Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Learning Outcomes:
• Understand the different meaning of the “~ましょう” form. (“Shall we…? Let’s…!”)
• Able to change the verbs into volitional form fluently & accurately in written and oral form.
(This verb form is used in sentences in which the speaker suggests, urges, or initiates an act)
• Able to listen and understand details about future plans.
• Able to rewrite sentences in the target structure.
Teacher Activity Student Activity Est. Time
1. Greeting and give lesson outcome 1. Listen to teacher 5 mins
2. Revision of volitional forms by asking 2. Students to answer questions and 20 mins
students how to convert two different verb then transform the verbs on cards orally
groups (~えます and ~います verbs) into as a class exercise.
volitional form. Then testing students’
understanding by using flash cards.
Ask students what ~ましょう means. Turn to pg31 and look at the example
Instruct students to look at the example sentences and try to work out the three
sentences and ask them if they see the different usage
different usages for ~ましょう (“Shall
we…? Let’s…!”)
3. Mark homework 3. Take out homework and give answers 5 mins
and make any necessary corrections
4. Listening task and marking 4. Listen to CD and answer questions 10 mins
5. Introduce “I am hoping to …” sentence 5. Listen to teacher and then translate 20 mins
structure and translate the first example sentence in pairs. Share answer at the
sentence together then assign each pair to end of the allocated time.
translate one sentence each.
6. Time challenge - Form groups of 3 and 6. In groups of 3, transform 10 verbs 5mins
give student 20 cards. Show overhead into the volitional form within 3 minutes.
projector slide and ask students to transform Repeat 2 times with new verbs. Check
the verbs into the volitional form within 3 answers via overhead projector slide
minutes. Then check answers by overhead and make any necessary corrections.
projector and make tell students to make
corrections if needed. Repeat twice with new
verbs.
7. Recap lesson and ask students how to 7. Listen to teacher. 5 mins
make plain volitional form.
Evaluation score – refer to NSW QTM Classroom Practice Guide for each element
Comments incl. evidence for evaluation score (2 sentences)
1 Intellectual quality
1.1 Deep knowledge
Comments: Students are expected to have some relevant prior knowledge to
1–2–3–4–5 understand new content. Tasks are designed to focus on one grammar point
and/or one skill (reading, writing, speaking, listening) at a time.
1.2 Deep understanding
Comments: Lesson is teacher driven but students have opportunity to demonstrate
1–2–3–4–5
some understanding through a variety of activities and worked examples.
1.3 Problematic knowledge
Comments: Students are not required to present or analyse alternative
1–2–3–4–5
perspectives and solutions.
1.4 Higher-order thinking
Comments: Students are required to analyse a variety of problems and apply a
1–2–3–4–5
number of grammar points.
1.5 Metalanguage
Comments: Students are expected to recognise the various uses of the Japanese
1–2–3–4–5
language through the use of correct conjugation to transform vocabulary.
1.6 Substantive communication
Comments: Lesson allows students to demonstrate their learning through the
1–2–3–4–5
tasks but does not give opportunity for elaboration.
Identify the two APST standards and two NSW QT model elements you are targeting for
improvement.
APST
1) 1.3 Students with diverse linguistic, cultural, 2) 2.6 Information and Communication
religious and socioeconomic backgrounds Technology (ICT)
QT model
1) 1.6 Substantive communication 2) 2.6 Student direction
Students are to form groups of 3-4 and work Resources: Textbook, Handouts.
collaboratively to convert a set of verbs specified in
question handout.
Listening Task: Teacher: Give students question sheet handouts. Advise students the
Students listen to a passage from the textbook’s passage will be played twice and they have to complete the worksheet
accompanying CD and answer 5 questions on a handout. within the allocated time. Facilitate class discussion to identify
commonly made mistakes by students.
10 min Passage incorporates vocabulary and sentence structure Students
covered in previous and current lesson. Student: Listen to CD and complete question worksheet. Discuss
answers as a class.
Answers to be discussed as a class after two repeats of
the passage. Resources: CD, CD player, Handouts.
Introduce New Grammar Point: Teacher: Introduce the “I am hoping to …” sentence structure. Facilitate
Introduce the “I am hoping to…” sentence structure and class discussion of two example sentences from the textbook. Allow
discuss two example sentences from the textbook students time to build their own statement using grammar point.
together as a class.
20 min Students
Student: Listen to teacher and participate in class discussion. Build
Allow students to build their own individual personal their own individual statement incorporating this grammar point.
statement using this new grammar point.
Resources: Textbook.
Time Challenge: Teacher: Introduce time-based game Kahoot! to students. Instruct
Kahoot! game will be displayed via projector or SMART students to form pairs. Display the game via a projector or smartboard.
Board. Students form pairs and enter the game using the
game pin. Student: In groups of 3, students to log into Kahoot! using the game
pin. Play a time-based game to test knowledge and understanding
Teacher/
5 min Kahoot! will display a verb in plain form and students have
Students
to find the correct volitional form from the 4 supplied Resources: Digital projector or SMART Board, Kahoot! game, wifi
answers within the time limit. connection.
Resources: N/A
Reflection:
What have I learned about the teaching and learning process when preparing this lesson?
While modifying the original lesson plan to prepare this lesson, I learned that the teaching and
learning process is significantly influenced by the standards in the Australian Professional Standards for
Teaching (APST) and the elements of the NSW Quality Teaching (QT) Model which overlap and interrelate
The original lesson plan included the use of projector slides, flashcards and other teaching-learning
resources to give students both individual and group-based learning opportunities. At first glance, this
lesson plan seems to encompass a number of different teaching strategies to assist students to develop
deep understanding of the learning content. However, after careful consideration of both the APST and
I modified the lesson plan to shift from being teacher-centred to become more student-centred,
starting by giving students the opportunity to participate in discussions with their peers and the teacher to
encourage deep understanding by actively engaging with the learning content. I also gave the students
the opportunity to exercise direction within the classroom, thus giving them more responsibility over their
own learning. These changes address elements of the NSW QT Model which the original learning plan
failed to encompass.
My modifications also include allowing students to make meaningful connections between learning
content and their own individual lives. This was done by setting a task where students integrate class
content with aspects of their own lives to construct their own individual statements, rather than copying or
translating example sentences from the textbook. I also made a modification to a time-based challenge by
implementing the use of Kahoot! and introducing ICT to the classroom. These changes reflect standards
Overall, this assignment has taught me that the teaching and learning process is not as simple as
designing fun and engaging activities or facilitating content-heavy lessons to ensure curriculum outcomes
are met. It is an intricate balance which combines doing both engaging students while delivering curriculum
content, which is only achievable by using the APST and NSW QT Model to create high quality teaching
structures and features to express own ideas and questioning throughout the lesson,
5.UL.4 - experiments with linguistic patterns and particularly when students are required to build an
structures in Japanese to convey information and individual statement using the new grammar
WHS:
What are the key risk issues that may appear for and need to be reduced/eliminated in this lesson?
Using your syllabus and support documents as well as other WHS policy- Outline the key WHS
This lesson is designed to take place in a traditional classroom, as such there are no significant risk
• providing everyone with a safe and healthy working and learning environment;
• providing appropriate information, training and instruction to facilitate safe and productive work
ACADEMIC JUSTIFICATION:
Although the original lesson plan by Ms G. Wong, a Japanese teacher at Georges River College
Penshurst Girls’ High School, integrates a number of teaching-learning resources while facilitating both
individual and group-based student learning opportunities, there are a number of areas which can be
improved. My modified lesson plan proposes improvements targeting the elements “Substantive
communication” and “Student direction” from the NSW Quality Teaching (QT) Model and standards
focused on “Students with diverse linguistic, cultural, religious and socioeconomic backgrounds” and
“Information and Communication Technology (ICT)” from the Australian Professional Standards for
Teachers (APST).
recognizing the correlation between deep understanding and high student academic achievement. It is an
element which ensures “students are regularly engaged in sustained conversations about the concepts
and ideas they are encountering. These conversations can be manifest in oral, written or artistic forms”
(NSW Department of Education, 2013). In the original lesson plan, activities were entirely teacher-centred
which did not allow students any opportunities to critically engage with and discuss learning content. My
modified lesson plan includes a number of opportunities for students to actively engage with class content
through discussions with peers and the teacher. These discussions will allow students to develop deep
understanding by actively engaging with the class through sustained conversations about the concepts
Similarly, the teacher-centredness of the original lesson plan does not give students any
opportunities to exercise direction in the classroom. As per the NSW QT Model, student direction is an
element of a quality learning environment which allows students to “exercise some direction over the
selection of activities related to their learning and the means and manner by which these activities will be
done” (NSW Department of Education, 2013). In student-centred learning environments, students are
expected to have greater responsibility for their learning as they are required to actively select, interpret
and apply information to make sense of class content thus establishing deep learning and understanding
(Baeten et al, 2014). By modifying each individual activity to be more student-centred, students can identify
areas of learning which they want to revisit and revise, giving them the ability to exercise direction in the
The original lesson plan also fails to give students an opportunity to make meaningful connections
between the learning content and their own individual lives. The APST includes a standard which focuses
on “students with diverse linguistic, cultural, religious and socioeconomic backgrounds” (AITSL, 2014).
Fisher and Frey (2015) argue that students most effectively acquire vocabulary when they are “actively
involved in word learning and are encouraged to make personal connections with new vocabulary they
encounter.” This has significant implications for language learning. In my modified lesson plan I have
included tasks which allow students to engage with new grammar and vocabulary by constructing their
own individual statements in Japanese, rather than instructing them to simply copy or translate example
sentences from the textbook. This kind of activity allows students to create meaningful connections by
integrating class content (in this case, grammar and vocabulary) with aspects of their own individual lives
My modified lesson plan also includes an online game as a teaching and learning strategy which
uses information and communication technology (ICT). I have included this game to address the lack of
ICT in the original lesson plan because integrating ICT in class is another standard in the APST which
aims to expand learning opportunities for students. The integration of ICT in language-learning classes
transforms “learning from a traditional passive experience to one of discovery, exploration, and excitement
in a less stressful setting” (Young, 2003). The implementation of Kahoot! as a time-based challenge in
which students can work together to test their knowledge creates a more interactive, collaborative and
Together, the APST standards and NSW QT Model elements create a best practice framework for
classrooms. Using these, I have identified four areas – substantive communication, student direction,
students with diverse linguistic, cultural, religious and socioeconomic backgrounds, and information and
communication technology (ICT) – as areas which can be improved in Ms G. Wong’s original lesson plan.
By facilitating discussions ensuing students actively engage with learning content to develop deep
understanding, giving students opportunities to direct their learning, allowing students to make meaningful
personal connections with classroom content, and implementing the use of ICT, students can have a more
REFERENCES:
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2014) Australian Professional Teaching
Standards (APST). Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-for-
teachers/standards/list
Baetan, M., Dochy, F., Struyven, K., Parmentier, E., & Vanderbruggen, A. (2016). Student-centred learning
environments: an investigation into student teachers’ instructional preferences and approaches to
learning. Learning Environment Research Journal,19 43-62. doi 10.1007/s10984-015-9190-5.
Cervetti, G., DiPardo, A., & Staley, S. (2014) Entering the Conversation. The Elementary School Journal,
114 547-572. doi 0013-5984/2014/11404-0005.
Department of Education. (2013). Work Health and Safety (WHS) Policy. (Reference number:
PD/2013/0454/V01) Retrieved from https://education.nsw.gov.au/policy-library/policies/work-health-
and-safety-whs-policy
Department of Education. (2003). Quality teaching in NSW Public Schools. Retrieved from
http://www.darcymoore.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/qt_EPSColor.pdf
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2015). Meaningful Vocabulary Learning. Educational Leadership. 72, 77-78.
Young, S. (2003). Integrating ICT into second language education in a vocational high school. Journal of
Computer Assisted Learning. 19, 447-461.