Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
COM
Co
ht
py
s
rig ed.
re
ht
se
rv
©
20
10
Re
M
pr
cM
od
uc
ah in w
tio
on
n
Pu
bl
is
ho
hi
ng
le
or
G
ro
in
up
pa
un ou
rt
w
le
ith
ss
ot
he
tp
rw
er
is
m
e
is
no
si
JOAN E. SPIEGEL, MD
on
E
ndotracheal tube (ETT) cuffs have
te
Instructor in Anesthesia
d.
is
in the mid-20th century. Until that time, Dr. Spiegel has nothing to disclose.
d.
A N E S T H E S I O L O G Y N E W S G U I D E T O A I R WAY M A N A G E M E N T 2 0 1 0
51
In 1926, anesthetist Arthur Guedel experimented
with various rubber items, including dental dams, con-
doms, and gloves, to construct the first ETT cuff, test-
ing his prototypes on animal tracheas obtained from
his local butcher. Guedel’s friend and fellow anesthetist,
Ralph Waters, encouraged him to provide a leak-proof
ETT seal that would complement Waters’ closed circuit,
soda-lime absorption system for positive pressure ven-
tilation (PPV). But where was the most advantageous
siting of the rubber cuff in the airway? Optimal position
of the cuff was not intuitively obvious at the time.
A
Co
py
rig ed.
Figure 1. Top: A typical HVLP, dis- earn a position as a family pet in the Waters’ home.
tio
on
Pu
Covidien). Bottom: The HPLV cuff on Cuff System, Design, and Material
bl
the endotracheal tube used with the The American Society for Testing and Materials
is
HPLV, high pressure-low volume; HVLP, high volume-low distance from the tip of the tube to the end of the cuff,
or
pressure; PVC, polyvinyl chloride which varies with tube size. The end of the cuff must
ro
in
le
ith
ss
I N D E P E N D E N T LY D E V E L O P E D B Y M C M A H O N P U B L I S H I N G
52
Low- and High-Pressure Cuffs
In the 1960s, endotracheal cuffs were made of red
Table 1. Ideal Intracuff Pressures
rubber and classified as high pressure-low volume For Adults Using Traditional PVC
(HPLV). Today, HPLV cuffs are made of nondisposable Cuffed Tubes
silicone, and high volume-low pressure (HVLP) cuffs are
made of tissue-compatible polyvinyl chloride (PVC) or Pressure cm H2O mm Hg
polyurethane (Figure 1). What are the differences?
The HPLV cuff has a small diameter at rest and a low Ideal 20-30 15-22
residual volume, which is the amount of air that can
High >40 30
be withdrawn from the cuff after it has been allowed
to equilibrate with atmospheric pressure. For sealing in Low <20 15
A
to overcome the low compliance of the cuff itself. The PVC, polyvinyl chloride
rig
Co
cuff makes a small area of contact with the trachea and From references 15 and 16.
ht
py
rig ed.
of pressure within the cuff and of the tracheal mucosa inquire as to the volume of air required to inflate an
rv
will not be consistent. ETT cuff. However, the more important question should
20
One concern associated with the cuffs is possible be one of how much pressure will be exerted on the
10
Re
ischemic damage to the mucosal wall with prolonged mucosa when the cuff is properly inflated.
M
pr
use. Another potential problem is that the cuffs may Conventional HVLP cuffs require about 20 cm H2O
cM
od
inflate in a noncircular fashion and cause the ETT to to seal the trachea. Microaspiration still can occur at
injure the trachea. pressures up to 60 cm H2O, so guidelines depend on
uc
ah in w
Some advantages of high- versus low-pressure cuffs clinical requirements. Pressure limits for routine cuff
tio
on
are their reusability and lower overall cost, and lower inflation are determined in part by the blood pressure of
n
Pu
incidence of sore throat. They also may provide better the capillaries supplying the trachea, which is approxi-
bl
protection against aspiration than low-pressure cuffs. In mately 48 cmH2O.10 An intracuff pressure greater than
is
addition, because the cuffs deflate to sit very close to 34 cm H2O results in decreased perfusion to the tra-
ho
hi
the ETT, the tube and cuff are more easily visible dur- chea, whereas total obstruction of tracheal blood flow
ng
le
When using a non-disposable HPLV ETT with a sili- suggests 20 cm H2O to be a reasonable lower limit of
ro
in
cone cuff, such as that within the LMA Fastrach (LMA cuff pressure in adults when using HVLP PVC cuffs. The
up
pa
North America), it is prudent to pay careful attention consensus regarding acceptable maximum cuff pres-
un ou
to cuff pressure; however, the lack of routine manome- sure ranges from 25 to 40 cm H2O in adults (Table 1.)
rt
ter use makes this difficult. Knowlson and Bassett dem- The margin of error for overinflating cuffs is not
w
le
ith
ss
onstrated that proper inflation in the HPLV cuff could large, and clinicians do not adequately understand the
be achieved by inflating the cuff to the minimal volume relationship between volume and pressure in this set-
ot
that sealed the trachea—the minimal occlusion volume ting.11-13 An exponential increase in pressure with rising
he
tp
(MOV).8 MOV is achieved by inflating the cuff just above volume is expected with a high-pressure ETT at lower
rw
er
the point where a seal is achieved by listening for a leak volumes of air, but can occur with high volumes even in
is
m
following intubation at peak inspiratory pressures (PIP) HVLP cuffs. For HVLP cuffs, a linear relationship exists
e
is
during PPV. between volume and pressure within the cuff over a
no
si
on
An HVLP cuff comprises a thin compliant wall that, range of sealing pressures. In 2009, Hoffman et al dem-
te
when inflated, adapts and conforms easily to the irregu- onstrated this phenomenon using intubated canines.
d.
is
lar borders of the tracheal wall. A significant advantage of They calculated a Spearman rho correlation of volume
pr
high-volume cuffs over low-volume cuffs is that, provided and pressure of 0.97 or 97%, validating a near-perfect
oh
the wall of the cuff is not stretched, the intracuff pres- linear relationship.14
ib
sure will correlate closely with tracheal mucosal pressure However, volume necessary to achieve a cuff pres-
ite
(Wilder, 1996).1 Although HVLP cuffs are associated with sure of 20 to 30 cm H2O varies considerably between
d.
fewer complications than HPLV cuffs, the devices may patients, regardless of tube size and patient morpho-
cause serious tracheal injury if the intracuff pressure is metric characteristics. Measuring cuff pressures there-
maintained within the steep part of the pressure-volume fore is still necessary.
curve (the ideal range being 20-30 cm H2O).9 When using nitrous oxide (N2O) during general anes-
thesia, particular attention should be paid to changes
Volume, Pressure, and Sealing Characteristics in cuff pressures.2 The increase in cuff pressure varies
The purpose of the ETT cuff is to provide a seal at directly with the partial pressure of N2O and time, and
a pressure high enough to prevent aspiration but not inversely with cuff thickness. The gas will expand the
impede blood flow in the trachea. Clinicians frequently resting inflated cuff over time during the administration
A N E S T H E S I O L O G Y N E W S G U I D E T O A I R WAY M A N A G E M E N T 2 0 1 0
53
of general anesthesia, with the greatest change occur-
ring after the first hour of anesthesia. The perceived
benefit of adding N2O to the cuff when first delivering
anesthesia is questionable because the gas will diffuse
out of the cuff as easily as into it when the concentra-
tion of inspired N2O is decreased, resulting in unwanted
loss of cuff pressure and sealing.17
Newer cuff designs claim to allow less N2O to dif-
fuse into them over time by virtue of their design and/
or material. The Profile Soft-Seal (Smiths Medical) is
theoretically impervious to diffusion of N2O because it
A
Co
py
Seal.18
20
10
UNIQUE CUFFS
Re
M
pr
ah in w
on
Pu
chea. Although the cuff will not cause tracheal injury, the
bl
hi
These tubes and cuffs are designed for use with car-
ng
le
(Figure 3). Two PVC cuffs at the distal end are inflated
ro
in
le
ss
tal part of the cuff and moves air within the cuff toward
d.
is
I N D E P E N D E N T LY D E V E L O P E D B Y M C M A H O N P U B L I S H I N G
54
Table 2. Examples of Commonly Used ETTsa
contraindicated.
Co
ht
py
Hi-Lo (Evac) Hi-Lo is a common ETT for Operating room and chron-
s
rig ed.
M
pr
cM
od
ah in w
on
tube.
n
Pu
bl
is
ho
hi
(Kimberly Clark) design that claims superior may provide superior seal-
sealing within the trachea at ing. For children, the short,
or
le
ss
e
is
no
si
on
te
ETT, endotracheal tube; N2O, nitrous oxide; PVC, polyvinyl chloride; VAP, ventilator-assisted pneumonia
a
Newer designs address contour of cuff and subglottic secretion control.
A N E S T H E S I O L O G Y N E W S G U I D E T O A I R WAY M A N A G E M E N T 2 0 1 0
55
trachea at some point along the cuff and thus mark- (Covidien) tube incorporates the same tapered cuff
edly reduces the microchannels at the sealing zone. In design as the TaperGuard but is made from polyure-
another improvement, the TaperGuard Evac ETT con- thane rather than PVC. Similarly, the Microcuff (Kimberly
sists of the tapered cuff design and allows for the drain- Clark) creates an effective seal at intracuff pressures of
age of secretions through an integrated suction lumen. 15 cm H2O, and has been shown to reduce VAP by 43%
The TaperGuard Evac ETT is associated with a signifi- when compared with traditional PVC cuffs.21 The use of
cant reduction in the risk for VAP compared with non- polyurethane cuffs has been shown to reduce the inci-
subglottic suctioning tubes.19 dence of early VAP in cardiac patients compared to use
of traditional cuffs.22
POLYURETHANE
The architecture of the trachea is nonuniform, non- Monitoring Cuff Pressure
A
cylindrical, irregular, and D-shaped. When a cuff with The aneroid manometer is the most commonly used
ll
redundant PVC material is inflated, tiny channels are device for monitoring cuff pressures (Table 3). Manom-
rig
Co
created that encourage pooling or collection of secre- eters are precise and accurate but cumbersome to use,
ht
py
tions within the folds. (The HVLP cuff is 1.5-2 times the expensive, require calibration, and pose an infection risk
s
rig ed.
diameter of the trachea when fully inflated.) VAP can to patients if not properly cleaned. Pressure-limiting
re
occur as a result of these secretions. In order to pre- valves are attached to the proximal end of the inflation
ht
se
vent microaspiration and VAP, intracuff pressures as tube, where they act as a reservoir for excess pressure
rv
high as 50 cm H2O have been used to seal PVC cuffs. within the cuff and keep intracuff pressures within a
20
Cuff material made of ultrathin (10 micron) polyure- preset range, usually around 25 cm H2O. The drawback
10
Re
thane, instead of the traditional polyvinylchloride (50- of these valves is their inability to change pressure lim-
M
pr
80 micron) allows sealing of cuff in the lumen of the itations, a problem when higher sealing pressures are
cM
od
trachea at pressures of 15 cm H2O or lower. This effect needed. The latest technologies for controlling pres-
may result from the polyurethane material draping over sure include electronic regulators designed specifically
uc
ah in w
the irregular tracheal mucosal contours, perhaps simi- for ETTs. These devices seem to solve the problem of
tio
on
lar to the way plastic wrap seals food. The SealGuard cuff management, but they have some drawbacks. One
n
Pu
bl
is
ho
Aneroid manometers Precise and accurate; must be calibrated; may transfer infectious agents unless
G
ro
cleaned; some need complex set up using tubing and stopcocks. Intracuff pres-
in
up
un ou
rt
Lanz pressure-regulating Limits intracuff pressure to approxi- Hi-Lo cuff with Lanz valve
valve mately 30 cm H2O. May not be useful in
w
le
ss
rw
er
is
m
e
is
no
si
on
te
d.
is
ing valve.
ite
ETT, endotracheal tube; N2O, nitrous oxide; PIP, peak inspiratory pressure
I N D E P E N D E N T LY D E V E L O P E D B Y M C M A H O N P U B L I S H I N G
56
in vitro study, for example, found that the regulators
may interfere with the self-sealing mechanism of HVLP
Table 4. Recommendations for the
cuffs when set pressures are lower than peak inspira- Use of Cuffed ETTs in Children
tory pressures.23 In addition, if the distal end of the tub-
ing, which has a standard luer connection, is connected 1. After tracheal intubation, an air leak around the
inadvertently to a blood line, a fatal air embolus could tube must be present at 20 cm H2O positive air-
be delivered. way pressure with the cuff uninflated.
Endotracheal Cuff Use in Children 2. The cuff should be carefully inflated using a
manometer until air leakage disappears. Cuff pres-
Children under the age of 8 years were a demo- sure should not exceed 20 cm H2O.
graphic previously considered ineligible to receive
A
cuffed ETTs. The clinical consensus seems to be shift- 3. Cuff pressure should be continuously monitored
ll
ing, however. The practice of using cuffed tubes in chil- and should be reduced if it exceeds 20 cm H2O.
rig
Co
py
pressure is strictly monitored.24 Advantages of cuffed 4. The cuff should not be actively deflated except
s
flows, decreased pollution in the operating room, and ETT, endotracheal tube
20
ah in w
on
Pu
hi
le
ith
ss
cuff-related injury, microaspiration, and VAP. With the Figure 5. Microcuff (Kimberly Clark)
he
tp
increasing use of cuffs in children under age 8, newer pediatric endotracheal tube.
rw
er
safety and reducing the number of re-intubations asso- Note the more distally placed polyurethane cuff.
e
is
te
References
d.
is
Belg. 2001;55(4):273-278.
3. Fan C, Chow P, Tsai K, et al. Tracheal rupture complicat-
ing emergent endotracheal intubation. Am J Emerg Med. 8. Knowlson GT, Bassett HF. The pressures exerted on the trachea by
2004;22(4):289-293. endotracheal inflatable cuffs. Br J Anaesth 1970;42(10):834-837.
4. Terashima H, Sakurai T, Takahashi S, Saitoh M, Hirayama K. Post- 9. Riley E, DeGroot K, Hannallah M. The high-pressure characteris-
intubation tracheal stenosis: problems associated with choice of tics of the cuff of the intubating laryngeal mask endotracheal tube.
management [article in Japanese]. Kyobu Geka. 2002;55(10):837- Anesth Analg. 1999;89(6):1588.
842.
10. Seegobin RD, van Hasselt GL Endotracheal cuff pressure and tra-
5. Lu YH, Hsieh MW, Tong YH. Unilateral vocal cord paralysis follow- cheal mucosal blood flow: endoscopic study of effects of four
ing endotracheal intubation—a case report. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. large volume cuffs. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984;288(6422):965-
1999;37(4):221-224. 968.
A N E S T H E S I O L O G Y N E W S G U I D E T O A I R WAY M A N A G E M E N T 2 0 1 0
57
11. Braz JR, Navarro LH, Takata IH, Nascimento Júnior P. Endotracheal 18. Karasawa F, Mori T, Okuda T, Satoh T. Profile soft-seal cuff, a new
tube cuff pressure: need for precise measurement. Sao Paulo Med endotracheal tube, effectively inhibits an increase in the cuff pres-
J. 1999;117(6):243-247. sure through high compliance rather than low diffusion of nitrous
oxide. Anesth Analg. 2001;92(1):140-144
12. Fernandez R, Blanch L, Mancebo J, Bonsoms N, Artigas A.
Endotracheal tube cuff pressure assessment: pitfalls of finger
19. 510(k) Clearance Letter, Covidien. Boulder, CO.
estimation and need for objective measurement. Crit Care Med.
1990;18(12):1423-1426.
20. Mulier J et al. Tracheal cuff leak in morbidly obese patients intu-
13. Hoffman RJ, Parwani V, Hahn IH. Experienced emergency med- bated with a TaperGuard, Hi-Lo cuffed, or a Hi-Lo cuffed and
icine physicians cannot inflate or estimate endotracheal tube lubricated tracheal tube. 63rd Annual PostGraduate Assembly
cuff pressure using standard techniques. Am J Emerg Med. abstract P-9108, New York, NY, December 2009.
2006;24(2):139-143.
14. Hoffman RJ, Dahlen JR, Lipovic D, Stürmann KM. Linear correla- 21. Data on file. Roswell, GA, KCCW. (Study performed at the Univer-
tion of endotracheal tube cuff pressure and volume. West J Emerg sity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI)
A
Med. 2009;10(3):137-139.
ll
py
rig ed.
ary phenomenon of the nitrous oxide-filled endotracheal tube 24. Wheeler M, Cote CJ, Todres ID. The pediatric airway. In: Coté CJ,
cuff after cessation of nitrous oxide administration. Anesth Analg. Lerman J, Todres ID, eds. A Practice of Anesthesia for Infants and
10
Re
cM
od
uc
ah in w
tio
on
n
Pu
bl
is
ho
hi
ng
le
or
G
ro
in
up
pa
un ou
rt
w
le
ith
ss
ot
he
tp
rw
er
is
m
e
is
no
si
on
te
d.
is
pr
oh
ib
ite
d.
I N D E P E N D E N T LY D E V E L O P E D B Y M C M A H O N P U B L I S H I N G
58