the relationship between the simulated RQD values (for 12. Elmo, D., Rogers, S., Dorador, L.
S., Dorador, L., and Eberhardt, E., 2014.
different core run length) and rock mass fragmentation, and An FEM-DEM numerical approach to simulate secondary the relationship between rock mass scale and assumed fragmentation. Computer Methods and Recent Advances in threshold used to calculated RQD (e.g. 10cm vs. 20cm). Geomechanics, 1623-1628. doi:10.1201/b17435-286 13. Elmo, D., Rogers, S., Stead, D. and Eberhardt, E., 2014. Discrete Fracture Network approach to characterise rock ACKNOWLEDGMENTS mass fragmentation and implications for geomechanical The authors would like to thank NSERC (Natural Sciences upscaling. Mining Technology, 123(3), pp.149-161. and Engineering Research Council of Canada) for the 14. Grenon, M. and Hadjigeorgiou, J., 2003. Open stope financial support provided to this research through a stability using 3D joint networks. Rock Mechanics and Collaborative Research Development grant (Grant No. Rock Engineering, 36(3), pp.183-208. CRDPJ-453374; Characterization of secondary 15. Hoek, E., 1999. Practical Rock Engineering. fragmentation processes using a combination of laboratory https://www.rocscience.com/learning/hoek-s-corner. experiments and numerical analysis). Golder Associates 16. Hoek, E., 2007. Rock mass properties. Practical rock engineering. Available at www. rocscience. kindly provided an academic license for the DFN code com/learning/Hoek’s-Corner. (FracMan) used to carry out this work. 17. Hoek, E., Carter, T.G. and Diederichs, M.S., 2013. Quantification of the geological strength index chart. REFERENCES In 47th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association. 1. Barton, N., Lien, R., Lunde, J. 1974. Engineering 18. Hoek, E., Kaiser P.K. and Bawden W.F. 1995. Support of classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel underground excavations in hard rock. Rotterdam, support. In: Rock Mechanics, Vol. 6, No. 4, 189-236. Balkema. 2. Bear, J., 2013. Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Courier 19. Palmstron A. 2001. In In-situ characterization of rocks. Corporation. Sharma V.M. and Saxena K.R. eds. A.A. Balkema 3. Bieniawski, Z. T. 1976. Rock mass classification in rock publishers, 2001, pp. 49 - 97. engineering. In: Exploration for Rock Engineering, Ed. Z.T. 20. Priest, S.D. and Hudson, J.A., 1976, May. Discontinuity Bieniawski, Balkema, Cape Town, 97-106. spacings in rock. In International Journal of Rock 4. Bieniawski, Z.T., 1989. Engineering rock mass Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics classifications: a complete manual for engineers and Abstracts (Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 135-148). Pergamon. geologists in mining, civil, and petroleum engineering. 21. Rogers S., D. Elmo, G. Webb and A. Catalan. 2010. A DFN John Wiley & Sons. based approach to defining in situ, primary and secondary 5. Deere, D., 1988. The rock quality designation (RQD) index fragmentation distributions for the Cadia East panel cave. in practice. In Rock classification systems for engineering 2nd Int. Symp. on Block and Sublevel Caving. Perth, purposes. ASTM International. Australia. 6. Deere, D.U. and Deere, D.W., 1998. The rock quality 22. Rogers, S.F., Moffitt, K.M., Kennard, D.K. 2006. designation index in practice. Rock classification for Probabilistic slope and tunnel block stability analysis using engineering purposes. ASTM Spec. Publ, 984, pp.91-101. realistic fracture network models. In: The 4l US. 7. Deere, D.U. and Hendron, A.J., J., Patton, FD, and Cording, Rock Mechanics (USRMS), Symposium on EJ (1967). Design of surface and near-surface construction ARMAIUSRMS 06-1052 in rock. In Failure and Breakage of Rock-Eighth 23. Starzec, P. and Tsang, C.F., 2002. Use of fracture- Symposium on Rock Mechanics (pp. 237-302). intersection density for predicting the volume of unstable 8. Dershowitz, W.S., Herda, H.H. 1992. Interpretation of blocks in underground openings. International Journal of fracture spacing and intensity. In: Proceedings ofthe 33’’ Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 39(6), pp.807-813. US Rock Mechanics Symposium, Publ. 33, 757-766. 24. Staub, I., Fredriksson, A., Outers, N. 2002. Strategy for a 9. Elmo, D. and Stead, D., 2010. An integrated numerical modelling–discrete fracture network approach applied to rock mechanics site descriptive model, development and the characterisation of rock mass strength of naturally testing of the theoretical approach. Svensk fractured pillars. Rock Mechanics and Rock Karnbranslehantering AB, Rapport R-02-02, May 2002. Engineering, 43(1), pp.3-19. 10. Elmo, D., 2006. Evaluation of a hybrid FEM/DEM approach for determination of rock mass strength using a combination of discontinuity mapping and fracture mechanics modelling, with particular emphasis on modelling of jointed pillars (Doctoral dissertation, University of Exeter). 11. Elmo, D., Clayton, C., Rogers, S., Beddoes, R. and Greer, S., 2011. Numerical simulations of potential rock bridge failure within a naturally fractured rock mass. In Proceedings International Symposium on Rock Slope Stability in Open Pit Mining and Civil Engineering (Slope Stability 2011).