Você está na página 1de 5

African Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Research Vol. 3(2), pp.

031-035, February, 2010


Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJMCSR
ISSN 2006-9731© 2010 Academic Journals

Full Length Research Paper

Relationship between continuity and momentum


equation in two dimensional flow
I. A. Idowu* and J. B. Adewuyi
Department of Mathematics, Lagos State Polytechnic Ikorodu, Lagos, Nigeria.
Accepted 6 November, 2009

In this paper a quantitative discussion on a theory describing the relationship between the continuity
and momentum equation in two dimensional flow together with the momentum equation in vectorial
form: ρ dq dt = −∇p + ρg + µ∇ 2 q is reported. Via expanding ∇ * (∇.q ) in cylindrical polar coordinates,
the end result is proved to be Euler equation.

Key word: Continuity equation, momentum equation, cylindrical coordinates, polar coordinate.

INTRODUCTION

A more detailed view of the fluxes across the parcel can research, Karnidakis et al. (1991) studied the high order
be obtained within a reasonable space of time of which splitting methods for the incompressible Navier-Stokes
our attention is restricted to two dimensions. We can then Equations. Also Tan et al. (1998) considered simulated
write the equations for the component and look closely at flow around long rectangular plates under cross flow
the change in these components. Donna (2003) Con- perturbations and Amoudry (2008) consider planar view
sidered the transformations permit, the determination of of a parcel unit depth. Assume ρ is constant across the
pressure distributions and fluid film thickness for any parcel, so we can write for the mass of the parcel,
orientation of the hemispherical shell including the hori- δµ = ρδν = ρδxδyδz . In the two-dimensional flow, each
zontal position, for which the conventional description, of
Reynolds equation is well suited. Serre et al. (2001) component of velocity can vary in both x and y
Studied the configuration of cylindrical cavities subjected directions. We can approximate those velocity changes
to a radial through flow or to a differential rotation of the across our incremental parcel by a Taylor expansion. In
walls are relevant to rotating machinery devices. Van this case we will consider the base values of qualities
Doormal and Raithby (1982) describe an iteration such as pressure and velocity to be the value of the
technique for the solution of the set of coupled algebraic center of the parcel and expand around these values.
equation that represent the mass and momentum Note that value of the corner, x = y = z = 0 , could also
conservation equations in an incompressible fluid flow be assured as base values. Since the parcel is
formulation and the proposed method solves for con- infinitesimal with respect to mean flow scales. The
tinuity and momentum simultaneously along lines through magnitudes of these values are uniform across the parcel
the calculation domain. Phillip and Liu (2008) in two
in the limit δν → 0 . We write the incremental changes at
phase flow models continuity and momentum equations
are established for a sediment phase and a fluid phase. the point, we need not be zero. Again we look at the total
The model we present here solves concentration change in the density and the scope of the parcel as it
weighted averaged equations for both phase. Leggett instantaneously occupies the point ( x , y ). We can derive
and Liu (1984) Studied Applications of boundary element the continuity equation in a slightly different manner, by
methods to fluid mechanics topics in boundary element considering a specific infinitesimal parcel in a
Largrangian sense. The derivation will illustrate the close
connection between Largrangian and Eulerian perspec-
tives and we will send up with the familiar Eulerian
*Corresponding author. E-mail: ejabola@yahoo.com expression. Starting with the Langrangian perspectives
we consider a very small parcel such that δν → 0 , with
Classification: Fluid mechanics no sinks or sources. We then follow the particular
032 Afr. J. Math. Comput. Sci. Res.

parcel that experiences volume and density changes with ∂R 6.0


respects to five only field varcash will vary infinitesimal ∂ν + ∂q ⋅ nds
across the small dimensions of the parcel. Then the v
∂t s
statement for the constant mass of fluids parcel, then the
statement, for the constant mass of this parcel ρδν is ∂p
completely expressed in the five derivatives, Hence, + ∆ ( pq ) = 0 7.0
∂t
D(( ρδν )/ ∂t ) = 0 . However, when the parcel moves
through the fluid, to volume must distorts and changes The equation (7.0) is known as the equation of continuity.
due to the changing forces in the thus field. The It is the differential form of the law of conservation of
derivative separated into density and volume changes by mass written in form of the flow field.
using the chain rule for differentiation. In the end, the Equation (7.0) is now rewritten in detail in the three
derivative can be converted to the Eulerian expression. most continuity used coordinate systems.
In Cartesian coordinates

MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS ∂p ∂( pu) ∂( pw) ∂( pw)


+ + + =0 8.0
The differences between the various derivatives can be ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z
explained in a more formal manner as follows:
In cylindrical coordinates
Consider a fluid particle moving with a load velocity;

q= i υ + jν + κω 1.0 ∂p d ∂ ( rpqr ) 1 ∂ ( pqθ ) ∂ ( pqz )


+ + + =0 9.0
∂t r ∂r r ∂θ ∂z
and investigate the change of the property
b = b( x , y , z , t ) of the particle. The change in b with In spherical coordinates
time and position may be expressed as
∂p 1 ∂ ( r 2 pq ) 1 ∂ ( pqθ sin θ ) 1 ∂ ( pqθ )
+ + + = 0 10
∂b ∂b ∂b ∂b ∂t r 2 ∂r r sin θ ∂θ sin θ ∂θ
db= ∂t + ∂x + ∂y + ∂z 2.0
∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z In some particular cases equation of continuity assumes
simpler form given in Cartesian coordinates.
The rate of change of s in time ∂b equation become
∂t ∆ ⋅ ( pq ) = 0
or ⋅ 11
∇b ∂b ∂s ∂b ∂b
= +U +V +W } 3.0 ∆⋅q = 0
∇t ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z
Now, for momentum, Newton’s second law of motion
∇ b ∂b states that the rate of change of momentum of a
= + z ⋅ ∂b 4.0 thermodynamics system equals the sum total of the
∇t ∂t
forces acting on the system.
By equation (3) we can direct operation of ∂b in new
D
coordinates. pqdv = gpdv + Tds 12
Dr v v s
∇ b ∂b ∂b ∂b ∂b
= + qr + qϑ + qz , When g is a general body force per unit mass, and T is
∇t ∂t ∂r r∂θ ∂z
the system boundary for x-component Equation 12
5.0 becomes
∇ b ∂b ∂b ∂b ∂b
= + qr + qϑ qθ D
∇t ∂t ∂r r∂θ r sin θ∂θ pxdv = gxpdv + Tnxds 13
Dt v v s
The law of conservation of mass has already been pre-
sented in a form applicable to a control volume may be The Reynolds transport theorem may now be applied to
rewritten as: the left-hand side of this equation
Idowu and Adewuyi 033

This may be put in symbolic compact form.


D du u∂u v∂u w∂u
pudv = ρ + + + dv 14
Dt v v ∂t ∂u ∂y ∂z ∆q
ρ = −∇ p ρg + ∇.τ 23
∆t
The stress term Tu inside the surface integral is now
written in terms of its components to yield
The expression for the stress and the rate of strain
component in several coordinate systems are now written
∂τ xx ∂τ yx ∂τt
Tnn ds = [T xxi ]
+ Tynj + Tzx k ⋅ nds =
∂u
+
∂y
+
∂x
dv
down.
In Cartesian coordinates of q = iu + jv + kw
s s v
15
∂u ∂v ∂w
ε xx = , ε yy = , ε zz = ,
where the divergence theorem has been used again. By ∂x ∂y ∂r
subtraction of equation 14 and 15 into equation 13 yields
∂u ∂r ∂w
xx = ∂µ , yy = ∂µ
, zz = ∂µ , 24
∂u u∂u v∂u w∂u ∂Txx ∂Tyn ∂Tzx ∂x ∂y ∂z
ρ + + + − gx − + + ∂v = 0 16
v ∂t ∂u ∂t ∂t ∂u ∂y ∂z In cylindrical coordinates q = e r q r + e9 q 9 + e z q z

Becomes
∂qr ∂qϑ qr ∂qz
ε rr = ε 9ee = 1 r + , ε zz =
Txx +Tyy +Tzz ∂r ∂ϑ r ∂z
ρ= 17 ∂qr ∂qϑ qr ∂qz
3 τ rr = 2µ , τ 99 = 2µ 1 + , τ zz = 2 µ
∂r r ∂ϑ r ∂z
It is customary to separate out the pressure terms from 25
the total stress
In spherical coordinates q = e r q r + e 9 q 9 + eφ qφ
T ij + - p∂ij +τij 18
1 ∂qR qr 1 ∂qR qr
τ ij = ∂µΣij Eθθ = + , τθϕ = 2µ +
And equation 18 is written in tensor form as R ∂R R R ∂R R
1 ∂qϕ qR qθCotθ
T=-p + τ 19 Eϕϕ = + ,
RSinϕ ∂ϕ R R
p 0 0 1 ∂qϕ qR qθCotθ
τϕϕ = 2µ + 26
P= 0 p 0 RSinϕ ∂ϕ R R
0 0 p
Using 29-31 to eliminate the stress components from the
Equation 19 is used to modify the momentum. differential momentum and equation 20-22 Becomes

Dq
∂u ∂u ∂u ∂u ∂p ∂τ ∂τ yz ∂τ zz ρ = −∇ ρ + ρg − µ∇ x (∇ xq ) = −∇ ρ + ρg − µ∇ 2 q
ρ +U +V +W =− + ρ gy + xz + + Dt
∂t ∂x ∂y ∂t ∂x ∂x ∂y ∂z 27
20
By using equation (11), if ∇ is the Laplacian operator
2

∂v ∂v ∂v ∂v ∂p ∂τ ∂τ yz ∂τ zz applied to the velocity vector in Cartesian coordinates,


ρ +U +V +W =− + ρ gy + xz + + expanding ∇ × (∇ × q ) in cylindrical polar coordinates
∂t ∂x ∂y ∂t ∂x ∂x ∂y ∂z
21 we obtain

(rqr ) + 12 2r − p2 ∂qθ
∂w ∂w ∂w ∂w ∂p ∂τ ∂τ yz ∂τ zz ∂p ∂ 1 ∂ ∂2q
ρ +U +V +W =− + ρ gy + xz + + = ρ gr − +µ
∂t ∂x ∂y ∂t ∂x ∂x ∂y ∂z ∂r ∂r r ∂r r ∂z r ∂θ
22 28
034 Afr. J. Math. Comput. Sci. Res.

D
= ρ gθ −
∂p

∂ 1 ∂ ∂ 2θq ∂ 2θq
(rqθ ) + 12 2 r + 2 r + 22 ∂qθ y
r∂θ ∂r r ∂r r ∂z ∂z r ∂θ
29 dy C
dx u
∂p I ∂ ∂qz 1 ∂ 2 qz ∂ 2 qz V p(x, y) B
= ρ yz − +µ r + 2 +
∂y r ∂r ∂r r ∂θ 2 ∂z 2
30 rd θ dr A
By repeating the for spherical coordinate, we obtain qr qθ
r
= ρ yϕ −
1 ∂p
+ µ
I ∂
R
∂q θ
+
1 ∂2
+ Sinθ
∂q ϕ m(r, θ )
RSin θ ϕ
2
R ∂R ∂R R Sinθ ∂θ
2 2
∂θ θ
x
I ∂ 2 qϕ 2 ∂qr 2Cosθ ∂qϕ
+µ + 2 + 2 31 Figure 1. Plane for two-dimensional flow, with four streamlines
RSin θ R Sin θ R Sinθ ∂ϕ R Sin 2θ ∂ϕ
2 2 2
denoted by the letters A, B, C and D.

By substituting µ = 0 in the navier-stokes equating


which is called momentum equation (27) – (31) we obtain left, between, say, streamlines A and B must therefore
an equation come out at the right side without change. Because the
distance between the two streamlines accommodating
Dq this mass flux seems in the drawing to increase, the
ρ = ρ g − ∇ρ 32 mass flux seems per unit Cross section ρ .. q , must
Dt
decrease from left to right. There is therefore some
This is called the Euler equation relation between the convergence and divergence of
stream lines and the vector ρ .q . Furthermore, because
stream sheets are not crossed by the flow, each sheet
DISCUSSION
represents a certain mass flux per unit depth of stream
Solutions of the momentum equation result in velocity sheet taking place below it, flowing between it and some
particular stream sheet representing zero flux.
vectors q and pressure ρ which satisfy both the
This mass flux is called the stream function and it is
momentum equation and the continuity equation. Given denoted by ϕ
such a combination, [ q . ρ ], we can check whether it
constitutes a solution by substitution into the equations. ∂ϕ = (∂y )(up ) = (− ∂x )(vp )
How to find such a solution is another matter and any
general step leading toward this goal is useful. For two
dimensional flows it is possible to eliminate the continuity of which follows
equation from the system of equations by using only
functions which satisfy the continuity equation. This elimi- ∂x − ∂ϕ
nation is a formal step toward a solution and functions u = , vρ =
which affect this elimination and the stream functions and ∂y ∂x
if the flow is defined as two dimensional when its des-
cription in Cartesian coordinates shows no z-component By using planned polar coordinate in the representative
of the velocity and no dependence on the z-coordinate. plane and letting.
Such a flow can be described in the z = 0 plane, by
shown a flow pattern identical to that in the z = 0 plane. ϕB = ϕA + dϕ
The z = 0 plane is therefore called representative plane.
Figure 1 shows a representative plane for two- dϕ = (rdq (q r ρ )
dimensional flow, with four streamlines denoted by the
dϕ = (d r )(− qq ρ )
letters A, B, C, D. which the whole pattern may be shifted
in the z-direction parallel to itself. Thus the streamlines
also represent stream sheets, that is barriers which are
not crossed by the flow. The Mass flux entering at the Which becomes;
Idowu and Adewuyi 035

1 ∂ϕ − ∂ϕ Phillip L, Liu F (2008). Two-Dimensional, Two-Phase sediment


qr ρ = , qθρ = Transport Modeling Laurent Amoudry, Proudman Oceanographic
r ∂θ ∂r Laboratory, Liverpool, UK.
Serrie EBP, Kofarba R (2001). Numerical Simulation of the transition is
three – dimensional rotating flows with walls. Boundary layers
instability. Int. Formal Fluid Dyn. 5(2): 17-30.
REFERENCES Tan BT, Thompson MC, Hourigan K (1998). Simulated Flow around
Long Rectanglular Plates under Cross Flow Pertubations. Int. J.
Amoudry H (2008). Two – phase modeling of grander sediment for Fluid Dyn. 2(1).
sheet flow and scour. Ph.D. Thesis Cornell University. Van Doornail JP, Raithby GD (1982).The Simultaneous Solution along
Donna M (2003) Reynolds Equation for Spherical Bearings J. Tribol. lines of the Continuity and Momentum equations.
125(1): 203-207.
Karnidakis GE, Israeli M, Orszag SA (1991). High-Order Splitting
Methods for the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations, J. Comput.
Phys. 97: 414-443.
Leggett JA, Liu PLF (1984). Applications of boundary element methods
to fluid mechanics topics in boundary element research, led by C
Brebbia), Springer – ver lag. 1(1).

Você também pode gostar