Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
net/publication/225232634
CITATIONS READS
22 49
2 authors, including:
Epaminondas Christou
Hellenic Centre for Marine Research
71 PUBLICATIONS 2,029 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
COCONET (Project full title: "Towards COast to COast NETworks of marine protected areas ( from the shore to the high and deep sea), coupled with sea-based wind
energy potential. " View project
PERSEUS Policy-‐oriented marine Environmental Research in the Southern EUropean Seas.Grant Agreement 287600 View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Epaminondas Christou on 01 November 2016.
Abstract. We evaluated the duration of Copepodite field are often slower than those observed for the same
Stages C1 to C6, the biological cycle and the number of species in the laboratory (Burkill and Kendall 1982).
annual generations of the planktonic copepod Acartia In the present study, the development period of the
clausi in a meso-oligotrophic area of the eastern Mediter- copepodite stages and the generation length of the plank-
ranean Sea (Saronikos Gulf, Greece). The results were tonic copepod Acartia clausi were estimated using cross-
based on 95 zooplankton samples collected during the correlation analysis of its comparative abundance in the
period November 1988 through June 1990, at intervals of field. A. clausi is commonly found in enclosed bays and
1, 2, 7 and 15 d, the sampling intervals being dependent coastal areas where it often constitutes one of the most
on the abundance of A. clausi. Time-series analysis abundant copepod species (Specchi et al. 1981, Uye 1982,
(cross-correlation) of fluctuations in the comparative Ianora et al. 1985, Kimmerer and McKinnon 1985, Sulli-
abundance (percentages) of the copepodite stages present van and McManus 1986, Christou 1990).
was used to determine the duration of the development Similar studies have estimated stage duration from
stages and generation length. This methodology could abundance peaks progressing through consecutive devel-
significantly contribute to the identification of cohorts, opment stages (Gaudy 1976, 1984, McLaren 1978, Her-
and hence to the estimation of stage duration, from field man et al. 1984), whereby the development period of each
data for a given copepod species. The development of A. stage is estimated as the interval between two successive
clausi stages was not isochronal; duration of the first peaks of two consecutive stages. In most cases, however,
copepodite stage was shorter than that of the last three such estimates are difficult, if not impossible, because of
stages. The mean generation length estimated (28.6 d) is cohort overlapping as a result of irregular fluctuations in
among the highest recorded in the literature for A. clausi abundance (Uye 1982, Uye et al. 1983, Gaudy 1984). The
at the range of temperatures prevailing in the area (13 to present study overcomes this difficulty by using cross-
25 ~ Throughout the year there were four or five gen- correlation analysis, which identifies statistically signifi-
erations. The possible limiting role of food availability on cant relationships between fluctuations in the abundance
the duration of each stage and hence on generation length of any two development stages.
is also discussed.
Table 1. Time-series of sampling dates (constructed as indicated in Table 2. Acartia clausi. Abundance (individuals/m3) ofcopepodite
"Materials and methods") used for cross-correlation analysis. stages and adults in 1988-1990
Mean time (d) between two successive samplings (= sampling fre-
quency) is show in parentheses Stage 2 (%) max. (%) (Date)
3500 3500 a
5437
3O00 3000-
2500 84 2500-
?
v
2OO0 2000~
+
5OO
o+.......... + 1!! O
8 e
4
3
2
. 'iJii 1
1
0
o J P MAN J J A SO N D J F M A M J ~8 +31 5 10 15 20 25 30 5 10 15 20 25 30
19:89 1990 .'LPRIZ MJ~.u
Fig. 1. Acartia dausi, Variations in total abundance (a) and per- Fig. 2. Aeartia clausi, Variations in total abundance (a) and per-
centage of p0pulatiou comprised by the different copepodite stages centage of population comprised by the different copepodite stages
(b) during November 1988 through June 1990 (b) from end of March to end of May 1990
~ uuu!luu"
-0,~
-1
-20 -10 0 10 2O -20 -10 0 10 20
0.5 0.5
-0.5
-1
.20 -10 0 10 20 -20 -10 0 10 20
.,..(
0
:i
-1 - V Y - - - : ' T V . " 7 , r " , 7 , ; " r
i . . . . .
.....
. . . . . .
0.5 0.5
-0.5 -0.5
-1
-20 -10 0 10 20 -20 -10 0 10 20
0.5
time - lag
E.D. Christou a n d G . C . Verriopoulos: Analysis of c o p e p o d biological cycle 647
i 9 i i i i i , i i , i 9 '
1 1
::ct, c6 ::Co :: i :
0.5
o+ ........... i......... J
4 T , , t , , I , + T + + I , , /
-20 -10 0 10 20 -7 -4 -1 2 8
-0.5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I
*+~ :i .......................................... ,
.,ii ...............................................
I . . . . I+ i i ~ T , , , i I . . . . I
,TTTT-,;7]T-
-11 -7 .-3
~:-77~
5
Y'."Y~-7----,
S la
-20 -10 10 20
ict, c~ (1)
0.5
: i
.,.< : i
-0.5
-~0 HO 0 10 20 -9 -6 -3 0 9
0.5 0.5
..III;i.............JHli- .....
~~ ~~ ~l--
-O.S .02
-20
..........................
. . . .
-10
[ ...........
i , , , , i + , i i
L. . . . . . . .
0
, , ,
10
l i
20
~i,--,-~-~II+II+II~II-I+--.-+,-.+--.-I+--,I-~-I.I-iIi
-9 -6 -3 6
--N'---'--~--:--:-: :.-:---'--'---'--:--:.-:-:-:---'---~-
_,..: ..'._.~_.._..:..!.._....:...~
Ct, CSi (7) i
:...'...i_.:._.:._.L - ;c4, c4 (1)
0.5
i ili . . .+Ii. IiIIiIIII:
: i
0.5
:i
ii i
..................i1 .....
.......... 1 ......... Hi i I Fig. 5. Acartia clausi. Statistically significant cross-
-0.5 -0.5 ........ i........ i....... correlations between a b u n d a n c e ( % ) of copepodite
stages (see also Table 3). Time-series frequency
(sampling frequency: 1, 2 or 7 d) is s h o w n in paren- .
~ F ' ; ; i , , i , : T , 7 ,--.---.-r-;-;-i--:--.---,-.---.--i:-:-r-;--.--r theses
-7 -4 -1 2 5 -9 -6 -3 0 3 8
time- lag
648 E.D. Christou and G.C. Verriopoulos: Analysis of copepod biological cycle
CIC3:7'22~__~C~_C3:4.2 q
C1-C3 1.28 t
C3-C4:7 22 ~CIC4:10221 ~C3-C4 : 4.36j
---*C3-C4:6,01
C3-C4:4 80 ~'C1 C4:8,57 ~
C1-C4:7 22
CI-C4:6 53
~----~CI-C4:6.93
C2-C4:7 22
C1-C3:4 21
C4-C5:4.B0 fC4-C5:4.80]
C5-C6:1.20
C2-C6:15,05-~C
C2-C6 14 44~ 2-C5:14.751 "C5-C6:7.53 j @5-C6:4,36]
C2-C5:7,22
Fig. 6. Acartia clausi. Estimated durations (d) of Stages C1 to C5 based on data from Tables 1 and 3 (for computation see "Results",
Paragraph 4). Total time-interval between C1 appearance and C6 appearance was 17.7 d
Table 3. Acartia clausi. Statistically significant correlations between Table4. Acartia clausi. Time-intervals (d) between copepodite
abundance (%) of Copepodite Stages C 1 - C 6 (see Figs. 3 and 4). t: stages (data from Table 3) for two successive generations, and esti-
sampling frequency (d) mation of generation length (G, days), (for computation see
"Results", Paragraphs 4 and 5). t: sampling frequency (d)
(n) x y t time-lag r P
Stage (n) t time-lag days G
(39) C1 C2 15 3 0.339 < 0.05 transition
(39) C1 C3 15 3 0.388 <0.02
(39) C1 C4 15 -1 0.339 <0.05 C1 C2 (39) 15 3 45.15 43.80
(39) C2 C4 15 2 0.349 < 0.05 C1-C3 (39) 15 3 45.15 40.94
(39) C2 C6 15 1 0.365 <0.05 C2-C4 (39) 15 2 30.10 22.88
(39) C3 C4 15 2 0.452 < 0.005 C3-C4 (39) 15 2 30.10 25.74
(39) C3 C5 15 1 0.378 < 0.02 C4-CI (39) 15 1 15.05 23.62
(39) C3 C5 15 - 1 0.326 < 0.05 C5-C3 (39) 15 1 15.05 24.21
(39) C4 C5 15 -1 0.394 <0.02 C5-C4 (39) 15 1 15.05 19.85
(38) C1 C2 7 1 0.342 <0.05 C5-C1 (12) 7 2 14.08 27.55
(38) CI C3 7 1 0.363 <0.05
2 28.57
(38) C1 C4 7 1 0.349 <0.05
(SE) (3.12)
(38) C2 C3 7 1 0.461 <0.005
(38) C2 C4 7 1 0.434 < 0.01 C1 - C 6 17.73
(38) C2 C4 7 - 1 0.353 < 0.05 C6-C1 10.84 ~
(38) C2 C5 7 1 0.331 < 0.05
(38) C2 C6 7 2 0.351 <0.05 a Time-interval between appearance of adults (C6) and appearance
(38) C2 C6 7 3 0.342 <0.05 of C1 of next generation
(38) C3 C4 7 - 1 0.402 < 0.02
(38) C3 C4 7 1 0.394 <0.02
(12) C1 C5 7 -2 0.636 <0.05
(12) CI C6 7 2 0.746 <0.02
same generation. Whenever the time-interval between
(20) C1 C4 2 3 0.520 <0.05
(16) C1 C3 1 1 0.547 <0.05 two similar stages varied, the mean was taken. The results
(16) C3 C4 1 4 0.580 <0.05 (Fig. 6) indicated development times of 1.36, 2.86, 4.36,
(16) C4 C5 1 4 0.617 <0.05 4.80, 4.36 d for Copepodite Stages 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, re-
(16) C5 C6 1 1 0.559 <0.05 spectively, i.e., a total development time of 17.73 d be-
tween the first and the sixth copepodite stage.
Generation length (G, Table 4) was estimated from the
development time of the various stages (Fig. 6) and the
val between the occurrence of two copepodite stages was time-intervals between copepodite stages for two succes-
estimated as the product of the cross-correlation time-lag sive generations (Table 4). The mean G ( = 28.6 d) was
and the frequency of the time-series. On the' assumption considered to be the mean generation length for the
that the above relationships illustrate stages belonging to whole study period. Assuming that hatching lasts about
the same or to two successive generations, the results 23 h (Ueda 1981), the time between hatching and the
were classified into two groups as a function of the length appearance of C1 was estimated at 10 d.
of the time-interval between any two stages (Fig. 6, Table Based on the fluctuations in the female: male ratio for
4). The initial relationships (Fig. 6) represent the results Stages C5 and C6 over the whole study period (Fig. 7),
of the cross-correlation analysis of individuals in the the number of generations/year would seem to be 4 or 5.
E.D. Christou and G.C. Verriopoulos: Analysis of copepod biological cycle 649
waters o f the Saronikos G u l f was < 0 . 4 7 gg/1 on m o r e Edmondson, W T., Winberg, G. G. (1971). A manual on methods
t h a n half the sampling dates (Christou unpublished for the assessment of secondary production in fresh waters.
Blackwell, Oxford (IBP Handbook No. 17)
data), low f o o d availability could be expected to have h a d Field, J. G., Clark, K. R., Warwick, R. M. (1982). A practical
a limiting effect on g r o w t h rate and hence the generation strategy for analyzing multispecies distribution patterns. Mar.
time o f A. clausi. Moreover, such f o o d limitation could Ecol. Prog. Ser. 8:37-52
itself affect, at least partially, the relative d u r a t i o n o f the Field, J. G., McFarlane (1968). Numerical methods in marine ecol-
various stages; i.e., periods with low f o o d levels could ogy. L A quantitative similarity analysis of rocky shore samples
have increased the d u r a t i o n o f some stages ( c o m p a r e d to in False Bay, South Africa. Zoologica african. 3:119-138
Friligos, N. (1982). Enrichment of inorganic nutrients in the Inner
each other) above the expected values (e.g. expected Saronikos Gulf (1973-1976). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 13:154-158
C 4 < C 5 ; estimated C 4 > C 5 , Fig. 6). F o o d availability Friligos, N. (1984). Nutrients of the Saronikos Gulf in relation to
could therefore act as a limiting factor on the d u r a t i o n o f environmental characteristics (1973-1976). Hydrobiologia 112:
each or any stage and hence affect the total generation 17-25
length. F o o d deficiency (cultured p h y t o p l a n k t o n or natu- Garcia-Soto, C., de Madariaga, I., Villate, F., Orive, E. (1990).
ral food) has been f o u n d to delay the development and Day-to-day variability in the plankton community of a coastal
shallow embayment in response to changes in river runoff and
increase the d u r a t i o n o f copepodite stages in various water turbulence. Estuar., cstl. Shelf Sci. 31:217-229
c o p e p o d s (Vidal 1980, K a w a b a t a 1989, H a r t 1991). The Gaudy, R. (1970). Contribution /t la connaissance du cycle bi-
low f o o d levels typical o f the study area, m a y increase ologique et de la physiologic de coptpodes du golfe de Marseille.
stage duration by delaying development and, hence, gen- Thtse d'Etat, Universit6 de Marseille
eration length, resulting in numerically p o o r populations, Gaudy, R. (1976). Etude du placton de la zone de la rade de Ville-
franehe-Sur-Mer ~i la fin de printemps (17 mai au 16 juin 1971).
a situation which is in a c c o r d a n c e with the very p o o r
Vie Milieu 26:77-106
conditions, even o f the neritic zone, o f the eastern Med- Gaudy, R. (1984). Biological cycle of Centropages typicus in the
iterranean Sea ( A z o v 1991). North-Western Mediterranean neritic waters. Crustaceana
The variations in the f e m a l e : m a l e ratio indicate 4 or (Suppl.) 7:200-213
5 annual generations for Acartia clausi (Fig. 7), a result Greze, V. N. (1978). Production in animal populations. In: O. Kinne
similar to other reports in the literature for the same (ed.) Marine ecology. IV. Dynamics. Wiley & Sons, London,
species in other temperate regions (e.g. 4 generations in p. 89-114
Hart, R. C. (1991). Food and suspended sediment influences on the
Scotland, M c L a r e n 1978; 4 to 6 generations in Japan, naupliar and copepodid durations for freshwater copepods:
U e d a 1978, U y e 1982). comparative studies on Tropodiaptomus and Metadiaptomus. J.
Plankton Res. 13:645-660
Acknowledgements. We are grateful to R. Friedrich for useful com-
Hay, S. J., Evans, G. T., Gamble, J. C. (1988). Birth, growth and
ments and suggestions. We also thank Dr. K. I. Stergiou and Mrs.
death rates for enclosed populations of calanoid copepods. J.
M. Kontaris for assistance in the text revision.
Plankton Res. 10:431-454
Herman, P. M. J., Heip, C., Guillemijn, B. (1984). Production of
Taehidius diseipes (Copepoda: Harpacticoida). Mar. Ecol. Prog.
Literature cited
Set. 17:271-278
Azov, Y. (1991). Eastern Mediterranean - a marine desert? Mar. Ianora, A., Mazzochi, M. G., Scotto Di Carlo, B. (1985). Zooplank-
Pollut. Bull. 23:225-232 ton community structure for coastal waters of the gulf of Naples
Bougis, P. (1976). Marine plankton ecology, North-Holland, Am- in the summer of 1983. Rapp. P.-v. R~un. Commn int. Explor.
sterdam scient. Mer M~diterr. 29:299-300
Bray, J. R., Curtis, J. T. (1957). An ordination of the upland forest Ignatiades, L., Karydis, M., Vassiliou, A., Moschopoulou, N.
communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27:325-349 (1982). Hydrography. [in Greek] Data report of phytoplankton
Burkill, P. H., Kendall, T. E (1982). Production of the copepod ecology of Saronikos Gulf, Aegean Sea. Nuclear Research Cen-
Eurytemora affinis in the Bristol Channel. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. tre Democritos, Athens [DEMO (82/1)]
7:21-31 Ignatiades, L., Moschopoulou, N., Karydis, M., Vassiliou, A.
Christou, E. (1990). Fluctuations of zooplankton, during spring (1983). Phytoplankton. [in Greek] Data report of phytoplank-
and summer in a coastal area of the Saronikos Gulf. [in Greek] ton ecology of Saronikos Gulf, Aegean Sea. Nuclear Research
In: Proceedings of the Third Hellenic Symposium of Oceanogra- Centre Democritos, Athens [DEMO (83/8)]
phy and Fisheries. N.C.M.R., Athens, p. 513-520 Iwasaki, H., Katoh, H., Fujiyama, T. (1977). Cultivation of marine
Clarke, K. R., Green, R. H. (1988). Statistical design and analysis copepod Acartia clausi Giesbrecht. I. Factors affecting the gen-
for "biological effects" study. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 46:213-226 eration time and egg production. Bull. Plankton Soc. Japan 24:
Clarke, K. R., Warwick, M. (1989). Lecture notes on the statistical 55-61
treatment and interpretation of marine community data. Part II. Kawabata, K. (1989). Natural development time of Eudiaptomus
In: Report of the training workshop organised in the framework japonieus (Copepoda: Calanoida) in Lake Biwa. J. Plankton
of the long-term programme for the pollution, monitoring and Res. 11:1261-1271
research in the Mediterranean (MED POL-Phase II), Athens, Kimmerer, W J., McKinnon, A. D. (1985). A comparative study of
September 1989. United Nations Environment Programme, zooplankton in two adjacent embayment, Port Phillip and West-
Athens, p. 91-124 ernport Bays, Australia, Estuar., cstl. Shelf Sci. 21:145-159
Corkett, C. J. (1968). La reproduction en laboratoire des coptpodes Klein Breteler, W C. M., Fransz, H. G., Gonzalez, S. R. (1982).
marins Aeartia clausi Giesbrecht et Idyafurcata Baird. Ptlagos, Growth and development of four calanoid copepod species un-
Bull. Inst. oc~anogr. Alger. 10:77-90 der experimental and natural conditions. Neth. J. Sea Res. 16:
Corkett, C. J., McLaren, I. A. (1970). Relationships between devel- 195-207
opment rate of eggs and older stages of copepods. J. mar. biol. Landry, M. R. (1975). The relationship between temperature and
Ass. U. K. 50:161-168 the development of life stages of the marine copepod Acartia
Durbin, E. G., Durbin, A. G., Smayda, T. J., Verity, P. G. (1983). elausi Giesbrecht. Limnol. Oceanogr. 20:854-857
Food limitation of production by adult Acartia tonsa in Narra- Landry, M. R. (1978). Population dynamics and production of a
gansett Bay Rhode Island. Limnol. Oceanogr. 28:1199-1213 planktonic marine copepod, Acartia clausi, in a small temperate
E.D. Christou and G.C. Verriopoulos: Analysis of copepod biological cycle 651
lagoon on San Juan Island, Washington. Int. Revue ges. Hydro- Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island: temperature and resting egg
biol. 63:77-119 production. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 28:121-128
Landry, M. R. (1983). The development of marine calanoid cope- Thompson, B. M. (1982). Growth and development of Pseudo-
pods with comment on the isochronal rule. Limnol. Oceanogr. ealanus elongatus and Calanus sp. in the laboratory. J. mar. biol.
28:614-624 Ass. U.K. 62:359-372
Laskaratos, A., Kaltsounidis, N. (1989). The Inner Saronikos Gulf Tranter, D. J. (1976). Herbivore production. In: Rushing, D. H.,
physical oceanography: elaboration of existing data and mea- Walsh, 3". J. (eds.) The ecology of the seas. Blackwell, Oxford,
surements of sea level. [in Greek] Final report on the study of the p. 186-224
hydrodynamics and pollution by the effluents of Athens. Uni- Tranter, D. J., Smith, P. E. (1968). Zooplankton sampling, Monogr.
versity of Athens, Athens oceanogr. Methodol. (UNESCO) 2:27-56
Legendre, L., Legendre, P. (1983). Numerical ecology. Elsevier, Ueda, H. (1978). Analysis of the generations of inlet copepods with
New York special reference to Acartia clausi in Maizuru Bay, middle Ja-
Lindahl, O., Perissinotto, P. (1987). Short-term variations in the pan. Bull. Plankton Soc. Japan 25:55-66
zooplankton community related to water exchange in the Gull- Ueda, H. (1981). Hatching time of Acartia clausi (Copepoda) eggs
mar fjord, Sweden. J. Plankton Res. 9:1113-1t32 isolated from the seawater in Maizuru Bay. Bull. Plankton Soc.
Martens, P. (1981). On the Aeartia species of the northern Wadden Japan 28:13-17
Sea of Sylt. Kieler Meeresforsch. 5:153-163 Ueda, H., Kuwahara, A., Tanaka, M., Azeta, M. (1983). Underwa-
McLaren, I. A. (1978). Generation lengths of some temperate ter observations on copepod swarms in temperate and subtrop-
marine copepods: estimation, prediction and implications. J. ical waters. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Set. 11:165-172
Fish. Res. Bd Can. 35:1330-1342 Uye, S. (1980). Development of neritic copepods Acartia etausi and
Miller, C. B., Johnson, J. K., Heinle, D. R. (1977). Growth rules in A. steueri. II. Isoehronal larval development at various temper-
the marine copepod genus Acartia. Limnol. Oceanogr. 22: 326- atures. Bull. Plankton Soc. Japan 27:11-18
335 Uye, S. (1982). Population dynamics and production of Acartia
Omori, M., Ikeda, T. (1984). Methods in marine zooplankton ecol- clausi Giesbrecht (Copepoda: Calanoida) in inlet waters. J. exp.
ogy. Wiley & Sons, New York mar. Biol. Ecol. 57:55-83
Pagano, M., Saint-Jean, L. (1983). Croissance en poids d'Acartia Uye, S., Iwai, Y., Kasahara, S. (1983). Growth and production of
elausi en lagune ]~bri6 (C6te d'Ivoire). Revue Hydrobiol. trop. the inshore marine copepod Pseudodiaptomus marinus in the
16:151-163 central part of the Island Sea of Japan. Mar. Biol. 73:91-98
Sekiguchi, H. (1985). Biology of cladocerans and copepods in Ise Vidal, J. (1980). Physioecology of zooplankton. II. Effects of phyto-
Bay. 2. Vertical distribution of neritic copepods in relation to plankton concentration, temperature, and body size on the de-
their life histories. Bull. Fac. Fish. Mie Univ. 12:1-12 velopment and molting rates of Calanus paeificus and Pseudo-
Sokal, R. R., Sheath, P. H. A. (1963). Principles of numerical taxon- calanus sp. Mar. Biol. 56:135-146
omy. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco Woodmansee, R. A. (1958). The seasonal distribution of the
Specchi, M., Fonda Umani, S., Radini, G. (t981). Les fluctuations zooplankton of Chicken Bay, Florida. Ecology 39:247-262
du zooptancton darts une station fixe du Golfe de Trieste (Haute
Adriatique). Rapp. P.-v. R6un. Commn int. Explor. scient. Mer
M6diterr. 27:97-100
Sullivan, B. K., McManus, L. T. (1986). Factors controlling season-
al succession of the copepods Acartia hudsonica and A. tonsa in C o m m u n i c a t e d b y J. M. P&6s, M a r s e i l l e