Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
MACHINE DESIGN
https://www.machinedesign.com/print/27888 1/7
11/19/2018 Selecting Fasteners for Thin-Walled Joints
Engineers need to consider more than just strength when choosing the
right fastener for joints only 1/8-in. thick or less.
Stephen Mraz | Mar 19, 2015
Nuts, bolts, and machine screws are the most common fasteners used for thin
joints, despite the ongoing development of other fastener types. One reason for
their popularity is that they are come in a wide range of types and sizes. Over
500,000 standard versions are commercially available, as well as innumerable
custom and special versions.
Bolts and machine screws are also the primary choice for joints that require
subsequent disassembly and reassembly. Other fastener types meet this
requirement, including spring clips, but they do not provide the same structural
strength.
For a given fastener size, joint shear strength is highest for bolts and machine
screws and successively lower for tapping screws, conventional rivets, and blind
rivets. However, even with blind rivets, the joint material usually fails before the
fastener.
Assembling nut-and-bolt joints is relatively slow, even when workers use power
tools. In some applications, assembly times can be cut by using push-on fasteners
instead of conventional nuts. Push-ons also prevent loosening; however, they are
limited to relatively light tensile loads.
Perhaps the most serious limitation of nuts and bolts is the need for access to the
back of the joint whenever a nut is used. This limitation does not apply to
https://www.machinedesign.com/print/27888 2/7
11/19/2018 Selecting Fasteners for Thin-Walled Joints
machine screws that engage threads in the joint elements, but joints thinner than
1/8-in. may not provide enough thread engagement to properly hold a machine
screw.
For some applications, threaded inserts solve both the access and thread-
engagement problems. Some inserts get welded to the base component, but this is
a time-consuming technique, and heat can distort parts and damage finishes. A
better alternative to welding is to install self-clinching inserts, most commonly in
the form of nuts pressed into suitably sized holes. Such inserts are also available
as stand-off and male studs. A typical self-clinching nut that provides a 1/4-in.
thread in 1/16 to 1/8-in. cold-rolled steel has a push-out strength of 600 lb and a
torque strength of 160 lb-in.
Tapping Screws
There are two broad categories of tapping screws: thread-forming and thread-
cutting. Both make their own threads when driven into properly sized pre-formed
holes. Some pierce or drill their own holes, eliminating a separate hole-forming
operation, and some have built-in washers to add more bearing or sealing
surfaces.
Tapping screws are suitable for a wide range of materials and thicknesses. They
work on sheet metal, structural steel, brass, bronze, zinc, aluminum, polyamides,
polycarbonates, and wood, in thicknesses ranging from 0.02 to 0.50 in.
For a given size, tapping screws cost less than nuts and bolts or machine screws,
but more than conventional and blind rivets. Tapping screws can be installed
manually or with power tools. However, installation is inherently time-
consuming, especially when hard materials such as stainless steel demand high
driving torques.
Tapping screws do not require access to the back side of the joint, but in joints up
to 0.06-in. thick, the screw must project as much as 3/8 to 5/8 in. beyond the
back of the joint to ensure acceptable fastening strength. In some applications,
the lack of backup space eliminates tapping screws as a fastening option.
Conventional Rivets
Conventional rivets, like nuts and bolts, are available in a wide variety of standard
types, sizes, and materials. Variants include solid, tubular, semitubular,
bifurcated, and two-piece rivets. Two-pieced versions are installed where one-
piece rivets would split, craze, or crack materials like wood and plastics. Tools and
machine for setting conventional rivers run the gamut from simple hand tools to
advanced, fully automated robots.
Perhaps the primary limitation of conventional rivets is that the back of the joint
must be accessible for bucking during installation. In many cases, such access is
only accomplished by drilling an access hole.
Blind Rivets
There are two types of blind rivets: pull-mandrel and dive pin. Both types come in
a wide variety of sizes, materials, and variations.
Pull-mandrel rivets can have hollow cores, solid cores with open ends, or vapor-
tight solid cores with closed ends. For a given rivet length, they have a wide grip
https://www.machinedesign.com/print/27888 4/7
11/19/2018 Selecting Fasteners for Thin-Walled Joints
range, (the thickness of material they can fasten). Engineers can choose from a
long list of rivet and mandrel materials.
Drive-pin rivets have a pin protruding from the head. Workers install them by
driving the pin down with hammer, expanding the shank against the blind side of
the joint. Installation requires no special tools, but the materials must be rigid
enough to withstand hammer blows.
Both types of blind rivets can be installed easily in five seconds or less, and there’s
no need to access the back of the joint. Installation tools are relatively simple and
inexpensive.
Blind rivets are not as strong as nuts and bolts. However, they have adequate
strength for thin joints and resist vibrations better than tapping screws and nuts
and bolts.
Blind rivets can be installed in blind holes in plywood, composition board, and
some plastics. The limiting criterion is the ability of the material to withstand
rivet expansion without fracturing. In through-fastening applications, blind rivets
require a minimum of back-up space. About 0.15 in. is needed for 1/8-in.
diameter rivet, less for smaller sizes. Blind rivets do not permit easy disassembly.
However, several types are easy to drill out and replace.
https://www.machinedesign.com/print/27888 5/7
11/19/2018 Selecting Fasteners for Thin-Walled Joints
There are no simple rules for determining which are the best fasteners for a given
thin-walled application. But answering the following eight questions can give
design teams solid grounds for a good decision.
1. After original assembly, will the joint ever be taken apart and put back
together for maintenance or access to other parts? If so, tapping screws or nuts
and bolts are almost certainly the best choices.
2. Will the joint experience shock or vibrations? If so, either conventional or
blind rivers are probably needed, and tapping screws are eliminated.
3. What strength is needed? Nuts and bolts provide the most tensile and shear
strength, followed in order of decreasing strength by conventional rivets,
tapping screws, and blind rivets. Nuts and bolts are also best at resisting
https://www.machinedesign.com/print/27888 6/7
11/19/2018 Selecting Fasteners for Thin-Walled Joints
https://www.machinedesign.com/print/27888 7/7