Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
3 end paper, the field determined in the neighbor- ponent of armature leakage reactance with
view, reference 2 of the discussion. hood of the air gap does not correspond to the same assumptions given in this paper
As mentioned in the assumptions of reality for the following reasons: The air gap and I am planning to present this work in a
this paper and in references 1 and 2 of this is represented by a return current assumed separate paper.
paper the boundary at z=0 is an unbroken to flow in a filament; this makes the cal- A comparison between the results of
plane, assumed to be of iron with infinite culated maximum flux density tend to in- reference 4 and this paper is inappropriate
permeability. Thus gap and slots are finity as we approach the radius p. because entirely different machine construc-
covered. The effect of the air gap then is A better result can be obtained in this tion types were studied. The end core
considered by assuming the fictitious re- area if the return filament is replaced by a plane, which in reference 4 is assumed to be a
turns of the coils on a circular filament lying washer covering all the width of the air perfect conductor, is assumed in this paper
in the middle of the air gap. On the other gap and carrying a distributed peripheral to be a magnetic mirror. Due to this con-
hand, the protruding part of the coils is current. The conductors can also be re- dition the return current and radial current
connected with the return current part, placed by a staircase instead of the cylinder. sheet must be considered.
along the slots on the end-core plane, by The actual conditions in this area considering Furthermore, the surface of the retaining
means of the radial parts which are assumed also the complicated geometry (stepped ring considered to be magnetic, is taken as
to be made of the current bands of the coils laminations and slotted teeth) renders the the internal cylindrical boundary in refer-
by changing direction from axial to radial. analytical treatment of the field difficult. ence 4. In this paper, the retaining ring is
In this way the radial current sheet is I also wish to thank Dr. Smith for his nonmagnetic and the rotor shaft is taken as
also assumed to be a continuous current valuable discussion. The analysis in this the internal cylindrical boundary. As a
sheet. This configuration gives satisfac- paper has as its main purpose the calculation consequence of this last condition the effect
tory results for the greater portion of the and controlling of associated losses and re- of the rotor field must also be considered in
tooth area as it is deduced from Figs. 11 and actances as well as the calculation of forces the rigorous determination of the end zone
12 of this paper. on the end winding conductors. I have magnetic field and the end component of the
As was stated in the conclusions of the used these results to calculate the end com- armature leakage reactance.
1. For all cases studied, only line energiza- * Based on an isokeraunic level of 15, a line length of 110 miles, and a shielding failure rate of 1% wherever
shield wires are employed.
tion and reclosing caused overvoltages in
excess of twice normal line-to-ground voltage.
Energization produced transients of 2.36 L. Thompson, L. 0. Barthold, J. J. LaForest, C. B.
per unit and reclosing an adjacent line section MODELS, F. A. Fisher, J. G. Anderson, J. H.
Lindh. Ibid., see pp. 587-97 of this issue. Hagenguth. Ibid., pt. III-B, vol. 78, 1959 (Feb.
produced a similar value. The maximum 3. MODEL TECHNIQUES IN THE TRANSIENT NET- 1960 section), pp. 1725-34.
overvoltage on fault clearing was 1.56 per WORK ANALYZER SOLUTIONS OF POWER SYSTEMS 9. THE ROLE OF LIGHTNING STRIKES TO THE
,unit. PROBLEMS, L. 0. Barthold, R. F. Silva. Proceedings CONDUCTORS BYPASSING THE GROUND WIRES IN
of the Amer-ican Power Conference, Chicago, Ill., THE PROTECTION OF HIGH-VOLTAGE-CLASS LINES,
2. Because of the high median value of vol. 22, 1960, pp. 722-31. M. V. Kostenko, I. F. Polovoy, A. N. Rosenfeld.
footing resistance involved, lightning trip- 4. SWITCHING SURGES: I-PHASE-TO-GROUND
Elektrichestvo, Moscow, USSR, no. 4, 1961, pp.
outs of about one per year can be expected if VOLTAGES, AIEE Committee Report. 20-6.
AIEE
two shield wires and 30-unit insulator strings Transactions, pt. III (Power Apparatus and
are employed. Without shield wires, outage Systems), vol. 80, June 1961, pp. 240-61.
rates of 10 to 13 are likely. The use of 35- 5. SWITCHING SURGES DUE TO ENERGIZATION OR
unit strings will cause a further decrease in
these values.
RECLOSING, I. B. Johnson, R. F. Silva, D. D.
Wilson. Proceedings of the American Power
Conference, vol. 23, 1961, pp. 729-36.
Discussion
6. TRANSIENTS IN POWER SYSTEMS (book), H. A. C. L. Rudasill (Virginia Electric and Power
Peterson. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, Company, Richmond, Va.), and H. M.
References N. Y., 1951. Smith and C. L. Wagner (Westinghouse
7. MONTE CARLO COMPUTER CALCULATION OF Electric Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pa.):
1. 500-Kv-LINE Design: II-ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION-LINE LIGHTNING PERFORMANCE, The authors have presented an interesting
STRENGTH OF TOWERS, W. R. Johnson, E. G. J. G. Anderson. AIEE Transactions, pt. III
Lambert J. B. Tice, P. J. Turner. IEEE Trans- (Power Apparatus and Systems), vol. 80, Aug. 1961, and timely discussion of the use of the TNA
actions on Power Apparatus and Systems, see pp. pp. 414-19. and geometrical models to predict the per-
581-87 of this issue. formance of 500-kv lines. The subject has
8. DETERMINATION OF LIGHTNING RESPONSE OF
2. 500-Kv-LINE DESIGN: III-CONDUCTORS, R. TRANSMISSION LINES BY MEANS OF GEOMETRICAL been of special interest to the discussers since
57s Johnson, Wilson, A nderson-500-Kv-Line Design-I AUGUST 1 963
they made similar studies as part of their S. Price, A. J. McElroy, H. M. Smith, D. F. Shankle. Table IV
over-all system study for the Virginia Elec- Ibid., see pp. 487-500 of this issue.
tric and Power Company (VEPCO) 500-kv 3. FIELD MEASUREMENT OF SWITCHING SURGES
AS MODIFIED BY UNLOADED 345-KV TRANS- Authors' Outages
transmission system. In this regard cer- FORMERS, A. J. McElroy, W. S. Price, H. M. Number of Minus Shielding Clayton-Young
tain questions on procedure and interpreta- Smith, D. F. Shankle. Ibid., see pp. 500-20 of this Insulators Failures Calculation
tion of results have been raised by the paper. issue.
It has been stated that the purpose of the 25 .1.124 .............. 1.20
model studies was to determine the probable J. M. Clayton and F. S. Young (Westing- 26 ....... 1.08 .............. 1.13
magnitude of switching surges on the system. house Electric Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pa.): 27 ......... 0.95 ............. 1.08
How can probabilities be assigned from The authors have presented a very interest- 28.. 0.83 ............. 1.05
29 ..... 0.82 .1.02
these studies? Are not the maximum mag- ing discussion of the lightning and switching- 30 ............. 0.81. 1.00
nitudes, within the limits of the initial as- surge studies made on this 500-kv transmis-
sumptions, the values that are determined? sion line. Our particular interest is in the
The only means of obtaining probability data lightning protection problem, and we have
is by making actual system measurements 5. There is a conspicuous absence of insu-
several questions to ask. lator data and, consequently, it is difficult to
and determining the probability of various
pole-closing sequences and the overvoltages 1. Distributions of footing resistances assess the apparent leveling-off effect in
that they generate. In the ANACOM shown in Fig. 11 of the paper provide a very outages as the number of insulators in-
study for the VEPCO project, for example, realistic way of calculating the performance creases. Even when shielding failures are
all the variable parameters, such as breaker of the entire line. We wonder, however, if subtracted, there is no significant improve-
pole-closing sequence, were adjusted to give the authors have not placed too stringent a ment in performance shown when insulators
the maximum system overvoltages. The limitation on the line by assuming a distri- are added above 27. Could the authors dis-
results, however, were modified, based on bution such as A having an average footing cuss this problem? Is the leveling off due to
experience factors obtained from field tests, resistance of approximately 75 ohms. Rea- "window effect" of the tower or can it be
such as are described in references 1-3. lizing that this line traverses mountainous accounted for by other phenomena?
The authors state that the leakage and terrain where one would expect high footing 6. What span lengths were assumed in this
magnetizing reactances of the system trans- resistance, we wonder if the authors have any study? Also, it is not obvious what A and
formers are duplicated by the model trans- correlation between measured ground re- B refer to in Fig. 10. Could this be ex-
formers. How do the leakage resistances sistances and the resistance that the light- plained?
and the hysteresis losses compare? In the ning surge current would see. This would
VEPCO study and other studies run on the provide a clue as to which distribution most We have nmade a comparative calculatiosn
transient analyzer (ANACOM) used by the accurately reflects the performance of the using footing-resistance distribution B and
discussers, the model transformer losses were line. the authors' value of 28.5 strokes. No
too high to be representative of the system. 2. The authors mention the use of counter- shielding failures were assunied. The insu-
A special equivalent, using a saturable reac- poise as a method of reducing tower-footing lator data available to us are assumed to be
tor and feedback amplifier, was used to resistance. Were actual counterpoise con- representative but are not duplicates of the
match more closely the actual transformer figurations studied during the model tests values used by the authors. Table IV shows
characteristic. or was an upper limit of footing resistance our results.
In using the Thevenin's Equivalent ap- assumed for the digital computer portion
proach to the system behind the switching of the study?
point, the authors seem to neglect any re- H. R. Stewart (New England Electric Sys-
flections from that part of the system during 3. The authors have used a 1 % shielding tem, Boston, Mass.): The authors do not
the transient conditions caused by the failure rate for this line. Although this mention whether they investigated the
switching disturbance. Depending upon agrees with Burgsdorf's data for a 33-degree effect of counterpoise in their lightning per-
their time of arrival, such reflections may shielding angle, we wonder if it is not too formance studies. Experience on the New
reduce or increase the maximum voltages. high. Several things must be considered England Electric System, where counter-
The authors do not mention representing when calculating the number of shielding- poises were installed 10 to 15 years ago on
any system loads in their studies. Omis- failure outages a line will experience. The practically all its lines which were built 15
sion of these loads and the system damping sag of the ground wire and phase conductor or more years previously without counter-
that results can give unrealistic dynamic tend to improve the shielding angle while poises, indicates that a counterpoise will
overvoltages. The paper shows that the lowering the height along the span. As the provide at least the tripout-outage-rate
maximum overvoltages occur on line ener- number of insulators is increased, the number improvement between case II and case I or
gization and reclosing. Shunt reactors were of shielding failures is also reduced. Calcu- between case III and case I in Table III of
used to limit these overvoltages to 2.36 per lations we have made for this line indicate the paper. Thus if the tested tower-footing
unit. Did the authors consider the use of that, when considering the tower alone, a resistances of the line turn out to be distribu.-
circuit-closing resistors in the circuit breakers shielding failure outage rate of 0.1 to 0.15 tion A of Fig. 11, and if it is desired to secure
as a means of reducing these overvoltages? flashover per 100 miles each year can be ex- a lightning performance corresponding to dis-
In the VEPCO study, use of these resistors pected. When considering the line as a tribution B or distribution C, it might be sug-
limited the switching-surge overvoltages for whole, the rate drops to a negligible amount. gested that this could be secured by installing
500-kv switching to less than 2.0 per unit. Could the authors elaborate on this prob- a continuous counterpoise, rather than by
Table III of the paper indicates very little lem? attempting to reduce individual tower-foot-
improvement in lightning performance from 4. A fourth problemn arises when we con- ing resistances. It is appreciated that in
using more than 28 insulators, especially for sider the number of strokes to the line. the mountainous terrain cited, the installa-
the lower footing resistances of cases II and Since data on strokes per square mile are tion of a continuous counterpoise may not
III. Would the authors comment on the quite limited, we have based our calcula- be inexpensive, but neither is the reduction
reason for this behavior? Also, in view of tions on data reflecting the number of of tower-footing resistances in such terrain.
this, how can the authors reconcile their strokes to transmission lines. Using these
statement that with the 35 insulators re- data, we would expect about 50 strokes per
quired by switching surges, a "probably 100 miles each year in an area where the W. Piper and R. E. Moran (Stone and
significant reduction in outage rates over isokeraunic level is 15. The authors have Webster Engineering Corporation, Boston,
those reported for 30 units in Table III" evidently used a value of 28.5 strokes to this Mass.): The paper represents a summary of
would result. 110-mile line. We wonder if the authors, a great number of investigations, calcula-
based on their experience with this calculat- tions, estimates, and studies involved in
REFERENCES ing method, believe that the strokes per preparation of some of the design parameters
1. FIELD MEASUREMENT OF SWITcHING SURGES square mile provides an accurate measure of for a 500-kv transmission line. The authors
ON UNTERMINATED 345-KV TRANSMISSION LINES, line performance. If this line had been built
A. J. McElroy, W. S. Price, H. M. Smith, D. F. are to be commended for a concise presenta-
Shankle. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus in an area having an isokeraunic level of 30, tion of their effort.
and Systems, see pp. 465-87 of this issue. would a value of 57 strokes have been as- It is interesting to note that, with a single
2. FIELD MEASUREMENT OF 345-KV LIGHTNING sumed instead of the commonly used value possible exception, the calculations and
ARRESTER SWITCHING SURGE PERFORMANCE, W. of 100 strokes per 100 miles each year? tests have resulted in indications that the
AUGUST 1 963 Johnson, Wilson, Anderson-500-Kv-Line Design-I 579
switching surge for this proposed 500-kv The leakage resistances of the model trans- tribution A was chosen by Pacific Gas and
system should not exceed a value of 2.6 per formers were matched very closely to the Electric Company engineers based on their
unit, without the addition of any special de- power transformers. Past studies have prior experience with lines in similar moun-
vices for limiting this maximum. In the shown the hysteresis loss in a model study is tainous terrain. The validity of any
consideration of devices and arrangements much less important than rigorous magnetic lightning outage calculation is strongly af-
for limiting the crest of the switching surge, modeling of the transformer saturation fected by this selection, and it is often per-
it is apparent from the data included in characteristics. tinent to study several distributions to de-
Table I of the paper that the installation of The difference between a Thevenin's termine the sensitivity of the outage rate
series capacitors on this system would not be Equivalent representation and distributed upon this choice.
effective. The installation of shunt reac- representation, when low-side switching was In the model tests, counterpoise was not
tors, on the other hand, would obviously re- studied on this system, was negligible be- actually used. At the time the tests were
sult in a reduction of the maximum value of cause of the isolating influence of the trans- made it was not (and still is not) intended
this surge. Is it intended that some shunt former. Where 500-kv switching was stud- that counterpoise would be extensively re-
reactors will be included in the initial or ied, the appropriate distributed system was quired; hence its effects on the resistance dis-
subsequent construction of this 500-kv sys- utilized, as noted in the paper. tributions were onlv approximate.
tem and, if so, to what extent will the instal- Since representation of full load on the
lation of these reactors be carried out? The Regarding shielding failures, sag in con-
system will tend to reduce switching surges, ductors obviously improves the shielding
shunt reactors, as indicated, would represent no-load and light-load conditions were
a considerable investment. Have the au- angle and reduces line height, but this
studied on the TNA as limiting conditions. parameter was automatically taken into
thors investigated the possibility of other Shunt-reactor compensation on the 500-kv
means for limiting the transient voltage to account by previous investigators when they
system was not intended primarily as a published shielding-failure data on actual
acceptable vaiues, i.e., surge-suppressing re- method of reducing the switching transient,
sistors installed in the circuit breakers? lines. Their tabulated shielding-failure rates
but was applied to minimize sustained used the height of the towers and shielding
These lightning performance calculations overvoltage conditions. It is interesting,
provide an example of the statistical ap- angle at the towers as their basic parameters
however, that a substantial reduction in to define the line geometry, but midspan
proach to estimating the lightning perform- switching-surge transient voltages results
ance of a transmission line, including com- effects are inescapably included in the data.
from shunt-reactor compensation.
parative results for suspension-insulator The initial section of 500-kv line was The validity of shielding failure assump-
strings for several different numbers of scheduled for completion in 1963, with the tions or calculations is, in the authors' opin-
units. The model tower shown in Fig. 8 2.5 switching-surge level considered desir- ion, the most indeterminate part of any
appears to be designed for free-swinging in- able, based on the characteristics of avail- present lightning outage calculation. This
sulator strings for all three phases. It will able equipment. The design of subsequent is a subject on which more field investiga-
be interesting to note any deviation from line additions for the projected 500-kv sys- tion is required, and we strongly urge that
these data for a V-string arrangement for tem will incorporate any improvements in such investigation be made. At the present
the center phase and V-strings for all three equipment then available. time, one has the choice of using either theo-
phases. Is the statistical sampling of tower- The small improvement in calculated retical calculations or actual field experience.
footing resistance accomplished in an evenly lightning performance for variations in the The calculations in this paper have utilized
graded manner, or at random; i.e., is the number of insulator units from 25 to 30 the latter, since they must finally serve as the
footing resistance of adjacent towers approx- units is also shown in the calculations of basis of acceptance of any theoretical ap-
imately the sanie, or would the computer be Messrs. Clayton and Young who, in fact, proach.
likely to select a tower with very high footing show even less variation than the authors. The number of strokes per square mile was
resistance to be located such that adjacent This small performance variation is all one tak-en as 0.23 times the isokeraunic level.
towers on both sides would have very low could reasonably expect, considering that This is lower than the values sometimes sug-
footing resistance? Would this situation, insulator lengths only changed 20%, that gested by others. It was arrived at from
which may be encountered in the field, alter shielding failures included in the calculations our own field observations and those ob-
the results of the calculations on any way? are practically independent of small length tained from several other investigators. In
Would the authors care to comment on the changes; and that in this range, the only the program, this is an inserted parameter to
relative performance of a line with evenly strokes causing flashover are very-high- be changed as required by geographic condi-
graded footing resistance as compared with a amplitude strokes that have a relatively flat tions and storm paths. This stroke inci-
line where most of the footing resistances statistical distribution. dence is used in association with the Hagen-
have been reduced to some predetermined The authors agree with Mr. Stewart that a guth formula for strokes intercepted by
level, but where a limited number of struc- distributed counterpoise can sometimes lines. If the line had been in an isokeraunic
tures mnay have footing resistance greatly in offer a dramatic improvemnent in perform- level of 30, a value of 57 strokes would have
excess of this predetermined level? ance, provided midspan spacings are ade- been used, all other things being equal. It
quate. The New England Electric System should be emphasized that the number of
experience with counterpoise gives strong strokes to the line has little effect when con-
W. R. Johnson, D. D. Wilson, and J. G. evidence of this effectiveness. In fact, one sidered alone. It is how this value is used in
Anderson: The authors greatly appreciate of the purposes in showing the effects of dis- conjutnctionl with all the other parameters of
the contributions of the various discussers, tributions B and C was to emnphasize that the program, such as current-amplitude and
and are gratified to see the general interest one may gain very little in some cases by re- waveshape distributions, that establishes the
in the EHV transmission problems discussed ducing only the resistance of the highest filnal result One could very easily use dif-
in this and the two companion papers. footing-resistance towers. This should also ferent values for many of the parameters and
Messrs. Rudasill, Smith, and Wagner answer the last question of Messrs. Piper and arrive at a very similar answer-as indeed
have raised the question of assigning switch- Moran. was done by Messrs Clayton and Young.
ing-surge probabilities in these studies. The outage rates were calculated for foot- The "absent" insulator data mentioned
The switching-surge magnitudes reported ing-resistance distributions A, B, and C of by the above discussers are shown for V-
here were the maximum values for the par- Fig. 11 without regard to the means by strings in a companion paper (reference 1 of
ticular switching conditions in each in- which these resistance distributions might be the paper). It did not seem reasonable to
stance. Although switching-surge proba- obtained physically. Actual counterpoise present the same data in both papers.
ability studies, in which the characteristics of does not produce a time-invariant ground re- These data are critical-impulse flashover
air-blast circuit breakers were accurately sistance. The effects of extensive use of values and were used as the starting point
represented, have been done on the TNA, counterpoise can be evaluated by a modifica- for a postulated volt-time curve having the
maximum surges were of principal concern tion of transfer impedance curves in the same type of turn-up as those published
in this case. Since surge levels vary widely Monte Carlo routine. One does not nor- for 18-unit insulator strings. For these
between systems, it was not felt sufficiently mally make this modification unless exten- long strings, this was the best approach
accurate to apply the results of field tests on sive counterpoise usage is contemplated; available, since no laboratory data on volt-
one system to the design of another. In the otherwise it is approximated by a resistance, time curves of very long strings have been
past, excellent agreement has been shown as was done in distribution C of Fig. 11. published.
between field tests on actual systems and The discussion of Messrs. Clayton and The span lengths used were 1,000 feet.
TNA tests representing the same conditions. Young raises many points of interest. Dis- The letter A in Fig. 10 shows the voltages
580 Johnson, Wilson, Ander-sn-500-Kv-Line Design-I AUGUST 1 963
between shield wire and the nearest phase footing resistances for the stricken tower or Towers on each side of the stroke are as
conductor at the stricken point. Letter B span are chosen at random (just as a stroke sumed to have identical footing resistances,
designates the curves for the voltages pro- would do) from an arranged population of in order to simplify calculation. This would
duced across the outside insulator strings at footing resistances. This population is seem to be a valid assumption, and will not
the tower for this same midspan stroke. "biased" toward certain resistance values as greatly influence the results in practially
For the lightning-outage calculations, the demonstrated by the curves of Fig. 11. any case.