Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
I, the undersigned declare that I am the author of this work, and that any content from other
sources has been acknowledged and fully cited.
Assessor’s comments:
Assessor: Mark of Assessment: _______
Date of Assessment:
TITLE: Heat Transfer In A Single Pass Shell And Tube Heat Exchanger
OBJECTIVE: Obtain experimentally the heat transfer coefficient in a shell and tube heat
exchanger.
THEORY:
Lt = Tube Length
Nt = Number of Tubes
Np = Number of pass
Ds = Shell Inside Diameter
Nb = Number of Baffles
B = Baffle Spacing
Baffle Spacing is obtained:
Transfer of heat from one fluid to another is an important operation for most of the
chemical industries. The most common application of heat transfer is in designing of heat
transfer equipment for exchanging heat from one fluid to another fluid. Such devices for
efficient transfer of heat are generally called Heat Exchanger. Heat exchangers are normally
classified depending on the transfer process occurring in them. General classification of heat
exchangers is shown in the Figure 1.1. Amongst of all type of exchangers, shell and tube
exchangers are most commonly used heat exchange equipment. The common types of shell
and tube exchangers are: Fixed tube-sheet exchanger (non-removable tube bundle): The
simplest and cheapest type of shell and tube exchanger is with fixed tube sheet design.
Removable tube bundle: Tube bundle may be removed for ease of cleaning and replacement.
Removable tube bundle exchangers further can be categorized in floating-head and U-tube
exchanger.
U-tube exchanger: This type of exchangers consists of tubes which are bent in the
form of a „U‟ and rolled back into the tube. This means that it will omit some tubes at
the centre of the tube bundle depending on the tube arrangement. The tubes can
expand freely towards the "U" bend end.
Shell
Shell is the container for the shell fluid and the tube bundle is placed inside the
shell. Shell diameter should be selected in such a way to give a close fit of the tube
bundle. The clearance between the tube bundle and inner shell wall depends on the
type of exchanger. Shells are usually fabricated from standard steel pipe with
satisfactory corrosion allowance. The shell thickness of 3/8 inch for the shell ID of
12-24 inch can be satisfactorily used up to 300 psi of operating pressure.
Tube
Tube OD of ¾ and 1‟‟ are very common to design a compact heat exchanger.
The most efficient condition for heat transfer is to have the maximum number of tubes
in the shell to increase turbulence. The tube thickness should be enough to withstand
the internal pressure along with the adequate corrosion allowance. The tube thickness
is expressed in terms of BWG (Birmingham Wire Gauge) and true outside diameter
(OD). The tube length of 6, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 ft are preferably used. Longer tube
reduces shell diameter at the expense of higher shell pressure drop. Finned tubes are
also used when fluid with low heat transfer coefficient flows in the shell side.
Stainless steel, admiralty brass, copper, bronze and alloys of copper-nickel are the
commonly used tube materials.
Baffles
Baffles are used to increase the fluid velocity by diverting the flow across the
tube bundle to obtain higher transfer co-efficient. The distance between adjacent
baffles is called baffle-spacing. The baffle spacing of 0.2 to 1 times of the inside shell
diameter is commonly used. Baffles are held in positioned by means of baffle spacers.
Closer baffle spacing gives greater transfer co-efficient by inducing higher turbulence.
The pressure drop is more with closer baffle spacing. The various types of baffles are
shown in Figure 1.6. In case of cut-segmental baffle, a segment (called baffle cut) is
removed to form the baffle expressed as a percentage of the baffle diameter. Baffle
cuts from 15 to 45% are normally used. A baffle cut of 20 to 25% provide a good
heat-transfer with the reasonable pressure drop. The % cut for segmental baffle refers
to the cut away height from its diameter.
Fouling Factor
The most of the process fluids in the exchanger foul the heat transfer surface. The
material deposited reduces the effective heat transfer rate due to relatively low thermal
conductivity. Therefore, net heat transfer with clean surface should be higher to compensate
the reduction in performance during operation. Fouling of exchanger increases the cost of (i)
construction due to over sizing, (ii) additional energy due to poor exchanger performance and
(iii) cleaning to remove deposited materials. A spare exchanger may be considered in design
for uninterrupted services to allow cleaning of exchanger. The effect of fouling is considered
in heat exchanger design by including the tube side and shell side fouling resistances. Typical
values for the fouling coefficients and resistances are summarized in the table below
APPARATUS USED:
1. Close all valves at first. Fill the boiler with three-fourths full of tap water. Pre-heat the
boiler for 30 minutes.
2. Open valves so as to let steam flow through the shell side. After fifteen minutes, allow the
water to flow through the tube side. Run for another 15 minutes.
3. Record the initial, as well as the final, temperatures of both the steam and cooling water.
2. Measure the flow of water, using a pan and a stop-watch.
3. Close all valves again.
4. Allow the exchanger to cool about 10 minutes.
5. Make three trials by repeating steps 2 to 6 with the flow rates of both the cooling water
and the steam held constant for each trial.
The shell and tube heat exchanger has 1 shell pass and 2 tube passes.
Trials 1 2 3
ΔTh oC 58 52 50
ΔTc oC 16 18 19
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS:
SAMPLE COMPUTATIONS:
SKETCH:
OBSERVATION:
CONCLUSION:
REFERENCES:
F. P. Incropera, D. P. DeWitt, T. L. Bergman, and A. S. Lavine, “Fundamentals of Heat and
D. Q. Kern, Process Heat Transfer, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Int. ed. 1965.
Dutta B.K. „Heat Transfer-Principles and Applications‟, PHI Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 1st ed.
2006.
COMPUTATION:
D i=16 m m
2
π D 2 π (16)
A= = =201.06 mm 2=0.201 m2
4 4
First Trial:
T 1 =96 ℃ ; T 2 =42 ℃
t 1 =26 ℃ ; t 2 =38℃
J
C pw =4187
kg−K
0.001 m3
v w =2.29
l 1min
(
min 60 sec )( 1l )
=3.82 x 10−5 m 3 /s
m3
mw =v w ρ=3.82 x 10−5 1000 kg /m 3=0.0382kg /s
s
kg J J
Q=Q w =mw C p w ∆t w =0.0382
s (
4187
Kg− K )
( 38℃−26 ℃ )=1919.32
s
120
100
80
Steam
60
Water
40
20
∆ t 1=96−38=58 ℃
∆ t 2=42−26=16℃
∆ t h−∆ t c 58−16
LMTD= = =32.61 ℃
∆ th 58
ln
( ) ( )
∆ tc
ln
16
2
m ℃
F=0.001 (Hard Water)
W
Q 1919.32 W
U= = =292 .82 2
A ( LMTD ) (0.201) ( 32.61 ) m ℃
Second Trial:
T 1 =95 ℃ ; T 2 =46 ℃
t 1 =28℃ ; t 2 =43 ℃
J
C pw =4187
kg−K
0.001 m3
v w =2.29
l 1min
min 60 sec( )( 1l )
=3.82 x 10−5 m 3 /s
m3
mw =v w ρ=3.82 x 10−5 1000 kg /m 3=0.0382kg /s
s
kg J J
Q=Q w =mw C p w ∆t w =0.0382
s (
4187
Kg− K )
( 43 ℃−28℃ )=2399.15
s
100
90
80
70
60
Water
50
Steam
40
30
20
10
∆ t 1=95−46=52℃
∆ t 2=43−28=18℃
∆ t h−∆ t c 52−15
LMTD= = =29.76 ℃
∆ th 52
ln
( ) ( )
∆ tc
ln
15
2
m ℃
F=0.001 (Hard Water)
W
Q 2399.15 W
U= = =401 .08 2
A ( LMTD ) (0.201) ( 29.76 ) m ℃
Third Trial:
T 1 =94 ℃ ; T 2 =47 ℃
t 1 =28℃ ; t 2 =44 ℃
J
C pw =4187
kg−K
0.001 m3
v w =2.29
l 1min
min 60 sec ( )( 1l )
=3.82 x 10−5 m 3 /s
3
m
mw =v w ρ=3.82 x 10−5 1000 kg /m 3=0.0382kg /s
s
kg J J
Q=Q w =mw C p w ∆t w =0.0382
s (
4187
Kg− K )
( 44 ℃−28 ℃ )=2599.09
s
100
90
80
70
60
Steam
50
Water
40
30
20
10
∆ t 1=95−46=50 ℃
∆ t 2=43−28=19℃
∆ t h−∆ t c 50−19
LMTD= = =32.04 ℃
∆ th 50
ln
( ) ( )
∆ tc
ln
19
m2 ℃
F=0.001 (Hard Water)
W
Q 25 99.15 W
U= = =403.59 2
A ( LMTD ) (0.201) ( 32.04 ) m ℃
PROBLEMS :
(1) Explain the use of the correction factor, F, in the computation for the log mean
temperature difference.
(2) A thin walled concentric tube heat exchanger is to be used to cool engine oil from 160
to 60 C, and water, which is available at 25 oC, is to be used as the coolant. The oil and water
o
flow rates are each 2 kg/sec, and the diameter of the inner tube is 0.50 m. The corresponding
value of the overall heat transfer coefficient is 250 W/ m 2-K. How long must the heat
exchanger be to accomplish the desired cooling?
(3) A concentric tube heat exchanger uses water, which is available at 15 oC, to cool
ethylene glycol from 100 to 60oC. The water and glycol flow rates are each 0.5 kg/sec. What
are the maximum possible heat transfer rate and effectiveness of the exchanger? Which is
preferred, a parallel flow or counter flow mode of operation?