhD thesis (Unpublished), Universitat de Barcelona,
seaward advance of its shoreline and a normal regres- 238 pp.
sive pattern. Within this general aggrading±prograd- LoÂpez-Blanco, M., Marzo, M., Burbank, D.W., VergeÂs, J., Roca, E.,
ing trend, the horizontal displacements (the AnadoÂn, P., PinÄa, J., 2000a. Tectonic and climatic controls on
magnitude of the transgressions and regressions in the development of foreland fan deltas: Montserrat and Sant
individual fundamental sequences) become greater LlorencË del Munt systems (Middle Eocene, Ebro Basin, NE
Spain). Sediment. Geol. 138 (1±4), 17±39 (this volume).
relative to the vertical (aggradational) displacements LoÂpez-Blanco, M., Marzo, M., PinÄa, J., 2000b. Transgressive-
through time. This general decrease in the A/S ratio regressive sequence hierarchy of foreland, fan-delta clastic
Ð for successive fundamental sequences through wedges (Montserrat and Sant LlorencË del Munt, Middle Eocene,
time Ð is consistent with the tendency for shoreline Ebro Basin, NE Spain). Sediment. Geol. 138 (1±4), 41±69 (this
trajectory angles to lower through time and with volume).
Posamentier, H.W., Allen, G.P., James, D.P., Tesson, M., 1992.
increases in the number of important relative sea- Forced regressions in a sequence stratigraphic framework:
level falls through time. concepts, examples and exploration signi®cance. AAPG Bull.
76, 1687±1707.
PuigdefaÁbregas, C., MunÄoz, J.A., Marzo, M., 1986. Thrust belt
development in the eastern Pyrenees and related depositional
sequences in the southern foreland basin. Spec. Publ. Int.
Acknowledgements Assoc. Sediment. 8, 229±246.
Rasmussen, H., 1993. Sedimentology and high-frequency
Financial support for this study has been provided sequence stratigraphy of transgressive fan-delta deposits:
M. LoÂpez-Blanco et al. / Sedimentary Geology 138 (2000) 143±159 159
Sant LlorencË del Munt fan-delta complex, SE Ebro Basin, Siggerud, E., Steel, R.J., Pollard, J.E., 2000. Bored pebbles and
NE-Spain. Thesis for the degree of Cand. Scien., University ravinement surface clusters in a transgressive systems tract,
of Bergen, 136 pp. Sant LlorencË del Munt fan delta complex, SE Ebro Basin,
Rasmussen, H., 2000. Nearshore and alluvial facies in the Sant Spain. Sediment. Geol. 138, 159±175.
LlorencË del Munt depositional system: recognition and devel- Steel, R.J., Rasmussen, H., Eide, S., Neuman, B., Siggerud, E.,
opment. Sediment. Geol. 138, 71±98. 2000. Anatomy of high sediment-supply, transgressive tracts
Siggerud, E., Steel, R., 1999. Architecture and trace-fossil charac- in the Vilomara composite sequence, Sant LlorencË del Munt,
teristics of a 10,000±20,000 year, ¯uvial-to marine sequence, Ebro Basin, NE Spain. Sediment. Geol. 138, 125±140.
SE Ebro Basin, Spain. J. Sediment. Res. 69, 2.