CHI-SQUARE TEST

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
properplatform * 100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
Feedbackregularly

properplatform * Feedbackregularly Crosstabulation

Count
Feedbackregularly Total
Strongly Agree Disagree Neither
Agree Agree nor
Disagree
Yes 8 19 5 3 35
properplatfor
No 8 18 11 6 43
m
Sometimes 4 5 9 4 22
Total 20 42 25 13 100

Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.277a 6 .218
Likelihood Ratio 8.515 6 .203
Linear-by-Linear 4.032 1 .045
Association
N of Valid Cases 100
a. 3 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is 2.86.

Symmetric Measures
Value Approx.
Sig.
Nominal by Contingency .276 .218
Nominal Coefficient
N of Valid Cases 100

CORRELATION METHOD

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
continuouslyupdated * 100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
receiverecognition

continuouslyupdated * receiverecognition Crosstabulation

Count
receiverecognition Total
Strongly Agree Disagree Neither Agree
Agree nor Disagree
Strongly Agree 6 7 5 1 19
Agree 9 11 9 6 35
continuouslyupdate
Disagree 7 5 14 6 32
d
Neither Agree nor 1 5 6 2 14
Disagree
Total 23 28 34 15 100

Symmetric Measures
Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Approx.
Errora Tb Sig.
Nominal by Contingency .285 .450
Nominal Coefficient
Interval by .202 .088 2.040 .044c
Pearson's R
Interval
Spearman .208 .090 2.108 .038c
Ordinal by Ordinal
Correlation
N of Valid Cases 100
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

ONE WAY ANOVA TEST

ANOVA
encouraged
Sum of df Mean F Sig.
Squares Square
Between 1.601 3 .534 1.062 .369
Groups
Within Groups 48.239 96 .502
Total 49.840 99

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: encouraged
Tukey HSD
(I) extremelysatisfied (J) extremelysatisfied Mean Std. Error Sig. 95% Confidence I
Difference (I- Lower Upp
J) Bound
Agree -.29199 .19900 .461 -.8123
Disagree -.07937 .21416 .983 -.6393
Strongly Agree
Neither Agree nor -.31313 .27129 .657 -1.0224
Disagree
Strongly Agree .29199 .19900 .461 -.2283
Disagree .21262 .17214 .606 -.2375
Agree
Neither Agree nor -.02114 .23951 1.000 -.6474
Disagree
Strongly Agree .07937 .21416 .983 -.4806
Disagree
Agree -.21262 .17214 .606 -.6627
 Neither Agree nor -.23377 .25225 .791 -.8933
Disagree
Strongly Agree .31313 .27129 .657 -.3962
Neither Agree nor
Agree .02114 .23951 1.000 -.6051
Disagree
Disagree .23377 .25225 .791 -.4258

encouraged
a,b
Tukey HSD
extremelysatisfied N Subset for
alpha = 0.05
1
Strongly Agree 18 1.7778
Disagree 28 1.8571
Agree 43 2.0698
Neither Agree nor 11 2.0909
Disagree
Sig. .516
Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are
displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 19.471.
b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic
mean of the group sizes is used. Type I error
levels are not guaranteed.